What is real though was Donald Trump’s speech at the White House Correspondents Association Dinner on July 24^th, 2026. A one hour, four minutes and three seconds long rambling of a mad man. This is not political, even though this man is also the man who can open that briefcase and press the red button to launch a nuclear strike. To see people still praying to the alter of Trump, to call him the best president in history is mind blowing. The only aspect or place where he is the best is in his own mind.

The delusion is astounding. In his speech he announced that he’ll be running for a fourth term. In his reality maybe, but in the reality of the rest of the world he is only serving his second term at the moment, having served from January 20, 2017, to January 20, 2021, and again from January 20, 2025, to present and which is supposed to end in January 2029. Also, according to the 22^nd Amendment of the US Constitution no person can be elected to the office of the president more than twice. One would think that as the current sitting president Donald J Trump would know that. Yet, the audience claps like performing seals.

When anyone dare criticize the man, he has no qualms to openly and publicly release the vilest of vile insults and criticisms. When Megyn Kelly, who was a core Trump supporter opposed the military strikes on Iran, arguing that it violated his core “America First’ promises, he turned on his biggest supporters, like Megyn, Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, Candace Owens etc. and called them ‘low intelligence’ and losers. 372 words of a Truth Social post was spent talking about these four media personalities who used to be his ardent followers, writing that they were ‘stupid people’ and ‘nobody cares about them.’ Well, that is not actually true. Megyn Kelly for instance has a Bachelor of Arts (B.A) degree in Political Science from Syracuse University and a Juris Doctor from Albany Law School, she practiced corporate litigation for roughly nine years before transitioning to television news. I would not call her stupid. She also has about 4.4 million subscribers on YouTube, so that is hardly someone nobody cares about. The rants on Truth Social and even in public and in his speeches are becoming more and more belligerent, attacking other politicians, media personalities and the public without any decorum or respect for his own position as a world leader.

With his cognitive decline now in full view, Donald Trump’s empathy and care for other Americans and his country’s brave men and women, who don uniforms to protect them all, him included, have completely vanished, he does not care, does not care about your sons, daughters, husbands and wives and said as much. When confronted with the human cost of the Iran conflict, Donald Trump downplayed the fatalities by comparing the current death toll to past major wars, stating, ‘One is too many, but it is 18, whereas in Vietnam, we lost 200 000,’ and then he casually walked off the tarmac as if the question was never asked of him. When confronted with the Pentagon’s investigations which pointed to the fact that it was the US responsible for the bombing of a school which left 160 little girls and teachers dead, he flippantly stated that ‘mistakes are made’ and suggested that images of the aftermath were ‘AI generated.’

The number of posts and AI generated cartoons he puts out in a short span of time (1 to 2 hours) is just deranged and always with himself as the savior, the hero, planting an American flag on an Iranian oil tanker and worse.

What is far worse than any of this is the fact that although his more than an hour-long monologue, jumping from one topic to another, his belligerence, his aggression, his obsessive behavior, is so in-your-face clear, there are still people praising him, talking about him as ‘sent by God.’ He may be a servant of many things, one being mammon, but servant of God he is not.

It is easy to underwrite and support the ‘Make America Great Again’ movement, because that should be each and every appointed leader’s mantra, but is Donald Trump making American great again? Obviously, we cannot compare the current inflation rate with the post Covid rates (2021 & 2022 December to December), but the December – December CPI for 2023 was 3.4%, 2024 2.9% and 2025 2.7%, however the inflation rate for the 6 months January to June 2026 is 3.5%. So, although the US does not look too bad and is not anywhere the CPI figures reached in 2021 and 2022, we have to remember that American oil and gas producers benefit from higher market prices since the US export energy. It is the consumer who faces the higher prices at the pump and increased everyday expenses. Does Donald Trump care? No, he does not. Does he care about the high global energy prices, the spiking shipping costs and the global financial markets’ instability? No, he does not. Does he care about the $32 trillion national debt? No, he does not. Where is the money going to come from to continue the Iran US war? More borrowing?

Trump’s term is only running out in January 2029. Will America survive that long, economically or otherwise? Will the world survive, economically or otherwise, that long? The prognosis is not looking positive at all, not if this misogynistic, narcissistic man in cognitive decline remains in the seat of power.

Tip Jar

Suddenly, and it does seem to coincide with the rise in the interest in aliens and UFOs, there is a renewed interest in Tim Cohen’s book and his views. Tim Cohen’s book is a very specific and detailed analysis on biblical prophecy and written from a Hebrew Christian perspective. Of course, the controversy surrounding Tim Cohen’s book rests on the fact that according to his analysis, King Charles or Prince Charles as he was then, fits the biblical description and his calculations perfectly when it comes to who the antichrist may be.

Cohen spent a lot of time and pages dissecting Charles’s coat of arms or then the official coat of arms of the Prince of Wales.

According to Cohen, the imagery and the crest literally mirrors the apocalyptic beasts described in the book of Revelation, specifically Revelation 13.

He links the symbols, the lion, the bear, and the leopard to biblical text. And he claims that the red dragon emblem associated with whales symbolizes Satan granting power to the beast.

Cohen also reports that if you had the numerical values of Charles’s full names and official royal titles, whether in English or Hebrew, it still calculates to 666.

He also refers to the genealogy of the British royal family and of course like us looked at Charles’s immense global footprint. In Cohen’s view Charles’s involvement with the World Bank, and of course not from Cohen’s book but from our own knowledge the other organizations like the WEF etc. In Cohen’s view these organizations are the framework for a new world order and global governance.

The Bible itself, however, does not give any specific description of the antichrist. What we today may perceive as the antichrist is pieced together bits and bobs from both the Old and the New Testament. From what we can learn, the Antichrist does not walk around with horns on his head or has eyes glowing red when he’s angry, but instead, what we do learn from the Bible and interpretations of the Bible, is that whoever he is, he is a master of social masking, very charismatic and a deceptive global leader.

The prophet Daniel describes him as having a mouth speaking great things. He is boastful yet eloquent, a compelling orator who uses language to captivate the masses. And here you can refer to Daniel 7 verse 8. The Bible also describes the antichrist as someone with extreme arrogance who will, and I quote from Daniel 11, ‘exalt himself above every god.’ Now, strangely, this is not just a once off. Paul in the Bible echoes this in the New Testament stating that this man, this antichrist opposes everything that is worshiped.

According to the Bible, he does not conquer by brute force initially. No, instead he rises to power through intrigue and flattery and uses a false peace agenda to deceive many people. Also, be very careful about the interpretation of the prefix anti-, as in antichrist. In the original Greek, the prefix ‘-anti’ does not necessarily mean against, but in Greek it mostly means ‘in place of.’

The Bible warns that he will present or he already presented himself as a savior, a peacemaker and a solution to global crisis effectively stepping into the role of a messiah.

So, let’s have a look at 77 year-old Charles. He himself claimed that he was related to Dracula or then Vlad the Impaler. You will remember that in a previous chapter we spoke about Count Vladimir Dracul whose son obviously took his name, Dracula (Son of the Dragon) as well as earning the name Vlad the Impaler for himself. Now remember Vlad’s father was also a member of the Order of the Dragon.

Vlad himself earned his nickname because he impaled his enemies on wooden stakes near and around his castle. We also know that Charles, King Charles, owns several properties in Romania. It started with one. Last I heard it had turned into three properties. But there are those saying it could be as many as 10. Charles himself said that genealogy shows that he is descended from Vlad the Impaler or then Count Dracula, Son of the Dragon.

So, there you have it. we had finally brought the legend or the myth (or maybe even the reality) of the reptilian together with a real history of a Romanian warlord named Count Vladimir Dracula, one of the most vicious, most cruel people to have ever lived, also as close to being satanic or devilish as one could imagine and then by his own admission, a character King Charles is related to by blood.

Is it thus possible that there are overlaps in history, is it possible these evil humans sometimes manifest as dangerous reptilians (dragons maybe) and that the antichrist could one day manifest as part human and part reptile? A snake maybe? Is that why we call someone who is devious and sly a snake?

In the last and final part we shall pull it all together and look at whether Charles fits the bill, or maybe there is someone else...

Can it occur naturally or would it require some help like slicing and splicing? Even so, what does science say?

Even mixing of human DNA can sometimes be quite tricky. So, is it even possible to mix human DNA with some kind of alien DNA? And then, if and when, it was done, what will the results be?

We humans do have close, and I mean very close, non-human relatives already, and they do not even need a spaceship to get here. Humans share about 98,8% of their DNA with both chimpanzees and bonobos. 98,8% is darn close, if you ask me. We also share 98% of our DNA with a gorilla and 97% with the orangutan. The most amazing thing about this is that although there is only 1 2% difference in DNA between man and ape, we are still so very different.

The reason is that although it sounds so tiny, in reality it amounts to millions of individual genetic differences.

So, one would think that with such a small difference in DNA, it should be possible to create a bonobo or chimp/human hybrid. But no, alas, it is not or then highly unlikely to biologically impossible even with modern techniques like IVF.

This is because the language of DNA is so complex and the barrier to having or creating a, say, bonobo/human child or a chimp/human child does not rely on the amount of DNA we share but how that DNA is structured and organized. The biggest hurdle or barrier happens at the chromosomal level which is the structures that pack our DNA. Humans have 46 chromosomes or then 23 pairs. The chimpanzee and bonobos have 48 chromosomes or then 24 pairs. Those who believe in evolution may say or tell you that two ape chromosomes fused together to form the human chromosome 2. If that is true or correct, then it is this particular mismatch which makes a human-chimp hybrid impossible. It means, in practical terms, that should a human sperm and chimp egg, or the other way around, be brought together in a test tube, the chromosomes will not line up correctly during cell division and the fertilized egg would almost certainly fail to divide properly and would die in the embryonic stage.

