Market Recap

Trade Ideas

Income Investing

Market Recap | August 24, 2026

U.S. stocks started the week under pressure as investors positioned for a high-stakes stretch featuring Nvidia earnings, July PCE inflation data, and the Jackson Hole symposium. The main debate is whether elevated Treasury yields and stretched AI expectations can coexist with the market’s still-positive year-to-date trend.cnbc+1

Market snapshot

Entering Monday’s session, futures pointed to a softer open

The Nasdaq’s relative weakness and the VIX uptick point to renewed caution around technology and other long-duration growth assets

Treasury Doubles Long-Bond Buybacks as It Moves to Support Market Liquidity

The U.S. Treasury is increasing the size of its buyback operations for longer-dated government bonds, a move designed to improve liquidity in a part of the market that has faced rising yields and uneven demand. Beginning September 9, Treasury will at least double the maximum size of each targeted operation—from $2 billion to at least $4 billion—for nominal coupon securities in the 10–20 year and 20–30 year maturity ranges. The change will run through November 4, the end of the current refunding quarter

Stock trading idea , lets talk about Hudson Technologies is a small-cap refrigerant-services company with an unusually meaningful government-contract catalyst. The headline is real: its newly re-awarded DLA contract has a $210 million ceiling over five years, nearly equal to HDSN’s roughly $239 million market cap—but that comparison can be misleading because the contract is an IDIQ purchasing vehicle, not $210 million of guaranteed profit or booked backlog

What Hudson does

HDSN sells and manages refrigerants and industrial gases, reclaims used refrigerants, performs HVAC/refrigeration system services, and has carbon-credit-related activities. Its central investment theme is the regulatory phase-down of higher-global-warming-potential HFC refrigerants: constrained virgin supply can increase the value and importance of reclaimed refrigerant inventory and reclamation capabilities.

The business has three practical drivers:

Refrigerant sales volume and price.

Margins on owned refrigerant inventory, which can move sharply with commodity-like refrigerant pricing.

Higher-value services: reclamation, diagnostics, system optimization, industrial gases, and the DLA relationship.

This is not a traditional defense contractor. The military relationship is a steady government logistics/supply contract attached to its refrigerant-and-gas business, not a weapons, aerospace, or defense-technology program.

DLA / military contract

In August 2026, Hudson was re-awarded the DLA IDIQ contract after the initial October 2025 award was challenged and rescinded during a competitor’s bid protest. The new initial term runs through August 4, 2031, with a DLA option to extend another five years through July 31, 2036

The central point: $210 million is the potential value of the five-year IDIQ base periodnot five-year guaranteed revenue. An IDIQ sets a maximum ordering framework; actual revenue depends on delivery orders, agency demand, pricing, and execution.

2025 DLA revenue was $38.2 million.

2024 DLA revenue was $35.5 million.

2023 DLA revenue was $53.0 million.

First-half 2026 DLA revenue was $15.8 million, versus $17.7 million in first-half 2025.sec+1

So the award is better viewed as a durability/de-risking event that protects an existing, material revenue channel rather than an automatic $210 million growth windfall.

Market-cap comparison

At an approximately $238.6 million market capitalization, the $210 million five-year award is about 88% of market cap.

Looking at the chart, I would keep this on a watch list. Waiting till the 10EMA , crosses abvoe 20EMA and price is above the 50EMA.

Income Investing powered by

is a newer weekly-income ETF built around synthetic autocallable notes linked to a U.S. large-cap equity benchmark. Think of it as a structured-product income strategy placed inside an ETF wrapper—not a straightforward stock or covered-call fund. It launched May 12, 2026.

What it owns

Rather than holding a basket of S&P 500 stocks directly, VAIE primarily holds a total-return swap with Goldman Sachs tied to its “AUTOC500” autocallable strategy, alongside Treasury bills/cash collateral. As of August 24, the swap represented about 99.9% of net assets, with T-bills used as collateral.

How the strategy works

The autocallable structure is designed to

Pay weekly distributions when the underlying conditions are met.

Offer some downside buffer through a specified barrier.

Cap or limit upside because autocallable notes can be redeemed early after favorable market performance.

Produce income that is contingent—not guaranteed—and can change materially with market volatility, rates, and the underlying index behavior.

In plain English: VAIE is giving up much of the “unlimited upside” of stocks in exchange for a higher stated income stream plus conditional downside protection

The big distinction is that the 16.30% is a distribution rate, not the same as a guaranteed yield or total return; the much lower 30-day SEC yield is a useful reminder that headline payout and underlying economic income are different measures.

Key trade-offs

Potential fit

You want frequent cash distributions.

You understand structured-note payoffs and are comfortable sacrificing upside.

You want a small satellite allocation rather than a core S&P 500 replacement.

Main risks

Counterparty risk: the main exposure is delivered through a Goldman Sachs swap.

Autocall/early-redemption risk: a strong market may call the structure away, limiting continued upside participation.

Barrier risk: “downside protection” is conditional; a large decline beyond the barrier can still lead to significant losses.

Payout risk: distributions can decline, and they may include return of capital rather than pure investment income.

New/small-fund risk: VAIE has a short live history and relatively modest assets, so there is little long-term evidence for how it performs across different market regimes.

Bottom line

VAIE is best viewed as a high-distribution structured-income vehicle, not a high-growth equity fund. Before buying, I’d track NAV total return versus the amount paid out, review each Section 19a notice for return-of-capital treatment, and keep position sizing conservative until it has more history through a real correction.

The primary leadership remained in technology/AI and energy. Investors were encouraged by softer inflation readings earlier in the week and stronger odds of the Fed holding rates steady in September. At the same time, the market is increasingly sensitive to elevated valuations and the crowded AI trade, especially ahead of Nvidia’s August 26 earnings.

Oil was the macro wildcard. Its advance can help energy stocks but also risks reviving inflation concerns, cutting into consumer purchasing power, and keeping the Fed cautious. That tension was evident Friday: consumer sentiment weakened, one-year inflation expectations edged up to 4.3%, and retail sales unexpectedly fell 0.6% in July.

Treasuries and yield curve

Long-duration Treasuries sold off sharply, creating a bear steepening: long-term yields climbed more than short-term yields.

For an equity/options trader, 4.7% on the 10-year is an important level to monitor. If the 10-year keeps moving higher while growth data soften, that is generally a tougher mix for long-duration growth stocks, rate-sensitive sectors, and richly valued AI names. Conversely, a retreat in yields could relieve valuation pressure and support another risk-on move

HYG is giving a cautiously constructive, not euphoric market signal: short- and intermediate-term credit conditions look stable, but its failure to regain the 200-day moving average suggests investors are not fully dismissing longer-term growth, inflation, and rate risks.

Why HYG matters

holds U.S.-dollar high-yield (“junk”) corporate bonds. Because lower-rated companies depend more on favorable economic and financing conditions, is a useful credit-risk gauge

Rising HYG generally means investors are comfortable owning lower-quality corporate debt—often a risk-on confirmation for equities.

Falling HYG, especially sharply or with rising volume, can signal widening credit spreads and a risk-off shift before or alongside equity weakness.

It is also sensitive to Treasury yields: rising yields can pressure HYG even if credit conditions are not deteriorating.

HYG’s indicated distribution yield is about 5.94%, and its year-to-date daily total return was 2.32% through August 14

Levels to watch

Bullish confirmation: A sustained move above roughly $80.20–$80.35 would reclaim the 200-day average and recent range high. That would be a cleaner risk-on/credit confirmation.

First support: Roughly $79.45–$79.65, where the 20-day and 50-day averages sit.

More serious caution: A break below $79.35 would violate the recent one-month low. A continued decline toward $78.57 would suggest more meaningful deterioration in credit appetite.

What to watch next week

Import/export price data — Tuesday, Aug. 18 at 8:30 a.m. ET. This is the main scheduled BLS inflation-related release next week and can influence bond yields, the dollar and metals

Retail earnings Walmart and Target report next week, alongside Home Depot and Lowe’s. Following July’s 0.6% drop in retail sales, their commentary on demand, margins, pricing, and lower-income consumers matters more than usuall

Oil and Middle East headlines. WTI above roughly $80 and Brent in the high-$80s keep energy strong but make the inflation narrative less comfortable. A fresh oil spike could push yields higher and pressure broad-market multiples.

Long-end Treasury yields. Watch whether the 10-year holds above 4.7% and whether the 30-year remains near or above 5.25%. Continued steepening would be a warning that the bond market—not near-term Fed policy—is becoming the market’s main constraint.

S&P 500 behavior near record highs. Friday’s retreat was modest and the VIX stayed near 14, so the uptrend remains intact. But weak breadth, a yield breakout, or failed rebounds in AI/semiconductors would argue for more consolidation rather than chasing extended calls.

Positioning ahead of Nvidia. Nvidia reports August 26, so next week may feature positioning and volatility in semis, data-center infrastructure, power, and AI-adjacent names even before the actual earnings release.

