When I begin working with someone who wants coaching and mentoring to reach a personal, professional, financial, or creative goal, I do not need to know what the inward limiting belief is. I do not need to go hunting for it, diagnose it, or make uncovering it the first assignment. We begin with the life the person wants to create, and we start moving toward it. The old belief will surface all on its own, usually at precisely the moment when progress begins requiring something genuinely new from us.

This is where the work becomes interesting, because the obstacle often appears disguised as something completely reasonable. We procrastinate. We suddenly question the goal. We become unusually tired, anxious, distracted, irritated, perfectionistic, or convinced that the timing is wrong. We may create unnecessary conflict, return to an old relationship dynamic, become preoccupied with what other people will think, or find a hundred sensible reasons to remain exactly where we are. What looks like resistance is often the old self recognizing that change is no longer theoretical.

Carl Jung repeatedly returned to the question of whether we are living from our own center or organizing our lives around expectations that have been handed to us. This becomes especially important in the second half of life, when many of the structures that once defined us no longer provide enough meaning. We may have become remarkably accomplished at locating approval, meeting expectations, caring for others, being responsible, succeeding professionally, or becoming the person our family and culture could understand. Those adaptations were not necessarily mistakes; many of them helped us belong, survive, achieve, and build a life. The difficulty comes when we continue obeying them long after they have stopped serving the life that now wants to emerge.

That is why an outward goal can become such an extraordinary doorway into inward transformation. You may believe you are trying to write the book, build the business, earn more money, leave the job, create the relationship, establish a boundary, make your art, speak publicly, or finally put your own work into the world. Yet somewhere along the way, the goal asks you to become visible where you once learned to hide, to trust yourself where you once sought permission, to receive where you learned only to give, or to risk disappointing someone whose approval once represented safety.

Now we have arrived at the real threshold.

The tension that appears here is not necessarily evidence that we should turn around. Very often, it is evidence that we have reached the exact place where an old pattern can no longer accompany us into the life we say we want. The body may register this before the conscious mind understands what is happening, which is why fear, anxiety, hesitation, exhaustion, anger, grief, or the sudden urge to retreat can become valuable information. Rather than treating these responses as enemies to overcome, we can become curious about what they are protecting and what they believe will happen if we actually succeed.

This is where Jung’s idea of living from one’s own center becomes deeply practical. The question is no longer simply, What do I want to accomplish? We begin asking what part of me wants this life, what part of me is frightened by it, and whose voice I hear when I imagine crossing the threshold. We begin noticing the difference between an authentic hesitation and an inherited prohibition, between discernment and fear, between the wisdom that says not yet and the old conditioning that has always said you cannot.

The inward and outward work therefore belong together. I am interested in the goal because it gives us somewhere to go, but I am equally interested in what begins to surface as we move toward it. The goal creates motion, motion creates friction, and friction reveals the places where our present life is still attached to an earlier understanding of who we needed to be. We do not have to shame that earlier self or tear our history apart to move forward. We can understand why those patterns developed, honor what they once accomplished, and then decide whether they still deserve authority over the life we are creating now.

Perhaps this is what it means to return to our own center. We are not inventing an entirely new person or erasing everything that came before. We are learning to recognize the quieter voice beneath the accumulated instructions about who we should be, what we should want, how much we should ask for, whom we are allowed to disappoint, and how visible we are permitted to become. Gradually, the outward life begins to come into greater relationship with the inward one, and achievement becomes something more meaningful than reaching another destination. It becomes evidence that we are learning to participate consciously in our own transformation.

If you are standing at one of these thresholds now, you may already recognize it. There is something you want, perhaps something you have wanted for years, and you can feel both the pull toward it and the old resistance rising to meet you. You do not have to know everything that resistance contains before you begin. Start walking toward the goal, and allow the path to show you what is ready to be understood, released, reclaimed, and transformed.

If you are ready to cross into that new territory, I invite you to continue on the path of your own personal story. We can work with the goal in front of you while listening carefully to what emerges along the way, so that you are not simply achieving something new while carrying the same old limitations with you. The deeper work is learning to trust your own center, your own knowing, and the person you are becoming, until the life you are creating begins to feel unmistakably like your own.

“The day came when the risk to remain tight in a bud was more painful than the risk it took to blossom” (attributed to Anaïs Nin).

written: Bren Littleton, August 10, 2026

original photograph: B. Littleton

Tin Flea Press, c. 2026

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

The same day Miles died, the resident coyote mama defended her young pup from three feral dogs trespassing behind the barn. It was one of those odd, surreal moments of digging a grave for my domestic kitty companion while watching survival strategies of two similar gene pools figure out territories, tactics and intelligence. There was something of myself in play here. The coyote family had moved in early on when the horses’ manure pile had first been tractored into a berm, right before a snow storm. The heat kept the coyotes warm as they burrowed into the hay and sawdust based pile of aging organic material. It was home for multi generations of this family, and even in summer, in the high temps of June, the family orbited within the back four acres, as a place to rest, recover and water down.

The top photo is of the moment Miles claimed his chair. The bottom photo is of mama coyote checking in recently, early morning. The horses are gone, the chair is gone, the berm has whittled down to a small rise, a new pair of feral dogs occasionally roam by without much incident, and it is now Jack who waits for Orion, as I dream. This coyote matriarch is still very much alive with another year’s pup. They continue to roam for miles, and Miles, in memory. The unexpected lessons of survival and of making home seem to be the same practice, regardless of which species burrows in under the night sky.

written by Bren Littleton.

Tin Flea Press, c. 2026

Original photography: B. Littleton

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

Here’s a few questions from this week’s coaching study group I host:

How do we discover purpose when we feel lost? What happens when effort, planning, and willpower are no longer enough? How do we move through fear when certainty is unavailable?

The Conversations to Ponder:

Purpose is rarely absent from our lives, although there have been periods when I was convinced it had disappeared entirely. Looking back, I can see that it never left. It appeared through attraction, curiosity, imagination, frustration, longing, and through the recurring obstacles that seemed determined to follow me from one chapter of life to the next. At the time, I interpreted many of these experiences as interruptions. Now I understand that they were often invitations. Something within me was attempting to move toward a larger life, even when my conscious mind had no idea where that movement was leading.

Over the years, I have become less interested in conventional definitions of success and more interested in the quality of relationship I maintain with my deeper nature. I have watched people accomplish remarkable things while feeling increasingly disconnected from themselves. I have also witnessed individuals facing extraordinary hardship who somehow remained connected to a source of meaning that allowed them to continue. The difference was rarely talent, intelligence, education, or opportunity. More often, it seemed to rest in whether they had learned to trust the conversation taking place between the visible life and the unseen life moving beneath it.

For much of my professional life, I believed that if I worked hard enough, planned carefully enough, and understood a situation thoroughly enough, I could find a way through almost any challenge. Then life introduced experiences that did not respond to planning. Certain losses, disappointments, uncertainties, and ruptures arrived that could not be solved through effort alone. The more I tried to force an answer, the more I discovered the limits of what my familiar identity could accomplish.

I think this is where Jung parts company with many contemporary success teachers. Action remains important, perhaps more important than ever, but there are periods when the old ego can no longer lead in the way it once did. There are moments when a death, illness, betrayal, divorce, financial collapse, creative failure, addiction, or the loss of an identity that once organized our lives changes the landscape entirely. We are no longer dealing with a problem. We are standing inside a rupture. The assumptions that guided us begin to dissolve. What once felt safe no longer feels safe. What once felt certain becomes uncertain.

I have experienced moments when the collapse was not merely external but internal. The future I imagined no longer made sense. The explanations I once trusted no longer explained what was happening. What surprised me most was not the loss itself, but the humiliation experienced by the ego. Not humiliation in the social sense, but in the archetypal sense. I found myself confronting the uncomfortable reality that I was not nearly as in control as I had believed. The maps I carried were incomplete, and no amount of determination could force them to become accurate.

Yet I also discovered that the answer was not to abandon the ego. If anything, a strong ego became even more necessary. What changed was its role. Rather than commanding the future, it became responsible for participating in the future. Rather than insisting on certainty, it learned how to tolerate uncertainty. Rather than demanding a complete blueprint, it learned to work with fragments, intuitions, impressions, and possibilities.

This realization altered how I understand phrases such as “success leaves clues” (T. Robbins). There may be times when clues are useful, particularly when we are building a business, developing a skill, or pursuing a clearly defined goal. Yet when life has been shattered, clues are often insufficient. During those periods, I was not searching for clues to success. I was searching for signs that life was still moving.

The signs rarely arrived in dramatic ways. Sometimes they appeared through a dream that refused to leave me alone. Sometimes they emerged through a conversation that lingered in my thoughts for days. At other times they arrived through a poem, an image, an unexpected opportunity, a chance encounter, or a persistent feeling that continued asking for my attention. More than once, I discovered that my body understood the direction of my life before my mind could explain it.

What helped me most was learning that courage is not the product of certainty. Courage emerges through participation. The first step often comes long before confidence arrives. In some instances, I moved forward carrying considerable fear. In others, I moved forward while doubting my decision. What mattered was not the absence of fear. What mattered was the willingness to take a step anyway.

Again and again, I found that movement itself created possibilities that could never have been seen from the place where I was standing. The act of beginning altered the landscape. A conversation led to another conversation. One opportunity revealed another. A small risk uncovered a larger possibility. What had felt impossible while remaining still became manageable once I entered into relationship with it.

Perhaps this is one way of understanding the relationship between Ego and Soul. The Soul may provide the direction, but the Ego provides the feet. The Soul may reveal a possibility, but the Ego must consent to the risk of embodying it. Without Soul, action becomes mechanical and disconnected. Without Ego, vision remains trapped in imagination.

What ultimately carries us forward is neither blind striving nor passive waiting. It is the ongoing dialogue between a life attempting to emerge and a self willing enough to participate in this emergence. Transformation has rarely arrived in my life as a complete blueprint. More often, it appears as a series of invitations, each asking for one small act of trust, one small act of participation, and one more step into a future I could not yet fully imagine.

written by Bren Littleton

Tin Flea Press, c. 2026

Original photography: B. Littleton

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

For many years conversations about environmental protection have centered on regulation, sustainability, conservation, carbon reduction, and compliance. These are important conversations, yet they often begin from the assumption that nature exists outside of us as an object to be managed, measured, protected, or exploited. What is emerging in some parts of the world suggests a very different question. Rather than asking how we can better manage nature, a growing number of organizations are beginning to ask how nature itself might be represented within the decision-making process.

This shift introduces us to the idea of the Nature Guardian.

What is a Nature Guardian?

A Nature Guardian is not simply an environmental consultant, nor is this person merely a sustainability officer whose role is to ensure compliance with regulations. A Nature Guardian serves as a representative of the Land itself, bringing the needs of ecosystems, watersheds, wildlife, forests, soils, and future generations into discussions that have historically been dominated by financial, legal, and operational concerns.

For many listeners, this may sound unusual, even radical. Yet when we pause for a moment, perhaps the more surprising reality is that such a role has not existed until now.

Modern corporations routinely grant legal standing to entities that cannot physically speak. A corporation itself is considered a legal person. Trusts, foundations, and investment vehicles are given representation and protection under the law. Boards appoint directors to represent shareholders, investors, employees, customers, and strategic interests. Yet the forests that provide the timber, the rivers that provide the water, the soil that produces the food, and the ecosystems that make all economic activity possible have traditionally had no voice at the table.

The Nature Guardian movement asks a simple but profound question:

If corporations are granted legal personhood, why should the Land remain voiceless? What is fascinating is that this idea is no longer theoretical.

Several pioneering organizations have begun formally changing their governance structures to include Nature in decision making. Perhaps the most widely cited example is the British company Faith in Nature, which became the first corporation in the world to appoint Nature as a director on its board. Through a legal proxy system, individuals with expertise in ecology, environmental law, and stewardship participate in board decisions specifically from the perspective of Nature’s interests.

What makes this development noteworthy is that Nature is not merely being consulted. Nature is being represented, and the distinction matters.

Consultation often occurs after major decisions have already been framed. Representation changes the conversation before decisions are made. It allows ecological concerns to enter the room at the same moment that financial projections, operational strategies, and shareholder expectations are being discussed.

Other organizations have followed similar paths. FutureEverything, an innovation and cultural organization in the United Kingdom, formally appointed Nature to its governance structure and has helped develop frameworks for other entities interested in doing the same. House of Hackney, a luxury interiors company, incorporated legal mechanisms designed to ensure that ecosystems have meaningful influence over corporate choices involving sourcing and production.

Alongside these governance innovations, many major corporations have begun creating executive-level positions focused specifically on Nature. Companies such as Chanel and Christian Dior have established leadership roles dedicated to climate, biodiversity, ecological impacts, and supply chain relationships with ecosystems. Microsoft has invested heavily in nature-based restoration strategies, recognizing that healthy landscapes are not simply environmental concerns but critical infrastructure for long-term resilience.

Although these positions differ from the Nature Director model, they reflect the same underlying realization. Business decisions do not occur apart from nature. Every product, every service, every supply chain, and every economic activity emerges from a relationship with the living world.

Canada offers another fascinating expression of this movement.

Rather than placing a single Nature Director on a corporate board, many Canadian resource projects have developed partnerships with Indigenous communities through Indigenous Guardians programs, Indigenous Advisory and Monitoring Committees, and land stewardship councils.

These initiatives emerge from a worldview that many Indigenous cultures have carried for thousands of years. Within this perspective, Land is not property. Land is relationship.

The capitalization of the word Land becomes important because it signals a shift in consciousness. Land is no longer viewed merely as terrain, acreage, or resource inventory. Land becomes a living presence that shapes identity, culture, memory, responsibility, and belonging.

Indigenous Guardians often serve as the eyes and ears of the Land. They monitor watersheds, wildlife populations, migration corridors, fisheries, forests, and culturally significant sites. They combine scientific monitoring with Traditional Ecological Knowledge developed through generations of direct relationship with place.

What makes these programs remarkable is that they bring knowledge gathered on the Land directly into executive and governmental decision making.

In the Trans Mountain Indigenous Advisory and Monitoring Committee, representatives from Indigenous nations participate in environmental oversight related to pipeline operations. Across Ontario, Indigenous Guardian initiatives work alongside forestry and mining operations to monitor watershed health, biodiversity, and long-term ecosystem resilience. Along the Pacific Coast, Coastal Guardian Watchmen programs monitor marine ecosystems and fisheries while collaborating with industries whose activities affect those waters.

These examples suggest a subtle but important transformation. Rather than treating environmental concerns as obstacles to development, they invite ecological knowledge into the center of planning itself.

When viewed through this lens, the Nature Guardian is not merely a new corporate role. The Nature Guardian becomes a symbol of a larger cultural evolution.