There are also of course other issues like developmental timing. The human and chimp embryos grow at entirely different rates. For example, human brains and nervous systems take much longer to develop in the womb than in the chimp or the bonobo.

The chemical signals telling an embryo thus to grow limbs or a heart or whatever would thus be out of sync. So, if it is almost impossible to create a human-chimp hybrid, how difficult must it be, if not downright impossible to, through natural means or otherwise, create this human alien or then human-reptilian hybrid.

So, it’s not that us mere mortals do not believe David Ike. It is that even our limited knowledge of science makes it difficult to believe him, but let’s for a moment, pretend that whatever DNA reptilians have, whether it is 97, 95 or 91% similar to that of a human, it is in the right sequence, right pairing and right packing to line up in the embryonic phase. You will have to have a heck of a lot of imagination, but let’s go ahead and pretend it was, it is, and it can be possible because fact remains, we don’t know otherwise. We cannot say definitively that it is impossible to breed these hybrids, because we have no idea what a so-called reptilian’s DNA looks like. So, we can’t say one way or the other, because … we don’t know.

However, we can speculate and we can pretend and that is exactly what we are going to do now. We must move on and try and understand how a child inherits, for instance, a parent’s eye color or hair color.

I’m going to give a quick simple overview because most people who had children will have some sort of idea. Let’s say DNA is like a recipe book and the genes are the individual recipes or recipe for each and every trait that we have. Every child receives two copies of each recipe, one from the mother and one from the father. To understand why a child has brown eyes and dark hair or is blonde and blue eyed, the explanation comes down to how these recipes interact to form the child’s own recipe book. This interaction is driven by what is called genetic dominance.

In genetics, some recipes are stronger, louder, bigger than others, or maybe more expensive. For example, dark hair and dark eyes are indeed dominant. If a child inherits one copy of a recipe for dark hair or eyes, it will usually override the other recipe for light hair or eyes. In the same way, blonde or red hair and blue or green eyes are indeed recessive, the quieter, slower, weaker recipes. Therefore, a child will need two copies of this weaker gene, one from each parent, and then also with no bully dark gene to bully them back into submission. Of course, it is far more complicated than this. I.e., dad may have brown eyes but carry a blue-eyed gene as well. Mom has blue eyes and thus received two blue eyed jeans from her parents. So, it is 100% possible for them to have a blue-eyed child because both have a blue-eyed gene.

Or one could say that out of the four recipes brought to the table, three had blue eyed genes. I’m not going to take this any further because we are not talking about simple human DNA, we’re actually talking about some unknown DNA. So in reality we can speculate until the cows come home.

What if beyond our wildest dreams and imagination there is such a thing as an alien- human or human-reptilian hybrid?

What would he or she look like?

Which would be the dominant gene, the human gene or the reptilian gene? It is difficult to say, once again, as we don’t know anything about alien or reptilian DNA.

What is true though is that it sometimes happens that a physical trait which was considered bred out or dormant suddenly pops up two to three generations later and sometimes even longer. You know that huge hook nose or that very coarse curly hair which everyone was glad to be rid of suddenly pops up in the youngest member of the family and dad knows he will have to start saving for plastic surgery.

How does that happen? Well, say grandparents, grandpa A and Grandma B get together. Grandpa has dead straight hair, which is a dominant gene, and grandma has coarse curly hair, a recessive gene. Their daughter, who has straight hair, inherited one dominant and one recessive gene. She is thus a carrier of this recessive gene. Now she marries the bloke with straight hair whose parents had straight hair, and they have a kid with straight hair but unbeknown to her, but unbeknown to them one of them still carries that recessive gene which in turn they will pass on to their daughter. This kid marries a guy who, like her has straight hair, but he has a curly haired ancestor and now both have a recessive gene to give. What happens now? Now their poor Betty pops out with great grandma’s coarse curly hair or the family’s roman nose...

Let’s look at an imaginary scenario: Let us imagine Queen Victoria’s mother, Princess Victoria of Saxe-Coberg-Saalfeld, had a hybrid baby. The kid may not have looked like a little reptilian at all because both Victoria Saxe-Coberg-Saalfeld’s were human. So, the reptilian DNA may remain as a recessive gene, and this can continue for who knows how long. For all we know, maybe that is why, until very recently, royalty married royalty or at least titled elite, in other words, to ensure that that recessive reptilian gene is maintained and not bred out. Remember, Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Phillip were third cousins through Queen Victoria and second cousins once removed through Christian the 9th of Denmark or something like that. (I was honestly too lazy to go look up the exact details, but you catch my drift.)

So, so far science tells us it’s not likely but not impossible, not impossible at all for there to be a reptilian recessive gene, or any other kind of recessive gene for that matter, still lingering in the blood of Prince Harry and Prince William.

The conclusion we have thus made today is that we are definitely not in any position to dismiss David Icke. Not at all. We can’t dismiss him either, not unless or until we get hold of that elusive reptilian DNA.

In part four we’ll talk about the science of shapeshifting and metamorphosis in animals and how it could happen, if at all, in humans. Thereafter we will talk about Tim Cohen’s antichrist theory.

When one looks into the word ‘reptilian’ the mind immediately shifts to something cold-blooded, aloof and very far removed from humankind, but is it? When we use the word in relation to what we perceive as human, the alien concept/narrative may shift to a more prominent, more modern theory, some would even say ‘conspiracy theory.’ To be clear, when we talk about reptilians when referring to humans, we are not talking about spaceships, but more about global control, hidden bloodlines and institutional power.

In this framework the ‘reptilian’ lore or theory is interpreted in two ways:

Firstly, the literal hybrid view, which is what David Icke, for instance, prescribes to. This hypothesis/ theory claims that ancient, non-human lineages interbred with humans and particularly those with leadership qualities or in leadership positions. This resulted in hybrid bloodlines who retained power throughout the centuries, just like the British Royal Family. Obviously, they retained through non-democratic passing of power along the bloodline instead of through, say, a majority vote, or in other words; exactly like the British Royal Family’s Line of Succession.

Secondly, we have an allegorical/symbolic point of view. This is where the term ‘reptilian’ is seen as a dark metaphor. It represents a ruthless, cold and calculated ruling class which lacks empathy, operates entirely out of primal, survivalist ‘reptilian’ brain and views the general population as a resource to be used and managed.

Unlike standard UFO lore, the secret elite narrative focusses on genealogy and institutional captures states. What does this mean in plain English? Simply this; the British Royal Family, along with other European royal houses are often placed in the center of these theories because of their guarded bloodlines, immense ancestral wealth and centuries of institutional permanence. These bloodlines are then also linked to international banking systems, secret societies, global organizations and the theory, which is sometimes more fact than theory, that these bloodlines orchestrate certain major events like political changes and economic shifts.

So, let’s step back for a moment and compare this to reality: The guarded bloodlines, ancestral wealth and institutional permanence of the royal family is a given, but it is when it comes to the organizations and affiliations of members of the Royal Family that the origins of the myths, gossip and theories start to really make sense and shows us why this reptilian lore is attributed to the likes of the royal families. Charles (prince/king) had been and likely still is a huge proponent of the WEF, the Duke of Kent and Prince Michael are both known Freemasons etc. Many of the ceremonies held by and attended by the Royal Family are just plain weird. One which comes to mind is the Order of the Garter ceremony. Many of these ceremonies still have dressed up little boys known as pages, carrying the robes and in today’s day and age with so much institutional abuse emerging out in the open, this tradition is starting to take on a slight ominous look and feel.

Psychology goes deeper than this though. We are often faced with things and situations we cannot explain; corruption, wars, economic inequality and so forth. How can humans do this to other humans? Surely those leaders, those elites cannot possibly be human? It is easier to accept that these people are non-human rather than accept that they are naturally indifferent. So often, when a population feels totally disconnected from their elites and/or leaders and when people feel oppressed, they tend to depict their ruler as monstrous e.g. as vampires or then non-human entities like reptilians.

It is fascination how ancient mythology, genealogy and a deep distrust of political institutions and even the media, merge into one single theory/hypothesis/myth.

If only it ended there, but there are so many historical myths and stories which plays right into the reptilian theory that no paper on the subject would be complete without mentioning some; The early medieval Frankish family claimed that their lineage began when the queen was impregnated by a sea beast (the Quinotaur). The Emperor of China claimed direct lineage from dragons, the pharaohs of Egypt wore the upright cobra on their crowns and in Greek mythology the foundational king of Athens, Crecrops, was depicted as a man with a serpent’s tail. Lastly there is literally a secret society group of elites bound by a reptilian symbol, “Societas Draconistarum” (Order of the Dragon). Its most famous historical member was Vlad II of Wallachia who took the name Dracul, which literally means Dragon or Devil. He passed the title on to his son Vlad III Dracula, and as they say,” the rest is history”.

Then there is the metaphor, “blue blood”, which historically is not really a metaphor because many years ago the Spanish nobility’s skins were so pale that it made their veins look blue, hence the term “blue blood.” Again, this created an image of some people being physically different and then already there was talk of copper-based blood and non-human circulation.

