Everything got done. Because it’s my job.

Then a friend texted me: “Hey, haven’t heard from you in months. Everything okay?”

I hadn’t dropped a single work thing. I’d dropped her.

That’s the part nobody warns you about when they tell you to “just push through” a busy season. The tasks with deadlines survive. The things without deadlines are the ones that quietly disappear, and usually those are the relationships.

The real problem

We think of busy as a time management problem. Too much to do, not enough hours, need better systems. And sure, some of that’s true. But if you’ve ever come out the other side of a brutal stretch and realized you ghosted a client, missed a friend’s milestone, or went silent on a referral partner who used to hear from you monthly, you already know the real problem isn’t your calendar.

It’s that busy has a sorting function built into it. When capacity gets tight, your brain automatically triages toward whatever has a deadline attached and away from whatever doesn’t. Relationships almost never have a deadline. So they lose, every time, unless you build something that overrides the default.

I’ve watched this happen to me and to clients in nearly identical ways. The work gets done. The people get quiet. And usually nobody notices until months later when a referral doesn’t come, or a client doesn’t renew, or a friend stops reaching out because they got tired of being the one who always initiates.

What actually keeps things from dropping

Here’s what I’ve learned, mostly by dropping things first and figuring out the fix after.

1. Decide in advance what’s non-negotiable, not in the moment. If you wait until you’re buried to decide what matters, busy will decide for you, and it will always pick the loudest deadline over the quietest relationship. Before a known busy stretch hits, I ask myself one question: who am I not willing to go dark on for the next month? I write down three to five names. Not a vague “stay in touch with people,” an actual list.

2. Lower the bar for what counts as staying in touch. This was the biggest mindset shift for me. I used to think reaching out meant a real conversation, face-to-face, coffee, a proper catch-up. During a busy season, that standard guarantees silence, because you genuinely don’t have time for that. So I lowered it. I’ve found a 15-minute Teams or Zoom call is equally effective. Instead of meandering, you stick to what’s top of mind, what they have going on. At the very least, a one-line text. Even a comment on their post. Forwarding an article with “this made me think of you.” None of it is impressive. All of it keeps the thread alive.

3. Put it on your calendar, or it doesn’t exist. I live by my calendar. If a task isn’t there, it doesn’t get done, and reaching out to people is no exception. So I create what I call no-minute meetings, quick blocks on the calendar with no agenda except being a reminder. When one pops up mid-day, I don’t overthink it, I just shoot off a quick email or text to whoever’s on my list.

4. Build a five-minute buffer around your actual work, not instead of it. I don’t mean block off an hour for “networking.” I mean, when I finish a client call, I give myself five minutes before opening the next task to send one message to someone I haven’t talked to in a while. It’s small enough that busy-me will actually do it, which is the whole point.

5. Tell the people who matter that you’re in a busy stretch. This one felt awkward the first time I did it, because I didn’t want to come off as self-important. I quickly got over it, and it’s become one of the most useful sentences I use. Something like: “Heads up, I’m heads-down on a few things this month, so I might be slower to respond, but I didn’t want you to think I went quiet on purpose.” That single sentence does more to protect a relationship than a weeks-long gap followed by an apology ever will.

6. Do a quick pass before the busy season ends, not after. Right before I come up for air, I look back at who I meant to reach out to and didn’t. Not to spiral about it, just to catch it early. I put it in the calendar! The gap between “I meant to” and “I actually did” is where relationships quietly die, and catching it a week late is a lot easier to repair than catching it three months late.

How to actually do this, this week

If you’ve got a busy stretch coming up, or you’re in the middle of one right now, here’s the version of this you can use today.

Write down three names. People you’d genuinely regret losing touch with if this season went sideways.

Next to each name, write the smallest possible gesture that counts as staying in touch with them specifically. For one person that might be a text. For another it might be liking and commenting on something they posted. It doesn’t need to be the same for everyone.

Set a recurring reminder, once a week, for the length of your busy stretch, that just says “one message.” Not “network.” Not “follow up.” Just: one message, to one person on that list.

And if you already know you’re about to disappear on someone, send the heads-up sentence now, before the silence starts, not after they’ve already noticed it.

Where this actually leads

The people who are best at relationships aren’t the ones who never get busy. Everyone gets busy. The people who are best at this have just stopped treating relationship maintenance as something that only happens when there’s spare time, because spare time is a myth during a real crunch. They’ve built it into the busy itself, at a scale small enough to survive contact with a packed week.

I still think about that text from my friend. Not with guilt exactly, more like a reminder. The work always looks like it’s the thing on fire. It rarely actually is. The quiet stuff is what burns down while you’re busy putting out the loud stuff, and you usually don’t smell the smoke until weeks later.

So before your next busy season hits, or if you’re already in one: who’s on your list of three? And what’s the smallest possible thing you could send them today that would let them know you didn’t forget?

If you want the deeper version of this, the actual referral-partner check-in system I use so client relationships never go quiet even during my most brutal stretches, that’s exactly the kind of thing I break down for paid subscribers. Might be worth a look if this hit close to home.

As always, if you think of someone who might benefit from this feel free to forward it on.

Subscribe now

I have several friends who have recently started consulting businesses after long, successful careers inside established firms. They are smart, experienced leaders with genuinely valuable perspectives. They have sat in difficult client meetings, guided teams through complex decisions, helped win major projects, and learned lessons that could save someone else time, money, or heartache.

I love seeing them begin to share what they know.

I read their posts and understand the depth behind every word because I know them. I know the projects they have led, the rooms they have been in, the problems they have solved, and the people who have trusted them. I can fill in the gaps between what they wrote and why it matters.

But their future clients may not.

Someone encountering them for the first time may see a thoughtful post but still not understand who it is for, what problem it addresses, or why this person might be the one to call. The expertise is there. The connection to the reader is not always as clear.

At the same time, I know other leaders who have spent decades accumulating knowledge but have not started sharing any of it. They tell me they would like to write, but they do not know what to say. They assume they need a completely original idea, a polished content strategy, or a profound point of view before they can begin.

Some people are writing but not reaching the people who need them. Others have something important to say but cannot figure out how to start.

I think these are two versions of the same problem.

You probably do not need more ideas

Most experienced leaders do not have a shortage of things to say. Their ideas are already hiding inside the conversations they have every day.

They are in the advice they repeatedly give clients. The questions they wish someone had asked earlier. The mistakes they see organizations make over and over again. The meeting that stayed with them on the drive home. The moment they realized the client was asking one question but needed the answer to another.

The challenge is learning how to translate those experiences into something another person can recognize and use.

When you have lived inside your expertise for years, it is easy to write from the inside out. You begin with what you know, what you do, what is changing in your profession, or what other experts should understand.

Your potential client is reading from the outside in.

They are not necessarily thinking about your methodology, discipline, or professional vocabulary. They are thinking about the difficult conversation they need to have with their leadership team. They are worried about the project that is falling behind, the client relationship that feels uncertain, or the growth plan that has not produced growth.

They may need your expertise, but they are experiencing it as a problem.

Make it easy for them to see how your expertise answers their problem, so they can connect the two.

Your peers may understand you. Will your future clients?

This is where thoughtful content can quietly miss its audience.

We naturally write for the people already around us. They understand our terminology, recognize our experience, and appreciate the nuances of what we are saying. When they like or comment on a post, it reassures us that the content is working.

Peer validation is meaningful, especially when you are stepping out on your own. But agreement from people who do what you do is not the same as recognition from people who need what you do.

You may be writing for people who understand your expertise instead of people who need your expertise.

There is a subtle but important difference between a peer reading your post and thinking, “That is so true,” and a potential client reading it and thinking, “That is exactly what is happening inside our organization.”

The second response begins a different kind of relationship.

It tells the reader that you understand their world. It helps them name something they may have been struggling to articulate. It gives them a reason to remember you, follow you, share your work, or begin a conversation.

That does not mean every post needs to produce a phone call or turn into a client. Relationships rarely work that quickly or neatly. Someone may read your work quietly for months. They may forward it to a colleague, bring the idea into a leadership meeting, or remember your name when the need becomes urgent — actions you may never see, but real ones all the same.

Your future clients are reading

In the last year, I’ve reviewed dozens of LinkedIn profiles for leaders launching consulting practices. The ones getting inbound inquiries all had one thing in common — and it wasn’t more followers.

It’s a common misconception: that visibility is the goal, and the algorithm will sort out the rest. But follower count and inbound inquiries turned out to be almost unrelated. The profiles generating real conversations weren’t the loudest or the most frequent posters. They were the ones where, within thirty seconds, you knew exactly who this person helps and what problem they solve.

Your future clients may already be reading what you write. The question is not simply whether they see you.

The question is whether what they see helps them recognize that you understand them.

That is good news because you do not need to become louder, post every day, or manufacture opinions just to remain visible. You may simply need to look at what you are already saying through the eyes of the person you hope to reach.

The shift can be surprisingly small. A thoughtful post that currently speaks to your peers may only need a clearer audience, a more recognizable problem, and a stronger connection between your expertise and something your client cares about.

I put together the exact audit I run on my own writing — six questions I ask before I hit publish, plus two real before-and-after rewrites showing how a “true but forgettable” sentence becomes one a client actually recognizes themselves in.

Because here’s the uncomfortable part: most of the leaders I know aren’t failing to build a following. They’re building the wrong one. And by the time that becomes obvious — six months of posting, plenty of peer applause, still no client inquiries — it feels a lot harder to change course than it would right now.

Here’s the six-question audit that keeps me on the right side of that line — and how to know, before you hit publish, which one you’re actually writing.

Before you go further — if this is resonating, I’d love to have you in this community for good. Free subscribers get every article like this one, right in your inbox, no algorithm deciding whether you see it. If you’re not already subscribed, now’s a great time — hit follow below so you don’t miss what’s next.

Subscribe now

Read more

Afterward, I sent a note to my subscribers with another question:

What if the business development that needs a jump-start is your own?

One reader wrote back with an answer I wanted to share.

They had recently moved to a new company and were rethinking their personal professional business development strategy. Their new firm was further along in its BD journey than the one they had left, but they were still wrestling with questions many people face after a transition:

What do I do next? Where should I invest my time? How do I integrate more effectively with the rest of my team?

Then they said something that gets to the heart of personal business development: we are rarely successful as a team of one.

They saw their network as a collection of personal professional relationships, but they also understood that those relationships become more valuable when combined with the knowledge, relationships, and goals of the larger team.

That is the tension inside every personal BD plan.

The relationships may be yours. The reputation may be yours. The choices about where you show up and how you contribute may be yours. But if you work inside an organization, your plan cannot exist entirely on its own. It should help you grow while also helping your team see the market more clearly, build stronger relationships, and make better strategic decisions.

I am seeing that same tension in conversations with colleagues as we refine their personal BD plans. The first thing I asked was, “What do you want to achieve?”

One answered, “I want to learn how to advertise myself.”

I understood what they meant. They wanted to become better known inside and outside the company. They wanted to leverage their market experience and relationships to support their career growth and position themselves for a future promotion. They were looking for the fastest path to get there.

But “advertising yourself” is not quite the same as building a professional reputation. Advertising asks, “How do I get people to notice me?” A thoughtful BD plan asks, “What do I want people to trust me for, and how do I demonstrate that value over time?”

Almost every conversation eventually reached the same practical concern:

How am I supposed to do all of this while still doing my job?

It is a fair question. Architects, engineers, builders, project managers, consultants, and technical professionals already have full-time responsibilities. Their performance is measured by the quality of their work, their project results, their responsiveness, and often their utilization. Business development can sound like a second job they are expected to complete before breakfast, after work, or somewhere between deadlines.

A personal BD reset is not about doing more.

It is about becoming more intentional about what you do, why you are doing it, and how it connects to something larger than yourself.

Transitions expose what your old rhythm was carrying

Moving to a new company is one of the clearest times to rethink your business development strategy.

Some relationships will follow you because they trust you personally. Others may have been more connected to your former company, role, or projects than you realized. Your new organization may serve different markets, have different strengths, or expect you to contribute in different ways. Even familiar contacts may need help understanding what your move means and how you can now help them.

You may also lose the internal partner who once helped you make sense of business development. It may have been a formal BD leader, a mentor, a principal, or a colleague who naturally connected relationships to strategy. They helped you decide which opportunities mattered, where to invest your time, and how the pieces fit together. Many people do not recognize how important that person was until they are no longer there.

Without that support, business development can begin to feel like a collection of lunches, events, LinkedIn activity, and good intentions with no clear direction.

I experienced my own version of this when I started Ivi Gabales Consulting in the first quarter of 2025. I had spent years building relationships on behalf of firms. Suddenly, I had to build for myself.

The shift sounded simple, but it required me to rethink how I talked about my value. I could no longer lead with, “Here is what our firm can do for you.” I had to be able to say, “Here is what I can do for you.”

It was uncomfortable at first. Many of us have been taught that promoting ourselves is self-serving, especially when we work as part of a larger organization. But becoming known for your expertise is not an act of disloyalty. If you are a trusted advisor, clients want to work with you because of how you listen, think, solve problems, and make them feel supported. Whether you bring work into your own business or into a larger firm, trust still moves through people.

I had a clear idea of who my ideal client was and i targeted all my content, collateral, and outreach to that niche. In less than a year I had 4 fractional clients providing me with full time work.

The goal is not to make yourself bigger than the team. It is to understand and articulate what you bring to it.

A transition does not mean you have failed at business development. It means the system around you changed, and your plan needs to change with it. You do not have to wait for a new job to experience this. A promotion, new market focus, leadership change, major project win or loss, or simply a season of feeling stuck can all signal that it is time for a reset.

Your BD plan is also a career plan

For many professionals, business development enters the conversation only when they begin moving toward senior leadership. They have spent years becoming excellent at delivering the work, and then the expectations change. They are asked not only to lead projects, but also to understand the market, strengthen client relationships, create opportunities, mentor others, and help shape the future of the business.

That does not mean everyone seeking a promotion needs to become a traditional salesperson. It means leadership increasingly requires the ability to look beyond the work directly in front of you.

A personal BD plan makes that transition intentional. It asks you to consider what kind of leader you want to become, which markets or clients you want to understand, where you can create value beyond your current assignment, and which relationships will matter as your responsibilities grow.

Your career goals should also connect to the company’s needs. Does the organization need a stronger presence in a geographic market? Deeper relationships in a client sector? Someone who can connect technical expertise to emerging opportunities? A leader who can bring different parts of the company together around a shared strategy?

The goal is not to perform business development so leadership notices you. The goal is to begin practicing the broader thinking, relationship-building, and strategic contribution the next role will require.

Done well, business development becomes part of how you do your current job and how you prepare for the next one.

