Nobody wrote it down. But we crafted it. Carefully. In whispered awe of a life we think we see around us. We began to evaluate our lives by its standards.

Blessed life theology says: If God is walking with you, you will feel comfo…

Read more

Enjoy this special access as paid subscriber.

This is video overview of chapter 3 of my book—Broken Open at Rock Bottom—produced to be an engaging learning tool to meant to deepen your understanding of the architecture of grief and tools for navigating the space in-between crisis and breakthrough.

👉 Grab your copy of the full…

Read more

I recently ran Chapter 3 of my book, Broken Open at Rock Bottom, through Google NotebookLM to see how its AI hosts would analyze the material. I was blown away by how naturally they breakdown this chapter on the spiritual formation that happens within our grief and pain.

Note: This audio overview features AI-generated hosts synthesized directly from my written chapter.

👉 Grab your copy of the full book here:

E. Derrik Porter is a pastor-scholar, educator, and moderator of The Presence Collective who writes on faith, leadership, and the examined life, shedding with people who refuse to live shallow and want their lives to carry weight and make Godly impact

No fanfare. No formal ceremony. Just a room where the work continues, and the ones carrying it forward are not the ones who built it.

I watched that moment happen on a Sunday.

The pastoral leaders were away — resting, restored, removed from the weight they carry every week. And their adult children were in place. Every one of them. In place. Serving, leading, holding the line with a kind of quiet authority that did not ask for permission.

And in that moment, I heard something that has not left me since.

They are not standing in for their parents. They are stepping into their assignments.

The Distinction That Changes Everything

These two phrases live close enough to each other that most people never notice the distance between them. But that distance is where legacy is won or lost.

To stand in for someone is a positional assignment. You are a placeholder. A warm body in a cold chair. Your authority is borrowed. Your tenure is temporary. You are waiting for the real leader to return so you can exhale and step aside.

To step into is something different entirely.

Stepping into is not about filling a vacancy. It is about fulfilling a calling. The one who steps in is not asking what do I do while they are gone — they are asking what does this moment require of me, now that it is mine?

One is about Substitution. The other is about Succession..

The former holds the place. The latter carries the purpose.

Preparing Them for Their Absence

Here is what I do not want us to miss about that Sunday morning.

These leaders were not hovering. They were trusting.

And trust, at that level of leadership, is one of the most mature and difficult acts a legacy leader can perform. It sometimes feels better to believe you are indispensable than it is to know you are replaceable. Indispensability feels like importance. Replacement feels like risk.

But the leaders who leave and watch the work continue — without a phone call, without a crisis, without a system held together only by their personal presence — those are the ones who have actually built something. Not just a ministry. Not just a team. A legacy.

Rest, for a legacy leader, is not abandonment.

Rest is testimony.

The work ran without them because they did the harder work beforehand — the work of formation, of investment, of releasing what they built into the hands of people they trusted to carry it.

The Weight We Place on the Next Generation

I want to speak to those of us who are seasoned. Veterans of the mission. The ones whose names are attached to what we have built.

We have to ask ourselves an honest question.

Have we been forming successors — or have we been appointing stand-ins?

Because there is a way to develop the next generation that never quite lets them arrive. We give them access but not authority. We give them assignments but not agency. We let them serve on the stage but keep the decisions in our office. We call it mentorship. But what it produces is a generation that is perpetually on standby — capable, prepared, faithful — and yet waiting for a permission that never fully comes.

That is not legacy. That is dependency.

The adult children on that Sunday were not waiting. They were not performing for approval. They were not glancing at the door to see if their parents had come back early. They were fully present, fully engaged, fully in.

Because somewhere along the way, the work had become theirs too.

The Theology of Succession

There is a moment in the text — running through the prophets, through the apostles, through the whole sweep of salvation history — where God does not merely transfer a task. He transfers identity.

Elisha does not stand in for Elijah. He carries the spirit of Elijah — doubled.

Joshua does not stand in for Moses. He crosses the Jordan that Moses never crossed.

Timothy does not stand in for Paul. He carries the gospel into a generation Paul would never reach.

In every case, the successor is not trying to replicate the predecessor. They are continuing a work that was never about the predecessor to begin with.

God is the source. We are the resource.

The work was never ours to own. That means it is not ours to hoard, either.

The Call

If you are a legacy leader — pastor, principal, founder, elder, parent — I want to leave you with this.

Stop building people who can hold your place.

Start building people who can take your position into places you have never been.

There is a generation behind you that is not waiting to stand in.

They are ready to step in.

Give them the room.

E. Derrik Porter is a pastor-scholar, educator, and moderator of The Presence Collective who writes on faith, leadership, and the examined life, shedding with people who refuse to live shallow and want their lives to carry weight and make Godly impact

I heard that on TikTok a few days ago, and it landed. Hard. Because I’ve been thinking about how many times I’ve waited to feel ready — before making a move, before stepping into something significant, before committing to what I already knew I needed to do.

Over the course of my life, there have been moments where I was right on the edge of something. A major move. A real leap. And I hesitated.

