Ever since the European Union ultimately „fell from grace“ in 1993 with the Maastricht Treaty, the European Union (EU) has proved itself to be a supranational institution that oversteps its remit, imposing external control on its Member States, and a financial bottomless pit, particularly with regard to the impact on the so-called donor states, i.e. the net contributors. The proposal for the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for 2028–2034 once again provides for an increase in expenditure – by no less than around 80 per cent. It is virtually a foregone conclusion that this will place an additional burden on Germany, the main net contributor, in particular.

Defence & Climate Protection

The Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) is, so to speak, the EU’s long-term budget, through which the Commission in Brussels exerts significant influence over the parliamentary prerogative – that is, the budgetary authority – of the contributing Member States. This planning period is set to come into effect officially from January 2028. Not only are enormous additional expenditures planned, but the EU also intends to set new priorities in its financial plan, specifically in the areas of competitiveness and defence. To this end, a new fund is even being created – the „European Competitiveness Fund“ – which will incorporate defence alongside strategic technologies, digitalisation and climate protection. The plan is to allocate 409 billion euros to this fund alone.

Excessive Cuts for the Agricultural Sector

The European Commission is proposing to increase the total budget by a further 800 billion euros, but anyone who believes that, given this exorbitant expansion of funding, at least some sectors will be spared cuts is sorely mistaken. According to farmers’ organisations, the agricultural sector is facing cuts of more than 20 per cent. 🤡 Shame on anyone who were to think of the Agenda 2030 targets in that context… 🤡 As far as agricultural policy is concerned, the proposed financial framework represents a radical change – though not for the better. The EU Commission intends to completely abolish the previously independent agricultural budget, the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), and to conceal the reduction in funding for agricultural policy by merging it with regional, cohesion and social policy within the so-called „European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security“. In future, payments are to be linked even more closely – as it sounds so appealing – to specific societal benefits, which include, for example, climate protection.

The Truth behind CEAS

The proposal for the Multiannual Financial Framework provides for a massive increase in funding for migration management (NOT reduction) – almost a threefold increase – compared with the previous funding period. It is worth taking a look at the recently adopted EU asylum reform known as the „Common European Asylum System“ (CEAS), particularly as it is well known that politics – or rather propaganda – is conducted in Brussels through rhetorical mislabelling. For, on closer inspection, the EU asylum pact turns out to be nothing more than a smokescreen that further fuels the mass influx of migrants and makes it even more costly for EU Member States. Essentially, the CEAS still does not rely on a consistent halt to immigration, but is focused, under the guise of a „solidarity mechanism“, on the redistribution of funds and migrants. The problem of a lack of deportations, however, is not being tackled in a targeted manner. Remigration: nowhere to be seen!

More German Money for Brussels

The up to 35 billion euros a year that Germany pays into the regular EU budget – and Germany’s contribution is actually far higher when special programmes and irregular debt instruments are included – will no longer be sufficient for Brussels, given the proposed MFF. According to EU Ambassador Thomas Ossowski, under Brussels’ new plans, Germany’s contribution could skyrocket to as much as 60 billion euros a year. It is likely that another Special „Asset“ for the EU – comparable to the title of the German dept program – for the EU will soon be required as well… Moreover, Brussels is encroaching on sovereign rights by the European Commission proposing new sources of revenue, including levies on emissions, non-recycled electronic waste and a levy on high-turnover companies. All in all, EU fiscal policy can be regarded as a major reason for a DEXIT.

There are now almost 26 million people with a migratory background living in Germany, and although the costs of migration are skyrocketing and the influx of immigrants is increasingly reflected in crime statistics, asylum seekers/demanders from culturally distant origin are pouring – across open borders – into the country in tsunami-like waves. Last year, 2025, the „top ten“ countries of origin for first-time asylum applications were Afghanistan, Syria, Turkey, Somalia, Iraq, Eritrea, Iran, Guinea and Vietnam. It is fair to say that these countries of origin are hardly likely to be a bed of roses when it comes to cultural integration. Records show that, for 2024, refugee-related expenditure in the federal budget amounted to around 28.4 billion euros, in addition to some 6.7 billion euros spent by the federal states on benefits under the Asylum Seekers’ Benefits Act. The costs at local authority level are not even included in these figures. Added to this is the fact that, despite a significant number of naturalisations, people WITHOUT German citizenship are still significantly over-represented in all areas of criminal proceedings. For the 2023/24 reporting period, 41.8 per cent of suspects, 38.9 per cent of those convicted in court and 37.4 per cent of prisoners in Germany were foreign nationals.

Competence deficit

If Germany is to remain the land of its indigenous peoples and undergo a course of development rooted in its own traditions, it must reverse this process of foreign infiltration. Due to uncontrolled immigration over too many years, this cannot be achieved simply by reducing immigration; indeed, given that immigration is taking place not only across borders but also through maternity wards, it cannot even be achieved by merely halting further immigration. When a bath overflows, one does not prevent this simply by turning the tap back slightly to allow less water to flow in. Germany – as well as other EU member states – urgently needs a targeted and consistent remigration policy. However, Germany already lacks independent powers in the areas of immigration, asylum and refugee policy, as these were ceded long ago to the EU’s sovereignty-sponge in Brussels. European asylum and refugee policy is largely governed by the Common European Asylum System (CEAS), with EU directives – in addition to regulations such as the Eurodac and Dublin Regulations – playing a central role; and it is precisely these that Member States are obliged to transpose into national law.

Subscribe now

Brussels’ dictatorship of directives

Examples include the EU Reception Conditions Directive (2024/1347) and the EU Asylum Procedures Regulation (2013/32/EU), the EU Council Directive (2004/81/EC), which grants victims of human trafficking the right to remain; the EU Qualification Directive (2011/95/EU), which relates to the right to refugee status or subsidiary protection; the EU Long-Term Residence Directive (2003/109/EC); the EU Temporary Protection Directive (2001/55/EC), which is not without reason also referred to as the „Mass Influx Directive“ – most recently activated in early 2022 – or the EU Family Reunification Directive (2003/86/EC). To ensure that repatriation cannot be implemented politically based on national self-determination, Brussels implemented the EU Return Directive (2008/115/EC). Even the EU Free Movement Directive (2004/38/EC) is not without its problems in light of Brussels’ obsession with EU expansionist drive; or, for example, one need only think of the Spanish government’s plans to legalise large numbers of illegal immigrants, who then will in turn benefit from the above-mentioned Family Reunification Directive, exacerbating the problem anew.

Withdrawal from the ECHR

Identical, the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) – despite its rather appealing-sounding title at first glance – poses a problem, which is why, not without reason, withdrawing from this Convention was a much-discussed topic during the Brexit process in the UK, specifically with a view to tightening immigration policy and making deportations easier to enforce. In Germany, the ECHR forms part of ordinary federal law through an Act of Approval, which means that courts must take the Convention into account when interpreting laws. And it is simply a fact, concerning deportation and asylum law, that the ECHR massively restricts the legislature’s scope for action in relation to deportations, even in the case of serious offenders. The surest guarantee of an immigration and asylum policy in Germany that is free from outside influence is, and remains, sovereign national self-determination, free from the dictatorship of EU directives: Germany needs the Remigration DEXIT! By the way, that’s also true for the other EU member states.

Our security hangs in the balance… but so does our freedom. A succession of crises, occurring at ever-shorter intervals, is increasingly used to peddle the crisis of freedom in the name of a security lost long ago. Coincidence or fabrication? That question is difficult to answer, but it is hard to dispute the often deliberate exploitation of crises, in line with the famous quote by the war criminal Winston Churchill: „Never let a good crisis go to waste“. When one considers the political demands for a paternalistic surveillance state that derive from these crises – and often coincide with particular global agendas, such as Agenda 2030 – the aforementioned question is entirely justified. To draw on another quote from the English-speaking world in relation to the politics of fear-mongering p(l)andemics, we might cite Shakespeare, whose character Polonius in „Hamlet“ says: “Though this be madness, yet there is method in’t”.

Migratory Crimes

A weekend example from Germany that illustrates just one of the problems rife in almost all Western European countries. A policy, for example, which does not tackle a surge of crimes committed by migrants through remigration measures, but instead relies on knife-free zones whilst immigration continues unabated, coupled with the suppression of free speech related to the problem, must surely be identified as a „crises creation system“. Let us just recall the first weekend in July in this context: On the night of 2 July, a 27-year-old man died from stab wounds during an altercation in Calden, Hessen; two days later, reports emerged of an attack with a machete in Berlin’s Volkspark Mariendorf; and from the following day onwards, the Hochsauerland District Police Authority has also been seeking witnesses regarding an “altercation involving a knife”, and on the same day in Erfurt, two men were injured with a knife, one of them seriously; and as early as the following day, Sunday 5 July, three men were seriously injured by knife stabs in Essen-Rüttenscheid, North Rhine-Westphalia. Whilst mass migration may be the root cause of numerous problems, the overall crisis is far more wide-ranging.

Subscribe now

In the following, a brief outline of the crisis-induced apocalypse, tantamount to the decline of the Occidental world:

1.) De-industrialisation, not least due to the bureaucratic gridlock of an EU characterised by the fact that it is less than the sum of its member states.

2.) „Smart City“ plans, in which, in the wake of irrational climate hysteria, „free movement for free citizens“ will become a relic of the past.

