This mental model is almost completely wrong. And understanding why it is wrong is the starting point for understanding one of the most consequential infrastructure stories in East Africa.

The internet is not in the cloud. It is not wireless in any fundamental sense. It is, at its core, a physical network of cables, processors, and buildings, connected by glass fibre that carries pulses of light across thousands of kilometres of ocean floor. When you open Instagram, send a WhatsApp message, or watch YouTube, a physical signal travels from your device through your router, through cables buried under roads and strung between poles, through a network of towers and switching points, eventually arriving at a physical building where a physical server receives the request, processes it, and sends the response back through the same chain in reverse.

The speed and cost of that round trip is your internet experience. And that round trip, for East Africa, begins and ends at the coast of Mombasa.

What Sits Under the Ocean

Stretch your arms out as wide as they go. The glass fibre strand that carries your internet data is roughly the thickness of a human hair. Coat it in plastic, wrap it in copper wire, armour it in steel, seal it in polyethylene, and you get a submarine cable roughly the diameter of a garden hose. Lay that cable across 10,000 kilometres of ocean floor, manage the pressure and the seawater and the fishing trawlers dragging across it, and you have the physical infrastructure that makes global digital communication possible. (shoutout to my high school computer science class cause we actually learnt really cool stuff)

These cables carry light pulses. The light travels through the glass fibre at roughly two-thirds the speed of light in a vacuum. A signal from Mombasa to Marseille takes about 70 milliseconds. There is nothing faster. Satellites are slower. Wireless is local. The submarine cable is the backbone of the global internet, and it has been since the telegraph era.

Kenya’s coastline sits on one of the most strategically important stretches of ocean on earth for submarine cable routing. The East African coast is the natural pathway between Asia, the Middle East, Europe, and Africa, which is why cable after cable has landed at Mombasa over the past two decades.

The cables landing there now are TEAMS (the East African Marine System) which Kenya’s government part-owns and which runs to the UAE. EASSy (the Eastern Africa Submarine System) a 10,000 kilometre cable running down the East African coast with nine landing stations across the region. SEACOM, an African-owned cable running to India and the Mediterranean. LION2, the Lower Indian Ocean Network, connecting the island chains of the Indian Ocean. DARE1, the Djibouti Africa Regional Express, linking Somalia, Kenya, and Djibouti. PEACE, the Pakistan and East Africa Connecting Europe cable, a Chinese-backed system connecting Mombasa to Karachi, Marseille, and beyond.

And then 2Africa, a 45,000 kilometre cable that encircles the entire African continent. Its ownership reads like a who’s who of global tech: Meta, China Mobile, Orange, Saudi Telecom, Telecom Egypt, Vodafone, and a consortium of African operators. It has two landing points in Kenya. A new cable called Daraja, co-led by Safaricom and Meta, is expected online in 2026 linking Mombasa directly to Oman.

Mombasa is the landing point for eight cables, more than any other city on the East African coast. That number is not accidental. It is the accumulated outcome of geography, existing infrastructure, port access, and the connectivity decisions of dozens of cable consortia over twenty years. Each cable that lands reinforces the case for the next one. Mombasa became the internet gateway for East Africa the same way airports become hubs: first through geography, then through network effects, then through sheer momentum.

Everything that happens with internet connectivity in Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Rwanda, and the landlocked countries beyond them is downstream of those eight cables.

The Buildings Where the Internet Lives

Now: what do you do when eight cables arrive at your coast? (apart from the standard ‘karibuni chai’, cause we’re nothing if not good hosts)

You need a building. Specifically, you need a building that can receive the cables, distribute their capacity to whoever needs it, keep servers running without interruption (24/7 not like KPLC and the occasional power outages - shoutout that one clip of a football match with the commentators shouting LOADSHEDDING), and do all of this securely enough that the world’s largest technology companies trust it with their infrastructure.

That building is a data centre. And not all data centres are the same.

A hyperscale data centre is what companies like Google, Meta, and Microsoft build for themselves. Massive facilities housing hundreds of thousands of servers, drawing hundreds of megawatts of power, spread across campuses in places with cheap electricity and cold air. These are the facilities the AI industry is currently spending $50 billion per project to construct. They are owned entirely by one company, built for that company’s own compute needs, and they are not in Kenya. The power costs alone would make a hyperscale facility in Kenya economically irrational by an order of magnitude.

A colocation data centre is different, and this is what matters for Kenya’s story. Rather than one company owning everything inside, the colocation operator owns and manages the physical facility, the power systems, the cooling infrastructure, the security layers, and the connectivity. Multiple tenants rent space inside it, from individual server racks to private suites to entire halls. They bring their own equipment, plug into the shared infrastructure, and pay for space, power, and connectivity. The colocation operator is a very sophisticated, very secure landlord.

You can rent a single rack in a colocation facility. A rack is a standard metal frame holding servers, about the height of a tall refrigerator, with 45 rack units of usable space. You can rent a cage, a fenced-off cluster of racks. You can rent a private suite, a walled room with its own access controls and dedicated power. The pricing scales with space, power draw, and connectivity, and understanding that pricing is understanding the data centre business model: infrastructure rented by the unit, uptime sold as the product.

The most important variation is the carrier-neutral colocation data centre. Carrier means telecom, ISP, cable operator. Neutral means the facility has no commercial relationship with any of them that would create a preference. Everyone is welcome, no one is favoured, and critically, any tenant inside the facility can connect directly to any other tenant through a simple physical interconnection rather than routing their traffic through an outside network.

This neutrality is what changed how the internet worked in East Africa.

The Geography That Made It Matter

When iColo, the carrier-neutral data centre company that would become the infrastructure backbone of Kenya’s internet, placed its first Mombasa facility in Nyali, the decision was not just about building in a coastal city. It was about building in the right place relative to the cables.

The submarine cables landing at Mombasa terminate at cable landing stations on the coast. Those stations convert the optical signal from the cable into something that can be distributed across terrestrial networks. From the landing station, the signal needs somewhere to go. Historically, it went into the networks of whichever telecom operator owned the landing station, where it would be metered, marked up, and sold to downstream operators.

Place a carrier-neutral data centre close enough to those landing stations to run direct fibre connections, and you create a new option. Instead of routing your traffic through an incumbent’s network, you can bring it directly into the neutral facility, where you can connect freely to every other operator, platform, and cable also present there.

This is the architecture that made Mombasa’s data centre ecosystem possible. The cables on one side. The neutral building in the middle. The rest of Kenya’s internet economy on the other side.

The next article in this series is about what happened when that neutral building opened, why it changed the economics of internet access in East Africa, and how a decision made in a data centre in Mombasa is the reason Safaricom can give you free WhatsApp data today.

The internet has a physical address. This is where the story starts.

Part 2 of 4 next Friday: “The Neutral Ground.” How one building in Mombasa unlocked the Kenyan internet economy.

Stay Blessed.

Finance Fridays: Special Series

Subscribe now

Here is a question to sit with.

If you wanted to build the most profitable product in the history of gaming, what would it look like?

It would feel like skill. It would offer the illusion of control. It would let you win just enough to believe in your own analysis. It would combine multiple decisions so that when you lost, there was always a specific, fixable reason: one leg that missed, one player who had a bad day. It would make the wins feel enormous and the losses feel correctable.

It would be the multi-bet.

What the Sportsbook Actually Wants From You

Let’s be clear about the economics of sports betting from the house’s perspective.

A standard single bet, one team to win one match, generates a margin for the sportsbook of approximately 4.5% to 5%. This is the juice, the built-in advantage from odds that are set slightly below the true probability of each outcome. On a KES 1,000 single bet, the house keeps approximately KES 45 to KES 50 on average over many bets.

That is a viable business. But it is also a business where a few good days by smart bettors can eat into margins significantly. The house needs a product with a higher edge. A product where the math is so heavily stacked in their favor that they effectively cannot lose at scale.

The product is the multi-bet.

A multi-bet (called a parlay in the US, accumulator in the UK) combines multiple selections into a single bet. All selections must be correct for the bet to win. The appeal is obvious: combine four matches, each at roughly even odds, and turn a KES 100 bet into a potential KES 1,000+ payout. It sounds like leverage. It looks like leverage. It is not leverage.

The Mathematics They Hide From You

Here is the math the apps do not show you in the interface.

Take a simple example. Two coin flips. Each is a 50/50 chance. In a fair betting market, if you bet KES 10 on heads on flip one, you win KES 10 profit. You double your money.

Now parlay those two flips. You need both to land heads. The probability drops from 50% to 25%. In a fair world, the payout on a winning KES 10 bet should be KES 30 in profit, because your true odds of winning are one in four.

Sports betting apps pay you approximately KES 26.

They are shaving value off the top. And they shave value every single time you add another leg to the multibet. By the time you have built a five-leg accumulator, which is entirely normal behavior on SportPesa, Betika, or Odibets, the house edge has grown from approximately 5% to well above 30%. By the time you are playing a jackpot with fifteen correct score predictions, the house edge is astronomical, sometimes exceeding 40%.

On a single bet, the house keeps about 5 shillings from every 100 wagered. On a multibet, the house keeps about 30 shillings from every 100 wagered. On the big jackpot, the house keeps considerably more.

This is not a secret. The mathematics of probability are public information. But the apps are designed to make you feel your analytical skill, your knowledge of Arsenal’s recent form or Messi’s expected goals per 90 minutes, closes that gap. It does not. The house advantage on a multibet is structural. Your insight about the match is real. Its effect on your probability of winning a ten-leg accumulator is close to zero.

The Kenyan Jackpot Product

Kenya has taken the multibet and built an entire cultural product around it.

The jackpot, where bettors must correctly predict the outcomes of thirteen, fifteen, or seventeen matches to win a prize often advertised in the hundreds of millions of shillings, is structurally identical to the parlay. It is a multibet with enough legs that the theoretical house edge is so large as to make the word “betting” almost a misnomer. You are not making a financial wager with a defined probability structure. You are buying a lottery ticket dressed in statistical language.

But it does not feel like a lottery. It feels like analysis.

This is the genius of the product, and the reason it has captured millions of Kenyans with financial ambitions rather than gambling impulses. The jackpot requires you to make predictions about actual football matches using actual football knowledge. You research team form. You check injury reports. You consider head-to-head records. You feel like an analyst, like someone applying skill to a problem, not like someone pulling a lever on a fruit machine.

In 2017, Samuel Abisai won KES 221 million from a SportPesa jackpot. The story made national headlines. He went from television studio to television studio explaining his selections. He became famous overnight. SportPesa called it “the biggest payout in African football history” and received months of free advertising as a result.

What the coverage did not explain, because it did not fit the narrative, is the structural reality: for every Samuel Abisai, there are millions of Kenyan bettors who placed the same bet, applied the same analysis, and lost. The jackpot winner is real. The millions of losers who funded his prize are invisible. That is how the product is designed.

The Same-Game Multi-bet and the Illusion of Knowledge

The most recent evolution of the multibet product is the same-game accumulator, now available on Kenyan platforms through features like SportPesa’s “Bet Builder” and similar products on other platforms.

Previously, you could not multibet within a single match because the outcomes are correlated. If Manchester United wins, Marcus Rashford is more likely to have scored. Betting both in a parlay meant the sportsbook was exposed to correlated risk they could not accurately price.

So they rebuilt their algorithms to allow it anyway, accepting the correlation because the product is so profitable that even with more careful pricing it generates extraordinary margins.

Now you can bet, on a single match, that Arsenal will win, that Saka will score, that the match will have over 2.5 goals, and that there will be at least two yellow cards. Four legs. One game. An illusion of analytical precision applied to outcomes that are, individually, uncertain and collectively, exponentially unlikely.

The product creates what psychologists call the illusion of knowledge. You know Arsenal. You follow Saka’s performances. You understand the Premier League. That genuine knowledge creates confidence that extends beyond its actual predictive power. Football is chaotic. Anything can happen. A defender slips. A referee makes a call. A player picks up a knock in the warmup. One random event kills your ten-leg same-game multibet and you lose everything you wagered.

But you tell yourself: I was so close. Just one leg missed. Next time I will get it right.

And the app is counting on exactly that thought.

The Real Financial Cost in Kenya

The American research on sports betting’s financial impact is sobering. A study analyzed millions of transactions and found that for the average person, for every dollar increase in betting activity, net savings and investment went down by two dollars. People were not spending their entertainment budget. They were pulling money from savings, reducing retirement contributions, and going into overdraft.

Kenya’s version of this story is bleaker, because the economic baseline is more precarious.

Youth unemployment at 32.4%. Over 2.97 million unemployed Kenyans. A significant portion of bettors from low-income backgrounds who place small amounts, KES 10 to KES 50, hoping to multiply them into meaningful money. Stories of university students losing tuition fees. Research documenting gambling-related mental health crises and, in the most severe documented cases, suicides linked to financial losses from football betting.

Youth are estimated to be gambling over KES 20 billion per month, according to research on Kenyan betting patterns, and much of that money ends up in foreign accounts held by the international corporations that own many of the platforms.

The government collected KES 88.4 billion in taxes from the betting industry over five years. The social costs on the other side of that ledger are harder to quantify and rarely appear in the same sentence.

Three Things You Should Actually Know

The video I watched to prepare this series ended with practical advice. It is worth repeating in a Kenyan context.

Stop playing multibets as a strategy. If you enjoy betting as entertainment and have a specific budget for it, single bets are the rational product. The house edge is 4.5%, not 30%. It is still a long-term losing proposition, because the house always wins, but it loses more slowly. The multibet is not an investment. It is not even good entertainment value per shilling. It is the most profitable product on the menu for the company, which means it is the least profitable one for you.

The jackpot is a lottery ticket. Treat it as such. The analysis you do is real. Its effect on your probability of winning thirteen or fifteen correct scores is marginal. If you play the jackpot, play it with exactly as much money as you would spend on a lottery ticket: an amount whose loss you would not notice. Not rent money. Not savings. Not borrowed funds.

The notification after the loss is not a coincidence. When you receive a boost offer, a free bet, a “your luck is turning” notification immediately after a losing bet, you are being caught in a specific psychological state by a system that tracks your betting behavior in real time. The app knows you just lost. It knows you are in the state of “almost.” The notification is not customer service. It is a hook designed by a behavioral science team to catch you at your most vulnerable.

The Honest Conclusion

This is not a call to ban betting. Betting is legal. Millions of Kenyans participate. Some do so responsibly, with set budgets, as genuine entertainment. The product itself is not evil.

What the product is: a financial system, operated by sophisticated corporations with access to behavioral science, probability mathematics, and real-time data on your specific betting patterns, designed to extract the maximum amount of money from you while keeping you engaged long enough to extract more.

You are not betting against the match. You are betting against an algorithm that has been optimized over millions of data points to price outcomes in a way that guarantees its own profitability. You are playing a game whose rules you have not read, whose mathematics you have not seen, and whose designer is considerably better resourced than you are.

That does not mean you cannot play. It means play with your eyes open.

The house always wins. The question is only how much it costs you to find out.

This has been the House Always Wins series.

Stay Blessed.

You think you are watching football.

You are not. Or rather, you are, but that is not what the app needs from you. The app needs something far more specific. It needs the four to eight seconds between your team scoring and your rational brain asking whether you should bet again. It needs that window. And it has been designed, by neuroscientists and UX engineers, to close it as fast as possible.

This is not speculation. This is the documented product philosophy of the sports betting industry, borrowed wholesale from a field that had already perfected it: mobile gaming.

The Time-to-Reward Problem

Think about the last time you walked into a betting parlour to place a physical bet. The counter. The queue. The paper slip. The process.

That friction was not inefficiency. It was, however unintentionally, a built-in circuit breaker. The time between impulse and transaction gave your prefrontal cortex, the part of your brain responsible for rational decision-making, a moment to intervene. Should I really be betting my rent money on this? That question had space to arrive.

The apps removed that space.

Sports betting apps are designed to minimize what neuroscientists call the “time to reward.” The faster a platform gets you from impulse to wager, the less time the logical part of your brain has to ask any questions. The fastest Kenyan apps load live markets in under 1.3 seconds on a standard Safaricom 4G connection. M-Pesa deposit is instant. The bet is placed before the thought completes.

This is not a side effect of good technology. It is the product.

The Candy Crush Playbook

In 2012, Candy Crush Saga launched. Within a year it had 93 million daily players. The game was addictive in a very specific and very researched way: variable rewards, sensory feedback, near misses, and progress streaks. The genius of Candy Crush was not that it was fun. It was that it was designed to feel perpetually close to winning in a way that made stopping feel irrational.

Sports betting apps borrow this playbook with minimal modification.

Variable rewards. Not every bet hits. Not every accumulator comes through. But the ones that do hit create a neurological event that the brain encodes as far more significant than the losses. Variable reward schedules, where the win is unpredictable, are the most potent driver of compulsive behavior identified in behavioral psychology. They are also the structural reality of sports betting.

The cash-out button. This is the most psychologically sophisticated feature in modern sports betting apps. You place a bet, your team goes ahead by two goals, and the app offers you a button: Cash out now for 80% of your potential winnings. It feels like a generous feature, like the app is giving you control. What it is actually doing is transforming a passive activity into an active one. Instead of placing a bet and watching the game, you are now glued to the screen making micro-decisions every few minutes. Every time the cash-out value changes, you get a small spike of adrenaline. You are no longer watching football. You are playing a game about the football.

The near-miss effect. In slot machine research, the near miss is well documented. When two cherries appear and the third is a lemon, the machine plays an “almost win” sound and lights flash. The brain registers this not as a loss but as “I nearly had it.” Dopamine is released almost identically to a win. Sports betting apps replicate this precisely. You bet on a player to score 20 points. He scores 19. A rational analysis says: I made a wrong prediction and lost money. The gambler’s brain, shaped by the interface’s near-miss framing, says: one more point. I was right about everything else. Let me go again.

And the app knows exactly when you have just had a near miss. Because immediately after a loss, you will receive a notification. A boost offer. A bonus bet. They are not being generous. They are catching you in the state of “almost,” which is the most receptive state a betting customer can be in.

Bonus Bets: The Economics of Addiction Acquisition

“Deposit KES 100, get KES 500 in free bets.”

You have seen this. Maybe you have taken it. Here is what it actually means.

The bonus bet is not free money. In almost every case, bonus bets cannot be withdrawn. They must be wagered, often multiple times, before any winnings can be accessed. They are monopoly money that exists only inside the platform’s ecosystem.

The companies are not being generous. They are making a calculated investment. The research on customer lifetime value in sports betting consistently shows that a successfully acquired customer is worth thousands of shillings over their lifetime. Spending KES 500 to acquire one is not charity. It is customer acquisition cost, the same metric that tech startups use, applied to an industry that profits from a percentage of every losing bet.

The free bet gets you inside. The psychology keeps you there. And once you are comfortable inside the app, all the features described above begin their work. The cash-out button. The live betting market that refreshes every thirty seconds. The jackpot that is always one leg away from paying out. The notification after the near miss.

It does not feel like a trap. It feels like entertainment. The most sophisticated traps always do.

Aviator and the Pure Dopamine Product

Kenya has one product that makes sports betting look restrained in comparison.

Aviator, the crash game available on multiple Kenyan platforms, is a virtual plane that takes off and climbs. A multiplier rises as it climbs. You cash out before the plane crashes, or you lose everything. The entire mechanic is built around one decision, made in real time, under time pressure, with a number changing rapidly in front of you. There is no sport. No analysis. No “insight” about team form or weather conditions or injury updates. There is only the number and the rising tension of when to press the button.

Aviator became so widely played in Kenya that it prompted government warnings and calls for intervention. Its mechanics, cashing out before the virtual plane crashes, created the same neurological loop as sports betting but stripped of any pretense of analysis. It was the clearest possible demonstration of what these apps actually are underneath the sports statistics and match previews: dopamine delivery systems, packaged to feel like skill.

The science on what this does to a developing brain is not ambiguous. A 2022 study documented cases of gambling-related suicides in East Africa, predominantly among young males aged 16 to 40, frequently linked to financial losses from football betting. University students who lost tuition fees to gambling constituted four out of every seventeen documented cases in certain studies.

The app that loads in 1.3 seconds. The bonus bet that feels like free money. The near miss that feels like almost winning.

These are not neutral features. They are a system. And the system is working exactly as designed.

There is one specific bet these apps are praying you make. It is not who wins the match. It is something far more profitable. See you next week for part 3 of this series.

Stay Blessed.

Finance Friday: Special Series

Let me ask you something.

When did you first see a SportPesa billboard?

Think about it. Not the app, not the ad on your phone, not the WhatsApp group where someone shares “sure tips” every Friday morning. The billboard. Because there was a moment, probably sometime around 2013 or 2014, when those boards went up across Nairobi and you registered them the same way you registered any other advertisement. Furniture store. Insurance company. Betting company.

Normal. Expected. Background noise.

That normalization did not happen by accident. It was the outcome of a deliberate, decades-long process that turned what was once a criminal activity into a multi-billion shilling industry sitting in the pocket of 79% of Kenyan adults. And like most things that quietly become enormous, the origin story is stranger than the outcome.

Kenya Was Betting Before the Apps. The Apps Just Removed the Friction.

To understand how we got here, you have to understand what was already in place.

Kenya’s gambling history does not start with smartphones. It starts with the Betting, Lotteries and Gaming Act of 1966, a piece of legislation written the year Kenya was three years old, when the primary gambling concern was horse racing and football pools at local clubs. The law was designed for a world of betting parlours and paper slips, and for decades it functioned adequately within those limits.

Then mobile money arrived.

M-Pesa launched in 2007. By 2010, Kenya had one of the most sophisticated mobile payment infrastructures anywhere on earth. The rails were already laid, tens of millions of people moving money via phone, comfortable with digital transactions, trusting the system completely. The betting companies arrived and found an ecosystem purpose-built for what they needed. A psychology professor at Kenyatta University put it plainly: “When online betting came along, it found this ideal system was in place.”

SportPesa received its operating license in 2013. Within four years, it had become one of the most recognizable brands in Kenya, sponsoring Arsenal, Everton, and the Rugby Sevens. Betika, Odibets, Betway, and dozens of others followed. By the 2025/26 licensing period, the Betting Control and Licensing Board had approved 99 licensed companies to operate in Kenya. Ninety-nine.

The Kenyan betting market is now projected to be worth $831 million. The country ranks second in Africa for betting participation, with 79% of adults having placed a bet. In 2023/24 alone, KRA collected KES 24 billion in taxes from betting and gaming entities. Between July 2024 and March 2025, Kenyans were wagering an average of KES 274 million daily. That is not a month. That is a day.

The casino did not come to Kenya. Kenya became the casino. And it happened because the regulatory framework that governed it was designed for a world that no longer existed.

The Loophole Structure: How Legal Ambiguity Became an Industry

In Kenya, the mechanism was different from the American story but the underlying logic was identical. A law written for a previous era, meeting a technology it was not designed for, creating a gap that an industry drove through before anyone knew what was happening.

The 1966 Act had no meaningful provisions for mobile betting. It did not contemplate M-Pesa as a payment rail. It did not anticipate that a person could place a bet, watch a match, and receive winnings all from a device they carried in their shirt pocket while standing in a matatu queue. The regulatory body, the BCLB, was underfunded, understaffed, and operating under a framework that made effective oversight nearly impossible.

The betting companies did not break the law. They operated in the space where the law had not yet arrived.

By the time the government recognized what was happening, the industry had over 20 million registered accounts, had normalized betting as a social activity for an entire generation of young Kenyans, and had embedded itself so deeply into the sports media landscape that separating betting from football coverage had become structurally difficult.

The government tried. In 2019, the government cancelled or suspended the licenses of all betting companies and demanded they prove tax compliance before resuming operations. SportPesa shut down its Kenyan operations for several months. The void was immediately filled by competitors. When SportPesa returned, the market had barely noticed it was gone.

In 2025, the Gambling Control Act was passed, the most significant legislative overhaul of the sector since 1966. It introduced a new Gambling Regulatory Authority, a 15% gaming tax on gross gaming revenue, mandatory responsible gambling messaging, and stricter advertising controls. For the first time, “bet now” as a direct call to action was prohibited in advertising. All creatives now require regulator approval.

These are real changes. They are also late ones. The industry they are trying to regulate has already built its infrastructure, established its user habits, and achieved cultural normalization that legislation alone cannot easily undo.

The casino is in 35 million pockets. The regulatory conversation is just beginning.

What the Numbers Say About Who Is Betting

This is the part that should sit with you.

The age demographic for Kenyan sports betting is 18 to 35. That is not a coincidence. That is the precise overlap of maximum digital engagement, maximum economic precarity, and maximum susceptibility to a product that promises financial escape.

