World Breastfeeding Week rightly draws attention to the value of breastfeeding. It should also make space for one of the most common and understandable questions parents ask:

How do I know my baby is getting enough milk?

The appeal of a technological answer is obvious. Bottles have markings while breats do not. A parent bottle-feeding can see that a baby has taken 60 mL. A breastfeeding parent may instead be left interpreting swallowing, nappies, sleep, crying, breast fullness and a parade of frequently contradictory advice.

It is therefore easy to understand the attraction of a wearable device that promises to display milk flow and feed volume in real time. This is not a ridiculous problem for technology to tackle. If such a device were sufficiently accurate, reliable and easy to use, it could have real clinical value.

But a precise-looking number is not necessarily a precise measurement. Technology can reduce uncertainty only if the measurement itself is trustworthy. Otherwise, it simply gives uncertainty a decimal point.

What would a breastfeeding monitor tell us?

Before discussing whether a monitor could be useful, we need to separate three different questions:

1. How much milk did the baby transfer during this particular feed?

2. How much milk is the mother producing across the whole day?

3. Is the baby receiving enough nutrition to remain well and grow appropriately?

These are related, not interchangeable questions. Even a perfectly accurate measurement of one breastfeed would answer only the first. It would not automatically tell us the mother’s total milk production, whether the next feed will be larger or smaller, or whether the baby’s overall intake is adequate. It also would not tell us why transfer was low. A smaller volume might reflect a brief top-up feed, recent feeding from the other breast, normal cluster feeding, poor attachment, sleepiness, illness, restricted tongue movement, an ineffective suck or simply a baby who was not particularly hungry at that moment.

A number can describe what happened. It cannot, by itself, explain it.

Where accurate measurement could be useful

There are situations in which an accurate and properly interpreted measure of milk transfer could be extremely helpful.

Premature and medically vulnerable babies

Premature babies may be transitioning from tube feeds to direct breastfeeding while their growth, nutritional intake and stamina are being monitored closely. Some become tired before completing a feed. Others may appear to suck well without transferring the expected volume.

Similar concerns may arise in babies with cardiac or respiratory disease, neurological problems, marked jaundice, significant growth concerns or other conditions that affect feeding endurance and safety. In these settings, knowing milk transfer could help clinicians tailor supplementation while protecting breastfeeding. The important words are in these settings. Measurement would be part of an individual clinical plan, not a standalone app deciding whether a feed had passed or failed.

Persistent growth or milk-transfer concerns

Objective measurement might also help when a baby is not regaining weight as expected, when milk transfer remains uncertain after a skilled feeding assessment, or when a parent is trying to establish direct breastfeeding after a difficult start. Used intermittently, under professional guidance, a dependable measurement could help distinguish genuinely poor transfer from understandable parental anxiety.

Lactation assessment and research

A validated monitor could help researchers study milk flow, sucking patterns, different feeding interventions and the transition to breastfeeding in premature infants. It might also help lactation specialists assess a difficult feed without repeatedly weighing the baby. This is why the idea deserves serious investigation. The need is real. The scientific standard must therefore be real too.

Measuring every feed is unnecessary for healthy thriving babies

Breastfeeding is variable by design. Babies do not consume an identical volume at fixed intervals throughout the day.

In a study of 71 exclusively breastfeeding mother and infant pairs, babies fed between 6 and 18 times in 24 hours, and individual measured breastfeeds ranged from 0 to 240 g. Feed volume varied according to the breast used, the time of day and whether it was the first or second breast offered. The authors concluded that feeding according to the baby’s needs was more appropriate than trying to make every baby conform to an average pattern. (Kent and colleagues, Pediatrics, 2006)

Longitudinal work also shows that feeding behaviour changes as babies grow. Feeds may become less frequent and shorter while the amount transferred at each session increases, even when total daily intake remains relatively stable. (Kent and colleagues, 2013) I see this pattern evolve regularly in my baby clinics.

That means a single feed is a snapshot, not a diagnosis. A small feed may be entirely normal if another follows shortly afterwards. A large feed does not prove that every subsequent feed will be adequate. There is no universal millilitre target that every breastfeed must reach.

Routine measurement could also change the experience of breastfeeding. Parents may begin comparing each feed with the last, chasing an arbitrary target or interpreting normal variation as failure. A monitor should reduce anxiety, not transform feeding into a series of performance reviews conducted by a tiny, hungry manager.

How to tell that breastfeeding is working

For most healthy term babies, adequacy is judged from the whole pattern over time. No single sign is sufficient on its own.

1. Look at attachment and milk transfer

An effective feed commonly begins with quicker sucks, followed by deeper, slower and more rhythmic sucking once milk is flowing. Swallows may be seen or heard, with brief pauses between bursts of sucking. The baby’s cheeks usually remain rounded rather than drawing inward. The baby should be able to remain attached, and breastfeeding should not cause persistent or escalating nipple pain. The baby often releases the breast spontaneously, the nipple should not emerge severely pinched or blanched, and the breast may feel softer afterwards.

When there is concern, watching a complete feed is often more informative than receiving an isolated number. Things like feeding frequency, rhythmic sucking, audible swallowing, weight, nappies and direct observation of feeding are important indicators of how well milk is being transferred.

2. Feed responsively and often enough

Healthy newborns commonly breastfeed frequently, including overnight. Feeds need not occur at perfectly even intervals. Cluster feeding, particularly in the evening or during periods of rapid growth, is common and does not automatically indicate a low milk supply. Feeding should usually follow the baby’s cues rather than a rigid timetable.

3. Follow wet and dirty nappies

Nappy output is one of the most useful practical indicators during the early newborn period. The following is just a rough guide:

• Day 1: at least 1 wet nappy and 1 black, tarry stool.

• Day 2: at least 2 wet nappies and 2 black stools.

• Day 3: at least 3 wet nappies and 3 black or green stools.

• Day 4: at least 4 wet nappies and 3 to 4 stools becoming green or yellow.

• Day 5: at least 5 wet nappies and 3 to 4 stools that should be turning yellow.

• From day 6 to 6 weeks: at least 6 heavy wet nappies with pale urine each day, usually accompanied by several yellow, loose or seedy stools.

The change from black meconium to yellow stool is particularly useful in the first week. Stool frequency becomes more variable after the early newborn period, so these numbers should not be applied rigidly to an older baby.

4. Follow the weight trajectory

Some weight loss during the first few days is normal. A loss greater than 10% of birth weight should trigger a clinical and feeding assessment, including consideration of dehydration or illness and observation of a feed. It does not, by itself, mean that breastfeeding has failed.

When feeding is going well, weight gain usually begins around day five. Most babies regain their birth weight by about two weeks, although some take up to three weeks. What matters is the trajectory on an appropriate growth chart, considered alongside feeding and the baby’s clinical condition, rather than one number in isolation. Repeated weighing without a clinical reason can create as much confusion as repeated feed measurement. Healthy babies do not need to be placed on a scale after every meal.

5. Assess the baby, not just the feeding record

A well-hydrated baby should generally be alert when awake, have a moist mouth, wake or cue for feeds and show an age-appropriate pattern of urine and stool output.

Contentment after a feed can be reassuring, but it must never be used alone. Some babies cry despite feeding well, and an unusually sleepy or unwell baby may appear deceptively “settled.” Likewise, cluster feeding, softer breasts, taking a bottle after breastfeeding or being unable to express much with a pump do not independently prove that milk supply is low.

Seek prompt professional assessment if a baby is consistently difficult to wake for feeds, cannot remain attached, has no clear swallowing, has fewer wet nappies than expected, has persistent dark urine, is increasingly jaundiced, continues losing weight, appears unwell, or if breastfeeding is causing significant pain or nipple damage. A baby who is very lethargic, has a dry mouth, has not passed urine for 12 hours, is breathing rapidly or has a temperature of 38°C or higher under three months requires urgent medical assessment.

Measurement is not the enemy

There is an important distinction between opposing unnecessary routine monitoring and opposing measurement altogether. Test weighing, in which a baby is weighed immediately before and after feeding using a sufficiently precise scale and a strict protocol, can be useful in selected clinical settings. A 2025 validation study involving 38 premature infants found that repeated test weights performed using a standardised bedside protocol were highly reproducible and showed close agreement with feeds of known weight. (Kinoshita, White and Doolan, 2025)

That study supports the use of a specific test-weighing protocol in that premature population. It does not validate every scale, every weighing technique or a different device that estimates milk flow by another method.

This is how validation works. Evidence belongs to the exact method, device version, population and circumstances that were studied. It cannot simply be transferred by association.

What proper validation of a breastfeeding monitor should include

If a device claims to measure breastmilk volume accurately during a feed, its validation should answer a simple clinical question:

How close is the device’s reading to the best available reference measurement for an individual feed?

Answering that properly requires much more than demonstrating that fluid can pass through a sensor in a laboratory.

The final marketed device must be tested

Prototype work is valuable for development, but validation should use the version that parents will actually buy, with the final hardware, nipple interface, software and calculation algorithm. If the algorithm is repeatedly adjusted using the validation data, the device is still being trained or developed. It then needs testing in a new dataset that was not used to tune it.

The study should be prospective and registered

The protocol, primary outcome, sample-size calculation, planned exclusions and acceptable accuracy thresholds should be specified before the results are known. Prospective registration reduces the temptation to choose the most flattering analysis afterwards.

The participants must reflect the intended users

A study should include enough mother and baby pairs to assess performance across the circumstances in which the device will be used. That includes different feed volumes, milk-flow rates, feeding positions, stages of lactation, breast and nipple anatomy, infant ages and patterns of sucking.

Premature, medically complex and healthy term babies should not simply be mixed together and treated as one homogeneous population. If a device is promoted for a particular high-risk group, it needs specific evidence in that group.

The reference measurement must be appropriate

Bench testing with controlled flow rates is necessary, but it is not clinical validation. During breastfeeding, babies move, pause, change suction and may compress or displace anything placed at the breast. Milk can leak, flow backwards or remain within a device. The properties of human milk may also differ from the liquid used during calibration.

Clinical comparison therefore requires a carefully standardised reference method, such as test weighing performed with calibrated high-precision scales and a predefined protocol. The reference method’s own uncertainty must be reported.

Agreement must be reported for individual feeds

A low average difference can be misleading. Imagine that a monitor reads 20 mL too high for one feed and 20 mL too low for the next. Its average error is zero, but neither reading was accurate.

A proper method-comparison study should report:

• The mean signed difference, or bias.

• The mean or median absolute error.

• Relative or percentage error where appropriate.

• Confidence intervals around the estimates.

• Bland and Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement.

• Performance across low, medium and high feed volumes and flow rates.

• Repeatability when measurements are repeated.

• The number of failed, missing or excluded feeds and the reasons for exclusion.

• Analyses that account for multiple feeds measured from the same mother and baby pair.

The 95% limits of agreement are especially important because they describe the range within which most differences between the new device and reference method are expected to fall. A correlation coefficient is not enough. Two methods can be strongly correlated while disagreeing substantially for individual measurements. (Bland and Altman on measurement agreement)

The device itself must not materially alter the feed

If a monitor is incorporated into a nipple shield or another interface placed between the breast and baby, validation should examine whether it changes attachment, sucking mechanics, comfort or milk transfer.

Research on ordinary nipple shields shows that their effects can differ according to why they are being used and in which population. In one study, shield use did not reduce transfer among mothers already using shields for nipple pain, but it reduced milk transfer in a comparison group without breastfeeding difficulties. (Coentro and colleagues, 2021)

This does not mean that every shield is harmful. It means that “the sensor measured the milk passing through it” and “the device did not change the feed” are separate questions, and both require evidence.

Clinical consequences should be studied

Technical accuracy is only the beginning. Researchers should also ask whether using the monitor:

• Improves breastfeeding confidence or increases anxiety.

• Changes supplementation decisions appropriately.

• Helps premature babies transition to direct breastfeeding.

• Improves growth or reduces unnecessary intervention.

• Affects breastfeeding duration.

• Produces readings that parents and clinicians interpret correctly.

A technically impressive device can still cause harm if its output is misunderstood or used without clinical context.

Independent scrutiny matters

Company-led development studies are normal and necessary. They are how devices improve. But a company webpage, promotional statement, conference abstract or internal technical report is not equivalent to a complete peer-reviewed clinical validation study.

Peer review is not magical and publication does not guarantee that a study is good. It does, however, require methods and results to be presented in enough detail for independent scrutiny. Replication by researchers who are independent of the manufacturer provides stronger reassurance still.

Clinical investigations of medical devices should be designed, conducted and reported in a manner that protects participants and produces credible results, principles reflected in ISO 14155:2026.

Where is the published evidence?

As of 10 August 2026, following targeted searches of PubMed and major clinical-trial registries, I could not identify a full peer-reviewed clinical validation study of a final marketed consumer device that measures breastmilk flow and volume in real time during an individual breastfeed.

The literature contains valuable studies of test weighing, nipple shields, sucking dynamics, milk-production assessment and emerging lactation technologies. These studies help define the problem and show how potential reference methods can be validated. They do not automatically validate a separate commercial monitor.

This finding does not prove that no manufacturer has collected additional data, and it does not establish that any particular device is inaccurate. It means that robust evidence sufficient for clinicians, researchers and parents to independently evaluate broad accuracy claims was not publicly verifiable in the peer-reviewed literature I reviewed.

What should parents ask before trusting a measurement?

Before relying on a breastfeeding monitor, ask:

1. Has the final version of this exact device been clinically tested?

2. Is there a complete peer-reviewed paper, rather than only a summary or promotional statement?

3. How many mother and baby pairs, and how many feeds, were studied?

4. Were the babies similar to the baby for whom the device is being considered?

5. What reference measurement was used, and how precise was it?

6. Were individual errors and 95% limits of agreement reported?

7. How did it perform during small feeds, rapid flow, movement and interrupted feeding?

8. How many readings failed or were excluded?

9. Has the result been independently replicated?

10. Has anyone studied how the displayed number changes parental anxiety, supplementation or breastfeeding continuation?

If those questions cannot be answered, the output should not be treated as clinical truth simply because it appears on a polished app.

The bottom line

Healthy term babies do not need every breastfeed converted into millilitres. Breastfeeding is assessed by looking at the whole pattern: frequent and effective feeds, rhythmic sucking and swallowing, appropriate wet and dirty nappies, the baby’s clinical wellbeing and a reassuring weight trajectory.

If any part of that pattern is concerning, the answer is a skilled feeding and clinical assessment. An inadequately validated number should not provide false reassurance, and a normally small feed should not create unnecessary alarm.

Parents deserve useful innovation. They also deserve to know the difference between a promising device and a clinically proven measurement.

Accuracy claims should follow robust evidence, not arrive before it.

Evidence note: The literature and public sources for this article were reviewed up to 10 August 2026. I welcome relevant peer-reviewed evidence or factual corrections and will update the article where appropriate.

Medical note: This article provides general educational information. It is not a substitute for an individual feeding assessment or medical advice. Premature, low-birth-weight, jaundiced, unwell or medically complex babies require an individual feeding plan.

The views expressed are my own and do not represent those of my employers or affiliated institutions.

Leave a comment

A birthkeeper, who had been hired by a woman who later died after giving birth at home, told a coroner that she was “not there to make a birth safer.”

That sentence is chilling because it exposes the central problem in the freebirth world: The gap between influence and responsibility. It is the space where someone can present themselves as a guide, a mentor, a supporter, an educator, a birthkeeper, or whatever the fashionable term happens to be, while stepping away from accountability the moment the situation becomes clinical. We see it time and time again.

That is the part we need to talk about.

Freebirth means giving birth without a midwife, doctor, or trained clinical professional present. It is different from a planned homebirth with a registered midwife. That distinction is important, because the two are often blurred in public conversations, sometimes accidentally and sometimes very deliberately.

A planned homebirth with regulated midwifery care involves clinical assessment, training, professional standards, transfer plans, documentation, governance and accountability. Freebirth does not. A woman may give birth alone, with her partner, with friends, or with a doula or birthkeeper present, but the defining feature is the same: there is no trained professional present whose role is to recognise and respond when something changes. And birth can change very quickly.

Most births go well. That is true, and it matters. Birth is not an illness. Pregnancy is not automatically a pathology. Women are not broken machines waiting for doctors to fix them. I have no interest in promoting a fear-based view of birth where every contraction is treated like a hostage negotiation.

But acknowledging that most births go well is not the same as pretending that all births will go well. The fact that birth is usually physiological does not mean it is always predictable. A mother can bleed. A baby can get stuck. A placenta may not deliver. Infection can develop. A baby may be born limp, pale, floppy, or struggling to breathe. These are not abstract risks or philosophical inconveniences. They are the moments where trained support can make the difference between recovery and tragedy.

The Australian case reported by The Guardian involved 30-year-old Stacey Warnecke, who died after giving birth at home. Her birthkeeper, Emily Lal, had reportedly been paid thousands of dollars for a freebirth support package. The inquest heard that after the birth, Warnecke lost a significant amount of blood, began struggling to breathe, and later died in hospital from complications related to a massive postpartum haemorrhage. During the inquest, Lal said her role was not medical. She described herself as attending in the role of a supportive friend. She said she was not there to make birth safer and was not clinically trained to assess blood loss.

This is where the whole thing becomes deeply uncomfortable. Because if someone is simply a supportive friend, why are they charging thousands? If someone is offering antenatal education, birth attendance and postpartum support, why do they have no responsibility for safety? If someone is present at the birth, trusted by the mother, asked about blood loss, and involved in conversations about whether to call an ambulance, how can they also say that none of this is their role?

That is not just a technicality. That is the whole issue. Support matters in birth. I believe that very strongly. Women need to feel safe. They need advocates. They need people who understand their fears. They need people who can help them ask questions and communicate their wishes. Many doulas do valuable work in this space, and this article is not an attack on doulas. But emotional support is not the same as clinical care.

A doula is not a midwife. A birthkeeper is not a midwife. An online course is not clinical training. A social media following is not competence. Confidence is not evidence. And calling yourself a “supportive friend” after building a business around birth does not erase the influence you may have had in the room.

In medicine and midwifery, accountability is not optional. Doctors, midwives and nurses are regulated. Our training is defined. Our practice is subject to standards. Our decisions can be reviewed. Our outcomes can be audited. Our mistakes can have consequences. That does not mean healthcare professionals are perfect. Far from it. Healthcare can fail badly, and when it does, families deserve honesty, investigation, apology and learning. But at least there is a structure where accountability exists.

With unregulated birth support, the picture is much murkier. People can sell support, sell education, sell reassurance, sell an entire worldview, and then say they were not providing medical care when a woman or baby is harmed. They can influence decisions while denying responsibility for the consequences of those decisions. That is a dangerous place to be.

This matters because freebirth is rarely sold in a neutral way. It is often wrapped in a powerful emotional narrative. Women are told to trust their bodies, to trust birth, to reclaim their sovereignty, to reject fear, to step away from a system that does not respect them. For a woman who has had a traumatic previous birth, or who feels dismissed in antenatal appointments, or who fears unnecessary intervention, this language can be incredibly seductive. And we have to be honest about why.