The practical market setup is: bullish trend in equities, but with growing rate and oil risk beneath the surface. For directional options, it favors waiting for confirmation around yields and index support rather than assuming record highs automatically lead to a straight-line continuation

SPY Expected Move

Put Credit Spread Idea $SPX

Sell (Short Put): 7770 Strike

Buy (Long Put): 7740 Strike

Net Credit & Cost Breakdown (Per 1 Contract)

Net Credit (Expected at Mid Price):

Mid Credit=$29.95−$20.10=$9.85 per share ($985.00 total credit received)

(At Natural/Worst Fill: $29.70−$20.30=$9.40 or $940.00)

Max Risk / Capital Required (Cost):

Width of Strikes=7770−7740=$30.00 points ($3,000)

Max Risk (At Mid Credit)=$30.00−$9.85=$20.15 per share ($2,015.00 collateral held)

Summary

Net Credit Received: $985.00 (at midpoint)

Max Loss / Margin Requirement: $2,015.00

Max Gain / Loss Ratio: Return on Risk is ~48.9% ($985 / $2,015)Risk-to-Reward Ratio: 2.05 : 1 (You are risking $2.05 to make $1.00)

Return on Risk: 48.88% ($985 / $2,015)

Breakeven Point at Expiration: 7,760.15 (Short strike 7,770 − Net Credit $9.85)

Key Risk Factors

Downside Price Exposure: SPX is currently trading around 7,785.76. The short 7,770 strike is only ~15.76 points (~0.20%) below the current spot price. A minor pull-back in the index puts this trade in the loss zone.

Pin Risk / Full Loss Threshold: If SPX drops below 7,740.00 by expiration (a decline of ~0.59%), you suffer the full maximum loss of $2,015.00.

Vega / Volatility Expansion Risk: An unexpected surge in implied volatility (IV) will expand option premiums, causing the spread price to rise and creating unrealized losses even if the underlying index stays stagnant.

5-Day Time Horizon: With only 5 days remaining until the August 21 expiration, gamma risk is elevated—meaning the position’s Delta will shift rapidly on small price movements toward the short strike.

Recent Headlines

Iraq holds direct talks with US and Iran over Hormuz oil passage

US national debt crosses $40 trillion as analysts warn of 'silent default' risk

J.P. Morgan cuts Oracle price target, lifts Microsoft's

Bitcoin passes 20.07 million mined coins as support thins

Income ETF Spotlight Powered by

The Edge Report has a special Offer - Free 7 Day Trial check your Portfolio Safety Score , Distrubtion Score , ETF screener , Alpha Rankings , many education tools and videos

Free 7 Day Trial

U.S. equities enter the week at record or near-record levels after a strong, tech-led rally. The focus now shifts from earnings momentum to whether this week’s inflation and consumer data validate the market’s expectations for a less-restrictive Fed path.

Some catalyst to look out for this week

Wednesday, Aug. 12 — CPI, 8:30 a.m. ET: The marquee release. Reuters’ poll expects headline CPI at 3.4% year over year and core CPI at 2.5%. A hotter print could lift yields and pressure long-duration tech; a softer result would reinforce the recent risk-on move

Thursday, Aug. 13 — PPI and jobless claims, 8:30 a.m. ET: Producer prices will help traders judge whether pipeline inflation is easing or building

Friday, Aug. 14 — retail sales, 8:30 a.m. ET; sentiment, 10:00 a.m. ET: This is the consumer-strength check. Strong spending with tame inflation is the preferred “soft landing” setup; weak spending may revive growth concerns.

The S&P has broken above its 3 Month Range of 7,250 to 7,600 while volatility went down. The CPI/PPI print could sequence could create sharp moves in index futures, yields, the dollar, and mega-cap tech

For options traders consider defining risk before Weds and Thurs morning ,than relying on a directional move IV may increase into reports and then compress afterwards

Lets dive into some Macro data

Put to Call Ratio is currently 0.769 falling , which means 77 Put (options) to 100 call (options). What does this tell us ? Options flow is becoming more Call heavy , this is near term bullish sentiment , but not yet extreme bullish

Lets take a look at market breadth comparing $SPY / $RSP divergence

The rising RSP/SPY ratio means industrials, financials, materials, smaller large-caps, and other non-mega-cap parts of the S&P 500 are contributing more.

Broad Market participation is increasing

The current message is risk-on rotation and improving breadth, not necessarily “sell tech.”

$SPY implied move thru 8/21/26 *source Barcharts

Sectors

Crypto

10 Year Treasury Yield

The Blue Print To Wealth

As I promised on Gold Digger Media podcast I would share some of my Ebook Blue Print to Wealth

Blueprint To Wealth

230KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

New Segment for the Edge Report powered by Dividend Visions

is an affordable, highly useful, and growing platform for investors of all types... but especially retail income investors. We know because that is what we are at our core, myself and CEO / Founder Bert Sweet, although we obviously stay diversified and also seek growth investments too. We wanted to provide users with powerful data, visualizations, and tools to get more accurate information on their portfolios in this volatile market. Knowledge is power with so many similar ETFs and stocks out there in the new global economy evolving daily.

Get your 7 Day free trial here:

https://www.dividendvision.com/?via=theedgereport

Today we are going to look at ETF

An autocallable ETF is an ETF that packages a portfolio of equity-linked derivative contracts designed to pay high, conditional income. In exchange for that income, investors take meaningful downside/tail risk: if the referenced equity index drops far enough, coupons can stop and principal can be impaired.

What you might have missed from The Edge Report this week on social media

Kevin Warsh is trying to present himself as a tougher, more disciplined Federal Reserve chair, but his early messaging has created a different impression

A hawkish tone without a clear roadmap, a political shadow he cannot fully escape, and a bond market that is no longer willing to give policymakers the benefit of the doubt. The result is a Fed chair who says he wants a policy “regime change,” yet has left investors unsure about what that change actually means in practice.

The problem with the latest speech

Warsh’s latest post meeting remarks were supposed to reassure markets that the Fed remains serious about inflation, but the reaction suggested the opposite. Reporting after the July 2026 meeting said his comments left investors uncertain about how aggressive the Fed intends to be, even as he pledged an unwavering commitment to bring inflation down.

CNBC also reported that the Fed’s statement under Warsh was shorter and stripped out details investors had relied on, including more explicit guidance and even voting information, making the Fed’s reaction function harder to read.

That matters because central bank credibility is not built only on policy rates. It is built on communication, consistency, and a clear sense of what officials will do when inflation, labor data, or bond yields move against them. Warsh’s problem is that he is trying to sound tough while keeping his options open, and markets usually interpret that combination as uncertainty rather than strength.

What Warsh says his policy will be

Warsh has laid out a broad framework rather than a detailed rulebook. He has said there is no “soft inflation target,” that the Fed needs to “get monetary policy right,” and that a broader rethink of how the institution operates may be necessary. He has also said the public will “see no changes” in Fed independence and has emphasized that prices remain too high.

Taken together, that points to four claimed priorities

Restoring inflation credibility and reinforcing the 2 percent target.

Reducing the Fed’s reliance on over engineered messaging and lengthy forward guidance.

Reassessing the framework for projections, communications, and possibly the balance sheet.

Maintaining formal independence from the White House, at least in institutional design.

The problem is that these are still principles, not a roadmap. Investors know what Warsh says he values, but they are still trying to determine what conditions would actually trigger hikes, cuts, or a tolerance for tighter financial conditions coming from the Treasury market itself.

Why critics call him political

The political critique of Warsh is not just about Donald Trump. It is about the perception that Warsh’s public tone changes with the political environment. Critics argue that he sounds more hawkish when Democrats are in office and more accommodating when Republicans are in power, which makes him look less like a fixed monetary thinker and more like a political weather vane.

Examples are important here. In September 2009, with Barack Obama in office and unemployment still rising, Warsh was described as remaining “more worried about upside risks to inflation,” even in a weak economy. During that broader period, his rhetoric was associated with warnings that the Fed risked staying “too accommodative for too long,” reflecting a tight-money bias during a Democratic administration.

By contrast, in 2018, during Trump’s first term, Warsh co-authored a Wall Street Journal op-ed arguing the Fed should pause rate hikes, a stance widely read as more dovish than his earlier posture.

In 2025 and 2026, his messaging again shifted toward policy recalibration, a new framework, and the idea that structural forces such as productivity and AI could help contain inflation, themes that fit more comfortably with a Republican administration that wants lower rates without openly demanding easy money on paper.

The clearest political flashpoint came during his 2026 confirmation hearing, when he declined to say Trump lost the 2020 election. That moment was not about monetary policy directly, but it affected how every subsequent policy statement was interpreted: once a nominee appears unwilling to contradict Trump on a straightforward factual question, even legitimate policy nuance starts to look like political calibration.

The Druckenmiller-Bessent network

Warsh is also not operating in a vacuum. Reporting has tied him to a macro-financial network that includes Stanley Druckenmiller and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Barron’s reported that Druckenmiller mentored both Warsh and Bessent, while Yahoo Finance reported that Warsh has been a partner at Duquesne since 2011 and that his relationship with Druckenmiller has been described as unusually close.

That does not prove policy capture, but it does matter. It suggests Warsh emerges from a shared intellectual and market ecosystem where fiscal policy, Treasury financing, dollar strength, and global capital flows are all treated as part of one macro puzzle rather than separate silos.

For markets, that raises a real question is Warsh running a traditional inflation-targeting Fed or a broader macro strategy that must quietly coordinate with Treasury realities?

Europe and Japan are moving too

The global backdrop complicates everything. The European Central Bank raised rates in June 2026, lifting the deposit facility to 2.25 percent, the main refinancing rate to 2.40 percent, and the marginal lending facility to 2.65 percent. That was the ECB’s first hike since 2023 and reflected concern that renewed geopolitical inflation pressures could become embedded.

Japan is on its own path, but it is no longer the old zero-rate outlier. By July 2026, the Bank of Japan had kept its short-term policy rate at 1.0 percent, after previous hikes had already brought rates to their highest level in many years. In other words, two of the world’s most important central banks are no longer acting as if the age of permanently free money is intact.

Does the U.S. have to follow?

Not automatically. The Fed sets policy for domestic conditions, not to mimic Frankfurt or Tokyo. But in practice, global rates still matter because they influence exchange rates, capital flows, imported inflation, and the relative attractiveness of U.S. debt.