3.) Woke madness, which presents us with a decadent, society-corroding „diversity clown world“ in which pathological identity disorder is declared the new normal.

4.) Abortion and suicide propaganda, marketed as euthanasia, amount to a rejection of the own future.

5.) Black Lives Matter and Critical Race Theory indoctrination, which persecutes any dissent against Western self-hatred as heresy.

6.) A policy of replacement migration which endangers the future existence of the autochthonous, indigenous folks of Europe much more than past wars did.

7.) A suspension of diplomacy in geopolitical affairs, which escalates conflicts with bellicose rhetoric.

8.) A WHO health dictatorship whose manic vaccination agenda nullifies the right to physical integrity.

9.) Political methods that represent less and less participatory governance and more the conditioning of an increasingly „transparent“ – in Germany we say „vitreous“ – populace, whose freedom becomes equally (digitally) fragile, whilst, nevertheless, an Epstein scandal still remains unsolved in strict intransparency.

10.) Moreover, governmental cabinets of the Western hemisphere, in particular in the societally “Dis-United” States and in pre-war Germany of the year 2026, morphed into a „Wailing Wall“ even redefining their raison d’état towards Israel’s hegemonic interests.

The system is the flaw

The disastrous interplay between a political class operating in an intellectual no-man’s-land – one that can no longer rise above empty, arrogant rhetoric – and the established mainstream media, whose journalistic output amounts to nothing more than sycophantic rubbish that equals an arrogant withholding of information, delivers us into the hands of a power-driven „Trust the Science“ expertocrazy, where out-of-touch, commissioned scientists, sheltered within their opportunistic filter bubble of media sycophancy, encounter ideological deniers of reality. Here, one can rightly claim that this system is not flawed; rather, this system IS the flaw. Fundamental opposition has probably never been more important in history than it is today!

I had the pleasure of interviewing three charming young mothers involved in an impressive community project for the German monthly magazine „AUFGEWACHT-DS“. Below is the unabridged original English version.

The “Return to the Land” movement (RTTL) is an intentional community that, modelled on Orania in South Africa, is organising a settlement project for white people in the Ozark Mountains in the US state of Arkansas: https://returntotheland.org/

The organisation was founded in 2023 and currently owns land for two settlements. Several families already live in the first RTTL settlement. AUFGEWACHT/DS editor Sascha A. Roßmüller spoke to three young mothers from the RTTL settlement, Caitlin, Alison and Sally, who also run the RTTL Ladies podcast.

Sascha A. Roßmüller:

Ladies, you are, in the classical sense, settlement pioneers and live in the white settlement project of the Return To The Land (RTTL) movement in the Ozark Hills in northern Arkansas, but let’s start a bit earlier: Have you been politically engaged before? Please tell German readers about your previous career.

Caitlin:

No, I haven’t been very politically engaged in my life before joining RTTL. The closest to “activism” I have gotten is trying to have deep conversations with friends and family, or even old coworkers, about the reasons why society seems to be degrading.

Alison:

I really had no interest in politics before this. I always had a sneaking suspicion that the government was never on our side and that both sides of the aisle were controlled by money, but it was only in recent years that I came to understand the true nature of the problem. I was just a retail manager trying to save up money in the hopes that I’d one day be able to get married and start a family. I never dreamed I’d be involved in such a pioneering and controversial movement, but here I am!

Sally:

I have always been interested in activism and volunteering; it was only after I had my children that I began to get interested in overtly political causes. Thinking about the future world they will live in has motivated me to get involved in White nationalism in earnest. I love history as well, so I enjoy delving into topics like WW2 and revisionism and understanding how we got to this point as a race from a historical perspective.

Subscribe now

Sascha A. Roßmüller:

How long have you been living in the RTTL settlement, and what has changed for you since then? As some of you are young mothers, did this affect your decision to settle down, or was raising children the very reason for this change in life?

Caitlin:

I have lived here for just over a year. I had four children before moving here, and Number 5 in February. I feel the safest I have ever felt in my life here. I trust the parents of the other children here to give my kids the same advice as I would, because we are ideologically on the same page! I enjoy living out in the woods and working on a homestead for my own sake, but my main reason for making the move is so that my kids can be as healthy as possible.

Alison:

I’ve been around for about a year and a half. I was aware of the community at its inception, but did not join right away. It was only when I began a relationship with my now-husband that I relocated. I imagined what it would be like to raise a family out here, and could only think that it would be a much more enriching experience for my future children and me than anything I could have built for myself in the city.

Sally:

I joined the Private Membership Association about a year and a half ago, but I don’t live at the Settlement full-time. We are part-owners of the riverfront recreational property and are in the process of selling our personal properties and establishing a permanent presence in the Ozark community. For now, my family and I visit as often as we can and coordinate projects on the RTTL online chats. Yes, without a doubt, finding a safe community to raise my kids in has been a primary motivation for seeking out an intentional community lifestyle.

Sascha A. Roßmüller:

How disruptive do you feel your relocation to the RTTL settlement has been? Did you say goodbye to your previous social environment, or do you still maintain contact with family and friends outside the settlement, and what changes did everyday life bring?

Caitlin:

I was only living 40 minutes away from the settlement, already knew everyone living here, and had been visiting an average of twice a week before moving, so it was a pretty easy transition for me. Most of my connections with old friends have naturally drifted away, but I keep in contact with some. I am thankful that my parents decided to move nearby from out of state so that they could see their grandkids grow up. Luckily, they are much happier in Arkansas in almost every aspect of life!

Alison:

The move was scary at first. I had been taking care of myself in a totally different environment, and suddenly I was quitting my well-paying job and leaving my brand-new house for an undeveloped lot in the middle of the woods. But I adjusted far more quickly than I thought I would. The peace and tranquility of the nature is warm and welcoming, and for the first time I feel surrounded by people who actually care about me, other than my small family. I went from waking up early and making an hour-long commute to a 10-hour job 6 days a week to waking up with the sun and tending to my family, home, garden, and livestock. It’s a far more fulfilling lifestyle.

Sally:

As I said, we aren’t living at the settlement full-time. We still reside on our farmstead in Georgia, but just by virtue of our involvement in the movement and doxxing, etc., we are no longer in touch with much of our extended family for ideological reasons. Missing out on family support makes finding and joining a community of like-minded people even more important. Our kids need friends and role models, and we mothers need each other.

Sascha A. Roßmüller:

Do you and your family live exclusively off the settlement, i.e., as a farmer/self-sufficient or existing businesses, or do family members/your partners still need to engage in full-time or part-time professional activities outside the settlement?

Caitlin:

My husband works part-time. We are also working on expanding our garden a little more every year, and doing research on making food products that are legal to sell under Arkansas’ Cottage Food Laws.

Alison:

I have some savings and property left from before, and my husband takes jobs periodically to make sure we have plenty, but we are transitioning more and more to self-sufficiency.

Sally:

My husband’s job is the main reason we have not made the move to the Settlement full-time. He still needs to put in some time at his current position before we will have financial security to establish and develop a permanent homestead on the land at Community 1.

Sascha A. Roßmüller:

How do you handle your children’s schooling in the settlement? Do these schools visit neighbouring communities, or can this be done entirely through homeschooling?

Caitlin:

The families here homeschool privately. I personally go to the library often, and I know of at least one other mom who attends local homeschool events. I bet we will collectivize more of the schooling as our community grows.

Alison:

The state that we’re in is very amenable to homeschooling, and all of the children on the land are homeschooled, mainly by their own parents. Although sometimes we hold joint classes where one adult teaches multiple children, usually an extracurricular activity.

Sally:

Yes, kids at the Settlement are homeschooled, and at present most of them are still very young. The goal I think, is to expand the teaching options to include more cooperative learning formats and tutoring exchanges as the kids’ educational needs grow more sophisticated. Educating our kids outside the anti-White public school system is very important to us, not only to ensure they receive a rigorous, high-quality education in accordance with our values, but also to keep our children from becoming targets of malevolent groups that want to subvert our community.

Sascha A. Roßmüller:

What are your personal goals and expectations, and regarding your settlement project, for the next, say, ten years?

Caitlin:

My main goal would be to make the community a viable enough place to live that the children here now would be able to stay and feel like they have opportunities here. I would also like to see a media team put together that focuses on creating wholesome, pro-White content for people of all ages. It would be great if enough musicians joined to start some sort of small ensemble!

Alison:

For my own space, I’m hoping to expand my garden and livestock to the point that we’re as close to self-sufficient as possible. My husband is always building and improving our living space, and he has some very grand ideas for a beautiful final home build that we can spend our lives in and pass down to our children. For the community overall, I’m hoping more families relocate after building up the land, so that we can more effectively coordinate joint education efforts for the children. One member is collecting book donations for a library they are planning to build. I’m very much looking forward to it!

Sally:

I would just like to see more and more families moving in and building permanent houses and structures on the land, as well as investing in infrastructure and establishing prosperous businesses, especially agriculture and manufacturing, which in turn creates more opportunities for even more folks to move in. And lots more White babies! I want RTTL to take over the economy of the whole area! Personally, I’d like to establish a natural health clinic for RTTL folks focusing on homoeopathy, herbal medicine, and gentle childbirth.