Many women have had poor experiences in maternity care. Some have felt ignored. Some have felt rushed. Some have had interventions poorly explained. Some have felt coerced or frightened. Some have had procedures done to them rather than discussed with them. Some have been left with trauma that was never properly acknowledged. If we pretend that does not happen, we are lying to ourselves.

When women walk away from maternity services, we should not start by calling them reckless. We should start by asking what they are walking away from. That is the part the healthcare system has to own. Trust is not rebuilt by lecturing women. It is not rebuilt by saying, “We know best, now stop Googling.” It is rebuilt through better communication, better consent, better continuity, better trauma-informed care, and a culture where women feel that the person in front of them is on their side.

But we also have to say the other part clearly:

The answer to poor care is better care. It is not no care.

It is possible to criticise maternity services and still recognise the danger of unassisted birth. In fact, we have to do both. If we only talk about the risks of freebirth, women who already distrust the system will feel attacked and may move further away. If we only talk about autonomy and never talk about clinical risk, we abandon women and babies to a fantasy version of birth where nothing bad happens unless someone has interfered. That fantasy is dangerous.

One of the most common responses to concerns about freebirth is that women and babies also die in hospital. That is true. They do. Hospitals are not magical buildings where death cannot enter. Medicine does not eliminate risk. Maternity care can fail, and sometimes those failures are devastating. But hospital adverse outcomes do not make freebirth safe.

If someone dies in a car while wearing a seatbelt, we do not conclude that seatbelts are useless. We investigate what happened. Was the road unsafe? Was the car faulty? Was the driver impaired? Was the emergency response delayed? We look for learning. We do not respond by telling everyone to drive without a seatbelt because harm can happen either way.

The same principle applies here. The question is not whether risk can ever be completely removed. It cannot. The question is whether risk is recognised, reduced and responded to quickly.

Postpartum haemorrhage is a good example. Bleeding after birth can become serious very quickly. It is not always as obvious at the beginning as people imagine. Blood loss can be underestimated. A woman can look relatively well until she suddenly does not. The signs can be subtle, then catastrophic. In a clinical setting, people are trained to watch for that. Blood loss is assessed. Vital signs are monitored. Medications are available. IV access can be obtained. Senior help can be called. Theatre, transfusion and escalation are there if needed.

That is what a safety net looks like.

The same applies to the baby. Most babies transition well after birth. They breathe, cry, pink up and go skin-to-skin. It is beautiful when that happens. But some babies need help. Some need stimulation. Some need airway support. Some need breathing support. Some need resuscitation. And when a baby is not breathing properly, oxygen is not an optional extra.

A baby who is blue, floppy, pale, gasping, grunting, or struggling after birth is not making a spiritual transition. That baby may be in trouble.

As a neonatologist, this is where I struggle most with some freebirth rhetoric. There are online spaces where delay is reframed as trust, where distress is reframed as normal transition, and where intervention is portrayed as a violation rather than help. That is not harmless language. It shapes decisions at the very moment when delay can matter most. A baby does not need ideology. A baby needs oxygen. That may sound blunt, but sometimes blunt is kind.

Then there is the purity culture around birth. This is not unique to freebirth, but freebirth takes it to its most extreme form. Birth becomes a ladder of virtue. Spontaneous labour is ranked above induction. Vaginal birth above caesarean. No epidural above pain relief. Home above hospital. “Trusting birth” above asking for help.

The result is that women are made to feel that the manner of birth says something about their worth as mothers. It does not.

A woman who has an epidural is not less powerful. A woman who has an induction is not less intuitive. A woman who has a caesarean is not less connected to her baby. A woman who chooses monitoring is not less brave. A woman who asks for help has not failed. What matters is not whether birth fits someone else’s ideology. What matters is that the mother is respected, the baby is protected, and help is available if it is needed.

This is why the “supportive friend” defence troubles me so much. Friends matter. Support matters. But if you are building a business around birth, if you are charging significant money, if you are presenting yourself as someone with special knowledge, if your words influence whether a woman seeks help, then you are not just a passive presence. You are part of the decision-making environment. And if you are part of that environment, you cannot wash your hands of safety.

Respecting autonomy does not mean standing by while a woman deteriorates. It does not mean withholding concern because you were not asked the right question. It does not mean treating emergency decision-making as if it is a calm consumer choice being made in a quiet room with a cup of tea. Emergencies are messy. People are frightened. People freeze. People minimise. People dissociate. People say they are fine when they are not. People need others in the room to recognise danger and act.

The way forward has to involve more than simply condemning freebirth. Condemnation alone will not work. It may even make things worse.

We need to improve maternity care so fewer women feel driven away from it. That means listening properly when women say they are frightened. It means explaining risk without threatening. It means asking for consent and meaning it. It means making space for questions. It means improving continuity where possible. It means ensuring that a woman who has had a traumatic previous birth can access a proper debrief and support before her next one.

We also need clearer public information. Women should understand the difference between a planned homebirth with a registered midwife and freebirth without clinical care. They should understand what doulas can and cannot do. They should know what red flags in pregnancy, labour and after birth require urgent help. They should know that they can seek care at any point, even if they have avoided the system until then.

That last point is crucial. The door back into care must always be open.

If a woman has planned a freebirth and then becomes frightened, or starts bleeding, or feels unwell, or notices reduced movements, or her baby is born struggling, she must feel able to call for help without fear of being scolded or humiliated. The response should not be, “I told you so.” The response should be, “You are here now. Let’s help you.” Because shame does not save lives.

At the same time, we need to be much more serious about the accountability gap around unregulated birth support. It is not enough for someone to attend births, charge money, influence decisions and then say safety was never their role. If safety is not your role, then what exactly are you selling? And if what you are selling affects whether a mother or baby gets timely medical help, then the public has a right to ask who is overseeing you.

Pregnant women deserve better than a choice between a system that may feel cold and an online movement that may feel warm but disappears when the ambulance is called. They deserve care that is both respectful and safe.

Opening Night: Thursday March 12, 6 pm to 9 pm (with wine reception)
Friday March 13: 10 am to 4 pm
Saturday March 14: 10 am to 4 pm

It didn’t begin as a grand plan. It began with a phone call.

Holly and I met through art years ago. Not medicine. Not the podcast. Art. She knew me as someone who painted before she knew I worked in neonatal intensive care. When she rang me about the idea of an exhibition, she said she wanted to return to painting properly, and that motherhood had shifted everything for her. She also said something that stuck with me: that she felt I didn’t get to make enough art anymore.

The timing felt right.

Holly’s story over the last few years has been complicated. She experienced a miscarriage two weeks before her wedding during the Covid era. Not long after, she became pregnant again. Her son Leo was born severely unwell and spent nine days on a ventilator before coming home. Twenty months later, her daughter Amber was born in what she describes as a healing experience.

In between those births was the kind of early motherhood that most people don’t post about. The exhaustion. The identity shift. The pause in creative life. For Holly, painting stopped. Family took over.

Subscribe now

This exhibition marks her return.

Her work combines ballpoint pen and paint, pop surrealism and portraiture. The bodies are unapologetically present. Pregnant torsos. Blooming forms. Figures that feel both strong and exposed. There is colour and vibrancy, but there is also tension. One piece depicts a mother divided in tone, suggesting the internal split that many women experience but rarely articulate. The joy and the fracture sitting side by side.

My own relationship to motherhood is different, but adjacent. I have spent more than two decades working as a neonatologist at the Rotunda Hospital. I witness the beginning of parenthood daily. I see fear, relief, shock, resilience. I see mothers in control and mothers overwhelmed. I see the quiet competence that develops in real time.

In my work for this exhibition, motherhood is not a single moment. It is a process. The pieces move from abstraction toward form. Shapes become recognisable. Colour settles into bodies. The work reflects how identity shifts gradually rather than instantly. Becoming a mother is not a switch. It is an ongoing reorganisation.

Between Holly’s experience of living motherhood and my experience of observing its earliest hours, a conversation has emerged. The exhibition is that conversation made visible.

The show includes mixed media works that range from intimate to graphic. Some pieces are restrained and minimal. Others are bold and almost electric in tone. Across them all is a shared interest in the body, in protection, in transformation.

We chose to open the exhibition in the week of Mother’s Day deliberately. The day itself often simplifies motherhood into something neat and celebratory. The work on these walls is not neat. It reflects exhilaration and boredom, trauma and repair, autonomy and responsibility. It reflects the fact that motherhood alters a person in ways that are physical, emotional and existential.

This exhibition is also taking place during a time that feels personally charged. With family of my own currently living through instability in Kuwait and in Palestine, the themes of protection and family are not abstract. Proceeds from artwork purchased through my art page will go toward supporting families in Palestine through trusted contacts on the ground. That decision sits quietly alongside the exhibition. It is not the centre of it, but it is part of it.

The exhibition details are simple:

Motherhood
The Copper House Gallery
Dublin 8

Opening Night: Thursday March 12, 6 pm to 9 pm
Friday March 13: 10 am to 4 pm
Saturday March 14: 10 am to 4 pm

There will be a wine reception on opening night.

If you have followed either of our work over the years, this show brings those strands together. It is not a departure. It is a consolidation.

Motherhood is often spoken about loudly. This exhibition attempts to look at it more directly.

We would be glad to see you there.

Afif

Last week the 2024 IMIS National Report landed. Headlines did what headlines do. Nearly half of babies in some hospitals born by caesarean. Inductions up. Risks up. It is easy to read this and think maternity care is spiralling in the wrong direction.

The data tell a more complicated story. As a neonatologist working in this system, I want to unpack what has actually changed over the last decade, where the real concerns lie, and what parents should take from all of this if you are pregnant now, planning a pregnancy, or still processing a previous birth.

First, what is IMIS and why should parents care?

IMIS is a national data system that collects standardised information from all 19 public maternity units in Ireland. It tracks things like:

• how many babies are born

• rates of caesarean birth and induction

• serious maternal complications

• neonatal complications like encephalopathy

• perinatal mortality and infant feeding patterns

These data are used to monitor safety, spot worrying trends, and compare hospitals to national averages. It is not perfect, but it is one of the main tools we have to understand how maternity care is performing at a system level.

The big demographic shift: fewer births, older mothers

Two key trends over the last decade:

1. The number of births has fallen by over 20 percent since 2014
   IMIS shows an average annual decline in births of about 2.1 percent between 2014 and 2024, across the 19 maternity units. Fewer babies are being born, but the work is not necessarily easier because of trend number two.

2. Mothers are older
   CSO data for 2023 show a record number of babies born to women aged 40 and over, and a steep rise in births to women aged 45 and over compared with a decade earlier. Perinatal mortality audits repeatedly show that perinatal deaths are more common at the extremes of maternal age, particularly in women aged 40 or more compared with those in their early thirties.

So we now have fewer pregnancies overall, but a higher proportion of them in older age groups that carry more baseline risk. That context matters a lot when we talk about interventions and outcomes.

Caesarean and induction rates: what actually changed?

The bit you saw splashed everywhere is real:

• Induction of labour increased from about 29.6 percent in 2014 to 38.5 percent in 2024.

• Caesarean section increased from about 29.6 percent in 2014 to 40.6 percent in 2024.

At the same time:

• Assisted vaginal births (forceps or ventouse) decreased from 15.5 percent to 13.8 percent.

• Severe perineal tears (third and fourth degree) have fallen slightly, from 1.92 percent of vaginal births in 2014 to 1.89 percent in 2024, a small change but importantly not going up in the face of other shifts.

So the pattern is fairly clear. More inductions, more caesareans, slightly fewer instrumental deliveries, and slightly fewer severe perineal injuries.

Why are caesarean rates rising?

There is no single answer. The likely contributors are:

• Older maternal age, more chronic conditions, more IVF and assisted reproduction

• Lower tolerance for risk from both clinicians and families, especially after several high profile maternity scandals

• Inductions themselves, which change the pattern of labour and can increase the likelihood of caesarean in some scenarios

• Larger babies in some groups and higher BMI

• More continuous fetal monitoring in higher risk pregnancies, which detects more abnormalities but also leads to more intervention

It is very tempting to say “high caesarean rate = bad system”. Reality is messier. What matters most is who is having caesareans, why, and what the outcomes are for mothers and babies.

Perinatal mortality and corrected perinatal mortality: what do these terms mean?

This is where parents’ eyes usually glaze over, so let us strip the jargon away.

• Perinatal mortality rate (PMR)
  This is the rate of babies who die around the time of birth. It usually includes stillbirths (from a defined gestation or weight) plus early neonatal deaths, usually deaths in the first 7 days of life, divided by the total number of births, and expressed per 1000 births.

• Corrected perinatal mortality rate (corrected PMR)
  This is the same measure, but it removes babies who die because of major or lethal congenital anomalies that could not be prevented or treated.
  In practical terms it asks: “If we exclude the babies who sadly had conditions not compatible with long term survival, how often are healthy babies dying around birth?”

HSE and maternity safety statements use a similar concept, sometimes called adjusted perinatal mortality, defined as stillbirth and early neonatal deaths in babies above a certain birth weight, excluding lethal congenital defects, per 1000 deliveries.

For parents:

PMR tells you the overall burden of baby deaths around birth.
Corrected PMR tells you how often babies die who were otherwise structurally normal, which is a closer indicator of how the system is performing.

So, are more babies dying, or fewer?

We have to combine IMIS with the national perinatal mortality audit and CSO data to get a full picture.

• The National Perinatal Epidemiology Centre (NPEC) reports that the perinatal mortality rate in Ireland in 2023 was 4.3 per 1000 total births and the corrected PMR was 3.0 per 1000 births.

• These rates are low by international standards and, importantly, have not exploded despite rises in maternal age and intervention. The trend over recent years has been relatively stable or improving at national level.

On the broader infant side:

• The CSO reports that in 2023 the infant mortality rate in Ireland was 3.3 deaths per 1000 live births, very similar to the EU average of about 3.3 per 1000.

So in plain terms:

We have more inductions, more caesareans, older mothers, and fewer births,
but we do not see a surge in babies dying around birth. If anything, serious harm remains rare and sits at a relatively low level for a high income country.

That does not mean everything is fine. A perinatal death rate of 4.3 per 1000 still represents devastated families. But the idea that rising intervention has wrecked perinatal survival is not supported by the national data.

Neonatal encephalopathy and therapeutic hypothermia

Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is a type of brain injury around the time of birth. It is one of the gravest things we deal with in neonatal units. It is also often used as a marker of how safely babies are delivered.

The IMIS 2024 data show:

• Neonatal encephalopathy rates have fallen modestly, from 1.49 per 1000 babies in 2015 to 1.37 per 1000 in 2024.

• Therapeutic hypothermia use, the cooling therapy we use to reduce brain injury, has fluctuated year to year but is broadly stable.

So while headlines scream about rising caesareans, the indicator most closely linked to severe hypoxic injury looks slightly better, not worse. From a neonatal perspective, that matters. If we were seeing a steep rise in NE or cooling in parallel with rising interventions, I would be much more worried about the direction of travel.

Maternal complications: ectopic pregnancy, eclampsia, tears

IMIS highlights several key maternal issues:

• Ectopic pregnancy
  The rate has risen from around 11.9 per 1000 women in 2014 to 18.9 per 1000 in 2024. That does not necessarily mean the biology suddenly changed. It likely reflects better diagnosis, more early pregnancy scanning, and more assisted reproduction, but it does increase workload and risk.

• Eclampsia
  Rates of eclampsia, a severe complication of pre eclampsia involving seizures, have continued to fall overall since 2014, with some year to year noise.

• Severe perineal tears
  As mentioned earlier, severe third and fourth degree tears have slightly decreased as a proportion of vaginal births.

Taken together, the maternal safety picture is mixed but not catastrophic. Some complications are rising, some falling. What you do not see is a health system in free fall. You see a service under pressure that is holding outcomes together, but at the cost of rising intervention and a workforce that is frankly stretched to bits.

How does Ireland compare internationally?

A quick sense check, using broader sources:

• Infant mortality in Ireland sits around 3.3 deaths per 1000 live births, similar to or slightly better than the EU average.

• Maternal mortality is very low. Recent OECD data suggest Ireland is among the countries with a three year average maternal mortality ratio under 3 deaths per 100 000 live births, which is a strong performance internationally.

This does not excuse poor local practice, bad experiences, or gaps in care. But when you zoom out at national level, Ireland sits in the group of countries where severe maternal and infant outcomes are relatively rare. That is worth holding in mind when social media is convinced that birth here is uniformly unsafe.

The problem with the “too many caesareans” headline

Let us be blunt.

A caesarean section is not a moral failure. It is a surgical procedure. For some women it is life saving. For some babies it is the difference between a brain injury and a normal life. For some, it is medically unnecessary and driven by system issues, fear, or defensive practice.

We have three separate questions:

1. Is the overall rate too high for a high income country with our risk profile

2. Are particular groups of women having too many or too few caesareans

3. Are women and families getting full, honest information and real choice

IMIS answers some of question one, but almost none of question three. It gives us numbers, not stories. It tells us that intervention is going up, and that serious neonatal outcomes are not rising in parallel. It does not tell us if a woman felt bulldozed into section, if she was traumatised by her birth, or if she had continuity of care.

Rising caesarean rates are a signal. They should trigger deeper analysis using Robson classification, local audits, and perinatal reviews, not a simplistic “good vs bad” shouting match.

What should parents actually take from all this?

If you are pregnant, planning pregnancy, or still processing your last birth, here is the stripped back version.

1. Ireland remains a relatively safe place to have a baby by international standards: Infant mortality is low. Perinatal mortality and corrected perinatal mortality are low. Maternal deaths are rare. That does not minimise individual tragedies, but it is important context.

2. You are more likely to be offered induction or caesarean than a decade ago: Especially if you are older, have underlying medical issues, had previous complications, or conceived via IVF. You are not imagining it. The data back it up.

3. More intervention has not translated into a wave of extra babies dying around birth: Neonatal encephalopathy rates have edged down slightly. Perinatal mortality is stable or improving. This suggests that some of the increased intervention is likely a response to risk that is actually helping to prevent the worst outcomes. It also suggests we might be able to be more precise and less blanket in how we use these interventions.

4. Your experience still matters, even if the outcome was “healthy mother, healthy baby”: IMIS cannot see your birth trauma, your emergency hysterectomy, your breastfeeding struggles, or your PTSD. Absence of a bad number in a report does not mean your experience was good enough. Both can be true at the same time.

5. Older maternal age is now a central part of the story: A bigger share of births are to women over 35 and over 40. That brings higher baseline risk. It also demands better pre conception care, more realistic counselling, and honest conversations about induction, section, and complications.

Where do we actually need to do better?

This is where I stop being polite with the system.

1. Capacity and staffing

Keeping outcomes stable while intervention rises is not magic. It is midwives, obstetricians, anaesthetists, neonatologists, nurses, HCAs and allied health staff working at their limits.