Pivoting from Hubris:

For centuries industrial societies have operated as though humans stand apart from nature. We have often imagined ourselves as managers of the natural world rather than participants within it. Yet every climate disruption, every drought, every wildfire, every disappearing species, and every declining watershed reminds us that separation was always an illusion.

The health of the Land and the health of human communities have never been separate realities.

Perhaps this is why the emergence of Nature Guardians feels so significant. It represents more than a policy innovation. It suggests the possibility of repairing a relationship.

Many of us have grown accustomed to asking what we can take from the Land. We ask how much timber can be harvested, how much water can be diverted, how much energy can be extracted, and how quickly development can proceed.

A Nature Guardian introduces a different question.

What does the Land need?

Such a question may initially appear simple, yet it changes the entire conversation.

What does the river need?

What does the forest need?

What does the watershed need?

What does the salmon need?

What does the future need from us?

The presence of a Nature Guardian ensures that these questions remain visible, even when economic pressures encourage us to forget them.

I find myself wondering whether the greatest contribution of this movement may not be legal or corporate at all. Its greatest contribution may be psychological.

A society reveals its values through what it chooses to represent. We appoint advocates for investors because investment matters. We appoint advocates for shareholders because ownership matters. We appoint advocates for customers because commerce matters.

What becomes possible when we appoint advocates for the Land because life itself matters? Perhaps the deeper invitation is not simply for corporations to adopt Nature Guardians. Perhaps the invitation is for each of us to become one. Not in a formal legal sense, but in the daily practice of remembering relationship.

What would change if every major decision included a brief pause to ask what serves the Land? What would change in our communities, our businesses, our schools, our politics, and our personal lives if we carried that question with us?

The emergence of Nature Guardians suggests that a new story may be taking shape. It is a story that does not reject business, innovation, or economic development. Rather, it asks whether these activities can unfold within a larger covenant of reciprocity.

The Land has always supported us. The question now appearing in boardrooms, Indigenous stewardship programs, and governance experiments around the world is whether we are finally willing to support the Land in return.

Questions We Either Ask or Ignore:

For much of modern Western culture, writers and thinkers have reminded us of the inexplicable kinship between humans, the land, and the cosmos, while simultaneously amplifying the limited, dominant culture focus of “What can I do with this land?” Yet the more important question often becomes, “What does this place ask of me?” That subtle shift changes everything. It moves us from possession to participation, from management to reciprocity, from entitlement to belonging.

One of the gifts is the reminder that the Land is not merely scenery. It is not a backdrop against which human life unfolds. It is an active participant in our becoming. The Land shapes our imagination, our health, our memories, our stories, our economies, and even our sense of self. When we lose relationship with place, we often lose relationship with aspects of ourselves.

Questions such as these, not as exercises to complete, but as companions to live with over time.

When was the last time I sat quietly enough to notice what is alive around me rather than what I am thinking about?

What species of birds, insects, trees, grasses, and animals share this place with me, and what does it say about my relationship to home if I cannot name my neighbors?

What was here before my house, before my neighborhood, before the roads and parking lots?

Whose ancestors walked this Land long before I arrived?

What stories does this place hold that I have never taken the time to hear?

How does this place shape my moods, my dreams, my creativity, and my sense of possibility?

What have I received from this Land that I rarely acknowledge?

If gratitude is a form of reciprocity, how am I expressing gratitude to the place that sustains me?

What does this watershed need from those who live within it?

What is the condition of the soil beneath my feet?

Where does my water come from before it reaches my faucet, and where does it go after it leaves my home?

What plants and animals are struggling here, and what might their struggles reveal about our collective choices?

What would change if I understood myself not as a resident of this place, but as a participant in its ongoing story?

If the Land could speak, what would it thank us for?

If the Land could speak, what would it ask us to stop doing?

If the Land could speak, what would it ask us to remember?

Our Authors, Thinkers, Guides:

For clarity, guidance, and further readings, these personal questions direct us to a body of work, starting with environmental writer Barry Lopez, who often invited readers to understand that landscapes are not empty spaces but carriers of intelligence and memory. These questions also echo Terry Tempest Williams’ writings/teachings that insist intimacy with place inevitably becomes a form of responsibility. Wendell Berry’s observation that affection precedes stewardship, that we care for what we have come to know and love echo the foundation of deep relationship with Land.

The teachings of author Leslie Marmon Silko continually presents an understanding that stories, people, animals, weather, and geography form a single living fabric rather than separate categories. Simon Ortiz contributes a vital understanding that language and place are inseparable. For him, words are not merely tools of communication but expressions of relationship, carrying within them the memory of the Land, the wisdom of ancestors, and the responsibilities of belonging. His work reminds us that when we speak of restoring our relationship with the Land, we are also speaking of restoring our relationship with story, identity, and voice itself.

And, finally, although not in any way comprehensive in reviewing the literature on ecological agency, is Bill Plotkin, founder of Animus Valley Institute and author of “Nature and the Human Soul,” where he explicitly poses the recurring invitation to ask how the larger Earth community participates in our own maturation and individuation. Jung observed that modern people often suffer not because they have too little information, but because they have lost contact with instinct, symbol, imagination, and the deeper layers of the psyche. Plotkin extends this observation by suggesting that we have simultaneously lost contact with the Earth. The psychological wound and the ecological wound mirror one another.

The question that continues to stay with me is one that gathers all of these voices into a single inquiry:

“What if the Land is not something we own, but someone we belong to?” This is not a new question, as our ancestors once held this question to be non-negotiable, as seen in our vast multicultural mythology of animism, and intricate cosmology of Nature gods, goddesses, and rituals.

This question is unsettling for many people now because it reverses centuries of assumptions, yet it may be one of the most important questions available to us at this moment in history.

If we belong to the Land rather than the Land belonging to us, then stewardship is no longer an environmental strategy. It becomes an expression of kinship. It becomes an act of remembering who we are within a much larger community of life.

And perhaps that is the deeper wisdom behind the emergence of Nature Guardians. They are not introducing a completely new idea. They are helping modern institutions remember an ancient one. The Land has never been a possession. It has always been a relationship.

From a Depth Psychological Perspective:

The emergence of Nature Guardians is not only a legal innovation or a governance experiment. It may also be a symptom of something deeper occurring within the collective psyche. When a culture begins creating formal roles to represent rivers, forests, watersheds, and ecosystems, it suggests that something long excluded is attempting to return.

From a depth psychological perspective, one might even say that the Land is returning from the cultural shadow.

For several centuries, many industrial societies have organized themselves around the assumption that nature is inert matter, raw material, property, or resource. Yet the human psyche has never fully accepted that reduction. Dreams remain populated with animals, forests, mountains, oceans, and weather. Mythologies across cultures speak of sacred groves, talking animals, living rivers, and mountains that possess wisdom. Children naturally relate to the more-than-human world as animate and alive before they are taught otherwise.

What if the rise of Nature Guardians is one expression of the psyche attempting to restore a relationship that was never meant to be severed?

That possibility opens another series of questions that move beyond policy and into personal inquiry:

What part of myself becomes more alive when I spend time in relationship with a particular place?

What have I forgotten because I no longer spend time listening to the natural world?

Which landscape has shaped me most deeply, and what qualities of that place now live within me?

Where do I experience wonder?

Where do I experience belonging?

What places feel like home to my body, even when they are unfamiliar to my mind?

What landscape appears most often in my dreams, memories, fantasies, artwork, or imagination?

What might that landscape be attempting to teach me?

These are questions I could imagine Wendell Berry asking while walking a Kentucky hillside, Terry Tempest Williams contemplating in the desert, Barry Lopez listening to the stories held within an Arctic landscape, Simon Ortiz remembering the inseparability of language and place, Leslie Marmon Silko tracing the living relationship between story and geography, or Bill Plotkin guiding someone toward a deeper ecological identity.

Each of them, in their own way, reminds us that the healing of the Earth and the healing of the human psyche may not be separate projects. Perhaps the most hopeful aspect of the Nature Guardian movement is that it invites us to imagine institutions doing what individuals have been trying to learn all along: becoming capable of relationship, reciprocity, humility, and listening.

In this sense, the question is no longer whether corporations should appoint Nature Guardians. The deeper question may be whether all of us are willing to become guardians of the relationships that make life possible. Perhaps the Land, patient as ever, has been waiting for us to validate the quest to see, hear, and accept how an archetypal presence in the history of humanity, keeps us alive.

One thing I have learned from integrating the threads of Berry, Lopez, Williams, Ortiz, Silko, and Plotkin, Jung is that conversations about the Land often become conversations about much more than the Land. People may initially think they are discussing ecology, conservation, or corporate governance, only to discover they are really exploring belonging, identity, memory, ancestry, responsibility, and what it means to live well in a place.

That is one reason I think the Nature Guardian concept has such power. It is concrete enough to be understood through policy and organizational structures, yet symbolic enough to open deeper questions about our collective relationship with the living world at a time where national policies threaten our surrounding communities and historic sanctuaries of federal lands.

written by Bren Littleton, June 13th, 2026

original photograph by B. Littleton, “Meares Island”

Tin Flea Press, c. 2026

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Not because acceptance is passive, but because it asks us to relinquish the fantasy that our worth depends upon becoming someone else.

Jung understood that accepting oneself completely is terrifying because acceptance requires relinquishing the fantasy that our worth depends upon becoming someone other than who we are. Most of us have spent years, if not decades, attempting to earn belonging through improvement. We imagine that if we can become less anxious, less needy, less angry, less fearful, or somehow more evolved, then we will finally deserve the love, respect, and recognition we have been seeking. Yet the psyche rarely responds well to being treated as a self-improvement project.

What I have observed in my own life and in the lives of countless clients is that lasting change rarely begins with correction. It begins with contact. It begins when we become willing to sit beside the parts of ourselves we have spent years trying to outgrow, outthink, heal, transcend, or leave behind. The movement toward wholeness emerges not from eliminating these aspects of ourselves, but from developing the capacity to recognize them as members of our own inner community whose stories, fears, and protective strategies deserve to be heard.

The work, then, is not about arriving at some perfected version of ourselves waiting in the future. The work is learning how to inhabit the life we have now with greater honesty, greater awareness, and greater compassion for the complexity of being human. As we become less divided against ourselves, the energy once consumed by self-rejection becomes available for creativity, relationship, leadership, love, and meaningful action in the world.

For me, this understanding became the bridge from therapy into coaching. I became less interested in helping people fix themselves and more interested in helping them develop a conscious relationship with the personas of themselves they had forgotten, abandoned, or learned to distrust. Again and again, I discovered that the qualities standing between a person and their deepest aspirations were often not weaknesses at all, but neglected aspects of their own humanity waiting to be welcomed back into the conversation.

What many people describe as transformation may simply be the experience of no longer abandoning themselves. When that happens, the goal is no longer to become worthy. The goal is no longer to become healed enough, successful enough, spiritual enough, or complete enough. What emerges instead is a growing capacity to stand in honest relationship with oneself, and from that place of acceptance to participate more fully in life as it is, carrying both our gifts and our wounds with a little more awareness, a little more humility, and a little more grace.”

written by Brenda Littleton

Original photograph by B. Littleton

Tin Flea Press, c. 2026

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

The obstacle was rarely a lack of intelligence, talent, opportunity, education, motivation, or even support.

More often, the greatest limitation to growth was a person’s relationship to the versions of themselves they learned to ignore.

Again and again, I watched capable people reach toward meaningful goals while remaining tethered to older identities organized around being small, safe, invisible, pleasing, careful, or quiet. Their aspirations pointed toward expansion, yet their inner lives remained loyal to strategies that had once protected them from disappointment, rejection, shame, abandonment, or failure. What appeared on the surface as procrastination, self-doubt, perfectionism, indecision, anxiety, imposter syndrome, or lack of confidence often revealed itself as something much deeper. Hidden beneath the struggle was an ongoing refusal to acknowledge aspects of the self that had been exiled, or repressed, long ago.

As a Jungian, I came to understand that the distance between where we are and where we want to be is often occupied by the orphaned parts of our own psyche. The very qualities we seek in the outer world are frequently connected to aspects of ourselves we have rejected, disowned, or abandoned. We long for confidence while avoiding our vulnerability. We seek authority while remaining disconnected from our anger. We want intimacy while hiding our needs. We pursue purpose while distancing ourselves from grief, fear, uncertainty, and longing.

This creates a painful internal tension. We begin doubting our instincts. We dismiss what we know in our gut. We talk ourselves out of our own experience. We become skilled at explaining away our deepest knowing in favor of safety, predictability, and social approval. In many cases, we become participants in our own self-gaslighting, quietly abandoning our inner authority while searching outside ourselves for permission to become who we already are. We have been taught to become more, when if fact, what best serves us is shedding the layers of diversion.

My transition from therapist to coach emerged from observing this pattern repeatedly. While I deeply respect therapy and benefited from it personally and professionally, I became increasingly interested in something beyond symptom reduction, behavioral change, or personality improvement. I was less interested in helping people become better versions of themselves and more interested in helping them become more fully themselves.

Much of our culture is organized around self-improvement. We are encouraged to fix, optimize, heal, transform, upgrade, and reinvent ourselves. Even many of our psychological and leadership models are built around identifying deficits and correcting them. While these approaches can be valuable, I began noticing that many thoughtful and successful people were exhausted by the endless project of self-repair. They had spent years analyzing themselves, studying themselves, and trying to heal themselves, yet remained disconnected from the very parts of themselves that needed their attention most.

Jung offered a radically different perspective. He understood that wholeness is not achieved by eliminating unwanted aspects of the personality. Wholeness emerges through relationship. The task is not to become perfect. The task is to become conscious. The task is not to transcend the shadow but to encounter it. Not to erase our contradictions but to hold them. Not to fix what is broken but to develop a deeper capacity to remain present with what is true.

This understanding changed my work and, more importantly, it changed my relationship with myself.

As a coach, educator, writer, and mentor, my commitment is not to help people become someone else. My commitment is to help people develop a conscious relationship with the lives they are already living. Together, we learn how to notice what has been pushed aside, what has been silenced, what has been shamed, and what has been waiting patiently beneath years of adaptation and performance. We learn how to listen rather than correct, how to witness rather than judge, and how to remain present with the complexity of being human.

Acceptance is not resignation. Acceptance is the beginning of relationship.

When we stop treating ourselves as problems to solve, something remarkable begins to happen. The parts of us that have been hidden beneath shame, fear, grief, self-criticism, and old protective strategies no longer need to fight for recognition. They begin to soften. They begin to trust. They begin to participate in our lives differently because they are finally being seen.

I have come to believe that many of our struggles are not the result of being broken. They are the result of being divided against ourselves.