I keep coming back to this one memory. Growing up, there was a shortcut to the candy store — a stone wall in the middle of the alley that cut through the tenement buildings and opened up to 129th Street. If you jumped the wall, you shaved the trip down from minutes to seconds. But you had to jump.

I remember dangling from that wall — eight, maybe ten feet up — just hanging there. Waiting. Waiting to feel ready to let go.

What was I actually waiting for?

That’s the question I’m sitting with now. Because when I fast-forward through life — through all the lifing — I realize I’m still that kid sometimes. Still hanging. Still waiting for the right moment to release my grip so I can get to the candy store.

But maybe readiness isn’t the rush of adrenaline that prepares the body for fight or flight. Maybe ready is the decision to face the outcomes. To accept whatever comes next.

The Grip Is the Problem

Here’s what I’ve come to understand about that wall.

The hanging wasn’t neutral. Often it looks like being patient and felt like reasonable caution. But hanging from a wall eight feet up is not a sustainable position. The arms get tired and hands weaken. The longer you hold on waiting to feel ready to let go, the less strength you have when you finally do.

Waiting to feel ready can deplete us before we do.

And there is something else I did not understand at eight years old but I understand now — the ground was always there. It did not move. It did not get further away the longer I hung. The outcome I was afraid of was a fixed distance below me the entire time. What changed was not the drop. What changed was me. My grip. My resolve. My willingness to accept what was already true. I was going to have to let go eventually, and the only question was whether I did it with intention or out of exhaustion.

Most of us let go out of exhaustion. We hold on until we cannot hold on anymore and then we call that courage. But it was just gravity. ha!

Real readiness, the kind that is a decision and not a feeling, means releasing the wall before your limbs give out. It means choosing the drop instead of suffering it.

The grip is the problem. Not the wall. Not the height. Not the uncertainty of what the landing looks like.

Because as long as you are holding on to the familiar, to the safe, to the version of your life that does not require the decision, you cannot reach what is on the other side. And there is something on the other side. That has never been the question.

The question has always been whether you are willing to let go.

What are you gripping right now that is costing you more strength than it is worth?

Not recklessly, not everything you are holding needs to be released. But sit with it honestly. Is what you are holding onto keeping you safe or is it keeping you stuck?

Name the grip. That is where we start.

To the community:

What is the thing you have been gripping? What’s the familiar, the safe, the almost-decision that you know it is time to release?

Drop it in the comments. We are in this together.

There’s more to come.

Just Watch. Just Wait.

The best of God is coming to you

Song: “Dancing at the Edge”

Artist: M’Kenzie & Co.

Written and Produced by E. Derrik Porter

Adapted from the message, The Edge is Not the End

Read more

“What’s madness but nobility of soul / At odds with circumstance? The day’s on fire! / I know the purity of pure despair, / My shadow pinned against a sweating wall. / That place among the rocks—is it a cave, / Or winding path? The edge is what I have.”

Theodore Roethke, In a Dark Time

The edge is what I have. Not the answer. Not the resolution. The edge.

I know that edge personally, vividly. When I wrote At Rock Bottom, But Broken Open in 2023, I was not writing from a place of recovery. I was descending, still on the way down toward the bottom. The wounds were not yet scars. The pain was raw and present, not post-traumatic. I did not hand readers the tidy lesson of a survivor standing safely on the shore—I handed them a musing of a man still struggling in the deep. That is the only authority this essay claims. Not hindsight. A report from one embedded within.

There is a particular kind of courage required to write from the middle of a trying season rather than from the other side. The middle exposes you and denies you the editorial comfort of resolution. You cannot overlook the ugliness of it all and say, but look what it became because you are still trying to make sense of the mess. What you can say is what the poet said, the day’s on fire and my shadow pinned against a sweating wall. Roethke knew the terrain. So did David.

David writes Psalm 27 from the middle as well. He is not on the other side of his struggle. We are so accustomed to testimony from hindsight, from THAT is what God did. But David is dispatching his words from inside the crucible as his enemies are present tense and the violence is at the door. And his confession is the most honest sentence in the room: I would have lost heart. He came to the edge of himself, the edge of his confidence. The unless is the only thing between him and the abyss of despair.

Unless I had believed to see the goodness of the Lord in the land of the living.

The Hebrew word there — tov — does not mean "barely enough." It means the best things. The finest portion. David is not surviving on minimal grace. He is tethered to a conviction that the best God has to offer is still ahead of him in the territory of the living. That conviction does not remove the edge. It redefines it

This season has a name.

In the work I have been building toward — a manuscript called Thresholds — I have been trying to name what David was standing on and what Roethke was standing on and what I was standing on when the words of But Broken Open first left me. The name I keep returning to is this: a threshold.

Thresholds are the places that look like endings. From one direction, they present as walls. Dead ends. Caves with no exit. But what looks like a terminus from this side is often a door from the other. The passage is real. The movement is possible. But you cannot see it until you are willing to stand at the edge long enough to let your eyes adjust.

This is the work that does not get covered in most leadership curricula. This is the interior geography that productivity frameworks skip.