Before you add more, take an honest look at what you have

Most people respond to a stalled business development plan by adding activity. They attend another event, join another organization, schedule more coffees, or promise themselves they will post more often.

Activity can create momentum, but it cannot replace direction.

Before adding anything to your calendar, ask yourself:

What do I want business development to help me accomplish over the next twelve to eighteen months? Am I trying to enter a new market, deepen my position in an existing one, build a network in a geographic area, become more valuable inside my company, prepare for a future leadership role, or create opportunities for my own business?

Which relationships have I meaningfully strengthened during the past ninety days? Who already trusts me but may not understand what I do now? Which relationships have gone quiet because I did not have a reason or a rhythm for staying connected?

Where am I investing my time today, and is that investment aligned with where I want to go? Am I participating deeply in one or two communities, or appearing occasionally in too many places?

What do I want to become known for? If someone referred an opportunity to me tomorrow, would they know what kind of opportunity to send?

How well does my team understand my relationships, interests, and market knowledge? How well do I understand theirs?

And finally, am I actually stuck, or am I expecting results from relationships and activities I have not consistently invested in yet?

These questions are not meant to make you feel behind. They help identify the real gap. Your BD may not need more effort in every direction. It may need more clarity in one.

Start with direction, not networking

“I need to network more” is not a business development strategy. Neither is “I need to get out there.”

One colleague came into our conversation with several potential markets, a limited geographic area, and multiple local organizations they were trying to support. They wondered whether they should expand into a location with less competition.

None of those ideas was necessarily wrong. Together, however, they could easily become a plan that consumed every available hour without creating meaningful traction.

We began narrowing by asking where they already had credibility, where the market activity was, and what work they genuinely wanted to be doing. The questions shifted the conversation from “Where might there be less competition?” to “Where do my experience, relationships, interests, and the company’s needs create the strongest reason for me to invest?”

A useful personal BD plan begins with that kind of direction. You may choose a client type, market sector, geographic area, technical expertise, or business problem around which you want to build.

Try completing this sentence:

Over the next year, I want to become better known among ________ for my ability to help with ________.

For one person, that might mean becoming better known among school district leaders in a particular region for helping them deliver complex capital programs. For another, it may mean building relationships with healthcare executives around pediatric behavioral health design. A business owner may want to become the first person growing companies call when their business development efforts feel scattered.

The answer does not have to be perfect, but it needs to be specific enough to guide your choices.

Once you have a direction, you can evaluate everything else against it. Does this organization put you near the community you want to understand? Does this event help you deepen the right relationships? Does this content reinforce the expertise you want to be known for? Does this opportunity move you toward the work you want next?

Direction gives you permission to say no to activity that looks productive but does not support the plan.

Choose the relationships that deserve your attention

Most people do not have a networking problem. They have a staying-connected problem.

They know plenty of people. What they lack is a deliberate way to decide which relationships need attention and what the next step should be.

Start with a small group rather than trying to maintain everyone at once. Your priorities might include clients you want to understand more deeply, former colleagues you want to reconnect with, new contacts in your target market, internal partners who could help you learn or grow, and peers who may become future clients, collaborators, or decision-makers.

Do not only look upward. Early in my career, many of the people I met were not yet signing contracts or leading organizations. Over time, we grew into new roles together. A strong network includes the leaders who can open doors today and the peers who may shape the market tomorrow.

For each priority relationship, identify one natural next step. It might be a conversation, an introduction, a useful article, a project debrief, an invitation to an event, or simply checking in because it has been too long.

The point is not to attach an immediate ask to every relationship. It is to remain present enough to understand what matters to the other person and to be useful when the opportunity arises.

Choose where people can experience you

Joining an organization is not the same as investing in one. Membership may put your name on a list, but contribution helps people understand who you are, what you care about, and how you work.

Choose a professional organization, committee, community, or cause connected to the market you want to serve. Attend often enough to recognize people and be recognized. Volunteer for work that lets you contribute something useful. Ask thoughtful questions. Help someone else succeed. Follow up outside the scheduled events.

This is not about finding the room with the highest concentration of potential clients. It is about finding a community where your interests and the needs of the market genuinely overlap.

The same principle applies to visibility. Visibility without a point of view is just exposure. You do not have to become a full-time content creator, but you do need to make it easier for people to understand what you know, what you notice, and what you care about.

Choose one or two subjects connected to your direction. Share what you are learning from client conversations, projects, conferences, market changes, or your own experience. You can do that through LinkedIn, an article, a presentation, an internal training session, a panel, a client roundtable, or a thoughtful question in the right meeting.

Your visibility should not feel like a performance separate from your work. It should help others see the value already present in how you think.

If someone read your last five posts, heard you speak at an event, or sat beside you in a client meeting, would they leave with a clear sense of what they could trust you to help them with?

If not, you may need more focus, not more visibility.

Bring your personal relationships into the team strategy

This is the piece the subscriber’s response made impossible to ignore.

A personal BD plan should not become a private spreadsheet of names that only one person understands. Relationships are personal, and trust cannot simply be transferred from one colleague to another. But the insight surrounding those relationships can and should strengthen the team.

Share what you are hearing. Compare your relationship map with your teammates’ maps. Look for gaps, overlaps, and opportunities to make thoughtful introductions. Talk about which clients know only one person in the company and which relationships would benefit from a broader team.

Do not confuse relationship ownership with relationship protection.

If a client trusts you, introducing them to the right teammate should deepen the relationship, not threaten it. It shows that you understand their needs well enough to bring more value to the table. It also reduces the risk that the entire client relationship disappears when one person changes roles or leaves the company.

The best teams do not dump their contacts into a system and call it collaboration. They add context. They explain the history, trust, sensitivities, commitments already made, and where another person might genuinely help.

Internal visibility matters too. Your coworkers need to understand the market knowledge, relationships, and interests you bring. You also need to understand the expertise and relationships around you well enough to connect them to the right external need.

Rarely are we successful as a team of one. Personal business development creates more value when it becomes part of a shared strategy.

Do not build a second job

When I looked at my colleagues’ calendars, the answer was clearly not to add five breakfasts, two evening events, a board position, and weekly LinkedIn posts. That might look like a robust BD plan on paper. In practice, it would be abandoned the moment a project demanded their full attention.

The answer is not to wait until you are less busy. For most high-performing professionals, that season never arrives. Instead, look for ways to make business development part of work you are already doing.

A client meeting becomes a relationship-building opportunity when you arrive with one thoughtful question about what is ahead, not only what is due today. A project debrief can uncover future needs as well as lessons learned. A conference you already attend becomes more strategic when you identify three people to contact before you arrive. A technical presentation can increase your visibility while helping your team and clients understand an emerging issue. A follow-up email can strengthen a relationship when it includes something genuinely useful.

Your project work is not separate from business development. Delivering well, understanding the client, communicating honestly, and creating confidence are some of the most powerful business development activities you can do.

But integration does not mean business development requires no additional time. Some relationships need conversations outside a project agenda. Organizations require real participation. Visibility requires thought and preparation. If your company expects you to contribute to growth, there should be an honest conversation about priorities, workload, and what you have permission to stop doing or delegate.

You cannot keep adding responsibilities and call it development.

Once the scope is realistic, put it on your calendar. A plan that lives only in a document will eventually become something you intended to do.

Create a rhythm small enough to sustain. Each week, strengthen one priority relationship. Start or renew one conversation. Share one useful resource, insight, or introduction. Take one visibility action. Spend fifteen minutes documenting what you learned and deciding what comes next.

Once a month, look across the larger plan. Are you investing in the right relationships? Are you showing up consistently in the community you chose? Is your team learning from what you are hearing? Is your visibility reinforcing the expertise you want to build?

Every quarter, revisit your direction. Markets change. Roles evolve. Relationships deepen or fade. Your plan should be steady enough to create momentum and flexible enough to respond to what you learn.

Measure movement before revenue

Revenue matters. But in relationship-driven industries, it is often the last visible result of work that began months or years earlier.

Measure the leading indicators too: meaningful conversations, relationships strengthened, introductions made or received, invitations to participate, client intelligence uncovered, follow-ups completed, and opportunities influenced.

Also pay attention to a quieter indicator. Are people beginning to seek your perspective?

When someone asks what you are seeing in the market, invites you into a strategic conversation, introduces you to someone important, or thinks of you when an opportunity emerges, your positioning is changing.

Relationships build trust. Trust builds opportunity. Opportunity drives ROI.

Your reset does not have to be dramatic

You do not need a new CRM, a packed event calendar, or a hundred-name target list to restart your business development.

You need a direction you can explain, a small group of relationships you will intentionally strengthen, a community where you will contribute, a point of view you are willing to share, and a rhythm that keeps the plan moving.

Then you need to connect your effort to the people around you.

Your personal BD plan should help you grow, but it should also make your team stronger. It should turn what you know and who you know into shared insight, thoughtful action, and better opportunities for everyone.

If your business development feels stalled, do not begin by asking how to do more.

Ask where you are going, who matters, where you will invest, what you want to be known for, and how your team can move forward with you.

That may be the reset you need.

I am curious: which part of your personal BD plan needs the most attention right now? Direction, relationships, community, visibility, consistency, or team alignment? Reply or leave a comment. Your question may be exactly what someone else in this community is trying to solve too.

They lead strategy for a midsized AEC firm, and this was not the complaint of someone who wanted to push more sales responsibility onto an already overworked team. They genuinely believed more people in the company could contribute to its growth. They could see the relationships, knowledge, and potential sitting throughout the organization. What they could not understand was why so few people seemed willing to step forward.

They had talked about the importance of business development. They had encouraged people to attend events, spend time with clients, and bring back what they were hearing in the market. Leadership had said that everyone was responsible for growth.

Still, business development continued to feel like something that belonged to a handful of principals, executives, marketers, and naturally outgoing people.

They wanted to know how to motivate everyone else.

Because they are my friend, I would tell them the truth.

I am not sure motivation is the problem.

Most people want their company to succeed. They want job security, meaningful work, strong clients, interesting projects, and opportunities to grow in their careers. They understand, at least intellectually, that the company needs new business to create those opportunities.

But understanding that business development matters is not the same as knowing how to participate in it.

When leaders say, “Everyone is responsible for business development,” employees may hear something entirely different. They may hear that they are now expected to become salespeople.

And let’s be honest. Most architects and engineers did not choose their professions because they thought, “I would love to sell!”

They went into design because they wanted to create something, solve difficult problems, improve the way people experience a place, or see an idea become real. They built their careers by developing technical expertise and delivering good work. Then one day, often after being promoted into a senior role, they were told that they were now responsible for bringing in business.

That transition can feel abrupt because we often use business development and sales as if they mean the same thing. They are related, but they are not identical.

Sales is generally focused on converting an identified opportunity into revenue. There is a potential buyer, a defined need, and something to sell. The sales team qualifies the opportunity, presents the offer, responds to objections, negotiates, and works toward a decision.

Business development begins earlier and extends further. It is about building relationships, understanding the market, identifying needs, developing partnerships, strengthening the company’s position, and creating opportunities that may not yet exist.

The simplest distinction is this: business development creates and expands the opportunity. Sales converts the opportunity into revenue.

In AEC and other professional-services industries, however, the lines are blurry.

Our clients are not choosing a product from a shelf. They are choosing people to help them navigate complex, expensive, and often very public decisions. They are evaluating whether we understand their priorities, whether they trust us, and whether they can picture themselves working with our team when the project becomes difficult.

A project manager listening closely enough to uncover a client’s next challenge is doing business development. An architect who helps an owner think differently about a problem is doing business development. An engineer who explains a complex issue in a way that creates confidence is doing business development. A marketer who connects what the firm is hearing across the market is doing business development. An emerging professional who invests in peer relationships is building a network that may become important years from now.

None of them may describe what they are doing as selling. That does not make their contribution to growth any less important.

I once heard an owner’s representative explain why a team had won a project by saying, “Your superintendent won that for you.”

The superintendent likely was not trying to sell anything. They were answering questions honestly, demonstrating competence, building confidence, and helping the client picture what it would be like to work with the team.

That is business development, too.

This distinction matters because if people believe business development means becoming someone they never wanted to be, they will resist it. They may picture cold calls, forced networking, self-promotion, awkward conversations, or asking clients for work. They may wonder when they are supposed to do it, how they will be evaluated, and whether they will be blamed if their efforts do not immediately produce an opportunity.

Then they look at everything already on their plates and quietly return to the work they know how to do.

So the question I would ask my friend is not, “How do we motivate them?”

I would ask, “What have you built around them?”

Have you given people a clear role in the company’s growth? Have you shown them what business development looks like at their level? Have you taught them how to build relationships, ask thoughtful questions, recognize an opportunity, and share what they learn? Have you made time for it? Do their managers encourage it? Do you recognize the behaviors that lead to revenue, or only celebrate the person whose name is attached to the win?

You cannot motivate people into a system that was never designed for their participation.

Think like a high-performing team

If my friend wants to create a company where more people contribute to business development, I would encourage them to stop thinking about building a sales force and start thinking about building a high-performing team.

High-performing teams are not created by asking everyone to perform the same function. They work because people understand the goal, know the role they play, trust their teammates, share information, and have the support they need to contribute.

Business development should work the same way.

The principal who develops an executive relationship plays one role. The project manager who hears about a client’s next challenge plays another. The superintendent who earns the client’s confidence contributes differently from the marketer who studies the market, connects the dots, and helps the team prepare. The emerging leader who joins an industry organization may be developing relationships that become valuable long before anyone knows what the future opportunity will be.

Not everyone needs to sell. But everyone should understand how their work can help the company earn trust, create value, and grow.

That shared understanding is where a business development culture begins.

Define business development in human terms

Before asking people to participate, leaders need to change the language around business development.

Instead of telling someone to “go sell,” ask them to listen. Ask them to stay curious about the client’s business. Ask them to notice what is changing, follow through on a promise, make a helpful introduction, or share something the larger team should know.

Those behaviors are more natural to many technical professionals because they are connected to how they already serve clients. They do not require someone to adopt a sales personality. They require them to become more intentional about the relationships and information already present in their work.

The first step may be helping people recognize that they are already doing parts of business development. Before asking them to become something they do not recognize, show them the value of what they already bring.

Give people different ways to contribute

One of the quickest ways to discourage participation is to create a single image of what “good at business development” looks like.

Usually, that image is someone charismatic who loves walking into a room full of strangers, can start a conversation with anyone, and seems to collect relationships effortlessly. Those people can be valuable, but they are not the only people who can contribute to growth.

The thoughtful listener may learn more in one client conversation than the most outgoing person in the room. The technical expert may create credibility by explaining an emerging challenge. The connector may know exactly who should meet. The project leader may earn the next opportunity by delivering an experience the client wants to repeat.

A high-performing team uses those differences. It does not ask everyone to become the same kind of business developer.

