Subscribe now

This week we have published three research articles and two brief reports.

The first research article is Postapocalyptic environmentalism and activist subjectivities in the Dark Mountain Project by Lena Taylor & Kristen Lyons. The article analyses Dark Mountain’s post-apocalyptic environmentalism to show that embracing uncertainty and multiple endings can foster experimental activist subjectivities, challenging claims from collapse-oriented activism.

The second research article is Climate disinformation and moral distortion by J.K.G. Hopster & Carlo Martini. The article develops the concept of “moral distortion” through climate-discourse case studies, distinguishing it from factual disinformation, moral corruption, and greenwashing. It shows how true facts can mislead by obscuring moral implications, as illustrated by pro-CO2 rhetoric and BP’s individual-carbon-footprint framing.

The third research article is When beliefs meet technology: conservatism, climate denialism, and support for solar geoengineering by Dasom Lee and colleagues. The article examines whether climate denialism mediates the relationship between political conservatism and support for three solar geoengineering technologies across 13 countries. It separates ideology from denialism, finding that denialism largely explains conservative opposition, while residual effects vary by technology and country.

The first brief report is The translation problem: nature–climate integration between goal setting and implementation by Ana Dias. The report explains why nature–climate commitments tend to lose integration as they move from international goals into implementation. It presents the “translation problem” lens: sectoral metrics, institutions and laws drive de-integration, exposing a structural goal-setting–implementation paradox.

The final book report is The climate refugee misnomer by Eli Auslender, Charlotte Weatherill & M. M. Golam Rabbani. The authors critique “climate refugee” through international law, racialised discourse, and Bangladesh’s climate-related mobility. They link these lenses to show the label obscures complex displacement realities, enables border securitisation, and deflects responsibility from major emitters.

More to come next week!

Feel free to share this post in your networks. Have a great week!

Environmental Politics
Find us on LinkedIn, Twitter, and Bluesky.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

This week we have published one research article, one brief report, one introduction to special issue, and one guest post.

The research article is How to measure environmental concern: an IRT evaluation and advancement of established survey scales by Sarah Gomm & Franziska Quoß. The article uses item-response theory to assess 36 survey questions on environmental concern in a representative Swiss sample and develop a refined scale. Its nine-item ECo scale improves precision at high concern levels and predicts pro-environmental behaviour and policy support better than established measures.

The brief report is A caution on climate hope by Joe Blakey and Marc Hudson. Challenging the assumption that hope is essential for climate action, the authors warn that “false hope” and techno-solutionist optimism can sustain delay and depoliticise the systemic transformations required; instead, they call for a context-sensitive understanding of hope, pessimism, hopelessness, and other emotions in climate politics.

The introduction is Unpacking the politics of ecocide by Ignasi Bernat Molina, Robert Knox & David Whyte. The introduction traces ecocide from its anti-imperialist origins to today’s push for international criminalisation. It asks how law can challenge environmental destruction without obscuring its political and structural causes.

Finally, the guest post is A History of Republican Polarisation on Climate Change by Jesse Callahan Bryant. This blog post relates to the research and findings of the recent article - Intraparty polarization on climate change in Republican Party discourse, 1987–2016.

More to come next week!

Feel free to share this post in your networks. Have a great week!

Environmental Politics
Find us on LinkedIn, Twitter, and Bluesky.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

This week we have published a new issue and three research articles.

Volume 35, Issue 6 is out now. It includes ten research articles, one brief report, and three book reviews. Full details here.

The first research article is Relational state capacity in environmental governance: responsibility–capacity alignment in Nanjing’s waste sorting by Yanhua Deng & Chengguang Hu. The article examines how state capacity in environmental governance is relationally constituted through the alignment between the environmental responsibilities assigned to different actors and their capacities, using Nanjing’s mandatory household waste-sorting policy. It shows that the policy achieved early success when responsibility rested with local governments, but implementation weakened when responsibility shifted to citizens without sufficient habits.

The second research article is A multiscalar framework for assessing climate politics from a justice perspective: the case of Denmark by Salvatore Paolo De Rosa, Anna Kirstine Schirrer, Mads Ejsing & Stefan Gaarsmand Jacobsen. The article examines how climate justice can be assessed across international diplomacy, national policymaking, and civil-society mobilisation, using Denmark as a case study. It shows that Denmark’s claim to climate leadership is constrained by eco-modernist and growth-oriented governance.