Warren Bennis and Robert Thomas understood something about this. In Geeks and Geezers (2002), they introduced the concept of the crucible — intense, often shattering experiences that force a fundamental restructuring of identity, values, and purpose. They studied leaders across generations and asked a simple question: what separates the extraordinary from the merely competent? The answer was not talent. Not access. Not strategy. It was what they carried out of their hardest season.

The crucible, Bennis and Thomas argued, is where leaders are made. The decisive trait is what they called adaptive capacity — the ability to be broken and reconfigured rather than simply broken. The ones who became extraordinary were the ones who found meaning in the fire.

This is rigorous work. It is true. And what I offer is not a dismissal of two of the most careful researchers in modern leadership studies, but instead a witness to what their framework cannot reach.

Adaptive capacity can locate what the crucible produces.

It cannot tell you who meets you inside it.

This is the seam where the scholarship ends and the testimony begins.

David was not surviving his crucible on grit. He was not surviving on adaptive capacity, on emotional intelligence, on a well-developed sense of personal narrative. He was surviving on one conviction: I will see the goodness of the Lord in the land of the living. The unless was not a strategy. It was a Person.

The research describes the vessel. It cannot account for the fourth man in the fire.

Roethke stands at the edge of his poem and holds the tension without resolving it. The edge is what I have. It is an honest ending, built entirely on human perception.

The cave or the winding path — Roethke does not answer his own question. He simply holds the tension. The edge is what I have.

But David does not end there. David answers the question Roethke could only hold.

The edge is a threshold. And the God of tov — of the best things, the finest portion — is already on the other side of it.

That is not a therapeutic claim. It is a theological one that changes everything about how we move through the fire. We do not simply develop adaptive capacity in the crucible. We encounter the One who is the source of it. The crucible does more than manufacture what we need by revealing the One who has it.

David’s witness does not leave us without guidance as it teaches us three things.

1. Confess the edge without conceding to it. David said I would have lost heart — not I lost heart. That distance between the would have and the did is where your resilience lives. You are allowed to name the pressure without agreeing with its verdict. Tell the truth about where you are. Just do not let where you are restrict you where you are going.

2. Anchor to God’s character when your circumstances offer no evidence. At the edge, the evidence may offer strong support for surrender. Every unanswered prayer, every prolonged season, every door that did not open is a vote. David refused to let circumstances decide — not because he was naive, but because he knew something about God that his circumstances could not disprove. Tov. Still coming. Still promised. Resilience will not hold you here — resilience is a human resource and the edge is beyond human resources. What holds you is a conviction about who God is that runs deeper than what God has not yet done.

3. Declare forward before the deliverance comes. David did not write Psalm 27 from the other side. He wrote it from the middle — which means he prophesied his own survival before he had evidence of it. He declared I will see before he could see. You do not have to be through it to speak past it. Open your mouth before the breakthrough. That declaration is not denial. It is the one move that surrender cannot survive.

The edge is where surrender starts to make sense — and where audacious expectation has to make its stand.

But the edge is not the end. The edge is a threshold.

David overcame the despair of his edge with the word unless. And I am overcoming mine own because I too have an audacious expectation that will see the best of God in the worst of times.

So I leave you with one question.

If you are in the middle of a struggle, and at the edge of surrender, what declarations and decisions are you making?

E. Derrik Porter is a pastor-scholar, educator, and moderator of The Presence Collective who writes on faith, leadership, and the examined life, shedding with people who refuse to live shallow and want their lives to carry weight and make Godly impact

.

[Verse]

If you’re walking through the valley

And you’re feeling cold and dark

If you’re feeling lost and lonely

And you’ve tried with all your heart

And the light is getting dim

And your patience is wearing thin

Let me tell you

Let me tell you

The edge is not your end

[Chorus]

Your life

Your future is secure in Him

The edge is not your end

[Post-Chorus]

Just watch

Just wait

The best of God is coming to you

[Verse 2]

Just when you thought you lost it all

God will turn it around

Just when you think you had enough

His love will pick you up

And He’ll tell you

And He’ll tell you

The edge is not your end

[Chorus]

Your life

Your future is secure in Him

The edge is not your end

[Post-Chorus]

Just watch

Just wait

The best of God is coming to you

Just watch

Just wait

The best of God is coming to you

Just watch

Just wait

The best of God is coming to you

The Presence Collective is where E. Derrik Porter sheds with people who refuse to live shallow—leaders, learners, and believers who want their lives to carry weight and make Godly impact.

Do you actually expect things to get better? Not hope. Not wish. Not pray and then brace for the worst.

I mean — do you genuinely expect goodness?

Because David did. And he wrote it down in one of the most desperate psalms in the Bible. And that’s what this message is all about.

An audacious expectation.

Believing you’ll live.

To see the best of God

Now, not later.

Watch and be blessed and share it with others.

The Presence Collective is where E. Derrik Porter sheds with people who refuse to live shallow—leaders, learners, and believers who want their lives to carry weight and make Godly impact.

