I don’t believe the strategy of capturing media outlets or at least having a degree of control over them is a bad strategy, but it shows that a lot of the articles attacking Restore are not coming from a place of honesty and level ground. Capturing MSM outlets is a brilliant way to gain political power and get consistent positive coverage, presented to hundreds of thousands of Boomers who may not be on social media.

I also believe the power and control goes both ways, this is because these Media outlets don’t necessarily need the support of Reform UK, but Reform UK most definitely needs the support of them. This again, shows how Reform are just establishment, because these MSM outlets are owned and have been a core part of the centre right political establishment for decades. This might be one of the reasons why there has been such a unified attack on Restore, because the centre-right political establishment is civic-Nationalist and very Zionist/pro-interventionist and Restore Britain is more Ethno-Nationalist/British ethnic-identity and also critical of Zionism and are non-interventionists.

The Telegraph

This is just the last week of articles produced by The Telegraph regarding Restore Britain:

• Restore refuses to sack co-founder accused of anti-Semitism

• Britain’s Jews are right to fear the rise of Restore

• Reform: No talks until Restore expels co-founder accused of anti-Semitism

• Being Muslim makes you less British, claims Restore co-founder

• We are witnessing the emergence of a 21st century British fascism

• Rupert Lowe has royal warrant despite refusing to say King is a white Briton

• Rupert Lowe’s racist cheerleaders can no longer hide their despicable extremism

• From Churchill to Harry Kane: The Britons who are not British, according to Rupert Lowe

• Lowe once fought alongside me for Israel. Now Restore poses a grave threat to Britain’s Jews

• Restore co-founder ‘suggested Farage had been bought by Jews’

• Restore Britain is beyond the pale

• Rupert Lowe refuses to say that the King is a white Briton

• Farage must reject Rupert Lowe’s repugnant dance with white nationalism

• Restore’s income tax cuts could cost £100bn

It is quite clear what narrative The Telegraph is pushing here - some might ask, what do they say about Reform UK? Well, they have a dedicated page about Reform UK in which they consistently produce positive articles about Reform.

The Daily Mail

The Daily Mail are another MSM outlet that have been attacking Restore Britain since it became a political party. One of the articles released by The Daily Mail included me, in which they essentially called me a ‘White Supremacist’ and a ‘Neo Nazi’ while also identifying me as a ‘Restore activist’. This was conveniently timed a couple of days before polling day at the Makerfield by-election.

But, why would The Daily Mail want to attack Restore Britain?

Well, to benefit Reform UK, by attacking opposition. The wife of the owner of The Daily Mail, Lady Rothermere donated £50,000 to Reform UK in September last year. Nigel Farage has also personally written 35 articles for The Daily Mail, and that’s all within the last couple of years.

GB News

GB News is the obvious one, although being less aggressive towards Restore compared to the others, they are undoubtedly very pro-reform. In fact, within the last couple of days Rupert Lowe has forced GB News to take down an article as he believed it was slanderous.

The links between Reform UK and GB News are clear, I mean lets just look at the presenters - Nigel Farage, Lee Anderson, Matt Goodwin and also, some past presenters like Richard Tice, Darren Grimes and Alex Phillips. Nigel Farage alone has made £700,000 from presenting at GB News since becoming an MP and Lee Anderson around £100,000. It is quite clear that a media organisation that is willing to pay Reform figures hundreds of thousands of pounds just to hold a show once a week is obviously going to be pro-Reform, also the other way around - Reform figures won’t want to go to far right or say and do things that the owner of GB News won’t like as I'm sure they would like to keep their jobs.

