During the coldest stretches of last winter, electricity usage understandably increased as families and businesses worked to keep their homes and buildings warm. That higher usage contributed to higher bills. But for many Delmarva Power customers, the increases were far more dramatic than simply using more electricity.

Our offices heard from constituents who received electric bills exceeding $1,000, with some reporting bills that were two or three times what they would normally pay.

That experience deserves more than an explanation of how much electricity someone used. It deserves a serious conversation about the policies that determine how Delaware generates and purchases electricity, what those policies cost ratepayers, and whether they are helping us build the generation we need for the future.

Small charges still add up

One response we frequently hear when discussing Delaware’s energy mandates is that individual costs aren’t significant.

An Alternative Compliance Payment might only amount to a few dollars on a particular bill. Another program or surcharge might add another $10 or $20. On their own, those amounts may not seem particularly large.

But families don’t pay each line item separately. They pay the total.

When grocery prices remain elevated, gasoline costs are putting pressure on household budgets, and families are already dealing with higher costs across the board, telling a Delaware family that another $20 charge “isn’t that much” misses the point.

Small costs add up, especially when they are the result of policies the General Assembly has the ability to change.

And Delaware’s energy policies have created a growing number of those costs.

The RPS has a real cost

One of the clearest examples is Delaware’s Renewable Portfolio Standard.

Senate Bill 33, signed into law in 2021, increased the renewable energy requirement for Delaware’s electric suppliers. Republicans warned at the time that the mandate would increase costs for ratepayers and create challenges for utilities trying to comply.

Those concerns were not theoretical.

Delmarva Power has repeatedly been unable to meet the renewable requirement and has therefore made Alternative Compliance Payments. In 2025 alone, Delmarva Power customers paid $14,370,700 through these payments, with the money going into DNREC’s green energy fund.

We understand the technical distinction. An Alternative Compliance Payment is not a fine for illegal conduct, rather it is a compliance mechanism written into state law.

But the practical reality is straightforward: if Delaware did not require a certain percentage of electricity to come from qualifying renewable resources, there would be no renewable quota to fall short of and no Alternative Compliance Payment to make.

The name doesn’t change who ultimately bears the cost.

Senate and House Republicans responded by introducing legislation to address the problem.

House Bill 80, sponsored by Rep. Mike Smith and Sen. Eric Buckson, would have significantly reduced the state’s renewable mandate. Sen. Gerald Hocker’s SS1 for Senate Bill 64 would have returned money to ratepayers. These were efforts to provide direct relief while reconsidering policies that are adding costs to Delaware’s electricity system.

RGGI is another cost we need to address

The Renewable Portfolio Standard is not the only policy affecting energy costs.

Delaware joined the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, or RGGI, in 2008. The program requires participating power plants to purchase allowances for their carbon emissions.

Republicans have proposed getting Delaware out of RGGI because we believe Delaware ratepayers should not be forced to absorb additional costs from policies that make it more difficult and expensive to generate electricity.

Again, the argument isn’t that any one program is solely responsible for a family’s electric bill.

It is that Delaware has layered policy after policy onto an electricity system that already faces growing demand. If we want lower bills, we need to take a serious look at every policy that makes electricity more expensive and ask whether the benefit justifies the cost.

We also need more generation

Reducing unnecessary costs is only part of the solution.

Delaware needs more electricity generation.

Demand is increasing. Data centers and other large electricity users are adding significant new demand to the PJM system, while existing generation faces increasing pressure. At the same time, some dependable sources of electricity have been retired or placed under increasing regulatory pressure.

We believe Delaware should have a diverse energy portfolio that includes renewable energy, natural gas, nuclear power and other reliable sources of generation.

That is why Republicans supported and introduced legislation aimed at increasing the amount of dependable electricity available to Delaware.

House Bill 186, introduced by Rep. Kevin Hensley and Sen. Brian Pettyjohn, would have created a targeted, capped tax credit to encourage the construction of up to three high-efficiency combined-cycle natural gas power plants. The goal was straightforward: bring additional dependable generation onto the system, improve energy security and help stabilize prices.

Senators Gerald Hocker and Brian Pettyjohn have also been working with stakeholders on what it would take to bring the Indian River Power Plant back online, potentially putting an existing generating facility back to work for Delaware.

We also support nuclear energy as part of Delaware’s long-term energy strategy. Nuclear power provides reliable, around-the-clock generation without the same carbon emissions associated with fossil fuels, and Delaware should not rule out any viable source of dependable electricity as we look at how to meet future demand.

And Republicans have not opposed renewable energy simply because it is renewable. In 2021, our caucus unanimously supported community solar legislation through Senate Bill 2, expanding renewable options while recognizing the importance of maintaining a reliable electric grid.

The goal should not be to pick one energy source and eliminate everything else.

The goal should be more electricity, more reliability, and lower costs.

Data centers should help provide the power they consume

The rapid growth of data centers presents another challenge.

These facilities can consume enormous amounts of electricity, creating substantial new demand on the PJM grid and across the nation. Delaware should welcome investment and economic development, but we should not ask existing ratepayers to shoulder the cost of energy necessary to serve these massive electricity users.

That is why Senate Republicans supported House Bill 445, legislation that passed the Senate unanimously.

The bill requires qualifying data centers to produce or procure sufficient generation to meet 100% of their annual energy needs, with requirements for new generation, clean energy resources, and backup power. It also provides mechanisms for data centers that cannot immediately meet the full requirement to work toward doing so.

The principle is one we strongly support: if a company is going to consume enormous amounts of electricity, it should be part of the solution for producing that electricity.

We should not continue adding demand to the grid while expecting existing Delaware families and businesses to absorb the cost.

The path forward

There is no single bill that will solve Delaware’s energy challenges, but there are concrete steps we can take.

We can reduce or eliminate mandates that unnecessarily increase the cost of electricity. We can pursue an exit from RGGI. We can encourage the construction of new natural gas generation. We can keep nuclear energy on the table. We can look for ways to bring existing generating facilities back online. We can make sure massive new electricity users contribute to the generation needed to serve them.

Most importantly, we can create an environment where companies actually want to build power generation in Delaware.

More generation means more supply. More supply means greater reliability and, over time, downward pressure on prices.

That is the direction we believe Delaware needs to take.

The 153rd General Assembly demonstrated that there are Republicans in the General Assembly willing to propose real solutions and support good ideas regardless of which side of the aisle they originate from.

We will continue fighting for policies that increase power generation, strengthen the reliability of our electric grid, and lower the cost of keeping the lights on for Delaware families and businesses.

Delaware does not need more energy mandates that make electricity more expensive.

We need more power.

Despite the marathon session, Senate and House Republicans remained focused on advancing practical legislation that supports Delaware families, strengthens our workforce, improves public safety, expands access to healthcare, and protects our agricultural community. Many of those measures have already been signed into law or now await Governor Matt Meyer’s signature.

Delivering Results for Delaware

Throughout this legislative session, Republicans in the General Assembly sponsored and advanced legislation addressing many of the issues Delawareans discuss most often.

In healthcare, SS 1 for Senate Bill 208 modernizes Delaware’s psychology licensing framework to help expand access to behavioral healthcare services across our state. House Bill 305 establishes a pilot program aimed at improving health outcomes for Delawareans living with diabetes while exploring ways to reduce long-term healthcare costs. Senate Bills 216 and 217, both signed into law, join Delaware in interstate licensure compacts for respiratory therapists and cosmetologists, making it easier for qualified professionals to work in Delaware while strengthening our workforce.

Supporting our military community also remained a priority. Senate Bill 219 increases Delaware’s military pension tax exemption, providing additional tax relief to veterans while making our state more attractive for military retirees. Senate Bill 317 designates May as Veterans Month in Delaware, ensuring the service and sacrifice of our veterans are recognized each year.

Several important public safety initiatives also advanced. Senate Bill 232 increases penalties for intentionally damaging emergency response vehicles, helping protect the equipment first responders rely on every day. SS 1 for Senate Bill 234 establishes a clear statutory definition of “first responder” to ensure those who answer the call during emergencies are properly recognized in Delaware law. Earlier this session, Senate Bill 38 was signed into law to expand assistance for retired law enforcement animals by including retired police horses.

Agriculture and rural communities also saw meaningful progress. Senate Bill 53 codifies Delaware’s Farm to Community Program, strengthening connections between local agriculture and Delaware families. House Bill 371 streamlines Delaware’s farmland preservation program while maintaining our state’s longstanding commitment to protecting agricultural land.

Education remained another area of focus. House Bill 350 directs the Department of Education to study opportunities for homeschool students to participate in public school extracurricular activities through a potential pilot program. Senate Joint Resolution 15 calls for a review of Delaware’s use of the SAT within the state’s school accountability system while encouraging a broader recognition of career readiness, workforce credentials, and dual enrollment opportunities.

Senate Joint Resolution 13, signed by the Governor, also directs the Delaware Judiciary to study court reminder programs that could reduce missed court appearances and improve government efficiency.