If Europe is hiking and Japan is normalizing, a too-dovish Fed risks putting more pressure on the dollar and potentially allowing inflation expectations to drift.

On the other hand, if the Fed tightens aggressively while Treasury yields are already elevated, it risks compounding a financing problem for both the government and the private economy.

That is why the better answer is that the U.S. may not need to follow mechanically, but it cannot ignore the global direction of travel. Warsh’s vague communication matters more in that setting, because markets are trying to figure out whether the Fed will validate global tightening, resist it, or let the Treasury market do the work.

The fiscal trap debt, deficits, and Treasury yields

The biggest issue hanging over U.S. monetary policy may not be the overnight rate at all. It may be the cost of financing a government with very large deficits and a huge debt stock in a world of structurally higher yields.

Reuters reported that higher Treasury yields feed directly into borrowing costs and that the 10-year yield moved above 4.5 percent at points this year, while the long bond has also faced sharp pressure.

Interest costs are already climbing. The Peter G. Peterson Foundation reported that through the ninth month of fiscal year 2026, interest payments on the national debt were 10.5 percent higher than a year earlier.

Treasury data also emphasizes the mechanical link: total interest expense depends on the amount of federal debt outstanding and the rates investors demand to hold it.

This is why every rise in yields matters twice. First, higher yields tighten financial conditions for households, firms, and the broader economy. Second, they increase the government’s own financing burden, making deficits harder to stabilize and increasing political pressure for lower rates, financial repression, or some inflation tolerance.

Can inflation make the debt cheaper?

There is a theory, sometimes whispered more than stated openly, that inflation can help reduce the real burden of debt over time.

The logic is simple if nominal growth and tax receipts rise faster than the fixed face value of older debt, the real value of that debt declines. In that narrow sense, inflation can erode debt.

But the trade-off is brutal. If bond investors believe inflation is being tolerated as a fiscal solution, they demand higher yields to compensate, and those higher yields make new borrowing more expensive. That means the state can only “inflate away” debt if markets remain calm enough not to punish refinancing costs immediately, which is a much narrower path than many casual inflation theories admit.

This is one reason Warsh’s position is so complicated. He wants to sound like a hard money Fed chair, but he is operating in a fiscal regime where sustained high yields increase stress on the Treasury, and where too much anti-inflation zeal could collide with the government’s borrowing needs.

What matters most going forward

The key issue is not whether Warsh talks like a hawk. He plainly does. The key issue is whether he can establish a coherent reaction function that convinces markets he will fight inflation without pretending the Treasury market, deficit path, and global central-bank shifts do not exist.

That is why his vagueness is not a minor communications flaw. It sits at the center of the current macro debate. If his message remains broad and politically adaptable, critics will keep arguing that his tone changes with the party in power and that his real constraint is not the Fed’s inflation mandate but the fiscal and political system around it.

A cleaner test will come when Warsh faces a genuine conflict: sticky inflation, rising Treasury yields, and direct or indirect pressure for lower rates. At that point, the market will learn whether his “regime change” means a serious defense of price stability, or merely a new vocabulary for the same old political balancing act.

Lets start out with a deep dive in the macros for the market and see what we can figure out what the data is telling us.

Put to Call Ratios

A put to call ratio below 0.7 is often treated as bullish, while a reading above 1.0 is often treated as bearish. At .99 it appears it is slowly creeping up. Its showing that Index plus the options flow is put heavy , but not in extreme. In sentiment terms, that leans cautious/bearish in the short term, but not yet at the kind of panic level that usually marks major washout lows.

How to trade around it

Short Term elevated put volume means Skew and Downside Vol may be richer so selling index/ETF downside via spreads or structured trades can be attractive if your technical don’t confirm a major break.

we are looking at Bull Credit Spreads at Spy Resistance Level , due to the PCC slowing raising to 1.00-Bull put spread matches a view of VOL elevated, sentiment cautious, but no clear technical breakdown which is exactly what a near‑1.0 put/call ratio often represents.

Next lets look at the $MMFI Index Chart, this tracks the percentages of NYSE ( broad market) stocks closing above their 50 day Simple Moving Avg. basically a breadth oscillator

Using the $PCC Chart and $MMFI Chart we have put together a sentiment + breadth frame work

Now lets take a look at the very important 10Y Treasury Note Yield , keep in mind high the yield the more downside pressure on stock indices.

Direct rate trades we are looking at here at the edge report

Buying a Put option 85 strike (Sept.18,2026) cost $218.00 Delta .69 break even $82.82 68% probity of profit- Max loss 218.00 Max Profit $8,282.00. we are looking for 25%-30% profit

One last thing we need to pay attention to is the Japan Carry trade slowly unwinding. The Japanese yen is hovering near 40‑year lows against the U.S. dollar even after the Bank of Japan raised its policy rate to 1%, the highest level since the mid‑1990s. At the same time, Tokyo has been tightening rules and screening on foreign investment in sensitive sectors, which effectively makes it harder for certain foreign investors—especially those linked to foreign governments to deploy capital into key Japanese companies. The Edge Report will continue to follow this situation.

Other Macro & Economic Data

They are losing because they are looking at the wrong data — or no data at all.

If you want an edge in today’s market, you do not have to be a genius. You just need to check a few key signals, over and over, that tell you what is really happening under the surface.

Think of the market like a football game.

The final score is what everyone talks about, but the real story lives in first downs, yards per play, and turnovers.

Prices are the score. The data we will talk about today is the play‑by‑play.

The company’s “truth” – EDGAR

Before you trust any stock pitch, you should know what the company is actually telling regulators.

That is what EDGAR is for.

EDGAR https://www.sec.gov/edgar/search/ is the SEC official database where public companies file their reports with the SEC. You will find

10‑K and 10‑Q reports (annual and quarterly)

Risk factors and business descriptions

Insider buying and selling

Debt, cash flow, and share count details

This is the “no excuses” version of the story. Headlines can spin. Social media can hype. Filings are the closest thing you have to the source.

If you want to keep it simple, start with the latest 10‑K and 10‑Q. Look for revenue, profits, debt, and any big changes the company is talking about.

The backdrop – FRED and the 10‑Year Treasury

A great company can still struggle in a bad environment.

That is why you also need to understand the backdrop the business is operating in. This is where FRED and the 10‑year Treasury yield come in.

FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data) is a free database from the St. Louis Fed that tracks a huge list of economic series, including interest rates and Treasury yields.fred.stlouisfed.gov

One of the most important numbers on the planet is the 10‑year U.S. Treasury yield. It influences

Mortgage rates and borrowing costs

How investors value growth stocks

The relative attractiveness of stocks vs. bonds

When the 10‑year yield is rising sharply, it is often a headwind for long‑duration growth names and for highly leveraged companies. When it is falling, it can act as a tailwind for risk assets

You do not have to become a bond trader. Just ask simple questions like

Are rates trending higher or lower?

Are we in a “higher for longer” world, or is the market pricing cuts?

Does this environment help or hurt the type of stock I am buying?

What is inside your ETFs – ETF.com

A lot of investors own ETFs because they sound safer or simpler.

But here is the trap: if you own five different ETFs that all hold the same top 10 names, you are not diversified. You are concentrated and just paying multiple expense ratios for it.

Sites like ETF.com let you:

See the top holdings inside each ETF

Check sector and country weights

Compare overlap between funds

This is how you answer questions like

“Do I really own 100 stocks, or do I own the same 20 names five different ways?”

“Is my ‘diversified’ portfolio actually just a bet on large‑cap U.S. tech?”

Understanding ETF overlap is especially important for income investors using dividend ETFs, covered call funds, and bond funds. It tells you if your income stream is actually coming from different places or the same narrow slice of the market.

Market Sentiment – Put/Call ratio

Now we move from fundamentals to feelings.

The put/call ratio is one of the simplest sentiment gauges out there. It compares how many put options are trading versus call options.

When the put/call ratio is high, more people are buying protection or betting on downside. That usually means fear.

When the put/call ratio is low, more people are chasing upside with calls. That usually means greed or confidence.

It is not a perfect timing tool, but extreme readings often line up with emotional turning points in the market.

When everyone is terrified and loading up on puts, that is often when downside risk is actually shrinking. When everyone is confident and loading up on calls, risk of a shakeout can quietly be rising.

Credit stress – HYG (high‑yield bonds)

Stocks get all the attention, but credit markets often flash warning signs first.

HYG is a popular ETF that holds high‑yield, or “junk,” bonds. Think of it as a rough proxy for how comfortable investors are lending money to weaker companies.

When HYG is stable or rising, credit conditions are usually okay.

When HYG is falling hard, especially with widening spreads, it suggests stress.

Why does this matter for equity investors?

Because when credit markets seize up, many leveraged companies face higher borrowing costs, refinancing risk, or even survival risk. Equity markets tend to catch up to credit markets, not the other way around.

Put simply if HYG is breaking down, pay attention. The “stress meter” is moving.

Connecting the dots – a simple mental dashboard

You do not have to watch every data point every day.

Instead, think in terms of a simple mental dashboard:

Company truth: EDGAR filings

Macro backdrop: FRED and the 10‑year yield

Fund structure: ETF.com and your ETF holdings

Sentiment: Put/call ratio

Credit stress: HYG and high‑yield spreads

Prices are the final output. This dashboard is the context.

It helps you move from “I feel like this” to “the data looks like this,” which is a huge step toward better decisions.

Step 7 The most important data – your own portfolio

Here is the part most people skip.

You can stare at EDGAR, FRED, ETF.com, the put/call ratio, the 10‑year, and HYG all day long. But if you are not tracking your own portfolio clearly, you are still flying blind.

