*

*

The scam artists of Tsinghua University’s Academy of Arts and Design are (top image) Dai Shunzhi 戴順智 and Liu Xiangpeng.

For some 30 years they peddle their works in exhibitions online and off, and they are no takers.

Unable to get rich that way, they now resort to thieving from the public purse. So, on top of charging off-salary expenses, they have resorted to skimming Rmb100,000 in yearly grants to exhibit works recycled from paintings they can’t sell.

The trick: Re-categorize their works into English, adopting labels as “international”, code word for White Man’s art styles. The latest of which is titled, “Post-modern deconstruction aesthetics.”

That way the Chinese officials writing the cheques wouldn’t suspect a thing: they don’t read English, you see, much less English labels of trite Whitey art from 50 years ago.

These motherf**kers… China has more than 2,000 years of a track record in great visual (and performing) arts and they want to imitate some has been White styles.

This is the same dog and pony show at the political departments of Tsinghua (and other universities), charging the public Rmb300,000 for a shot at importing some White professor scumbag, drenching him in pickled western political banality such as the “realist political theories of John Mearsheimer” or “The Grand Chessboard of Zbigniew Brzezinski.” With that, they hold a symposium and pocket the profit.

For a longer-term scam, they draw up curricula with even grander sounding names (in English of course), all plagiarised from the Harvard and Yale graduate course book.

In video below Xiaolang 小懒 exposes the most current scam at Tsinghua’s art school. You can actually see what these Ching Chong Chinaman fraudsters are up to, here (in English of course).

The root cause to this runaway thievery in China?

Answer: Xi Jinping’s fetish for Whiteness, ably supported by an assortment of White and Banana motherf**kers, Victor Gao, Ben Norton, the (White) Friends of Socialist China, others.

With Xi, if there’s no White Man and no White endorsement, China has no art of worth, no culture, no civilization, no nothing. What a sick man!

*

Below (three videos), Chinese art — painting, literature, calligraphy, music — from 1,000, 1,500 years ago come alive once treated to AI and animation. And the details are breathtaking. O! My Motherland…

*

*

*

*

*

… but then Sachs was trying to be political correct.

We Chinese don’t have to be that, that is, answer to White Man’s political correctness, itself another propaganda form of deceit.

The White race is a global disease!

Like an invasive cancer, the White Man will, in their retreat and their defeat, find global niches to intrude on then invade, occupy and claim right of settlement on other lands. For example, the European seizure of Palestine that’s been justified on a political correct but fictitious biblical title deed.

Today, on grounds of assisting China and making us Chinese rich, White Man is claiming the right to occupy and squat on indigenous Chinese territory.

And so? We Chinese, both in our Motherland and abroad, must be wary of these White Motherf**kers, the Ben Nortons and their Daniel Dumbrill Niggers (image above). They claim to bring enlightment, progress and to inject new knowledge, skills, even “diversity” into China.

In the screen capture above the Nortons and the Dumbrills are emblematic of a post-modern Internet version of White thieves and pirates from Europe 200 years ago. It showed how, then and now, they had operated when they started upon China.

First, they show up.

Then when Chinese refused entry, they insisted on staying, claiming (by lying) that they only want to trade freely. After which they went on to seize nearly all the ports on the eastern coast, starting with the occupation of Hong Kong in wars from 1839 to 1840

The Left and the socialists among White people are quick to dismiss as racist this imperialist occupation.

They instead blame it on old (European but not White) capital greed tied, logically to imperialism. And since capital is race and color blind, therefore, so their logic says, imperialist conquest and plunder had nothing to do with the White race.

If that were true, why was continental Europe spared of English seizure at the height of White colonialism? It is very rich after all. Why is White occupation centered only on countries that are not White, many of which are 100 times poorer like Peru or Timbuktu? Why hadn’t capital from the world’s richest country (China) for 2,000 years moved into, invade and occupy Rome? Or move from India to Europe?

Under emperor Wu, the Han Chinese army had reach the Caspian 2,000 years ago. And, 150 years before Columbus, Ming capital ships had seven times reached Africa, the Indian Ocean and the Red Sea in flotillas that carried an armed force of over 50,000 each trip. Chinese capital could have seized India, the Arab world and all Southeast Asia with just the wave of a hand.

Instead, the imperialist capital culprit has been and always been White.

Thus, hiding behind and using White justification-theories of capitalism and imperialism, the Ben Nortons and Edward Kupermans are ensconced into China today.

They claim to be “anti-imperialist socialist brothers” to the Chinese, even doing China a favor spreading Chinese socialism. (When did Chinese asked them for that favor? These deceitful, shameless motherf**kers!)

As is usual of White motherf**kers and like Jeffrey Sachs lying and acting deceitful, the Thieves of Baghdad are on the move today.

But the dangers in again seeing the loss of Chinese land, sovereignty and dignity isn’t these White people who we, any day now, can swat dead like flies. The Edward Kupermans are finished anyway.

The greater danger is within; collaborators with White Man like Xi Jinping, like Kuperman’s facilitator the Dunhuang city mayor, and their Anglophile sycophants Victor Gao, Zhang Weiwei and their petty, little dancing girls and their banner boy Carl Zha.

*

*

TWe are defying Xi Jinping…

In China, Xi Jinping is a dead duck emperor. He’s no longer in charge overall (China doesn’t belong to his father!) His situation, his standing and his status can be seen, foretold, in the video clip above.

In finance, foreign exchange, capital movements and taxation, the rank and file are taking over. See this, “China guts the Anglophiles.” (Or this and this.) In education we have moved in on the Niggers who pollute and poison the kid classrooms (image below). These House Niggers have been using their charcoal black skin to gain Chinese sympathy for work entry and hiring.

In immigration in particular (video below), we are taking a stand against the orders of Xi who has thrown open the door to the cancerous White Man and his Niggers.

As to the Thief of Grayzone Ben Norton and the Daniel Dumbrills?

We’ll get to these motherf**kers. No hurry. They are not going anywhere (actually they have no where to go). This is because we first get the traitors, that is, their local agents, their corrupt facilitators, both corporates and individuals, the Carls, Victors and Henrys.

These days, China is giving notice to the world and to ourselves: Where it affects Chinese property and China’s integrity and sovereignty, whether in word or deed, we, the mighty Han China of millennia will no longer tolerate your shit.

Brown skin Pinoys take note.

Call us by any name or morality you wish; on our property, in our land, we Chinese don’t answer to White biblical standards much less report to the White motherfucker and his Niggers!

*

*

By the Mandate of Heaven: This (below) is how, eventually, we’ll deal with the Anglophiles and the White collaborators, openly and unapologetically. Just wait…!

*

*

*

DEFINITIONS…

1. Potemkin Village

2. Class…

3. Epstein Class…

*

GETTING RICH IN CHINA BY ELON MUSK

Twitter is inaccessible in China without a VPN but its owner, the racist White bigot Elon Musk is received by ministers of the State, showered in media accolades and surrounded always by young Chinese girls each time he visits (immediately above). His Tesla cars get free State-sponsored promotions.

All this isn’t an accident of contradictions. There is more…

• YouTube is also inaccessible but Douyin, the former owner of TikTok, do more to peddle lies and illusions not just about China but especially of the world. For Democratic American DEI (diversity, equity, inclusive) effect, House Niggers in muscular bare skins are promoted as virile black pearls of beauty.

• Google, Facebook, and The New York Times might not spread western, that is, White Man political propaganda but, abroad, CGTN (think ) and Global Times, do more than all three western platforms combined to cover up actual Chinese state of affairs and what China is when far away from Shanghai’s gleaming tower blocks of Potemkin illusions which they merrily redistribute (think of the philistine Shanghai Eye peddling White Man designer brands.)

• TikTok may not be used in China (and therefore sold) to peddle LGBTQ tastes of body wear but the notorious Italian insurer Generali is permitted into China, where it markets life insurance policies on DEI “outreach” campaigns that was at the same time selling LGBTQ lifestyles in Hong Kong (think Karim Bettache and his sleep-in gay partner Peter Beattie, both ensconced in the Chinese University of Hong Kong). Every June, Generali sponsors “Pride” month of gay and lesbian Democrats marching through the streets.

• Periodically Chinese authorities clear out the Internet of opinion trash, especially political ones from abroad, but they allow to remain on Weibo and Douyin even more trash produced behind an Epsteinian sunglass class and facade of Disney-like Potemkin castles, luxury yachts and private jets serving child sex, bikinis and (always) wines of unknown origin.

• In just three months in 2023, China shut down more than 4,200 sites and removed 55 apps from app stores for various breaches, including provision of unauthorised news services. Yet in the same quarter, Douyin, Xiaohongshu, and Weibo do more to help disappear Chinese girls from their villages into the blinding Epstein class than do the gay pair of Bettache and Beattie (of ) peddling in combination through the CHUK stupid anti-Trump rants.

*

THE DISAPPEARANCE OF XIAOMEI

We, Ji’an and I, hadn’t heard from Xiaomei (a pseudonym) for — what? — four years now. But not from her parents who would periodically call from their Shanxi (not to be confused with Shaanxi) mountain-top village. The last call was January shortly before chunjie.

“Anything?” the father asked. “Nothing,” I answered. That chunjie we didn’t visit their home though we said we’d try and even though he was ashamed to let us see that generations later there had no improvements. For decades, it’s been the same planked-wall debilitated hut without a toilet and kitchen and roof holes so large you can count the stars through it.

It’s easy to forget a person when said person is out of mind and out of sight. Yet Xiaomei’s parents don’t go to police who almost certainly would tuck away any such report in missing persons file which, in grand total nationally, could fill a bedroom. Besides, going to the police meant telling them what Xiaomei do for a living — prostitution, a criminal misdemeanor.

It’s not that Xiaomei didn’t try for a regular job. What else is 15-year girl to do for money when alone in the city?

We had lost count, but as we recall maybe two dozen something jobs in two years. We, Ji’an and I, once shoved, pushed and dragged her to Kodak in Shenzhen (since closed) for an interview. One look at her ID card, the guard at the gate, slapped his forehead and exclaimed: “Underage!” He just wouldn’t let her through despite our pleas. Over the phone Ji’an had forgotten to tell the “human resources” officer that Xiaomei was just one month past her 15th birthday.

That day, Xiaomei fled from both the factory and Shenzhen, refusing to talk to us for over a month because we had dragged her through the humiliation of rejection. I don’t think she ever forgave us.

Prostitution was far easier, straightforward, and that with cash loaded upfront, no capital costs, and minimum risks. Dusk till dawn could earn up to Rmb1,000 and nobody asks questions and nobody talks; she is incognito and as invisible and as unnoticed as the day she left the village within six months of entering junior high.

Once, she scolded me, “I took so much trouble to get away from the mountain, don’t ask me to go back. I will never go back!”

Xiaomei belongs to the generation Xi Jinping cultivated. She is indoctrinated to believe that money making buys happiness, not to mention all sorts of things she had never seen before. Things that we take for granted, she doesn’t. Seeing for the first time the gleaming white porcelain toilet bowl in a hotel room, she confessed, giggling, with no tinge of embarrassment, “I thought it was for washing clothes.”

Through her, I learned of the thousands (yes, thousands!) of Xiaomeis and a cruel world in the generation that Xi built on the Potemkin illusion, promoted via touristy and HSR images of Shanghai, Shenzhen and Guangdong in CGTN, WeChat and Weibo. All tell the same lie, which is that China is rich, powerful and getting even richer than especially America, richer than even the Epsteinian class. Everything can be had; people have only to be inventive and daring and follow the great commandments of the Great Comrade Leader Xi Jinping.

One way to get people to follow Xi’s commandments is to have Donald Trump stand beside him at Tiananmen Gate to inspect the Sep 3 military parade. Campaigning for this, Victor Gao said that, with Trump beside Xi, China would be globally venerated as a great, wealthy nation.

The same White adulation is still in big demand.

In this — 外国人眼中的中国十大成就, in Red Culture 红色文化网, August 12, 2026, for example, brought to you by the Communist Party of China (CPC) — is one of the most insidious form of promoting the westernization of China. It reads, in translation, “China’s Top Ten Achievements in the Eyes of Foreigners.”

Xi’s inferiority complex translated into a fetish for White people and blonde hair. CPC officials like Xi desperately want China to be liked, adored and lauded by the same White class of White people that China never needed in the first 20 years (1979-to-2000) of economic reforms. With Xi installed as president everything changed.

Last year he got his Anglophile henchmen 金灿荣 Jin Canrong and 高志凯 Gao Zhikai alias Victor Gao to repeatedly fake an open invitation in guancha: “特朗普总统，访华行程何不选在九月三日？/ President Trump, why not choose September 3 to visit China?”

The idea was to put up a White endorsement, from Donald Trump no less, to China’s grand economic and military achievements. That way, Xi could brag to all Chinese, and the world, too, he had taken China to arrive at superpower status, even going by the standards of White USA. Jin and Gao said all that, rather openly too, in their campaign to impress Chinese but especially foreigners of Xi’s achievements.

In Xi’s China White approval meant everything, including the promotion of White presence in the most ancient festivals like duanwu jie. It is as if without White Man and White endorsement, China has no value, no history, no culture, no nothing.

At the end of its self-congratulatory, self-adulating “China’s Top Ten Achievements” approved by “foreigners” (by which they mean White and only White), the CPC cadre who wrote it had the picture below posted…

Another White motherf**ker in China…

MARXIST STREET SAFETY AS END OF CLASS WARFARE

The Chinese media had lifted off that screen capture (above) from the White woman’s YouTube program talking about how safe were Chinese streets at 2 in the morning. This was then circulated and re-circulated in scores of websites and platform. But, what has that (street safety) to do with China’s material and technical progress; the Red Culture author 朝阳少侠 Chaoyang Shaoxia doesn’t say.

With a foreigner’s adulation, the CPC didn’t just get endorsement. Chaoyang Shaoxia is also suggesting that everything good about China came from the CPC: there is no China without the CPC, says the lyrics of a popular song.

This is patently a lie because civility is an intrinsic Chinese trait. If the White woman feels safe anywhere in China it is only because Chinese ethical culture and civil life made that possible, a global statistical fact seen in UN social scores that consistently rank China’s murder and related crimes per capita as one of the world’s three lowest.

Equal to the lying is that these CPC motherf**kers like Chaoyang Shaoxia (and Xi Jinping) would not and refuses to see the converse and acknowledge thereto: Why is that White woman saying it unless her own country and others she had visited are dangerous to walk the streets alone? Or even with a friend!

But to acknowledge that New York or Frankfurt is many, many times more dangerous to walk in the night than Shanghai is also to expose the lies a hypocritical Chinese government and its State-manipulated Anglophile media has been living with. It is the lie that they have been cultivating White con artists and savages (such as Trump or Benjamin Netanyahu or Edward Kuperman or this ) to pass judgement on the ethical and political standards of China.

Receiving side of White people projecting their racist prejudices on China are the Xiaomeis. Like White people, they also ship their Chinese world view abroad, imagining that Whites, Niggers and brown-skins to be as civilized as are Chinese.

They can’t imagine otherwise. This is because they have never live in such environments where under free conditions, for example, prostitution (excepting in slavery circumstances) is considered a woman’s individual economic right and not a voodoo matter of biblical moral choice.

This explains why Xiaomei’s parents accepted as Fate her sex work, however grudgingly. They don’t blame her but see Xiaomei’s life as a consequence of their own failures.

THE REBIRTH OF GODDESS ATHENA

This also explains why Kong Limei (top image), third runner-up in a 2021 Miss World Macau contest, could disappear for three years in the Philippines and the Chinese government paid nary a notice or interest.

When the government pretends nothing happened the Internet takes over wherein search engines are today inundated with queries under the names “Athena” and “Athena Liya.”

Interest in Athena came accompanied with other disappearances abroad such as the case of 祁萌 Qi Meng (image on top) who nobody, including her own family, could reach or find after she landed in Bangkok on August 2.

But disappearances are not an abnormality in Chinese society today.

Thousands more, both boys and girls, disappeared from their villages daily after they don’t show up in school and so on.

Disappearances is a sort of in-thing.

It meant, implicitly, that they had gone off to make money, that is, in search of wealth — a good thing, according to China’s peddler of westernization reforms Deng Xiaopeng. Xiaomei disappeared from our lives four years ago and, until today, we all still presume she has gone elsewhere to make a better life for herself.

Kong Limei aka Athena disappeared with an online speculation posting the image below, claiming her to be Miss No. 66. It turned out to be false.

Even so, that image of the girls, shot at a luxury entertainment centre in Sihanoukville, Cambodia, need not necessarily apply to just Kong Limei.

All the girls could easily count as having disappeared, as mostly from China because who among the girls would sensibly send such a picture back to their parents to tell them of their whereabouts? (And note the man in black speaking on a mobile phone. He is the sheep herder.)

Readying for “work” serving Xi’s Epstein class in Potemkin Cambodia…

IS ATHENA SAFE? WHERE IS SHE?

Kong (or Athena) especially attracted current attention due in part of speculation that her disappearance had become a criminal matter, one of kidnap-for-ransom, although no police, whether in China or the Philippines has even acknowledge it.

But, more to the point, this resurrection of Kong had to do with her Miss Macau image and her past life she so willingly posted for all to see (images reproduced below).

Today’s reporters, both Chinese and White, are like YouTube subscribers fucking voyeurs. They smell a prey and blood in Kong from whom they could milk off for money selling articles. In a sense they are the Edward Kupermans and Ben Nortons in China, milking for money however and whenever they can.

On camera, images reproduced in Kong’s Douyin personal account (screen capture below), Kong shows up with exquisite makeup, slender figure and luxurious lifestyle: high-end hotels, private swimming pools, international flights, brand-name clothing. Her posts were like a constantly updated “illustrated guide to upper-class life”, noted one reporter.

Kong’s post of herself is reminiscent of the girls Donald Trump brings to his beauty pageant shows and to the inner bedroom circle of the Epstein billionaire class.

But, from Xiaomei I learn that that (the above) is not how the girls think of themselves.

Often and typically, with an incredulous naivety, they see the lifestyle as necessary displays (in economic terms) of personal capital assets to be appropriated to earn an income. There is no sex to be associated with the plunging V-necklines and eight-inch high heels nor do they have any desirous longing for the LVMH handbags. Those are simply capital embellishments to turn a profit.

Even the name Athena is a capital embellishment.

This kind of innovation into free market exchange is why Kong had to disappear into the fictional Athena though she is likely to have no idea why her English name is actually Greek for the goddess of wisdom and warfare subsequently syncretised with the Roman goddess Minerva.

This way of westernization has the same rationale Hong Kong OEM manufacturers of clothing and footwear, even electronics accessories, employ White names to their companies and products in China.

White renaming is an emblematic act, the same sort disappearing act companies employ to negate the self for another name, title and entity. Most importantly, the disappearance sells; it makes a profit!

Isn’t that what Deng, Xi and the CPC are urging all Chinese to do — get rich?

Yet motherf**kers like the reporter Gua Guanghao 郭光昊 peddling Athena stories (for money of course) just don’t get it. Or maybe most people in government and media are born stupid.

No matter. For, such is the generation Xi Jinping bred, flaunted, and promoted.

Because, how else could Kong pick up these traits growing up under the tutelage of a previous generation that only knew frugality and a thin gruel of rice porridge?

From where did Kong acquire these preferences for an Epsteinian lifestyle particularly in a 5,000 year-old country closed to the world for millennia and a Daoist civilization with a set social structure to fall back on?

By the time the Chinese learned the lessons of Xi’s Epstein westernization, hundreds of thousands of lives would have been destroyed when not killed. This is one more reason why Xi Jinping must go. No, better yet, we bury that motherf**ker along with his Potemkin China and his Epstein class!

Kong Limei disappeared then reappeared as Athena…

*

*

INNOCENCE & NAIVETY

So naive and innocent was Kong (or Athena), she posted her travel itinerary via a boarding pass for the world to see, imagining, like ten out of ten rural Chinese girls, that people especially foreigners have no ill will towards her. Why does she think that? Because, they would argue to themselves, they offended nobody. And because, like White bitch proclaiming victory in her street night forays, says, if it is so safe in China it must also be safe in Bangkok or Phnom Penh where Chinese and Chinese capital are everywhere. Or New York with its Chinatown.

Further below is the Evergrande cultural center that people as Xi Jinping like very much and promotes daily, even though behind the artificial gate is in fact and in reality a bogus ancient Chinese settlement, like a Disney theme park. That is, a Potemkin village.

In the circumstances, when China is directed by Xi no less, can anyone fault Kong for pursuing the same kind of scam life on forged principles, emulating the Epstein class.

Farther on, the resuscitation of Kong on the Internet coincided with mass arrests of criminal gangs and their leaders in Cambodia, Myanmar and Thailand.

Xi made sure to display these arrests as doing something against international criminality, but forgot to tell everyone he had created the conditions of such: Did Comrade Deng not say, never mind black or white cat. Only thing important is it catches the money mice.

*

*

*

The crimes Xi Jinping founded abroad…

*

The incredulous innocence and naivety in Kong et al is reflected in Xi Jinping and his ruling clique. Not fit to rule China, or lead Chinese affairs in international relations, Xi never could, not even after 13 years as president, five of that working directly with Donald Trump, fully reconcile his fetish for Whiteness to White evil.

So eager is he for this White endorsement, Xi’s Anglophiles would not believe, and therefore kept censored, what Americans themselves could see and say aloud (below) about their deranged leader: his financial corruption, child sex predation, real estate thuggery and a murderous penchant for murder to assert US primacy, even killing Iranian children of Manib. It explains why China continue to work with White Israel while it paid lip service to Palestinians over genocide.

*

Against the cruel White world outside China, ordinary Chinese like Xiaomei and Kong Limei are often compared to red plum blossoms still strung onto the branches (video below). In music, they are often reminded to “never embellish your dreams” / 不裝飾你的夢 (next video). Sometimes, they won’t listen.

*

*

*

*

*

*

Treachery starts and ends with Xi Jinping

I ran my fingers through a pile of print publications, stacked up against the wall of a waiting room of a government office which shall not be named. Pulling out a copy, I felt it as clean and as crisp as the day it was printed. It had never been read.

Above is a headline screen capture of the People’s Daily. First line reads in translation: “Three Keywords.” Below it is how officialdom see progress, the same stupid way Third World minds see and promote modernization today and 50, 70 years ago. That third rate mind imitates New York gleaming towers of glass and steel.

Finishing the People’s Daily article, I can’t find those keywords that were supposed to capture the essence of the “First Half Year Answer Sheet” into China’s economy. Instead is endless repetition of the three syllable name, Xi Jinping, Xi Jinping and Xi Jinping.

Below is a brief random sample from the article with a Baidu translation:

登高望远，方能抢占先机；布局未来，就是赢得主动。/ Only by looking high and looking far can we seize the opportunity; to lay out the future is to win the initiative.

Almost immediately after, the key words Xi Jinping:

习近平总书记曾感言：“治理这样一个国家很不容易，必须登高望远，同时必须脚踏实地。” General Secretary Xi Jinping once said: “It is not easy to govern such a country. It must be lofty and at the same time down-to-earth. ”

Then something about agriculture popped out that cannot reasonably make any sense:

近年来，3个村通过党建引领，发挥西于架村、郭庄村蔬菜种植和东于架村土地资源优势，走上了抱团发展的新路子。/ In just a few years, it has increased from 17 to 320: the change of vegetable greenhouses in three villages in Dezhou, Shandong Province depends on local conditions.

No wonder the publications in the waiting room are never read: you’d have to plough through endless, mundane piles of trite and shit. These are churn out daily even in guancha 观察者网 which functions by imitating American sensationalist writing with reporting and “analysis” on controversy, scandal and lies. Only make sure the controversy, scandal and lies are western and foreign ones.

On one of guancha’s rolling banners is this: 习言道｜健康是1 其他是后面的0. Translation, “Xi Jinping Idioms｜Health is 1, others are 0 behind.”

You, as they say, can’t make up these kinds of stupidity.

All of which raises the question: Seventy years in, why do they keep producing this shit? Why commit vast resources by pilfering the state treasury to churn out this day-in, day-out garbage? The answer is the question inversed: what else are they suppose to do for a living?

Officialdom produces this milieu.

Anglophile sycophants like Victor Gao, Zhang Weiwei and the hundreds of professors in university political departments are paid to make up grand treatises that are never tested but read sensational for publication one day and totally useless and false ten years on. Think of the mindless bales of stupid books spun off from Francis Fukuyama and John Mearsheimer. Think of the three keyword article in the People’s Daily.

They create a cottage industry of word production continued today by motherf**kers like Ben Norton. What do they serve — a better world, more peaceful? Nothing, nothing of the sort. On the contrary. And what do they amount to today. Again, nothing.

If not for imitating America (local universities now have a contest to produce the “top ten Chinese think-tanks”), there is no way these sycophants and Anglophiles could ever justify their American-level salaries. They don’t even know to change a light bulb, but for thieving from the treasury day-in day-out, for their high living expenses and their business class travel to Europe and the US.

They excel in this mindless, daily looting because ruling motherf**kers like Xi Jinping tolerate, entertain, host and encourage them.

Indigenous Chinese intellectual life, government affairs and conduct of the state were never like that.