Youth unemployment in Kenya for those aged 20 to 29 reached 32.4% according to KNBS data. The number of unemployed Kenyans rose to 2.97 million in 2023. Research consistently finds that individuals facing financial hardship are more susceptible to gambling as a coping mechanism or with hopes of quick gains.

A 2024 GeoPoll study found that 82.8% of Kenyans had placed a bet. A separate study found that 84% of Kenyan youth polled had experimented with betting as part of their “hustling.” Of those, one-third bet daily.

Over 70% of young Kenyans have ever placed a sports bet. 88% of them do it on their phones. 10% bet habitually every day.

KES 24 billion in tax revenue. KES 274 million per day in wagers. Kenyans placing bets at the rate of KES 2,800 per second.

Those are not signs of a leisure industry. Those are signs of an economy.

The loophole that put a casino in your pocket was not one specific law or one specific decision. It was the gap between the speed at which technology moves and the speed at which regulation follows. Every country with a smartphone-dense population has experienced some version of this story. Kenya’s version was particularly fast, particularly deep, and particularly concentrated among the age group that can least afford to lose.

Once they had you inside the app, they needed to keep you there. That is where the video game designers came in. See you next week for part 2 of this series.

Stay Blessed.

It sounds like something invented to make economists sound more interesting at parties, but the underlying idea is genuinely important and, once you see it, you cannot unsee it. Here is what it says: people do not want their standard of living to swing wildly from month to month. They would rather have a predictable, stable level of consumption than an erratic one, even if the erratic version averages out to the same total over time.

Think about what that means practically. Given a choice between earning KES 50,000 every month for a year and earning KES 150,000 in January, KES 10,000 in February, KES 80,000 in March, and so on, with the same annual total, most people prefer the stable version. They are willing to accept a lower average in some scenarios just to avoid the uncertainty of not knowing what next month looks like.

This preference for predictability, this aversion to uncertainty, is not irrational. It reflects something true about how humans function. You cannot pay rent with a good average. You cannot feed your children with a smooth long-run trend. You need something reliable, this month, now.

Economists call this behavior risk aversion applied to consumption. But the simpler word for what makes consumption smoothing possible, what allows people to manage the gaps between income and expenditure, what enables anyone to save, borrow, invest, or defer gratification in the expectation of future reward, is trust.

Not trust in the abstract. Trust in a specific system. Trust that the money you deposit will be there when you return. Trust that the interest promised will be paid. Trust that the institution holding your funds is not quietly using them for something else. Trust that if something goes wrong, someone with authority will intervene.

This is not a soft concept. It is the load-bearing wall of the entire financial architecture. And when it cracks, everything above it cracks with it.

Why Trust Is the Actual Product

Banks do not primarily hold your money. That is the intuitive model, and it is mostly wrong.

When you deposit KES 100,000 into your savings account, the bank does not put those notes in a box with your name on it. It lends most of them out, immediately, to a mortgage borrower, a business owner, a student. It keeps a fraction in reserve, enough to handle the normal flow of daily withdrawals, and the rest is circulating in the economy in someone else’s hands.

This is called fractional reserve banking, and it is the mechanism by which banks create credit, and by which credit creates economic activity. It is also the mechanism by which banks are, by design, perpetually vulnerable to a specific kind of crisis.

If every depositor walked into every branch tomorrow and demanded their money simultaneously, no bank in the world could honor those requests. The money is not there. It is in the economy, doing economic work. This is not fraud. It is the system functioning as designed. Banks borrow short and lend long, taking your short-term deposits and converting them into long-term loans, earning the difference in interest rates as their fundamental business model.

The entire structure works on one condition: that depositors do not all ask for their money at the same time.

And the reason they do not ask for their money at the same time is trust. Trust that the bank is sound. Trust that the regulator is watching. Trust that in the worst case, a deposit insurance fund will cover losses. Trust that this is a safe place for money to live.

Remove that trust, even temporarily, even based on a rumor, and the architecture becomes instantly fragile. Because the thing that protects a bank from a bank run is not its capital ratios or its loan book quality. It is the collective calm of its depositors. And collective calm is, by nature, susceptible to collective panic.

April 2016: A Tweet and an Empty Vault

On the night of Sunday, April 3, 2016, messages started moving through Kenyan WhatsApp groups.

Chase Bank was in trouble.

Nobody was entirely sure where the information came from. It moved the way information moves in WhatsApp groups: without a clear origin, through trusted contacts, with the urgency that attaches itself to anything that threatens money. By Tuesday, April 5th, it reached Twitter. A well-known user posted: “After Imperial, CBK focused on forensic audits and found a similar alleged fraud at Chase Bank where close to KES 15 billion is missing from the books.”

Chase Bank’s social media team responded immediately. “That information is completely false and we urge the public to ignore it.” The bank issued a press statement asserting it was “strong, sound and transparent.”

Forty-eight hours later, Chase Bank was under receivership.

Here is the exact sequence. Wednesday, April 6th: Chase Bank restated its 2015 financial results. The new figures showed insider loans, loans to directors and employees, had swollen to KES 13.7 billion, up from figures published six days earlier. KES 8 billion in insider loans had been understated in the original report. The restated accounts received a qualified opinion from auditors Deloitte and Touche.

As soon as those numbers became public, the bank run that had been building over two days became a stampede. Depositors arrived at branches in numbers the tellers could not handle. Several branches ran out of physical cash. ATMs went dark. By end of Wednesday, the vaults were literally empty. On the morning of Thursday, April 7th, the Central Bank of Kenya ordered Chase Bank closed.

The CBK governor blamed social media. “Malicious comments” on WhatsApp and Twitter, he said, triggered the liquidity crisis. Critics pushed back: social media did not put KES 13.7 billion in insider loans in Chase Bank’s books. The fraud was already there. The social media posts simply revealed what was already true, and gave depositors a reason to act on information that insiders had been acting on for days before the general public knew anything.

This is the nature of a bank run. It is not irrational. Each individual depositor who withdrew their money from Chase Bank on April 6th was making a completely rational decision given the information available to them. The collective outcome of those rational individual decisions was the collapse of the institution. This is what economists call a coordination failure, a situation where individually rational choices produce a collectively catastrophic outcome.

There were 55,000 depositors. Youth groups, women’s investment clubs, small businesses, the Law Society of Kenya, the United Nations SACCO, SportPesa, all of them with funds locked inside an institution that the banking sector’s social trust infrastructure had just failed to protect.

The CBK’s own statement inadvertently captured the whole problem. It said Chase Bank “experienced liquidity difficulties following inaccurate social media reports.” The social media reports turned out to be accurate. The liquidity difficulties were real. The crisis was not a misunderstanding. It was a disclosure.

October 2015: The Fraud That Ran for Thirteen Years

Six months before Chase Bank collapsed, Imperial Bank became the story that Chase Bank’s depositors feared they were living through.

On October 13, 2015, the Central Bank placed Imperial Bank under receivership. The stated reason was “unsafe and unsound business conditions.” The actual reason, which forensic investigations would spend years unraveling, was that the bank’s founder and managing director, Abdulmalek Janmohamed, had been running an elaborate theft scheme for at least thirteen years.

The mechanism was a software reporting program that generated fictitious accounts and moved funds into them. The funds were then channeled through a network of twenty companies into personal accounts. The forensic audit by American firm FTI Consulting ultimately established that at least KES 34 billion had been siphoned from the bank. The Central Bank later sued to freeze assets worth KES 42 billion held across more than forty companies.

In 2012, a whistleblower had sent an email to the Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission, the Treasury, and the CBK, flagging possible money laundering and tax evasion at Imperial Bank. A CBK official received the information and asked Imperial Bank’s CFO about it. The CFO denied it. No further action was taken. Three years later, the scheme collapsed following Janmohamed’s death in September 2015, which removed the person managing the concealment infrastructure.

What makes the Imperial Bank story particularly corrosive to systemic trust is not just the fraud itself. It is the allegation, tested in court proceedings that are still ongoing as of 2026, that the regulator responsible for preventing exactly this kind of fraud was itself compromised. That CBK officials maintained an inappropriate relationship with the bank’s management. That the system designed to protect depositors had been captured by the people it was supposed to police.

At time of writing, the KES 44.8 billion fraud case against former Imperial Bank directors is on the brink of collapse because KDIC cannot agree on fees with the American forensic firm that conducted the audit, whose witnesses are needed to testify. Ten years later. The money is largely unrecovered. Most depositors received partial payments. The case grinds on in a Nairobi courtroom while the files gather weight.

The depositors who trusted Imperial Bank trusted the institution, and they trusted the regulator standing behind it. Both failed them. That is not a banking story. That is a trust story.

2025 to 2026: The SACCO Question

The most recent chapter in Kenya’s financial trust narrative is quieter than Chase Bank’s social media explosion and less dramatic than Imperial Bank’s forensic revelations. But for the millions of Kenyans whose savings sit not in commercial banks but in SACCOs, it is possibly the most personally relevant.

Kenya has over 13,000 registered SACCOs. Only 355 are regulated by the SACCO Societies Regulatory Authority. Those 355 regulated SACCOs hold assets of approximately KES 1 trillion and serve over 7.4 million members. The other 12,600 plus SACCOs operate with limited oversight.

In 2025, a research paper published in an academic journal noted something alarming: KUSCCO, the Kenya Union of Savings and Credit Cooperatives, had indicated that a majority of deposit-taking SACCOs would be unable to meet regulatory liquidity requirements in the event that members all withdrew their savings simultaneously. The SACCO sector, in other words, has the same structural vulnerability as the banking sector, fractional reserve logic applied to cooperative savings, but with lighter regulation, less robust deposit protection, and in some cases, governance structures that have proven susceptible to exactly the kind of insider abuse that brought down Imperial Bank.

KUSCCO itself collapsed with a reported insolvency of KES 12.5 billion. The ripple effects hit member SACCOs across the country. Ndege Chai SACCO raised its loan provision to KES 71.5 million, partly due to KUSCCO exposure. Kenya Highlands SACCO saw its non-performing loan ratio spike to 26.44%, far above SASRA’s prudential benchmark. Provisions skyrocketed to KES 284.2 million, up from KES 32 million the previous year, directly denting member dividends.

The government has responded with a reform agenda: a proposed Sacco Societies Amendment Bill, a Central Liquidity Facility for emergency support, a Deposit Protection Fund, mandatory professional registration for SACCO executives. The Cabinet Secretary made a pointed statement: “Those who create governance failures in one SACCO will not be allowed to shift to another,” acknowledging the documented pattern of failed leadership simply moving between institutions.

These are the right reforms. They are also late ones. Millions of Kenyans, including teachers, civil servants, farmers, and healthcare workers, have built their financial lives around SACCO savings, because SACCOs offered better rates, more community trust, and lower barriers than formal banking. The revelation that many of those SACCOs are running on inadequate regulatory foundations is not a technical finding. It is an announcement that the trust the members placed in these institutions may not have been warranted.

And then, this week, something happened that brought this entire argument to a live demonstration.

On Sunday, July 5, 2026, a graphic began circulating on Kenyan social media. It was designed to look like an official news broadcast. It quoted Treasury Cabinet Secretary John Mbadi as announcing that the government planned to borrow more than KES 1 trillion from SACCO savings to finance infrastructure projects through the National Infrastructure Fund. The quote was fabricated. The graphic was fake. CS Mbadi had made no such statement.

What happened next was entirely predictable to anyone who has been paying attention to this piece.

SACCOs across the country began receiving calls from panicked members. Not one or two calls. Numerous calls. Members demanding to know if their savings were at risk. Members threatening to withdraw immediately. The organizations that had spent years building trust with teachers, nurses, boda boda riders, and small traders found themselves on the phone explaining that their savings were safe, that the government had no legal access to SACCO deposits, that the viral graphic was a forgery.

The government responded Monday morning. CS Mbadi issued a personal statement: “My attention has been drawn to some false information doing the rounds, claiming the government of Kenya intends to borrow money from SACCOs to fund projects through the NIF. It is maliciously choreographed to misinform the public, taint government and elicit public uproar.” The National Treasury issued a separate statement calling the claims “entirely fake and malicious.” The Principal Secretary for Cooperatives called a press conference and demanded NTV retract a related broadcast. The government’s own communication machinery spent a full day doing damage control over a fabricated graphic.

Here is the thing, and it is the most important sentence in this section: the panic was understandable.

Not because the graphic was true. It was not. But because the underlying anxiety it activated was completely rational given everything that had actually happened. Imperial Bank depositors had been told their bank was “strong, sound and transparent” right before it collapsed. Chase Bank customers had been told the social media rumors were false right before the bank ran out of cash. KUSCCO had collapsed with KES 12.5 billion in losses. Dozens of SACCOs were running non-performing loan ratios above SASRA’s prudential benchmarks. The Cooperatives Bill was actually moving through Parliament. The government had actually identified SACCO savings as a pool of domestic capital it found interesting for development financing purposes.

The fake graphic did not invent the fear. It ignited a fuel that had been accumulating for years.

Deputy President Kindiki had genuinely said, during the Ushirika Day celebrations at Uhuru Park on June 4, that the government intended to shift eligible infrastructure projects into the National Infrastructure Fund and that cooperatives, holding over KES 1 trillion in savings, could play a bigger role in funding national development. What the government meant, and what industry leaders clarified afterward, was a structured, voluntary investment arrangement, similar to how pension funds invest in Treasury instruments, not a seizure or mandatory diversion of deposits. The distinction is real and important. But in a country that has watched banks collapse while issuing reassurances, and SACCOs fail while regulators looked elsewhere, the space between “the government is interested in your savings” and “the government is coming for your savings” had compressed to near zero.

That compression is the trust deficit at work. It is what years of institutional failure produce: a population that cannot afford to give institutions the benefit of the doubt, because history has shown that by the time the doubt is confirmed, the money is already gone.

The SACCO story this week ended with clarifications, retractions demanded, officials on podiums. The deposits, for now, remained where they were. But the phone lines stayed busy, and the underlying question that the fake graphic asked is still out there, waiting for an answer that only consistent institutional behavior can provide.

The Geometry of Panic

Here is what all three stories have in common, and why the academic concept we started with matters.

People save in order to smooth consumption. They put money aside in good months to protect themselves in bad ones. They defer spending now in exchange for security later. The entire logic of a savings product, whether a bank account, a SACCO share, or a retirement fund, depends on the assumption that deferred spending can be recovered. That the money will be there.

When that assumption is broken, the rational response is immediate withdrawal. Not because people are panicking irrationally, but because the calculus of consumption smoothing has reversed. The expected future value of keeping money in the institution has fallen below the expected future value of holding it in cash or moving it elsewhere. You smooth consumption by protecting what you have. And you protect what you have by getting it out before the queue gets longer.

The bank run is not a failure of rationality. It is rationality applied to a situation where trust has been lost. The tragedy is that the individual rationality of each person running produces the collective outcome everyone was trying to avoid.

This is why systemic trust is not just a moral nice-to-have in financial systems. It is the functional prerequisite for the system to exist at all. Without it, the fractional reserve architecture collapses. Without it, the SACCO’s pooled savings model becomes impossible. Without it, the entire chain of deferred gratification, lend now to borrow later, save now to spend later, invest now to receive dividends later, breaks down.

Trust is not a feature of the financial system. It is the system.

What You Should Actually Do With This

Three practical things, placed in order of importance.

Know what protects your deposits. The Kenya Deposit Insurance Corporation guarantees deposits at licensed commercial banks up to KES 500,000 per depositor per institution. This means if your bank fails, you receive up to KES 500,000 back regardless of what happens to the bank’s assets. If you hold more than this at a single institution, your excess is exposed to the liquidation process. SACCO deposits do not currently have the same protection, though the proposed Deposit Protection Fund is meant to address this. Until it is operational, the protection for SACCO savings in a failure scenario is considerably less certain than the protection for bank deposits.

Check SASRA’s list. Before placing significant savings in any SACCO, verify it is on SASRA’s list of licensed deposit-taking institutions. The list is public and updated. A SACCO operating without SASRA licensing is operating without the oversight framework that exists to catch exactly the kind of governance failures that have brought down institutions before. The regulatory imprimatur is not a guarantee of safety. But its absence is a significant warning sign.

Diversify your institutions, not just your assets. Most financial literacy conversations focus on diversifying between asset classes: some stocks, some bonds, some cash, some real estate. Fewer conversations address the equally real risk of concentration within a single institution. Splitting significant savings across two or three licensed institutions, bank and regulated SACCO and a money market fund, means that a single institutional failure does not simultaneously destroy your entire financial buffer. The deposit insurance ceiling makes this especially relevant for anyone with savings above KES 500,000.

The Trust Tax

There is one final observation worth making, and it connects back to where we started.

Consumption smoothing requires that financial products work as advertised. That the savings account pays the stated interest. That the SACCO’s books reflect reality. That the regulator’s clean bill of health means something. Every time a Kenyan financial institution fails in ways that were preventable, every time a regulator is found to have been compromised, every time depositors discover that the disclosure they received was inaccurate, the cost is not just the funds lost by those specific depositors.

The cost is a tax on trust. A small erosion in the credibility of the entire system. A slightly higher threshold that the next institution has to clear before the next saver decides to engage. A slightly stronger pull toward keeping cash under a mattress, toward lending only to family, toward the informal savings circles that do not require trusting a licensed institution because they run on something older and more personal.

Kenya’s financial system has deepened considerably in the past twenty years. Mobile money alone has brought millions of previously unbanked citizens into formal financial participation. The SACCO sector has mobilized savings from communities that commercial banks never reached. That progress is real.

Its continuation depends on something that no regulatory framework, however well-designed, can fully legislate into existence.

It depends on institutions being worthy of the trust placed in them.

When they are not, the cost falls on the people who trusted them most.

Finance Fridays. Thank you for reading.

Stay Blessed.

Subscribe now

Printers are on subscription services now because printing was already so fucking easy you might as well get an app involved am I right. You get 15 pages of printing free until you hit a paywall and now you have to pay a monthly fee to use a physical objects already in your house, on paper that you already purchased. There are some garage door openers that are on subscription services now; you have to rent the ability to open a door in the house that you want or more likely in a house that you rent…you are renting the ability to open doors in the house that you rent. EVEN BETTER… Did you guys know that medical software uses subscriptions too? The software that doctors need to use the machines to do neurosurgery! Sometimes doctors will go into neurosurgery and go “Oh shit our subscription needs to be renewed, we need to get our account manager on the phone before we can do neurosurgery”, the LAST person I want involved in my neurosurgery is a member of the sales team cause now we have to get a guy on a teams call before you guys can operate? Oh it’s going downhill. The fact that everything’s on subscription though makes me really confused when people are optimistic about brainchips. They’re gonna advertise it by being like now you can see the world how dogs see the world but little do you know that now dog vision is the lowest tier subscription that you can have. And if you want to see like a human again, that’s another $18.99 a month. After you took the bait and for dog vision they’re going to put taste and smell on dynamic pricing. You don’t think these people are going to go so far as to make us rent our own bodies? We basically already are.

Anyways ganji ndio inabonga take care of your loved ones. God is for us so no one can stand against us. No weapon formed against us shall prosper. Cheers.

On July 1, 2026, Sony published a post on the official PlayStation blog.

The post was short, corporate in tone, and catastrophic in implication. Starting January 2028, all new PlayStation games would be available in digital formats only. No more discs. No more physical copies. No more walking into a shop, picking a game off the shelf, bringing it home, and putting it in a drawer you will forget about for six years before rediscovering it and feeling inexplicably wealthy.

From January 2028, if you want a new PlayStation game, you go to the PlayStation Store, you click buy, you pay full price, and you receive something that is not, by any legal definition, the game.

You receive a license.

Specifically, you receive what PlayStation’s own terms of service describe as “a personal license to use that product for private, non-commercial use.” Not the game. Access to the game. On their servers. Under their terms. Revocable.

The internet, as it tends to do when corporations do something that is simultaneously profitable and philosophically indefensible, caught fire.

And somewhere in the back of everyone’s heads, a question surfaced that the games industry has been trying not to answer for two decades: if buying a game doesn’t mean owning it, what exactly is pirating one?

What You Think You’re Buying vs. What You’re Actually Getting

Let us be precise about what a digital purchase is, because the language corporations use is designed to prevent you from being precise about it.

When you buy a physical disc, you own the disc. You own a tangible object that contains the software. You can sell it, lend it to a friend, donate it to a charity shop, or let it gather dust in a drawer for twenty years and then play it on appropriate hardware. Your ownership of that disc does not expire. It does not require a server connection. It does not evaporate when the company that made it decides to stop supporting the platform.

When you buy a digital game, a digital movie, a digital book, or a digital album, you do not own anything in the same sense. You have purchased a license, a contractual permission, to access a file that lives on someone else’s infrastructure, under terms that someone else wrote, which they can change, revoke, or discontinue at their discretion.

The companies know this. They have always known this. For years, they dressed the transaction in the language of ownership anyway, because “buy” converts better than “license” and “purchase” sounds more permanent than “access until further notice.”

In 2025, California called that out formally. AB 2426, signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom, requires sellers of digital goods, movies, games, music, books, applications, to explicitly disclose when a purchase is actually a license. Banned is the use of words like “buy” or “purchase” without a clear statement that what is being transferred is a revocable license and not unrestricted ownership. Aaron Perzanowski, a professor of law at the University of Michigan, called it “the first state to recognize that when digital media retailers use terms like ‘buy’ and ‘purchase’ to advertise digital media licenses, they are engaged in false advertising.”

False advertising. For years. At scale. Across the entire global entertainment economy.

The law made it official. The practice was already obvious.

The Catalogue of Things That Were Yours Until They Weren’t

This is not theoretical. There is a growing list of specific instances where things people paid full price for simply ceased to exist.

In April 2024, Ubisoft deleted The Crew from players’ digital libraries. Not from sale. From libraries. Games people had already bought, already installed, had played for years. The servers shut down, the license became void, and the game vanished from accounts. No refund was issued automatically. No physical version could rescue anyone.

Sony is closing the PlayStation Store for PS3 and PS Vita in stages, beginning August 2026 in some regions and completing by July 2027 globally. Anyone who bought digital games for those platforms and had not already downloaded them faces losing access permanently. Sony acknowledged the news “may be disappointing.” The disappointment is that money people spent in good faith is being erased.

Microsoft has delisted dozens of titles from its digital storefront, including games tied to expired licensing deals with sports leagues, musicians, and filmmakers. When the license between a game publisher and a music rights holder expires, the game may be removed from sale. If you did not already own it physically, you cannot own it at all.

Amazon shut down its Prime Reading program in certain regions with minimal notice. Books people had been reading disappeared mid-chapter.

Your Kindle library is not yours. Your iTunes purchases are not yours. Your PlayStation library is not yours. Your Google Play Movies purchases are not yours, as Google reminded users in Canada when it shut down that service and told customers their purchased films would simply become inaccessible.

These are not edge cases. They are the documented, normal behavior of the digital ownership model operating as designed.

The Printer That Hates You

Sony is a dramatic example. But the ownership problem is not limited to entertainment. It has infected the physical world in ways that are arguably stranger and more immediately annoying.

Consider the printer.

HP, the world’s largest printer manufacturer, sells you a physical device for a price that seems reasonable. The printer is yours. You paid for it. It sits on your desk. It is a physical object you own, in the way you own a chair or a kettle.

Then you try to print something with a non-HP cartridge.

The printer refuses. HP’s firmware updates, delivered automatically and without the option to decline, have included code that detects third-party ink and blocks printing. In some cases, printers have been bricked entirely by these updates. In others, they accept third-party cartridges until an update tells them not to. The physical device you purchased is operating under terms you did not agree to when you bought it, enforced by a company that can reach into your property via your internet connection and change its behavior.

HP went further in 2023 by launching a subscription service called HP All-In, in which you do not buy a printer at all but pay a monthly fee for the right to use one. The printer remains HP’s property. If you stop paying, HP remotely disables the device. A physical machine, sitting on your physical desk, in your physical home, that HP can turn off from California.

Printer ink costs more per ounce than Dom Pérignon. The business model has been built on this for years: sell the hardware at a loss or break-even, then charge extortionately for the consumables, locking out alternatives through DRM. HP took that model and went one step further, removing the pretense of ownership entirely.

This is not a minor inconvenience. It is a philosophical position about what you actually get to keep when you pay for something.

The Farmer and His Tractor

The most dramatic version of this story happened in an industry nobody expected: farming.

John Deere makes tractors. Big, expensive, diesel-powered machines that cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. Farmers buy them. Own them, in the way you think you own something after paying several hundred thousand dollars for it.

Except that modern John Deere tractors contain software. And John Deere’s position, maintained for years, was that farmers owned the hardware but only licensed the software. And since you cannot operate a modern tractor without its software, and since John Deere restricted access to the diagnostic and repair tools for that software exclusively to its own dealer network, the practical reality was: if something breaks, you call a John Deere dealer, you pay John Deere dealer prices, you wait for a John Deere technician, and you do all of this even if the mechanical fix is something a farmer with a wrench could have handled in twenty minutes.