Until we learn to accept our own humanity, we will continue asking the world to grant us a compassion we have not yet extended inward. We will continue seeking externally what can only be cultivated internally. The ways we reject ourselves inevitably shape the ways we experience others, and the qualities we refuse to acknowledge within ourselves often return through relationships, conflicts, disappointments, and projections.

Jung once wrote, “The most terrifying thing is to accept oneself completely.”

Not because acceptance is passive, but because it asks us to relinquish the fantasy that our worth depends upon becoming someone else.

Jung understood that accepting oneself completely is terrifying because acceptance requires relinquishing the fantasy that our worth depends upon becoming someone other than who we are. Most of us have spent years, if not decades, attempting to earn belonging through improvement. We imagine that if we can become less anxious, less needy, less angry, less fearful, or somehow more evolved, then we will finally deserve the love, respect, and recognition we have been seeking. Yet the psyche rarely responds well to being treated as a self-improvement project.

What I have observed in my own life and in the lives of countless clients is that lasting change rarely begins with correction. It begins with contact. It begins when we become willing to sit beside the parts of ourselves we have spent years trying to outgrow, outthink, heal, transcend, or leave behind. The movement toward wholeness emerges not from eliminating these aspects of ourselves, but from developing the capacity to recognize them as members of our own inner community whose stories, fears, and protective strategies deserve to be heard.

The work, then, is not about arriving at some perfected version of ourselves waiting in the future. The work is learning how to inhabit the life we have now with greater honesty, greater awareness, and greater compassion for the complexity of being human. As we become less divided against ourselves, the energy once consumed by self-rejection becomes available for creativity, relationship, leadership, love, and meaningful action in the world.

For me, this understanding became the bridge from therapy into coaching. I became less interested in helping people fix themselves and more interested in helping them develop a conscious relationship with the personas of themselves they had forgotten, abandoned, or learned to distrust. Again and again, I discovered that the qualities standing between a person and their deepest aspirations were often not weaknesses at all, but neglected aspects of their own humanity waiting to be welcomed back into the conversation.

What many people describe as transformation may simply be the experience of no longer abandoning themselves. When that happens, the goal is no longer to become worthy. The goal is no longer to become healed enough, successful enough, spiritual enough, or complete enough. What emerges instead is a growing capacity to stand in honest relationship with oneself, and from that place of acceptance to participate more fully in life as it is, carrying both our gifts and our wounds with a little more awareness, a little more humility, and a little more grace.

written by Bren Littleton

original photograph by B. Littleton

Tin Flea Press, c. 2026

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Active Imagination Through Writing: Listening to the Body's Voice

Begin by sitting comfortably with a notebook and pen. Before writing a single word, allow yourself a few moments to settle into your body.

Take several slow breaths. Let your shoulders soften. Gently stretch your neck forward, then from side to side, and finally backward. Notice any areas of tension without attempting to change them. Simply acknowledge their presence.

Now bring to mind something that has been asking for your attention. It may be an emotion you have been avoiding, a fear that continues to revisit you, a conflict, a loss, a persistent worry, or even an unfinished task that has become emotionally charged through avoidance.

As you hold this situation in awareness, notice what happens in your body.

Perhaps your stomach tightens. Perhaps your chest becomes heavy. Perhaps there is a sensation in your throat, your jaw, your shoulders, or your lower back. Resist the urge to analyze. Instead, become curious.

Ask yourself:

"Where does this live in my body?"

Allow your attention to rest with the sensation.

Imagine that the sensation is not merely a physical response but a carrier of meaning. Approach it with respect. Rather than trying to eliminate it, silently thank it for appearing.

You might say:

"Thank you for arriving so quickly."

"Thank you for letting me know you are here."

"Thank you for carrying something important."

Spend several moments simply staying present with the sensation.

When you feel ready, begin your curiosity and writing.

Imagine that the body sensation has a voice and can speak. Write a question to it and listen to the first response you hear. No editing. Don't over think (this is the ego wanting to run the show).

Please show me an image of you today?

What name do you want me to call you?

How long have you been with me. When did you first show up in my life?

What is your purpose in my life. What is your job?

What can I do to help you today?

After each question allow the sensation to answer. You can write your experiences in real time, or wait until the end.

Do not censor. Do not edit. Do not decide in advance what it should say. Let the words arrive as they come. Write the dialogue exactly as it unfolds.

Continue the conversation for ten to fifteen minutes. Ask questions. Listen. Respond. Follow the thread wherever it leads.

If emotions arise, welcome them into the dialogue. If memories emerge, allow them to speak. If images appear, write them down. If another voice enters the conversation, perhaps a younger self, an inner critic, a fearful protector, or a forgotten dream, allow that voice a place at the table.

The purpose is not to solve a problem. The purpose is to enter into relationship.

When the dialogue feels complete, pause and read what has been written.

Over time and with practice, you will create an intimacy and trust, and old patterns, protective personas, complexes will mirror your trust and will start to reassign their prior duties into new, balanced ways of health, healing, and homeostasis. In other words, anxiety is quiet, fear is satisfied, anger is accepted, disappointment is seen, heard and re-homed.

If it is time to move through resistance and make friends with what we have repressed and ignored, then this process of writing and active imagination is a structural tool for release and inner balance.


written by Bren Littleton
original photo collage by B. Littleton
Tin Flea Press c. 2026

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

When we begin to understand the impact of narcissistic parenting, the temptation is to focus exclusively on what was lost. Certainly, there are losses. The child who grows up in the orbit of a narcissistic parent often learns to abandon parts of themselves to survive. Their attention turns outward. They become vigilant, intuitive, and highly skilled at reading emotional weather. This is the developmental time when an Empath is born. They learn to anticipate, manage, soothe, and adapt to other peoples’ needs, as they perpetuate the early childhood pattern established to survive the narcissistic parent.

Recognition:

The task is not to hate these adaptations or wage war against them. Too often, people look back at their people-pleasing, perfectionism, hypervigilance, self-doubt, or inability to set boundaries and see only weakness. They judge themselves for not having been stronger, more independent, or more self-assured. Yet these patterns did not emerge by accident. They developed for reasons that once made perfect sense within the environment in which the child was living.

A child has very few options when confronted with chronic emotional instability, criticism, manipulation, or conditional love. The psyche does what it has always done. It adapts. It develops strategies designed to preserve connection, minimize conflict, and increase the likelihood of emotional survival. What later appears dysfunctional often began as an act of intelligence. The child learns to scan a room before speaking. They learn to anticipate disappointment before it arrives. They learn to monitor the moods of others to stay safe. These adaptations deserve understanding before they are asked to change.

For this reason, healing rarely begins with rejection. It begins with recognition. We can appreciate the role these patterns once played while also acknowledging that they may no longer serve the life we are trying to create. There is a profound difference between understanding why a pattern developed and allowing it to govern the rest of our lives.

As adults, we are asked to undertake a different task than the one required in childhood. Survival is no longer the sole objective. The question becomes whether the strategies that once protected us now prevent us from fully participating in our own lives. The vigilance that once kept us safe may interfere with intimacy. The self-sacrifice that preserved connection may erode self-respect. The constant monitoring of others may leave little room to hear our own desires, values, and instincts.

The Patterns:

The psyche has a remarkable compensatory function. What was missing in childhood frequently appears later as a longing, an ache, a recurring dream, a persistent frustration, or an unfulfilled desire. The unconscious does not merely expose what has been wounded. It continually points toward what seeks restoration.

A narcissistic mother often makes the child responsible for her emotional state. The child learns that keeping her happy feels like survival itself. As an adult, this pattern frequently appears as chronic people-pleasing, over-functioning, and an inability to recognize personal needs. The compensatory task becomes learning that another person’s feelings belong to them, while one’s own feelings deserve equal care and attention.

When affection appears only when the child performs well, love begins to feel conditional. Achievement becomes confused with worthiness. The adult may spend decades pursuing perfection, hoping to finally earn the acceptance that should have been freely given. Healing begins when value is no longer tied to productivity, accomplishment, or approval.

When feelings are consistently dismissed, a child learns to mistrust their own inner reality. They begin asking others to tell them what is true. They seek permission to feel what they already know. The compensatory movement of the psyche invites a return to emotional authority, where feelings become information rather than inconveniences.

Some narcissistic parents compete with their children rather than protect them. The child’s confidence, beauty, creativity, intelligence, or joy may unconsciously threaten the parent. As a result, success becomes associated with danger. Visibility feels risky. The adult may hide their gifts without understanding why. The healing task is to claim one’s creative life without apology.

Humiliation often arrives disguised as humor, criticism, teasing, or sarcasm. The child learns to question their own experience and eventually concludes they are simply too sensitive. Yet sensitivity is not weakness. Sensitivity is perception. What requires healing is not the sensitivity itself but the shame attached to it.

Guilt becomes another form of control. The child feels selfish for wanting independence, boundaries, privacy, or personal desires. The adult often experiences tremendous anxiety when saying no. The compensatory movement here is the development of healthy boundaries, not as walls against others, but as structures that protect the integrity of the Self.

The confusion deepens when the parent appears loving in public and entirely different in private. The child lives within two realities simultaneously. One is visible to the world. The other remains hidden. This split frequently produces self-doubt and isolation because the child’s experience is repeatedly invalidated. Healing requires trusting one’s own memory and perception.

Emotional and personal boundaries are often violated as well. Privacy is treated as rebellion. Individuality is treated as disrespect. The child learns that belonging requires self-erasure. Later in life, the soul asks for something different. It asks for relationship without abandonment of self.

Perhaps the deepest wound occurs when the child is not recognized as a separate person. They become an extension of the parent’s needs, expectations, fears, and unfinished ambitions. Their own identity remains underdeveloped because it was never fully mirrored or welcomed.

Another Perspective:

Yet depth psychology asks a different question. Rather than focusing exclusively on what was lost, it invites us to consider what these adaptations may be asking of us now. The patterns that once protected us from emotional injury often continue long after the original danger has passed. They become woven into our personality, our relationships, our habits of perception, and our understanding of ourselves. What protected us as children, however, may limit us as adults.

When viewed through this lens, the symptoms themselves begin to reveal direction. If I spent years monitoring another person’s emotions in order to maintain safety, then my task may not be to become better at caring for others. My task may be to develop the capacity to listen to myself with the same attentiveness I once reserved for someone else’s needs.

If I learned that love arrived only when I performed well, pleased others, or met expectations, then part of my healing may involve discovering relationships rooted in mutuality, honesty, and emotional safety rather than achievement and approval. The question shifts from, “How do I earn love?” to “How do I participate in relationships where love is not something that must be earned at all?”

If my feelings were routinely dismissed, minimized, or ignored, then my work may involve reclaiming confidence in my own emotional life. Feelings become more than reactions to manage or suppress. They become sources of information, carrying insight through sensation, dream, image, intuition, and instinct. What was once treated as weakness gradually reveals itself as a form of intelligence.

Seen this way, healing is not simply the elimination of old wounds. The psyche often uses those very wounds to point toward what has been neglected, underdeveloped, or left unlived. The places where we suffered frequently reveal the qualities that now seek our attention. In this sense, the wound does not merely describe what happened to us. It often contains clues about the medicine required for the next stage of our life.

Creating Your Personal Path:

Many children grow up feeling fundamentally welcomed in their families. Their emotions are reflected to them with care. Their growing independence is encouraged. Their individuality is recognized and supported. Through thousands of ordinary interactions, they develop an internal sense they matter, that their feelings have value, and they can move through the world without abandoning themselves.

Others grow up under very different conditions. They learn early that harmony depends upon managing someone else’s emotions. They discover expressing disappointment, anger, sadness, or disagreement carries consequences. They become skilled at adapting themselves to the needs of others while gradually losing contact with their own inner experience. Over time, accommodation becomes automatic. What began as a strategy eventually becomes an identity.

One of the most difficult aspects of healing is recognizing this form of parenting occurred at all. Many adults who grew up in narcissistic family systems are remarkably capable, responsible, and accomplished. They have built careers, raised families, and fulfilled obligations. Because they survived, they often assume that nothing significant happened. They compare their experiences to more obvious forms of abuse and conclude their pain is somehow illegitimate. They learn to dismiss needs, disappointments, and forms of inner peace, both in themselves, and in others.

Yet the psyche remembers what the conscious mind often minimizes. It remembers the loneliness of not being seen. It remembers the confusion of living with inconsistent love. It remembers the exhaustion of carrying emotional responsibilities that never belonged to a child. The first task of healing, therefore, is not changing anything. The first task is allowing ourselves to tell the truth about what happened and how deeply it shaped the way we learned to live.

Only then can the deeper work begin. Only then can we distinguish between the adaptations that helped us survive and the qualities of the Self that have been waiting patiently beneath them, seeking expression, relationship, creativity, and a life no longer organized around fear, anger and terror.

This journey from a narcissistic parent into a sovereign self is possible. It is not as difficult as is the repression used to ignore the unmet needs, over the past decades. Small steps provide great relief. And, these small steps live in self-worth, hope, joy, reclamation of our identity, empowerment and creative expression.

“Carl Jung said that if you find the psychic wound in an individual or a people, there you also find their path to consciousness. For it is in the healing of our psychic wounds that we come to know ourselves. . . . In the evolution of consciousness, our greatest problem is always our richest opportunity,” (Robert Johnson, We: Understanding the Psychology of Romantic Love).

By Brenda Littleton

Writer, Educator, Jungian Coach

Tin Flea Press, c. 2026

original photo by B. Littleton

Subscribe now

Share

When Women Who Run with the Wolves (Estes, 1992), first entered the lives of women, it did not feel like reading a book as much as remembering something ancient. Many women recognized themselves in its pages before they fully understood why. Beneath the stories, myths, and folktales was a deeper recognition that something instinctual, creative, and alive within them had not disappeared, only been buried beneath duty, performance, pleasing, fear, and survival.

Clarissa Pinkola Estés wrote about what she called the Wild Woman, the instinctual soul-life within women that remains connected to intuition, creativity, embodiment, imagination, and deep inner knowing. This inner life recognizes what is life-giving and what is diminishing. It senses danger, grief, beauty, betrayal, desire, and renewal often long before the conscious mind can organize language around the experience. It is the part of women that continues listening inwardly, even during the seasons when life demands adaptation, survival, caregiving, or endurance.

Her work gave women permission to trust what their bodies, dreams, grief, rage, creativity, longing, and intuition had been trying to say all along.

For many women, the book arrived at precisely the moment they could no longer continue living entirely through accommodation. It named exhaustion that had no language. It restored dignity to anger. It treated intuition as intelligence rather than overreaction. It reminded women that creativity is not decorative to the soul, but necessary to it.