You can feel the charged atmosphere in a not-so-recent account, written circa 90 BCE, by Sima Qian remembering and translating into text court events that debate life and death state policy.

The issue of the day was, according to the Fan Ye’s houhan shu 後漢書 or Book of the Late Han, was this: With so much resources granted him, why and how did General Li Ling lose a battle to a bunch of goat herding barbarians, the Xiongnu Huns, circa 99 BCE.

Li lost, i.e. got killed, nearly a third of some 5,000 soldiers given to him to command. An open court tribunal and conference, presided by Han emperor Wu ruled in favor of the charge of negligence and incompetence bordering on treason. After which, sitting in jail awaiting execution, he sought Sima’s help to escape the punishment of death.

Below is an excerpt from Sima’s “Letter to Ren’an” (honorific name for Li Ling):

Chinese courtesy requires Sima not to name Li Ling in person or call him “you.” Hence, when referring to Li, he substitutes with self reference.

Even so, or perhaps because of this courtesy, the profundity jumps out of the page, written as if yesterday (even in translation). And then there’s the literary style execution of what’s essentially a scribe reporting (a part of Sima’s official job) that makes his account so sought after today and still discussed more than 2,000 years later even oceans away among stupid White busybodies with nothing to do.

Without White Man, without Israel and the US, the top two existential global threats, China would be so different than it is today, true to itself and so much better for it and the rest of the world.

Today, surrounded by Anglophile sycophants, Xi Jinping is a piteously, empty, hollow emperor who only rely on drum beatings in guancha and People’s Daily to get by.

“All his past actions” must be brought to bear on Xi. If Li should pay with his life for one failure out of scores of battle field victories, Xi’s ten life times aren’t enough to atone for his betrayal of our Motherland. Immediately, he must be led to his death especially for his humiliation of the People’s Liberation Army, an act that is itself a statutory crime.

With him gone, his guancha dogs will have no master to turn to but look for new ones — or perhaps leave and go to White Man country or, if wanted, join Donald Trump. Below is an image capture of what and who is the White motherf**ker as exemplified in Trump openly insulting a black guest to the White House.

But, it is strange: why do other people stoop so low as to take these insults? Perhaps they regard such conduct as normal and characteristic of White barbarian DNA.

Like in all great (and old) civilizations, death in the Chinese world is a constant preoccupation of the living. Only the stupid White Man, drunk in his biblical voodoo, believes otherwise and that death is instead some extraordinary un-human, even an ungodly event.

Unless Xi Jinping is god, his death is therefore not taboo in Chinese discourse particularly in regards to the direction he is taking China.

That direction is Xi’s racist fetish for White skin people and blondes, a trait of Anglophiles and Bananas such as Victor Gao along with 金灿荣 Jin Canrong. The two motherf**kers had repeatedly suggested to Xi he invite Donald Trump to stand beside him at Tiananmen Gate to inspect the Sep 3, 2025 military parade.

A child sex predator, Trump’s presence, his hair blazing blonde and gold under the summer Chinese sun, would enhance Xi’s prestige in the eyes of the Chinese, said Gao. “Imagine the scene broadcast to billions around the world,” Gao gushed with campaign enthusiasm carried out at guancha 观察者网, the liberal LGBTQ pro-US and anti-Russian online publication. The publication is paid for with State funds.

As reward for sharing his Anglophile fetish for Whites and blondes, Xi that year further approve a proposal to extend visa-free access to more than 40 plus nations, nearly all White. Now, so the logic goes, the Chinese population can enjoy the sight of the White Man and rub shoulders with White skin without ever leaving home.

CGTN calls this visa promotion “second-home tourism.” Then it began extolling the virtues of White owned beach front apartments on Hainan, by now a White-dedicated, tax-free White enclave like half a dozen of those in Shanghai, Fujian and Jiangsu.

Hordes of prostitutes from China’s interior have arrived to help welcome this new foreign population; it being sold like Thailand’s Pattaya where fat, old White Aussies with bulging bellies can bath in the sea all day then drink and fuck all night — all duty-free, care of Xi Jinping (image on top, meeting with Hainan communist party officials).

Xi’s drive for “cultural tourism”, ostensibly to bring Dollars into poor regions as Guangxi and Jinan, has left the field wide open to create pornographic flesh pots and prostitute dens in China’s seaside and mountain resorts. Destitute families with no trinkets to sell, “culture” much less, encourage their 16 and 18 year-old girls to give up the back-breaking farm work to enter the flesh trade. (Ji’an once related to me what she was told about the new work: “You have only to lie down.” The prettiest and most ambitious receive 500 pricks in a single year, a good portion White ones. Word gets around, you see.)

Meanwhile, Xi’s Anglophile mouthpieces (editorial Anglophiles in guancha and CGTN) merrily lend a hand to the “cultural tourism”, issuing promotional flyers and publishing YouTube videos that sell (as “news”) to White people “NPC immersive experience” tours (NPC stands for “non-player character”; see flyer sample immediately below).” Very immersive, no?

In this most recent CCTV Hainan promotional video, titled “Immersive Culture” in Hainan, where and what’s the culture (presumably Chinese) that one won’t see in Pattaya or Phuket? Answer, nothing!

This employ of linguistic imperialism centered on the Anglo-American White (instead of, say, Sanskrit or Persian or Creole) is today applied to reclaimed-beach front real estate in Hainan that China’s native land laws and collective ownership cannot touch. “International” or “internationalization” has always been and remains Anglo White only. In Hong Kong, this American styled deceit has lead to fraudulent schemes, though not unlawful, to drive up property prices.

As White Man says, you can’t make this shit up… and that’s in socialist, egalitarian, common prosperity China that makes US$1 trillion in annual trade surpluses while the Xi’s government pleas “self-reliance” as excuse for minimizing support to rural down and out villagers. With robots in factories, the situation has gotten worse. (Of course, you won’t hear or read any of this from see-no-evil, hear-no-evil scumbags at Friends of Socialist China.)

“Welcome to Hainan. Welcome to Sanya,” say the CGTN girls (below). “Want anything? Anything at all. We speaka “high quality” CGTN English and we are your “high quality” personal services guide…”

Xi’s domestic agenda to create exclusive foreign, White touristy enclaves has had its trial run some 25 years ago. It was at the Fujian mountain-top town of Guling (Kuliang to Americans) where, appropriating State funds and infrastructure support, he had converted the place into a choice real estate property catering solely to Americans. Then, he had sold the land theft also as “second-home tourism.”

From theft followed by the sale of mountain top to seaside real estate over the decades, the list of Xi’s sins and crimes run through the entire American gamut of appropriating state power for illicit private benefit.

The most recent case of American Edward Kuperman who was allowed to sponge millions from the Dunhuang City government for doing next to nothing is an extension of Xi’s preferred White domestic policy. Kuperman’s case is exemplary in a number of ways:

• its racist bigoted quality that openly discriminates in favor of the foreign, White Man (against the native, compliant Chinese), and,

• thievery by pilfering the State treasury, in that case through city hiring codes and payment schedules that local officials themselves drew up!

Transmitting Xi’s White privilege and White preferred agenda, media mouthpieces guancha and CGTN are but vocal expressions of Xi’s racist bigotry.

Beating even Qing era corruption, the criminality in Xi’s schemes spill into other areas, cultivating a climate of law-fixing, illegal amendments thereto, extortionate price fixing, asset bubble creation, money laundering and especially this, the redirection of statutory, legal and enforcement powers into amassing private wealth. (We don’t have to list them here, it will run all day.)

Kuperman’s case is blatantly not just racist and discriminatory (in favor of foreigners and White at that), it is retroactively illegal and criminal under the 2026 July 1 Ethnic United and Progress law, the 中华人民共和国民族团结进步促进法. (Re: Art. 6. All citizens of the People’s Republic of China are equal before the law… Discrimination against or oppression of any ethnicity is prohibited.) Xi and the Dunhuang City mayor must answer, put on trial and, upon conviction for treason, shot within 24 hours.

Suffice to say, Xi, now having entered the roster of failed emperors and rulers, will have to be forced to go. Neither Chinese ethics nor our history permits any exception.

Xi is neither God nor Son of Heaven. Yet in guancha, sycophants (think Victor Gao and Zhang Weiwei) are gushing with medieval accolades of worship and creating totem poles out of Xi like he is the Son of God: 习近平总书记引领“十五五”开局之年中国经济破浪前行 or this, 大道行天下｜“以天下之利为利”——中国元首外交的世界情怀与大国气派 (Brief translation: “Xi Jinping leads China’s economy to beat the waves,” and “World feels the great diplomacy power style of Xi Jinping.”)

Wait now for the propaganda refueling by White Man (The Thief of Grayzone Ben Norton), Niggers (Trevor Noah) and Anglophiles and Coconut Heads (Radhika Desai). They lurk not far behind.

On the other hand, articles like those below (see, Rural China: What No One Tells You) bring in no money to these motherfuckers. Real life call out the government’s lies and scams (plus the effect of the inhumane one-child policy): they about a woman talking about real life in her own village with the same sentiment Ji’an and I share.

Above and below (in awful English sub): Instead of thinking through the problem and coming up with an ethical Chinese way, Xi Jinping’s fetish for the White Man copied in its entirety an American AIG medical and pension model plan. That plan tied up future payments to the job. No job or laid off, you are fucked like are millions of homeless Americans. And guess which insurer made money out of it, by the hidden costs of inflating pharmaceutical product and medicine prices?

As Chinese ethics dictate, Xi will not be judged by his credentials nor by his delivery to GDP per capita, inflated, as in the US, by the Jack Mas peddling debt and credit to even buy a bowl of rice. All that had come from the people, not from him. Governments, even like the best during the Han, Sui and Song eras, come and go like the seasons.

The penultimate test for Xi’s government lies in the Chinese century-long project of building and rebuilding the foundations laid out by our ancestors.

But “NPC immersive experience” tours don’t contribute to foundation building. Nor does appropriating land to serve Xi’s White fetish, and peddling mountain “homestead”, and reclaiming land for seaside real estate where collective ownership is absent.

Built from the ground up, the test of continuing State building and maintaining the beauty and the purity of an exclusively Chinese culture are the only things of enduring worth. They are eternal. They are also the only things to have survived intact and recognizable today all through 5,000 years of our written and recorded history (not the HSR rails, not AI robotics, nor the hoard of rare earth minerals or the US$1 trillion yearly trade surpluses).

The test, therefore, is the outcome from the qualitative injunction demanded in the Mandate of Heaven.

That is, the Mandate tests not what Xi has delivered or will deliver: It is what those outcomes, present and future, will cause to leave behind, seen and unseen that are found and enunciated in all officialdom and in private homes, even today, 3,000 years after zhouli 周禮, the Rites of Zhao, were put down in writing. Of paramount criterion in the zhouli construction, the genesis of the Mandate, are two simple everyday (English) words, peace and harmony.

Simple, yes. Yet these are deep foundational issues of logic and phenomenology that only Chinese (with some Japanese and Koreans thrown in) are capable of answering to.

Answering them require an expanse of Chinese-specific knowledge that’s beyond the grasp of the barbarian mind in White motherf**kers. It’s none of their business anyway. (So shut the fuck up, Martin Jacques; you understand nothing, so go away and play with your toys.)

Bottom line in the Mandate is its penultimate Confucian credo that Xi is, after all, human — not god, and that yellow outside, white inside Bananas, Anglophiles and White professors and editors at Friends of Socialist China, CCTV and guancha 观察者网 make him out to be. (Academia and media have their reasons, too, to prop up Xi: they all profit and get rich from the State largesse paying towards, for example, Xi’s bigoted racist White privilege domestic policy. Such is their treachery.)

In that sense, Xi is the equal of Wu Sangui 吳三桂, a top Ming official (1612-1678) who opened the doors of the Great Wall to northern barbarians leading in turn to Manchu rule and hence to ultimate state ruin and demise by 1910. There’s no question in many minds that Xi, like Wu, is repeating Qing mistakes so that the only questions left to answer therefore are, if they are deliberate, why?

Xi’s treachery runs to book length and goes back decades, too many to recount here one by one. Suffice to say, therefore, he failed and must pay with his life for his betrayals to the Motherland.

In the circumstances and against Xi’s track record of treachery even rebels and criminals look like saints. He’s no different from many past emperors (depicted in today’s films, for example, the one below of the Tang era) that Chinese civilisation has produced alongside the best and greatest. The Han emperors of Wen 漢文帝 and Wu 漢武帝, were some of most instrumental in laying the teleological (as opposed to voodoo in White Man’s theology), ethical and cultural foundations of today’s Chinese state.

Xi is not fit to stand on their shoulders. Worse than that, he’s been shitting on their memories and those of our forefathers and ancestors.

Below is the reproduction and a modern dramatization of events prefacing the An Lushan rebellion, one of China’s most violent ones leading to some 20-to-30 million deaths. An Lushan lead to the ultimate destruction of the Tang government 1200 years ago in spite of China’s cultural and civilization achievements then.

For the Motherland!

There is no word-for-word equivalent to the English term, bribery. A common Chinese equivalent is 赂 lu, that is, individual gift giving. More commonly, bribery in the old days is connected to paoguan 跑官, literally to fleece off an official position by the act of paying off other officials in order to become one.

In its modern-form, corruption is everywhere made a crime but not treachery, the perfidious and willful act of betrayal to fidelity, confidence, or trust. In China, the term appears no where in the penal code.

If State confidence is given and trust granted to high officials, why shouldn’t betrayal of the same, which is treachery, be made a penal code punishable offense?

Treachery is at the root of corruption after all: A word spoken, an act producing treachery is easily defined, readily spotted, calibrated and itemized. If it were a crime, Xi Jinping would have to die a thousand times over.

In one episode alone, at timestamp 00:20 (above) and 18:20 (below), are the reasons why the emperor must die. Even those sworn to defend the emperor had to concede to the arguments, not just on the force of the logical and ethical reasoning but simply on humanitarian grounds. And conceding to the argument, they still want to stop the rebellion — but that’s only out of a sense of duty.

In the circumstance, there is no middle ground; there is only paradox which, to be resolved, one side must die.

And so it is with the fate of Xi Jinping. Either he goes or we go dying to rescue our nation from Xi’s treachery. So it is written in the Mandate of Heaven…

The Chinese process of State building started under the Zhou rulers (since c.1000 BCE) then through the Tang (below) 1,500 years ago continues to this day, 1,500 years later. This, most important of all, is why Xi Jinping must go… Worse than getting in the way, he and his guancha minions have placed themselves as the end of history and above the people and State!

The logical outcome, Xi Jinping dies

If reason is eternal and if logic induction (or deduction) were permitted, even encouraged to be pursued step by step to its ultimate conclusion then, is there no limit to logic? Where, indeed, is the logical end point — assuming there’s such an end?

Follow the two conversations (same clip, same episode #EP37, timestamps 00:20 and 18:20), one sees that their logical flow have no end point. On both occasions, the protagonist supposedly “good guy” 张小敬 Zhang Xiaojing loses the argument, even conceding that, in the interest of both the State and the people, the emperor must die.

So, as a former soldier sworn to allegiance to the emperor and almost died doing so, what is he to do? He produces an oft-repeated answer heard even today from people like Xi: Zhang exists to protect the “people.”

This is a piece of trite because, if the emperor (or president) is the heaven’s representative for the people on earth, tianxia 天下, isn’t the claim of serving the People the equal of serving the emperor who Zhang’s concedes must die? And vice-versa.

Logic ends when a conflict that results from the deduction becomes irresolvable. and irreconcilable. The conundrum is simply unavoidable.

It is easy for a man to answer questions of loyalty — whether serving the emperor or People isn’t the issue.

But what if the same dilemma were laid at the door of the ruler, the emperor, or say, Xi Jinping? Xi’s position becomes antithetical to the People’s interests so that for anyone choosing between ruler and the ruled, then it has to be axiomatically true Xi should not and can not continue to rule.

At that point where the State is supreme, rationale calculation must give way to purely extra-legal, ethical considerations.

This juncture when reached, the conundrum — who comes first, emperor or people — begins to unravel: individuals each make their our own decision. Right or wrong in such a moment of decision becomes a matter of personal ethical choice that no law can dictate and no logic or reason can continue to arbitrate.

We reach the dead-end of our choices.

In the film, Zhang, who was made a criminal by the emperor for killing some 30-odd people for corruption and abuse of authority, becomes instead the defender of the system and the emperor heading it.

On the other hand, those who kept faith with destroying an abusive system, starting with the emperor at the top, are turned into rebels scorned.

This paradox has been the preoccupation of Chinese thinking found in discourses, such as in films (above the《长安十二时辰 》 and in 《庆余年》and 《琅琊榜》), in music, in operas and plays, in historical text and in our philosophical treaties.

So as never to have to reach the dilemma, Chinese historians such as the famous court scribe Sima Qian avoided that question entirely. In the film《庆余年》an actor was made to say, “never speak of it but always keep it silent in your heart.”

The rebels’ answer is straightforward: once Xi the emperor is killed, the problem — who comes first, ruler or ruled — goes away, at least until the next bastard ruler.

This is why Xi must die: it will be his biggest sacrifice to the people he claims to represent and to work for! Anything less, is failure. Death will be his supreme contribution to the cause and welfare of our Motherland and its people, the Chinese. Long live!

That a leader or ruler tended to always end up antithetical to the people (or the welfare of the State) is, by now, axiomatic.

Return to the clip above to see how one emperor or another will invariably end up choosing his personal self over the people. This, in modern parlance, “conflict of interest” is unavoidable. In his throne, the ruler or emperor cannot be and finds impossible to be both at the same time: to be human and to be president.

Democratic (western) elections never, never, never resolves the problem: it only repeats the cycle more often and more frequent than is tolerable.

China’s system of Mandate is infinitely better off than that which came out of the White Man: the former constantly changes the prerequisites and the paradigm in which the ruler (or president) operates. Those prerequisite and paradigm are never, never, never fixed. Nothing is fixed when nothing is written.

This flexibility works to people’s advantage not against them as the stupid White Man like Francis Fukuyama repeatedly asserts. For example, we can now tell Xi Jinping he has outlived his usefulness as president and ruler: So get the fuck out!

The democratic choice is his to make: leave in peace and go die in his grand real estate home in America or die by the sword he has used against his generals….

*

*

*

*

*

*

Afterword

In Cao Xueqin 曹雪芹 we Chinese had anticipated the existence and arrival of the White Man before this barbarian became barbarian…

满纸荒唐言，一把辛酸泪！
都云作者痴，谁解其中味？

Pages full of idle words
Penned with hot and bitter tears:
All men call the author fool;
None his secret message hears.

Then…

假作真时真亦假，无为有处有还无。

Truth becomes fiction when the fiction’s true;
Real becomes not-real when the unreal’s real.

And this:

问古来将相可还存，也只是虚名儿与后人钦敬。

All those whom history calls great
Left only empty names for us to venerate.

*

It’s only foreign, White thieves who made sure to hide under the cover of a farmer’s bamboo hat or surrounded by Chinese girls. The more evil, the more thieving they are, the more they want to go native. Their reasons — no, justifications — are not hard to fathom…

*

Edward Kuperman & his Ching Chong pilfering ways

It is a constant, nearly daily conversation over family dinner in the farms and villages and at tea break among city factory and office workers: If foreigner and especially if White, you get special treatment.

Once White, doors in high-places open as if automatically; traffic stops on the streets; the law is overlook and often just bypassed; the CGTN and guancha editors offer White Man never-ending coverage; in brothels, the White prick is serviced by two or more girls at the price of one — and that’s on extended time.

The only required requisite of White Man talking is, say nothing bad but only nice things: how glorious and wonderful are China’s high speed trains, its streets are supersafe at 2 am, its culture unique (never mind Ben Norton can’t even identify that word in Chinese), that its governance is world class (never mind 6,000 senior and mid-level officials were prosecuted in 2025, and Xi Jinping is a champion of cronyism, stuffing even the entire 20-member senior echelon with his cronies), Tiananmen Square (never mind its dried up moats stink of horse urine), and, of course, China is beating America at everything, including the condition of toilets.

It’s the usual Ching Chong Chinaman trite, picked up by Anglophiles who adopt it as their mantra for reporting: White Man doesn’t understand China. But, if we hire White Man to tell grand, cave dwelling stories of China and how clean are the toilets then surely White Man will love Chinese culture and long to fuck every Chinese he sees (like how these two White Australians show theirs.)

Non-stop, almost regularly, Ji’an and I hear these kinds of stupid conversations. We are so sick of it, even if they are just gossips. But they are true, and here is one evidential anecdote.

At a street noodle stand early morning, we had overheard banter among three young women next table. The topic concerned foreign men who visited their brothel located at a nearby street intersection.

The night before was eventful: a tall White man speaking in English had come, he’s a regular it seems — one girl had heard him said he came from “America” 美国.

His complaint this time was over the smallness of the bed (relative to his 6ft 2in), and demanded another bed, a recurring problem each time White Man comes over for a fuck. If there were no such bed, he demanded a new one. But where was the brothel to find a king-size bed at 11 in the night — even if it is necessary to appease the White Man and so be rid of the complaint once and for all.

The ensuing quarrel did not stop until the brothel offered the man three girls at the (discounted) price of one.

The issue at stake, one girl said, isn’t his overbearing attitude. Rather why their boss, the brothel’s “Madame”, should give him privileged treatment, given especially he is charged a discounted rate?

One answer, another concluded, owes perhaps to his status: a professor at a local college teaching English. She added:

“They get special treatment, starting with salaries that are many times more than local teachers. Maybe the college is even paying for his [brothel] visits… as entertainment expense.”

In the larger scheme of things, the White English professor is not an exception. So, the case of Edward Kuperman aka Gu Aihua 古爱华 is simply reaffirmation of an endemic corruption wherein the Chinese state treasury is simply treated as a private, personal cookie jar by every official, up and down China, from a village official to the museum and university professor to the Shanghai mayor.

The Kuperman corruption scandal is unlike media headline cases as that of Sichuan, Nanchong county official Gu Zhengju who pocketed some Rmb124 million over some 20 years running some districts.

Those cases are easy to establish, to prove and hence to convict — they leave a physical, paper trail: bank accounts, a mansion here and there, balance sheet statements.

Hence, those kinds of cases made for nice headlines (and so they appear daily) to suggest, inversely, that Xi Jinping, because he is acting against corruption, is therefore as clean as a whistle.

Kuperman cases are more insidious and pervasive — and therefore better hidden.

He along with tens of thousands others (such as the American brothel professor) working for the like of guancha 观察者网, in universities as Fudan, Peking and Tsinghua, and in city governments, pilfer from the Treasury as legitimate expense. It’s also blatantly transparent, a supposed virtue in White societies.

This cumulative pilfering at Dunhuang City alone paying Kuperman comes to Rmb 1.5 million over the life of his employment contract — not yet counting other expenses like housing subsidy (Rmb 300,000) that no Chinese ever, ever, ever gets.

Thus, an over-budgeting and an over-payment of Rmb 200,000 a year multiplied by five years multiplied by a thousand functionaries distributed across China translate into an aggregate loss of Rmb 1 billion!

Given China size, given its army and layers of bureaucrats, and given the pervasiveness of media and academic looting, Rmb 1 billion is a pittance.

And that’s in a country that, individually earns one-sixth of Singapore’s income per capita. IMF ranks China 73 of 190 nations in a sliding scale of top-to-bottom income earners.

Even as China remains relatively poor, White and Anglophile motherf**kers treat the Chinese treasury like it is an Everest of gold.

Instead of correcting their errors (if for nothing else than out of fairness to other employees), Dunhuang City goes into propaganda overdrive, aided by White-imitating editors at guancha 观察者网.

Out of the blue, guancha publishes Dunhuang City’s statement in full, saying nothing into how the scandal had erupted and the penultimate source of the controversy. They don’t even use the actual American name Edward Kuperman but hides instead his identity under the Chinese pseudonym Gu Aihua 古爱华 that nobody outside China knows. It provided not even the background into Kuperman’s thievery. Instead it simply regurgitated word for word the Dunhuang City authorities:

• The Rmb 900,000 figure cited in websites as Kuperman’s salary is not his annual salary from Dunhuang City. (Dunhuang City is lying. This is because no one ever said it was, but that the Rmb 900K figure is his actual total income including moonlighting stints for the like of CCTV and CGTN.)

• The City said his salary alone is Rmb 300,000 a year, with a cost of living allowance of Rmb 30,000 yuan, and a fixed lump sum Rmb 300,000 payment for the purchase of a house.

Over a contract’s life of, say, five years, Kuperman would take home clean, net of expenses, Rmb 1.5 million — a sum five times more than his Chinese colleague, doing identical work.

Here, though, is a deeper, fundamental corruption problem ongoing in Dunhuang City: why is Kuperman, a foreigner after all, paid to buy a house when he already receives a yearly housing allowance — which is itself a privilege offer available only to foreigners?

On the surface, Dunhuang City’s transparency seems unusual to people who can only picture China as a state that hides everything dark.

But the transparency has become a standard ruse for quiet, pervasive corruption not just in China but especially in the US where influence peddling and open bribery are legal activities. Indeed, nothing hides a thief better that a very busy, overpopulated street.

More than the practical and ethical problem of fairness in Kuperman’s case, is an issue of discrimination. In street lingo, it’s called, simply, cronyism and the biggest, most important practitioner in China is none other than the president Xi Jinping

This White privilege in China is, in effect, cronyism but practised on an international, racial scale: it’s the racism of the anti-racists.

