Over the years, this has become one of the resources I’ve shared most often with clients, friends, and workshop participants. Every few months, someone asks me to send it again, so I thought I’d publish it here where anyone can return to it.

I originally wrote this exercise many years ago, and it first appeared in The Kid and the King. Looking back, I can see that it planted seeds for much of what I’ve been writing recently in The Last 5%. Much of that writing has been about learning to turn inward, meeting the parts of ourselves we’ve spent a lifetime trying to fix, outrun, or silence, and slowly replacing judgment with curiosity, and shame with compassion.

Sooner or later, though, that same invitation extends beyond ourselves. It asks whether we are willing to meet the people who have hurt us with the same curiosity we’ve been learning to offer ourselves. Not because what they did was okay, and not because they deserve a free pass, but because we no longer want our lives organized around the pain they left behind.

When I first wrote this letter, I thought I was trying to forgive my father. Looking back, I don’t think that’s what I was doing at all. I think I was trying to become someone capable of emotional generosity. At the time I believed the obstacle was my father. Over the years I came to realize that the deeper work was inside me.

For much of my life, when a relationship became painful, my instinct was to create distance. Sometimes that was the right decision. But I also discovered that removing someone from my life wasn’t the same as releasing them from my heart. This letter became the medicine for that.

This isn’t a letter you send. It’s a letter you write for yourself.

Take your time with it. Write by hand if you can. Don’t worry about getting the words right. Just tell the truth.

Part One: The Rant

Begin with this sentence:

I’ve been really pissed at you, pretending that I’m not.

Then write without censoring yourself.

This is not the time to balance the story. That comes later.

Write everything.

The obvious hurts. The disappointments. The betrayals. The resentment you’ve carried for years. The conversations you wish you’d had. The things you never said. Even the small, petty grievances you’ve been embarrassed to admit.

Don’t worry about being fair.

Don’t try to sound wise.

Don’t clean it up.

This part isn’t about becoming a better person.

It’s about finally becoming an honest one.

Part Two: The Impact

When you’ve said everything you need to say, begin a new paragraph with these words:

What I realize today is that by holding onto this anger, it’s impacting my life in ways that are no longer acceptable to me.

Now the focus changes. The letter is no longer about what happened. It’s about what continuing to carry it has done to your life.

Where does it still show up?

• Your closest relationships

• Your work

• Your body

• Your sleep

• Your relationship with authority

• Your willingness to trust

• Your capacity for intimacy

The point isn’t to create more shame. It’s simply to see the cost.

The realization that changed everything for me was this:

As long as I continued holding onto my anger, I remained a victim of what had happened.

Not because of what was done to me, but because I was still allowing it to shape how I lived today.

At some point I realized that was no longer acceptable to me.

I wanted my life back.

Part Three: Emotional Generosity

Begin with these words:

What I realize today...

Now begin wondering about the other person’s life.

Not to excuse them.

Not to minimize what happened.

Simply to understand that they, too, have an inner world you may never have fully seen.

I often begin with something like this:

I don’t believe there was ever a morning where you woke up and decided your purpose that day was to hurt me.

They may have caused me pain, but I no longer believe that pain was the purpose of their life.

Whether that is literally true isn’t really the point. The point is to soften the certainty you’ve carried for so long and become curious about the life that shaped them.

You might ask yourself:

• What might it have been like to be them?

• What burdens were they carrying?

• What pain had they inherited?

• What did they never receive that they couldn’t give?

• What fears shaped the way they moved through the world?

If it’s true for you, this is also a place to acknowledge your own part in the relationship. Not because you’re responsible for what happened, but because relationships are rarely as simple as our pain first tells us they are.

This isn’t about excusing harmful behavior. Some things are inexcusable. Some relationships should end. Some boundaries should remain exactly where they are.

Emotional generosity asks none of those things.

It simply asks whether you are willing to let another person’s humanity exist alongside your own pain.

One Last Story

Years after writing this letter, I found myself sitting in the car with my father. There wasn’t a plan. I simply asked him, “What was it like having me as your son?”

He was quiet for a long moment.

Then he said, “It was really hard.”

That conversation didn’t erase the past. It didn’t suddenly make everything okay. But something had changed.

For the first time, I wasn’t only listening as the son who had been hurt. I was listening as another human being trying to understand the life sitting beside me. I heard about the pressure he carried as an immigrant, as an Indian physician, and as a father trying to raise a son whose life made very little sense inside the community he came from. I began to hear the loneliness in places where, years earlier, I could only hear criticism.

That didn’t change my experience, but it changed my relationship to his experience. And that changed something in me.

Looking back, I don’t think this letter taught me forgiveness. It taught me something much more important.

Every place where I struggled to feel emotionally generous toward another person pointed me back toward something I had not yet released inside myself. Not something broken, simply something that was still asking to be seen.

Over time I came to understand that the people I found hardest to be emotionally generous toward often became my greatest teachers. Not because they had something else to teach me, but because they revealed the places where I was still holding on. Every place I couldn’t extend emotional generosity invited me back into myself, to soften, to grieve, and eventually to release something I didn’t even know I was carrying.

Not because the other person had changed.

Not because the past had changed.

Because I had.

Today, whenever I notice myself withholding emotional generosity, I try to become curious instead of certain. What am I still holding onto? What inside me has not yet been released?

For me, that’s what this letter has always been about. Not forgiveness. Becoming the kind of person whose heart has room for both truth and humanity.

That’s a practice I’ll probably spend the rest of my life learning.

Thanks for continuing to walk this journey with me.

If you’ve made it this far, thank you. And thank you to my subscribers who continue to support this publication.

Subscribe now

I know your time and attention are precious, and I do not take it lightly that you would spend some of it here with me. Your texts, emails, comments, and notes mean more than you probably realize. They remind me that this writing is part of a larger conversation, one I hope is useful, honest, and additive to the work so many of us are trying to do in our own lives and relationships.

One practical thing, because this is the strange world we now live in: your likes, comments, and shares really do matter. Not because I need applause, but because the algorithm often determines whether a piece like this reaches the people who may need it. Your engagement helps this work travel beyond the small circle where it began.

Leave a comment

However you arrived here, and whatever you carry as you go, I am grateful you came.

From the heart,

Shasheen

Share

This piece grew out of my return to finishing The Last 5% Book. I wanted to create an anchor for my clients and for those who have been following this Substack, something that gathers one of the most subtle and important shifts I have found in my own life. It has changed the way I experience myself, my relationships, and the work I do. I am still finding the language for it. In many ways, everything else I have written here circles this one idea from a different angle. If you are reading in the Substack app, you can tap the play button in the upper right corner and listen instead.

A note on language: when I write about a “part” of us, I mean it plainly. A voice, an impulse, a place inside with its own fear, history, and intention, even when it does not agree with the rest of us. Nothing more technical is needed to follow along.

I see a version of the same moment almost every day in the people I work with. Someone has just described a pattern with remarkable clarity. They understand how it developed, what tends to trigger it, and the cost it has had in their life. They may be able to connect it to childhood, to a relationship, to a protective strategy, or to some old conclusion they formed about who they needed to become. There is often a brief pause after the recognition, and then the question arrives.

What do I do about it?

It is a completely understandable question. Most of us have been trained to respond to difficulty by gathering information, developing a plan, and taking action. We are taught that progress means movement, and movement means doing something. The person asking is sincere. They want to grow. They want to stop repeating the pattern. They want to make a different choice.

Still, I have become interested in what happens in the small space between the recognition and the question.

Something has come into view. A feeling, a reaction, a part of the person that does not make sense, or a place where all their insight has not yet produced the change they hoped for. For a brief moment, the experience is simply there. Then, almost immediately, it becomes a problem. The search begins for the explanation, the practice, the book, the conversation, or the steps that will make it different.

The movement is so familiar, and so respectable, that it rarely feels like we are moving away from anything. It feels like responsibility. It feels like maturity. It feels like the natural response of a thoughtful person committed to their own development.

There is nothing wrong with understanding or action. Many situations require both. What interests me is the relationship that can quietly take shape underneath the action. One place in us becomes responsible for changing another. One knows what should happen, while another appears to be standing in the way. One becomes the manager, the teacher, the coach, or the judge. The other becomes the problem.

As I continue to work on The Last 5%, I find myself returning to this relationship again and again. Most of the people I work with are not lacking insight. They have read the books, gone to therapy, attended retreats, learned the language, and spent years trying to understand themselves. They know a great deal about what they do and why they do it. Yet there often comes a point when more understanding does not seem to take them much further. The same reactions remain. The same places still become activated. They know what they are supposed to do differently, but the knowing does not fully change the experience.

I am beginning to think this is where the last five percent begins.

What remains may not be another piece of information. It may be the relationship we have developed with the part of ourselves that has not changed.

Without realizing it, many of us have built an entire self-improvement life around an adversarial arrangement. There is the self trying to get somewhere, and there is the self that keeps interfering. The tired self. The resistant self. The frustrated self. The self that misses the practice, avoids the conversation, breaks the commitment, becomes reactive, or repeats the old behavior after promising that this time would be different.

The more responsible part steps in to manage the situation. It analyzes what happened and determines what needs to change. It builds a better structure, a stronger commitment, or a more disciplined plan. When the rest of us does not cooperate, the pressure increases. We tell ourselves we should know better. We remind ourselves how many times this has happened. We become disappointed, irritated, or ashamed.

The language sounds responsible. Underneath it, one part of us is trying to gain control over another.

This is difficult to see because the pressure often works.

Fear can motivate us. Shame can get us out of bed. The need to prove something can sustain years of effort. An old sense that we are not quite enough can drive us toward achievement, usefulness, recognition, and mastery. Some of the most capable people I know have built extraordinary lives while being deeply at odds with themselves.

I know something about this in my own life. Some of my striving has come from genuine care, interest, and devotion. Some of it has come from a less settled place, from a sense that stopping might expose something I did not want to feel, or that enough accomplishment might finally resolve an uncertainty I carried about myself. Those motivations can live beside each other for a long time. From the outside, they may look exactly the same.

The pressure may have helped build the business, maintain the practice, care for the family, or create the life. Self-opposition is not ineffective. It can be extremely effective. The harder question is what it produces alongside the result.

When opposition becomes the source of our energy, peace can begin to feel threatening. If I stop pressuring myself, who will keep me moving? If I am no longer disappointed in myself, what will stop me from becoming complacent? If I stop treating resistance as an obstacle, will I still do difficult things?

The struggle defends itself as necessary. It points to everything it helped us accomplish and says, this is because of me. What it does not draw much attention to is the exhaustion beneath the discipline, the inability to let success land, or the quiet belief that rest must be earned and can be taken away at any moment. It also does not mention how quickly satisfaction gives way to the next demand, or how often the achievement we hoped would settle something inside us brings only a brief period of relief.

The adversarial relationship is hard to recognize because it rarely introduces itself as hostility. It arrives wearing respectable clothes.

The internal pressure is called discipline. The constant evaluation is called self-awareness. The refusal to rest is called work ethic. The disappointment is called having standards. The fear of becoming ordinary is called ambition. The voice insisting that we are not enough yet presents itself as the part that cares most about our future.

None of these qualities is inherently harmful. Discipline matters. Standards matter. Ambition can be a genuine expression of creativity and purpose. Self-awareness can deepen a life. The difficulty is that self-attack can become so intertwined with these qualities that we lose the ability to tell them apart.

What we experience as shame does not always feel like shame. Sometimes it feels like urgency, seriousness, honesty, or concern. It may appear as a tightening in the body, a subtle withdrawal of warmth, or the conviction that we cannot relax until we have corrected whatever is wrong. It can sound measured and reasonable while carrying the same underlying message: the person you are right now is interfering with the person you are supposed to become.

Shame does not always feel like humiliation. Sometimes it feels like the most responsible voice in the room.

• • •

The pattern becomes easiest to see after we fail to do something we intended to do.

There is the missed practice, the conversation we avoided, the commitment we did not keep, or the task we did not complete. That is the first event. It may have consequences and require attention, but by itself it is often fairly simple. Something happened, or something did not happen.

Then the commentary begins.

You should know better. You said you were going to do this. This always happens. You are not as committed as you think you are. You are wasting time. You are falling behind.

Sometimes the voice is loud and unmistakably harsh. More often it is subtle. We may not consciously think, I am ashamed of myself. We simply experience a loss of warmth toward ourselves, a small internal recoil, or a sense that something about us is unacceptable and needs to be corrected before we can move on.

The shaming part believes it is helping.

It is trying to make the experience painful enough that we will not repeat it. It believes that if we feel bad enough about what happened, we will finally change. It may fear that without the pressure we will become lazy, careless, selfish, irresponsible, or undisciplined. Somewhere along the way, it learned that pain was required for movement.

Then, particularly for those of us who have spent years doing inner work, another voice arrives.

It knows that shame is not useful. It has read about self-compassion. It understands that criticism often makes things worse. It says, stop being so hard on yourself. You should not speak to yourself that way. You need to be kinder. You have done all this work, and you are still shaming yourself.

This second voice sounds wiser and more evolved. Listen closely, though, and the same structure may still be operating. One part of me is now turning against the part that shames.

We have not stopped shaming. We have simply begun shaming the part of us that shames.

This is where self-improvement becomes especially difficult to see clearly. We learn that shame is harmful, then use that knowledge to condemn the part that learned to use shame. We learn about parts, then decide that some parts are more evolved or acceptable than others. We learn to observe the ego, then build a more sophisticated ego that feels superior for noticing it.

The old relationship does not disappear when we acquire better language. It learns the language.

This is why simply telling ourselves to stop being self-critical rarely reaches very far. The command may be delivered in a softer tone, but the underlying movement remains unchanged. A part of us has again been named as the problem, and another part has been assigned to correct it.

The alternative is not to excuse the shaming or let it run unchecked. It is to turn toward it with enough curiosity to understand what it believes it is doing.

What is it afraid would happen if it stopped applying pressure? What does it believe the shame prevents? When did it learn that criticism was the safest way to create change? What responsibility has it been carrying?

The shaming part is often treated as the least evolved part of us, the one we should have outgrown by now. Yet it may be one of the hardest-working parts we have. It may have spent years trying to protect us from failure, humiliation, rejection, or regret. Its methods may be painful, but its intention is not necessarily cruelty. It may be terrified that without its vigilance everything will fall apart.

That does not mean we agree with it. It means we stop beginning the conversation by trying to get rid of it.

Only then can we turn toward the part that did not follow through.

What actually happened when we did not sit, write, exercise, make the call, complete the task, or keep the promise? Were we exhausted? Were we afraid? Had we committed to more than we could realistically hold? Was the promise made by one part of us without any real agreement from the rest? Was there resentment underneath the resistance? Did the task expose us to failure, judgment, disappointment, or something else we were trying not to feel?

Perhaps the commitment no longer felt true. Perhaps we were avoiding something difficult. Perhaps we acted carelessly and need to repair what happened. Curiosity does not guarantee a noble explanation. It simply lets us find out what is actually there.

Shame has already decided the meaning of the missed day. It says the miss is proof of laziness, weakness, or lack of commitment. Curiosity does not know yet. It stays long enough to ask.

This is not an excuse. I think it may be the beginning of a more honest accountability. When we are no longer defending ourselves against punishment, we can look more directly at what happened. We can acknowledge the effect of our behavior without collapsing into a judgment about who we are. We can make a repair, change the structure, or choose differently next time because we have understood something real, not because we have frightened ourselves back into compliance.

• • •

I see this same architecture in many forms.

We begin a practice because it matters to us. Meditation, writing, exercise, prayer, or some ordinary commitment to care for ourselves. Then, almost without noticing, we turn the practice into a measurement. We count the days. We become attached to the streak. What began as a place of return becomes evidence about the kind of person we are.

When we show up, we feel approved. When we miss, the commentary begins. The practice meant to bring us into a deeper relationship with ourselves becomes another place where our standing is evaluated.

This is one reason the distinction between discipline and devotion has become important to me. From the outside, the acts may look identical. I sit for twenty minutes. I write the article. I go for the run. Internally, though, the relationship can be completely different.

The version of discipline many of us learned contains an opponent. A part of us does not want to do the thing, and another part must overcome it. Devotion begins somewhere else. The act becomes a way of tending to something that matters. Resistance, fatigue, reluctance, and distraction may still be present, but they do not have to be defeated before we begin. They can be included.

I do not always know which one is operating in me. I can call something devotion while using it to prove that I am disciplined. I can practice compassion because I hope compassion will finally make an unwanted part disappear. I can become curious about myself while quietly conducting an investigation whose real purpose is to locate the defect and remove it.

The clearest sign is usually the agenda. Am I turning toward this part because I genuinely want to know it, or because I want it to change? Am I offering compassion, or am I managing the situation more effectively with a kinder voice? Am I listening, or waiting for the part to say whatever will allow me to move on?

Curiosity is difficult because it does not already know the answer. Compassion is difficult because it does not demand improvement in exchange for its presence. Neither asks us to ignore harm or abandon boundaries. They create enough room for action to arise from contact rather than opposition.

This is what I mean by meeting rather than managing.

Meeting does not require us to abandon plans, standards, or practical action. A financial plan may genuinely be needed. A difficult conversation may need to happen. A boundary may need to be set. The question is what else we are asking the action to accomplish.

Sometimes the plan has been given a second job. It must not only address the situation, it must also prove that we are safe, worthy, competent, lovable, or finally okay. When a plan carries that burden, no plan can ever be enough.

The external situation may improve, but the inner demand attaches itself to something new. The income rises, and the fear finds another number. The relationship changes, and the insecurity finds a different question. The goal is reached, and after a period of relief another goal appears carrying the same promise.