You cannot keep squeezing that indefinitely without something giving. If we want safe induction and safe caesareans, we need:

• adequate theatre capacity

• enough midwives to staff labour wards and induction suites without unsafe ratios

• neonatal units that are not permanently at “one cot left”

The IMIS report should be a driver for capital investment and workforce planning, not an annual box ticking exercise.

2. Equity and variation between hospitals

National averages can hide a lot. Smaller units with fewer than 1000 births a year have a different risk profile and backup structure than tertiary centres with over 8000 births.

We need transparent, hospital level IMIS dashboards that the public can actually read, with:

• local caesarean and induction rates

• local perinatal mortality and corrected PMR

• contextual information about case mix

Parents should not have to decode PDFs to work out if their local unit is an outlier.

3. Informed choice and birth experience

There is no data point in IMIS that says “this woman felt heard” or “this couple left utterly traumatised”. That is not an argument against IMIS. It is a reminder that audit and lived experience both matter.

Rising intervention for a high risk woman who feels well informed and supported is one thing. Rising intervention for a low risk woman who feels railroaded at 39 weeks because “that is what we do here” is quite another.

Real improvement would mean:

• continuity of midwifery care for more women

• standardised, evidence based counselling around induction and caesarean

• integrated perinatal mental health services for those who have traumatic experiences

So, is the glass half full or half empty?

If I look only at the national data:

• Perinatal and infant mortality are low

• Neonatal encephalopathy is slightly down

• Severe maternal complications like eclampsia are down

• Severe perineal tears are not increasing

• Caesarean and induction rates are up, but not obviously causing extra baby deaths

That is a cautiously “glass half full” narrative for a system under serious pressure.

If I think about the workload, the rota gaps, the lack of NICU capacity in some places, the stories parents bring to clinics and podcasts, and the staff burnout I see daily, the glass does not feel that full.

Both realities are true at once.

Final thought for parents

When you see the next scary headline about caesareans or rising risk, remember this:

• Outcomes for babies and mothers in Ireland remain good by international standards.

• Rising intervention is partly a response to older, more complex pregnancies, and partly a symptom of a risk averse, under resourced system.

• You are allowed to want both things at once, a safe outcome and a humane, respectful experience.

The IMIS report tells us we are not falling off a safety cliff. It also tells us that we are running that safety on the back of rising intervention, older mothers, and a service that needs serious investment, better transparency, and a much stronger focus on how birth actually feels for the people living it.

If you are reading this while pregnant, the takeaway is not “panic, caesareans everywhere” and it is not “shut up, the numbers look fine”. It is:

Ask questions, insist on clear explanations, and remember that you are allowed to be central in decisions about your body and your baby. The data is there to support safer care, not to silence you.

Leave a comment

The Irish scene: what the numbers tell us

In Ireland, the situation is both sobering and inspiring. The INFANT Research Centre reports that about 4,500 babies are born prematurely each year in Ireland, which is roughly one in every 16 babies. Globally, about one in ten babies is born preterm. While numbers alone cannot tell the whole story, they help us understand the scale. Thousands of families. Thousands of hopes and fears. Thousands of nights spent pacing corridors, waiting for a call. Thousands of first breaths, first kangaroo-holds, and hard-earned milestones.

Why this matters to me

As a neonatologist, I have witnessed the intensity of those first seconds and minutes. The sound of machines, the quiet in the corridor as the team gathers, and the anxious look from a mother across the incubator door are all familiar. As a researcher, I know there is still much we do not fully understand about prematurity: why it happens, how to improve long-term outcomes, and how to support entire families. As a podcaster and digital artist, I believe in sharing these human stories to help build our collective awareness.

But beyond all roles, I am humbled. Watching a baby born so early fight for life shows both the fragility of human beginnings and the strength of hope. Seeing parents advocate at every step—questioning, learning, and keeping watch, reminds me that resilience is not just an idea but something lived every day.he true heart of the story.

For every preterm baby, there is a parent whose world changes in an instant. The expected due date fades away, replaced by monitors, alarms, clinic visits, and uncertain milestones. Still, the parent continues. They learn to understand medical terms, support skin-to-skin time, and sometimes become a source of hope.

These parents deserve more than acknowledgement; they deserve action. They deserve neonatal units designed for family-centred care. They deserve follow-up services that monitor not just survival but thriving. They deserve a community where no one says “you’re alone in this”.

Looking ahead: what we must keep pushing

We cannot celebrate survival without confronting the gaps. If we want Ireland to lead in neonatal care the way families deserve, we need to act.

• Prevention and prediction: Stronger antenatal risk assessment. Better prediction tools for preterm birth. Earlier, smarter intervention instead of reactive care.

• Family-centred neonatal care: Skin-to-skin as default. Parents treated as partners, not visitors. Psychological support that actually exists outside a brochure.

• Huge investment in NICU infrastructure: This is the piece we can’t dodge anymore. Too many units across Ireland operate in cramped, outdated spaces that simply cannot deliver optimal modern neonatal care. We need bigger footprints, private family spaces, proper isolation rooms, breastfeeding and pumping facilities that are not afterthoughts, and a design that supports neurodevelopment rather than fighting against it. You cannot build twenty-first-century care on twentieth-century infrastructure. The babies and their parents deserve more.

• Research and long-term follow-up: Survival is the starting line. We need robust follow-up programmes tracking development, heart health, learning, and long-term wellbeing. Research should not be a luxury; it should be built into the system.

• Awareness and advocacy: Buildings turning purple once a year is fine, but policy needs to turn purple as well. Consistent funding, public visibility, and national strategy are the only ways this becomes more than a social media moment.

On a personal note

Every time I walk into a neonatal unit, I feel both the weight of responsibility and the privilege of being part of these stories. I think of the tiny bodies still developing, the parents pacing outside the incubator, and the moment a baby reaches out for a human touch despite all the wires and tubes.

And I think: We are not doing this alone. The strength of the infant, the grit of the parent, the devotion of the neonatal team; they all converge. If I learned anything, it is this: resilience grows in the soil of struggle, hope blooms in the incubator’s glow, and community matters more than we often admit.

So today, I invite you, whether you are a parent, clinician, researcher, friend, or simply someone who cares: to pause. Remember the babies born too soon. Honour the families who loved them fiercely. Take one small action: share a story, support a neonatal unit, or speak up.

On 17 November, we mark World Prematurity Day. But for many families, the journey lasts for years. Let our awareness support them far beyond just one day.

Share

Epidural analgesia has been used safely for many years and remains one of the most effective and widely available methods of pain relief in labour. Seventy-five percent of first-time mothers avail of one. The technique involves placing a small catheter into the epidural space in the lower back, through which a local anaesthetic and a small dose of opioid are administered. The goal is to block the transmission of pain signals from the uterus and birth canal to the brain, while keeping the mother awake and alert. Only a very small amount of the medication, if any, reaches the baby.

Despite the extensive experience and research supporting its use, misinformation persists. The idea that an epidural can negatively affect a baby’s behaviour or development often stems from personal observations rather than scientific data. Someone may notice that a baby born after an epidural appears calm or slow to feed and assume that this is the cause. But newborn behaviour in the first hours of life is influenced by many factors, the length and intensity of labour, maternal exhaustion, use of oxytocin, the timing of feeding, or simply the baby’s own temperament. Without controlling for these factors, it is impossible to isolate the effect of the epidural itself.

A recent study frequently cited online illustrates how easily research findings can be misinterpreted. The authors observed that newborns whose mothers received epidural analgesia appeared slower to go through certain early behaviours, such as moving toward the breast. However, the study had serious limitations. It included a small sample of infants and used statistical methods that were inappropriate for the collected data. The variation in the timing of newborn behaviours was so large that the reported averages were not meaningful. The authors treated the skewed data as normally distributed, rendering their comparisons unreliable. In short, the study generated interesting observations but cannot support broad conclusions about cause and effect.

In contrast, larger and better-designed studies provide a far clearer picture. A recent cohort study from China followed more than 1,800 mothers and babies from birth to one year of age. The researchers compared those who had an epidural during labour with those who did not, adjusting for multiple factors such as maternal age, education, gestational age, and birthweight. At twelve months, the babies were assessed using a validated developmental screening tool. The findings were reassuring: there were no differences in motor, language, cognitive, or social development between the two groups. The duration of epidural use also did not make a difference.

These results align with decades of international research showing no long-term effects of epidural analgesia on babies. When smaller studies over the years have reported differences in early feeding or alertness, those differences have typically been transient and not associated with lasting consequences.

It is important to distinguish between what is biologically plausible and what is not. The medications used in modern epidurals, typically low concentrations of local anaesthetic such as ropivacaine combined with a small amount of opioid, have minimal systemic absorption. They act locally on the nerves in the spine. The concentration that might reach the baby through the placenta is so small that it is unlikely to have any measurable pharmacological effect. From a physiological standpoint, there is no credible mechanism by which an epidural could impair long-term neurological or developmental outcomes.

Misinformation tends to thrive where science meets emotion. Childbirth is one of the most profound and vulnerable experiences in a person’s life. It is entirely natural to seek meaning in every outcome and to connect choices in labour to the baby’s well-being. But this can create a breeding ground for fear-based narratives, particularly when shared by individuals who speak passionately but without scientific training. Observations, no matter how sincere, are not the same as evidence.

For parents, what matters most is making informed choices without guilt or fear. Choosing an epidural does not mean opting out of a natural experience or taking an unnecessary risk. It is one of several valid ways to manage pain during labour, and its benefits are well-documented. When pain is well controlled, stress hormones are lower, oxygen delivery to the uterus improves, and mothers often feel more present and engaged in the birth. These are not small advantages.

None of this means that every woman should have an epidural, or that other approaches are inferior. Birth is not one-size-fits-all. Some prefer to labour without medication, others plan for an epidural early, and many make the decision in the moment. What is important is that the decision is based on facts, not fear.

The persistence of myths about epidurals harming babies tells us more about how information spreads than about medicine itself. In an era where anyone can publish their “observations” to thousands of followers, misinformation can travel further than evidence. Yet, as clinicians and researchers, it is our role to keep communicating what the data actually show, calmly, transparently, and with empathy.

Parents deserve honest information. They deserve to know that the weight of scientific evidence supports the safety of epidurals for both mother and baby. And they deserve to make their decisions free from judgment, ideology, or guilt.

The reality is simple: an epidural does not harm your baby, either in the short term or the long term. What it does is provide safe, effective relief from one of the most intense forms of pain a person can experience. That relief can allow for clearer thinking, calmer breathing, and, in many cases, a more positive birth experience.

The choice to use an epidural should never be portrayed as a weakness or risk. It is a medically sound option grounded in decades of research, clinical experience, and compassionate care.

Leave a comment

The Swedish Sibling Study

Sweden keeps detailed health records that allow researchers to follow entire populations over decades. Using this resource, scientists recently looked at 2.5 million children born between 1995 and 2019 to test whether paracetamol use in pregnancy was connected to later diagnoses of autism, ADHD, or learning disability.

At first glance, the raw data suggested a very small increase in risk, around a 5% higher chance of autism in children exposed during pregnancy, with similar signals for ADHD and learning difficulties.

But here’s the crucial part: the researchers then compared siblings within the same families. One child was exposed to paracetamol during pregnancy, another wasn’t. Same genetics, same home, same parents. Once those comparisons were made, the apparent risk completely disappeared. Autism, ADHD, intellectual disability, no difference at all.

Even when they looked at mothers who used paracetamol more often, the risk still wasn’t there once siblings were compared. The conclusion? Earlier studies probably picked up family background and genetics, not a true effect of paracetamol.

What This Means for Parents

Paracetamol remains the safest painkiller during pregnancy. The current advice is clear:

• Use the lowest effective dose

• For the shortest time necessary

• Don’t avoid it when you genuinely need it

Untreated fever or pain can be far riskier to both mother and baby than the medicine itself.

Fever and Autism: Pregnancy vs Labour

Fever has also been studied separately.

• During pregnancy: Longer fevers, especially in the second trimester, have been linked to a small increase in autism risk; however, confounding is also likely to play a huge part in this association. The good news is that this risk appears weaker when fevers are treated with paracetamol.

• During labour (intrapartum): Large studies that accounted for other birth factors found no link between fever in labour and autism. Once the confounders were removed, the signal disappeared.

So, treating fever in pregnancy matters. Intrapartum fever, by itself, does not appear to increase the risk of autism.

Bottom Line

• Scaremongering headlines are common, but the strongest evidence we have is reassuring.

• Paracetamol in pregnancy, used sensibly, is safe.

• Fever in pregnancy should be treated.

• Fever during labour is not linked to autism.

Parents deserve clear information, not panic. Science isn’t perfect, but right now the balance of evidence says that paracetamol, when used appropriately, is not something to fear.

Deep Dive for the Curious

If you want the technical details, here’s what the Swedish study actually showed:

• Study design: Nationwide cohort of 2.48 million children born in Sweden between 1995–2019.

• Exposure definition: Maternal paracetamol use recorded through prescriptions and midwife antenatal reports. About 185,909 children were considered exposed.

• Outcomes measured: Diagnoses of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and intellectual disability (ID), using national health registers.

Main findings

• In population-level analyses (comparing all children): small but statistically significant increases were seen. For autism, the hazard ratio was 1.05 (about a 5% increase). Similar figures were found for ADHD and ID.

• In sibling-controlled analyses: when exposed and unexposed siblings were compared, the associations disappeared. Autism: HR ~0.98 (95% CI crosses 1). ADHD: null. Intellectual disability: null.

• Dose–response: In non-sibling comparisons, higher reported paracetamol use correlated with stronger associations. In sibling analyses, no dose–response effect was present.

• Interpretation: The authors concluded that previous associations were due to familial confounding (shared genetics, shared environment, maternal conditions) rather than a direct causal effect of paracetamol.

Fever studies

• Prenatal fever: Meta-analyses and large cohorts suggest a small increase in autism risk, especially with prolonged fevers or those occurring in the second trimester. The risk signal weakens when fevers are treated with antipyretics.

• Intrapartum fever: When adjusted for confounders (e.g. epidural use, prolonged labour, infection), no independent association with autism remains.

What is Confounding?

Confounding happens when two things are linked together in a way that makes it look like one is causing the other, when in fact both are connected through a third factor. For example, mothers might take paracetamol in pregnancy because they have fever or infection. Those underlying conditions, not the medicine, could influence the baby’s later health. If researchers don’t account for that, the results can wrongly suggest paracetamol itself is the problem. Sibling studies help untangle this by comparing children who share the same genetic and family background, which reduces the impact of confounding.

Why sibling studies matter

Sibling-comparison designs are powerful because they inherently control for many unmeasured factors like parental genetics, socio-economic status, and home environment. That makes them one of the best tools for teasing out causality in large epidemiological studies.

Reference:
Ahlqvist VH, Sjöqvist H, Dalman C, et al. Acetaminophen Use During Pregnancy and Children’s Risk of Autism, ADHD, and Intellectual Disability. JAMA. 2024;331(14):1205–1214.

Whooping cough, also called pertussis, is back in the conversation. Like my other examples, it is a vaccine preventable illness, yet cases have been rising here and abroad. That makes it a real worry for parents of newborns and young infants, because the youngest babies are the ones who get the sickest. This piece explains what pertussis looks like, how it spreads, how to protect a baby, and what to do if exposure happens. There is a technical deep dive at the end for clinicians or anyone who wants the full detail.

What is whooping cough?

Whooping cough is an infection caused by the bacterium Bordetella pertussis. It targets the airways and lungs. In toddlers and adults it may show as a long cough that just will not quit. In babies under six months the disease can be severe, requiring hospital care. That gap between newborn vulnerability and the time their vaccines start working is why protecting babies matters so much.

How it starts and what it feels like

The first few days usually look like a common cold. Runny nose, sneezing, a bit of fever, a mild cough. After about a week the cough changes. It becomes paroxysmal. That means it comes in long fits that leave the child gasping for breath. Sometimes the gasp makes a “whoop” sound. Not every child who has pertussis makes that noise. If a baby is infected, they may not cough at all. Instead they can have pauses in breathing, go pale or blue, or look very floppy and weak. Those signs are emergency warnings. The cough can drag on for weeks. People still call it the 100 day cough because recovery is often slow.

How it spreads

Pertussis spreads when an infected person coughs or sneezes. Tiny droplets carry the bacteria. People are contagious before they even feel ill. That is how a visitor with a mild cough, or a teenager who thinks they have a “lingering cold”, can infect a newborn.

Babies are at the highest risk

Newborns and infants under six months have the smallest airways and immature immune systems. The combination makes prolonged coughing fits dangerous. Hospitalisation, breathing support and, in rare cases, intensive care can be needed. That is why we protect the baby indirectly, by vaccinating pregnant mothers, family members and close contacts, and by keeping the newborn away from anyone who is unwell.

Understanding the Vaccines

Vaccination is the single most effective defence against whooping cough. Two vaccines work together to protect babies from whooping cough. That gap is why the Tdap vaccine in pregnancy matters. The HSE recommends that every pregnant woman receive the Tdap vaccine between 16 and 36 weeks of each pregnancy. The reason is straightforward. When the pregnant woman is vaccinated, their immune system produces antibodies. These cross the placenta and reach the baby before birth. Those antibodies reduce the chance the baby will get severe pertussis in the first weeks of life.

The pregnancy vaccine (Tdap)

• What it is: Tdap stands for tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis. It is a combination vaccine given between 16 and 36 weeks of pregnancy.

• How it works: The vaccine does not contain live bacteria. Instead, it uses purified proteins to trigger your immune system to make antibodies. These antibodies pass through the placenta and into your baby’s bloodstream before birth. That means your baby is protected from the very start, during the weeks when whooping cough is most dangerous.

• Safety: Millions of pregnant people worldwide have had Tdap. Studies show no increase in miscarriage, stillbirth, premature birth, or growth problems. Side effects for the mother are usually mild, such as a sore arm or brief tiredness. The vaccine cannot cause pertussis in you or your baby.

The infant vaccine

• When it is given: In Ireland, babies are offered the pertussis vaccine as part of the routine childhood immunisation schedule at 2, 4, and 6 months. Booster doses follow later in childhood.

• Why it matters: The antibodies passed from pregnancy fade by about six months, so babies need their own doses for long-term protection. Each dose builds stronger immunity and reduces the risk of severe illness.

• Together with the pregnancy vaccine: This “two-step” approach, protection from maternal antibodies at birth, followed by the baby’s own vaccines, gives the strongest and safest shield against whooping cough.

Why it matters now

Babies born without that maternal antibody are vulnerable the moment they arrive. Babies who had a vaccinated mother are far less likely to be hospitalised or die from pertussis. That protection is not permanent, which is why baby vaccines still matter, but it covers the highest risk window.

Timing and repeat pregnancies

The recommendation is to give Tdap during every pregnancy, even if the previous pregnancy was recent. Antibody levels decline over time. Each pregnancy is an opportunity to give the newborn direct protection from birth.

Family and household boosters

Household immunity matters too. Make sure older siblings, parents and frequent visitors are up to date. Adults can have mild symptoms but still pass the infection on. A booster for household members adds an important layer of defence.