A Gift That Cost a Billion Dollars

The facts here matter — because when they get blurry, that blurriness is doing someone a favor. Qatar gifted the United States a Boeing 747-8 — a 13-year-old commercial aircraft valued at approximately $400 million. The plane cost the American taxpayer nothing to acquire. The headline was crafted accordingly: free plane. But the Pentagon quietly transferred $934 million from a classified missile defense program to fund the aircraft’s rapid conversion to presidential specifications. Aviation experts — not political opponents, but engineers and industry analysts — projected the total retrofit cost at over $1 billion. The Air Force Secretary, when pressed by Congress, acknowledged the figure could reach that threshold, though he suggested some costs would have been incurred regardless. The facts remain: a plane that cost nothing to receive will cost Americans somewhere between $400 million and $1 billion to make usable. It will serve one man, temporarily, before being transferred to his presidential library foundation in 2029. And nobody scrambled this project because a threat materialized. They scrambled it because someone wanted the plane before a particular moment passed. This is not an argument about patriotism or national security. The President of the United States requires a functional, secure aircraft. No serious person disputes that. This is an argument about priorities expressed through public spending — and what that expression reveals about whom this government believes it serves.

A Billion Dollars Has a Body Count

Economists and policy analysts understand something that political rhetoric obscures: every dollar allocated is also a dollar withheld from somewhere else. Opportunity cost is not an abstraction. It is a choice wearing a budget. At the current average federal cost of approximately $1,400 per month per household, $1 billion in Section 8 housing vouchers shelters nearly 60,000 American families for a full year. In 2024, the United States recorded its highest homelessness count in modern history — more than 770,000 people without permanent shelter, an 18 percent increase from the year prior. Chronic homelessness has nearly doubled since 2016. Black Americans, representing 12 percent of the national population, account for 32 percent of all people experiencing homelessness — a disparity born not of moral failure but of systemic disinvestment compounding across generations. Sixty thousand families housed. From one budget line. For one year. Or consider food insecurity. As of late 2025, roughly 14 percent of American households — up from 12.5 percent in 2024 — reported not having reliable access to adequate food. In New York City alone, 40 percent of families report they cannot afford their weekly groceries. SNAP benefits cost approximately $1,000 per family of four annually. $1 billion feeds one million families for a year. That sentence should not be able to coexist with what comes next in this piece — but it does, because we have learned to hold contradictions without flinching. The crisis does not stop at food and shelter. Rural hospitals are closing at historic rates, leaving communities — disproportionately white, working-class, and Republican-voting — without emergency medical access. The average rural hospital renovation project runs $15 to $50 million. $1 billion could fund between 20 and 65 of them — restoring life-saving services to communities that have been told, election cycle after election cycle, that they are seen. The public spending tells a different story. The United States faces a shortage of more than 300,000 teachers. Recruitment and retention incentive grants — loan forgiveness, signing bonuses, relocation assistance — average $10,000 to $25,000 per educator. $1 billion addresses the pipeline crisis for 40,000 to 100,000 teachers, sending a structural signal that this nation intends to educate its children rather than merely test them. These are transformational returns that shape destinies.

The Cruelest Irony Has a Budget Line

What makes this moment particularly difficult to rationalize — from any ideological vantage point — is not the aircraft in isolation. It is the context. At the precise moment the Pentagon transferred nearly $1 billion toward the retrofit of a luxury jet, the Trump Administration’s FY2026 budget proposed cutting the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s affordable housing programs by 44 percent. Not trimming. Not restructuring. Cutting nearly in half. Hundreds of thousands of families would lose rental assistance. Emergency housing programs would be consolidated or eliminated. The proposed budget for housing vouchers alone represented a reduction of more than $26 billion — a 57.5 percent decrease. The federal government accelerated $934 million toward one aircraft for one man while simultaneously proposing to strip $26 billion in housing assistance from the most economically vulnerable Americans. These decisions did not occur in different administrations or across different eras of policy. They were made within the same budget cycle, signed by the same executive authority, administered by the same government. This is not a budget error, but what intention looks like when it stops hiding behind procedure.

The Myth of Fiscal Conservatism

Those who defend this expenditure on grounds of fiscal responsibility or national security should grapple honestly with this: the nation’s existing Air Force One fleet remains operational. Boeing is already under contract to deliver two new 747-8s possibly in 2027 and 2028. Aviation experts were unambiguous in their assessment that the Qatar conversion made no financial or practical sense precisely because that work was already underway. Nobody scrambled this project because a threat materialized. They scrambled it because someone wanted the plane before a particular moment passed. Genuine fiscal conservatism asks: what is the highest-value use of constrained public resources? It does not ask: how do we justify this expenditure after the decision has been made? The Pentagon’s unwillingness to disclose the total cost — classified, they say — does not inspire confidence that the answer to that first question was ever seriously sought. One need not oppose presidential air travel to oppose this specific expenditure at this specific moment for these specific reasons. The issue is not the existence of Air Force One. The issue is choosing to spend a billion dollars expediting a luxury conversion while proposing simultaneous, historic cuts to programs that keep American families housed, fed, and functional.