In Part 2 we have just barely touched on how deep the lore of the reptilian-human hybrid goes and in Part 3 we’ll look at a possible scientific and even biological explanation which may even shock you and if you think David Icke is a cook, you may change your mind after Part 3.

For me such a person would be Prince Charles, now King Charles. I remember him being interviewed and he was asked about girlfriends and what qualities a wife should have, and he answered quite straight forwardly, but something happened to his face. There was a sudden glint in his eye, he looked sideways and he licked his lips. I saw the video likely even after the demise of Diana, so obviously it was recorded quite some time before he even met her (I hope). I remember thinking “Ugh, that is one large, scaly predator, or a rough bloke when it comes to the bedroom, or the lounge floor or behind the barn, and I wondered how many actually came out from behind the barn… I also remember wondering whether he was quite human.

Today, so many years later, it could be 30 years or more, we are actually there where it is no longer strange or weird to wonder, even out loud, whether someone is actually really human. Over a short period of time and largely due to someone like David Grush, the whistleblower, things have changed and UFO or UAP stories, including aliens (or not), have become commonplace and no one is rushing to book you a bed in an insane asylum. However, there are times when I personally do feel like I am in an insane asylum when listening to everyone’s hypothesis on what is real and what is not. There are those talking about interdimensional beings, time travelers, interplanetary travel, beings from under the ocean and the aliens among us, which also supposedly come in various shapes and sizes; the tall whites, the Nordics and the bad ones, the nasty reptilians.

I do not comprehend the interdimensional hypothesis, nor do I comprehend the time travelling business. I can be a parrot and tell you word for word what others say about this, because I listened to it often enough, but it does not correspond with the little I know about science. I understand the concept of the molecules of a solid object being closer to each other than the molecules of a liquid and then of course the molecules of gas are even further apart, but geez how far apart must the molecules of something be to travel through dimensions, which I interpret as space and time? And then, when it reaches its destination, it must have the ability to pull those particles together and materialize… my mind does not quite want to put that all together and form any kind of humanoid shape. At least not a walking, talking, blinking, farting shape at the very least. I would guess the same would apply to time traveling. What has passed is mostly dead and buried, six feet under, they say. My brain, and I am sure the brain of many others, cannot comprehend a way of moving back to a time when our parents or grandparents or even great-grandparents are still alive in a physical form. Having said all that, I am willing to set that aside, after all, why bother to even try and understand something until the truth reveals itself.

What concerns me, and others like me who do not wish to re-study physics in order to try and understand the hypothesis of interdimensional beings or time travelers, are those who supposedly walk among us. So, it was while talking to some very clever, highly educated people that I heard something thrown into the conversation which, maybe, I should not have heard. Yes, I can understand the Nordics among us, yes, I can understand the tall whites among us, heck I would even easily believe that there are humanoid creatures with bases under the ocean, because God knows, we as humans have not even discovered 20% of the creatures under the ocean yet, as a matter of fact, scientists are of the opinion that 91% of life under the ocean has not been discovered or recognized yet. What baffled me or then ‘blew my flapjacks’, were the reptilians… Apparently, allegedly the British royal family are reptilians.

How, why, what about… the questions immediately shot into my mind. I am not unfamiliar with David Icke, I have listened to him for years, more as entertainment than fact seeking. He himself said that there was a time in his life when his brain resembled scrambled egg, when he did not know his front from his backside, but even though he now considers himself sane, he still tells the story of the royals being reptilian, of shape shifting during rituals and so forth and it was during a lighthearted mention of this that my mind went back to Charles’ behavior while being asked about a future wife. At that moment I could easily have believed that he was, and maybe still is, a shape shifting reptilian or maybe even a snake. I was still dreaming up these images when I overheard a conversation which maybe I should not have. ‘Pity we cannot tell the truth,” she said, “we know that reptilians are not shape shifters but that it refers to a secret, very secret, society. Suddenly the bell rang and I knew where it was ringing, a whole load of knowledge and understanding opened up. Suddenly I understood that it was true and that aliens were walking among us, sometimes they are not exceptionally tall and pale or have bright blue eyes, heck they may not even be short and grey, some look just like us, short, fat, dark or pale, blue eyes, grey eyes, green or brown. It is not about how they look but about how they act.

How many people will just go “oh, interesting, now how do I pay these bills, where can I get a good mechanic...?” upon hearing that there are some aliens floating around in our skies. If the aliens have been floating around in our skies for hundreds of years or built bases in our mountains or under our oceans, then clearly, they mean us no harm. At least less harm than a nuclear bomb or a missile over a school. That is until humans start interfering. History has shown that the moment people start interfering things go wrong, well broadly speaking…

Before European/western contact the Americas were inhabited by different empires, like the Aztecs and the Incas. There were trade networks and indeed tribal warfare and territorial disputes. However, after colonization by European nations these “empires’ had other things to deal with, things like smallpox and measles, which very nearly wiped out an entire group of people/ nation. Western concepts of land ownership were foreign to these people and their views of “land stewardship” and this led to forced removals and the reserve system. Of course, there is also the issue of residential schools and that is a part of history which deserves a video on its own. The Aztecs and the Incas were not the only ones either, there was the Khoisan in South Africa, the Māori in New Zealand, and the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders in Australia.

The question thus remains; what will an alien landing or an alien invasion look like? Will we excitedly chat about it online and watch every YouTube, Sky News, BBC etc. videos we can find…. For all of 7 days, before we go back to our usual routine? Will the aliens be the “invaders’ who will put us in reserves and who will bring illnesses we have never encountered before and who will want to teach our children to be alien instead of human? Or will we be the aggressors who will fire first and ask questions later? Who will imprison our visitors and who will torture them until they share all their secrets with us and then get rid of them because they are no longer of any use to us?

At first, it was announced that they will be the sponsors of Archewell Philanthropies, but then they went ahead and let half, if not more, of their staff go. This raised questions; how would two people who do not know what a hard day of work looks like, manage a multi-million-dollar home and estate, be hands-on with the charities they support, work to bring in money and handle the administration of a ‘global’ charity? Of course, they can’t and of course they wouldn’t, they do not have the knowledge or expertise to do so. Soon it leaked that they indeed acquired a third-party sponsor. What they neglected to include in their narrative was who this third party sponsor is.

In 2021 an amount of $10 000 000 was paid to Archewell Foundation from an unknown donor via Silicon Valley Community Foundation SVCF and again (not yet in public records) in January 2026 $2 million dollars was paid to Archewell Philanthropies via SVCF. Because of the 10 million in 2021 paid via SVCF it was assumed that they had acquired the professional services of SVCF to be the fiscal sponsor and to take the administration of the philanthropic endeavour off their hands. If that was the case however, why keep it secret? Why lie about it? Archewell would not have been the first to outsource administrative parts of their business or charity to a professional company.

However, even with a minute amount of knowledge about the law and tax law, one thing becomes abundantly clear and immediately jumps out at you; moving to a third-party fiscal sponsorship model their financial trail becomes much harder if not impossible to follow. The current fiscal sponsorship model has far too many loopholes for nefarious donors and other entities to slip through and not only can we suspect that these entities could be ‘buying’ loyalty, but it is also a brilliant breeding ground for money laundering.

Under the current laws, if a ‘high profile’ entity like Archewell moves to a fiscal sponsor, which then becomes a ‘parent’ 501(c) (3), they stop filing their own public Form 990. Their finances now become part and parcel of the parent organization’s annual report, sometimes merely appearing as a single, anonymous item among hundreds of other projects.

What is happening now is that the US government (suddenly) recognises that if a 501 (c) (3) acts as channel for money to pass through, without actually knowing or disclosing who is running the project, they are creating a massive opportunity for money laundering, foreign interference and various other kinds of nefarious and even dangerous actions.

Looking at the scenario through this lens instead of purely an entity offloading the headache of public disclosure i.e. public filings and other administrative duties, it becomes clear that there can be much to worry about which would extend far beyond only rotten financial dealings, it is possible that the current model of fiscal sponsorship can endanger the nation and entire country by fiscal sponsors accepting anonymous donations on behalf of a project (which is what Archewell will be labelled as for the ‘parent’ 501c3.). The public has no way of knowing whether the donations are coming from legitimate donors, foreign governments or entities with conflicting interests and goals.

Seeing that we are using Archewell as our example today, need you be reminded that while in Jordan Harry and Meghan Mountbatten-Windsor visited Questscope an NGO operating a youth center in a refugee camp. Very noble, except that the charity has clear links to pro-Hamas content on social media and staff members also post pro-Hamas content. Is it, could it be possible for a group like Hamas to use an entity like Archewell Philanthropies and its fiscal sponsor to launder money and get a foothold in the US? Absolutely. There is no accusation here, no saying Hamas is using Archewell, merely proving that it is possible.

Also note that CharityWatch’s critique of Archewell was biting. They made it very clear that despite Archewell’s tax filings claiming they undergo independent audits, they had repeatedly ignored requests to produce them. Archewell’s 2024 – 2025 Impact Report was all about “soft” metrics, for example “85% of participants found meaning in life...” The kind of statement which would have you spit out your coffee… Their latest Form 990 also showed that 47% of their spending was categorized under “Other fees for Services.” That is usually a euphemism for consultants, legal fees or PR and NOT actual charity work.

Fortunately, there had been an awakening of sorts. On 23 April 2026 the US Department of the Treasury and the IRS announced a major Form 990 Transparency initiative, and while there is no outright ban on fiscal sponsorships yet, the new direction this is taking signals a massive shift in how they will be managed and policed.