If the pregnancy vaccine was missed

Not every parent manages to get the Tdap vaccine during pregnancy. Sometimes people are not aware it is recommended, or the timing window is missed. If that happens, there are still important ways to reduce the risk for a newborn until they begin their own vaccine course.

• Make sure others are protected: Check that anyone in regular contact with the baby has had their pertussis vaccine. Older siblings, grandparents, and other caregivers should be up to date. Even a mild cough in an adult can transmit the infection.

• Limit exposure to coughs and colds: Ask visitors with any cough to stay away. Babies should not be passed around casually during outbreaks.

• Good hygiene: Wash hands before holding the baby, especially after coming in from public places. Cover coughs and sneezes.

• Be alert for early symptoms: If a baby under six months has spells of coughing, pauses in breathing, or goes floppy, seek urgent medical review.

• Talk to your GP: If someone in the household is exposed to or diagnosed with whooping cough, your GP may recommend antibiotics for the baby or for other close contacts to reduce the risk of spread.

These steps cannot replace the protection of the maternal vaccine, but they can lower the chance that a baby will be exposed during the most vulnerable early weeks of life.

Keeping the household safe

If there is a newborn at home, be conservative about exposures. Ask visitors with any cough to stay away. Encourage good hand hygiene and respiratory etiquette. If someone in the house has a cough, consider a phone call to your GP or PHN to discuss testing and antibiotics for close contacts. High risk people include premature babies, infants with underlying heart or lung problems, and anyone who has not completed their vaccine course.

What to do if exposed

If a household member gets confirmed pertussis, health services will consider giving antibiotics to close contacts. This post-exposure prophylaxis can reduce the chance the baby becomes infected. The decision depends on who is exposed and the baby’s age and health. Talk to your GP or public health nurse quickly if there has been exposure.

When to get urgent help

Bring your baby to emergency care right away if any of these happen:

• Pauses in breathing.

• Baby goes pale or blue.

• Baby is floppy or much less responsive than usual.

• Baby refuses feeds or vomits after coughing.

• Coughing spells are prolonged and the baby struggles for breath.

If you are worried, act. Do not wait to see if it improves.

A note on the recent rise in cases

Pertussis moves in cycles, but the last few years brought large increases in many countries. 2024 had higher case numbers than recent seasons. Falling vaccine uptake and waning population immunity are both factors. Ireland has recorded rising numbers too, though the pattern varies regionally. The practical response remains the same: protect newborns with maternal vaccination, keep household vaccines current, and act early when there is exposure.

What parents can do this week

• Check your child’s immunisation record.

• If pregnant, make an appointment or ask your maternity team about the Tdap vaccine.

• Keep newborns away from anyone with a cough.

• If someone in your household is diagnosed with pertussis, contact your GP or PHN about antibiotics for close contacts.

• Learn the red flags and get help quickly if your baby shows them.

Deep dive for the curious

This section is for clinicians, for parents who want technical detail, or for anyone who likes the background facts.

Case definition: Clinically, suspect pertussis when a cough lasts more than two weeks and includes coughing fits, post-tussive vomiting, or the whoop. Laboratory confirmation uses nasopharyngeal PCR, culture, or serology depending on illness timing.

Testing: PCR on a nasopharyngeal swab is most sensitive early in the illness. Culture confirms but is slower. Serology becomes useful later, when PCR may turn negative.

Treatment: Macrolide antibiotics, such as azithromycin, are used for cases and for close contacts when indicated. In established disease antibiotics reduce transmission, but they do not shorten the lengthy cough once it is established. Supportive care is crucial for infants. That may include supplemental oxygen, specialised feeding support, and, in severe cases, intensive care.

Severe disease and complications: Infants can develop pneumonia, seizures, or hypoxic brain injury from repeated apnoeic episodes. Mechanical ventilation is sometimes required. In rare but extreme cases clinicians may use exchange transfusion or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Prophylaxis for contacts: Antibiotic prophylaxis for household contacts is used to protect vulnerable infants, and to limit spread in close settings. Timing and choice of agent follow local guidance and the age and health of the contacts.

Epidemiology and immunity: Pertussis circulates in multi-year cycles. Immunity from vaccination and from infection wanes, which allows periodic outbreaks despite high coverage. Booster programmes aim to reduce this risk and protect the most vulnerable.

Closing Words

Whooping cough is not a relic. It is present, it can be dangerous, and it is preventable. The single most important step for protecting newborns is the Tdap vaccine in pregnancy, given every pregnancy. After that, infant vaccines, household boosters, good hygiene and early action on exposure make a real difference.

Leave a comment

Why Babies Struggle in the Heat

Newborns and young infants are sensitive to high temperatures. Unlike adults, babies don’t sweat effectively and can’t cool themselves as easily. In fact, infants produce more body heat relative to their size, and their temperature can rise faster, they retain heat more than adults.

Because babies can’t verbalize discomfort, they rely on us to protect them from overheating. Even a mildly hot day can make a young baby uncomfortable or even ill if proper precautions aren’t taken. Overheating in infants not only causes irritability and dehydration, but is also linked to increased risk of heat exhaustion and even SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) in severe cases. Understanding their vulnerability is the first step to keeping them safe.

Creating a Cool Home Environment (Without A/C)

1. Keep the Heat Out: During the hottest part of the day, close curtains or blinds on windows to block direct sun and keep the room cooler. Light-blocking or thermal curtains can help reduce incoming heat. In the evening or early morning when outside air is cooler than indoors, open windows (if safe to do so) to let in a breeze and ventilate. Many UK/Ireland homes trap heat, so using the cooler night air can bring the temperature down.

2. Encourage Airflow: If you have a fan, use it to circulate air in the room, but do not point it directly at the baby. A direct fan can actually dehydrate infants by blowing away moisture and can make them too cold or uncomfortable. Instead, position the fan to oscillate or direct it toward a wall or ceiling, just to keep air moving. A useful trick is placing a bowl of ice water in front of a fan to cool the airflow slightly (essentially a DIY cooler). Always keep fans and cords well out of baby’s reach for safety. If your home has multiple floors, remember that lower floors (like the ground floor) tend to stay cooler than upstairs, it might help to spend more time downstairs during peak heat.

3. Cool Rooms Strategically: Identify the coolest room in the house (often a north-facing room or one on the shade side) and consider setting up your baby’s cot or a safe play area there during the day. Remove any unnecessary padding or cot bumpers that can restrict airflow around the cot. Using light cotton curtains or blinds to block sunlight while allowing some air through can keep that room more bearable.

4. Mind the Indoor Temperature: It’s wise to monitor the room temperature where your baby sleeps. A nursery thermometer is handy, the ideal sleep environment for an infant is about 17 –20 °C. If your home is warmer than this, take the other steps in this guide to bring the temperature down. Never place a baby’s cot next to a direct heat source (radiator, heater, or sunny window). And never, ever leave your baby in a closed, parked car or unventilated space, even for a few minutes, temperatures can skyrocket quickly and become life-threatening.

Dress Lightly: Clothing and Bedding Tips

When it’s sweltering, less is more in terms of baby clothing. Keep your baby in lightweight, loose-fitting outfits or sometimes just a nappy to prevent overheating. Cotton is an ideal fabric in hot weather as it’s breathable and absorbs sweat, helping cooling by evaporation. Avoid synthetic fabrics that can trap heat and irritate the skin.

For newborns and infants under 6 months, it’s usually sufficient to dress them in a short-sleeved vest or just a nappy when indoors if it’s very warm. Check your baby’s skin for signs of heat rash (small red bumps, often on the neck, back, or creases); loose cotton clothing can help prevent and ease prickly heat rashes.

Bedding: Ditch heavy blankets and quilts in hot weather. Use a light cotton sheet or a low-tog baby sleeping bag (0.5 tog if available) with no padding. Often, you won’t need any covering at all besides perhaps a thin muslin or sheet over a nappy-clad baby. Do not use hats or bonnets on your baby when indoors or sleeping, babies cool themselves through their head, and wearing a hat can cause overheating during sleep (Hats are useful right after birth or outdoors for sun protection, but not for sleep in hot weather.)

At night, if it’s very warm (over ~25 °C in the room), many babies will be fine sleeping in just a nappy and perhaps a sleeveless bodysuit. Keep nightwear to a minimum and remove any extra bedding if the baby is warm or sweaty. You can always add a lightweight layer later in the night if temperatures drop. Remember that babies sleep most comfortably when their environment is on the cooler side of our comfort range a too-warm baby will be restless and at risk of overheating.

Hydration and Feeding in Hot Weather

Keeping your baby well-hydrated is critical during a heatwave. For infants under 6 months, breast milk or formula provides all the hydration they need; do not give water to young babies (unless directed by a paediatrician) because it can upset their electrolyte balance and fill their tummy improperly; never dilute formula or give infants other liquids like juice etc. Instead, offer extra feeds on demand. Breastfed babies may want to nurse more frequently in hot weather, even if for shorter durations, this is normal and helps them stay hydrated. Breast milk adapts in hot weather; your body may produce slightly thinner milk for thirst-quenching. If you are breastfeeding, make sure you drink plenty of fluids as well, staying hydrated helps you maintain your milk supply.

Watch for dehydration signs: Check that your baby has regular wet nappies. A well-hydrated infant should have 6–8 pale wet nappies in 24 hours. If you notice fewer wet nappies, or the urine is dark and concentrated, it’s a sign the baby needs more fluids. Other dehydration signs can include a dry, sticky mouth, and extreme fussiness or lethargy. If your baby is refusing to feed, seems very listless, or has sunken eyes or a sunken soft spot, seek medical advice, these can be signs of dehydration or heat illness.

Feeding comfort: Skin-to-skin contact can make both you and baby sweaty in the heat. When nursing or bottle-feeding, you might place a light cotton sheet or towel between you and the baby to reduce skin contact and keep you both a bit cooler. Try feeding in the coolest room available, and ensure good airflow in that area.

Safe Sleep During a Heatwave

Keeping your baby cool at night is not only about comfort, it’s also about safety. Overheating has been linked to a higher risk of SIDS, so safe sleep guidelines become especially important in hot weather. Here’s how to ensure safe, cool sleep:

• Cool the room before sleep: In the evening, ventilate the nursery or bedroom by opening windows (if outside air is cooler) and using a fan to circulate air (remember: indirect flow only). You might even give your baby a lukewarm bath before bedtime to cool their body temperature slightly, many parents find this helps baby settle in the heat. (The bath water should be tepid, not cold)

• Minimal sleepwear: Dress your infant in minimal clothing for bed, a simple short-sleeve vest or just a nappy can be enough if the room is very warm. Remove any thick bedding; a single light sheet or an empty cot with just the mattress and a well-fitted sheet is safest. Do not use bulky blankets, duvets, or pillows around a young baby, as these can cause overheating and pose a suffocation risk. A light cellular cotton blanket (with tiny breathable holes) can be used if needed – these allow airflow and are safer for temperature regulation.

• Cot placement: Position the cot or Moses basket in the coolest part of the room, away from direct sunlight. Never place a baby’s cot next to a radiator or heater, or in direct line of a fan or air conditioning vent. Also, avoid leaving baby to sleep in a pram or car seat during hot weather, especially in an enclosed space. A pram can become like a little greenhouse, even more so if covered with any cloth. Transfer baby to a properly ventilated cot for sleep whenever possible.

• Head and face uncovered: Make sure your baby’s head remains uncovered during sleep. This means no hats or hoods, and keeping blankets away from the face. Babies release heat from their heads to cool down; blocking that can lead to overheating. If you swaddle your baby normally, consider that swaddling is not recommended in hot weather or use a very thin cotton muslin and ensure the room is cool. Many families skip swaddling during a heatwave to prevent trapping too much warmth.

• Check on them: It’s wise to check your baby’s temperature by feeling their tummy or back of neck periodically. The skin should feel comfortably warm, not hot, sweaty, or cold. If baby feels hot to the touch, or if you observe sweating, remove a layer of clothing or bedding and consider increasing air circulation. A touch test on baby’s hands or feet isn’t reliable (babies’ extremities often feel cool even when they are too warm), always check the core (tummy/back) for a true reading.

Expect that your infant’s sleep pattern might change in hot weather. They might wake more often due to discomfort or conversely seem extra sleepy from the heat during the day. Be flexible, if they take an extra nap or drink more at night, that’s okay during a heatwave. Prioritize keeping them cool and hydrated, and resume normal routines when the weather moderates.

How to Recognize Overheating: Signs & Symptoms

It’s crucial to be able to tell when your baby is becoming too hot. An overheating baby may show one or more of these warning signs:

• Excessive warmth or sweating: The baby’s skin may feel hot to the touch, especially on the chest or back, and you might notice damp hair or sweat on their neck/back. Sweating is a key sign (though infants may not always sweat a lot, so don’t rely on sweat alone. If a baby is drenched in sweat or has a sweaty head/neck, they are too hot.

• Flushed skin or heat rash: Many babies develop a red, flushed face when overheated, or you might see a blotchy red rash of tiny bumps (heat rash, also called prickly heat) on their skin. The rash often appears on the neck, chest, or nappy area in response to sweating. On the other hand, some babies’ skin might appear pale with cool, clammy sweat, then turn red and warm as heat stress worsens.

• Irritability or lethargy: An overheated baby might be unusually fussy, crying, and unable to be comforted, or, conversely, unusually drowsy, listless, or floppy. If your baby who is normally alert becomes sluggish or hard to wake, that’s a serious red flag. Overheating can make babies very sleepy or even dizzy, as their bodies struggle with the heat.

• Rapid breathing or heart rate: You may notice your baby breathing fast or panting when too hot. Their heart rate may also be elevated. A bright red tongue or dry mouth can accompany this if they’re becoming dehydrated. Always ensure they are getting enough fluids (via milk feeds) to support their cooling.

• Fewer wet nappies and other dehydration signs: As mentioned, if the baby isn’t getting enough liquid, dehydration can set in. Fewer than 6 wet nappies in 24 hours, dark urine, a sunken soft spot on the head, or no tears when crying are signs of dehydration and possible heat stress. The baby may also have a dry or sticky mouth. In heat, keep track of those diaper counts!

• Severe symptoms (medical emergency): In extreme cases, overheating can progress to heat exhaustion or heatstroke. Signs include very high body temperature (baby feels very hot, possibly with a fever > 39–40 °C), vomiting, fast breathing, or unresponsiveness, or even seizures. The skin may be hot and dry to the touch if sweat mechanisms have shutdown. If your infant ever shows these signs, treat it as an emergency, move the baby to a cooler area immediately, begin gentle cooling measures (see below), and seek medical help right away.

What to do if you suspect overheating: At the first sign your baby is too hot, act quickly to cool them down. Move to a cooler space out of direct heat (indoors or at least in shade), remove excess clothing, and encourage hydration (offer breast or bottle). You can sponge the baby with lukewarm water or give a tepid bath to help lower their temperature gradually. Never use icy cold water or a cold bath, as cooling too fast can be a shock, gentle, lukewarm water is effective and safe. You can also use a soft fan breeze nearby (not directly on them) to aid evaporation from their damp skin. If the baby’s condition doesn’t improve quickly with these measures, or if they display any severe symptoms, get medical attention promptly. Trust your instincts: it’s better to be cautious and seek help if you’re worried.

Heatwave Safety: What Not to Do

Just as important as the do’s are the don’ts. Avoid these common mistakes that could put your baby at risk during hot weather:

• DON’T cool too quickly or with extreme cold: Plunging a baby in a very cold bath or shower, or applying ice packs, is not a safe way to cool them. Sudden cold can constrict their blood vessels and actually raise core temperature. Instead, use lukewarm water for baths or sponging, which is effective without the shock. Similarly, never rub alcohol on a baby’s skin to cool them (an old folk remedy), it’s dangerous. Cool water and air circulation are safest.

• DON’T point fans directly at baby: As noted earlier, a fan blowing straight on an infant can overly dry and cool them, or dehydrate them by increasing moisture loss. Always ensure any cooling breeze is indirect. Also keep the fan a safe distance away and out of reach.

• DON’T cover the pram with a blanket or heavy cover: It might be tempting to drape a muslin or blanket over a stroller to shield baby from sun, but doing so can turn the pram into an oven. Even a thin cloth greatly reduces air circulation and traps heat inside, causing temperatures to soar dangerously. Use a parasol or sunshade attachment for the pram instead, or stick to the shade. And never leave your baby sleeping in a covered pram in hot weather they are much safer in a cot indoors or another ventilated space.

• DON’T leave baby in a parked car or enclosed space: This is a life-threatening hazard. Cars can heat up by several degrees per minute in the sun. Even five minutes in a hot car can be extremely dangerous for an infant. Always take your baby with you and never risk it. Likewise, avoid tight enclosed spaces like small rooms with no air flow.

• DON’T overdress or use too much bedding: Resist the urge to “be on the safe side” by adding an extra layer, in heat, the risk is being too warm, not too cold. Remove any waterproof mattress protectors (they hold heat and sweat). No duvets, quilts, or pillows around the baby. And remember, no hats during sleep and no mittens or socks if it’s very hot; those trap heat.

• DON’T give water (or juice) to young babies instead of milk: As mentioned, babies under 6 months should not be drinking water as their kidneys can’t handle it well. Water also fills them up with no calories, which can lead to less feeding and potential electrolyte imbalances. Stick to breast milk or formula, and just offer it more often.

• DON’T ignore warning signs: If your baby seems off, for example, unusually quiet, excessively irritable, or not feeding, don’t just assume they’re “fine.” Babies can go downhill quickly in extreme heat. Check their temperature (feel their torso), try to cool them, and if you’re unsure, call a health professional for advice. Do not give fever-reducing medicine to a baby for heat stress without medical advice; if a baby is overheated from the environment, the solution is cooling and hydration, not medication (unless directed by a doctor).

(Sources: NHS, HSE Ireland, American Academy of Pediatrics, Pregnancy Birth & Baby Australia, UNICEF)

Final Thoughts

Heatwaves can be challenging with a young baby, but with some proactive steps you can keep your little one cool, safe, and as comfortable as possible. Stay calm and pay attention to your baby’s cues. Often, keeping a baby cool is about simple measures: find the coolest spot, undress them, offer extra feeds, and chill out together until the heat passes. By using the tips above – and avoiding the common hazards – you’ll be well prepared to protect your baby during hot days.

Share

That leaves breastfeeding mothers facing a deeply unfair choice. Continue feeding their baby, or take a medication that might improve their diabetes, cardiovascular health, mobility or quality of life. The mother’s health is quietly treated as optional, while even a theoretical risk to the baby is treated as unacceptable.

GLP-1 drugs such as semaglutide, better known as Ozempic or Wegovy, and tirzepatide, sold as Mounjaro, have brought this problem into sharp focus.

Until recently, the standard advice was simple: avoid them while breastfeeding. We had animal studies, theoretical concerns and almost no human data.

That is no longer entirely true.

The latest evidence suggests that injectable semaglutide and tirzepatide pass into human milk in either undetectable or extremely small amounts. That is reassuring. It is not, however, the same as saying that they have been conclusively proven safe for every breastfeeding mother and baby. The answer has moved from “absolutely not” towards “possibly, depending on the circumstances.”

