Larry Walters, 33, from San Pedro, had always dreamed of flying. He bought 42 helium weather balloons, tied them to a regular Sears lawn chair, strapped on a parachute, packed a BB gun (to shoot balloons for descent), a CB radio, sandwiches, and a six-pack of beer.

He expected to float a few hundred feet above his backyard.

He cut the rope — and shot straight up like a rocket to 16,000 feet.

He drifted directly into the main approach path for Los Angeles International Airport. Two airline pilots radioed the tower reporting a man in a lawn chair holding a gun at 16,000 feet.

For 45 minutes he floated over Los Angeles, freezing, too scared to shoot any balloons in case he fell. Eventually he started popping them one by one and slowly came down.

He landed tangled in power lines in Long Beach, causing a blackout. When police arrested him and asked why he did it, Walters replied:

“A man can’t just sit around.”

The FAA fined him $4,000. He became a national folk hero — “Lawnchair Larry” — and later inspired the movie *Up*.

One of the greatest true American stories of pure, ridiculous, beautiful ambition.

(Part 1)

On August 3, Jim Cramer told CNBC he’s getting rid of all his Bitcoin.

His explanation: quantum computers will be able to break Bitcoin’s cryptography in roughly three years.

This came right after his interview with IBM CEO Arvind Krishna, who warned that investors should be “paranoid” about quantum machines being able to defeat modern encryption within 3–4 years.

Now, Cramer’s reputation speaks for itself — the existence of “Inverse Cramer” says enough — but people still have questions.

Bottom line: pay attention, but don’t panic.

Here’s the real issue…

Your Bitcoin wallet has a private key (your secret password), and that private key generates your public key (the part visible to the world).

On classical computers, reversing that process — deriving the private key from the public key — would take billions of years.

A sufficiently powerful quantum computer running Shor’s algorithm could theoretically do it in minutes.

Today, your public key only appears on‑chain when you spend Bitcoin.
So if you move your BTC into a fresh wallet that has never sent funds out, your public key remains hidden and you’re protected.

But older wallets didn’t work that way.

Wallets from 2009–2010 exposed public keys directly on the blockchain, which means those coins are permanently vulnerable.

When you combine:

• coins in early‑era wallets

• coins in wallets that have ever sent BTC

…it comes out to roughly one‑third of all Bitcoin ever mined.

About 1.1 million of those coins belong to Satoshi — and those keys can never be “re‑hidden.”

The simplest protection:
Move your BTC to a brand‑new address you’ve never spent from, and leave it there.

It’s important to note that anyone with a quantum computer powerful enough to crack Bitcoin would have to ignore Satoshi’s million coins to come after yours — which is… unlikely.

So when does a machine like this actually appear?

That estimate has shifted twice this year.

⭐ JIM CRAMER SAYS HE’S DUMPING HIS BITCOIN BECAUSE OF QUANTUM COMPUTERS 🔐

(Part 2)

The old consensus was that quantum‑breaking Bitcoin was 10–30 years away.

Then March changed everything.

Google’s Quantum AI group, working with the Ethereum Foundation and Stanford, published research showing that breaking Bitcoin’s cryptography would require fewer than 500,000 physical qubits and about nine minutes per key.

That’s roughly 20× less hardware than previous estimates.

In the same week, Caltech and a startup called Oratomic announced that 26,000 qubits could achieve the same result on a different architecture — given about ten days of runtime.

Here’s what exists today

None of the current machines are error‑corrected anywhere near the scale required.

The largest key publicly broken on real quantum hardware this year was 15 bits.
Bitcoin uses 256‑bit keys.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s defenses are already being deployed.

• BIP‑360 (a new address format that keeps public keys entirely off‑chain) was added to Bitcoin’s official proposal repository on February 11 and is already running on a testnet with 50+ miners.

• BIP‑361 covers the migration process and the question of what happens to coins that never move.

My take: the CLARITY Act vote on September 14 will influence Bitcoin’s price long before any quantum computer does — so that’s where attention should be.

Don’t get distracted by the boogeyman.
And yes… always inverse Cramer.

“Every proposed data center should disclose its expected withdrawals, actual consumption, water source, cooling design, discharge volume, electricity-related water footprint, drought contingency plan, and contractual priority during shortages. If officials cannot provide those numbers, they have no legitimate basis for demanding that households, farms, or small businesses surrender access in the name of technological progress.” -Martin Armstrong

@kerry84469This guy is an expert. Why do they need all that water?#nowaterneeded

Tiktok failed to load.