Farmers who tried to use independent mechanics were locked out. The software would refuse to authorize repairs made outside the dealer network, because the software recognized which “payload files” had been officially paired to the system and which had not. A farmer could replace a physical part. The tractor would still refuse to function until a dealer came and told the software it was allowed to run.

The FTC sued John Deere in January 2025, alongside the attorneys general of Michigan, Illinois, Arizona, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. The complaint alleged that Deere had used anti-competitive practices to build an artificial monopoly over repair services for equipment that farmers depended on for their livelihoods. As of July 8, 2026, yesterday, the FTC announced a settlement: a ten-year consent decree requiring Deere to give farmers and independent repair shops equal access to the diagnostic software its dealers use.

The farmers won. But it took years of organized pressure, multiple state attorneys general, a federal antitrust case, and a $99 million class action settlement just to establish the right to fix something they had paid several hundred thousand dollars to own.

The software made the hardware someone else’s property. That was not a bug. It was the business model.

The Logic That Broke the Contract

Here is why all of these situations, PlayStation games, HP printers, John Deere tractors, Ubisoft’s deleted libraries, Amazon’s disappearing books, feel related even though they span completely different industries.

They all rely on the same structural move: detaching access from ownership by embedding software, licenses, or server dependency into products in ways that allow the manufacturer to retain effective control even after the sale.

The physical product or the downloaded file becomes the delivery mechanism for an ongoing relationship with the company, a relationship governed by terms the company wrote and can revise, enforced by technology the company controls.

When you bought a disc in 2005, the transaction was complete. Money changed hands. Object changed hands. No further relationship was required. The disc worked whether or not the company was still in business, whether or not the servers were online, whether or not you were paying a subscription, whether or not the company’s terms of service had changed.

When you buy a digital license in 2026, the transaction is not complete. It is the beginning of a conditional relationship that persists as long as the company chooses to honor it. You are not a purchaser. You are a subscriber who paid upfront.

The companies have been able to maintain this model because the convenience of digital access genuinely is real and genuinely does appeal to most people most of the time. Digital is easier. Digital is instant. Digital means no scratched discs, no lost cases, no shelves full of physical media taking up space. Most people made the trade without scrutinizing what they were giving up, because most of the time, the limitations do not matter.

They matter when the server goes down. They matter when the company gets acquired and the new owner decides the old library is a liability. They matter when the licensing deal expires. They matter when Sony closes the PS Vita store and everything you downloaded on that device becomes inaccessible.

At that point, the thing you were calling ownership turns out to have been access. And access, it turns out, has an expiry date.

The Title

Let us return to the title of this piece, because it is not a joke.

If the act of paying money for a digital product does not confer ownership, but only a revocable license to access that product under the licensor’s terms, then the moral and philosophical distinction between purchasing a license and obtaining unauthorized access to the same product becomes genuinely murky.

Not legally murky. The law is clear: unauthorized copying of copyrighted material is infringement. The legal framework is not in question.

Philosophically murky. The argument that purchasing a digital game means you own it, and therefore pirating it is theft, rests on the assumption that legitimate purchase confers some meaningful form of property rights over the thing purchased. If the legitimate purchase confers a revocable license that can be terminated at the company’s discretion, and the pirated copy confers an unrestricted copy that will continue to function regardless of whether the company stays in business, the company changes its terms, or the servers go offline, then the pirated copy arguably confers more of what we think of as ownership than the legitimate purchase does.

PlayStation’s own terms say you do not own the game when you buy it on the PlayStation Store. A pirated PlayStation game, loaded through unofficial means, is not governed by those terms. Which transaction more closely resembles ownership?

The answer is philosophically uncomfortable and legally irrelevant. But the corporations that built the license model created this corner themselves. When you spend decades telling customers that buying means owning while structuring every transaction so that you retain the ability to revoke access, you eventually produce a generation of consumers who notice the contradiction and draw the logical conclusion.

California noticed. The FTC noticed. The farmers noticed. The gaming community noticed last week.

The argument “piracy is theft” has always leaned on the implicit premise that a legitimate purchase gives you something equivalent to what the pirate takes without paying. Increasingly, it does not.

What This Actually Means, Practically

The ownership question is not just philosophical. It has real financial consequences that most people do not think about until it is too late.

Your digital library is not an asset in the traditional sense. You cannot sell it. You cannot transfer it to your children when you die, because most digital licenses explicitly die with the account holder, making them non-inheritable. You cannot use it as collateral. You cannot donate it. The KES 50,000 you have spent on PlayStation games over ten years does not represent KES 50,000 in assets. It represents ten years of access that the platform can terminate.

This matters most at the extremes. For casual consumption, the difference between owning and licensing is invisible because the access keeps working and the question never comes up. For collectors, preservationists, people who care about long-term access to specific things they have paid for, the difference is everything.

The practical response is not necessarily to stop using digital services. Most people will not. The convenience is real and the failure cases, while real, are not daily occurrences.

The practical response is to understand exactly what you are buying and price it accordingly. A digital purchase is a subscription paid upfront, with uncertain duration. Price it that way. Maintain physical copies of things you care deeply about keeping. Do not assume that your digital library will survive the company that hosts it.

And the next time a company calls it “buying” while meaning “licensing,” notice the word choice. Someone designed that language. They designed it because “buy” closes transactions that “license” does not.

You are allowed to name that for what it is.

Stay Blessed.

Subscribe now

This sounds obvious. It was not, at the time.

Before Markowitz, the way most people thought about building a portfolio was essentially: find the best stocks, buy them. If a company had strong fundamentals, growing revenue, a solid management team, you bought it. If it had all three, you bought more of it. Risk was something you felt in your gut, not something you measured.

Markowitz measured it.

What Harry Markowitz Saw in 1952

Markowitz was a PhD student at the University of Chicago when he started working on the problem of portfolio construction. His 1952 paper, “Portfolio Selection,” formalised the mean-variance framework and placed risk alongside expected return as co-equal decision variables.

The central insight was this: the risk of a portfolio is not a simple average of the risk of its individual components. It is a function of how those components move relative to each other.

Here is the practical translation. Suppose you own two stocks. Stock A goes up when oil prices rise. Stock B goes down when oil prices rise. Held separately, both stocks are exposed to oil price risk. Held together, they partially cancel each other out. The portfolio is less risky than either stock alone, not because either stock changed, but because of how they relate to each other.

This led to the concept of the efficient frontier, a curve representing portfolios that offer the highest return for each level of risk, or the lowest risk for each level of return. Any portfolio sitting below this curve is suboptimal.

This was genuinely revolutionary. Before MPT, investors typically selected securities on standalone merits, underemphasising diversification and the interplay of securities within a portfolio. Markowitz gave them a mathematical framework for thinking about the whole rather than the parts.

But here is the problem with Markowitz’s framework, and it is a significant one: it is computationally brutal. To build an optimal portfolio using his method, you need to calculate the expected return and variance of every asset you are considering, and then the covariance between every pair of assets. For a portfolio of 50 stocks, that means 1,225 separate covariance calculations. In the 1950s, that was an arithmetic nightmare. Even with computers, the tendency was to produce extreme portfolios, combining extreme positions in a way that made portfolio managers deeply uncomfortable.

The model told you the optimal portfolio on paper. It did not give you an intuitive sense of why a specific stock belonged in it.

That was the problem Sharpe set out to solve.

Enter the Young Man at RAND

William Sharpe was born in Boston in 1934. He received his PhD from the University of California in 1961 and was influenced by the theories of Harry Markowitz, whom he met while working at the RAND Corporation between 1957 and 1961.

That meeting between Sharpe and Markowitz at RAND is one of the more consequential coffee-break conversations in the history of finance. Markowitz had built the architecture of modern portfolio theory. Sharpe was working on his dissertation and needed a supervisor. Markowitz pointed him at the problem: can you simplify this? Can you find a way to think about how individual assets contribute to portfolio risk without needing all those covariance calculations?

Sharpe spent years working on it.

In 1963, he published a paper called “A Simplified Model for Portfolio Analysis” that contained many of the same key concepts as the later seminal paper. But as Sharpe himself admitted, he had carefully “put the rabbit in the hat” before pulling it out. He had assumed a preordained relationship between a security and the overall market rather than deriving it from first principles.

That bothered him.

“So I spent several months trying to figure out how to do it without putting the rabbit in the hat,” he said later.

The result was the 1964 paper: “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk.”

There is an irony worth noting here: the paper which became one of the foundations of financial economics was initially rejected from publication. Sharpe had to wait for the editorial staff to change before it was finally published in 1964.

The paper that introduced Beta to the world was rejected.

The Realisation: Not All Risk Is Created Equal

The central move in Sharpe’s 1964 paper is a conceptual split that changed everything.

He divided risk into two types.

The first type he called systematic risk, also known as market risk. This is the risk that affects every asset simultaneously. Recessions, interest rate changes, geopolitical shocks, global pandemics. When the whole market falls, your portfolio falls with it regardless of how carefully you picked your stocks. You cannot diversify this risk away by adding more stocks because the thing causing the fall is hitting everything at once.

The second type he called unsystematic risk, also known as idiosyncratic or specific risk. This is the risk unique to a particular company or sector. A CEO scandal. A product recall. A competitor entering the market. An accounting fraud. This risk is specific to that company and uncorrelated with what every other company is doing. You can diversify this risk away. If you own 30 stocks, one CEO going rogue affects only that holding. The other 29 are unaffected.

Here is the punchline Sharpe arrived at, and it is elegant: in a well-diversified portfolio, you can eliminate unsystematic risk almost entirely. What you cannot eliminate is systematic risk. Therefore, in equilibrium, the market only compensates you for taking systematic risk.

Read that again. The market does not pay you extra for risks you could have diversified away. If you put your entire savings into a single stock and it crashes, the market is not sympathetic. You took a risk you did not have to take. The only risk the market compensates is the one that cannot be avoided, the one tied to the movement of the market itself.

This is the conceptual foundation of Beta.

Beta: The Number That Measures Your Market Exposure

Beta is a single number that tells you how sensitive a stock is to movements in the overall market.

A beta of 1 means the stock tends to move with the market. Above 1 means bigger swings. Below 1 means smaller swings.

A stock with a beta of 1.5 tends to rise 15% when the market rises 10%, and fall 15% when the market falls 10%. It amplifies market movements. High reward potential, high exposure to market swings.

A stock with a beta of 0.6 tends to move more gently. When the market rises 10%, this stock rises roughly 6%. When the market falls 10%, it falls roughly 6%. Less exciting, more stable.

A stock with a beta close to zero moves largely independently of the market. Think of a company whose fortunes depend almost entirely on factors unconnected to broader economic cycles.

A negative beta is the rarest and most interesting case. The stock tends to move opposite to the market. Certain gold miners and inverse ETFs behave this way. When the market panics, these assets sometimes rise, which is why they are used as hedges.

What Sharpe showed was that Beta is the correct measure of a stock’s contribution to the risk of a diversified portfolio. Not total volatility. Not standard deviation on its own. Specifically the market-linked component of that volatility. Because the rest, the idiosyncratic noise, gets washed out when you hold enough different assets.

The CAPM asserts that the correct measure of riskiness is Beta, and that the risk premium per unit of riskiness is the same across all assets. In other words, the market has one price for systematic risk, and every asset is priced according to how much of that systematic risk it carries.

The Formula: CAPM in Plain English

The Capital Asset Pricing Model produces one output: the expected return of an asset, given its level of systematic risk.

Here is the formula, translated:

Expected Return = Risk-Free Rate + Beta x (Market Return minus Risk-Free Rate)

Each piece has a clear meaning.

The risk-free rate is what you earn for taking no risk at all. In practice, this is usually the yield on a government Treasury bill, since government debt in stable countries is considered the closest thing to a guaranteed return. In Kenya, this is the 91-day T-bill rate, which has been sitting around 9% recently. In the US context, analysts typically use the 10-year Treasury yield, which sits around 4.3%.

The market return is what you expect the broad market to return on average. Historically, the US stock market has returned around 10% annually. The Nairobi Securities Exchange has varied considerably but averages roughly 12 to 15% over long periods in nominal terms.

The market risk premium is the difference between the two: market return minus risk-free rate. It is the extra compensation the market offers you for stepping out of the safety of a T-bill and into equity risk. If the risk-free rate is 9% and the expected market return is 14%, the market risk premium is 5%.

Beta scales that premium by how much market risk your specific asset carries.

Practical example, placed in a Kenyan context:

Kenya 91-day T-bill: 9% Expected NSE market return: 14% Market risk premium: 5% Stock beta: 1.3

Expected return = 9% + 1.3 x 5% = 9% + 6.5% = 15.5%

What this tells you: given this stock’s level of systematic risk, a rational market should price it to deliver at least 15.5% annually. If you look at the stock and believe it will actually deliver more than that, the model says it is underpriced relative to its risk. If you believe it will deliver less, it is overpriced. CAPM gives you the benchmark against which to make that judgment.

Where CAPM Meets Your Brokerage Account

This is the part your class will not tell you. Knowing CAPM in theory is one thing. Knowing how to use it when you are actually sitting in front of a brokerage account is another.

Here is how it works in practice, step by step.

Step 1: Find the Beta of any stock you are considering.

Most public companies have a published beta based on historical returns. You can find it on financial data providers like Yahoo Finance, Bloomberg, or directly on your brokerage platform. For NSE stocks, the Kenyan Wallstreet, Stockswatch Kenya, and some brokers like Genghis Capital and Dyer Blair publish beta estimates. If you are looking at US-listed stocks through a platform like Hisa or eToro, Yahoo Finance gives you beta for free on the stock summary page.

Step 2: Run the CAPM calculation.

Use the 91-day T-bill rate as your risk-free rate if you are evaluating an NSE stock. Use the 10-year US Treasury yield if you are evaluating a US stock. Find the market return estimate for the relevant index. Plug in beta. Calculate the expected return CAPM says you should demand.

Step 3: Compare that to your own expected return for the stock.

Do your own analysis of the company. What do you think it will actually return based on its fundamentals, growth trajectory, and sector outlook? If your estimate is significantly higher than the CAPM expected return, the stock may be underpriced relative to its risk. If your estimate is lower, the model suggests you are not being adequately compensated for the risk you are taking.

Step 4: Know your portfolio’s total beta.

Your portfolio beta is simply the weighted average of the betas of all your holdings. Multiply each stock’s beta by the percentage of your portfolio it represents, then add them all up.

If you have 40% in a stock with beta 1.5, 35% in a stock with beta 0.8, and 25% in a stock with beta 1.0:

Portfolio beta = (0.40 x 1.5) + (0.35 x 0.8) + (0.25 x 1.0) = 0.60 + 0.28 + 0.25 = 1.13

This tells you your portfolio as a whole moves about 13% more than the market in either direction. When the NSE rises 10%, your portfolio tends to rise 11.3%. When it falls 10%, your portfolio tends to fall 11.3%.

If that feels too volatile for your situation, you shift allocation toward lower-beta holdings. If you are young, have a long time horizon, and can absorb short-term swings for long-term gains, a portfolio beta above 1 may be entirely appropriate.

Step 5: Use beta to stress-test your portfolio.

Before you buy a new stock, ask: what does adding this position do to my portfolio’s overall beta? If you are already running a portfolio beta of 1.4 and are considering adding a stock with a beta of 2.0, you are pushing your market exposure higher. That is a conscious decision you should make intentionally, not accidentally.

What CAPM Gets Wrong (And Why You Should Know That Too)

Sharpe won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1990. The model he built is taught in every finance programme on earth. It is used by fund managers, investment banks, and individual investors. It is also imperfect, and understanding the imperfections is as important as understanding the model.

Beta relies on historical price data, which means it is backward looking. A company’s risk profile can change fundamentally due to leverage changes, strategic pivots, or shifts in the competitive landscape. Historical beta may not reflect future risk.

CAPM is also a single-factor model. It says market risk is the only systematic risk that matters. Later models like the Fama-French three-factor model added company size and value characteristics as additional systematic risk factors that help explain returns beyond what beta alone captures. The real world is messier than one factor.

The model also assumes investors are rational, markets are efficient, and everyone has access to the same information. None of these are fully true in practice, and on the NSE particularly, where liquidity is thinner and information asymmetry is more pronounced, the model’s assumptions strain harder against reality.

Use beta for sizing positions by risk, balancing a portfolio to a target beta, and estimating expected return in CAPM. Be careful or ignore beta when the company is in an event window, when regime shifts change correlations, when liquidity is thin, or when you are trading very short timeframes.

Beta is a tendency, not a promise.

The Lineage You Are Part Of

Here is what I find genuinely fascinating about this whole story.

Markowitz sat down in 1952 to formalise something most people were doing by feel. Sharpe looked at Markowitz’s framework and spent years trying to simplify it without cheating. The resulting model was rejected by a journal, eventually published, and sixty years later is the foundation on which every serious conversation about portfolio construction begins.

Two men, a handful of equations, and a concept that changed how trillions of dollars get managed.

Sharpe was awarded the 1990 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences, shared with Harry Markowitz and Merton Miller, for their pioneering work in financial economics.

The next time your brokerage account shows you a beta figure next to a stock name, you now know what it means, where it came from, and what to do with it. That number is the output of a decades-long conversation between some of the sharpest minds in economics about the fundamental question of what risk actually is and how it should be priced.

The answer they arrived at: systematically, with a single Greek letter, in a formula you can run on your phone.

Use it.

Check out this interesting article that challenges the status quo of portfolio allocation weights between stocks and bonds, very interestiStay blessed

Subscribe now

Not the slow, polite, institutional something that capital markets people write about in quarterly reports. Something louder. Something that looks, from the outside, like a market waking up from a decade-long nap and immediately trying to make up for lost time.

If you have been paying attention this year, you have felt it. If you have not been paying attention, this piece is your full briefing. Because 2026 has given the NSE one of its most eventful stretches in recent memory, and most Kenyans are watching it the way they watch something happening in a building they did not know was open to them.

It is open. It has always been open. The door just got a lot wider.

Let us go through what has happened, in sequence, because the sequence matters.

First Understand What the NSE Actually Is

The Nairobi Securities Exchange is Kenya’s stock market. Founded in 1954, it is the principal bourse in East Africa, the place where shares in Kenya’s publicly listed companies are bought and sold every weekday between 9:30am and 3:00pm. Currently, the NSE has a market capitalization of KES 3.7 trillion, the equivalent of roughly $28.5 billion.

To invest on the NSE, you have historically needed a Central Depository and Settlement Corporation account, a licensed broker, paperwork, minimum trade sizes, and enough patience to navigate a system designed for institutions rather than individuals. The average Kenyan looked at all of that, looked at their M-Pesa wallet, and made the rational decision to leave the stock market to the pension funds and the people in suits.

As a result, while over 1.4 million people are registered to invest on the NSE, only about 61,000, around 4.3%, are actually active traders. A market of 57 million people, with an active investor base the size of a mid-sized Kenyan town.

That was the starting point. Now here is what changed.

Chapter One: Safaricom Brought the Stock Market Into Your Phone

On February 10, 2026, Safaricom and the NSE launched Ziidi Trader.

The platform is embedded within the M-PESA app and enables Kenyans to buy and sell listed shares on the NSE directly from their mobile phones, without opening a separate broker account or completing traditional paperwork. You are already on M-Pesa. You already have money on M-Pesa. Now you can, without leaving the app you use to buy groceries and pay rent, buy a piece of Safaricom, or EABL, or KCB, or any company listed on the exchange.

For years, the single biggest friction point in Kenya’s retail investing journey has been onboarding. To participate in the stock market, a Kenyan had traditionally needed to manually register for a CDS account, complete paper forms, deposit funds through a bank, and wait for processing that could take days. Ziidi Trader bypasses the entire structure. The onboarding lives inside an app 35 million Kenyans already have.

The structural innovation is an omnibus account. Rather than every investor holding their own personal CDS number, Safaricom holds a pooled CDS account through its partner broker, Kestrel Capital, and individual holdings are tracked separately within the platform. You are a beneficial owner. Your shares are yours. The paperwork lives somewhere else.

On cost: a purchase of 100 shares valued at KES 4,500 attracts a total transaction charge of roughly KES 68.50, covering brokerage commissions and statutory charges, representing a transaction cost of approximately 1.52%. Traditional brokers often charge a minimum commission regardless of trade size, which punishes small investors. By allowing a KES 4,500 trade to cost only KES 68.50, Safaricom made micro-investing mathematically viable for the first time.

The immediate result: since its launch, Ziidi Trader has reportedly accounted for an average of 40% of trades on the NSE, representing about 5% of total daily trading volume, a strong indication of uptake among small retail investors.

This is what democratization of a financial market looks like in practice. Not a policy document. Not a government initiative. A button, inside an app, next to the money you already have.

Chapter Two: Kenya’s Biggest IPO Since Safaricom in 2008

On January 19, 2026, the Kenya Pipeline Company opened its Initial Public Offering to the public.

The government was aiming to raise $824 million, selling a 65% stake in KPC, Kenya’s first IPO since 2015, with proceeds channeled toward a new National Infrastructure Fund for roads, ports, airports, and energy infrastructure.

Think about the context for a moment. Kenya Pipeline Company is not a glamorous tech startup with a compelling growth narrative. It is a petroleum transportation monopoly. KPC recorded revenues of KES 38.59 billion and after-tax profits of KES 7.49 billion for the year ended June 2025. It moves fuel from the coast to the interior through a 1,300 kilometre pipeline network and holds 800,000 cubic metres of storage capacity across various depots. It is infrastructure in the most literal sense.

The IPO was poised to be the largest equity issuance in Kenya since Safaricom’s listing in 2008. Safaricom’s 2008 offering was 4.63 times oversubscribed. This was the benchmark everyone was watching.

It did not go exactly as the government hoped. The controversies started early.

Opposition senator Okiya Omtatah filed a case to stop the privatization, arguing there was a lack of public participation and that the process failed to meet constitutional requirements on the disposal of public assets. A former Central Bank of Kenya chairman told Semafor that the process was “not transparent,” cautioning that concerns over boardroom dealings would affect investor confidence. There were debates about whether the KES 9 per share price correctly valued the company. Analysts at some banks put fair value higher. Others argued the planned reduction in dividend payout from 94.5% to 50% of profits made the returns less attractive than the headline price suggested.

Foreign investors spent a measly KES 34.8 million against their allocation of KES 21.2 billion. Local retail investors bought KES 4.1 billion against their allocation of KES 21.2 billion. Oil marketers, who many assumed would want a stake in the company that moves their fuel, spent KES 23.1 million against their allocated KES 15.9 billion.

The IPO was saved by two categories of investor: 465 local institutional investors led by NSSF and the Public Service Superannuation Fund, and Uganda’s state-owned oil company, which stepped in to take a significant stake.

The official result: the IPO was oversubscribed at 105.7%, raising KES 106.3 billion against the target. KPC listed on the NSE Main Investment Market Segment on March 10, 2026.

Oversubscribed is technically true. The fuller truth is that the IPO was oversubscribed by institutions and Uganda, while the retail investors and strategic players it needed most largely sat it out. It cleared the target. It did not prove what the government hoped it would prove about appetite for state asset privatizations.

What it did do: it breathed life into a market that had not seen a major listing in over a decade and set the stage for what came next.

Chapter Three: Family Bank Goes Public. The Market Goes Frenzy.

This one happened today.

On June 23, 2026, Family Bank listed on the NSE by way of introduction. The listing brought the bank’s 1.66 billion shares from the over-the-counter market, where they had traded since 2006, onto the NSE’s regulated platform, giving existing shareholders greater liquidity and a transparent, market-driven mechanism for price discovery.

Family Bank is not Kenya’s largest lender. It is not NCBA or Equity or KCB. It is a mid-tier bank with 96 branches, over 1.3 million customers, and a growth story that the market apparently found deeply compelling.

The bank’s total assets rose 32.3% to KES 230.3 billion in the first quarter of 2026. Profit after tax rose 52.6% to KES 1.6 billion in Q1 2026, building on a 55.4% increase for the full year 2025. Those are not the numbers of a company limping to a listing. Those are the numbers of a company that timed its public debut to coincide with its best financial performance in recent memory.

The listing reference price was set at KES 18 per share, below the fair values produced by all five valuation methods used ahead of the listing, in a move designed to support liquidity and retail participation rather than maximise opening proceeds.

That discount was the fuel.

The bank listed at KES 18 and closed the session at KES 26, a 44% gain in a single trading day. The stock hit an intra-day high of KES 50, handing those who sold at that level a 178% return on the KES 18 listing price in a matter of hours. Market capitalisation rose from KES 29.9 billion to KES 43.2 billion in one session.