Teach before expecting

“Go build relationships” is not a development plan.

If someone has never attended an industry event with purpose, show them how you prepare. If you want project managers to have stronger client conversations, help them develop better questions. If you expect people to identify opportunities, teach them what signals to listen for and where to bring the information afterward.

Invite emerging leaders into meetings before expecting them to lead those meetings. Debrief what happened. Explain why a question mattered, what you heard beneath the answer, and what follow-up would be helpful.

Confidence rarely appears before experience. It grows when someone is given a manageable opportunity, supported through it, and trusted with a little more the next time.

Create time and permission

Leaders cannot say that business development is important while measuring people almost exclusively on utilization, project delivery, and short-term financial performance.

Employees pay attention to what the company truly rewards. If every available hour is committed to project work, business development becomes extracurricular. It happens at breakfast, after work, or whenever someone can squeeze it in. Eventually, even willing people decide they do not have the capacity.

If relationship-building matters, make room for it. Talk about it in performance conversations. Include it in career planning. Help people identify a small number of relationships or activities worthy of their attention instead of vaguely expecting them to “get out there.”

Permission also means creating an environment where people can share what they are hearing without fear. Sometimes the most valuable intelligence is that a relationship is weak, a client is unhappy, or an opportunity is not right for the company. If every difficult observation is met with blame or pressure, people will stop bringing information forward.

Recognize what happens before the win

Revenue is a lagging result. By the time a contract is signed, dozens of actions may have contributed to it.

Someone made the introduction. Someone stayed connected when there was no immediate opportunity. Someone noticed a change in leadership, asked a better question, shared an important piece of intelligence, or helped the team make a smart no-go decision. Someone delivered the current project so well that the client wanted to work with the company again.

If recognition only goes to the person credited with the win, everyone else learns that their contribution does not count.

A business development culture celebrates the actions that create trust and opportunity, even when those actions cannot yet be tied neatly to revenue.

Culture is what your people experience

I have worked for companies that put people first. I have worked for companies that put profit first. And I have worked for companies that understood something more nuanced: building the right culture was the key to taking care of both.

The healthiest companies did not treat culture and growth as competing priorities. They understood that when people feel valued, know what is expected of them, and believe in the work they are doing, they are more likely to take care of clients, strengthen relationships, and contribute to the future of the business.

Building a business development culture is not about turning every architect, engineer, builder, or technical professional into a salesperson. It is about creating a high-performing team in which people understand the goal, see where they fit, and are equipped to contribute.

Your people may not need more motivation. They may need clarity, confidence, coaching, time, and a culture that proves business development really belongs to them.

A business development culture is not a company where everyone sells.

It is a company where everyone understands how they contribute to growth.

If this made you think differently about the culture inside your own organization, I would love to hear from you. Where do your people get stuck when it comes to business development? And what has helped them begin to see themselves as part of growth?

If you know a leader who is asking how to get more people involved in business development, please share this with them. It may be time to stop asking how to motivate people and start examining what has been built around them

.

A member of my leadership team once said to me, “You should be more like X. They are everywhere.”

I knew exactly what they meant.

There are people in every industry who seem to be at every conference, every reception, every committee meeting, and every important conversation. Their faces appear in event photos. Their names surface in introductions. When something is happening, they are usually somewhere near it.

And whether we want to admit it or not, being everywhere works.

We tend to trust what feels familiar. The more often we see someone, the more likely we are to remember them, recognize their name, and assume they are connected to what is happening in their industry. Their visibility becomes a form of social proof. If they keep appearing in important rooms, we begin to believe they must be important too.

That is not necessarily shallow. Familiarity reduces uncertainty. It helps people know who you are before they need what you do. In business development, leadership, and professional services, that recognition can create opportunities that expertise alone cannot.

But visibility has a ceiling.

Eventually, it is not enough for people to recognize you. They need to know why your presence matters.

The problem with being everywhere

When I heard that comment from my leadership team, part of me took it as a challenge. Should I attend more events? Join more organizations? Accept more invitations? Post more often? Find more ways to make sure people saw me?

Those things can help. I believe in showing up. Many of the relationships that have shaped my career began because I attended the meeting, accepted the invitation, or started the conversation. You cannot contribute to rooms you never enter.

But I also started thinking about the people whose presence I value most.

They are not always the people I see most frequently. They are the people who make the room better.

They ask the question that helps everyone see the problem differently. They introduce two people who should know each other without wondering what they will receive in return. They add context that changes a decision. They notice whose voice has not been heard. They follow up with the information, connection, or encouragement they promised.

When their names appear on an attendee list, I do not simply think, “I know that person.”

I think, “I am glad they will be there.”

That is a very different kind of relevance.

Familiarity is not the same as trust

Visibility makes it easier for people to recognize you. Repeated visibility can even create the impression that you are influential, connected, and informed.

But familiarity is not the same as trust.

Trust develops when people experience your judgment, generosity, consistency, and usefulness over time. They learn that you understand the issues beneath the surface. They see that you can contribute without needing to control the conversation. They notice that when you offer to help, you follow through.

Being everywhere may get your name into the conversation. Being useful is what makes people want to keep you in it.

This distinction matters because many highly accomplished people are investing enormous amounts of time in visibility. They attend the right conferences. They serve on committees. They participate in leadership meetings. They accept coffee invitations. They post regularly. They stay busy, connected, and seen.

Yet they still wonder why those efforts are not producing deeper relationships, greater influence, or more meaningful opportunities.

The answer may not be that they need to show up more often.

They may need to contribute more intentionally when they do.

Contribution does not mean talking more

When we hear “be part of the conversation,” it is easy to assume that contribution belongs to the loudest or most confident person in the room.

It does not.

Contribution is not measured by airtime. Some people talk frequently without moving the conversation forward. Others say very little but offer one observation that changes how everyone thinks.

You can contribute by listening closely enough to recognize what has not been said. You can ask a question that reveals the concern beneath the carefully prepared answer. You can translate a complicated issue into language that helps someone make a decision. You can connect an idea from one conversation to a challenge in another. You can make space for a person whose expertise is needed but whose voice has not yet entered the discussion.

Sometimes the most valuable contribution happens after the room has emptied. It is the thoughtful follow-up, the useful resource, the promised introduction, or the call that says, “I kept thinking about what you said.”

Being valuable in a room is not about proving how much you know. It is about noticing what the room needs and deciding whether you can help provide it.

Speaking at the Women in Design and Construction Conference. The goal was not simply to be seen onstage, but to contribute something the audience could carry into their own work. If you’re curious what was going on here send me a message and I’ll tell you. It was slightly embarassing but totally effective.

The three levels of professional relevance

I think about professional relevance in three levels.

Visibility says, “I recognize that person.”

Contribution says, “We need that person in this conversation.”

Trust says, “I want that person involved before we make the decision.”

Visibility is valuable because it opens the door. Contribution gives people a reason to invite you back. Trust changes when they bring you into the conversation.

At the visibility level, people may greet you at an event or recognize your name online. At the contribution level, they begin seeking your perspective, remembering your ideas, and connecting you with others. At the trust level, they call before the opportunity is public, ask what you think before reaching a conclusion, or invite you into a problem that has not yet been solved.

That progression does not happen because you attended enough events to earn points. It happens because your presence repeatedly created value.

There is an uncomfortable question beneath all of this:

If you stopped showing up, would people notice only that you were absent, or would the conversation actually lose something?

I do not ask that question to make anyone feel inadequate. I ask it because the answer tells us where to focus. If people would miss seeing you, you have built familiarity. If they would miss what you bring, you have built relevance.

Showing up is the first step, but relevance comes from what you bring with you. The Contribution to Relevance Framework helps you move beyond simply being seen by asking four questions about how you prepare, contribute, connect, and follow through. It is not about becoming the loudest person in the room. It is about becoming someone whose presence makes the conversation better.

The Visible to Relevant Framework

Before your next conference, client meeting, industry gathering, leadership discussion, or networking event, ask yourself four questions:

Before the room: What do I understand?

Inside the room: What can I contribute?

Across the room: Who can I connect?

After the room: What can I carry forward?

The questions are simple. Using them well requires you to stop measuring success by how many people saw you and start paying attention to what became possible because you were there.

Paid subscribers: Continue reading to learn how to use the Visible to Relevant Framework to prepare for the room, contribute without dominating it, become a valuable connector, and turn visibility into lasting relevance.

Read more

One night, I went to trivia with a group of coworkers and somehow ended up on a team with our president and CEO. The next afternoon, I was kayaking on Lake Union with my marketing team. There was no agenda at either event. No client strategy. No business development plan. No PowerPoint. We were answering trivia questions, laughing when we were very confidently wrong, paddling around the lake, and getting to know one another outside the roles we normally occupy.

Somewhere between trivia and trying not to tip over a kayak, I found myself thinking about something I spend a lot of time talking about externally: relationships.

In business development, we understand their value almost instinctively. Who knows the client? Who has credibility with them? Who can make the introduction? Who understands what is keeping that client awake at night? Who has enough trust in the relationship to get the phone call before an opportunity ever becomes public?

We spend years cultivating those connections because we understand there is an ROI attached to them. But I am not sure we give the same level of attention to the relationships inside our own organizations.

We should.

The strength of your internal relationships affects how quickly information moves, how comfortable people are asking for help, whether difficult conversations happen early or late, how freely people share opportunities and ideas, whether teams collaborate or protect their own territory, how leaders hear what is really happening inside the organization, and ultimately how clients experience your company.

And right now, those relationships may be becoming even more important.

The organizational chart is moving

We are living through an interesting period of leadership transition.

Many Baby Boomers who have spent decades leading companies, offices, departments, and teams are retiring. What follows is rarely as simple as replacing one person with another. There is usually a cascading effect.

Someone moves into the top job. Someone else moves into theirs. A leader who once managed one office is suddenly responsible for an entire region. A department head becomes an enterprise leader. Someone who has been your peer for the past five years may now be your boss.

The boxes on the organizational chart can change overnight. Relationships do not.

Imagine someone who was your peer yesterday becoming your boss today. You already know each other. You may have spent years working side by side, sharing frustrations, solving problems, giving each other advice, and having the kind of candid conversations that happen when neither person has authority over the other. Now one person is responsible for evaluating the other.

Does the relationship suddenly become formal? Can you disagree as freely? What happens when your former peer needs to give you difficult feedback? What happens when you think they are making the wrong decision?

The new leader has an equally complicated job. Yesterday you were one of the group. Today you are leading it. You cannot pretend the old relationships do not exist, but you also cannot operate exactly as you did before.

You may be closer to some people than others. You have shared histories, inside jokes, loyalties, disagreements, and opinions about one another that were formed long before the promotion. Now everyone is watching how those relationships translate into leadership.

Are decisions fair? Are old friendships influencing opportunities? Is the new leader avoiding a difficult conversation because it feels uncomfortable to manage someone who used to be an equal? Or have they gone too far in the opposite direction and created unnecessary distance because they are trying so hard to establish authority?

None of that gets solved by a promotion announcement.

The relationship has to evolve along with the role.

The job changes when your responsibility gets bigger

There is another transition I see happening in organizations. Someone can be an exceptional leader of a team, office, business unit, or market and then be promoted into responsibility for something much larger.

On paper, it looks like the natural next step. In reality, the job may be completely different.

When you lead a smaller group, you can know a great deal about what is happening. You may have direct relationships with most of the people doing the work. You can stay involved in the details, and people know how to get to you.

Then your responsibility expands. Now there are more people, more offices, more markets, more layers, and more decisions than any one person could possibly touch. Leadership can no longer depend on your ability to personally know everything.

Your influence has to travel farther than your direct reach.

That means relationships become even more important, not less. You need leaders underneath you who trust you enough to tell you what is really happening instead of what they think you want to hear. You need peers who will challenge you. You need people several levels below you who feel safe raising a concern. You need leaders across functions who will share information instead of protecting it.

Perhaps most importantly, you have to trust other people to lead.

The skills that made someone an excellent department head may not be the same skills they need to lead an entire organization. At some point, leadership becomes less about your individual ability to execute and more about the strength of the relationships around you.

Can people disagree with you? Can a former peer tell you that you are wrong? Can someone who reports to you admit they do not know the answer? Can leaders make decisions without needing your approval every time? When you walk into a room, does the conversation continue, or does everyone suddenly start editing themselves?

Those are leadership questions, but they are also relationship questions.

Your relationship with the person you report to matters

Most of us think about our relationship with our boss primarily through the lens of performance. Am I meeting expectations? Am I delivering what they need? Do they think I am doing a good job?

Those things matter, of course. But a strong relationship with the person you report to should go deeper than a recurring one-on-one and an annual performance review.

Do they understand how you think? Do you understand what pressures they are carrying? Can you disagree without worrying that disagreement will be interpreted as disloyalty? Can you tell them something is not working before it becomes a crisis? Can you ask for help without worrying that doing so will make you appear incapable?

When those relationships are strong, work changes. There is less energy spent managing perception and more energy spent solving problems. Leaders can give people greater autonomy because they understand how those people operate. Feedback can become more direct because enough trust exists for the feedback to be useful instead of threatening.

And surprisingly small interactions can help build that trust.

Sitting beside someone at trivia is obviously not the same thing as working through a difficult business decision together. But I would argue that those seemingly insignificant moments make the difficult conversations easier later.

When you have laughed together, learned something about each other’s lives, discovered a shared interest, or watched someone passionately defend a completely incorrect trivia answer, you have added another dimension to the relationship.

You remember there is a person behind the title.

Your peers may be your most valuable internal network

I think peer relationships are among the most underestimated relationships inside an organization.

These are the people beside you trying to move work forward. They may have different responsibilities, personalities, and priorities. Sometimes you may even be competing for the same limited resources.

If the only time you interact is when one of you needs something, every interaction begins to feel transactional.

But when you have invested in the relationship beforehand, the dynamic changes. You pick up the phone instead of writing the carefully constructed email. You share information sooner. You are comfortable saying, “I need your help.” You send an opportunity their way because they are the right person for it. And perhaps just as importantly, they can tell you, “I think you are missing something,” because the relationship can withstand candor.

That becomes increasingly valuable as an organization gets larger.

No individual can possibly know everything happening across a company. You need people who know people. Someone in operations needs to know whom to call in marketing. Marketing needs to know which project leader has the right story. Business development needs to hear what the project team learned from the client. One office needs to know what another office has already figured out.

Relationships become the connective tissue.

For those of us in business development, this is especially important because sometimes the person who helps you win a client is already sitting inside your organization.

They worked with the architect ten years ago. They know the decision maker. They understand the technical challenge. They know why the last project struggled. They have the story that belongs in the interview. They may actually be the person the client needs to meet before the client can picture working with your company.