The IRS will revise Form 990 to require much more detailed reporting on:

1. Fiscal Sponsorship Arrangements. For the first time the IRS wants specific documentation on how, why and from where these “parent” non-profits move money to their “projects” like Archewell.

2. Government Grants and Contracts. The IRS will also want increased disclosure on how public funds are being utilized and whether it is being diverted to advocacy or political activity. NOTE: A section 501(c)(3) organization may not make a contribution to a political organization described in section 527 (such as a candidate committee, political party committee or political action committee (PAC)).

3. Foreign influence. In future the 501(c)(3) will have to identify the origin, destination and use of funds to prevent foreign entities from using US non-profits as conduits for domestic influence.

Looking specifically at Archewell Philanthropies, there are 3 major red flags; The fact that Archewell failed to provide the independent audits they claimed existed, the fact that they “offloaded” or transferred some of their initiatives, like Parents Network to other non-profits like Parents Together and lastly their current “secret sponsor” strategy. Because of their inability to provide their audited financials already caused CharityWatch to give them a dubious rating. The fact that Archewell is attempting to keep their fiscal sponsor a secret, points to one of two things:

1. The sponsor is controversial and Harry and Meghan do not want the sponsor’s other projects linked to theirs, or.

2. Their goal is total anonymity. They want to break the paper trail completely, so that journalists can no longer report on their declining income or high overhead costs, or whatever it is they wish to hide form the public. Whatever their reasons are, it is clear that we are moving into the mechanics of “Dark Money” and exactly why Chairman Jason Smith of the House Ways and Means Committee showed his support for the new revisions, stating that tax-exempt status is privilege, not a right.

For me this is a “I told you so” moment, because going back on previous videos on YouTube and writings, you will note that I attempted to wave the flag and blow the whistle so hard, but it is true that no one is as deaf as those who do not want to hear. When the proposed new regulations are published for public comment in the next few weeks, the secret Harry and Meghan tried to keep will become a liability for them and if the laws and proposals are passed and the fiscal sponsor still would not disclose Archewell’s financials the sponsor will lose its own tax-exempt status.

This move by the IRS, and the US Department of Treasury is long overdue. There is no fairness in taxing your citizens into the poorhouse yet giving the rich and famous loopholes galore to not only be exempt of taxes but also to work against the government of the day. It is not a democratic way to run a country.

There are people who call themselves Christians who are still fighting in Donald Trump’s corner and who will even delve into the Bible and other religious scripture to validate their love of and loyalty to Donald Trump. So let us fight back in their language.

· Donald Trump has been married three times. His first two marriages failed because of infidelity, because he had affairs with other women and girls. It is thus correct to say that Donald Trump broke one of the ten commandments, namely the seventh commandment which makes it clear “You shall not commit adultery.” Also to be considered is the “hush’” money he paid Stormy Daniels to conceal an affair while he was married to Melania.

· Various fact-checking organizations have documented thousands of false and misleading claims Donald Trump made during his campaigns and his presidencies. This will include disputes over election results, economic data, personal matters and much more. It would thus be fair to say that he had broken the second commandment; You shall not bear false witness.

· Trump’s public brand is heavily reliant on wealth, status, luxury and image. His lifelong pursuit of “winning” even at the expense of others and his clear desire for the possessions of others, completely fits the definition of coveting and thus it would be correct to say that he also broke the 3rd commandment, which reads: “You shall not covet”

· Trump frequently held and still holds political rallies, conducted high stakes business negotiations and played golf on Sundays. Although common in modern secular life, strictly speaking, it would not be wrong to say that he has broken the 5^th Commandment, “Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy.”

· You shall not murder – Although there is no indication that Donald Trump had ever been personally involved in the physical act of murder, it can be argued that Donald J Trump can be held responsible for some of the atrocities committed by his armed forces. In particular because he shows no remorse for any of the atrocities committed i.e. the bombing of the school in which 167 girls between the ages of 5 and 12 died. Trump showed no remorse, labelled it as an accident and ignored it – as does the mainstream media. The strike was no accident, it was a “double tap’ strike, which means that after the first strike, 5 minutes later, there was another targeted strike on the same location. In the broader sense the attack took place under the ultimate command of Donald J Trump and his Minister of war Pete Hegseth, neither of whom apologized or showed any kind of empathy or remorse.

· You shall not steal. While his business practices have faced numerous lawsuits regarding unpaid contractors and fraud, there had not been any convictions in the traditional sense. However, it is also true that DJ Trump has made his intentions to unlawfully take or remove things which does not belong to him or his country, and to do so by force, i.e. there is oil, lots of it, I can take it. Why not? Whether the intention to commit an act and the actual physical act can be treated the same under the law or in religion is up for debate.

· Blasphemy. Whether Trump committed blasphemy by posting an image of himself as Jesus or not, is still being debated. However, what theologians agree on is that it was indeed sacrilege.

The ONLY commandment we can honestly say Donald Trump has NOT broken is “Honour Thy Father and Mother.” DJT consistently spoke of his deep reverence for his parents, Fred and Mary Trump. He credits his father for his business acumen and his mother for his sense of showmanship. There is at least that…

The point is that one has to choose your poison very carefully and practically be an expert in the subject you choose to accuse or defend someone with. For non-thinkers it is only too easy to reach out to religion and to twist religion or read into it what they want, i.e. easy fix. The Bible is written for everyone, from the most to the least intelligent because collectively we are all God’s children, or supposed to be, but by using religion to excuse the villain’s less honorable deeds the non-thinker exposes him- and herself for the person he or she really is when the academic and the true scholar counteracts their arguments with facts. Trained not to think for themselves yet still awake enough to feel instinctively that religion is the one thing almost everyone can be emotionally manipulated by, they form a crusade against the true righteous thinking human beings, storming at them with the proverbial burning cross. To the naked eye it appears as if the world is being run by imbeciles and zombies, but among the rubble there are still a few who think out of the box and can think independently and who do try to make a difference, but like in a zombie apocalypse movie those are the ones who have to hide in tight spaces and fight like warriors against a zombie-like majority rolling ahead like a huge wave turning everything in its way into zombies like themselves.

Donald Trump did just that and he did so very successfully, so successfully that even though we can fight back and point out the dangers and flaws of the man, even though we can fight back on the same battlefield, be it religion or something else, although the man himself gives us enough ammunition every day to fight him, his zombies are still chanting the same drivel.

May God be with us all…

It is Monday 13 April 2020. Today we’ll address the British Royal family.

So first let’s address the matter of the King addressing the nation on the Queen’s real birthday on April 21^st, a birthday which would have been her 100th birthday. First and foremost, despite the wide speculation in the media and social media, the King addressing the nation on that day will purely be to honor his dearest and beloved “Mummy” or maybe he’ll have a bee in his bonnet and frog’s logs for dinner and call her mama, who knows… The entire purpose of the speech will be to bore us to tears when he drones on in his pompous voice and secondly to mark the centenary of the Queen’s birth, her legacy and service. Later Charles and Camila will host a reception at Buckingham Palace for representatives from charities which had close ties to the Queen. Ag shame, Charles will have to put up with making conversation with some “plebians” for an hour or so.

Of course, this all comes mere days before Charles and Camilla’s visit to America and our all-time favourite president, Donald J. Trump, the man who had single handedly brought the world to a near collapse and may still do so. I want to read to you a post by Michael Keith Roberts. Please note that along with the post he also posted a map of the Gulf of Mexico, depicting hundreds of vessels. His post reads:

“REAL TIME ENGRGY TAKE-OVER, BABY! This isn’t the Straits of Hormuz - this is the Gulf of America! Hundreds of super tankers from every comer of the planet are racing to Texas & Louisiana to fill up on the sweetest, cheapest and most American ail on earth. While the world panics over Hormuz, President Trump just made the USA the No1 energy Superpower again! Records exports, record tankers, record winning. The globalist chokehold is broken. America is the new gas station for the planet!”

So, like I predicted and received immense hatred and bullying for, this is what it is and was all about along. Donald Trump ordered and invaded Venezuela and stole 3 oil tankers, then they invaded Iran, Iran closed the strait of Hormuz and other desperate countries are now flocking to America to buy stolen oil.

So, this is the man Charles and Camilla will be visiting. Charles, who is head of the church of England will show, through his actions, that he approves of a man who does not care about 167 little girls dying in exchange for a barrel of oil. Charles will be licking the boots or arse - you decide - of a man who posted an Al generated picture of himself as Jesus Christ - the worst blasphemy of any Christian in any church - Catholic, Anglican, Presbyterian, it truly does not matter. Even the Moslems will not approve of anybody depicting himself as Mohammed and such a person would likely. be in grave danger. I had to go double check to see whether it the post was true. This false prophet will be the man the head of the Church of England will be breaking bread with, if Charles chooses to go ahead with the state visit.

Today we are going to have a look of British Constitutional Law and what it tells us about State visits. Let’s go see whether Charles, as sovereign and as head of the Church, has any say in the matter. The paper was written by Francesca Jackson, and I’ll summarize from her paper, you can click on the link and read the complete paper if you wish.

https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2026/04/08/francesca-jackson-king-charles-president-trump-and-the-state-visit-some-constitutional-considerations/

Donald Trump recently released a string of verbal attacks on Keir Starmer - anyone who takes any interest in what is going on in the world today will know that. Yet, it was announced recently that the state visit will go ahead.

Certain political parties see the state visit yet another diplomatic coup for Donald Trump, but despite opposition from the public and a large number of clergy & politicians, it appears that the ones in charge are unwilling to budge, so who exactly oversees state visits?