And decades later, women still return to this work because the world continues to reward disconnection from the self. Women are still taught to override instinct, overextend emotionally, remain endlessly available, and abandon their own inner rhythms in order to maintain acceptance. Yet beneath adaptation and cultural conditioning, the psyche is never passive or absent. It remains continuously alive, carrying instinct, memory, creativity, longing, image, and intuition forward through the hidden life of the soul.

That feeling in your gut is there for a reason.

Women are taught, very early, to distrust their own knowing. To second-guess discomfort. To explain away tension. To override exhaustion. To stay polite when something feels wrong. But the body rarely lies. The tightening in the stomach, the sudden fatigue around certain people, the feeling of shrinking inside yourself, the inability to fully exhale, these are not random inconveniences. They are communication.

Estés helped women understand that intuition is not irrationality. It is ancient intelligence.

A woman often knows long before she can explain. She knows when a relationship is depleting her. She knows when a room is unsafe. She knows when her creativity is dying. She knows when she is betraying herself to maintain belonging.

The tragedy is not that women have instincts. The tragedy is how many women were trained to apologize for them.

You do not have to explain every instinct or make yourself smaller to keep others comfortable.

One of the deepest wounds many women carry is the belief that they must justify every boundary, every no, every withdrawal, every discomfort. Women become experts in over-explaining themselves because they were conditioned to believe their instincts alone were not enough.

But a sovereign woman does not require permission to protect her peace.

There comes a point in healing when a woman begins to understand that clarity itself is enough. Exhaustion is enough. Discomfort is enough. Misalignment is enough. She does not need a courtroom presentation to leave what harms her.

Many women learned to survive by becoming emotionally manageable to others. Smaller. Softer. Less disruptive. Less honest. Less direct. But shrinking oneself to maintain acceptance eventually creates depression, resentment, anxiety, numbness, or physical symptoms within the body.

The wolf does not apologize for sensing danger.
The soul does not flourish inside chronic self-abandonment.

If you’re constantly tired, it is not because you are “bad at coping.”

Women are exhausted for reasons that go far beyond time management.

Many women are carrying entire emotional ecosystems on their backs. They manage households, conversations, moods, expectations, disappointments, schedules, children, aging parents, finances, relationships, and often the unspoken emotional stability of everyone around them, while also sustaining professional lives, creative ambitions, meaningful work, and the deeper callings of their own inner lives. They become interpreters, caretakers, organizers, peacekeepers, therapists, encouragers, absorbers of tension, and often the quiet architects holding entire systems together without acknowledgment of the psychic, emotional, and physical energy such labor requires.

And then they wonder why they cannot feel themselves anymore.

Exhaustion is not always weakness.
Sometimes it is prolonged self-abandonment.

Estés understood that the psyche starves when women live too far from what nourishes them. A woman can become profoundly tired from living against her own nature. From saying yes too often. From suppressing anger. From never creating. From never resting deeply. From never being alone. From living entirely in performance and obligation while the deeper self waits quietly at the edge of the forest.

The body eventually protests what the soul can no longer tolerate.

Your anger is not wrong.

For many women, anger was the forbidden emotion.

Women were allowed sadness.
Women were allowed caretaking.
Women were allowed forgiveness.
But anger threatened systems built upon female compliance.

So women learned to redirect anger inward. It became anxiety, guilt, shame, depression, numbness, people-pleasing, over-functioning, eating disorders, perfectionism, chronic illness, silence.

But healthy anger is often a form of intelligence.

Sometimes anger is grief finally finding a voice.
Sometimes it is protection.
Sometimes it is the soul refusing further humiliation.
Sometimes it is the body saying: no more.

Estés did not romanticize rage. She understood it as sacred information. Anger can illuminate where a woman has betrayed herself, tolerated too much, ignored intuition, or abandoned longing.

A woman who reconnects with healthy anger often begins changing her life. She sets boundaries. Leaves destructive relationships. Creates art. Speaks truth. Stops over-explaining. Stops negotiating away her worth.

The return of anger is often the return of life force.

Women were never meant to heal alone.

One of the great illusions of modern culture is that healing should happen privately and efficiently, as though pain can be solved in isolation and transformation can occur without relationship. Yet women have historically healed in community. Around fires. At kitchen tables. In gardens. During long walks. Through stories, songs, tears, touch, witnessing, laughter, and shared survival.

Women have always found one another.

In church basements and recovery circles.
In AA meetings and grief groups.
In classrooms and hospital corridors.
In the boardroom and the art studio.
On the battlefield and in activist movements.
In the operating room, on the trading floor, at the racetrack, in dance studios, libraries, shelters, cafés, and late-night phone calls between exhausted friends trying to hold together the realities of modern life.

Healing does not only happen in formally sacred places. It happens when women speak honestly about what their lives actually require. It happens when women stop editing their exhaustion, when they admit ambition without apology, and when they tell the truth about caregiving, marriage, motherhood, money, sexuality, loneliness, aging, grief, creativity, resentment, longing, work, and survival.

A woman saying,
“I will not live like this anymore,”
is often speaking from the deepest part of the psyche, the part that recognizes she is more than what has been required of her and that endurance alone is not the same thing as living.

A woman admitting she wants more life, more meaning, more creativity, more rest, more honesty, or more connection is not failing others. She is beginning to hear herself again.

These moments matter because something reorganizes when truth enters the room.

The nervous system settles.
Shame loosens.
Language returns.
The body stops bracing.
Imagination begins moving again.

This is part of what Clarissa Pinkola Estés understood so deeply. Women remember themselves in the company of women who are willing to live truthfully. The psyche responds to recognition. And often healing begins the moment a woman no longer has to carry her inner life entirely alone.

You do not need to become someone else.

Much of this work is not about self-improvement in the commercial sense. It is about recovery. Recovery of voice. Recovery of instinct. Recovery of imagination. Recovery of the original self that existed before shame, conditioning, trauma, perfectionism, narcissistic family systems, or cultural expectations taught a woman to fragment herself.

So many women spend decades trying to become acceptable versions of themselves while quietly mourning the loss of who they really are.

But beneath adaptation, the original self often remains alive.

Waiting.

The wild self is authentic.
It is the part of a woman that knows what she loves.
What she refuses.
What she longs for.
What she creates.
What brings her alive.

The goal is reunion with the deeper self that has remained present all along.

And creativity matters more than women are taught.

Women often place creativity last, somewhere beneath responsibility, productivity, caregiving, emotional labor, and survival. Art becomes optional. Writing becomes indulgent. Solitude becomes selfish. The woods become something visited “someday.”

But Estés understood creativity as a life force.

When women stop creating, something inside begins to dry out.

The “woods” in her work are both literal and symbolic. They represent the untamed inner world where instinct, imagination, sensuality, truth, grief, and renewal continue to live, even after years of silence or neglect. Women who never enter the woods of their own inner life often begin to feel restless, emotionally flat, chronically tired, or strangely disconnected from themselves, even when everything appears successful from the outside.

The enduring power of Women Who Run with the Wolves is not simply that women continue to read it. It is that the truths inside it continue to live inside women themselves. The book restores the sense of continuity between Estes’ enduring work and the enduring nature of women’s instinctual knowing itself. It reminds women that beneath adaptation and cultural conditioning, the psyche is not passive or absent, but continuously alive.

A woman may spend years tending family, profession, caregiving, grief, partnership, survival, and the many necessary threads woven into a human life, yet beneath all of it, something ancient continues breathing.

The intuitive self remains.
The creative self remains.
The relational self remains.
The dreaming self remains.

Even when neglected, the psyche continues speaking.

Through longing.
Through exhaustion.
Through image.
Through sudden tears.
Through attraction.
Through anger.
Through creativity.
Through the body.
Through dreams that arrive carrying symbols older than language itself.

This is what Estés understood so deeply. The soul does not abandon women simply because women have been taught to abandon themselves in order to maintain culture, stability, or belonging. Something within the feminine psyche remains in quiet relationship with life itself, with instinct, with ancestry, with imagination, with nature, with the unseen threads connecting women across generations.

Women carry lineages of knowing that persist beneath performance.

And even during the seasons when consciousness becomes consumed by survival, productivity, caregiving, heartbreak, duty, or fear, the deeper psyche continues its work. It continues trying to move a woman toward aliveness, toward meaning, toward expression, toward what wants to be fully seen, heard and accepted.

In this way, the Wild Woman continues enduring within women across time.

Waiting. Listening. Remembering.
Dreaming women forward into their own unfolding lives.

Thank you, Dr. Estes.

written by Bren Littleton

image created by B. Littleton

Tin Flea Press, c. 2026

from my class, “Life After a Narcissist.”

When a daughter is raised by a narcissistic mother, the question is not simply one of personality or difficulty, but one of a family system.

Within a family system, each member is organized into roles that stabilize what cannot be faced directly, and one of those roles is the scapegoat. The scapegoated daughter is not randomly chosen, but is often the one who registers what is off, who feels too much, sees too clearly, or refuses, even quietly, to align with the unspoken rules that keep the system intact. What cannot be acknowledged in the mother, or in the family as a whole, is displaced onto her, and she becomes the location for blame, for disruption, and for emotional truths that have no other place to go.

In this arrangement, the mother’s needs, perceptions, and self-image set the emotional terms of reality, and the daughter learns early that love, approval, and even basic safety are contingent on adaptation. She is required, often without words, to carry projections that do not belong to her, to absorb tension she did not create, and to make sense of reactions that shift without explanation.

Over time, this produces a particular kind of intelligence, as she becomes attuned to tone, to subtle changes in mood, and to what must be said or avoided in order to maintain connection, yet this intelligence comes at a cost, because it organizes her around vigilance rather than self-trust, and around accommodation rather than authenticity.

The role of scapegoat is not simply about being treated unfairly, but about being positioned as the problem in order to preserve the system. If there is conflict, she is the cause; if there is discomfort, she has created it; and if she speaks a truth that unsettles the family, that truth is reframed as her failure rather than the system’s limitation.

In this way, the role becomes self-reinforcing, because the more she reacts to the pressure placed on her, the more her reactions are used as evidence that she is, in fact, the issue, and what begins as projection becomes internalization.

The mother’s voice does not disappear when the daughter grows up, but becomes internal, showing up as the inner critic, the sharp judgment, the impossible standard, and the quiet, constant sense that something is wrong with her. This is not her original voice, but a voice she learned in order to remain in relationship, a relationship of survival.

From a family systems perspective, the scapegoated daughter serves a stabilizing function, because she carries what the system cannot metabolize, allowing others to maintain a more coherent sense of self, yet for the daughter this creates a profound distortion, as her identity forms around what she has been assigned to hold rather than what genuinely belongs to her.

She does not learn to say “No” because her “No” has no place to land, and instead “No” becomes internalized as inhibition, as self-limitation, and as a preemptive shutting down of needs before they can even be expressed.

This is the central issue, because the daughter does not say no to the world, but lives no internally, as contraction, as hesitation, and as the quiet erasure of her own needs before they are ever spoken.

This is why leaving the family, or gaining intellectual insight, is not enough to undo the pattern, because the role has moved inside, and the system continues, now organized within her own psyche and body.

The work that follows is not only to understand what happened, but to begin the slow and exacting process of stepping out of the role in a new lived experience, which requires differentiating between what was given to her and what is actually hers, restoring the capacity to register her own responses, and allowing new forms of choice to emerge where there was once only adaptation. This action is called agency, of having agency and the ability to wield personal choice.

This is not just a dramatic break, but a reorganization, and it begins by seeing the structure clearly enough that it can no longer operate without awareness.

Reclaiming does not begin with saying “No” out loud, because for the scapegoated daughter no may not yet exist as a conscious decision. Sayin “No” begins much earlier, in the body, at the first moment of hesitation. Before language appears, there may be a tightening in the chest, a pulling back in the stomach, a subtle pause before agreeing, or a sense that the body has already stepped backward while the mouth is preparing to say yes, and that moment matters because it is not resistance to be overcome but information to be recognized.

The first act of reclaiming is simply to notice it and to name it privately, because nothing has to be said yet and nothing has to be defended, and the work begins by restoring perception, as the daughter who learned to override herself must first learn to recognize herself again.

Once the “No” is recognized, the next step is not immediate action but non-abandonment, because the old survival pattern moves quickly, and the daughter feels hesitation, guilt rises, fear follows, and almost instantly she shifts into compliance, explanation, or accommodation.

Reclaiming interrupts that speed, as she allows the sensation of no to remain in the body for a few seconds longer than usual without rushing to erase it, and although this may feel difficult because the body experiences an unexpressed “No” as danger, it is precisely here that the attachment begins to loosen, and in the language of Marion Woodman, this is the body beginning to reclaim its authority, no longer organized solely around adaptation, but gradually learning to live from an inner ground that can be felt and trusted.

From there, the daughter begins with micro-choices rather than dramatic boundaries, because a full verbal refusal may overwhelm the system and return it to collapse or overexplanation, and instead she practices smaller movements that reflect her internal truth, such as asking for time, reducing her level of availability, or pausing before responding.

These choices are not evasions, but early forms of self-return, and in the work of Melody Beattie, this kind of shift reflects the gradual movement out of codependent patterning and into a life organized around one’s own reality rather than the management of others.

At the same time, she begins to recognize the impulse to explain, which once served to make her reality acceptable to others, and she experiments with saying less, allowing a single sentence to stand without elaboration, and allowing silence to remain without filling it.

In doing so, her words begin to reflect her position rather than replace it, and each time she resists the reflex to justify, she loosens the belief that her reality must be argued into legitimacy.

Often, the feeling here is, “My reason is not enough.”

Inevitably, this leads to the experience she has long worked to avoid, which is another person’s disappointment, and for the scapegoated daughter this has often meant criticism, withdrawal, or loss of connection.

Reclaiming requires that she remain present in the face of this response, without collapsing or attempting to repair, and as she stays with herself while another person has their reaction, the psyche begins to register, through lived experience, that another’s discomfort does not require her self-abandonment.

This is how the attachment loosens, through repeated moments in which she remains with herself where she once would have left.

What comes into view over time is not something new, but something that has been held, often without language, for years.

What lived in the shadows was never evidence of failure, nor did it originate in deficiency, nor did it belong to the role it was placed in. It was her way of knowing, a sensitivity that registered what others could not face, a clarity that did not reorganize itself to maintain stability, and a refusal, even when it could not be spoken, to align with what was untrue.

These qualities were never distortions, and they were never the problem, but were the part of her that remained intact.

As the internal structure begins to loosen, these qualities are no longer organized around survival, and begin to take their own form, as her attention is no longer pulled outward in the same way, and her energy is no longer organized around anticipating and managing response.

There is space, and within that space something begins to move that had been waiting, not as a reaction or correction, but as expression, direction, and the emergence of a life that does not require her to fragment in order to participate in it.