This may be why the emptiness after achievement can feel so disorienting. The achievement was real. It may have required courage, intelligence, discipline, and years of work. But the relief we expected was being asked to come from somewhere it could not come from. The success did what success could do. It could not settle the deeper question we had assigned to it.

Many high-achieving people eventually arrive at this point. The strategy that carried them through much of life continues to produce results, but the results no longer settle what they once seemed to settle. The person may have more insight, more success, and more choices than ever before, yet the underlying pressure remains.

The instinct is often to search for the next method. We assume there must be one more thing we have not understood. Sometimes there is. But sometimes the deeper invitation is to notice the relationship we are bringing to every method.

It is possible to turn healing into another project of self-correction. We can use meditation to become more acceptable to ourselves, therapy to become less inconvenient, spirituality to rise above ordinary human reactions, and self-awareness to keep a more detailed record of everything we believe is wrong.

Even practices intended to soften the ego can become another place to establish our standing. We measure our consistency, the depth of our insight, the sincerity of our practice, or the quality of someone else’s. The old hunger for comparison does not disappear simply because the setting has become spiritual.

This is not an argument against discernment. I may sense that a room drains me or that a teacher’s presence does not feel right, and that experience matters. But discernment is different from appointing myself the judge of another person’s sincerity. I can see the outside of someone else’s bow, apology, or prayer. I know only the inside of my own, and even that takes a great deal of honesty.

The work keeps returning me to my own experience, my own intention, and the relationship I am having with whatever is arising in me.

This is part of what makes the last five percent so difficult to locate. It does not necessarily live in the behavior itself. Two people can take the same action for entirely different reasons, and the same person can perform the same practice from a different place on different days. The distinction is often found in the relationship underneath the action.

Am I moving toward something that matters, or escaping something I cannot bear to feel? Am I holding a standard, or using the standard as evidence against myself? Am I taking responsibility, or trying to gain control over a part of me that frightens or embarrasses me?

These are not questions I can answer once and be finished with. The mind is too clever for that. It can justify almost anything when it wants to preserve a familiar arrangement. I can make self-attack sound like accountability and avoidance sound like wisdom. I can call compulsive action purpose and withdrawal surrender.

This is why I have come to trust the quality of the relationship more than the sophistication of the explanation. Is there curiosity here? Is there compassion? Is there room for the part of me that has not caught up with everything I know?

• • •

For a long time, I believed that if I stopped attacking myself, the standard would disappear with the attack. If I stopped applying pressure, I would become careless. If I allowed myself to be where I was, I would lose my desire to grow. Acceptance felt dangerously close to resignation.

I no longer believe they are the same.

A standard is a direction. It reflects what matters to me and what I believe I am capable of. Self-attack is the punishment I impose for not already being there. They may have traveled together for a long time, but one does not depend on the other.

I can tell the truth about a mistake without humiliating myself for making it. I can keep a commitment without making my worth depend on perfect consistency. I can recognize a pattern that causes harm without making an enemy of the part of me that learned it.

A good teacher does not lower the standard because they refuse to abuse the student. A good coach can see clearly what is possible while remaining interested in what is getting in the way. The direction remains, but the relationship in which we move toward it changes.

Being on our own side does not mean approving of everything we do. It does not mean that boundaries disappear, difficult conversations are avoided, or consequences no longer matter. It means we stop requiring our own humiliation as the price of change.

Self-attack consumes energy. It makes mistakes harder to examine because every mistake becomes a threat. It creates secrecy inside us, places that hide because they expect punishment when they are found. It clouds our decisions because the choice is no longer only about what is needed. It is also being asked to protect us from shame, prove our worth, or restore our standing in our own eyes.

When some of that threat begins to soften, more honest reflection becomes possible. We can look directly at what happened because we are no longer preparing to prosecute ourselves for it. We can become curious about the real reason we avoided something, rather than forcing the avoidance into a familiar story about laziness. We can take responsibility without using responsibility as a weapon.

I am still learning this. I still reach quickly for the answer. I still turn experiences into projects and parts of myself into problems. I still confuse pressure with care and urgency with clarity. These patterns are old, and they have been useful enough that I do not expect them to disappear simply because I can now see them.

What I am beginning to recognize is the moment when the relationship changes. Sometimes there is a pause before the search, the plan, or the correction. In that pause, I can ask a different question.

What is actually happening here?

Not what should I do about it, at least not immediately. Not how do I make it stop. Not what does this say about me. Just what is here, and what would it be like to stay close enough to know it?

Often the part I have been trying to overcome turns out to be carrying something understandable. Fear that I will repeat an old mistake. Exhaustion from being pushed for too long. Grief that has had nowhere to go. A desire that does not fit neatly inside the life I have built. A younger intelligence still using the only method it knows to keep me safe.

The shaming part may be there too, worried that this curiosity is another excuse and certain that without pressure nothing will change. That part belongs in the conversation. Being on my own side cannot mean placing the shamer outside the circle. No part of me has to be condemned before it can be understood.

The behavior may still need to change. A repair may still be necessary. A commitment may need to become more realistic, more honest, or more disciplined. But the relationship no longer has to begin with opposition.

This is the shift I keep finding at the center of The Last 5%. We can spend years gathering insight, changing behavior, and learning to manage ourselves more effectively. Much of that work matters. But there comes a point when management reaches its limit. The next movement is relational. We turn toward the part that has not changed, the part that shames, and the part that is ashamed, and we stop requiring one of them to lose before the rest of us can move forward.

Perhaps that is the last five percent. Not another method for becoming someone else, but a different relationship with the person who is already here, one in which even the voice that has been hardest on us no longer has to be treated as the enemy.

Thanks for continuing to walk this journey with me.

If you’ve made it this far, thank you. And thank you to my subscribers who continue to support this publication.

I know your time and attention are precious, and I do not take it lightly that you would spend some of it here with me. Your texts, emails, comments, and notes mean more than you probably realize. They remind me that this writing is part of a larger conversation, one I hope is useful, honest, and additive to the work so many of us are trying to do in our own lives and relationships.

One practical thing, because this is the strange world we now live in: your likes, comments, and shares really do matter. Not because I need applause, but because the algorithm often determines whether a piece like this reaches the people who may need it. Your engagement helps this work travel beyond the small circle where it began.

Leave a comment

However you arrived here, and whatever you carry as you go, I am grateful you came.

From the heart,

Shasheen

Share

Yesterday I attended the dismantling of the Green Tara sand mandala. For days, the monks from Drepung Loseling Monastery patiently placed one grain of colored sand after another, creating something remarkably beautiful while knowing from the very beginning it would be swept away. That wasn’t an unfortunate ending to the process. It was the process. The mandala was never meant to be kept. It was meant to be offered

.I thought I’d leave reflecting on impermanence. Instead, I left laughing at myself. As the monks began to gently brush the sand away, almost everyone in the room, myself included, instinctively reached for a phone. One last picture. One last video. There we all were trying to capture the very thing that had been created to remind us that we can’t hold onto anything. It made me smile. Not because I thought we were missing the point, but because it felt like such a human thing to do. When something moves us, we want to keep a piece of it. Looking through my phone later that evening, I realized I have hundreds, maybe thousands, of photographs I’ll probably never look at again.

As I watched the monks, something else quietly caught my attention. They had spent days creating something they knew would disappear, yet they never seemed preoccupied with the finished mandala. Their attention was on what they were doing as they did it. Watching them, I found myself wondering how often I do the opposite. How often I’m thinking about finishing the project, strengthening the relationship, preserving the memory, or capturing the moment instead of simply being there while it’s happening. Maybe that’s true of more than photographs. Maybe it’s true of conversations, friendships, the people I love, and all the ordinary moments that quietly become a life.

As everyone began gathering their things to leave, each of us was given a small bag of the blessed sand. Traditionally, most of the sand is returned to nature as an offering, but because of the drought here in Santa Fe and the lack of a nearby body of flowing water, the remaining sand was shared with those of us who had gathered. I was one of the last people leaving when one of the monks smiled, held up another little bag, and asked, “Would you like some more, Shasheen?”

“Sure,” I answered without thinking.

By the time I walked out, I had somehow gone from one small bag of blessed sand to three.

It wasn’t until I was driving home that I started laughing. Apparently, the part of me that believes “a little more” must be better is alive and well.

As I write this, those three little bags are sitting on my desk. My first thought was to put them on my altar. But as I was writing this, another idea came to me. Outside my office is the little fountain where I begin and end most days. It’s where the birds gather. It’s where I often sit between sessions. It’s where I’ve spent countless mornings simply watching life unfold.

I think that’s where the sand belongs.

Thanks for walking this journey with me.

From the heart,

Shasheen

Leave a comment

Subscribe now

I came home from nearly three weeks in Mexico at the end of June carrying more questions than answers. Ten days in the jungle, followed by another week on the quiet island of Holbox, had slowed something down in me. There was less urgency to figure everything out and less need to arrive somewhere. A few days after returning home, I celebrated my birthday and quietly stepped into my fifty-seventh year. For the first time in a long while, I didn’t feel any pressure to decide what this next season of life was supposed to become. I simply wanted to stay close to whatever had begun to soften.

One of the unexpected gifts that arrived on my birthday was a message of forgiveness from someone who had once been an important part of my life. It caught me by surprise. For a moment, I felt the familiar pull to revisit the past, to make sense of it all, to understand what it meant. But that passed more quickly than it once would have. What stayed with me wasn’t the story itself, but the quiet realization that I could hold it a little more gently than I once could. A few days later, we found ourselves sharing the same room during the Green Tara Puja. Nothing needed to be resolved. There was no need to revisit the past. We simply shared the same chants, the same silence, the same space.

As the days unfolded, I found myself smiling at how often the retreat seemed to continue in unexpected places. It was as though life kept picking up the conversation wherever I happened to be.

One of the invitations we kept returning to in Mexico was the practice of staying with what was actually happening here and now. Again and again, we found ourselves exploring the ways we had learned to protect ourselves, the personalities we had so carefully constructed over a lifetime, the strategies that had once helped us belong, stay safe, or feel loved. It was strangely comforting to recognize that so much of what we criticize in ourselves began as an intelligent response to being human. Somewhere along the way, we all get wounded, and somewhere along the way, we all adapt. The challenge isn’t that we adapted. It’s forgetting that the adaptation isn’t the whole story of who we are.

A few weeks later, I had the privilege of once again opening my home to the monks from Drepung Loseling Monastery during their annual pilgrimage to Santa Fe. Each year they share different offerings with the community, and this year I was fortunate to host the Green Tara Puja. If you’ve never experienced one, it’s difficult to describe the effect of hearing those deep, resonant chants move through a room. They don’t simply fill the space. You feel them in your body. Every now and then I’d find myself pulled back into the logistics of hosting, checking on guests, answering a text, making sure lunch was on its way, only to have the sound draw me right back into the moment. It was almost impossible to stay distracted for very long.

One of my favorite moments had nothing to do with me. Bear wandered over to one of the monks, the very same monk he seemed drawn to last year, and quietly settled beside him. As the monk rested his hand on Bear’s head, Bear simply looked up at him with that familiar, gentle curiosity he seems to reserve for people he instinctively trusts. It lasted only a moment, but it stopped me in my tracks. No words. No performance. Just two beings completely at ease in one another’s presence.

After the puja, while we waited for lunch to arrive, the monks wandered the property. One sat quietly by the fountain watching the hummingbirds. A few gathered on the rooftop deck, taking in the mountains. Someone asked what there was to drink, and we pointed to a few bottles of sparkling water. One monk picked up the lemon sparkling water, smiled, and softly repeated, “Lemon... lemon.” After more than an hour of chanting, he took a long sip. His whole face brightened. Then, almost instinctively, he reached for another can and handed it to one of the other monks with the same warm smile.

“Lemon water.”

Nothing extraordinary was happening, and yet somehow it felt like everything was.

As I watched them over those few days, I realized I had been searching for the wrong word. For years, I would have called what I admired discipline. Their commitment is extraordinary, and their lives are unquestionably shaped by practice. But that wasn’t what kept moving me. It was their warmth. Their joy. Their ease with one another. The complete absence of needing to be anyone other than who they already were.

It made me wonder if what I had been calling discipline all these years was actually something much quieter. Maybe the better word is devotion. Not devotion as obligation, but devotion as love. The kind that returns, day after day, not because someone is keeping score, but because your heart naturally finds its way back to what matters.

Looking back over the past month, I’m struck by how often the same invitation arrived through completely different experiences. A retreat in Mexico. Redefining love and partnership. An unexpected birthday message. A sacred gathering with the monks. None of them looked alike, yet something essential felt remarkably familiar. It wasn’t as though I was collecting philosophies. It felt more like hearing the same truth spoken with a different accent.

As I write this, the monks are continuing their annual pilgrimage through Santa Fe. This year’s offering is a Green Tara sand mandala that, when it is complete, will be swept away. Days of extraordinary care devoted to creating something they know from the very beginning will not last. There is something quietly beautiful about that. Not because it teaches us not to become attached, but because it reminds us that the value of something isn’t determined by how long it remains. Sometimes the offering is simply in the making.

I’m beginning to wonder if a life is something like that.

Maybe we aren’t here to perfect ourselves. Maybe we’re simply here to keep returning. To this moment. To the people we love. To the frightened places within ourselves. And perhaps each return can be made with just a little more kindness than the last.

The language may change, but the invitation doesn't.

Thanks for continuing to walk this journey with me.

If you’ve made it this far, thank you. And thank you to my subscribers who continue to support this publication.

Subscribe now

I know your time and attention are precious, and I do not take it lightly that you would spend some of it here with me. Your texts, emails, comments, and notes mean more than you probably realize. They remind me that this writing is part of a larger conversation, one I hope is useful, honest, and additive to the work so many of us are trying to do in our own lives and relationships.

One practical thing, because this is the strange world we now live in: your likes, comments, and shares really do matter. Not because I need applause, but because the algorithm often determines whether a piece like this reaches the people who may need it. Your engagement helps this work travel beyond the small circle where it began.

Leave a comment

However you arrived here, and whatever you carry as you go, I am grateful you came.

From the heart,

Shasheen

Share

📷 Bears Devotion 2, July 15, 2026, Santa Fe, NM, By Author

📷 Bears Devotion 1, July 14, 2025 Santa Fe, NM, By Lucy Barna

It’s been quite a year. I’m sitting here this morning with Bear, who turns twelve this year, feeling mostly quiet and grateful. Maybe a little tender. Maybe a little disoriented in that strange birthday way, when you find yourself looking back and looking ahead at the same time, trying to take in the year you just lived and the one you are about to enter.

Another year around the sun. Being born on the 4th of July has always made this day feel a little symbolic. Some years it has felt louder. Fireworks, celebration, declarations, all of it. This year feels different. If there is a declaration, it is a quieter one. A declaration to keep reorienting. To keep coming back to what matters. To take better care of myself. To take better care of the little one inside. To continue softening the stance I have had toward myself for so much of my life, and to keep listening for a kinder voice within.

I was told this is the year of The Hanged Man for me, and honestly, it fits. A year to pause. To surrender a little more. To loosen my grip. To stop trying to force the next answer, and to see what becomes available when I am willing to meet life from a different angle. That is not always easy for me. There is still a part of me that wants to figure it out, move it along, make sense of it, get to the next place. But maybe this year is asking for something softer. More trust. More patience. More willingness to let life reveal itself without needing to wrestle it into clarity too soon.

There is so much noise in the world right now. So much chaos. So much urgency. I do not want that to harden me. I do not want it to make me less kind, less open, or less emotionally generous. I want to keep tending the inner life, not as a way of turning away from the world, but as a way of showing up with a little more steadiness and a little more love. I keep learning that how we meet ourselves has everything to do with how we meet the people we love, and how we move through the world.

So maybe that is the practice this year. To be more patient with the places still learning. To stay close to what is tender. To keep softening. To keep listening. To keep finding my way back to love, especially in the places where the old voice still wants to tighten, judge, or turn away.

And to everyone who has been part of this journey, walking beside me, reading along, witnessing, reflecting, loving, challenging, or simply staying connected in your own quiet way, thank you. I cannot tell you how much that has meant. For those of you following and subscribing on Substack, thank you too. It means more than you know.

Here’s to another year of softening, surrendering, listening, loving, and continuing to become.

From the heart,

Shasheen

📷 This is 56, July 4th, 2026, Santa Fe, NM.

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

This morning I am sitting in Holbox, Mexico, watching the turquoise water roll onto shore after an early run along the beach. I came here after ten days of deep transpersonal work in the jungles of Mexico, and part of what has made this place feel so special is that I did not arrive here alone. I came to rendezvous with dear friends I first met in Thailand, Alejandra from Mexico City, and Alejandro from Italy. Alejandra had lived on Holbox for several years before she and Alejandro later connected in Thailand, and together they have helped me experience the island through a sense of intimacy and connection I could not have found on my own. In Thailand, I had experienced Alejandra’s water rebirthing therapy and Alejandro’s deeply revealing EFT sessions, both of which stayed with me long after I left. Being met here by them after ten days in the jungles of Mexico gave this island a sense of community I could not have planned. Through Alejandra’s invitation, we were brought into a very intimate and special temazcal ceremony led by a beautiful ceremonial guide from the center of Mexico City. Song, fire, darkness, steam, prayer, laughter, and community. I did not arrive as a tourist trying to figure out a beautiful place. I arrived in a relationship, in care, in the kind of friendship that lets a place reveal itself differently.