Ok don’t laugh or snicker, just hear me out because this is not fiction but fact – at least as it stands now. The UK Royal Visits Committee is responsible for coordinating state visits, both incoming and outgoing. It is chaired by the under-secretary at the Foreign Commonwealth office. The private secretaries of the King and the Prince of Wales, Charles and William, also attend meetings, alongside members of the cabinet office. The Prime Minister, the Keeper of the Privy Purse, the Chief Executive of UK Trade and Investment and the National Security Advisor are all called on to attend these meetings. The Cabinet Office is responsible for passing the recommendations of the RVC Royal Visits Committee to the minister who, at the time, is responsible for advising the king on political and global matters, which, since 1970 is the Prime Minister. The monarch is also constitutionally bound to accept the advice of the PM.

None of this means however that the entire cabinet agrees that Charles, considering the current political climate, should go to the US albeit for the 250th anniversary of the United States’ independence. Many feel, particularly those in Foreign Office, that the trip risk embarrassing Charles & Camula. However, it appears that the RVC, has decided that the benefits of celebrating the historic connections and the modern bilateral relationship outweigh any potential embarrassment to the monarchy

However, NONE of it means that the monarch has no say. If/ when the members of the RVC are undecided or there are any external issues it will be left up to the monarch to decide. I think, it would be truthful to say that the monarch is bound, or it is recommended to follow the PM’s advice, but it does NOT render him helpless - a piece of rubbish which can be swept from one point to another. In 1974 for instance, the Queen was scheduled to visit Australia in March, but due to the elections producing a hung parliament there was huge uncertainty in England and the Queen decided not to visit Australia at that time.

Now, even when reading the rest of the document, it remains uncertain whether the king himself approves or disproves of the visit to the US. Maybe, the fact that posts from the palace constantly refers to the visit as being ‘on advice of His M’s government...’ tells us that the King is not too keen on it.

As a note from my side, I have been informed that Charles’ doctors and medical team, as well as his wife Camilla, are against his visit to the United States. However, I am assured that Charles refuses to cancel the visit because of his health. I am also informed. that Charles threw a massive tantrum when it was suggested that William represent him during the formal celebrations of the US independence celebrations.

As Donald Trump’s posts and remarks are going from bad to worse and the situation in Iran teeters on the knife’s edge. I personally do not quite understand why Charles is so adamant on going. I think that it is likely to prove to all that he can still do the job and if that is the case then why are big channels and the media leading with dramatic headings such as “Sick king to address the nation...!” If he is healthy and strong enough to travel to the US for 3 days filled with events and visits, surely it is a walk in the park to give a speech celebrating the Queen, his mother?

During the last elections it was clear that there was no other choice but Trump. Why? Because Donald Trump promised to:

1. Reduce or eliminate the National Debt – instead the US’s national debt is rising and still there is no end in sight. At the end of the 2021 fiscal year the national debt was 28.43 trillion dollars, in 2024 35+ trillion dollars, 2025 38.4 trillion dollars and in 2026 it looks even worse, so far standing at 39+ trillion dollars.

2. Protect American manufacturing and jobs. The reality is that tariffs on foreign made parts and motorcars have triggered price increases by automakers with Trump’s administration stating it ‘couldn’t care less’ about the cost increases.

3. End the war in Ukraine within 24 hours of returning to office. No useable agreement has been brokered between Ukraine and Russia to date.

4. Bring peace in the Middle East – Instead Donald Trump started a major war in Iran at the encouragement of Israel. Instability in the Middle East is worse than it had been for years as neighboring countries to Iran had since been pulled into this war. Thousands, including children and American soldiers have by now lost their lives in a war which costs America in the region of 2 billion dollars per day.

5. Clamp down on illegal immigration. Instead, at least 2 American citizens were fatally shot by federal immigration agents, 70 US citizens (more or less) wrongfully deported, until November 2025, 170 US citizens had been held against their will during operations. Other matters of agents pointing guns at, pepper spraying and punching individuals who were later confirmed as citizens of the US are routinely reported.

The list of promises made and promises left behind in the gutter filled with muck, is a long one. The fact that there is severe criticism of Donald Trump’s administration does not come as a surprise, nor is it unfounded. It does not matter which side of the political fence you are on, it is not humanly possible to look the other way and pretend everything is okay, because it is not.

The war in the Middle East is affecting everyone around the globe. Take Australia for instance. The Middle East conflict is significantly impacting Australia by driving up fuel prices, creating supply chain disruptions and it is worsening inflation and living costs. The conflict is also creating an uncertain environment for citizens abroad. Let’s peep at Germany; Rising energy costs threaten to derail Germany’s economic recovery. Supply chain disruption due to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz threatens Germany’s productivity and economic stability the same as it does elsewhere in the world. Foreign policy challenges and security concerns affect Germany as it does many other countries. We can wade through the countries one by one and the same reporting will be commonplace.

Is it thus a surprise that the Americans are not the only people suffering under the, often unlawful, decisions of Donald Trump? Gone is the excuse that people the world over have no right to comment because they are not American. This war and its consequences touch each and every one of us, some just maybe more than others. Regardless of a Supreme Court decision which prohibits Donald Trump from using tariffs as a tool to blackmail countries, he continued to impose tariffs. It also found that Donald Trump lacked the authority to impose tariffs. The Supreme Court also confirmed that IEEPA does not authorize the president to impose tariffs. Yet Donald Trump went right ahead and imposed a 100% tariff on certain Australian made pharmaceuticals entering the US.

There are concerns about Donald Trump’s mental or physical state. Mental health experts have raised concerns about potential paranoia, impulsiveness or narcissism or then ‘pathological paranoid narcissism. His deranged posts on Truth Social are not helping to build trust in the man and his leadership. On the contrary, long childish tirades again the likes of Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones, calling them nut jobs, troublemakers and stupid, only serves to doubt his stability even more.

The man who served as president of the US from 2017 until 2021 is not the same man we are seeing now. MAGA – Make America Great Again – seem to be a mantra furthest from his mind at the moment, because nothing he is doing or has done over the past few months proves to be the actions of a man who really thinks things through, nor of a man who wants the best for his country and the world. He called himself the Peace President, he compared himself to Jesus in a speech from Mara Lago during Easter, but the man who speaks war and death over so many people, threatening to wipe out an entire civilization is not a man of faith or a man who cares about anybody, least of all you and me, but instead a man who is either mentally unstable or has some medical condition, or whose ego has grown to dangerous levels or then a man who may even be blackmailed by his ally Benjamin Nethanyahu, maybe with things which remain hidden in the Epstein files, we don’t know.

The fact remains that now that the peace negotiations have failed, someone has to step in and at the very least find out what is ailing Donald Trump, find out whether he is still fit for purpose, or whether he is capable to lead his country. We cannot remain sitting on the sidelines and just watch as he destroys country, after country, after country. The world sighed a sigh of relief when the assassination attempt on Donald Trump did not succeed, but he does not extend the same curtesy to the rest of the people of the world. What made Donald Trump turn, what caused him to send your kids into danger, why is he ignoring the ICC and the ICJ and his own Supreme Court. We better find out soon before there is nothing left to save.

We have spoken about how the war in Iran was Ol’ Bennie N’s wet dream for forty years (by his own admission). We have spoken about how the war in Iran was a war of choice for Donald Trump. America was not under any imminent threat at the time, Trump did not consult with his Congress, the very same congress who, under the US Constitution has the EXCLUSIVE power to declare war. Nor did The Don consult with the UN. ‘The Don’ and his minister of war Pete Kegsbreath was bored playing with their Lego one day and decided to go bomb some stuff. Of course, Ol’ Bennie N was only too glad because now he could make his dream come true, no more Iran. Although Bennie is not Muslim, he still hoped for his 72 virgins.

So off they went. With no thought of what it will cost the people who voted them into power, with no thought at what it would cost the world or anyone or anything else. The truth is; whether you are a fan or a follower of any of these men and their cohorts, they do not care about you or anyone else. Would a caring president go play golf while his people are dying on the battlefield? Would he go host and party with a dumb non-Christian British king while his people are dying on the battlefield? That, however, is exactly what he is doing and planning to do. He does not care whether you can eat or sleep in a comfortable bed tomorrow. Mara Lago has plenty of comfortable beds and a golf course. So, seeing that The Don does not care what this war is costing the earth, let us calculate the cost. However, let me mention at this point that my calculations are not accurate because the US and Israel are lying to us about the number of real casualties, they are bragging about military installation they are destroying but are lying to us about what else they are doing and refusing to allow anyone to report on, but I am going to give it a try, because even though inaccurate it is still better than total ignorance. If these statistics pains you, then let it hurt where it should because only when we are angry enough will we do something about it.

So, let’s do it!

According to Western Media and US media 15 American soldiers have died in this war so far. According to the Middle Eastern and Iranian media, approximately 500 American soldiers have died. According to Western and US media 300 American soldiers have been injured. According to Iranian and other media that figure is somewhere between 700 and 1500. Who do we believe? Let’s look at another statistic. According to Western media and US media 11-13 US Military bases had been damaged or destroyed. For a change the number does not really vary when it comes to other media sources. Iranian and other sources report 17, but they include diplomatic sites in this figure.

According to the Western Media and American media Iran shot down 7 US aircraft which includes an A10 Thunderbolt II and a F15. According to other media sources and the Iranian media 16 US aircrafts were shot down, however, the number includes helicopters and drones.