Your internal network can be every bit as valuable as your external one.

But you have to build it before you need it.

The relationship changes again when people work for you

When someone reports to you, there is another layer of responsibility.

You hold something they do not. You may influence their assignments, opportunities, visibility, compensation, and career trajectory. That makes relationship building more than a leadership preference. It becomes part of the job.

People need to know what you expect from them, but they also need to know that you know them.

What motivates them? What are they trying to learn? Where do they want to grow? What part of their job gives them energy? What are they exceptionally good at that perhaps no one is taking advantage of yet? What are they struggling with? What would make them leave?

You cannot learn all of that during a performance review once a year. You learn it through relationship.

This becomes particularly important when we talk about employee retention. Organizations often start asking difficult questions after someone turns in a resignation. What could we have done differently? What would make them stay? What opportunity were they looking for?

By then, the decision may have been forming for months.

The relationship needed to exist before the resignation letter.

When people trust their leaders, they are more likely to tell them when something is wrong. They are more comfortable admitting what they do not know. They ask for opportunities. They share ideas. They take risks. Leaders get information early enough to actually do something with it.

There is enormous ROI in that.

Succession planning is relationship planning too

All of this makes me think differently about succession planning.

Companies understandably spend a great deal of time asking, “Who is ready for the next role?” That is important, but perhaps there is another question we should be asking at the same time:

What relationships will change when they get it?

Who will suddenly report to this person? Who will become their peers? Where will they need to establish credibility? Which former peer relationships will need to be recalibrated? Who may feel passed over? Which relationships does this leader need to start building now rather than after the promotion?

And if someone is stepping into responsibility for a much broader group, who are the people throughout that organization who will help them understand what is really happening?

Succession planning cannot only be about transferring authority.

It also has to be about transferring and building trust.

That takes much longer.

Build the relationship before there is an agenda

This may be one of the simplest parts of relationship building, and one of the easiest to forget.

Not every coffee needs a purpose. Not every lunch needs to result in an introduction. Not every conversation needs a next step. You do not need to walk away from every interaction asking, “What did I get out of that?”

In fact, some of the strongest relationships are built precisely because there was no immediate payback expected.

Have coffee with someone because you are curious about them. Eat lunch with people outside your immediate team. Ask a colleague how they ended up doing what they do. Sit next to someone you normally would not talk to at the next company event. Celebrate somebody’s win even when it has nothing to do with you. Make an introduction because it will help them, not because you expect one in return.

And sometimes, simply check in.

The moment people realize you only reach out when you need something, the relationship starts to feel transactional. But when you have invested time without an ask attached, trust has room to grow.

Then, when the hard conversation comes, when the big opportunity appears, when you need help, or when the organization changes around you, you are not starting from zero.

There is already trust in the bank.

That does not mean we build relationships so we can eventually cash them in. That misses the point.

The goal is not to build a bigger internal network so you can extract value from it later.

The goal is to build genuine relationships.

The value tends to follow.

Your clients eventually feel all of this

Here is where internal relationship building connects directly back to business development.

Your clients do not experience your organizational chart. They experience your people.

They notice when your team communicates well. They notice when somebody was clearly brought into the conversation five minutes before the meeting. They notice when one department does not know what another promised. They notice when people interrupt each other. They notice whether your interview team genuinely trusts one another, and they absolutely notice when they do not.

We sometimes spend enormous amounts of time trying to manufacture chemistry before an important client interview.

But chemistry is difficult to manufacture.

It is much easier when the relationship already exists.

The superintendent and project executive who already trust one another communicate differently. The architect and contractor who have built a relationship before the pursuit solve problems differently. The marketing professional who really knows the operations leader can draw out a better story. The senior executive who has invested time with the next generation can confidently bring them into the client relationship instead of keeping every relationship at the top.

The client may not be able to articulate exactly what they are seeing. They just know they can picture themselves working with this team.

That is when internal relationship building becomes external business development.

You do not need another meeting to do this

I do not think the solution is putting “build stronger internal relationships” on everyone’s annual goals and scheduling another mandatory networking event.

People know when connection is being manufactured.

It can be much simpler.

Have lunch with the person you normally only email. Stay a little longer after a meeting because the conversation became interesting. Ask someone what they are working on that excites them. Take the coffee meeting with no agenda. Go to trivia. Get in the kayak.

Those moments can seem insignificant because there is no immediate transaction attached to them. No opportunity moves to the next stage. No proposal gets submitted. No revenue suddenly appears on the dashboard.

But relationship building has always worked that way.

You rarely know which conversation will become valuable later.

The coworker you laugh with today may be the person you need beside you during a difficult pursuit six months from now. The peer you invest in today may become your boss. The emerging leader working for you today may someday lead the company. The colleague in another office may know exactly the person your client needs to meet.

And sometimes there is no dramatic business outcome at all.

Sometimes you simply create a workplace where people know one another, trust one another, and enjoy doing hard things together.

There is tremendous value in that too.

Maybe the real test of our internal relationships comes when something changes. A retirement. A promotion. A reorganization. A difficult project. A bad quarter. A new leader.

That is when you find out whether you have built a collection of coworkers or a network of trust.

We understand that clients choose people they know and trust. Maybe we should apply that same level of intention to the people inside our own companies.

Because the better connected we are internally, the better we can show up externally.

That is relationship to ROI too.

And sometimes it starts in a client strategy meeting. Sometimes it starts over coffee. And sometimes it starts arguing over a trivia answer one night and trying not to tip over a kayak the next afternoon.

They all count.

I would love to hear how you are seeing this play out inside your own organization. Have leadership transitions changed relationships between former peers? Have you had to navigate becoming the boss of someone who was once your equal, or having a former peer become yours? And where could stronger internal relationships change the way your organization works?

If this resonated, please share it. Maybe even the person you have been meaning to get coffee with.

They said something I need to share with anyone responsible for winning work: the team that demonstrates how it will work with the client scores best.

Not necessarily the team with the most polished presentation. Not always the team with the longest list of relevant projects or the strongest individual résumés. The team that helps the client experience what working together will actually feel like.

Then, over lunch, one of the state’s top owner’s representatives validated the very same idea. We were discussing a recently awarded project when they said, “Your superintendent won that project for you. He showed us what it would be like to work with him.”

Two conversations. Two highly experienced clients. The same conclusion.

The interview is not simply a presentation. It is a preview of the working relationship.

Qualifications get you shortlisted. Confidence gets you selected.

Most teams treat the interview as the moment when they need to convince the client that they are qualified. They spend weeks perfecting slides, rehearsing transitions, anticipating questions, and deciding who will cover each section. All of that matters, but it can create the illusion that confidence is something a team can manufacture once it enters the room.

It is not.

Interviews do not manufacture confidence. They reveal whether the preparation created it.

When a team truly understands the client, has spent meaningful time together, has wrestled with the work’s hardest challenges, and knows how each person will contribute, you can feel it. The answers are natural. The handoffs are smooth without appearing scripted. Team members listen to one another and build on each other’s ideas instead of waiting for their turn to speak. When someone receives an unexpected question, the others do not panic. They trust that person to respond, and they know when to add something useful.

When that preparation has not happened, you can feel that too. The presentation may be beautiful, but the team still feels like a collection of individuals. Everyone knows their assigned slides, yet they do not appear to know one another. Their answers are technically correct, but the client is left wondering how the team will respond when the work becomes difficult and there is no script.

Because the client is not only evaluating whether your team can do the work. They are imagining what it will feel like to do the work with you.

The real questions are rarely written on the page

A client may ask about schedule, cost, communication, risk, stakeholder engagement, technical challenges, or unforeseen conditions. Those are the questions on the page. Underneath them are much more human questions.

Will you tell us the truth when the news is not good? Will you listen before deciding what we need? Will you make our jobs easier or create more work for us? Will the people in this room actually be the people we see after the contract is signed? Can we trust your judgment when the answer is not obvious?

That is why I tell teams to answer the question underneath the question. The technical answer matters, but the client is also listening for evidence of judgment, chemistry, humility, candor, and trust.

If clients ask how you will manage a delayed decision, they do not only want to hear about your tracking system. They want to know whether you will identify the issue early, explain the consequences clearly, and help them make a decision without making them feel blamed.

If they ask about conflict, they do not need to hear another team claim that it communicates well. Every team says that. They are trying to determine whether you can disagree constructively, remain calm, and protect the work without damaging the relationship.

If they ask about the person who will lead the work every day, whether that person is a superintendent, architect, engineer, project manager, consultant, strategist, or account lead, they are not only evaluating technical qualifications. They are deciding whether this is the person they want beside them when the work becomes complicated, the schedule is slipping, and stakeholders are demanding answers.

Your résumé may get you into the room. Your behavior wins the work.

The owner’s representative did not tell me that our superintendent won because he had the longest résumé or the greatest number of similar projects. They said he showed them what it would be like to work with him.

That is a different kind of proof, and it is not limited to construction.

An architect can create confidence by showing how they listen to competing stakeholders and turn ambiguity into a clear design direction. An engineer can make the difference by explaining a complex technical issue in a way that helps the client make a better decision. A consultant can demonstrate that they will challenge assumptions without making the client feel challenged. A business leader can show that they understand not only the work being proposed, but also the pressure the client will face while delivering it.

In every industry, clients are trying to determine whether the people in front of them will make the work better, the decisions clearer, and the difficult moments easier to navigate.

Strong interview teams do not simply describe collaboration. They demonstrate it. They do not tell the client that they communicate well. The client watches them communicate well. They do not claim to value different perspectives. The client sees them invite another team member into the answer. They do not say they will listen. They listen during the interview, adjust their response, and remain curious.

The interview becomes a small sample of the working relationship.

Where most interview preparation falls short

Most teams do prepare. The problem is that they prepare for the presentation instead of preparing for the decision.

They review the solicitation. They divide the slides. They refine the graphics. They rehearse until everyone can deliver their assigned section within the allotted time. Then they walk into the interview believing that if they communicate their qualifications clearly enough, the client will choose them.

But qualifications are usually what got them shortlisted. The interview is where the client decides whether those qualifications belong to a team they can trust.

This is where even experienced teams miss the mark. The senior leader carries too much of the conversation because they are the strongest presenter. Technical experts provide more detail than the client needs. The people who will lead the work every day are given one slide and told to stick to the script. Everyone practices speaking, but no one practices listening, building on another person’s answer, or responding when the conversation moves somewhere unexpected.

The team leaves feeling that the interview went well because it covered everything it intended to cover.

The client leaves asking a very different question: Did we just meet the people we will actually be working with?

That may be why your highly qualified team keeps coming in second.

The Client Confidence Framework

Before anyone begins polishing slides, I take teams through what I call the Client Confidence Framework. It shifts interview preparation away from presenting qualifications and toward creating the confidence a client needs to choose you.

The framework asks four questions:

What is the client really deciding?

What does the client need to experience from us?

Who needs to make that confidence real?

How will we demonstrate it?

The questions are simple. Answering them honestly, building agreement around the answers, and translating them into an interview strategy is not.

The four questions are simple. Knowing how to answer them, align your team around them, and demonstrate the answers in the room is where most interview strategies fall apart. Paid subscribers can continue reading to learn how to apply the Client Confidence Framework.

Read more

Who should I meet?

I’ve started asking a different question.

What can I learn about my clients before I ever have to compete for their work?

Last week I attended my first Design-Build Forum on the Washington State University campus in Pullman.

I expected presentations about procurement, project delivery methods, and construction trends. Maybe I’d hear about upcoming capital projects or where the market was headed.

Instead, I spent the day listening.

Not for opportunities. For clues.

Throughout the day, university leaders invited architects, engineers, and contractors into an unusually candid conversation. They spoke openly about construction costs, artificial intelligence, stakeholder management, lessons learned, small business engagement, and the future of higher education.

Then one question stopped me.

“Are we getting in the way?”

Think about that for a moment.

An owner stood in front of the very people they hire and asked how they could become a better partner.

That question wasn’t about project delivery.

It was about leadership.

It told me this was an organization willing to challenge its own assumptions instead of defending them. It told me they valued honest feedback. It told me they weren’t looking for firms that would simply agree with them. They wanted partners who would help them make better decisions.

As the day continued, I noticed something else.

The conversations weren’t really about buildings.

They were about the people responsible for building them.

When they talked about cost certainty, they weren’t simply talking about budgets. They were talking about the confidence to stand in front of university leadership and say, “We know where this project is headed.”

When they discussed stakeholder management, they weren’t asking for better meeting agendas. They were describing the reality of balancing faculty, researchers, finance, operations, students, donors, and executive leadership, all with different priorities.

When they debated whether to renovate instead of build new, they weren’t simply discussing facilities. They were talking about stewardship.

Even the conversation about artificial intelligence wasn’t really about technology.
It was about accountability.

Who owns the decision when AI is wrong?
That question has very little to do with software and everything to do with leadership.

By the end of the day, I realized I wasn’t taking notes on what they were saying anymore.

I was writing down observations.
Not observations that would help me “win WSU.”
Observations that would make me a better business developer regardless of who was sitting across the table.

Because here’s what I’ve learned after years in business development.
Clients rarely tell us how to win their work. But they constantly reveal how they make decisions.

They reveal what creates stress. They reveal what success looks like. They reveal what kind of partner they trust.

The challenge is that most of us are so busy thinking about what we’re going to say next that we miss what they’re already telling us.

The best client conversations aren’t interviews.

They’re opportunities to understand how another person sees the world.

And once you understand how they think, your conversations, proposals, interviews, and relationships naturally become more relevant.

Read more

By the time you read this, I’ll be somewhere between coffee meetings, conference sessions, hallway conversations, and dinners with people I haven’t seen in months, maybe even years.

I love business travel.

Not because of the flights or the hotels. I love it because it gives me a chance to reconnect with old friends, strengthen existing relationships, and meet people I’ve been looking forward to getting to know.

But over the years, I’ve realized something.

Most people think conferences are where business gets done.

I don’t.

I think conferences reveal the work you’ve already done.

I’ve watched organizations spend thousands of dollars sponsoring receptions, hosting elaborate dinners, renting hospitality suites, and handing out enough branded swag to fill another suitcase.

There’s nothing wrong with any of those things.

If your budget allows for it, great.

But here’s the secret no one talks about.

Those things don’t create relationships.

They amplify the relationships you’ve already invested in.

The highest ROI at a conference doesn’t come from the biggest budget.

It comes from the preparation that happened weeks before you arrived.

Before I ever pack my suitcase, I’ve already started preparing.

I’ve studied the attendee list.

I’ve reached out to people I want to reconnect with.

I’ve scheduled coffees and breakfasts.

I’ve asked for introductions.

I’ve looked at what people have been working on so I can ask thoughtful questions instead of making small talk.