Important Work Still Ahead

Not every proposal received the consideration it deserved.

Senate Republicans will continue advocating for policies that make Delaware more affordable, including proposals to provide energy bill relief through Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative revenues, encourage new in-state electricity generation, provide tax relief for overtime and tipped workers, strengthen school safety, and protect Delaware’s outdoor heritage through a constitutional right to hunt, fish, and trap.

These remain common sense ideas that deserve continued discussion during the 154th General Assembly.

The Final Night Should Give Every Delawarean Pause

While we are proud of the legislation that advanced this year, the way the General Assembly concluded its work should concern everyone, regardless of political affiliation.

The Senate’s original agenda alone included 76 items, consisting of one gubernatorial nomination and 75 bills. To put that in perspective, it took until May 5 for the Senate to consider its first 75 bills of the entire legislative session. Yet that same volume of legislation was compressed into a single day and overnight session on June 30.

Many of those votes occurred after midnight, when lawmakers, legislative staff, attorneys, reporters, Capitol Police, pages, and everyone else who keeps Legislative Hall operating had already worked extraordinarily long hours. Those public servants deserve our gratitude for their professionalism and dedication.

Delawareans also deserve a legislative process that allows sufficient time for lawmakers and the public to review legislation before final votes are cast. Regardless of which party controls the General Assembly, important public policy should not routinely be decided in the middle of the night. Transparency, thoughtful debate, and deliberate decision making should always take precedence over racing the clock to adjourn.

Perhaps no bill illustrated that concern more than House Bill 75.

For years, survivors, advocates, and legislators worked together on legislation intended to permanently remove barriers preventing victims of child sexual abuse from pursuing civil justice. The bill represented years of advocacy and careful negotiation. However, during the Senate’s final hours, a floor amendment substantially altered the legislation by adding new limitations and restrictions.

Every Senate Republican voted against that amendment because we believed it weakened the protections and opportunities for justice that survivors had fought so hard to achieve. The House sponsor ultimately struck the bill rather than accept those changes, bringing years of work to an unfortunate end, at least for this General Assembly.

Victims of childhood sexual abuse deserve better than seeing legislation of this magnitude fundamentally changed during the closing hours of session. Senate Republicans remain committed to working with survivors and advocates to pursue meaningful legislation that delivers justice for victims.

Looking Ahead

Although the 153rd General Assembly has adjourned, our work continues.

Over the coming months, Senate Republicans will continue serving constituents, monitoring implementation of new laws, and preparing legislation for the next session. We remain committed to advancing policies that strengthen Delaware’s economy, support our communities, improve public safety, and make our state a more affordable place to live, work, and raise a family.

Thank you for following along throughout another legislative session. We look forward to continuing the conversation in the months ahead.

When lawmakers return to Dover on June 9, just 10 legislative days will remain before the General Assembly adjourns for the year on June 30.

As often happens in the final weeks of session, some of the most consequential legislation is still awaiting action. Bills can move quickly through committees and onto the floor, making it important for Delawareans to stay informed about what is still under consideration.

From energy costs and tax relief to public safety, election integrity, housing policy, and firearm regulations, the decisions made over the next several weeks could have lasting impacts on families, businesses, and communities across our state.

Here are some of the bills worth keeping an eye on as the clock winds down on the 2026 legislative session.

Bills We Believe Deserve Consideration

Lowering Costs for Delaware Families and Workers

Delaware families continue to face affordability challenges, from rising utility bills to the increasing cost of everyday necessities. Several bills currently pending before the General Assembly seek to provide relief.

Senate Bill 65, sponsored by Senate Republican Leader Gerald Hocker, would withdraw Delaware from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). Supporters note that Delaware has already exceeded its carbon reduction goals while consumers continue to face high energy costs. The bill aims to reduce regulatory costs that are ultimately passed on to ratepayers and allow Delaware to pursue a more balanced approach to energy policy.

Senate Bill 299, sponsored by Senator Bryant Richardson, would create a state tax credit of up to $15,000 on overtime earnings. At a time when many Delawareans are working extra hours to make ends meet, the proposal would allow workers to keep more of the money they earn.

Similarly, House Bill 386, sponsored by Representative Jeff Hilovsky, would provide tax relief on tips earned by hospitality and service industry workers. The measure would allow eligible workers to deduct up to $15,000 in qualified tips, helping many hardworking Delawareans keep more of their income.

Protecting Students and Schools

School safety remains a top priority for families and educators.

Senate Bill 304, sponsored by Senator Eric Buckson, would expand security options for private and charter schools. The bill would clarify that schools may employ qualified retired law enforcement officers or constables for security purposes and would create a pathway for trained school sentries in situations where schools cannot afford a full-time school resource officer or constable.

Supporters argue that every school should have access to reasonable security options regardless of its size or financial resources.

Strengthening Election Integrity

Confidence in our elections is essential to maintaining trust in government.

House Bill 112, sponsored by Representative Bryan Shupe, would require voters to present photo identification before casting a ballot while also making identification more accessible. The legislation would provide a free initial state-issued identification card and require county election offices to conduct outreach programs to help residents obtain identification.

Supporters believe the bill strikes a reasonable balance between protecting election integrity and ensuring access to the ballot box.

Preserving Delaware Traditions

For generations, hunting and fishing have been part of Delaware’s culture, heritage, and outdoor way of life.

Senate Substitute 1 for Senate Bill 212, sponsored by Senator Dave Wilson, would begin the process of enshrining the right to hunt, fish, and trap in the Delaware Constitution. Twenty-four other states have adopted similar protections.

The measure also makes clear that wildlife management regulations, licensing requirements, and property rights would remain intact.

Delivering Justice for Survivors

House Bill 75, sponsored by House Republican Leader Tim Dukes, would allow victims of childhood sexual abuse to pursue civil claims against their abusers regardless of when the abuse occurred.

The bill recognizes that many survivors do not come forward until years or even decades after the abuse took place. By eliminating barriers created by expired statutes of limitations, the legislation would help ensure that perpetrators can still be held accountable and that survivors have an opportunity to seek justice.

Bills Raising Significant Concerns

Mandates That Could Increase School Construction Costs

Senate Bill 272 would require certain school construction projects to utilize project labor agreements under specified circumstances.

Although the bill was amended to increase the project cost threshold from $1 million to $5 million, concerns remain that it could favor union-affiliated contractors over merit-shop contractors, reduce competition, and increase costs for taxpayers funding school construction projects.

Several contractor organizations and groups representing minority-owned businesses have expressed opposition to the legislation.

Harm Reduction or Enabling Drug Use?

Senate Bill 249 would establish a regulatory framework for state-approved harm reduction programs and decriminalize possession of certain drug paraphernalia by individuals who use drugs.

Supporters argue the bill is intended to reduce overdose deaths and connect individuals to services. Critics question whether distributing supplies associated with drug use addresses addiction itself and worry the policy could normalize behavior that communities are already struggling to combat.

As Delaware continues to face challenges related to substance abuse, lawmakers should carefully consider whether this approach addresses the root causes of addiction.

Additional Burdens on Firearm Dealers

Senate Substitute 1 for Senate Bill 300 would create a new state licensing and regulatory framework for firearm dealers.

The legislation imposes new licensing, training, inspection, security, and record keeping requirements on federally licensed firearm dealers operating in Delaware.

Supporters argue the bill promotes accountability. Opponents contend it places additional burdens on law-abiding businesses while doing little to prevent criminals from obtaining firearms illegally. Concerns have also been raised by some firearms experts that the bill could create the framework for a firearm registry, despite supporters disputing that characterization.

State Government Versus Local Control

One of the most closely watched bills remaining on the Senate Ready List is Senate Substitute 1 for Senate Bill 23, which seeks to increase housing development and address Delaware’s housing shortage.

While increasing housing availability is an important goal, many local government organizations have expressed concerns about the legislation’s impact on local control. Critics argue that zoning and land-use decisions should remain primarily in the hands of local elected officials and residents who best understand the needs of their communities.

The debate over this bill reflects a larger question: how should Delaware balance the need for additional housing with the ability of local communities to shape their own future?

Government Records, Parental Rights, and Gender Designations

House Bill 375 would make significant changes to how gender designations are handled on various government documents, including birth certificates, driver’s licenses, and marriage records.

The legislation would allow individuals to change gender designations without obtaining a court order or certification from a medical or social service provider.

Supporters view the bill as a modernization of state law. Opponents have raised concerns about the distinction between biological sex and gender identity, the potential implications for medical record keeping, and provisions that could allow changes involving minors without requiring agreement from both parents.

The Final Stretch

With only 10 legislative days remaining, many of these bills could see significant movement before lawmakers adjourn on June 30.

Some proposals would provide tax relief, strengthen school security, protect election integrity, preserve Delaware’s outdoor traditions, and expand opportunities for justice. Others raise questions about costs, government mandates, local control, public safety, and regulatory burdens.

Of course, these are only a handful of the bills still moving through the legislative process. Hundreds of pieces of legislation have been introduced this session, and the agendas for committee hearings and floor sessions are expected to grow longer as June progresses and lawmakers work toward adjournment on June 30.