The question then becomes; IF 13 US military bases were destroyed or severely damaged in the Middle East, 7-16 aircraft shot from the sky, how is it possible that there would only be 15 American deaths? Were the soldiers stationed there all in bunkers all day all night in case the Iranians drop a missile on their base? According to information released only 1 (ONE) soldier died as result of his injuries sustained during an attack on a military or airbase during this war. Is there anyone who really and truly believes this? How can anyone believe the numbers put out by the American president and his minister of war? It does not make sense.

Not only is the loss of life heartbreaking, but now it appears that the American government, its president and its minister of war, are ignoring, disowning, and dishonoring these brave men and women and to save their own image they are also showing the middle finger at their parents, husbands, wives, children and friends – ‘so what, they died, I said there will be casualties…’ I can hear The Don say.

But let us continue to tally up the figures. When we look at the physical cost of the losses, we can straight away look at the aircraft lost and for this exercise we can pretend that we believe American propaganda. If it is true that a Thunderbolt, a F15 and 5 other aircraft, for example a Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker (used for re-fueling), were downed we can easily estimate a cost of $650 million, which could very well be an underestimation because the value of a combat ready F15 could be as much as $117 million. As of early April 2026, losses from strikes on US bases in the Middle East are estimated to approach $5 billion. In total it is estimated that the war had cost Americans $11 billion in the first 2 – 3 weeks.

But America is not the only country with losses.

According to Iran’s narrative 3531 Iranians were killed up until the last day of March 2026. Of that number they say, 1607 were civilians and that would include at least 244 children. The Red Cross reported 1900 killed and 20 000 injured.

Lebanon: 1368 killed, of which at least 124 were children.

United Arab Emirates: 12 deceased.

Qatar: 7 dead

Kuwait: 7 dead

West Bank: 4 Palestinian women.

Syria: 4 Civilians

Bahrain: 2/3 people were killed when a residential building was hit.

Saudi Arabia: 2 people were killed when a projectile hit a residential area

France lost 1 soldier.

But that is not all – it appears that Bennie N and The Don are not satisfied with the thousands of people killed, they do not want the injured to survive either.

75 Iranian police facilities were bombed by the US

There were 20 attacks on Iranian healthcare facilities, 21 medical emergency centers were damaged or destroyed, 18 ambulances blown up, 11 healthcare workers killed and 55 wounded. A major pharmaceutical company was hit by the US in an attempt to disrupt medicine supplies.

THIS IS NOT WAR, THIS IS EVIL!

This topic arose from videos on Instagram and from TikTok videos. On an exercise video the woman’s camel toe was so obvious, so in your face that you have to move on before you vomited your breakfast all over your morning newspaper. Then there were hordes of videos with headlines ‘help me choose a wedding dress’ – yes, I know 9 out of 10 times it is nothing more than an advertisement for a wedding dress boutique, but that is not the point we will be making here today. It is obvious that unless you do an online search for conservative wedding dresses, you will find that 9 out of 10 of the wedding dresses shown shows cleavage and more. The ‘more’, being bare shoulders on a good day, but be warned, it could be anything else.

Well, if the wedding is to take place in a church, of course the more conservative and respectful will wrinkle their noses and they may not approve of the bare shoulders, chest exposing, melon advertising dresses. Oh, and remember; if a pair of jeans gives you camel toe, then it is too tight and it is not just them, the Muslim guy from the corner store or the devout Christian on the train, saying so.

You read the comments on these videos and each time someone mentions a too naked dress or too tight pants, the poster will ‘they or them’ the person leaving the comment. “They are ridiculous,” “I can do what I want, he or she has no say”, “They are old fashioned.” A hundred, if not more, excuses why Ms. Camel Toe or Ms. Melon is right and they, them/he/she is wrong. However, in the real world….

In the real world, Ms. Camel Toe or Ms. Melon is wrong. Let’s say Ms. Camel Toe is assaulted one day (Okay there is NO reason ever for an assault, none whatsoever.). It will be Ms. Camel Toe who will cry the hardest and the loudest, who will cry on an Instagram or a TikTok video, who will tell the world how unfair it is that it happened to her, but the question is..; What was going through her head, what was buried beyond the everyday obvious which allowed her to leave the house looking like that? Somewhere, some brain cells were hoping that Camel Toe will draw attention, those brain cells were being naughty and cheeky and were out to tease. Those braincells and their friends, the hormones, were experiencing sadistic pleasure in flaunting something they/him/ her could not have. Oh, the schadenfreude! Then, when that sadistic pleasure is taken out of the equation because someone commented negatively or because, lo and behold, someone took the wares on offer without asking, then it is everyone’s fault but their own.

The author of this piece is female, so she does not derive any particular pleasure from looking at female anatomy, yet open Instagram or TikTok and you are bombarded by various forms of the female anatomy. Where is the pride, the self-respect or the dignity or the active braincells of these women when they post these images? Do they, for once, sit down and contemplate WHO may be watching their camel toe or their melons? Yes, the female author of this piece may scroll on without leaving a comment, but will everyone do so? What about the bloke down the road who lost his job and his girlfriend due to his mental health issues, what about the bloke whose religious believes may be radical but who is sick of his sons ogling you or his young teen girls wanting to be you because it looks ‘free?’ Not only is it about respecting yourself, but it is also about respecting others, and it is time our daughters, sons and even us older people start to learn about respect and practice it.

There are 2 things which make it impossible to just dismiss the theories out of hand; The first would be that the universe is so vast, unmeasurably vast, that it would be almost entitled and narcissistic to believe that humans are the only intelligent biological entities in the entire universe. Secondly, it is almost equally hard to believe that thousands of people saw the same or similar things and that they would all be delusional or drugged. There is something out there which is mysterious and which we do not fully understand yet, whether it is from another world, another solar system or whether it is right here from our own planet. Having said that, it is equally hard to believe that in today’s world and society, with so many miraculous achievements and inventions, scientists and astronomers, we are still unable to say what these things are or where they are from.

Telescopes, computer modeling and physics have come a long way over the past 100 years. Astronomers can now explain complex astrological processes but still cannot decisively explain what those things in our skies are. Nor can they even decisively tell us what the Buga Sphere is although it had been prodded, poked and studied for a long while now. You need not be Einstein’s cousin to be just a little unbelievable and distrustful of what is out there and what we are being told.

It has even been said that there are biologics (remains) which have been studied and which is being held in secure facilities. Would any of us know whether any of it is true or not or whether it is a hoax or misunderstanding or misinterpretation? No, because governments, churches and other organizations feel so superior that they think they can decide what we should know and when, that it is up to them to evaluate our brain power and maturity and up to them to decide how the world’s plebs will handle such information, and that while the ‘plebians’ are mostly paying their salaries.

Then there are those who find it hard to dazzle us with their brains, their charm or their looks, so they baffle us with bullshit. One would think that if an entity has the power and knowledge to reach earth from another planet, be it in or out of our solar system that the entities themselves would be rather more sophisticated than a naked stick insect with a bulbous head, surely they will know better and protect themselves against the elements of a strange planet? Unless off course if they are not biological but machines and if that is the case they could as much be from China as anywhere else. As a matter of fact, if these naked creatures are machines, the chances that they would be from China would be much bigger than them being from outer space.

As for the stories about interdimensional beings, that would be yet another story which is hard to swallow and so would the stories about time travel and linear time be. A theory which makes a lot more sense and which could explain how travel through space could take place would be around the Law of Conservation of Mass, which is the idea that matter can’t be destroyed and which is one of the ‘coolest’ rules of the universe.

Every atom that existed at the beginning of time is still there today (and that would include the material UFOs are made of and/or their pilots are compiled of). The atoms have merely been rearranged over time. A simple explanation would be to imagine you are building a castle or a house out of 100 LEGO bricks, but a week down the line you are bored with it so you take it apart and build a spaceship with the bricks. You still have 100 LEGO bricks, but the form has changed from a castle or a house to a spaceship, but the matter (the bricks) stayed the same. Another example would be melting an ice cube. The water molecules (H₂O) stay H₂O but they move from solid structure to a flowy one (water / liquid) and if you add more heat, it becomes a gas or then steam. Cool the steam down and it becomes water again.

Could it thus be that entities and their ships or just one half of the equation change form during travel? Not travel through dimensions and time, but simply change from solid to liquid or gas which could withstand the immense pressure of immense speed, or which can withstand the passage of time, or which allows them to move faster as they do not present any kind of major resistance? Do they return to a solid form once they slow down to enter earth’s atmosphere? Or consider Albert Einstein’s famous equation: E=mc². This equation tells us that matter and energy are two sides of the same coin. Inside the sun or a nuclear reactor, a tiny bit of matter can be converted into a massive amount of energy, but even then, nothing is lost to the universe; it just shifts from a physical form into a wave of energy. Is this the answer?

Like anything else it is just a theory and one of many others out there, but a theory does not a fact make and it is very hard to believe that organizations like NASA, ARRO, FBI, CIA and even Russia’s Thread 3, Unit 73790 and The Russian Academy of Sciences have not found anything yet to either debunk or prove UFOs, UAP and/or alien sightings.

If there are other life forms, humanoid or otherwise, living in our oceans or in a tunnel system underground or on military bases, then it is the people’s right to know, because planet earth belongs as much to us as it does to NASA scientists or any other agency or entity.