A Nation’s Priorities Are a Moral Document

Leadership scholars — and I count myself among them — understand that institutions do not merely reflect values. They produce them. What governments choose to fund, accelerate, and celebrate tells citizens not only what is prioritized but what is possible. And when citizens are told — through budget lines and transfer documents and classified expenditures — that the spectacle of power takes precedence over the stability of their households, they receive a message far more durable than any speech. The aircraft is gleaming. It lands with the authority of an empire — and that, apparently, was the point. But authority without accountability is not leadership. It is posturing. Somewhere in the United States, tonight, a family of four is still in a car. The spectacle is over and the crowd has gone home. But America still deserves a government that asks what else we could have built — and loses sleep over the answer.

E. Derrik Porter is a pastor-scholar, educator, and moderator of The Presence Collective who writes on faith, leadership, and the examined life. Speaking truth to power and striving to be better he seeks.

There is a category of knowledge that your best days cannot produce.

It is not because you lack intelligence or because you have not studied, or prayed, or positioned yourself well. There are things about God that are so specific and irreplaceable that they are only legible in conditions our need for ease works overtime to avoid.

The furnace teaches what …

Read more

It comes daily. Sometimes it arrives before you open your eyes — in the form of a number, a diagnosis, a silence where a voice used to be. It is detailed. It is confident. And it is loud.

The question Paul raises in 2 Corinthians 4 is not whether the report is real. It is. He had his own: beatings, imprisonments, shipwrecks, a thorn in the flesh he couldn’t shake. He doesn’t minimize any of it. What he does is refuse to let it be final.

“For which cause we faint not.” — 2 Corinthians 4:16

That opening line is a refusal before it is anything else. Not an explanation. Not a theology lecture. A refusal. We do not faint. We do not fold. We do not give in.

And then he tells you why.

You are not just surviving the trial. You are being made in it.

Don’t give in to the darkness. See through it.

Thirty-eight years on a mat.

Long enough that the mat is no longer where he suffers. The mat is who he is. The wound has set his schedule, named his friends, written his explanations. And beneath St. Anne’s they dug and found Bethesda exactly as John described it — the twin-basin pool by the Sheep Gate, five porches, the place scholars once dismissed as a Gospel invention. The stones stopped arguing with the text.

So set the scene honestly. This is a house of mercy, full of people who cannot reach the water — what Gardner C. Taylor once described as an arena of need. And Jesus, walking in, looks past thirty-eight years of suffering and asks a question that sounds almost unkind:

“Wilt thou be made whole?”

Here is why that question is more clinical than cruel.

Jesus is not mocking the man. He is naming the deepest thing in him — the part that has made peace with paralysis. After thirty-eight years, healing is not only the gift of working legs. Healing is the loss of the only self he has ever known. And some part of every long-suffering soul is afraid of that trade.

So hear me. Some stalls are not waiting on God. They are waiting on us to be honest about whether we want to leave the mat.

What Bethesda and a laboratory have in common

I am supposed to tell somebody today that the question is mercy, not insult.

Because here is what took the laboratory five decades to confirm and what the text knew the whole time.

In 1967, two psychologists named Martin Seligman and Steven Maier ran an experiment on the anatomy of despair. Subjects exposed to a suffering they could not escape eventually stopped trying to escape it at all. And the cruelty in the data was this: when the exit was finally opened, they would not walk through it. They had learned, in the marrow, that effort was pointless. Seligman called it learned helplessness, and the name became famous.

But the science kept going, and fifty years later Seligman and Maier did something rare — they corrected themselves. The newer neuroscience found the original theory backwards. Passivity in the face of long suffering is not the thing we learn. Passivity is the default. It is wired in. The thing that has to be learned, the acquired skill, the trained muscle, is hope. Surrender is the factory setting. Agency is the gift that has to be given.

Now read the question again. Do you want to be made whole?

The lab spent fifty years and arrived where the Gospel had been standing the entire time: a man cannot lift himself off the mat by trying harder, because the mat was never a habit he could break by bearing down. It is wired in beneath the will — a default. Effort cannot undo what effort never created. Call it the empirical shadow of grace: the data tracing the very shape the altar named first. Science can describe the pit with stunning precision. It was never able to throw down a rope. God is the source; we are the resource.

That is why I trust the data and bow to the text. The science is the illustration. The Scripture is the point.

Two postures, two pathologies

But the mat is not the only seat, and the second one is more respectable.

In 2 Kings 7, four men with leprosy sit at the gate of a starving city and do the math out loud. Starve inside, die out here, or risk the enemy camp and maybe live. And at first they choose the seat in the middle — the one that feels safe precisely because it asks nothing of them. The man at the pool suffers passively; he has stopped doing the math. The lepers suffer rationally; they have reasoned their way into paralysis and called it prudence. If the mat is learned helplessness, the gate is its educated cousin — the stuckness of capable people who have built a whole theology of waiting. The mat catches the wounded. The gate catches the gifted.