By the time I walk into the first session, many of the conversations I’m most looking forward to are already on my calendar.

That’s what allows me to be fully present.

I’m not wondering who I should meet or hoping I’ll bump into the right person.

I’m focused on deepening the relationships I’m there to build.

Networking isn’t something I squeeze in between sessions.

For me, it’s the reason I’m there.

One of the questions I often ask leaders is this:

Are you attending conferences, or are you preparing for them?

There’s a difference.

Preparation changes everything.

It changes how you walk into a room.

It changes the quality of your conversations.

It changes whether you leave hoping someone remembers you or knowing you’ve strengthened relationships that will continue long after everyone has flown home.

One of my favorite things to watch at conferences is how people naturally gravitate toward certain individuals.

It isn’t always the loudest person in the room.

It isn’t always the person with the biggest booth or the fanciest event.

It’s often the person who seems to know everyone.

They’re introducing people to one another.

They’re stopping to ask about someone’s family or congratulating them on a recent promotion.

They’re picking up conversations that started six months ago as if no time has passed.

There’s a reason for that.

People are drawn to trust.

When they see someone surrounded by genuine relationships, making thoughtful introductions, and investing in others without expecting something in return, they notice.

Relationships become social proof.

Not because you’re trying to impress anyone, but because consistency has built credibility over time.

That’s why I don’t believe conferences are where your reputation is built.

They’re where your reputation becomes visible.

The real work happened months before.

It happened when you stayed in touch without needing something.

When you reached out just to check in.

When you made an introduction that benefited someone else.

When you remembered a birthday, a promotion, a new role, or a project someone was excited about.

Those moments compound.

Then, when you see each other again, you don’t have to start over.

You simply continue the conversation.

That’s the return on investing in relationships.

So if you’re attending a conference this year, don’t worry if your company can’t afford the biggest sponsorship, the rooftop reception, or the expensive dinner.

You don’t need the biggest budget to build meaningful relationships.

You need intention.

You need curiosity.

You need consistency.

And you need to start before the conference ever begins.

Because the people who leave with the strongest relationships, the best opportunities, and yes, sometimes even the new clients, didn’t create those relationships in forty-eight hours.

They simply showed up and harvested what they’d been planting all year.

Thank you for spending a few minutes with me today.

I’d love to hear from you.

What’s one habit that’s helped you get more value from conferences or networking events? Share it in the comments. Someone else might benefit from your experience.

And if this resonated with you, I’d be grateful if you shared it with someone who’s headed to a conference this season.

Over the course of a career, we meet hundreds, sometimes thousands, of people. We work together, sit beside each other at conferences, collaborate on difficult projects, share meals, exchange ideas, and occasionally become genuine friends. We tell each other we should stay in touch. In the moment, we mean it.

Then work becomes busy. Someone changes jobs. A project ends. A new responsibility consumes our attention. Months pass, then years. Eventually, we think about reaching out, but enough time has passed that the message feels awkward. We tell ourselves we will do it later, when we have a better reason.

Too often, the reason finally arrives when we need something.

We need an introduction. We are looking for a new client. We want information about an opportunity. We are considering a career change. We need someone to recommend us, hire us, refer us, or take our call.

That is when we discover the difference between having a large network and having active, trusted relationships.

This week, I am traveling to Spokane to reconnect with some of my favorite people in the industry. Some of them have known me through different jobs, different companies, and different seasons of my career. We have watched one another take risks, step into leadership, change directions, win work, lose work, and become different versions of ourselves.

I am not going there to collect business cards. I already know these people. I am going because relationships need more than a history. They need continued attention.

That distinction matters. Your network is not a static list of everyone you have ever met. It is a living record of who you have supported, remembered, encouraged, introduced, and stayed connected to.

The good news is that staying connected does not require an elaborate system or hours of networking every week. It does require intention. Good intentions alone are rarely enough, however, especially when our calendars are crowded and our attention is fragmented.

You need a simple way to decide who you want to stay connected with, why the relationship matters, when to reach out, and what would make the interaction meaningful.

That is what the Relationship Rhythm Framework is designed to do.

It is built around three simple actions:

Choose the relationships you want to maintain and deepen.

Connect in ways that show attention, relevance, and genuine interest.

Continue through a sustainable rhythm that keeps good intentions from becoming forgotten ones.

You do not need to contact everyone equally, reach out constantly, or invest in complicated technology. You need to know who matters, give the relationship a meaningful next step, and create a system that helps you follow through.

Choose: Stop Trying to Maintain Every Relationship Equally

One reason people become overwhelmed by networking is that they imagine they must personally maintain hundreds of relationships at the same level. They look at the number of contacts in their phone or connections on LinkedIn and conclude that meaningful follow-up is impossible.

They are right. It is impossible, and it is also unnecessary.

Not every relationship needs the same amount of time, attention, or access. That does not mean some people are valuable and others are not. It means relationships naturally exist at different levels of depth.

I have people I went to high school with, college friends, current and former coworkers, industry connections, clients, consultants, vendors, association colleagues, and people I have met through different seasons of my life. The list never ends.

For this conversation, let us limit the framework to professional relationships.

I divide them into three groups: Core, Cultivate, and Community.

Core Relationships

Your Core relationships are the people you want to remain genuinely close to. These may include trusted clients, collaborators, mentors, advocates, referral partners, former colleagues, and professional friends.

These are the people whose calls you would answer. You know what is happening in their careers and often in their lives. You would gladly help them even if there were no immediate benefit to you. They may also be the people who tell you the truth, open doors for you, recommend you when you are not in the room, and help you navigate important decisions.

Most people have fewer Core relationships than they think. That is not a failure. Depth requires time.

For an individual professional or business owner, a realistic Core group might contain ten to twenty-five people. The exact number matters less than your ability to maintain genuine knowledge of and care for each person.

What began as a few random texts and casual meetups over Filipino breakfasts eventually became the Filipino Breakfast Club.

We are a group of professionals in the AEC community brought together by friendship, shared experience, and an appreciation for rice at breakfast. Through company changes, career pivots, promotions, setbacks, and new chapters, we have remained part of one another’s lives.

We have stayed connected through regular breakfasts, mutual introductions, honest advice, celebrating each other’s wins, and simply continuing to show interest in what is happening in one another’s lives.

Over time, the group has grown. Every so often, someone brings a new person to breakfast, and before long, that person becomes part of the circle too.

Yes, we exchange industry intelligence, leads, and the occasional update about who is doing what and where. But that is not what has held the group together.

The relationships came first. The information, opportunities, and introductions grew naturally from the trust we built around the table.

These are people in my Core group.

Cultivate Relationships

Cultivate relationships are people you want to know better. There is already a meaningful reason for the connection, but the relationship has not yet developed enough to be considered Core.

You may have met them at a conference, worked together briefly, been introduced by someone you trust, connected through an industry organization, or had one memorable conversation. There may be shared interests, complementary expertise, or the potential to support one another professionally.

This is where many relationships quietly disappear. We have a great meeting, promise to reconnect, and then leave the next interaction to chance.

Cultivation is not about pursuing someone until they become useful. It is about giving a promising relationship enough attention to discover whether there is genuine mutual interest and value.

For this group, the most important question is not, “How often should I contact them?”

It is, “What is the natural next step?”

Perhaps you offered to send an article. Maybe they mentioned an upcoming launch, hiring decision, presentation, move, or major project. Perhaps you discovered that you will both attend the same event.

The next interaction should grow from something real that was already shared.

Community Relationships

Your Community is the broader group of people with whom you want to remain visible, supportive, and connected. These may include former coworkers, professional association colleagues, people you know through social media, conference contacts, clients from earlier in your career, and individuals who share your interests or work in your market.

You do not need to schedule individual quarterly calls with everyone in your Community. Trying to do that would turn relationship building into an exhausting administrative exercise.

Instead, remain present through broader activities. Attend gatherings. Write and share useful ideas. Comment thoughtfully on other people’s work. Congratulate them when something meaningful happens. Make introductions. Send invitations. Respond when they reach out.

Your Community may not hear from you personally every month, but they should have some sense of who you are, what you care about, and how you contribute.

That is the difference between visibility and familiarity. Visibility means people see your name. Familiarity means they have begun to understand the person behind it.

Choosing does not mean deciding who is worthy of a relationship. It means being honest about where you can realistically invest your time and attention.

Connect: Give Every Follow-Up a Reason

One of the most common phrases in business communication is also one of the least effective:

“I’m just checking in.”

We use it when we want to reconnect but have not given enough thought to why the other person might want to hear from us. It asks them to create the substance of the conversation.

A meaningful follow-up usually contains one or more of three things: memory, relevance, and contribution.

Memory shows that you paid attention. You remember the initiative they were launching, the challenge they were facing, the child who was graduating, the trip they were planning, or the goal they were trying to reach.

Relevance gives the message a reason to arrive now. You saw something connected to their work. An event is approaching. Their company announced a change. A topic from your last conversation resurfaced. Enough time has passed that you genuinely want to know what happened.

Contribution gives something to the relationship. It may be information, encouragement, an introduction, an invitation, a recommendation, a thoughtful question, or simply recognition.

Before you reach out, ask yourself:

What do I remember?

Why does it make sense to connect now?

Is there something useful, encouraging, or meaningful I can contribute?

Not every message needs to contain all three. These questions simply help you move beyond empty contact.

Instead of writing:

Just checking in to see how you are doing.

You might write:

I was thinking about our conversation regarding your expansion into a new market. You expected to make a decision this summer, and I would love to hear where things landed.

Or:

I saw this article about employee ownership and remembered the questions you were asking when we met. I thought it might be useful to you.

Or:

I will be in Spokane on Thursday and realized it has been far too long since we sat down together. I would love to hear what you are working on and how this year has treated you.

The difference is attention. People can feel when you remember them.

Staying top of mind is not about repeatedly placing your name in front of someone. It is about becoming associated with attentiveness, generosity, reliability, and genuine interest.

You want people to remember not only what you do, but how they feel when they hear from you.

Continue: Create a Rhythm That Helps You Follow Through

People sometimes resist creating a relationship system because they worry it will feel calculated. They believe authentic relationships should happen spontaneously.

Some do. Many do not.

There is nothing artificial about reminding yourself to contact someone you genuinely care about. We use calendars to remember birthdays, anniversaries, appointments, and important commitments. The reminder does not make the feeling less sincere. It keeps the intention from being buried beneath more urgent demands.

Technology should remind you to care. It should not make the relationship feel automated.

You do not need a sophisticated platform to begin. Most people can build an effective system using Outlook or Google Calendar, their email, contact notes, and perhaps a simple spreadsheet.

Use Your Calendar for Core Relationships

For your Core relationships, create a recurring reminder every thirty, sixty, or ninety days, depending on the relationship.

Do not title the reminder “Contact Sarah.” Include enough context to help your future self reconnect meaningfully.

A useful reminder might say:

Reconnect with Sarah. Ask how the expansion is progressing and whether she hired the operations leader. Mention the leadership article we discussed.

The reminder should prompt attention, not merely activity.

Do not automatically contact every Core person on the same rigid schedule. Some relationships naturally involve frequent interaction. Others can remain strong with a few meaningful conversations each year. The goal is to prevent an important relationship from drifting simply because both people became busy.

Create Specific Next Steps for Cultivate Relationships

For Cultivate relationships, avoid setting a generic recurring reminder before the relationship has developed. Instead, schedule the next logical interaction.

If someone mentions that a decision will be made in September, create a reminder for September. If they are preparing to launch a company, follow up after the launch. If you offered to send information, schedule that task immediately. If you will both attend an event, make a note to connect there.

The next contact should feel connected to their life, not imposed by your system.

This also helps you follow through on promises. Reliability is one of the fastest ways to build trust. Failing to do something small that you offered to do is one of the easiest ways to weaken it.

After I send a thank-you email or text, I often create a follow-up reminder for myself. Some are monthly. Others are scheduled six to eight weeks out, depending on the person and what we discussed.

I cannot tell you how many times I have reached out because of one of those reminders and heard, “I’m so glad you called. I have this lead,” or, “Your timing is perfect. I was just thinking about you.”

That is why staying top of mind matters.

The lead is not the reason I maintain the relationship, but the opportunity may never have surfaced if I had allowed too much time to pass. The reminder keeps me connected. The relationship creates the trust. The opportunity grows from there.

Create a Weekly Community Rhythm

Your broader Community does not need hundreds of individual calendar reminders. Instead, reserve twenty or thirty minutes each week for a Relationship Review.

During that time, look through recent emails, upcoming events, LinkedIn updates, your calendar, and your list of Core and Cultivate relationships.

Ask yourself:

Who accomplished something worth celebrating?

Who have I been meaning to reconnect with?

What promise have I not yet fulfilled?

Who could benefit from an introduction?

Whose work could I support or share?

Who is entering a season where encouragement might matter?

This does not need to become a complicated ritual. The purpose is to create enough space to notice people before you need something from them.

Here in the Pacific Northwest, the gray of winter can really get to people. During that season, I often send simple, encouraging messages. Sometimes it is, “I’m thinking about you.” Sometimes it is, “How are you really?” Other times, it is an invitation to meet for coffee or get pedicures.

You know the season. You know people may appreciate hearing from someone who remembers them.

Not every follow-up has to be strategic. Sometimes the most meaningful thing you can offer is warmth.

A recurring Friday morning or Monday afternoon calendar block may be enough to create this rhythm. Protect it the way you would protect any other important business-development activity.

Relationships are not separate from the work. For many leaders, entrepreneurs, and business owners, relationships are what make the work possible.

What Should You Record?

You do not need to document every conversation. Doing so would feel invasive and become impossible to maintain.

Record information that helps you be a more attentive and reliable person.

You may want to capture:

• How you met.

• What they are working toward.

• The challenges they are navigating.

• Topics that matter to them.

• Important professional or personal milestones they voluntarily shared.

• Something you promised to do.

• The most natural reason to reconnect.

• People you may want to introduce them to.

The standard is simple: record what you would reasonably want a thoughtful professional contact to remember about you.

Do not collect deeply personal information merely because you can. This is not surveillance. It is a support for memory and follow-through.

You can place these notes in Outlook Contacts, Google Contacts, a spreadsheet, a digital notebook, or your company’s relationship-management system.

The tool matters far less than whether you will actually use it.

Do You Need a CRM?

Maybe, but probably not on the first day.

A calendar reminds you when to reconnect. Contact notes remind you what matters. A CRM helps you view relationship history, activity, opportunities, and connections at a larger scale.

For a consultant, coach, startup founder, or individual leader managing a focused group of relationships, Outlook or Google Calendar may be enough. Adding an elaborate CRM too early can create more administration than value.

A CRM becomes useful when:

• You are managing dozens of active business relationships.

• Several people on your team interact with the same organization.