For those unfamiliar with the tradition, a temazcal is often described as a sweat lodge, though that hardly captures the experience. In the way it was held for us last night, it carried the feeling of a return to the womb, a symbolic death and rebirth. You enter the dark. You sit in the heat. You surrender to the process. Then, at some point, you emerge again. What made last night so meaningful was the timing. The ceremony came at the end of ten days of inquiry, challenge, and an intimate look at myself and others. Ten days spent exploring the places where we hide, protect, perform, and disconnect, along with the possibility of something more honest, more connected, and more alive. By the time we entered the lodge, something had already been moving. The temazcal felt less like a beginning and more like a completion, a final invitation to sit with what had been revealed before stepping back into the world.

This morning, watching the sun rise on the longest day of the year, I found myself reflecting on a journey that began just over four years ago. On May 1, 2022, memories surfaced that changed the course of my life. What strikes me looking back is that they did not emerge during the hardest chapter of my life. They arrived during one of the strongest. We had just come through COVID. Like many people, I had found myself standing at a fork in the road. I could feel how easily those years could have become a darker chapter. Instead, I poured myself into growth. I had written my first book. I had climbed Kilimanjaro. I was in some of the best physical condition of my life. Looking back now, it almost feels as though my system knew something before I did, that I was finally ready to see what had remained hidden, to understand why certain patterns continued to show up despite decades of personal growth, and to stop fighting with parts of myself I did not fully understand.

I had no idea where that opening would lead. A Master’s degree in Clinical Psychology. Compassionate Inquiry. Internal Family Systems. The beginning of The Last 5%. The Amazon. The Sacred Valley. Darkness retreats in Thailand. The redwoods. And now, the jungles of Mexico. If you had shown this path to the high school version of me, or even the version of me standing there four years ago, I would have thought you were out of your mind. And yet somehow, this is the life that has emerged. A life I love. A life that continues to surprise me.

What those memories ultimately opened for me was much larger than the memories themselves. They opened a deeper inquiry into what it means to be human. Through my own experience, through years of coaching, and now through my work as a therapist, I have become increasingly convinced that none of us escapes childhood unchanged. We all experience moments of misattunement. We all reach conclusions about ourselves, often harsh conclusions, about whether we are enough, whether we are lovable, whether we belong, whether we matter. From those conclusions, we build lives. We develop ways of securing love, belonging, significance, safety, approval, or control. Many of those ways of moving through the world work remarkably well. In fact, our culture often celebrates them. Achievement, performance, caretaking, self-reliance, perfectionism, being the one who always has it together. These can become the very traits others admire in us, and the very traits we eventually mistake for who we are.

This is where The Last 5% has become so important to me. It is not simply about understanding our patterns. It is about the reorientation back to oneself that becomes possible when we stop treating those patterns as enemies and begin to meet them as parts of a system that once tried to protect us. The challenge is not always that these ways of surviving fail. The challenge is that they often succeed. They help us build careers, relationships, reputations, homes, families, and lives that look impressive from the outside. Some of those survival strategies helped me build a beautiful life. They also made it harder to receive and fully experience parts of the life I had built. That is one of the quieter costs of a strategy that works. From the outside, life can look full. The career, the relationships, the home, the reputation, the competence, the generosity, the strength. Yet inside, something can still be braced. Something can still be scanning. Something can still be trying to earn safety, love, belonging, or rest in a life where those things may already be present.

That sentence is painful to write because it is true. And I imagine some of you may recognize something in it. You may have built a life that works. You may be the person other people count on. You may be capable, thoughtful, disciplined, generous, successful, and deeply aware. You may have spent years working on yourself. You may understand your patterns, name your wounds, and recognize your triggers. And still, some tender part of life may remain difficult to fully receive. This is the quiet ache I keep seeing in myself, in clients, in friends, and in so many people who have done everything they were told would lead to freedom. A part of you knows how to manage, improve, and perform life. Another part is still waiting for permission to rest inside it. This may be where the mask begins to come off, when we stop asking the world to love the performance and begin learning how to stay with the parts of ourselves that once believed the performance was necessary.

One of the great shifts of the last four years is that I am less at war with myself. For years, I thought the shame was the problem. I thought the self-criticism was the problem. I thought the relentless drive to become better, do better, achieve more, understand more, and finally become enough was the problem. And in many ways, those patterns did carry real costs. They created pressure. They created distance. They made it harder to receive and fully experience parts of the life I had built.

But as the inquiry deepened, I began to see something else. Shame had disguised itself as motivation. Self-criticism had masqueraded as growth. The striving had not come from nowhere. It was the product of an intelligent young psyche trying to make sense of experiences it could not fully understand. A child reaching conclusions. A child attempting to solve problems far too large for a child to solve. A child deciding, often unconsciously, that if he could just be better, achieve more, take care of everyone else, get it right, or stay one step ahead, perhaps he would finally receive what he most longed for.

There is a heartbreaking innocence in that. There is also a profound intelligence. The softening did not come because I decided to be kinder to myself. It came because I finally began to understand what those parts of me had been trying to do. They were carrying responsibilities they were never meant to carry alone. Perhaps that is the deepest shift of the last four years. The parts did not disappear. I did not transcend them. I did not finally solve myself. The fight softened. The deeper work has been learning to move below the neck, beyond understanding, into direct experience, into the wisdom of the body, the intelligence of the heart, and a different relationship with the parts of myself that learned long ago how to survive.

Sitting here this morning, after ten days of transpersonal work and a temazcal ceremony on the eve of the solstice, I find myself reflecting less on what I have learned and more on what has softened: the self-judgment, the certainty, the need to figure everything out, and the belief that enough insight would eventually solve the mystery of being human. Standing beneath the stars last night and watching the sun rise over the ocean this morning, I found myself feeling immense gratitude for a journey I never would have chosen and yet would not trade. It has opened the possibility of a more intimate relationship with myself, with the people around me, with the natural world, and with the mystery of being alive.

As I prepare to complete my 56th year on the planet, finish my 2nd book, The Last 5%, deepen my work with clients, and begin a three-year exploration of ecstatic mysticism, I do not feel like I am arriving anywhere. I feel more aware of how much remains unknown, and strangely, that feels like good news. The deeper I have traveled into my own experience, the less isolated I have felt. What began as a search for answers slowly became an appreciation for the shared human experience, a deepening connection to nature, to relationship, to community, and to the mystery that seems to reveal itself whenever we slow down enough to listen.

That is why I keep writing. The Last 5% is not a theory I am standing outside of. It is the inquiry I have been living. It is my attempt to understand why insight, success, discipline, and years of personal development can take us so far, while something tender and essential can remain just out of reach. More and more, I am beginning to see that the last five percent is not only about healing the wound. It is about what becomes possible when the old strategies soften, when the parts of us that learned to protect feel less alone, and when we can begin to meet life with more depth, intimacy, and honesty. My commitment is to keep using my own life honestly, carefully, and sometimes uncomfortably, as one example of this work. My story is not exceptional. That is precisely the point. The deeper I listen to my own experience, the more I recognize the human experience inside it. I see it in my clients. I see it in friends. I see it in the people who seem to have everything working from the outside and still carry a quiet ache they cannot quite name.

There is another layer to this reflection today. It is Father’s Day, and my daughter will turn thirty in a few months. Of all the roles I have been asked to grow into, being her father has been one of the most humbling. It has taught me that love is practiced over time, through tenderness, mistakes, repair, listening, and the ongoing willingness to keep learning. Sitting in the temazcal last night, with its prayers to the ancestors and to the generations still to come, I felt a deep reverence for my own father, whose journey from India to the United States, along with his vision and commitment, helped make it possible for me to be sitting here now, writing these words from the edge of the sea.

None of this has happened in isolation. I feel deep gratitude for the teachers, therapists, mentors, clients, friends, family members, and fellow travelers who have walked with me, challenged me, trusted me, and loved me through the messier parts of this becoming. This week in Holbox has reminded me again how much community matters, how different a place feels when we are received into it by people who know us, care for us, and help us listen more closely to where we are. There is a particular humility in realizing how many people have had a hand in whatever wisdom I now get to carry forward.

And to you, the reader, thank you for meeting me here. This writing has never felt like a performance. It has felt like a conversation, a place where I get to use my own life as one example of what it means to keep turning toward the places we might rather avoid. If this reflection resonates with something in you, I hope you will stay close to the conversation. The Last 5% is about this intimate journey back to ourselves. The places where we outsourced our worth, our safety, our lovability, and our belonging to the world around us, often very early, often without knowing we had done it. The places where the old operating system kept running long after the original conditions had changed. And the courageous reorientation of learning to care for the very parts of ourselves we spent a lifetime asking the world to hold for us.

Four years ago, a doorway opened in my life that I did not know existed. I never would have chosen to walk through it. At the time, it felt like a rupture. Looking back now, I can see that it was also a doorway home. The last four years have been my attempt to honor what opened. This morning, sitting beside the water in Holbox on the longest day of the year, that feels like enough.

Happy solstice. And happy Father’s Day to the fathers, father figures, and men doing the quiet inner work of loving well.

Thank you for walking this journey with me.

If you’ve made it this far, thank you. And thank you to my subscribers that continue to support this publication.

I know your time and attention are precious, and I do not take it lightly that you would spend some of it here with me. Your texts, emails, comments, and notes mean more than you probably realize. They remind me that this writing is part of a larger conversation, one I hope is useful, honest, and additive to the work so many of us are trying to do in our own lives and relationships.

One practical thing, because this is the strange world we now live in: your likes, comments, and shares really do matter. Not because I need applause, but because the algorithm often determines whether a piece like this reaches the people who may need it. Your engagement helps this work travel beyond the small circle where it began.

However you arrived here, and whatever you carry as you go, I am grateful you came.

From the heart,

Shasheen

📷’s Paradise Found, June 20-21st, Holbox, MX, By author.

🎧 Also, if you download the Substack app and subscribe for free, you can listen to all the posts by clicking the play button on the top right of the essay

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

My three-year journey into Ecstatic Mysticism began in a strange place: studying what happens in the first few seconds of meeting another human being. Before arriving in Mexico, our entry point was the encounter, transference, and the Enneagram. Encounter pointed us toward the living field between two people. Transference named the old emotional templates we bring into that field. The Enneagram gave language to the masks and adaptations we mistake for ourselves. By the time I was finishing a ten-day transpersonal retreat in the jungles of Mexico, these were no longer separate teachings. They were different ways of looking at the same moment: what happens when I come face to face with another person, and my old self arrives before I do.

The teachings did not stay conceptual for long. They moved quickly into embodied encounter practices: eye gazing, spontaneous movement, paired interactions, group exercises, and psychodramatic explorations of the masks we wear. The Gestalt attitude kept bringing us back to the here and now, to the body, to the field, to the actual moment of contact. Again and again, we were invited to notice the difference between what was happening in the encounter and what our imagination was already constructing around it. That distinction is not subtle. Someone walks into the room, and before they have said much of anything, something in us is already at work. We are reading the field. We are making tiny judgments. We are assessing safety, status, threat, attraction, possibility, and danger. Do they like me? Are they judging me? Am I above them, below them, on equal ground? Do they want something from me? Do I need something from them? Am I about to be seen, dismissed, desired, exposed, used, admired, rejected? At the most basic level, the organism is still asking an ancient question: am I going to eat it, or is it going to eat me?

Of course, we do not usually say it that way. We say, “I just had a feeling.” We say, “I liked their energy.” We say, “Something about them bothered me.” We say, “I don’t know why, but I immediately trusted them.” And maybe all of that is true. Sometimes the body is right. Sometimes the field really is telling us something. And sometimes the wound has grabbed the microphone. That was the humbling part. There was a lot of eye contact in the retreat. Direct eye contact. Long enough to get past the performance of eye contact and into the imagination that starts forming behind it. Do they like me? Do they dislike me? Are they seeing me clearly? Are they seeing something I am trying not to see? Am I making them uncomfortable? Are they judging me? Am I safe here? At fifty-six years old, after decades of therapy, coaching, spiritual work, meditation, writing, men’s work, plant medicine, and every other doorway I have walked through, it was humbling to sit across from another human being and still feel the old machinery come online.

This is where transference became more than a clinical concept. The person in front of me had barely done anything, but my imagination had already begun assigning them a role. They could become the one who might reject me, need me, admire me, misunderstand me, leave me, expose me, or finally give me what I had been looking for. The encounter was no longer clean. The past had entered the room wearing the face of the present. That is why I keep returning to The Last 5%. It is rarely the part we do not understand. It is the part we understand perfectly well until another person activates it.

The Enneagram gave me a language for this. I am a Two, commonly called the helper, which sounds benign enough. As a professional coach and therapist, it would be easy to say I found my calling. Helping people has been one of the organizing principles of my life, and much of that is sincere. I do care. I am moved by people. I can feel where the pain is in a room, and my instinct is to move toward it. But The Last 5% asks a more exacting question: where is the help coming from? Is it coming from freedom, or from anxiety? Is it coming from love, or from the old bargain that says, “If I am useful enough, maybe I will be wanted”? I am not interested in becoming less generous or less available. I am interested in knowing when my help is an offering and when it is an audition.

And that is where the mask becomes tricky. The mask does not usually announce itself as a mask. It arrives as something we have learned to call our personality, our gift, our way of loving, our role in the room. For me, it can arrive as helpfulness. For someone else, it may arrive as achievement, vigilance, intensity, withdrawal, charm, control, harmony, competence, or ease. Different masks. Different scanners. Same old bargain: let me become what keeps me safe. Personality was not a mistake. At some point, it worked. The mask began where something hurt, where something was missing, where something in us needed protection. Over time, what began as a way to survive the room became the way we entered every room.

And this is where the mask becomes more than an interesting psychological idea. It has a cost. The cost is intimacy. The mask may help us function. It may help us succeed. It may help us become impressive, generous, capable, charming, strong, agreeable, insightful, spiritual, or useful. It may even help us gain admiration, approval, and a sense of belonging. But there is a quieter question underneath all of that: is the part of me that most needs love actually being met, or is my adaptation receiving the applause?

That is the ache at the center of the mask. It can get us seen for what we do, what we provide, what we perform, what we manage, what we achieve, or how little we seem to need. But it cannot get us fully seen for who we are because the mask stands in front of the very part of us that longs to be known. This is where The Last 5% becomes relational. The question is no longer simply, “What is my pattern?” The deeper question is, “What does this pattern cost the people I love, and what does it cost me in my ability to be loved by them?” Because the mask not only protects the wound. It also organizes the relationship around the wound. It quietly asks the people closest to us to relate to our adaptation while the original tenderness remains hidden behind it.

This is the place where the work often stops too early. We can become very fluent in the language of our childhood. We can say the thing cleanly. My father was absent. My mother was critical. My parents divorced. I did not feel seen. I did not feel safe. I did not feel good enough. I learned to please. I learned to perform. I learned to disappear. I learned to become useful. All of that may be true, and still it may keep us one layer above the wound. The adaptation did not form around the event alone. It formed around the identity conclusion the child made because of the event. The event is what happened. The story is how we remember it. The conclusion is what the child made it mean about itself. Most of our work stops at the event and the story. The mask forms around the conclusion.

“My father was not around” is the adult sentence. “What kind of child has a father who does not come toward him?” is the wound. “I was left alone” is the story. “What kind of person gets left?” is the identity conclusion. “I was criticized” is the family history. “What must be wrong with me that the people I needed most could not see and love me as I was?” is the place the mask was built to protect. That question drops the floor. The child’s conclusion is usually brutal. It has no therapeutic language. I am unlovable. I am too much. I am invisible. I am a burden. I am disposable. I am only safe when I am useful. I am only wanted when I become someone else.

This is the wound underneath the wound, and it is why the mask has such force. The mask is not just a social performance. It is not just a personality quirk. It is not just the thing we do at parties, at work, in relationships, or in spiritual workshops. The mask is the strategy that formed around an existential conclusion the child could not bear to feel directly. If I am unlovable, I will become indispensable. If I am invisible, I will become exceptional. If I am unsafe, I will become vigilant. If I am going to be left, I will leave first. We may know our story. We may know our type. We may know our adaptation. We may know the family pattern. We may know exactly why we became the person we became. But The Last 5% is not satisfied by knowing. It asks whether we are willing to feel the original conclusion that the mask has spent a lifetime protecting us from.

That is why the encounter matters. When another person walks into the room, they do not simply meet our adult self. They touch the old conclusion. They activate the scanner. They awaken the questions underneath the personality. Will you see me? Will you leave me? Will you shame me? Will you want me? Will you need me? Will you use me? Will you overpower me? Will you discover what is wrong with me? And before we have time to answer from the present, the mask answers from the past. That split second is the encounter. It is also where The Last 5% stops being an idea. It lives where transference, imagination, and adaptation meet. The present person is in front of us, but the old figure is there as well. The old room is there. The old bargain is there. The old question remains: can I be here as I am, or do I need to become the version of myself that once kept me safe?

The mask deserves respect. It carried something we could not yet carry consciously. It helped us survive. It helped us belong. It helped us stay safe. It helped us get love, avoid pain, manage chaos, or maintain some sense of control when we did not yet have the resources to do anything else. But the work of The Last 5% is not simply to understand the mask. It is to notice when the mask is still doing the meeting for us. True encounter asks something more difficult than self-awareness. It asks for presence in the exact moment our adaptation wants to take over. Can I meet you without immediately organizing myself around the wound? Can I feel the old strategy rise and choose not to become it? Can I stay in the here and now long enough to discover whether this person is actually dangerous, or whether my system has simply mistaken the present for the past?