And here is the indictment I cannot preach from above, because I have sat in both seats: we survive the mat and the gate by renaming them. What we will not heal, we rename. The wound we stop calling a problem. The waiting we start calling a plan. The weight we have carried so long we stop calling it sin and start calling it personality.

From diagnosis to invitation

So when the writer of Hebrews finally speaks, notice what he does not say. He does not say try harder. He does not say believe more. He has read the human condition correctly — he knows that telling a man at Bethesda to summon more willpower is like telling Seligman’s subjects to simply choose the door. The default is too strong.

He says something else. “Let us lay aside every weight.”

Not carry it better. Lay it down. And then he hands you the two things no laboratory and no willpower could ever manufacture.

Grace supplies the strength. Jesus is the author and the finisher — not a spectator sending you onto terrain He never tested. He wrote the course and He crossed the line. The cross did the costly thing: it freed you from a life of guilt and shame, and freed you for a life of righteousness, love, and joy.

The witnesses supply the evidence. That great cloud is not a jury leaning over the rail to decide whether you deserve to run. They are former mat-dwellers and gate-sitters who made the same choice to set the weight down, and their finished lives are the proof that the track holds.

The lab can teach you that hope must be learned. Only the Gospel can teach you Who does the teaching.

So this is the word I came to bring. You were not built to lie between you and your name. You were not built to sit between two certainties of death. The science only ever described the pit. Grace is the hand that reaches in.

Get up. Lay it aside. And run for your life.

E. Derrik Porter is a pastor-scholar, educator, and founder of The Presence Collective who writes on faith, leadership, and the examined life

spirit / substance / style

Surrounded by miracles. Close enough to see the water move. Far enough to never quite catch it.

And when Jesus walked up to the man at the pool of Bethesda, He did not ask what was wrong with him. He asked one question that still indicts every one of us who has made peace with our paralysis:

"Wilt thou be made whole?"

Do you actually want this to change?

Read it slowly, because the question is not cruel — it is merciful. Some stalls are not waiting on God. They are waiting on us to be honest about whether we want to leave the mat.

The mat gives you an identity. The mat gives you sympathy. The mat gives you an excuse. And when you have been on it long enough, the mat starts to feel like home. That is the first cost of staying the same — you stop noticing what it is taking from you.

But the mat is not the only place people sit.

Four lepers sat at the gate of Samaria — famine inside the walls, an army outside them — parked in the only place that felt safe, right between two certainties of death. And one of them said the most courageous sentence in scripture:

"Why sit we here until we die?"

Not how do we win. Not how do we survive. Just — why are we accepting this as the final answer?

The mat is familiar suffering. The gate is convenient surrender. And both of them will let you die slowly while you tell yourself you are being wise.

So hear the turn.

The writer of Hebrews does not say try harder. He does not say believe more. He says: lay it aside. The weight. The thing that has been with you so long you stopped calling it sin and started calling it personality.

Lay. It. Aside.

Not because the race is easy. Because the race is yours.

And you do not run it alone. Jesus ran it first — author and finisher, He wrote the course and crossed the line. The cloud of witnesses is not watching to see if you deserve it. They are leaning in because they ran the same track, carried the same weight, made the same choice to set it down. Their lives are the evidence that the track holds.

Grace supplies the strength. The witnesses give the evidence.

Now you do the one thing left.

Get up. Lay it aside. Get in the race. And run for your life.

spirit / substance / style

Wilt thou be made whole? Jesus asked it at a pool of healing — to a man who had been lying on a mat for thirty-eight years.

Why sit we here until we die? A leper asked it at a gate between two certainties of death.

Neither question needed an answer from God.

Both needed one from you.

Watch the clip and…

Answer the question.

Fifteen years ago, Warren Buffett said he could fix the federal deficit in five minutes. He was not posturing. His plan was a single sentence: pass a law making every sitting member of Congress ineligible for re-election in any year the deficit exceeds three percent of GDP.

No task force. No ideology. No appeal to patriotism or legacy.

Just restructured consequences.

What followed was fifteen years of silence. Not because the idea was radical. Because it was uncomfortable. That kind of silence does not mean no one heard. It means someone benefits from not responding.

The problem was never the problem.

What Buffett understood, and what most policy wonks are reluctant to say plainly, is that the deficit is not a knowledge problem. Every sitting senator, every serious economist, every first-year policy student already knows the basic arithmetic of fiscal responsibility. Information has never been the issue.

The issue is that staying misaligned was never expensive enough.

This is one of the oldest institutional deceptions in human history: misaligned consequences masquerading as an unsolvable problem. We debate values when we should be restructuring costs. Our arguments are not as flawed as our systems of accountability.

Now bring it closer to home.

The same diagnostic applies to the organization we have been meaning to restructure. The conversation I have been meaning to have. The vision you have been building toward for three years that somehow never fully launches.

Most stalls are not complicated. They are protected.

A complicated problem requires more information, more resources, more time. A protected problem requires courage — specifically, the courage to stop quietly benefiting from staying where you are.

Ask yourself this honest question: If this stays stalled, I don’t have to ____.