The owner of GB News is Paul Marshall, his son Winston Marshall runs his own podcast in which he has held major Reform figures like Zia Yusuf and Nigel Farage…

Talk

Talk is another media outlet that is also very pro-Reform. Their main presenters being people like Alex Phillips, Julia Hartley-Brewer and Kevin O’Sullivan, all three of whom have been crashing out recently due to Restore Britain. Alex Phillips is currently playing victim and is claiming that she has been at the receiving end of ‘misogynistic’ attacks. These ‘attacks’ didn’t come from anywhere though, she for no reason other than a difference of opinion, started personally attacking the young chaps within Restore (Charlie Downes, Harrison Pitt and also Connor Tomlinson - although not having a role within Restore), essentially calling them trad-larpers and essentially saying they are insecure young boys. Alex Phillips then received responses, that were also personal seen as she (for no reason) attacked them. People pointed out that she is a childless, single 43 year old woman, who has piles of Tweets talking about how much she loves dating Indians and Africans. People are just pointing out the obvious, which is, she is in no position to attack people on their traditionalism, sex-life and relationships when she has an abhorrent track record herself.

Sorry for the little rant about Alex Phillips, I believe it was much needed. But, again Talk always was and always has been a Media outlet that is pro-Reform and consistently has Richard Tice, Robert Jenrick and also Farage on their show. Some past Talk presenters are people like Richard Tice, Isabell Oakeshott (Tice’s partner) and David Bull-chairman of Reform.

It does show how Reform UK are and will remain an establishment party. Their links and elements of control over certain MSM outlets and vice-versa is worrying. It is not a good thing that Reform to a certain degree is controlled and watched over by MSM outlets that are undoubtedly a core part of the political establishment, and have been for decades. It does make me wonder what the conversations are like behind close doors and what the reaction would be from these outlets, if Reform themselves were to be more nativist and non-interventionists…

Gen Z are angry, priced out of housing, trapped in insecure work, crippled by debt, no strong identity or community and disillusioned with a political establishment that feels like it actively works against them. But unlike past generations, they have tools – being social media platforms. If you go onto TikTok and Instagram now, which are some of the social media sites with the youngest age demographic you will see a huge amount of ‘Far-Right’ short videos. This includes edits glorifying European colonialism and history, ‘Far Right’ political ideologies and parties and also young men starting to show their identity while saying their radical right wing thoughts (including myself).

A Financial Times data journalist John Burn-Murdoch says that Generation Z are split ideologically between one side that is very liberal and one side that is increasingly conservative. This split and divide isn’t by age, education or wealth status, but gender, with the female side being very liberal and male side being very conservative.

What Gen Z have in common is that they’re radical, they’re done with the uni-party and acknowledge that if change is coming it will arrive from outside the boundaries of what’s considered the establishment.

‘Radicalisation’, no Realisation

Young men in this current society are lost, this society is chaotic, has no structure, no community and no identity - degeneracy is normalised, beauty is now ugly and the only metric of success is material. We have been stripped of a meaningful life, anything that is fulfilling in life like starting a family is almost impossible due to the housing prices and the cost of living, but even the idea of having children and starting a family in this society, is even seen as a strange thing to want to do.

We often here the word radicalisation when younger people have an opinion which the political establishment doesn’t like. But, ‘the radicalisation’ is more of a realisation. The reason for this ‘radicalisation’ is due to Gen Z realising what has been stolen from them. That Britain hasn’t always been a multi cultural-religious-ethnic wasteland, but rather quite the opposite. We see short videos of Britain in the 60s, and feel this strange feeling of anemoia, it looks beautiful, the buildings, the people and the culture. We know that this is what we were supposed to inherit, but it has been stolen from us.

This is just 1 video out of thousands on TikTok, this one having millions of views, like many others. Culture, community, tradition, identity, a life with meaning and all of this has been stolen from us and these videos that appear on social media make you realise it.

This often leads to many my age asking one question, ‘What did they die for?’

Look at the faces in this image above, think about how they felt, what they were thinking and why were they fighting. And now ask yourself if these men from Birmingham, would see Birmingham today, would they still have fought? Just for context, Birmingham is now minority White British, its ravaged by crime and the mayor of Birmingham is called Zafar Iqbal Chaudhry. I speak of Birmingham often because that is where I am from, more specifically a place called Alum Rock which is now around 5% White and last summer had ‘No Whites Allowed’ spray painted in numerous parts of the area.1

Did those men marching in the image above die for their descendants to be a minority in that same city 80 years on? Did they die for their descendants to not be welcome in their own country? Did they die for foreigners to hunt them if they’re out in their own area after 8pm? This is what radicalises people.