At a minimum, you want to know:

How much income your portfolio produces each year

How that income is spread across months and positions

Where your biggest risks and concentrations are

How your drawdowns compare to your comfort level

Whether your allocations line up with your actual goals

This is especially critical for income investors. Price is noisy. Cash flow is the plan.

Why I like using Dividend Vision

That is why I like tools that focus on income and portfolio “health” instead of just prices and charts. Dividend Vision is an affordable, highly useful, and growing platform for investors of all types... but especially retail income investors.

I spoke with CMO & Co owner Mike Schiemer, CETF CBDA “We know because that is what we are at our core, myself and CEO / Founder Bert Sweet, although we obviously stay diversified and also seek growth investments too. We wanted to provide users with powerful data, visualizations, and tools to get more accurate information on their portfolios in this volatile market.”

Knowledge is power with so many similar ETFs and stocks out there in the new global economy evolving daily

Dividend Vision is built with that mind‑set.

Help you forecast dividend income over time

Show payout timing so you can see which months are heavy or light

Consolidate holdings from major brokers into one view

Offer visuals like treemaps, donut charts, and other graphics to show allocation and risk, not just a list of

In other words, it takes portfolio data that would normally live in a messy spreadsheet and turns it into something you can read quickly.

Free Standard account + 7‑day Pro trial

For readers of The Edge Report, here is how you can try it without over‑committing:

• The Standard account is free, so you can track your portfolio and dividends

• Through our link, you also get a free 7‑day trial of the Pro plan, so you can test the advanced tools and visuals for a week before deciding

Start here:

Free Standard account + 7‑day Pro trial

https://www.dividendvision.com/?via=theedgereport

(If you use this link, The Edge Report may receive a commission, which helps support the research and tools we share. You pay the same or less than going direct.)

Final thought Data as a habit, not a flex

None of this is about flexing how “smart” you are.

It is about building a repeatable habit:

Check company truth.

Check the macro and rate backdrop.

Check what is inside your funds.

Check sentiment and credit stress.

Check your own portfolio health.

You do not need to be perfect. You just need to be a little more informed than the average trader who only looks at the price chart and their P&L.

That is the edge.

The stage is set, the stakes are locked in, and the battle for income supremacy is officially underway.

If you’ve been following the income investing space, you know that managing a portfolio isn't just about passive tracking anymore—it’s a competitive sport. The ETF Income Championship is bringing that exact energy to the market. We are looking at a high-intensity, year-long battle where 11 elite portfolio managers will go head-to-head to see who can engineer the ultimate income-focused engine.

As shown in image.png, the official countdown is on for the Official Draft Order Reveal, streaming live on X and YouTube.

The Stakes One Belt. One Year. One Champion.

This isn't a theoretical paper-trading exercise. Here is what's on the line as these managers step into the arena:

11 Portfolio Managers A curated field of sharp market minds vying for the crown.

$250,000 Portfolios: Each manager is commanding a real, substantial allocation of $250,000.

One Year to Prove It A grueling 12-month campaign starting July 5 to see whose systematic strategy holds up through every market twist and turn.

The Championship Belt At the end of the line, only one manager will hoist the official ETF Income Champion belt.

Real-Time Transparency Powered by Dividend Vision

What makes this competition truly unique is the absolute transparency demanded of the participants. There are no hidden moves or delayed reporting. Every public portfolio, live leaderboard update, and distribution tracking metric will be visible for the community to analyze in real time.

As a member of the Board of Advisors for Dividend Vision, I am incredibly proud that our team is serving as the Official Tracking & Leaderboard Platform for the entire championship.

Our team has engineered a dashboard built to handle the rigorous data tracking this tournament demands. We are providing the foundational tech to ensure every dividend payout, yield calculation, and portfolio fluctuation is captured with pinpoint accuracy, giving the community a front-row seat to the action.

Where to Watch

Make sure you lock in and catch the draft order reveal live to see where your favorite managers land on the board

When: Wednesday at 8:30 PM EST

Where: Streaming live on X and YouTube @DividendVision

The draft order sets the entire chessboard for the upcoming year. Who do you think secures the #1 overall pick, and what's your prediction for the winning ETF strategy?

Cybersecurity: The Line Item You Can’t Cut

When a CFO goes into recession mode, plenty of budgets get slashed. Travel, hiring, conference booths, even R&D can end up on the chopping block. What almost never gets touched in a serious way is cybersecurity.

Ransomware crews don’t care if GDP is negative. Nation‑states are not delaying their campaigns because your sales are soft. Boards know it, regulators know it, and cyber‑insurance underwriters definitely know it. That’s why security has quietly shifted from “IT project” to “non‑negotiable operating expense.”

If I’m building a portfolio for the next decade, I want exposure to those non‑negotiable line items. In this post, I’m walking through my 2024–2026 cybersecurity watch list, how I’d “layer the cake” in a portfolio, and where I’d consider adding simple options overlays like LEAPS or a wheel framework.

Why cyber spending holds up

Even when the economy wobbles, two forces keep cyber budgets alive.

First, attackers actually lean into turbulence. Employees are distracted, processes are changing, and controls can get sloppy. That’s perfect hunting ground for phishing, credential theft, and ransomware. Cutting security spend at the exact moment risk is rising is a career‑ending move for a C‑suite.

Second, more of the pressure is now top‑down. Regulators, auditors, and insurance carriers are writing concrete requirements into policies and rulebooks. “Do you have MFA and modern endpoint protection?” is becoming as basic a question as “Do you have audited financials?” Companies can trim around the edges, but there is a hard lower bound to how far they can cut.

That’s the backdrop for the names on the list: Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike, Fortinet, Zscaler, and Okta. Together they cover network security, endpoint, identity, and zero‑trust access — essentially the modern defensive stack.

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) from firewall vendor to security operating system

Palo Alto Networks is probably the cleanest example of how this space has matured. They started as a next‑gen firewall company. Now they’re pitching themselves as a full “security operating system” across the network, the cloud, and the SOC.

They’ve been steadily converting customers from one‑off products to multi‑year platform deals. That shows up in the numbers as strong growth in recurring subscription revenue and rising “ARR” tied to their newer cloud and security‑operations offerings. The more of your stack runs through Palo Alto, the harder it is to rip them out later.

The simple story: security teams are drowning in tools. PANW is selling simplification. One vendor, one architecture, fewer contracts, better visibility. That pitch plays in boom times, but it really resonates when budgets are tight and CIOs are told, “You can keep the security strong, but you have to cut vendor sprawl.”

Instead of paying $28,776 for 100 shares , a LEAPS options dated June 17th ,2027 165 call for 140.45/14,045 you get all the upside and downside risk is cost of call

CrowdStrike (CRWD) AI‑native defense on the endpoint

If Palo Alto is the architecture, CrowdStrike is the hunter sitting directly on your endpoints and workloads. Their Falcon platform started as cloud‑native antivirus. Over time they’ve bolted on identity protection, cloud workload security, threat intel, and managed response — all through one lightweight agent.

The key metric with CrowdStrike is ARR. They’re not just adding logos; they’re selling more “modules” per customer. Once Falcon is in, it’s easy for them to say, “You’re already sending us telemetry. Let us handle identity, or cloud, or data protection as well.” That’s textbook land‑and‑expand.

CrowdStrike’s threat reports lean hard into the next phase: adversaries using AI to speed up reconnaissance and attacks. If attackers are automating, defenders can’t be stuck on signature‑based tools. That narrative gives them a long runway to keep upselling customers on more automated, AI‑driven detection and response.

we are currently calling it a hold based on the 20 day EMA is showing a sell signal

Fortinet (FTNT) secure networking for the cost‑conscious

Fortinet lives a little closer to the “value” end of cyberspace. Their specialty is custom‑chip appliances that combine networking and security — firewalls, SD‑WAN, and so on. Think of them as the cost‑effective workhorse for companies that need strong defenses but can’t justify top‑shelf pricing everywhere.

During a downturn, that positioning can actually be a tailwind. A CIO might say, “We’re not allowed to weaken security, but we are allowed to save money.” Fortinet is a logical place to look. The result is a business that can hold up well when customers are shopping on price as long as the product remains “good enough plus cheaper.”

FTNT also tends to show up as a top holding in many cybersecurity ETFs. That institutional presence adds an extra passive‑flow bid under the stock when money moves into the theme as a whole with having a neutral rating a selling a put is a great option

Sell the 135 Put July 31,2026 premium $2.92/$292.00

Zscaler (ZS) zero‑trust and killing the VPN

Zscaler is what you get when you design network security for a world where nobody is really “on the corporate network” anymore. Instead of hauling remote users back through a clunky VPN, Zscaler routes traffic through its own cloud, inspects it, and then hands it off to SaaS apps or the open internet.

That fits perfectly with “work from anywhere” and “everything is in the cloud.” Security follows the user and the data, not the office building. Even if more people trickle back into offices, the architecture isn’t going back to 2005. There are too many cloud apps and too many distributed teams.

For investors, ZS is one of the purest plays on zero‑trust access. When a company decides to modernize away from legacy VPNs and web gateways, Zscaler is usually on the shortlist. That decision tends to show up as a multi‑year subscription, not a one‑off spend

Sell a Put Credit Spread

Okta (OKTA) identity as the new perimeter

Okta sits at the very front door: identity and access management. Single sign‑on, MFA, and lifecycle management aren’t glamorous, but they are absolutely central to modern security. Zero‑trust architectures always start with, “Who are you and what should you see?”

The company has had some bumps — including security incidents and the usual “can they execute?” questions — but the overall demand for better identity controls keeps rising. As more companies go passwordless, integrate dozens of SaaS tools, and tighten access for AI‑driven workflows, identity only gets more important.