Enable 3rd party cookies or use another browser

Martin Armstrong, in his recent article, explains why things are not exactly as they seem, and how you’re being steered again, like lemmings, to a conclusion you may not fully grasp, and why legitimately concerned local boards are ASKING THE WRONG QUESTIONS.

THE WATER WARS HAVE BEGUN -Martin Armstrong

So when he breaks down Bitcoin — not as a fanboy, but as a macro operator — it hits different.
And what he says in this video might genuinely shock you.

This is well worth a listen:

Let bygones be bygones

Get Motivated

Secure your Flipflops

Stay irrationally positive. It makes just as much sense as pessimism, and it’s way better.

There’s a reason David Sacks was just tapped as both the Crypto Czar and the AI Czar.

Because the two biggest wealth engines of our era aren’t running on separate tracks anymore — they’re merging into the same rail system.

AI is creating the demand.
Crypto is building the rails.
And the people who understand that convergence early are positioning themselves where the next decade of value will actually accrue.

This isn’t “AI over here” and “crypto over there.”
It’s one macro‑trend: the digitization, automation, and tokenization of everything.

The collision isn’t coming.
It’s already happening.

Most still don’t get it. There is no next stage (agentic) AI, without BITCOIN.

Don’t be a lemming.
If you bought high last cycle or you’ve spent the last 18 years saying you “missed Bitcoin,” understand something simple and uncomfortable:

The people who did best weren’t the ones who bought the blow‑off tops — they were the ones who accumulated during stretches exactly like right now:

• when Bitcoin is grinding around its 200‑day moving average

• when sentiment is bearish

• when attention is chasing shiny objects like AMD (hello, 10× in 18 months)

• when everyone is convinced “the real gains already happened”

This is the part of the cycle where the crowd gets bored, distracted, or scared — and where disciplined accumulators quietly build the positions that look “obvious” in hindsight.

If you believe in the long‑term arc of AI, autonomy, and digital infrastructure, then you already know:
You don’t get the upside without enduring the moments that feel uncomfortable.

This is where the real money is made, and it never feels good to buy right, because you’re never with the crowd. Those who fought the vaxx nazis should understand this… and the benefits.

It feels like….. RIGHT NOW

*nothing here is financial advice. Do your own due dilligence, always

Below is the letter we just sent on behalf of

@ICANdecide ,@React19org and others to current CDC Acting Director,

@DrJBhattacharya, regarding $1.5 billion contracts for Covid-19 vaccines. I am confident Dr. Bhattacharya and @SecKennedy would prefer to direct these funds toward treating and compensating the vaccine injured. I hope the White House will let that happen. As a country, we should take care of those harmed before we rush forward harming others.

Here is the text of the letter (with link to the original below):

Dear Dr. Bhattacharya,

We write on behalf of ICAN, React19, and numerous others to express our deep concern and disappointment that CDC has agreed to purchase $1.55 billion worth of pediatric and adult Covid-19 vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, and to raise serious concern regarding a potential violation of federal law.[1]

For the millions of Americans harmed by these products, this decision is deeply painful. Rather than directing resources towards treating those whose lives have been devastated, CDC has chosen to further enrich Pfizer and Moderna. The vaccine-injured deserve acknowledgement and care—not abandonment. The tens of thousands of individuals with serious injuries who have contacted our firm alone, and the over 40,000 members of just one group, React19,[2] with serious injuries represent real people whose suffering demands recognition. To allocate more than a billion and a half tax dollars to Pfizer and Moderna while offering those injured by their products nothing is a profound betrayal.