• Xi gave away to Americans an entire mountain city in Fuzhou, Fujian, called Guling (to Americans, “Kuliang”). There is even a government-sponsored website produced in the English only to help sell real estate property there to Americans.

• Xi has created a dozen White-only enclaves in Chinese cities where White people (including especially Germans and French) received licensing preference to build houses and start a business.

Small wonder, White Motherf**kers and their Anglophile underlings at the Friends of Socialist China have nothing to say of the endemic corruption: they themselves profit from the discriminatory, bigoted and “material” (sic!) conditions that Xi had had been creating since his Fujian days (1985-2002) and which he had promoted up and down the government since.

The 6,000 officials prosecuted yearly for corruption were not accidents of history nor instances of mere personal, ethical failures. They came directly from Xi’s personal cultivation and his cronyism, for example, bringing in all the generals into the Central Military Commission.

For corruption everyone else was blamed then thrown out, such as the two dozen PLA generals Xi subsequently sacked.

Yet no one faulted Xi who had himself, personally cultivated these generals! It’s as if Xi never, never, never needed to account for his prior decisions.

China is doing well today not because of Xi Jinping — it’s in spite of him!

Kuperman, Dunhuang City and guancha are simply banal, daily manifestations of deep-rooted corruption endemic in China. Over millennia, we ordinary Chinese learned and knew how to cope with such types, however sick the ruling regime, Xi above all. We had learned this from our forefathers and ancestors and so did the sex workers who had to put up with the English professor.

*

Here is another Ching Chong thief…

And, another…

They think their thieving ways will last them a lifetime and the span of Chinese history. But just wait… Xi Jinping will pay with his life for his betrayals.

***

Han Blood, Chinese Blood…

Long Live our Motherland!

*

*

*

The White Motherf**ker in China

*

An uproar and a scandal in China over the privileged White Man…

*

How the Rich Thieves from the Poor, How the Whitey scams

Like the Thief of Grayzone Ben Norton, American Edward Kuperman (video above) was imported into China by Anglophiles, the like of Hu Xijin 胡锡进 (below), the cockroach-face editor-in-chief of Global Times. Norton was himself imported into China by the Zhang Weiwei 張維為 of Fudan U.

These foreign imports share identical characteristics:

• first thing in China is to get a Chinese name; hence Edward Kuperman is Gu Aihua 古爱华, an absurd thing to do because Chinese names trace to native lineage and geographic ancestry, the two things that make a Chinese Chinese (since when did Kuperman acquire Chinese DNA?)

• a bogus personal profile, dependent on fraud and deceit, professing above all an admiration of Chinese, culture and political society. Professing Chinese sympathies is always done, without exception, by political sponsorship through the local media and universities in the like of Hu and Zhang.

• for his “admiration” of China, Kuperman is allowed to sponge on China’s treasury simply by talking on YouTube and other media platforms;

• just for talking — nothing else — Xi Jinping’s government allows Kuperman to defraud the Chinese, giving him a monthly salary of Rmb75,000 (US$12,000) a month, some 7 times the national average Chinese worker income of Rmb10,800;

• Kuperman is regularly sold in Chinese media (particularly in the English, in guancha 观察者网, Global Times, CCTV and CGTN) with never-ending stories about what a great and wonderful man he is who, with great personal “sacrifices,” gave up a life of privilege at home for Third World, filthy China; and

• while screwing Chinese (a willing Xi government and the girls), Kuperman quietly makes even more money feeding reports to American think tanks, above all the anti-China Washington-based American Enterprise Institute.

Life is good being a White motherf**ker in China.

No wonder they are flocking in and Xi Jinping — against the wishes of Chinese — has thrown wide open the doors to all and sundry in the name of “telling China’s stories to the world” and for East meets West understanding, yada, yada.

We don’t blame Kuperman, it’s the Bananas we must get, including Xi…!

*

*

*

How the fuck do we know?

Easy. It’s a small part of the total crackdown, but to get these rich Ching Chong Anglophiles, a (small) starting point is this: Exchange Of Information on Request (EOIR), else known as Exchange on Demand (EOD).

From there we get an approximate (legal) sum, though not yet the total, complete picture of total transfers and remittances abroad. We get:

• Source of funds, i.e. from which offshore account did funds originate, date of account opening.

• Total gains by year.

• Total dividends by year.

• Total withdrawal of profits and by what means (credit cards, etc).

• Wire and distribution of funds.

Related reports (by White Man):

• Asian Private Banker.

• Ascentium.

• Bolder.

• Bloomberg.

(Pssst… we are also looking into Xi Jinping’s foreign accounts and those of his White-imitating guancha 观察 cronies who are predictably silent, tying up their tongues, shutting their mouths and reporting zero on this new dawn. Suddenly they’re displaying lots of patriotism. These deceitful Ching Chong motherf**kers, so much like the White Man they emulate and adore...)

*

*

*

*

To the Chinese phrase 奸臣当道 何罪之有, in pinyin jiānchén dāngdào, hé zuìzhī yǒu, is a related English idiom: “The fish rots from the head down.”

More generally and fundamentally, the term is, in Chinese political ethics, a reminder that all looks well in Beijing at present — and that’s only because the political, media and financial corruption and looting is so endemic, suffusing all levels, that it is today normal, starting from Xi Jinping down.

Justice and righteousness would be out of place in Beijing today.

Hence, the endless media propaganda (most typically this one) bragging about the wonders of Xi and even more wondrous virtues of Chinese officials conducting national affairs at home and abroad.

Appearing alongside this propaganda campaign is an army of White sycophants (The Thief of Grayzone for example) bad mouthing their own (western) countries while extolling even more wonders of Chinese achievements and how their leaders are the world’s “smartest” (sic)!

This absurd and deranged state of affairs is dramatized in a 11 minute segment of the clip below, starting at 17:30 and on to 28:30. Clip is from the movie series: 庆余年. Which is also to say that while the like of CGTN and guancha are able to camouflage Chinese corruption and dress up their political elites in their campaigns, the People know and they are aware. Such is the beauty of a 3,000-year-long Chinese political culture. The phrase etymology origin is Song era.

*

*

The Crimes of Xi Jinping

By now Xi Jinping’s treachery and betrayal of China and its ethical principles are well established and beyond a shadow of a doubt. The charges being prepared against him and his zhongnanhai clique run as follows:

• disloyalty to ancestral China, the Chinese state, the Mandate of Heaven and to the Chinese people;

• betrayal of the People’s Liberation Army and its principles by an abuse of his authority and power vested in him by the Communist Party and by the people;

• active and persistent collaboration for two decades with western enemy, White forces;

• the partition and sale of Chinese land and property into foreign enclaves that amounts post-modern enfeoffment;

• massive corruption, enrichment of his personal self, his daughter, family, associates and political, business and media cronies;

• cultivation of said cronies especially in private businesses and media propaganda, producing in its turn a rentier, exploitative class efficient only at sponging off the national Treasury;

• poisoning, corruption and degrading indigenous Chinese familial traditions, native populations and culture by entertaining and by the active import of foreigners even common thieves (like this one) then embedding into Chinese institutions, in the same way White Man’s hostile politics and ideologies are bundled into the import of usurious corporate and financial interests.

Let Xi Jinping answer to these charges…

*

*

Xi Jinping allowed to continue will lead to a repeat of this…

*

*

*

*

Under the picture of himself with American Banana professor Francis Fukuyama (taken 2011?), Zhang Weiwei 张维为 provided the entire transcript of a captured live audience show on June 22. (Images above.) It must be earth-shaking that he should feel the need to convert speech into print. The excerpt below (in baidu translation from the original hanyu) forms the blurb of his June 28 transcript/article titled 两种知识体系的碰撞 / “A clash of two knowledge systems”.

“The West is very good at manufacturing concepts, ideas, and theories. Although our practice works and has already made sense, most of the existing theories in China originate from the West. We urgently need a new set of theories, starting from Chinese practice, drawing nutrients from Chinese civilization traditions, and creating a new set of theories to explain Chinese experience.”

That, the above, is all one needs to know what was said in about 60 minutes or so to few dozen-odd students made to sit through his yada, yada. Or else, no semester credit scores.

It’s easy, taking apart Zhang’s thesis because, so stupid is it, answering requires no great intellect.

But, before that, begin with the last three images above, taken 15 years apart between the first and the rest. Those images are revealing and telling and they especially penetrate into the heart of what Zhang was whining about to those (poor) students:

• First thing to note is, Zhang can’t sit down today without a western suit and tie, not even on a casual occasion as talking to students from those peasant farms. Why? The answer, in social psychology, cannot be known or discovered (to outsiders, for example) but detected only if one were born Chinese in China.

Which is this: Zhang knows, and so does everybody else, his words won’t have influence, authority and the power of intellectual mastery without appearing like a White Man. To appear White, Ching Ching Chinaman wears a tie — it’s that simple!

This thing — about “appearing like a White Man” — explains why Xi Jinping never stands before the Oct 1 Tiananmen parades in tie and suit but always and only in a Mao-styled jacket. Mao-styled because Oct 1 is, at root, an anti-colonial White, anti-imperialist West event. It’s exclusively Chinese. In other words, Xi can’t assert native Chinese identity and individuality while dressed White: the two, White and native, are mutually exclusive and has to be.

This, dressed like a White, is not simply antithetical to a domestic political statement of allegiance. It trashes the national foundations of identity, culture, ethics, statehood and so on. Further evidence to which is that Oct 1 is never, never, never called an “Independence Day,” an event that’s observed by every two of three nation-states in the entire world south of the equator and thereabouts. Why not in China? (No prizes for your answer.)

Recall, “independence” is especially a western and Westphalian concept: that is, the birth of national, sovereign statehood independent of any external force or power. If, your house were never occupied, freedom from occupation, or independence, wouldn’t arise.

Yet, independent sovereignty does not necessarily begin nor is it granted on independence day. Thus, for more than half of all 193 United Nation member states, this independent conduct of national affairs freed of external influence never, never, never arrives. Why not? (Again, no prizes for your answer but, if in doubt, try asking those Arabs or literate Africans or brown-skin Latinos.)

From the above arguments, we come to the bottom picture, fourth from the series of images above.

In said picture is the philosophy department dean of Peking University, one named Cheng Lesong 程乐松. In a White graduation cap, perhaps addressing students, what knowledge is and has Cheng conferred at graduation from the university’s sources of knowledge. (This is epistemology: how do you know what you know or, more plainly said, from where does your 2+2 idea come from?)

Cheng is chosen for this essay not just because he is Zhang’s contemporary but especially the former’s intellectual discipline (philosophy, more precisely Daoist philosophy) belongs to a category of knowledge called epistemology that Zhang is whining about. It is, according to Zhang, the “good” supreme ability of the White Man to “manufacture concepts, ideas, and theories” whereas Chinese are just too stupid to do any of the sort.

Hence, those Ching Chong Chinaman like Zhang only knows how to copy, that is, to imitate White Man’s “concepts, ideas, and theories” which people like he import “from the West.”

In the picture of Cheng is vivid illustration of that imitation, a square graduation cap to mark the zenith of knowledge accumulation — all copied from the West, of course.

In all 3,000 years of Chinese written history, whether in officialdom or in private settings, Chinese hats have never been square. It has always been round, and that for a reason far, far more than its symbolism: knowledge is never linear as in a two dimensional geometric plane. In gathering knowledge, as in life, there’s no beginning and no end. Hence the Daoist yinyang 阴阳 symbol operates in entirely circular fashion, never breaking off from the circle encasing it.

Western knowledge (and philosophy) eschews the Chinese approach in its entirety and indeed fights the latter.

In (western) linearity — i.e. a beginning and an end — is foundation not just to their knowledge in reason, logic, epistemology, etc, but also in their entire approach to life and study, religion and the physical and social sciences in particular. Discovery of cause and effect is fundamental to adding new knowledge especially in logic and reasoning and onward to, say, engineering and AI. (To see if this is true about White Man, read the Bible, start with Genesis; it’s all there!)

Without a White Man’s cap, Cheng will not confer the graduation of knowledge because he is saying, inferring and extrapolating a highly racist point of view: without White Man, the study of philosophy, including the purpose of Peking University’s existence, is incomplete!

Flip that idea around and apply it to the West.

Out of some 6,000 universities in the US, you can count in one hand those having a department dedicated solely to knowledge of Chinese-origin, much less a Chinese philosophy department. Quite clearly — and in contravention to Peking University’s philosophical position — American idea of knowledge is, and can be, whole and complete without Ching Chong Chinaman.

In this difference, it’s not that Americans are racists: they are completely entitled to believe in their self-sufficiency, their independence of thought, and so on. It is the Chinese universities like Peking that can’t do without White Man. Visit online Peking’s the philosophy department. One of the first marketing images that leaps from its web page are dead White males with Latinized alphabets (image above).

Why?

The force of the message in that and in other similar symbolic acts (the square cap) is identical to Zhang Weiwei in White suit and tie. Intellectually, these acts hark back to the Zhang’s admiration of western ability to alone “manufacture concepts, ideas, and theories” without which the Chinese finds next to impossible to articulate, that is, to “explain” their “experiences.”

Without White Man, therefore, Zhang is nothing. Yet, in spite of his imitation of Whiteness, Zhang still manages to sound and reason entirely in absurd, gaseous, wooly language. The reason Zhang comes off this way is because it is true (more on this later).

Whether in square cap or in suit and tie or in thought or in his speech, Zhang is both a vivid illustration and exemplar of the White Man: The perfect moron. In White western academia is a dumping down of knowledge, and Zhang imitates even that. So, it’s not incredulous that such a stupid man actually teaches in a supposedly top university. (Imagine therefore the students they churn out: garbage in, garbage out.)

Where from comes Zhang’s penchant for imitation — and imitating Whites only, rather than instead, say, Persians?

It isn’t just Americans and White people pushing their intellectual agenda they presume is the world’s best and finest because it comes from the West. For this racist conception of knowledge to transfer there must be a recipient. So, in China and in Fudan or Peking, the racist is that Ching Chong motherf**ker named Zhang Weiwei.

Return to his remarks, the first two sentences reproduced below:

“The West is very good at manufacturing concepts, ideas, and theories. Although our practice works and has already made sense, most of the existing theories in China originate from the West.”

The point in regurgitating the above is not Zhang’s admiration of the West; who cares if he sucks a White Man’s dick all day long. But what knowledge, or what field of knowledge, is it he admires and is therefore urging the (stupid) student audience to also admire. He listed “concepts, ideas, and theories.”

Two plus two is a conceptual idea, that is, it exists in pure thought that western philosophy categorizes as analytic logic as opposed to real life empirical knowledge that, for example, is verifiable when someone says, “a tree stands outside my house.” Or, it rained yesterday. Or that apple trees apple, and that all apples fall — an empirical idea that understood conceptually is known as gravitational law that first grew from a theory by the observation of a fact.

First thing to say about Zhang’s “concepts, ideas, and theories” are:

• Epistemology is not a racial monopoly that Zhang insists belongs primarily or solely to White Man: knowledge or mastery thereof is not confined to race. It was the Persians who mastered algebra and started medical science (such as explaining human-to-human disease transmission), and then passed that on to the Hellenistic world and onward to Newton and Leibniz.

  • It was Zu Chongzhi 祖冲之 (429–500 CE) who discovered the mathematical constant so that multiplying it with the radius of any circle produces the circumference length. The accuracy of that constant, down to the last seventh decimal point, 3.1415926 to 3.1415927, was unmatched for nearly 2,000 years until the calculator. Yet it is today given a western, Greek symbol π called pi. Clearly, Zu wasn’t just a quirk mathematician nor alone in such an ability because mathematics was a must-pass subject for admission into the Zhou bureaucracy (1122–256 BCE). Using pre-hanzi script (Oracle bone inscriptions, below), there was actually a standard text book that by the end of the Zhou-era became the jiuzhang suanshu, 九章算术 The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art when the hanzi language had mostly matured.

• Next point is to go back to Zhang’s claim — “most of the existing theories in China originate from the West”. This is empirically and factually a lie.

If Zhang is only referring to knowledge narrowly defined, excluding maths, science, philosophy and the like, all of which transcends race, what “concepts, ideas, and theories” is he is talking about? Political, international relations “theories”?

Apples falling is a theory graduating into gravitational law. But how is Francis Fukuyama’s The End of History and the Last Man (1992) even a theory? How is the Thucydides Trap a theory and not after-dinner gossip when, like it, ten out of ten so-called theories churned out in US university political departments — and copied by Zhang Weiwei — are never, never, never verifiable. And when attempts to verify them turned out in ten out of ten cases not just to be false but total lies, such as Mearsheimer’s realist balance-of-power “theory” in Iran versus US?

To elaborate on the answer to the question of “concepts, ideas, and theories”, then one has to asked, does Zhang know what is a “concept”? An “idea” or a “theory”?

Does that moron even know what it is he is saying? Does he know what lays in the idea contained in the most elementary algebraic formula: ax+b = 0. Does he even know why two and two must produce four and not five or three? Does that motherf**ker even know why he mustn’t fuck his mama — an issue that governs not just evolutionary biology but of ethics.

At the root of Zhang’s problem with his search for Chinese “concepts, ideas, and theories” is that he doesn’t know a fuck what he is saying. This is a man who spent all his adult life not developing actual concepts, ideas, and theories. All he has ever done his entire life is talk, talk, and talk: beginning as translator for Deng Xiaoping, and today more talk today in front of cameras.

What does he talk about?

Issues — not concepts, ideas, and theories — about China-US relations for example. And to flatter his ego, he has a TV program called “China the Way” to rhyme with his name weiwei. All this sounds very grand but wait till you hear from him the details, like this one repeated below:

The West is very good at manufacturing concepts, ideas, and theories…. We urgently need a new set of theories, starting from Chinese practice, drawing nutrients from Chinese civilization traditions, and creating a new set of theories to explain Chinese experience.

In is from these befuddling bundles of airy, meaningless words that people like Zhang make money and sponge on the nation to get rich. Drawing nutrients? New set of theories? Explain Chinese experience?

What nutrients? And what type of nutrients does Zhang want: Vitamin A or B or C?What “theories” does he need to “explain the Chinese experience”? Why is theory even needed or desired: an experience is what it is after all. Or, if not, then it is not “experience”. When should Chinese experience stop being Chinese but White? Since when does White Man produced a theory to explain American or European experiences?

Is Fukuyama’s “The End of History” some grand theory to explain White man experience? Is genocide and the mass slaughter of innocents a distinctively White experience? Or Palestinian? Or is it solely a Gaza experience? Does Zhang want some concepts, ideas, and theories to explain this genocidal White experience?

The problem with motherf**kers like Zhang isn’t just his imitation of some White intellectual life.

It is Zhang’s imitation of their dishonesty and intellectual fraud, especially making things up in particular to whitewash actual White history and politics and international relations. Hence, you never, never, never hear Zhang tell Fukuyama this: “Worse than failure and deceit, your knowledge and your grand theories obfuscate the evil encapsulated in White, western experiences.”

The problem of having to explain international relations, regardless from which side one stands on, is with intellectual fraudsters like Zhang Weiwei.

Nothing he ever does is original. Everything about him is White imitation: talk shows, think tanks, media propaganda, even his so-called “socialism with Chinese characteristics”. All this allows him to get rich and to sponge on the Chinese treasury, in return for which the Chinese nation and state gets worse than zilch — stupid, ruinous Chinese foreign policies.

The like of him are the problem because they manufacture problems then insert them into international relations. To say there is a “Clash of Two Knowledge Systems” is as absurd as saying the apple falls south in the US and north in China. Systems differ, naturally. But so what!

Conceptually, systems can’t clash if they don’t meet, like two straight parallel lines. And therein is the solution: White Man stay the fuck at home, and morons like Zhang shut the fuck up, go mind his own business and stop jerking off everytime he opens his computer for triple X pornography fantasizing about screwing blondes who he, a Ching Chong Chinaman, will never get to marry or touch, not even in Amsterdam brothels.

Here’s a new weiwei, a concept, idea and theory rolled into one Zhang way: It is proposed for the purpose of toppling then replacing Xi Jinping, hence, installing forthwith a new presidential emperor — with executive, constitutional authority framed in the Mandate of Heaven.

Talk about originating concepts, ideas, and theories…. We challenge Zhang — no, we dare him — to throw that out for casual discussion, even off camera. Scumbag!

Here’s another Chinese native original idea: the like of him should be banished to some desert hole, his university departments shut down and their faculty deans lined up on the Great Wall and shot. Worse than zilch, worse than useless, contributing nothing, these people are liabilities; they defraud, steal from and sponge on the Chinese nation and people. It’s just incredulous the garbage they spew and which the nation must tolerate, here and here for example.

*

*

*

*

• Real China: The real China are the Chinese natives of China, with real life and death problems to contend with, often expressed in art and on stage, not White-imitating fancy talk shows sponging on the State treasury….

*

“

I told you so…

This is not unexpected; it’s been predicted in these pages for years: The poisoning of indigenous Chinese society by Anglophiles, the Banana Xi Jinpings of China, and by their import of those voodoo and moribund western intellectual culture into everyday life.

For the first time, thus, the term “White, western Left”, in hanzi 西方白左化, have begun gaining traction in popular, widespread Chinese use.

In screenshot on top is today’s top headline employ of the term, appearing in the mainstream daily, Red Culture 红色文化. An opening line warned:

近年来，国内法学界悄然出现一股西化思潮，不少法律专家、学者陷入教条化认知误区。 [In translation, mine] A trend in recent years of western thought creeping quietly into Chinese society, butting heads with native jurisprudence have left behind confusion in legal circles and academia.

The confusion is this: What exactly are the Chinese studying, researching, expanding and executing in Chinese legal, intellectual and academic culture? Is that our own indigenous culture or that from the White western Man?

The article continues on the above problem which it acknowledges is self-created:

在这类观点的渲染下，废除死刑、封存重罪犯罪记录、少杀慎杀无底线扩大化等论调频繁出现在学术研讨、媒体发声和司法建议中。部分从业者脱离中国社会实际，生硬移植西方法治规则，造成法治理念与大众朴素正义的严重割裂。/ Rather than take up and solve the problems of society, those [White, western] views end up in ceasless arguments and bargaining over things as the abolition of the death penalty, legal processes and procedures, out-of-court settlements, paroles — all on the presumption that practising rule-of-law is deterrence against evil. Yet, it never does. Yet [in White society] evil expands instead up and, yet, everywhere — in academic seminars, media voices, and judicial suggestions — some leading Chinese jurists demand separate classes of law, even transplanting western “rule-of-law” concepts into Chinese society and court rooms.

The above point is valid. But then, what’s with this Chinese Banana (white inside, yellow outside) fetish for the White Man?

(This nauseating fetish diet for whiteness is a daily news items: everything the Chinese think about and do, including the duanwu jie or Dragon Boat festival, are executed and practised with White Man in mind, even the Three Gorges Dam is made to please White Man, and digital sovereignty should be Westphalian, Westphalian? This moron named , a former henchman and hanger-on to liberal fascist Kevin Rudd, simply has no other way to think other than to insert his supremacist White racism onto the rest of the world.)

Thus, the Red Culture article doesn’t even ask questions as elementary as to why the Chinese have this hangup for Whiteys. Instead, it goes on into some banal and trite explanations about White western origins of their legal culture that even monkeys and baboons know: to wit, their biblical origins and voodoo notions of original Sin.

So, who are these Banana Xi Jinpings? A general answer: Anyone who claims to speak up for or “defend” China, especially in the English.

It’s easy to spot the Chinese among them (think Victor Gao). This is so because they are not just everywhere but especially because they produce arguments that are identical to the White, western Left in their employ of, for example, “defending” China’s legal record in Xinjiang and Tibet, scumbags like and Daniel Dumbrill who sponge on the Chinese. (White motherf**kers and their Niggers justify their meddling in China with the excuse that they are “friends of China” and their support is for China’s sake, as if anyone asked them and we Chinese are incapable of defending our national reputation.)

Their argument (supposedly in defense of China) is that Uighurs, being a “minority” group in China has the widest possible legal protection in Chinese law (“look at all those many beautiful mosques,” they say on YouTube), just as the “civil rights” laws of America did for Blacks or similar minority immigrants in Europe.

There are many, many fundamental errors with that argument, to which one, the most prevalent, will be cited:

• By White Man’s definition, minorities are Blacks imported into America then bought and sold as slaves while the small numbers of native Americans were all that remained from White Man’s perennial genocide. Being small, therefore, they needed special “civil rights” protections — again, and always, after the fact, that is, their annihilation.

• But Uighurs were neither imported into Xinjiang nor were they slave descendants. They are natives — and that only in a secondary sense their migrant forefathers, having displaced the descendants of the Wusun and Yuechi peoples (today mostly in Kazakhstan, others in Kyrgyzstan and Afghanistan), were tolerated and allowed to remain on Han Chinese property by successive Ming and Qing governments. Being half-Turkic, they should be chopped up, the top half send back to the Ottoman Turks by courier and the other half buried in the Taklamakan desert sands.