So Okta is a bit more of a “prove it” story, but it lives at a mission‑critical layer. When the market gets pessimistic, that combination can create interesting entry points for patient investors who believe the long‑term identity trend is intact.

The Edge Report gives stock a overall 88% buy and price target of 150.00 a 27.32% return

Cybersecurity ETFs: the base of the cake

If you don’t want to pick winners, or you just want a diversified core to build around, there are a few dedicated cyber ETFs that do the heavy lifting for you.

Funds like CIBR (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity), (Amplify Cybersecurity), (Global X Cybersecurity), and (iShares Cybersecurity & Tech) all bundle dozens of these names together. You’ll usually see familiar tickers at the top: CrowdStrike, Palo Alto, Fortinet, and other key players, often with meaningful weights.

I like thinking of these ETFs as the sponge cake at the bottom. They give you broad exposure to the theme, including smaller companies you may never have time to research. From there, you can layer on your higher‑conviction single‑stock ideas and, finally, your options overlays

Cybersecurity isn’t a fad trade. It’s now sitting in the same mental bucket as accounting, legal, and compliance: annoying if you’re a growth‑at‑all‑costs founder, but absolutely essential if you want to stay in business.

That’s why I view it as a theme you can own across cycles. Start with the ETF base, stack your favorite platforms in the middle, then decorate with a controlled slice of options on top. The result is a portfolio “cake” that benefits from the long‑term tailwinds of cybersecurity, but still gives you room to trade, generate income, and lean into dislocations when everyone else is panicking about the latest breach headline.

The market is mispricing the risk on the $22 Billion buyout. Here is exactly how we are trading the structural spread and the macro volatility fallout.

The media landscape just shifted beneath our feet. Fox Corp. ($FOXA) officially announced a definitive agreement to acquire Roku ($ROKU) in a massive $22 billion blockbuster deal.

If you look at the raw deal terms, the destination looks clear: Roku shareholders are set to receive $160 per share ($96 in cash + roughly $64 in Fox Class A stock) when the transaction officially crosses the finish line in early 2027.

So why on earth is Roku stock currently hovering way down around $138?

Because Wall Street is doing what it does best when structural shifts happen: it’s panicking. Institutional investors aggressively dumped Fox stock following the announcement, sending $FOXA plunging over 15% out of immediate anxiety over the debt load and antitrust regulatory hurdles.

That emotional knee-jerk reaction created a massive gap between where Roku trades right now (~$138) and its ultimate acquisition destination ($160).

Playing this exact spread is a classic institutional maneuver known as Merger Arbitrage. But chasing it by simply buying the physical underlying stock right now means exposing your portfolio to massive, open-ended downside if antitrust regulators step in and derail the deal.

We don’t take unhedged coin-flips here.

Instead of taking on raw equity risk, The Edge Report is looking at the derivatives market to exploit the structural mispricing. Depending on your trading style, capital requirements, and risk tolerance, we have engineered two distinct, high-probability options setups to extract value from this chaos.

Subscribe now

Play 1: The Tactical Micro Play ($ROKU $140 ATM Straddle)

Best for: Active options traders looking to exploit violent headline swings while aligning perfectly with the final acquisition target price.

If you don’t want to deal with the operational hassle of managing a multi-leg pair trade across two separate tickers, you can isolate the pure volatility, time horizon, and path dependency of Roku alone using an At-The-Money (ATM) Straddle.

Instead of trying to predict the unpredictable regulatory timeline, we simultaneously buy both an ATM Call and an ATM Put at the exact same strike price.

The Execution

Using the mid-prices directly from the January 15, 2027 LEAPs chain (giving us a robust 213 days of runway):

Buy to Open (BTO) the $140 Call: ~$10.75

Buy to Open (BTO) the $140 Put: ~$9.20

Total Premium Committed: $20.03 ($2,003 total net debit per contract block)

Why the Math on This Trade is Beautiful

By committing $20.03 in total premium, we unlock three distinct structural advantages that traditional stock buyers completely lack:

The $160 “Magnet” Alignment: If you add our total premium cost ($20.03) to our chosen strike price ($140), your exact upside breakeven lands at $160.03. Look at that number again. Fox’s binding buyout offer is exactly $160.00. The options market has essentially priced this entire package so that if the merger closes smoothly, the intrinsic value of your Call leg alone captures the entire legal upside of the acquisition.

Built-In “Deal Break” Insurance: What happens if the government blocks the merger? Regular equity buyers will face a total bloodbath as Roku stock craters back to its pre-rumor floor. But because we hold the straddle, our downside breakeven is fixed at $119.97 ($140 strike minus the $20.03 premium). If the deal collapses violently, your $140 Put swells exponentially. A catastrophic deal-break scenario for equity holders transforms into a massive winning directional move for us.

The “Gamma Scalping” Cash Flow: This deal isn’t slated to wrap up until the first half of 2027. Roku isn’t going to sit perfectly flat at $138 for the next seven months. It will swing violently on antitrust rumors, earning reports, and leaks. Because we own the long options on both sides of the chain, we can actively trade blocks of underlying stock against our shifting deltas during these wild waves—locking in consistent micro-profits throughout the year to systematically grind down our initial entry cost.

Play 2: The Macro Safety Play (XSP July 31 $756/$764 Put Credit Spread)

Best for: Income-focused premium sellers who want to capitalize on the market’s elevated fear index without any single-stock corporate risk.

If you want to take a step back from individual company drama altogether, we can shift our focus to the index complex using XSP (Mini-S&P 500 Index Options). Corporate shakeups of this scale invariably pump localized implied volatility into the broader market index ecosystem. We can weaponize this macro fear by selling high-probability, structural insurance.

The Execution

Using the liquid July 31 monthly contract chain:

Sell to Open (STO) the XSP Jul 31 764 Put (Short Strike)

Buy to Open (BTO) the XSP Jul 31 756 Put (Long Protective Wing)

Net Credit Collected: $3.42 ($342 cash kept upfront per spread block)

Why the Math Works

74.67% Return Potential: Collecting a $3.42 net credit on an 8-point wide vertical spread means you are risking exactly $4.58 of collateral to make $3.42. If the S&P 500 simply holds its ground above the 764 level by late July, you realize a massive 74.67% return on your risk capital.

The Structural Index Advantage: Unlike single-stock equities like Roku or Fox, a broad-market index cannot gap down to zero overnight on a surprise corporate headline or regulatory block. Utilizing XSP gives us diversified macro exposure, features clean cash settlement (eliminating individual stock assignment risk), and lets us profit purely from rapid time decay (theta) while the single-stock merger noise sorts itself out.

The Bottom Line

Traditional merger arbitrage forces retail accounts to pick a single side and swallow massive, unhedged regulatory risk. By deploying derivatives strategically, we turn the market’s immediate emotional volatility into our personal edge.

Use the $140 Straddle if you want a protected single-stock play built to monetize violent headline swings over the next seven months.

Use the XSP Put Credit Spread if you want a high-yielding, cash-settled macro buffer play completely insulated from corporate headline risk.

We are not taking directional punts on this merger. We are systematically engineering our edge. Stay disciplined, manage your position sizing, and let the market panic pay you.

Disclaimer: Options trading involves significant risk and is not suitable for every investor. This breakdown is strictly for educational and informational purposes for Edge Report subscribers

Today I want to walk through why the market just sold off, but do it in plain English. Think of this as us sitting at a table with a notebook and a couple charts, not a textbook.

What just happened

We got a strong jobs report.
On the surface, that’s great: more people working, more paychecks, more spending.

But the market doesn’t just ask, “Is this good or bad?”
It asks, “What does this change about money?”

Strong jobs = strong economy… “but markets think one step further.”

Why “good news” hit stocks

Strong jobs tell the Fed, “The economy is still running hot. You don’t have to cut rates anytime soon. You might even hike again.”

Higher-for-longer rates change the math for investors

Borrowing stays expensive.

The “discount rate” used to value future earnings stays high.

Long-duration, high‑growth names (AI, tech, frothy stories) suddenly look a bit too rich.

So money rotates

Out of some of the high‑flyers that ran hard.

Into cash, safer assets, or whatever the next shiny opportunity is (think big IPOs like SpaceX taking up a ton of oxygen and liquidity).

“Yields up = money more expensive. That pressures stock valuations.”

The simple bond/stock relationship

You can boil a lot of this down to one relationship

When bond prices fall, bond yields go up.

When yields go up, stocks often feel it, especially the expensive ones.

Think of it this way, if you can suddenly earn more on safe bonds, you’re going to be pickier about which risky stocks you hold. The hurdle rate just stepped higher.

That’s basically what we saw: bonds sold off, yields popped, and equities flinched.

What the selloff looked like under the hood

This wasn’t just one random stock blowing up. It was broad

Major indexes down.

Tech and other high‑multiple names getting hit hardest.

Breadth weak lots more red than green across the list.

That pattern fits the macro

Not a “recession panic”

More of a “valuation and liquidity reset” after a strong run, with a big IPO(SpaceX) and higher yields giving everyone a reason to take some chips off the table.

“Under the surface: more names falling than rising.”

How I’m thinking about it

This is a policy and valuation scare, not a clear growth scare.

Strong data keeps the Fed on the front foot, which keeps yields elevated.

Elevated yields compress the equity risk premium and force some repricing in the crowded, high‑duration areas of the market.

Big deals (like a massive SpaceX IPO) need cash 70B so investors sell something to buy it.

Put differently the economy is still saying “I’m okay,” while the market is saying, “I need to adjust my prices to this new cost of money.”

What to watch next

If you want a super simple dashboard to track whether this turns into something bigger, I’d keep four things in view

2‑year and 10‑year yields: Do they keep climbing or calm down?