The third research article is Are liberal democracies immune to the democratic resource curse? by Ariel Paz-Sawicki & Lior Herman. The article examines whether major natural gas discoveries can weaken democratic institutions in established liberal democracies, using Israel as an exploratory case study. It shows that the Israeli gas industry’s efforts to secure favourable regulation were associated with legal corruption, media capture, and weakened regulatory independence, suggesting that liberal democracies may also face a “democratic resource curse.”

More to come next week!

Feel free to share this post in your networks. Have a great week!

Environmental Politics
Find us on LinkedIn, Twitter, and Bluesky.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

This week we have published one book review.

The book review is Climate politics: can’t live with it, can’t mitigate without it by Caroline Kuzemko. Reviewed by Yeqi Jin. The review finds that it reframes climate mitigation from the 1970s–2020s as a long-term political process across four phases. The book shows that politicisation of mitigation is beneficial, not obstructive, foregrounding its overlooked temporal dimension.

More to come next week!

Feel free to share this post in your networks. Have a great week!

Environmental Politics
Find us on LinkedIn, Twitter, and Bluesky.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

This week we have published one research article and one book review.

The first research article is State narratives of shale gas development: evidence from a text-as-data study of the United States and China by Kate Hua-Ke Chi. This study uses 225 US and Chinese government statements (2010–2024) to analyse how states narratively legitimise shale gas development. It is a systematic US–China comparison, finding shared economic/security framing but fracking as energy diplomacy.

The book review is Climate imagination: Dispatches from hopeful futures edited by Eschrich Joey and Ed Finn. Reviewed by Philippe Blanchard. The edited volume argues that imaginative fiction can help us act on climate change. The book review highlights the volume’s novel format, alternating novels with scientific essays, and its timely turn from dystopia toward grounded optimism.

More to come next week!

Feel free to share this post in your networks. Have a great week!

Environmental Politics
Find us on LinkedIn, Twitter, and Bluesky.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

This week we have published three research articles.

The first research article is The renaissance of carbon capture and storage in Germany and the politics of conditionality by Tobias Haas, Alina Brad, Etienne Schneider, Zoé Hüttenhain & Joza Koinzer. This article examines why and how CCS resurged in German climate policy via historical-materialist policy analysis. It finds coalitional, discursive and institutional factors undermined a conditional hard-to-abate-only approach, enabling a technology-open path with greater carbon lock-in risk.

The second research article is Just transitions under pressure: from early visions to new proposals and trajectories in the Global South by Yanis Rihi. This article traces just transition’s genealogy and maps its contemporary uses across Africa, Southeast Asia and Latin America. It identifies three overlapping Global South articulations (technocratic energy restructuring, grassroots environmental justice, and systemic transformation) and four structural barriers (epistemic exclusion, governance asymmetries, climate finance injustices, growth rationalities).

The third research article is The vertical production of horizontal capacity: governing transboundary environmental problems in China by Xinhui Jiang, Yifei Li & Sarah Eaton. This article shows that horizontal capacity in China’s environmental governance is not independent of vertical hierarchy but is actively produced by the central state through mandates, incentives, and institutions that orchestrate inter-jurisdictional cooperation on transboundary problems.

More to come next week!

Feel free to share this post in your networks. Have a great week!

Environmental Politics
Find us on Twitter and Bluesky.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

This week we have published a guest post.

The guest post is an interview with Guangzhi Ye and Zhiwei Yang, Beyond Policy Ambition: Why Implementation Credibility Matters, in which we discuss the findings of their recent article, co-authored with Sufang Zhang, Yi Niu, and Jiaying Wang: When legitimacy backfires: symbolic policy signals and strategic green compliance in China’s multi-level governance.

More to come next week!

Feel free to share this post in your networks. Have a great week!

Environmental Politics
Find us on LinkedIn, Twitter, and Bluesky.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

This week we have published three research articles and one discussion.

The first research article is Rethinking party environmentalism: the environmental politics expert survey by Ville Haapanen. The article introduces the Environmental Politics Expert Survey, mapping 165 parties in 24 European countries across multiple environmental dimensions. It shows environmentalism is multidimensional—material, ethical and nationalist—with positions patterned by ideology, party family and region.