Sascha A. Roßmüller:

To prevent the impression that such a settlement project would be a step back into the 19th century. Century, although this would be appealing to some, you also run a very modern project, namely the RTTL Ladies Podcast, to which I have also had the pleasure of being invited – finally, a little bit of advertising for this.

Caitlin:

That is one of the reasons I love RTTL! It’s a good balance between tradition and modernity. We are in the middle of a break because of my recent child being born, as well as two of the ladies on our team being pregnant! But if anyone would like to recommend guests or follow my personal social media, I am @RttlCaitlin on X and Telegram! Thank you for the opportunity to connect with your German readers!

Alison:

A lot of people mistakenly believe that we have no access to modern comforts. They might be shocked to hear that we have high-speed fibre optic and/or satellite internet across the land. That’s how we are able to record the RTTL Podcast and RTTL Ladies Podcast to share updates, ideas, and good conversation with people who support our project. We appreciate our viewers and hope you enjoy our content! Thank you again, Sascha, for appearing on our podcast and for your ongoing support.

Sally:

Yes! We really enjoyed interviewing you, and we hope to have you on again in the future. But you are absolutely right: even though some sacrifices of creature comforts are needed in order to make a new start on raw land, it pales in comparison to what our ancestors faced when they voyaged to completely unknown lands, which they toiled to tame and cultivate. Today we embrace new technology in whatever way can benefit our ppl. Many of the men at the Settlement are quite knowledgeable in the tech sector. Ultimately, we want to be self-contained and self-sufficient, and we also want to be resourceful to maximize our manpower and streamline our growth. We hold to many traditional values, but we are also accepting of more radical ideas if they can inspire ppl and help us meet our goals. Each family is free to build on their own land stake as they see fit, so if you want to have a big house with all the bells and whistles and modern conveniences, and you have the funds to do so, go for it! But most of us come from more humble means, so we will work with what’s possible and gradually add on as the opportunity arises. Our podcast is meant to show that RTTL is a family-friendly project; we want to foster White unity and develop a robust network of support for the thought leaders and creative minds in the White right, at the same time as welcoming the simple, hard-working, everyday folks who just want a safe place to raise a family. It’s a very exciting time; we have many projects in the works, so we hope to keep in close contact with you so we can share our progress with your audience as new developments are unveiled. We really appreciate all your support! Thank you for giving us an opportunity to show our little slice of White solidarity in action to the world!

Sascha A. Roßmüller:

Ladies, thank you so much for that special interview – you’re charming!

📌 For all those who are fed up with Netflix’s historical distortion, woke iconoclasts, and the clown world of everyday life;

📌 For all those who value style over decadence and recognise beauty in the essential identity of folk character;

📌 For all those who are not upset, that there is also a chapter regarding art in the Third Reich/Fascism included,

THIS BOOK IS AN OFFER TO ESCAPE THE RAGING TIDE OF THE ZEITGEIST TO THE SHORES OF TRUE CULTURE! ☝️

AVAILABLE HERE via that German publishing company (hopefully asap also by other companies abroad/overseas):

https://bestellung.deutsche-stimme.de/de/buecher/CULTURE-----AESTHETICS---IDENTITY---Sascha-A--Rossmueller.html

This interview was conducted for the German monthly magazine ‘AUFGEWACHT-DS’, but could only be published there in a shortened version. Below is the uncut interview in the original English version.

To support her fight financially, donate here:

https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/help-me-fight-the-israel-lobby/

Sascha A. Roßmüller:

Rahmeh, even though you are currently dominating the media in the United Kingdom and everyone on the island knows your name, please briefly introduce yourself to our readers, before things get politically explosive, and tell us who Dr Rahmeh Aladwan is in her non-public life.

Dr. Rahmeh Aladwan:

Of course. To your readers in Germany where my life is less of a headline or the topic of discussion between news anchors and foreign lobby assets, let me paint the authentic picture. To most, I am a doctor with a passion for sports, strength training and travel. In my private life, I am a Palestinian-Jordanian who resides on the British Isles with a deep love for my family, homeland, faith, animals and justice. Life was as simple as good coffee, a trip to Paris to watch the tennis, a busy on call of treating major trauma and broken bones, and some heavy deadlifts. This feels like a distant memory after the past two years and is certainly different to the headlines that prefer ‘Holocaust denier’, ‘Nazi’ and ‘terrorist supporter’.

Subscribe now

Sascha A. Roßmüller:

You served as a doctor until you spoke out publicly on the Palestinian question. How did you exercise your (alleged) freedom of expression, and what were the consequences, specifically on October 18, 2025?

Dr. Rahmeh Aladwan:

Indeed. My public stance on the Palestinian question after October 7 was not a novel disclosure. Having previously campaigned for Palestine and against the aggressions on Gaza, most notably in 2021/2022, I did not predict that my vocal opposition to the genocidal war carried out by the ‘jewish state’ post Oct 7 would result in this level of persecution.

My activism on social media resulted in me losing my job in London, being doxed, having an investigation initiated by the General Medical Council GMC (after a complaint by the Lawyers for ‘israel’), being smeared in the Daily Mail immediately after winning the investigation, being harassed, doxed, and smeared further until a second investigation was opened by the GMC (following complaints by zionist jewish doctors and jewish lobby groups). This is where matters intensified. I chose to be defiant, to speak louder and to expose them at every stage and every level. Sharing their strategies for persecuting nationals using the nation-state, its regulators, media and bought and groomed politicians landed me in further turmoil but it was one specific act that I did that was the indisputable threat to the lobby: naming ‘jewish supremacy’.

Although I am not the first to discuss jewish supremacism, even in the Palestine space, I believe I played too big a role in normalising it for the lobby to not launch a full attack to punish me for it.

Between my first and second hearing, the lobby used a tactic that is well known to the pro-Palestine movement which is to lobby for an arrest of an individual they are targeting to bolster their claim. I was arrested from my home two days before my second hearing for a speech I had given in July and a few X posts (one of which was a response to Streeting and the police claimed that it was ‘anti-semitic’). The Daily Mail had printed a defamatory article on this specific speech a week before where they had predicted my arrest at a protest I was due to speak at. I believe they wanted the picture of my arrest to accompany the article. The police arrested a doctor at the protest but de-arrested her eight minutes later claiming she had the ‘wrong identity’. An hour before the arrest, two men linked to the ‘israel’ lobby were seen speaking to the police and a picture of the police notepad shows my name written down and the officer searching a certain Act (malicious communications act) which was read by the police during my arrest one week later. The police already read out the debunked atrocity propaganda of October 7 including the mass rape hoax.

It is worth noting that the Met Police are the London police and they had travelled to a different city to make this arrest. Over eight officers stormed my home. I was searched and handcuffed. For a speech and X posts. I was subsequently arrested two more times, for another speech and X posts and the third time for three X posts that allegedly broke my bail conditions of not ‘stirring up racial hatred’ because the posts mentioned jewish supremacy and the jewish lobby.

Sascha A. Roßmüller:

You were ultimately suspended for 15 months, meaning you are not allowed to practise medicine, even though the GMC in the first instance cleared you of any medical misconduct, correct? Is that a classic example of a two-tier system (keyword: IOT hearing)?

Dr. Rahmeh Aladwan:

The first time I was cleared was in February 2025, after a 9 month investigation. The second investigation was launched in May 2025 after immense pressure by the jewish lobby and media. This time however, they were not content with the normal process where the GMC investigates, I respond to their research and a decision is made. The lobby wanted me suspended. The Jewish News printed an article titled: Frustration from communal groups as ‘Jewish supremacy’ doctor continues to hold medical licence. The pressure resulted in a referral to the Medical Practitioner’s Tribunal Service (MPTS) for an Interim Orders Tribunal (IOT) hearing. Effectively, this is the independent judicial arm of the GMC who make decisions on the fitness to practise of doctors and for this instance, the GMC was seeking an interim order on my practice while they investigate. It is worth noting that an IOT is an emergency tool designed to protect patients and the public from a doctor. In my case, the GMC were arguing that my online activism - my words - are dangerous to the extent that I should have restrictions placed on my practise or be suspended. I won at the IOT and I walked out with a verdict of no order on September 25. The MPTS decided that ‘a reasonable and fully informed member of the public would not be alarmed to learn that Dr Aladwan had been permitted to continue in unrestricted medical practice’.

Immediately after my victory, the jewish lobby, British media and even the Health Secretary (Wesley Streeting) engaged in a smear campaign against me. Streeting posted one day later on X: ‘The racist language of ‘Jewish supremacy’ reflects the values of Nazis, not the NHS. I fail to see how medics using such language with impunity doesn’t undermine confidence in the medical profession. I have no confidence in the our regulation system.’

The second referral to the IOT was just 12 days after my victory and it came after legal threats of a judicial review from both ‘Campaign Against Antisemitism’ (CAA) and the Health Secretary Wesley Streeting to both the GMC and MPTS. The MPTS allowed the GMC to present the same material that was judged in the first tribunal. Effectively carrying out res judicata which is a perversion of British judicial finality and a clear abuse of process.

In contrast, the GMC has refused to investigate jewish doctors who have posted genocidal material in support of ‘israel’ including justifying the murder of Palestinian doctors. I personally reported one jewish doctor who worked with me and lied about me to the Daily Mail as well as showed a concerning lack of empathy to the murder of Palestinian patients but the GMC refused to investigate her.