Delawareans who want to follow legislation, review bill language, track committee agendas, or monitor the status of specific proposals can do so through the Delaware General Assembly’s website. The site includes bill tracking, committee schedules, agendas, livestreams, and other legislative resources.

For more information and to follow legislation as it moves through the process, visit legis.delaware.gov.

The final weeks of session often move quickly. We’ll continue monitoring the legislation that matters most to Delaware families, workers, businesses, sportsmen, taxpayers, and local communities—and keep you informed about the decisions that will help shape our state’s future.

Over the course of nearly six hours of debate, senators considered legislation ranging from public school construction and firearm dealer regulations to veteran recognition and practical quality-of-life reforms. Some measures earned bipartisan support. Others drew serious concerns from our caucus.

While Senate Republicans opposed legislation we believe could hurt taxpayers, small businesses, and lawful Delawareans, we were also proud to advance commonsense bills sponsored by members of our caucus.

Here is a recap of what happened.

SB 272: Government Should Not Tilt the Playing Field

One of the most debated bills this week was SB 272, legislation dealing with project labor agreements on certain public school construction projects.

To be clear, our caucus does not oppose labor unions. They have played an important role in our nation’s history, helping secure many of the workplace protections and labor standards Americans benefit from today.

That is not the issue.

Our concern with SB 272 is that it inserts government into the bidding process in a way that critics and our caucus believe advantages union-affiliated contractors over merit shop contractors.

Under the bill, project labor agreements would be required on certain public school construction projects costing $5 million or more when multiple union-affiliated bids are submitted for a craft.

Critics argue that structure could:

• Reduce competition among contractors

• Discourage merit shop firms from bidding

• Drive up costs on large school construction projects

• Ultimately increase costs for taxpayers

Public construction contracts should be awarded based on fair competition, quality work, and value for taxpayers, not through government policies that put a thumb on the scale for one segment of the industry.

That is why our caucus opposed SB 272.

SB 300: Delaware Needs Enforcement, Not More Laws on the Compliant Majority

Another major debate centered around SB 300, which creates a new state licensing framework for federally licensed firearms dealers (FFLs) and imposes a long list of new requirements related to inspections, record keeping, compliance procedures, employee training, and other regulations.

Supporters argued the bill was necessary to address illegal firearm trafficking and crime guns.

Our caucus raised a different question:

Before Delaware creates new laws and regulations, are we enforcing the laws already on the books?

The state’s own data raises serious concerns.

For resolved felony firearms charges in Delaware:

• 2023: 81.8% were dropped or nol-prossed

• 2024: 81.4% were dropped or nol-prossed

• 2025: 82.6% were dropped or nol-prossed

That means over the last three years, an average of 81.9% of resolved felony firearms charges were dropped or nol-prossed.

The numbers on straw purchasing charges are similarly troubling:

• 2023: 78.9% dropped

• 2024: 95.0% dropped

• 2025: 80.0% dropped

Delaware already has laws making straw purchasing a felony. The issue is not always a lack of laws, but rather enforcement.

During debate, a witness for the bill sponsor testified that only 1% of Delaware FFLs were responsible for crime guns traced during criminal investigations.

That statistic deserves context.

Delaware has approximately 137 federally licensed firearms dealers. If 1% were responsible, that points to roughly one dealer.

So our caucus asked a basic question:

Why impose sweeping new burdens on the other 99% of dealers who are operating lawfully and in good faith?

The bill creates significant new compliance burdens, inspection requirements, and data retention mandates on lawful businesses that are already following federal law and cooperating with law enforcement.

Our caucus also raised concerns that, while supporters insist SB 300 does not create a gun registry, it for sure establishes a framework that many believe could make such a system easier to implement in the future.

To be fair, our caucus was not categorically opposed to every concept in the bill.

For example, discussions around employee training to identify suspicious purchasing behavior may have been workable.

As firearm dealer Ron Hagan, owner of Best Shot in Lewes, testified during debate, many responsible dealers are already training employees to identify suspicious customers and recognize red flags.

Had the bill sponsor worked collaboratively with Delaware FFLs to develop practical training standards while stripping out many of the extensive record keeping and regulatory burdens, there may have been room for a more productive conversation.

Instead, SB 300 places new restrictions on the compliant majority while Delaware continues to struggle to consistently enforce laws already on the books.

That is why our caucus opposed the bill.

SB 255: A Commonsense Reform Sponsored by Senator Buckson

Not every major vote yesterday was contentious.

SS 1 for SB 255, sponsored by Senator Eric Buckson, passed the Senate and makes practical changes to Delaware’s vehicle window tint law.

The bill:

• Adjusts the visible light transmission requirement for front side windows from 70% to 50%

• Clarifies that rear side windows and rear windows do not have a transmission requirement

The substitute bill also reflected compromise, changing the originally proposed standard from 35% tint to 50%.

This is the kind of practical, commonsense legislation that updates state law while balancing driver concerns with public safety.

SB 317: Honoring Delaware Veterans

Another meaningful bill that passed this week was SB 317, sponsored by Senator Dave Lawson.

The legislation designates the month of May as Veterans Month in Delaware.

This bill carries particular significance because Senator Lawson is a Vietnam War combat veteran and the only combat veteran currently serving in the Delaware General Assembly.

As Delaware prepares to observe Memorial Day this Monday, the timing is especially fitting.

While Memorial Day is dedicated to honoring those who made the ultimate sacrifice, Veterans Month creates an opportunity to recognize the service, commitment, and sacrifices of those who wore the uniform and defended our nation.

Looking Ahead

This week’s Senate session reflected two very different visions of governance.

On one hand, our caucus stood firmly against legislation we believe could increase costs, burden lawful businesses, and expand government in ways that miss the mark.

On the other, Republican senators advanced practical legislation that modernizes state law and honors those who have served our country.

That is what representation should look like: asking hard questions, challenging legislation when necessary, and advancing bills that improve life for Delawareans.

With several of these measures now heading to the House, the debate is far from over.

It is a pattern that raises serious concerns about both effectiveness and constitutionality.

At its core, the issue is this: rather than focusing on keeping firearms out of the hands of criminals, recent policies have increasingly focused on restricting what law-abiding Delawareans can own, how they can purchase it, and now, potentially, how those firearms are tracked.

We’ve Seen What Works

Not every firearm-related policy has followed this path.

In 2022, the General Assembly unanimously passed HB 423, re-establishing the Firearm Transaction Approval Program (FTAP) and designating the State Bureau of Identification as the point of contact for firearm background checks in Delaware.

This approach strengthened the background check process by allowing state authorities to review additional databases beyond the federal system. It also gave firearms dealers a direct line to report suspected straw purchases.

That is a targeted policy. It focuses on identifying prohibited persons and stopping illegal transactions before they happen.

It is worth noting that members of our caucus, Senators Gerald Hocker and Dave Lawson specifically, had long supported maintaining and strengthening this type of system. They vocally opposed doing away with the FTAP program when Democrat Governor Jack Markell was in office. Both bring real-world experience in the firearms industry, and their perspective has consistently emphasized enforcement and prevention over broad restrictions.

FTAP is an example of what effective, bipartisan public safety policy can look like.

The Shift Toward Broad Restrictions

That same year, however, marked a turning point.

A series of bills were passed that took a very different approach.

HB 450 banned the manufacture, sale, and future purchase of a wide range of semi-automatic firearms, while placing new restrictions on how lawfully owned firearms could be possessed and transported. SB 8 made it unlawful to possess, sell, or transfer certain firearm magazines over a set capacity, with penalties that escalate from civil violations to criminal charges.

These policies did not target individuals committing crimes. Instead, they placed new legal burdens on people who were already following the law.

When Constitutional Concerns Become Reality

Also in 2022, HB 451 was passed restricting the ability of adults under 21 to purchase certain firearms. It also limited adults under the age of 21 from hunting unless someone 21 or older was present.

During debate, some supporters of that bill acknowledged that constitutional questions could ultimately be left for the courts to decide, and that’s exactly what happened.

In 2025, the Kent County Superior Court struck down the hunting age restriction provision as unconstitutional.

This is not a hypothetical concern, rather it’s a clear example of legislation moving forward despite known constitutional issues, only to be overturned after the fact and taxpayers footing the legal bill.

The Real-World Impact on Delaware Businesses

In the years since, the trend has continued.

The permit-to-purchase system enacted under Senate Substitute 1 for Senate Bill 2 added additional steps, delays, and costs to the lawful purchase of firearms, specifically handguns.

The impact on Delaware’s federally licensed firearms dealers has been significant.

Some retailers have reported handgun sales dropping by more than half following implementation. Others have had to reduce employee hours to manage the decline in business. Broader data has shown a sharp drop in overall firearm sales in the state over a short period of time.

These are not large, faceless corporations. These are small businesses in our communities, many of them family-owned, now navigating an increasingly complex and costly regulatory environment.