The truth is, Gen Z specifically men, but also females are getting ‘radicalised’ but not because they’re getting deceived, groomed or forced, but because they have been brought up within a society that has been against them from the very start. They go to any city and they’re a minority, they walk down any street and see rampant degeneracy, men that act like women and women that act like men, no beauty standards, in fact no standards at all. They see militant foreigners and White liberals tearing down statues of their forefathers, foreigners basterdising our ancestors sacrifice and our ‘leaders’ rewriting our history and not only replacing us, but also replacing our ancestors from the history books.

Living in modern Britain, visiting any city, walking down any street, and then looking at that same city and street 80 years before is what ‘radicalises’ people. We know that countless generations of our forefathers have sacrificed their lives to build an ancestral homeland in which we can pursue our own destiny in piece, and younger generations are starting to realise, that that has been stolen from us. But to realise and to see what Britain used to look like we need social media. There is a reason why the political establishment with MSM don’t show us what Britain used to look like and there is a reason they have dedicated so much time and recourses into rewriting our history, saying ‘diversity built Britain’, ‘foreigners have been here before the start’ and creating models like Chedderman. They lie and social media exposes the truth.

But, why?

The government don’t want nationalism, European nativism, traditionalism or anything that goes against their establishment and its principles. The rise of such views are the greatest threat to them and their regimes so they ought to stamp it out. They have rightfully linked the rise of such views among Gen Z to social media and believe that if social media is one of the reasons why these views are becoming mainstream they should ban it.

They want to control the narrative, not only what people say, but what people see. You may think that this can’t be true due to the establishment being so liberal, well welcome to liberalism. They will be the most liberal people you ever meet until… until they see something they don’t like, and then they will be the most authoritarian, Machiavellian and illiberal people you will ever meet.

They tried and succeeded to censor freedom of speech on social media for a time, but that has changed. With the likes of Elon Musk buying Twitter (now X) and Mark Zuckerberg coming around and changing his ways - things have changed (for now). For a couple of years now since the fall of covid and BLM we have seen censorship ease, accounts restored, guidelines reshaped and with that, the rise of figures like Nicholas J Fuentes and other more radical figures.

Western liberal establishments biggest threat as of now is the truth, and that truth they have hidden away and censored ever since they got into power - through owning the Media. The establishment cannot control what is released on these social media sites like they can with Main Steam Media (MSM). You do not need to have permission to post on these apps, you do not need to be a state asset and you do not need to be told what to say by the establishment - and that’s why they hate it, CONTROL.

Two paragraphs above I briefly spoke about western liberal establishments being the most brutal and illiberal, when someone has another opinion that goes against theirs and when they feel threatened by it. I have first hand experience of this when The Daily Mail wrote an article about me essentially calling me a Neo-Nazi and White Supremacist. You may think its not a big deal and its just words, but it does go deeper than this. These words are the same words that got Charlie Kirk killed and justified it, words like ‘Neo-Nazi’ and ‘White Supremacist’ are words that not only justify violence, but cause it. This just shows the extent the establishment and its propaganda weapon (MSM) are willing to go when they see a possible threat (a 19 year old that says his opinion online and people agree with it).

Conclusion

In an ideal society, I would support this bill with honest intentions, but we are not in that ideal society (quite the opposite) and are ruled over by a hostile elite that hate us. The reason why they’re passing this bill, isn’t due to safety or protecting children, but to stop younger generations from realising what has been stolen from them.

It will be interesting to see the direction this proposed bill will take and if passed will it be successful… This bill in itself is a negative for nationalism and the anti-establishment radical right wing. Overall this is a sign that the establishment feels threatened and I believe that there will be a new wave of censorship in the foreseeable future.

Sidenote

Thanks for reading my article, I’m going to start writing a lot more now so stay tuned. If you have enjoyed this article consider subscribing, liking and sharing and feel free to comment and give me your thoughts and advice regarding my writing, many thanks,

Lorcan Barker.