The second research article is Intraparty polarization on climate change in Republican Party discourse, 1987–2016 by Jesse Callahan Bryant. Using computational analysis and close reading of 800,000+ congressional speeches, the article traces climate discourse between centre-right and far-right Republicans from 1987–2016. It finds climate polarisation was often stronger within the GOP than between parties, ending in convergence around anti-bureaucratic rhetoric rather than shared denial.

The third research article is The national knowledge politics of monitoring and evaluating adaptation to climate change: processes of repair, theatrical performance and legitimacy by Biraj Adhikari & Susannah Fisher. The article examines how Nepal’s adaptation M&E systems mediate international reporting demands and domestic institutional constraints. It shows that “repairwork” sustains performative policy and legitimacy, often prioritising visible progress over learning.

The discussion article is Legal and cultural impacts of ecocide law: a view from the legislative frontlines by Jojo Mehta & Anna Maddrick. This discussion highlights ecocide law’s potential to close a critical legal gap by reshaping responsibility for severe environmental harm. Bridging such gap is relevant for strengthening prevention, accountability and ecological governance.

More to come next week!

Feel free to share this post in your networks. Have a great week!

Environmental Politics
Find us on Twitter and Bluesky.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

This week we have published a new issue and one research article.

Volume 35, Issue 5 is out now. It includes nine research articles, one review article, and three book reviews. Full details here.

The research article is Green rhetoric, anti-environmental voting: legislative behavior in Brazil’s agribusiness caucus by Daniela Campello, Gabriel Madeira, Beatriz Rey, Joyce Luz & Fabiano Santos. The article examines whether Brazilian export-oriented agribusiness firms’ green rhetoric under global market pressure translates into different congressional voting behavior compared to legislators backed by domestic farmers. It shows that despite divergent public rhetoric, legislators vote near-unanimously against environmental protections regardless of donor type, revealing that transnational market pressures induce only rhetorical adaptation rather than reshaping domestic climate policy coalitions.

More to come next week!

Feel free to share this post in your networks. Have a great week!

Environmental Politics
Find us on Twitter and Bluesky.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

This week we have published one research article and one book review.

The research article is Fossil fuel reliance and public support for climate change mitigation: evidence from 105 countries by Christoph Klebl, Samuel Pearson & Jolanda Jetten. The article uses survey data from 101,956 respondents across 105 countries to show that citizens in more fossil fuel–reliant economies are less supportive of government climate prioritisation, more favourable to continued fossil fuel use, and less supportive of expanding renewables. It shows that lower climate worry and greater climate denial partially account for this association even after extensive country-level controls.

The book review is Capitalism at the limit: a political ecology of a world in crisis, by Ulrich Brand and Markus Wissen. Reviewed by Daniel Nyberg. The review portrays the book as a powerful synthesis showing how capitalism’s normal functioning drives overlapping ecological crises, making “monstrous normality” its everyday condition. It finds the book novel and timely in linking eco-imperial tensions, authoritarian turns, and new solidarities to planetary limits, offering one of the most compelling current accounts of environmental politics.

More to come next week!

Feel free to share this post in your networks. Have a great week!

Environmental Politics
Find us on Twitter and Bluesky.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

This week we have published three research articles, one review article, and one book review.

The first research article is Green Is the New Bad Libertarian Populism and the Edgar Friendly Style of Climate Denial by Cristóbal Bellolio. This article argues that a new form of climate denial — “libertarian populism” (LP) — is driving resistance to climate science independent of fossil-fuel industry influence. It finds that LP inverts climate politics’ moral codes, “green is the new bad”, by recasting high-carbon consumption as a symbol of plebeian identity and transgression, a political style the paper terms the “Edgar Friendly” mode of climate denial.

The second research article is Disagreement among friends: a collaboration-based framework for reducing polarization on climate change by Mary C. McGrath. The article tests whether structured conversations between climate skeptics and advocates who are already friends can reduce polarization on climate change. It finds that a collaboration-based framework among existing social ties can durably reduce climate polarization, especially by moving skeptics, even in a small, self-selected sample.