Whatever fills that blank is not a circumstance. It is a decision. And buried inside that choice is at the heart of your stall — the one thing that, if removed, changes everything.

Ideology speaks to your convictions. Incentive demands a strategy.

Buffett was never interested in what Congress believed. He was invested in what they would do when their seat was on the line. Most leaders never make that distinction. Most systems never recover from missing it.

Congress protects its seat and calls it service. We protect our comfort and call it wisdom. We protect our options and call it discernment. We protect our image and call it stewardship. The names change. The mechanism does not.

Until the cost of staying misaligned becomes more personally expensive than the cost of changing, the stall remains the strategy.

I know this personally.

I had to get ruthlessly honest about what was actually first in my life. I had to acknowledge what had been quietly crowding out the people and things that mattered most under the cover of ministry and productivity. I was not lying to anyone. I was posturing. Performing a version of priority that looked right from the outside but told a different story on the inside. God and marriage were listed first. But the calendar and my focus told the truth.

That reckoning was not comfortable. But it was redemptive. It gave back what my misalignment had slowly stolen.

Clarity, applied honestly, is one of the most redemptive forces available to a leader.

So the question worth sitting with is not: what should I do?

Most of us already know what we should do.

The more penetrating question is: what am I willing to lose in order to do it?

Buffett’s five-minute fix is simple. It is not easy. Simple means the path is clear, even when the way is hard. Easy would mean no resistance, no entrenched interest disturbed. Most necessary things live in that gap — simple enough to see, yet hard enough that we spend years looking away.

Ideology asks you to think differently. Incentive challenges you to do differently. One is a conviction. The other is motivation.

You need both. Starting now.

In July, I am releasing THRESHOLDS: A Framework for the One who Must Go Further. Not a motivational book. A rigorous, honest, faith-anchored guide for crossing from where you are to where you are called. If you already know this book is for you — stay tuned.

The Presence Collective / Spirit / Substance / Style

That is the part nobody wants to say out loud.

We watched a room full of educated, formed, credentialed people compete to offer praise to power — and something in us recognized the feeling.

Isaiah 1:17 has been waiting for this moment for centuries.

Learn to do right. Not as inspiration. As correction.

In today’s Elevate message — Find Your Spine — I walk through five layers of what that actually means. What it costs. What makes it possible. And why the week after Pentecost is exactly the right moment to say it.

This is not a comfortable word. But it is a necessary one.

Watch.

Most of us have a moment we keep going back to.

A room. A conversation. A season. A word that landed with the weight of a verdict. God felt close in a way He hasn’t quite felt since — and somewhere between then and now, that moment stopped being a launching pad and started being a location.

We built something there.

Luke 3 has something to say about that.

There is a moment in the third chapter that most of us have read so many times we have stopped being astonished by it. Jesus steps into the Jordan River. He stands in line like everyone else. No fanfare. No crowd-parting. No announcement. He simply shows up — and gets in line.

But then heaven does something it did not do for anyone else.

The Spirit descends. The Father speaks. Approval is declared. All in one moment. At one river. Before a single sermon has been preached, before a single miracle has been performed, before any public result has been produced.

Three things happened that day — and I want to name them precisely, because you need to understand what actually happened before you can understand what almost went wrong.

He was Anointed. The Spirit descended in bodily form — not near Him, not around Him — upon Him. The capacity for everything Jesus would do in three years of public ministry was deposited at that river before He did any of it. The anointing is not a feeling you work yourself into. It is a filling God works into you. The capacity for the assignment, deposited.

He was Appointed. The voice said — You are My beloved Son. Divine selection declared publicly. Heaven naming what earth had not yet recognized. God chose that ordinary river, among ordinary people, to say out loud what He had always known privately: this is the one.

He was Approved. The voice said — In You I am well pleased. Before one sermon. Before one healing. Before any public result whatsoever. Satisfaction declared before execution. Which means the approval was not a reward for performance. It was a declaration of relationship. You do not earn this. You receive it.

Anointed. Appointed. Approved. Every credential heaven issues — issued at one river. Before the ministry began.

Now here is the question that changes everything.

What if He never left?

When the Moment Becomes a Monument

What if Jesus — freshly anointed, publicly appointed, divinely approved — decided the Jordan was too glorious to walk away from? What if He surveyed what had just happened and concluded that nothing could ever top this moment? What if He built something there?

Picture it: a riverside community. Word spreads. People travel from Jerusalem, from Judea, from the surrounding regions — just to stand where the dove descended. Just to be near the man over whom the Father spoke.

Beautiful. And a tragedy.

Because the woman at the well would have died thirsty — and never known there was living water available to her. The man at the pool of Bethesda would have waited thirty-eight more years with no one to tell him to rise and walk. Lazarus would have stayed in the tomb. The five thousand would have gone home hungry. The Sermon on the Mount — never preached. The Lord’s Prayer — never taught. And the cross — the cross that held the sin of the world — would never have happened.

No crucifixion. No resurrection. No gospel.

The riverside community would have been the most anointed dead end in human history.