One being London, which is 36% native, if you look passed the foreigners, crime and new modern buildings London is a great city and was once the greatest in the world.

London is the home of the greatest museum in the world. The British museum has thousands if not millions of historical artifacts coming from every corner of this earth, all thanks to our forefathers. British people care about history, and we would not know half the things we know about history without the British. And that’s why we have artefacts from across the globe, because we preserved it when nobody else did. We brought the artefacts back to the motherland and protected it at all costs.

You often here people today complain about the British ‘stealing’ history, but the truth is they rejected it while we preserved it. We have seen throughout history uncivilised people destroy historical artifacts and it still happens today especially in the Muslim world in which they have found statues and figures and destroyed them in the name of idolatry.

You may ask why are you talking about the British museum anyway? Well, I propose that foreigners should pay to go into the British museum as it is currently free for all. I believe that it should remain free for British people seen as it is our ancestors who sacrificed so much to preserve this history. Foreigners did not care for history as we did and they shall be forever grateful that us the British, preserved what they dismissed.

We have the greatest Museum in the world, and it belongs to the British people, those who are foreign and wish to visit the Greatest museum ought to pay and it should be a high price in the range of 30-100 pounds. This would generate hundreds of millions of pounds a year from just one museum, I believe this should be replicated in all Museums in Britain that are currently free.

The money generated from this would make a huge difference in the life of our nation and would be invested directly back into our country. This is a common sense move for our country, and it benefits our country so why not do it?

It’s interesting that 1 short video of Britain in the 1930s can radicalise a person. They see a Britain they cannot recognise, one that is ethnically homogenous, very religious and actually British. In which families prosper, women respect themselves, men are masculine - a society with standards. One where the weak, the freaks and the degenerates would hide - where the idea of endless egalitarianism is laughed at. Streets were safe, churches were full and Britain was reproducing.

This makes any young man question, why if Britain has always been like that have I inherited this? Simply put it makes you wonder and question - what went wrong? The desire for something you have never experienced? Anemoia, nostalgia for a time you have never experienced. Deep down you know, that is what your forebears fought for, lived for and died for. Generations of Britons laid down their lives for you to inherit this, yet it was stolen from you. A culture, an identity, a nation stolen from you.

The future is the struggle to take back what’s yours, what you were meant to inherit. A homogenous ancestral homeland in which we and our descendants can carry on the legacy we were supposed to. In which we know who we are and who we descend from. In which degenerates and deviants were shamed. We had standards, we excelled and innovated.

This isn’t just a British problem, this is a European problem - the survival of Western Civilisation relies on the next 50 years.

Going through the education system I came to the conclusion that systemic racism against white people specifically men is real in Britain and in the western world as a whole. Whether I was in history, English or religious studies there was a narrative getting pushed. From learning about slavery and colonization - how ‘evil’ my ancestors were. To the poems learnt in English literature like “checking out me history” By John Agard – Jamaican language, anti-colonial narrative-(the white man stole my identity) combatting the Eurocentric nature of history taught in European schools, ironic right? To the teaching of the evil Christians/Europeans who invaded the Muslim world multiple times (crusades) for no reason. And other general teachings like, diversity is our strength, British culture is multiculturalism and that foreigners re-built Britain post WW2.

There was a clear narrative getting pushed, and obviously it wouldn’t be challenged, we are children we know of no other narrative, we learn what is unknown to us in school, so we believe what we hear from the people in authority. This molded the historical and ethical beliefs of my peers, and it really peaked during BLM. When everyone was apologizing for being white, I remember having assemblies and classes on just how white people bad black people good, white people own the systems black people oppressed by the system. Problem-White people. This became the general consensus of school children, other than some (me). I remember my debating starting in PlayStation parties, the first one was regarding the Black screens that everyone was posting on Instagram. I would get asked why did you not post it, why aren’t you saying BLM. My initial response was I don’t care. People would get shocked that I didn’t care, racist, evil etc. etc. But, the truth is, I did care, but I was scared to say why I cared.