The Next Step: SB 300

Now, with the introduction of Senate Bill 300, we are seeing the next phase of this approach.

This legislation would impose a new layer of requirements on federally licensed firearms dealers, including:

• State-level licensing and annual renewals

• Additional fees tied to sales volume

• Mandatory surveillance systems and data retention

• Detailed reporting requirements on firearm transactions

Among those requirements is the routine submission of transaction data, including identifying information about purchasers and the firearms themselves into a state-maintained gun registry.

Taken together, these provisions move beyond regulation and toward centralized tracking.

That raises a fundamental question: what is the end goal?

A Pattern That Cannot Be Ignored

When viewed individually, each of these bills may be presented as a discrete policy solution. Taken together though, they tell a different story:

• Certain types of firearms have been banned

• Lawful purchasing has become more difficult and more expensive

• Family operated small businesses are facing increasing regulatory burdens

• And now, proposals are emerging that would require detailed reporting of firearm transactions

That is a progression and it is one that should give every Delawarean pause.

What Comes Next?

If current trends continue, it is reasonable to ask where this leads.

If detailed tracking of firearm transactions becomes the norm, will future policies seek to limit how many firearms a person may purchase or own?

If constitutional protections are seen as obstacles rather than guardrails, will there be efforts to weaken those protections?

It is also worth noting what is at stake legislatively. If the current balance in the House of Representatives shifts by even a single seat towards the Democrats, one party would have the votes necessary to amend the Delaware Constitution without any support from the minority party.

That would mark a significant change in how foundational rights are protected in this state.

Refocusing on What Matters

Public safety is a serious responsibility, and it deserves serious solutions.

We should be focused on:

• Identifying and stopping prohibited persons from obtaining firearms

• Enforcing existing laws against those who misuse them

• Supporting law enforcement efforts to target criminal activity

What we should not be doing is placing increasing burdens on individuals who are already following the law, while expecting those measures to address criminal behavior.

Delaware has already shown that targeted, effective policy is possible and that is the approach we should continue.

Piece by piece, legislation has been introduced and, in some cases, passed that steadily shifts decision-making power away from local governments and places it in the hands of the state.

What may appear as isolated policy proposals are actually a part of a broader trend. Senate Bills 75, 87, 159, and now 23 all share a common theme: they weaken the ability of counties and municipalities to make land use and zoning decisions for their own communities.

That should concern every Delawarean, regardless of where they live or where they fall on the political spectrum.

The Role of Local Government

County and municipal leaders are closest to the people they serve. They understand the character of their communities, the needs of their residents, and the long-term vision for growth and development in their areas.

Zoning and land use decisions directly impact traffic, infrastructure, school capacity, public safety, environmental considerations, and the overall quality of life in a community.

These decisions have traditionally been made at the local level for a reason.

A Series of State Overrides

Consider the trajectory of these Democrat-authored bills:

Senate Bill 75 (Senator Paradee) limited the ability of counties to regulate where and how marijuana establishments can operate, preempting local ordinances and restricting local zoning authority in key areas. (Passed, but was vetoed by Governor Meyer. The Senate has since voted to override the veto along party lines and it now awaits a veto override vote in the House)

Senate Bill 87 (Senator Huxtable) requires local governments to allow accessory dwelling units by right, removing local discretion over whether such housing types fit within specific communities or neighborhoods. (Cleared the committee process and is ready to be considered by the full Senate)

Senate Bill 159 (Senator Hansen) went even further, prohibiting counties from denying certain conditional use permits for large-scale electrical substations tied to renewable energy projects, regardless of local concerns. In fact, this bill targeted one specific decision by the Sussex County government. Just as our caucus argued last year, it set the precedent. (Passed and signed into law)

Each of these measures chips away at local control in different ways.

Senate Bill 23: The Most Sweeping Yet

Now comes Senate Bill 23, sponsored by Democrat State Senator Russ Huxtable (6th District: Lewes, Rehoboth Beach, Milton), which represents perhaps the most significant expansion of state authority to date.

While framed as an effort to address housing affordability, the bill imposes sweeping mandates on counties and municipalities that fundamentally alter how zoning and land use decisions are made.

Among its provisions:

• It requires local governments to adopt state-approved affordable housing plans with specific targets and mandates.

• It mandates that at least 20% of housing inventory in municipalities with over 2,000 residents meet affordability criteria, regardless of local conditions.

• It compels zoning changes, including increased density and expanded housing types, often by right and without traditional public processes.

• It requires administrative rezoning to align with state-influenced plans within a shortened timeframe, limiting opportunities for local input.

Perhaps most notably, SB 23 elevates comprehensive plans to have the full force of law and ties them directly to state oversight and approval.

Taken together, these provisions significantly reduce the role of locally elected officials and the communities they represent.

A Question of Balance

There is no denying that housing affordability is a real challenge. It is an issue that deserves thoughtful discussion and meaningful solutions.

But the answer cannot be to sideline local governments and impose one-size-fits-all mandates from Dover.

Communities across Delaware are not identical. What may work in one area may not be appropriate in another. Local leaders are best positioned to strike that balance.

Why This Matters

At its core, this debate comes down to who should be making these decisions.

Should they be made by elected officials who live in and represent the community, or by policymakers in Dover who are far removed from the day-to-day realities on the ground?

Our caucus believes strongly that local governments must retain their voice and authority.

We will continue to advocate for policies that respect local decision-making, protect community character, and ensure that residents have a meaningful role in shaping the future of their neighborhoods.

Once local control is lost, it will never be regained.

Several caucus-sponsored measures cleared the full Senate, while others moved forward in the committee process, positioning them for action in the weeks ahead.

Legislation Passed by the Senate

Improving Access to Mental Health Care (SB 208)
The Senate passed Senate Substitute 1 for Senate Bill 208, sponsored by Senate Republican Whip Brian Pettyjohn, to help address Delaware’s shortage of mental health providers.

The legislation creates a licensure pathway for master’s-level psychology clinicians, allowing more qualified professionals to enter the workforce while maintaining appropriate oversight. With demand for mental health services continuing to rise, particularly in rural and underserved areas, this measure represents a meaningful step toward expanding access to care.

Strengthening Protections for First Responders (SB 232)
Legislation sponsored by Senator Dave Wilson to strengthen penalties for damaging emergency response vehicles also cleared the Senate this week.

Senate Bill 232 establishes a Class F felony for intentionally damaging emergency vehicles, such as fire trucks or ambulances, when the damage is significant or renders the vehicle unable to respond to emergencies. Protecting these critical resources helps support first responders and the communities that rely on them.

Expanding Access to Critical Medical Information (SB 236)
The Senate also passed Senate Bill 236, sponsored by Senator Dave Lawson, aimed at improving access to important medical and genetic history for donor-conceived individuals.

The legislation allows individuals, families, and medical providers to obtain accurate and up-to-date health history information—an important factor in diagnosing and treating medical conditions. This proposal addresses a gap in care and supports better-informed medical decisions.

Legislation Advancing Through Committee

Supporting Military Retirees (SB 219)
Senator Eric Buckson’s Senate Bill 219 advanced out of the Senate Executive Committee and now awaits consideration in the Senate Finance Committee.

This legislation would gradually increase Delaware’s tax exclusion for military retirement pensions, raising the exemption to $25,000 over time for retirees of all ages. The proposal builds on prior efforts and reflects a continued focus on supporting those who have served our country.

Improving Court Efficiency and Reducing Missed Appearances (SJR 13)
Senate Joint Resolution 13, sponsored by Senator Pettyjohn, was released from the Senate Judiciary Committee this week.

The resolution directs the Delaware Judiciary to establish a pilot court date reminder program in Justice of the Peace Court, using text message notifications to help individuals remember upcoming court appearances. Research shows that simple reminders can significantly reduce missed court dates, improving efficiency and reducing unnecessary costs for both the courts and taxpayers.

The resolution also calls for a study on the feasibility of expanding the program statewide.

Looking Ahead

As the legislative session continues, Senate Republicans remain focused on advancing practical, thoughtful policy solutions that address the needs of Delaware families and communities.

From improving access to care and supporting first responders to strengthening our courts and recognizing the service of military retirees, this week’s progress reflects a continued commitment to policies that make a difference.

More updates will follow as additional legislation moves through the General Assembly.

A Blizzard Warning has been issued for the entire State of Delaware. Meteorologists are forecasting snowfall rates of up to 2 inches per hour at the peak of the storm. Most of the state can expect around one foot of snow, with some localized areas potentially seeing upwards of two feet before the storm winds down.

Unlike some of our recent winter events, temperatures are expected to hover near or just below freezing. While that reduces the threat of frozen pipes, it brings a different concern: the snow will be wet, dense, and extremely heavy. Combined with strong winds and overnight blizzard conditions, this storm has the potential to create hazardous travel conditions, scattered power outages, and difficult cleanup efforts.