What was once carried as internal constraint becomes the ground of discernment, the capacity to recognize what belongs to her and what does not, and as she remains in contact with herself, her life begins to take shape in ways that reflect her, rather than the role she was given.

What was held in the shadows does not disappear, but becomes the very foundation from which she lives, and from that foundation she is able to claim, to create, and to move toward the life that has been waiting for her, not as an idea, but as something she can now enter and sustain.”

written by B. Littleton,

“Life After a Narcissist” c. 2021

Tin Flea Press c. 2026.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

A practical and embodied approach to dry, itchy skin, tissue change, and long-term care

Women have been dealing with pruritus, with extreme dry, itchy skin, for far longer than anyone has been willing to name it clearly. This is not new, and is not rare. And yet it continues to be treated as if it were a minor inconvenience, something to be managed quietly with another cream, another product, another short-term solution that never quite resolves what is actually happening.

We are speaking about the skin, the largest organ of the body, and what happens to it in the postmenopausal years when estrogen shifts, collagen declines, and the underlying connective tissue begins to change. For many women, this does not feel cosmetic. It feels intrusive, persistent, and at times overwhelming. The body becomes dry in a way that is difficult to soothe. The skin becomes reactive. Sensation sharpens. And most women are left to figure this out on their own, moving from product to product, spending time, energy, and money without being given a clear framework for understanding.

At the same time, postmenopausal women are not slowing down in the ways the culture once assumed. We are active. We hike, swim, ride, travel, create, work, build, love, and remain fully engaged in our lives. There is a mismatch between the vitality we carry and the condition of the skin we are now living in. The desire is not vanity. It is coherence. We want the body, including the skin, to keep pace with the life we are still very much living.

This is where the conversation needs to shift. Skin issues in menopause cannot remain in the category of topical beauty care. They belong in the center of how we understand aging, physiology, and long-term health. They require focus, intention, and applied research. They require a language that takes women’s experience seriously and translates it into meaningful care.

From here, a more useful question begins to emerge. Not what is wrong with the body, but what the body is asking for now.

If menopause is understood, even in part, as a change within the fascial system, within the fluid and sensory network beneath the skin, then the care we offer ourselves must extend beyond surface treatment. The body is not simply dry at the level of the skin. It is recalibrating across multiple systems, including tissue hydration, nerve signaling, hormonal balance, and cellular repair. What is being experienced on the surface is often the visible expression of deeper shifts within connective tissue and sensory processing.

Gentle movement becomes one of the most direct ways to support this change. Fascia responds to time and consistency rather than force. Aggressive stretching often increases tension in tissue that is already sensitive. Slow, sustained movement allows the body to reintroduce glide between layers and restore a sense of internal fluidity. This can include holding stretches for several minutes, incorporating spiraling movements through the spine and joints, and walking with attention to rhythm rather than speed. Practices such as yoga and tai chi support both fascial health and nervous system regulation, not as exercise alone, but as a way of restoring communication within the body.

Myofascial release can be approached in a similar way. Simple tools such as a soft ball, the hands, or a foam roller can be used to explore the body with attention rather than force. When pressure is applied slowly and held with patience, the tissue often begins to soften on its own. What initially presents as tightness or density frequently shifts when given enough time and attention. This reflects a growing understanding that fascia is not passive tissue but an active sensory system involved in communication throughout the body. The goal is not to fix the body, but to listen to it more carefully.

Many of the sensations associated with menopause, particularly itching and irritation, are influenced by the nervous system. As estrogen declines, the threshold for sensory input can change, making the body more reactive. What is experienced as itch or discomfort often involves both structural changes in the skin and altered nerve signaling. Supporting the nervous system becomes an essential part of care. Breathwork with a longer exhale, warm and rhythmic touch, and slow body awareness practices can reduce reactivity and allow sensation to be processed with less intensity.

Additional support may also be useful. N-acetylcysteine, NAC, has been used for its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties and has shown benefit in reducing histamine-related responses such as rashes and hives. Nutrients including vitamins B3, B12, D, and E contribute to regulating immune response and supporting the integrity of the skin barrier.

Hydration must be understood more broadly. It is not only about water intake, but about the body’s capacity to retain and distribute fluid at the cellular level. The inclusion of hydrogenated water has shown to help the body repair cells, reduce inflammation, and combat oxidative stress, and one study found that, when taken at 0.5 L/day, it could improve skin features and, in some cases, lengthen telomeres (a sign of aging). Internal support may also include electrolytes to improve hydration, omega-3 fatty acids to reduce inflammation, and nutrients such as vitamin C and amino acids to support collagen production. Persistent itching may also signal nutritional deficiencies, including low levels of vitamin B12 or iron, particularly in diets that are not well balanced. These possibilities should be considered when symptoms continue without relief.

Nutrition plays a central role in this process. A plant-based therapeutic approach such as the work of Caldwell Esselstyn offers a useful framework. While originally designed for cardiovascular repair, its emphasis on reducing inflammation, increasing fiber, and supporting nitric oxide production has direct relevance here. Diets rich in leafy greens, legumes, whole grains, and fruit support circulation, stabilize hormones, and assist in tissue repair. Frequent consumption of greens supports nitric oxide production, improving blood flow to the skin and underlying connective tissue and helping restore hydration where it is most needed.

External care remains an important part of the overall approach. The skin barrier often requires direct support as it adapts to hormonal change. Helichrysum oil, when properly diluted, is known for its anti-inflammatory and regenerative properties. Carrier oils such as castor seed oil, jojoba oil, prickly pear oil, and black seed oil can be selected based on the skin’s needs. These oils support moisture retention, reduce inflammation, and help restore the lipid barrier of the skin. Applied slowly and intentionally, this becomes more than a topical treatment. It becomes a way of reestablishing contact with the body.

It is also useful to recognize that menopause is approached differently across cultures. In Japan, the concept of kōnenki frames menopause as a natural transition rather than a condition to be treated. Traditional approaches include Kampo herbal medicine, acupuncture, and a diet rich in soy-based foods that provide phytoestrogens. Compounds such as S-equol, derived from soy isoflavones, have been shown to support hormonal balance and may improve skin-related symptoms. These approaches remind us that physiology is always shaped by context, diet, and perception.

What we are beginning to understand through research is what many women have already known in their bodies.

Emerging research is beginning to take a more serious and nuanced look at women’s health through the lens of connective tissue, aging, and systemic change. Large-scale analyses of fascia are identifying connective tissue as central to chronic pain, sensory disturbance, and age-related changes. At the same time, research in regenerative medicine is exploring how cellular repair processes continue to function over time, suggesting that the body retains an ongoing capacity for adaptation even as hormonal conditions shift.

When considered together, these lines of inquiry suggest that menopausal symptoms such as dry, itchy, reactive skin may not be isolated dermatological issues, but part of a broader reorganization occurring within connective tissue, hydration systems, and sensory processing. Clinical language has not yet caught up to this complexity, but the direction of the research is beginning to align with lived experience.

Touch remains one of the most direct ways to restore connection. When the body becomes uncomfortable, it is common to withdraw from it. Gentle, intentional touch helps reestablish a sense of safety and presence. Applying oil slowly, resting the hands on the body, and allowing warmth to register can regulate both the skin and the nervous system. This is not cosmetic care. It is relational care.

Time is an essential component of this process. The body is not returning to a previous state. It is reorganizing. The work becomes one of patience, sustained attention, and a willingness to remain in relationship with the body even when it feels unfamiliar.

If menopause is understood as a fascial and cellular shift, then the task is not to eliminate symptoms but to respond to them with greater awareness.

The body is not failing, it is signaling a need for different forms of care. When this is understood, what once felt like irritation can begin to be recognized as information. This information can guide the development of a more sustainable and responsive relationship with the body.

Selected References

Du, Y., et al. (2023). The role of fascia in chronic pain: A bibliometric analysis of global research trends (2013–2022).
Erceg Ivkošić, I., et al. (2023). Unlocking the potential of mesenchymal stem cells in gynecology. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 13(8), 1253.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2012). Black cohosh (Cimicifuga spp.) for menopausal symptoms.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Today, I listened to a client describe a frustrating experience, one of many along the path toward hip surgery. She had been moving through consultations, evaluations, and decisions about pain management, and found herself sitting across from a physician, trying to explain something that, to her, had become essential. She spoke about her fascia, about her work with another doctor who was considering postmenopausal bio-neurological changes as part of her treatment plan, and about her decision to pursue hyaluronic acid injections instead of cortisol, not simply for pain relief, but because of how her body was responding at a deeper level. Part of her management plan now included an awareness of the changes in her fascial system and the ways those changes were expressing themselves not only as pain, but through her skin. She described extreme dryness, chronic itching without any visible rash, and a level of irritation that moved across her body without clear cause. In her conversations with a more informed physician, she had begun to understand that with the postmenopausal loss of hormones, particularly estrogen, there is a measurable decrease in cellular hydration, that the tissues lose fluid, the skin barrier becomes more fragile, and the connective matrix beneath the skin, the fascia, becomes less supple, less able to glide, less able to hold moisture. What begins internally can surface as what is often dismissed as menopausal itch.

She was trying to bring this understanding into the room, and as she spoke, she could feel the disconnect. She knew she was speaking a language he did not recognize. What had become clear and embodied in her own experience sounded, to him, abstract, unfamiliar, even questionable. He challenged her, asked where her information was coming from, and what she was left with, more than anything, was not disagreement, but the quiet frustration of knowing something in her own body that had not yet been named or fully understood in the systems meant to support her. As she spoke, something in me shifted, because what she was describing was not foreign to me. For months now, I have been living inside a different expression of that same pattern. I have been itching, scratching, living with a level of skin irritation that is difficult to explain and even harder to resolve. There is no rash, no clear diagnosis, no obvious pathology, only a constant, low-grade, sometimes overwhelming sensation that something is not right, a growing discomfort, a subtle but persistent sense of disconnection from my own skin. And as I listened to her describe the relationship between hormonal change, fascial dehydration, and the way the body begins to signal through sensation, something began to link, not as an idea, but as a recognition in my own body. Because the experience she was naming in one part of the body, through pain and connective tissue, was not separate from what I had been feeling across the surface of my own.

There is something quietly annoying about the fact that science are only now beginning to name what millions of us have been living through for decades.

Millions of postmenopausal women are living in bodies that feel dry, itchy, and increasingly unfamiliar, and most of us have had no clear understanding of what is happening or how to respond to it. We wake in the night scratching our arms or legs without any visible rash, feel a persistent irritation beneath our clothing that no fabric seems to soothe, notice our skin becoming thin, papery, and overly sensitive to touch, or experience a faint crawling or prickling sensation that appears without warning and lingers without explanation.

We are told to moisturize more, to drink more water, to accept that this is simply part of aging. We try the creams, the oils, the routines that promise relief, and for a brief moment something softens, only to return again, often more insistently. What begins as dryness becomes something more complex, more intrusive, and far more difficult to name. And what stays with us is not only the discomfort, but the quiet sense that something deeper is being missed.

For years, the language offered to us has hovered around description without true understanding. “Menopausal itch.” “Hormonal pruritus.” “Neuropathic irritation.” These phrases circle the experience, but they do not hold it. They name what is happening on the surface, but not what we are actually living in our bodies. And so much of this has been carried quietly, not because we lack awareness, but because the systems meant to study and respond have not fully turned toward us.

And yet, the lives we are living tell a very different story.

We are living longer, fuller, more physically engaged lives. At seventy, we are hiking, swimming, riding horses, maintaining our yoga practice, dancing, sustaining intimacy, maintaining strength, remaining in relationship with sexual and sensual pleasure, vitality, and the world. Our bodies have not withdrawn, they are very much here, still expressive, still capable. But the models of care, the science of aging health, the importance of women’s longevity surrounding us have not kept pace with this reality.

This is where the tension becomes visible.

We have learned how to intervene in so many aspects of the body. We can reshape features, restore vision, replace joints, extend lifespan. And yet the largest organ of the body, our skin, along with the fascial system beneath it, remains underexamined in the context of menopause. If we begin to consider menopause not only as a hormonal event but as a fascial event, the question shifts: why is it that we can alter the structure of our faces, but not fully understand or support the changing structure of our skin and the connective tissue that gives it life?

Part of what has been missed lies just beneath the surface.

We have been trained to think of skin as something external, something to be treated from the outside. But our bodies do not organize themselves in layers of separation. Fascia, the continuous connective tissue network beneath the skin, surrounds muscles, nerves, and organs. It is living tissue, highly sensitive, richly innervated, and deeply responsive to hydration, movement, and hormonal signaling. As Robert Schleip notes in his research, fascia contains “a rich supply of sensory receptors,” suggesting that what we feel in our bodies is shaped as much by this inner network as by the skin itself. Carla Stecco’s anatomical work similarly describes fascia as a continuous, integrated system, one that does not isolate sensation but distributes it across regions of the body.

When our fascia changes, we feel different, even when the surface appears unchanged.

So when we describe itching without a rash, sensitivity without a clear cause, or a strange combination of fragility and tension, we are often describing something that involves not only the skin, but the system beneath it. This is why the prevailing explanation of dryness does not fully land. It does not account for the depth, the persistence, or the complexity of what we are feeling.

From a clinical standpoint, part of this picture is well understood. With the decline of estrogen, our bodies enter a different physiological state. Estrogen supports collagen production, lipid balance, and the presence of hyaluronic acid, all of which contribute to hydration, elasticity, and resilience. As these levels decrease, our skin becomes thinner, less able to retain moisture, and more prone to irritation.

But even here, something essential is left out.

These same changes are occurring within the fascial system. Collagen loss and reduced hydration alter the internal environment of connective tissue. The fluid matrix that allows tissues to glide becomes more dense, less responsive. Thomas Myers describes this ground substance as ideally having a “gel-like” quality that supports ease of movement between layers; when hydration diminishes, that ease is replaced by restriction, and sensation can shift along with it. We can begin to feel tighter, less at ease within ourselves. Not always visible, but deeply felt.

At the same time, our nervous systems are recalibrating. Estrogen plays a role in regulating sensory processing, including the perception of itch. As this modulation shifts, sensory nerves can become more reactive. The threshold for discomfort lowers. Sensations arise without clear dermatological cause, and they persist in ways that feel disproportionate and confusing. The work of Jean-Claude Guimberteau, who filmed living fascia in motion, reveals a dynamic, fluid architecture in constant communication, suggesting that changes in this internal environment can directly influence how sensation is generated and experienced.

Clinically, this is often labeled simply as pruritus. But even that word feels too small for what we are experiencing.