I believe this does highlight a two-tier system. It shows that the concerns and feelings of Zionist jews are given precedence and priority which perpetuates supremacy, privilege and exceptionalism. The big issue here that usually gets missed is that by allowing the jewish lobby to dox, smear, harass, sack, suspend and now arrest British doctors and citizens for speech, our civil liberties are being eroded. We have witnessed the subversion of our British institutions, undermining of our independence, attack on our sovereignty leading to our freedom of speech and expression as well as our freedom of assembly being stripped. The lobby has used counter terrorism laws against its own citizens who engaged in non-violent protest against weapons companies and institutions that facilitate the genocide. What troubles me deeply is that I do not believe that the majority of the British public realise the seriousness of this and that while they may not be campaigning for Gaza and Palestine (which I believe is a basic moral position), the persecution and removal of our rights will affect every single national and every movement. Freedom of speech is for all of us.

Sascha A. Roßmüller:

What can be said about the particular people who were primarily responsible for the witch hunt against you?

Dr. Rahmeh Aladwan:

The majority of the individuals and groups responsible for the witch hunt are jewish and hold pro-‘israel’ (zionist) beliefs.

Sascha A. Roßmüller:

Much of what is said about you relates to your use of the term “Jewish supremacy”, which is why you are accused of anti-Semitism. Why do you go beyond the term anti-Zionism?

Dr. Rahmeh Aladwan:

Being arguably Britain’s number one ‘anti-Semite’ while being an actual Semite myself is certainly ludicrous and would be rather funny if the repercussions were not so severe.

In terms of the use of jewish supremacy, I believe that Zionism is a made up word by Zionist jews for the illegitimate movement of ‘jewish nationalism’ in Palestine. I do not believe that jews have a right to a homeland in Palestine. Most jews are also not Semites. The jewish population in Palestine before the mass immigration of jews -facilitated by the British - was less than 2.4%. Therefore, the jews in Palestine are the immigrants who decided to claim a land through the mass slaughter and rape of the native Palestinians. This includes Muslim and Christian Palestinians – the Gentiles.

This is not ‘jewish nationalism’, this is jewish supremacy.

Subscribe now

Sascha A. Roßmüller:

In your opinion, what role do non-Jewish accomplices in the West play in promoting Israel’s special status even if it`s against their very own interests? For example, it is often also white people who advocate for so-called ‘affirmative action’ measures for non-white people who define themselves by their supposed victim status.

Dr. Rahmeh Aladwan:

Non-jewish accomplices (traitors) play a very large role in upholding the existence of ‘israel’ which in itself is the ‘special status’ since it requires viewing jews as superior to Palestinians (Gentiles). This is done through funding, blackmail, and upholding the fake victim narratives that jews use to justify stealing Palestine: ‘anti-Semitism’ and the ‘Holocaust TM’. This is a result of lack of knowledge, propaganda and on the Left of the political spectrum, this seems to stem from intrenched Judeophilia and on the Right it is coupled with perceived goals with zionism such as the failing anti-Iran narrative or the so called Western values that ‘israel’ supposedly has.

Sascha A. Roßmüller:

What is interesting about your case is that you do not approach that debate solely from a Palestinian perspective, but talk a lot about freedom of expression, censorship and the self-determination or lack thereof of Great Britain in this context. Please explain why this issue goes beyond the Palestinian question.

Dr. Rahmeh Aladwan:

Witnessing the process by which the jewish lobby uses Britain to gain outcomes favourable to ‘israel’ and the Zionist jewish population (who allegedly make up 5% of the UK’s population) resulted in me exposing it in this manner. The Palestine movement has been married to the Western Left who generally have a pro-immigration, anti-West, anti-nation state/nationalism stance. When I began highlighting the corruption of our institutions, I received some push back from the White liberal progressive Leftists and ‘anti-zionist’ jews. They saw it as me giving Britain an ‘out’. That by focusing on the jewish lobby, I was missing the ‘bigger picture’ which to them is US/Western imperialism and Western hegemony. This ties directly to the push-back I receive when I name jewish supremacy and state that the jews should leave Palestine. It became clear that whenever the spotlight is placed on any jewish groups, that even those who are the staunchest pro-Palestine activists found it uncomfortable. To the extent where they would always add caveats such as bring up Christian Zionism and how there are far more Christian Zionists than jewish Zionists. This doesn’t occur if I talked about Christian Zionism alone – those same people would not interject to mention jewish Zionists and their powerful lobby. Many anti-zionists jews showed anger at this approach too. It makes one seriously wonder why it is that only one group are consistently shielded and deflected from. In my opinion, its is covert supremacy and privilege.

While the ideological analysis is important, this materialises in a harmful way for the Palestine movement and the nation-state. Coupling the Palestine cause with the Western Left immediately alienates it to the majority of the public and makes it an almost immediate enemy to the centre-right and right-wing. This allows the lobby to remain entrenched in the civic nationalist and right-wing Western public who have been coupled with Zionism. British patriots on anti-immigration protests having ‘israeli’ flags between their union jack and Western Leftists counter protesting them while waving a Palestinian flag is an oxymoron. The ‘israelis’ are the immigrants.

Further from that, this results in the persecution of the Palestine activists being ignored by the right-wing dissidents who should know the value of free speech and assembly. It is the perfect divide and conquer for Zionism and the establishment.

The Palestine question in Palestine is about liberating the land from the invaders, reclaiming sovereignty and purifying the holy land. The Palestine question in the West is about liberating the state in which one exists from the lobby and reclaiming our basic rights. This is why anti-zionism should not be placed on the Western political scale, it is a concrete third position that benefits every person who is not an elite, military industrial complex beneficiary and non-jew.

Sascha A. Roßmüller:

You also surprised, or more precisely, shocked the public with your intellectual open-mindedness of talking even to so-called right-wingers, moreover, drawing an interesting comparison with the immigration behaviour of Jews in your homeland when discussing migration. As a Palestinian, what is your fundamental position on the polarising political issue of immigration and the question of remigration?

Dr. Rahmeh Aladwan:

As an Arab who is Palestinian and Jordanian, I understand the concept of nationality, ethnicity and homeland. Jordan, for example, has been subjected to various waves of mass-immigration specifically post the Nakba in Palestine in 1948 and the wars on Iraq and Syria. Naturally, people are not euphoric when they experience mass immigration in their countries because it results in a lack of jobs, housing, and social cohesion. As a Muslim, I do not see my ethnicity as superior to others, in fact I believe that only the measure of our good deeds makes us better people, and this is something that is judged by God. This does not mean that I do not appreciate the concerns of the public, even if they articulate them in a misguided way. For example, the British civic nationalist movement is focused on Muslims - it seems that this is the sanctioned grievance that people can have which puzzles me because Islam is a religion and not an ethnicity. This is not the same as Judaism where jews claim to be an ethnicity, but it appears that the script of the civnat movement is attempting to make those false parallels. The majority of immigration in Britain is legal and from India and China - two non-Muslim countries. This is why I believe the sanctioned targets for the subverted civnat movement are those who ‘israel’ deems as their number one ideological enemy (Muslims) which also then act as a distraction while the establishment continues mass immigration for their capitalist gains.

It would be disingenuous for me to claim that I have not noticed the increase in immigration in Britain and how clearly the public has become infuriated with this. The first uprising in Palestine was specifically against the mass immigration of jews. Of course, the jews entered Palestine claiming it as theirs and began a campaign of violent displacement, murder and dispossession of Palestinians which is ongoing till today. This is obviously different to the immigration in the West but I do not believe that is the only case where nationals are allowed to oppose migration.

I believe that Britain’s borders should be closed and I am against mass immigration.

As for remigration, I do not believe that I can speak for the native English. For Palestine, where the ‘immigrants’ are today’s supremacist, violent settlers, they all need to leave and those who remain when Palestine is liberated will be trialled and justice will be served for every crime.

If I were to approach the remigration topic for Britain, however, I would implement the same strategy for criminals, but for the rest, I would choose a holistic approach. I do believe that people should thrive in their own homelands, but they also need safe homelands without foreign interference, wars and theft of resources. The push for ‘assimilation’ by the civnats is counterproductive to reducing migrants in the country. The more that people preserve their identity, culture, faith, and customs, the more likely they would be to return to their homeland. Integration is important when one is a guest, but assimilation is a loss of identity that never truly works. For remigration to work, I believe these factors need to be considered. It is less about colonial guilt but more about implementing a policy that ensures the safety, freedom, survival and future of all nations in their own homelands.

Sascha A. Roßmüller:

Last but not least, Rahmeh, how are you personally coping with these attacks filled with Old Testamentarian hatred, and how can potential supporters help you to survive and stay steadfast?

Dr. Rahmeh Aladwan:

Surviving and resisting is how I would describe my state. My faith and principles are what keep me grounded as well as my family, and community (including the wonderful community that I know). The Palestine movement is bound by humanity and securing the future of all people and has been there for me throughout those two years which I am incredibly grateful for.

When the enemy knows that you cannot be bought, corrupted, or silenced, they will be relentless and they will do everything they can to break you but you have to trust that your integrity, morals and honour will prevail.

For those who want to support me, they can follow me on social media. My X is @doctor_rahmeh.