The founder, Titus Muya, pocketed a paper gain of KES 4.74 billion on the day. The Kenya Tea Development Agency, the largest shareholder at 18.98%, saw the value of its holding rise from KES 5.68 billion to KES 8.2 billion before markets closed.

178% in hours. That is not an investment. That is a lottery ticket that came in. Except unlike the lottery, this one was playing out on a regulated exchange, in full public view, and the underlying company had three consecutive quarters of 50%-plus profit growth to justify at least some of the enthusiasm.

The market is, at the time of writing this, still processing what just happened.

Chapter Four: The Records Quietly Piling Up

Underneath the headline events, 2026 has been a year of numbers that the NSE has not seen before.

The NASI All-Share Index, which measures the overall performance of all listed securities, hit an all-time high of 216.08 points in February 2026. The index had been at a record low of 88.56 points in October 2023. That is a near-doubling of the index value in roughly two years.

The NSE’s total market capitalization crossed KES 3 trillion for the first time, and the All-Share Index is up more than 18% year to date, supported by easing inflation and falling interest rates.

EABL reported 37% growth in net earnings to KES 11.2 billion in its half-year 2026 results, sending the stock soaring 5.4% in a single session and triggering a KES 4.00 interim dividend declaration.

Equity deals on the NSE crossed 20,000 for the second consecutive session in recent weeks, extending elevated trading momentum observed since the rollout of Ziidi Trader.

These are not abstract market statistics. They reflect something real that Kenyan investors, both institutional and retail, are coming back to the exchange in numbers that the market has not seen in years.

Why This Year Matters

Here is the bigger picture behind all the individual events.

Not a single company floated on the stock exchanges of Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania or Rwanda in all of 2025. Firms increasingly chose to raise money privately, avoiding the cost and disclosure that a public listing demands. The result was a slow draining of new life from East Africa’s bourses.

The NSE had been in a quiet crisis for most of the decade. De-listings outnumbered listings (companies being removed were more than those being added). Retail participation from citizens like you and I was microscopic. The market felt like a club for pension funds and a handful of informed individuals, like your favourite bank’s premium account with the black carddd. Young Kenyans with money to invest were putting it into money market funds, real estate, or just leaving it in their savings accounts.

Three things broke that pattern in 2026.

The first was macroeconomic: interest rates came down, inflation eased, and the shilling stabilized. The NASI rose more than 34% in 2024, creating a more favourable climate for listings. Investors who had been sitting in T-bills at high yields started looking at equities again as the rate environment shifted.

The second was structural: Ziidi Trader removed the single biggest barrier to retail participation. When buying a share costs the same effort as sending M-Pesa, the question of whether to participate shifts from “how?” to “which stock?”

The third was psychological: KPC’s listing, for all its controversies, proved that a major IPO could happen on the NSE in 2026 and the world would not end. It proved that institutional appetite existed. It signaled to other companies sitting on the fence about listing that the market was receptive. Family Bank saw that signal and pulled the trigger.

Family Bank’s strong debut is expected to encourage other Kenyan firms still weighing a float, while Uganda, Tanzania and Rwanda watch Nairobi closely for proof that appetite for listings has truly returned.

What This Means for You

The NSE is not the Nairobi lottery. It is not a get-rich-quick scheme, and anyone who experienced the Family Bank first-day frenzy and is now looking at the stock expecting it to keep moving toward the intra-day high of KES 50 should take a long breath.

What it is: a market that is, for the first time in a long time, generating genuine excitement, genuine liquidity, and genuine options for a Kenyan investor who wants to build wealth over time through ownership of pieces of real companies.

Ziidi Trader is sitting in your M-Pesa app right now. The NSE has companies across banking, insurance, telecoms, manufacturing, agriculture, and energy. Today alone, 58 listed equities participated in trading.

The barrier to entry has never been lower. The information available to retail investors has never been more accessible. And the market, for the first time in years, is giving people something to be interested in.

The question is no longer whether the NSE is worth paying attention to.

The question is what you are going to do about it.

Stay Blessed.

Note the italics, shoutout to articles that have spoken to how men should handle emotion and those that take power over ones’ emotions back from public verdict. Both have a place in the broader conversation. This is not a take on what should or shouldn’t be the norm, it is simply an observation and commentary on what mine is.

There’s a certain group of people who would look at the World Cup and equate it to the gladiator arena created by the elite to keep people distracted. But these people miss an unconscious motivation driving billions around the world to tune in to a single football match. When we look at Jonathan Haidt’s concept of self-placebbing, he explains the humans use objects and rituals to activate an emotional state they can’t generate through willpower alone. On a normal Tuesday your brain operates at a flat stable baseline; you can’t make your brain feel suspense then euphoria within minutes, but a football match hands you the cheat code.

Say you’re in a stadium and your country scores a goal! your brain is suddenly flooded with excitement. You look around the stadium and you see that same joy mirrored in thousands of strangers, and now you feel an overwhelming connection to something bigger than you. But then VAR intervenes and the entire stadium is frozen in suspense. A minute later, the referee gestures offside, the goal is erased and now your brain experiences a brutal crashing plummet from its high (like not feeling your phone in your pocket, zinashuka crazy). You just traveled through an entire universe of human emotion in a span of moments. The intellectual cynic may look at this and dismiss it as a waste of time. He thinks he’s superior and independent of this illogicality. But when we look outwards to the many things we do in life… listening to music, the morning run, going to the cinema, visiting an art gallery…it’s exactly what the football fan is doing. We all use external things to feel things because that’s how we feel alive and just because we used different mediums to get that shouldn’t make one more noble, normal or intelligent than the other.

I believe football or sports in general offers an emotional ride you can’t get elsewhere. One that straps you in safely enough for you to release and go on the rollercoaster without resistance.

The roar of thousands backing their nation rocking a stadium echoes across continents through the speakers of a television in a local and gets the hair on the back of everyone’s necks standing. Chills down the spine at the collective suspense, some watching live others glued to the screen but all eerily tense, enough to bond two strangers together stronger than you and your ex. (iza bro, ni mambo ya dunia)

What really gets me is the effort. Seeing the raw vigour of these athletes and their desire to win, the pouring of energy giving all they’ve got in pursuit of that summit, that peak that everyone dreams of but only one/some will achieve. It’s in the run-off celebration after scoring a goal to put your country ahead- something they’ve probably dreamt of as a child. The cruelty of defeat for the losing team/athlete contrasted sharply by the elation and joy of the winners, all held in one stadium on one grand stage like a nest of the human experience. Then suddenly eyes get a little watery (only when watching alone of course), and whatever blocked the tear ducts takes leave from work. I find it very interesting.

Shoutout to the men and women in the arena. All of us in our own ways are showing up in arenas of life, so keep going, keep striving, because from your effort others could draw inspiration. Most of all, do it for yourself.

Stay blessed.

Subscribe now

Sophie is a good tourist. She spent real money. Two weeks. A safari in the Mara. A few nights at a Nairobi hotel. Diani for the last stretch. She told all her friends back home how incredible it was. She left a five-star review. She is already talking about coming back.

Here is the uncomfortable question: how much of Sophie’s money actually stayed in Kenya?

The answer is less than you think. And the gap has a name.

The Middleman You Never See — Booking.com and the OTA Economy

Sophie did not phone a Kenyan hotel directly. She went to Booking.com, found something with good reviews, liked the photos, and booked. She probably also used Booking.com for her Diani property. Maybe Airbnb for one night in Nairobi. Standard behaviour. Completely reasonable.

Here is what happens in the background when Sophie clicks confirm.

Booking.com charges the hotel a commission of between 15% and 25% per booking. OTAs captured roughly 55% of the global hotel booking market in 2024. That means more than half of all hotel reservations worldwide are running through platforms that take up to a quarter of the room revenue before the hotel sees a cent.

For a small boutique guesthouse in Diani charging KES 8,000 a night, a 20% Booking.com commission means KES 1,600 per night goes to a Dutch tech company headquartered in Amsterdam. Not to the staff. Not to the owner. Not to the local supplier who brings the fresh fruit for breakfast. To Amsterdam.

In 2024, Expedia alone spent $1.65 billion in a single quarter on advertising — which is how they stay at the top of every search result, which is why hotels feel they cannot afford to leave, which is why the commission keeps getting paid. It is a trap with extremely good marketing.

The hotel knows this. They resent it quietly. They encourage guests to book directly next time. Most guests do not, because the OTA’s interface is cleaner, the reviews are aggregated, and the muscle memory of “just search Booking.com” is already installed. The platform wins because it owns the habit.

Sophie is a genuinely loyal customer of a hotel she has never contacted directly.

The Safari Value Chain — and the Leakage Problem

Sophie’s safari was incredible. Three days in the Mara. She saw lions. She cried again, once, during a sunset. Worth every penny.

She booked it through a tour operator based in the UK. A trustworthy company, good reviews, all-inclusive package. The package cost her roughly £2,400.

Here is where that money went. The UK operator took their margin. The international flight revenue stayed with the airline — we covered that in Part 2. The lodge in the Mara may or may not be Kenyan-owned; many of the premium safari properties are owned by international hospitality groups or foreign investors who repatriate profits. The vehicle was locally owned. The driver-guide, one of the most skilled and underpaid professionals in Kenyan tourism, earned a fraction of what Sophie paid for the experience he made possible.

The average import-related tourism leakage for developing countries sits between 40% and 50% of gross tourism earnings. For all-inclusive package tours specifically, about 80% of traveller expenditure goes to airlines, hotels, and other international companies — often headquartered in the traveller’s home country — rather than to local businesses or workers.

Read that again. In the worst-case all-inclusive scenario, 80 cents of every pound Sophie spent on her Kenyan holiday never economically arrived in Kenya.

A significant portion of tourism revenue generated from coastal Kenya is lost to foreign entities through profit repatriation and the use of imported goods, resulting in limited reinvestment in local businesses and communities.

This is the leakage problem. Tourism numbers go up. Revenue figures in the press release go up. And the guide driving the safari vehicle, the woman selling beadwork at the gate, the small lodge owner who is not affiliated with an international brand — they see a fraction of the headline number.

Kenya welcomed 2.4 million international visitors in 2024 and generated Ksh 452.2 billion in tourism revenue — a 28% increase from 2023. That is a real achievement. The question nobody in the press release is answering is: what percentage of those 452 billion shillings circulated in the Kenyan economy versus flowing back out through foreign-owned operators, hotels, and platforms?

The Currency Exchange Toll Booth

Sophie also changed money. She arrived with sterling, exchanged some at the airport bureau, used her UK bank card for the rest, and spent the odd dollar she had leftover from a previous trip.

Each of these transactions has a fee hidden inside it.

The airport forex desk quoted her a rate that was noticeably worse than the mid-market rate — that gap, called the spread, is the business model. The bureau buys low, sells high, pockets the difference on every transaction. The worse the rate they offer, the more they make. And you, stuck in the arrivals hall with no other option, take it.

Her UK bank card charged a foreign transaction fee of around 2.99% on every purchase made outside the UK. That is a quiet, automatic tax on every meal, every tip, every market purchase, running invisibly in the background.

The dollar-to-shilling conversion she did at a Nairobi CBD forex bureau was better — more competitive rates, more options, more transparency. That is the one transaction in the whole trip where she arguably got a fair deal on currency.

The cumulative cost of Sophie’s currency friction across two weeks: probably somewhere between KES 8,000 and KES 15,000, depending on how she managed it. Money that moved, but moved into financial infrastructure rather than Kenyan hands.

The Informal Economy — What the GDP Number Misses

Here is the part that never makes the tourism report.

The boda boda driver who took Sophie from her hotel to the market when she could not get an Uber. The mama mboga outside the Airbnb who sold her tomatoes and avocados three mornings in a row. The young man at the Maasai market who spent forty-five minutes with Sophie explaining the history and meaning of each piece before she bought two bracelets and a small carved giraffe. The fundi who fixed the zip on her bag for KES 200 and would not accept more.

None of these transactions appear in the formal tourism GDP figure. None of them went through a platform or a commission structure or a foreign intermediary. Every shilling in those exchanges stayed local — circulated immediately back into the Kenyan economy through the people who most needed it.

The informal tourism economy is the one that actually reaches the community. It is also the one most likely to be absent from any policy discussion about tourism revenue, because it is, by definition, uncountable.

The formal economy captures the headline number. The informal economy does the actual distributing.

Both matter. But only one of them shows up in the Cabinet Secretary’s press conference.

What Kenya Captures, and What It Doesn’t — The Series Finale (# repete repete repeteee)

Three parts. One trip. Visa to landing to departure.

At every stage, the pattern repeated: the desire, the experience, the memory — Kenyan. The infrastructure capturing the economic value of that experience — largely not.

The visa fees go to European governments and a private equity-backed processing company. The flight revenue goes to airlines and aircraft lessors headquartered in Europe and America. The hotel booking commission goes to a Dutch platform. The safari package margin goes to a UK tour operator. The premium lodge profit gets repatriated to its international parent. The loyalty points accumulate in a programme owned by a foreign carrier.

Kenya generated Ksh 452 billion in tourism revenue in 2024. Kenya is the experience. Kenya is the product. The Mara, the Swahili coast, the warmth, the wildlife, the food, the culture — that is all ours, entirely, and it is extraordinary. What we have not yet fully built is the financial architecture that makes sure we keep the money that our product generates.

That architecture starts with local operators. Local booking channels. Kenyan-owned hotels and lodges. Safari companies where the profit stays and circulates here. Tour operators who understand the product because they live inside it.

It starts with exactly the kind of company I want to tell you about.

A Word on BushBlazers

I have been building to this for three weeks, and it is not just a plug. It is the logical conclusion of everything we have covered in this series.

BushBlazers Tours, Travel & Safaris is a Kenyan-owned, Nairobi-based travel agency that has been operating for over 10 years, offering both domestic and international travel — safaris, holidays, visa assistance, flight bookings, honeymoons, corporate retreats, and group adventures. They have offices in Nairobi and Meru, a team of travel consultants who actually answer the phone, and a service philosophy built around customization rather than cookie-cutter packages.

I am loyal to them. Not because I was paid to say that. Because in a travel value chain designed to route your money through Amsterdam and London and Dublin before it touches anything Kenyan, choosing a local operator is a financial decision as much as a personal one.

When Sophie books her Mara safari through a UK operator, the margin stays in Manchester. When you book yours through BushBlazers, it stays in Nairobi. That sounds small. Multiplied across thousands of bookings, across an industry generating hundreds of billions of shillings, it is the difference between tourism as extraction and tourism as development.

They handle the parts of travel that this series has been pulling apart — visa applications, international flight bookings, local packages, the ground logistics that either go smoothly or ruin a trip. They handle them with the knowledge of people who know Kenya because they are Kenyan.

If anything in this three-part series made you want to travel — or think differently about how you travel — start there.

📞 +254 733 561628 ✉️ info@bushblazers.com 🌐 bushblazers.co.ke

That’s the series. Three parts. The permission economy, the aviation economy, and the ground economy.

The full value chain of a single trip, from the moment you decide to go somewhere to the moment you come back.

Next Friday we are back to our regular Finance Friday programming.

Stay Blessed.

From Chitty’s pages, the definitions flow, Of rights and obligations that the markets know. An offer, acceptance, consideration aligned, Binding the parties in the rules we’ve defined.

At the apex stands our supreme legal shield, The Constitution of 2010 to which all contracts yield. With Cap 23 and Cap 488 in place, Kenyan financial law finds its structural space.

In credit agreements, the terms must be clear, With term loans and overdrafts drawing us near. CBK guidelines govern the risk and the rate, While Article 47 protects the borrower’s fate.

When the funding is massive and projects are grand, A syndicate of lenders will join hand in hand. But remember Bank of Tokyo, let the rule be made clear: It is several liability for each committed share here!

Guarantees provide comfort as a secondary tie, But Section 3 requires a pen to apply. It must be in writing, signed by the hand, As Bank of Baroda confirmed in our land.

Derivatives dance on an underlying floor, Swaps, futures, and options opening the door. The ISDA Master governs netting and debt, Under the CMA Regulations of 2015 met.

Structured finance builds an isolated space, Where the Originator, SPV, and Investors find their place. KMRC securitizes to build houses in line, Repackaging the assets in an elegant design.

Yet law without equity can sometimes be blind, So the Maxims of Equity step in to be kind. Substance over form looks past the false sign, And he who seeks equity must act down the line.

Laches blocks the creditor who waits way too long, And equity yields remedies to correct every wrong. The backbone of finance, the shield of the law, Financial contracts protect us from flaw!

Learning when you are interested and curious is cool.

Early in 2025 I did service-based learning by volunteering at a children’s home. Here is my daily log of events:

WEEK 1

Day 1

Orientation and meeting teammates

Cabbages; washing, sorting

Took kids on stroller walk

Lunch break walked to naivas and got food because they do not offer lunch.

Cleaned windows with disinfectant; it had a strong smell that irritated the nose

Did laundry folding and sorting clothes

Realized instructions need to be understood clearly some colleagues did the wrong this blindly…ask questions

Day 2

Cleaning; housekeeping, the walls and mopping the floors…for both ground floor and upstairs rooms

Removed strollers and organized them ready for the walk after our short break at 10am. Dusted them to ensure they are clean.

Hanged wet clothes for them to dry paying attention to the method of hanging the laundry managers use.

Took the children on their stroller walk around the block, longer route than yesterday.

We did not have lunch today, we went to an office complex down the road and helped move office furniture from the 4th floor to the parking, loaded it into the truck and brought it back to the new life compound. It was a good change from the expected tasks, and used our problem solving skills etc. Then we unloaded it and left.

Day 3

I swept the laundry area, this task has to be done at the start of the day, because if one sweeps when clothes are drying they will get dirty. I paid extra attention to the little bits and pieces of leaves and branches that get stuck in spaces between tiles. This was a task that required patience and I can link my positive attitude towards this to the lessons from Strathmore on striving for excellence. Once done sweeping I collected the trash and put it in a wheelbarrow designated to collecting the same.

Next, two of my teammates and I were assigned a task of organizing donations; they were in large plastic bags mostly, contained toys and clothes. We developed a system of sorts for doing this, with three piles of clothing. One pile was for babies, one for toddlers and one for older children/adults. The criteria was measured by judging the size of the clothes. This took 5 hours in total and we sorted more than 10 ‘gunias’ of clothes.

To end the day, we assisted the compound caretaker Vincent in moving pipes from behind the shed to where he needed them for his work. It was a three man job, took teamwork and toughness. I then signed out and went home.

Day 4

Begun the day by doing some garden work; sweeping the outer kitchen area, the backyard garden, the kids basking site and the laundry area. I did this together with the caretaker on duty today, Steve. This took about 2 hours and I took my tea break at 10:10am. Had a good conversation with my fellow schoolmates who are volunteers here as well, about our academic journeys and how they are going so far. It is pleasant to have people who can I relate to in the same place of work.

We took the children on their daily walk in their strollers, today we only went down the street and stopped for some roasted maize. After walking back, we assisted Steven in moving the toys, clothes and other donation foodstuffs that we organized yesterday to be loaded into the pickup. Next, we set up a bouncing castle for the children, unfolded it and connected the air blower after which we wiped it down with soapy water and rugs. Normally, the children swim on Wednesday and jump in the caste on Thursday. However, due to the cold weather yesterday they didn’t swim so today with the sun it’s possible for them to have fun outside.

After that, we assisted one of the infant managers to roll cotton wool into balls. Our next task was with Steve as he taught us to fold the strollers as some were not straightforward. To end the day we helped our teammates fold clothes as we had a conversation.

Day 5

First task of the day was outdoor grounds maintenance; sweeping and raking the leaves to upkeep the environment. My tools were a wheelbarrow, metal spade, one long broomstick and one short broomstick (known as ‘kifagios’). They are the ideal set of tools because the long broomstick allows me to sweep as I am standing rather than bending, and gather the leaves in an efficient manner. Then, I use the short broomstick and spade to scoop the trash and put in the wheelbarrow. The areas I did were actually almost in a linear track; the backyard garden, to the laundry, to a sectioned off part of the property which interestingly has a ‘private’ sign next to the wooden gate to enter it. My understanding is that it may have previously been a residential part of the building, and it is connected to the reception area.

I noticed the drainage gutter in the laundry and next area of the property had a build up of leaves over time. So, I used the metal spade and short broomstick to pick up the leaves out of the gutter. I was surprised that I noticed that and glad I took initiative, something Strathmore promotes as values in their students. Also, seeing as the theme of the academic year is ‘personalized attention’, I can reflect on how it applies to us as volunteers by the different tasks that come naturally to us. I am drawn to outdoor tasks, working with my hands and very organized/routine activities.

We had a Forum during the break with Ms Renee the receptionist and Mr Simon from the social work office. We learnt about the work he does, gained insight on the legal and logistical process of rescuing a child as well as them being adopted. It was interesting to hear about this.

After the break, Mr Steve allocated us our next task. We moved the metal pipes to where we kept the plastic ones, and cleared the shed area of unnecessary items.

To end the day I assisted the housekeeping team in moving fruits and vegetables to the staff and toddler kitchens, then I played with the toddlers in the garden as they cut and ate the cake for one of my fellow volunteer’s birthdays. I’m content with my first week experience.

WEEK 2

Day 1

Last week Fred, the driver for the institution, told me that the leaves of guava trees have medicinal qualities. Today I started with field work and scooping up the fallen guavas in the backyard garden was the first task. I was assigned this by the compound caretaker manager on duty, Vincent, he’s been here for 8 years now. Using the set of tools I’m becoming used to; spade, wheelbarrow, short and long broomsticks…I raked the leaves into piles and scooped them into the wheelbarrow. I did that for the backyard, laundry and old private area of the compound.

To finish, I cleared the gutter of built up debris and leaves. In tight spaces I used my hands to pick it up and out. This all took up my first two hours of the day and I went for break at this point.

It was time for the toddlers to go on their walk after the break, so I helped my fellow volunteers in removing the strollers and unfolding them. We were each assigned a child, I was with Lily today. She is always smiling every time I see her and seems like a very joyful child. The walk went well and we got to talk as volunteers because more joined the team from USIU this week.

After the walk for the next hour before lunch break I was at the laundry, first hanging wet clothes then folding and arranging dry ones. This went by quick and soon we went on lunch break.

My last two hours after lunch break were spent doing two tasks. Irrigation was the first; Vincent showed us how to properly water plants and a grass lawn. I learnt from this experience that it takes a lot more water than I thought to do properly and the values of patience and commitment which Strathmore promotes came in handy.

I was given the front lawn to irrigate. It takes longer than one would expect and with thirty minutes left I’d done a quarter of the lawn. We will be doing irrigation the whole week for the whole compound. For a few minutes after finishing this I assisted the caregivers in bringing the children out to play, on the dry side of the lawn.

The final task was to fold the strollers and arrange them in storage.

Day 2

Today morning I begun my work with routine maintenance of the compound. This comprises of me sweeping areas, raking leaves and scooping fallen guavas from the lawn. One of our supervisors asked if I wanted a different task, I think the way this task is perceived is that it’s for newcomers to usher them in of sorts, or a lowly task is the minds of others. I’ve developed a new appreciation for it and for gardening, landscaping and the work that goes on behind the scenes at any institution. I’m glad the University’s promotion of humility and service to others is part of our education. Although it may not be easy work, I will use all the lessons learnt in my future.

My next task was to clean the corridor of the children’s accommodation area. This has a central area with two hallways opposite each other and a staircase to go upstairs in between them. One of my fellow volunteers and I wiped down the walls and surfaces, while another did the windows. That window detergent has strong chemicals and irritates my system but my teammate doesn’t mind it, so we worked to our strengths in collaboration.

After this, I moved the strollers out onto the lawn and unfolded them. The storage area for the strollers is under the stairs.

It was a particularly hot day today and by the time we were done with the short break we were called to take the children for a walk. It was a different group than the one we took yesterday. I was with Maya, she’s very calm but wanted to walk and tried very innovative techniques of getting out of the stroller. Once we were outside the gate she relaxed and enjoyed the ride. Today’s route was the longest one that they do; we walked down Turbo road which is not busy, took a left onto Nyangumi road, proceeded to the roundabouts on Dennis Pruitt and Cotton avenue and finally coming back into the gate as we turned left from lenana onto turbo road again.

Once we got back, me and my teammate were assigned laundry duties. We folded and arranged one batch of clothes. Next, we hung towels and sheets. Another load of clothes was done washing so we first took down dry clothes and then hunghung the wet ones. Then we went on lunch break.

For the last two hours, I was in the laundry area again only this time I was tasked with cleaning the laundry room. My teammate cleared dust from the walls and ceiling. I then dusted chairs and the back of the machines where a heel of dust was hiding. Wiped the surfaces of the table and machines. Then I put the machines back in place. Finally, I mopped the floors.