If we step back and look more honestly, what emerges is not a single condition, but a multi-system transition. Hormonal shifts. Structural changes in collagen and hydration. Skin barrier alterations. Increased sensory reactivity. And, very likely, a form of fascial dehydration that changes how we move and feel from within. To name menopause as a fascial event is to begin to see how these layers are not separate, but deeply intertwined.

These are not separate experiences. They are happening together, inside us.

And yet the research that does exist remains fragmented. Each piece is studied in isolation. Hormones in one field. Skin in another. Nervous system elsewhere. Fascia still emerging. But our bodies do not experience themselves in parts. We experience ourselves as a whole.

This is why so many of us have felt unseen within the current explanations.

It is not that nothing is known. It is that what is known has not yet been brought together in a way that reflects our lived reality.

We are, perhaps, just beginning to arrive at a more coherent understanding. Not a formal diagnosis, but a recognition of pattern. A post-estrogen shift in the neurofascial system, where skin, connective tissue, and sensory processing are all involved in a single lived experience.

To name it in this way is not to pathologize our bodies, but to respect their coherence.

Because the truth is, our bodies are not failing.

They are adapting.

They are reorganizing in response to profound internal changes, and in doing so, they are asking for a different kind of care. Not only surface treatment, but attention to hydration within the tissues, to movement that restores glide between layers, to nervous system regulation that softens sensory reactivity, to internal nourishment that supports repair and resilience.

Gentle, sustained stretching. Myofascial release through hands or simple tools. Walking, spiraling movement, anything that restores fluidity between layers. Breathwork with a longer exhale. Warm, rhythmic touch. Slow, safe awareness of the body. Adequate hydration supported by electrolytes. Omega-3 fatty acids. Nutrients that support collagen, including vitamin C and amino acids.

None of these are quick solutions. But together, they begin to form a more complete response to what our bodies are asking for when we understand menopause as a fascial event rather than a surface condition.

And still, the deeper question remains.

Why are we only now naming this?

Why has it taken so long for science to fully turn toward women’s midlife bodies, not as a niche concern, but as a central field of study? When will the same level of curiosity, funding, and integration be applied here?

Because we are not withdrawing from life.

We are still here. Still living. Still creating. Still moving in and through the world with strength, intelligence, and desire for engagement.

The naming of this experience matters.

It is not a small correction. It is the beginning of a larger shift, one that recognizes that our bodies are not problems to be managed quietly, but systems to be understood, supported, and met with the full attention they have always deserved.

What Is Beginning to Emerge

There are, quietly, other approaches beginning to enter the conversation. Not as solutions in the conventional sense, but as ways of working with the body that acknowledge the role of the nervous system, perception, and internal communication in how sensation is experienced.

Some women have found relief not by eliminating the sensation of itch, but by changing their relationship to it.

One of these approaches includes tapping, or Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT), a practice that combines light rhythmic tapping on specific points of the body with focused attention. While it does not directly alter the structure of the skin or fascia, it appears to influence how the nervous system processes sensation, lowering reactivity and softening the intensity of experience. When the threshold for discomfort is reduced, what once felt overwhelming can become more tolerable, sometimes even intermittent.

This matters more than it might first appear.

Because part of what we are encountering is not only structural, but sensory. The body is not simply dry; it is, at times, over-signaling.

And when signaling changes, our response becomes part of the experience.

There are also more inward practices that invite a different kind of engagement altogether.

In my work, I have long taught the use of Active Imagination, a Jungian method of entering into dialogue with the psyche through image, sensation, and felt experience. Traditionally, this has been used to work with anxiety, panic, pain, and emotional conflict. But the same approach can be extended to the body itself.

To the skin.
To the areas that itch, that irritate, that feel unfamiliar.

Rather than attempting to suppress or ignore the sensation, the invitation is to turn toward it, gently, and ask:

What are you trying to communicate?
What do you need?
What has changed?

This is not metaphorical work.

The body responds when it is met with attention that is neither invasive nor dismissive. Sensation, when listened to rather than resisted, often begins to shift in quality. Not always disappearing, but becoming more defined, more specific, sometimes less diffuse.

A relationship begins to form.

And within that relationship, something subtle but important changes. The body is no longer something happening to us, but something we are in communication with.

These approaches do not replace the need for medical understanding or physiological support. They do not rehydrate tissue or restore collagen directly. But they address another layer of the experience, one that is increasingly recognized as inseparable from the physical: the way the nervous system interprets and responds to what the body is signaling.

If menopause is, in part, a fascial event, then it is also a sensory one.

And perhaps part of what is on the horizon is not only better treatments, but a more integrated way of working with the body, one that includes structure, chemistry, and communication.

Not control.

But relationship.

And I find myself thinking again of my client, sitting in that room, trying to describe what she already knew in her body, trying to translate an experience that had not yet been fully recognized. The frustration she carried was not simply about being questioned, but about standing at the edge of something real without a shared language to hold it. Perhaps this is where we are now, not at the beginning of the experience, but at the beginning of its naming, learning, slowly, how to speak about what we have been living all along.

written by Bren Littleton

Tin Flea Press, c. 2026

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

There is a point where you understand your patterns. You can name where they began. You can trace the history, sometimes in remarkable detail. And still, in the moment when life asks something different of you, the body does not follow.

The old response comes forward. The same contraction. The same quiet turning away from what you know is true, even as part of you is fully aware in the moment. It isn’t a question of knowing better. Something deeper has not yet moved.

Over time, this creates its own kind of exhaustion. Not from lack of effort, but from the repetition of trying to bring insight into a life that does not yet receive it.

At some point, the question begins to turn inward. Why, if you understand this so clearly, does it not shift? Why does awareness not carry into action?

I know this place from the inside. There have been periods in my own life where what looked like procrastination was something else entirely. It was grief. Grief from the loss of roles that had once defined me, from the deaths of family and friends, from the quiet disappearance of what had been a kind of tribe, even among the horses I had known and loved, and from creative work that had reached completion and left an unexpected emptiness in its wake.

You can name what you want. You can feel the direction clearly. And still, there can be stretches of time where you cannot move toward it. The gap between intention and action becomes its own experience, and in that space, more loss can gather. Shame can follow. Not because you lack discipline, but because something in you has not yet been met at the level it requires.

The personal work can feel daunting for this reason. It asks you to stay with what you would rather move past.

I’m aware that many people are now working with what is often called “parts.” There is something valuable in this language. It gives form to inner experience and encourages a kind of presence, a willingness to listen for what has not yet been known.

At the same time, I tend to hold this a little differently. Rather than approaching these experiences as separate parts to be organized or managed, I understand them as movements within a larger field of the psyche, not to be managed, but to be met. This is a living relationship between what you know and what you have not yet been able to bring into awareness.

In the language I was trained in, this is the dialogue between the conscious and the unconscious. What appears as avoidance, hesitation, or immobility is not something to override or correct. It is something that has not yet been fully seen, not yet been heard, and not yet been allowed into your life in a way that it can change form.

The work, then, is not to eliminate these experiences or bring them under control. It is to learn how to remain present with them, long enough for what has been pushed aside, or left behind, to come forward in its own way.

Jung spoke of this as a process of individuation. It is not a quick integration, but a gradual movement toward becoming more whole. It asks you to develop the capacity to meet what has been disowned, including what may feel unfamiliar or difficult, without turning away.

What I have come to understand, through years of sitting with this, is that insight belongs to the mind, but change does not. Change happens in the body, in the nervous system, and in the deeper layers of the psyche that do not respond to explanation. They respond to contact.

They require time. They require a willingness to remain in relationship with what has not yet resolved.

This is where people often return to thinking, to analysis, to trying to understand it one more time. Not because you are avoiding the work, but because this part of the process is rarely given structure. It is rarely held in a way that allows it to complete.

I work in that space. It is a space where what is already known is given time and structure to come into form, where the body is included, where the psyche is listened to, and where something that has been held in place can finally begin to move.

Embodied Depth Work

A Private 10-Session Container

If you are reading this and recognizing yourself, then you likely already know a great deal about your own patterns. And still, something remains just out of reach. This is the work of closing that gap, not by adding more insight, but by allowing what is already there to take form in your life.

We work with what is present: what is held in the body, what is repeating in your life, and what has not yet been completed. The process is steady and does not rely on force.

I begin this work through a private 60-minute consultation. It is simply a place to sit together and begin to see what is ready to move, and whether this is the right space to continue. If it is, we move forward. If it isn’t, you will still leave with something clear and grounded.

If you feel the pull toward this, you can email me directly at brenda@brendalittleton.com. I will send a few available times and we can begin there.

You do not need more information. There is something in you that already knows. It may simply be waiting for the right conditions to come into your life.

No pressure. Just an invitation.

“Tell me, what is it you plan to do
with your one wild and precious life?”
— Mary Oliver

I’m a retired professor of graduate writing, a former psychotherapist, and now a Jungian coach working with creatives, professionals, and those at midlife who sense there is more to their existence than what has been lived so far.

My work sits at the intersection of body, psyche, and sacred ecology, helping people narrow the gap between their true intentions and their capacity to act on them.

I write from personal experience about mind, body, and soul, and about the quiet moments where creativity begins to take form.

I encourage love affairs with writing, the arts, music, and with everything in life where Beauty becomes the loudest voice in the room.

written by Bren Littleton

original photograph by B. Littleton, “The Road to King Clone”

Tin Flea Press c. 2026

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

written by Bren Littleton

original photo by B. Littleton, Raven Totem, Chesterman’s Beach, Tofino, B. C. Canada

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Read more

Something entered my life, unnamed at first, though I felt its presence with increasing clarity. My creativity remained strong, active, and seemingly without end, yet I found myself falling out of love with being creative. This condition did not arrive as a crisis, but instead revealed itself as a subtle interruption, a hesitation where there had once been decisive movement. I could still think, still imagine, still perceive the intricate shape of what wanted to be created, yet when I reached toward it, something in me did not move. This was not a decision, not a refusal, and not a resistance I could reason with. The energy was present, I could feel its direction and its quiet insistence, yet something in me did not translate that energy into action. The body did not organize around it. It did not initiate. I remained still, as though the signal had arrived but could not be carried forward.

I began to live within a strange doubleness. One part of me remained fully aware, observing, understanding, tracking ideas as they formed and gathered. Another part, quieter yet more powerful, refused to act. This was not resistance, it was presence. I was hosting something uninvited, something indifferent to preference or will. It altered the terms of engagement, not only with my work, but with my sense of self. The creativity did not disappear. The relationship to it changed.

What revealed itself over time was not a failure of discipline or a diminishment of intelligence, but a disruption in the continuity between intention and action. Awareness did not diminish; it sharpened. I could see the gap with precision and feel it as a measurable distance I could not reliably cross.

I did not arrive at ADHD easily. The term felt too narrow, too quick, for an experience that was layered, embodied, and historically shaped. I resisted it at first. Yet as the pattern persisted, curiosity replaced dismissal.

In time, I began to consider ADHD not as a limitation, but as a lens. It marked the beginning of understanding this experience as a lived condition, one in which thought, energy, and movement no longer aligned in a predictable way.

“When a woman tells the truth she is creating the possibility for more truth around her.”
— Adrienne Rich

In the work of Gabor Maté, attention is understood as something shaped by experience rather than fixed at birth. ADHD, in this view, reflects an adaptation to stress, to environments in which sustained presence carried a cost. This perspective did not excuse the experience, but it gave it context. It shifted the inquiry from what is wrong to what has occurred.

Tracing my own experience more honestly revealed that this disruption did not arise in isolation. It followed a period of deep grief. Not a single event, but an extended encounter with loss that moved through the body in waves, dissolving structures which had once held. This grief reopened earlier imprints and earlier adaptations, ways the system had learned to cope with what could not be metabolized at the time. In this reopening, something familiar returned, though I did not recognize it immediately.

The mind remained active. The imagination remained intact, yet the bridge between intention and action became unreliable. The ideas were still there. The creativity had not diminished, yet the capacity to enter it, to inhabit it, to move with it, no longer followed automatically. There was no flow. This is the aspect of ADHD that is rarely described with precision. The difficulty is not knowing what to do. It is not a lack of care. It is not even the absence of energy in a general sense. The difficulty lies in activation.

In earlier times, this experience would have been named differently. It might have been called melancholia, a quiet withdrawal of vitality from the world. It might have been understood as burnout, the exhaustion that follows prolonged overextension. It might have been framed as a midlife crisis, a necessary dismantling of identity in the face of accumulated strain. It might have been softened into the language of finding oneself, or misread as the cost of being highly driven, a Type A personality reaching its threshold. In more recent years, it has been folded into the language of multitasking and attention fatigue, as though the nervous system were simply overburdened by modern demands.

Each of these frameworks holds a fragment of truth. Each recognizes a loss of continuity, a disruption in energy, a change in relationship to one’s life. Yet none fully account for the specific experience of awareness remaining intact while the capacity to initiate becomes unreliable.

The current language names this pattern as ADHD. I use that term with care. Not as a fixed identity, and not as a reduction of complexity, but as a way of locating this experience within a shared and recognizable field. What I am describing has existed long before the label. It appears in the literature of melancholia, in accounts of creative paralysis, in spiritual texts that speak of the dark night, and in psychological descriptions of dissociation and withdrawal.

What distinguishes this experience, as I have come to understand it, is not simply a loss of energy, but a disruption in the translation of energy into action. The system does not fail, it reorganizes. It withdraws from conditions it can no longer sustain, even while awareness continues to perceive what is possible.

This is where the language of ADHD, once resisted, began to hold. Not as a reduction, but as a point of entry. It offered a way to recognize a pattern I had already been living, one that earlier frameworks had only partially named.

In the language of Daniel Amen, the brain requires consistent engagement of prefrontal systems to initiate, organize, and sustain action. When those systems are underactive or inconsistent, mobilization becomes unreliable. This clarified something essential: I was not resisting my life. I was inhabiting a system that could not consistently generate the energy required to begin.

The body made this even clearer. In the work of Bessel van der Kolk, unresolved experience is carried somatically and expressed through patterns of regulation and protection. Sitting inside the moments of non-movement, I could feel a subtle tightening before action, a hesitation that preceded thought. A question was being asked in sensation rather than language. Is this safe? Is this too much? Will this expose me beyond what I can hold? Can I do this?

The answer arrived as state. When uncertainty dominated, my movement stopped. From the outside, this appears as inactivity. From the inside, it reflects an intelligent system assessing risk and choosing conservation over exposure. What I once named as failure revealed itself as adaptation.

“Caring for myself is not self-indulgence, it is self-preservation, and that is an act of political warfare.”
— Audre Lorde

For decades, my attention moved outward. I listened for others, guided them, helped them articulate what they could not yet name. I knew how to sit with confusion and remain steady. I knew how to help rebuild meaning from fracture. What I had not yet learned was how to apply that same presence inward when the fracture was no longer observed but inhabited.