What part of you gets loved, and what part of you stays hidden? That may be one of the most honest questions The Last 5% asks. The mask may have helped us survive. It may have helped us become lovable enough, impressive enough, useful enough, harmless enough, strong enough, easy enough, or needed enough to stay connected. But intimacy cannot fully reach the part of us we have learned to protect from being seen. At some point, the very adaptation that helped us get love begins to limit how deeply love can reach us.

The Last 5% is subtle work. It does not always look dramatic from the outside. Sometimes it is only the pause before I become useful. The breath before I explain. The moment before I manage the room. The small internal recognition that the person in front of me is not the old figure, the old wound, the old parent, the old absence, the old verdict. It can seem almost too small to matter. But in our deepest relationships, these small moments are often the whole thing. They are the difference between meeting the person we love and meeting our own history through them. They are the difference between offering love and asking love to finally prove something. They are the difference between intimacy and repetition.

This is why I keep finding so much richness here. The work is humbling because the mask does not disappear just because we understand it. But there is freedom in catching it sooner. There is freedom in feeling the old conclusion rise and realizing it is not the whole truth. There is freedom in discovering that I can be generous without auditioning, helpful without disappearing, loving without bargaining for my place in the room. Maybe that is the deeper invitation of the encounter: to meet the person in front of us without making them responsible for the wound behind us. And maybe that is The Last 5%. The quiet, difficult, liberating space where the mask still appears, but no longer has to do the meeting for us.

Thanks for walking this journey with me.

If you’ve made it this far, thank you. And thank you to my subscribers that continue to support this publication.

I know your time and attention are precious, and I do not take it lightly that you would spend some of it here with me. Your texts, emails, comments, and notes mean more than you probably realize. They remind me that this writing is part of a larger conversation, one I hope is useful, honest, and additive to the work so many of us are trying to do in our own lives and relationships.

One practical thing, because this is the strange world we now live in: your likes, comments, and shares really do matter. Not because I need applause, but because the algorithm often determines whether a piece like this reaches the people who may need it. Your engagement helps this work travel beyond the small circle where it began.

However you arrived here, and whatever you carry as you go, I am grateful you came.

From the heart,

Shasheen

📷 The Mask, June 18th, 2026, Mayan Riviera Jungle, Mexico, by Author

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

“Should I stay or should I go?” can sound like a relationship question. And of course, sometimes it is. Sometimes we really do need to look honestly at whether a relationship is healthy, mutual, safe, honest, and alive. Sometimes staying becomes self-abandonment. Sometimes leaving becomes clarity. Sometimes the answer matters.

In my last piece, The Adaptation We Mistake for Ourselves, I wrote about the strategies we build around the original wound. This piece follows that thread into the place those strategies reveal themselves most clearly: the tension, rupture, and repair of the relationships that matter most.

The more I sit with this work, in my own life and in the tender conversations I am trusted to hold with clients, the more I see that the stay-or-go question often points to something underneath the decision itself. It is rarely only about whether the relationship should continue. It is also about what has been touched, what is asking to be tended, and what meaning our system has made before we even know we have made it.

Sooner or later, there is a tear.

Sometimes it is dramatic. A fight. A betrayal. A text that lands like a punch. A conversation that crosses a line. A moment where both people can feel something break. Sometimes the tear is quiet. A complaint hardens into a verdict. A small distance becomes normal. A disappointment never gets spoken. A resentment gets explained so well we stop questioning what it is protecting. A relationship remains polite while slowly losing its honesty.

Either way, something in the system has sounded an alarm. Some part of us has detected danger, rejection, control, criticism, abandonment, invisibility, disrespect, exposure, or the possibility of not being loved in the way we needed to be loved. Before we can slow down enough to notice what is happening, the system starts collecting evidence. We build the case. We find the data points. We become the prosecutor. Or we collapse, apologize, absorb, and call it peace. Different strategies, same underlying ache.

What I am beginning to see is that the tear itself is not always the problem. The tear is often the signal that something inside me needs tending.

That is usually not where we go first. We go toward the other person. What they did. What they failed to do. What they should have known. What they always do. What they never do. What their action must mean. And sometimes the complaint is legitimate. Sometimes the other person really did something clumsy, hurtful, immature, avoidant, careless, or unfair. This inquiry does not require us to pretend otherwise.

But the Last 5% lives one layer underneath the complaint. It lives inside the meaning.

This is the part I want to slow down and give room to breathe, because this is the place the protective system works so hard to keep us from revisiting. Underneath the argument, underneath the evidence, underneath the convincing case about what the other person did, there is often a much older and more painful conclusion about ourselves. The place we would rather not visit. The place we learned to build entire strategies around so we would never have to feel it again.

When you did not call, did I make it mean I was forgotten? When you pulled away, did I make it mean I was too much? When you criticized me, did I make it mean I was bad? When you did not choose me in the way I hoped, did I make it mean I was unlovable?

And even those questions may still be a little too clean. The real conclusion is often uglier. More primitive. More humiliating. More difficult to admit. Something like, of course they left, look at me. Of course they did not choose me, I am too much. Of course they ignored me, I do not matter. Of course love disappeared, I must not be lovable.

That is the place the protective system does not want us to go.

So it points outward. It builds the case. It gathers witnesses. It sharpens the complaint. It reaches for righteousness, because righteousness is much easier to tolerate than the old conclusion. Righteousness lets us stay above the tender place. It lets us organize around what they did instead of feeling what their action touched.

And sometimes what they did really did matter. That part must stay clear. The complaint may be accurate. The hurt may be real. The boundary may be wise. But the Last 5% asks whether we can tell the truth about the impact without using the other person’s behavior to avoid the deeper conclusion it awakened inside us.

Because that is where the old wound lives. Not only in what happened, but in what we concluded about ourselves when it happened.

For me, the most painful version is simple and brutal: I must not be lovable for you to do that. Not intellectually. I can argue with that sentence all day long. I can explain why it is irrational, dramatic, historically loaded, and unfair to the present moment. But in the body, in the younger place that learned to scan for love disappearing, it can feel less like a thought and more like a fact. I feel it in my chest and my throat.

That is where intimacy gets hard. Once that conclusion is alive, the other person is no longer only the person in front of us. They start to carry the weight of the old wound. Without realizing it, we give them the impossible assignment of proving the wound wrong, meeting the unmet place perfectly, and soothing the part of us that has already decided what this means. Then we get angry when they cannot do it.

This is where “Should I stay or should I go?” can become a distraction, even when it is a valid question. The deeper question is whether I can pause long enough to see what is being touched before I make the other person responsible for healing it, proving it wrong, or carrying the full weight of it.

This is part of why the Last 5% is so hard. When the old wound gets touched, we do not usually experience ourselves as protected. We experience ourselves as clear. We experience ourselves as justified. We experience ourselves as finally seeing the truth. Righteousness can feel clean, even when it is quietly keeping us from the place that most needs our attention.

But the accuracy of the complaint does not make it the whole truth. Sometimes we are so right about what someone else did that we lose access to the part of us that needs tending.

The test is simple and uncomfortable: if there is still a charge, there is still residue inside us.

And if something in you resists that sentence, I understand. I feel the resistance too. There is a part of me that wants to say, yes, but you do not know what happened. You do not know how many times I tried. You do not know how long I stayed open before something in me finally closed. And of course that may all be true.

This is why I want to be careful. I am not interested in using this idea to override someone’s reality, flatten the facts, or turn pain into a spiritual lesson. Some doors are closed for good reason. Some distance is sanity. Some endings are necessary. Some boundaries are the most loving thing left.

But if there is still a charge, there may still be something in us asking to be met. That does not make the other person right. It does not make us wrong. It simply means the residue is not finished with us yet. And maybe the resistance itself is part of the inquiry. What does the resistance protect? What does it not want me to feel? What would I have to touch if I stopped building the case for even a moment?

That “but” is important. It usually means some part of us is trying to move the focus back onto the other person before we have met what is still alive inside ourselves. We want them to understand, to apologize, to finally see what they did, to clean up the residue we are still carrying. And of course we want that. We want to outsource the tending to the very person who triggered the wound, as if their finally getting it right could set us free. Sometimes their repair helps. Of course it does. But it cannot replace the meeting we owe the part of ourselves that is still carrying the charge.

They may have a role in repair. They may owe us accountability. They may need to hear the impact. They may need to change their behavior if the relationship is going to continue. But the residue inside us, the charge, the old meaning, the place where the hurt fused with something deeper about our worth or lovability, that is ours to meet. This is the Last 5%.

So it may be worth asking: where have I confused being right with being free? Where have the ruptures been in my life? Where have I rendered a verdict so completely that curiosity can no longer enter the room? Where have I been so certain about what someone else did that I stopped asking what their action touched in me? Where has righteousness protected me from feeling the younger place that felt unseen, unwanted, dismissed, controlled, abandoned, or unloved?

Because the Last 5% often lives underneath the verdict, in the place we cannot reach when righteousness has taken over the whole room.

Many of us have enough insight to know what we are supposed to do. We understand communication, attachment, boundaries, nervous systems, trauma, and repair. We can say the right things. We can sound quite evolved. And then, in the intimacy of a real relationship, the scanner lights up and suddenly we are not responding only to the moment. We are responding to the old conclusion the moment awakened.

That is why the tear matters. The tear shows us where the work is. It asks us to slow down enough to ask: what did my system detect? What did I decide this meant about me? What younger place is asking to be met? What part of me is trying to make my partner, my friend, my parent, my child, or my ex responsible for tending something inside me that I have not yet known how to tend myself?

There is another layer here that I do not want to step over. There is another human being across from us with their own scanner. They are also reading the moment through their history. They are also protecting something. They are also making meaning, often faster than they can explain. Their protective system may look very different from ours, but it is still trying to do the same essential thing: keep something tender from being hurt again.

This is where the Last 5% becomes so demanding. When my scanner is activated, emotional generosity disappears quickly. The benefit of the doubt becomes hard to access. Curiosity narrows. Compassion gets replaced by interpretation. I stop wondering what may be happening inside the other person and start treating my conclusion as fact. I stop seeing a human being and start seeing evidence.

That is the moment worth slowing down.

You may stay, and you may go. You may repair, and you may not. You may decide the relationship has enough truth and mutuality to continue, or you may decide that distance is the most honest choice. But the opportunity inside the tension is real. Before the verdict, before the exit, before the collapse, before the righteousness hardens, there is a moment where the Last 5% is asking to be seen.

Can I tend what got activated in me without making you responsible for all of it? Can I remember that your system is protecting something too? Can I be emotionally generous without abandoning myself? Can I give the benefit of the doubt without overriding what I know to be true? Can I see how I contributed to the rupture and still honor the fact that something hurt?

This is where repair begins, because repair requires enough spaciousness to see both protective systems in the room.

I am writing this as someone still learning it. It is much easier for me to see the wisdom of this after the fact than in the moment when my own system is activated. In the moment, I can still confuse clarity with protection, discernment with defense, and righteousness with truth.

When I can meet what is mine, I have a much better chance of seeing the other person clearly. I can become curious again. I can appreciate, or at least begin to understand, that they may have been protecting something too. I can stop making them the whole problem long enough to ask what was actually happening between us.

That shift matters. It allows me to name my impact without collapsing into shame. It allows me to see how I contributed without making myself the villain. It allows me to hear the other person’s experience without immediately defending against it. It allows me to say, “I can really see how my actions impacted you,” and mean it.

Repair does not ask anyone to pretend the hurt did not matter or erase the facts. It becomes possible when both people are no longer trapped inside their first protective response. There is more room to ask the questions that actually matter: What happened here? What did you feel? What did I miss? What did I make it mean? What did my reaction cost you? What did my protection cost us?

That is very different from staying and enduring. It is also different from leaving as a way to avoid feeling. Sometimes we stay. Sometimes we go. Sometimes we repair. Sometimes we grieve. Sometimes we forgive. Sometimes we set a boundary and never reopen the door. But whatever happens next, something changes when we stop using the decision to avoid the tending.

The real question underneath “Should I stay or should I go?” may be: can I listen before I decide? Can I tend what is mine before I make the relationship carry what belongs to the wound? Can I let the tear become information before it becomes a verdict? Can I let the righteousness soften enough to feel the part of me it was protecting?

This is the reorientation I keep coming back to.

The Last 5% is not the pattern we are trying to change. It is the part of us beneath the pattern that has been desperately waiting to be met. And sometimes the tear in the relationship is the doorway back to that part of ourselves.

Thank you for walking this road with me.

If you’ve made it this far, thank you.

I know your time and attention are precious, and I do not take it lightly that you would spend some of it here with me. Your texts, emails, comments, and notes mean more than you probably realize. They remind me that this writing is part of a larger conversation, one I hope is useful, honest, and additive to the work so many of us are trying to do in our own lives and relationships.

One practical thing, because this is the strange world we now live in: your likes, comments, and shares really do matter. Not because I need applause, but because the algorithm often determines whether a piece like this reaches the people who may need it. Your engagement helps this work travel beyond the small circle where it began.

However you arrived here, and whatever you carry as you go, I am grateful you came.

From the heart,

Shasheen

📷 Transformation, Blue Moon May 31st 2026, Santa Fe, NM By Author

I used to believe there was some universal language of being human. Not intellectually, exactly. I knew people were different. I had taken enough assessments, studied enough models, coached enough people, and sat across from enough clients to know that we do not all enter the world through the same doorway. But somewhere underneath all that, I still assumed there was a deeper sameness. I assumed that if I could get beneath personality, behavior, communication style, and all the maps we use to explain ourselves, I would arrive at some common human operating system. In one sense, I think I was right. Just not in the way I thought.

My recent deepening into the Enneagram offered a lens into something I have been writing about for years: the different places people land after the original misattunement. I do not see it as the final explanation of human behavior, and I have no interest in turning any personality map into a belief system. But it did help me see, with more precision, how differently we adapt around early conclusions about love, safety, belonging, autonomy, and connection. It also helped me see some of my own blind spots. The particular way my adaptation expresses itself. In that seeing, something became clearer: the Last 5% is, in fact, a question of intimacy. It is what happens when the strategy that helped us survive begins to interfere with the closeness we most deeply want.

What we share is the architecture of adaptation. We scan for different things. We protect against different things. We organize around different fears, longings, sensitivities, and strategies. But somewhere along the way, each of us drew a conclusion about what love, safety, belonging, autonomy, or connection required, and a personality began to organize itself around that conclusion.

Most conversations about personality stop one layer too soon. They describe the type, the gift, the shadow, the stress pattern, the defense, and the behavior. All of that can be useful. But the deeper question is not simply, " What is my type? It is.

What conclusion did a younger part of me make about what connection was required?

What did I learn I had to become in order to keep love close, or survive when it was not available? Did I learn that love required being helpful? Impressive? Good? Interesting? Strong? Easy? Watchful? Independent? Agreeable? Did I learn that safety required control, that belonging required disappearing, that autonomy required distance, that connection required vigilance? That being loved meant becoming useful enough, successful enough, intense enough, strong enough that no one could forget, leave, criticize, control, invade, dismiss, or abandon me?

This is where personality models remain useful to me. They reveal adaptation. They reveal strategy. They reveal the particular way a human being learned to organize themselves around a conclusion about the availability, safety, or cost of love and connection. In ordinary life, we may call that our personality, our strength, our style, our gift, our sensitivity, our independence, our optimism, our steadiness, or simply “the way I am.” It becomes the thing people recognize in us. Sometimes they appreciate it. Sometimes they rely on it. Sometimes they are frustrated by it, depending on how our adapted style lands in them. Underneath the recognizable pattern is a younger conclusion still shaping what we scan for, what we protect against, and how we try to stay connected or safe.

Once that conclusion was formed, a scanner was installed as the first line of defense in the protective system. The scanner is always operating in the present, but it does not read the present cleanly. It reads through an old conclusion and immediately begins protecting against a possible future. It asks, often before we have any conscious awareness of it, "Does this mean what it meant Is t” Is this the beginning of the same kind of pain? Is this how love disappears? Is this how I get controlled, left, criticized, invaded, dismissed, trapped, or forgotten?

The adaptation should not become either a trophy or an indictment. The strategy is neither the whole truth of who we are nor some defect to be corrected. It is a trailhead, pointing back toward the original misattunement, the place where love, safety, belonging, autonomy, or connection did not arrive in the way a young part of us needed.

Some of us learned to move toward people by becoming useful, attuned, generous, or needed. Others moved upward into accomplishment, polish, excellence, and visible success. Some went into correctness, responsibility, refinement, moral clarity, and at times righteousness. Some moved inward into depth, longing, sensitivity, the search to be uniquely seen. Some went away into privacy, analysis, self-sufficiency, distance. Others learned vigilance, preparedness, questioning, scanning for what might go wrong. Some moved directly into possibility and motion, options, the next open door. Some moved against what felt threatening through strength, force, directness, and refusal to be controlled. And some moved under the conflict by becoming steady, agreeable, patient, and less visible to themselves.

Many of these movements become beautiful, useful, even beloved parts of who we are. The difficulty arises in the relationships where we are most vulnerable, when the scanner can mistake the present for the past and recruit the strategy before we know we have been hurt.

For some, the protection looks like tightening, managing, correcting, or proving. For others, withdrawing, armoring, pleasing, questioning, disappearing. And for some, it looks like movement: staying ahead of the heaviness, finding the next possibility, keeping an exit open, refusing to let the present moment become a room with no windows. From the outside, this may look like avoidance. From the inside, it can feel like oxygen. The system is trying to make sure the tender place is never trapped in pain without a way out.