• Important commitments are being lost in individual inboxes.

• You need to understand who has relationships with whom.

• You are trying to connect relationship activity to referrals, opportunities, and revenue.

• Your business has become too dependent on one person’s memory.

The danger is believing that purchasing a CRM will create relationship discipline.

It will not.

A CRM is only as relational as the information people put into it. If the system records only opportunities, projected revenue, probability, and last-contact dates, it is a sales database. That may be useful, but it does not tell you whether trust is growing.

I have seen systems filled with company names, opportunity values, pursuit stages, and last-contact dates, yet they contain almost nothing that helps someone prepare for an actual conversation.

Who does the client trust?
What is keeping them up at night?
What changed since the last meeting?
What did we promise?
Who on our team has the strongest relationship?
How have we helped when there was no active opportunity?

Those are the details that help people build trust. Those are also the details that too often live inside one person’s memory rather than within the organization.

A relationship-focused CRM should help you understand what matters to the client, who holds the strongest relationships, what was promised, what has changed, how you have been helpful, and what a meaningful next step might be.

Start with your calendar. Graduate to a CRM when the volume and complexity of the relationships require it.

Relationships should remain personal, regardless of the tool.

Put It Into Practice: A 30-Minute Relationship Rhythm Setup

You can build the first version of your Relationship Rhythm in thirty minutes.

Begin by identifying ten Core relationships. Choose people with whom you want to maintain genuine, long-term connection. Do not select people only because of their titles or buying authority. Include the people who challenge you, support you, advocate for you, and make your professional life richer.

Next, identify ten Cultivate relationships. These are people you have a legitimate interest in knowing better. Write down the specific reason you believe each relationship deserves more attention.

Then create one next step for every person. Some may need a recurring reminder. Others may need a single, timely follow-up. Give each reminder enough context so you know why you are reaching out.

Create a weekly twenty-minute Relationship Review on your calendar. Use that time to complete promises, notice milestones, make introductions, support someone’s work, and reconnect with one person who has drifted further away than you intended.

Finally, choose one helpful action you can take this week without asking for anything in return.

Send the introduction. Share the article. Offer encouragement. Extend the invitation. Celebrate the win.

Then continue the rhythm.

A network becomes valuable not because of how many people can help you, but because of how consistently you participate in helping others.

Do Not Turn People Into a Checklist

Any framework can be misused.

It would be easy to turn Core, Cultivate, and Community into another sales pipeline. It would be easy to measure contact frequency while ignoring relationship quality. It would be easy to schedule messages that sound personal but are sent only to keep your name visible.

That is not the goal.

The Relationship Rhythm Framework is not designed to manufacture closeness. It is designed to protect meaningful relationships from the forgetfulness that comes with a full life.

There will still be people you lose touch with. Some relationships belong to a specific season. Some people will move in a different direction. Others may return years later and feel as comfortable as though no time has passed.

You are not trying to hold onto every person you have ever known. You are choosing to care for the relationships that matter, remain open to the relationships that are developing, and contribute generously to the wider community around you.

When I think about the relationships that have lasted through job changes, career pivots, busy seasons, and long stretches between conversations, I think about Mary.

I have known her since 2012, when we were on the same marketing team at an architectural firm and became fast friends. There are some people you may not see often, but you never question where you stand with them. You simply know they are your person.

For the past fourteen years, Mary has been my cheerleader, my sounding board, a shoulder to cry on, and an endless source of good advice. We have celebrated wins, talked through hard decisions, shared disappointments, and watched each other grow through different seasons of life and work.

What I love most is that time never seems to erase the connection. We can sit down after months apart, start talking, and within minutes it feels as if the conversation never stopped.

That is what trusted relationships can become when they are cared for over time. They are not built through constant contact. They are built through consistency, honesty, generosity, and the quiet confidence that the other person is still there.

Your network is not measured by how many people recognize your name. It is revealed by the people who have known you through change, stayed close through the distance, and continue to remind you who you are.

Those relationships rarely maintain themselves.

But they are worth maintaining.

Thank you for reading. I would love to know what you think about the Relationship Rhythm Framework and how you stay connected to the people who matter most in your professional life.

If this article made you think of someone, share it with them.

And if it has been a while since we have talked, reach out and say hi. I would be glad to hear from you.

Read more

Your client may already know they need you. That does not mean they are ready to move.

I heard something in a conversation recently that I have not been able to stop thinking about: you have to be at the same speed as your client.

It sounds simple, almost too simple, but the more I sat with it, the more I realized how much wisdom is packed inside that one sentence. So much of business development, leadership, consulting, and client service comes down to timing. Not just your timing, but their timing. Their readiness. Their urgency. Their internal pressure. Their ability to make a decision. Their confidence in what they need next.

We love to talk about moving fast in business. We celebrate decisiveness. We praise urgency. We tell people to follow up, stay in front of the client, push the opportunity forward, and keep momentum alive. None of that is wrong. Momentum matters. Follow-up matters. A good business developer, seller-doer, principal, or firm leader cannot sit back passively and wait for the phone to ring.

But there is a difference between creating momentum and forcing movement. There is a difference between staying present and becoming pressure. There is a difference between helping a client move forward and trying to drag them into a decision they are not ready to make.

That difference is subtle, but it matters.

When I was running Ivi Gabales Consulting full time, I had a potential client who knew their company needed help. They owned an AEC firm, and from everything they shared with me, the need was real. They did not have a clear business development system. They were inconsistent in how they pursued relationships. They were falling behind competitors who had become more intentional, more visible, and more disciplined in the market. They could see the gap widening. They knew something had to change.

We had good conversations. Thoughtful conversations. The kind where you can feel the person across from you knows you understand the problem. I could see the path forward for them and their team. I could see how a stronger business development rhythm, better client targeting, clearer accountability, and more consistent relationship-building would help them. It was not theoretical. It was exactly the kind of work I had built my consulting practice to do.

But they could not pull the trigger.

At first, I did what most of us do when a potential client does not move forward. I started questioning myself. Did I explain the value clearly enough? Was the proposal too much? Was it too soon? Did I need to reframe the offer? Should I follow up again? Should I send another resource? Should I make the business case more obvious?

There is a particular kind of mental gymnastics that happens when you know someone needs what you offer, but they are not ready to say yes. You start looking for the missing sentence, the missing proof point, the missing magic phrase that will finally make the decision click into place.

But the more I sat with it, the more I realized the issue was not that they did not see the need. They saw it clearly. The issue was that they were not moving at the speed required to make the decision.

That distinction matters.

Sometimes a client can name the problem before they are ready to solve it. Sometimes they can feel the pain before they are ready to invest in the remedy. Sometimes they can intellectually understand the risk of staying the same, but emotionally, financially, or organizationally, they are not ready to make the change.

And that is hard when you are the person who can help.

It is hard because you can see the cost of delay. You can see the opportunity being lost. You can see how the same patterns will keep producing the same outcomes. In my case, I could see that every month without a stronger business development system was another month of reacting instead of building. Another month of hoping relationships would somehow turn into backlog without a real structure underneath them.

But no matter how clearly I saw it, I could not move faster than they could.

Around that same season, I had another potential client reach out to me in a completely different way. We had not spent months talking through scope. We had not gone back and forth on proposal language. We had not needed multiple meetings to diagnose the problem. They had been following my LinkedIn posts and reading what I shared about business development, client relationships, trust, visibility, and the internal challenges firm leaders often carry quietly.

When they finally reached out, they essentially said, “You are in my head. You already know me and my challenges. How do I sign up?”

That conversation moved quickly, not because I pushed it, but because they were already moving. They had been doing their own thinking long before they contacted me. They had been watching, reflecting, and recognizing themselves in the ideas I was sharing. By the time we talked, I was not introducing a new problem to them. I was naming something they had already been feeling.

That is the part of business development we do not talk about enough.

Sometimes the sale does not happen in the meeting. Sometimes it happens in the months before the meeting, when someone is quietly paying attention. They are reading your posts, listening to how you talk about the work, noticing whether your perspective feels useful, and deciding whether you understand their world. They may not like or comment. They may not email you. They may not make themselves known at all.

But they are forming an opinion.

They are deciding whether you sound like someone who gets it. They are deciding whether you are selling at them or speaking to them. They are deciding whether, when the moment comes, you will be someone they can trust.

This is why I believe so deeply in thought leadership, especially for people in professional services. It is not about becoming an influencer. It is not about feeding the algorithm or performing expertise for strangers. At its best, thought leadership is a way of letting the right people feel seen before they ever need to make a decision.

It gives people time to catch up to their own readiness.

That is also why business development cannot be measured only by who says yes today. A no today may be a no forever, but it may also be a not yet. A quiet follower may look like a stranger until one day they become the easiest yes in your pipeline. A client who hesitates may still trust you, but not be ready for the internal disruption that change requires.

The mistake we make is assuming everyone should move at our speed because we are ready. We have the solution, so we want them to see the urgency. We know the value, so we want them to understand the investment. We can see the opportunity, so we want them to act before they miss it.

But clients are not just buying strategy, services, or expertise. They are buying confidence. They are buying change. They are buying the belief that you understand what is actually at stake for them.

And change has a speed of its own.

For some leaders, that speed is fast because the pain is immediate. They have lost too many pursuits. Their backlog is thin. Their team is burned out. Their current approach is no longer working, and they know they cannot keep pretending it will fix itself. Those clients may be ready to move quickly because the cost of staying the same has become too obvious to ignore.

For others, the speed is slower. They may know the problem exists, but they are still managing fear, budget, internal politics, competing priorities, or the vulnerability of admitting that something important has been neglected. Hiring someone to build a business development system is not just a line item. It can feel like an admission that what got them here may not get them where they want to go next.

That can be uncomfortable.

And it is not only uncomfortable for the client. It is uncomfortable for the people trying to win the work. It is uncomfortable for the principal who knows they need to build new relationships but keeps relying on the same aging network. It is uncomfortable for the technical leader who is excellent at delivering work but unsure how to create opportunity. It is uncomfortable for the emerging professional who wants to contribute to growth but does not know how to start. It is uncomfortable for the BD professional who can see the market shifting but cannot get their internal team to move with the same urgency.

This is why business development is not just about being outgoing, well-connected, or good at follow-up. Those things help, but they are not enough. Business development is the ability to read people, read timing, read organizational pressure, and read the difference between interest and readiness.

That is a skill.

And like any skill, it can be learned.

As business developers, design consultants, advisors, technical leaders, and firm leaders, we have to learn how to read the pace of the people in front of us. We have to know when to keep showing up and when to stop pushing. We have to know when a client needs more clarity and when they simply need more time. We have to know when we are being helpful and when our follow-up is more about our own anxiety than their readiness.

Because the faster we push someone who is not ready, the more they often resist.

Not always because they do not trust us. Sometimes because they do. They trust us enough to keep the conversation open, but not enough yet to step into the decision. Or maybe they trust us, but they do not trust themselves, their team, their budget, or the timing. That is where emotional intelligence becomes part of business development. We are not just managing pipelines. We are managing human readiness.

The best business development leaders I know are not always the loudest in the room or the quickest to close. They are the ones who can sense the pace of the person in front of them. They know how to walk beside a client without running ahead of them. They know how to stay relevant without becoming relentless. They know that trust is rarely built by forcing urgency. It is built by being consistent enough that, when urgency finally arrives, you are already there.

That is the real relationship to ROI.

It is not just who you know. It is not just how often you follow up. It is not just whether someone likes you enough to take a meeting. It is whether you have earned enough trust, offered enough value, and stayed present long enough to be the person they think of when their readiness finally catches up to their need.

So maybe the better question is not, “How do I get this client to move faster?”

Maybe the better question is, “What speed is this client moving today, and how do I meet them there?”

And maybe, for firm leaders, there is another question worth asking: “Are we teaching our people how to read that speed, or are we just telling them to go build relationships?”

Because those are not the same thing.

You can tell someone to follow up. You can tell them to grab coffee. You can tell them to stay visible, go to the event, post on LinkedIn, and keep the relationship warm. But if they do not understand how to read client readiness, they will either push too hard, disappear too soon, or miss the moment when the opportunity finally opens.

That is where coaching matters.

Not because people need more scripts or more pressure to close the deal, but because they need someone to help them see what is actually happening in the relationship. They need to learn how to listen for timing, how to ask better questions, how to understand hesitation, how to stay present without becoming noise, and how to build trust before the pursuit ever becomes visible.

Because sometimes the most strategic thing you can do is not push harder.

Sometimes it is to stay visible, stay useful, stay thoughtful, and let the relationship mature at the speed trust allows.

“I hate posting on LinkedIn.”

Sometimes it’s followed by,
“I don’t have an hour to write a post.”
Or...
“I’m afraid I’ll say something that comes back to bite me.”
Or my favorite.
“I just don’t have anything interesting to say.”

Every time I hear it, I smile a little.
Not because I disagree.
Because I used to think the exact same thing.

For years, my job was helping architecture, engineering, and construction firms tell their story. I built marketing campaigns. I coached interview teams. I developed messaging. I helped principals become more visible.

Ironically...

I wasn’t doing it for myself.
I thought visibility belonged to people who wanted attention.
People who loved hearing themselves talk.
People who somehow had an extra ten hours every week to create content.
I couldn’t have been more wrong.

What changed wasn’t my schedule.
It wasn’t that I suddenly had more free time.
If anything, I’m busier today than I’ve ever been.

What changed was my understanding of what thought leadership actually is.
Thought leadership isn’t another task.
It’s documenting your thinking.

Somewhere along the way, we’ve convinced ourselves that posting means producing polished essays, controversial opinions, or profound life lessons.

No wonder leaders hate it. It sounds exhausting!
But think about your day today.
Maybe you coached a project manager through a difficult client conversation.
Maybe you helped your team decide whether to pursue an opportunity.
Maybe you noticed a trend in your market.
Maybe you walked out of a meeting thinking, “I wish more people understood this.”

Congratulations! You already have content!

Here’s what I think is really happening.
Firm principals tell me they don’t have time.
C-suite executives tell me they’re careful about what they say publicly.
Emerging leaders tell me they don’t feel experienced enough.

Three different excuses. One common denominator: FEAR.
They’re worried about being judged.
They’re worried someone will disagree.
They’re worried they’ll sound self-promotional.
They’re worried they’ll get it wrong.

Here’s the irony. Every day you choose not to share your thinking, people still form an opinion about you. It’s just based on less information.

Visibility isn’t vanity.
It’s reducing uncertainty.

Imagine you’re selecting between two firms.
Both are technically qualified.
Both have talented people.

One firm’s leaders regularly share how they think about risk, collaboration, innovation, procurement, or leadership.

The other says nothing.
Who feels like the safer choice?

Not because they’re smarter.
Because they’re more familiar.
Trust grows in familiarity.
That’s what your posts are really doing.