Major indexes vs equal‑weight: Are a few big names dragging everything, or is it broad?

Volatility (VIX): Are we just shaking out weak hands, or is stress building?

Credit / high yield ETFs: Do credit spreads stay calm, or do they start to widen?

If yields cool off and credit stays calm, this looks more like a digestion phase and a chance to re‑price frothy areas.
If yields keep grinding higher and credit cracks, that’s a different conversation.

The takeaway

The report said “lots of people have jobs” (good).

That told the money‑boss, “You don’t need to make money cheaper” (no easy rates).

When money stays expensive, some stock prices are too high, so they get marked down

As we close out May 2026, the equity complex remains in a defined bullish regime, yet internal mechanics suggest we are entering a late-cycle extension. Our proprietary “Edge” score currently sits at a 7 out of 10. While the primary trend remains constructive, this is decidedly not an “all-clear” signal. We are observing a market that is becoming increasingly stretched, characterized by a technical profile that remains robust at the index level while sub-surface metrics begin to fray.

CRITICAL RISK ADVISORY MAY 2026

While the primary trend remains bullish, risk management is now paramount. The lack of broader participation and aggressive positioning suggests the margin for error has narrowed significantly. Expect heightened volatility over the next few weeks as the market grapples with a “stretched” technical extension.

Primary Trend Analysis: SPY and Moving Averages

The foundational architecture of the U.S. equity market remains intact. The S&P 500 (SPY), Nasdaq-100, and even small-cap indices continue to trade above their key moving averages. This structural support confirms that the primary trend is “up.”

From a strategic standpoint, the trend is the ultimate arbiter; as long as the SPY holds above these core moving average clusters, the institutional playbook remains to treat pullbacks as “buyable dips” rather than the inception of a secular bear leg. However, the quality of these dips must be scrutinized as sector dispersion increases.

The Divergence: SPY vs. RSP (Market-Cap vs. Equal-Weight)

A glaring technical divergence has emerged between the market-cap-weighted SPY and the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP).

SPY Performance: The SPY closed at $756.48, marking a robust +6.31% gain over the measured period.

The Equal-Weight Lag: Conversely, the RSP has significantly underperformed, posting gains of approximately +4%.

This delta is a clear signal of “narrow leadership.” While the headline index suggests a broad bull market, the reality is that the “average stock” is failing to keep pace with the mega-cap titans. The trend is real, but it is narrowing into a concentration that historically precedes a period of consolidation or corrective rotation.

Market Breadth and Sentiment Indicators: Flashing Yellow

Sub-surface breadth metrics are currently flashing yellow, signaling a divergence that demands immediate attention from macro strategists.

The MMFI Indicator: The 50-day breadth indicator (percent of stocks above their 50-day moving average) has cooled from prior extremes to a “neutral-to-okay” zone of 58.81%. With the SPY near all-time highs and the MMFI only mid-range, we are witnessing a bearish divergence. Breakouts are increasingly concentrated in a shrinking circle of names.

The Put/Call Ratio (PCC): Sentiment reflects aggressive complacency. The PCC ratio of 0.60–0.74 indicates heavy call buying and a distinct lack of protective hedging.

Critical Vulnerabilities

Lack of Short-Covering Fuel: Because traders are not aggressively hedged, there is no “wall of short-covering” to provide a floor during a sudden drawdown.

Gamma Exposure: High levels of unhedged optimism leave the market highly susceptible to negative macro surprises.

Crowded Positioning: The “crowd” is leaning heavily into the long side, meaning a technical break could trigger a cascade of liquidations.

5. Macro Pressures: Treasury Yields and the US Dollar

The macro backdrop is shifting from a tailwind to a potentially hostile environment for “beta” exposure.

US10Y (10-Year Treasury Yield): Yields are hovering at 4.45%, the lower end of a 3.35%–5.00% annual range. However, 5.00% remains the “line in the sand.” A move toward 5% would compress the equity risk premium and force a rotation into risk-off assets.

DXY (US Dollar Index): The Dollar Index is firm at 98.94, trading in the upper half of its 52-week range (95.55–100.64). While not yet in a “runaway” mode, a break toward the 100.64 level alongside rising yields would create significant discount rate pressure on equities.

Commodity Signals: Hard Asset Hedging vs. Demand Concerns

Commodities are sending conflicting signals that suggest investors are hedging against policy tail risks.

Precious Metals (Hard Asset Flight): Gold has reached an elevated 4,542.47, While Silver is 75.30. This strength in the face of a firm Dollar suggests deep-seated worries regarding policy uncertainty and long-term inflation.

Energy (Growth Warning): In stark contrast, Brent Crude has rolled over to $91.12, a sharp -17.49% decline. While lower energy costs act as a deflationary tailwind for consumers, the magnitude of the drop suggests a “recessionary warning” regarding softening global demand.

Sector Performance and Dispersion

The “Technology Rocket” continues to dominate, returning +20.0% over the last 30 days. However, the tech sector is no longer a monolith; we are seeing massive dispersion within the group.

Growth Leaders: Real Estate (+8.7%), Consumer Discretionary (+8.6%), and Financials (+5.6%) have provided secondary support.

Defensive Laggards: Healthcare (-0.4%) and Energy (-2.6%) have failed to participate in the May rally.

Equity Heatmap The Great Dispersion

The following movers highlight the current “stock picker’s market” where even tech giants are diverging:

ORCL: +10.85% (Infrastructure breakout)

MSFT: +5.45% (Sustained leadership)

AVGO: +4.73% (Semiconductor strength)

NVDA: -1.45% (Exhaustion at the top)

GOOGL: -2.51% (Relative weakness)

INTC: -5.14% (Severe technical breakdown)

WMT: -2.65% (Consumer defensive lag)

Closing Synthesis Strategy for a Narrow Rally

We remain in a bull market, but the “Easy Money” phase has concluded. The divergence between the SPY and RSP, coupled with the cooling MMFI breadth indicator, suggests that index-level strength is masking internal fragility.pp

Crypto Markets

Fixed Markets

Strategic Mandate

Prioritize Selectivity: Passive beta is increasingly risky. Focus on “Technology Rocket” names showing relative strength (MSFT, ORCL) while avoiding those showing technical decay (INTC).

Monitor the Macro Thresholds: Any sustained move in the US10Y toward 5% or the DXY above 100.64 warrants an immediate reduction in equity exposure.

Respect the Commodity Signal: The decoupling of Gold (4,542) from Oil(91) suggests that while the inflation threat remains, growth concerns are beginning to percolate.

The current 7/10 score dictates a “long but hedged” posture. Discipline in sector rotation and stock picking will be the only way to maintain an “Edge” as this rally narrows further.

Most income investors obsess over covered call ETFs… but I think high‑quality closed‑end funds (CEFs) quietly do the job better.

Why?

CEFs can trade at discounts, so you can buy a dollar of assets for 90–95 cents and get paid on full NAV, not the discounted price.

Many CEFs use modest leverage and flexible distribution policies, which can boost income without permanently capping your upside the way call‑writing ETFs do.

Here’s a simple 4‑fund CEF income portfolio I like for 7–9% yield with an eye on NAV stability:

ADX – Adams Diversified Equity Fund

Core U.S. equity exposure with a long history of solid NAV growth.

Targets roughly an 8% annual managed distribution off NAV.

BST – BlackRock Science & Technology Trust

Tech‑focused growth engine with a mid‑single‑digit to high‑single‑digit payout.

Uses light call‑writing and often trades at a decent discount.

CSQ – Calamos Strategic Total Return

Hybrid mix of equities, convertibles, and high‑yield credit for smoother income.

Historically trades at a discount while paying a sustainable 7–8%‑type distribution.

PTY or PCN – PIMCO credit CEF (small position)

World‑class active credit management with a higher yield kicker.

I keep this as a smaller allocation to boost portfolio yield without letting any NAV drag dominate.

Using these four together in a balanced way, a reasonable long‑term expectation (based on historical behavior and typical yields) would be something around

7–9% average annual total return over a full cycle.

7–9% of the portfolio value paid out in annual income, depending on exact allocations and entry yields.

When you dig into the internal data for mid-May, the story changes completely. We are looking at an incredibly “top-heavy” rally. A tiny handful of mega-cap stocks are single-handedly keeping the ship afloat, while more than half of the individual stocks out there are quietly slipping into short-term downtrends.

Let’s break down the exact data points that are flashing warning signs right now.

The Data Breakdown: Where is the Money Actually Going?

The Massive Divergence (SPY vs. RSP): If you want proof that this rally is exclusive, look at the gap between the market-cap-weighted S&P 500 ($SPY$) and the equal-weighted version ($RSP$). The $SPY$ is outperforming the $RSP$ by a margin of +8.40% to +5.22%. That 3.18% performance gap tells us everything we need to know: the giants are doing all the heavy lifting, while the average stock is lagging behind.

Dwindling Market Participation: This is the most critical red flag. The percentage of stocks trading above their 50-day moving average has broken down sharply, dropping to just 49.74%—that is a steep -11.76% shift. Think about that: the index is sitting near highs, but fewer than half of its components possess positive short-term momentum.

Institutions are Buying Insurance (SKEW): While the surface looks calm, institutional players are quietly bracing for impact. The CBOE SKEW Index has climbed to 145.77 (+4.63%). When SKEW rises like this, it means big money is actively paying up to hedge against “black swan” events and tail-risk crashes. They don’t trust these current price levels

A Rising Dollar Headwind: To add fuel to the fire, the U.S. Dollar Index ($DXY$) is grinding higher toward 99.269. A strong dollar is a classic headwind for large multinational corporations because it eats into foreign earnings. Ironically, those multinationals are the exact mega-caps currently holding the entire market on their shoulders.