What to Expect

• Heavy snow developing this afternoon and intensifying into the evening

• Blizzard conditions overnight with strong winds and reduced visibility

• Snow tapering off Monday morning or early afternoon

• Dangerous travel conditions statewide

Snow Safety Reminders

Avoid unnecessary travel. If you can stay home, please do so. Keeping vehicles off the road allows DelDOT crews and emergency responders to clear highways and secondary roads more efficiently and safely.

Use caution when shoveling. Because this snow will be wet and heavy, it will place significant strain on the body. Those with heart conditions, respiratory issues, or other health concerns should strongly consider asking for assistance rather than shoveling themselves. If you do shovel:

• Take frequent breaks.

• Push snow instead of lifting when possible.

• Stay hydrated and avoid overexertion.

Prepare for possible power outages. Heavy snow combined with wind can weigh down tree limbs and power lines. Make sure phones are charged, flashlights are accessible, and you have essential supplies readily available.

Clear vents safely. If you use gas or oil heat, ensure outdoor vents remain clear of heavy snow buildup to prevent ventilation issues.

Stay Informed

For official updates, road conditions, and emergency information, monitor:

• Delaware Emergency Management Agency (DEMA): https://dema.delaware.gov/

• Local radio stations: WGMD, WDEL, WXDE

• Local TV meteorologists: WBOC, WMDT, WRDE

Our Senate Republican Caucus social media pages will continue sharing updates from DEMA, DelDOT, and other state and local agencies as conditions evolve.

Blizzard conditions can change rapidly and reduce visibility to near zero at times. Please use caution, look out for neighbors — especially seniors and those with medical needs — and give our plow operators, first responders, and utility crews the space they need to do their work.

We will continue to provide updates as this storm progresses.

Stay safe, Delaware.

We saw this in 2025 as well, so this isn’t a fluke and it isn’t the result of increased usage alone. It’s the predictable outcome of energy policies passed in Dover that prioritize ideology over affordability and reliability.

Why This Is Hitting DP&L Customers Hardest

Before we go any further, it needs to be noted that Delmarva Power & Light is the only regulated electric provider in Delaware, and therefore the only provider directly subject to the Renewable Portfolio Standard and other mandates.

Others, such as Delaware Electric Cooperative and DEMEC, are not regulated by the Public Service Commission and are not bound by the same requirements. While their customers have experienced higher bills due to increased usage, those increases have been nowhere near what DP&L customers are seeing.

The contrast is hard to ignore. When only one group of ratepayers is subject to a specific set of state-imposed mandates, and those same customers are seeing dramatically higher bills, the logical conclusion is that bad policy plays a role.

Mandates, Penalties, and Hidden Costs

In 2021, Democrats passed SB 33, significantly increasing Delaware’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) and requiring regulated utilities like Delmarva Power & Light to generate or procure 25% of their electricity from renewable sources. Since the law took effect, DP&L has repeatedly told our caucus it is unable to meet that mandate.

That failure is not the utility’s fault. The requirement itself is simply unattainable under current market and infrastructure realities.

When utilities cannot meet the RPS mandate, they are forced to pay “alternative compliance payments” (fines) that are then passed directly on to ratepayers. These costs are embedded in DP&L electric bills under the “Wind & Solar” component.

Since 2023, DP&L ratepayers have paid more than $40 million in these penalties. In 2025 alone, customers paid $14.37 million, with those funds deposited into DNREC’s green energy fund. None of that money lowers electric bills. All of it comes out of the pockets of Delawareans.

Despite our caucus’s request, as of this writing, DNREC has not provided us with the amount of money in the Green Energy Fund.

Warnings That Were Ignored

Senate and House Republicans, along with energy stakeholders and advocacy organizations, warned on the record that SB 33 and similar mandates would increase energy bills. Those warnings were dismissed. Today, families are paying the price.

While we agree that Delmarva Power’s most recent rate increase should not be approved, it is important to be honest about how we got here. They have been backed into a corner by state mandates that demand results without providing a workable path to achieve them.

Republicans Have Offered Real Relief

Republicans have not just raised concerns, we’ve also put forward solutions. Through proposals like SS1 for SB 64, HB 80, and related legislation, Senate and House Republicans have worked to reduce RPS mandates, return money directly to ratepayers, and provide meaningful energy cost relief.

We believe Delaware can pursue cleaner energy without forcing families to choose between keeping the lights on and paying other household bills.

The Grid Is Under Growing Strain

At the same time these mandates are squeezing supply, demand on the regional PJM grid is skyrocketing. One major driver: energy-hungry AI data centers that consume enormous amounts of electricity. Basic economics tells us what happens next—when demand increases and supply is constrained, prices rise.

Democrats’ race to “net-zero” has accelerated the closure of reliable, baseload power sources without a realistic plan to replace them. The result is a fragile grid, higher costs, and growing uncertainty.

Republicans have long supported a diverse energy portfolio, one that includes traditional baseload generation, nuclear energy, and renewables. This isn’t an all-or-nothing debate. It’s about balance, reliability, and realism.

A Better Path Forward

Republicans have consistently supported policies that strengthen the grid while keeping energy affordable:

• SCR 18 created the Delaware Nuclear Energy Feasibility Task Force, which is currently exploring how nuclear energy, including small modular reactors, could be deployed in our state. We are also examining whether large data centers should be required to generate power on-site to reduce strain on the grid.

• Senators Hocker and Pettyjohn are actively engaging with stakeholders to determine what it would take to bring the Indian River Power Plant back online.

• Representative Mike Smith and Senator Eric Buckson introduced HB 80, which would roll back the RPS to 10% for 10 years, which would allow time for renewable energy sources to come online.

• Representative Kevin Hensley and Senator Pettyjohn introduced HB 186, which creates a targeted, capped tax credit to incentivize the construction of up to three high-efficiency combined-cycle natural gas power plants in Delaware. The goal is to add dependable, dispatchable baseload power to the grid, improve energy security, reduce transmission costs, and help stabilize prices while encouraging redevelopment of brownfield and former power plant sites, higher efficiency standards, and optional carbon-capture technology.

• In 2021, our caucus unanimously supported SB 2, community solar legislation that expanded renewable options without imposing unrealistic mandates.

Ideology vs. Reality

Energy policy should be grounded in facts, not wishful thinking. Delawareans deserve reliable electricity at prices they can afford rather than mandates that sound good on paper, but fail in practice.

Republicans will continue to fight for energy policies that protect ratepayers, strengthen the grid, and allow innovation to flourish without sacrificing affordability. Delaware can do better and we’re committed to making sure it does.

Session Canceled Due to Winter Weather

The General Assembly did not convene on Tuesday as a result of the weekend snowstorm, lingering ice on roadways, and dangerously cold temperatures. With public safety and travel conditions in mind, legislative business resumed later in the week.

Hocker Advances Legislation to Lower Electric Bills

On Wednesday, Senate Republican Leader Gerald Hocker introduced Senate Substitute 1 for Senate Bill 64, updating legislation first proposed last year to ensure that certain revenues generated through the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) are returned directly to Delaware electric customers.

The revised bill preserves funding for existing energy efficiency, low-income assistance, and greenhouse gas reduction programs at current levels, while directing any funds raised above 2025 levels toward an on-bill rebate program for ratepayers statewide.

As energy costs continue to rise, SS1 for SB 64 keeps the focus on affordability and accountability, making sure RGGI does not become an expanding revenue source for the state while families and small businesses struggle to keep up with their monthly electric bills.

The bill has been assigned to the Senate Environment, Energy & Transportation Committee, with a hearing date expected soon.

Bipartisan Bills to Expand Workforce Mobility

Also on Wednesday, Senator Eric Buckson introduced three bipartisan bills aimed at expanding workforce mobility and supporting military families.

Senate Bills 216, 217, and 218 would adopt interstate licensure compacts for respiratory therapists, cosmetologists, and massage therapists, allowing qualified professionals to work across state lines without navigating duplicative licensing requirements.

These bills address workforce shortages while easing burdens on military members and spouses who relocate frequently in service to our country. The legislation preserves state regulatory authority, maintains public health and safety standards, and reflects a practical, bipartisan approach to getting people to work faster.

The bills are currently assigned to the Senate Legislative Oversight & Sunset Committee.

Fairness in Girls’ Sports Act Heard in Committee

The Fairness in Girls’ Sports Act (SB 215), sponsored by Senator Bryant Richardson, was heard in the Senate Education Committee on Wednesday.

The legislation was drafted to uphold the principles of Title IX and protect female student-athletes both on and off the field. While the bill ultimately did not advance out of committee, the hearing featured compelling testimony from female athletes who competed at the high school and collegiate levels.

Among the witnesses was a two-time Women’s College World Series champion who belongs to the first generation of women to benefit from the passage and implementation of Title IX.

Republicans continue to believe these conversations are worth having and that the voices of female athletes deserve to be heard.

Republicans Respond to Governor Meyer’s FY 2027 Budget

On Thursday, House and Senate Republicans held a joint press conference following Governor Matt Meyer’s presentation of his recommended Fiscal Year 2027 budget.