That is progress. It is also less catchy than a TikTok reel.

Why GLP-1 Drugs Have Become So Popular

GLP-1 receptor agonists mimic a hormone released by the gut after eating. They reduce appetite, slow stomach emptying and improve glucose-dependent insulin secretion.

Tirzepatide acts on both the GLP-1 and GIP receptors, but the practical conversation is similar: these medicines can substantially improve blood glucose control and produce significant weight loss.

For someone living with type 2 diabetes, obesity or related metabolic disease, the benefits may go well beyond fitting into an old pair of jeans. Treatment may improve cardiovascular risk, mobility, sleep apnoea, blood pressure and general health.

This matters after pregnancy. Some women enter pregnancy with type 2 diabetes. Others are diagnosed postpartum. Some have previously taken a GLP-1 drug and want to restart it. Many are also dealing with significant weight-related health problems while trying to recover from pregnancy, establish feeding and function on the sleep schedule of an overworked nightclub bouncer.

Insulin and metformin have much more established breastfeeding safety records and will often remain the first choices when treating diabetes. But they are not always sufficient, appropriate or acceptable for every person.

The question is therefore not simply, “Is this drug perfectly safe?”

The better question is, “What is the likely infant exposure, what benefit does the mother receive, what alternatives exist, and how vulnerable is this particular baby?”

What the Semaglutide Milk Study Actually Found

In 2024, researchers analysed breast milk from eight women using injectable semaglutide at weekly doses between 0.25 mg and 1 mg.

Milk was collected immediately before a dose and at 12 and 24 hours afterwards. Semaglutide was not detected in any sample. The laboratory could detect concentrations down to 1.7 micrograms per litre.

Because “undetectable” does not necessarily mean absolute zero, the researchers calculated a worst-case exposure by pretending that semaglutide was present at the laboratory’s detection limit. That produced an estimated relative infant dose of approximately 1.1 to 1.3 per cent.

A relative infant dose below 10 per cent is often considered reassuring when assessing breastfeeding medications. But that 10 per cent figure is a screening tool, not a magical certificate of safety. Infant age, drug toxicity, oral absorption and the consequences of even a very small exposure still matter.

Semaglutide is also a peptide medication. Any minute quantity swallowed in milk would be expected to be broken down substantially in the gastrointestinal tract, and semaglutide has very poor oral absorption.

Taken together, the pharmacology and the milk measurements suggest that systemic exposure in a breastfed infant would be extremely low.

That is the reassuring part! Now for the asterisk.

The infants in the study were between 4 and 23 months old. They were all receiving breast milk alongside other foods or milk. They were exposed during the study period for approximately three to nine weeks. Their mothers reported normal growth and development, but there were no infant blood measurements and no long-term developmental follow-up.

The study therefore did not establish safety in premature infants, newborn babies or young exclusively breastfed infants.

It would be incorrect to describe this as proof that semaglutide is completely safe throughout breastfeeding. It is better described as reassuring evidence of very low milk transfer in a small group of mothers feeding older infants.

Tirzepatide Has Now Entered the Conversation

Since the original semaglutide study, human milk data have also emerged for tirzepatide.

In a manufacturer-sponsored clinical lactation study, 11 healthy breastfeeding women received a single 5 mg dose of tirzepatide. The drug was undetectable in 164 of 171 milk samples. Across the seven samples in which it was detected, the total amount collected over 28 days represented less than 0.02 per cent of the maternal dose. The final measurable concentration occurred five days after dosing.

That is a remarkably small amount.

However, this was a single-dose study. Tirzepatide is normally used weekly and accumulates until it reaches steady state. A single-dose experiment may therefore underestimate exposure during ongoing treatment.

A separate 2025 preprint examined milk from five women using repeated weekly doses of 2.5 mg to 5 mg. No sample contained a quantifiable tirzepatide concentration, and the theoretical relative infant dose was calculated at below 0.05 per cent. No adverse effects attributable to tirzepatide were reported in the breastfed children.

That study is encouraging, but it remains a preprint and has not yet completed the full peer-review process. Five women are also five women, not a victory parade.

Current European product information now states that tirzepatide could be considered during breastfeeding. It notes the very low milk concentrations, the likelihood that any small amount would be degraded in the infant’s digestive system, and the remaining uncertainty about whether reduced maternal food intake might affect the composition or nutrient content of milk.

This represents a significant shift from the old blanket prohibition.

Why the Official Advice Appears Confusing

Here is where things become awkward.

The current European product information for Wegovy still states that semaglutide should not be used during breastfeeding because a risk to the breastfed child cannot be excluded.

By contrast, the United States LactMed database, updated in May 2026, concludes that injectable semaglutide was not detectable in milk and that the observed breastfed infants experienced no adverse effects. It advises using injectable rather than oral formulations during breastfeeding.

Meanwhile, the European product information for Mounjaro now says tirzepatide could be considered during breastfeeding.

This does not mean one authority is competent and another has been sniffing glue.

Regulatory labels are written conservatively and may take time to incorporate small independent studies. Different regulators also apply different thresholds when deciding whether evidence is sufficient to change formal product information.

The result is that the emerging scientific evidence and the official product labels are not yet perfectly aligned.

A prescriber in Ireland also has to consider that using injectable semaglutide during breastfeeding would currently run contrary to the European product information, even if an individual risk-benefit assessment suggests that infant exposure is likely to be minimal.

That distinction should be explained honestly rather than hidden behind a vague “ask your doctor.”

Oral Semaglutide Is Different

Injectable and oral semaglutide should not be casually lumped together.

Oral semaglutide formulations use an absorption enhancer called salcaprozate sodium, or SNAC. Human lactation studies found semaglutide below quantifiable levels, but SNAC and some of its metabolites were present in milk.

Because infants may clear SNAC less efficiently than adults, repeated exposure could theoretically lead to accumulation. Current prescribing information therefore recommends against breastfeeding during treatment with oral semaglutide products containing SNAC.

So, when discussing semaglutide and breastfeeding, the formulation matters.

The reassuring human evidence relates primarily to the injectable drug.

What About Liraglutide, Dulaglutide and Exenatide?

Other drugs in this family include liraglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide and lixisenatide.

They are all relatively large peptide or protein molecules. On pharmacological grounds, only small quantities would be expected to enter milk, and any swallowed drug would probably be substantially degraded in the infant’s gastrointestinal tract.

But a plausible mechanism is not the same as human evidence.

As of 2026, there are no published human milk concentration studies for liraglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide or lixisenatide. LactMed therefore recommends caution, particularly when feeding a newborn or premature infant.

At present, semaglutide and tirzepatide have the strongest direct human milk data in this group.

Could These Drugs Affect Milk Production?

There is currently no good human evidence showing that semaglutide or tirzepatide directly suppresses prolactin, blocks milk production or reduces milk volume.

The more credible concern is indirect.

These medicines reduce appetite. They may also cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation and dehydration. If a breastfeeding mother is eating very little, losing weight rapidly or repeatedly vomiting, she may struggle to meet the energy and nutrient demands of lactation.

An exclusively breastfeeding mother generally requires approximately 300 to 500 additional calories each day, although individual needs vary.

We do not yet know whether substantial GLP-1-associated weight loss changes the macronutrient or micronutrient composition of human milk. The tirzepatide product information specifically acknowledges this uncertainty.

The sensible response is not to force-feed someone because she has started Ozempic. It is to monitor whether she can maintain adequate nutrition, hydration and milk production.

Persistent vomiting, inability to eat, dizziness, dehydration, falling milk supply or unexpected slowing of the baby’s weight gain should trigger a prompt review by the prescriber and someone experienced in breastfeeding assessment.

Stopping treatment abruptly may not be appropriate when it is being used for diabetes, so changes should be discussed rather than improvised between feeds at three in the morning.

Which Babies Require the Most Caution?

The evidence is weakest for:

• Premature infants

• Newborns and very young babies

• Exclusively breastfed infants

• Babies with poor growth, gastrointestinal disease or significant medical complexity

• Mothers whose milk supply is not yet established

• Mothers experiencing severe appetite suppression, vomiting or rapid weight loss

Newborn and premature infants have different gastrointestinal physiology, metabolic capacity and nutritional vulnerability from the older, mixed-fed infants included in the semaglutide study.

There is no scientifically established rule that everyone must wait until three months postpartum. Waiting until feeding and milk production are well established may be a reasonable practical choice in some cases, but it should not be presented as a proven safety threshold.

An older baby eating a varied diet and breastfeeding a few times each day is a very different exposure scenario from a premature newborn receiving breast milk as their sole source of nutrition.

How Should the Decision Be Made?

The indication matters.

When treatment is required for significant type 2 diabetes or another important metabolic condition, the maternal benefit may outweigh a small and largely theoretical infant risk.

Where the goal is weight management alone, and treatment can reasonably be delayed without harming the mother’s physical or psychological health, waiting until the baby is older or breastfeeding has ended remains a valid option.

But waiting should be an informed choice, not an automatic punishment imposed because the mother happens to be breastfeeding.

A reasonable assessment should consider:

• Why the medication is needed

• Whether safer and adequately effective alternatives are available

• Whether the drug is injectable or oral

• The baby’s gestational age, current age and medical condition

• Whether breastfeeding is exclusive or partial

• Maternal nutrition, hydration and milk supply

• The proposed starting dose and rate of dose escalation

• How maternal and infant progress will be monitored

This is shared decision-making in its proper form. Not “the internet says it is fine,” and not “the label says no, conversation over.”

The Bottom Line

We can no longer honestly say that all GLP-1 drugs must automatically be avoided throughout breastfeeding.

Injectable semaglutide was not detected in milk from eight women taking doses up to 1 mg weekly. Tirzepatide was undetectable or present in extremely small quantities in an 11-person single-dose study, with additional reassuring but preliminary repeated-dose data.

These findings suggest that infant drug exposure is likely to be very low.

However, the studies remain small. They provide little or no evidence regarding premature babies, newborns, exclusive breastfeeding, higher semaglutide doses, long-term infant outcomes or the effect of substantial maternal weight loss on milk production and composition.

Oral semaglutide formulations containing SNAC should be avoided during breastfeeding because the absorption enhancer and its metabolites enter milk and may accumulate.

For other GLP-1 agonists, direct human lactation data remain absent.

The fairest current conclusion is this:

Injectable semaglutide and tirzepatide are not proven to be completely risk-free during breastfeeding, but the available evidence suggests that milk transfer and infant exposure are very low. Their use may be reasonable in selected mothers after an individual assessment, particularly when the maternal medical benefit is substantial.

The correct conversation is no longer simply “yes” or “no.”

It is “why, when, which formulation, which baby, and how will we monitor?”

That is usually how good medicine works. Annoyingly nuanced, but considerably better than guessing.

Share

References

1. Diab H, Fuquay T, Datta P, Bickel U, Thompson J, Krutsch K. Subcutaneous Semaglutide during Breastfeeding: Infant Safety Regarding Drug Transfer into Human Milk. Nutrients. 2024;16(17):2886. doi:10.3390/nu16172886.

2. Drugs and Lactation Database. Semaglutide. LactMed. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Updated May 15, 2026.

3. United States Food and Drug Administration. Mounjaro prescribing information. Lactation study data. Updated 2026.

4. European Medicines Agency. Mounjaro: Summary of Product Characteristics. Updated 2026.

5. Thompson J, Diab H, Datta P, Krutsch K. Tirzepatide in Human Milk During Periods of Maternal Dosing. SSRN preprint. 2025. doi:10.2139/ssrn.5387250.

6. European Medicines Agency. Wegovy: Summary of Product Characteristics. Updated 2026.

7. United States Food and Drug Administration. Oral semaglutide prescribing information. Lactation and salcaprozate sodium information. Updated 2026.

8. Muller DRP, Stenvers DJ, Malekzadeh A, et al. Effects of GLP-1 agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors during pregnancy and lactation on offspring outcomes: a systematic review. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2023;14:1215356. doi:10.3389/fendo.2023.1215356.

9. Health Service Executive. What to eat while breastfeeding. Accessed July 2026.

Disclaimer

This article is for general information and does not constitute individual medical advice. Decisions about medications during breastfeeding should be made with an appropriately qualified healthcare professional, taking account of the mother’s condition, the medication and formulation, the infant’s age and health, and the available alternatives.

Screen Inferiority, A Small but Meaningful Gap

Researchers have combed through dozens of experiments and meta-analyses and found a consistent screen inferiority effect, meaning kids often score a bit lower on comprehension when reading informational texts on screens versus paper. It isn’t huge, think a slight dip under timed conditions, but over years of study it can add up, especially when details matter (dates, definitions, formulas). Younger children around ages one to eight seem especially vulnerable, though cleverly designed digital books with thoughtful enhancements can sometimes reverse the effect. Even digital natives don’t escape it entirely, familiarity alone doesn’t seem to close the gap.

Why Paper Feels Different

Paper isn’t just nostalgic, it offers tactile feedback, the rustle of pages, the weight of a book, that anchors our reading. That stable layout lets students build a mental map, oh yes, that paragraph was on the top left page, which boosts recall. I remember when I was going through my years in college studying medicine; I had my own notes for every subject: meticulously crafted text, figures and diagrams to rival any medical journal, all done to aid learning and recall. The mere process of creating those notes helped consolidate the information! Screens, with infinite scroll and fleeting menus, can erode that spatial memory. Brightness, glare and pixelation add subtle cognitive load, our brains work a bit harder to decode text. Hyperlinks and notifications lure attention away, fostering skimming over deep reading. Eye-tracking studies show more re-reading on paper, more glancing and skimming on tablets.

The Upside of Screens

Of course, screens shine in access and adaptability. Interactive simulations, real-time feedback and multimedia can enliven dry topics. OneNote’s digital ink helps my kids organize thoughts, embed images and record audio explanations all in one place. Canva teaches them design principles alongside their school subjects. Most experts agree the key isn’t choosing one medium but using both thoughtfully, reserve paper for deep dives, dense chapters, complicated diagrams, note-taking by hand when comprehension matters, and lean on digital tools for drafts, collaborative work and quick research.

The Role of Adult Guidance

It turns out shared reading habits still matter, even on screens. When an adult co-views and discusses digital content with a child, comprehension and language skills get a boost similar to print books. Left alone, kids might focus more on swiping mechanics than meaning. My own routine is to take turns reading aloud in OneNote and pause to chat about what’s interesting or confusing.

Practical Takeaways for Parents

Here are some easy steps to balance paper and screen, drawn from the research and my own parenting experiments:

1. Hybrid Study Sessions
   Encourage your teen to print key readings (outlines, study guides) for heavy-duty review, then switch to digital for note-taking or concept mapping in OneNote, paper for encoding, screen for organization.

2. Mimic Page-Turning on Devices
   Use e-reading apps that simulate page flips or fixed layouts (PDFs with page view) rather than infinite scroll, this preserves spatial cues and reduces cognitive friction.

3. Block Distractions
   Before intense study, activate Do Not Disturb or use dedicated reading apps that hide notifications, a quiet digital environment helps sustain focus, mirroring the attentional benefits of paper.

4. Structured Screen Time
   Schedule brief, five to ten minute breaks every thirty minutes of screen reading, stretch, look away from the bright display, maybe flip through a printed page or sketch handwritten notes to reset cognitive load.

5. Adult-Coaching Moments
   Sit with your tween during a digital lesson, ask questions, what surprised you here, or play find this fact in a PDF, co-viewing elevates comprehension and meta-cognitive skills.

6. Harness Digital Multimedia but Sparingly
   Videos, animations and quizzes can reinforce learning, but avoid flashy extras unrelated to the text, multimedia should clarify concepts, not distract from them.

7. Develop Metacognitive Habits
   Teach kids to self-quiz, after reading a section on screen ask them to summarize key points aloud or jot them down on paper, that active retrieval strengthens memory more than passive scrolling.

8. Handwrite Critical Notes
   Handwriting engages sensorimotor brain regions differently than typing, use paper for mind-map sketches, equation derivations or vocabulary lists when depth really counts.

Your Turn to Chime In

I’d love to hear what’s working in your household, have you found clever ways to blend notebooks and tablets, do your kids prefer one medium for certain subjects? Drop your tips, triumphs or head-scratching moments in the comments below, let’s crowdsource the best of both worlds.

Parenting in a digital age can feel like tightrope walking between tradition and innovation, by leaning on evidence and mixing paper with pixels, we can help tweens and teens carry less weight, both in their backpacks and their minds, while still mastering the deep learning that will serve them long after the last battery dies.

Leave a comment

In the NICU setting, this kind of precision can potentially be helpful. Nurses and neonatologists already track every millilitre that tiny preemies receive. Weight checks before and after feeds work, but they’re intrusive, time-consuming, and offer only snapshots. A continuous readout could let care teams adjust latch and monitor a mother’s ability to breastfeed her baby. For a baby who’s born early or fighting an infection, that level of detail helps clinicians tailor feeding schedules, spot intolerance, and avoid complications. A nurse might glance at the monitor rather than tiptoe into a private moment between mother and child just to weigh an infant.

Outside the hospital, though, I worry about the message this device sends. Breastfeeding thrives on a kind of quiet confidence. A mother learns to recognize her baby’s rooting reflex, the way their jaw moves, the pause after a long swallow. Those cues grow stronger over days and weeks. If every feed registers as a chart on your phone, it suddenly feels as though your body can’t be trusted to do its job without technical proof. That’s a dangerous message to deliver to someone already adjusting to life with a newborn, sleep-deprived and brimming with questions.

Imagine a parent midway through the 2 a.m. feed, baby latched on but fussing. Instead of pausing to adjust positioning or switch sides, they glance at the graphs. The numbers look low. Doubt creeps in. “Is the device calibrated wrong? Did I place it correctly? Maybe my milk supply is low.” That moment can spiral into anxiety, to the point where someone might stop nursing at the breast altogether and switch to bottle-feeding pumped milk or formula just to see consistent volumes. The very tool meant to reassure ends up undermining the natural give-and-take between a mother and her baby.

That uneasy feeling isn’t just theoretical. Many parents already turn to “how much does baby eat?” charts on the internet. Baby forums light up with posts: My toddler only drinks 60 millilitres in one breast, is that enough? This new device could fuel more of those uncertainties. A gadget never gives context. It doesn’t explain that some babies pause to breathe more often, or that flow rates vary with a let-down reflex. It doesn’t suggest a different latch or reassure a newborn still mastering suck-swallow-breathe coordination.

It’s also worth thinking about practicality. A wearable sensor needs charging. It needs calibrating against a pump. It needs to sit snugly in exactly the right spot. Meanwhile, a mother cradles her infant, burps them, wipes tears or milk dribbles. Introducing another step in an already delicate dance can turn a peaceful feeding into another task on the to-do list. If the device hiccups midway through, the resulting data gap might leave parents more frustrated than when they started.