We struggle to comprehend how CDC’s current leadership can continue to disregard, among others, the following established facts:

•CDC fought in court for over 2 years to prevent public disclosure of data which showed that over 7% of the 10 million V-safe users reported needing medical care after a Covid vaccine, on average 2 to 3 times each, with over 70% of those medical encounters resulting in hospitalization, emergency room visits, or urgent care.[3]

•The fact that FDA fought for years to hide data, recently released, showing that when FDA adequately conducted empirical Bayesian analysis internally, it revealed significant safety signals that were hidden from the public.[4]

•In the clinical trial for Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine, there were 21 deaths in the vaccinated group and 17 deaths in the placebo group—meaning more deaths occurred in the vaccinated group—during the same time period, and where the placebo group contained more participants than the vaccinated group.[5]

•Those seriously injured by this product have been left without recourse because pharmaceutical companies have been granted complete immunity under the PREP Act, while the Countermeasure Injury Compensation Program (CICP) remains woefully underfunded and structurally designed to deny compensation (only 0.39% [56 of 14,152] of COVID-related CICP claims have been compensated, with an average payout, excluding three outliers, of a miserly $5,052.57 per claimant)[6]—leaving the injured with nowhere to turn.

•Five years after assuring the world these products are safe, the manufacturers still require PREP Act immunity for the very harms they claim will not occur—an obvious contradiction that requires suspending reality and reason to believe.

Until PREP Act immunity is lifted and the full scope of harm is properly accounted for, the CDC should not direct over a billion and a half dollars to Pfizer and Moderna. These funds should instead be used to treat and compensate those who have already been seriously harmed—the people who have been waiting far too long for help. The people who the CDC assured this product was safe.

CDC should cancel these contracts on the basis that it would be the moral, ethical, and compassionate thing to do. But if it won’t do so on those bases then, in order to confirm these contracts do not violate federal law, and to avoid litigation, please confirm forthwith that the procurement contracts with Pfizer and Moderna were not in any manner related to the Vaccines for Children Program (VFC), and that absent Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) approval, they will not be part of this program.

As you are no doubt aware, absent approval from ACIP, the vaccines procured from Pfizer and Moderna pursuant to these contracts cannot be procured, distributed, or administered through the VFC, and any such conduct would be a clear violation of federal law.[7] As provided in Section 1928 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396s), the VFC mandates that only vaccines recommended by ACIP may be provided under the VFC. Specifically, 42 U.S.C. § 1396s(e) requires the Secretary to use “the list established (and periodically reviewed and as appropriate revised) by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.”

Accordingly, unless and until ACIP affirmatively recommends these Covid-19 vaccines for the applicable pediatric populations, any distribution or administration of the vaccines procured under these contracts through the VFC would constitute a violation of Section 1928 and its implementing regulations.

Please confirm forthwith that the procurement contracts have been cancelled and that the funds will be reallocated to assist the vaccine injured. We hope, given your prior statements regarding these products, that you will take this approach. But if the moral and humane approach is not taken, at the very least please confirm forthwith that these procurement contracts are entirely unrelated to the VFC.

Very truly yours,
/s/ Aaron Siri

Here is a link to the full letter: https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/2026-06-16-Letter-CDC-Covid-vaccine-contracts.pdf

“We don’t get alot of things to care about”

Watch

The Fonz Returns and Drops the Realest Commencement Speech of the Year.

Henry Winkler just delivered one of the most grounded commencement lines of the year: you can fill your house, your garage, your basement — but without empathy, you’ll never live a rich life. Coming from the FONZ himself, it hits even harder. Emerson College didn’t just get a speech; they got a masterclass in what actually matters.

It’s heartfelt, surprising, and absolutely worth watching!

Henry Winkler — forever known as The Fonz from Happy Days — returned to Emerson College with a message far deeper than his iconic cool‑guy persona. What most people don’t know is that behind the leather jacket and the swagger, Winkler spent his entire early career secretly battling severe dyslexia, memorizing scripts phonetically and feeling like an impostor even as he became a cultural icon. That contrast — the world seeing “The Fonz,” while he struggled to read the words in front of him — is what makes his commencement speech so powerful. When he tells graduates that you can fill your house, your garage, your basement with stuff, but you cannot live a rich life without empathy, it hits with the weight of someone who’s lived both sides of fame. It’s heartfelt, surprising, and absolutely worth watching.

Start something you want to do without thinking of the end result and what benefits you'll receive. Go all in and have faith. Figure things out as they pop up.

The reason the new ethos jokingly dubbed “retardmaxxing”resonates so powerfully is because the joke is actually a delivery mechanism for something people are starving for: permission to stop performing, stop optimizing, stop pretending, and just be human again.
The Weber‑grill sermon is funny on the surface — but underneath it hits the same psychological pressure points that make Stoicism, minimalism, and anti‑hustle culture explode in popularity.

Let's break it down..