The third research article is Is far-right ecologism going mainstream? A comparison of right-wing groups in the European Parliament by Balša Lubarda & Aron Buzogány. The article analyses whether far-right ecologism in the EU is moving into the environmental positions of mainstream right-wing parties in the European Parliament, focusing on EPP, ECR and far-right groups’ voting and speeches from 2009–2025. It finds far-right environmental ideas mainstream mainly via selective horizontal diffusion into ECR rather than broad convergence of the whole right, fragmenting the right more than uniting it.

The review article is The role of norms in EU forest conservation politics – current trends and avenues for research by Antonio Basilicata. This systematic review examines how norms are defined, diffused, and contested in EU forest conservation politics. It finds that EU forest conservation politics reveals a multi-level, reciprocal norm dynamic, not top-down compliance, where diverse actors including courts, NGOs, and local communities actively co-construct and contest conservation norms, a dimension largely overlooked by existing forest governance scholarship.

Finally, the book review is Undermining resistance: The governance of participation by multinational mining corporations, by Lian Sinclair. Reviewed by Jing Vivian Zhan. The review highlights the book’s ethnographic account of how mining corporations in Indonesia use participatory mechanisms such as CSR and undermine local resistance to extractive projects. It finds the book meaningful and timely for showing how participation operates as a contested tool of governance in extractive capitalism.

More to come next week!

Feel free to share this post in your networks. Have a great week!

Environmental Politics
Find us on Twitter and Bluesky.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

This week we have published three research articles and one book review.

The first research article is Does right-wing populism undermine public support for environmental policies in Europe? by Dimitri Gugushvili, Bart Meuleman, Daniel Spruit & Edwin Dizdaric. It examines whether right-wing populism (RWP) undermines public support for environmental policies in Europe, using survey data across nine countries. It finds nativism to be the most consistent and strongest predictor of environmental policy opposition, while policy framing (e.g., earmarking tax revenues for the elderly or national industries) can significantly moderate that opposition.

The second research article is Values-based environmental justice: conflicts and promises in mining territories by Bárbara Bastos. This article proposes values-based energy justice framework to address the limits of traditional EJ theories in extractive contexts. Using ethnography across post-mining Iglesias (Italy) and active-mining Vazante (Brazil), it finds extractive logics colonise everyday values, while infrapolitical counter-practices quietly sustain alternative worlds. EJ struggles remain ontological battles over which worlds of value are foreclosed or kept alive.

The thirds research article is Domestic climate finance and the state: disentangling the transformative capacity of state-owned investment banks in the green transition by Daniel Mertens & Nils Stockmann. The article examines how German state-owned investment banks (SIBs) shape domestic climate finance and what makes them genuinely transformative for the green transition. Using data from 19 SIBs and 27 interviews, it finds uneven “green” capacity, with only a few banks allocating a substantial share to climate projects.

Finally, the book review is Rejecting climate doomism by Diana Stuart. Reviewed by Peter J. Jacques. The review highlights Stuart’s book for its clear, accessible argument that rejects resignation and “doomism” by emphasising that “every degree matters”. It finds the book timely and meaningful, paralyzing despair with evidence that significant harm reduction is still possible and links this to concrete strategies and social movements for transformative climate action.

More to come next week!

Feel free to share this post in your networks. Have a great week!

Environmental Politics
Find us on Twitter and Bluesky.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

This week we have published two research articles and one guest post.

The first research article is When legitimacy backfires: symbolic policy signals and strategic green compliance in China’s multi-level governance by Zhiwei Yang, Sufang Zhang, Guangzhi Ye, Yi Niu & Jiaying Wang. The article reveals that when local governments fail to act on green promises, firms respond with symbolic compliance over real transformation. It used matched city-firm panel data across China (2013–2023) to disaggregate these implementation gaps.

The second research article is Mobilising care in the polycrisis: framing eco-social activism in Hungary, Czechia, and Poland by Luca Sára Bródy, Michaela Pixová & Elżbieta Korolczuk. The article presents the concept of ‘care’ as a political grammar for eco-social movements in post-socialist Central Europe — Hungary, Czechia and Poland. Drawing on interviews and movement texts, it shows how activists bridge feminist, environmental and social justice struggles in contexts where solidarity remains ideologically tainted by socialist legacies.