Cost sits on the table too. Cutting-edge medical devices come with hefty price tags. In a hospital, budgets can stretch to cover technology that improves patient outcomes. Out in the community, who picks up the bill? Insurance rarely pays for a gadget simply because it offers peace of mind. That leaves parents choosing between spending hard-earned money or going without. Those with resources might gain an extra layer of assurance—while others are left feeling they’re missing out.

There’s also a risk of creating a two-tiered system of breastfeeding support. In areas where lactation consultants and in-home support aren’t readily available, some families lean heavily on technology to fill the gap. A device might look like an easy substitute for guidance from an expert who can help with positioning, pain management, and supply issues. It won’t notice if a baby’s jaw is slipping, or recommend stretches to help an overly tight tongue-tie. Replacing human expertise with a sensor that only measures volume narrows the conversation around breastfeeding to a single metric.

Despite these concerns, something new shines through this work. It’s a reminder that science constantly searches for ways to support families, especially those facing uphill battles in the NICU. Many mothers of preterm babies juggle feeds with pumps, tube feedings, and strict schedules. For them, reliable data isn’t a luxury; it’s a necessity. Any innovation that lightens their load and helps clinicians make faster, more informed decisions deserves attention.

What we need now are clear guidelines on where this device belongs. In tertiary care centres and special-care nurseries, let it serve as another tool in the neonatal toolbox. Teams can validate readings against standard methods, integrate data into electronic records, and train staff properly. Over time, we’ll learn exactly which groups of infants see the biggest benefits. Meanwhile, a handful of pilots at home might reveal whether families actually want this level of monitoring when they leave the hospital.

At its heart, breastfeeding isn’t a census. It’s a bond. It’s rooted in instinct, connection, and the body’s remarkable ability to adapt to a baby’s changing needs. Data can guide us, but it can’t replace that core relationship. For every mother who needs clinical precision, there are many more whose greatest support comes from a caring nurse, a skilled lactation consultant, or a network of fellow parents sharing reassurance over coffee.

I look forward to future studies that track how introducing this monitor affects breastfeeding duration, maternal stress, and infant growth outside the NICU. Real-world evidence will be the ultimate judge of whether technology eases anxiety or fans its flames. Until then, I hope we proceed with care. A tool that measures milk intake in real time can be a breakthrough in specialized care. For everyday families, it should stay in the background, available when needed but never demanding centre stage in the intimate act of feeding a baby.

As you begin introducing solids to your baby, you may find yourself scrutinising every sneeze, rash or gurgle, wondering whether the culprit is spinach, sweet potato, or just a passing bug. You’re not alone. In this article, I’ll share the different kinds of reactions you might see: the ones that truly signal an immune-driven allergy, the slower, subtler allergic responses, the mixed and murky disorders, and the many non-allergic phenomena that can look convincing. Along the way, I’ll offer practical advice in plain language, so you can breathe more easily at mealtimes and know when to seek help.

When the Immune System Shouts: Rapid-Onset (IgE-Mediated) Allergies

True food allergies of the IgE-mediated kind arrive fast and demand swift action. These reactions occur because the body’s mast cells, armed with immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies, unleash a flood of chemicals on contact with the trigger food.

Immunoglobulin E (IgE)
Think of IgE as the “siren” antibody your body produces when it misidentifies a harmless food protein, like peanut or milk, as a dangerous invader. Once made, IgE molecules attach themselves to the surface of certain immune cells, waiting for their specific trigger. The next time that food shows up, the bound IgE recognizes it instantly and sounds the alarm.

Mast Cells
Mast cells are like the body’s rapid-response units, stationed in the skin, airways and gut. When IgE antibodies on their surface bind to an allergen, they release a flood of chemicals, histamine chief among them, that cause the redness, swelling, itching or airway tightening we call an allergic reaction. In essence, IgE points out the target, and mast cells deliver the inflammatory response.

You might see hives, raised, itchy welts, sprout across the skin within minutes. Swelling of the lips, eyelids or face (angio-oedema) can be dramatic, as it was in my daughter’s case. Some children wheeze or cough, their airways tightening as histamine constricts the smooth muscle. Others vomit repeatedly, break out in a rash across the torso, or show early signs of anaphylaxis, dizziness, sudden lethargy or a pale, clammy complexion.

Sometimes the signs are confined to the mouth. A child might rub at their lips or say their tongue “feels funny” after tasting raw apple or melon, a mild form of oral allergy syndrome, where pollen-related proteins in fruit cross-react with pollen antibodies. These itchy, tingly sensations usually fade once the food is set aside, but on rare occasions they can escalate.

In any of these scenarios, hives and swelling, breathing difficulties, persistent vomiting, it’s best to treat the situation as serious. Bring your child to the accidents and emergency room for an immediate assessment and treatment. If an epinephrine auto-injector has been prescribed, use it without hesitation, then call your emergency services. Even if symptoms subside, follow up with a paediatric allergist to identify the trigger and develop a long-term management plan.

The Slow Burn: Delayed (Non-IgE-Mediated) Allergies

Not every food allergy makes itself known in real time. Non-IgE-mediated reactions unfold more quietly, often two to six hours after eating, and typically involve the gut or skin rather than the airways.

Consider food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES). A healthy-looking infant might tolerate rice cereal at breakfast only to be struck by profuse vomiting and diarrhoea a few hours later. Because it mimics gastroenteritis, parents often blame tummy bugs, until a clear pattern emerges with each feeding of the same food. In severe cases, dehydration and pallor can require emergency care. If your child exhibits these delayed, distressing symptoms two to four hours after a particular food, mention FPIES when you consult your doctor.

Another delayed response, food protein-induced proctocolitis, shows up as blood-tinged or mucus-streaked stools in an otherwise happy infant. I discuss this in detail elsewhere and I encourage to read it once you are done here!

Diagnosing non-IgE-mediated allergies takes patience. You may need to eliminate the suspected food under medical supervision for several weeks, watching for improvements in digestion, skin or growth. Unlike immediate reactions, these won’t compromise breathing or blood pressure, but they can sap your child’s comfort and impede healthy weight gain if unaddressed.

The Grey Zone: Mixed IgE and Non-IgE Disorders

Some conditions blend rapid and delayed features, blurring the allergy landscape. Atopic dermatitis (eczema), for example, may flare within minutes of eating a trigger or smoulder on for days after chronic exposure. Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is another mixed-mechanism disorder: in infants, it sometimes presents as feeding refusal and failure to thrive; in older children, as persistent vomiting or difficulty swallowing.

These mixed reactions call for a multidisciplinary team, dermatologists to manage skin, gastroenterologists to investigate the gut, and dietitians to guide tailored elimination diets. Often, an elemental formula or carefully supervised food trial is needed to pinpoint the culprit, with gradual reintroductions under close watch.

When It’s Not an Allergy: Common Mimics

Before you ban broccoli for life, know that many non-allergic phenomena can look convincing:

• Facial hyperaemia when chewing. Have you noticed your baby’s cheeks flushing a rosy pink as they gnaw on a teething biscuit or savour avocado? That warm glow, facial hyperaemia, occurs because chewing boosts blood flow to facial vessels. It can look like swelling or a creeping rash, but it’s perfectly harmless and fades once the snack is gone.

• Lactose intolerance. Toddlers may become gassy, bloated or have loose stools after dairy, but they won’t break out in hives or struggle to breathe. A brief trial of lactose-free formula or a dairy-free period can clarify the picture – this is extremely rare.

• Gastroesophageal reflux. Frequent spit-up, irritability and arching of the back often stem from reflux, not allergy. Adjusting feeding volumes, holding your baby upright after meals and, if needed, considering medication with a health care provider is the way to go.

• Texture aversions. Babies and toddlers sometimes recoil from lumps or colours in purees, triggering gagging or head-shakes. This is a sensory response, not an allergic one, it usually resolves with patient, playful exposure.

• Isolated mucus stools. A bit of mucus in the nappy, without fever, blood, poor feeding or weight loss—usually signals minor gut irritation (a passing bug or teething), not an allergy. It typically clears in a day or two; only if it lingers or other symptoms appear should you check in with your paediatrician.

If your child spits up but remains content, grows well and shows no hives or breathing issues, you’re likely dealing with reflux or a benign digestion quirk.

Guiding Your Weaning Journey

Check out my earlier Substack article for a deeper look at starting solids. Offer purees and soft finger foods around five or six months, when your baby sits with minimal support, follows the spoon with real interest, and shows little chewing motions. A chat with your paediatrician settles any uncertainty.

Fold common allergens into meals from the start. A smooth swirl of peanut butter in porridge, a thin scramble of egg, tender flakes of fish, or a spoonful of yogurt can fit into an ordinary routine. Occasional tastes won’t teach the immune system; regular exposure helps build tolerance.

When eczema appears, careful skin care matters. Daily moisturiser, prescribed creams, and neatly trimmed nails lower the risk of breaks that allow allergens inside. Prompt attention protects against uncomfortable itching or lingering inflammation.

A broad menu works best. Fruits, vegetables, beans, peas, and grains lay a solid foundation. Avocado, olive oil, and other healthy fats add more variety. Bright colours and shifting textures spark curiosity and support a robust gut microbiome.

Any sign of a genuine reaction or confusion about next steps may need a visit to a paediatrician or allergist. Clear advice replaces worry. The weaning journey becomes an exciting chance to watch your baby’s eyes light up at new tastes, and it’s comforting to know someone has your back when questions arise.

Trust Your Intuition, but Seek Help When Needed

Most mealtime mishaps are fleeting and benign. A single episode of gassiness or fussiness rarely signals a lifelong allergy. But if your instincts tell you that something is off, especially when breathing or consciousness are involved, pause and seek medical advice. True food allergies, though less common than we fear, can be serious. The sooner you identify and manage them, the safer—and more enjoyable, mealtimes become for everyone.

My daughter’s puffed cheeks and swollen lips were terrifying, but they taught me a powerful lesson: knowledge is your greatest ally. By learning to tell immediate hives and breathing distress from delayed tummy troubles, mixed-mechanism flares from simple flushing like facial hyperaemia, you’ll shield your child from true risks while avoiding unnecessary food bans.

Take the weaning phase one meal at a time. Observe, adapt, consult and, above all, savour those first messy bites and delighted smiles. After all, every new taste is a milestone, and with clarity and calm, you’ll guide your child safely through the rich tapestry of flavours that lie ahead.

Share

I’ve spent years observing how young minds engage with technology. I’ve watched teenagers turn to niche chat apps that adults can’t monitor when mainstream platforms shut them out. I’ve seen families tear themselves apart over secret logins and password resets. The first rule of effective parenting in a connected age is simple: empower our kids to come to us with any issues or questions without fear of reprimand. If our only message is You’re too young to decide for yourself, why would they ever think they can talk to us when things go sideways?

Imagine insisting that no one can ever obtain a driving learner permit, sit behind a steering wheel with an accompanying adult, then handing them car keys the moment they turn eighteen without a single lesson or supervised drive. It’s unthinkable in the world of road safety, yet that’s exactly what a blanket under-sixteen phone ban amounts to. We’d leave teens clueless about shifting gears or reading traffic signs, only to expect flawless navigation on day one. Instead, we teach them in stages, guide them through practice rounds and ride alongside until confidence and competence emerge. Our approach to social media must follow the same logic.

So let’s pause before we leap into a blanket ban. Let’s recognize the harms of social media without throwing out the baby with the digital bathwater. Then we can explore a toolbox of smarter, kinder solutions.

Why an outright ban backfires
Imagine you announce today that from tomorrow no one under sixteen may post, comment or even scroll. Some teens will shrug and grumble. Others will clandestinely download VPNs or ghost apps. They’ll whisper invites on encrypted platforms where monitoring is impossible. At that point you have lost all visibility. Is it better to be partially aware of a problem or completely blind to it?

Then there’s equity. Not every child has the luxury of open dialogue at home. For some, social media is their first chance to find mentors, supportive peers or educational communities. Cut them off and you risk isolating those who need connection most. Children already struggling with loneliness may sink further into depression. They might swap public platforms for private ones where predatory adults can lurk without a trace.

Technology is a classroom as well as a playground. Banning social media hardens the digital skills gap. Young people need to learn about privacy settings, content curation and responsible sharing while they are still under guidance. If we prohibit the practice, we force them to develop those skills in secret, or not at all.

A balanced toolkit for parents and policymakers

1. Digital literacy as a shared family project
   Sit with your child and explore their favourite apps together. Show curiosity. Ask them to teach you how an algorithm decides what they see. The goal is not surveillance disguised as “quality time.” It is genuine collaboration, so they feel safe admitting, “I saw something worrying today” when it happens.

2. Open-door communication
   In my work I often say the best parental control is an honest conversation. When our kids understand that asking for help will never earn them a lecture, they come forward with questions about body image posts, cyberbullying or sexting. Encourage questions with prompts like Tell me two things you love and one thing that creeps you out online.

3. Tiered access and phased responsibilities
   Rather than a cliff-edge ban at sixteen, introduce levels. At twelve, they get read-only access to chosen platforms. At fourteen, they can comment under your supervision. At sixteen, they’re entrusted to self-regulate with periodic check-ins. This mimics the real world: we learn to drive under supervision; we earn more independence with demonstrated responsibility.

4. Smart defaults and privacy nudges
   Tech companies can help. Default settings should favour privacy: no public profiles, strict comment moderation and time-use reminders. Parents can encourage children to use digital wellbeing dashboards built into many phones and apps. The goal is awareness not rigidity.

5. Critical thinking and media diets
   Social media isn’t just about play. It’s a news source, a toolkit for self-expression and a window into global cultures. Help kids curate a balanced media diet, mix creators who inspire art, science demos, comedy sketches and constructive debates. Teach them to ask Who made this and why? whenever they scroll.

6. Peer-led digital support groups
   Let teenagers guide each other under adult supervision. Create small cohorts, three or four friends, who meet weekly (online or off) to discuss digital challenges. This empowers them to find solutions together, with a trusted adult facilitating rather than dictating.

7. Professional support and early interventions
   Schools and clinics should offer short workshops with psychologists and tech experts. When parents, teachers and students learn side by side, stigma around mental health and online harm falls away. Early detection of anxiety or addictive patterns means we can act before issues become crises.

When a total ban makes sense, and when it doesn’t
There are moments when a pause button is wise. If a child shows signs of severe distress or addiction, a temporary suspension, agreed together in advance, can help reset boundaries. We frame it as a shared experiment rather than a punitive lockout. That distinction matters.

But as a public policy the one-size-fits-all ban on under-sixteens risks creating an underground digital black market. We need solutions that reflect the complex reality of how kids actually use technology. Balance public health concerns with our duty to prepare them for a world where digital fluency equals social and economic opportunity.

Looking forward with confidence
A full ban under sixteen is a blunt instrument. It promises safety but invites secrecy. We can do better than trading one form of harm for another. Instead, let us lean into shared responsibility, parents teaching digital literacy, policymakers setting smart defaults, industry offering privacy-first designs and communities providing mental health support.

Our message to children should be: We trust you to grow into thoughtful digital citizens. We are here whenever you need guidance. We believe that teaching you to navigate the online world safely will serve you far more than pretending it does not exist until you turn sixteen.

By empowering our children with the tools to come to us without fear of reprimand and by offering them a stepwise path to independence we foster resilience, critical thinking and emotional intelligence. That is the long game worth playing.

In six months, a year or five years from now, the risks of social media will still be real. But our children will face them with confidence, knowing they have not been banished from the digital world but equipped to thrive within it.

1. Plan Ahead but Stay Flexible

Check with your paediatrician. Healthy full-term babies over a few weeks old usually travel safely, but newborns under one month or preemies may need extra caution. If your baby has any health concerns, get clearance before you book.

Choose flight times that match sleep schedules. For infants, overnight flights can mean long stretches of sleep in a bassinet or your arms (but on the flip side you’ll be tired). With very small babies, flight timing is not at essential as we found that the white noise from the plane generally put them to sleep! For toddlers, morning flights sometimes work better, though some parents swear by post-nap departures. Have a backup plan, if your carefully timed flight gets delayed, you’ll need to improvise.

Arrive early and breathe. Everything takes longer when you have little ones. We always budget an extra hour beyond the airline’s suggestion (even now with teenagers!). That buffer transforms panic into patience when you face a nappy blowout or a last-minute feeding.

2. Master Airport Security and Check-In

Use family lanes and ask for help. Most airports offer priority or family lanes at security. If you don’t see one, politely request assistance. Agents are often happy to let parents with wriggly toddlers and strollers skip to the front (they have to come with some benefits!)

Know the liquid rules for baby gear. Formula, breast milk, and pureed foods in quantities over 100 mL are allowed in your carry-on. Just declare them. You can also bring water through security if it’s for your child (however security advice can vary from airport to airport so make you check ahead of time before you arrive at the airport – most airports have their security measures accessible on their website).

Divide and conquer. If you’re traveling with another adult, decide who handles tickets and who manages the kids. One of us would check bags while the other let our toddler stretch her legs.

3. Pack Like a Pro

You don’t need every gadget, but a few well-chosen items can make life dramatically easier.

Carry-on essentials.
• Nappies and wipes: estimate one per hour of travel, plus extras.
• Two changes of clothes for your child and one for you: expect spills, blowouts, and spit-up.
• Bottles or formula pre-measured, plus an empty sippy cup to fill after security. Ready made formula can be very handy for travel.
• Comfort items: pacifier, favourite blankie or teddy.
• Lightweight layers: planes swing between hot and chilly. A muslin blanket doubles as a nursing cover, sunshade, or extra layer.
• Snacks for toddlers: cereal puffs, raisins, or whatever your child loves.
• Baby-safe sanitizer and disinfectant wipes: for tray tables, hands, and dropped toys.

• Liberal use of screens is allowed while on a plane with a toddler!

Gear that pays for itself.
• Lightweight travel stroller. Ours gate-checked easily, giving our toddler a comfy ride through terminals.
• Baby carrier or wrap. Perfect for pacing the aisles when a bassinet or seat won’t calm your infant.
• Portable white noise machine or phone app. The hum of a plane can be soothing, but if cabin noise overwhelms your child, a gentle white noise helps them nap.
• Noise-cancelling infant earmuffs. Airplanes can reach 100 dB; protecting tiny ears and creating a quieter environment can make a big difference.

4. Boarding and Settling In

Family boarding. Many airlines let those traveling with young children board early. Use that time to stow gear, set up seats, and get organized without the crush.

Seat selection. If you bought a seat for your child consider putting them in a window seat. Even as a lap infant, a window seat gives you more privacy for nursing and fewer jostles from passing carts.

Stow strategically. Keep bottles, pacifiers, a small snack kit, nappies, and a wipe or two in the seat-back pocket. Store heavier items overhead and reclaim that precious under-seat space for your nappy bag.

5. In-Flight Ear Relief and Comfort

Equalize pressure on take-off and landing. For infants, nursing or bottle-feeding during ascent and descent encourages swallowing, which opens the Eustachian tubes and eases ear pain. Pacifiers work too. For toddlers, a sippy cup or pouch puree can achieve the same effect.

Address congestion. If your child has a cold or recent ear issue, consult your doctor beforehand. A dose of paracetamol or ibuprofen 30 minutes before descent can help. Saline nose drops and gentle suction can clear nasal passages, too.