Leaders from both caucuses expressed cautious optimism, noting a meaningful shift toward fiscal restraint compared to budgets proposed in recent years under the prior administration. Most notably, the Governor’s proposal slows operating budget growth to under 5 percent and significantly reduces the state’s projected structural deficit by more than 70 percent without tapping Delaware’s Budget Stabilization Fund.

That said, Republicans were clear that final judgment will wait.

As House Republican Whip Jeff Spiegelman emphasized, “the devil is in the details.” Lawmakers will reserve full evaluation until the budget is reviewed line by line and vetted through the Joint Finance Committee’s markup hearings, which begin next week.

While not every policy choice in the proposal aligns with Republican priorities, particularly regarding proposed tax and fee increases, the overall framework reflects principles Republicans have long advocated: responsible growth, reduced reliance on one-time funds, and more honest budgeting.

Joint Finance Committee

With the Joint Finance Committee set to meet this coming Tuesday, February 3, and throughout the month of February into the first week of March, the General Assembly will not return to session until Tuesday, March 10.

The State of the State

Governor Meyer framed his address around the claim that “the State of our State is strong,” highlighting resilience in the face of tragedy, economic pressures, political division, and climate concerns. The speech outlined an expansive, government-driven vision for Delaware, with the state playing a larger role in education, healthcare, housing, energy, and economic development often supported by federal funding and new regulatory authority.

Areas of Agreement and Real Opportunity

There were notable areas where Republicans found common ground with the Governor.

Both Senate Republican Leader Gerald Hocker and Senate Republican Whip Brian Pettyjohn welcomed the Governor’s explicit recognition that modern nuclear energy must be part of Delaware’s energy future. Reliable, in-state generation, particularly through safe, modern nuclear technology, offers a path toward affordability, energy independence, and emissions reduction without placing additional burdens on ratepayers.

Senator Hocker also emphasized the importance of revitalizing infrastructure already in place, including exploring the restart of in-state generation at facilities like the Indian River Power Plant, potentially using natural gas. If affordability and reliability are truly priorities, Delaware must be willing to pursue practical solutions rather than rely solely on new mandates or unproven approaches.

Senator Pettyjohn additionally expressed support for the Governor’s proposal to pursue a film tax credit. Delaware’s unique mix of beaches, farmland, historic communities, and urban settings makes it an attractive destination for filmmakers. A smart, accountable incentive could create jobs, attract investment, and showcase Delaware to the rest of the country.

The Governor’s acknowledgment that excessive permitting and red tape drive up costs for housing, businesses, and families was also welcome. Republicans have raised those concerns for years, and meaningful reductions in bureaucracy could help deliver real relief if followed by measurable action.

Concerns About Tone, Transparency, and Policy Direction

Despite these points of agreement, the address was not fully unifying.

Governor Meyer chose to inject partisan attacks into his remarks, particularly by blaming congressional Republicans in D.C. for rising healthcare costs tied to Affordable Care Act subsidies. As Senator Pettyjohn noted, civility cannot be something we promote privately while publicly engaging in political finger-pointing, especially when rural healthcare expansion in Delaware is being supported by federal funding authorized on a bipartisan basis.

Senator Hocker likewise pushed back on the Governor’s characterization of congressional Republicans, noting that Democrats wrote the Affordable Care Act and the later provisions that allowed enhanced subsidies to expire at the end of 2025. If Delaware is serious about affordability and access, whether in healthcare, energy, or housing, it requires honest conversations and durable reforms, not inaccurate or partisan narratives.

Beyond rhetoric, the speech relied heavily on federal grants and centralized state authority, raising concerns about long-term sustainability, local control, and whether promised efficiencies will materialize.

When Process Became the Problem: SB 228 and SB 230

Concerns about accountability and transparency were realized earlier this week.

Late Tuesday evening, Senate Democrats introduced Senate Bill 228 and Senate Bill 230 and, by around 10:00 p.m., rushed both bills onto the next day’s Senate Executive Committee agenda. Republican members of the Special Property Reassessment Committee were never consulted or given advance notice. Members of the business community, who are directly impacted by this legislation, learned the bills were on the agenda roughly 45 minutes before the committee hearing.

As Senator Hocker stated, this is not how a transparent or responsible government is supposed to work. When Senator Buckson and other Republican members raised legitimate concerns during committee about the speed and lack of transparency, they were met with dismissiveness from the Majority.

“These bills may have merit, or they may require amendments,” Senator Hocker said. “We simply don’t know, because neither lawmakers nor stakeholders outside the Majority party were given adequate time to review or vet them.”

Despite objections from every member of our caucus, and despite calls to slow the process down to allow for proper review and public input, the Senate Majority ultimately passed both SB 228 and SB 230 along strict party lines.

Why This Matters

Good policy cannot be separated from good process. Delawareans expect their elected officials to debate legislation openly, welcome differing viewpoints, and allow time for public engagement.

Our caucus remains willing to work in good faith, but we will continue to speak up when transparency is ignored, when process is abused, and when politics take precedence over thoughtful lawmaking.

As this session moves forward, Republicans will stay focused on accountability, affordability, local control, and practical solutions that put Delaware families first.

While exact snowfall and ice totals are still being refined as meteorologists track the storm, confidence is very high that our region will see a major winter weather event. Some areas of New Castle, Kent and Sussex Counties are currently projected to receive up to a foot (or more) of snow, while southern Sussex County, particularly along the coast, are expected to see ice on the back end of the system. Temperatures are expected to drop sharply with overnight lows dipping into the teens and even single digits for the next week.

We’ve shared winter weather preparedness guidance before, but with the potential severity of this storm, it’s worth revisiting some key steps you can take now.

Prepare Your Home

Protect your pipes.

• Insulate exposed pipes, especially those in basements, crawl spaces, garages, and exterior walls.

• During the coldest nights, allow a faucet to drip slightly to help prevent pipes from freezing.

• Open cabinet doors under sinks to allow warmer air to circulate around plumbing.

Have emergency supplies ready.

• Stock up on food, water, medications, and other essentials in case travel becomes difficult or power outages occur.

• Make sure flashlights, batteries, and portable phone chargers are easily accessible.

• If you rely on a generator or alternative heat source, ensure it is in good working order and used safely.

Check on neighbors and loved ones.

• Elderly neighbors, those with medical needs, or families without reliable heat may need extra assistance ahead of extreme cold.

Travel and Road Safety

If you are able, please stay off the roads during the height of the storm. Reducing traffic allows DelDOT crews and emergency responders to work more efficiently and safely to clear and treat roadways.

If travel is unavoidable:

• Slow down and leave extra space between vehicles.

• Keep an emergency kit in your vehicle, including blankets, water, and a charged phone.

• Let someone know your route and expected arrival time.

Stay Informed

Reliable, local information is critical during severe weather events. We encourage Delawareans to monitor updates from trusted sources:

Delaware Emergency Management Agency (DEMA):

• dema.delaware.gov

Local radio stations:

• WGMD

• WDEL

• WXDE

• WJWL

Local TV meteorology teams:

• WBOC

• WMDT

• WRDE

Our Senate Republican Caucus social media pages will also be sharing timely updates and information from DEMA, DelDOT, and other state and local agencies as the storm approaches and unfolds.

A Final Reminder

Winter storms can be unpredictable and conditions can change quickly. Taking a few simple steps now can make a significant difference in keeping your household safe and reducing stress during the storm.

Please use caution, look out for one another, and give our road crews and first responders the space they need to do their jobs. We will continue to share updates as more information becomes available.

Stay safe and stay warm.

Legislation Moving Forward
Two bills sponsored by Senator Dave Lawson, SB 38 and SB 112, were ceremonially signed on Wednesday, October 8. These bills recognize the lasting impact of Delaware’s law enforcement’s service and sacrifice in keeping our communities safe.

Meanwhile, SB 142 and SB 143, sponsored by Senator Brian Pettyjohn, will be ceremonially signed tomorrow, October 10, by Governor Matt Meyer. These bills are notable for their focus on anti-trafficking efforts, addressing a critical issue that affects communities across Delaware.

Property Reassessment Updates
The first public hearing of the Joint Special Committee on Property Reassessment, held on September 30, had its fair share of controversy. During that hearing, it was revealed that then-New Castle County executive Matt Meyer delayed the issuance of reassessment notices until mid-November 2024, after the General Election, despite Tyler Technologies recommending mid-summer.

The second hearing on October 7 showed that Sussex and Kent Counties have their reassessment processes well-organized. New Castle County, however, still faces questions about timing and transparency. As Senator Pettyjohn said following the first hearing, “Delawareans deserve clarity and fairness in this process.” Senator Buckson added, “It’s important that homeowners understand how their property values are being calculated, and that no one is left in the dark.”

Both Senator Pettyjohn and Senator Buckson represent our caucus on the special committee.

Veterans’ Affairs Leadership
Senator Dave Lawson, along with Senators Dave Wilson and Brian Pettyjohn, attended the swearing-in of Brigadier General Karen Berry, Delaware’s first Secretary of Veterans Affairs. Senator Lawson was a strong advocate for many years for the creation of the Delaware Department of Veterans Affairs. This new office will help ensure that our state’s veterans receive the attention and services they deserve.