That is why the Last 5% so often shows up in the relationships closest to us. A stranger cannot usually reach the original conclusion. A colleague may irritate us without touching the old question. But a partner, a child, a parent, a sibling, a close friend, someone whose presence reaches the part of us that still longs to be met, can touch the original place without meaning to. Their silence can feel like disappearance. Their disappointment can feel like danger. A request can feel like control, their independence like abandonment, their sadness like accusation. Their love can even feel threatening if receiving it requires us to soften the strategy that once kept us intact.

Intimacy is where the strategy gets tested, because intimacy asks for the very thing the strategy was built to protect: contact with what is tender, exposed, uncertain, real. The present moment is no longer just the present moment. It is the old conclusion coming alive again. The recognizable strength contracts into protection. Usefulness becomes a means of securing closeness. Excellence proves worth. Correctness avoids criticism. Depth searches for the missing recognition. Distance keeps us safe from demand. Vigilance prevents betrayal. Movement avoids being trapped in pain. Strength prevents being controlled. Steadiness avoids rupture.

In my case, the conclusion organized itself around helpfulness. Somewhere in me, love and usefulness fused together. That became a real strength. People have felt loved by it, and I do not want to pretend that is false. In many moments, the care is clean enough. I notice, I respond, I help, I support, and people receive it as warmth, generosity, and love. But in the relationships where I am most vulnerable, the same pattern can begin to carry a different charge. The care is still real. So is the love. The scanner may also be asking an older question, though: am I wanted here, even when I am not useful? Am I loved here, even when I am not anticipating everything? Can I be close without earning my place through care?

That is not easy to admit, but it feels more honest than pretending the strategy only costs me. It costs the people I love, too. They feel pressure inside the care, even when the care is real. The care has become tangled with protection. A younger part of me is also trying to secure the conditions under which love feels safe.

Every adapted style has some version of this. The thing people most appreciate about us is often the thing that got built around the wound. The strength has history inside it.

In much of life, the adapted style works. It builds careers and friendships, solves problems, gives us identity, earns admiration, and helps us feel competent and alive. But then we enter the places where we are most vulnerable, and suddenly the same pattern that works everywhere else does not bring us the connection we most long for. The helpful one feels unchosen. The impressive one feels unseen. The correct one feels unappreciated. The deep one, misunderstood. The self-sufficient one invaded. The vigilant one is unsafe. The one who keeps moving, trapped. The strong one controlled. The steady one, erased.

Because the pattern has worked so well in the rest of life, we often try to do more of it. We help harder, achieve more, explain better, withdraw further, scan more carefully, push stronger, stay quieter. We intensify the adaptation, hoping it will finally deliver the connection it was designed to secure. The closer the relationship, the less the strategy works. Intimacy wants us.

This also raises an uncomfortable question about the nature of our closest relationships. Not simply who is in our life, but what kind of truth those relationships can actually hold. The test of intimacy is the capacity for rupture and repair. Without that, what we call peace may just be a comfortable détente of agreeableness, a quiet arrangement where no one presses too hard, no one tells the whole truth, no one has to risk being fully seen.

Even self-awareness can become part of the disguise. We can sound reflective, emotionally intelligent, trauma-informed, spiritually mature, and still build relationships that never require the adaptation to soften. We can talk beautifully about patterns while quietly surrounding ourselves with people who do not challenge the one pattern we most need to see. And then we call it alignment, or resonance, or protecting our peace. Sometimes it is. And sometimes it is the protective system curating an inner circle where the old conclusion never has to be questioned.

That is not an indictment. It is an invitation to look more carefully. Are the people closest to me allowed to see me clearly? Can they tell me the truth without being quietly moved to the outer ring? Is there room for friction without exile, disappointment without collapse, repair after rupture? Can I be known in the places where my adapted style would rather stay useful, impressive, right, deep, independent, prepared, light, strong, or easy? Or have I built a life where the people closest to me reflect me back in a shape I can live with, while the people who press on something true slowly drift to the edges?

The inner circle can be a sanctuary for truth, or a curated place where the adaptation never has to be challenged. The difference is very hard to see from the inside.

This is also where the usual self-improvement response begins to break down. We take the adaptation and try to improve it. We try to make the protector more efficient, to discipline the part already afraid, to shame the part already carrying shame. We say, I should be better than this by now. I know this already. Why do I keep doing this? After all this work, why is this still here? What if it still being here is evidence of protection? What if the adaptation is evidence that something happened, that something hurt, that some younger part of us had to make meaning too early, that love or safety or belonging or autonomy once felt uncertain enough that a strategy had to be built around it?

If that is true, the next step is meeting. Not more self-attack, management, performance, or another layer of insight used as a weapon against ourselves. The Last 5% is the part of us asking for a new relationship with what the strategy has been keeping protected.

The strategy stops being something to manage; the misattunement becomes something to meet. The question changes from how do I stop doing this? To

What part of me still needs this strategy in order to feel safe?

In the meeting, the system can begin to loosen, because the tender place underneath it is no longer alone. The strategy does not have to work so hard when the wound it has been protecting is finally allowed to be met.

A note of care here. Meeting does not always feel like peace. For some, stillness is where the pain lives, where the thing they have spent a lifetime outrunning finally catches up. So this is not a call to force stillness or perform healing. Sometimes the work is simply staying one breath closer to the place we once had to leave in order to survive.

I am aware this essay is itself a kind of helpfulness. I am offering it anyway, more carefully than I once would have.

So maybe the invitation is not to discard your personality, transcend your type, or shame your strategy. Maybe it is to notice the scanner, honor the adaptation, and ask, with as much honesty as you can bear, what conclusion a younger part of you made about what love, safety, belonging, autonomy, or connection required? And where, in the relationships that matter most, is that old conclusion still trying to protect me from the very intimacy I say I want?

That is where the Last 5% lives. Finally meeting what the strategy has been protecting, so the intimacy we say we want no longer has to compete with the protection we once needed.

Thank you for walking this part of the journey with me. Your texts, emails, comments, and notes mean more to me than you probably realize. They remind me that this writing is not happening in isolation. It is part of a larger conversation, one I hope is useful, honest, and additive to the work so many of us are trying to do in our own lives and relationships.

And I want to say one practical thing, because this is the strange world we now live in: your likes, comments, and shares really do matter. Not because I need applause, but because the algorithm often determines whether a piece like this reaches the people who may need it. In today’s landscape, even the most heartfelt writing has to find its way through a very noisy system. Your engagement helps this work travel beyond the small circle where it began and find the readers for whom it may be meaningful.

So thank you. For reading. For responding. For sending private messages. For helping this conversation reach the people it is meant to reach.

From the heart,

Shasheen

📷 Tenderness, May 10, 2026, Santa Fe, NM, by Author

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

We have outsourced the work of seeing ourselves. The therapy session. The coaching call. The retreat. The book. The carefully worded AI prompt. We have built an entire ecosystem around the promise that someone, or something, can help us understand who we are and why we behave the way we do. Much of it is genuinely useful. Some of it has saved lives. But something has been quietly going wrong.

The more tools we have, the less time we seem to spend with the simplest and most honest data available to us: the evidence of our own lives. The pattern that keeps repeating. The feedback we keep dismissing because it did not arrive in the language we prefer. The thing the people closest to us keep trying to tell us. That data is free. It is immediate. It is usually inconvenient. And it may be more revealing than any framework we can reach for.

This is one of the more uncomfortable observations I keep circling in my work and in my own life. We have more language than ever. We can talk about attachment styles, nervous system regulation, inner children, protectors, and triggers. We can name patterns that previous generations could barely see. And we have begun to sound healed before we are healed.

The language of healing is not the same as healing. Knowing how to describe a pattern is not the same as interrupting it. Being able to explain your trauma response is not the same as taking responsibility for what that response does to another person. I know this pattern because I have seen it in clients, in people I love, in the wider culture, and in myself. Especially in myself. The more language I have gathered over the years, the more I have had to ask whether it is bringing me closer to contact or helping me stay one elegant step away from it.

This is where the self-help and psychological industries can unintentionally perpetuate harm. The frameworks that have emerged over the last few decades of trauma work and somatic research can open doors that were previously locked. They can help us move from shame to curiosity. They can help us stop treating our unwanted behaviors as enemies. They can help us understand that our most frustrating patterns often began as intelligent adaptations. That matters.

But something happens when the language gets absorbed faster than the transformation. When the framework arrives before the willingness to look. When the tool becomes a place to confirm what we already believe rather than confront what we have been avoiding. We speak fluently about our patterns while still acting from them. We use insight as evidence that we are doing the work, even when the people closest to us are still experiencing the same defenses, the same omissions, the same inability to sit in the seat of having caused pain.

This is where the Last 5% lives. The Last 5% is not about the part of us that has no insight. Most high-functioning people have plenty of insight. They have read the books. They have done the retreats. They have sat with therapists and teachers. They have language. They have tools. They can explain the origin story. The Last 5% is about the place where all of that has still not reached the body.

It is where the language is sophisticated, but the pattern remains intact. Where the adult can explain the wound while the child inside still runs the room. Where someone can say, “I know this is my trauma response,” while still asking the other person to organize themselves around it. Where we describe our protectors so beautifully that we never actually ask them to step aside.

That is the quiet trap. Once we have the right language, we can become very difficult to reach. We defend ourselves with therapeutic concepts. We frame avoidance as self-protection. We frame shutdown as a boundary. We frame another person’s accurate reflection as criticism, pressure, judgment, or emotional danger. Sometimes those are the right names. Sometimes the language is the only thing standing between us and the honest mirror in the room. And we cannot tell the difference because the language is what is doing the protecting.

Every tool reflects the material we bring into it. If I bring a biased story to a therapist, I may receive insight organized around my bias. If I bring a selective account to a coach, I may receive a strategy organized around my omission. If I prompt AI with the framing that already absolves me, I may get back a more articulate version of my own absolution. The output may sound wise. But it is still a mirror.

This is not a failure of therapy, coaching, or AI. It is a failure of input. The tool cannot work with the truth we do not bring. It cannot confront the omission we have already edited out. It cannot help us metabolize the evidence we refuse to sit with before we enter the room. That is why the work begins before the session, before the prompt, before the framework. It begins in the private moment when we ask, “Am I bringing the truth, or am I bringing the version of the truth my protector has selected?” That question is where the Last 5% starts to get honest.

Because underneath the tools is a deeper avoidance. We have stopped doing the slower work of sitting with the evidence our own lives are already giving us. The repeated pattern. The feedback we dismiss because it did not arrive gently enough, spiritually enough, or therapeutically enough. The truth our body has been holding for months. The thing our closest relationships keep revealing.

The answer is usually not somewhere else. The answer is usually in what we are already being shown and have not yet been willing to sit with.

This is how someone can be in therapy for years and still be the person their partner keeps trying to reach. That sentence may sting. It stings because it is not about therapy failing. It is about the version of ourselves we bring into therapy. If the version we bring has already been edited by the protector, the reflection we receive will be organized around those edits. The tool did not fail. The version brought into the tool was already selected.

This is true for all of us. We all have parts that want to be seen favorably. We all want relief more than truth, in certain moments. We all want to be understood before we are willing to be accountable. This is human. It is also costly.

Most of us say we want healing. What we often want first is relief. We want the ache to stop. We want the shame to soften. We want someone to tell us our reaction makes sense. And often, it does make sense. There is almost always a reason we became who we are. But the fact that something makes sense does not mean it is free from consequence.

Your pattern may be understandable and still harmful. Your wound may be real, and it still does not give you permission to keep recreating it. Your younger part may deserve endless compassion. It is also not qualified to lead your relationships.

That is one of the harder truths of adult healing. We need enough compassion to understand why the pattern exists and enough courage to see what it costs. In my experience, the second one is where we often slip away. The compassion comes more easily now, at least in the language. The courage gets quietly bypassed. Without compassion, we collapse into shame. Without courage, we collapse into performance. Better language. Better explanations. Better identity structures. Better ways of saying, “I am doing the work.”

But the real question is not whether we are doing the work. The real question is whether the work is doing anything. Are we becoming more honest? More available? More capable of repair? Less defended when someone we love tells us we hurt them? More able to sit in discomfort without immediately turning it into a story about our own safety? Are the people closest to us experiencing us as more reachable?

That last question is not small. The people closest to us often know the truth of our healing before our self-concept does. They know whether our work has made us more relational or merely more articulate. They know whether we can stay in the room when the conversation gets hard. They know whether our apology lands. They know whether our insight changes our behavior. The evidence is in our lives. It is also in the eyes of the people who love us. The failure to look at either is the same failure.

So what does it look like when the work is actually working? Usually, smaller than we think. A pause before the defense forms. A breath before the explanation arrives. A sentence like, “Yes, I can see how that hurt you,” offered without the next sentence explaining why it happened. The willingness to let another person’s experience stand for a moment without immediately balancing it against our own. That is the moment. It is not dramatic. It is not impressive. It will not look very good on a retreat brochure. It is a human being staying in the seat long enough for the other person to feel met.

That is what so often gets skipped. I say all of this as someone who has spent decades in coaching, therapy, and personal development. I have seen these tools save lives, open hearts, soften shame, and help people find their way back to themselves. I have also seen them become armor. Trauma language is used to avoid accountability. Spirituality is used to bypass grief. Nervous system vocabulary is deployed when someone is simply being asked to sit with the impact they had on another person. Boundaries are used to protect avoidance, when avoidance was exactly what the relationship needed less of. And I have seen all of this in myself, too.

That is what keeps the critique honest. This is not about those people over there who are doing it wrong. This is about the human tendency to turn anything, even healing, into protection. The psyche takes what helped us survive and wraps itself around it. Then, if we are not careful, it turns the very tools meant to free us into another layer of defense. Another ring around the wound. Another beautiful explanation that keeps us from touching the original pain. Another way to manage what is asking to be met.

This is why the Last 5% is so humbling. By the time we reach it, we are not beginners. We are not unaware. We are not lacking language. We are drowning in it. We have access to more tools than any generation in history. And the more sophisticated the tools become, the easier it is to use them to keep ourselves from the very thing they were meant to help us reach.

What we lack is not more explanation. What we lack is the willingness to let the explanation fall away long enough to feel what it has been protecting. To trust the evidence of our own lives. To listen to the pattern. To let the people who love us matter enough that their experience is not immediately cross-examined by our defenses.

That is the turn. From fluency to embodiment. From insight to contact. From managing the wound to meeting the part of us that still carries it. And that turn cannot be faked. It shows up in the body. It shows up in repair. It shows up in the pause before the defense. It shows up when our healing makes us easier to reach, not harder.

That may be the simplest measure we have. Not whether we know the right language. Not whether we have done the right programs. Not whether we can describe our trauma response with precision. But whether love can still reach us through our defenses. Whether truth can still find us. Whether the people closest to us feel met by us, not managed by us.

The work cannot be outsourced. No matter how good the tools get.

That is where the Last 5% begins.

Thank you for walking this part of the journey with me. Your texts, emails, comments, and notes mean more to me than you probably realize. They remind me that this writing is not happening in isolation. It is part of a larger conversation, one I hope is useful, honest, and additive to the work so many of us are trying to do in our own lives and relationships.

And I want to say one practical thing, because this is the strange world we now live in: your likes, comments, and shares really do matter. Not because I need applause, but because the algorithm often determines whether a piece like this reaches the people who may need it. In today’s landscape, even the most heartfelt writing has to find its way through a very noisy system. Your engagement helps this work travel beyond the small circle where it began and find the readers for whom it may be meaningful.

So thank you. For reading. For responding. For sending the private messages. For helping this conversation reach the people it is meant to reach.

From the heart,

Shasheen

📷 Reflections, March 6, 2026, Heart of the Peruvian Amazon, by Author

Leave a comment

Share

Subscribe now

This afternoon, I came home from the farmer’s market after one of those conversations with a dear friend about the state of the world. The kind of conversation many of us are having lately. The news. The uncertainty. The feeling that the world is asking our nervous systems to hold more than they were built to handle before lunch. I don’t need to list the details. We all know the feeling by now.

When I got home, I was preparing to sit down and enter my creative process, which is always a bit of a transition for me. There is a subtle shift required to move beyond the ordinary management of life into something more reflective, more available, more embodied. I am learning more and more that this does not happen simply because I want it to. There are conditions that help make it possible. A little space. A little quiet. A little willingness to settle in and connect with my purpose.

And of course, right as I was trying to make that shift, life started doing what life does. Calendars, schedules, travel plans, family obligations, house projects, the rhythms of being back in Santa Fe, and making room for the beginning of a three-year program in Ecstatic Mysticism all began spreading themselves across two screens, pretending to be manageable.

Apparently, even Ecstatic Mysticism comes with calendars, logistics, payment details, and a few emails I would rather not deal with.

Nothing dramatic was happening. That feels important to say. This was not some grand crisis or breakdown. It was just the normal amount of modern life layered on top of the normal amount of modern uncertainty. The farmer’s market conversation was still somewhere in my system. The headlines were still in the background. The calendar was open. The garden had its needs. People I love had their needs. The future was asking to be coordinated. And without quite realizing it, I could feel my relationship to all of it starting to narrow. A full life was beginning to look like a series of things that needed to be handled.

The tulips had come weeks ago. The columbines had begun to show themselves. The irises were starting to open. None of them needed me to notice. That is part of what I love about spring. It is full of small returns and new beginnings, and if you blink, you can miss them.

And then the western tanager returned.

Right outside my office doors, on the fountain.

This was my first sighting of the season, which always feels like one of those small but unmistakable spring moments. Bright yellow with black and red accents, almost impossible to miss. The season felt different the moment I saw it.