To support me defend against the lobby and state harassment, kindly donate here:

https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/help-me-fight-the-israel-lobby/

Subscribe now

The nations of the Western world, my home country Germany sadly not excluded, are exposed to a multitude of grievances, whereby in my opinion seven dominating crises developments can be diagnosed, which, due to their dynamic character and their cumulative potentiation, foster a situation to be categorised as a highly existentially threatening „meta-crisis“. It is essential to be aware of the strands of this interwoven Gordian knot of crises if we want to endeavour to break through it one day or at least escape the effects of this „crisis octopus“ by consciously creating alternative living environments for intentional communities. In the following the seven political cardinal sins.

(1) Demographic displacement including a cultural-imperialist reshaping, accompanied by excessive orgies of immigratory violence

The political question of the 21st century is the question of the continued existence of ethnicities. The Occidental world, above all the Western nations, is facing mass immigration, and even more, not controlled by the host nations but organised by globalists´ interest groups. That way, it is not at all an appeal to the immigrants to integrate, but to the tolerance of the target countries, which is tantamount to a call to abandon the traditional Occidental culture. This ‘clash of civilisations’ is increasingly accompanied by eruptive excesses of violence. The security authorities are failing completely, as security in Western „democrazies“ is seen less as a service to the citizens than rather as an instrument of power over them.

Where free folks should live, ‘population collectives’ exist under more and more totalitarian administration. However, where migration is declared the norm, integration degenerates into an illusion, which is why ethnocultural self-assurance becomes the order of the day, simply because an autochthonous ethnicity has the right to remain itself. A folk expresses a historically evolved, culturally moulded, and emotionally connected community. Numbers do not define a nation´s folk, but rather cohesion: it´s neither only biological, nor only cultural - it is both. Peoples are not static, but neither are they arbitrary. And in any case, the ethnicity is not negotiable. The homeland of peoples is not just a geographical place - it is a spiritual space, a historical context, a cultural horizon, so to speak, a living relationship between people, space, history and culture. The expulsion of people from their homeland through mass immigration, which is already taking on violent forms, is a crime.

2) Loss of sovereignty through the usurpation of power by supranational institutions of financial feudalist globalism

Decisions should be made where they can be taken with the utmost possible competence and proximity to citizens. Membership in international organisations, meant as truly intergovernmental organisations, can make sense; however, that must not lead to a permanent restriction of nation states´ self-determined freedom of decision. Alliances of states must not automatically expand their competences, so that the parliament of the nation-state has hardly left any say. Whether trade agreements, the supply of raw materials or the exchange of knowledge: a direct, bilateral agreement is often more effective than a complicated multilateral institution. We should be in favour of flat integration, not deep-rooted unification along the lines of the EU. A European Union that does not want to be accountable to the principle of subsidiarity and arrogates competences that encroach on the sovereignty of nation states should be denied membership.

Sovereignty refers to the ability to act independently, both politically and economically, as well as militarily and spiritually. That has nothing to do with compartmentalising isolation, but with orderly coexistence.

Subscribe now

(3) The Damocles Sword of military escalation due to deficient or completely suspended diplomacy

Geopolitical developments have led to an increasing number of powder kegs around the world, on which the fuse is being lit more and more frequently. In step with the retreats on the diplomatic stage, military action on the battlefield is taking centre stage. The global security architecture is more fragile than ever. However, geopolitics must not be an end in itself, but have to take into account the lives, dignity, and cultural characteristics of the peoples. The armed forces must be committed to protecting their people, not embarking on geopolitical adventures. The ideological cultivation of bloc confrontations is not a conflict resolution strategy, but a political dead end. The art of diplomacy is to be placed at the centre of political action again, in the knowledge that it is better to negotiate for a thousand hours than to shoot for just one minute.

(4) Castration of freedom by an overbearing, patronizing state and abusive, totalitarian ‘lawfare’

In an Orwellian overkill, not only the range of what is tolerated to be said is increasingly narrowed, in other words, the dominant establishment is by no means content with just silencing oppositional views - moreover misleading ‘in the name of tolerance’ -, but even demands proactive consent alongside its propaganda rituals. Whether through content-selective labels of virtue-signalling, whether through the free speech-castrating staging of microaggressions and hate speech accusations, or semantic-manipulative distortions of interpretation, in all cases, the discourse conceived as a source for the creativity of ideas is increasingly falling victim to a synchronised death by asphyxiation. Public life degenerates into a noisy nihilism that produces nothing more than supposed victim groups to perform in an agitatorically affected frenzy its quasi-religious rituals of reparation. As a means to enforce its conditioning rituals, the self-satisfied dogmatic claim to truth of a leading left of Jacobin intolerance requires a kind of therapeutic state that prescribes a subordinating suicidal altruism as a universal ethic in favour of immigrant minorities and artificial identities against any naturally grown community structures. As a result, the proof of skills, diligence and intelligence increasingly takes a back seat to the expression of convictions, with ideological rope teams counting for more than qualified performance.

The arrogated infallibility of the prefects of the „Mainstream-Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith“, whether it concerns pandemic gospels or the climate apocalypse, is moreover enforced by a litigious, hypocritical, and pseudo-democratic inquisition, which protects quasi-religious revelations of the powers that be from dissidents and their heretical statements critical of the governments. In addition, the concept of freedom has been devalued by confusing it with arbitrariness and reducing it to a hyper-individualistic perspective, which is nevertheless highly susceptible to manipulation. On the one hand, individual inclinations are exaggerated towards egocentric self-centeredness. On the other hand, conformity-inducing trends are established through synchronised influence on mass communication media, which is why, ultimately, a conditioned rather than a liberal society is evolving. It is therefore necessary to recapture the intellectual space in which independent thinking and freedom in the sense of the ability for self-determination are possible again. Not to forget: Community is not the opposite of freedom, but rather its deepest prerequisite.

(5) Societal conflict inflation by induced diversity polarisation

By opening up free spaces for marginalised groups, often serving the regime´s ideological ends, and closing those spaces off regarding the area of traditional leading culture, a mere illusion of freedom is created, while an increasingly inhomogeneous society is wearing itself out in the battle for particular interests. Like a socio-political squaring of the circle, in the ‘cosmopolitan’ decadent anarchy of freedom of movement, for example, liberalist obscene excesses and fundamental religious doctrines are supposed to move side by side on an equal footing without feeling hurt in their respective feelings, despite the massive expansion of the area of potential provocations and by ideological decree so-called micro-aggressions which are shed light on.

The stabilising social focus of a balance between individual personality and community requires a COMMON coordinate system of values and behavioural norms which, together with physical-phenotypical recognition characteristics, form an essential core component of identity. Immigration societies that have fallen prey to a diversity mania, therefore, run the very real risk of getting bogged down in cultural contradictions.

Share

(6) Prosperity-devastating fiscal debt-armageddon, and damage to the economy

The printing presses are running hot, figuratively speaking, to finance national debts, which not only deprive the governments of the required money for meaningful political tasks due to debt service, but moreover inflate the FIAT money system and thereby devalue the currencies. The unchecked growth in government debt has long been tantamount to a delayed filing of political insolvency. The global-capitalist exploitation logic of an unlimited economy is further unleashing an unhealthy, substance-depleting, cut-throat competition that guarantees less any innovative and sustainable progress than rather a systemic and crisis-prone economic 'gigantosclerosis'.

(7) Systematic abuse of social transfers and simultaneous demolition of the welfare state´s groundwork by economic decline

Western social systems are increasingly degenerating into 'bread and circuses' regimes in which the idea of merit-based, efficient performance is lost. In particular, the alimentation of large numbers of low-skilled immigrants from foreign cultures is putting a strain on state welfare systems. At the same time, the basis for maintaining a welfare state is being eroded in the course of rapidly advancing de-industrialisation. Today's globalisation is characterised by an institutional capitalist financial feudalism of a small elite on the one hand, and a precariat's socialism for the vast majority on the other. What is needed, however, is a social order beyond planned-economy collectivism and neoliberal profit maximisation, i.e. a market order in which people do not exist for the market, but the market exists for people.

The majority of daily parliamentary ghost driving can be subsumed under the seven crisis scenarios described above. For the explanatory activities of content creators from the camp of ethnonational dissidents, it is to recommend that these seven aspects are repeatedly named in public and systematically daily government decisions are illuminatingly assigned to those beforementioned dominating crises developments to sharpen crisis awareness by repetition on the one hand and to demonstrate a stringent structure in terms of content regarding the critical commentary on the multitude of political processes on the other. Only by recognising the main developments, based on prioritising the analysis of the situation, as the famous German strategic thinker Clausewitz taught, we will find answers and solutions to the problems we are confronted with.

History does not ask for excuses, but for answers for the future. Ethnicity or population. Order or dissolution. Future or downfall. The future begins with origins, and with the courage to defend them - otherwise there can be no rebirth from out of our distinctive own.

Making a final judgement on Trump's tariff policy is still somewhat premature. However, one thing is sure: That should be a fascinating field of study for all those economic free thinkers considering alternatives to free trade extremist hyperglobalisation, which is causing numerous socio-economic collateral damages instead of the supposed David Ricaro's comparative cost advantages. Anyway, to get straight to the point, I consider the latter economic theory, on which today's free trade doctrine is largely based, to be inaccurate from a holistic perspective. We will have to rethink economic cycles, qualitative or harmful competition, healthy or metastasising growth and the role of capital if we want to break out of the eternal cycle of economic flash in the pan and resetting crises. A crucial socio-economic aspect that is lost sight of in the course of short-sighted cash flow and yield assessments is the independent viability of regions, not least from the point of view that an excessive degree of economic dependency not only increases potential risks but also restricts societal self-determination. Globalisation is not a law of nature with no alternative that has suddenly fallen from the sky; it is the result of political decisions, which can be analysed, questioned, and even changed.