The body had been signaling for years. The appestat quieted, hunger and satiation lost clarity. Sleep became optional rather than restorative. Brain fog appeared, not as confusion, but as a dimming of available energy. These were not isolated symptoms. They formed a coherent pattern. The body was reorganizing under the weight of what had not yet been integrated.

“Rarely, if ever, are any of us healed in isolation. Healing is an act of communion.”
— bell hooks

This pattern extended beyond my own experience. Clients described a similar arc. Energy for meaningful work declined, while short bursts of focus and intensity gave way to prolonged stretches of lethargy, confusion, and brain fog. In those quieter periods, many turned toward regulating behaviors that offered temporary relief, including shopping, over-exercising, eating patterns, social media, gaming, and more recently, continuous engagement with AI. There was even a shared recognition that where a therapist once held their inner world, a digital presence now reflected it back, tracking not only their thoughts, but the recurring patterns within these gaps.

These cycles were not failures of character but attempts at regulation within a chronic rhythm of stimulation followed by depletion. The system searched for balance using whatever behavior was available, often attaching with an intensity that resembled addiction. Beneath this pattern was a deeper impulse toward connection, rooted in survival, emerging most strongly when uncertainty disrupted the system’s sense of continuity.

These patterns do not remain abstract. Under sustained stress, the system develops its own forms of compensation, often subtle, often misread, yet organized around the same need to regulate and preserve continuity. This, too, falls within the broader pattern now described as ADHD, not as a category, but as a way of recognizing how the system adapts when continuity breaks down.

I had already encountered a version of this pattern. After completing my dissertation, a work of deep personal and intellectual significance, I lost the ability to read. Not briefly, but for over a year. Reading, once central to my life, was no longer accessible. No matter what I picked up to read, after a quick glance, I did not have the capacity to stay with the message. I explained it as completion. I told myself I did not have the bandwidth to understand written language.

Years later, during a conversation about academic burnout, a colleague shared the same experience without prompting. She, too, could not read after completing her dissertation. The moment carried an unexpected sense of validation. What I had experienced in isolation revealed itself as shared.

Looking back, the context becomes clear. The dissertation was written under sustained pressure. Divorce, foreclosure, professional demands, and health concerns formed the backdrop. What appeared as completion contained unprocessed strain. The system had reached its limit.

Completion in form does not guarantee completion in experience. When the body carries work under strain, it may withdraw once the demand lifts. This is not failure, but instead is protection.

This reframes the question entirely. These moments of depletion and withdrawal begin to look less like breakdown and more like early signals. A system under sustained stress reorganizing in real time.

Grief activated deeper layers of abandonment within me. Not dramatically, but through quiet withdrawal. Energy receded and initiation faltered. What once felt natural required negotiation. Even creativity, once a place of vitality, became something I could see but not consistently enter. What might once have been called melancholia, or later named burnout, or even interpreted as a midlife unraveling, revealed itself here as something more precise. The system was not simply depleted. It was reorganizing. These were not random disruptions, but were meaningful responses.

This is what I call Personal Literacy. The ways we learn to read environments and adjust ourselves to survive them. We become fluent in expectation, pressure, and relational dynamics. These adaptations allow function and even excellence, but they are built on survival rather than full expression.

When grief enters, or when life shifts enough to dissolve these structures, the system reorganizes. Old patterns re-emerge, not as regression, but as unfinished responses returning to the surface. ADHD, in this light, becomes visible not as identity, but as condition. The inability to initiate reflects the intersection of safety, energy, and history.

What I had once resisted as too narrow revealed itself here as precise. Not because it explained everything, but because it pointed directly to the place where translation breaks down, where awareness remains intact but movement does not follow.

Shame often fills this space. The gap between capacity and action becomes visible. The weight of unrealized movement accumulates. Yet when the experience is met with attention rather than judgment, something else emerges alongside it: Understanding.

The question shifts from why do I not follow through, to what conditions allow movement to occur?

Movement does not arise from pressure in this system, it arises from alignment. For alignment to be present the body must register safety. The task must be small enough to enter. The engagement must carry meaning or curiosity. The internal voice must allow the process to unfold without attack.

Under these conditions, entry becomes possible. Not into the full vision, but into a point of contact. A sentence. A note. A small act of completion. Each completed movement rebuilds trust. Not abstract confidence, but embodied reliability.

What emerges is not discipline in its conventional sense, but translation. The capacity to translate vision into action without overwhelming the system that must sustain it.

ADHD, viewed this way, reflects the interaction between attention, safety, energy, and lived history. For those who are highly functional and deeply creative, this pattern can remain hidden for years beneath competence and performance, often misnamed as drive, ambition, or the cost of being a certain kind of mind. It is only when the continuity breaks, when what once carried us forward no longer does, that the underlying condition becomes visible.

It is often only after the interruption, after resistance gives way to curiosity and curiosity to recognition, that the condition can be named without reduction. By then, the language no longer defines the experience. It clarifies it.

Something entered my life, unnamed at first, and I lived for a time as though it were an interruption, a hesitation where there had once been decisive movement. I understand now it was not an interruption, but an invitation. The movement did not disappear. It changed its terms. It asked for a different kind of listening, a different kind of beginning. The distance I once could not cross has become a place I can stand within, attentive, responsive, and guided now by a curiosity that no longer seeks to control the movement, but to understand it, especially in those moments when continuity begins to break down. This is not a return to the life I once carried forward. It is the shaping of a new life I am now able to inhabit, where awareness and action meet in the same ground.

“One does not become enlightened by imagining figures of light, but by making the darkness conscious.”
— Carl Jung

written by Bren Littleton

April 8th, 2026

Image created in Canva

Tin Flea Press c. 2026

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

These moments, small and repeatable, begin to gather into understanding. A pattern comes into view, not as failure, but as adaptation. Something essential was missing during your formative years. Not because you were undeserving, but because the environment itself could not provide the consistency, attention, or emotional presence you required. The steadiness needed to rest inside your own experience, the attunement which would have reflected you back to yourself, and the space to feel without editing or restraint were not reliably available. Slowly, this understanding takes root. It does not demand blame, but it does ask for truth. And from that truth, a different kind of relationship with yourself becomes possible.

The work of reparenting begins in these same ordinary moments. It takes shape when you choose, almost experimentally at first, to respond differently. You notice exhaustion and, instead of pushing through it, you pause, even if only for a few minutes. You catch the sharpness in your inner voice after a mistake and soften the tone, replacing criticism with something more accurate and less punishing. You begin to ask yourself questions you were never asked before. What do I need right now? What am I feeling underneath this urgency? What would it look like to care for myself in this moment, even in a small way?

These shifts can feel awkward, even unnecessary. There is often an internal voice which insists you are fine, which urges you to keep moving, to not linger, to not make something out of nothing. That voice learned its role in an environment where efficiency, composure, or self-containment were valued more than emotional presence. It helped you function. It helped you belong. Yet now, it can interrupt the very care you are trying to establish.

Instead of arguing with this voice, you begin to recognize it. You hear its tone. You understand where it formed. And gradually, you choose not to let it lead. You stay with yourself a little longer. You allow a feeling to unfold instead of cutting it off. You give your body time to settle rather than forcing it forward. These are not dramatic changes, but they are deeply consequential. Each time you remain present with yourself, something steadies.

Over time, these repeated moments begin to reorganize your internal world. You may notice you recover more quickly after stress. You may find you no longer rush to fix other people’s emotions at the expense of your own. Situations which once felt overwhelming begin to feel more workable, not because they have changed, but because your relationship to yourself within them has changed. In the language of Carl Jung, this reflects a movement toward the Self, a gradual shift away from identities built primarily for adaptation and toward a way of being which feels more whole and internally aligned.

As this internal shift deepens, changes often begin to appear in your external life. You may find yourself less willing to participate in conversations where you silence your own perspective. You may begin to set limits in relationships where you previously overextended yourself. Roles which once felt natural may begin to feel constricting, as though they require you to return to an earlier version of yourself you no longer inhabit.

These changes can feel disorienting. There can be grief in recognizing how much of your life was organized around maintaining connection at the cost of your own presence. Yet there is also a sense of relief, even if it arrives quietly. As Anaïs Nin observed, there comes a point when the effort required to remain contained within an old form becomes more painful than the risk involved in expanding beyond it. You may feel this when you choose to speak honestly instead of smoothing something over, or when you decline a request and allow the discomfort to exist without rushing to repair it.

Writers such as Ursula K. Le Guin and Rebecca Solnit have described this kind of shift as a redefinition of power. It is no longer rooted in maintaining approval or avoiding conflict, but in alignment with your own perception and experience. You begin to trust what you see and feel, even when it does not match the expectations around you. You become less interested in being agreeable when agreement requires your absence.

The woman who emerges through this process does not become hardened, but she does become clear. She notices when she begins to negotiate her own worth and chooses differently. She recognizes the impulse to seek permission and pauses long enough to hear her own answer instead. The fear of standing alone in her own knowing may still surface, but it no longer determines her direction.

Reparenting makes this clarity sustainable. It is the ongoing practice of returning to yourself in the middle of real life, not in ideal conditions, but in the exact moments where you once would have left. It is choosing to rest when your body signals exhaustion, even when there is more to do. It is allowing yourself to feel disappointment without immediately reframing it. It is speaking to yourself with patience when you fall into an old pattern, rather than using the moment as evidence of failure.

Through this repetition, something begins to change at a deeper level. You start to trust your own presence. You learn, through experience rather than theory, you will not abandon yourself in the ways you once had to. This trust does not remove difficulty, but it alters how difficulty is held. You are no longer navigating your life alone, even when no one else is present.

You begin to recognize your needs, not as interruptions, but as essential parts of your life. You learn to take them seriously, to respond to them, to provide for yourself in ways once unfamiliar. What was never fully understood begins to come into form through your own attention and practice.

Reparenting often means to finally be seen, heard, and accepted, not by recreating the past, but by becoming the one who can offer this to yourself. You begin to understand something even more complex. Parents often give to their children what they themselves longed to receive, attempting, consciously or not, to repair their own unmet needs through the relationship. Yet what could not be completed there does not disappear. It remains, waiting.

The gap between how you were raised and how you needed to be loved does not close on its own. It becomes your work, not as burden, but as creation. As an adult, you bring this into reality through how you live, how you respond, and how you remain present with yourself. It becomes an expression of who you are in the world.

And slowly, through this ongoing return, something stabilizes.

Something essential was missing during your formative years. Not because you were undeserving, but because the environment itself could not provide the consistency, attention, or emotional presence you required.

Now, through your own care, something else becomes possible.

You develop the steadiness needed to rest inside your own experience.

Not because the past has changed, but because you now live from within your own authentic self-care and agency.

by Bren Littleton

April 7, 2026

Image created in Canva

Tin Flea Press c. 2026

Leave a comment

Share

Subscribe now

There was a time when I did not know I was living someone else’s language. I thought love meant attunement to others, the ability to anticipate, to soften, to adjust before anything could fracture. I believed that being a good daughter required a particular vigilance, a willingness to shape myself around what was needed, even when I could not name what that need was. Disappointment lived close by, not always spoken, but always implied, as though my existence required careful management in order to remain acceptable. In ways I could not yet see, I had learned to disappear in order to belong.

As Marion Woodman wrote, “We have to learn to say no to the mother in order to say yes to ourselves.” At the time, I had no language for this kind of refusal, no understanding that a life could be reorganized around something other than adaptation. I did not yet understand that I was translating myself out of my own life.

This pattern, often described by Bethany Webster as part of the Mother Wound, takes shape when a daughter grows up in relationship to a mother who is emotionally unavailable, overwhelmed, or unable to attune. In that environment, the child becomes the stabilizing force, learning to anticipate, manage, and give in order to maintain connection. Over time, this way of being becomes fluent. The body learns it, and the psyche organizes around it, so that what begins as survival gradually becomes identity.

I do not know this pattern as theory. I know it as structure, as lived experience, as the invisible architecture of my early life. My mother lived inside her own grief, her disappointments, and the quiet, persistent ache of an unlived life. She did not relate to me as a separate being with my own needs and interiority. Instead, I became the extension of her desires, the place where her longings could be projected and, when unmet, quietly resented. Looking back, I can see how what Jung described as the burden of the unlived life of the parent was not an abstraction in our home, but a daily psychological reality that shaped the language I was learning.

My needs were not simply overlooked; they were dismissed, exposed, and at times made into a form of social currency. I remember afternoons by the pool, where she and her friends would gather with pitchers of margaritas, the air thick with laughter that did not include me, but somehow included my intimate life. On more than one occasion, she brought out my private journals and read passages aloud as entertainment. The words I had written in solitude, attempting to understand myself, were turned outward, interpreted, and judged. What I experienced as confusion, longing, or pain, she experienced as insult. My inner life was not protected; it was appropriated. In the language Webster uses, this is one of the quiet devastations of the Mother Wound, where the daughter’s interior world is not only unseen but reshaped to serve the emotional needs of the mother.

Her guidance to me was often delivered in stark, unambiguous terms. One sentence has remained with me across decades: “Whatever you do, do not come home pregnant.” There was no conversation about care, about my body, about desire, or about protection in the deeper sense of being guided. There was only a directive, sharp and absolute, which placed the burden of consequence entirely on me while offering no relational support for how to live within that reality.

At sixteen, I went to a free clinic on my own to find birth control, navigating decisions about my body without guidance or protection. Over the following years, I endured a series of medical interventions, including IUDs and hormonal treatments, attempting to manage something that, at its core, required care, conversation, and presence. Eventually, I experienced an ectopic pregnancy that placed my life in immediate danger. Surgery was not optional; it was necessary to survive. When I told my mother what had happened, her response was immediate and unfiltered. She said, “Well, there goes my chance of being a grandmother.” In that moment, something clarified with irreversible precision. My life had not been the center of concern. Her loss, as she perceived it, was. The relational field had always been organized around her unmet needs, and I had been positioned within it accordingly.

In such an environment, the natural order between parent and child quietly reverses, and the child becomes the caretaker, the regulator, the one who absorbs what the adult cannot process. Over time, this requires a turning away from one’s own instinctual life, a pattern Marion Woodman described in the young girl who abandons her body and her inner knowing in order to remain in relationship. What is turned away from, however, does not disappear. It waits, often silently, until it begins to surface as exhaustion, longing, or a persistent sense that something essential has been left behind. Something in me began to feel the strain of continuing to translate myself out of my own experience, because, as Clarissa Pinkola Estés reminds us, what is vital will eventually insist on being lived.