That fountain has become one of my favorite parts of the house over the years. Every spring, it becomes a gathering place for birds passing through. Finches, nut hatches, chickadees, waxwings, robins, flickers, hummingbirds, evening grosbeaks, and the neighborhood coopers hawk surveying its next meal. Some mornings, it feels like half the neighborhood has stopped by before I have even finished my coffee. I can be sitting there trying to be a responsible adult with multiple calendars open, and just beyond the glass, life is carrying on with very little concern for my scheduling intensity.

In the middle of trying to coordinate the future, the western tanager landed. And once I let myself actually look, I realized the evening grosbeaks had returned, too. Not one, but three of them at the feeder. I had been so focused on organizing the next few months of life that I almost missed the fact that the season had shifted right outside my window.

I did not need to turn the western tanager into a spiritual assignment, although, knowing me, the temptation was certainly available. It was simpler than that. The western tanager interrupted me. It interrupted the subtle tightening around timing and coordination. It interrupted the part of me that had begun relating to life as if it were a set of problems to solve before I could finally get back to the life I actually wanted to be living.

I know this may sound like an amazing grasp of the obvious. A bird showed up, and I remembered life exists. Groundbreaking stuff. But I keep finding that the truths that matter most are often obvious long before they become available. And what became available in that moment was not exactly a new insight. It was a shift in location. For a few seconds, the life I had been managing became a life I was inside of again.

That feels like the subtlety I keep trying to describe in The Last 5%. It is not really about being more grateful or mindful, although both are lovely and usually cheaper than therapy. The shift is quieter. The same calendar can feel like pressure or participation. The same garden can feel like another chore or a place I get to tend. The same family obligation can feel like one more demand or a chance to stay connected to the people I love. The same three-year program can become another administrative burden or an invitation into a deeper relationship with mystery, practice, and the parts of life that cannot be fully managed.

That distinction matters to me right now because I can feel how easily I lose it. Coming back from Peru, the Amazon, the Sacred Valley, then moving through the redwoods, then back into Santa Fe and spring chores, house projects, and travel plans, I have been noticing how quickly I can move from connection to management. Management is not the enemy. The manager in me has earned some respect. That part has kept a lot of trains on the tracks, or at least prevented a few from flying completely off them. The issue is when management becomes the sole focus, and the life within the tasks disappears.

Even the beautiful things can become tasks when I lose my connection to them. The garden becomes another thing to get done. Family becomes an obligation. Creative work becomes something I need to squeeze in. Even spiritual practice can become another item on the calendar if I am relating to it from the same place. That is what the western tanager interrupted this afternoon. Not my life. My reduced relationship to it.

A week ago, in the redwoods, a hummingbird had done something similar. I was standing among those enormous trees, carrying my usual head full of thoughts, when this tiny hummingbird appeared and hovered there long enough to interrupt whatever internal conversation I was having with myself. It did not explain anything. It did not need to. It simply stopped the machinery for a breath.

But that was the forest. Two days of solo silence. No phone. No food. No calendar. Of course, something softened. The harder test was always going to be here, in an ordinary afternoon, with two screens open and a list of things to handle. Whether any of it could survive Santa Fe.

Apparently, the tanager had thoughts on that.

I think this is why nature keeps feeling so important to me right now. Not as an escape, and not as a way to bypass the very real concerns of this particular moment in history. People are carrying a lot. We are. But as I try to move toward a more embodied existence, I am realizing that connection is not a luxury. It is part of how I stay in the right relationship with reality. Connection with the body. Connection with the season. Connection with the people I love. Connection with the actual life happening around me. Connection with the fact that I can be sitting beside a window in spring while birds return to a fountain they somehow remember.

There is something almost embarrassingly simple about nature when I let myself really see it. The western tanager is not trying to become more colorful. The robin is not wondering if it should have been a hummingbird. The evening grosbeaks are not holding a meeting about whether their timing is appropriate. Each thing arrives as itself, responding to food, water, shelter, weather, light, and the intelligence of the season.

But it is not only the absence of striving that gets me. It is the presence. The way each thing seems to move from one present moment into the next, simply being what it is. I would hate to think the natural state of human beings is rumination or projection. And yet, if I am honest, that is where I can end up living when I am not paying attention. Replaying. Anticipating. Coordinating. Trying to get ahead of what has not happened yet while dragging along the residue of what already has. Meanwhile, right outside the window, spring had arrived without needing my help.

For a moment, I stopped reducing life to something to be handled and remembered that I was part of it. The calendars were still open. The world was still doing what it does. Nothing on my list had magically handled itself, which was rude. But something had changed. The life I was trying to manage became, for a few seconds, the life I was allowed to meet.

The western tanager returned this afternoon. Then I noticed the evening grosbeaks. The tulips, columbines, and irises had been trying to tell me the season was changing for weeks.

Apparently, I needed the bird version, too.

Thank you for walking this part of the journey with me. Your likes ❤️, comments, emails, and notes mean more to me than you probably realize. They remind me that this writing is not happening in isolation; it’s part of a conversation, part of a community, part of the same ecosystem I wrote about above. I’m grateful to be in it with you.

From the heart,

Shasheen

📷 The return of the Western Tanager, May 12, 2025, Santa Fe, NM, by Author

📷 The return of the Grosbeak, May 9, 2026, Santa Fe, NM, by Author

Leave a comment

Share

Subscribe now

Since returning from Peru, reentry has been messy.

There’s something strange about moving from the jungles of the Amazon, the Sacred Valley, and long stretches of contemplative space back into the pace and texture of life in the States. Returning to Santa Fe. Skiing in Telluride. The changing of the seasons. Coming home to spring chores, gardens needing attention, board meetings, emails, and the quiet mental load of managing everyday life. I found myself noticing how quickly the nervous system slips back into what I often refer to as management mode, a constant orientation toward what needs attention next. What needs fixing? What needs coordinating? What needs remembering?

Not in some dramatic way. Just quietly. Automatically. Life resumes its rhythm quickly.

At the same time, I’ve been deeply inspired to continue working on The Last 5%. I’m happy to say I finally specced out the first nine chapters. They’re organized, coherent, and the introduction is now in the hands of my editor. After years of circling these ideas through lived experience, coaching, therapy, nature, relationships, contemplation, and my own inner work, something about the book's architecture is finally beginning to settle into place.

Subscribe now

Maybe that’s part of why I recently found myself drawn to the coastal redwoods of Northern California this past week for a five-day immersion led by Graseilah Coolidge and Epic Gatherings, whose work I had stumbled upon here on Substack after coming across her TEDx Talk, “How Forests Can Shape the Future of Peace.” In it, she speaks about the possibility that forest immersions can open new pathways toward reconciliation, trust, and collaboration. Something about that vision immediately resonated with me. Two of those days were spent entirely alone on a solo forest immersion. No food. No phone. No music. No journaling. No books. No conversation. Just a tarp, hammock, sleeping bag, sleeping pad, water, and a small designated footprint in the forest I was instructed to remain within. Silence. Stillness. Time.

The timing itself felt significant. We had entered Beltane, the midpoint between the spring equinox and the summer solstice, traditionally associated with fire, fertility, growth, and transition. There was also a full moon (Flower Moon) overhead during our first night there, and the entire experience carried a quiet, mystical undercurrent. Not forced. Just present. As though nature itself was participating in something ancient that humans have always known how to enter when they slow down enough to listen.

Spending time alone wasn’t new to me. I’ve done multiple darkroom retreats, ten days at a stretch in complete darkness while fasting. But something about this experience felt different. Maybe it was coming on the heels of Peru and the lingering intimacy of the Amazon jungle and the plants. Maybe it was the abruptness of reentry itself. Or maybe it was simply the feeling of being held in the cradle of ancient redwoods.

And when I say ancient, I mean ancient. Towering beings that have stood for millennia. Massive trunks stretching impossibly upward into mist and silence. As someone who spends a great deal of time outdoors around mountains and powerful landscapes, I thought I understood awe. But redwoods are different. Especially as someone who gardens and pays attention to living systems. To stand among beings that grow to that scale, knowing their strength comes from interconnected root systems woven beneath the ground, felt like quiet wisdom made visible.

Before we entered the forest, Graseilah framed the experience as a rite of passage. There was deep intentionality to the entire thing. Ceremony. Fire. Reverence. We were told that once we went out onto our solo sits, the support team would tend the central fire continuously until we returned. The entire container carried an extraordinary level of care. The flowers around the ceremonial space. The attentiveness of the team. The beauty and simplicity of the setup. Even the meals carried that same level of thoughtfulness. Everything was sourced carefully and prepared from scratch by a kind, loving chef named Chad, trained at the CCA. Nothing felt flashy. The entire environment communicated care, and I could feel my nervous system responding to that almost immediately.

One of the most surprising parts of the experience was sleep. Anyone who knows me knows I typically sleep five to seven hours a night, and seven is a rare achievement. Out there, I slept nearly twelve hours. Deeply. Comfortably. Completely exposed beneath a tree in damp coastal air with temperatures dropping into the forties at night. I remember waking up, almost shocked at how deeply my body had relaxed. It felt as though something inside me had finally been given permission to stop bracing.

What struck me later was how much preparation had gone into making that possible. Before entering the forest, my management systems had fully activated. I had researched extensively. Thought carefully about moisture, temperature, exposure, rain, insects, and cold. I had worked out a hammock setup that kept me suspended off the wet forest floor with an insulated sleeping pad beneath me, partly for warmth and moisture control and partly because, if I’m being honest, I really didn’t want things crawling on me in the middle of the night. I pre-tied prusik loops for my ridgeline. Dialed in my tarp system. Packed layers carefully. Thought through contingencies. The manager in me did what it has always done well. It prepared.

And honestly, it worked.

I remember waking up one morning to the sound of rain hitting the tarp overhead and instinctively checking the lines and corners of the setup. Everything held. I was warm. Dry. Comfortable. And lying there listening to the rain in the middle of the forest, I quietly appreciated the amount of preparation and attention I had put into getting myself there.

That landed deeply for me.

Because I realized I had spent years speaking about managers, protectors, control, anxiety, all of these systems we build to navigate life. Yet lying there warm and dry while the rain hit the tarp overhead, I could actually feel gratitude for the part of me that had worried enough to prepare. The part that had thought ahead. The part that had wanted safety and comfort and warmth.

Somewhere along the way, many of us begin relating to our own protective systems as obstacles instead of adaptations. We criticize the anxious parts. Shame the distractors. Attack the procrastinator. Judge the manager. Even healing can quietly become another project of self-correction. Another subtle war against ourselves.

Out there in the forest, I watched this happen inside me in real time. I had entered with the intention to surrender. To meditate. To simply count one hundred breaths repeatedly and remain present. And almost immediately, I discovered I could barely get to one hundred without distraction. Thoughts. Planning. Sleepiness. Mental drift. Self-criticism. The full spectrum arrived. At one point, I remember almost laughing at myself. Here I was sitting in one of the most beautiful and ancient environments imaginable with all this silence and spaciousness surrounding me, and I still couldn’t count one hundred breaths without drifting into planning something, fixing something, analyzing something, or wanting to take a nap.

But eventually something softened. Instead of trying to force myself into stillness, I started asking different questions. What is this distraction trying to do for me? What is it afraid might happen if it stopped? I could feel the shift when the inquiry itself became less corrective and more curious. Less managerial. More relational.

There was also something unexpectedly comforting about the forest itself. Before going out there, I had imagined insects everywhere. Creatures moving around all night. Constant vigilance. But the reality was surprisingly gentle. There was a massive banana slug that slowly moved across the dark, rich soil near my site one afternoon. A black and yellow centipede whose bite, I later learned, was far more painful than a wasp sting. A few tiny spiders. Smaller insects. Mostly, though, there were birds. So many unfamiliar calls from species I’d never hear in the Rockies.

One sound I did recognize immediately was the distinct cry of a red-tailed hawk circling overhead from time to time. That sound felt familiar. Grounding somehow. Like hearing a voice from home in the middle of a completely foreign environment.

And then there was the hummingbird.

The first afternoon, I heard the unmistakable buzz of hummingbird wings nearby. At first, I couldn’t place it. It honestly felt impossible that a hummingbird would be out there among these massive, cold redwoods. But I heard it again later that afternoon. Then again the next morning, just before dawn. I immediately climbed out of my hammock and sat quietly beneath the tree, looking around.

And there it was.

Hovering maybe ten feet away from me. Tiny. Suspended in the middle of these enormous ancient trees. Eventually, it settled onto a branch, and for several quiet moments, we simply shared the same space together. No insight arrived. No lightning bolt realization. Just presence.

I remember being struck by the juxtaposition of it all. This tiny, fragile creature moving effortlessly through the same forest as these massive, ancient redwoods. And somehow both belonged equally.

The forest asked nothing of me.

The redwoods asked nothing of me.

The hummingbird asked nothing of me.

There was nothing to prove there. Nothing to force. Nothing to become. Just the quiet experience of being there exactly as I was, distracted mind and all.

And maybe that’s what stayed with me most deeply after leaving the forest. The realization that reconciliation probably does not begin out there first. It begins within ourselves. Within the anxious parts. The distracted parts. The managers. The protectors. The parts we’ve spent years trying to correct, silence, overcome, or outgrow.

Maybe peace itself begins the moment we stop relating to ourselves as a problem to solve.

One breath at a time.

Thank you for walking this part of the journey with me. Your comments, emails, and notes mean more to me than you probably realize. They remind me that this writing is not happening in isolation; it’s part of a conversation, part of a community, part of the same ecosystem I wrote about above. I’m grateful to be in it with you.

From the heart,

Shasheen

📷 Beneath the coastal redwoods during Beltane. Santa Cruz Mountains, CA. May 1 to 5, 2026. Photo by author.

Leave a comment

Share

Subscribe now

I’ve been thinking a lot about reentry lately. Not just coming back from Peru geographically, but psychologically, emotionally, and almost existentially. The first few days back, I found myself sitting here in Telluride, looking at the mountains, unpacking bags, opening emails, looking at my calendar filling back up again, thinking about skiing, thinking about work, thinking about plans, dinners, trips, responsibilities, and I could feel this strange tension inside me. Nothing was wrong. My life is beautiful. I live in a beautiful place. I have meaningful work. I have deep friendships. I get to ski, travel, write, build things, and help people. From the outside, and even from most inside measures, life is very full. And yet something felt different after Peru, and I’ve been trying to put language to it.

I can tell something is stirring in me. Even last night, at our end-of-the-season party at the club, one tequila too many, talking with people I’ve known for years, I found myself having a couple of really meaningful conversations that I probably wouldn’t have had a month ago. Something in me wanted to connect more deeply, to really see people and be seen differently, not just in the roles we all play here, but as people inside this same ecosystem. Walking home in the cold mountain air later that night, I could feel these existential questions just sitting there with me. Not in a heavy way, not in a depressed way, but in a very real way. Like something shifted and I’m still trying to understand what moved and where I now stand in relation to everything.

In Peru, especially in the Sacred Valley and the jungle, there was this constant feeling that I wasn’t visiting nature; I was inside it. Not observing the mountains, but being among them. Not looking at the river, but sitting with it. Not watching the moon, but living under it. The sun mattered. The clouds mattered. The rain mattered. The soil mattered. The direction the valley opened mattered. The solstice mattered. The equinox mattered. The cycles mattered. Everything felt like it was part of a larger system that I was inside of, not separate from.

I found myself asking this strange question while walking in the mountains there: do I become the mountain when I walk on the mountain? Not in some mystical quote kind of way, but in a very real sense. My legs are working because of the slope of the mountain. My lungs are working because of the altitude of the mountain. My eyes are seeing because of the light hitting the mountain. My body is literally responding to the mountain. Without the mountain, my body would be doing something completely different. So where do I end and where does the mountain begin? The line isn’t as clear as we like to think.

And then you come back home, and very quickly you are back in identity. I am the skier. I am the telemark skier. I am a platinum member of the Telluride Ski and Golf Club. I am the author. I am the coach. I am the business owner. I have my staff, my accounting team, my assistant, the people I work with, and the people who rely on me. I am beginning a three-year program in ecstatic mysticism. I am the one with the house. I am the one with the schedule. I am the one with the responsibilities. And all of those identities are real. They are not false. They are not bad. In many ways, they are the result of decades of work, discipline, curiosity, risk, and opportunity. Identity is how we build a life in the modern world. Identity is how we contribute, specialize, create value, and find our place in society. But identity also separates. Identity says I am this and you are that. I am successful, and someone else is not. I am a skier, and the other person is not. I am a writer, and someone else is not. I am a seeker, and the other person is not. I am educated, and the other person is not. Identity organizes the world, but it also divides the world.

What I felt in Peru was not the absence of identity, but the presence of something bigger than identity. It felt more like belonging than identity. Not belonging to a group or a club or a profession, but belonging to the world itself. Belonging to the earth. Belonging to the sky. Belonging to the cycle of sunrise and sunset. Belonging to the same system that the birds and the rivers and the trees belong to. And I think that’s why reentry is strange. Because you move from belonging back into identity very quickly. In Peru, nobody cares what you do for a living when you are sitting in ceremony or walking through a village or watching the clouds move through the Andes. The mountains do not care about your resume. The river does not care about your net worth. The moon does not care about your LinkedIn profile. You are just a human body sitting on the earth under the sky, the same as everyone who has ever lived.

Then you come back, and within a few days, you are back in roles and titles and plans and calendars and conversations about projects and money and status and success and productivity and optimization and all the things that make modern life work. Again, none of that is wrong. But it is very different from belonging. I’ve started to think that a lot of what we are actually looking for when we talk about intimacy, connection, meaning, purpose, all these big words, is actually belonging. Not belonging in the sense of fitting in, but belonging in the sense of being part of something larger than our individual identity.