Put to Call Ratio

Market Scoring Summary

The Edge Report Analysts aggregate these metrics into our core market model, the imbalance becomes incredibly clear. Here is how the current tape scores across our three primary pillars

So, what’s the bottom line here? We are navigating a fragile market environment. Yes, mega-caps can keep the major indices afloat for a while through sheer size, but a market lacking internal breadth is living on borrowed time.

Historical precedents show us that when a massive divergence opens up between the index leaders and the average stock, the index eventually “catches down” to reality. Protect your capital, watch your position sizes, and don’t mistake a top-heavy index rally for a healthy, broad-based bull market. Stay sharp out there, and we’ll see you on the next update.

Stock Spotlight Google

The Macro Shift: Why Google is Playing the 10-Year Long Game

Now, while the short-term technical are flashing amber, we have to look at the massive secular moves happening beneath the surface of Big Tech. If you want to know why a few mega-caps are vacuuming up all the capital in the world, look no further than Alphabet (Google).

There’s a strong argument to be made that Google may have just silently locked down the entire AI race.

With the recent launch of Gemma 4—their cutting-edge open-weights model family—alongside their massive, proprietary, closed Gemini ecosystem, Google is effectively slamming the door on the competition. It’s a pincer movement.

A lot of analysts are asking: “If Gemma 4 is free to download and use, how does that make Google any money?”

Subscribe now

The answer is simple: The models are open, but the rails are not.

When enterprise developers download a high-performance open model like Gemma 4, they still need massive compute infrastructure to host, fine-tune, and deploy it at scale. They need cloud architecture. They need data pipelines. And who provides the seamless, optimized ecosystem for that? Google Cloud.

Google is building an unassailable full-stack monopoly. Think about the sheer scale of their consumer and developer footprint:

The Hardware & OS Entry Points: They own Android, the Pixel lineup, and Chromebooks.

The Gateway Software: They control Chrome, Google Workspace, and highly addictive consumer AI tools like Notebook LM.

The AI Engine: They give developers the ultimate playground with Gemma 4 open-weights, while powering high-end enterprise needs with closed Gemini models.

This is a text-book definition of playing the long game. Right now, young developers, students, and startup founders are building their very first AI workflows entirely within the Google ecosystem because Gemma 4 is incredibly accessible and powerful. Fast-forward five to ten years: when those developers become CTOs, tech leads, and enterprise founders, what cloud provider are they going to choose? What enterprise software will they deploy? They’ll stick with the ecosystem they grew up in.

So while the market’s technical breadth is fragile today, companies like Google are digging competitive moats so deep that the future revenue generation looks nearly bulletproof.

Under the Hood: The Q1 2026 Fundamental Health Check

Host: Now, as technical traders, we love the long-game story, but we validate with the hard math. If you want to know if a mega-cap company can actually afford to play a massive infrastructure land grab like this, you look at the fundamental metrics. Alphabet just dropped its Q1 2026 earnings, and the numbers reveal a textbook financial fortress.

Let’s look at the key metrics backing this stock up:

Operating Margin (36.1%):

Final Takeaway

Host: So, what’s the ultimate conclusion for The Edge Report this week?

We are navigating a dual-reality market. In the short term, the technical tape is undeniably fragile. Market breadth is weak, institutional hedging is rising, and a few massive companies are carrying the weight of the world.

But when you open the hood of the top leader—Google—and see a company growing revenues at 22% overall, operating at a 36% margin, running a 95%+ Rule of 40 cloud business, and sitting on a hundred-billion-dollar cash cushion, you realize why money is hiding there. It’s not just blind speculation; it’s a flight to a fundamental fortress.

For our short-term trading bankrolls, we protect capital and hedge against market divergence. But for the long macro game, the moats in big tech are only getting deeper.

Stay sharp, manage your risk, and we’ll see you on the next update.

Yeah… going from Buffett to a software ETF is a bit of a leap. But the more I thought about it, the more it felt like a shift I needed to make.

Here’s the real story behind it.

For decades, Berkshire Hathaway has been the definition of value investing. Durable businesses, strong cash flows, and a massive war chest waiting for the right opportunity. And right now, that war chest is huge over $300 billion in cash.

But that’s also the issue.

Buffett is waiting for a “fat pitch.” And he might be right to wait. But while he’s sitting on cash, there’s a different kind of value already playing out in the market one that doesn’t show up in the traditional playbook.

That’s where AOTS comes in.

The ETF is run by John Tinsman, and his version of “value” looks very different from the old-school model. Instead of focusing on low P/E ratios or asset-heavy businesses, he’s focused on something much simpler:

How scalable is the business once it’s built?

Think about it like this.

If Dominos sells one more pizza, they need more dough, more labor, more delivery cost. Every new sale has a real, incremental cost.

But a software company? They build the product once. Selling the next unit costs almost nothing.

That’s what Tinsman calls low marginal cost and it’s the core of his strategy.

He’s not chasing hype either. This isn’t ARK-style “hope it works” investing. He’s looking for companies that are already profitable (or very close), growing earnings, and acting as infrastructure—the rails that other businesses run on.

That last part is key.

The real winners in this cycle aren’t always the flashy apps—they’re the platforms behind them.

So when I compare AOTS to BRK.B, it really comes down to this

Berkshire is waiting for value to appear.

AOTS is betting that value is already here just in a different form.

And for me, I’d rather be positioned where the growth and scalability are already happening instead of sitting on the sidelines waiting for a better entry.

That doesn’t make Berkshire a bad investment. Not even close.

It just means the game is evolving.

And right now, I think “platform value” is where the edge is.

Top 10 Holdings of AOTS

Amazon — 8.22%

Alphabet Class A — 8.07%

Apple — 6.99%

NVIDIA 6.76%

Microsoft — 6.43%

Meta Platforms — 5.98%

Visa — 5.25%

Mastercard — 4.43%

Netflix — 4.05%

Oracle — 4.00%

To learn more about AOTS

https://aotetf.com/

Sector Roundup Follow the Money

Technology continues to set the pace, jumping 17.76% this past month. Between the relentless AI narrative and heavy hitting earnings from the mega-caps, it’s still the engine of this rally. Close behind is telecom services at 16.48% is a classic “catch-up” trade where investors have pivoted back toward beaten down names looking for yield and a bit of a rebound.

Consumer discretionary added a solid 11.26%, which is a great sign for the health of the retail space. Meanwhile, industrials and financials are grinding higher up 5% and 5.04% respectively showing that the market is still buying into the idea of a stable, growing economy.

On the flip side, we saw energy dip 0.93% and healthcare slide 1.88%. These defensive sectors are getting left behind as capital migrates toward areas with higher growth

We’re seeing healthy participation, which is vital for this rally to have legs. It’s not just a handful of stocks doing the work anymore, which gives the current move a bit more staying power.

However, we can’t ignore the 10-year Treasury yield, which is holding steady between 4.39% and 4.40%. It’s a bit of a balancing act those rates are high enough to keep valuations in check, but they haven’t been high enough to derail the broader momentum yet.

The Macro Check-In

The economic backdrop remains a “Goldilocks” scenario not too hot, but definitely not cold. March gave us 178,000 new jobs and a 4.3% unemployment rate, confirming the labor market hasn’t lost its edge. On the inflation front, core PCE is running at 3.2%, which is still a little sticky compared to the Fed’s target, keeping the central bank’s policy path at the forefront of everyone’s mind.

Right now, the trend is your friend, but keep a close eye on those yields. As long as the 10-year stays contained and we continue to see decent participation across sectors, the path of least resistance remains higher. If rates start to creep up again, expect that leadership to narrow back down toward the big tech giants in a hurry.

Stay sharp out there.

Look at the federal budget breakdown. Social Security is about 22% of spending, Medicare is 14%, Medicaid and health programs are 8%, defense is 12%, and interest on the debt is already 14% — nearly a trillion dollars a year. That matters because interest isn’t building roads, funding innovation, or strengthening the economy. It’s the cost of past borrowing, and it keeps growing as debt and rates stay elevated.

What makes this dangerous is that interest is no longer a small line item in the background. It is becoming one of the biggest uses of federal dollars, and it’s crowding out room for everything else. If you’re spending this much just to service old debt, you have less flexibility for defense, infrastructure, research, tax relief, or any real policy goal.

How Governments Usually Handle Debt

Governments generally have four ways to deal with heavy debt:

Raise taxes.

Cut spending.

Grow the economy faster than the debt.

Inflate the debt away over time.

The first two are the cleanest on paper, but politically they are the hardest. Tax hikes are unpopular, and real spending cuts are even harder because the biggest categories are politically sensitive and economically important. That leaves the third and fourth options growth and inflation. Growth helps, but when debt is already this large, inflation becomes the quieter and more realistic pressure valve.

The Quiet Solution

My best guess is that policymakers will try to keep nominal growth and inflation running hot enough to make the debt burden easier to manage in real terms. In plain English: let prices rise, keep rates from rising too much relative to inflation, and slowly reduce the purchasing power of the dollar over time.

That does not mean a dramatic crash. It usually looks more like financial repression: rates that lag inflation, steady demand for government debt, and a gradual erosion of real debt value. That’s not a new playbook. It’s one of the oldest tricks governments have when debt gets too heavy.

What Tends To Work In That Setup

If that is the road we’re on, certain assets tend to do better than cash or long-duration bonds.

Oil and natural gas, because energy tends to benefit when inflation and hard-asset demand stay elevated.

Commodities, because they are the raw materials of inflation.

Real estate, because tangible assets can reprice with inflation over time.

Gold and silver, because they are classic stores of value when people lose confidence in paper money.