My last task was to fold and arrange the strollers in place. After which, we called it a day and went home.

Day 3

As I was signing in this morning our receptionist Renee asked me to see the head housekeeper Anastasia. She was in the toddlers section, and there I was assigned my first task of the day.

The day room was to be deep cleaned. This was a team effort as in the rooms, my fellow volunteer was making the children’s beds and others cleaning the bedrooms. I walked in to the sound of the children singing and they actually sounded coordinated and like they understood each other. I used a broom and a mop for the task, first step was to pour a moderate amount of water on to the floor and scrub using the broom as I ‘push’ the water around the room with it, a technique that Ms Anastasia showed me. There was a lot of food on the floor so handling that took patience and after scrubbing, I used the mop to clean up and leave it drying. This took up most of the first hour.

Next, I went to see Mr Steve as he told me to meet him when I’m done and get my next task. He assigned me field work at the gazebo in the front lawn. I took out the children’s toys, one by one, out of the gazebo on to the lawn. There were 31 toys for riding or walking, one slide and one spade. Next, I wiped down each toy so that they are clean for playtime. The bucket I was given had soap and today is not the scheduled day for a full wash of the toys, so I got water without soap to use with the duster to wipe them. After this, I cleaned the gazebo using the mop and very little water because it needs to dry by the time all volunteers go on break. Then I emptied the buckets and went for my break.

Today none of the age groups were going for a walk. It has become one of my favorite parts of the day so I’ll have to wait until tomorrow for the next one.

After my break, Vincent told me to accompany him for the next task. This was to clean the windows and walls of the building’s front-facing side. He showed me how it’s done; wet the wall and window, use soapy water and a rug to scrub them down, rinse them with water, dry with another rug and finish by wiping the windows with a dry rug and disinfectant. We worked with a system where he did the initial wash then I finished the drying and disinfecting. After that, we got to cleaning the tile flooring just next to these walls and windows. He scrubbed them with a broom and soapy water, then I helped him rinse and direct the water to the drain with a ‘kifagio’. After we were done it was lunch time.

In the last two hours of the day, I helped my fellow volunteers fold clothes in the laundry, then three of us folded the strollers and arranged them in storage. They had been cleaned earlier.

The last task was spending time with the children, they were on the swings and a group of toddlers went swimming. After they finished, Mr Steve told us to empty the inflatable pool of water; so using buckets three of us emptied it, and at the same time it acted as irrigation for the lawn. We then moved it to a drying area and ended the day.

Day 4

This morning I got to observe Mr Steve take out the lawn mower and prepare it for use. It’s the first time I’ve seen one up close. So, the plan was for us volunteers on field work duty to get done with the lawns so that he can mow the grass. I begun by scooping the fallen guavas and dumping them in the wheelbarrow.

As I was doing this I thought that it was a lot of waste cause every morning a lot of them fall and these can be eaten if collected in good time. Coincidentally, the manager was passing and asked Steve what can be done to reduce the waste and he acknowledged we should do something about it. I guess where attention goes energy flows.

I finished sweeping the grass area then moved on to the laundry and behind private area of the compound. Then I took the wheelbarrow to the main dustbin and emptied it.

All the toddlers and crawlers were going for a walk today so it was a big group. Jay and I took the strollers from the storage out to the parking lot and unfolded them. All volunteers then took a break.

After the break, we went on the walk. Today’s walk was a longer route and very eventful. We went all the way to Naivas and entered the supermarket. The children all got lollipops and were very excited. I was walking Myra today and she said ‘thank you unco’ when I opened the lollipop wrapper for her. It was a very pleasant walk.

When we got back my next task was to clean up the garbage collection area. I scooped up the accumulated dirt and dust around the area with a spade, swept the area and organized the bins.

After the lunch break, myself and two of my fellow volunteers folded the strollers and organized them in storage.

Today I got to learn and do something new. My last task of the day was lawn mowing. Mr Steve took me to the lawn and showed me how to change the oil, we put in a new pour of synthetic motor oil into the mower. He demonstrated how to handle the machine and I then got the chance to do it, mowing a section of the lawn myself. I value that learning experience and it was enjoyable as well.

Day 5

Absent (made up for this day by adding one more in week 6)

WEEK 3

Day 1

I started the day at the toddlers unit. Took their worn clothes to the laundry and then returned the basket as they were in the process of changing would add more clothes.

Next, I took the spade, broomstick and wheelbarrow to the garden to begin my second task. We still do not have a solution for the wasted guavas falling down, so I found them on the ground this morning. Mr Vincent gave me a separate bucket to put the fallen guavas in so that they do not mix with the raked leaves in the wheelbarrow. I continued sweeping the laundry area and private area of the compound, also clearing the gutters because the heavy rain had cause them to be blocked with leaves.

I went for tea break.

After the break I was at the laundry with five of my fellow volunteers, and an older volunteer who says she works but commits her Monday mornings to coming to new life. The task was hanging wet clothes and taking down dry ones. It was interesting to hear that she’s also done short courses at Strathmore to enhance her professional career. This is in line with the them of lifelong learning that Strathmore promotes.

Then we went on lunch break.

In the last two hours of the day, I first helped my fellow volunteers in folding and arranging laundry.

After that, Mr Vincent assigned me a new area which I can sweep. As he was explaining the task to me, we paused and had a very engaging conversation. He shared with me some life advice and history of his journey up to this point. I finished the task and called it a day.

Day 2

Started the day at the day room, dusting and mopping it. This was the first task of the day. The babies normally spend time in this room so it’s important that it’s clean.

Next, I did the usual task of sweeping around the compound.

I went on break at the time designated.

After the break, Mr Vincent called me to do landscaping. This was a very engaging and enjoyable task. There was a tree that had to be chopped down, thorn bushes to be cleared and clean up afterwards. He showed my fellow volunteer and I the technique to swing an axe and chop the big wood trunks and logs, and a smaller machete to cut branches and weeds. This was quite fun and a good workout. We finished and cleaned the area by sweeping and gathering all the waste into a pile, being careful for thorns.

We went on lunch break at this point.

To end the day we swept behind the kitchen garden area.

Day 3

In the morning I wiped down the office furniture we brought a few weeks ago, because it was rained on. Then I helped out arrange clothes in the laundry.

I went for break.

Today I got to experience the welcoming of a child to New Life. It was very special. The caregivers and housekeepers called all volunteers to join them as they sang songs of thanksgiving and praise for the child from the car entering the gate until he was carried into the reception. He was then introduced to everyone, his name is Finley and he’s 6 days old. We then had a session where people spoke blessings over his life and denounced anything negative from his past or his biological families past. This was recorded and he might get to see it one day. Volunteers were also given a chance to say something. It was amazing to see how much joy everyone was filled with and how a child is truly a blessing.

Afterwards, Mr Steve and Mr Vincent assigned two of us a task to deep clean the tiles of the back kitchen garden area we had sweeper yesterday. We used firm broomsticks, soapy water and a hose to scrub and rinse the tiles. The leveling of tiles was uneven so there was a slope. This made water sit still at some point and we had to push it out onto the grass.

We then put the office furniture out in the sun as directed.

To end the day I helped out in the laundry and kitchen store area.

Day 4

There is an apartment construction sight right next to New Life’s compound. Earlier in my SBL the staff mentioned how they and the children have had to adapt to the constant noise that comes from it. Concerns regarding privacy were also raised due to the high rises being so close to the compound.

So yesterday, the construction workers had to cut down a tree that was right on the fence. A lot of branches and debris fell on New Life’s side of the fence as well, so this morning my first task was to scoop up and sweep all that, put it in a wheelbarrow and dump it in the trash collection area for the garbage truck to collect.

After that, I helped move furniture and organize a room upstairs that was to be used for a conference meeting today.

I then helped out at the laundry to sort the dirty clothes before washing and folding dry clean clothes. I went for break at this point.

After break, the garbage collection truck came and because Mr Steve was transporting some goods, Ms Anastasia and I opened the back gate for the garbage collectors. At first we could not open the padlock because the key holder had many keys we didn’t know which one it was, so I called Mr Steve and he explained to me which one it was. Then, when trying to open the padlock it wasn’t twisting, so we persisted for about ten minutes until it finally did. It was a good task where I got to problem solve and learn the process of garbage collection. I noted that the collectors were taking about how their management sometimes doesn’t give all the supplies and tools they need for their job, that’s a point of improvement a garbage company can penetrate the market with; motivating employees by dignifying their work.

Next I assisted in taking the furniture and tv back to where it was, after the conference meeting was finished.

I then went on lunch break.

After the break my fellow volunteer and I helped clean up after Mr Steve planted vegetables in the garden. I had a good conversation with him during the planting where I learnt about agriculture and afterwards talking about life and current affairs. It was soon time to leave so we called it a day.

Day 5

Today morning I arrived, checked in, then was assigned a task. This was to sweep the front-facing side of the building. From the reception area and parking lot all the way to the gate. Then to sweep and collect the leaves in the surrounding lawns.

Mr Vincent and Mr Steve advised me to start with the reception area and driveway as the management normally complain if these area are unkept by 10am. So, I went ahead and did just that.

We had a forum with Ms Renee during tea break where we discussed our volunteering experience so far. The main topic she asked us about was how New life can improve its communication and exposure with the outside world. Solutions that came up were social media engagement and community events that raise awareness and provide opportunities for the outside world to connect with the children, as well as understand what New Life does and how they can contribute to the cause.

After break, I finished scooping up leaves that I had piled up around the compound. Then, I was tasked with cleaning up the garbage collection area. It had a lot of dust built up, as well as trash and leaves that fell out of the bins from recent collections. This took up the period until lunch time. I went at it slowly but surely, and it felt good afterwards when Mr Steve told me I did a good job.

Today I really did a lot of sweeping. After lunch, Mr Steve was doing some gardening work on the plants that are along the driveway. He asked me to clean up and collect the residual leaves, branches and dirt. This took up the last two hours of the day and at the end the driveway was clean once more. The guard at the gate, Bartholomew, also commended my work so that was nice. We also talked about his previous jobs and how he encountered some employers that were very passionate about maintaining their compounds, so there is a broader lesson within everything I’m doing here. I dumped the trash in the bin, signed out at the reception and called it a day.

WEEK 4

Day 1

I checked in and begun the first task of the day which was upkeep of the back garden, children’s basking area, laundry and private area of the compound in that order.

This took up the first two hours of the day.

I went for mid-morning break.

I helped out with hanging clothes at the laundry.

The children were scheduled to go for a walk today. So I assisted in setting out the strollers in the front area and fastening the children’s seatbelts. I was walking Vivian today, I noticed her and other children pronouncing what they saw, motorcycles and lorries for example. When we got back we folded and arranged the strollers.

Then I helped out at the laundry.

I went for lunch break.

My last two hours were spent at the laundry then I called it a day.

Day 2

Today I started with sweeping the back garden, laundry area and private area of the compound. Mr Vincent was doing some gardening and weeding so I scooped up the residual waste leaves and grass on the ground. This took up my first two hours.

I went on break.

After break, I finished up scooping the leaves and grass and swept the area. Then I was called to feed the children at 11:30, the first time I would be doing this.

I went to their basking area where they were, was instructed to pick any child and put a bib on them. A caregiver handed me the bowl of food; lentils and mashed rice, and a spoon. I fed two babies, the first baby ate well but for full, Jervan finished the whole bowl. After eating I sat with him a while before they went back inside.

Mr Steve tasked me with sweeping the path between the workshop and laundry, which is right next to the construction site so it gets very dusty. I started this task and put it on hold to go for lunch break.

After lunch, I finished sweeping the path and the workshop shed area as well. Ended the day helping out at the laundry area.

Day 3

I swept around the compound for the first two hours of the day.

I went on tea break.

Next, I cleaned up after gardening was done and put the trash in the bins.

Mr Steve, one of my fellow volunteers and I went outside the compound to clean up along the perimeter wall and sidewalk.

I went on lunch break.

After lunch I helped Mr Vincent do some weeding of the grass in the compound and swept up after. This was my last task of the day.

*in report talk about and reference info about average adult sitting time, how this comm service keeps me active and uses my motor skills which are beneficial to health.

Day 4

I checked in and started my first task which was to rake leaves, collect fallen guavas and sweep around the compound. Next, I helped arrange the toys near the gazebo outside and sweeper it afterwards.

I assisted in bringing out the strollers because the children were going on a walk today.

I went on tea break.

After break, the children went out for the walk, I was walking Lily in the stroller. It was a very calm activity and one I look forward to. We came back from the walk.

I helped wipe down and fold the strollers, then arranged them in storage. Next, my fellow volunteer and I unloaded fruits and vegetables from the pickup and carried them to the store and kitchen. I then helped out at the laundry.

At this point I went for lunch break.

After lunch I helped out at the laundry until it was time to checkout.

Day 5

My day started off with sweeping the backside of the compound and laundry area, this took up the first two hours of the day. I went on tea break.

We had a forum during tea break where we followed up on last week’s discussion, talking about ways new life can communicate and get better exposure. We also gave feedback on the way their social media is being handled and shared suggestions for improvement. My fellow volunteers also shared their challenges and highlights of the week.

After break, Mr Vincent and I worked on the private area of the compound. I was tasked with removing weeds and small growth of plants from between the tiles of the parking, using a small blade or ‘panga’. He was weeding the grass in the garden and trimming the plants along the fence as well.

I went on lunch break.

After lunch I returned to finish the task. Using a spade, broom and wheelbarrow, I collected the residual grass and fallen leaves. Lastly, I helped out at the laundry and called it a day.

WEEK 5

Day 1

My first task of the day was sweeping the compound and collecting leaves and trash.

I went on tea break.

I helped bring out strollers and set them up, we then went on a walk with the children. This was a very enjoyable walk. We went to Naivas, where the children got lollipops and we took a different route back passing by yaya centre which was a good change of scenery to what were used to on walks. I was walking Liam and he was very calm, relaxed and enjoyed his lollipop.

When we came back I helped fold the strollers after they were wiped down by my fellow volunteers and I arranged them in storage. Collaboration and teamwork are definitely skills I’ve used in my time here.

I went on lunch break.

After lunch, I hanged clothes in the laundry. My last task was to help out with valentines decorations, which took thirty minutes past my leaving time. So I did my part and at that point I called it a day and left.

Day 2

Started the day with the routine task of sweeping the compound from the back garden, laundry, to the private area.

I then went on tea break.

The period before lunch was spent doing a task outside. In the front garden, Mr Vincent and Mr Steve had cut down a tree and were chopping wood into sizes that were manageable, two of us helped carry the pile of branches to the back side of the compound and piled them next to the garbage bins. I then raked the leaves, wood chipping and small branches in the grass as my fellow volunteer put them in the wheelbarrow.

I went on lunch break.

The last task took up the rest of the day. 4 months ago Mr Vincent cut a tree up and piled it in the private area of the compound, it was ready to be used as firewood so we needed to move it. Two of us got wheelbarrows, Mr Steve would load it with firewood then we take it and add onto the pile we had made earlier today. After the last wheelbarrow load I put the equipment back and checked out for the day.

Day 3

For the first two hours I swept the front area of the compound; reception to driveway all the way up to the gate. Then just before break I started collecting leaves and branches that Mr Steve had pruned. I put the wheelbarrow aside and went for tea break.

After tea break, I continued collecting the leaves and branches around the compound for the next two hours.

I went on lunch break.

My SBL supervisor came to visit at this point. We spoke about my experience so far, talked about what New Life does and he asked me some questions for grading. It was a good discussion.

Afterwards, I returned and arranged the equipment I’d been using earlier to where it’s meant to be, helped Mr Steve distribute guavas that he collected from the tree to staff and volunteers, then signed out and called it a day.

Day 4

First task was sweeping the compound, had to take breaks in between due to the rain.

Went on tea break.

Afterwards, I helped out at the laundry.

I went on lunch break.

Finished the day organizing the shed.

Day 5

My first task was sweeping the driveway and front area, this took the first section of the day.

Went for tea break where we had a forum as is the custom on Friday’s. Two New Life directors spoke to us volunteers as we had tea, they commended us on the work we’re doing and gave insight on their experience with the institution. They also invited us for an evening they’re hosting at the home on 20th March, to help set up and also get a chance to network with corporates.

After tea break, I helped out at the laundry and in organizing the afternoon’s activities. Mr Vincent and I set up the bouncing castle for the children. Today was a child’s birthday as well as the 26th anniversary of the home moving to kilimani, from loresho. After that, I planted some flowers in plastic bags with Mr Steve; he told me the plan is to do that so they grow their roots then in a few weeks he will plant them in the ground or pots, with the objective of making the compound more colorful and bright.

I went on lunch break. They offered us lunch today.

After lunch break I was at the laundry until it was time to leave.

WEEK 6

Day 1

I swept the back garden and scooped up guavas, then I swept the front area of the compound round to the back.

I went on tea break.

After the break, we went for a walk with the children. We used a completely new route today. Went all the way to Naivas, Wood avenue and bought lollipops for the children. This was one of the most enjoyable walks I’ve been on and we were a big group today as well so many children got to go. I was walking Myra and noticed she talks and can pronounce many words, for example, in the supermarket I was pointing out different things and the ones she knew she stated, and I told her names of new items. We walked back, wiped down and folded the strollers then arranged them in storage.

I helped out at the laundry.

I went on lunch break.

After lunch, I assisted in filtering rocks in legumes that were to be cooked, then I folded clothes at the laundry until the end of the day.

Day 2

In the morning hours I swept around the compound.

I went on tea break.

The children were to go on a walk, only the crawlers unit. I walked Ruth today and we did a short distance, to the end of the street and paused under the shade. As the children relaxed I had a good conversation with Matthew and Njung’e, two of my fellow volunteers. We walked back and put the strollers in storage.

I went on lunch break.

I helped out in the laundry for the rest of the day.

Day 3

Today morning I checked in and begun sweeping the compound. We were fewer volunteers than usual, a few of us had finished their SBL hours yesterday. This meant that there was more work to go around for the rest of this week.

I went on tea break.

Afterwards, I was with a few other volunteers as we supervised the children playing and joined them as well.

We pumped the inflatable pool for the children to swim in later in the day.

A donation came in and I helped carry it into the reception, then to the storage space once it had been documented. The manager also asked me to help carry a new microwave upstairs to the storage space, guided by the senior staff supervisor, Ms Eunice.

I then assisted Ms Christine to carry potatoes from the parking to the pantry and store them.

Next, I helped Mr Steve pack up the bouncing castle which the children used last Friday.

I hanged clothes at the laundry.

I went on lunch break.

I folded clothes at the laundry until the end of the day.

Day 4

Today was a slower day than most. With fewer volunteers and the institution already in a rhythm of operation, it felt like there was less urgency and fewer tasks.

I swept the compound in the morning. I then was at the laundry for the majority of the day. I helped Mr Steve organize the shed and that was the only thing outside of laundry duties for the rest of the day.

Day 5

Today was my last day. After arriving in the morning I swept the laundry area.

I then helped Mr Steve and Mr Vincent set-up the bouncing castle in the lawn, the children used it in the afternoon.

As the children were going back inside for lunch, I was asked to help bring them in. I walked with Liam as he held my hand then carried him upstairs.

Next, similar to my first day here, I was called to help out in the kitchen with preparing batches of spinach.

This took the remainder of the time left. I signed out at the reception and went home.

A dream I had circa July 2024 made me pause and write it down. From my notes app, here it is:

I dreamt that I swam from the coast to South Africa. It felt very real and I even remember telling people on the beach that I just swam from Kenya to South Africa. I have this feeling that there’s a reason I had that dream.

Lastly, I’d like to leave a few tips I’ve written down and refer to when dealing with cars now and in the future. Heavily influenced by the digital creators in Kenya’s booming car scene, shout out SK Mubea. Here they are:

Storing for extended time periods

• Don’t engage handbrake; prevent break pads getting stuck on disks. Use wooden blocks to keep stationary.

• Fresh oil change and service.

• Fill up the fuel tank to prevent rust.

• Spray spark plugs with oil to prevent rust.

• Store away from sun to prevent UV ray damage to paint and interior.

Basic Service

• Tires

• Brakes

• Shock absorbers

• Engine oil

• Brake fluid

• Coolant

• Windshield wiper fluid

• Engine air filter

• Cabin air filter

• Windshield wiper blades

• Lights

Safety Checklist (eg for a road trip)

• Check tire pressure (spare tire as well)

• Make sure all lights are working

• Jumpstart kit

• First-aid kit

  ---

Cheers.

Stay blessed.

Not a scam. Not a spam. An actual, official, government-issued reminder that I need to file my 2025 income tax return by June 30th, 2026. The audacity. The personalized audacity. KRA, an institution that once made filing a return feel like applying for a visa to a country that didn’t like you, now sends courteous SMS reminders like a dentist’s office.

I read the message, set my phone down, and thought of Matthew 22:21.

“Give back to Caesar what is Caesar’s.”

Jesus said this when the Pharisees tried to trap him with a question about paying taxes to Rome. The crowd was hoping he would say something revolutionary. He looked at a coin, asked whose face was on it, and delivered the most unbothered tax compliance advice in recorded history. Pay your taxes. Move on. Live your life.

Two thousand years later, KRA has taken this scripture and run with it. Caesar’s face is now on the iTax portal and Caesar would like his return filed by 5pm on June 30th, please.

This is your guide to giving Caesar what is Caesar’s, understanding what Caesar is actually taking, and learning crucially, what you are legally allowed to keep. #avoidants not evaders iktr.

First: What Is a Tax Return, and Why Do You Have to File One?

Let us start from the beginning, because the number of Kenyans who have a KRA PIN and have never filed a return is genuinely significant, and every single one of them is technically in violation of the Income Tax Act.

A tax return is a declaration. You are telling the government: here is what I earned in 2025, here is what was already deducted, and here is whether there is anything left to settle. It is not necessarily a payment. It is a report.

Every person with a KRA PIN and an Income Tax Obligation is required to file an annual Income Tax Return, regardless of whether they earned income or not.

Read that again. Regardless of whether you earned income or not.

If you earned nothing in 2025, you still need to file what is called a Nil Return. The government wants you to officially tell them that you earned nothing. This takes approximately two minutes on iTax or on KRA’s WhatsApp number (0711 099 999, save it now). The penalty for not filing, even if you owe zero tax, is KES 2,000. KES 2,000 for something that takes two minutes. The maths on that penalty are genuinely motivating.

The filing window for the 2025 year of income runs from January 1, 2026 to June 30, 2026. If you are reading this in the last week of June, you are running out of time. If you are reading this after June 30th, the penalty has already found you.

The Money Caesar Already Took: Understanding PAYE

If you are employed in Kenya, your employer has been paying your tax for you every month under a system called Pay As You Earn. PAYE is deducted from your salary before you ever see it, which means most Kenyans have been paying income tax without quite registering it as such.

Here is how it works.

Kenya uses a progressive tax system. The more you earn, the higher the rate applied to each additional shilling. The current bands look like this:

On the first KES 24,000 of your monthly taxable income: 10%. On the next KES 8,333: 25%. On income above that up to KES 800,000: 30%. On income above KES 800,000: 35%.

Progressive taxation means that if you earn KES 50,000 a month, you are not paying 30% on all of it. You are paying 10% on the first KES 24,000, 25% on the next KES 8,333, and 30% on the remaining KES 17,667. This is an important distinction that gets lost in conversations where someone says “I’m in the 30% bracket” as if the government takes 30% of their entire salary. It does not. It takes 30% of the portion above a certain threshold.

After calculating the tax, every employed Kenyan gets a personal relief of KES 2,400 per month, or KES 28,800 per year. This is a flat credit that reduces your tax bill directly, regardless of what you earn. It is Caesar’s way of saying: here is a small acknowledgement that you exist.

Your employer is supposed to have been doing all of this correctly and issuing you a P9 form, which is your annual earnings summary showing your gross pay, taxable benefits, PAYE deducted, and statutory contributions. When you file your return, the P9 is your key document. If your employer has not given you one, ask HR immediately. You are legally entitled to it.

The Other Things Caesar Takes: NSSF, SHIF, and the Housing Levy

Your payslip, if you have ever stared at it long enough to feel mildly violated, shows deductions beyond PAYE.

NSSF is the National Social Security Fund, your retirement contribution. The current statutory deduction under the contested two-tier framework is complicated enough to deserve its own article, but the practical effect on most payslips is a combined employee and employer contribution that goes toward your eventual pension. It is your money. It is just being held for you, with interest, until you are 55 or 60.

SHIF replaced NHIF in October 2024 as Kenya’s healthcare contribution mechanism. It is calculated at a flat 2.75% of your gross salary. A KES 50,000 gross salary means KES 1,375 goes to SHIF monthly. No upper cap, unlike NHIF’s old banded system. In theory, this funds your access to public health services and contracted private facilities. In practice, the transition has been turbulent enough that many Kenyans are still figuring out what exactly they are entitled to. The contribution is mandatory regardless.