Noise management. The constant roar can be overwhelming. Some babies nap to engine hum; others benefit from soft noise-cancelling earmuffs. Try both and see what soothes your child.

6. Sleep Strategies for Every Age

Under 6 months. If your airline offers a bassinet, reserve a bulkhead seat well in advance (you may have to phone the airline to avail of this). Many infants sleep soundly in those little sky cradles. On red-eyes, treat the flight like bedtime: swaddle, pj’s, a quiet lullaby. Never sedate with over-the-counter meds, they can backfire or pose risks.

6–12 months. Mobile six-month-olds may resist napping. For stubborn sleepers, wear them in your carrier and sway or pace the aisle gently.

1–2 years. Toddlers are unpredictable nappers. We found that putting our two-year-old in pj’s and offering bedtime milk helped. If she refused, we’d take short aisle walks when permitted, then return to the seat for another nap attempt.

7. Nappy Changes on the Fly

Last change before boarding. A fresh nappy at the gate goes a long way.

Use the lavatory changing table. Most planes have one. Line it with your travel changing pad and keep a “nappy change kit” with a nappy, wipes, and cream so you’re not hauling the entire bag into the loo.

No changing table? Ask a flight attendant. They may suggest the galley counter or even the closed toilet seat. Keep one hand on baby at all times, be swift, and double-bag any particularly stinky nappies.

Plan for delays. Always pack extra nappies and wipes beyond your estimate. Better safe than scrambling.

8. Handling Crying and Meltdowns

Basics first. Hunger, wetness, pain, fatigue, check the usual suspects. Once on a flight to Kuwait, our seven-month-old screamed nonstop until I realized her ears hadn’t popped; a quick feed and she conked out.

Soothing techniques. Use your tried-and-true home remedies. Rock, sing, shush, offer a pacifier. For infants, the “5 S’s” (swaddle-like hold, shush, swing, suck) can help even in a standing position when buckle-up rules allow.

Distraction for toddlers. New toys, picture slideshows on your phone, or a surprise “present” can buy you precious calm. In a pinch, a pre-downloaded cartoon on a tablet with toddler-safe headphones can be a lifesaver.

Tag-team parenting. If you’re not solo, swap kids before you reach your breaking point. A fresh set of arms and a change of voice can reset both child and parent. If you’re alone, a friendly neighbour or flight attendant may step in for a minute, don’t hesitate to ask.

Stay calm. Babies and toddlers pick up on stress. Deep breaths, a gentle smile, and your calm presence go further than you think. Most fellow passengers empathize, even if they don’t show it.

9. Short Flights vs. Long Hauls

Short flights (under three hours). Be efficient. Plan a quick feed at take-off, rotate mini-activities for toddlers (board book, snack, toy, cartoon), and repeat at landing for ear relief. If your baby won’t nap, be prepared to walk the aisle or bounce in the galley, if crew allows.

Long-haul flights. Treat it as a mini-day. Schedule meals, playtime, and sleep like you would at home. Use bassinets for sleep if available. When your child finally naps, take your turn, drink water, have a snack, or steal some shut-eye yourself.

Arrival strategy. On international layovers, a stroller or carrier helps you navigate long corridors and customs lines. Plan enough connection time, rushing through jumbo terminals with a double stroller is no one’s idea of fun.

10. Jet Lag and Post-Flight Recovery

Shift schedules immediately. Adopt local meal and nap times on day one. Even if your child resists, exposure to natural light in the morning helps reset their internal clock.

Maintain bedtime routines. Bath, book, lullaby, familiar cues go a long way in a new time zone, even if the sun is still up.

Nap strategically. If an extra nap is essential, keep it short and early in the day so it doesn’t interfere with nighttime sleep.

Be patient. It may take two to three days for your little one to adjust. Offer extra snuggles and accept a few night wakings as part of the process.

11. Health Precautions and Infection Prevention

Travel exposes little immune systems to new germs. A few simple measures can go a long way toward keeping your baby or toddler healthy.

Stay up to date on routine vaccinations. Before you leave, check that your child has received all age-appropriate shots. These protect against serious illnesses that can spread rapidly in crowded airports and airplanes.

Consider an extra measles dose for high-risk trips. If you’re traveling between six and twelve months of age into an area with a measles outbreak, ask your GP about an early MMR vaccine. This supplemental dose doesn’t replace the standard vaccine schedule; you’ll still get the routine MMR at 12 months. But it gives extra protection when outbreaks make measles a real threat.

Hand hygiene is your best friend. Carry a small bottle of baby-safe hand sanitizer. Use it after nappy changes, before feeds, and especially after touching public surfaces like tray tables, armrests, and lavatory doors. Wipes can double as disinfectant for tray tables and seat buckles.

Avoid high-risk areas in crowded airports. If possible, steer clear of busy play areas or lounge corners where other children have been crawling. Opt for less crowded seating zones. A soft travel blanket can serve as a barrier between baby and airport floor.

Support immunity with sleep and nutrition. Travel days are exhausting. Well-rested and well-fed children fend off bugs better. Stick to healthy snacks and try to maintain nap routines as much as you can, even in transit.

Seek care promptly. If your child shows fever, rash, or breathing difficulty after a trip, seek medical advice right away. Early treatment prevents complications and helps contain any spread of infection.

These precautions, combined with your overall travel plan, ensure you’re not just getting there in one piece, but doing it as healthily as possible. Safe and healthy travels make for happier adventures, and more smiles to remember.

Final Encouragement

Flying with babies and toddlers will test your planning, patience, and improvisation. You might pace the aisle humming a lullaby at 3 AM or crouch in a cramped lavatory changing an epic nappy. You might resort to screen time or hand out snacks like candy. None of it makes you a bad parent, it makes you a pragmatic one. Focus on your child, tune out the imagined judgments of fellow passengers, and remember: every flight eventually ends.

Anne and I have had moments when we wondered if we’d survive a 24-hour travel with two little ones. But we’ve also watched sunrises from the plane window, our babies cradled in our arms, and marvelled at their wide-eyed wonder at the clouds below. Those moments make the chaos worthwhile.

So to the nervous parent gearing up for take-off: you can do this. It won’t be perfect, but it will be okay. You’ll emerge more confident, with at least one hilarious story to share. Safe travels, and may your journeys be filled with more smiles than tears.

Bon voyage with baby—you’ve got this!

A massive new study just published in Nature Human Behaviour brings genetics onto centre stage in this developmental dilemma. Researchers pooled data on 70,560 European-ancestry infants, all tracked for the age when they first walked independently. Here’s what they found: common genetic variants account for about a quarter of the variation in walking age. They pinpointed 11 specific regions in our DNA that push the onset of walking earlier or later. In plain English: your baby’s walk-time is as much a roll of the genetic dice as it is about tummy time or masterful parental coaching.

A Closer Look at the Science

The team used genome-wide association scans: basically, they looked across the entire genetic blueprint of each child, hunting for single-letter DNA differences that line up with walking age. Their fancy model estimates that roughly 11,900 common variants together explain most of the heritable influence. One standout culprit sits in a gene called RBL2, which also shows up in brain-expression data. In kids carrying certain versions of this gene, brain regions tied to motor control (think basal ganglia and cerebellum) actually develop a bit differently, even in newborn MRI scans.

They didn’t stop there. By computing a polygenic score, a single number that summarizes all those tiny genetic differences, they could predict about 3 to 5 percent of the variance in walking age. Not earth-shattering for prediction, but enough to reveal a biological underpinning. And that score correlates not only with infant brain volume in motor regions but also with traits later in life: higher scores (linked to later walking) genetically correlate with higher IQ and even educational attainment, while inversely with ADHD.

So walking age is far from just a cute milestone you Instagram. It’s a window into neurodevelopmental wiring that echoes down the line into cognitive and behavioural profiles.

When to Stop Worrying and Embrace the Range

Okay, genetics matters. But babies are mini explorers, and each one unfolds on their own timetable. Here’s the kicker: clinical guidelines use 18 months as a red flag, if little Clara isn’t walking by then, they recommend a specialist check-in. Yet historical data suggest only about a third of “late walkers” have an underlying disorder. That means two out of three are simply cruising at their own pace.

Genes don’t lock you in. Environment still plays a starring role. Practice, muscle tone, culture, nutrition and yes, sheer luck in which genetic hand you’re dealt all mingle to shape that first solo step. So when your paediatrician peers at that milestone chart, know that those percentiles blur into a broad spectrum.

Beyond the Chart: Finding Your Baby’s Pace

This is the moment when caring for little humans collides with obsessing over milestone charts. First off, celebrate the process, every roll, scoot, cruise and wobble is part of your child’s personal adventure. Reacting with alarm at a few weeks’ difference steals the joy in the discovery.

Second, remember that genetics is neither destiny nor excuse. It’s context. If your kid’s genetic score nudges toward a later start, you can’t rewrite that sequence. But you can offer plenty of floor time, supportive shoes once the ankles flex, and a living room free of sharp-corners so practice feels safe.

Third, resist the “one-size-fits-all” timeline. Our species evolved with a protracted motor learning phase on purpose. Longer infant immobility correlates with bigger brains in evolutionary cousins and in humans. More time lying down equals more time wiring neural circuits that will later govern balance, coordination and yes, higher cognition. Think of those extra weeks or months as bonus brain building, not lost ground.

Fourth, tune into your child’s unique rhythm and temperament. The same genetic variants tied to later walking also tilt toward better academic performance. Maybe those kiddos spend more time observing, less time blitzing across the room, and that observational edge primes their learning style.

Finally, lean into the wonder. Your child’s first steps aren’t just biomechanics; they’re a rite of passage. They mark the moment your living room becomes an arena, your front yard a racetrack and your world a stage for boundless exploration. Whether it’s at nine months or eighteen, that smile of triumph is the same.

Practical Takeaways

1. Document but don’t panic: note when rolling, sitting and crawling happen, but treat walking age as a guideline, not a strict deadline.

2. Support practice: safe spaces, soft obstacles, and encouragement go a long way.

3. Follow paediatric advice: if walking really hasn’t started by 18 months, a check-up can rule out treatable issues.

4. Celebrate individuality: every child’s timeline reflects a complex dance of genes and experience.

In the end, the beauty of human development is its variability. Our babies aren’t robots programmed on a fixed schedule. They’re each an experiment in nature’s grand design, and sometimes the slowest starters bloom into the most thoughtful thinkers. So let’s put down the stopwatch, roll out the play mat and watch with wonder as each child finds their own two feet, whenever their genes and giggles see fit.

Share

The Sweet Benefits of Pacifiers

Babies are born with a strong need to suck, both for nutrition and comfort. When hunger is satisfied but the baby still craves sucking, a pacifier steps in. Here’s why they can be a game-changer:

1) Soothing and Sleep
A pacifier can often stop tears in seconds by satisfying that non-nutritive sucking reflex. It even helps babies cope with minor discomfort, like vaccinations or heel pricks, and can make it easier for both baby and parents to fall, and stay, asleep. However when they are really young and can’t put the pacifier back in their mouth if it falls off during sleep, you run the risk of yoyoing to and from their cot to put it back in their mouth (as we found out the hard way with our first born).

2) Reduced SIDS Risk
One of the most compelling benefits is a reduced risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome when a pacifier is used at nap time and bedtime. While we don’t know exactly why, the protective effect is strong enough that most paediatric guidelines recommend offering a pacifier for every sleep.

3) Feeding Transitions for Preemies
In neonatal units, giving preterm infants a pacifier helps develop their sucking strength and coordination, often allowing them to feed by mouth sooner and get discharged earlier.

4) Thumb-vs-Pacifier
If your baby has a strong need to suck, a pacifier can be a helpful alternative to thumb-sucking. Unlike a thumb, a pacifier can be taken away when you decide it’s time, making later weaning easier.

Not every baby will take to a pacifier (we could not for the life of us convince our second born to use one) and that’s perfectly fine. But for many families, these benefits make it a valuable tool in those early months.

Pacifiers and Safe Sleep: The SIDS Connection

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome is every parent’s worst fear, and anything that can lower its risk is worth considering. Offering a pacifier at nap and bedtime is now standard safe-sleep advice. Studies consistently show that pacifier use during sleep cuts SIDS risk by roughly half. Theories include keeping airways more open, reducing deep-sleep vulnerability, and preventing babies from burrowing face-first into bedding. But it is important to put this in context with regards the other risks associated with SIDS: smoking, alcohol and sedative/mind altering medication, are the biggest risk factors for SIDS.

How to use it safely for sleep:

• If you’re breastfeeding, wait until nursing is well established (around 4 – 6 weeks) before introducing the pacifier at sleep times.

• Always offer the pacifier when putting baby down for naps and at night. If it falls out after they doze off, there’s no need to reinsert it (that didn’t work for us!)

• Never tie a pacifier around baby’s neck or clothes, and use a one-piece design with a wide shield so it can’t pose a choking hazard.

Even if you’re hesitant about pacifiers, this sleep benefit alone makes it worth a try.

Pacifiers and Breastfeeding: Finding the Balance

Will a pacifier throw off breastfeeding? That’s the million-dollar question. Early advice often told moms to avoid pacifiers until breast-feeding was flawless, to prevent “nipple confusion.” The worry was that a soft rubber pacifier could teach a newborn the wrong sucking technique or reduce feeding cues, potentially harming milk supply.

What the research shows: When introduced after breastfeeding is well under way, pacifier use does not shorten the duration of exclusive breastfeeding. In most motivated nursing mothers, babies who use pacifiers continue nursing just fine.

My approach: Delay pacifier introduction until about 4 weeks, once latching is strong, weight gain is on track, and supply feels secure. Then use the pacifier for comfort, never as a replacement for a true hunger cue. Think of it as a “comfort bridge” between feeds. If baby spits it out and still cries, follow their lead, they might actually be hungry or need a cuddle. With this middle-ground strategy, you can have a well-fed, happy, pacified baby without sacrificing nursing goals.

The Toddler Years: Teeth, Ears, and Talking

Pacifiers shine in the first year, but beyond that, the downsides grow:

Dental Effects: If a child uses a pacifier heavily past age two or three, it can lead to an open bite (front teeth not meeting). The good news is that if the habit stops by around age three, most teeth align correctly as they grow. Letting the pacifier linger until four, five, or six increases the chance of lasting issues.

Ear Infections: After about six months, pacifier use is linked with a higher rate of middle-ear infections. If your little one has recurrent ear infections in the second half of the first year, consider cutting back on pacifier use.

Speech and Language: There’s little evidence that normal pacifier use delays speech. But babies who have the pacifier in constantly get fewer hours of babbling practice. By around one year, start reserving the pacifier for sleep and big-upset moments so your toddler has ample pacifier-free time to talk, babble, and learn words.

Common Misconceptions

• “Pacifiers are a lazy shortcut.” Comforting a baby is never a shortcut, it’s responsive parenting.

• “They’ll wreck breastfeeding.” Introduce at the right time, and most nursing babies sail along just fine.

• “Pacifiers ruin teeth.” Short-term use carries virtually no risk; quit by age three and tooth alignment usually self-corrects.

• “My child will never give it up.” Toddlers adapt quickly once you decide it’s time. With the right strategy, most kids are pacifier-free by three.

Parenting advice often swings extremes. My advice is to filter out the judgment and focus on what works for your family. If the pacifier brings calm, use it. If it’s not your thing, skip it. There’s no one-size-fits-all.

Safe Use and Hygiene

• Pick a one-piece pacifier with a wide shield.

• Sterilize for newborns; wash with hot soapy water after six months.

• Inspect regularly and replace if cracked or worn.

• Never tie around baby’s neck or cot.

• Don’t dip in honey or sweet substances. If you need extra comfort during shots, ask your paediatrician about medically approved glucose drops.

Weaning Strategies

When it’s time to say goodbye, choose the method that fits your child and your style:

• Gradual Weaning: Limit daytime use first, then naps, then nighttime.

• Cold Turkey: Declare a “binky ban” and stick it out through the toughest few days.

• Pacifier Fairy Ritual: Let your toddler leave pacifiers out for a magical character in exchange for a small gift.

• Nipple Alteration: Trim or poke a tiny hole in the pacifier tip so it’s less satisfying, prompting your child to lose interest.

If you’re looking for a no-cut, minimal-mess way to make a pacifier less satisfying, you can gently poke a very small hole in the tip with a fine, sterilized needle. The idea is that the extra airflow makes the pacifier feel “broken,” and your toddler may decide it’s simply not worth sucking anymore. This can be a useful last-ditch option once you’ve already tried gradual limits or a goodbye ritual: Before you try it, keep these caveats in mind: You need a needle sharp enough to make one clean, precise puncture. Blunt tools will tear the material and leave rough edges that can irritate gums. Sterilize the needle and the pacifier thoroughly beforehand. Any unclean tool could introduce bacteria and raise the risk of oral infections. Inspect the pacifier every single day. If you spot any cracking, fraying, or uneven edges around the hole, toss it immediately. A compromised nipple can shed tiny pieces that pose a choking hazard. This approach is not endorsed by paediatric or dental associations. It carries more risk than simply tapering use or using a “Pacifier Fairy” story. Treat it as a backup plan, not your first choice. If you decide to go this route, explain to your child that the pacifier is “broken” and show them how it doesn’t work anymore. Pair the hole-poke with plenty of praise for big-kid behaviour and a comforting alternative, a favourite stuffed animal or blanket—to help them transition. That way you’ve got both the mechanical nudge and the emotional support they need to let go.

Aim for a calm window, avoid major life changes like starting daycare or a big move. Offer extra cuddles and comfort, and within a week or two most toddlers adjust beautifully.

Final Thoughts

Pacifiers are neither hero nor villain. They’re a tool, one that offers real benefits like comfort, easier sleep, and even SIDS risk reduction when used properly. Their downsides, dental shifts, ear infections, speech interference, are easily managed with good timing, safety measures, and a clear weaning plan. Use a pacifier confidently in those first precious months, step back as your child grows, and choose the right moment to say goodbye. Whatever path you choose, know that you’re making an informed decision for your baby’s wellbeing. That’s what matters most.

Against this fraught backdrop, Huschke and colleagues have published a compelling qualitative study that compiles nearly 300 free-text accounts of perceived “veiled coercion” during induction consent discussions in Ireland. Their analysis, informed by the Health Service Executive’s National Consent Policy, illuminates distressing examples: clinicians invoking the “dead-baby card”, speeding through consent documents and offering insufficient information about risks and benefits. These firsthand stories wield considerable power in drawing attention to pain points within our consent processes and underlining the imperative for patient-centred communication.