⭐ 1. It’s anti‑optimization in a world drowning in optimization

Modern life tells people:

• maximize productivity

• maximize income

• maximize fitness

• maximize attractiveness

• maximize discipline

• maximize your “brand”

Everything is “maxxing.”

The Weber‑grill sermon flips the entire script:

“Stop trying to be a hyper‑optimized machine. You’re allowed to be a normal person.”

That message is rare — and it feels like relief.

⭐ 2. It uses humor to bypass defensiveness

If someone said the same ideas in a TED Talk, people would roll their eyes.

But when a guy in a backyard, preaching from a grill, says it with comedic exaggeration, your guard drops.
Humor is a Trojan horse for truth.

People absorb the message because they’re laughing while they hear it.

⭐ 3. It’s a rebellion against performative self‑improvement

Most self‑help content today is:

• preachy

• moralizing

• perfectionistic

• shame‑based

The grill‑sermon is the opposite:

• self‑deprecating

• unserious

• imperfect

• human

It says:

“You don’t need to fix everything. You’re fine. Go grill something.”

That’s a radically comforting message.

⭐ 4. It validates the feeling that life is overwhelming

People feel:

• overstimulated

• overworked

• over‑scheduled

• over‑judged

• over‑connected

• under‑rested

The sermon acknowledges that without lecturing.
It says:

“Yeah, life is insane. So stop pretending you can optimize your way out of it.”

That honesty feels like someone finally telling the truth.

⭐ 5. It gives permission to embrace imperfection

The core “truth” behind the meme is this:

Being a little messy, a little chaotic, a little confused is normal.
You don’t need to be a flawless machine.

People crave that permission.

Because deep down, everyone knows:

• they’re not as disciplined as influencers

• they’re not as optimized as productivity gurus

• they’re not as confident as motivational speakers

The grill‑sermon says:

“Good. You’re not supposed to be.”

That’s why it hits so hard.

⭐ 6. It’s “dad wisdom” disguised as absurdity

The Weber grill is symbolic:

• backyard

• simplicity

• family

• real life

• no pretense

It’s the opposite of the polished, sterile, studio‑shot self‑help world.

It’s basically saying:

“The real wisdom is in the backyard, not in the boardroom.”

People trust that energy more than corporate‑style advice.

⭐ 7. It’s a pressure‑release valve for a generation raised on self‑critique

Most people today live with:

• internalized pressure

• comparison

• shame

• anxiety

• fear of falling behind

The sermon is a release valve.
It says:

“You don’t need to be exceptional. You just need to be alive.”

Click to Watch on X

Watch

(And Why It’s Almost Impossible to Get — Plus the Backdoor Paths We Found)
*Nothing here is investment advice. Always do your own due dilligence or consult an advisor

PAID SUBS: DON’T MISS THE UPDATE BELOW (SCROLL DOWN)

SpaceX is widely expected to go public within the next few months, and if it happens, it will likely be the largest IPO in history. That alone explains the surge of interest — but the real reason investors are scrambling for exposure is simpler:

SpaceX isn’t just another company. It’s the backbone of multiple trillion‑dollar future industries.

• Global satellite internet

• Reusable rockets

• Point‑to‑point Earth travel

• Deep‑space logistics

• Defense and intelligence contracts

• AI infrastructure (via Starlink + compute)

If you believe any of those sectors will define the next 20 years, SpaceX is the purest expression of that thesis.

But here’s the problem.

Why It’s Almost Impossible to Get SpaceX Exposure

SpaceX is still private, tightly held, and extremely selective about who can buy shares. The barriers are steep:

• Minimums in the millions

• Only open to institutions and insiders

• Secondary markets are restricted

• Most shares are locked up

• Retail investors are completely shut out

Even many RIAs and family offices can’t access it directly.

That’s why the hunt for public‑market proxies has become so intense.

The Backdoor Options We Found

After digging through filings, holdings reports, and private‑public crossover vehicles, a few legitimate paths emerged — all imperfect, but all real. #1 is Stunning!

Want the deets? Become a contributor/subscriber to help us compound goodness. On this stack, ALL SUBSCRIPTION FUNDS GO TO OUR NON-PROFIT MICROLENDING HELPING UNBANKED ENTREPRENEURS BUILD SMALL BUSINESSES, JOBS AND LOCAL ECONOMIES.