• In other words, there are no minorities in China and, hence, there are no special minority protection laws. All are equal (hopefully). Consequently Uighur killers will be hunted down, shot or jailed like any other Chinese criminal. Who’s got a problem with that? And what the fuck is it to these White motherf**kers?

This adoption and infusion of barbarian White values and ethical standards into Chinese society and law isn’t just racist, it is especially disgustingly false when Uighurs are considered akin to minority Blacks and Red Indians.

A result of which, Chinese law is incapacitated when Uighurs actually commit crimes of massacres on Han and other nationalities. These are never mentioned by White Man, including supporters of China and Bananas themselves. So killers are let off easily — all because they are a special protected group. In this way, thus, a straightforward crime by mass street murders and rioting gets impunity, exactly the way White massacres of other races as in Gaza are exempted from punishment for “right of self defense.”

All this is the direct, traceable consequences from the import and adoption of White, western Left, its other name being, the western liberal Left, people like Ben Norton, and Friends of Socialist China. That is, these are the globalists referred to by in this post.

These motherf**kers and their Chinese Anglophile sponsors (guancha, et al) are a poison on Chinese culture.

Failing in its analysis, failing to identify root causes, Red Culture does not address the problem nor the truth of the matter — which is, the import by Bananas and the resulting poisoning of Chinese society by White voodoo.

Failing to address the poison source, the Banana Xi Jinpings are spared of scrutiny. Spared because it takes two to clap and because without willful import thereof and participation there’s nothing White western motherf**kers can do to undermine Chinese society, whatever their ideological bend.

The Red Culture article only correctly identifies that this poisoning is coming from the White western Left, but without illustrating the transfer mechanism. Failing that, too, Red Culture can only appeal:

他们忽略了中西法治文化的本质区别，我国传统法治文化秉持杀人偿命、欠债还钱、善恶有报的现世正义，追求公道落地、善恶分明，而非寄托于虚无的精神救赎。/ They [Bananas, Anglophiles] ignore the essential difference between Chinese and Western rule of law culture. Murder will be paid with life is a Chinese tradition of worldly justice, as are the repayment of debts and reward of good and of evil. The pursuit of justice, good and evil are distinct earthly realities, not pinned to some, afterlife spiritual salvation.

Even that explanation is hardly adequate (it reads like the author had not read his Analects nor the Rites of Zhou).

Chinese legal, and therefore ethical, culture falls on just one plank:

• Prevention not justice: like a good deed, crime is also an incidental extension of human conduct, unavoidable; if it happens, it happens. Better therefore to prevent its occurrence by cultivating a person from childhood until death.

This stress on humanistic cultivation rather than extract punishments after the fact explains why China, against its continental vastness and 1.4 billion, has such low homicide rates (table below). Children are raised to respect their own lives and that of the neighbor as well.

This also explains a bedrock of Confucian and Han Fei legalist jurisprudence that see crime as a failure of individual, family and societal cultivation so that punishments are extensions to correct for internal, domestic failure.

In Chinese jurisprudence and ethical culture, justice (and with it punishment) is best reserved for Banana Xis who poison Chinese society with their fetish for whiteness.

It is because the murders and the crimes they commit, the damage they inflict — not against individuals but, worse, the entire nation — are invisible to the naked eye. We therefore have no qualms killing these motherf**kers and leave their chopped off heads dangling from some Tiananmen flag poles! Xi Jinping, you motherf**ker, you are next!

*

Fifth Column Traitors in China

On every metric, economic, political and social, China has been a civilization superior to the White Man, the West and the US in particular. Given this to be true, materially and in every facet of life, it’s no accident nor is it new China has surpassed Americans. That this, too, is empirically true, why are there the Banana Xi Jinpings in our midst? Unless they don’t know their own history, which is improbable, then they are very obviously bought and in the pay of White Man…

Video Contents and Synopsis

Jun 27, 2026 Chinese Chronicles: A Long Poem of History

How did the Han Dynasty go from being so poor that the emperor couldn’t find four horses of the same color, to the world’s richest empire in just a few decades? This is the untold story (in the English) of ancient China’s greatest economic miracle — a transformation that, at its peak, likely made Han China even richer than the Roman Republic. In this documentary, we uncover the genuine secrets behind the Rule of Wen and Jing, and the technology, policies, and ideas that turned a devastated land into a superpower 2,200 years ago: 文景之治, 汉朝
————————————————————————
Chapters

• 00:00:00 Introduction: Poorer Than You Can Imagine

• 00:06:03 Chapter 1: Technology Is the Primary Productive Force — Iron Tools, Crops, Irrigation, and Standardization

• 00:17:16 Chapter 2: Recovery and Rest — The Unbelievably Low Taxes of Wen and Jing

• 00:27:57 Chapter 3: Government Bonds 2,200 Years Ago — The Hidden Genius of the Noble Rank System

• 00:39:39 Chapter 4: Centralization — The Fiscal War Against the Regional Kingdoms

• 00:50:50 Chapter 5: Huang-Lao Thought — The Frugal Emperors Who Chose Not to Fight

• 01:02:04 Chapter 6: Richer Than Rome — Comparing Han China with the Roman Republic, Ptolemaic Egypt, Parthia, and India

*

*

Here in this proof, my Brother, is the First and Last White Man in History, probably Jew…

*

*

History & The Last Traitor

The question asked in China’s Red Culture essay (screenshot above) is: Why are White western elites the most “unpatriotic,” always ready to sell out their country (think Biden, Starmer, Trump et al)?

The essay failed in its answer to truth but here in 3 secs it is, all in plain sight: White elites (including Russians) have the power to do so, and because in lands like the US, Canada, Israel, Argentina, etc, these being stolen property, were never theirs to begin with. Hence White Israeli Jews killing occupied Gaza is nothing. The land & property destroyed ain’t theirs. Death isn’t White.

As for non-elite White commoners: They have only the supremacist myth of their skin color to sell, racially — and the stupid, treacherous Xi Jinping to believe the myth and buy into the racism.

Without power, with nothing to sell, nobodies like Ben Norton aka Thief of Grayzone, Daniel Dumbrill, , et al, go out to do the actual thieving, sponging on other peoples, Chinese for example, by pretending to be even more Chinese than Confucius.

Anglophiles receiving and treating Americans and Whites to special favors are as natural to them as milk is to cheese.

Xi gave away an entire mountain city, Guling 鼓岭, in Fujian to (White) Americans, in return for…?

Elsewhere in China he created exclusive White residential and industrial enclaves, two for Germans alone! While Israel was slaughtering Palestinians in Gaza, Xi was merrily doing business with Israeli Jews, even gave, in 2025 May, a national Chinese medal for heroism to one its (dead) soldiers. Xi’s Hong Kong real estate crony, the Anglophile globalist Ronnie Chan of Hang Lung has offered to develop stolen Palestinian land, building new housing. (This and other images below. For detailed accounts and empirical evidences into Xi’s national treachery, look up earlier shuzheng articles such as this.)

All this says why Alexander Dugin (video below) thought the White “anti-imperialist” Left, progressive liberals, “globalist” and Anglophiles are the most bigoted.

Ah… Whitey scumbags come in 50 shades of colonial imperialist power!

But Red Culture forgot to ask, why are Banana elites (yellow outside, white inside) so much like White elites, also the most “unpatriotic,” always ready to sell out their nation?

*

*

*

*

*

We Descendants of the Dragon

*

A Peasant Who Hid his Children from Xi

Of all the stories circulating in our families, Laoer’s case is most distressing.

After he had his second grandchild, a son (the first was a daughter), he packed his entire family — wife, son, the new infant and a two-year-old toddler — then headed off on a bus journey of almost 2,000 km. I never knew why he picked that city and didn’t ask. I was running over his hukou 户口 book when I visited him in Hebei more than a decade later. By which time he already had a second grandson, age 3.

“But their names are not here,” I said stabbing at the hukou page, referring to his two grandsons.

“Of course, not. 你想早死!” The second line is untranslatable but means something like committing suicide.

Laoer’s circumstance is the direct consequence of government design, named the One-Child Policy that reverses 3,000 years of successful Chinese state building and the attendant culture and civilization that follows. After all, what can be the purpose of the state if not to build an enduring, flourishing populace:

• their freedom and ability to produce life (measured by birth rates, minimal infant mortality);

• their preservation of life (longevity, increased knowledge esp. in children’s education); and

• their minimization of oppression and suffering (inequality reduction, homicide mortality).

The first of the three above criteria are foremost because, failing that renders the rest inconsequential to the other purposes of statehood. In the table above, China is unlike other countries in the same global ranking of low-birth countries. Population destruction is by choice, forced down the throats of people under deliberate policy execution, so that Laoer’s case wasn’t mere anecdotal evidence in state suppression.

Here’s statistical evidence: In 2023, 9,762,000 abortions were performed on over 52 percent of all pregnancies, a number twice as frequent as, say, the year 2000. (Laoer’s wife refused the abortion.) Measuring the number of abortions per thousand women of reproductive age, the number being 33 percent, China beats almost all countries.

Such numbers are the aggregate of the ordinary (Han) Chinese response to the state suppression which, to be sure, the government would allow enough flexibility in policy execution. It only needs to know when never to cross the line, for example by exempting 55 of the 56 national groups of the policy who are not Han. Most of them live isolated in the mountain border regions and tracking them was difficult and hazardous anyway.

All this flies, of course, in the face of communist claims to equality of treatment, setting Han families to alone pay the price and as national targets for extermination and discrimination — even though it was Han ancestors who made all the sacrifices, who had created the Chinese state, including the People’s Republic, and were never aggressive towards the small groups. If any of those nationalities were indigenous to the US or Canada or Australia, for example, they would be mostly dead!

Obedient to state demand, Laoer has the only son who now bears his three grandchildren. He used to have two; the first born having died in a waterfall pool drowning incident. Some years after that they returned to the county office to inquire.

Can they use the previous penalty fine (imposed on the second son) to have another child, who on paper would be the third legal person however, the first being dead. The county official said, No. In that case, could they have a third child but counting penalty as second offspring?

This kind of toing and froing at the county offices illustrate a measure of flexibility in policy execution, such as doing away with fixed rate penalty and allowing some discretionary power by the registration official.

In one sense that allows for “corruption”, which is how the self-righteous (White) liberal motherf**kers would think. But, humanity cannot endure, paradoxically, within the bounds of rules if the county official didn’t break the said rules.

This is the beauty of Chinese civilizational culture. Refusing to become White, obeying western “rule-of-law,” the minor official challenges the Communist Party each time he bends the rules. He does so on the Confucian axiom that laws are to serve people, not people to serve the law.

For a second child, the policy spares parents of the heaviest penalty on the presumption the first would be a girl, charging in return the lowest rate. Even so, Laoer’s second born coming after the first (now dead) son, he had paid the bottom rate anyway (rewarded with some gifts and a token sum send to official).

Pulling his face the official stared at Laoer and said:

“Laoxiang 老乡, it is not that I don’t wish to help. I’ve already done you a favor for your second son. This time how, you tell me, will I report your case upstairs? It will be very, very difficult.”

The issue at stake isn’t just over registration, updating the hukou 户口. It’s existential, not in any loose metaphorical sense but as a matter of life and death. Without putting a name in the family hukou records (a system that’s older than the name China), a child can have no ID card, without which, no school, no education, no job, no bank account. In effect no life — literally.

[Contrast the cruelty of this modern operating system with the arriving foreign motherf**kers, favored by the racist Communist Party, settling in China, with no One Child Policy to contend with, no hukou, unhindered registration for public services anywhere and anytime, and no questions asked. The irony is more depressing: CPC people like Wang Yi would rather import workers, typically White, supposedly because they’re smarter than to nurture China’s indigenous population.]

More than a decade later when the grandchildren started arriving, Laoer understood that delayed registration of his two grandsons does not remove nor negate their legal status. There is no deadline for registration of new births (it would be impractical given China’s size and dispersed population) and no legal infringement. Nothing changes the lineage, a child’s familial and ethnic identity, nor legal personhood.

Relocating the family changes nothing either. Registration or no registration, a child located away from the native home remains unqualified to enter school. (Another lie circulated in Anglophone media is that rural parents deliberately leave behind their kids when they go off to work in urban factories and construction. They have no choice, because of school.)

The point fundamental to the above is money for the penalty charge.

Laoer therefore had only to wait — and to keep saving money.

For violating the One-Child Policy, and dependent on family and economic circumstances, or if the child to be registered is No. 2 or No. 3 or No. 4, the going penalty rate ranges progressive upwards from Rmb 50,000 to Rmb 500,000 per child. His estimate of penalty fees at the time we met was Rmb 200,000 for the two grandsons. This sum is 50 times the median urban salary. Assuming Laoer sets aside Rmb 1,000 a month in savings, it would take him some 17 years to come up with the penalty fee, also assuming no intervening emergency, medical or other extraordinary expenses.

No wonder, his family almost never come back to laojia 老家 and I almost never see him there. Hovering in the background, listening in, Ji’an stepped in. Standing behind me, a hand on my shoulders, she said:

“Shushu 叔叔, don’t worry too much. We can lend you the money and you can register right away. Just tell us how much you need.”

The case with Ji’an was fortunate. Although half a Miao, mother’s side, her parents were still granted exemption from the One-Child Policy. Thus, after her, came two siblings, both sons who now serve in the People’s Liberation Army.

But the problems stemming from the Policy is generational.

How many children can Ji’an and I have? Will our children get exemption from penalties even though I’m full blooded Han and she half a Miao? Perhaps with a strong enough argument, we will be charged half the going rate (1 Han x 0.5 Miao) for each additional child. Or perhaps a quarter of rate on grounds that the child is a quarter Miao, using the child’s DNA composition instead of the parents?

We’ll never know, and we don’t want to know. This way, we stop thinking about this wretched business.

*

*

Anti-Chinese CPC, Xi Jinping

The CPC’s destruction of the family, officially launched two generations ago coincided with the same starting year of Deng Xiaoping’s economic reform in 1979. Now, the One-Child Policy has caught up with the nation.

You see this, distressingly, in the villages.

Everywhere Ji’an and I went, we see individual children without brothers, sisters, cousins, uncles, aunts, and so on. They are often wandering alone, playing by themselves at a mountain stream or collecting firewood. The days of children running around the living room, chasing one another in their mind-games and in their frolicking have since totally vanished.

Children stop being children. They become not even like monkeys clinging on to the backs of their mothers, who are absent anyway because they must leave home just to put food on the table.

At the end of 2025, China’s change in natural population (live birth relative to natural deaths) fell by 3.39 million compared to, say, 2.08 million in 2023. This fall in China’s head count is the highest numerical decline since the People’s Republic founding in 1949.

Once the replacement rate (births net of deaths) trend is set, there’s no going back (for reasons to be explained later and also available here). In the decade of the 2020s, China will face on average a net population loss of 6 million a year, 10 million a year in the 2030s, 20 million in the 2040s.

Restated another way, “the population decline will not simply continue, it will gather pace” concluded Mikhail Afanasyev, who heads a Russian research team collecting and analysing demographic and social data on China and the world. Its purpose is to prepare for a new world order outside the West; in plain speak, what kind of a world do you want it to be?

China is fascinating to Afanasyev because its human population destruction is deliberate, created by design unlike countries like Korea or Singapore that share near identical reproductive rates (Afanasyev uses the term “fertility”) of around 1.0 birth per woman of reproductive age. A stable population replacement rate, that is, no net increase or increase, is 2.1.

Just looking at the numbers then tracking the statistical trend, China’s head count will fall by 60 million total in the decade of the 2020s, 100 million in the 2030s, 200 million in the 2040s.

Extrapolating this trend, China’s current 1.4 billion population will fall below 1 billion by mid-century, i.e. 2050. And it won’t stop there for a number a reasons. Chief of which are that as mid-century approaches:

• (a) is the crowding of deaths; many more of those born a generation earlier, say, in the 1960s, would pass away. This, in its turn,

• (b) leaves behind more men and women than not to have 1 child on average, or none at all. (Case in point: As Laoer’s son and daughter-in-law die, his grandchildren are even less willing or less able or both to have any child at all. They will remember what their grandfather had to go through in the county office.)

The prognosis in the end, Afanasyev says…

“is bleak. By the end of the 21st century, China’s population will amount to 200 million people, with the absolute predominance of the elderly. So the process whose beginning we are observing today is not even contraction — it is demographic implosion.”

In summary, China’s population going by present trend will fall to below 1 billion in 2050, fewer than 200 million by the year 3000. That last number was the pre-Ming population, almost a thousand years prior.

This is a total and complete inversion of what it is the Chinese state exist for: to wit, to nurture the family, to flourish the nation, and to bring peace and happiness!

The interplay of the term 国家 guojia — the state before the family, the family before the nation — is rendered absolutely meaningless.

Social Well-Being Index

Afanasyev had published his essay, RT June 19, 2026, under the rubric “Why we need the Social Well-Being Index.” Answering that question ‘why’ is worth reproducing in chunk-full. Start here:

“In recent years, the topic of the sustainability of nations has emerged from the oblivion into which it had sunk decades earlier, during the era of the confrontation between capitalist and socialist world systems. While Marxism-Leninism didn’t view nations as actors in historical processes, the main alternative to the communist ideology of the USSR and China was Western liberal universalism that emerged in the latter half of the 20th century. …

The Sustainable Development Goals adopted by the UN shortly after the collapse of the USSR and the Soviet bloc stemmed from the Limits to Growth report published by the Club of Rome. Along with ecological and social responsibility, it promoted the need to reduce the human footprint, presenting population growth in the Global South as a catastrophic “demographic explosion” and recommending population control as a prerequisite for sustainable development. Simultaneously, “green investing” mechanisms were employed to restrain developing nations and reinforce the dominance of the post-industrial West. …

In turn, the Oxford concept interpreted human development as individual well-being and freedom of self-expression. Grounded in this concept, the UN’s Human Development Index (HDI) which measures income, life expectancy, and education levels, highlights the inverse correlation between these “human development” indicators and birth rates in different countries. This reinforced the perception that large populations are underdeveloped and hinder both the sustainable progress of humanity and the “human development” of individuals in each country. There was only one notable exception, which we will discuss later.

At first glance, it looks like the HDI evaluates countries, but in fact it evaluates and compares average individuals rather than nations, ethnic groups, or communities within which the Homo sapiens has always existed. This approach implies that human society is merely a collection of rational individuals, and that individuals are primary and society is secondary. By turning individualism into a methodological principle, the HDI not only showcases the West’s economic leadership but also emphasizes its “humanitarian” superiority, thus becoming another tool of global Westernization.

The thrust of Afanasyev’s argument is very sound, to which he has captured in the table-chart above with the question: Why is it that countries with high UN, HDI scores also produce the most wretched people? Their wretchedness is seen in their high frequency in domestic violence, in high homicide rates and so on.

Something is clearly wrong with the HDI measurements or with White western people or both. This conclusion harks back to very basic questions that White western Man never want to ask, much less to answer: What the fuck is the purpose of the State, the 国家 guojia in China?

Answering those questions lead to Afanasyev’s Social Well-Being Index,

a tool for measuring and comparing the well-being of historically established human communities: localities, peoples, and nations. In defining human well-being and measuring it, we imply the following fundamental principles.

The highest good for any person is life itself. This fact is universally acknowledged by all religions, civilizations, and cultures. Thus, human well-being as such first of all supposes procreation, or the production of new life. Consequently, any indicators of human development that fail to consider this aspect cannot accurately assess human well-being.

While the production of offspring is an essential part of human well-being, it is not sufficient in itself. Human existence from birth until death inevitably involves suffering. If life itself is the supreme good, then other things that ensure well-being are essentially means of alleviating suffering. Therefore, human well-being implies not only producing new life, but also organizing life in such a way as to help alleviate suffering. What does this mean? To reduce human suffering means to minimize life threatening situations and eliminate extreme forms of human oppression.

It is important to emphasize that procreation and the organization of human life are socially conditioned…

*

The Failed Chinese State

Several days after Afanasyev’s article on China appeared, highlighting the Social Well-Being Index, the CPC government threw themselves into a fit.

Instead of taking a fresh look at the global data, especially in Social Well-Being Index, or even to consider Afanasyev’s arguments, they stared down at him. They questioned not how he had arrived at his conclusions (China’s population collapse for example), nor into the humanitarian destruction, nor the future of Chinese familial culture.

Instead — believe it or not — they, the Anglophiles, demanded that the government continue down the same path as before. (Five samples of their counterpoints are given in screenshots above.)

Essentially, their arguments (if one can call it that) came down to this trite: (a) China must keep amassing wealth and get rich, as in growing its GDP per capita from US$15,000 to US$50,000; (b) China doesn’t have enough arable land and, besides, too many people are crowding in urban high-rise “pigeon cages 鸽子笼”; and (c) most ludicrous of all, appearing in the People’s Daily, is that Xi Jinping doesn’t care for the wishes of a few thousand people because the CPC alone serves and serves best 1.4 billion. That is, party loyalty and control supersedes the State, nationhood, culture and civilization and people’s welfare such as that of Laoer.

Such kind of attitudes reflect Xi’s cabal of liberal Anglophiles who, now in control of the levers of power, decides what’s right and wrong, what’s permissible and not.

This reminds of Trumpian logic (in for example trying to settle the war against Iran) and of White, western government condescending and arrogant culture, encapsulated in ex-German foreign minister Annalena Baerbock: German people are worth nothing because “I don’t care what voters think.”

This also reminds of the White meddling socialist Left declaring ideological victory (below) wherein an “achievement” is GDP per head, grand hotel accommodation and free high speed rail pass without ever once even looking into how that achievement was arrived at.

It was reached with the total destruction of the family, so that the GDP pie is today divided with fewer people.

It was reached from the eradication of people’s well-being that the Chinese state had swore to uphold for 3,000 years and now totally repudiated because these “socialist” motherf**kers know it pays them in rewards, in incomes and in grants that they can’t get in their fancy homes but not if they suck up to Chinese power and authority, never mind the empirical truth which they don’t even bother to find out, nor have the brains to do so.

*

Higher individual GDP incomes weren’t intended to serve people such as Laoer. Its intent was to prove to the White world that the Chinese are smart, a line told by this White motherf**ker.

If Laoer, like others, had higher incomes it was achieved in spite of socialism not because of it.

Thus, statistics trolled out are meant to exhibit the arrogance of a condescending White socialist tribe, and a Xi Jinping and party who understood the useful convenience of ideological propaganda.

We see (in the above images) how White Liberals and the Left lie and lie and lie about China’s development and about the actual contributions of the CPC.

In the Social Well-Being Index, China is ranked overall at 51, alongside Lithuania and UK (chart above). Proving? In the most elementary sense, there are countries like Peru and Kazakhstan that do well and need not be rich — even better still, they need not be socialist and then destroy the family for getting rich.

Worse for it, Anglophiles and White people tell lies while hiding the empirical truth: that in socialist China is the most anti-human, anti-Chinese, anti-familial, and anti-Confucian state.

Chinese liberals today wag their tongues like the Left and like dogs barking, without intellectual vigor and empirical study. So indoctrinated are they that they actually use the HDI as a measure of Chinese achievement instead of questioning its metrics. They don’t ask elementary questions like: What is the purpose of State? What’s the point of socialism if it means social destruction?

Where the CPC and its state didn’t intervene, the Chinese performed fantastic, with one of the three lowest homicide rates in the world (table below). That is, we Chinese are a very civilised people unlike White barbarians no matter how rich.

Without state intervening, parents made sure their children had a full secondary education, producing in aggregate statistical score 75 per cent of total population, the equal of Italy and Malta. For comparison, Singapore’s score, world highest in secondary enrollment is 100 percent whereas Chad, ranked 146 at the bottom with 5.7 percent. This measure of full secondary education is a preferred social indicator as opposed to HDI using the first 9 years of schooling which is anyway compulsory by law for almost all countries.

In place of refuting the Social Well-Being Index, the screenshots below, display what they run in the racist, pro-Zionist 观察 guancha propaganda. It’s all about how great, smart and glorious is China — according to some stupid White motherf**ker. It’s about how the dragon boat race is now a Chinese global phenomena, that Jack Ma, one of China’s wealthiest parasitical financier in tech, is actually a farmer at heart, and so on.

All this is beyond disgusting and vile.

*

*

*

Ode to the Women of China

***

Han China Restoration = Death of CPC, Xi Jinping

*

Tribute to the Last Han Minister

*

To the PLA Million Peasant Army

…like our ancestors we’ll fight the Anglophile Xi traitors, like we fight foreigners and occupiers!

*

No Regrets, We Fight…

*

*

The closing of an era, of Chen Xi 陈希, which translates into the end of Xi Jinping…

Chen Xi’s term in office, taking orders from Xi, nepotistic against the rest of China, favoring Tsinghua alumni has been an unmitigated disaster, leaving behind a spineless, moribund bureaucracy, an economic growth cut in half, and a two-face foreign policy pandering to western, White interests, all totally unsuited to a China in a new world order. Everybody could see what was wrong; nobody said a thing! Like him, they shut their eyes.

*

*

These monkey just can’t make up their minds: Central Organisation Department, later Chinese Academy of Governance now National Academy of Administration.

Closure of a Xi Jinping era

To begin to see the relevance to China in the removal of Chen Xi (image above, with eyes closed), born 1953, that 999 out of 1,000 Chinese would regard as a nobody begin with the following institutional bodies:

• Central Organisation Department (COD), alternate English name National Academy of Administration or Chinese Academy of Governance 国家行政学院 (image above, 2017).