President Joe Biden was 82 years old at the end of his presidency and during his presidency it became clearer and clearer that the man was suffering. His health was clearly not good, and it was extremely difficult for him to keep up. A 2024 report by Special Counsel Robert Hur cited ‘significant limitations’ in his memory and ‘diminished faculties.’ President Biden also underwent surgery and treatment for skin cancer during his presidency. Weeks after leaving office it was announced that he was diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer that had metastasized to the bone. At the end of his presidency the American people and people the world over were reeling with what could only be described as shock. To be polite; Kamala Harris was the worst candidate the Democrats could put forward as presidential nominee in 2024. Me. Harris, regardless of being Biden’s vice president, did not solicit confidence in the people of America, nor for that matter anywhere else in the world. A choice between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump was practically a given.

The Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement is a movement launched by Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. It advocated for “America First” policies, including a strict immigration enforcement, protectionist trade and a strong military. The movement was (maybe still is) centered around Donald Trump who often emphasized nationalistic and populist policies. Regardless of the fact that analysts divided the movement into several groups, including passionate Trump supporters (which loosely one could also liken to “cultists”), white nationalists, Christian fundamentalists, “America First” proponents (of all races) and anti-establishment figures.

During his presidential campaigns, Donald Trump consistently advocated for an “America First” policy, pledging to bring American troops home and to end “endless wars” in the Middle East. He criticized foreign nation building, described the Iraq invasion as “a big fat mistake.” He frequently claimed that US troops should only be engaged in missions directly serving American national interests. While advocating for a smaller American military footprint, he promised to maintain a strong military which could either win quickly or avoid conflict entirely, even promising during his 2024 campaign not to start a new war.

For Americans Donald J Trump was the “Peace Tsar”, the man who was going to correct the economy by pumping all resources back into America and above all, the man who was going to keep them and their children safe. For many Donald Trump was the savior they had been waiting for. However, in late 2025 the US commenced a major military buildup in the southern Caribbean against Venezuela and on 28 February 2026 the United States and Israel launched a massive strike against Iran and here we are…

The “Peace President’ and his counterpart, Netanyahu, have now effectively caused an energy and economic crises. Oil prices have surged, stock exchanges globally have fallen significantly. Supply chain and logistic disruptions caused by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz are contributing to the threat of a global recession. The conflict has caused over 1300 deaths and 7000 injuries (conservatively calculated). The conflict has the potential to push 45 million more people into acute hunger and… the US has spent $12 billion on military actions from the 28^th of February to today 17 March 2026 (conservatively).

If ever there was a lesson never to become a sycophant, a blind follower of any other human being, let this be the lesson. Blind faith in something or someone gives them power and power seem to drive most beings (humans included) crazy.

You or I may not be groupies of the UN, but there is a reason why there are such things as the UN Charter and the International Court of Justice. Colonization had to be stopped and everyone on the planet deserves the right to self-determination and self-rule.

International law strictly prohibits one country from interfering in the internal politics or leadership of another, primarily through the principle of non-intervention and the legal requirement to respect state sovereignty. Illegal interference includes not only the use of force (e.g. military invasion to change a regime) but also coercive acts, often aimed at a state’s economic or social systems.

UN Charter Article 2(4): prohibits the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.

Customary International law, as affirmed by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), guarantees every state the right to choose its own political, economic and social system without external pressure.

The only exceptions to the prohibition on force are authorization by the UN Security Council (Chapter VIII) or the exercise of self-defense against an armed attack.

Trump and the US were not under direct threat when they struck Iran alongside Israel, thus self-defense is not a defense.

I also sincerely doubt that Mr. Trump had asked for authorization from the UN as he clearly has no respect for the UN.

Just by threatening the life of the new Iranian leader, purely based on the fact that he was chosen as the new leader, is thus also a great threat to the world as a whole and a contravention of international law.

None of this is about Islam or Hamas or Isis or Boko Haram or Christianity. This war, the war between Israel, the US and Iran are now involving 15 other countries, it is about power, it is about the expansion of Israel, it is about oil and it is about money. The irony is that money equals power, oil equals money, and money equals power, a full circle. Land also equals power, so suffice it to say, the war against Iran is not about human rights even, it is about power and more specifically Netanyahu and Trump’s insatiable greed for power.

For Marco Rubio to state that the war is about preventing Iran from having nuclear capabilities in the future is like moving all the penguins and polar bears from the arctic because it may melt 200 years from now. One must have one heck of a talent to see into the future like that. It is like sending someone to death because a tarot reader said he/she committed a murder.

What is true though is that the war against Iran is an illegal war – regardless of the fact that Ayatollah Khomeini was a cruel and harsh dictator. According to international law it was an illegal attack. No amount of sycophancy can provide enough excuses to cover the fact that it was and still is, an illegal war.

More sickening is the sycophancy of some people who, regardless of the findings of the US Military, the findings of the UN and the findings of an investigative outlet called Bellingcat, still argue that it is pure Iranian false reporting and propaganda telling us that it was an US missile which killed the children in the school for girls. It is unfortunate and very sad for all Christians and Westerners, but all indications from all reports are that it was an US Tomahawk missile which actually aimed and hit a medical clinic run by the IRGC navy which was the target but unfortunately the school was a mere 200 meters away. How can anyone look the other way or argue when three different entities found that the weapon was one which neither the Israelis not the Iranians had in their possession? There is no looking the other way and this, accident or not, was a war crime.

Does it please anyone to point a finger at the United States of America? Very definitely not. America’s people are our people; their diversity lead the rest of the world to diversity. The saying “everything is bigger and better in America” has just been destroyed by a man who was led by his ego. A man who thought he was bigger than the law of his own country and bigger than the law of all countries on earth. It is said that all is fair in love and war, but what has happened since 28 February 2026 is not defendable.

WAR does not create peace, does not bring peace, but instead war breeds hatred. No one is naïve enough however, to think pacifism is the answer either, each country should be forever ready to defend itself.

However, God forbid you as an educated non-American have an opinion. My empathy for children of war was given a kick in the teeth and anti-Semitic was the least of the insults hurled at me. Someone who tried to be more empathetic and ‘understanding’ sent me this DM:

Hi Bookie, as I said before, I’ve watched you for probably most of the time you’ve covered the Markle’s. I learned from you and appreciated your insight. I have a feeling that what you said about America taking down (an evil regime). My words, I thought, were coming from two things, your dislike of the tariffs and you not feeling well. Since you aren’t Christian and you don’t live here, it isn’t easy to understand. You can’t believe the media, etc. etc.

Here is my reply:

Of course I am angry, who wouldn’t be having their sons and daughters killed in a foreign country? Yes, I am a Christian and as a Christian I can not see the benefit of having our Christian sons and daughters killed by evil and for other people’s ulterior motives. This has nothing to do with tariffs, how could you even think that? I have never been against tariffs. If everyone else had been putting tariffs on American goods, then Trump was within his right to put tariffs on their goods. I have never been in favor of a charity state. What I was against was that he used it to threaten and blackmail countries; you do this and I’ll add another 10% tariff, you do that and it will be another 10%..., that kind of thing. Trump was playing a dictator and God at the same time. That is what I was against. I was also against him charging some countries 10% and others 30%, just because he did not like or agree with a leader. Apparently, I was right too, because the American courts agreed with me.

The US Supreme Court told Donald Trump on February 20 that the tariffs he has used to try and bend the world to his will are unlawful. Tariffs are taxes and it is not for the president to impose them. According to the US Constitution, Congress holds the power of the purse. Andrea Loux Jarman, Bournemouth University.

DM continued…

Trump saying he will no longer allow American boys and girls to die on foreign soil, what happened to that?

Trump won the presidency in 2016 and 2024 thanks in no small part to campaigning against the long and draining wars of his predecessors. Now, he’s started a war of his own. NBC News

I am sure that when these kids joined the military they did so out of love for their country, they are willing to die for America and not Israel or Ukraine or whoever. It is also true that money is involved, and if not money, then deals. Go read about Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and the meetings he had in Jerusalem and Israel. I have a feeling he had been ‘negotiating’ this war with Israel for months if not years.

I am tired of people kicking me in the teeth for caring, maybe I should stop caring, let them die wherever whenever… let the boxes come home with flags draped over them, let the parents cry, who am I to care? Let Netanyahu laugh because America became his gun fodder, who am I to care?

It is not my fault that the American dollar is still the currency most foreign trade takes place in, but although I am not supposed to care, why does Donald Trump then care whether we are part if BRICS or not? Russia appears to be a convenient scapegoat for all wrong decisions other world leaders make.

I am sick of the ‘freedom’ rhetoric, freedom, at what price? One does not go and free the people of another country when your own are being suppressed. Suppressed by financial constraints and suppressed in their right to freedom of speech…

As of 12:45 pm my time, 3 March 2026, the US has lost 6 US Service member and 3 US jets were downed in friendly fire, 11 people were killed in Israel and deaths were reported in the UAE, Kuwait and Bahrain, energy prices are soaring across the world, a UK RAF airbase was struck in Cyprus… good going, and there is still no end in sight. When we tally the loss of life and the widespread death and destruction, would it still be worth the ‘freedom’ of Iran?

We are currently living in a world where the consequences of ‘spare the rod and spoil the child,’ or where every deviant action is explained away or ‘excused’ with the mental health mantra, is as clear as day and where many of us can attest to the devastating consequences. Where perpetrators are far too readily seen as ‘victims of circumstance.’ The abuser can not be punished because he himself was a victim of abuse, the murderer killed because his mother was killed… the criminal, the wrong doer, becomes the victim. When the criminal then gets away with his crime he becomes the victor over the system.