Bonus tip: Anything over $50 gives you FOUNDER STATUS (yeah!). It’s a ghost deal.. just enter the best number you can contribute. It’ll work.

“We don’t give free fish. We lend zero interest microloans so people can buy their own rods and nets and get their own fish for the rest of their entire lives while selling their extra fish and providing jobs and fish for other villagers as well”

1. Baron Partners Fund (BPTIX/BPTRX)

The highest SpaceX exposure in the public markets.
~29% of the fund is SpaceX. (new reports indicate closer to 32%!)
This is the closest thing to direct ownership you can get.

I think that one reason this one is being overlooked is likely that many sites like seeking alpha and yahoo finance show the fund holds “SpaceX preferred shares”, which many investors mistakenly assume behave like traditional income‑paying preferred stocks. They don’t. These are actually late‑stage venture preferred shares — equity, not bonds — and they convert 1:1 into common stock at IPO, often with better protections and shorter lockups than standard pre‑IPO common shares.

By the way, the rest of this fund is composed of TSLA and other hand-picked growth stock holdings, with an investment team headed by legendary investor Ron Baron, which appear especially attractive on the current Iran conflict market correction (*not advice)

Current holdings here: https://www.baroncapitalgroup.com/product-detail/baron-partners-fund-bptrx#section-portfolio-characteristics

2. Baron First Principles ETF (RONB)

A surprisingly concentrated ETF with:

• 21.5% SpaceX

• 5.4% xAI

• Additional Musk‑ecosystem exposure

For an ETF, this level of private‑company concentration is rare.

3. Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGIX/BFGFX)

A strong secondary option with:

• ~16–19% SpaceX

• xAI exposure

• Tesla and other Musk‑adjacent holdings

It’s not the highest, but it’s meaningful.

4. Crossover ETFs (XOVR, NASA)

Lower exposure (10–11%), but still legitimate ways to participate in the private‑to‑public transition.

Why This Matters Now

If SpaceX does IPO in the next 12 weeks — and many analysts believe it will — the window to position ahead of the event is closing fast.

Historically, the biggest wealth creation in transformative companies happens before the IPO and in the early years after it, not once the company is fully mature.

Again — none of this is advice.
But understanding the landscape matters.

Because when the largest IPO in history is approaching, the question becomes:

Do you want exposure — and if so, how do you get it when the front door is locked?

We found the backdoors.
Use them wisely.

Bonus:

🚀 What’s in it for me? (Anwer: Perhaps a 65% jump if all goes well)

Two Hypothetical (but realistic) SpaceX IPO Day Valuation Projection Scenarios And What that Could Mean for Price Appreciation on IPO Day (remember, you have to be in it already to win it..)

Scenario A — SpaceX IPO at $1.5 trillion

This represents roughly a 2× increase from SpaceX’s last internal valuation (~$80–90B for core SpaceX + ~$60–70B for Starlink implied).

Scenario B — SpaceX IPO at $2.5 trillion

This represents roughly a 3× increase from the last internal mark.

These were the two anchor points we used to model the impact on each public‑market proxy.

📈 Updated Impact on Each Investment Option (Using these Scenarios)

⭐ 1. Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX/BPTIX)

SpaceX Weight: 32% (updated)

Scenario A — $1.5T IPO (~2× increase)

→ Estimated NAV impact: +28% to +38%

Scenario B — $2.5T IPO (~3× increase)

→ Estimated NAV impact: +50% to +65%

Why:
BPTRX holds SpaceX venture preferred shares, not income preferreds.
These convert 1:1 into common at IPO and often have better lockup terms than standard pre‑IPO common.
This is why the exposure is so powerful — and why many investors underestimate it.

⭐ 2. Baron First Principles ETF (RONB)

SpaceX Weight: 21.5% + 5.4% xAI

Scenario A — $1.5T IPO (~2×)

→ Estimated NAV impact: +18% to +25%

Scenario B — $2.5T IPO (~3×)

→ Estimated NAV impact: +35% to +45%

Why:
RONB is unusually concentrated for an ETF and has a second kicker via xAI.

⭐ 3. Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGIX/BFGFX)

SpaceX Weight: ~16–19% + xAI + Tesla

Scenario A — $1.5T IPO (~2×)

→ Estimated NAV impact: +12% to +18%

Scenario B — $2.5T IPO (~3×)

→ Estimated NAV impact: +25% to +35%

Why:
Meaningful SpaceX exposure, but diluted by a broader portfolio.