• Central Party School (CPS) 中央党校, long name 中国共产党中央委员会党校.

Both bodies were as of 2018 completely merged, the CPS being the older of the two, but they remained functionally separate: the CPS as training school for mid-to-senior level public officials and the COD to assign then distribute the graduates to the various ministries and departments. At any one time, the CPS trains 1,300 students.

That, in those two functions, is where power lies: whoever runs it have a hand not just to determine the senior echelon of governing apparatus but directed China’s future, cultivating cronies in the process. It’s a problem as old as China. In Chen Xi’s case, he was given the job — on Xi’s recommendation — to run both.

Xi’s in-your-face nepotism was most apparent in Chen Xi, both being Tsinghua alumni.

Upon his COD appointment, Chen held no seat in the highest level 25-member Politburo Standing Committee that was customary since there was a Politburo. Xi simply broke with party precedent, allowing Chen for five years to shepherd an entire generation of Tsinghua graduates into China’s top official, ministerial and department positions.

This revolving door of party princelings, Tsinghua, and top official positions, poisoned the entire atmosphere of government. It inflicted into Chinese administration a US Democratic brand of global liberalism that was endemic in Beijing’s top academic institutions, Tsinghua, Peking, Fudan.

Chen Xi was from 1990-1992 a “visiting scholar” to Stanford in chemical engineering “research”, whatever the fuck is it he researched because there was zero published work, either in Chinese or English. Chemical engineering was also Xi’s graduating discipline.

In another manner of speaking, Chinese officials from Xi down got where they are today sponging on the State treasury. Family and patron-client nepotism was rife especially under Xi (recall the top two-dozen military generals across all branches). One commentary noted (Li Cheng, 2016):

“Xi Jinping helped advance the careers of many leaders in his inner circle, but perhaps no one received more direct assistance from him than Chen Xi. He and Chen were classmates and roommates at Tsinghua University from 1975 to 1979. As sports fans who were also interested in politics and international affairs, they became close friends almost immediately upon meeting at Tsinghua. On Xi’s recommendation, Chen Xi joined the Communist Party [CPC] at Tsinghua in November 1978, a few months before graduation.”

Against all Confucian Chinese values that for 2,500 years railed against playing favorites, university brand names like Tsinghua and personal connections turned into the beaten path to positions of wealth and power. This was the thing that contributed to the destruction notably of the Tang, Ming and Qing governments.

Chen Xi was finally made to step down from the COD in 2023, succeeded by a provisional head Li Ganjie. In 2026 June 5 he was finally made to resign from the CPS succeeded, provisionally, by Cai Qi.

Two weeks later, June 18, 2026, Cai Qi formally took over both COD and CPS functions, as per 国家行政学院 announcement (screenshot in top of post).

There is no clearer sign: the era of Xi is coming to a close. He had single-handedly monopolised State power and authority — a position worse than nearly all emperors in China’s 3,000 years of written history. Monopoly went through Chen Xi, and through him the party school and then the National Academy of Administration.

These two bodies are the CPC’s key to the control of organizational, doctrinal and administrative functions that for a decade went through only motherf**kers among Tsinghua Anglophile liberals. These are the people (think Victor Gao and Zhang Weiwei) who think the world of the White Man.

In truth, Xi had better made those changes. Or does he prefer that the People’s Liberation Army sit down to occupy classrooms of Tsinghua and the Central Party School. The choice is his to make!

*
Our Chinese project of taking back China from Xi and his Anglophile cabal is just the beginning. But we must hurry:

• Li Qiang another of Xi’s crony has, on Jun 15, launched a nation-wide land zoning campaign that will allow State institutions to seize, gather up peasantry and farm land, re-purpose land use, re-gazette title deeds then resell them to all and sundry, including foreign and American financial institutions.

• Simultaneously, the CPC Shanghai liberals have launched a massive propaganda campaign the Lujiazui Forum, to bring in western funds into the local capital, equities and bond market.

• Among the early signs is the transfer of US national private debt to China, using cross trades in the main: Wall Street raising Rmb credit, primarily through panda bond issuances because Chinese bond interest payments are low and cheap. Rmb proceeds will either go to buy Chinese land and assets or revert back, after exchange conversion, to pay for US Treasuries. The result would be a massive movement of Dollar-denominated assets into Rmb, in effect a conversion of US to Chinese debt. Moody's estimates said panda issues as at mid-June 2026 stood at Rmb 137 billion, up 80 percent year-on-year. This compares to Rmb 183 billion for all of 2025. There seems to be no stopping it especially given the central bank’s intent to keep interest rates low, they say, to attract foreign capital, a total lie because nobody in China, the government least of all, needs the Dollar to buy a bowl of congee, a combined harvester or build a bridge!

*

POST-SCRIPT: A NEW ASIA WORLD ORDER

Under a new presidential emperor (our model is Qu Yuan, below) China’s foreign policy will, among other things,

• grow a spine and be more transparent and assertive in its defense of the oppressed of the world, especially in political and security matters;

• abandon its Wang Yi two-face foreign conduct, sucking up to White neo-colonial empire on the one hand while issuing platitudes to the rest;

• give meaning, veracity and concrete actions to mere words at present when granting top priority to China’s relations with its neighbors;

• center the Asia regions of Central, South and West to China’s economic and political developments, uniting them to the East, these being centers of world civilizations and cultures (see Jugnunama video below, issued Jun 6, 2026); and

• take on the White Man in any corner of the world that threatens, usurp or endanger local or Chinese interests or both.

*

Above, Chen Xi with colleagues in party school. Immediately above, a People’s Daily, 2024 Oct issue: One of Chen Xi’s last jobs, handing out certificates on refresher courses for public officials. His term in office, taking orders from Xi and discriminating against the rest of China in favor of Tsinghua has been an unmitigated disaster, leaving behind a spineless, moribund bureaucracy, an economic growth cut in half, and a two-face foreign policy totally unsuited to China in a new world order. Below Cai Qi.

*

*

Qu Yuan without White Man

This segment is in memory of Qu Yuan 屈原, c. 340-278 BCE, one of China’s greatest officials who, also a gifted poet, threw himself and drown in a river. (A detailed biography is in Sima Qian’s shiji 史記.)

Revered even today, 2,500 years later, Ji’an and I each laid three joss sticks to him in his temple on the day known as 端午节 duanwu jie dedicated to his memory and contribution to Chinese ethical and bureaucratic culture, to statehood and governance. A thousand Xi Jinping are not fit to tie his shoe laces!

Sadly, in Chinese Anglophile media there is no honoring of duanwu without featuring White people — whose ethical culture and individual personal values are the anti-thesis of, i.e. diametrically opposite to Qu Yuan. In CGTN and Global Times, never a duanwu jie goes by without White people at the fore, in the front pages to boot, as if without them, without their endorsement and recognition the dragon boat race and zongzi 粽子 are of no significance even at home. This appropriation of local culture to Whiteness is so disgusting: duanwu like numerous Chinese events and memorials have become a backhanded way to worship the White Man.

We blame this state of affairs in no small measure to Xi’s nepotism and racist bigoted worship of the blonde hair and white skin.

Below, is an epilogue from Li Sao 離騷, Lamentations, the longest, Chinese free-style poem in Chinese literature that Qu Yuan had finished after his dismissal from the bureaucracy (but later rehired, which he never took up). The English translation below (Internet archives), circa 1950, published 1953, was by Yang Xianyi and wife, both since dead, while working in the state-owned Foreign Languages Press in Beijing.

国无人莫我知兮，又何怀乎故都？
既莫足与为美政兮，吾将从彭咸之所居。

Since in that kingdom all my virtue spurn,
Why should I for the royal city yearn?
Wide though the world, no wisdom can be found.
I'll seek the stream where once the sage was drowned.

*

• Liang 梁: The Liang era (502–557 CE) that birthed the Sui 隋 (581 to 618 CE) were in combination one of the shortest-run Chinese states, under 120 years total. Yet together they were also the most economically successful but, more beautiful than that, artistic such as in painting, craftsmanship and women’s fashion. And it was especially romantic, partly from southern Chinese influences. Hence, the film 《天盛長歌》, retitled in the English as Rise of the Phoenix…

*

*

*

*

*

China at its Height of Power & at Point of Vulnerability

In a post-modern era, at its current height of power at home and abroad, China is also vulnerable, hence at a point of danger because, for a variety of motivations, traitorous, self-serving sycophant forces will seek the nation’s power.

To capture that national power, those forces will seek its primary sources: the material resources and capacities — military, production, technological, intellectual — plus its physical wealth.

In another word, to capture the land and its people.

These are the penultimate sources and wellspring — and the raison d’etre — of China’s of national existence and rule. They collectively produce, in their turn, national strength, prestige, and the pillars of culture and civilization that has endured unbroken for 5,000 years.

It is the duty therefore of the People and its backbone, the People’s Liberation Army, to preserve what the Chinese ancestors have bequeath to the people and this land. That bequeath is contained in the following handed-down governing principles:

• the Mandate of Heaven,

• the deeds and memories of our ancestors,

• the native land of the indigenous Chinese and the preservation of its unity.

It is only to the above that the Chinese owe their allegiance, not the Communist Party of China (CPC) or Xi Jinping whose contributions are nothing without our people, our ancestors, and their collective history.

It is this collective history — all 5,000 years of it — that the current regime of Xi Jinping, aided by foreign, typically White and Anglophile motherf**kers are erasing in, for example, the propaganda lie being distributed at present:

To these motherf**kers, China is the product of an instant, in this case of an ideology. It has no history, no culture, no Chinese — anybody can be rich, only follow their recipe. That is, stick to White Man’s socialism, the world becomes heaven.

This, on the one hand, is the White Liberal Left, a despicable lot seeking to erase China’s history and culture.

Despicable because they lie. For, if they are right, then from where does the CPC, or its so-called “socialism,” draws its strength, resources and capabilities if not the people and the resources of the land cultivated by our ancestors? What was Han emperor Xuan (漢宣帝, 91 BCE-to-48 BCE) doing if not socialism before there was socialism when he abolished all taxes on land and agricultural produce for 90 percent of the population, and then distributed for free farming implements and seeds to the poorest? What were the Han government’s “Ever Normal Granaries” the changpingcang 常平倉 (a reserve, buffer stockpile which continues to this day to include crude oil, natural gas, scarce minerals) 2,000 years before socialism even existed in name?

None of all that was socialism — of course, not! — they were simply practical, humanist measures undertaken by varied Chinese government the past 2,500 years to alleviate the adverse consequences of an imperfect market economy and against natural disasters. That is, Chinese authorities since the beginning of time made sure to stick to the principles laid out in the Mandate of Heaven. (Han China was a Confucianist state.)

On the other hand, at the other end of the White ideological spectrum is the Davos World Economic Forum globalist Liberals. They comprise the like of politicians as France’s Emmanuel Macron and Britain’s Keir Starmer, and the parasitical US financiers, the like of Stephen Schwarzman (Blackstone), Larry Fink (BlackRock), James Dimon (JP Morgan Chase), all who got rich by hijacking then sponging on global pension funds, starting in the US.

To these, i.e. the latter group, Xi panders to especially because that’s where the money lies, not in the Liberal Left that serves only as a convenient propaganda tool, for legitimizing purposes, employing their Marxist trite for the little scrapes Chinese Anglophiles with access to the State treasury throw at them under the table.

Governments, parties, rulers and emperors come and go; the nation and people of China have always endured.

Having endured, it therefore stood intact, free to itself, to its commoners and free of foreigners who, as the song 《我的祖国》/ My Motherland below likens to wolves, endlessly prowling around China to satiate their greed and employ their shenanigans.

It is from these Anglophiles, headed by Xi Jinping having hijack national power, that ordinary Chinese seek to recover their nation!

The charges against Xi’s treachery and those of his Anglophile cabal are now well documented as evidential record. The same records show sycophant forces as Anglophiles emerging from the woodwork to feed on the carcasses and the foundations of the system that had birth a new China.

Xi sits at the top of this pile of worms. The People’s charges against him, all of which are matters of demonstrable record (see previous posts) run as follows:

1. He weakened by crippling the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) through acts of disgracing and then sacking the entire senior echelon of its top two dozens generals who he himself had brought in and promoted to national power.

2. He has drafted a new law to seize collective peasantry land for resale to top private bidders, especially to his favored foreign agents, the Jared Kushners and the Stephen Schwarzmans.

3. He has and is expanding White residential and industrial enclaves in half a dozen provinces, and has ordered repopulating Guling in the Fujian mountains with Americans to whom he had sold as real estate while as Fujian top dog from around 1998-to-2002

4. Through his proxies 郑毓煌 Zheng Yuhuang and 王辉耀 Henry Wang he has doubled an initial quota of 50,000 Americans to 100,000 to create foreign neo-colonial settlements to whom he sells parcelled out land with re-purposed private title deeds.

5. He has launched a no-questions-asked open door policy to bring foreign migrants into China, a policy camouflaged as a visa-free visitor arrival pass for up to 40 countries, nine out of ten of which are from the West and Europe, that is, White people.

6. He makes secretive deals with US President Donald Trump, most ominous of which is that the current and future American regimes would abandon Taiwan totally in return for unhindered access to and to tie up swathes of the Chinese population, land and markets to private capital from Blackstone, BlackRock, JP Morgan Chase, Visa and Mastercard, Cargill and to private individuals, Jared Kushner and the families of Kushner, Trump, Musk and Schwarzman.

In the circumstances, against this onslaught of theft, pillage and plunder dressed up as legal “reforms” what are the Chinese to do?

Fortunately, history offers a precedent, an inspiration and a hope: Kunyang 昆陽 in present day province of Henan, 23 CE.

That was the year a motley division of 3,000 former peasant farmers led by Liu Xiu 劉秀 (later Han emperor Guangwu 漢光武帝) broke the siege of 400,000 commanded by the usurper Wang Mang. That single event was decisive in restoring the Han state without which there is no successor Chinese state running to the present. (See video below.)

China is today at the same inflection point, the same crossroad, with its foundational and institutional pillar the PLA wrecked by Xi Jinping, and the nation carved and sliced up piece by piece for sale to all and sundry, even as foreigners pour into the land with next to no control.

Let this be a notice to Xi Jinping, the Wang Mang 王莽 of today’s China, for having usurped power, then he and his forces will be crushed, removed and exterminated:

Spearheaded by the PLA, a Liu Xiu among us will rise up, rally the loyalist, and wrest back control of the Motherland into native hands from the traitors, and thus to reunify All Under Heaven 天下, restore the Mandate of Heaven and revive the People’s Republic of China whole.

When finally defeated and killed in 23 CE, Wang Mang's body was cut into pieces, his head delivered to the provisional Han capital of Wancheng and there hung on the city wall gate until the crows had finished pecked off his eyes and every facial tissue.

Wang had seized Han authority in 9 CE, occupying it for a total of 15 years, both start and end years inclusive.

Counting from 2013 when he was made presidential emperor, and having overstayed his tenure and exhausted all goodwill accorded him, Xi’s time has come to a close — and so too his ruinous domestic policies!

*

The Miracle of Year 23 CE: With 3,000 against 400,000, Han China was restored.

The Decisive Moment: Kunyang

*

Postscript: How Donald Trump made money from China

*

War drums beat on the Great Wall today…

*
O! My Motherland!

*

*

*

The reborn People’s Liberation Army, PLA, after we Chinese are done with that treacherous Xi Jinping…

*

A national grassroots momentum is building up to call out Xi Jinping for his double dealings, his corrupt ways, his pro-Zionist Nazi-styled eugenics and especially for his national treachery catering to foreigners and White, American billionaires. For background and context see some of the previous posts:

• China’s Urgent Search for a Replacement to Xi Jinping.

• The Global Landlords & the Xi-Trump Grand Collusion against China, World.

• The Chinese Fifth Column Punks & their Foreign White Agents.

*

*

An Eugenics Plan Reborn in a Professor

Not even among the Communist Party (CPC) cadres is he known until he appeared out of the blue, in an explosive way, from mid-May on, repeating 哔哩哔哩 bilibili videos of a live forum, his remarks therein recycled on Sina (above), in WeChat circles and even in American platforms X (above) and YouTube, the last two of which are banned in mainland China. (Disclosure: This author is not a CPC member. The party’s total membership roll is officially 100 million as at January 2025.)

The notoriety in the remarks by 郑毓煌 Zheng Yuhuang (images above) isn’t just in calling to import an initial batch of 100,000 foreigners so as to change China’s demographic. It’s to create an elite class of rulers with an underlying White racial stock favored by especially Xi Jinping and an Anglophile ruling cabal within the CPC. (More on this later.)

This issue, as in many things that Chinese watch and listen, typically in silence, isn’t just about what’s been said. Such issues don’t come out of the blue and out of nothing. Rather, it’s who said so. Hence, the notoriety stems not just in Zheng’remarks but on whose behalf he speaks. The way to get that answer is to look at Zheng himself:

• Born 1975, Zheng, 51, is a CPC member from the coastal county of Xianyou in Fujian where president Xi Jinping was provincial governor, among other posts held from 1985 to 2002. Within the Fujian provincial capital of Fuzhou, 12km east from downtown, is an exclusive American-held mountain enclave known as Guling 鼓岭 located at a no-man’s land intersection of several national forestry parks foremost of which is its namesake Mount Gushan 鼓山. (Detail map above, and more on this later.)

• Zheng had regularly taught at Tsinghua University (also Xi’s alma mater), from where he had graduated and then moved to Columbia University for a doctorate in “marketing” — all this while when Xi was the Fujian top dog and nationally, too. It is this alliance of Tsinghua PhDs (others are Peking, Shanghai Jiaotong and Fudan) and US academia that today seemed to call the shots in zhongnanhai, the central seat of power and administration in Beijing central.

Currently Tsinghua dean of the School of Marketing and Innovation, Zheng also runs a private college, Yingchuang Academy, established in 2015 with other alumni. All of which is also to say that Zheng’s entire life, from childhood to Tsinghua then Columbia to the present, rested on sponging on the State treasury, the people by extension.

Similar others within Xi’s cabal of Anglophiles are the like of Victor Gao, Henry Wang, Zhang Weiwei, all who rely not on any actual productive work or scientific, molecular or quantum or mathematical breakthroughs but pure yada, yada. This is, of course, a copy of American revolving door think tanks from where professors jump between giving speeches and drum up papers that pretend to be discovery of natural laws.

Marketing, whatever that is, fits this intellectual scam to the tee, such as those import-100,000 remarks Zheng delivered at the live-audience forum. (More on this later.) Here’s a sample of Zheng’s remarks and comments made thereto:

• In 哔哩哔哩 bilibili: 清华原博导郑毓煌噫淋合订本——每年引进十万外国人，跟外国人谈恋爱会提高创造力。美国送外卖月入五千到一万美元，美国没有酒桌文化，越南泰国马来西亚免费医疗教育。https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1SMDXBsEbW/?spm_id_from=333.337.search-card.all.click

• Response, in 哔哩哔哩 bilibili: 汪英来：是什么人在逼我们的大学要放开校门？是什么人在一直在鼓吹中国人跟外国人混血优越论？一定要警惕总是发表一些奇谈怪论的全裸或者半裸学者，不要被它们裹挟和利用。

The notoriety in Zheng’s idea is not even its novelty, which it is not.

It simply harks back to — and pays homage — to Nazi and fascist eugenics, to wit, the attempt at selective and discriminatory cultivation of a special human specie centered on White people.

But, here is the larger point: Xi himself favors people like Zheng talking about and tinkering with specie cultivation, although both, Xi the chemical engineer and Zheng of PhD “marketing” had probably never cultivated an algae in a petri dish or watch a worm grow back from two cut halves. Each time they open their mouth to talk of economics, it is a joke.

As Xi moves invariably in time towards death, he, like Qin Shihuang 2,200 years earlier, has begun to pay attention to prolonging his life. Word from zhongnanhai is replete with such gossips. (In Sep 3 last year, at the Victory Day parade at Tiananmen Square, Xi was overheard telling Vladimir Putin about living beyond 100.)

But, without going into petri dishes, it is possible to test the soundness and vigor in Zheng’s pseudo science.

Testing that intellectual capacity among Anglophiles in people as Zheng is easy. How so? Because he went to Columbia, meaning he has written in the English. (Disclosure: this author also studied in America.)

Here is a sample of a paper in marketing Zheng delivered then got published in the Journal of Consumer Affairs, Sep 2020 issue (catalogue of Zheng’s submission available here, https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Yuhuang-Zheng-2079541416).

Start with this declarative statement in Zheng’s opening line: “Saving (sic) behavior affects both personal welfare and national economies.” Huh?

On that presumed axiom hangs this conclusion, Zheng said of his “study to examine the effect of social exclusion, a breakdown of social relationship, on fixed savings, which is especially pertinent to Asians. By considering the cushion hypothesis theory and the gender disparity…”

Skip all that grand sounding cushion hypothesis yada, yada and return to Zheng’s starting point claim: (a) savings affect welfare, and (b) savings affect national economy. Really?

Worse than the trite (savings affect welfare) is the sheer stupidity of that man because if savings affect the economy, then from where does savings come from? Money grow in trees? This is asked because if savings come from and is left from expenditures that come directly out of wages received from labor monetized into a market and an economic system — to wit wages, productive capacity, capital expansion, money supply and circulation growth — then how does saving “affect” the economy? Isn’t it, therefore, the other way around?

Here’s another of Zheng’s papers. It’s so incredulously stupid as to be unbelievable. Dated June 2013, it’s titled: “Is money really the root of all evil? The impact of priming money on consumer choice…”

Begin from his opening line presumption which Zheng takes as natural law. Take that down takes down the entire edifice of his argument.

His argument is actually just a claim (not causal law) which, worse for it, that motherf**ker can’t even cite the Bible accurately, which is today available with a click online. Never in it is recorded such a statement either from Jesus or any of the apostles and prophets that “money is the root of all evil.”

What it records is “the love of money” and even there the money referenced is not related to “evil” much less “all evil” as root cause. The love of money simply leads to “all kinds of troubles.”

1 Timothy 6:10…”For the love of money causes all kinds of trouble….”

Given that this is the quality and calibre of students and professors that China’s top Tsinghua university (and similar others) churn out each year, what has America to worry about being taken over by China?

Is it any wonder that today, out of 28 million who finish high school each year, only 14 percent bother to take the gaokao 高考 university admission exam, hence expressing a wish to go to university. (The author says this from widespread personal knowledge.) That is, 86 in 100 don’t give a shit for China’s universities but we don’t hear of them because Xi’s propaganda machinery ignores these students like they are bugs. Without confidence in themselves, as Anglophiles tend to be, the like of CCTV, CGTN and American-born Chinese are only interested in bragging, in propaganda issue after issue.

*

*

*

Live a Xi Proxy, Die a Xie Proxy

Knowing Zheng’s intellectual calibre, we can now come to the meat of Zheng’s racist claim about importing 100,000 foreigners (presumably White).

First thing to note is that it was made not in May or June this year but eight months earlier in Oct 2025. (It is in the screenshot just below the video.)

In the forum’s ten minutes or so given to that argument, Zheng’s logic run in the main as follows (other related remarks speak to, for example, taxi driver banalities like how travel frees and open up the mind, yada, yada):

• (a) The US is strong and a superpower.

• (b) The US is open to migration.

• (c) Immigrants bring new blood that invigorate US national strength.

• (d) Therefore immigrants made US strong and powerful.

Based on the logic above, China will be strong and become a superpower if it admits 100,000 (White, American) foreigners into China within a year. That’s Zheng’s conclusion. And what does he want to cultivate this new mixed-breed of specie if not for the presumed, resulting great intellectual ability? To what end, if not to run the country?

So easy is it to refute, even on just simple factual grounds — the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act for example, not to mention hereditary biology — that it’d be a waste of time to enter into debating Zheng’s stupidity. For his syllogism to work, Zheng relies on Chinese ignorance, like White people know next to nothing about Chinese culture, language, history, etc.

That Zheng’s wild claim is been dredged up, splashed across print and online media and then rerun across a variety of platforms isn’t for nothing.

And here’s the crux of the recycling being conducted today: It is one of the top items in a charge sheet varied people are assembling against Xi Jinping.

This charge sheet isn’t just to get even with Xi. It’s on account of two scores: (a) people want to reverse Xi’s treacherous domestic policies and (b) in the light of what Xi did to the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), sacking the entire echelon of two dozen top generals for alleged misconduct and corruption without himself taking any responsibility.

For disgracing the PLA, Xi must suffer the consequences. (Disclosure: We the People are working closely with the PLA rank and file toward that end.)

Considering that Xi was involved in the cronyism, he cannot expect to continue without suffering any consequences. After all, he is also the commander-in-chief, having himself brought in and elevated most of the generals.

For a variety of reasons, and given the above, nobody in mainland China will finger Xi by name in Zheng’s treason plan. Zheng is simply used as proxy to go after Xi.

It’s equally dangerous to infer by extrapolating Zheng to Xi. Until this affair catches full national attention, all that can be done is to infer by association. Association because Zheng’s remarks, exhibiting his personal, individual treachery and traitorous conduct, is an open and shut case even if Xi is not named.