The Affordable Housing Levy is 1.5% of your gross salary, deducted from your pay, with an equal contribution from your employer. KES 750 from you, KES 750 from your employer, every month, going into the affordable housing fund. There is a detail worth knowing here: the Affordable Housing Levy relief was repealed in December 2024, meaning the 1.5% is still deducted from your pay, but it no longer reduces your taxable income. Payroll systems that still subtract it before computing PAYE are out of date and will undercharge income tax. Whether the houses being built justify the levy is a separate conversation and a considerably longer article.

What Caesar Is Not Entitled To: The Reliefs You Should Be Claiming

This is the section most people skip, and it is the most financially useful part of this piece.

Tax reliefs are amounts that legally reduce either your taxable income or your tax liability. They are not loopholes. They are not tax evasion. They are provisions in the law that exist specifically to reduce your tax burden in exchange for certain behaviours the government wants to encourage: saving for retirement, buying insurance, owning a home.

Most Kenyans with legitimate relief claims never file for them. Caesar is not going to remind you to take back what he does not owe you. That is your job.

Here is what is available:

Insurance Relief. If you pay premiums for a life insurance, health insurance, or education insurance policy for yourself, your spouse, or your children, you are entitled to a relief of 15% of those premiums, up to a maximum of KES 5,000 per month or KES 60,000 per year. The policy must be with a KRA-approved insurer and must meet the relevant conditions. If you are paying KES 20,000 a year in life insurance premiums, you get KES 3,000 back against your tax bill. Most people paying life insurance have no idea this exists. Now you do.

Pension Contributions. Contributions to a registered retirement benefit scheme beyond the statutory NSSF amount are deductible from your taxable income, up to a limit of KES 360,000 per year, or KES 30,000 per month. This is the most powerful relief available to a Kenyan salaried worker. If you are contributing to an employer pension scheme or a personal retirement fund registered with the Retirement Benefits Authority, that contribution reduces the income on which you pay tax. Put KES 30,000 extra per month into a registered pension, reduce your taxable income by KES 30,000, and at a 30% tax rate, save KES 9,000 in tax. Per month. Every month. The government is literally paying you to save for retirement by taxing you less when you do it.

Mortgage Interest Relief. If you have a mortgage from a registered financial institution for the purchase or improvement of your owner-occupied residential house, you can deduct the interest paid on that mortgage from your taxable income, up to KES 30,000 per month or KES 360,000 per year. If you are paying mortgage interest, confirm this deduction is being applied. Many payroll systems do not apply it automatically.

Post-Retirement Medical Fund. Contributions to an approved post-retirement medical fund are deductible up to KES 15,000 per month. This is a relatively new provision that most people are not yet utilising.

The pattern here is not complicated. The government reduces your tax when you save for retirement, buy insurance, and pay a mortgage. These are the behaviours of someone building long-term financial stability. Caesar is, in his way, incentivising responsible financial behaviour. Take the incentive.

How to Actually File: The Practical Guide

Open your laptop. Go to itax.kra.go.ke. Log in with your KRA PIN and iTax password. If you have forgotten your password, the portal has a reset function. If you have never logged in and your PIN was auto-created when you got your ID, your default password is your ID number.

Once inside, click Returns, then File Return, then select Income Tax Resident Individual for the IT1 form. Select the year of income 2025.

If you are employed and your only income is from your job: download the simplified Employment Income Only form. Your employer’s data should be prepopulated. Verify it against your P9. Check Section M for your PAYE deducted and Section T for your deductions, which should include NSSF, SHIF, the Housing Levy, and your personal relief. If everything matches your P9, confirm and submit. Download the acknowledgement receipt. You are done.

If you had more than one employer in 2025, declare income from all employers in a single return.

If you have additional income beyond your salary, whether freelance, consultancy, online work, rental income, or anything else, declare it in the same return. This is where Kenyans with side income get caught: PAYE covers your employment income. Your side income is untaxed by default and must be declared. KRA now validates declared income against various data sources including M-Pesa records, withholding tax certificates, and import customs data. The days of earning Ksh 500,000 in consultancy fees and quietly hoping KRA does not notice are becoming fewer.

If you earned nothing in 2025 but have a PIN: file a Nil Return. Go to itax.kra.go.ke, follow the same path, select Nil Return, submit. Or save 0711 099 999 on WhatsApp, message “Hi,” and let KRA’s chatbot Shuru walk you through it in approximately two minutes.

The iTax portal is notoriously congested in the final week of June. Filing today or tomorrow is better than filing on June 29th when the system is processing half the country simultaneously and your submission gets stuck at 3pm with no acknowledgement receipt and a deadline at midnight.

What Happens If You Don’t File

Caesar is patient. But Caesar has a penalty schedule.

The late filing penalty is the higher of 5% of the tax due or KES 2,000, plus interest on unpaid tax. For someone who owes no tax, it is a flat KES 2,000. For someone with significant undeclared income, 5% of the tax due on that income is a considerably larger number.

Beyond penalties, taxpayers who fail to file returns by June 30, 2026 will be subject to default assessments under Section 29 of the Tax Procedures Act. A default assessment means KRA estimates your income and charges you accordingly, without your input. The estimate is rarely generous. You can appeal, but appeals cost time and stress and occasionally money, all of which you could have avoided by filing.

The KRA PIN is linked to your ability to do many things in Kenya: open bank accounts, access government tenders, complete certain financial transactions, import goods, register property. An active KRA PIN in good standing is a functional economic asset. A PIN with unfiled returns and accruing penalties is a liability you carry everywhere.

The Bigger Picture: Where Your Taxes Go

This is the part of the tax conversation where most people either check out or get genuinely angry. Both reactions are understandable.

Kenya’s 2026/27 budget is KES 4.82 trillion. Of the KES 3.01 trillion the government expects to collect in revenue, a significant portion comes from PAYE, income tax, and VAT paid by ordinary Kenyans and businesses. Then, as we covered in a previous edition of Finance Friday, KES 1.09 trillion of that goes to domestic interest payments on debt. Before a single teacher is paid or a hospital bed is stocked, your tax money is already servicing loans.

This is frustrating information. It is also not a reason not to file.

Not filing does not redirect your tax to a better purpose. It adds a penalty to your name, creates a compliance problem for your future self, and gives Caesar a grievance he will eventually collect on. The system is imperfect. The obligation is real regardless.

The better use of that frustration is to vote, to follow budget debates, to read the Finance Bill when it drops (not after it passes), and to hold elected officials accountable for where the money goes. Your tax return is a legal document. The advocacy for how it gets spent is a democratic one.

A Quick Reference Before You Go

What you need to file: KRA PIN, iTax password, P9 form from employer, bank statements if you have additional income, withholding tax certificates if applicable.

Deadline: June 30, 2026. Today is June 26. You have four days. Four days is enough.

Reliefs to check: Personal relief (KES 2,400/month, already applied). Insurance relief (15% of premiums, up to KES 5,000/month). Pension contributions above statutory NSSF (up to KES 30,000/month deductible). Mortgage interest (up to KES 30,000/month deductible).

Nil Return if you earned nothing. I did it today and it takes two minutes on iTax or WhatsApp. Avoid the KES 2,000 penalty if you skip it.

Portal: itax.kra.go.ke. WhatsApp: 0711 099 999. KRA phone: 020 4 999 999.

Caesar has had his face on coins, on currency, on government letterheads, and now on SMS reminders to your smartphone. The obligation to render unto him has survived empires, colonial administrations, and three constitutional amendments.

File your return. Claim every relief you are legally entitled to. Keep your receipt.

Then go live your life.

Stay Blessed.

Oh, before you go may I offer you some water to wash this article down? Here you go…what Kering’ wants, Keringets.

Subscribe now

Two people. Same flight. Seats next to each other.

One paid KES 45,000. The other paid KES 112,000.

Same meal. Same overhead bin. Same turbulence over Sudan. Same pilot mispronouncing the destination. Same everything.

Different price. By KES 67,000.

If that sentence made you want to go back and check your last flight ticket, you’re in the right headspace. Welcome to Part 2.

Airlines Are Not in the Business You Think They Are

Here is the first thing to understand about airlines: they are genuinely terrible businesses. The margins are wafer thin. Fuel is unpredictable. Labour is unionized and expensive. Planes break. Weather happens. And you are competing with every other airline on the same route, where the customer’s entire decision-making process can be reduced to: who is cheapest.

Since 2015, the average one-way airfare has dropped from $270 to $158 in real terms. That is, $112 back in passengers’ pockets per trip. Fares went down. Costs did not. So airlines did what any sensible business does when their main product stops making money.

They found another product.

In 2024, global airline ancillary revenue (meaning everything that is not the base ticket) surpassed $148 billion. Five airlines now earn more than 50% of their total revenue from extras. The bag you checked. The seat you selected. The meal you paid for. The priority boarding you bought because the queue looked long and you were tired. That is the real business now.

Frontier Airlines topped the global chart with 62% of total revenue coming from ancillary fees meaning for every $100 base fare, passengers paid an additional $161 in add-ons.

Read that again. The ticket is not the product. The ticket is the invitation.

The Algorithm That Sold You Your Seat

Back to our two friends in row 24.

The reason they paid different prices is a system called yield management, and it is one of the most sophisticated pricing mechanisms ever built. The airline is not just setting a price. It is running a continuous auction. Adjusting fares hundreds of times a day based on how full the plane is, how far out the departure is, what day of the week it is, what time you are searching, and yes, what device you are using and what your browsing history suggests about how price-sensitive you are.

The goal is to fill every seat at the maximum price that particular passenger is willing to pay. Not one price for everyone. Different prices for everyone, calibrated individually.

The person who booked four months out got the low fare because the plane was empty and the airline needed commitment. The person who booked three days before departure paid through the nose because the plane was nearly full, alternatives were limited, and the algorithm knew it.

This is why travel Twitter is full of people saying “book on a Tuesday” or “search in incognito mode.” Some of it is true. All of it is people trying to outsmart a system that has been doing this longer and more precisely than any human could.

You are not beating the algorithm. You are just occasionally catching it on a good day.

You Are Probably Sitting in Someone Else’s Plane

Here is something most passengers never think about: the plane you are on probably does not belong to the airline you paid.

The average airline leases roughly 50% of its fleet rather than owning it outright. Some airlines lease everything. The logic is simple: a brand new Boeing 787 costs around $250 million. Most airlines do not have $250 million sitting around per aircraft, especially when they operate hundreds of them. So they lease.

Enter the aircraft leasing industry. A sector worth over $300 billion globally, dominated by companies most people have never heard of.

AerCap, headquartered in Dublin, owns 1,749 aircraft. More than Delta, American, and United combined. If it were an airline, it would have by far the world’s largest fleet. It is not an airline. It has never flown a single passenger. It is a landlord.

AerCap buys planes in bulk from Boeing and Airbus, negotiating prices that individual airlines never could. Then it leases them out to Kenya Airways, Emirates, Ryanair, whichever airline needs capacity and collects a monthly rent, and manages the asset over its lifecycle.

The pilot is employed by the airline. The cabin crew is employed by the airline. The plane belongs to someone in Dublin who you will never meet and whose name is not on the livery.

This is normal. It just does not come up in the safety demonstration.

The Real Money Is in the Perfume

You finally clear security. You are heading to your gate. You walk through the duty-free section, which seems to take longer than the actual boarding process, past the perfume, the whisky, the chocolate, the luxury watches, and the inexplicably expensive neck pillow.

This is not accidental.

In 2024, global airport non-aeronautical revenue (which is everything except what airlines pay to land and park) reached $73.3 billion. Retail and duty-free represents the largest single category, commanding 23% of that total.

Airports make money two ways. Aeronautical revenue: the fees airlines pay to use the runway, the gates, the ground handling. Non-aeronautical revenue: everything you spend once you are inside. Airports have quietly figured out the second one is significantly more controllable and often more profitable than the first.

Airlines negotiate landing fees hard. They have leverage. A passenger buying overpriced Johnnie Walker at the duty-free has no leverage whatsoever. They are bored, slightly anxious, and in an altered mental state produced by the combination of security stress, artificial lighting, and the feeling that they are already in a different country even though they are still in Nairobi.

Airports design for this. The route from security to your gate passes through retail, always, in every major international airport. Over 62% of international air travelers make at least one commercial purchase inside airports. The layout is the strategy. (like supermarket aisles or house of leather)

JKIA is still building toward this model. The revenues are there. The infrastructure and retail mix that turns a transit passenger into a spending passenger is what separates a regional hub from an international one. That gap is both a problem and an opportunity, depending on where you sit. # hopeful for development

The Invisible Architecture Holding It All Together

One last thing worth knowing.

When you fly Kenya Airways to Amsterdam, you might notice the ticket says KQ but the plane says KLM once you connect. Or your booking confirmation mentions a flight number from an airline you did not choose. This is code sharing and airline alliances at work, the behind-the-scenes agreements that stitch global aviation together.

Airlines cannot profitably operate every route in the world. So they partner. Skyteam, Star Alliance, Oneworld… these are the three major airline alliances that cover most of global aviation. Members share routes, passengers, lounges, and frequent flyer programmes. Kenya Airways is a Skyteam member, which is how a KQ ticket can legitimately get you onto an Air France or Delta flight without you needing to rebook.

For passengers, it means seamless connectivity. For airlines, it means selling routes they cannot operate alone. For the industry, it means that global aviation is not actually a collection of independent carriers competing freely. It is a structured network of partnerships that decides, collectively, how people move around the planet.

The two people in row 24 booked through different channels, paid different prices, and may be holding tickets from different airlines. They are sitting next to each other on the same plane, owned by a company in Dublin, operated by an airline in Nairobi, flying a route made viable by a partnership with a Dutch carrier.

The miracle is not that it works. The miracle is that it happens 100,000 times a day.

What Kenya Captures, and What It Doesn’t

Kenya Airways operates in one of the most structurally difficult businesses on earth. Thin margins, high costs, fierce competition, and an ownership structure ( majority government-owned ) that adds political complexity to operational complexity.

The aircraft leasing industry is almost entirely European and American. AerCap is Irish-American. Its main competitors are based in Ireland, Japan, and the US. Africa does not have a meaningful aircraft lessor. The continent’s airlines pay rent to Dublin.

The airport retail economy at JKIA is growing but still thin compared to comparable hubs in the region. Addis Ababa and Nairobi are competing for East African hub status. The difference will partly be decided by which airport makes the transit experience compelling enough to choose.

And the yield management systems, the pricing algorithms, the booking platforms that determine how airline tickets are sold globally are all developed and owned outside Africa.

The infrastructure of getting there is, again, almost entirely not ours.

Part 3 — Being There: A tourist lands in Nairobi, books through Booking.com, tours through a UK operator, pays in dollars, and leaves after two weeks feeling like they really experienced Kenya. We’re going to find out exactly how much of their money actually stayed.

Finance Fridays. Stay Blessed.

Not seed money for a side hustle. Not capital for a small shop. A loan to start a trading company, specific, structured, commercially thought through. His uncle, Sanusi Dantata, handed over 500,000 Nigerian naira. Dangote took it, imported some rice, some sugar, some cement, and got to work.

If you know what 500,000 naira looks like in 1977, you know it was not nothing. You also know it was not $32.5 billion.

That part took forty-nine years.

Today, Aliko Dangote is the only Black billionaire on earth to have crossed the $30 billion mark, a threshold he has now held for 14 consecutive years as Africa’s wealthiest person. His conglomerate spans cement, sugar, salt, flour, fertilizer, and oil refining across ten African countries. The refinery sitting on the edge of Lagos Bay is, as of 2026, the largest single-train crude oil processing facility on the planet. And somewhere in the recent past, this man sat in the same room as President William Ruto, looked at a map of East Africa, and said it plainly, in the matter-of-fact way that men who build $20 billion things tend to speak: I want to build another one.

There are people you read about. And then there are people you study.

This one you study.

The Blueprint

Most people who look at Dangote see a trader who got obscenely rich. That reading is technically accurate and strategically useless. It misses the architecture.

The insight that built his empire is almost embarrassingly simple once you see it: Africa imports nearly everything it should be producing itself. Not because the raw materials do not exist here. Not because the labour does not exist here. Because nobody built the factories. The continent pays foreign companies to manufacture goods from African raw materials, ships them across oceans, clears them through African ports, pays duties on them, builds a distribution chain for them, and then wonders why costs are high and margins are thin and nothing accumulates.

Dangote looked at that and did not see a problem. He saw a price list.

Take cement. Nigeria in the 1990s was importing millions of tonnes annually. The obvious play was to become a distributor: buy from the importers, sell to the builders, capture the margin in between. That is what a trader does. Dangote went further back in the chain. He built the factories. Acquired the quarries. Owned the trucks. Dangote Cement is now Africa’s largest cement producer, with combined capacity of 52 million tonnes a year, present in ten countries. He owns 87.45% of it. Last year, its profit nearly tripled, from N279.1 billion to N743.3 billion.

Sugar next. Same logic. Then flour. Then salt. The playbook never changed, only the commodity did: find the thing Africa is importing that Africa’s own ground could produce, build the production infrastructure, own the chain from raw material to consumer. Do it again. Do it again. Do it again.

Traders capture margin. Dangote built industry. Those are not the same thing. A trading position can evaporate overnight when a competitor undercuts, a contract ends, or a market moves. A cement plant processing 52 million tonnes a year across ten countries does not evaporate. It is not a bet on a price. It is the price.

That distinction is the whole story.

The Refinery. A Ten-Year Argument With Reality.

In 2013, Dangote announced he was building an oil refinery in Lagos.

Sit with the absurdity of that for a moment. Nigeria, Africa’s largest oil producer, the continent’s biggest crude exporter, a country sitting atop billions of barrels of proven reserves, was importing almost all of its refined petroleum. Petrol. Diesel. Aviation fuel. Kerosene. Exported raw, bought back processed, at a premium that made Nigerian consumers pay more for their own country’s oil than they should have by any rational logic. The four government-owned refineries? Chronically, almost performatively dysfunctional. The country was bleeding foreign exchange to import fuel it should have been producing, and had been doing so for decades.

So Dangote said he would fix it. Privately. With his own capital. A 650,000-barrel-per-day facility in the Lekki Free Trade Zone, bigger than anything the federal government had managed to operate in forty years.

The polite version of the public reaction was skepticism.

Original cost projection: $9 billion. Completion target: 2016. Actual cost: $20 billion. Actual completion: 2023. The years between those two dates were a sustained argument with time, money, regulatory friction, naira devaluations, contractor disputes, and the accumulated opinion of people who kept saying the math did not work. There was always a new projected date. There was always a new reason it would not happen. The project became almost mythological in Nigerian public life, permanently imminent, never quite real.

Then, in May 2023, the Dangote Petroleum Refinery was commissioned.

By early 2026 it hit full processing capacity: 650,000 barrels per day. Nigeria, for the first time in living memory, stopped being a net importer of its own fuel. Jet fuel exports to Europe surged 770% between 2024 and 2026. The petrol queues that had become a defining feature of Nigerian urban life, the hours, the generators, the black market, began to ease.

And now he is expanding it. From 650,000 to 1.4 million barrels per day. Upon completion, that makes it the largest refinery in the world, ahead of India’s Jamnagar. The world’s largest refinery. In Lagos. Built by an African. With African money.

There is a word for that. Several, actually.

The cleanest one is audacity. The most accurate one is proof.

African Money, African Markets, African Infrastructure

Here is the part that should make every Kenyan investor sit up straight.

The Dangote Group is preparing to list the Dangote Petroleum Refinery & Petrochemicals on the Nigerian Exchange. The transaction is projected to be the largest equity offering in African capital market history, and not by a small margin. Analysts have valued the refinery at between $40 and $50 billion. The IPO floats approximately 10% of the equity, roughly $5 billion in shares, to institutional and retail investors.

For scale: when MTN Nigeria listed on the NGX in 2019, it raised $876 million, the largest deal the exchange had ever seen. This IPO is targeting nearly six times that. The listing, confirmed by Dangote in comments aired on Arise TV in May, is targeting September 2026 across multiple African exchanges.

Multiple African exchanges. Including, potentially, Nairobi.

Frank Mwiti, CEO of the Nairobi Securities Exchange, has already flown to Lagos and met with Dangote at the refinery to discuss exactly this. “We discussed how the Nairobi Securities Exchange and other African exchanges can support what could be Africa’s biggest IPO yet,” Mwiti said afterward. Dangote’s own words on the matter were characteristically blunt: “All of Africa should invest.”

That is not a sentiment. It is a structural argument wearing the clothing of one.

The refinery earns in US dollars from petroleum exports. The proposed dividend structure pays in US dollars, backed by those export earnings. For a Kenyan investor who has been watching the shilling drift toward KES 134 against the dollar this year, a dollar-denominated dividend from the most strategically significant industrial asset on the continent is worth understanding. The investment case writes itself, if you are the kind of person who reads prospectuses, which since you are here, you probably should become.

What makes the IPO philosophically interesting beyond the numbers is what it represents. The largest capital market event in African history, on African exchanges, distributed to African investors, funding African infrastructure. Not listed in London because that is where serious money lives. Not in New York because that is where global capital pools. Here. On the continent. The capital, Dangote is arguing with the structure of this deal, should come from us.

The Next Bet

Now for the part that lands closest to home.

In April, at a Nairobi business event, President Ruto stood next to Dangote and said this: “We do not want to be held hostage any more by the Strait of Hormuz. We do not want to be held hostage by wars started by other people. We have our resources here, and we are saying we are going to use our African resources to industrialize our region.”

Those sentences were not written by a speechwriter to fill air. They were a direct response to what the Middle East conflict has done to East African fuel prices in 2026. Brent crude moved from $63 to nearly $100 a barrel. Fuel prices at Kenyan pumps hit record highs. The CBK paused its rate-cutting cycle because of the inflationary blowback from a war East Africa had nothing to do with and no tools to influence. Every matatu fare increase. Every generator bill. Every logistics cost. All of it traceable back to refining capacity that does not exist on this side of the continent.

A domestic refinery does not just reduce costs. It severs the dependency entirely.

Dangote has said he prefers Mombasa over Tanzania’s Tanga port as the site for the East African facility. “Mombasa has a much larger, deeper port,” he told the Financial Times. “Kenyans consume more.” The project sits between $16 and $20 billion. Kenya has signaled it will invest through the National Infrastructure Fund. Dangote has said explicitly that the ball is in Ruto’s court, that government support and a stable incentive framework are the conditions that make the project real rather than theoretical.

If it is built: fuel self-sufficiency. A petrochemical industry anchored at Mombasa port. East Africa as a refined petroleum exporter to the region. Thousands of construction jobs, then operational jobs, then the downstream industry that clusters around refining infrastructure.

If it is not built: we stay exactly where we are. Importing fuel. Absorbing shocks from conflicts we did not start. Watching the pump price move every time someone in a country most Kenyans could not locate on a map makes a decision.

The choice is not complicated. The execution is. These things always are.

What The Man Actually Teaches

There is a temptation, writing about Dangote, to reach for the motivational register. Work hard. Dream big. Believe in yourself. Africa can do it. All of that is true and none of it is useful.

The more interesting lesson is structural.

His entire model is built on a long time horizon in environments that brutally punish long time horizons. Nigeria’s policy environment, its currency volatility, its regulatory landscape: none of it is forgiving to patient capital. Most rational investors, domestic or foreign, price that risk and walk away. Dangote priced it differently. Not because he ignored the risk, but because he had a higher conviction in the underlying thesis than in the probability of the obstacles stopping him.

The refinery took a decade and cost twice what was projected. He finished it anyway. The Ethiopia cement plant saw staff shot dead by protesters during regional violence. He stayed, repaid the loans, repatriated the profit, and just announced a $400 million expansion. These are not stories about luck or connections or being born into the right family, though he was, and it helped. They are stories about a specific kind of stubbornness that treats long-term industrial logic as more reliable than short-term political noise.

The second lesson is the one about building versus extracting. He could have stayed in trading. The margins were real. The capital requirements were lower. The headaches were fewer. He chose the harder path every time, building productive capacity rather than capturing margins on capacity someone else built. The asset at the end is harder to move, harder to copy, harder to displace. A cement plant is not a spreadsheet. You cannot short-sell a refinery.

At 21, I am not building a $20 billion refinery. That point is made. But looking at what Africa imports and asking who should be building that domestically, that mental model does not require $20 billion. It requires the question. Dangote just happens to have answered it at an extraordinary scale.

The Closing Number

$100 billion.