Transition of Fiscal and Monetary Policy

The Trump administration's tariff policy initiatives are becoming a hot topic regarding economic policy, but this does not necessarily mean that we have to howl with the mainstream wolves. Partway, Trump will work on negotiating tariffs that are connected to even non-economic issues. Nevertheless, he recognises tariffs pricipally as leverage to compel foreign companies to invest in the USA. Tariffs as a tool to locate international competition within the home country. Moreover, tariffs do not necessarily distort "the" market but potentially can shape and organise a particular market or even be a correction of an erroneous trading system. In the course of the Trump tariff discussion, some stocks, predominantly speculative assets – propped up the last years –, cratered recently. However, Jared Woodard of Bank of America denied an economic crisis and explained that the selloff was a rotation due to a risk reassessment of investors because of a fiscal and monetary policy transition. If he is right, Trump's tariff policy triggers just a recalibration within a new, in long-terms more solid, market environment. Research from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta shows that the actual impact of Trump's tariffs on consumer prices will be modest, with estimated increases of just 0.81 to 1.63 per cent.

Subscribe now

McKinley-Specter and Metzler-Paradox

Indeed, it is hard to see that, compared to the previous deficit spending, which was replaced by DOGE's commitment, a selective and, above all, supply-orientated tariff policy will pose a major risk of inflation. Research by the economists Alberto Cavallo, Gita Gopinath, Brent Neiman, and Jenny Tang analysed the effects of tariffs imposed in 2018. They found that while import prices increased almost in direct proportion to the tariffs, the impact on consumer prices was far more limited. Finance Professor Michael Pettis of the "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace ", a well-known analyst of global trade imbalances, has long argued that trade deficits are not simply the result of consumer preferences but are driven by deliberate policy choices. Not least, remind the so-called Metzler paradox after economist Lloyd Metzler that imposing a tariff can improve the terms of trade in a manner that domestic prices of imported goods subject to the tariff actually fall. – So, most likely, there is no need to be afraid of the spectre of William McKinley.

Share

Socio-Regional Structures

For a long time, neoliberalism's protagonists have tried hard to realise their global aim of a deregulated and privatised world market based on free trade – a market that will finally only be subordinated to the laws of speculative capital. Further, there is always a lot of talk regarding competitiveness. However, exclusively within the context of a more and more globalised economy, increasingly with the consequence of an erosion of productive economic substance due to profit-driven squeeze-out competition outweighing the socially desirable results of doing business. Therefore, it is of regulatory necessity that market laws are socioeconomically limited when they begin to have devastating repercussions for a region. It can't be ignored any longer that many economic problems are caused by globalism, which is why those can't be solved with intensified hyperglobalism. In reality, international trade is a bit more complex than a static equilibrium problem. Besides economic mathematics, specific parameters of culture regarding socially- and geographically-grown economic structures will have to be considered. One should not even focus on the global free trade balance alone but emphasise socio-regional structures. It is in the interest of nation-states that regional circulating value-added chains of production within the country stay intact. Not least is the share of imported component products among export goods of a national economy's interest, even if it's a classical exporting nation.

Globalist Leviathan

Moreover, referring to the market theory of Adam Smith, there is to take into account that a well-functioning market is based on simultaneous and complete information on the market being given to all of its participants, which is why, naturally, the size of a market cannot be unlimited, in other words, all-encompassing global. As an essential critic of free trade dogmatism, the German economic theorist of the 19th century, Friedrich List, can shed light on that debate. Unlike the suppositions of cosmopolitan economics, List's idea was a national system of innovation that was deeply based on sociology and history. Instead of capitalist values, for List, the productive forces are the focus of interest. He agrees with Ricardo's view of the comparative cost advantages only from a short-term perspective. Moreover, List concludes that Ricardo's theory doesn't come into effect concerning free trade between the developed industrial nations and less-developed nations. We, further, can refer to "Der geschlossene Handelsstaat "(The Cohesive Self-Sufficient Trading State) by the German philosopher of freedom, Johann Gottlieb Fichte, which is coming more and more into reality, to the same degree as global free trade is taking the form of today's Leviathan. The free trade ideology of globalist fanatics based on David Ricardo's law of comparative cost advantages – due to a noticeable increase in comparative disadvantages on the other side – will have to give way to a national economic ethos of a regional-oriented kind.

Less Globalisation and more Regionalism

Less globalisation and more regionalism must be the motto for the future. That does not at all mean a devaluation of trade between nations in general, but rather that bilateral task-oriented and reasonable treaties limited to a manageable time frame and based on democratic principles should be preferred to supranational, large-scale, institutionalised automatisms. The most crucial thing in economic theories is to realise that, contrary to Ricardo's law, price-levelling in the form of so-called comparative cost advantages must not be the one and only decisive factor, but rather, we must focus on the consequences of foreign trade relations for a national economic structure in its whole. The realisation of Ricardo's free trade doctrine led to the decay of regions that were once highly varied and complex but have now become industrial monocultures. Once these monocultural structures are well-established, due to the fact that the international division of labour has been carried to extremes, then more and more dependencies will develop until it seems that we can hardly do without the sorts of trade flows that were previously unnecessary. We must cut this Gordian Knot of international trade and its underlying political structures.

Socioculturally Integrated Economy

Sooner or later, we will further have to face the problem that capital's claims on the performance of the national economy at the cost of labour is a fatal flaw inherent in today's financial system, which regularly leads to the annihilation of capital in a crisis, which is only a setback to this system in order to keep it running anew. Therefore, a political paradigm shift should lead to considerations regarding reforming the monetary economy to avoid significant collateral damage wrought by strategically operating capital. The fundamental axiom of alternative economic thinking should be integrating an economic system into the sociocultural spheres of a regional structure. Therefore, the delocalised economy should be replaced respectivele re-rooted by locally defined markets in which the social element is realised by aiming for structural variety instead of blind glorification of the dogma of unlimited growth towards oligopolistic distorted cut-throat-competition.

Syria hit the international headlines at the end of November/beginning of December with a force that pushed even the Israeli genocide in Gaza out of the public eye - at least until Trump announced his plans of a forced Nakba. The jihadist comeback in Syria, which Turkey and Israel supported, brought down the Assad government. However, the geopolitical entanglements in that context extend far beyond Syria as the powder keg of the Middle East is being ignited on several fronts, with the proxies for geopolitical proxy wars being brought into position. For Syria, that particular situation of globalist attack is nothing new, and as USAID has recently been dissolved, it's worth a look back to the attempted "Colour Revolution "in the course of the so-called Arab Spring, which was nothing more than a large-scale geopolitical regime change operation that ended disastrously everywhere and without which the Islamic State would not have been able to gain momentum. It was among others, in particular Samantha Power, who gained a questionable reputation for fostering an aggressive foreign policy, and after having become one of the key architects behind the NATO intervention in Libya in 2011, Power also advocated for using military force to topple the government in Syria – the same Samantha Power who chaired the USAID until Jan 20th.

Well-known actors at the table

Nevertheless, the Assad government has managed not only to preserve state unity but also to ensure acceptable economic development for this region, at least as long as no war has been brought into the country and no Western sanctions regime has strangled the economy. Syria has constantly been exposed to a field of tension between various internal interests and multiple ambitions of external third parties. Moreover, it has always had to fight in its border regions, for example, the Golan Heights, which were occupied by Israel in the so-called Six-Day War in 1967 and annexed in 1981, although recognised as part of Syria under international law. Even according to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Israel destroyed more than 80,000 inhabitants in 194 settlements on the Golan Heights in 1967. However, in the course of the late 2024 events in Syria, Israel has once again significantly expanded its occupation there. The northern part of Syria has always been in Turkey's sphere of ambitions, as it is home to Kurdish settlements, and Ankara has endeavoured to curb Kurdish separatist aspirations reaching into Turkey. Syria was, therefore, already confronted with two geopolitical players, with the self-proclaimed world policeman, the USA, as an ally in Israel's luggage from the very beginning. The conflicts with Israel, not only in Syria but also in Lebanon and Iran, expanded the geopolitical dimension - not least due to Iran's connection to Russia through its BRICS membership. In the course of the "civil war "or defence campaign against IS, Russia, as an ally of the Assad government, received a naval base on the Syrian Mediterranean coast in Tartus as well as the Hmeimim airbase near the city of Lattakia. Therefore, all the geopolitics players are sitting at the Syrian table.