When you are truly intimate with someone, you are not your title, and they are not their title. You are not your achievements, and they are not their achievements. You are just two human beings sitting together, talking, listening, sharing, being seen, seeing. Identity softens, and something more basic shows up. Nature does that. Ceremony does that. Deep conversation does that. Grief does that. Awe does that. Love does that. All of those experiences temporarily dissolve identity and remind us that we are not just our roles; we are part of something larger, older, and more connected than we normally remember.

And something else happened when I came back this time that has been sitting with me. On previous trips, and again this time, I got what I can only describe as a call. Not in some dramatic way, just quietly. Two different parents reached out to me about their kids. They were struggling, and they were looking for help. And while I am busy right now, while I have plenty going on, I found myself immediately saying yes, and not just yes, but yes, I’ll help, and I don’t want to charge you. I just want to help. Both parents were surprised and incredibly grateful, and I tried to explain to them that I don’t fully understand it myself, but something in me feels pulled in that direction. When I get to sit with someone, especially a young person who is struggling, and I get to use whatever gifts I’ve been given, whatever insight, whatever experience, whatever perspective, and I get to try to help them suffer a little less or understand themselves a little more, I honestly don’t think there is anything more meaningful that I could possibly be doing.

I don’t say that from an ego place. If anything, it feels like the opposite of ego. It feels more like I am a small part of a much larger system, and sometimes I get tapped on the shoulder and told, This is where you are needed right now. And the more I pay attention to that, the more meaningful life seems to become. It makes me start to question this idea of coincidence versus connectivity. Are these just random events? Or are we actually part of a much more interconnected ecosystem of people and experiences and timing and relationships than we normally realize? Why am I connected to these people? Why do they call me at certain moments? Why do certain conversations happen at certain times? Why do certain teachers show up when we are ready? Why do certain places call us? Why do certain books fall into our hands at exactly the right moment? I don’t know the answers to those questions, but I am starting to pay more attention to the connections.

If I locate myself only in identity, then everything is about me and what I’m building and what I’m achieving and what I’m doing and what I’m known for. But if I locate myself in belonging, then I start to see myself as part of an ecosystem. Part of a network. Part of a web of relationships and timing and opportunities and responsibilities and chances to help and chances to be helped. Maybe meaning doesn’t come from building a bigger identity. Maybe meaning comes from understanding where we sit in the ecosystem and then participating in it fully and generously, using whatever gifts we’ve been given in the places where we are needed.

And I think this is also connected to something else I’ve been thinking about as I step into this next phase of life. I turn 56 this year, and I’ve been thinking about what it means to move from the phase of life where you are building yourself to the phase of life where you are contributing yourself. My friend Michael O’Brien talks about the ripple we create in the world. Not the rock, the ripple. We spend so much of our lives building the rock, building the identity, building the career, building the reputation, building the life. But at some point, life becomes less about the rock and more about the ripple. Less about what we accumulate and more about what moves through other people because we were here. Less about what we build and more about who we help. Less about becoming someone and more about being part of something.

So sitting here in Telluride, looking at these mountains, I find myself thinking that maybe the real challenge is not to get rid of identity. That’s not realistic and probably not even desirable. Identity allows us to build things, contribute, specialize, create, help, lead, teach, write, ski, and do all the things that make life interesting. Maybe the real challenge is not to locate ourselves only in identity. Maybe the question is: where do I locate myself? Do I locate myself in what I do, what I earn, what I achieve, what I’m known for, what I’m good at? Or do I locate myself in the fact that I am a human being on a planet, under a sun, pulled by a moon, breathing air, drinking water, walking on soil, temporarily alive like every other person who has ever lived, and connected to a web of people and experiences and moments that give my life meaning beyond anything I could build on my own?

One location creates hierarchy. The other location creates humility. One location creates a comparison. The other location creates belonging. I’m starting to think that a lot of the unease people feel, even very successful people, is actually a location problem. We have located ourselves almost entirely in identity and almost nowhere in belonging. Peru didn’t give me answers so much as it moved my location for a while. It reminded me that before I am anything else, before skier, before author, before coach, before business owner, before any of it, I am just a human being walking around on a planet for a very short period of time, somehow connected to a whole web of other human beings, and occasionally given the chance to be useful to someone else.

And strangely, when I remember that, everything else becomes more meaningful, not less. Skiing becomes more beautiful. Work becomes more meaningful. Conversations become more important. Helping someone feels more real. Even sitting quietly looking at the mountains feels like enough. Maybe that’s what reentry really is. Not going back to your old life, but trying to figure out how to live your life without forgetting where you actually are, and maybe more importantly, how you are connected to everyone else who is here with you.

Thank you for walking this part of the journey with me. Your comments, emails, and notes mean more to me than you probably realize. They remind me that this writing is not happening in isolation; it’s part of a conversation, part of a community, part of the same ecosystem I wrote about above. I’m grateful to be in it with you.

From the heart,

Shasheen

📷 New Moon and Venus, Telluride, CO, March 17, 2026, Taken by Author.

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

Share

For six days, we drifted slowly through narrow tributaries of the Amazon by boat. Sometimes the motor was cut, and we paddled quietly beneath the dense canopy. Sometimes we stepped onto terra firma and walked slowly through the forest floor, stopping every few steps while our guide pointed toward something in the trees we had completely missed. At first, the jungle looked like a wall of green, branches, shadows, and leaves blending together into one continuous texture. Nothing distinct. Nothing obvious. Then Julio would gently tap the side of the boat and point, and slowly the shape would reorganize itself in our vision. A collared hawk perched high in the canopy. A cocoi heron standing motionless at the river’s edge. A flash of color resolving into a tanager or trogon. A blue and yellow macaw is cutting across the sky. A pink river dolphin breaks the surface of the river for only a second before disappearing again. The jungle had been full of life the entire time. We simply didn’t know how to see it yet.

Only later did it really occur to me how profound that simple lesson was. After ten days in a plant medicine ceremony, completely disconnected from the outside world, I had transitioned from the retreat center on the river into the next phase of our journey, spending several nights at the Tahuayo Lodge before moving even deeper into the reserve to the Amazon Research Center. Ceremony had quieted the mind in one way, but the jungle itself seemed to have something else to teach entirely. What I found myself noticing again and again was how dramatically our experience of life changes depending on the lens through which we are looking. The forest wasn’t hiding anything from us. It was simply waiting for our attention to slow down enough to recognize what was already there.

The Amazon makes this lesson unavoidable. What at first looks like a uniform wall of green gradually resolves into layers, patterns, movement, and sound. Our main guide, Julio, along with Gianella, a young guide in training, demonstrated this again and again. The boat would be drifting quietly along the edge of the river when Julio would point toward what looked to us like ordinary branches or shadow. At first, we saw nothing. Then slowly the shape would reorganize itself. A bird. A snake. A monkey. The jungle reveals itself piece by piece. Without Julio’s trained attention guiding us, most of those animals would have remained invisible to us. Not because they were hiding, but because our attention simply didn’t yet know where to look.

One of the most remarkable moments came when we stepped off the boat and walked into the forest on terra firma in search of poison dart frogs. The forest floor looked like nothing more than a carpet of leaves and twigs. Our guide crouched down and pointed to a patch of ground that looked identical to everything around it. We stared at it for a long time before the shape suddenly reorganized itself in our vision. There, perfectly still in the leaf litter, was a tiny frog no bigger than a coin, glowing in bright orange and yellow like a small ember on the forest floor. Once you saw it, you could not unsee it. But until someone pointed in exactly the right place, your eyes simply passed over it as if it wasn’t there at all.

That moment stayed with me. Not because the frog was rare, though it certainly was, but because it reminded me of something that feels universally human. The world rarely changes as quickly as our perception of it does. The jungle had been full of frogs the entire time. We simply hadn’t learned how to see them yet.

As the days unfolded, the forest revealed more of itself. An emerald tree boa wrapped along a branch extending over the river, its body blending almost perfectly into the bark. A pygmy marmoset peering down from the canopy (photo above), the smallest monkey in the world, staring back through the lens of my camera. A large-headed capuchin paused long enough to lock eyes directly with us before disappearing into the trees. Scarlet macaws appear as a bonded pair, their colors almost surreal against the deep green backdrop of the rainforest. The deeper lesson of these encounters wasn’t simply about biodiversity, though the Amazon certainly overwhelms the senses with it. What struck me most was the humility of realizing how much of life is unfolding around us at any given moment that we simply do not notice.

Psychologists have long demonstrated how dramatically our awareness is shaped by what we expect to see. In one famous experiment, people are asked to count basketball passes on a screen, so focused on the task that many fail to notice a person in a gorilla suit walking through the scene. Sitting in the boat watching Julio effortlessly point out animals that had been invisible to us seconds earlier, I realized we were experiencing something very similar. The brain filters reality constantly, selecting what seems relevant and discarding the rest. We move through life convinced we are seeing clearly, while entire dimensions of experience slip quietly through the gaps in our awareness.

Watching Julio work the river made me think about something I’ve been studying for years in the realm of inner work. Much of my work revolves around the realization that many of our reactions in life are driven by parts of ourselves that formed long ago in response to earlier experiences. These protective patterns develop with good intentions. They are trying to keep us safe. But over time, they can also train our perception to interpret the world in ways that are no longer accurate. We begin reacting to signals that aren’t actually present, or we miss opportunities and connections that are right in front of us.

For most of my life, like many people, I instinctively tried to manage those reactions. To override them, analyze them, control them. What I’ve come to understand more recently is that something very different becomes possible when we stop trying to manage those reactions and instead begin to meet them. When we slow down enough to become curious about what is actually happening inside us, something remarkable begins to occur. The parts of us that were once driving automatic responses soften. Our awareness expands. And just like in the jungle, we begin to see things we had been missing.

That realization was tested unexpectedly during our stay in the forest. After ten days completely disconnected from phones and the outside world, I learned that our dog Bear had been hospitalized back home. A house sitter had allowed her dog to stay at the house without telling me, which resulted in a fight that left Bear with an infected bite requiring an overnight hospital stay and a $2,400 bill. Managing the situation remotely from the Amazon Research Center sharpened the contrast between the peaceful bubble we had been living in and the reality that life outside the jungle continues to unfold in all its unpredictability.

I felt the anger immediately. The sense of betrayal. A younger version of me recognized that reaction instantly. For most of my life, I would have managed that feeling, analyzed it, justified it, stayed caught inside it. This time, something different happened. I simply met the reaction. I felt it move through me without letting it take over the entire landscape of the moment.

The next morning, we paddled quietly through a narrow stretch of river near the research center, scanning the trees for monkeys. The forest felt alive again in the same way it had before the phone call. The jungle hadn’t changed. The animals were still there. What had changed was the space inside me that allowed the moment to pass without consuming everything else around it.

Of course, being here in the Amazon doesn’t mean I’m unaware of what is happening in the world beyond the forest. After ten days without headlines or notifications, reconnecting even briefly with the outside world has been almost surreal. The political and international news cycles feel intense, chaotic, and exhausting even from a distance. I can feel the pull of those headlines trying to drag my attention back into the same cycles of urgency and reaction that dominate so much of modern life. And I know from my own history how easy it is to become consumed by that pull, how quickly it can erode not only mental clarity but physical and emotional well-being as well.

It is easy to speak about balance when you are floating quietly down a tributary of the Amazon surrounded by birds and monkeys and the soft rhythm of the river. Eventually, I will return home, and the noise of the world will be waiting there again. But if this experience has reminded me of anything it is that our attention is one of the most powerful forces shaping how we experience reality. The jungle was never hiding anything from us. We simply needed guides who knew where to look, and the patience to slow down long enough to notice.

Much of what we are searching for may already be present, waiting quietly just outside the narrow band of attention we normally inhabit.

Sometimes the work is simply learning how to look again.

Tomorrow we leave the rainforest and head to Cusco. In a single day, we’ll go from the Amazon basin to nearly 12,000 feet in the Andes, trading dense jungle for stone ruins and mountain air. It’s quite a shift in landscape, and I’m curious what will reveal itself there. I’ll share what unfolds as we continue the journey.

Thank you for being a part of this one.

From the heart,

Shasheen

Thank you! I recognize how tender many of these conversations are. They ask us to look at things that are subtle, foundational, and not always comfortable to name. The fact that you are here, reading, reflecting, and sitting with this work means more than I can easily articulate.

Even when I do not hear from you directly, I know you are reading. I feel it. And for those of you who have reached out through thoughtful texts, direct messages, and emails, please know that they have meant the world to me. They have deepened my commitment to keep sharing, to keep refining, and to keep telling the truth as I discover it.

If something in this post resonated, a simple like ❤️ or comment here on the platform genuinely helps more than most people realize. It allows these conversations to reach others who are also quietly doing this work. And if you prefer to reach out privately, I welcome that too.

Thank you for being part of this unfolding. Thank you for taking this below-the-neck work seriously. And thank you for staying.

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

Share

On the second day of the retreat, a worn copy of The Celestine Prophecy appeared on a small wooden shelf in the common area. I hadn’t gone looking for it. I simply noticed it while passing by, two days into what would become a ten-day immersion in the Amazon rainforest. The book is about synchronicity, about the subtle energetic exchanges between people, about the ways human beings compete for control without realizing it. Normally, I might have smiled at the coincidence and moved on, but something about the timing caught my attention.

It also carried a small story of its own. One of the volunteers, Renee from Australia, had overheard me mentioning the book in conversation the day before. I had shared that it was a book that changed my life many years ago, one of those early sparks that first opened my curiosity about the invisible dynamics shaping human interaction. I had completely forgotten that the story itself takes place in Peru. Within twelve hours, Renee somehow tracked down the only copy she could find on the property and quietly placed it on the shelf. Later, she set it down on the dining table in front of me. It became the book that carried me through the stay.

By the second day, something inside me had already begun to surface. Without phones, without news cycles, without the constant hum of commentary telling us what matters and why, I found myself becoming acutely aware of a familiar reflex. Judging. Assessing the room. Not maliciously, but almost automatically. Who feels grounded. Who seems performative. Who appears fluent in the language of spirituality. What startled me was not that the reflex existed, most of us carry versions of it, but how exposed it felt without the usual distractions to buffer it. The jungle offers very few distractions.

What it offers instead is pace.

We were staying right on the river. Most mornings I would wake early, walk down the dock steps, and immerse myself directly in the water. The tributary moved steadily past the property, wide and reflective, carrying an enormous volume of water without the slightest hint of urgency. The moment you stepped in you could feel the current pressing against your legs and chest. Some mornings I would swim upstream against that pull for a short stretch close to the river’s edge, slowly pushing through the resistance until my breathing deepened and my body warmed. Then I would release and let the current carry me downstream toward Mishana.

As the bend approached and the clay banks came into view, I would swim hard to break through the eddy line and enter the still water along the shore. Once inside that pocket of calm, I would pull myself onto the clay bank and scoop the cool earth into my hands, coating my arms, chest, and face with mud. Let it dry. Let it tighten against the skin. Then rinse it back into the river and walk back home. The ritual was simple and repetitive, yet something about its rhythm began to settle the body in ways difficult to articulate. The river itself seemed to model a different relationship with time. It moved steadily, powerfully, but never hurried. Gradually, something inside me began to match that rhythm.

The jungle was not silent. Each morning the great kiskadee landed on the same small tree near the patio, its bright yellow chest flashing against the deep green canopy as if announcing the start of the day. Kingfishers hovered above the river with remarkable stillness before diving for their prey. Yellow and black caciques moved through the trees in bursts of sound, echoing the calls they heard around them. The forest was alive with movement, yet nothing felt rushed and nothing appeared to be performing. Everything seemed to move in relationship with everything else.

Throughout the ten days, Brian and Mariella, our English-speaking hosts, helped orient us to the rhythm of the place. The plant immersion unfolded gradually, beginning with an initial consultation where each of us spoke about our physical state, our intentions, and the areas of our lives we felt called to explore. It was not a clinical intake in the modern sense. It felt more like an introduction, a slow opening of a relationship between ourselves and the plants that would be guiding the process.

During that consultation, we were introduced to Maestra Angela, a Shipibo curandera from a long lineage of healers, along with Urias, her partner and a healer himself. Their presence carried a quiet steadiness that needed no announcement. The conversation moved easily between practical guidance and the deeper worldview that shapes Amazonian healing traditions. Plants were not discussed as substances or tools but as living intelligences that people had been learning from for generations.

The days that followed began introducing those relationships slowly. There was structure, a whiteboard in the common area listing each participant and the protocols for the day, but the structure felt relational rather than rigid. Chiric sanango. Cat’s claw tea. Renquilla poultice. Kitchen medicines prepared daily for digestion, immune support, and nervous system balance. There were no sterile measuring devices. “Two fingers to start,” someone would say, referring to the height of liquid in a small cup. “If you’re sensitive, take less. Go slow.”

Chiric sanango became familiar to me not as a supplement but as a living plant I had stood beside. It did not have a towering trunk like some of the jungle trees. Instead it had leaves and small flowers that seemed almost modest in appearance. The first time I drank its preparation I felt a subtle tingling move through my forearms and face, steady and organizing rather than dramatic. What struck me was that I could picture the plant itself while feeling that sensation.

The medicine was no longer abstract.

It had a face.

The vapor baths deepened that relationship. We would sit over large pots of simmering plants beneath a hooded tarp that created a small chamber for the rising steam. The heat would build slowly, the scent of the plants filling the space as the vapor moved through the body. Seven to ten minutes at a time. Stand slowly afterward. Let the body absorb what it needs.