⭐ 4. XOVR — ERShares Private‑Public Crossover ETF

SpaceX Weight: ~11%

Scenario A — $1.5T IPO (~2×)

→ Estimated NAV impact: +8% to +12%

Scenario B — $2.5T IPO (~3×)

→ Estimated NAV impact: +15% to +20%

Why:
Legitimate exposure, but lower concentration.

Thanks for sticking with this exploration of one of the most significant financial events on the horizon. Remember — none of this is advice. Think of it as a starting point for your own due diligence, curiosity, and long‑term wealth‑building journey!

IMPORTANT UPDATE!!! We have a new top contender!!

*not financial advice. Education for your further due dilligence!!

The BPTRX Problem: The Cap‑Gains Bomb

BPTRX is the purest SpaceX play — but it has two structural issues:

✔ 1. Massive embedded unrealized gains

When SpaceX IPOs, BPTRX will be forced to:

• mark up its SpaceX preferred + common

• realize gains

• distribute them to shareholders

This could be double‑digit % of NAV.

✔ 2. You pay taxes even if you don’t sell

This is the classic mutual‑fund tax trap.

✔ 3. After the IPO, BPTRX may trim SpaceX

Because:

• position size balloons

• risk controls

• mandate constraints

So you get:

• tax pain

• position shrinkage

• post‑IPO rebalancing

This is why many advisors avoid adding BPTRX right before a liquidity event.

⭐ 3. XOVR’s New 23% Exposure: Why It Matters

XOVR is now:

• an ETF (no forced cap‑gain distributions)

• holding SpaceX LLC directly

• with 23% exposure (up from ~10% last year)

• with no mutual‑fund tax drag

• with daily liquidity

• with no redemption‑driven selling

This makes XOVR the cleanest, most tax‑efficient SpaceX proxy currently available.

It is the first time XOVR has legitimately rivaled BPTRX as a SpaceX vehicle.

⭐ 4. RONB’s Role

RONB is:

• diversified

• Musk‑ecosystem heavy

• lower SpaceX beta

• lower volatility

• lower concentration risk

RONB is not a pure SpaceX play — it’s a Musk macro‑bet.

⭐ 5. Is there a better “back door” than XOVR?

Here’s the full landscape of all public SpaceX proxies:

✔ 1. BPTRX/BPTIX

Highest exposure, but tax‑inefficient and distribution‑heavy.

✔ 2. XOVR

Now the best ETF‑based SpaceX exposure after the 23% update.

✔ 3. RONB

Diversified Musk ecosystem, not a pure SpaceX bet.

✔ 4. SATS (EchoStar)

Not a SpaceX proxy — they sell spectrum to Starlink, but exposure is indirect and small.

✔ 5. Google (GOOGL)

Owns a small early‑round stake in SpaceX.
But it’s <1% of Google’s valuation — immaterial.

✔ 6. Fidelity private funds

Hold SpaceX, but only accessible to:

• accredited investors

• with lockups

• high minimums

Not a practical “back door.”

✔ 7. Private secondary markets

You can buy SpaceX shares on:

• Forge

• EquityZen

• Rainmaker

…but:

• prices are inflated

• supply is thin

• lockups exist

• accreditation required

Not ideal for most investors.

⭐ 6. So is XOVR the most efficient SpaceX exposure right now?

Here’s the clean, non‑advice framing:

If someone wants SpaceX exposure without the BPTRX tax bomb, XOVR is currently the most efficient, liquid, tax‑friendly public‑market proxy.

It gives:

• high exposure (23%)

• ETF tax structure

• no forced distributions

• no lockups

• daily liquidity

• diversified Musk ecosystem around it

This is the first time XOVR has legitimately become the #1 ETF‑based SpaceX vehicle.

⭐ 7. The simplest possible answer

**BPTRX has the highest SpaceX exposure but carries a massive cap‑gains bomb.

XOVR now has 23% SpaceX exposure with no tax bomb — making it the cleanest, most efficient public‑market SpaceX proxy available today.

There is no better “back door” unless you buy SpaceX privately.**

NOTHING HERE IS FINANCIAL ADVICE. DO YOUR OWN DUE DILLIGENCE