However, despite the importance and poignancy of these accounts, the study’s recruitment methods and sample composition introduce significant limitations that must temper our interpretation. Huschke et al. recruited participants primarily through birth-rights social media groups and doula networks: channels that naturally engage digitally connected, highly educated and advocacy-minded women - likely to have experienced a negative interaction with hospital births when compared with the general population. The study’s sample was therefore strikingly unrepresentative of Ireland’s birthing population and effectively excluded many marginalised women. Fewer than 3000 of approximately 300 000 annual births, just 1 per cent, ever saw the survey invitation, and under 300 women (0.1 per cent) provided the in-depth free-text reflections that underpin its conclusions. The recruitment channels naturally favoured digitally connected, highly educated, English-speaking Irish nationals (94 per cent of respondents versus roughly 75 per cent of actual births, and 84 per cent with third-level education versus around 50 per cent nationally). By contrast, women from lower-income backgrounds, non-English speakers, those without reliable internet access and migrant communities had little to no opportunity to participate. As a result, the voices of many who may have experienced induction in routine, respectful discussions, or who simply lacked the means or awareness to engage with an online activist survey, remain unheard. This sample bias not only inflates reports of perceived coercion but also silences the majority whose experiences might tell a very different story.

This scenario is a perfect example of selection bias, a phenomenon in which the individuals who participate in research differ systematically from the broader population researchers seek to describe. In essence, selection bias occurs whenever recruitment methods favour certain subgroups, whether through self-selection by those with strong feelings, reliance on specific communication platforms or exclusion of harder-to-reach individuals, while inadvertently silencing others. The result is a dataset that may exhibit high internal consistency but lacks external validity: it tells us precisely about the views of that vocal subset, but not about the silent majority whose experiences may range from neutral to positive or who simply never encountered the invitation to participate.

Equally important is the distinction between sample size and representativeness. Statistically, a larger sample reduces random error, confidence intervals shrink as the standard error decreases in proportion to 1/√n. Thus, surveying 2,500 women from a population of 300,000 births could, under ideal conditions, yield a margin of error of around ±2 per cent at the 95 per cent confidence interval level. Yet this statistical precision addresses only random variation and says nothing about systematic error. A large but biased sample remains unrepresentative; it produces a more accurate estimate of that subset’s characteristics, but not of the population at large. When research claims to capture the “majority view” based on a convenience sample of one per cent, it risks misleading readers and policymakers.

The implications of these methodological shortcomings extend beyond academic debate. If the prevalence of “systemic routine coercion” is overstated, healthcare leaders might implement blunt policy measures that undermine well-conducted, medically indicated inductions. Moreover, by focusing exclusively on negative accounts, the study marginalises those women whose consent discussions were comprehensive and supportive, thereby distorting the public’s understanding of everyday practice. In effect, flawed methods can do women a disservice by perpetuating a narrative of universal mistrust rather than guiding targeted improvements.

To build on Huschke et al.’s valuable contributions and attain a truly representative portrait of induction experiences, future research must adopt more rigorous designs. Mixed-mode recruitment, combining online platforms with postal invitations, in-hospital enrolment and outreach through community health centres, would engage under-represented demographics, including non-English speakers, lower-income families and women without robust social-media networks. Stratified sampling by region, socioeconomic status, ethnicity and hospital setting would ensure proportional representation across Ireland’s diverse obstetric landscape. Finally, integrating qualitative testimonies with anonymised hospital records, capturing induction indications, consent timings and maternal-neonatal outcomes, would enable triangulation of patient perceptions with objective clinical data.

Huschke et al. have performed an invaluable service by shining a light on women’s lived experiences of feeling pressured during induction discussions. Their free-text narratives humanise the often-abstract notion of informed consent and demand improvements in clinician communication and consent protocols. Yet recognising their methodological flaws and constraints is equally critical. Only through balanced inquiry, one that honours both the most distressed voices and the majority whose experiences may not be extreme, can we craft policies and practices that truly uphold women’s autonomy, safeguard medical necessity and reflect the nuanced reality of induction of labour in Ireland.

I would love you hear your views on my take of this survey (onl rule is to be courteous and nice!)

Leave a comment

In The North Road he turns Britain’s A1 into an intimate journey across time and self. He starts at a dig site of Roman remains, then follows its imprint through medieval coaching inns and the turnpikes that stitched his country together. Half travelogue, half memoir, half psycho-geographical experiment, it’s hard to pin down, and that’s the point. You wind through Rob’s past struggles with grief and lockdown isolation. You ride shotgun as he navigates COVID’s “Alpha One” variant and wrestles with what it means to keep going when the road feels endless. But what really struck me, stayed with me, and compelled me to write this, was his description of what it feels like to be a parent of two small children a few pages in:

“There were things to be done at every turn: piles of washing and dirty dishes, nappies to change, and always someone to be bathed, fed, held, helped or coaxed out of a crying fit. With two children now, there was no escape for either of us anymore. As any parent knows, newborns and toddlers exist entirely in the present and it quickly became clear that we would need to do the same. For a while at least. Time slipped and snagged. A minute might catch on a moment and stretch into an hour, a day could vanish in what seemed seconds. Our universe shrank to the immediate and the essential which made focusing on anything beyond the walls and windows of the house impossible.”

That passage struck me like a slap and a warm hug all at once. I imagined Rob writing it after one of those marathon days when you bounce between the sink and the playmat without ever really leaving the living room. He nails something I have learned in my years as a parent and a neonatologist: small humans demand everything from you right here right now and they have zero appreciation for your future plans. There is beauty in the forced presence and terror in the loss of perspective. I needed to write about that tug of war and share it with you on Substack.

I fell in love with the idea of a road as a metaphor for life long before picking up Rob’s book. In a review for the Guardian Andrew Martin wrote that The North Road is a beautifully written study of a route that feels alive. He describes how Cowen weaves history, fiction, and autobiography into psycho geographical musings. He talks about ghosts and landscapes haunted by kings and common folk alike. It sounded perfect for the parents reading this who feel trapped on their own tiny stretch of asphalt between kitchen and nursery.

Parenting can feel like that road movie Andrew mentions. You are the driver in a battered hatchback bouncing along bottomless potholes of crying tantrums, midday expeditions through supermarkets, and midnight emergency nappy runs. You have no idea where you are headed and the scenery can be grim. Coffee-stained clothes and Cheerios underfoot become your whole environment. Gone are the grand vistas you dreamed of.

There is more to this than defeat. Robs book is a reminder that roads tie us to history and to each other. My shed of parenting moments ties me to every mother and father who has ever begged the universe for just fifteen minutes alone. The road never ends until you do. Same with parenting. There will always be another load of laundry another meal to prepare another question asked in the middle of the night. So how do we reclaim ourselves when our universe has shrunk to walls and windows?

For me the answer has been quiet rituals of escape (Fortnite with the dads being one of them). A ten-minute walk once the baby is finally asleep. A short YouTube video while I stir a sauce. A quick sketch when the toddlers are building couch forts. I used these little pit stops to stretch my brain beyond the immediate crisis. They remind me that I am not solely defined by Mother or Father.

Mindfulness popped into my life the way a friendly layby appears on a long highway. Unexpected but welcome. When I first heard the word, it seemed abstract. Years later I realize that parenting is a crash course in presence. You have no choice but to be there for that moment. You learn to cherish the tiny milestones. A first laugh an extra minute of eye contact. The way time can flex and contract. Once I began treating those moments as my teachers, I found a calmness I never expected.

That does not mean my brain does not wander into the future. It did all day long. Will I finally finish that painting? Will dinner ever be on time again? Am I raising monsters or geniuses? Will they remember how deeply I loved them? Will Anne and I have dinner on our own ever again? (the answer is yes to all of them). These questions pile up. It is not realistic to banish them all. The trick is to observe the thoughts without letting them hijack your mood. You see them pass like cars on a highway you are parked beside.

Rob’s book offers another layer of comfort. He reminds us that every road has dead ends and detours. Sometimes you dig up an old skull from Roman times and confront the ghosts of the past. Other times you find a place where Margaret Thatcher once bought shortbread or where Cromwell mustered his troops. You feel the weight of collective history. As a parent I carry the weight of my own family history. I watch my children play and I think of my parents and my grandparents and the stories we never told each other. Roads connect us all and so do nappies and tantrums and those endless piles of dishes.

That is why talking about The North Road feels right. It is not just another travelogue. It is an invitation to wander and to wonder. It is permission to leave your four walled world and follow a ribbon of tarmac into the unknown. Rob gives us a map for remembering how to observe how to feel how to stay curious even when you do not have time to brush your hair.

You will find no tips here. No five steps to better time management. You will find a fellow human marvelling at the world and at the absurdity of being swept along by forces both tiny and vast. Parenthood is no different. One moment you are singing lullabies the next you are torn between guilt and relief the moment your child finally sleeps. It is messy and it is beautiful. It feels like a crash course in philosophy that you did not sign up for but you are living anyway.

If you want to take that journey yourself I encourage you to pick up The North Road. Read it with a mug of tea in hand on a Saturday afternoon. Let it remind you that roads are more than concrete. They are stories they are memories they are lifelines. And if after that you still find yourself staring at dishes and nappies remember that every parent on earth knows exactly how you feel. Our roads may look different, but they all lead through the laundry pile.

So carve out your own layby sometime this week. Take five minutes to walk breathe sketch or simply stare out a window without guilt. Let your mind wander north or south or back to your childhood or forward to the day your children will read this. Then come back to the hustle and know that even if the roads ahead are never straight you are never driving alone.

You can get the book here

Fast-forward a few years, and now I also host a parenting podcast. Through honest conversations with experts and fellow parents, I’ve learned a lot about “discipline without damage”—how to guide little ones without bribes or punishment. It’s not about perfection (trust me, I still have my meltdown moments); it’s about practical strategies that respect a child’s emotional world. Let’s dive in.

Understanding Little Brains

Toddlers and preschoolers can’t always think logically when big emotions flood them. The part of the brain handling impulse control and rational thought (the prefrontal cortex) is still under construction. So when your child is shrieking because you sliced their sandwich “wrong,” logic isn’t going to land. Their “downstairs brain” has taken over—primitive emotions are driving the show. I wish I knew this when I caught my then 3 year old daughter trying to feed paper to my then 18 month old son, and wondering why she started wailing when I tried to stop her (and explain that she may kill her little brother in the process).

What This Means for Discipline

1. Don’t take it personally – Kids aren’t out to embarrass us (even if it feels like it).

2. Connect before correcting – When a child’s mid-tantrum, rational talk is useless. First, calm them (and yourself), then teach.

Calm, Then Teach: Co-Regulation

When our toddler flips out, we often do the same, just in grown-up form, yelling or stomping. That just throws fuel on the fire. Experts talk about co-regulation, which means staying calm so our child can “borrow” our steadiness. I compare it to an anchor in a storm. If you manage to stay grounded, your child will often settle faster too.

Keeping Your Cool

• Deep Breaths: Silly as it sounds, a few slow inhales help you pause.

• Low, Slow Voice: Kids respond better to a gentle, quiet tone.

• Short Phrases: “I see you’re upset. I’m here. Take your time.”

This doesn’t mean you give in, just that you hold space for their feelings. After the wave subsides, you can guide them toward a more appropriate response.

Boundaries: Firm and Friendly

Gentle discipline isn’t boundary-free; in fact, clear limits help children feel secure. Picture a safe playground with a fence. Kids can explore within that space, but the fence is non-negotiable.

1. State the Rule: “We don’t hit.” “We don’t throw food.”

2. Acknowledge Feelings: “I see you’re angry.”

3. Hold the Limit: If the child keeps throwing food, you might remove the plate and say, “We’ll try again later.”

Over time, consistency teaches them that boundaries are real, and that you’ll enforce them with love, not threats.

Managing Public Tantrums

Ah, the dreaded meltdown in a crowded restaurant or shop, when you feel every eye on you. Here’s what I’ve learned:

1. Tune Out the Crowd: Your priority is your child, not random bystanders.

2. Move to Safety: If the spot is unsafe or blocking traffic, gently relocate.

3. Co-Regulate: Get low, speak gently, and keep words minimal. “I hear you. You’re mad. Let’s take a breath together.”

4. Preventive Tactics: Avoid outings when they’re tired or hungry and keep a small “busy” toy handy.

It won’t always stop a meltdown, but it keeps you from spiralling into panic. Once the storm passes, do a quick reset: “That was tough, huh? Now, let’s finish our shopping.”

Avoiding Punishments and Bribes

Growing up, many of us experienced spankings, harsh timeouts, or sticker charts. While they can alter behaviour in the short run, research shows harsh punishments often increase aggression or shame. Rewards like sweets or extra screen time teach kids to behave for a prize, not because it’s right.

So what do we do instead? Natural and logical consequences, plus warm guidance.

• Natural Consequence: If a child refuses a coat, they’ll feel cold outside (assuming it’s safe).

• Logical Consequence: If they throw a toy, the toy goes away for a bit.

• Time-Ins, Not Time-Outs: Stay with your child; help them calm in a designated cozy spot rather than sending them off alone.

These methods keep the focus on learning rather than fear or reward-seeking. You might say, “You threw the truck, so the truck has to rest now,” instead of “Go to your room!” or “Be good and I’ll give you sweets.”

Consistency: Your Secret Weapon

Discipline without damage hinges on consistency—doing what you say, saying what you do. If bedtime is at 7:30, try to keep it close to that, even if it’s tempting to negotiate “just one more show.”

Inconsistency confuses children (“Wait, last night I got an extra cookie when I whined—maybe I’ll try again!”). Consistency, on the other hand, provides stability. They may test the fence for a while, but once they see it doesn’t move, they adapt. That said, we’re human. We can’t be perfect, and that’s okay. If routine slides during illness or holiday chaos, be transparent: “We’re doing things differently tonight because Grandpa’s visiting. Tomorrow we’ll go back to normal.”

If you have a parenting partner, aim to align on the big rules. When parents contradict each other, kids quickly learn to exploit that rift. Agree privately, present a united front, and handle disagreements later—away from curious little ears.

Repair and Reconnect

After a meltdown, theirs or yours, repair is crucial. It’s easy to think “Phew, tantrum’s over, moving on,” but children often feel uneasy afterward, wondering if all is forgiven or if Mom and Dad are still mad.

1. Offer a Hug or Gentle Words: “We had a tough moment. I love you. We’re okay.”

2. Apologise if Needed: If you shouted, own it. “I’m sorry I yelled. I was frustrated, but I shouldn’t have done that.”

3. Briefly Recap: With toddlers, keep it simple: “You were sad we had to leave. Next time, let’s say ‘I’m sad’ instead of screaming, okay?”

Repair teaches kids that relationships stay strong, even if conflicts happen. They also learn an important life skill: apologizing and making amends.

Practical Tips for Everyday Discipline

Let’s get down to the nitty-gritty. Here are some day-to-day strategies I’ve found helpful:

1. Offer Two Choices

   • Example: “We have to wear shoes. Do you want your sneakers or boots?” This gives a sense of control while maintaining the boundary.

2. Catch Them Doing Good

   • Offer genuine praise and explain what they did well: “I noticed you shared the crayons—thank you.” Focus on the action: “You waited so patiently,” rather than “You’re a good girl.” We want them to value the behaviour itself, not just external approval.

3. Use Short Explanations

   • “Hitting hurts, and we keep each other safe. If you feel mad, let’s stomp our feet or use words.” Keep it developmentally appropriate.

4. Redirection

   • For toddlers, redirect to something acceptable: “You can’t bang on the TV, but here, you can bang this drum.” It’s not giving in; it’s showing them a safer alternative.

5. Family Routines

   • Consistent mealtimes, bedtimes, and simple rituals (like a bedtime story) reassure kids about their world. Routines cut down on power struggles because “that’s just what we do.”

6. Preventive Play

   • A playful approach before tough moments can release tension. If your child hates leaving the park, play a quick “chase me to the gate” game so they run off some energy before the dreaded transition.

Brain-Building through Emotional Coaching

Think of every tantrum as a chance to build your child’s emotional intelligence. When you gently say, “You seem sad,” or “You look mad,” you’re helping them name their feelings. Over time, they learn to label and manage those emotions better themselves—reducing outbursts. You don’t have to be a therapist to do this; just be curious about your child’s perspective.

Screen Time and Self-Regulation

Screens can be convenient babysitters, but overuse might lead to more meltdowns, especially if screen time replaces hands-on play. If you notice your child is extra cranky after a tablet session, consider scaling back. If you do allow screen time, watch or engage together sometimes, asking questions. Make it interactive, rather than passive.

Handling Aggression

Sometimes kids hit, bite, or shove because they can’t express their feelings yet. Immediately address safety, stop the harm, and then provide a simple correction: “I won’t let you hit. It hurts. Let’s find another way to show anger.” Then help them find a calmer alternative (like hitting a pillow or using words).

Avoid labelling them as “bad” or “mean.” Instead, describe the behaviour: “That was hitting, and it’s not okay.” Children easily internalize harsh labels, which can reinforce negative behaviour. Focus on building skills: “When you’re mad, come tell me.”

When You Slip Up (Because We All Do)

I’ve yelled. I’ve bribed. I’ve apologised to my kids more times than I can count. We all have moments when we handle things poorly. The important part is what happens next. Offer a sincere “I’m sorry,” then show your child that tomorrow is a new day. They learn resilience not just from your successes, but also from how you handle mistakes.

Real Talk: Does This Actually Work?

Gentle, respectful discipline takes more energy on the front end. Punishments and rewards might seem to “work” faster, kids freeze in fear or jump for a treat, but they don’t teach emotional regulation or empathy. Over time, guiding children with warmth and consistency pays off. You’ll see fewer power struggles and more cooperation, because your child respects you, not just your authority. You’ll hear them using the words you modelled: “I’m mad, but I can calm down.”

Does it mean zero tantrums? Nope. They’re kids! But you’ll handle those explosions more smoothly, and the trust you build will make a difference in every interaction. Plus, the bond you maintain is priceless.

Beyond Toddlers: Lifelong Skills

While this post focuses on toddlers to preschoolers, the principles remain relevant through adolescence (and when dealing with surgeons according to my anaesthesiologist wife!). By starting young, teaching empathy, emotional expression, and boundaries, you lay a foundation your child will use for years. A six-year-old who’s learned that “I don’t like your tone, but let’s talk,” might become a teenager who’s better at communicating frustration instead of slamming doors.

Remember, the goal isn’t instant compliance; it’s helping our kids mature into empathetic, emotionally healthy humans. That growth is a journey, not a quick fix.

Final Thoughts: You’ve Got This

No parent gets this right 100% of the time. But every effort to stay calm, offer a choice instead of a command, or hold a boundary without yelling makes a difference. It shows your child they are safe, loved, and capable of learning better ways to handle life’s ups and downs.

• Take heart in small wins, like the time your child remembered to use words instead of throwing a toy.

• Celebrate your own wins, when you responded calmly instead of yelling.

• Give yourself grace on tough days. We’re all juggling a million things. A meltdown doesn’t mean you’ve failed; it means you and your child are human, navigating big feelings together.

I often say: Tears, tantrums, and triumphs—they’re all part of the same road. Gentle discipline is about guiding our kids with empathy while still being the confident leader they need. Yes, there will be chaos along the way, but take it from me, a parent who’s had to physically carry a screaming child from the shops, it’s absolutely possible to discipline without damage. With patience and love, we can shape our kids’ hearts and minds, leaving them (and us) healthier and happier in the long run.

Leave a comment