Too often we have to hear or read about the perpetrator of a crime being rehabilitated or that he had found salvation in religion. Far too often a mere ‘sorry’ from a Bill Gates or a Bill Clinton is enough to wipe their vile actions from any and all public platforms and the message is sent out that there is nothing to fear. Punishment is merely saying you are sorry, how easy, you can even cross your fingers behind your back and not mean a single word of the apology.

The facts are that if you want change then the punishment should involve a measure of fear, because rehabilitation requires a true and deep-seated change of heart. The new world order however preaches that if punishment is harsh or degrading it will only breed more resentment rather than self-reflection. However, justice has to be a deterrent otherwise it is useless. At this point we also need to consider that some criminals may indeed be on the psychopathy spectrum and that you cannot teach empathy to a psychopath. As a matter of fact, therapy can make a psychopath even more dangerous as it teaches them how to better manipulate via expressing ‘feelings in order to get what they want.

Punishment of the criminal should incapacitate the born perpetrator, remove him/her from society to protect the innocent. Punishment should serve as a warning to others. Justice should be handed out via the original idea behind Lady Justice and the scales of justice; if a heavy crime is met with a light consequence, the scale remains broken and the victims are in fact dishonored.

The very prevalent ‘victim narrative’ of modern society is nothing more than a manipulative trap and no true justice will ever come to true victims if the system is too busy making excuses for the perpetrators.

Personally, I would prefer to say as little as possible until the very day Air-Miles Randy Andy is actually charged and arraigned, because the truth is that what we have seen was maybe just a show of force and power after we all said that the current king, King Charles, is a weak man. Remember that so many advisors and his eldest son had been on his back for years now to do something about his younger brother, but he was not going to be ‘told’ what to do. That was until he, Charles, was heckled in public. Then and only then it became about him and not just about his brother and only then did he move to remove Andrew’s titles.

Also notable is the fact that Andrew was only taken in on the ‘misconduct’ matter and not a single word had been spoken about Andrew’s alleged sexual misconduct. It has been nearly 7 years since the supposed death of Epstein – remember, the day when a silicone mask with no legs was removed from that prison – and regardless of numerous stories from other victims about deaths and bodies buried on Epstein’s Zorro ranch, not a soul, a cop or an agent have taken a single spade to that ground. The latest excuse being that the new owner would not allow it, which is a lie, as he actually invited them to have a ‘look’ around. Besides, where were they before the ranch was sold? Ever heard of a warrant? Apparently not. Only now, after some of the files were made public are they willing to go do some digging. I wonder how many parents had been waiting in vain for their children to come home…

Will other men, one of the Bills even contracted an STD from one of Epstein’s girls, ever see the inside of a prison cell? What better or more ‘proof’ do you want than an STD? A STD and photographs… Apparently it is not enough, although one of the girls in a photograph with Billy-boy was only 15 at the time.

How far back does this actually go, how many years? Could it have gone back all the way to the 70s and 80s? It appears that it is very likely that Epstein was indeed building up his repertoire in the early 80’s. And what happens if some of these deviants are sent to prison? Will it be the end of it or will we start to question things like King Charles’s 30-year friendship with England’s most prolific pedophile, Jimmy Savile, as well? Will historians start digging into Lord Louis Mountbatten and his sexual preferences going all the way to the young boy who was apparently his deckhand on the fateful day, the day his boat blew up? Was it so commonplace for royals to have strange children in and around the palace that all Prince Philip could say when he saw Jimmy Savile bring a girl into the palace was ‘Jimmy, put away the child...’ before he continued reading his newspaper?

Maybe it is time we realized that we and our offspring are nothing more than fodder in the eyes of the royals and the elite. Our lives and our deaths mean nothing to them. When we cry over the losses we suffered, they retire to the palaces or castles or mansions. When we stare at a glass of piss colored water, they sip champagne…

In 2012, after Jimmy Savile’s death in 2011, Operation Yewtree was launched and eventually identified 450 victims reporting abuse by Jimmy Savile. 214 Criminal offences were formally recorded across 28 police districts. Allegations spanned 50 years with over 600 individuals providing information to investigators. The recorded crimes included 126 indecent acts and 34 rape or penetration offences. ‘Horrific!’ the masses would chime, how can it be possible for this to be discovered only after his death, surely someone must have seen / heard or suspected something… Oh yes indeed they did. There were 5 official allegations of sexual assault recorded against Jimmy Saville by police forces in England and Wales. There were also two pieces of intelligence information regarding Savile found after his death, the one dating back to 1964. Yet no charges were ever brought against Savile. In several cases victims felt disbelieved or were told by police to ‘forget it.’ In later years the inspectorate blamed “cultural mistrust of evidence from children” as the reason why no action was taken, however it was a weak excuse as victims and reports involved both sexes and people of all ages, from very young to the oldest being in her 80s. It is more likely that Savile got away with his dastardly deeds because of who his friends were. Friends like the Prince of Wales, Prince Charles and the PM Margaret Thatcher. ‘Mistakes were made,’ British police admitted and today, particularly after the release of the Epstein files it is clear that the biggest mistakes were likely that the investigations did not extend to the ‘friends’ of Savile, the Prince of Wales included.

According to a documentary about Savile on Netflix there is no proof that the prince knew or had information about Savile’s behavior. According to the documentary Savile fooled many people, including Prince Charles, but this cannot be true. It cannot be true because of the fact that there were 2 intelligence reports in which Savile’s behavior towards young girls were mentioned. The Monarch and likely at the time also Prince Charles would have been informed about such investigations. However, even if they were not informed, there were numerous complaints from palace staff about Savile’s conduct, including a mention from Princess Diana that she found him creepy after he licked her arm. Even Prince Philip once told Savile to ‘put away the kid’ when he entered the palace with a young girl. There are no excuses, I am one person sitting behind a keyboard, I can be fooled, but Charles Mountbatten-Windsor has staff, advisors, security and access to the country’s intelligence. It was thus a choice, a choice made by England, to blindly accept that Savile ‘fooled’ everyone. This choice was not based on fact or ignorance and today the world is reaping the fruits of this and similar choices made by people who preferred to kiss the feet of the elite in return for a pat on the head.

Today we know, after looking through millions of Epstein pages, that the so-called elite are the people who are enabling the pedophile, racism, corruption and undue influence on the political and justice systems. Sure, there are exceptions, but they are few and far between and you should likely not go looking for those in politics or the monarchies of the world.

Does it come as a surprise that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, the late queen’s favorite son, was so heavily involved with Jeffrey Epstein? Yes and no. Yes, because there was no need for Mountbatten-Windsor to go that route or even pay for play. indeed, prince of the realm and not the Queen’s most unattractive child, he could have had anyone and he did indeed have models and actresses, but it was the depravity, the society in which he grew up which made him favor the ‘adventure’ and the challenge of the ‘risk.’ Indeed, we now learn that the son of the Queen was only 11 when a friend’s father took them to a strip-/sex club. Where was his mother? Where was his father? Why did they allow this, why did they refuse direction for their son after such an incident? They likely did nothing because it was seen as ‘acceptable’ among their level of society - which, as we can now see, then bred deviants. Congratulations parents of the 60’s particular those in high society, you excelled in your absence and your own debauchery.

However, we cannot just blame parents from the 60’s or blame the elites; where were the parents of Virginia Giuffre and any of the other girls who landed in Epstein’s clutches? We learned that Virginia’s father drove her to the airfield where Epstein’s plane took off from. We learn that her father took her at her word about studying massage, a job, even if legit, I would not allow my 16/17-year-old to do anyway.

We also now learn of the utterly disgusting behaviors and actions which took place in Jeffrey Epstein’s orbit. One of the most upsetting photographs being of a child no older than 12, tied down, lying on a lawn and being burned by magnifying glasses tied to her ankles and wrists while Jeffrey is burning her with one on her stomach, all while grinning like the true vile sadist he was. What no one is talking about however is that someone was holding that camera, someone was there with him while he was doing it. He also had staff, among which a South African couple, Miles and Cathy Alexander, who worked for him as property manager and house manager/housekeeper. Miles and Cathy Alexander of Jeffry’s Bay, who claim they saw nothing, never saw anything nefarious although they worked for Jeffrey for 8 years. Miles and Cathy Alexander, who even if they were never physically involved have blood on their hands as much as Epstein himself. Miles and Cathy Alexander who should be charged with accessory after the fact, at the very least. But they won’t, will they? Why? Because, even after the most vile of footage and photographic evidence have been released, there had not been a single arrest.

Two of the most compromised ‘witnesses’ are obviously Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Bill Gates, because there are already photographic images of them with a number of Epstein’s girls of varying ages. Yet both of these men are still free to roam the earthly plane. The police investigation the king of England has agreed to also has nothing to do with sex offences or trafficking or abuse, but instead it concerns Andrew possibly, allegedly providing Epstein with British trade secrets. Why would Charles so readily agree to this? Likely because he has no choice, it is already out in the open and secondly because he is more likely to balk about this than the abuse of a minor or trafficking - deeds which his ancestors regularly partook in because it was their ‘right’ as royals.

An American senator who saw the unredacted Epstein files said that if all the persons guilty of some or other crime according to the files, should be arrested the entire ‘system’ will collapse. It is clear, however, that it is likely what should happen. The ‘system’ in most countries is either corrupt or collapsing, so to say that it would be a loss of some kind would be hypocritical. Maybe the systems should collapse in order for the world to be cleansed of the vilest of humans.