To grasp that, start with one title that has since been recycled repeatedly (screenshots above): 如何看待前清华教授建议引入10万外国人来中国居住，生混血儿提升创造力？ In translation (mine), it reads: “Former Tsinghua professor wants to import 100,000 foreigners into China to create a colony of mixed-race children.” (Also see 小懒 xiaolan where Zheng is also featured in her YT video from around timestamp @6:00))

*

The Treacheries of Xi Jinping

Even when said in October 2025, there was nothing new in Zheng’s idea.

Before him was Henry Wang Huiyao 王辉耀. In 2020, he had proposed an identical eugenics plan to create a special mixed breed colony by importing foreigners (actual number unknown but said to be between 30,000 and 50,000). By foreigners, Wang meant White people of course. (See, for example, a screenshot of The Economist headline below. Also see this or this.)

Although dated 2020, Wang remarks were themselves years late, long after Xi became president in 2013, when the eugenics plan was already bandied about, according to The Economist “to make easier for rich or highly skilled foreigners to become permanent residents.”

Xi has not only accepted Wang’s suggestion. Also, he has since vastly expanded on it by offering to import, instead of several thousand, 50,000, starting with an initial batch of 16,000 Americans already registered. To support the plan:

• Xi has continued the expansion of exclusive White western enclaves in half a dozen provinces, with all government national and provincial resources thrown into the effort, for the infrastructure, etc.

• Vastly populate an entire mountain plateau city of 鼓岭 Guling/Kuliang, especially reserved for Americans.

• He has begun issuing visa free entry to primarily White, western nations, a total of some two dozen countries including Russia.

• He has ordered large tech companies like Huawei to import, with exorbitant salaries, six-to-ten times local levels, thousands of workers from the West.

Xi’s racist preference for White is plainly evident in his selection of immigrants, the countries entitled to visa free entry, reserving an American quota of 50,000 immigrants, presumed White, and the fact that foreigners can have as many children they want but not Han Chinese who are restricted to one but no more than two in exceptional cases.

The Chinese problem has with Xi goes beyond his racist bigotry:

• it’s his neo-colonial outlook and domestic policy practices;

• his especially overt, unchallenged discrimination against native Han Chinese;

• his treachery to sell Chinese land to foreigners, land that for over 2,500 years, right up to 1953, had been fought over with blood and incalculable sacrifices to keep intact; and

• his betrayal to the Chinese nation to issue a law known colloquially (in the English) as the Homestead Law, with CPC Central Committee consideration and approval now pending. Its expressed purpose is, privatization of land holdings: rounding up especially all rural, farm land, enclosed them into a single state entity, re-purpose conditions for use, re-gazette title deeds, then resell each to rich individuals, locals and foreigners alike with local and western bank mortgage financing using new reconstituted title deed as collateral.

White enclave expansion for Europeans (primarily Germans, French, Italian) and the American repopulation of the Guling mountain city are parts of the new land redistribution program. For example, to bring in and accommodate more Americans into 鼓岭 Guling, the Fujian government has launched, as recent as July 2025, an appeal (in the English) to its resettlement. It has also officially renamed the city Kuliang to fit in with White Man’s mis-pronounciation.

Xi’s neo-colonialism has not only meant devoting national resources (road access, utility lines, and infrastructure support such as schools, postal services, banks) into building a mountain city for (White) Americans and entire cities for Europeans.

It especially also means denying some 400 million Chinese their hukou (family lineage record book) relocation rights from the farms to cities. This is discrimination happening within their own country, through the suppression of their national — and human, biological — rights. (Their children won’t be admitted to schools, for example, forcing the parent-workers to abandon them in villages without parental care. That, or have no children at all. This is so scandalous that last year, and for the first time in a century, China’s population fell by a net 6 million, that is, natural deaths exceeding births.)

Henry Wang is a Democrat DNC agent serving in China on behalf of the US regime and like Zheng is also a Communist Party (CPC) member.

Zheng’s ties to the US rich also go through the universities, in particular Columbia where he had his PhD in marketing. In this, for example, is an interview by Liangzi, a piece of fucking moron, 鄭毓煌：讀書才能改變階級, Aug 2025, where you find Zheng name dropping American universities on a dozen occasions: America is where he has sent his children. Cornell and MIT came up for special mention.

Other Anglophiles in Xi’s racist, eugenics camp also have identical ties to US universities, Victor Gao through Yale for example.

Xi Jinping’s cruelty meted out against Chinese in favor of White people is, by now, legendary, prompting daily propaganda campaigns through government channels like CCTV and CGTN, all saying what a wondering man he is, caring for the poor.

All that may be true — for their propaganda effect. But, omitted in these campaigns, Xi cares for the rich even more, far, far more, especially if you are White and rich, like Jared Kushner, Donald Trump’s son-in-law, Stephen Schwarzman of Blackstone and Larry Fink (BlackRock), James Dimon (JP Morgan Chase) and Elon Musk (Tesla, SpaceX). Their products get more exposure over the state media machinery than local companies and brands.

To promote this rags-to-riches propaganda abroad, Xi’s foreign agents in the like of Friends of Socialist China issue totally misleading claims like what a wonderful job Xi’s socialism has done for Chinese — efforts that had long pre-dated him and that countless individuals have devoted enormous, life and death sacrifices that are never publicized.

Anglophile sycophants in media made sure to say nothing about the land privatization under the Homestead Law or Guling or the enclaves or Zheng Yuhuang or the 100,000 human trafficking or Henry Wang.

On YouTube, Xi has people like Ben Norton to help Daniel Dumbrill repackage the neo-colonial, mixed specie eugenics as China’s great liberal opening up to foreigners (farther below). The colonial resettlement of Palestine West Bank and Gaza would be, from Xi’s point of view, more straightforward and transparent. …

So much for China constant mouthing of national sovereignty in UN and international forums. And so much for White Man’s infuriating hypocritical, liberal, bleeding heart socialism that makes us ordinary Chinese want to puke, not just me but xiaolan as well and hundreds others who understand the English.

Regardless, we will return sovereignty to our people; we’ll have our justice and we promise Xi will pay. The native land of Chinese does not belong to his father to do as he pleases.

*

*

*

Three Heads Dangling over Tiananmen Square

In opening lines of the video above, 小懒 xiaolan features an exchange between a teacher and her student in what appears to be mid-size lecture hall for a political class. The teacher had said something to the effect that she was a loyal servant of the People’s Republic who will not “eat out of the nation’s bowl and then smash it.”

That line is a common Chinese refrain. In political discourse, it refers to those who, after they had grown up, and after they had drawn strength and sustenance from their nation, they then betray it. It’s an act not unlike Ben Norton betraying his own country, the US, or like Xi Jinping China!

In daily, practical business terms, it repudiates the White Man’s capitalist, free market notion that wealth accumulates from individual success and hence considered rightful reward. On the contrary. A person as Jack Ma who, having profited from his Alibaba’s tech and mobile device businesses in China, ships out this stash of profits to the Cayman island or collaborate with George Soros funds that seek to undermine China’s currency stability for speculative exchange rate gains. (This happened in the Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998.)

Mid-way into the teacher’s explanation, a student in the back row shouted from his seat that he was from Taiwan though he had used the term “Republic of China” instead. His inferential conclusion is self-evident: Not from the Mainland therefore, he owes no allegiance to the nation. That is, he would break that rice bowl. In another manner of speaking, betray China at the drop of a hat.

The teacher walked up to the student, told him to pack up his stuff, demanded he leave and never to return, including to sit for his final exam. It was, in effect, expulsion and not just from the class but the school probably as well.

In the next video on Indians, xiaolan features the same, identical claim by a large group Indians in Nanjing who, having blocked off a road, created a ruckus in the name of some White Man’s liberal, individual religious and speech freedoms. Their claim is that, being foreigners, they are not bound by Chinese customs and ethical practices. These practices, often not expressed in law, included this: respect your neighbors and never, never get in their way.

The crux of the xiaolan’s complaints in both cases are identical: foreigner refusing to accept Chinese social rules and norms. They demand instead to assert their individuality, their identities, however repugnant, like black face, white mask Dumbrill demanding access — not just for himself but every arriving foreigner — to all of China’s subsidized state services as if he owns the nation.

This liberal attitude are especially found in White people like Ben Norton, staking and invoking their personal claims on China, indeed on anything and any property that fancy him. The Nortons and Dumbrills refuse to accept their standing as guests in a Chinese living room, obliging them to behave as one. Instead they act out like proprietors of a nation, entitling themselves to everything therein that aren’t theirs and to which they don’t belong. (See YT video screenshot below.)

There is no doubt in the minds of not just xiaolan but all Chinese that the adoption of western liberalism by Xi and his Anglophile cabal has produced these unprecedented events that are sacrilegious.

Sacrilegious because Chinese abroad, very conscious they are just guests and not migrants, would never violate their own ethical code to intrude on or to impose themselves on others.

But over millennia, Chinese history shows that their tolerance will only go so far.

When the break with tolerance comes, the world is turned upside down, shattered into a million pieces: the An Lushan rebellion, the Taiping, and the Boxers. In each case, no law, no ethics will hold back the Chinese, our ancestors slaughtered tens of millions to keep, paradoxically, the unity and the peace. It’s all or nothing!

And, truth be told, we have had it with the Anglophile cabal and these foreign motherf**kers with their liberal (socialist) ideologies piled on top of domestic policies bought from them!

We await the day, hanging on the flagpoles of Tiananmen Square the heads of Xi Jinping, Ben Norton and Daniel Dumbrill, one for each Fifth Column Banana, the meddling House Nigger and in between them the White Man’s head.

These are not dreams but actionable ideas our ancestors have taught us are possible when we kick off a mass public revolt against Xi Jinping and his Anglophile cabal. It’s either that or they reverse course — no buts, no ifs!

*

*

*

These A-Cha motherf**kers on Chinese property… we’ll deal with them!

*

More important than the CPC, Chinese allegiance runs as follow, as is that of the party and the PLA:

• the Mandate of Heaven,

• the memories of our ancestors, and

• the native land of the indigenous Chinese and its unity.

Take note Xi Jinping and Anglophiles: neither we the People nor will the PLA tolerate anybody to injure or to undermine any and all the above.

*

An original color film record of 1949 Oct 1 from the Soviet archives…

*

*

*

*

*

Making Russian Western:

The Fifth Column Foreign Agent

Until his retirement Zhou Li 周力 (above) was as 中共中央对外联络副部长 / deputy liaison head, International Department, Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC). The more interesting part of his past is his posting at the Chinese embassies in Russia and later on Ukraine as ambassador until 2010 then moving on to Kazakhstan.

This diplomatic and liaison background tells why his recent most article at Red Culture / 红色文化, June 10, 2026, is empirically accurate and especially pertinent to the present. It is titled 俄罗斯惩治“第五纵队”的“外国代理人”制度，的确行之有效！/ Russia’s ‘anti-foreign agent’ system destroys the Fifth Column.

It’s a long post, with detailed explanations into the definitions, origins, and rise of two parallel concepts, the foreign agent and the Fifth Column, today enmeshed into one. From this bundling, lies the potency in the eventual destruction of Ukraine as a sovereign, independent state (and as Russian ally), leading finally to the breakout of war in February 2022.

All this is clearly a warning to China. What Zhou Li says, in effect, is we Chinese aren’t paying enough attention to the Fifth Column in cahoots with the foreign agent: we focus primarily on the latter. Of the former, we are largely indifferent perhaps in the belief Chinese, given our culture, don’t have it in us to betray our country to foreigners.

But Zhou cites the Russian example because, after a mass sell-off of national assets from roughly 1990 to 2000 that left men selling sticks of cigarettes on sidewalks for a living while women freelanced as prostitutes. The government of Vladimir Putin finally took back control of the country from circa 2001 and 2002 on.

One of the first things he did — successfully — to pull Russia back from total ruin was to go after the Fifth Column and the foreign agents simultaneously by treating them as the same enemy. A Fifth Column person is typically engaged in the media, academia and companies. The foreign agents, typically dressed as non-government organisations also worked with all three.

China is not Russia in 1990 or 2000 but that’s not the problem. Both the Russian Fifth Column and the foreign agents had been feeding western propaganda to the population decades before Russia’s implosion. They had been tilling the ground, fermenting the conditions for its economic and financial collapse.

The Russian experience is pertinent to China. Before dealing with China’s Fifth Column and their foreign agents, below are pertinent excerpts from Zhou’s article, translated from the Chinese. Zhou quotes Putin extensively (in italics):

Since Russia launched a special military operation against Ukraine on February 24, the United States, Europe and other Western countries have strongly condemned Russia and imposed the most severe sanctions in history. Some Russian social elites have left Russia one after another, actually cooperating with the actions of the United States and Europe to further suppress the Putin authorities.

Against this background, Putin held a meeting with leaders from all over the world and once again talked about the “fifth column” issue. Putin pointed out that:

“Western countries are trying to use the socio-economic consequences of war losses and sanctions to divide our society, incite civil strife in Russia, and use the ‘fifth column’ to achieve their goals. There is only one goal, which is to destroy Russia.”

Here, Putin's definition of the “fifth column” became clear: It is a national traitor. Said he:

“I don't condemn those who own villas in Miami or the French Riviera. They can't do without their foie gras [fattened liver of a force-fed goose], oysters, or so-called sexual liberation. The problem is not that at all. But that many people in this group have already rooted their roots in the West. They no longer belong to our people and do not belong to Russia.

“In order to enter the ‘high society’ of Europe and the United States, these people are willing to betray their mothers. But they may not realize that the ‘high society’ just uses them as consumables to maximize harm to our people. …

“No country is exempt [from these machinations], not to mention the Russian people who can always tell who is a patriot, who is a rascal and a traitor, and spit out these rascals and traitors mercilessly into the street like flies. I firmly believe that this kind of natural and necessary social self-purification will only strengthen our unity, cohesion, and ability to meet any challenges.” [Cited in, Большаяпресс-конференцияВладимираПутина, http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/47250]

Extrapolating from Putin, Zhou wrote:

Foreign agents are not exactly the equivalent of the “fifth column”. But there are great similarities:

• 1) both point to internal groups or individuals serving external forces;

• 2) both emphasize the foreign attributes of the source of funds;

• 3) both are justified on the maintenance of national security;

• 4) both are marked as “untouchable” by various social mechanisms and public opinion.

The difference between them are that:

• 1) fifth column is a political concept with strong ideological overtones; “foreign agent” is a legal concept with clear identification criteria and procedures.

• 2) the fifth column has a broader meaning and can cover groups and individuals that are not recognized by law; the ”foreign agent” system provides operational legal tools to transform political concepts into specific law enforcement actions.

At that point, Zhou bundles the Fifth Column and foreign agent into a single common enemy:

The lessons from the collapse of the Soviet Union and the upheavals in Eastern Europe have long confirmed that foreign forces rely on financial infiltration and public opinion brainwashing to vigorously support the “fifth column” team, which is the usual means of tearing apart the social consensus of other countries and creating turmoil in national power.

The United States and Western countries have systematically and premeditatedly used various nominal foundations and intelligence agencies to transport resources and train ‘talents’ to non-governmental organizations and anti-government forces in Russia all the year round. They have used civil activities and public opinion to build momentum and wait for opportunities to interfere in Russia's internal affairs and plan Russian social turmoil in order to influence the direction of Russian politics, and even subvert legal elections.

*

The Fifth Potemkin Columns of China

Potemkin #1

Money Scam Blueprint from Above

Mabel the Flower Pot & Deng Xiaoping the Useless Gardener

Forget Mabel, the woman in between the two motherf**kers, one White, one Banana. She is just decoration, we Chinese call a flower pot — in the day. Bed time? Who knows?

Note especially below, how the Fifth Column have a penchant for White imitations, everything White, from the adoption of think-tank propaganda names and leather furniture in colonial-style wood panelled rooms to post-modern talk shops like the war mongering Aspen (above). So bad is this Anglophile fetish for Whiteness that Deng Xiaoping the White adoring Motherf**ker once told the Chinese nation to switch from using chopsticks to fork and knife. Deng’s generation then dared him to pass a law forbidding chopsticks. Deng dare not.

Yet this fetish for Whiteness is considered the “real China” (image below) whereas its 3,000-year-old documented past (further below) is considered passe unless used to scam some stupid, infantile foreign students looking for a cheap, subsidized easy-to-graduate PhD tagged to their future name cards.

Disclosure. Each time I return to laojia with Ji’an, I get an endless stream of complaints from student relatives, neighbor’s kids, friends of friends, etc: Chinese universities are a fucking waste of time! After which comes the horror stories… One father told me outright few years ago: “I will never, never send my kid to university!” This was a slap in my face, I being the village most academically qualified but I’m sure that was not his intent.

The kid, now 20, accompanies the father daily in the family’s Rmb 180 million-a-year petroleum retail chain. In their outwardly grotesque, eight-story new laojia family house, there is no leather furniture in colonial-style wood panelled rooms. Everything is Chinese.

In the Ming era said father would have been the local county Marquis and I, if say the badly paid scholar-official, would have to go to him, begging bowl in hand, to build a new road or school or a public facility. These days, however, so-called scholars like Victor Gao (below left) pimp off the Treasury by playing mini-emperor hosting some mixed-dog specimen Anglophile named Danny Haiphong from 18,000 km away.

These, thus, are the Fifth Column motherfuckers who, as Putin had described them, “can’t do without their foie gras, oysters, or so-called sexual liberation.” Small wonder, the Chinese Fifth Column, especially those resident at guancha 观察者网 like Victor Gao, despised Putin and made sure to undermine his visit while doing everything to lift up Donald Trump to high heaven.

*

Potemkin #2

Garbage In, Garbage Out

Epsteinian Behavior Economics: To Get Rich, Fuck the Kids

Like in countless cases, such as the arrests of Min Zin (near end of post), the images immediately above and two below reflect the beginnings of Fifth Column and foreign agent penetration into centers of Chinese influence and power.

Start with a name, any name, say, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, source of the three images. Then look at their in-house “finance and economics research” curricula (below). What do they teach? How about starting with this, economy and culture. Underneath the title, it reads “immersion in local traditions, modern city life...” Next, go to “cross-cultural communication”. It “visits panda base and cook authentic Sichuan food.” (Sic!)

After that, consider the case of Prof Richard Ebstein (sic), an American who was teaching under the grand sounding discipline of “behavorial economics” in Singapore before they happily let him go and packed him off to Chengdu’s SWUFE. Two bullet points illustrate the facts above:

• How many of the dozen-odd international students posing under the building’s entrance lintel plaque know how to read the sign and know what it means? And why?

• What economic behavior is Ebstein teaching? Whose behavior? His mama? And how is he to teach and “research” economic behavior in China when he doesn’t even know how to write his own name — and read it.

Chinese academia in economics, international affairs are especially (a) an employment scam and (b) a dumping ground for useless morons, invariably White, unwanted and unemployable in their own country.

None of that is any of our business, except for two things: (a) It’s their never ending lying, calling that kitchen an “immersion” experience in “local traditions” — and (b) doing all that, paying off the students and the White Motherf**ker Ebstein by sponging on local fiscal budgets just to satisfy some inane China foreign policy objective.

Is this suppose to be “socialism with Chinese characteristics”?

To see what that all means to us Chinese, compare the SWUFE kitchen and an actual one where Ji’an and I had spent two chunjie seasons, total two months, like that seen in the image below. (That kitchen was 10 times far worse than that in the image.) Note the pile of wood beside grandma. Unlike the press-and-lit gas-fired stoves in SWUFE, where did that pile come from? Whose money is SWUFE squandering? And for what fucking concrete, practical results? Cross-cultural communication? And communicating to what end?

Immediately above and below: daily, without end, White motherf**kers and their Anglophile underlings (usually some piece of White cock sucking Banana cunt like the one below) lie about what’s real in the Potemkin villages that SWUFE (for example) and China’s foreign ministry manufacture…

• A Fifth Column Cunt & her Foreign Agent. Below, in a badly-acted, short 4-minute clip, is the “real Red China” and its (ethical) traditions that matter most to Chinese (it has had 11 million views - outside China), not some Arab Gulf Potemkin lookalike cities. White motherf**kers like Jackson Hinkle will never, never understand that but will contribute to undermine and to ruin it, a process taking place and plainly evident, seen and heard in that piece of Anglophile cunt backing him to provide some racist cover-up and ABC (America-born Chinese) Banana-face propaganda justification…

*

The real China

When for the benefit of some White audience, some American motherf**ker named Jackson Hinkle and his Anglophile cunt decide what is real (or unreal) in China, it becomes especially infuriating. Watch the real China in this 《山风无语》/ The Mountain Wind is Silent.

In it is the China exactly as I had found it during several seasons in Ji’an’s family mountain village home. It’s not just the real China residing among the cypress, pine and fir forests and inside the adobe-walled homes but in its ethical and civilization foundations. It is where the illiterate woman have a better sense of ethical judgment than some English-speaking bitch sucking up to White Man and better than some White-imitation Victor Gao who think a world of Yale. It is also where some 1,200 million Chinese have their native homes in the tens of thousands of villages distributed across the continent and not some “underrated city” that ordinary Chinese have no part in — and don’t give a fuck.

No foreign motherf**ker and his ABC cunthole — those, as described by Putin, who “can’t do without their foie gras, oysters, or so-called sexual liberation” — will have the last word on what to us Chinese is real or not real, nor how the future shall be!

*

*

Subverting China:

The Fifth Column & their Foreign Agents

In China, we know who they are, the Fifth Column, because they live among us, feed from our bowls, and sponge on the people and the State treasury. Given that they are integral to the existence of the foreign agents — and because they lead the national security apparatus to said foreign agents — we give them a wide berth. (See at the end of this end of this post for case in point: the recent arrests of the American national Min Zin who had been collaborating with Tsinghua and Shanghai Pudong university academics.)

To see how the elite pyramid structure in politics and wealth, in China, Japan and the US screws over common people, consider the case of the grandson of Sanae Takaichi, China’s top political enemy in Japan (video above).

In it, 小懒 explains the structure of hereditary politics bringing up people with positions and money because of their family name, no different than it was 2,000, 3,000 years ago. Under the same racist bigotry, White motherf**kers (from nobodies like Ben Norton to the children of Jared Kushner, etc) and Niggers (Daniel Dumbrill) insert themselves into Chinese affairs. They sing the praises of China, hankering to get in via education, business, media, tourism, to make money and to get ahead.

These become the “China Hands” — euphemism for foreign agents who typically work with the Fifth Column. Said 小懒

“These so-called ‘China Hands’ are the most deadly… because they stab the deepest!”

The Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu who grew up in the US is a classic case in point.

He expresses the penetration of Israeli Jews first into local society, seeping into financial and corporate power, then into the capture of US party politics, domestic law making, the military and finally into a merger between the US and Israel now coming into fruition. The Israelization of America is today complete. (See especially Max Blumenthal speaking, from @19:40, on the privatization of statehood via Kushner and the Rothschilds in collusion with individual rulers in the US, Israel, Albania, Qatar, etc.)

Early and intermediate signs in the privatization of the Chinese state is seen through the capture of the nation by foreigners (White Americans and White Jews in particular), recruited through shady local Fifth Column characters like Henry Wang, Victor Gao, Zhang Weiwei.

Speaking in Princeton University, Henry Wang, founder-president of the Center for China & Globalization (CCG) openly invites 50,000 (White) young Americans to settle in and create their own colonies inside China. Wang attributes this invitation to Xi Jinping in a speech made in San Francisco for the APEC summit in November 2023. (There is no such written record of Xi saying so.) Regardless, 16,000 have already been registered for the first batch of admissions, facilitated in part of

To a White audience, outside China, Wang’s deputy at CCG, Victor Gao pretends to be China’s spokesman.

Gao is on the frontline to promote a G2 economic and financial alliance between China and the US. Inside China, Gao’s chief propagandist for G2 is the Zionist, pro-Israel-US, publishing house guancha 观察者. It promotes the Israelization of China — that is, to turn China White — through the offices of the Chinese embassy in Tel Aviv and its ambassador Xiao Junzheng. Through Zhang Weiwei, guancha sells and markets Donald Trump in MAGA “communism.”

Meanwhile, Daniel Dumbrill, with Ben Norton in tow, treat China like some 19th Century colonial settlement. To exploit and to sponge on its subsidized “open door” policy, they urge foreigners (presumably, White speaking Anglo-Americans) to individually move into and occupy China — permanently — through its cheap university classrooms, by taking up jobs, and preferably fuck Chinese girls for some mixed-breed specimen kids as Dumbrill is now doing (above).

Through the Anglophile Wave Media, Cyrus Janssen speaks like China is his father’s property for him to sell and convert into a White copy if only foreigners were to pretend — to “become Chinese.” All that is required of pretense is, drink Chinese tea, wear Chinese clothes, eat hotpot and foreign gays strut around town in hanfu showing off their liberal man-fuck-man genderless western values.

Cultural appropriation in China — by pretending to be Chinese — is that easy because the Chinese are vulnerable and vulnerable because they are highly tolerant so White males like Janssen can tonight just grab any teenage girl off the streets, fuck her, make babies, dump her, move on to the next, and so create a mix-breed racial specimen.