I cared not because I thought black people were getting systemically discriminated against but rather quite the opposite. I saw statues torn down, defaced. I saw cities burnt. I saw people attacked. I saw anti-white hatred flourish, and not be challenged. The narrative was fuck white people, their ancestors, their culture and their countries. They are the route to all evil, they invented evil. The truth is I cared that my identity, country and history was getting attacked. It was a crazy times, to even say All Lives Matter back then was to guarantee yourself to get attacked.

This was one of the many things that started me challenging their narrative, to debate and to reject it. This lead me to learning about who I am, my history and the truth. I learnt about the empire, learnt about my ancestors and I learned about how and who built Britain. This was a big shock to me, as I always thought Britain was multicultural and multiethnic since its existence, due to them teaching us that, with the proof of this multiethnic millennia old country being 1 black courtier in part of Henry the VIIIs reign. I learnt that my ancestors conquered a third of the world, invented 40% of inventions, first empire to abolish slavery and to civilize the world. Rather than being ashamed I was quite the opposite, I was proud. The real story of my ancestors is that they were a tribal people, (angles, Saxons, Britons) that came together and formed a unique nation, England, later uniting with the Scotts and the Welsh forming Britain and together creating the best empire the world has ever seen.

This opened things up, my whole worldview shifted, they lied. My ancestors were great and heroic, something to proud of. British people built Britain not diversity.

This was my first realization, if they lied about this then what else.

With this narrative thriving on social media, in academia and the education system I felt like I should at least try and combat it. I first started at 14 years old 4 years ago, posting patriotic content about history - why you should be proud to be British. I connected with others online realizing that I’m not alone, but that there is thousands and thousands of young white men who share the same experience.

It was now post BLM era. It died down a little. What emerged on social media was interesting. When I’m talking about social media I’m not talking about Twitter (x) or Facebook, I’m talking about sites that younger people were on-TikTok and Instagram. Waves upon waves of young Europeans on anonymous accounts started making videos. Videos of the European empires, battles, ancestors, anti-immigration, nationalism and most importantly, European countries pre-WW2, pre multiculturalism, pre diversity. Beauty standards, architecture, community, identity, peace, greatness, culture. This is where I and millions of others would start to realize what had been stolen from us, that once our nations were great. That we weren’t meant to inherit a multicultural, multi-ethnic meaningless ugly society. But, the opposite, a homogenous nation bound by a common, ancestry, culture and legacy. A Britain that was British. Not in the modern sense of British where it is a set of value that have been made up by treasonous politicians like Blair. But the true British, the only British. The English, The Scottish, The Welsh and Irish, their culture their customs and their legacy.

I had always hear the term the great replacement THEORY, I remember searching it up. What came up was a far right, Neo-Nazi racist conspiracy theory that white people are getting replaced. I realized that instead of debunking the ‘theory’ by giving statistics that say otherwise, It called it a theory and said the founders of it and anyone that acknowledged it, was a far right, racist, Nazi. Everyone deep down knows it’s not a theory, walk through any city, town and sadly soon the countryside and you can see it.

This is what molded a lot of my views, I am very conservative minded, yet I’m not a conservative. The conservatives are the people that have facilitated our replacement. They would rather the replacement of the British people than to get called racist. Conservatism to me is being a loser, is accepting liberalism and playing there game. I reject it, I don’t participate and why should I. The truth is, moderacy and conservatism isn’t going to solve this issue, it has failed to do so, in fact It is the issue and I’m happy to say that moderacy will die with the older generations. The future is radical or there is no future. Conservatism has failed to combat liberalism.

The next generation of young white men know what’s been stolen from them, they know the establishment is against them and they know they are getting replaced. We don’t care about being called racist anymore and we don’t care if we hurt feelings. If we don’t do anything there is no future, our descendants will be a persecuted minority and eventually extinct. We know what we are fighting for, we don’t want to debate our existence. We do it out of love, not out of hate. Being radical in this society is a good thing, we reject the modern world for the modern world rejects us.

I hope you enjoyed this piece of work, I am knew to writing, so the structure may seem off. Please consider liking and sharing!

Subscribe now