All that heaven deposited. All that the Father declared. All that the Spirit empowered. Contained. Preserved. Monumentalized. Poured on no one.

And before you say — that’s Jesus, not me — I need you to sit with what I just described.

Because you have been to that river. You know what a monument feels like from the inside.

It feels like faithfulness.

Why We Stay — What the Research Reveals

This is not just about Jesus. And the reason so many of us recognize this pattern in our own lives is not simply spiritual. The tendency to build permanent residence at our peak moment is deeply embedded in how human psychology works.

In 1993, Nobel Prize-winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman and his colleagues demonstrated what they called the Peak-End Rule: people do not remember experiences as a whole. Memory is rarely a perfectly accurate record of events. The peak-end rule focuses our memories around the most intense moments of an experience and the way an experience ends. We reconstruct the past from two dominant data points — the peak and the ending — and those two moments carry disproportionate weight over everything else. Nielsen Norman Group

Here is why that matters for the Jordan.

Kahneman makes a distinction between two selves: “the experiencing self” that does the living and the “remembering self” who keeps score and makes choices. The evaluations made by the “remembering self” are dominated by the most extreme moment of an experience — and our choices are influenced by this. Frontiers

Your monumental moment — that revival service, that word spoken over your life, that season when heaven felt close and everything seemed possible — was, by every neurological measure, a peak moment. And your remembering self has been running back to it ever since. Not because you are weak. Because you are human. The brain is designed to return to its highest intensity memories and use them as reference points for present meaning.

The problem is not that you remember the Jordan. The problem is that your remembering self has made the Jordan the permanent address of your identity — while your experiencing self has stopped moving. So leaving the river does not just feel like movement. It feels like loss. And that feeling is not incidental — it is structural. Tijer

Kahneman and Amos Tversky’s landmark research on loss aversion established that the pain of losing is psychologically about twice as powerful as the pleasure of gaining. This means that when you are standing at the edge of your Jordan — fully anointed, fully credentialed, fully equipped — and contemplating the move into the assignment, your brain is not doing a neutral cost-benefit analysis. It is running a grief calculation. Leaving the peak moment registers psychologically as losing something, even when what you are gaining is everything you were made for. Behavioral Economics

This is how we are wired. But our wiring alone does not determine destiny.

The Monument Problem

I need to be precise about what I see most often because the people I am describing are not rebellious. They are not careless. They are sincere, grateful, God-loving people who had a genuine Jordan moment — and have been living at the river ever since.

They keep returning to the moment God touched them. They are curating the memory of the anointing instead of spending it. Telling the story of what God did instead of doing what God said. Protecting the deposit instead of releasing it.

What they have built is not a ministry. It is a monument.

And here is the paradox the research names precisely: the more meaningful the peak experience was, the stronger the psychological pull to preserve it rather than deploy it. When people contemplate moving beyond what they have already invested — emotionally, spiritually, relationally — the brain frames that as accepting a certain loss. This systematically biases toward continuation of the current state, even when better alternatives exist. Leadership IQ

You stay at the river not because you lack courage. You stay because your remembering self has convinced your experiencing self that nothing after the Jordan will ever be as real.

But that is a lie the brain tells. And it is a lie with serious consequences.

You Were Designed to Pour

We are leaky vessels. Not airtight vaults.

What God places in us was never designed for containment. The filling was never meant to stay inside. You cannot hoard an anointing. You cannot preserve a calling by keeping it to yourself. The moment you make securing the gift more important than releasing it — you have stopped being a vessel and started being a vault.

Vaults don’t pour.

The filling creates pressure. The pressure creates flow. That restlessness you feel? That low-grade dissatisfaction with staying put? That is not dysfunction.

That is readiness wearing a disguise.

Which means the greatest tribute you can pay to your monumental moment is not to memorialize it.

It is to move from it.

Honor the anointing by moving in it. Honor the filling by releasing it. Honor what God spoke over your life by walking in the direction of what He said — even when you cannot see where the road leads, even when the assignment feels larger than your capacity, even when leaving the river feels like leaving the only place where God ever felt real.

The Jordan felt real because God was there. But God did not stay at the Jordan either.

The Upper Room Turned

At the end of history’s longest wait, there was another room. One hundred and twenty ordinary people — Anointed, Appointed, Approved — sitting in the upper room with a choice to make.

Monument. Or movement.

They had everything the brain tells you to protect. A shared peak experience. A room where fire had fallen. A community of people who had witnessed the same glory. The cognitive gravitational pull toward staying would have been enormous.

But Peter stood up. And walked out the door.

Three thousand people were added to the church before the sun went down.

Pentecost Sunday is not a celebration of what happened in that room. It is a celebration of what happened when they left it.

You are standing at a door right now.

Heaven has spoken over you. The Spirit has filled you. The Father has declared His pleasure over your life — before you produced a single result. The credential is issued. The equipping is complete.

The monument has served its purpose. It told you who you are. Now let it tell you where to go.

Tip the vessel. Move from the moment.

Prepare to be poured.

The Presence Collective / Spirit / Substance / Style