Subscribe now

Oil from Iran or Qatar

If the constellation described above is then expanded to include raw material deposits and certain conflict chains of an alliance-political nature, the explosive nature of the situation increases further. In the course of Israel's war of aggression against Lebanon in 1982, Hezbollah was founded, which is supported by Iran in its fight against the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF), with connections running via Syria. The USA naturally intervened in the "civil war" in order to gain a foothold in regions relevant to agriculture and, in alliance with the Kurds, to secure access to the Syrian oil fields. Syria is also of geopolitical interest regarding two potential pipeline projects. The first is oil from Qatar, which is to be transported via Saudi Arabia, through Syria to Turkey, and from there overland to Europe, i.e. almost all players allied with the USA, or – alternatively – oil from Iran, which could take the route across the Mediterranean to Europe via Iraq and through Syria. Under the Assad government, Iranian oil would have flowed, which would have been entirely contrary to the US sanctions policy towards Iran. With Russia / Iran and the USA / Turkey, two NATO and two BRICS nations were therefore in conflict with each other in Syria. It is also nothing new that the USA uses jihadist groups to assert its interests in foreign policy, even if these groups regularly get out of hand, which can easily be used as a reason for intervention once the Moor has done his duty. Let's take a look at the history of the Soviet war in Afghanistan when the USA made use of the mujahideen.

Moderate Rebels or radical Jihadists

Significantly, Hajat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) leader Abu Mohammed al-Julani declared immediately after taking Damascus on Dec 8th that the "mujahideen "had won the war, which confirms the suspicions of an externally induced regime change operation. Although the Syrian government troops put up so little resistance that background collusion and/or bribery are to be suspected here, the HTS advance was nevertheless preceded by Israeli air strikes. In the meantime, Israel - after (!) the alleged liberation of Syria - has destroyed almost all of Syria's military facilities with more than 500 targeted air strikes in violation of international law, without any objection from the new rulers. At this point, it should be remembered that the Netanyahu cabinet is pursuing the Greater Israel project, according to which the Israeli state is to extend beyond the Gaza Strip and the West Bank to include other areas of Jordan, Lebanon and Syria. Paradoxically, Israel is one of the big winners of the Islamic "Jew-hadists" takeover. Absurdly, even many Palestinians celebrated the "liberation "of Syria, although this represents a setback for Iran and Hezbollah, whose solidarity the Palestinians could always be sure of. In contrast to Hezbollah, Hamas is aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood, which has always been an instrument of the political West to exert its hegemonic influence through the "divide and conquer "principle or polarisation in the Arab region through targeted destabilisation.

Jabhat al-Nusra

Interestingly, the new Syrian rulers are labelled as "moderate rebels "by the leading Western media, although HTS leader al-Julani has a biography that deeply contradicts this: after all, he was previously sent to Syria by the "IS caliph "al-Baghdadi to establish a representative office of the caliphate there. At the time, his current force was still operating under Jabhat al-Nusra. It only later changed its name to Hajat Tahrir al-Sham, presumably to give itself a moderate image for Western support. Access to the Western media was immediately opened up via CNN as soon as the European Parliament generously approved 160 million euros in reconstruction aid for the new Syria for 2024 in December. However, this supposedly free Syria has yet to prove itself as free since the Western coalition also has torture prisons of the kind that Assad is accused of, and the Al-Hol camp in the region of the Kurdish so-called "Syrian Defence Forces "(SDF), for example, does not have a reputation for being a reformatory with a recreational character.

Democratisation: Nil Report

By the way, Tulsi Gabbard was correct in her assessment of the new Syrian leadership as an Al Qaida offspring at her confirmation hearings for the job as Director of National Intelligence in the second Trump administration. What I fear is that the realities to expect in the new Syria are intended by the globalist establishment for the purpose – after financing the upcoming "caliphate "there – to precisely cite those Western-endorsed conditions as an argument for further not being able to deport the many Syrian refugees in Europe back to their home country. What conditions am I talking about? Three telling examples: The alleged "moderate rebels" have already started Islamising the Syrian curricula, conspicuously eliminating all pre-Islamic ancient high-cultural (often Hellenistic) references, which have always played a key role in shaping the identity of Syrians. Former Islamist "beheading expert "Matin Abu Ahmed has been appointed as advisor to the Syrian "liberator "Al-Julani ("democratised ". Ahmed Al-Scharaa). End of January, the corpse of Assad-loyal university professor Dr Rasha Nasser Al-Ali was found with her fingers cut off and further signs of torture one day after she and other university professors had been arrested by the "moderate liberators "of Syria, not at all signals of a democratisation process in full progress.

Share

No Autonomy of the EU

Finally, after the ex-al-Nusra fighters and now anointed by the mainstream establishment as "moderate rebels "will have freed the last imprisoned IS jihadists from their prisons, the "IS refugee treck "to Europe is likely to be pre-programmed - after all, Netanyahu is already bombing his way clear in Syria for his "Greater Israel "project, where he will no longer need the Hajat Tahrir al-Sham-stooges then. It's said that USAID had funnelled around $15 billion into Syria while secretly funding opposition networks and anti-government operations. Further, Geroge Soros` Open Society Foundation (OSF), by their media network, pushed anti-Assad narratives in global media, portraying the war as a grassroots uprising rather than a Western-backed coup. Given these players, it should come as no surprise that there are now vehement attempts to weaken Russia in Syria. Unsurprisingly, Europe is not showing any sovereign political autonomy in the case of Syria, either. EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and King Abdullah II of Jordan signed a partnership agreement aimed at helping Jordan deal with the socio-economic impact of the Syrian crisis. Citing two sources, the US daily Politico writes that von der Leyen decided to provide the funds to Jordan without consulting the EU member states.

Russia's access to the Mediterranean

The political West will undoubtedly be pulling out all the stops behind the scenes to ensure that the contracts for the Russian military base on the Syrian Mediterranean coast are cancelled. However, the Russian government is likely to take a realistic view of the situation and step up its efforts to establish a good relationship with General Khalifa Haftar of the Libyan National Army and Prime Minister Osama Hammad, who governs eastern Libya in competition with the UN-recognised government in Tripoli in western Libya. A naval base could also be set up in the harbour town of Tobruk, where the Al-Khadim air base already exists. Therefore, Russia is unlikely to completely lose its access to the Mediterranean. The Russian military contingents in the Sahel states of Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso, Sudan and the Central African Republic in the geopolitical struggle for the black continent will continue to be supplied from this region, especially as Russia has also been using the north-west Egyptian Sidi Barrani airbase near the Libyan border since 2017. – In the meantime, the balkanisation of Syria goes on as an intermediate step for the Zionist's Greater Israel project.

Yes, the right-wing conservative AfD party has doubled its vote and achieved slightly over 20 per cent nationwide. That is an electoral success – no doubt about that – but will it also be effective, or in what way could it be? Beyond the ideologically dysfunctional state of parliamentarianism regarding constructive-cooperative terms, it makes sense to essentially analyse what we have to learn from that election. Germany is losing its character inherited by the generations that formed it as the migratory demographic tipping point has nearly been reached in too many regions, particularly when looking at the age cohorts of future procreative relevance.

Center-Left Government

The pressure to act for a political paradigm shift could not be more significant. However - although the voters punished all three parties of the previous governing coalition - Germany is not getting a centre-right government but a representatively smaller centre-left government of Christian and Social Democrats, the former chancellor's party. A look at the personnel tableau of the „German“ SPD's list of candidates shows further that no change of attitude on migration policy along the lines of, for example, the Danish Social Democrats is to be expected here. By elevating the so-called „firewall“ to a dogma vis-à-vis the 152 AfD MPs, which the SPD has no intention of doing vis-à-vis the 149 Green and Left Party MPs – despite all the announcement rhetoric of Friedrich Merz during the election campaign – nothing decisive will change in migration policy. Solely Blackrock-Merz will assume the role of the new hood ornament of globalist liberal capitalism after the parliamentary departure of the FDP. Unfortunately, the AfD result is insufficient to at least set up parliamentary committees of enquiry, which would require 25 per cent of MPs. We will, therefore, continue to experience the ideological „managing“ of anti-German resentment while simultaneously marginalising the AfD. Short reminder: In Austria, the FPÖ even won the elections and is still not in government.

Subscribe now

West- and East-Germany

Due to the electoral system, the Christian Democrats and Social Democrats have a combined 44.9 per cent of 328 out of 630 seats, which is enough to form a government. However, a look at the election results in Germany reveals one thing which is not to be ignored, namely the obvious difference in voting behaviour between West Germany and the up to now (!) less foreign infiltrated East Germany. It may be necessary to draw decisive conclusions from that, even if they may appear very controversial from a traditional nationalist perspective. First, let's take a look at the large, densely populated federal states in western Germany: in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany's largest federal state, the Social Democrats are still the second strongest force and, together with the Greens and the Left Party, have more than 40 per cent. The AfD only received 16.8 per cent there. In the second largest federal state, Lower Saxony, the SPD, Greens and Left Party achieved almost 43 per cent, while the AfD did not reach 18 per cent and remained below the national average. The following two large federal states, Baden-Württemberg and Bavaria, the centre party is more dominant and the AfD is also below the national average, although not as much.

Share

Controversial Conclusion: Secession

The situation is entirely different in Eastern Germany, where the AfD is clearly the strongest force in all five federal states with well over 30 per cent in each case, in Saxony with 37.3 per cent and Thuringia with 38.6 per cent, it is even tending towards the 40 per cent mark. The AfD, therefore, received more votes in Eastern Germany than the three parties of the previous traffic light coalition combined. The share of people with a migration background in North Rhine-Westphalia and Baden-Württemberg in the West, for example, is 34.3 and 37.1 per cent, but in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania and Saxony in the East, it is 10.5 and 11.5 per cent. To preserve ethnic continuity, East Germany, i.e. the territory of the former GDR, would therefore be well advised to pull the ripcord in the face of the „Great Replacement“ and think about secession. A reversal of German reunification - without the cesspool Berlin - while retaining the same revolutionary slogan of 1989: „WE ARE THE FOLK!“ For long stretches of its history, the German nation also lacked state unity and was a patchwork of small principalities, but it was nevertheless able to blossom during this period, making Germany a cultural nation (Kulturnation). It is crucial to concentrate on the essentials - and this is not the form of the state but the folks who run that state!