Select resource and hard-asset businesses, especially those with pricing power.

That doesn’t mean these assets go straight up. It means they may be better positioned than assets that depend on stable money and low inflation. In a world where debt is high and the currency is being quietly managed, hard assets often get the better end of the bargain.

The Bigger Picture

The real story isn’t just that government debt is large. It’s that the cost of carrying it is becoming a major part of the budget itself. Once debt service starts taking a bigger slice of revenue, the government’s options narrow fast. That usually leads to more subtle policy choices: keep rates contained, tolerate inflation, and hope time does the heavy lifting.

That is why I keep coming back to the same macro conclusion, the path of least resistance is not austerity. It’s gradual devaluation.

And if that’s the world we’re in, investors should think less about chasing paper promises and more about owning real assets.

The government may not say it out loud, but markets will tell the story: when debt gets this big, someone has to pay, and history says inflation usually gets the bill.

It’s one of the oldest tricks in the book: Financial Repression.

Here is a list of stocks and ETFs that I believe will do well when this rotation starts to happen

Energy & Natural Resources

Energy isn’t just a hedge; it’s a cash-flow machine.

ETFs XLE (Broad Energy), XOP (Exploration & Production)

Stocks Exxon Mobil (XOM), Cenovus Energy (CVE), and Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ). Bloom Energy (BE) , Utilities Duke Energy (DUK)

Commodities & Materials

These are the raw materials of inflation. If the dollar buys less, these naturally reprice higher.

ETFs PDBC (Broad Commodity Basket)

Stocks Freeport-McMoRan (FCX) for copper/gold,

Albemarle (ALB) for the lithium transition.

Real Estate (REITs)

Tangible assets that can adjust rents alongside rising prices.

ETFs VNQ (Broad REIT exposure)

Stocks Prologis (PLD) for logistics/warehousing

Realty Income (O) for dependable monthly dividends.

Gold & Silver

The classic stores of value when confidence in paper money wavers.

ETFs GLD (Physical Gold), SLV (Physical Silver), and GDX (Gold Miners)

Stocks Newmont (NEM) and Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM).

The Bigger Picture

The real story isn’t just that the debt is large; it’s that the cost of carrying it has become a major part of the budget itself. Once debt service starts taking this big of a slice, the government’s options narrow fast.

The path of least resistance isn’t austerity—it’s gradual devaluation.

As investors, we need to think less about chasing speculative growth and more about owning real assets. The government may not say it out loud, but the markets will tell the story: when the debt gets this big, someone has to pay, and history says inflation usually gets the bill.

Stay sharp,

The Edge Report

Market Breadth: Signs of Stabilization

One of the most telling indicators of market health is the relationship between cap-weighted (SPY) and equal-weighted (RSP) S&P 500 ETFs.

The Concentration Risk: SPY is currently dominated by the “Magnificent 7,” accounting for roughly 35% of its weight.

The Rotation Signal: Recently, RSP edged out SPY on a daily basis (+1.26% vs. +1.21%). This suggests a modest broadening of participation beyond the largest names—a much healthier setup than the extreme concentration of the prior year.

Nasdaq Context: While QQQ continues to lead, 65% of QQQ components are now trading above their short-term moving averages, hinting at a subtle improvement in tech breadth. SPY / RSP 6 Month Chart

Credit Markets: The Stabilizing Force

High-yield and investment-grade corporate bonds remain the “canary in the coal mine.”

HYG (High Yield): Sits steady around $80.65 with tight spreads.

LQD (Investment Grade): Attracted over $56 billion in inflows this year, underscoring confidence in corporate balance sheets.

Historical Context: Unlike 2008, the yield curve is normalized and upward-sloping (+40 bps), and CRE delinquencies (7.5%) remain well below the 10%+ “panic” levels of the GFC

.

The JPM Collar: Tactical Support & Resistance

JPMorgan’s quarterly put-spread collar—exceeding 35,000 SPX contracts—creates a powerful “pinning” effect on the S&P 500.

Key Support: Recent rolls highlight 6,475 as the primary strike for dealer hedging.

The Mechanics: Dealers hedge procyclicality to keep volatility contained within a 3-5% range through quarter-end.

• The Risk: A decisive break below 6,475 could trigger a “gamma unwind,” forcing futures selling and amplifying downside moves

  

  .

  Alpha Strategy: Recommended Trades

  Based on the current macro backdrop, we are favoring “catch-up” rotations and volatility hedging.

  Thanks for reading! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

  Trade A: The “Pinning” Income Play

  Strategy: Sell SPX May 15 6400/6350 Bull Put Spread.

  Rationale: Capitalizes on the JPM collar support. As long as 6,475 holds, this trade harvests theta (time decay) with a high probability of success.

  Trade B: The Rotation Long

  Strategy: Buy RSP June 19 At-the-Money (ATM) Calls.

  Rationale: Plays the “broadening participation” theme. If mega-caps stall while the other 493 stocks catch up, RSP will outperform.

  Trade C: The “Tail Risk” Hedge

  Strategy: Buy VIX July 20/30 Call Spread.

  Rationale: With the VIX in the teens, insurance is cheap. This protects against a surprise break in the 6,475 support or an escalation in CRE distress.

  ---

  Bottom Line: We are in a “climb the wall of worry” environment. Position for rotations, but keep a close eye on the JPM support levels.

  The Edge Report | Data as of April 19, 2026

  Thanks for reading! This post is public so feel free to share it.

  Share

The Edge Report: Oaklawn Handicap Day – April 18, 2026

Saturday marks one of the most anticipated cards in the 121-year history of Oaklawn Park. With the $1.25 million Oaklawn Handicap (G2) headlining a stacked day of racing, bettors are looking at a “clash of titans” featuring three of the top dirt horses in the country.

Track Bias & Speed Figures

Based on recent meet data, Oaklawn continues to reward Tactical Speed.

Sprint Bias: Sprints are playing to the outside. Posts 7–9 have seen a significant advantage recently (~40% win rate), while the rail can be tricky for horses that don’t break alertly.

Route Bias: Forwardly placed runners dominate the routes. In 1 1/16 mile races, front-runners and pressers account for over 70% of wins.

Surface Note: The “Daily Variant” is key today. With a high-caliber field, expect winning times to flirt with the lower end of our “Par Times” guide. If the track is fast, the Oaklawn Handicap winner will likely need a Beyer in the 110–115 range.

Key Workouts

Sovereignty (Race 11): The Horse of the Year has been “working the lights out” for Bill Mott. His April 12th move was a bullet, showing he’s ready to fire fresh off the layoff.

White Abarrio (Race 11): Saffie Joseph Jr. has this veteran on a strict schedule. Clockers noted him “on the muscle” in his final prep. He looks several lengths better than his Pegasus effort.

If (Race 1): From the Steve Asmussen barn, this one has been showing professional gate speed in morning drills. Expect an aggressive send from Keith Asmussen.

Oaklawn Routes

Featured Race: The Oaklawn Handicap (G2)

This 1 1/8-mile test is the centerpiece. Here is the “Edge” on the big three:

Sovereignty (4-5): The class of the field. If he repeats his Travers performance, they are running for second.

Journalism (5-2): The Preakness winner is the projected pace-setter. If the track is playing “speed-kind” (see our Bias Report), he could prove very difficult to pass in the long Oaklawn stretch.

White Abarrio (7-2): The “Wiseguy” horse. Owners are confident and he has the tactical versatility to sit just off the lead and pounce.

Rumors & Horses to Watch

The “Looming Upset”: Rumors from the backside suggest Liberal Arts (15-1) is training like a different horse for Heather Irion. While he’s been away for 11 months, he loves a heavy track—keep an eye on the weather.

Race 5 Sleeper: Like A Diamond (3/2) is the heavy favorite, but some clockers are whispering about A Vision Of Hope (7-1), who has been finishing his gallops with massive energy.

Turn Data Into Dollars. Join the Journey.

For over 20 years, I have navigated the complexities of the options market, refining a singular philosophy: Wins aren't found; they are manufactured.

Whether it’s a moving average crossover on a daily chart, a mispriced horse in the 5th at Gulfstream, or a delta-neutral options spread, the objective remains the same—identifying a statistical edge and applying rigorous bankroll management to exploit it.

I’ve spent two decades mastering the intersection of Market Timing, Event Wagering, and Bankroll Management. Now, I'm bringing that playbook to you.

What is The Edge Report?

This isn't just another financial newsletter. It is a technical deep dive into the mechanics of wealth. From the author of The Blueprint to Wealth, this report is designed for those who view the markets not as a casino, but as an engineering problem to be solved.

Each week, we will break down:

Technical Trading: High-probability setups in stocks and options using proven indicators and price action filters.

Prediction Markets & Wagering Finding +EV (Positive Expected Value) in sports, horse racing, and event-based markets.

The Math of Success Applying strategies like the Kelly Criterion and advanced risk management to protect and grow your capital.

Macro Insights Understanding how global liquidity and economic shifts create opportunities in equities and alternative assets.

The bridge between traditional finance and prediction markets is narrowing. Success in 2026 requires more than just "buying and holding." It requires the ability to spot an edge across multiple disciplines and the discipline to execute when the math is in your favor.

I will be dropping the first official issue of The Edge Report mid April

We are going to look at specific setups currently forming in the markets and how I am positioning my own "bankroll" for the quarter ahead.

Join the journey. Let's start manufacturing wins together

Follow Me on X https://x.com/EdgeReport91#:~:text=Jesse%20Franklin-,%40EdgeReport91,-20%20plus%20year

Follow Me on Blossom social

https://www.blossomsocial.com/#:~:text=Jesse%20Franklin-,%40pinnaclewealth,-15%20Stocks%20%C2%B7