Not collecting likes. They are reducing uncertainty.

I stopped trying to impress people.
Instead, I started answering questions I already answer every day.

Questions clients ask.
Questions colleagues ask.
Questions young professionals ask.
Questions I wish someone had answered for me twenty years ago.

Suddenly, posting became easier.
Because I wasn’t trying to perform.
I was trying to serve.

The surprising part?

People I’d never met started recognizing me at conferences.
Someone would walk up and say, “I read your posts.”
Or, “I’ve been following your articles.”

Not because I went viral. Because I became consistent.

The relationship started before we ever shook hands.
That’s Relationship to ROI.

So if you hate posting, maybe you don’t actually hate posting.
Maybe you hate the pressure you’ve attached to it.
The pressure to sound brilliant.
The pressure to be original.
The pressure to never offend anyone.
The pressure to create instead of simply contribute.

You don’t need to change the industry every Tuesday morning.
You just need to let people see how you think.

Because someday, someone will hire your firm, invite you onto a board, recommend you for a leadership role, or call you about an opportunity not because of one post.

But because over time, your thinking became familiar. And familiar becomes trusted.

Relationships don’t begin the day you meet someone.
Sometimes they begin months earlier, when someone quietly reads what you’ve been willing to share.

A few days ago, I was listening to entrepreneur Julie Solomon’s podcast when she said something that immediately made me think, I need to remember that.

Read more

Some were early in their careers trying to figure out what came next.
Some were seasoned leaders carrying the weight of growing firms and developing future leaders.
Some were thinking about retirement.
Some were considering starting businesses.
Others were wondering if it was finally time to leave a role they had outgrown.

What struck me wasn’t how different they were. It was how similar many of their conversations sounded.

One theme kept surfacing. People felt stuck. Not unsuccessful. Not unhappy. Not incapable. Just stuck.

As I listened, I found myself reflecting on my own career.

I know what burnout feels like.

I know what it’s like to wake up on Monday morning already exhausted by the week ahead.

I know how draining it can be to sit in a role you’ve outgrown. To feel capable of more but unable to fully use your strengths. To find yourself increasingly disconnected from the work, the leadership, or the direction of the organization.

I’ve experienced what it’s like when your values no longer align with company priorities. When you don’t have the support or resources needed to be successful. When you’re carrying responsibility without the authority to create change.

I’ve stayed too long at jobs.

I’ve also watched opportunities pass by and wondered what might have happened if I had acted sooner.

One crossroads in particular stands out.

In early 2025, I was wrestling with a decision. Should I look for another job? Or should I finally take the leap and start my own company?

Like many people facing a major career decision, I sought advice. I was hoping someone would tell me what to do.

Instead, one very wise person asked me a single question: “Would you regret not doing it?”

The answer came immediately. Yes! I would.

Ivi Gabales Consulting was born the next day.

Looking back, that conversation taught me something important.

Most people aren’t stuck because they lack options. They’re stuck because they lack clarity.

And that’s where I believe leaders need to pay attention. Because what I heard at that conference wasn’t just a collection of personal career challenges. It was a leadership challenge.

Every leader has people on their team who feel stuck. The high performer who has outgrown their role. The emerging leader who wants more responsibility but doesn’t know how to ask for it. The experienced professional who feels disconnected from the organization’s direction. The employee who stopped raising their hand because nobody seemed to listen.

When people feel stuck long enough, something happens. They stop growing. Then they stop engaging. Eventually, they leave.

Sometimes physically. Sometimes mentally long before they submit a resignation letter.

As leaders, we spend a lot of time talking about retention, engagement, succession planning, culture, and talent development. But underneath all of those conversations is a simpler question: Do our people feel like they are growing?

Because growth creates energy. Growth creates engagement. Growth creates optimism. And growth creates loyalty.

The opposite is also true. When growth stops, people begin looking elsewhere for it.

The same principle applies to organizations.

I’ve met firms that were stuck in old ways of thinking, old business models, old markets, and old assumptions about what made them successful. Just like people, organizations can outgrow the strategies that got them where they are.

The challenge is that growth often requires discomfort. A difficult conversation. A leadership change. A new market. A new service. A new way of thinking. Most meaningful growth comes with uncertainty attached.

That’s why one of my favorite questions remains the same one that changed my own career: Would you regret not doing it?

It’s a powerful question for individuals. But it’s equally powerful for leaders.

Would you regret not investing in your people?
Would you regret not addressing the culture issue everyone sees but nobody talks about?
Would you regret not developing your next generation of leaders?
Would you regret not pursuing the opportunity that could transform your business?

Sometimes clarity doesn’t arrive in the form of an answer. Sometimes it arrives in the form of a question.

And the leaders who ask the right questions often unlock growth not only for themselves, but for the people around them.

If there is one takeaway from all those conversations last week, it’s this: Pay attention to the people who seem stuck. Including yourself.

Because being stuck is often not a sign that something is wrong. It’s a sign that growth is trying to happen.

The question is whether you’ll recognize it before the opportunity passes by.

_______________________

If this article resonated with you, subscribe to my Substack.

Ivi Gabales' Substack

Former architect turned business development strategist. I write about the real engine behind growth in AEC, relationships, positioning, and strategy that actually win work, along with the behind-the-scenes lessons no one teaches you until you’re in it.

Each week, I explore the intersection of leadership, business development, relationships, and trust. The conversations that happen before the proposal, before the promotion, and before the opportunity often determine what happens after.

Join me as we explore the human side of growth.

A few months ago, I heard several multi-seven-figure entrepreneurs talk about a concept that initially made no sense to me.

They all credited part of their success to the same thing: Detachment.

As someone who built a career in business development and later launched my own consulting business, that sounded completely backwards.

Aren’t we supposed to care more? Work harder? Follow up faster? Stay visible? Build more relationships? Create more opportunities?

That’s certainly what I believed.

After all, most of us in the AEC industry are builders, planners, and problem-solvers. We are taught that effort influences outcomes. We build schedules to reduce uncertainty. We develop risk mitigation plans. We coordinate hundreds of moving parts to deliver successful projects. The idea that success could somehow come from detachment felt completely at odds with everything I had learned throughout my career.

Then I started Ivi Gabales Consulting.

When you’re building something from scratch, every opportunity feels significant. Every proposal, every discovery call, every speaking engagement, and every potential client carries a different weight. There is no large organization behind you. There is no steady stream of opportunities arriving at your doorstep. Every conversation feels like it matters because, quite frankly, it does.

Looking back, I can see how easy it was to become attached to outcomes.

I found myself evaluating conversations based on what they might become. Would this lead to a client? Would this result in revenue? Was this relationship worth the investment of time and energy?

Without realizing it, I had slowly shifted my focus away from serving people and toward something else entirely.

I had become attached to being chosen.

If I’m being honest, I think that attachment started long before I launched a consulting business.

I’m the youngest of nine children. Like many kids in large families, I learned early that achievement got attention. Good grades got attention. Success got attention.

Over time, I made it my mission to become the best version of myself. The achiever. The one who stood out.

That drive served me well. It helped me become an architect, build a career in business development, start a business, and pursue opportunities that often felt bigger than I was ready for.

But every strength has a shadow side.

The desire to achieve can quietly become the desire to be chosen. And when being chosen becomes part of your identity, rejection feels heavier than it should.

As I listened to those entrepreneurs talk about detachment, I realized the concept was difficult for me not because I disagreed with it, but because it challenged something I had spent a lifetime pursuing.

Perhaps detachment isn’t about caring less.
Perhaps it’s about separating our worth from the outcome.

That realization changed the way I think about business development, leadership, and success itself. The longer I sat with the concept, the more I realized that many of us in AEC wrestle with the same challenge. We simply use different language to describe it.

We call it ambition. We call it accountability. We call it performance. Yet underneath all of those labels is a very human desire to be selected.

We want to win the pursuit. We want to make the shortlist. We want to secure the client. We want to earn the promotion. We want the validation that comes when someone says, “We choose you.”

The problem is that many of the outcomes we care most about are ultimately outside our control.

You can assemble the best team and still lose a pursuit. You can deliver a flawless interview and still finish second. You can invest years building a relationship only to have a project delayed, canceled, or awarded elsewhere. Anyone who has spent enough time in this industry has experienced some version of this reality.

What I’ve come to understand is that detachment doesn’t mean caring less. It means caring deeply about your effort while letting go of your need to control the outcome.

That is a very different thing. You still prepare. You still follow through. You still invest in relationships. You still pursue opportunities. You still care. What changes is that your emotional well-being is no longer tied to a single result.

One of the clearest examples of this came to me recently during breakfast with a facilities director from a local school district.

Like many owners today, they were navigating uncertainty. Funding questions. Delayed projects. Competing priorities. The conversation wasn’t tied to an active pursuit. There wasn’t an RFP on the horizon. There wasn’t an immediate business opportunity sitting across the table.

Five years ago, I might have walked away wondering whether that breakfast was worth the time. Today, I see it differently. The breakfast was the opportunity.

Not because it will necessarily lead to a project next month. Not because there is guaranteed revenue attached to it. The opportunity was the relationship itself.

Trust was built. Understanding was gained. The relationship was strengthened. That is the work before the pipeline.

The work that doesn’t show up in CRM reports. The work that can’t always be tied directly to revenue. The work that often determines who gets the call when opportunity eventually arrives.

Ironically, the less focused I became on extracting value from every interaction, the more value seemed to emerge. I listened more carefully. I became more curious. I asked better questions. I focused less on what I could gain and more on how I could help. And opportunities began showing up in places I never expected.

Not because I cared less. Because I cared differently.

I stopped focusing on being chosen and started focusing on being useful. That may be the real lesson behind detachment.

For emerging leaders, it means recognizing that one pursuit does not define your career.

For business developers, it means building relationships without needing every conversation to become an opportunity.

For firm leaders, it means trusting long-term investments in people, visibility, and relationships even when the return isn’t immediately visible.

Perhaps that’s what those entrepreneurs were trying to tell me all along. Success didn’t come when they stopped caring. Success came when they stopped gripping so tightly. They detached from the outcome and reattached to the process. To serving. To learning. To building relationships. To showing up consistently whether there was an immediate opportunity or not.

The more I’ve reflected on it, the more I’ve come to believe that detachment is not a personality trait. It’s a leadership skill. It’s the ability to invest deeply without needing an immediate return. It’s the ability to lose a pursuit without losing confidence. It’s the ability to build relationships without treating every conversation like a transaction. It’s the ability to separate your value from the outcome.

Like any skill, it requires practice. I’m still practicing.

But the longer I work in this industry, the more convinced I become that many of the best opportunities arrive long after we’ve stopped chasing them. They come from trust built over years. They come from relationships strengthened without expectation. They come from consistently showing up when there is nothing immediate to gain.

And perhaps that’s why detachment may be one of the most overlooked business development skills in AEC.

Your Turn

I’d love to hear your perspective.

Has there been a moment in your career when letting go of a specific outcome actually led to better results? Maybe it was a pursuit you didn’t win, a client you stopped chasing, a promotion that didn’t happen, or a relationship that paid dividends years later.

Leave a comment below or send me a message. I’d love to hear your story.

Sometimes the most valuable lessons in our careers come from the outcomes we couldn’t control.

Last night, I was heading home after a long, hot day. It had been one of those summer days where you feel like you’ve used up all your energy before the workday is even over. I still had a 50-minute commute ahead of me, but there was one saving grace: plenty of daylight left.

On the drive home, I called Mike.

“What do you want for dinner?” he asked.

I didn’t have a specific craving.

“I just want to put my feet in the water and cool off.”

“How about sandwiches?” he replied.

Immediately, I thought: picnic.

One of the things I love about where we live is that we’re only a few minutes from a beautiful lake. It wasn’t a grand plan. It wasn’t a reservation or a special occasion. It was simply a beautiful Washington summer evening waiting to be enjoyed.

When I got home, Mike had already taken care of everything. Bánh mì sandwiches and salad were ordered. Drinks were packed in a cooler. The picnic blanket was ready by the door.

I quickly changed clothes, and off we went.

A few minutes later, we were sitting by the water, our feet in the lake, enjoying the kind of evening that reminds you how lucky you are to live here. Paddleboarders drifted across the water. Kids jumped off the dock. Dogs chased tennis balls into the lake. The air had finally cooled enough to be comfortable.

It was one of those ordinary evenings that probably wouldn’t look remarkable to anyone else.

And yet, it felt perfect.

As I sat there watching the sun begin its slow descent, I realized the picnic wasn’t really what made the evening special.

It was the feeling of being known.

Earlier that afternoon, I had made an offhand comment during a phone call. Nothing dramatic. Nothing urgent. I simply said I wanted to put my feet in the water and cool off.

Mike heard it.

More importantly, he acted on it.

The older I get, the more I realize that this is what people are looking for in every relationship.

Not perfection.

Not grand gestures.

Not someone who always has the right answers.

People want to feel seen.

They want to feel heard.

They want to know that what they say matters.

We spend a lot of our lives chasing big moments. The promotion. The project win. The wedding. The dream vacation. The milestone birthday. The accomplishments that make for great photos and great stories.

But when I think about the strongest relationships in my life, they were rarely built in those moments.

They were built in the ordinary spaces between them.

A friend who remembers a conversation from months ago and asks how it turned out.

A colleague who checks in after a difficult week.

A leader who notices when someone is struggling and takes the time to ask how they’re doing.

A client who calls simply to see how things are going.

A spouse who hears a passing comment and turns it into a summer picnic.

None of these moments are particularly dramatic. Most wouldn’t even make it into a social media post. Yet they are often the moments that matter most.

The more I thought about it, the more I realized that attention may be one of the most valuable gifts we can give another person.

We live in a world filled with distractions. Notifications compete for our focus. Conversations happen while we’re checking our phones. Meetings run into other meetings. Most people are carrying around an invisible list of responsibilities and worries.

Attention has become increasingly rare.

Which is why it feels so meaningful when someone gives it to us.

Attention says, “I see you.”

Attention says, “I was listening.”

Attention says, “What matters to you matters to me.”

In business development, I often talk about trust. People sometimes assume trust is built during the proposal interview, the important meeting, or the big presentation.

I don’t think that’s true.

Those moments may reveal trust, but they rarely create it.

Trust is usually built long before anyone walks into the room.

It’s built when you follow through.

When you remember.

When you check in.

When you make an introduction without expecting anything in return.

When you consistently demonstrate that the relationship matters.

The same is true in our personal lives.

Trust isn’t built through one extraordinary act.

It’s built through hundreds of small moments that communicate the same message over and over again:

I see you.

I hear you.

You matter.

Last night’s picnic lasted only a few hours. The sandwiches are gone. The sun set. The evening ended.

But what stays with me is something much simpler.