In the course of the Cold War2.0, the beginning of which can be roughly dated to the emergence of the Western regime change operations in Eastern Europe labelled as colour revolutions, the militarily relevant susceptibility to crises increased around the globe, as geostrategic disputes were often „outsourced“ elsewhere as proxy conflicts. Regarding Ukraine, most people are hoping for an end to the war as quickly as possible. Yet, the Munich Security Conference, from February 14th to 16th, nevertheless took place without Russian representatives. Now, the negotiations between the USA and Russia proceed without the EU. Regrettably, the development of that security conference in Munich has long been of the kind that one has to question how far this is still in touch with international security. Inviting all sides to dialogue would make it easier to understand the logic of each other's interests, and further - as the political scientist Timofei Bordachev pointed out - the immediate reactions to controversial statements could be assessed and, that way, better reflected, provided the goodwill. Security and peace are to be considered together as a win-win situation for all geopolitical players, but this would require abandoning the entrenched „hydraulic mindset“ that one's own benefit can only be realised at the expense of the geopolitical counterpart. It would be a signal to rename this conference as Peace Conference and invite conflict parties to attend.

Subscribe now

Confrontational Narratives

As soon as conflicts break out, and even more so when they take on military forms, confrontational narratives not just develop but quickly harden. Propaganda substitutes discourse, and each side demands not to mediate - but to take a stalwart stand. Too often, the peoples of countries – primarily victims regardless of which side – are confused with their respective governments, and the distance needed to the responsible executives/legislatures gets lost. Due to the demographic situation, the European peoples, whether Romanic, Germanic or Slavic, cannot afford to bleed out by quarrels that escalate into the meatgrinder of war. War and mass immigration are each already life-threatening for Europe and Occidental culture; however, simultaneously, they are tantamount to an apocalyptic catastrophe. One problem is that every outbreak of war is usually followed by a war of position and undiplomatic alliance politics, where mediators would be needed.

Peace Researchers

Far too often in history, Occidental brethren nations have been at each other's throats, each time causing generations of resentment. In most cases, it was neighbouring nations whose relations with each other suffered as a result. Due to that resentment, confrontational narratives became entrenched, which left potential synergy effects unused because a majority mostly did not look constructively forward but revanchistically backward. That doesn't mean looking back could not be instructive. Today, however, we should be aware that instead of warmongering rhetoric and maximum positions, the leaders in charge should devote themselves to the study of how wars ended or ended successfully, i.e. which negotiation strategies and which immediate post-war treaties in history caused new problems or precisely offered opportunities for future-oriented understanding. World politics needs peace researchers who focus on successful conflict settlements/resolutions.

Share

Uncover self-fulfilling prophecies

What is required is the intellectual discipline to examine the scenario of war from the perspective of how to end it, whereby one will possibly discover that from an ethno-identitarian point of view, there was never a real winner, and to uncover disastrous automatisms in the course of self-fulfilling prophecies (e.g. the so-called Thucydides trap) along ossified alliance-political doctrines that have perhaps long needed reform. The current situation poses two crucial questions of principle: firstly, how can Europe, understood as the Occidental cultural biotope of its ethnicities, maintain its adequate level of self-determination and influence amid hegemonic competition while simultaneously minimising division without becoming too centralised? And secondly: How can we deal with autochthonous (!) minorities within Europe, especially in border regions, without letting historical burdens dictate our actions, but rather keeping the future prosperity of our Occidental brother nations in mind as a priority?

Our European peoples cannot afford to let their procreative generation bleed to death in civil war scenarios triggered by migration-related racial unrest or religious struggles, nor in the meat grinder of fratricidal wars. Without indigenous Europeans on this continent, the question of nation-state sovereignty no longer plays any role. - The ideological task of Europe's ethno-nationalists today is to conduct historical peace research and develop political peace concepts. The historians in our ranks may begin to analyse historical peace initiatives.

World politics has rarely been so pervasive that hardly any nation can remain unaffected by the spheres of influence and power-political strategies of the "global players ". As a result, national self-determination is increasingly becoming an asset in need to defend, but, moreover, the integrity of personal self-determination is also threatened in the wake of encroaching supranational institutions, whose control-obsessed regulatory mania extends into individual everyday life. Globalist delegitimisation crises and institutional paternalism turn world politics into a personal matter. Military alliances, supply chains, and trade relations - in other words, a large number of previously familiar structures are undergoing radical change, and this all-encompassing transformation is accompanied by a convergence of numerous crises, which increases the challenges for and demands on the responsible political organisers to an unusual degree.

Geostrategic Reshuffling

Geopolitically, we are witnessing a transformation process from the unipolar US hegemony that followed the collapse of the Eastern bloc to a multipolar world order. The contested fields on the geopolitical chessboard are shifting from the Atlantic to the Pacific region. NATO vs. SCO, BRICS vs. WEF, World Bank vs. AIF, the poles demanding their political rights, have already taken on institutional forms. This geostrategic reshuffling is not proceeding smoothly exclusively based on political treaties; on the contrary, military conflicts are increasing. Unfortunately, the rhetoric has also changed, and whereas during the Cold War, politicians predominantly invoked peace, today's language is more akin to warmongering mobilisation. Eastern Europe and the Middle East have become contested zones for proxy wars that harbour the dangerous potential for escalation, expansively triggering a domino effect of destruction.

Subscribe now

Postmodern Dissolution

On the one hand, energy policy has become a lever for realising political goals; on the other hand, mainly in parts of the political West, it has become so distorted by ideology that it is tantamount to self-harm. All of this contributes to economic friction, accompanied by a technological arms race that is possibly disregarding the dangers of so-called Artificial General Intelligence. A global debt crisis, which is no longer to be denied, is highly likely to have an impact soon, which will also make it more difficult to meet the challenges. In the West, there is also the zeitgeist problem of a postmodern dissolution of tried and tested traditional forms of societies in the swamp of woke diversity hallucinations. Refugee migrations on the scale of invasions from culturally distant regions further intensify the polarisation of societies.

Clarity of the Situation

There is hardly any awareness of the importance of ethnic integrity and continuity in the global reality 2025 outlined above. As an ethno-identitarian political fringe group, which - no matter how well-founded its arguments - does not (yet) have the necessary majorities or at least represents a critical mass as a minority, it is therefore imperative that it gains both an unadulterated clarity of the situation and a realistic assessment of its possibilities in terms of which short and medium-term intermediate steps are to use to achieve its desired long-term goals. Without tactical flexibility, nothing lasting will be achieved. Still, the need for flexibility requires a firm adherence to principles to avoid getting lost in non-binding cultural relativism. Different approaches to action, whether party-, meta-, media-, cultural-political, entrepreneurial engagement or community-building, are a secondary question as long as the different fields of action cooperate, each forming a mosaic piece for a common, coherent picture.

Share

Perseverance

Perseverance will be the decisive virtue underlying successful action since - even if history has often proven that, contrary to communist ideology, it is open-ended - political paradigm shifts in the ethno-identitarian sense are not realistic overnight. This political struggle against the global financial-feudalist establishment is not a sprint but a marathon. Networking must be a central element of ethno-identitarian activity to oppose the established power apparatus of the cosmopolitan regime effectively. Although a demographic tipping point is already a reality in many Western nations, especially in urban regions, and regional consolidation may first have to take place as a starting point for a later Reconquista, that networking must not be limited to national borders. The extremists of hyper-globalisation must be confronted with the recognition: Cross-border networking against the no-border replacement policy!

Subscribe now

My sincerest greetings from Germany to the Substack community,

I am a German/Bavarian freelance journalist, book author and longstanding political dissident against the establishment, who is convinced of the importance of effectively connecting identitarian dissidents all around the globe – people who also seek to preserve our Occidental heritage. I´m a member of the German political party „Die Heimat“ (currently part of the executive board), which pursues the same goal of preserving Germany and Europe's cultures, traditions and heritage.

My purpose on that platform is to highlight the subject matters the establishment tries to silence and comment on the ideological opportunism of the media stooges of the powers that be. Although I endeavour to free people from the establishment`s „manipulation imprisonment“, nevertheless, I understand that nobody wants to see constand doom and gloom. For that reason, as a matter of course, posts promoting beautiful art and culture will also find their place in this account. Consider such content as „comfort content“ for fellow ideological dissidents as we are all exposed to numerous ugly decadence in today`s socio-political climate.

May this endeavour for enlightening contribute to many people, hopefully taking back control of their respective intellect and aid in the detachment from so many calamitous narratives espoused by those in power.

I will offer my followers an orientation beyond the mainstream perspective by commenting on what I consider crucial current events and publishing shorter articles on specific issues. I will provide subscribers with more detailed essays and analyses on selected topics. I do not conceal my gratitude for any support, as this will enable me to be more focused on the time-consuming task of being a political commentator critical of the zeitgeist and an active networker together with other political organisers.

Yours

Sascha A. Roßmüller