Finally, the guest post is Why Presidents Make Climate Policy More Polarized—And What We Can Do About It by Aaron Childree. This blog post relates to the research and findings of the recent article - Polarizing figures in polarized times: presidential involvement and public opinion on climate policy.

More to come next week!

Feel free to share this post in your networks. Have a great week!

Environmental Politics
Find us on Twitter and Bluesky.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

This week we have published two research articles and one guest post.

The first research article is Democratic legitimacy in practice: stakeholder participation in the rule-making of the Paris agreement article 6.4 removal standard by Jiyeon Chun, Minkyung Song & Raehyun Kim. This article uses LDA topic modeling on 436 stakeholder submissions to assess if Paris Agreement Article 6.4 rule-making was democratically legitimate. It finds participation was substantive, not tokenistic, but structurally unequal.

The second research article is Governing climate migration: the right to a livable space by Hélène Benveniste & Simona Capisani. Current institutions only govern cross-border displacement, missing immobility and internal migration. This article proposes a “right to a livable space” framework that covers all climate mobility outcomes.

Finally, the guest post is Climate Justice Under Pressure, an interview with Tatiana Sokolova. This interview relates to the research and findings of the recent article - On the climate justice front: Co-producing prefigurative politics in ‘Ecodefence! and others vs. Russia’ climate case in the European Court of Human Rights.

More to come next week!

Feel free to share this post in your networks. Have a great week!

Environmental Politics
Find us on Twitter and Bluesky.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

This week we have published two research articles and one book review.

The first research article is Does energy security threaten the rule of law? dynamic evidence from the European Union by Tufan Sarıtaş, Emin Ahmet Kaplan, Yasin Büyükkör & Alper Aslan. It finds EU democracies prove resilient: energy security risks do not weaken the rule of law. Using PVAR across 25 EU states (2008–2023), this article flips the usual question — does energy risk erode institutions? — and finds robust legal systems hold firm.

The second research article is Consensus or cheap talk? The discursive politics of South Africa’s just energy transition by Charlotte Sophia Bez, Thomas Klug, Giacomo Raederscheidt & Jan Christoph Steckel. JET policies in South Africa create surface-level consensus but mask deep political divides. Using ML on 2,300 news articles, this article maps skeptic, realist and opportunist stances, showing just transition risks co-optation by fossil fuel interests.

Finally, the book review is Governing the End by Lisa Vanhala and Governing Climate Change Loss and Damage edited by Lisa Vanhala and Elisa Calliari. Reviewed by Happy Mathew Tirivangasi. The review reports that Vanhala’s book shows recognition advanced while responsibility was repeatedly muted through “cultivated aquiescence.” The edited volume finds loss and damage is translated rather than adopted, blurred with adaptation or blocked by domestic political economies.

More to come next week!

Feel free to share this post in your networks. Have a great week!

Environmental Politics
Find us on Twitter and Bluesky.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

This week we have published one research article and one guest post. We also have an ongoing call for Special Issue proposals.

The research article is The desire for environmental justice: psychoanalysis and the political power of enjoyment by Jeffrey E. Blackwatters. This article explains why people remain emotionally invested in environmentally harmful systems despite knowing better. It does so by taking a psychoanalytic lens — using desire, enjoyment, and fantasy — to enrich environmental justice theory beyond rational liberal frameworks.

The guest post is Environmental Justice in a Criminal Register, an interview with Daniel Bertram. This interview relates to the research and findings of his recent article - Penal Environmentalism.

Finally, we have also have a call for Special Issue and Symposia proposals. Deadline for this round is 15th June.

More to come next week!

Feel free to share this post in your networks. Have a great week!

Environmental Politics
Find us on Twitter and Bluesky.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

This week we have published one research article, one book review, and one introduction to special issue.

The research article is Polarizing figures in polarized times: presidential involvement and public opinion on climate policy by Aaron Childree. This article isolates an understudied driver of climate opinion polarization — presidential involvement — showing that policy salience and partisan framing tied to the president deepen the partisan divide, with Republicans driving most of the polarization.

The book review is More and more and more: an all-consuming history of energy by Jean-Baptiste Fressoz. Reviewed by Yogi Hale Hendlin. The book demolishes the myth of “energy transition,” showing humanity accumulates energy sources rather than replaces them. Fossil fuels, for instance, still underpin renewables today. The review finds this symbiosis framework urgently contemporary, exposing “transition” as a corporate delay tactic, not a climate plan.