That is the Dangote Group’s revenue target by 2030, backed by a $2.5 billion Afreximbank facility. New sectors on the expansion list include ports, pipelines, gas, mining, data centres, and power. The refinery expands to 1.4 million barrels per day. Fertilizer plants go across twenty African countries by 2028. A new mega-refinery, potentially, at the Port of Mombasa.

Ten years ago, the Lagos refinery was a number on a page and a man with a stubbornly long time horizon. Then they poured concrete. Then they ran pipe. Then, one day in 2023, it started.

The man from Kano borrowed 500,000 naira and spent the next five decades building the industrial spine of a continent. He is 69 years old, worth $32.5 billion, and announcing expansions.

He is not done.

Neither, it seems, is the story.

Stay Blessed.

Finance Friday — Special Series

Every year, human beings take approximately 4.5 billion trips. They spend trillions of dollars doing it. And most of them have absolutely no idea where that money goes.

This is a three-part series about the business of travel. Not the travel content version. Not the “hidden gems in Europe” version. The balance sheet version. We are going to follow a single trip from the first thought to the last receipt and watch what happens at every stage.

We start before you pack. Before you book anything. We start at the part of travel most people don’t even think of as the travel industry.

We start at the border.

There is a building in Upper Hill where Kenyans go to ask Europe for permission.

It opens at 8am. By 7:30 there is a queue. The people in it are dressed slightly more formally than the occasion requires; dressed, essentially, for a job interview for a trip they want to take on their own money. They are carrying folders. Documents printed, sorted, tabbed. Bank statements. Employment letters. Hotel bookings made but not yet paid for, because you cannot pay before you know if you can actually go. Return flight tickets purchased and held, ready to be cancelled if the answer is no. A cover letter… a literal cover letter, addressed to a consular officer, explaining in respectful, structured prose why you would like to go to Germany for two weeks and come back home afterward.

Most of them have also paid, before even joining this queue: roughly KES 14,000 in visa fees, between KES 3,500 and KES 7,000 in service fees to the building itself, and somewhere between KES 4,000 and KES 9,000 for a mandatory travel insurance policy they cannot use until they receive the visa they needed the insurance to apply for.

Then they wait. Four to six weeks, usually.

For a significant number of them, an email arrives.

The email is short. Polite. Says something like: “We regret to inform you that your application for a Schengen visa has been unsuccessful.” No breakdown. No specific reason. No real appeals process. Just a reference number, a generic inbox that does not accept replies, and the quiet suggestion that you are welcome to try again.

You will not get the money back. You will not get the weeks back. You will not get an explanation.

Here is the question nobody in that comment section is asking: who is making money from all of this?

Quite a few people, actually. Let us go through them.

The Passport as a Financial Product

Before we get to the fees and the queues and the private equity firms behind the buildings in Upper Hill, we need to talk about the document at the center of all of it.

Your passport is not just identification. It is a financial product. Its value is determined entirely by where you were born…a fact you had precisely zero input in (you were the output haha) and that value determines how freely you can move through the world, access opportunities, attend conferences, close deals, or just go somewhere because you feel like it.

The Henley Passport Index measures this annually. Singapore sits at the top of the 2026 ranking, granting its citizens visa-free or visa-on-arrival access to 192 countries. A Singaporean passport is functionally a skeleton key for the planet. Dora the Explorer would be Singaporean today.

The Kenyan passport currently provides visa-free access to 71 destinations. We sit around 68th globally and tenth among African nations, behind Seychelles, Mauritius, South Africa, Botswana, Namibia, Lesotho, eSwatini, Malawi, and Morocco.

71 versus 192. That gap is not geography. It is not poverty either, not in the simple sense. It is diplomacy; the accumulated weight of bilateral agreements, trade relationships, political alliances, and the collective perception of your country’s citizens as either likely tourists or likely immigrants. The “power” of a passport is really just a measure of how many other governments trust your government and, by extension, trust you.

This makes a passport an asset. A significant one. And like most significant assets, different people are born holding wildly different versions of it. A British or German passport holder travels on an effectively waived entry fee to most of the world. A Kenyan holder pays visa fees, service fees, insurance premiums, processing delays, and uncertainty to access the same places. The asset gap compounds into a cost gap that follows you every time you travel.

There are people who solve this the expensive way: second citizenship programs. Countries that will sell you a passport in exchange for investment. Malta charges approximately €690,000 for EU citizenship. Turkey grants it at a $400,000 property investment threshold. The Caribbean has built entire government revenue models on selling mobility to people who can afford to buy it.

Most of us are not in that market. So we work with what we have and absorb the costs accordingly.

The Visa Fee Economy

Here is something that sounds obvious when you say it plainly but almost nobody frames this way: a visa is a government charging you money to cross their border. It is admission. Cover charge. Entry fee.

And it is a serious revenue line for the governments collecting it.

Australia collected $4.13 billion in visa application fees in 2024/25. That is their eighth largest source of federal revenue, equivalent to what they collect from fringe benefits tax. The US Bureau of Consular Affairs, the part of the State Department that handles passports and visas, is 96% funded by visa fees rather than congressional appropriations. The American visa operation runs almost entirely on money collected from people who want to visit or immigrate. It is a business with a government front desk.

The standard Schengen visa fee is €90 for adults. Approximately KES 14,500 at current rates. This is the floor. It is non-refundable regardless of the outcome. If you get rejected (which a statistically notable number of African applicants do) you have paid €90 for the privilege of being told no. The government keeps it. No receipt adjustment. No appeal fee waiver. Asante, next.

On top of this sits the mandatory travel insurance. Every Schengen visa applicant must purchase insurance covering a minimum of €30,000 in medical costs, valid across all 29 Schengen countries, for the full duration of the proposed trip. You must buy this before you receive the visa. The insurance is required to get the visa. If the visa is refused, some policies will refund you only if you were careful enough to choose one with a visa refusal clause…but the time spent sourcing, purchasing, and attaching the certificate to your application is gone either way.

This insurance market has a captive customer base. You cannot apply without the product. You cannot negotiate the terms. You need the certificate, it must say specific things, and you need it before you know whether any of it was necessary. Companies have been built specifically around this demand, selling Schengen visa insurance from as low as €0.80 per day, banking on volume from tens of millions of applicants across Africa, Asia, and the Middle East who have no alternative.

Before you have spent a shilling on flights or hotels, governments and insurers have already collected. The trip has not started. The money has already moved.

The Outsourcing of Borders. Meet VFS Global.

Here is where the business story gets genuinely interesting.

Most people assume that the building where you submit your Schengen application is run by Germany or France or Italy. It is not. It is run by a private company called VFS Global. And the story of VFS Global is one of the more remarkable business stories in global travel. One most of the people waiting in that queue have never heard.

VFS Global was founded in Mumbai in 2001. Headquarters now in Dubai and Zurich. As of 2026, it processes visa applications on behalf of 70 governments across more than 4,000 application centers in 167 countries. In 2023 alone it processed 24.1 million applications…roughly 100,000 every single day.

The core business model is clean. Governments need to collect visa applications, biometric data, and processing fees from people across dozens of countries. Running full embassy visa sections in 167 countries is expensive and operationally complicated. So they outsource it. VFS builds and runs the centers, collects the biometrics, receives the documents, and passes everything to the relevant embassy for the actual decision. The government pays VFS a fee per application processed.

VFS also charges the applicant directly through a service fee, on top of the government visa fee, for using the center. At most African locations this runs between €30 and €60 per application. And in most cases, VFS is the only available channel. You cannot submit to the embassy directly. There is no alternative window.

So already we have two revenue streams: income from governments for running their visa infrastructure, and direct fees from applicants for the privilege of going through VFS in the first place.

That would already be a solid business. What made it a spectacular one was what VFS calls “value added services.”

VFS’s financial statements showed profits growing fourfold between 2017 and 2024 while the number of applications processed only grew by 15%. Revenue per application rose 41% since pre-pandemic levels. The company’s own filings consistently attributed this growth to value added services. In India, the value added services subsidiary was running pre-tax margins of up to 70%.

The services themselves include things like premium lounge access, courier return of your passport, document checking before submission, form-filling assistance, and priority appointment slots. Technically optional. In practice, former VFS staff in Kenya and Nigeria described being trained to sell these aggressively, with bonuses that could nearly double their base salary if targets were hit. The contractors who make up the majority of the VFS workforce, earning roughly €126 a month, had every structural incentive to keep pushing.

The applicant standing in that Upper Hill queue is not a customer in any market sense of the word. They cannot choose a different provider. They cannot negotiate. They can take the optional services or risk feeling like their application is less complete than the person ahead of them in the queue. That is the dynamic. And the margins reflect it.

VFS Global was valued at $7 billion in 2024, up from $2.5 billion when Blackstone acquired it. Blackstone then sold a portion of its stake to Singapore’s state-owned investment firm Temasek for $950 million; banking roughly $475 million in profit from that one transaction.

Sit with that for a second. A private equity firm bought the company that processes visa applications on behalf of governments, grew its profits fourfold by upselling services to applicants who have no alternative, and then sold part of that asset to a sovereign wealth fund for nearly a billion dollars.

The person in the queue funded that trade. They just did not know it.

The African Passport Penalty

Kenya made a genuinely progressive call in 2023 when President Ruto announced the removal of inbound visa requirements for all foreign visitors, replacing it with an Electronic Travel Authorization. Kenya joined a small and growing group of African nations betting that open borders generate more value than visa fees collect.

A German citizen today can visit Kenya with about four minutes of online effort and a $30 ETA fee.

A Kenyan visiting Germany will spend four to six weeks, a folder the size of a small report, approximately KES 25,000 to KES 35,000 in fees and insurance before booking a single flight, and will still face a real probability of rejection with no meaningful explanation offered.

This asymmetry is not an accident. It is the accumulated output of unequal diplomatic relationships, economic power differentials, and the collective perception of African travelers as higher migration risks. The Schengen visa rejection rate for African applicants is significantly higher than for applicants from wealthier countries. A Kenyan with identical financials, employment status, and travel history to a South African applicant faces a harder process and a higher rejection probability; because the risk perception attached to the passport is different, and visa officers work with aggregate statistics, not individual files.

The financial consequence is that African travelers pay more to access the world than almost any other group of equivalent economic means. They pay in fees. They pay in documents. They pay in non-refundable application costs for rejections. They pay in the time cost of a process that can stretch months. They pay in the economic opportunities missed while a passport sits in a processing center.

Nobody announces this as policy. It is not written anywhere as deliberate discrimination. It emerges from the logic of fee structures, historical rejection rates, outsourced processing, and bilateral agreements negotiated between governments of wildly unequal power. The result lands on the individual as an expense and a wait and an uncertainty. The structural cause sits several layers above any of them.

Your guy is on a trip he budgeted, planned, and prepared for. He just hit the invisible toll booth that was never on the map.

What Kenya Captures, and What It Doesn’t

Kenya dropped its inbound visa requirement. That is an attempt to signal we are tourism-friendly, business-friendly, aligned with the African Union’s longstanding push for greater intra-African and global mobility. The government decided that openness is worth more than the revenue from visa fees.

What Kenya has not yet figured out is how to capture value on the other side of that equation. The processing companies, the insurance products, the technology infrastructure, the diplomatic leverage that determines passport power ALL OF IT is held and operated by entities outside Kenya, outside Africa.

Every Kenyan who pays a Schengen fee sends money to a European government. Every Kenyan who pays a VFS service fee sends money to a company majority-owned by Blackstone and Temasek. Every Kenyan who buys mandatory travel insurance sends that premium to an insurer operating under European frameworks.

The desire to go somewhere is Kenyan. The infrastructure monetizing that desire is almost entirely not.

This pattern does not stop at the visa office. It follows the trip the whole way. The flight. The hotel. The payment systems. The tour operator. At every stage, the question is the same: where does the money actually go?

That is what the next two parts of this series are about.

Part 2 — Getting There: Two people, same flight, seats next to each other. One paid KES 45,000. The other paid KES 112,000. Same meal. Same turbulence over Sudan. We’re going to figure out why.

Finance Fridays. Stay Blessed.

Not because the account is empty. Because you have never once tapped it or typed its PIN in Kenya. M-Pesa and a Visa contactless have handled every transaction in your adult life, and this particular multicurrency card…which you loaded specifically for this trip, very responsibly, very adulting…has been living in your wallet untouched for so long that it never learned your touch.

The cashier was polite. The queue was less so. My friend Anthony helped me out with Euro coins to pay.

Thankfully, and this is the part that felt like divine intervention, I had packed cash. Old school, crumpled, slightly embarrassing cash. This came in clutch for the rest of the trip. And in that moment, standing in line with euros in my hand while a line of people watched me, I understood something I had intellectually known but never physically felt: Kenya’s payment infrastructure has made us genuinely soft in the best possible way. M-Pesa works so seamlessly, so quietly, and everywhere that the concept of a backup plan for payment feels almost silly at home. Abroad, it proved essential. The contingency I packed as a ‘just incase’ became the hero of the story.

File that under things they don’t teach you in school.

On the Scooters

We found Lime scooters. Wadau, these things are electric and on the Uber app. “We should try them out-”, don’t have to tell me twice, kwani mi hudoo?

If you have never ridden an electric scooter with your friends at the end of a long day, I am asking you to put that on your list. It feels like you are starring in the opening montage of a coming-of-age film, or that one titanic scene when two of you ride at once. We had adventures everyday (the week we spent there had good weather compared to the one before and after).

The old town, the river, the glass towers of the financial district visible in the distance. The city holds its history and its modernity in the same hand without dropping either.

It was a good week.

The Four Rooms That Actually Mattered

Okay so boom. Finance student brain back on.

The academic program took us through four institutions that, between them, hold a significant amount of power over how money moves in the world. Here is what I took from each one.

Deutsche Börse hosts 14,000 listings. Fourteen thousand. The NSE has fewer than 70. I am not saying that to be dismissive of home. I am saying it because the gap is not talent, not capital, not ambition. The conversation I had with Christopher at the Deutsche Börse kept returning to one word…transparency. Transparent reporting standards, transparent pricing, transparent governance. That is what attracts listings. That is what builds market depth. The NSE’s ceiling is not where it currently sits. The path to raising it is less mysterious than we sometimes make it sound.

The International School of Management gave me the most practically useful reframe of the week. Corporate finance is not, and has not been for some time, a binary choice between debt and equity. Blended finance structures (instruments that combine grant capital, concessional loans, equity, and guarantees in creative configurations) are reshaping how companies and projects get funded. This matters enormously for African businesses that are too large for microfinance and too risky for traditional institutional capital. The middle ground is not empty. It is being built, and the tools exist.

Deutsche Bundesbank is where the digital euro conversation happened, and it was the most intellectually interesting session of the trip. Not because a digital currency is a novel idea, institutions have had that conversation. But because the people building it are thinking through problems most people have not even asked yet. How do you incentivize ordinary citizens to actually use it when they already have habits and trust built around existing payment methods? And crucially: how do you design a central bank digital currency that does not quietly hollow out the commercial banking system it is supposed to coexist with? Every deposit that moves from a commercial bank into a digital euro wallet is a deposit that bank can no longer lend from. That tension is real and unresolved. The fact that they are asking the question seriously is itself reassuring.

The European Central Bank was the one that connected most directly to writing I have been doing recently. One monetary policy. One interest rate. Nineteen countries. The same lever that stimulates a slowing economy in one member state can overheat another one that is already running hot. Managing that without fracturing the union is a daily, unglamorous, extremely high-stakes exercise in institutional compromise. It gave me a sharper appreciation for what regional monetary coordination would look like if Africa ever gets serious about it. The complexity is not a reason not to try. It is a reason to understand exactly what you are signing up for before you do.

Monopoly Money

I noticed a shift in mentality.

When you spend in a foreign currency, especially in cash, something strange happens to your relationship with money. The notes feel unfamiliar. The numbers do not map onto your internal price anchors. You cannot automatically feel whether something is expensive or reasonable the way you can at home. And so, almost by necessity, you stop treating money as a scoreboard and start treating it as a tool. I asked, “what do I want this to do? Is this experience, this meal, this gift worth this number?”, You stop hoarding and start deciding.

Tumia pesa ikuzoe. Spend money and let it get used to you. The philosophy is not recklessness. It is the opposite of the anxiety that makes people hold money so tightly it never works for them. Money that moves creates. It’s like flowing water.

I got gifts for family on that trip. Every time someone has travelled and brought me something, they navigated this exact calculation in a foreign place, thinking about people at home while managing a budget that felt like Monopoly money. I have a new appreciation for that now. It is a small act of love dressed up as a shopping errand.

Frankfurt gave me a lot. Some of it was academic. Some of it was a declined card and a Lime scooter and the rare particular feeling of systems that work.

All of it counts.

Finance Fridays. Stay Blessed.

The World Cup starts in a tomorrow. And look, I love football as much as the next person (watched it since I was 3 years old). The group stage drama, the upsets, the goals that make you jump off the sofa (Mbappe vs Argentina 2022 December wewe you just HAD to be there) at midnight on a Tuesday. But, I am still a finance student. So after debating formations and predicting game results I am left here thinking about the money.

Specifically, how a football tournament became one of the most sophisticated economic machines on the planet.

Let’s get into it.

First, the numbers that set the scene

FIFA projects total revenue of $13 billion for the 2023 to 2026 four-year cycle, potentially making this World Cup the most profitable sporting event in history. For context, revenue has grown over ten times since the last US-hosted World Cup in 1994, which generated $957 million. Thirty-two years. Ten times the money. That is not just inflation. That is a business that figured out what it was selling.

This edition features 104 matches, 5 million expected spectators, and a 39-day tournament window across 16 host cities in three countries. The scale alone is unprecedented. But the scale is also a financial strategy in itself, which we will come back to.

FIFA: The most profitable non-profit you’ve never thought about

Here is the part that always surprises people. FIFA is, technically, a non-profit organisation. It does not pay corporate tax. It distributes its surplus to member associations and development programmes. And yet it is sitting on billions of dollars in revenue from a tournament it hosts once every four years.

How? By controlling everything that matters.

The official sponsorship slots for 2026 are completely sold out, making it the most commercially successful tournament in the federation’s history. Coca-Cola, Adidas, Visa, Hyundai, McDonald’s, and a handful of other global giants have locked up the official rights, with the average sponsorship package costing tens of millions of dollars per year.

Visa alone holds a contract valued at $200 million through 2026 as FIFA's official payment partner. Coca-Cola, a FIFA sponsor since 1974, spends an estimated $100 million per cycle. These are not advertising spends. They are entry fees into the most watched event on earth.

And then there is the kit war happening in the background, which is its own fascinating sub-plot.

Adidas has held official FIFA sponsorship rights since 1970. Nike has never been an official FIFA World Cup sponsor. Yet Nike consistently generates as much or more conversation during World Cups than Adidas, simply by focusing on storytelling, athlete partnerships, and culturally resonant campaigns. It is a masterclass in ambush marketing: you do not buy the stage, you become the conversation happening around it.

Bernstein Research estimated that both Nike and Adidas could each see a 3 to 4% bump in global sales from the tournament, with the global football jersey market estimated at $11.7 billion by the end of the competition.

People buy shirts when their team is winning. Brands know this. They plan for it years in advance.

The host city problem: the party you throw but can’t afford

Now here is where it gets genuinely interesting, and a little uncomfortable.

Everyone assumes that hosting the World Cup is a goldmine for the host cities. The hotels fill up. The restaurants overflow. The city gets global visibility. And some of that is true.

FIFA projects the 2026 tournament will generate $40.9 billion in GDP across North America, with individual US host cities seeing between $160 million and $620 million in incremental economic activity.

But look at who actually captures that value.

The 11 US World Cup host cities are facing a collective shortfall of at least $250 million, due to a highly restrictive deal from FIFA that may yet see the federal government, as well as local and private funding, have to pick up the costs. FIFA’s own commercial contracts mean cities cannot even do deals with local convenience store chains, as their sale of food is considered to cut across primary partners such as McDonald’s. Some cities are apparently pitching local dry cleaners for sponsorship. That is not a metaphor. That is the actual situation.

In Canada, Toronto’s cost estimates rose from tens of millions to roughly $380 million. In Mexico, hotel rates spiked nearly 1,000% in certain cities as the tournament approached.

The pattern is consistent across World Cup history. FIFA collects the centralized revenue; broadcast rights, sponsorships, ticketing, hospitality. The host city bears the cost of venues, security, infrastructure, and logistics. The city gets the economic spillover. FIFA gets the balance sheet.

Contracts between FIFA and host cities lock host cities out of prospective revenues more than ever, leaving FIFA with a larger share of the revenue. Some of those contracts were so restrictive that host cities tried to keep them confidential. Courts ordered them released.

It is a brilliant structure if you are FIFA. It is a complicated one if you are a city mayor trying to explain to your residents why they are subsidizing the world’s richest sporting body.

The prize money: who actually gets paid

The 2026 World Cup will distribute a record $871 million in prize money to the 48 participating nations. The winners take home $50 million. Even the teams that exit at the group stage receive $9 million each, plus a $2.5 million preparation fee paid before the tournament begins.

Here is the detail most people miss: players do not receive money directly from FIFA. The prize money goes to national federations, which then decide how much to share with the squad, the coaching staff, and support personnel. Some federations are transparent about this. Others are considerably less so.

Additionally, FIFA will pay $355 million to clubs through the Club Benefits Program, compensating the clubs for releasing their players during the tournament. So your club’s star striker goes to the World Cup, potentially gets injured, and the club receives a cheque from FIFA as compensation. The tournament has thought through almost every financial relationship in the ecosystem.

Now bring it home: what the World Cup means for Kenya and Africa

Ten African teams at the 2026 World Cup. That is double the previous allocation, and it matters economically in ways that go beyond football pride.

Data from previous tournaments shows that betting volume on matches involving African teams is up to four times higher than on neutral fixtures. With ten African nations in the tournament, analysts predict the continental betting total could exceed KES 1 trillion over the month-long event.

A trillion shillings. Wagered. In a month. By a continent where a significant portion of that money is moving through platforms like M-Pesa, which means the mobile money ecosystem gets a meaningful boost in transaction volume whether or not anyone wins a bet.

On the kit side, PUMA has the deepest African portfolio at this tournament, supplying five African nations including Ghana, Senegal, Ivory Coast, Morocco, and Egypt. It is a deliberate long-term market strategy: betting on underdeveloped football economies with growing global fan bases. When Morocco goes deep in this tournament and millions of people across the continent buy a Moroccan shirt, PUMA collects that revenue. The manufacturing happens elsewhere. The demand is here.

This is the gap Africa has not yet closed: we generate enormous consumer interest in the World Cup and capture relatively little of the financial value that interest creates. The betting platforms are largely foreign-owned. The kits are designed and manufactured abroad. The broadcast rights are held by international media groups. The money flows in, circulates briefly, and flows back out.

That is not a reason to not enjoy the football. It is a reason to think about who is building the infrastructure around African football fandom, and whether any of it is ours.

The one financial idea the World Cup proves every four years

Attention is an asset.

FIFA does not own football. It does not own the players, the clubs, or the history of the game. What it owns is the platform where the world’s attention concentrates for 39 days every four years. It has monetized that attention so completely that it generates billions from a tournament it doesn’t even play in.

Every sponsor, every broadcaster, every betting company, every jersey manufacturer is paying for access to the same thing: the eyes and emotions of billions of people who care deeply about what happens on that pitch.

There is a finance lesson in there that extends well beyond sport. The most valuable thing in the modern economy is not a product or a service. It is the moment when someone cannot look away.

The World Cup has 5 million people buying tickets to that moment. And several billion more watching it for free, generating revenue for everyone except themselves.

Enjoy the football.

Stay Blessed.

The Ordinary Kenyan, we are told, is who the government works for. The Ordinary Kenyan is who bears the burden of taxation with admirable stoicism. The Ordinary Kenyan is resilient. Hardworking. The Ordinary Kenyan will benefit from this road, this stadium, this digitization initiative, this bottom-up agenda, this new policy framework, this thing we are announcing today.

The Ordinary Kenyan is referenced so frequently that you would think someone, somewhere, has met them.

So let’s try to find them.

Not through a government report. Not through a GDP figure or a poverty line drawn by someone in Washington. Through the texture of actual life in this country: what things cost, what choices get made, what gets skipped, and what gets borrowed to cover what was skipped. Through Fuliza balances and unga prices and school fee deadlines that arrive with the certainty of gravity.

Here is what I think is true, and what this piece will argue: the defining feature of the ordinary Kenyan is not poverty. It is constrained choice. It is the permanent, grinding reality of trading one necessity against another. Food or transport. Rent or school fees. Healthcare or debt. Dignity or survival.

The ordinary Kenyan is not poor in the simple sense. They are cornered. And there is a difference.

How The Corner Was Built

There is a version of recent Kenyan history that gets told as a success story. And parts of it genuinely are.