Janssen is followed by other White motherf**kers (Jason Smith) who, like all White Man singing the praises of China are invariably unemployed and unemployable at home. Hence, they look to China to get rich, just as did 19th Century Anglo opium traders and pirates. The chief criteria to move into and occupy China is White skin, speaking English, preferably with an Internet connection at home — just like ABCs who flaunt their Chineseness in Shanghai White enclave bars because they are Bananas, white inside, yellow outside, who can’t even remember to write their mother’s name in hanzi. Outside those Whitey bars, they have no idea how 1.4 billion Chinese live and die and why Chinese dynastic governments come and go.

*

• Sample case: American foreign agent working with Fifth Column

The Foreign Mixed Specimen Agent

They fuck around inside China, we disappear them…

Min Zin, executive director of the Institute for Strategy and Policy (ISP) of Myanmar ​was detained on Jun 3 the moment he arrived in Kunming. Below is the American NPR news item dated Jun 12 (screenshot above) on his arrests (emphasis added):

Min Zin, who heads a think tank focused on his native country of Myanmar, was detained on arrival at Kunming airport in China’s southwest Yunnan province on June 3. They said Min Zin had gone to Kunming at the invitation of a Chinese academic institution. (Want to know who?)

Min Zin founded ISP Myanmar which in recent years has been writing about Chinese foreign policy and trade with Myanmar. ISP regularly carry out exchanges and swap ideas with Chinese think tanks, with which it publishes reports on issues such as Myanmar’s rare-earth exports to China.

He is currently PhD candidate at the University of California, Berkeley.

ISP and Min himself are financed by both Americans and Germans, the latter through the state-run Hanns Seidel Foundation (German abbreviation HSS). The Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung was declared in April 2025 an undesirable organization in Russia.

Like Blackstone’s Stephen Schwarzman (under its Schwarzman Scholars foundation, the HSS engaged in covert political activities abroad through regular scholarship, one-off grants and related funding programs, ostensibly to create conditions for “peace” and build “bridges” among nations. (See this, for example, https://www2.daad.de/deutschland/stipendium/datenbank/en/21148-scholarship-database/?detail=10000132).

Another example of such White Man covert operations that infiltrate local politics through Fifth Column agents is provided by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom. Together with the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), it funnelled money into Hong Kong to pay off school boys to riot in 2019.

The Germans, alone or with the NED, are especially active in East Asia and Latin America (Peru, Columbia). Ideologically driven like the Friends of Socialist China, they demand other countries become like them. Or else…?

Below is a partial article list by Min Zin published at the Foreign Policy journal.

In East Asia, foreign agents, typically Americans of Asian descent like Min Zin, distribute their propaganda through the pro-US, pro-Israel Singapore via State-owned media SPH.

Below is an example of such a collaboration between SPH and Min Zin. Note the presumptuous and highly inflammatory character and tone and then the lies in SPH to blame China for Myanmar problems but totally hides and omits the role of White Man (especially Anglo-America) in undermining and distabilising Myanmar (creating and arming insurgents, instigating riots and street assassinations) since before it was even independent in 1948.

Just read that Anglophile bitch named Constance Tan. We are keeping her in file though…

*

Appendix #1

Fifth Column president Xi Jinping.

His Foreign Agents Jared Kushner, Stephen Schwarzman

Like foreign motherf**ker Ben Norton et al, people like Min Zin are self-glorified foot soldiers pretending to be able to shake the world. The one who actually does so, and doing it a billion more times in greater stakes is that man below who Xi Jinping colludes with. (See this.)

*

This, the above, needs to happen in China. We Chinese demand to take back the Fujian mountains of 鼓岭 Guling/Kuliang, the island of Hainan and a dozen other White enclaves in Suzhou, Shanghai, Jiangsu that the treasonous Xi Jinping gave away to foreign motherf**kers. Xi and his entire corrupt neo-liberal Anglophile cabal must go! The People’s Liberation Army is with the People!

Below, what is Kushner building in and under the mountains and why Sazan…

*

• Appendix #2

Video above, Jun 12, 2026

The West’s ability to pressure China through energy supply has been treated as a strategic given since 2022. This video runs the actual contract numbers — durations, counterparties, volumes, and pricing structures across fourteen long-term deals signed since 2020 — and asks whether that assumption was ever grounded in data, or whether it was a conclusion someone needed to be true.

Sources cited: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies LNG Contract Survey 2024 | QatarEnergy Investor Disclosures 2022–2023 | Kpler LNG Shipping Registry | International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2021 | Bruegel Institute Energy Pricing Analysis | Australian Department of Industry Science and Resources LNG Export Data | Gazprom Annual Report 2022 | TotalEnergies Investor Disclosures 2023 | Energy Law Journal 2023 | National Energy Administration of China gazette 2014 | Nikkei Asia Review | Reuters Energy Desk

Timestamps:

• 00:00 — The IEA Projection That Didn’t Age Well

• 04:30 — The 2014 Decision Nobody Covered

• 09:00 — The Counterargument, Taken Seriously

• 13:30 — The Verdict

*

*

*

SYNPOSIS

Standing up to the Xi-Trump Cartel Privatizing State Power

This is a long post, some 6,800 words. If necessary, please break up reading.

Its overarching theme addresses a new extraterritorial, landlord class that’s White, independent, amoral, thieving and unabashedly corrupt. Its existence, and the sustaining of it, relies not just on military and financial muscle but also a new kind of diplomacy that’s personal, anti-bureaucratic, and a no-scruples approach to buy off governments and governments to buy them off for access to global power. The problem: what if the global power is owned not just by America only but is also Chinese? Solution: Twin the two.

This twin is known in China and the US, euphemistically, as G2, a term employed by guancha 观察, the pro-Israel Zionist, US copycat think tank Fifth Column lodged inside the Communist Party (CPC). It’s has been expressedly repeated by Jared Kushner (see video interview farther below), Donald Trump’s son-in-law through marriage to Ivanka Trump.

For this twinning, enter, therefore, Kushner, Stephen Schwarzman of BlackStone, varied US technology and financial companies and Xi Jinping’s cabal of American lobby groups, guancha being the most virulent. The first group peddles access inside China, the second to buy access by bundling China industrial might with US finance, money and create safe hideout to stash their Chinese loot.

Since Xi, this blasphemous G2 twinning of American and Chinese power has been the cornerstone of China’s foreign policy, especially under Xi from circa Trump’s first term, carried on to Biden and today given clear outlines. Blasphemy because in Chinese political and familial ethics, G2 betrays our Chinese Confucian state ideals and of the Chinese nation where allegiance lays only

• (a) in the Mandate of Heaven,

• (b) ancestry, and

• (c) to their indigenous land.

Now, all three are thrown open to White Man and western predation.

How did Xi lead China to host such White predatory monsters, exemplified in Jared Kushner (top image, right), yesterday Biden’s Hunter (top image, left), all with the power to be at once racist, murderous, evil (on all three counts, think Gaza and its Board of Peace) with a greed impossible to satiate? This posts traces that formation. The corrupting ramifications in and outside Motherland China going forward are going to be mind boggling:

• Replicate the American privatization of power inside China wherein both foreign and domestic policies are manipulated, directed and managed by big business and financiers.

• Open the way for direct, foreign access particularly by US and Israel to Beijing policy making over the long term, across varied social and economic endeavors, from university curricula to charging interest rates and gazetting land use, and all that over generations from the Kushners and Schwarzmans to the families of the Victor Gaos and Henry Wangs of China.

The Trump-Kushner and Xi collusion continues from where Hu Jintao 胡锦涛 (president 2003-2013) had left off with the Biden family business. (For example, see this ‘Hunter Biden and China: A timeline of his business ties to the Far East.’ The New Yorker, 2020 Dec 19.)

In China, questions being raised include (some answers included in this post):

• How will the Chinese nation and people make Xi and his pro-American cabal of neo-liberals pay for the betrayal of their public offices?

• What else have the Xi-Trump collusion bought and sold in China, other than land, political and market access? How much did Chinese officials pocket in return?

Because of the multi-faceted, multi-generational approach to cementing G2, the term “global landlords” used in title above seems anachronistic and out of place. On the contrary. It’s very Chinese; land being the source of identity, underpins all deals and give cross-generational value to actual economic output.

Above all, land underpins White Man’s colonial thievery and plunder witnessed over the last three to five centuries and, therefore, greatly favored inside America and Israel, and favored by the Trump and Kushner families. Also think Albania, Palestine, Ukraine, and the mountains of 鼓岭 Guling/Kuliang in Fujian today settled and occupied by Americans, with 50,000 more on the way facilitated by the finance-land faction of the Xi-Trump cabal. The English term translated from the Chinese for this extraterritorial sweep-and-grab of a nation is called “enfeoffment.” (All of these below in this post.)

Segments in this post are from top down:

1. Introduction: Xi Jinping’s White Thief

2. Poor Arabella: The use & abuse of a daughter

3. Land and family in White predatory morality

4. Collusion in Gaza, in Albania, in China

5. The Xi-Trump Grand Collusion

   • 5.1 US Term Sheet

   • 5.2 China Term Sheet

   • 5.3 Summary of Xi-Trump Collusion

6. Sidebar #1 The invasive cancer that Xi Jinping seeded in China

7. Sidebar #2 Israelization of America & Making China White

*

1. Xi Jinping’s White Thief

Below, pictured in 2017, in Mar-a-Lago, are Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner with China’s Xi Jinping and wife Peng Liyuan: they don’t just sit in the same room, at the same dining table, they share the silver cutlery. This is historical “abnormality,” a “coincidence”, No?

Kushner returned to China with Trump for the mid-May 2026 summit. Promptly, guancha 观察者网, Xi’s chief foreign propagandist, serving largely a White, Anglo-American audience, splashed 38 articles on the US and China summit within a 24-hour online news cycle. That 38 represented 9 out of 10 posted “news” items in a single day awake!

Yet in all that outpouring, they blotted out the Kushner name in its entirety and all accompanying images, ordering other Chinese media such as CGTN and CCTV to do likewise. Are these signals of a “falling out” between Trump and Xi? (Please… don’t be stupid, like those White Man’s headlines.)

Guancha understood which side of their bread is buttered and when to shut their Anglophile mouths. Hence, in the two years of Israel/American genocidal extermination of Gaza, they rarely touched on any of the slaughter. After which, they won’t even credit Kushner for operating, on Trump’s behalf the Gaza Board of Peace, the Final Solution mechanism to remove 2 million Palestinians from their land and on the bones of the 100,000 dead built a Class A Mediterranean shore front luxury real estate. Yet in the last eights years since Trump version 1 White House, Chinese authorities permitted Kushner to come and go as he pleases, entertained him in Beijing and assisted him to raise Chinese money for his real estate projects, from New York Manhattan to Albania.

Note, not the Ching Chong Chinaman in the foreground — he’s just, as some of us Chinese say, a turtle head, Anglo variety to boot — but watch the man at the extreme left; he is Jared Kushner, the GOP successor to the Hunter Biden of Ukraine, cannabis and sex-racket fame.

*

*

2. Poor Arabella

With a smattering of horrendous, incomprehensible hanyu 汉语, (falsely labelled as “Mandarin”, video above), Donald Trump’s grand-daughter from Ivanka Trump, Arabella Rose Kushner (above in 2017 at age 6; below, 2025, at age 14) was trolled out in Mar-a-Lago, Palm Beach, Florida, as biblical evidence of water turned into wine. To her stupid guests Xi and wife, totally ignorant of western ways and philosophy, Arabella is the conversion of White to Yellow and hence a crowning achievement in China-US relations.

With Arabella entertaining Xi and wife, Chinese scumbags at Anglophile CGTN and CCTV would brag to the world what a glory is Chinese culture than even Trump paid attention.

As is typical of Anglophiles imitating Whites, the editors were lying. Of course, Trump doesn’t know a thing in Arabella’s bad Chinese recitations — nor does he care. And, of course, Arabella when she sings about rice fields and the ocean waters have no idea into their conceptual association: she was never raised in a farm, much less a Chinese village, source and origin of Chinese society and crucible of Chinese civic culture and civilization.

The fault in this grand Potemkin display of hypocrisy and dishonesty lies with scumbags like Cui Tiankai, China ambassador to the US: Who is ambassador Cui trying to impress from Arabella’s entertainment? Xi or Trump or both? If Trump, he might conclude he now has the heart of Xi. But really? If Xi, he would say he has direct access to Trump, through family and Kushner, bypassing therefore the bureaucracy at the US State department.

But using the family was a 2,000 year-old Chinese way of conducting internal dynastic court politics — not 21st Century US privatization of diplomacy.

And, why is access mutually exclusive between the State and family? Even if true that direct is better or more efficient than bureaucratic access, what have been the results from Cui’s cultivation of the Trump family and of Kushner? (Also see this.) China (and the world) is a better, safer place from US power, trade, financial and military? Or is it because direct access rewards with money in silence?

With direct access failure now in full flight (Albania, Ukraine, Gaza), should we now blame Arabella? Or Kushner? How about we Chinese just line up 肏你妈 Cui Tiankai at the Great Wall then shoot that motherf**ker in the head, one bullet through his skull — with the families of Xi, Trump and Cui watching while Arabella sings ‘Ode to the Heroes’ from the rampart watch tower left behind by the Great Han (video below).

肏你妈 Cui has done the most un-Chinese thing ever: tampering with people’s families.

It’s this tampering that’s been the genesis in much of Chinese corruption the last three millennia up to the present, borne by tying state power to families, between family and family, and now between the Xi and the Trump and Kushner families. That Xi and Trump should choose to conduct state affairs along this path, then we play by Chinese rules: we play with their fucking lives. When Xi goes down, everyone in his household, wives, concubines, kids, servants, ball carriers, shoe shine officials, everybody, go with him!

Smelling a rat, even White people don’t like it one bit, appropriating individual family connections to enrich themselves under cover of State conduct.

Once distributed through the family, the resulting corruption of individual private lives is painful to witness. See, in picture below, how at age 14 in 2025, with self-consciousness and internal awareness coming into form, Arabella, standing apart from Trump, looks so downcast being thrown into a fake Potemkin role. Clearly, everybody used her: her own trusted father Jared Kushner, Trump, Cui and Xi and wife; all had their individual motives.

When will White people be ever free if they aren’t even raised free?

Poor Arabella: they just won’t leave her alone, not at age 6 nor at 14. The trouble with this tragedy is, she can’t undo all the things Cui, Kushner et al did to her and on her Self; these become, collectively, her morality and culture long after she had forgotten that 2017 day in Mar-a-Lago.

*

*

*

*

3. Land and family in White predatory morality

To hear Ivanka Trump Kushner explained the island (video opening clip) — to her White audience, she tells it best — Sazan comes straight out of the Hollywood movies in which White people are indoctrinated: The island is magical, uninhabited, pristine, and it is especially, in White philosophy scam, a place where “people want to live.”

Really? And what people?

Ivanka’s description is also representative of White attitudes toward land, especially other people’s land: Any land uninhabited is for the taking, an attitude well reflected in White Man’s justification of genocide of Palestine as “a land without a people.”

In White morality and business culture, land is just real estate property for buying and selling. It’s not unlike treating Black and brown-skin human slaves or treating Nature as commodity.

Land to them has no living quality, therefore, having no sovereignty, no attachment, no history, no culture and no identity. But it especially belongs to White people with power: the only issue left to resolve getting that choice land, like turning Gaza into a beach front property, is the method.

The answer by White people everywhere, by especially Israel and the Kushners of the world, the Rothschilds, and the JP Morgans, is to get American power involved — just tell Trump what to do (or whoever is the next president).

American power is not in the passport, rendering ordinary Americans bragging about their fucking democracy totally useless. It’s the American state and behind that raw power.

For example, to till the ground, to get rid of 2 million Palestinians and to prepare Gaza for beach front real estate, was to get the Kushner White House bundled onto the project called Board of Peace (also see Grayzone, screenshot below). This Board isn’t just the privatization of the government’s role, of land use, land development, housing construction and so on. It is especially also the privatization of Statehood, that is enfeoffment, a (failed) millennia-old Chinese practice that, astonishingly, some 40 heads of 21st Century governments and states couldn’t see — to their own detriment!

4. Collusion in Gaza, in Albania, in China

American logical reasoning for the employ of brute force to serve a profit motive is one part religious, another part ontological: the White race being supreme, is taught and raised to believe the planet is their inheritance. This sounds absurd in the 21st Century but that’s how White people are indoctrinated in Sunday school, so it’s not for nothing that the Bible’s reputation is voodoo. (Reason follows the Will is White Man’s live-by Nietzschean credo.)

Hence, Benjamin Netanyahu’s never-ending appeal to “western” civilization — by which he has to mean only White people — in warring against all its Muslim neighbors. This appeal to the “West” seems anachronistic to Israel as a color-blind religious state but not if the westerners understood the term to mean “White”, particularly when bundled into its fundamentalist and supremacist racist bigotry. Hence, too, it’s not for nothing the German chancellor Friedrich Merz would publicly thank Israel for “doing the dirty work for all of us” (“all of us” being White people of Europe and America) in bombing Iran and mass killing its entire senior echelons of political and military leaders as well as any Muslims who Jews (Whites) can lay their hands on.

Religious fundamentalist, to which racism and bigotry are parts thereof, are White creations and their cultural value speciality.

Bundled into this biblical-sourced bigotry wherein salvation is an individual endeavor, so, too, is personal, individual ownership. Like the Jehovah God is a tyrant in the universe, the White Man is planet’s earth tyrant. To that tyranny, ownership is a requisite to land possession.

It didn’t matter therefore that Sazan is just 5 km from the Albanian mainland, a UN registered state with a sovereign entitlement, its borders protected by international laws such as the UNCLOS sea law.

While Ivanka reflects on Sazan as a hermit ideal hideaway — an idealized Hollywood fictitious inversion of a rich White public glamor — her White House husband cum agent for Israel Jared Kushner see in Sazan the opposite.

True to his White culture upbringing, he sees land possession as a manifestation of power and a triumph of possession and political and personal connections — both to God and Man.

Names like Max Rothschild, Albanian prime minister Edi Rama and the White House that Kushner drops off in just half a sentence are revealing into his Philistine barbarian character, one who understand no culture nor philosophy but finds himself enamored by power through wealth, politics and ideology.

That the Albanians are today rioting over media revelation the Kushners had taken over Sazan, this foreign takeover of sovereign territory is no accident of history. Albanian demands won’t be realized not even if they try to push Rama out of office. Rama and his ruling clique will see to it precisely because they are also personally invested parties in the theft and sale of Sazan.

Small wonder, then, that 观察者网 guancha, the pro-Zionist Israeli and US financial agent in China have covered up the Sazan protests and riots (also see last segment in this post). Not a word. Throughout China the same kind real estate enfeoffment of Hainan to (especially White) foreign capital interests have taken place.

Modern-day enfeoffment, the parcelling out of land to special interests groups, resembles in every detail China’s dynasty era employing special civil and criminal laws separate from the rest of the nation and people. In today’s China it makes foreigners a special, favored category of population.

There were prototypes of this discrimination against Chinese, most infamous and notorious of all in the 21st Century was Xi Jinping’s sale of the Guiling/Kuliang mountains to White Americans while as a Fujian mayor and as provincial governor 1985 to 2002 (see this).

Newer and more matured forms of enfeoffment have turned Chinese cities German, such as in a Shanghai metropolitan area known as Anting 安亭, population 96,000, the also German enclave of Taicang 太仓 in Jiangsu, 831,000, and numerous other versions, French, Russian, Italian equivalents and of course, Anglo-American Hong Kong.

In Xi’s betrayal of the nation and people of China is the evolving China-US relations in creating a G2 alliance, not militarily, but on terms political, economic and especially finance — with support in landed property possession.

When Trump arrived in China with a planeload of Wall Street billionaires (see list here) he was expressing the dichotomous, dual-face quality of American economic power that the Chinese government had, following advise by Anglophile motherf**kers, stupidly copied in its entirety and now must live with its consequences — or die.

*

5. The Xi-Trump Grand Collusion

The structure of the dichotomy Trump brought by a planeload to China runs as follows:

• Elon Musk needs Chinese electric car batteries as does China need Jew, Zionist influence on Trump.

• Tim Cook needs China’s phone parts and production lines as does China need American technology markets.

• Stephen Schwarzman (of Blackstone, pictured above while peddling influence in China in 2025) needs political connections to break into Chinese real estate for the same reason Pan Shiyi 潘石屹 and wife Zhang Xin 张欣 used to peddle influence inside the Communist Party for Shanghai and Beijing land to build their SOHO China.

• David Solomon (Goldman Sachs) and Larry Fink (BlackRock) hanker after Chinese IPOs and panda bonds in equal measure to Chinese capitalists (think Jack Ma) hankering after a sanction-free US banking and finance system along with its Cayman island hide-outs (think Sazan) to collect and amass then stash their Dollar receipts abroad.

• Brian Sikes (Cargill) needs Chinese port and cargo warehousing to store and distribute US grain and related farm commodities just as badly China needs to re-secure the Panama and Australia’s Darwin ports before American power wrench and breakup the entire shipping infrastructure.

• Ryan McInerney and Michael Miebach (respectively Visa and MasterCard) want a tie-in merger and acquisition deal with Jack Ma’s Ant Finance, AliBaba’s subsidiary, for an equivalent reciprocal action in US consumer, credit card finance and student loans.

This China-US get rich racket (see video, Wall Street Lands in Beijing) is the direct result of Anglophile influence peddling (and corruption within the CPC) urging Chinese officials to suck up to White America to get rich quick.

It’s this same corruption racket that Trump has brought to China for, Xi’s says, a “historic moment.”

The sensible, ethical Chinese approach to that “historical moment” was to mitigate against and install protective walls against the dire, corrosive effects of dealing with Americans, especially with the Trump family. Instead, the May summit cemented the desires of China’s urban noveau riche and their Anglophile go-between motherf**kers in 观察 guancha especially to get more out of a Xi-Trump collusion.

That is, restated in a word, the summit tightened the embrace between the assortment of influence peddlers for the Bund of Shanghai, SOHO China and the panoply of Wall Street private capital. (See Xi Jinping’s Epstein Friends.) Xi and Trump had enabled all of that!

Below are parts of the Xi-Trump collusion term sheet into which Jared Kushner sits in between throughout. (See Kushner’s role and his admission in this video interview, published Oct 2023. Interview is featured further below in video.)

5.1 US current term sheet to China (with corresponding China offer in the next list.)

• (US-a) Retreat from Taiwan but, on the side, the US will let Japan and Philippines take on China along the Pacific sea borders without direct US intervention.

• (US-b) No weapons for Iran in return for a halt to the American hijack of Chinese cargo and end to secondary sanctions.

• (US-c) A revival of the prototype 鼓岭 Guling/Kuliang high-end real estate deal (think Sazan or Gaza waterfront development) wherein entire chunks of prime real estate property, including mountains, are sold or leased to American mortgage finance such as Blackstone and BlackRock. To trade this property grab, the US have seized Chinese-operated landed property around the world, notably Panama and Australia sea ports and transport routes.

• (US-d) The US will no longer touch nor harass the estimated 270,000 Chinese students and researchers in the US. What will China do?

• (US-e) To protect against depreciation of the Dollar-Rmb exchange value in Chinese held in Dollar-denominated assets, especially those in the US, is an offer to retire US federal debt, currently at US$39 trillion, by turning them over to private capital markets. Will Chinese bank savings help to fund those markets?

Note on shifting Dollar-based foreign assets held by China into US hands then collaterizing these purchases into Chinese assets: land, ports, gold and silver, market funds, panda bonds, Chinese stocks and insurance.

A common method runs as follows: A US corporate buys a Chinese asset, say the two Panama ports. These assets convert into collateral to raise China loans/debt for the purchases of Chinese government bonds or buy any asset, especially land, from Chinese ownership.

While, on the one hand, the Dollar proceeds accrued to former Chinese port owners convert into Rmb-denominated financial and physical assets at home, those assets can be resold to the American partner who bought those ports, at a profit of course. If the Chinese assets are land and buildings, said American partner, would have to raise Rmb through Chinese banks for its purchases. Raising Rmb in this way, commonly called bridging finance on fixed interest terms with draw-down, use-by expiry date, offers the Panama ports as collateral. Issuing bonds on the back of the Panama ports is another option but this is messy and exiting it even messier.

Regardless of the circuitry, Xi’s cronies colluding with the cronies of Trump and Kushner, the US gets a headline political victory and port ownership. But that ownership is reverted back to Chinese control through the Rmb loan. In effect is the exchange of two bundles of assets, an existing bundle in the Panama ports and a new one created in China, land and buildings if the assets are for long term possession, or government bonds, the most favored form of assets for easy access and liquidity.

The same idea restated another way is a one-on-one transaction, Class A for Class B assets, money changing hands in between under a easy, clean, one-off straightforward deal like buying a slap of pork off a street vendor.

Because national assets are at stake and because the pork will have to pass through multiple layers of bureaucracy, Kushner enters the picture. For paving the way, how much in payback will Kushner get for stitching together such a deal? The standard, benchmark fee (called a commission fee) of 10 percent of closing pricing is a high probability.