Over time, control begins to feel like safety, and giving becomes regulating. The body learns that by anticipating needs and managing emotional terrain, a sense of stability can be maintained. In adulthood, this often shows up as an almost automatic assumption of responsibility in relationships, where one gives more, holds more, and leads more without consciously choosing to do so. It can feel like fluency, but it is a fluency in self-erasure, a pattern Webster identifies as central to over-functioning.

Yet beneath this capacity, something begins to strain. Resentment gathers, often quietly at first, especially when others do not reciprocate or when they resist the unspoken expectations embedded in the giving. It can feel as though the problem exists in the present relationship, but more often, as Webster points out, the emotional charge belongs to an earlier time, when needs were dismissed or met with contempt and could not be expressed safely.

To begin to shift this pattern requires turning toward that original wound with honesty and care. It requires grieving what was not received, without softening the truth to protect the parent. This grief is not conceptual. It is lived, often in waves, as the psyche begins to register what it adapted around for years. Alongside grief, anger begins to emerge, and here many women hesitate. Yet there is a form of anger that is not destructive but clarifying, one that restores boundary and dignity. Estés writes of this as a fierce knowing that protects the soul, and it is often this quality that interrupts the old language and makes space for something more true.

As this process unfolds, the compulsion to over-function begins to loosen. Not all at once, and not without discomfort, but with a growing awareness that one is not responsible for managing the emotional lives of others. The idea that worth must be earned through giving begins, slowly, to lose its authority. What begins to take its place is a quieter, more demanding path, one that asks a woman to become who she is rather than who she was required to be. Jung described this movement as individuation, though in lived experience it often feels less like a concept and more like learning, moment by moment, a different way of being in relationship to oneself and others.

This shift does not lead to withdrawal or coldness, though it can feel that way at first. Instead, it creates the conditions for a different kind of relationship, one where giving and receiving begin to find proportion, and where connection no longer depends on self-erasure. Webster names this emotional sovereignty, though in the body it feels less like a concept and more like learning a new language.

This shift begins in small, almost unremarkable moments that, over time, reorganize an entire life. When someone you care about is struggling, the old pattern might move you immediately into action, offering solutions, anticipating their needs, adjusting your time, and staying engaged until they feel better, often at the expense of your own energy. The new movement is quieter. You listen, you care, but you do not take over. You allow them to have their experience without stepping in to manage it, remaining present without becoming responsible.

In another moment, someone offers you something, a compliment, support, or even a simple act of generosity. In the past, you might have rushed to reciprocate, deflect, or minimize, as though receiving created a debt that had to be repaid immediately. In this new way of being, you pause. You allow the moment to land. You say thank you without qualification, letting yourself receive without turning it into an obligation.

There are also moments when something does not feel right. Previously, you might have stayed silent, telling yourself it was not worth the disruption, or that being understanding was the higher ground. Now, the shift may look like something very simple. You name what you feel. You say, “That doesn’t work for me,” or “I need something different here,” without over-explaining or apologizing for having a need at all. Even in your own internal landscape, the change becomes visible. Where you once anticipated what others might need from you, you begin to ask a different question: What do I need right now? And rather than dismissing the answer, you allow it to matter.

None of these moments are dramatic. In fact, they can feel unfamiliar, even uncomfortable at first, because they interrupt a lifelong pattern of self-erasure. Yet each small shift restores proportion. Each moment of restraint, of receiving, of speaking clearly without over-functioning, becomes a quiet act of self-trust. Over time, these small acts accumulate. What once felt like withdrawal reveals itself as balance. What once felt like distance becomes clarity. What once felt like the risk of losing connection begins to show itself as the foundation for a more honest and reciprocal form of relationship.

To recognize, with increasing clarity, that what you carried was never a measure of your strength, but a response to what was missing is part of this return. To begin releasing, without self-judgment, the roles you stepped into when there was no one else to hold what needed holding allows those roles to loosen their authority. To grieve what was not given, not as a collapse into the past, but as a truthful acknowledgment of what your life required and did not receive, softens what has been held too tightly for too long and creates space for a more honest way of being to emerge.

To trust the quiet signals of your own body, to stop turning away from yourself in order to remain in relationship with others, and to let your own experience become a legitimate source of guidance marks a fundamental shift. To learn, slowly and without urgency, that you are allowed to receive, and to remain present when something is offered without immediately moving to reciprocate or minimize, restores a sense of belonging within your own life.

To allow your relationships to reorganize in response to your own internal shifts, not through force but through the steady rebalancing of your way of being, reveals that connection does not require your disappearance. Love, in its most mature form, includes you. To remember, again and again, that you were never meant to hold everything together, and to release the illusion of that responsibility, opens the possibility of a life no longer organized around survival, but around presence.

In this way, you begin to create your own language of life, of love, and of being in the world, where kindness, care, presence, understanding, and compassion walk beside you as you become fluent in your own life.

written by Bren Littleton

Tin Flea Press, c. 2026

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

For a long time I misunderstood the nature of my relationship with Doubt. I treated it as an occasional visitor, the sort of mild hesitation anyone might feel before choosing a pair of shoes, deciding what to cook for dinner, or wondering whether a concert ticket is worth the price.

That was never the kind of doubt that lived with me.

My Doubt was far more intimate. It did not concern trivial decisions. It appeared at the exact moments when I was closest to becoming fully myself.

It arrived when I stood in front of a room to give a lecture and wondered, quietly but fiercely, Do I know enough to speak with authority?

It arrived when I sat with a depressed client whose eyes were hollow with exhaustion and asked myself, Do I trust my own instincts enough to stay here with them, in the tender, uncertain places?

It arrived precisely when my life asked me for courage.

Which is curious, because courage has never been difficult for me in the obvious places. I have ridden horses that were determined to test gravity. I have steered boats through twenty-foot seas where the horizon rose and fell like a living lung. I have body-surfed in swells that could tumble a person like driftwood.

I have held a father’s hand when his last breath landed in my chest like a quiet bird.

I have stayed on suicide phone calls for ninety minutes, waiting patiently for the tired chemistry of the brain to release enough dopamine so the person on the other end could say, almost with surprise, “I think I’m still here.”

In these moments, life is so large, so undeniable, so loud with importance that doubt has nowhere to hide. The energy of the moment sweeps it aside. There is simply the work of being alive.

But Doubt is cunning. It prefers the smaller rooms.

It arrives when I want something so badly that I cannot tell the difference between dedication and delusion. It sits beside me when I fall in love with an idea that no one else seems interested in receiving. It whispers questions that sound suspiciously like wisdom.

Are you sure?
Maybe this is foolish.
Perhaps you should wait.

Eventually I realized Doubt was not merely visiting. Doubt had moved in.

In fact, Doubt had become my lover.

I excused it. I listened to it. I rearranged my life around it. I fawned over it with elaborate rationalizations. I gaslit myself on its behalf. Doubt was elegant in its reasoning and surprisingly persuasive in its caution.

Like many lovers, it brought gifts. It offered compensations, patterns of dismissal, small addictions to distraction, and a steady retreat into the places that never rejected me: writing, forests, horses, the open sea.

Looking back, I can see that Doubt was an extraordinary companion. It was loyal. It was attentive. It was always ready to appear the moment my life began to open too widely.

What I did not understand for many years was that Doubt had been protecting something much older.

The origin of our relationship goes back to a logging road on Vancouver Island.

I was three years old.

My parents were driving from Port Alberni to Tofino along the rough access road that wound through the mountains before the modern highway existed. In those days it was a narrow logging route. The road was uneven and slick with rain, and the logging trucks had the right of way. When one of those enormous machines appeared around a bend, a small car had to pull off immediately because those trucks carried loads so heavy they could barely slow down.

Driving that road required constant vigilance.

Inside the car, both my parents were smoking. The windows were closed because it was raining. My mother was late in her pregnancy and not feeling well. I had chronic ear, nose, and throat infections from breathing smoke in small spaces, and the pressure in my ears made the long drive unbearable.

I was screaming in the back seat with pain and dizziness and motion sickness.

About two hours into the trip, my mother had reached the end of her patience. She shouted for my father to pull over and get me out of the car.

And so he did.

I was lifted from the back seat and placed on the gravel slope beside the road. Below me was a boggy riverbed scattered with large boulders and cottonwood trees. The river roared through the valley with a wild sound that felt strangely welcoming.

Without hesitation, I ran.

My father was attending to my mother, who finally had relief from the noise of my crying. The landscape was familiar to them. They knew the area well, and perhaps they assumed I would remain nearby.

Instead, I disappeared for two hours.

Down by the river I found a small cove of rocks and shallow pools of water. Moss covered the stones. Branches lay scattered along the banks. I dipped sticks into the water and used them to paint the rocks, watching the dark shapes appear and fade.

I was perfectly content.

When my father eventually found me, I remember feeling excited to show him this small sanctuary that had held me so gently while they enjoyed their quiet.

But relief, fear, and anger are not known for their subtlety.

He scooped me up quickly and returned me to the car. My mother did not look at me. The doors closed. The smoke returned. The road continued.

It took me many years to understand what my three-year-old self absorbed in that moment.

The lesson was simple: You are easier to love when you are quiet.

And so Doubt began its quiet courtship.

As I grew older, the only places I consistently felt risk and excitement were in romantic love. For a week, or sometimes five years, the energy of attraction temporarily silenced Doubt. But whenever confusion entered the relationship, whenever voices were raised or tenderness retreated, Doubt returned immediately to reclaim its position beside me.

It was dependable that way.

For a long time I believed Doubt was simply part of my personality. But life, in its curious generosity, eventually interrupted that belief rather dramatically.

I broke my back and several ribs.

Pain has a way of removing illusions with astonishing efficiency. Lying still for long periods gives a person time to examine their most loyal companions. During those months of recovery I began to see Doubt more clearly. It was not a flaw. It was a protection.

Doubt had spent decades preventing me from reliving the logging road moment of feeling unwanted.

Once I understood that, the spell began to loosen.

These days my life is organized around a different commitment. Instead of proving that I deserve to be here, I practice living in ways that show how deeply I want my own Self.

It is an interesting reversal.

Sometimes, when courage settles quietly into my bones and satisfaction spreads through the ordinary moments of the day, I hear a familiar sound. It is the roar of that river from long ago. The same river that ran beside the little cove of stones where a three-year-old child painted rocks with water and discovered a world that welcomed her without hesitation.

When that memory returns, I sit down beside her.

She climbs easily into my lap, still holding her small stick like a wand, and tells me the secrets she hears from the water, from the trees, from the patient stones. I listen carefully. I hold her the way she should have been held on that rainy logging road.

And I tell her something I did not yet know how to say back then.

I tell her I want her. Always.

When I listen closely, the message that comes back through the sound of the river is no longer the old one.

I do not hear, I don’t want you.

What I hear now is something far wiser.

I don’t want you to doubt.

written by Bren Littleton

original photo: family photo 1958

Tin Flea Press c. 2026

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

There is a quiet place beneath every story we tell about why we are not yet creating.

If we pause long enough, we can feel it. Beneath the explanations about timing, discipline, readiness, or needing one more idea, there is a subtle current moving underneath the surface of the mind. It is the pulse of something that once reached toward expression and quietly pulled back when the world did not know what to do with it.

Many creative lives begin this way.

Not with failure.

Not with a lack of talent.

But with a moment when something genuine in us reached forward and did not find the welcome it needed.

A drawing dismissed.

A poem misunderstood.

An idea met with indifference or ridicule.

A room that valued safety more than imagination.

The psyche learns quickly in these moments. Long before we can explain it with words, the body absorbs the lesson.

This part of you is dangerous.

Do not show it again.

What follows often looks like procrastination, hesitation, perfectionism, or the constant feeling that the work is not quite ready. Yet what appears to be resistance is often something far more intelligent. It is the psyche protecting the most alive parts of you until there is enough strength, safety, and inner authority to carry them.

In depth psychology we might call this the shadow, although that word is often misunderstood. The shadow is not simply what is wounded. It also contains what was too vivid, too imaginative, too emotionally intense to survive easily in the environments where we first tried to live as ourselves.

Brilliance can be exiled just as quickly as pain.

So can originality, curiosity, anger, tenderness, and wild imagination.

None of these were hidden because they lacked value. They were hidden because they needed protection.

For many creatives, the block is not a lack of inspiration. It is the nervous system remembering earlier moments when expression felt unsafe. The body tightens before the work can even begin. We call it procrastination, but beneath it there is often a quiet contraction that says, almost protectively, not yet.

Seen this way, resistance is not the enemy.

It is a guardian.

The task is not to fight it, shame it, or overpower it with discipline. The task is to create enough steadiness inside ourselves that the parts which once hid can begin to emerge again.

This is why the doorway back into creative life is rarely found through force of will alone. It begins more quietly through presence, attention, and the gradual rebuilding of safety within the body.

A paragraph written without judgment.

A sketch drawn simply to feel the pencil move across the page.

A sentence that appears before we know where it is going.

These are small acts, but they reopen the conversation between the self and the imagination.

Over time something important becomes visible.

The part of you that seemed to delay your work was not trying to stop your life. It was trying to protect the most luminous parts of it until you were ready to stand beside them.

Creative hesitation is rarely proof that you are not meant to do the work.

More often, it is evidence that something inside you has been waiting for the moment when your voice can finally be welcomed by the person who matters most.

You.

When people recognize their resistance once served a protective purpose, shame loosens and curiosity begins to return. This is often the moment when creativity starts to move again.

Hesitation may actually be the psyche protecting something deeply alive that was once unwelcome. This reframing is extremely powerful because it removes shame.

Once shame softens, curiosity can enter, and curiosity is the emotional state which allows writing to begin.

Here is an exercise from my writing program to start your process of being in conversation with your Creative Self:

Remembering What Once Wanted to Be Expressed:

Before beginning, take a moment to sit quietly and notice your breathing. Allow your body to settle into the chair. Let the room become still around you.

Then write for ten minutes without editing or correcting yourself.

Prompt #1:

Write about something you once loved to do but gradually stopped sharing with the world.

It may have been drawing, singing, telling stories, building things, asking unusual questions, or imagining possibilities others could not see.

Describe the memory as clearly as you can. Where were you? Who else was present? What did the activity feel like in your body when you were doing it?

Do not worry about making the writing beautiful. Simply allow the memory to return.

Material is from my program, Writing is Therapy:

Writing is a method of self-discovery, shadow work, and psychological integration. The doorway is creativity, but the deeper destination is consciousness.

Students learn:

how the psyche protects expression.

how to work with the inner editor.

how to access the unconscious through writing.

how language reorganizes emotional experience.

if interested, email me at brenda@brendalittleton.com

written by Bren Littleton

original art work: paste paper by B. Littleton

Tin Flea Press c. 2026

Share

Leave a comment