Between 2003 and 2013, Kenya’s economy grew at an average of 4.7% annually. Free primary education put millions of children in classrooms who had no business being there by any previous measure of national capacity. Mobile money rewired how a continent thought about financial access. The middle class expanded. Nairobi built glass. The narrative of an “African rising” had Kenya near the top of every optimistic projection.

The ordinary Kenyan felt some of that. Not all of it, not equally, but enough to believe the direction of travel was correct.

Then the borrowing started in earnest.

Kenya’s public debt crossed the trillion shilling mark around 2012. It crossed ten trillion by 2022. As of the 2026/27 budget, it sits at approximately 11.7 trillion shillings, and the country now spends more on debt interest payments every year than it spends on the education of its children. That sentence is not rhetorical. It is a line item comparison in a publicly available budget document. Domestic interest payments in the coming fiscal year: Ksh 1.09 trillion. Education allocation: less.

The debt was not stolen in one dramatic heist. It accumulated the way most financial traps do: gradually, then suddenly, with each individual borrowing decision carrying its own reasonable justification at the time. A road here. A railway there. A stadium being rushed to completion for a football tournament. Each project came with a ribbon-cutting ceremony and a speech about transformation. The bill came quietly, in the form of a budget that has less and less room every year for the things that make ordinary life liveable.

By the 2024/25 financial year, debt servicing consumed 71.2% of ordinary government revenue. Not the total budget. Ordinary revenue. The money the government actually collects from taxation, fees, and levies from its own citizens. Of every hundred shillings collected from Kenyan taxpayers, seventy-one went straight to creditors before a single teacher was paid or a single hospital bed was stocked.

The ordinary Kenyan did not sign those loan agreements. They are paying them back regardless.

That is how the corner was built.

The Arithmetic of Getting By

Meet the ordinary Kenyan. Not the one in the speech. The actual one.

She wakes up at 5:47am because the matatu she needs leaves the stage by 6:15 and the next one will make her late and being late has consequences she cannot afford this month. She did not sleep particularly well because she was running numbers in her head: the rent is due in eleven days, the school fees reminder came in yesterday as a WhatsApp message from a class teacher who means well, and her Fuliza balance is sitting at negative 847 shillings, which means her M-Pesa is technically open but practically closed until she moves some money from her Equity account, which she will do after confirming whether her client paid the invoice she sent ten days ago.

She is not in crisis. This is just Tuesday.

He is 29 years old and holds a degree in Business Information Technology from a mid-tier Kenyan university. He has been employed, sort of, for three years. The “sort of” covers a contract renewal that didn’t come through, six months of freelance work that paid inconsistently, a current job that is real but pays Ksh 38,000 a month before the PAYE that the government collects reliably even when it delivers nothing reliably in return. He splits a two-bedroom apartment in Umoja with two other men his age. They do not talk about how long this arrangement will last. The subject sits in the room like furniture nobody acknowledges.

His mother calls on Sundays and asks when he is getting his own place. He says soon.

This is not a story about failure. Both of these people are, by most measurable standards, doing fine. They are employed, or nearly so. They are fed, mostly. They are connected, educated, and functional. They are also permanently one emergency away from a financial problem they cannot solve alone, which is why the WhatsApp group exists.

Every Kenyan of a certain income bracket knows the WhatsApp group. It has a name like “Umoja wa Familia” or “Campus Crew 2018” or just the names of the members strung together. Its primary social function is maintaining connection. Its secondary function, the one nobody announces but everybody understands, is emergency infrastructure. Someone’s mother needs an operation. Someone’s baby was admitted. Someone’s father’s funeral costs more than anyone has on hand. The group mobilizes. Ksh 500 here, Ksh 1,000 there, a few people sending Ksh 200 with a voice note apologizing that it isn’t more.

This is Kenya’s actual healthcare system for millions of people. Not SHA. Not NHIF in its previous form. Not a policy framework. A WhatsApp group and the goodwill of people who are themselves one emergency away from needing the same.

The numbers behind this reality are not subtle. The 2026/27 budget allocates Ksh 139.9 billion to the Ministry of Health for a population of over 57 million people. That is roughly Ksh 2,454 per person for the year. Two thousand, four hundred and fifty-four shillings. The price of two bags of unga and a packet of sugar, with change left over for exactly nothing.

Meanwhile, a single stadium contract was signed for Ksh 45.85 billion.

The ordinary Kenyan is not asking for much. They are asking for the arithmetic to make sense. It does not. It has not for a while. And the people who control the arithmetic have very little incentive to change it, because the ordinary Kenyan, for all their exhaustion, keeps showing up. To work. To the ballot box. To the WhatsApp group.

Resilience is a virtue. It is also, in the right political conditions, a convenience.

Why The Corner Is Comfortable For Everyone Except You

Here is something that sounds cynical but is actually just accurate: the ordinary Kenyan’s constrained life is not a government failure. It is, in many respects, a government outcome.

That distinction matters.

A failure implies that someone tried and fell short. That the road to here was paved with genuine intention and unfortunate circumstance. Some of it was. But a significant portion of what defines ordinary Kenyan life in 2026, the narrowness of choice, the permanent financial precarity, the dependence on informal safety nets, is the predictable result of a political incentive structure that has never been seriously threatened enough to change.

Consider what a Kenyan politician actually needs to survive. They need votes, which require visibility. They need money, which requires proximity to public resources. And they need a population that is busy enough managing daily survival that it cannot sustain prolonged, organized political pressure. Not because politicians sit in rooms designing suffering. But because a population living at the edge of its means is, by definition, one that is harder to mobilize and easier to buy.

A Ksh 500 handout lands differently on someone with savings than it does on someone whose Fuliza is in the red. This is not a moral observation. It is political arithmetic.

The infrastructure serves this logic cleanly. A stadium is not just a stadium. It is a visibility machine, a procurement opportunity, and a narrative device in one concrete structure. It photographs. It generates national pride. It gives the government something large to point to when someone raises the hospital that wasn’t built, the teachers who weren’t hired, the medicines that weren’t stocked. Try criticizing a stadium the week tickets go on sale for an AFCON match. See how that goes.

The Finance Bill 2026/27 tells this story in numbers. Kenya’s total budget stands at Ksh 4.82 trillion against a revenue projection of Ksh 3.01 trillion. The gap, Ksh 1.1 trillion, is the largest fiscal deficit in the country’s history. Domestic borrowing is projected at a record Ksh 995.7 billion, which means the government will borrow nearly a trillion shillings from the same financial system that ordinary Kenyans need to borrow from to start businesses and buy homes. When the government is that hungry for domestic credit, interest rates stay elevated and private sector lending tightens. The ordinary Kenyan feels this as expensive loans and slow business. The budget document describes it as “fiscal consolidation.”

Language is doing a lot of work in that gap.

What makes this particularly difficult to fight is that the system does not require villains to function. It requires incentives. And the incentives are currently structured so that the politician who delivers a visible project wins more than the one who quietly improves a supply chain for rural health facilities. The voter who is exhausted from financial survival is less likely to spend a Saturday organizing than the voter who has enough margin in their life to be angry on behalf of principle.

The system does not punish the ordinary Kenyan for being ordinary. It relies on it.

What Seeing Clearly Actually Costs

There is a question that sits underneath everything in this piece, and it deserves to be asked directly: if the system is this coherent, if the incentives are this entrenched, if the ordinary Kenyan’s constrained life is this useful to the people who run things, then what exactly is the point of understanding it?

It is a fair question. Knowledge without power can feel like a cruelty of its own.

But here is what I have come to believe, and what I think the evidence of ordinary Kenyan life actually supports: the first and most durable form of resistance available to an ordinary person is accurate perception. Not optimism. Not activism, necessarily, though that matters too. Just the discipline of seeing things as they are rather than as they are presented.

The ordinary Kenyan is already doing this, more than they are given credit for. The person who knows that the chama contribution for their neighbour’s hospital bill is covering for a collapsed public system is not naive. They are keeping two accounts simultaneously: the human one, which is generous and community-minded, and the political one, which knows exactly what that generosity is compensating for. That double accounting is not cynicism. It is sophistication.

The 29-year-old splitting rent in Umoja and telling his mother “soon” every Sunday is not defeated. He is navigating a housing market shaped by interest rates he did not set, on a salary compressed by a tax burden he did not design, in an economy growing at 5.3% that he cannot feel in his pocket. Knowing that does not put him in his own apartment. But it means he stops blaming himself for the corner and starts seeing the walls for what they are.

That shift matters more than it sounds.

Because a person who understands their constraints clearly makes different decisions than one who believes their constraints are personal failures. They organize differently. They vote differently. They ask different questions at the ballot box and in the comment section and at the baraza and in the conversations that happen after church when nobody is performing for anyone.

Kenya has never lacked for extraordinary people living ordinary lives. It has sometimes lacked the shared language to name what those lives are actually up against.

This is an attempt at that language.

The ordinary Kenyan is not a rhetorical device. They are not a campaign prop or a budget justification or a sympathy anchor in a politician’s speech. They are a person running numbers in their head at 5:47 in the morning, trying to make a life in a country that is also, simultaneously, trying to make itself.

Both projects deserve to succeed. So far, only one of them is getting the budget for it.

Stay Blessed.

Subscribe now

It is the moment you stop watching the magician’s hand waving in the air and start watching the other one. The one doing the actual work. The one you were never supposed to look at.

It happens in relationships. It happens in religion. And if you’re paying attention in 2026, it is happening in politics here in Kenya, and everywhere power has learned that spectacle is cheaper than accountability.

This is about that moment. The awakening.

Part I: The Saudi Playbook. How to Buy the World’s Silence.

Let’s start far from home, because the lesson travels.

Saudi Arabia has a problem. It is a petrostate run by an absolute monarchy with a documented record of suppressing dissent, restricting women’s rights, and most visibly to the Western world; the 2018 assassination of journalist Jamal Khashoggi inside a Saudi consulate in Istanbul. The international outcry was loud. The consequences were...mild. And that mildness was not an accident.

Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, the PIF, has deployed billions of dollars into global sport, from LIV Golf to Newcastle United Football Club, to the Saudi Pro League, to F1 races, boxing mega-events, and the 2034 World Cup bid, all under the umbrella of Vision 2030. The word the world reached for was sportswashing aka glamour and spectacle to scrub a reputation clean.

But calling it sportswashing undersells the strategic sophistication of what’s actually happening. This is not PR. This is Game Theory.

In game theory one of the most powerful moves a player can make is to change the payoff matrix; to restructure the game so that other players’ incentives shift in your favour. Not because you convinced them but because the numbers now tell them to cooperate. Saudi Arabia did exactly this.

By the time Ronaldo arrived at Al-Nassr PIF had grown the Saudi Pro League’s estimated market value from €370 million to €970 million in just two seasons. A 160% expansion with clubs like Al-Hilal and Al-Ahli seeing individual valuations rise over 300%. The league itself became a career destination. European agents, broadcasters, sponsors, and federations all developed financial relationships with the Saudi ecosystem. And reality played out…the moment you become someone’s revenue stream, they stop criticising you. Not because they agree with you. Because they can’t afford not to.

PIF’s acquisition of Newcastle United in 2021 for £305 million was, as per Forbes’ May 2025 valuation, worth £820 million, making it PIF’s only sports asset to show positive equity performance. A Premier League club in a football-obsessed English city, generating broadcast revenue, matchday income, and brand appreciation. The city of Newcastle which was economically neglected for decades is now passionately defending Saudi ownership, because the team is winning and the jobs are there.

Khashoggi who? Ganji ndio inabonga.

That is the genius of the strategy. They didn’t silence their critics. They made silence profitable.

LIV Golf, for all its financial losses including $624 million in UK-recorded losses in 2024 alone, and over $5 billion invested since launch still fractured the PGA Tour, forced a merger framework, and drew top players like Dustin Johnson and Bryson DeChambeau into the Saudi orbit. The critics called every Greg Norman press conference a conversation about Khashoggi. The Saudis didn’t care. Because the domestic audience which actually matters for regime stability watched their country on a global stage and felt pride.

That was always the real target.

Part II: Infrastructure as Performance (The Kenyan Remix)

Now come home.

The language is different. The budget is smaller. The sovereign wealth fund does not exist (National Infrastructure Fund may be similar). But the logic is identical.

Kenya’s version of the Saudi playbook does not use golf courses and football clubs. It uses tarmac, concrete, and stadiums. It uses the Standard Gauge Railway. The Nairobi Expressway. And now most audaciously, the Talanta Sports City Stadium. The 60,000-seater arena is being rushed to completion ahead of AFCON 2027.

The Talanta Stadium’s construction contract was awarded to China Road and Bridge Corporation and signed on May 26, 2024. It stands at Ksh 45.85 billion which is nearly ten times the Ksh 5 billion threshold that legally requires clearance from the Attorney General before signing. That clearance was never sought.

An audit by Auditor-General Nancy Gathungu found a Ksh 10.85 billion cost discrepancy. A gap between the Ksh 35 billion sanctioned by the Treasury and the Ksh 45.85 billion contracted with the foreign builder, with zero accounting for the difference. The contract was awarded through direct procurement, bypassing competitive tendering. The Ministry of Sports was stripped of its procurement role mid-process and the work handed to the Ministry of Defence. A bureaucratic shuffle that the former Attorney General Justin Muturi described, bluntly, as “one of the greatest heists to ever happen under the Kenya Kwanza regime.”

And yet. The stadium is going up. And when it is done, and AFCON is here, and 60,000 Kenyans are singing in the stands and the cameras are rolling and Ruto is waving from the VIP box… most people will not be thinking about the Ksh 10.85 billion. They will be thinking about football.

That is not an accident either.

Part III: The Game Theory of the Shiny Thing

Let’s be precise about why this works, because understanding it is the first step to escaping it.

Politicians make rational choices. They are not irrational or stupid. When a Kenyan government decides to build a stadium instead of funding hospitals, it is making a calculated bet based on a very specific political payoff analysis.

Ask yourself: what is the visibility of a stadium versus a functioning public hospital upcountry?

A stadium is concrete. It photographs. It has a ribbon-cutting ceremony. You can name it after someone. It hosts events that generate emotions of joy, national pride, and shared identity. As recently as December 2025, President Ruto announced the stadium would be renamed the Raila Odinga International Stadium. A political masterstroke that tied Kenya’s biggest infrastructure project to one of its most powerful political brands, buying broader coalition support in one announcement.

A properly staffed maternity ward in Kakamega? It saves lives quietly. There is no ribbon. There is no camera angle. There is no song.

Now ask: what happens to the politician who criticizes the stadium?

They are called “anti-development.” They are framed as opposing Kenya’s international standing. They are accused of not wanting Kenya to succeed on the continental stage. When Kiharu MP Ndindi Nyoro warned that the bond financing the stadium could ultimately cost taxpayers Ksh 100 billion, his statement which was backed by parliamentary standing and budget committee experience, was drowned out in the noise of construction progress updates and AFCON excitement. Not to say his word is to be taken as truth, but the government rarely lets experts do their job.

The game is designed so that truth-telling is politically costly and cheerleading is politically rewarded.

This is not cynicism. The stadium forces opposition politicians and civic voices into a corner: oppose it, and you’re the one who doesn’t want Kenya to have nice things. Support it, and you’re complicit in the heist.

Meanwhile, the numbers that actually define your life are elsewhere:

Kenya’s debt service obligations consumed 71.2 percent of ordinary revenue in the 2024/25 financial year leaving virtually nothing for essential public services. Domestic interest payments alone in the 2026/27 budget exceed the entire education budget. The country’s debt-to-GDP ratio has surged to above 65%, over 10 percentage points above the statutory ceiling set in Kenya’s own Public Finance Management Act.

These numbers are invisible. They do not photograph. They do not generate chants.

The stadium photographs beautifully.

Part IV: The Limits of the Playbook

Here is where even the most airtight political strategy begins to crack and where Saudi Arabia’s recent retreat becomes instructive.

PIF’s decision to end funding for LIV Golf at the end of the 2026 season came after cumulative losses of over $5 billion with no path to profitability and a wartime domestic budget that could no longer justify subsidizing a golf league that no Saudi citizen watches. The spectacle became too expensive. The real costs came home.

Kenya is following a similar trajectory, even if more slowly.

As of March 2026, CAF found that none of Kenya’s proposed AFCON venues met the required Category 4 standards for hosting the continental tournament. Contractors at Nyayo Stadium had abandoned the site over Ksh 2.6 billion in unpaid dues. Kenya had not paid the Ksh 3.9 billion hosting fee to CAF. The very event the stadium was sold to the public on the basis of may yet expose the emptiness of the performance.

The shiny thing is not even shining yet. And already, the paint is peeling.

Part V: The Coming of Age

So what can we do with this knowledge? (at least what I’m trying, mimi si baba yako)

The first thing is to resist the temptation to become merely cynical. Cynicism is the lazy cousin of wisdom. It says “everything is corrupt, nothing matters, why bother” and in doing so, hands the game entirely to the people running it. They want your apathy. Apathy is even cheaper to manage than enthusiasm.

What you are aiming for is something harder: clear-eyed engagement. The ability to feel joy at AFCON because football is genuinely beautiful and the community is genuinely valuable, while simultaneously holding the question: at what cost, and who paid for it, and who didn’t have to?

The Saudi fan who watches Newcastle win the Carabao Cup and feels pride is not wrong to feel pride. But the journalist who simultaneously asks who owns the club and why is not wrong either. Both things are true. The ability to hold both without collapsing into either pure celebration or pure cynicism is the mark of a politically mature citizen.

In Kenya, specifically, that maturity looks like this:

• When you see a new expressway, ask: who borrowed money for it, who will repay it, and who can afford to use it?

• When you see a stadium, ask: what did the audit find, who got the contract, and what was not built with that money?

• When a politician names infrastructure after a rival to buy peace, ask: what deal was just struck in the room you weren’t in?

None of these questions are anti-development. They are the questions that make development real rather than theatrical.

Kenya’s debt-to-GDP ratio surged from 50% in 2015 to 72% in 2023 not because Kenyans are poor managers of resources, but because the political incentive structure rewards visible spending and punishes the invisible discipline of fiscal restraint. Changing that requires citizens who can see past the ribbon-cutting and into the balance sheet.

The coming of age in the title is not about disillusionment. It is about the expansion of what you can see.

A child sees a stadium and sees football. A teenager sees a stadium and sees national pride. An awakened citizen sees a stadium and sees a bond on the Nairobi Securities Exchange, a direct procurement that bypassed the law, a Ksh 10.85 billion unexplained gap, a contractor who will earn interest on late payments at three points above the CBK base rate, and a maternity wing somewhere that did not get built.

An awakened citizen does not walk away. They walk in.

They vote with this knowledge. They ask questions in public. They support the journalists and the auditors and the MPs who read the footnotes. They refuse to be bought with concrete.

Saudi Arabia spent over $5 billion trying to launder its reputation through sport. The Boston Globe wrote in 2022 that if LIV Golf was an attempt at sportswashing, it isn’t working because every press conference became a conversation about Khashoggi. The laundering failed internationally because enough journalists, fans, and commentators refused to let the spectacle replace the story.

Kenya has its own version of that refusal. The Auditor-General published her findings. The former Attorney-General spoke publicly. Parliament is asking questions. The numbers are in the public domain.

The only question is whether enough citizens read them.

Read the fine print. The real story is always there. Stay Blessed.

You probably didn’t hear about it. It wasn’t trending on X. But I want to understand money. Really understand it. If you want to as well, this is the story you need to know right now.

Let me explain it the way I’d explain it to you over a coffee at Java. (Lazizi - Sauti Sol)

There’s a man called Jerome Powell.

He chairs the U.S. Federal Reserve. Basically, America’s Central Bank. And right now, his job is one of the hardest in the world.

Here’s why.

Man like J has one lever. Moja tu kama seesaw. He can either make money more expensive (raise interest rates) or make money cheaper (lower interest rates). That’s it. That’s the whole toolkit.

Normally, that’s enough. Economy overheating? Make money expensive wewe…people borrow less, spend less, prices cool down. Economy slowing down? Make money cheap bana… people borrow more, spend more, economy picks up.

Simple. Clean. Works beautifully.

Until your patient develops two diseases at the same time. (shivers in SHA)

Right now, America has two problems happening simultaneously:

Problem 1: Inflation is too high. Prices are rising faster than they should. The Fed’s target is 2%. They’re sitting above that, and an oil shock from the Middle East is making it worse by the week.

Problem 2: Jobs are getting shakier. Unemployment is creeping up. Companies are hiring less. The economy is softening.

Here’s the cruel joke of it all… the cure for one problem makes the other one worse.

To fight inflation, Powell would raise interest rates. But raising rates makes borrowing expensive, companies slow down, people lose jobs. Unemployment gets worse.

Powell would lower interest rates to protect jobs. But lowering rates pumps money into the economy, spending goes up, prices rise. Inflation gets worse.

He is, in the most literal sense, stuck.

Economists have a name for when both things happen together; rising prices and a struggling economy. They call it stagflation. And the last time it happened seriously was in the 1970s, after an oil shock from the Middle East triggered a decade of economic pain in the Western world.

Sounds familiar.

What they never tell you in the headlines.

Jerome Powell’s problem is not just America’s problem. It is Kenya’s problem as well.

The US Dollar is the world’s reserve currency. That means almost every global transaction from oil, imports, debt repayments, to cloud computing subscriptions is settled in dollars. When America sneezes, the rest of the world, especially countries like Kenya, catches the cold. Globalization came with strings attached like a- (complete the sentence for yourself, 2 marks).

Here’s how the chain reaction works:

When U.S. interest rates are high, money flows toward America. Investors from all over the world including those who had money parked in Kenyan Treasury bills pull their cash out of places like Nairobi and send it to New York, because they can earn better returns there safely.

When that money leaves Kenya, demand for the Kenyan shilling drops. The shilling weakens against the dollar. And when the shilling weakens, everything we import becomes more expensive…because we pay for imports in dollars.

Oil. Laptops. Phones. Machinery. Medicines. All of it priced in dollars. All of it gets more expensive the moment the shilling moves.

Now add the oil shock on top.

The Middle East conflict that started earlier this year pushed the global price of oil from about $63 a barrel in December to nearly $100 by April. Kenya imports every single drop of refined fuel it uses. We do not refine our own (Dangote might change this soon). So when Brent crude oil spikes, your petrol station gets the memo within weeks and so does every matatu operator, every delivery service, every small business running a generator.

Your unga isn’t just expensive because of drought. Your fare isn’t just expensive because of traffic. There’s a longer chain pulling on prices and it starts at a podium in Washington D.C.

So what is the Central Bank of Kenya doing about it?

The CBK had actually been cutting interest rates. Ten times in a row. Trying to make credit cheaper and help the economy grow. But in April, they stopped. They paused the cuts. Because with oil prices rising and global uncertainty climbing, cutting rates further risked letting inflation get out of hand here at home.

As of today, the Kenyan shilling is holding steady sitting around 129 to the dollar. One of the most stable currencies in Africa right now. That’s genuinely good news. But that stability came at a cost: high interest rates that made loans expensive for businesses and ordinary Kenyans.

And that stability has a few cracks. Wall Street analysts the big banks like Standard Chartered and Citigroup are quietly forecasting that the shilling could weaken to around 134 by the end of 2026 if the Middle East situation doesn’t resolve. That’s not a collapse. But it’s enough to feel in your grocery run, your streaming subscriptions, your imported phone.

What does this mean for you, practically?

If you run a small business that imports anything like equipment, products, supplies your costs are going to drift upward. Plan for it now, not when the invoice lands.

If you’re a freelancer or working for a company that pays you in USD, a weaker shilling is actually good for your take-home pay in shillings. One of the rare upsides.

If you’re thinking about a big loan like a mortgage or a business loan, understand that the CBK is unlikely to cut rates significantly any time soon. The cheap-credit window is, for now, closed.

And if you’re just trying to understand why your money doesn’t stretch as far as it used to? It’s not just you. It’s not just bad luck. There is a structural story underneath it, and now you know it.

Kama wewe ni sharp boy/girl continue boosting the entertainment sector na dorime. You do not taste this economic reality in your bubbles (champagne but also, living in a bubble - see what I- 😉).

The honest truth is this:

Kenya is not a passive bystander in global finance. We are deeply wired into a system where decisions made in Washington, conflicts fought in the Middle East, and oil prices set in London all show up at our fuel pumps and supermarket shelves.

Understanding that chain doesn’t make the prices go away. But it does make you financially literate in a way that most people, including many adults, simply are not.

And that is one of the most valuable things you can own.

See you next week. Stay blessed.

If you want more of this, subscribe below. I’m on a journey of breaking down finance and economics simply, every week, with a specific focus on what it means for Kenya and the rest of Africa.

Subscribe now