Leadership and Perspective
Published in the Delaware Business Times, Senator Gerald Hocker recently shared his thoughts in an op-ed focusing on Delaware’s business environment and the need for policies that support economic growth, investment, and job creation.

Even in the legislative offseason, your state Senate Republicans are keeping a close eye on critical issues, advancing legislation, and advocating for transparency, fairness, and support for Delaware communities.

Senate Republican Leader Gerald Hocker (R-Ocean View) said the decision reflects long-standing concerns voiced by coastal communities about both the economy and the environment.

“Delaware’s beaches are the backbone of our local economy, supporting thousands of jobs and generating millions in revenue annually,” Senator Hocker said. “Just as importantly, this decision helps protect our fragile inland bays, which faced potential disruption from transmission cables slated to run through the Indian River. These concerns are finally being heard, and I’m grateful for the administration’s commitment to protecting both our coastal economy and our environment.”

Senate Democrats have attempted to frame Republican opposition to the project as hypocritical in light of the GOP’s objection to Senate Bill 159, which overruled a local Sussex County zoning decision relating to the project. Senate Republican Whip Brian Pettyjohn (R-Georgetown) said that comparison is misleading.

“Senate Bill 159 was unprecedented in that the state government stepped in to override a local land use decision by Sussex County,” Pettyjohn said. “That’s a matter of local control. What we are talking about now is the federal government reconsidering federal permits it issued for a project in federal waters. Local control is not a factor here, and it is disingenuous to suggest otherwise.”

Democrats have also accused Republicans of treating renewable energy as a “bogeyman.” Senator Bryant Richardson (R-Seaford) pointed to his resolution earlier this year establishing a Nuclear Energy Feasibility Task Force as evidence to the contrary.

“Our caucus has consistently supported cleaner, more reliable energy solutions so long as those solutions make sense economically,” Richardson said. “That’s why I introduced SCR 18, which creates a task force to explore Small Modular Reactor technology here in Delaware. Nuclear energy is one of the most dependable baseload sources of zero-emission power, and it could provide the reliability our grid needs while advancing our clean energy goals.”

Republicans also noted that Democrats’ claims about the benefits of the project are misleading. The turbines would be sited in federal waters off the coast of Ocean City, Maryland. Maryland, not Delaware, would receive the renewable energy credits. Meanwhile, Delaware’s inland bays would bear the environmental cost of burying transmission cables beneath the Indian River Bay.

The caucus reiterated its position that renewable energy development should not come at the expense of Delaware’s communities, economy, or environment.

###

For residents of New Castle and Sussex counties, the results have been staggering as some tax bills have jumped by 400% or more. Kent County residents, especially poultry farmers, experienced large spikes a year ago as Kent used the new assessments for last year’s tax bills.

Senate and House Republicans actually called for a special session in a press release a couple weeks ago, but with the intent that thoughtful legislation would be introduced with ample time to fully vet the proposals. Instead, the day delivered a flurry of fast-tracked bills, last-minute amendments, intra-party and partisan floor disputes, and more than a few missed opportunities for real reform.

What Passed

Six bills and one resolution cleared the legislature, and most were signed into law shortly after:

• SCR 122 – Urges state, local, and school officials to review the reassessment process to ensure fairness and transparency in the future.

• SB 203 – Affirms counties can set different tax rates for different classes of property, retroactively and going forward.

• SB 204 – Clarifies that municipalities have that same authority noted in SB 203 and allows local governments to adopt the changes into their charters without needing individual charter changes. Wilmington and the city of New Castle already do this.

• SS1 for SB 202 – Requires New Castle County to submit quarterly reports on reassessment impacts; updates property terminology. As of this writing, Governor Meyer has not signed this into law.

• HB 240 – Requires counties to refund property tax overpayments of $50 or more after appeals.

• HB 241 – Requires counties to offer payment plans for residential taxpayers hit with $300+ increases in school taxes; reduces late fees in New Castle County; sunsets after three years.

• HB 242 – Allows New Castle County school districts to raise commercial rates to offset residential taxes and extends the payment deadline to October 30, 2025.

What Didn’t Pass — and Why That Matters

Two of the most consequential bills never saw the light of day:

• HB 245 – Would have ended school districts’ ability to automatically hike property taxes by up to 10% post-reassessment without voter approval.

• HB 246 – Would have capped annual tax increases at 2% for five years unless approved by referendum.

Republicans pushed to bring HB 245 to the floor. Rep. Mike Smith warned that refusing to act amounted to “political malpractice.” The Democrat majority voted against even considering it.

To underscore why this matters, Republican staff reviewed the archived floor debate from HB 129 during the 126th General Assembly, the bill that first established the 10% limit. At the time, there was no cap at all. Lawmakers intended the 10% ceiling as an emergency safeguard, allowing school districts to raise taxes only when absolutely necessary to avoid going into the red. Instead, this year’s reassessment has exposed how some districts have used the cap not as a last resort, but as a guaranteed allowance by inflating budgets beyond what’s needed to maintain operations. As a result, taxpayers are stuck with sharply higher property taxes, especially in the Christina and Appoquinimink school districts.

Also blocked: a motion to bring HB 73, a bipartisan bill doubling the senior property tax credit from $500 to $1,000, to the floor. Most Democrats either voted no or abstained.

The Process Problem

House Republicans and progressive Democrats blasted the one-day sprint, which skipped committee hearings and public testimony. Bills were dropped less than 48 hours before votes. Senator Eric Buckson abstained on certain roll calls, sticking to his principle of never voting on legislation he hasn’t had time to thoroughly review, especially ones with substantive last-minute amendments.

House progressives, led by Rep. Madinah Wilson-Anton, argued they were sidelined from the process. Leadership pushed back, but the open, intra-party rift underscored how disjointed the day’s agenda really was, at least in the House of Representatives.

Entertainment in the House Chamber

There were tense moments and even a few laughs. At one point, Rep. Mike Smith requested Gov. Matt Meyer to come to the floor to explain his role in the reassessment when he was New Castle County Executive. The governor never showed. He was reportedly in the building after hanging out in Philadelphia with former NFL stars and current collegiate coaches Michael Vick and DeSean Jackson for a photo op.

Theatrics or not, it highlighted another frustration: Republican leaders said they had received no communication from the governor or his staff about the session’s bills before the gavels dropped.

Bottom Line

Yes, yesterday produced some short-term relief measures. But as Sen. Brian Pettyjohn put it: “These bills are a band-aid.” The underlying issues like unchecked post-reassessment tax hikes, meaningful relief for seniors on fixed incomes, and a transparent process, remain unresolved.

The Delaware Senate Republican Caucus will keep pushing for lasting reforms from now until the General Assembly reconvenes in January, and beyond.

New Legislation Introduced

Senator Brian Pettyjohn – SB 140: Stopping the EV Mandate
Senator Pettyjohn introduced SB 140 to prevent the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) from unilaterally implementing a mandate requiring the sale of electric vehicles in Delaware. The bill ensures any significant policy changes affecting consumers and businesses must be approved by the General Assembly—not imposed by unelected bureaucrats.

Senator Dave Wilson – SS1 for SB 79: Free Legal Help for Guardians Adopting Former Foster Children
Senator Wilson’s substitute for SB 79 establishes a pathway for qualifying guardians to receive free legal counsel when adopting children formerly in state custody. The bill removes a major financial barrier for families willing to give children permanent homes and a stable future.

Senator Brian Pettyjohn – SB 142: Strengthening Penalties for Sexual Extortion
Introduced with bipartisan support, SB 142 enhances penalties for sexual extortion, making it a Class B felony when the victim is a child or vulnerable adult and suffers serious injury or death. Modeled after South Carolina’s “Gavin’s Law,” the bill also integrates sexual extortion awareness into Delaware’s Erin's Law curriculum—ensuring students, educators, and parents are informed and protected.

Senator Brian Pettyjohn – SB 143: Providing Parents Access to Deceased Minors’ Digital Accounts
Inspired by Ohio’s “Braden’s Law,” SB 143 would allow courts to fast-track applications from parents or guardians seeking access to a deceased minor’s digital assets and accounts. The goal: spare grieving families unnecessary delays and ensure timely access to important information during some of their most difficult moments.

Bills Headed to the Governor’s Desk

Senator Eric Buckson – SB 69: Banning Red Dye 40 in School Meals
SB 69, sponsored by Senator Buckson, passed the House unanimously this week and now awaits Governor Meyer’s signature. The bill prohibits Delaware public schools from serving foods or drinks that contain Red Dye 40, a synthetic additive linked to hyperactivity and behavioral issues in children. This legislation puts student health first and helps create safer, healthier school environments.

Senator Brian Pettyjohn – SS1 for SB 119: Updating a Child’s Birth Certificate to Include a Deceased Father
SS1 for SB 119 directs the State Registrar of Vital Statistics to amend the birth certificate of Levi Ryan Murray to include his father, Ryan Murray, who tragically passed away after the embryo’s creation but before implantation. This legislation ensures Levi’s birth certificate reflects the truth of his parentage and offers long-overdue closure to his family.