The feeling of being known.

And maybe that’s why the little things feel so big.

They’re never really about the thing itself.

Maybe it’s a cup of coffee. A phone call. A handwritten note. A text message. Or a picnic by the lake on a warm summer evening.

They’re evidence that someone was paying attention.

The strongest relationships aren’t built on extraordinary moments.

They’re built on ordinary moments handled with extraordinary care

.

Every business development meeting looked almost exactly the same. Someone would open the CRM. We’d review the pipeline. We’d discuss opportunities. We’d update pursuit statuses. We’d talk about proposal schedules, interview dates, win probabilities, and projected revenue.

To be clear, all of that is important.

Opportunities need to be managed. Pursuits need attention. Forecasting matters.
But after sitting through countless BD meetings, I found myself asking the same question over and over again:

**What about all the work that happened before something entered the pipeline?**

Opportunities don’t just magically appear in a CRM. Before there was a lead, there was a relationship. Before there was a pursuit, there was trust. Before there was an opportunity, there was visibility, credibility, and often years of investment.

Someone stayed in touch.
Someone made an introduction.
Someone shared an insight.
Someone helped solve a problem.
Someone consistently showed up long enough to become trusted.

Yet when we sit down to review business development performance, very little of that conversation makes it onto the screen. We review the outcomes. Rarely do we review what created them. I think that’s where many firms have a blind spot.

Why Business Development Feels So Hard

One thing I’ve learned is that most people don’t struggle with business development because they dislike relationships. Most people struggle with business development because they don’t know how success is measured.

If you’re a project manager, success can be measured through schedule, budget, quality, and client satisfaction.

If you’re a principal, success may be measured through profitability, growth, and staff development.

If you’re an engineer, architect, or construction professional, success is often tied to solving problems and delivering work.

Business development is different. The outcomes are often delayed. The path isn’t always obvious. And the activities that create results don’t always fit neatly into a spreadsheet. That’s why so many technical professionals find business development frustrating. The connection between effort and outcome isn’t always immediate.

You can spend months building a relationship and see nothing happen. Then three years later that same relationship turns into a project. How do you measure that? How do you reward it? How do you coach someone to do more of it? Most firms don’t have a good answer.

The Problem with Activity Metrics

Because trust is difficult to measure, many firms default to measuring activity.
How many meetings did you attend?
How many clients did you call?
How many events did you go to?
How many lunches did you schedule?
How many emails did you send?
And before anyone tells me that attending events and golfing with clients is business development, let me challenge that idea.

Activity is not impact. Showing up is not relationship building. Visibility is not trust.

We’ve all met people who attend every conference, every networking event, every happy hour, and every golf tournament. Some create tremendous opportunity. Others create very little. The difference isn’t the activity. The difference is what happens because of the activity.

Did the relationship deepen?
Did trust increase?
Did the client share something they wouldn’t have shared before?
Did you gain insight into a future challenge?
Did you become a resource instead of a vendor?
Did you create an advocate?
Those are the things that matter.
The event was simply the vehicle.

The Question Nobody Can Answer

Here’s the question I ask business developers, principals, and seller-doers all the time:

How do you prove you’re effective at business development?

Most people immediately point to revenue. Or wins. Or backlog. Or proposals submitted. But those are all lagging indicators.

A project awarded today may have started with a relationship built five years ago. The opportunity may have emerged from dozens of conversations that never appeared in a CRM. The trust that helped win the project may have been established long before procurement even began. So if revenue is the outcome, what are the leading indicators?

What are the things happening today that increase the probability of opportunity tomorrow?

That’s the question that interests me.

If we can’t identify what creates opportunity, how can we intentionally create more of it?

What If We Measured Trust?

I’m not suggesting we create some artificial trust score. Relationships are far more nuanced than that. But I do think firms should become more intentional about measuring the things that create trust.

Questions like:
Who are our strongest client advocates?
Which relationships are growing?
Who consistently opens doors for us?
Which clients seek our advice before they seek our proposal?
Where are we being invited into conversations before procurement begins?
Who refers us to others?
Where are we becoming trusted advisors instead of service providers?

Those aren’t pursuit metrics. They’re relationship metrics. And they may tell us more about the future health of our business than the pipeline itself. Every pursuit starts somewhere. Every opportunity has an origin story. And more often than not, that story begins with trust.

Maybe We’re Measuring the Wrong Thing

Most firms track pursuits. Some firms track opportunities. Very few firms track what creates them. That’s why so many people struggle with business development. We’re asking people to do something that we haven’t clearly defined, consistently measured, or adequately rewarded.

We tell project managers to build relationships. We tell principals to be visible. We tell seller-doers to get involved earlier. But we rarely explain what success actually looks like before an opportunity exists. What is their metric for success?

I feel that this next evolution of business development. Not simply managing the pipeline but understanding what happens before it. Understanding how relationships become trust and how trust becomes opportunity. And how opportunity eventually becomes revenue. Projects do not magically appear in a CRM. They emerge from years of conversations, experiences, insights, introductions, and relationships.

The irony is that the most important work in business development often happens long before anyone calls it business development.

A Few Questions for You

If your firm’s pipeline disappeared tomorrow, what evidence would you have that future opportunities are still being created?

How would you measure the strength of your relationships?

How would you prove the trust you’ve built?

I’d love to hear your thoughts!

How do you measure business development in your firm today? And more importantly, are you measuring what creates the opportunity, or only what happens after it appears?

Thank you for reading!

Business development is one of the most important functions in a firm, yet it remains one of the least understood and most difficult to measure. I don’t pretend to have all the answers, but I do think we’re asking the right questions.

If this topic resonates with you, I’d love for you to join me on this journey. Subscribe to my Substack for conversations about business development, leadership, trust, visibility, and the relationships that ultimately create opportunity.

And if you have thoughts on this topic, I’d genuinely love to hear them. How does your firm measure business development? What have you found works well? What are we getting wrong?

Drop a comment below and let’s continue the conversation.

BD for the last week

Last week I clocked over 60 hours of business development. I was at the NW Indian Gaming Conference (photo attached) for the first three days. Then was at a Seattle Mariners game that our company hosted. Bookended my week with breakfasts, lunches, and a happy hour enjoying the PNW sunshine. Check my Linkedin to read all about these events.

#relationshiptoroi #beforethepipeline #trustleadstorevenue #businessdevelopment

And I agree.

Some of the strongest pursuits I have been involved with were won long before procurement ever began. The relationships were established. The client knew who we were. We understood their organization, their challenges, and their goals. We had invested time learning about their business and demonstrating that we genuinely cared about helping them succeed. By the time the RFP arrived, we were not introducing ourselves. We were continuing a conversation.

That is how business development should work.

One thing I want to clarify, however, is that I am not advocating for showing up only when you hear an RFP is coming.

Clients can feel that.

In fact, most of us can.

We’ve all experienced the person who suddenly starts calling, emailing, inviting us to coffee, or asking how we’re doing after months or years of silence. It doesn’t take long to figure out that the relationship is tied to an opportunity.

People don’t want to feel like a pursuit strategy.

They want to feel like a person.

The strongest business development professionals I know build relationships whether there is an opportunity on the horizon or not. They stay connected because they are genuinely curious about their clients, their organizations, and the challenges they are facing. Opportunities eventually emerge from those relationships, but the relationship itself is never treated as a transaction.

Ironically, that is what makes those relationships so valuable when an opportunity does arise.

Over the years, I have also noticed a trap that many pursuit teams fall into. Sometimes they become so focused on preparing for an opportunity that they stop paying attention to what the client is actually telling them.

I have sat in countless pursuit planning meetings where everyone around the table was convinced they knew exactly what the client wanted. Someone says the client is focused on sustainability. Someone else says schedule certainty is the most important thing. Another person insists that innovation will be the deciding factor. Before long, the entire team has aligned around a win strategy, marketing is building messaging around it, and technical staff are tailoring solutions to support it.

The problem is not that these ideas are wrong.
The problem is that they are often based on assumptions.

And once we start building a narrative, we naturally begin looking for evidence that confirms it.

I think this is simply human nature. We all do it. Once we believe we understand the situation, we tend to filter new information through what we already think we know. We pay attention to comments that support our assumptions and unintentionally dismiss the ones that challenge them.

The danger is that clients are not static.

Leadership changes. Funding changes. Political priorities change. Communities evolve. New pressures emerge. A client who was focused on growth two years ago may now be focused on operational efficiency. A school district that was once talking about innovation may now be consumed by budget constraints and deferred maintenance. A healthcare organization planning expansion may suddenly be facing workforce shortages and looking for entirely different solutions.

Meanwhile, pursuit teams are often still operating from information gathered months, or sometimes years, earlier.

I think this is where many firms misunderstand the purpose of business development. We often talk about relationships as a way to gain access. We want the meeting, the introduction, the seat at the table. Those things certainly matter. But the greatest value of relationships is not access. It is understanding.

Strong relationships allow us to keep learning.

They give us permission to ask questions. They help us understand what is changing inside an organization. They provide context that never appears in an RFP. They reveal concerns that clients may not yet be ready to state publicly. They help us see around corners.

When I think about the best business developers I know, they are rarely the people who walk into a room convinced they have all the answers. They are usually the most curious people in the room. They continue asking questions long after everyone else believes they understand the situation.

What has changed?

What are we missing?

Who else should we be talking to?

What is keeping this client awake at night?

Those questions have often uncovered more useful information than an entire pursuit planning session.

The longer I work in this industry, the more convinced I become that curiosity is a competitive advantage. Confidence is important. Clients need to trust that we can solve their problems. But confidence without curiosity can become dangerous because it convinces us that we already know.

And the moment we think we already know, we stop listening.

So how much work should you do before the RFP drops?

A lot.

Build relationships. Understand the market. Learn your client’s business. Study their challenges. Invest in the relationship long before an opportunity appears.

But leave room for discovery.

Leave room for the possibility that your assumptions are incomplete.

Leave room for the client to tell you a different story than the one you have been telling yourself.

Because preparation creates readiness. It should not create certainty.

The firms that consistently win are not always the firms that prepared the most. More often, they are the firms that remained curious the longest. And in a profession built around solving problems, that may be one of the most valuable skills we can develop.

#curiosity #relationshiptoroi #beprepared #businessdevelopment #businessstrategy

I have to confess, when I first entered business development, I thought that was exactly what success looked like.

I thought it was sharp outfits, packed networking events, knowing the right people, and being seen in the right rooms. I thought it was about being polished enough, connected enough, and visible enough that opportunities would naturally follow.

And to be fair, some of that does matter.

Relationships often begin with visibility. People need to know who you are before they can trust you. Networking opens doors. Showing up consistently matters. Being active in organizations matters. Investing time into the industry matters.

But over time, I started noticing something.

The people everyone truly trusted were not always the loudest people in the room. They were not always the flashiest. They were not always the ones working the room the hardest.

The people others leaned on, called first, and brought into important conversations had something deeper. They made people feel safe.

The more events I attended, the more active I became in organizations, and the more I sat back and observed, the more I realized that surface-level charisma may get you in the door, but it does not sustain relationships.

What builds lasting relationships is depth. What makes someone a trusted advisor, true collaborator, and eventually even a friend, is not perfection. It is honesty.

Here is the lesson I learned: People trust honesty faster than perfection.

And I do not mean oversharing or turning conversations into mini therapy sessions. I mean real transparency. The kind that says here’s where we are. Here’s what we’re learning. Here’s what we’re trying to improve. Here’s what we need from our partners to make this work better.

That kind of openness changes relationships. It shifts them from transactional to collaborative. And collaboration is where trust starts turning into ROI.

Recently, I attended our Trade Partners Summit, and honestly, what stood out to me most was not the presentations, the slides, or the market updates. It was the tone set by leadership from the very beginning. There was a level of transparency in the room that, personally, I felt refreshing.

Leadership openly shared where the company has been, where we are now, and where we are trying to go. Not in polished corporate language designed to make everything sound perfect, but in a grounded and honest way. There was acknowledgment of challenges. There were conversations about lessons learned. There were discussions around market realities, operational pressures, and areas where we can improve.

And what struck me most was this: transparency invited transparency. Because leadership was willing to be open, our trade partners became open too. They shared what they were seeing in the market, what clients are nervous about, what pressures subcontractors are feeling, what communication gaps exist on projects, what frustrations happen in the field, and what has worked well and what has not.

Some of the most valuable conversations happened after the formal presentations ended. Over drinks and smaller one-on-one conversations, people started talking honestly about where trust breaks down and what partnership actually requires.

I am not talking about performative partnership but real partnership. The kind where people can have difficult conversations early instead of waiting until problems escalate. That kind of dialogue does not happen when people feel like they are walking into a performance. It happens when people feel safe enough to tell the truth.

And that matters because trust is not built from one impressive presentation or perfectly rehearsed meeting.

Trust is built when people believe you will communicate honestly, especially when things are difficult.

Trust is built when people know you will tell them the truth, you will communicate early, you will not hide problems, you are willing to listen, you are willing to improve, and you are willing to take accountability.

That is vulnerability in leadership.

In business development, vulnerability is often misunderstood. People hear the word vulnerability and immediately associate it with weakness. I actually think vulnerability requires confidence. Because it takes confidence to admit you do not have everything figured out.

It takes confidence to ask partners what they really think and be willing to hear the answer. Confidence to create space for honest feedback instead of defensiveness. When leaders do that, relationships deepen faster.

The irony is that many firms say they want stronger partnerships while operating from fear. Fear of looking imperfect. Fear of losing leverage. Fear of difficult conversations. Fear of admitting mistakes. Fear that transparency will somehow weaken their position.

When everyone stays surface-level, we keep conversations safe and we protect optics, and often times we allude to what sounds good instead of what is true. But we all know surface-level relationships rarely lead to long-term opportunity.

The firms and leaders who build lasting trust are usually the ones willing to communicate clearly and honestly long before there is a problem.

Clients remember that.
Trade partners remember that.
Consultants remember that.

Transparency creates predictability. And predictability creates trust.

When people know how you communicate, how you respond under pressure, and whether you are willing to have honest conversations, they begin to feel safer building with you. This is also why relationship-building alone is not enough.

You can know a lot of people and still not have trusted relationships. You can attend every networking event and still not be the person someone calls when stakes are high.

Relationship to ROI is not about collecting contacts or becoming the most visible person in the room.

It is about creating enough trust that people are willing to build with you, solve problems with you, advocate for you, and bring you into opportunities when they matter most.

Trust grows when people see consistency between what you say and how you operate. That requires openness, follow-through, communication, accountability, and humility. And often, trust begins the moment someone decides to stop pretending everything is perfect.

Because real partnership begins where real conversation starts.

#relationshiptoroi #trustedadvisor #vulnerabilityisunderrated