Goldman Sachs played this same middle-man role and, most notoriously, got 9 percent for selling Dollar bonds, and that’s on top of an assortment of fees that totalled more than US$100 million. The bond issue, in two tranches, spread over in 2011-to-2013 raised US$3.5 billion to buy all of Malaysia’s power infrastructure already owned by the Malaysian government. The deal, known as 1MDB, turned out to be a fraud because the power plants didn’t need US$3.5 bn upfront of which US$1 billion went straight into the pockets of the family of Malaysian prime minister (until 2018) Najib Razak and his cronies outside of government.

The IMDB involved half a dozen legal jurisdictions, from New York to Singapore, Hong Kong and Luxembourg. This is reason why the CEOs of Goldman and JP Morgan had accompanied Trump to the Beijing summit: Kushner will need their global distribution and banking network in the event bonds and loans have to be mustered.

That two measly Panama ports could spin into multiple layers and derivative instruments of wealth — collectively called “financialization” — is precisely the strength in the Trump entourage. The catch is this: collusion at this international depth and scale requires political agreement at the highest, Xi-Trump level.

It is this same one-on-one, family-to-family, state and private collusion that forms the essence of the Sazan deal. Somewhere in Albania, or next door Montenegro, Max Rothschild has received a pledge of hard, tangible collateral, most commonly a landed property, marked up 10 times, or 20 or 100. With that pledge and markup, the Rothschild is in business, lending some US$1 billion to Kushner’s Affinity Partners for “development” of Sazan. The catch is, Edi Rama feels, as prime minister, he owns Sazan, even Albania. Or he is a Xi Jinping who feels entitled to the 1.4 billion nation of the People’s Republic — like in the old dynastic days.

*

5.2 The China term sheet to US.

• (CN-a) Offer Trump & Co an “open up China” market policy without committing to specifics but widely taken to mean individual and corporate access to China’s financial and real estate market. In return the White House will say and do nothing on Taiwan. Result: This exchange has turned out to be a geo-political disaster for China, producing within a month of the summit a Japan-Philippine agreement on “maritime delimitation”.

• (CN-b) A Xi pledge not to arm Iran in return for the stated in clause (US-b). Result: Like the above this too became another policy disaster. Within weeks of the summit, the US sanctioned at least four Chinese banks that were financial intermediaries in the China-Iran trade and a slew of independent refiners handling Iranian crude, for a total of 18 sanctioned entities. Of significance, is the Bank of Kunlun 昆仑银行 in Xinjiang owned by China’s state-owned petroleum company, CNPC. The bank is Iran’s primary wallet, receiving payments on Iran’s behalf for oil, remitting that to Iran in Rmb or other currencies, and spending (i.e. debiting) the balances on Iranians purchases of Chinese goods, including gold. In this way, up to an equivalent of US$100 million a day flows through Iran’s bank account, or US$3 billion a month. How this flow will be disrupted is an open question.

• (CN-c & CN-d) In meeting US hostage taking of Chinese students in the US, the Chinese government will collaborate with Blackstone and others (like the universities of Princeton and Yale) on Xi’s pet project to resettle 50,000 young (White) Americans in China. Arriving with Trump for the May summit, Schwarzman met China’s education minister Huai Jinpeng. Blackstone’s offer, was finalized a month earlier in April. On top of offering scholarship under its Schwarzman Scholars program, Blackstone will finance American students to settle in China. The program acts as like a neo-colonial occupation gateway to enter China through a Chinese language exempt, easy-to-graduate, class-taught masters degree in “global affairs” (whatever that is) in Tsinghua University in Beijing. It starts in August 2027.

  • Sold as a lie — to “teach young leaders about China (that’s) harder to get into than Harvard” — the program serves the rich by the rich because Schwarzman offers no such scholarships to any of 200 million university-aged children of poor peasant families in China. On the contrary, Schwarzman have been influence peddling in China, especially all through 2025 in get-rich land schemes. One of those he met, foreign minister Wang Yi urged Schwarzman to use his influence to protect China-US relations from “decoupling” under a branding China calls “people to people exchange.” That branding, too, was a lie because, in the main, people-to-people meant elite to elite, the corrupt rubbing the corrupt. In that relationship, Schwarzman will recover his money from buying and selling choice real estate, along with provision of mortgage financing to new American buyers. It will draw on the Guling/Kuliang model of White colonial traders settling down and occupying 19th Century China. (See English-Chinese sign above nailed to a tree at the perimeter gate of a Anglo-American property in Shanghai until early 1949.)

  • To support this enfeoffment of Chinese land to serve foreign private capital and a new Chinese land owning class, the Xi government has proposed a new, American-style homestead law entitling local authorities to seize and amass rural land from farmers and peasants, re-gazette land use, re-title, then repackage the title deeds for resale to private property developers including foreign capital.

• (CN-e) China will continue to retrench its Treasury securities, now down to US$650 billion, half its 2013 peak of US$1.3 trillion. The proceeds of which, mostly held by and in Chinese banks, are used to pay for Rmb-denominated government bonds in the 2025-2026 financial year worth some Rmb 1 trillion. In effect, this is a forced carry-over trade in reverse, exchanging high-yielding US Treasuries for ten-year China government bonds (CGB) that yield half of US bonds at present (chart below). This will free private Rmb savings in Chinese banks to migrate elsewhere, China capital controls notwithstanding.

*

*

5.3 Summary of Xi-Trump Collusion

Below is a summary of the points raised earlier, above.

• Liberalize finance: Convert China-held US Treasury securities holdings into tangible assets and credit to international capital market.

• Open up China: Offer Chinese properties, especially real estate, insurance and private equity assets for purchase by US (and Israeli) companies and individuals.

• Consumption boost: Launder Chinese savings and capital through individual consumers into US universities (some 270,000 cumulatively (in four-year residential cycles, aggregating US$135 billion), into property and wealth investments in London, and into hoarding and distribution of Chinese capital though Cayman island centres.

• China & US as G2 Peacemakers: While the US ignites fires around the globe, Trump and Xi step in like vultures to pick on the carcass: Gaza Board of Peace land, Ukraine land, food and minerals, Venezuela oil, Iran oil, gas and shipping routes, Panama ports.

*

Sidebar #1 Private capital

6. The invasive cancer that Xi Jinping seeded in China

The video’s title “China just replace steel with this insane new material” is, on point of fact, accurate: high-tensile, formable, moldable specialty steel is the new generation of raw material for building physical civilizations.

But that topic’s underlying theme — as is usual in such discussions of West versus China — misses the infinitely more critical aspect of why the West lags behind. This lag results not from ideology, not in free market capitalism versus socialism, or communism that Anglophone motherf**kers at Friends of Socialist China mislead and lie to the world about China’s meteorite economic resurgence (in this, for example, screenshot further below).

On the contrary, free market and, with it, the accompanying technological change, works perfectly to China’s great industrial reformation. If socialism were to replace the free market, the results would be demonstrably worse — guaranteed!

In talking about the inertia in western industrial (hence steel) production, the video alludes for a few seconds to private capital, then drops it entirely — the same private capital that equally stupid White people like Donald Trump say underlays America’s industrial greatness.

No: The problem in industrial production lays in the existence of private (western) capital, and access thereof, from poor Saharan countries to the richest in the Persian Gulf to Sweden.

Private capital not only inhibits and stops technology change and application (such as building a new specialty steel plant), it is the exact, direct cause to western industrial and economic decay.

That cause, lying in the private capacity to alone print money and distribute it, is this: its exclusive power to issue credit, its monopoly to determine who gets rich and who does, who gets a loan and who not and at what terms. Private capital is the parasitical thing that eats alive the system, known as capitalism, hosting it.

Over time, this will be Xi Jinping’s contribution to destroying Chinese civilization when he brings in American private capital, bundling it to the Chinese monetary system, marrying it to an ethical Confucian economy, and to fund real estate and corporate takeovers, start ups, and finance industrial production.

In that process, Xi will corrupt China’s national, economic rejuvenation. This is the corruption from paying off bureaucratic favors and influence peddling (to Xi’s White worshipping Anglophile cabal) to fiscal and monetary planning. Xi will destroy China from the inside out, as the West has done to itself since the introduction of bank finance into capitalism and ideology, both Left and Right.

*

Video topics in Kushner Interview

• Trade war, BRI, China refusing US access, not following rules. Solar panels, electrification as examples of state subsidy for China to gain pricing and market power.

• Xi: China colonial history,

• G2 & Michael Pillsbury: The Hundred-Year Marathon, China’s Secret Strategy to replace America as the Global Superpower, 2016.

• Kushner: Kushner’s children learn Mandarin, children sing songs for Xi and wife. Prefers US-led world order than Chinese led & playing “zero-sum” game — these farmed the”frames the US perspective”.

• Trump: unpredictable to Chinese; playing “day-by-day, issue-by-issue” (Kushner: “it’s how an entrepreneur thinks”). China lifted “300 million people out of poverty at the expense of other countries, the world.” I want to change the paradigm so that for the next 20 years we can maintain our advantage over them, our competitive dynamic.” US has best private sector

References

• Donald Trump’s strategy with China | Jared Kushner and Lex Fridman. Lex Clips, Oct 15, 2023.

• Capital Flight: Kushner family in Beijing: ‘Invest $500,000 and immigrate’ to US. CNN May 8, 2017. https://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/06/news/jared-kushner-nicole-family-event

• The dirty secrets behind Jared & Ivanka’s illegal Private Albanian Island. Jimmy Dore June 6, 2026.

• Protests Erupt Over Ivanka, Kushner Private Albanian Island. Breaking Points, June 5, 2026.

• Giant crowds clash with police in Albanian protests over Ivanka’s plan to build on protected island. The Independent, June 5, 2026.

• Kushner Family Businesses And Ties To Countries Around The World. MSNBC, Jan 9, 2018.

• The New Yorker: Jared Kushner Is ‘China’s Trump Card.’ MSNBC, Jan 22, 2018.

• WSJ: Jared Kushner Warned About Ties To Wendi Deng Murdoch. MSNBC, Jan 17, 2018.

• Donald Trump’s strategy with China | Jared Kushner and Lex Fridman. Lex Clips, Oct 15, 2023. Lex Interview Partial, Lex Clips Oct 18, 2023.

• What Does Xi Jinping Want from Mar-a-Lago? The Cipher Brief, 2017 Apr 5.

• Capital Flight: Kushner family in Beijing: ‘Invest $500,000 and immigrate’ to US. CNN May 8, 2017. https://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/06/news/jared-kushner-nicole-family-event

• China’s Xi Jinping dines in San Francisco with US business leaders, hints at return of pandas. San Francisco Standard, Nov 15, 2023.

• Anbang Insurance. https://www.timesofisrael.com/kushners-make-4-billion-deal-with-chinese-firm-raising-eyebrows/

• Jared Kushner’s family firm ends investment talks with China’s Anbang, BBC, 2017 Mar.

• Jared Kushner’s sister, Nichole Kushner Meyer and the family’s attempt to raise money in China.. CCN, 2017 May 8: https://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/06/news/jared-kushner-nicole-family-event. (Image below, Kushner fund raising advertisement in Beijing, 2017.)

*

*

Sidebar #2 Making China White

7. Israelization of America & Making China White

To see how the elite pyramid structure in politics and wealth, in China, Japan and the US screws over common people, consider the case of the grandson of Sanae Takaichi, China’s top political enemy in Japan (video above).

Above, 小懒 explains the structure of hereditary politics bringing up people with positions and money because of their family name, no different than it was 2,000, 3,000 years ago. Under the same racist bigotry, White motherf**kers (from nobodies like Ben Norton to the children of Jared Kushner, etc) and Niggers (Daniel Dumbrill) insert themselves into Chinese affairs. They sing the praises of China, hankering to get in via education, business, media, tourism, to make money and to get ahead. These become the “China Hands.”

Said 小懒: “These so-called ‘China Hands’ are the most deadly… for they stab the deepest!”

The Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu who grew up in the US is a classic case in point.

He expresses the penetration of Israeli Jews first into local society, seeping into financial and corporate power, then into the capture of US party politics, domestic law making, the military and finally into a merger between the US and Israel now coming into fruition. The Israelization of America is today complete. (See especially Max Blumenthal speaking, from @19:40, on the privatization of statehood via Kushner and the Rothschilds in collusion with individual rulers in the US, Israel, Albania, Qatar, etc.)

Early and intermediate signs in the privatization of the Chinese state is seen through the capture of the nation by foreigners (White Americans and White Jews in particular), recruited through shady local Fifth Column characters like Henry Wang, Victor Gao, Zhang Weiwei.

Speaking in Princeton University, Henry Wang, founder-president of the Center for China & Globalization (CCG) openly invites 50,000 (White) young Americans to settle in and create their own colonies inside China. Wang attributes this invitation to Xi Jinping in a speech made in San Francisco for the APEC summit in November 2023. (There is no such written record of Xi saying so.) Regardless, 16,000 have already been registered for the first batch of admissions, facilitated in part of

To a White audience, outside China, Wang’s deputy at CCG, Victor Gao pretends to be China’s spokesman.

Gao is on the frontline to promote a G2 economic and financial alliance between China and the US. Inside China, Gao’s chief propagandist for G2 is the Zionist, pro-Israel-US, publishing house guancha 观察者. It promotes the Israelization of China — that is, to turn China White — through the offices of the Chinese embassy in Tel Aviv and its ambassador Xiao Junzheng. Through Zhang Weiwei, guancha sells and markets Donald Trump in MAGA “communism.”

Meanwhile, Daniel Dumbrill, with Ben Norton in tow, treat China like some 19th Century colonial settlement. To exploit and to sponge on its subsidized “open door” policy, they urge foreigners (presumably, White speaking Anglo-Americans) to individually move into and occupy China — permanently — through its cheap university classrooms, by taking up jobs, and preferably fuck Chinese girls for some mixed-breed specimen kids as Dumbrill is now doing (above).

Through the Anglophile Wave Media, Cyrus Janssen speaks like China is his father’s property for him to sell and convert into a White copy if only foreigners were to pretend — to “become Chinese.” All that is required of pretense is, drink Chinese tea, wear Chinese clothes, eat hotpot and foreign gays strut around town in hanfu showing off their liberal man-fuck-man genderless western values.

Cultural appropriation in China — by pretending to be Chinese — is that easy because the Chinese are vulnerable and vulnerable because they are highly tolerant so White males like Janssen can tonight just grab any teenage girl off the streets, fuck her, make babies, dump her, move on to the next, and so create a mix-breed racial specimen.

Janssen is followed by other White motherf**kers (Jason Smith) who, like all White Man singing the praises of China are invariably unemployed and unemployable at home. Hence, they look to China to get rich, just as did 19th Century Anglo opium traders and pirates. The chief criteria to move into and occupy China is White skin, speaking English, preferably with an Internet connection at home — just like ABCs who flaunt their Chineseness in Shanghai White enclave bars because they are Bananas, white inside, yellow outside, who can’t even remember to write their mother’s name in hanzi. Outside those Whitey bars, they have no idea how 1.4 billion Chinese live and die and why Chinese dynastic governments come and go.

*

Jared Kushner: Everything You Didn’t Know About His Shitty Past, 2026 Jun 7.

*

Why China Is Watching the SpaceX IPO More Closely Than Wall Street. 2026 Jun 7.

*

人生如戏

*

*

Xi Jinping & his White American Epstein class…

Change of Custodian of the Mandate of Heaven

What else has Donald Trump got on Xi Jinping in the Epstein Files for a Taiwan-Open Up China real estate deal? The partial list (below) constitute the preliminary referential causes for the People’s and PLA (People’s Liberation Army) arrest, pending full investigation, prosecution and execution of Xi, his cabal of Anglophiles and associates:

• Xiplomacy: Xi Jinping and his American Friends, Xinhua. 2023 Jul.

• China’s Urgent Search for a Replacement to Xi Jinping, shuzheng. 2026 Jun.

• A Global Mandate of Heaven: China’s Post Xi Comeback into a New World Order, shuzheng. 2026 Jun.

• The Epstein Class, Dissent Magazine. 2026 Mar.

• Everything To Know About The ‘Epstein Class,’ The Term That’s On Everyone’s Tongues, AOL. 2026 Feb.

*

*

Post Xi Jinping China in a New World

习近平 肏你妈. Fuck the corrupt White lover Xi Jinping. In a new world order, China and the Chinese demand the following:

• 1. The return by repatriation of all Chinese property held abroad, artifacts, items old and new, large and small, now stashed away worldwide, whether in museums (totalling at least 47) or in private collection. White people and their minions have 10 years to complete this demand, all shipment charges repayable at cost by China and handled only by Chinese. In particular, are items from the Dunhuang caves, loot from at least 32 Han ancient town and cemetery sites in Taklamakan Desert of Xinjiang’s Tarim Basin, the 圓明園 yuanming yuan, the Beijing National Treasure Museum and Library, plus thousands of artifacts pilfered from individual villages, temples, ancestral halls and private homes by White people arriving as “tourists” or on other visit visas holding passports from such countries as the Netherlands, France, Sweden, Germany, UK and the US.

*

• 2. The return in full of 1 billion taels of gold or 1,180 million troy ounces, the equal of 37,000 tonnes, with 2022 exchange value US$2.1 trillion, extorted from then taken out of China between 1901 and 1940, both years inclusive, by and distributed as follows:

  • Russia 28.97%,

  • Germany 20.02%,

  • France 15.75%,

  • Britain 11.25%,

  • Japan 7.73%,

  • United States 7.32%,

  • Italy 7.32%,

  • Belgium 1.89%,

  • Austria-Hungary 0.89%,

  • Netherlands 0.17%,

  • Spain 0.03%,

  • Portugal 0.02%,

  • Sweden and Norway 0.01%.

*

• 3. The compensation and repayment in full in gold and/or the equivalent precious metals (no banknotes) for the willful fire destruction, plunder and pillage of the 圓明園 yuanming yuan in its reconstruction value, with restoration of all items (estimated 1 million pieces) removed and stolen, all value calculations made on the date of repayment backdated to 1860 October 5, with interests charged therefrom at a minimum of 2 percent per annum with ceiling on an agreed fixed rate. States primarily responsible for the murders, arson and theft 圓明園 yuanming yuan: France and UK.

*

• 4. The return of all Chinese ancestral land through international treaty, which shall be recognized and lodged in the United Nations General Assembly, annulling all colonial and/or foreign defined and foreign marked land and sea borders, whether formal or informal, and thus for the full return of all Chinese land and territorial waters sovereign to, contiguously and concurrently held within the land and sea borders up to and inclusive of territories of Ming and/or Qing China, which ever is applicable and acceptable to the People’s Republic of China.

*

• 5. A complete statement of facts and full recognition to be registered in the United Nations General Assembly of the atrocities and crimes against humanity and war crimes, including genocide, ethnic cleansing and plunder, committed by involved countries, individually and collectively, against the nation and people of China, beginning 1839 to 1949, and extended to the Korea peninsula, 1950 to 1953. A token sum of punishment of US$1 shall be applied to each of these guilty parties as seal and as acceptance of apology as provided for in the UN statement and recognition of facts.

*

*

《逢雪宿芙蓉山主人》

Overnight in snow at Mt Furong

Remembering 劉長卿 Liu Changqing (709 - 785 CE)

From the quan tangshi《卷一百四十七》

《逢雪宿芙蓉山主人》

逢雪宿芙... :	

日暮蒼山遠，

天寒白屋貧。

柴門聞犬吠，

風雪夜歸人。

[In translation, mine.]

At dusk, darkness blanket distant mountains,

yonder, heaven turns cold, the house looks poor.

From the brush-gate, I hear a dog bark,

a traveller has returned through wind and snow.

• Note: Liu’s poetry have been preserved in and can be heard in their original Chinese at Works by Liu Changqing 劉長卿 | LibriVox: https://librivox.org/author/3147?primary_key=3147&search_category=author&search_page=1&search_form=get_results&search_order=alpha

*

*

*

*

Worse than lying to their audiences, the news, the chatterbox and the YouTube headlines that each make money out of every click, they misinform on the information and data they broadcast and publish. Most information and data don’t lie; they don’t have to.

Here’s an example. To the question, “What is the dollar share of global financial transactions?” data from the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) provides a very consistent answer over the years: around 88 percent.

Instantly, this shuts down any and all claims that “dedollarization” is happening across the world. Airy, gaseous terms like “dedollarization” are themselves false when further used to buttress inane YouTube talking head claims of “American decline.”

The BIS number of 88 percent is unshakeable until you asked what is the composition of the trade that the number measures against?

The answer is well known to economists: trade in goods and services. But look beyond the word trade or, better yet, trade in services. This is because, within services, is a persistent, trajectory rise in dollar-denominated transactions of derivative financial instruments of all kinds, most commonly known by their initials as MBS (mortgage-backed securities), CDO (collaterized debt obligations).

Outside these are the derivatives trades more international in scope. Collectively they are called forward and futures contracts held over trade of currencies, precious metals (gold and silver) and commodities (the like of grain, copper, beef).

In 2001, BIS recorded US$100 trillion for the total of these dollar derivative trades. In Dec 2007, just a six-year difference, those trades had risen to US$681 trillion, an implausible number, yet factually true, even though world total GDP that year was just US$58.5 trillion, US$110.9 trillion in 2024 (chart on top).

It is implausible because, if GDP is the total currency measure of all goods and services produced in a single period, how can a sub-sector as trade in derivatives be almost seven times bigger?

Yet the number is factual and on record.

If factual then, against this phenomenal growth in the underlying denominator, i.e. dollar derivatives, the 88 percent dollar share in global settlements begins to look false. Once derivatives, which are just paper transactions that produces nothing tangible, are taken off of trade composition, then the dollar share will have to crash.

The only question left to answer is, how much remains.

It won’t be much since actual GDP output is seven times less than the dollar volume in derivative transactions. Does that prove dedollarization? Which is a stupid question to ask because derivatives existed some two or three decades before dedollarization (by BRICS or whoever) became vogue.

Reflecting on the same matter — which is, establishing an underlying empirical truth — is another commonly talked issue: Who is the big power, the stronger and the bigger of two between Country A and B.

We take this case from Moon of Alabama whose answer to the question reframed goes like this: “Who of the two, Russia and China, has all the stuff that is needed for a modern life?”

Alabama supplies the answer in two parts.

• Part 1: The country with all the “energy, minerals, commodities, foodstuff plus the abilities to retrieve and process all of them into useful products.” On that basis, therefore, Russia is bigger than China that “mostly import these things through rather fragile sea routes.”

• Part 2 uses income per head on purchase power parity, PPP, basis. With that, with Russia's GDP per capita in 2022 at US$31,962 while China stood at US$21,291, then Russia is the stronger.

Alabama’s Part 2 answer is easily stamped out, like it’s shit on a sidewalk.

Just look at the comparative charts below, which uses World Bank data on current exchange rates brought up to date to 2025. Make a guess, which of the two chart is Russia or China?

More interestingly is why, writing in 2026 March, (this date, as pointed out by , is wrong; it’s 2023 March) had Alabama use 2022 PPP data? and not say 2024 or 2025?

The answer is suggested in the same graphs: the Russian rouble, fluctuating year to year, is not a stable currency unlike the Chinese Rmb. Against the Dollar, the rouble crashed in 2022, turning to rubble.

In practical terms that rouble exchange crash allowed each Dollar to simply buy more goods in 2022. Or, using the same exchange conversion in PPP terms, Russia looked to have produced a GDP per head three times its nominal exchange rate GDP of US$10,500 per head — a number less than China’s US$11,500.

Alabama wasn’t wrong when framing his GDP numbers in PPP terms. Like BIS, that Alabama motherf**ker just knew how to lie about it.

Knowing how to lie harks back to Alabama’s question: “Who of two, Russia and China, is the bigger and stronger?” To get the answer he wants, he had to pick on the thing — a poor performing financial year at that — to satisfy his racist bigotry.

This need to lie is, inversely, also a need to suppress information, like BIS did. But it would be exposed however if he simply put up the two charts below showing a pattern over 10 years. But the truthful way, by demonstrating context of trajectory, is not what Alabama seeks.

Like BIS, Alabama also relies on gaseous, woolly terms — “these things,” “abilities to retrieve and process” them and “useful products” — as substitutes for empirical data. Unlike BIS, however, there’s not a single specific term, not to mention a number of measure.

What “useful products” is Alabama talking about? Like cars that it imports from China, previously Europe? Or, like oil and gas that it “retrieves” — then sell to China — for its US$31,962 in terms of 2022 PPP income or about US$10,000 in current rate of exchange? Which is also to say if Russia doesn’t sell that which it “retrieves,” it won’t be getting its US$31,962.

Alabama conducting himself as a motherf**ker stares into your face!

Back then to Alabama’s question-and-answer: Who, between Russia and China, is the bigger power, having “all the stuff” that makes modern life possible. All the stuff? Without imports, Russians can’t even make a toilet bowl so Alabama can have a shit especially in winter.

The moral of the story is this: White Motherf**kers like Moon of Alabama are not interested in empirical truths to conduct their lives and negotiate through this world. They rather make up stories just to show how their race is cleverer, smarter and the stronger than the rest of the world (and Chinese), the supreme White race chosen by god.

In BIS, they regularly churn out information and data that obscures and obfuscates the same facts rather than illuminates so as not unsettle the “America still leads” myth. This is explained in the video below, which is both interesting and very good!

The fault is not in the stars that White people look up at the moon howling and cursing nightly, the fault is in themselves — backed by their White audiences — none of who could ever see themselves as underling dogs.

*

*

*