As session ramps up, our caucus remains laser-focused on protecting families, increasing government accountability, and standing up for Delawareans’ rights. We’ll continue to introduce and advance legislation that reflects your values and addresses the real challenges facing our state.

Want to stay in the loop? Be sure to subscribe and share this post to help spread the word.

Senate Bill 75: Undermining County Authority on Retail Marijuana Stores

SB 75, which amends Title 4 of the Delaware Code, seeks to regulate the operation of retail marijuana stores by imposing strict limits on the authority of counties to control their placement and operation. While the bill purports to balance state and local interests, it significantly erodes counties’ ability to tailor regulations to their communities’ specific needs.

A particularly concerning amendment to SB 75 prohibits counties from banning retail marijuana stores in areas zoned for commercial or industrial use simply because they are within 500 feet of a place of worship. This restriction dismisses the valid concerns of communities that may wish to protect the sanctity and character of religious spaces. Places of worship are often central to community identity, and local governments should retain the flexibility to decide whether a marijuana retail store is appropriate in such proximity.

Moreover, SB 75 preempts and supersedes all existing and future county ordinances regarding marijuana establishments, effectively stripping counties of their ability to adapt regulations over time. The bill mandates minimum operating hours for retail marijuana stores (9 a.m. to 9 p.m. Monday through Saturday, and noon to 8 p.m. on Sundays) and prohibits counties from banning indoor marijuana cultivation facilities in agricultural or industrial zones. It also restricts counties from prohibiting retail marijuana stores in commercial or industrial zones, except under narrow conditions, such as being within a half-mile of another store or 500 feet of specific facilities like schools, childcare centers, or parks.

By imposing these one-size-fits-all rules, SB 75 disregards the diversity of Delaware’s counties. What works for an urban area may not suit a rural community, yet this bill ties the hands of local leaders who are best positioned to understand their constituents’ priorities. Local control ensures that decisions reflect the values and circumstances of individual communities—not a top-down mandate from Dover.

Senate Bill 87: Threatening HOA Autonomy Over Accessory Dwelling Units

SB 87, which amends Title 25 of the Delaware Code, mandates that local governments permit accessory dwelling units (ADUs)—such as in-law suites or garage apartments—without “prohibitive barriers or onerous application or zoning requirements.” While we recognize the need to address Delaware’s housing shortage, our caucus is deeply concerned about a provision in this bill that could undermine the rights of homeowners’ associations (HOAs) to govern their communities.

Lines 58–63 of SB 87 state that any covenant, restriction, or condition in a deed, contract, or other instrument affecting property transfer—or any rule based on such covenants—that is created or takes effect after June 30, 2027, and prohibits or unreasonably restricts ADUs on single-family residential lots is “void and unenforceable.” What is concerning is the lack clarity surrounding the language regarding HOAs not governed by the Unit Property Act with rules already in place.

Many HOAs in Delaware have existing covenants that prohibit ADUs to maintain the aesthetic, functional, or economic character of their neighborhoods. If SB 87 is interpreted to invalidate these covenants for HOAs not under the Unit Property Act, it would strip these private communities of their contractual rights to self-governance. Homeowners choose to live in HOA-governed neighborhoods precisely because of the agreed-upon rules that protect property values and community standards. By potentially overriding these covenants, SB 87 could disrupt the expectations of thousands of Delaware homeowners.

The lack of clarity in this provision only heightens our concern. Without explicit assurance that existing HOA covenants are protected, SB 87 risks imposing a state-level mandate that overrides private agreements, effectively dictating how communities must operate. This is a clear overreach and an affront to the principle of local control, which extends to the private governance structures that homeowners voluntarily adopt.

The Broader Threat to Local Control

Both SB 75 and SB 87 reflect a troubling trend in Delaware’s legislature: the erosion of local decision-making authority in favor of centralized state control. Local governments are closest to the people they serve. They understand the nuances of their jurisdictions—whether it’s the cultural significance of a place of worship, the practical needs of a rural county, or the shared vision of a neighborhood. When the state imposes blanket regulations, it risks alienating communities and undermining the democratic process.

Our caucus believes that Delaware thrives when its counties, municipalities, and private communities have the freedom to govern themselves. We are committed to defending local control and ensuring that the voices of Delawareans are heard in the decisions that shape their communities.

"Today, the Delaware Senate took an important step toward securing a more reliable, affordable, and sustainable energy future for our state. We are pleased that SCR 18, which creates the Delaware Nuclear Energy Feasibility Task Force, passed with bipartisan support. This task force will examine the potential role of small modular reactors in Delaware’s energy portfolio and explore whether nuclear energy can help stabilize costs and improve reliability for families and businesses.

“We thank the 13 Senate Democrats who voted in favor of this resolution and recognize their willingness to put good policy ahead of partisanship. Energy policy is too important to be dictated by politics, and today’s vote shows that there is broad support for having serious discussions about Delaware’s energy future.

“As SCR 18 moves to the House of Representatives, we look forward to continuing this bipartisan effort. If House leadership believes a broader approach is necessary, Senator Richardson and sponsors are open to working together to expand the scope while ensuring nuclear energy remains part of the conversation. Delawareans deserve practical solutions that prioritize affordability and reliability, and we are committed to delivering just that."

--

“I was pleased to have Senator Stephanie Hansen as a co-prime on this resolution,” Senator Richardson said. “She has devoted much of her time to help solve the problems associated with making sure Delawareans have an adequate supply of power now and in the future while making sure our environment is protected.”

“The events that unfolded last night in Washington, D.C., were deeply disappointing. Delaware’s federal delegation often speaks of bipartisanship, yet the actions of U.S. Senators Chris Coons, Lisa Blunt Rochester, and Representative Sarah McBride did not reflect the respect and decorum expected in public service.

“While differences in policy are a natural and necessary part of our democracy, there are moments that transcend politics—moments that call for unity, humanity, and recognition of individuals who inspire us all. It was disheartening to see certain members of Congress choose not to acknowledge a courageous 13-year-old battling cancer, Laken Riley’s grieving mother, a young man accepted into West Point, and other remarkable guests whose stories deserved recognition.

“Public service demands a commitment to respect and civility, even in disagreement. We urge Senators Coons, Blunt Rochester, and Representative McBride to reflect on the impact of their actions and uphold the standards of leadership that Delawareans rightfully expect and deserve.”

Our caucus has heard from countless constituents who are facing unsustainable electricity bills, and we are committed to taking action. After meeting with stakeholders in the energy sector, it has become clear that Delaware’s green energy mandates, including its participation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), are key drivers of these rising costs. These policies, rather than fostering a balanced and sustainable energy portfolio, have forced Delaware to rely on expensive imported electricity while discouraging investment in traditional energy generation within our own state.

The Reality of Delaware’s Energy Policies

• At a recent committee meeting, DNREC’s State Energy Office confirmed that Delaware now has 10,000 solar installations producing 241 MW of energy. While this is an achievement, it is still far below the 410 MW that the now-retired Indian River Power Plant generated.

• Despite requiring utilities to meet aggressive Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards (RPS), Delmarva Power has been unable to purchase enough Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) to comply with these mandates. Instead, the company has paid $26 million in compliance fees over the past two years—costs that have been passed directly to ratepayers.

• While some argue that the increased costs on monthly utility bills are minimal, they are anything but for seniors, single parents, and working families already struggling with inflation and economic uncertainty.

Our Plan for Relief

We are introducing a series of bills to correct course and bring relief to Delaware’s ratepayers:

• Senate Bill 64: This legislation would redirect RGGI revenues back to ratepayers instead of funneling millions into government-controlled programs. New Hampshire has successfully implemented a similar policy, providing much-needed relief to their residents.

• Senate Bill 65: Senator Hocker will introduce legislation to withdraw Delaware from RGGI altogether. While reducing emissions is important, it should not come at the expense of affordability and reliability.

• Senate Concurrent Resolution 18: Sponsored by Senator Richardson, this resolution creates a task force to investigate the feasibility of nuclear power in Delaware. As energy costs continue to rise and reliability concerns persist, it is essential to explore all available options, including nuclear energy, to ensure a stable and affordable energy future for Delawareans.

• Future Legislation: Additional measures are currently being drafted and will be introduced in the near future to further address the instability and high costs caused by Delaware’s current energy policies.

A Call for Balanced Energy Policy

Our caucus supports an all-of-the-above energy strategy—one that includes renewable sources, but also recognizes the need for traditional energy sources such as coal to maintain reliability and affordability. The state should not be setting unattainable goals that only serve to penalize businesses and residents. We must focus on policies that balance environmental responsibility with economic reality.

As we move forward, we encourage our colleagues on both sides of the aisle to put Delawareans first. Our constituents deserve an energy policy that is reliable, sustainable, and, most importantly, affordable. We will continue to fight for solutions that provide real relief while ensuring Delaware’s energy future is secure.