The introduction to special issue is The politics and governance of phase-out: a framework for empirical research by Adrian Rinscheid, Florentine Koppenborg & Gregory Trencher. Phase-out of unsustainable technologies is a distinct, understudied policy approach. This soon-to-be-published Special Issue fills the gap by proposing a five-angle analytical framework to guide empirical research: covering power, ideas, institutions, policy design, and outcomes.

More to come next week!

Feel free to share this post in your networks. Have a great week!

Environmental Politics
Find us on Twitter and Bluesky.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

This week we are announcing the winner for our article of the year award, 2025, and have published our new issue, one research article, and one book review.

The Environmental Politics Article of the Year Award, Volume 34 (2025) winners are David Caldwell, Gidon Cohen and Nick Vivyan, ‘Long-run trends in partisan polarization of climate policy-relevant attitudes across countries’. Congratulations!
In making this decision, it was agreed that:

Opinion polarization has become a major empirical feature of energy and climate politics, yet it has not been systematically examined across countries. This paper makes an important contribution by showing how the U.S. compares with its cross-national peers and how patterns of polarization have changed over time. Drawing on four ISSP Environment modules from 1993 to 2020, the paper provides a valuable over-time assessment of public opinion and highlights the gradual erosion of consensus around climate politics. It is a timely, rigorous, and highly relevant study that [is expected to] quickly become an important reference in the field.

Our new issue contains nine research articles, a review article, and three book reviews. Full details here.

The research article is Obstructing change: political inertia and the maintenance of climate inaction in Australia by Vanessa Bowden, Daniel Nyberg & Christopher Wright. The article reveals how Australia’s climate inaction is actively maintained, not just passively stuck. Through 62 interviews, it identifies 3 novel mechanisms (division, paralysis & displacement) showing how narratives produce political inertia even without overt denial.

The book review is The long heat: climate politics when it’s too late by Wim Carton and Andreas Malm. Reviewed by Yelda Erçandırlı. The book reframes adaptation, carbon removal and geoengineering as tools of fossil capital, not merely neutral fixes. It shows how ‘late climate politics’ protects property and shifts harm onto the Global South through class & imperial power.

More to come next week!

Feel free to share this post in your networks. Have a great week!

Environmental Politics
Find us on Twitter and Bluesky.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

This week we published one research article, one book review, and one guest post.

The research article is Mass animal starvation and the global development paradigm: toward multispecies food sovereignty as global wellbeing by Yamini Narayanan. The article highlights that development intentionally produces mass animal hunger as capitalist fuel, yet this atrocity is invisible in global policy. It is the first to politicise animal starvation as a justice issue and propose multispecies food sovereignty as a framework for global wellbeing.

The book review is of A review of ‘The environment in conflict: implications and pathways’ by Richard A. Marcantonio. Reviewed by Chloe Vongyer. Marcantonio’s 5-part framework — trigger, neglect, degradation, control, vector of violence — synthesises siloed debates and reframe environmental harm as violence itself.

Finally, the guest post is Climate Scepticism’s New Home: Inside the Conservative Mainstream, an interview with Robyn Eckersley. This interview relates to the research and findings of the recent article - Nationalism, populism and climate scepticism in Australia: comparing radical and conservative, centre-right discourses.

More to come next week!

Feel free to share this post in your networks. Have a great week!

Environmental Politics
Find us on Twitter and Bluesky.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

This week we published one guest post.

The guest post is from Yi Hyun Kang, The Youth in Climate Politics Isn’t Who You Think. The post draws on the recent article - Greta Thunberg and the transnational youth elite in global climate politics: myth or reality? “When young people took to the streets to demand more ambitious and urgent climate action in the late 2010s, this question was quick to emerge. While public support for youth climate activism was widespread, criticism persisted, especially with the assumption that those involved did not represent youth more broadly. Greta Thunberg, who initiated the Fridays for Future movement, became a target of such critiques. But does such a ‘youth elite’ actually exist, and what are its implications for global climate politics?”

More to come next week!

Feel free to share this post in your networks. Have a great week!

Environmental Politics
Find us on Twitter and Bluesky.

Subscribe now