Later came the love baths, infusions of plants like piri piri, corazoncito, and charamacho poured gently over the head and shoulders. The instruction was simple. Do not rinse. Let it air dry. Let the skin receive it.

And before every ingestion, before every bath, there was always the same small gesture.

A pause.
A hand on the heart.
An intention.

One afternoon we hiked deeper into the forest to encounter several of the plants growing throughout the property. Some had been cultivated intentionally. Others seemed to have claimed their own places within the surrounding ecosystem. During that walk Pancho guided us toward a towering tree that he explained was connected to the Chullachaqui, the protector of the forest in Amazonian tradition.

We were invited to pay our respects.

A small prayer was offered. Mapacho tobacco was placed at the base of the tree as an offering. There was no theatricality to the moment. No spectacle. It was simply part of the worldview guiding the relationship between people and the land.

The forest is not a resource alone.

It is a relationship.

Over the days that followed that idea began to settle somewhere deeper in me.

The repetition of the rituals, the steady presence of the river, the birds arriving each morning, and the slow pulse of a drum in the afternoon, while a nylon-string guitar moved gently through a blues scale, created a rhythm that felt increasingly natural. Something softened. The reflex to evaluate every room began losing its urgency. There was more space between stimulus and response. Eye contact lingered longer. The need to manage the energy in the room began, at least slightly, to give way to simply meeting it.

And somewhere during those days the realization surfaced quietly.

It wasn’t about the plants themselves.

It wasn’t about ceremony or jungle mysticism.

What revealed itself was much simpler.

We do not have an information problem. We have an intimacy problem.

Modern life has become extraordinarily efficient at creating distance between us and the systems that sustain us. We open a bottle. We swallow something. We read a label if we are curious, and then we move on. The pharmaceutical world has extracted extraordinary intelligence from nature, molecules isolated, compounds stabilized, effects measured and replicated in ways that save countless lives.

None of that is wrong.

But something subtle disappears when the relationship disappears.

The deeper issue is that the intelligence itself becomes fragmented. A plant is studied. Its compounds are separated. A particular molecule is identified as the active ingredient and reproduced in a laboratory. That molecule becomes a vitamin, a supplement, a pharmaceutical placed into a bottle and shipped around the world. Yet the living system that produced that intelligence is dismantled in the process. The plant itself, the soil it grew in, the microbial networks surrounding its roots, the relationships that shaped its chemistry over thousands of years are all reduced to something we believe we understand. In the process we often destroy the ecosystems that made those medicines possible in the first place. Biodiversity disappears. Entire species vanish. The medicine becomes something we consume rather than something we relate to.

What we experienced in the jungle offered a radically different orientation. Before ingesting any plant we were invited to meet it. To see it growing. To touch its leaves. To understand what it supports in the body and spirit according to generations of observation. And just as importantly, we were taught to speak to it.

Not theatrically.

Through intention.

A pause. A hand on the heart. A moment of clarity about why we were receiving the plant into the body. The curanderos explained that the plant carries its own intelligence, but that intelligence responds to direction. You do not simply ingest the medicine and wait for something to happen. You enter into a relationship with it. You give it permission to work on what needs attention. You guide it toward the areas where healing or clarity are needed.

The plants were not treated as substances.

They were treated as collaborators.

Once that relationship forms with the plants outside the body, something similar begins to happen inside the body.

Curiosity appears.

What is this sensation moving through my arms when the chiric sanango begins to work? Why does the river change the rhythm of my breathing? Why does the steady pulse of a drum slow the pace of thought?

The inner world and the outer world stop feeling like separate landscapes. They begin to mirror each other. The birds demonstrate patience. The river demonstrates pace. The plants demonstrate relationship. And the body remembers how to listen when curiosity returns.

For the past thirty years, I have worked with leaders, founders, and high-performing individuals who have already accomplished extraordinary things. These are not people searching for basic self-help advice. They have read the books, built companies, worked with coaches and therapists, and optimized nearly every dimension of their lives.

Yet many of them eventually encounter a layer that strategy alone cannot reach.

I often describe it as the last five percent.

It is not solved through more tactics and it is not solved through greater control. It lives in intimacy. Intimacy with the body. Intimacy with sensation. Intimacy with the signals we override while pursuing excellence.

The forest did not teach me something mystical.

It reminded me of something fundamental.

Over the past year my travels have taken me through Bali, Thailand, and now deep into the Peruvian Amazon. Different traditions. Different teachers. Different landscapes. Yet each place has pointed toward the same quiet realization.

Transformation rarely comes from pushing harder.

More often it comes from restoring relationship.

Relationship with breath.
Relationship with the body.
Relationship with the natural world that shaped our nervous systems long before modern life accelerated beyond recognition.

Sometimes it begins with something very simple.

Standing quietly beside a plant, touching its leaves, and acknowledging the life you are about to welcome into your own body.

Curiosity begins there.

And very often, that is where the last five percent lives.

Thanks for continuing to be on the journey with me.

From the heart,

Shasheen

Thank you! I recognize how tender many of these conversations are. They ask us to look at things that are subtle, foundational, and not always comfortable to name. The fact that you are here, reading, reflecting, and sitting with this work means more than I can easily articulate.

Even when I do not hear from you directly, I know you are reading. I feel it. And for those of you who have reached out through thoughtful texts, direct messages, and emails, please know that they have meant the world to me. They have deepened my commitment to keep sharing, to keep refining, and to keep telling the truth as I discover it.

If something in this post resonated, a simple like ❤️ or comment here on the platform genuinely helps more than most people realize. It allows these conversations to reach others who are also quietly doing this work. And if you prefer to reach out privately, I welcome that too.

Thank you for being part of this unfolding. Thank you for taking this below-the-neck work seriously. And thank you for staying.

Leave a comment

Share

Subscribe now

I am somewhere in the air as I write this, en route to Peru. The cabin lights are dimmed. Most people are asleep. The low hum of the engine is steady and indifferent. Suspended between where I have been and where I am going, I find myself reading about Epstein again. Not scrolling. Not reacting. Reading slowly. Looking at what was enabled. What was protected. What was tolerated

There are moments in history when something surfaces that forces us to look at architecture, not just events. The revelations surrounding Jeffrey Epstein were not just about one man. They revealed something systemic. Not partisan. Not fringe. Systemic. Vulnerability leveraged. Influence insulated. Networks closing ranks. Protection of power at scale. The files make clear that this was not accidental negligence. It was enabled. Protected. Sustained.

What happened to those women was wrong. Nothing about what follows softens that. I wrote previously about that moment here, and their courage still sits with me. Conversations about abuse are not theoretical for me. They live in my own history.

What unsettles me most is not only the harm. It is the organization. The intentionality. Once you see vulnerability leveraged at that scale, it becomes difficult not to notice how leverage operates more quietly elsewhere. Different severity. Different consequence. But the same orientation toward amplifying fear, consolidating certainty, rewarding compliance, and protecting status.

We live inside systems that leverage the most human imprint there is: the early, often wordless sense that something is wrong with me. Trauma does not require catastrophe. It can form in the inevitable misattunements of ordinary life. A caregiver misses a cue. A rupture goes unrepaired. The child does what children do. It makes meaning. I am not enough. I am too much. I am not lovable. I must adapt to belong. What begins as survival intelligence becomes identity.

And once that imprint exists, it is extraordinarily easy to leverage. Systems do not need to create insecurity. They only need to amplify what is already there. Fear captures attention. Comparison drives engagement. Certainty consolidates allegiance. What is predictable can be optimized. In that sense, the architecture is deliberate. It rewards performance. It rewards certainty. It rewards us for adapting to the very structure that eventually exhausts us.

Sitting here in the dim light, I can feel something uncomfortable rising in me. Not just anger at institutions. A recognition of participation. I check metrics. I track response. I optimize language. Even writing here, the subtle pull of likes and comments can feel like small gold stars for being a good boy. Not because I am coerced. Because I am conditioned. Because belonging and relevance can still feel like survival.

That recognition does not feel empowering. It feels like betrayal. A subtle shame. Even disgust. Not at the world. At how faithfully I participate in systems that leverage the same imprint of wrongness I say I want to heal.

And beneath all of it, I can feel the mind reaching for something stabilizing. Explanation. Certainty. Control. The addiction is not abstract. It is human. It is leveraged. It is organized around the belief that if I can just understand enough, optimize enough, position myself carefully enough, I will not have to feel that old tremor of wrongness.

We are living in unprecedented times. Information moves faster than our nervous systems can metabolize it. Power structures are destabilizing. Institutions are exposed. Trust feels fragile. Even those who have spent years doing their inner work are feeling activated in ways they thought had already been resolved. This is not personal failure. It is collective nervous system strain.

The architecture is real. It is intentional. It is deliberate. Fear organizes populations. Certainty consolidates allegiance. Control stabilizes power. When you recognize that, exhaustion begins to make sense. Of course, people are tired. Of course, even practitioners feel stretched. The environment itself is dysregulating.

Regulation is resistance.

Not as a wellness trend. Not as self-optimization. A regulated nervous system is harder to manipulate. A coherent heart does not require manufactured certainty to feel safe. Choosing presence in a culture organized around fear is a quiet act of sovereignty.

This is where I understand the exhaustion I hear from so many of you. The fatigue with self-improvement. The frustration with therapy as a way of life. The weariness of treating yourself as an ongoing project. If the work has been organized around fixing what is wrong, of course, you are tired. If the stance has been to manage vulnerability rather than meet it, exhaustion makes sense.

The paradigm that says something is wrong and must be mastered is collapsing under its own weight. The shift required now is not toward more work or toward resignation. It is toward a different stance. Managing says fix it, control it, overcome it. Meeting says understand it, relate to it, unburden it. Managing organizes around fear and certainty. Meeting organizes around curiosity and coherence.

For many of us, especially high performers, managing became identity. Excellence protected us. Competence created safety. Mastery kept the tremor of wrongness at bay. That strategy built careers and lives. It also quietly reinforced the very architecture we now feel exhausted by.

If systemic harm is intergenerational, so is conditioning. Some of what we carry predates us. Family narratives. Unprocessed grief. Silent contracts. As I travel toward Peru with my uncle and cousin, I am not chasing enlightenment. I am curious about burdens that may not have begun with me. Curious about architecture that runs through lineage as well as culture. Curious about what shifts when we approach ourselves not as projects, but as humans carrying history.

I remain deeply committed to the work I do. Not because I believe something is wrong with you. Not because I believe something is wrong with me. But because I believe burdens can be unburdened. Because I have seen what happens when we shift from fear and certainty toward heart and coherence. Because I want to walk alongside others in this human experience, not above it and not outside it.

The architecture outside us is being exposed. The deeper question is whether we are willing to notice the architecture inside us as well. Not with accusation. With curiosity.

I will share what unfolds on the other side of this journey.

And as always, thank you for walking this road with me.

From the heart,

Shasheen

📷 Taken By Author, Ouside my Office Door, Santa Fe, NM 09/01/23

Thank you! I recognize how tender many of these conversations are. They ask us to look at things that are subtle, foundational, and not always comfortable to name. The fact that you are here, reading, reflecting, and sitting with this work means more than I can easily articulate.

Even when I do not hear from you directly, I know you are reading. I feel it. And for those of you who have reached out through thoughtful texts, direct messages, and emails, please know that they have meant the world to me. They have deepened my commitment to keep sharing, to keep refining, and to keep telling the truth as I discover it.

If something in this post resonated, a simple like ❤️ or comment here on the platform genuinely helps more than most people realize. It allows these conversations to reach others who are also quietly doing this work. And if you prefer to reach out privately, I welcome that too.

Thank you for being part of this unfolding. Thank you for taking this below-the-neck work seriously. And thank you for staying.

Share

Leave a comment

Subscribe now

If you’ve been following this series, we’ve been circling one distinction: meeting versus managing. First we named it. Then we explored what meeting looks like in relationship. Now I want to take you underneath it, into the body, into the nervous system, into the parts that mobilize before we even think.

Years ago, I was working with a mentor of mine named Katherine. She asked me a simple question.

“How are you feeling?”

“I feel anxious.”

She looked at me gently and said,

“I can see that you feel anxious.”

Then she waited.

One. Two. Three.

Those three seconds felt almost unbearable. My jaw tightened. My chest buzzed. My mind searched for something sharper to say. I wanted to explain the anxiety, justify it, soften it, pivot into something competent. Anything but sit there and be seen inside it. Instead, she stayed…

“What else are you feeling?”

“I feel tired.”

“I can see that you feel tired.”

One. Two. Three.

At some point something in me softened. Not dramatically. Just enough. Like a guard lowering his weapon an inch. And that was the moment my eyes widened, because I realized I had almost never stayed inside an uncomfortable emotion without moving away from it.

What I learned growing up was not the pause. What I learned was performance or distraction. Move toward achievement, usefulness, competence, or move away into distraction. Either way, move. Staying still inside a feeling felt inefficient, almost dangerous.

Recently, I saw this pattern clearly. I read a post written by someone I deeply care about. It hit me hard. It felt like betrayal. My body reacted immediately, tight chest, heat, urgency. My first impulse was to reach out and initiate a conversation.

On the surface, that looks mature. Communicative. Responsible. I believe in talking things through. But when I slowed down, I saw something uncomfortable. My urge to reach out was not primarily about connection. It was about regulation. If I could talk to them quickly, clarify, get reassurance, understand their intention, then the dysregulation inside me would settle. The conversation would become the solution to my internal state.

That is management.

So I did something different. I stayed. I did not send the message. I did not initiate the call. I sat with the tightness and with my hand on my heart I said internally, “I can see that you feel hurt. I can see that you feel anxious.” I did not try to fix it. I did not try to override it. I waited.

Twenty-four hours later, I had the conversation. And it was fantastic. Clean. Connected. Generous. Not reactive. I was no longer trying to use the conversation to stabilize myself. I was relating from steadiness rather than urgency. The outcome shifted because the source shifted.

When Katherine said, “I can see that you feel anxious,” she was not trying to calm me down. She was signaling to the part of me mobilizing for protection, You make sense. You do not have to escalate right now. At the same time she was signaling to the rest of my system, You are okay. We are okay. You are safe here.

That is seeing.

Seeing is not agreement. It is not indulgence. It is not passivity. It is communicating safety to the part that believes it must stay vigilant. When a protective part feels seen rather than overridden, it does not have to escalate. The nervous system reorganizes.

Here is the humbling truth. For years I thought I was highly regulated because I was highly functional. I communicate. I process. I take responsibility. I do not suppress. But I can see now that at times I over-communicated to regulate. I processed anxiety out loud because it felt productive and relational, when in reality I was trying to settle something inside me by recruiting someone else into it.

Function is not the same as regulation. Communication is not always connection. Sometimes it is management dressed up as maturity. Management builds success. It rarely builds peace.

A child learns regulation in relationship. When a parent can say calmly, “I see that you’re scared,” and stay present, the child’s nervous system wires in something foundational: uncomfortable does not mean unsafe. If that experience was inconsistent or absent, the system adapts. It reaches outward through performance or distraction. Not because it is broken, but because it is intelligent.

Many of us built our identities on managing states we were never taught to meet.

So here is the quiet experiment. The next time you feel mildly activated, before you send the message, before you make the call, before you fix the misunderstanding, put your hand on your heart and say internally, “I can see that you feel ______” Then pause. Do nothing for a few seconds.

Notice what happens. Does your body soften? Does it resist? Does another voice appear saying this is inefficient or weak? That voice is protecting something too.

Meeting does not eliminate action. It transforms the source from which action comes. You still have the conversation. You still send the email. You still take the step. But you do it from regulation rather than reactivity.

If the first essay named the distinction and the second showed what meeting looks like in relationship, this is the mechanism underneath it. Meeting is not softness. It is nervous system repair. It is developmental completion. It is learning, sometimes for the first time, that uncomfortable does not mean unsafe.

You can build an impressive life on management. Many of us have. But if you want freedom, not just functionality, the work becomes quieter and less visible. It begins in moments no one else sees, when you resist the urge to perform or distract your way back to okay and instead choose to stay.

If this feels obvious, try it once in a moment that actually matters.

“I can see that you feel ______”

Then wait….and then wait some more.

Not to become passive. Not to avoid action. But to discover that safety may not require earning, explaining, or performing at all. You may already be okay.

And once you feel that in your body, even briefly, it is very hard to go back to living only from the neck up.

I would love to hear your thoughts,

From the heart,

Shasheen

📷 Taken by D.Morton, Morning Light at the top of Milk Run, Telluride CO 02/22/25 #morningswithbear

Thank you for continuing to walk this journey with me. I recognize how tender many of these conversations are. They ask us to look at things that are subtle, foundational, and not always comfortable to name. The fact that you are here, reading, reflecting, and sitting with this work means more than I can easily articulate.

Even when I do not hear from you directly, I know you are reading. I feel it. And for those of you who have reached out through thoughtful texts, direct messages, and emails, please know that they have meant the world to me. They have deepened my commitment to keep sharing, to keep refining, and to keep telling the truth as I discover it.

If something in this post resonated, a simple like ❤️ or comment here on the platform genuinely helps more than most people realize. It allows these conversations to reach others who are also quietly doing this work. And if you prefer to reach out privately, I welcome that too.

Thank you for being part of this unfolding. Thank you for taking this below-the-neck work seriously. And thank you for staying.

Share

Leave a comment

Subscribe now

In the last essay, I named something many people quietly recognize but rarely articulate. At a certain point, the very strategies that helped you become capable, functional, and successful stop producing the kind of change you’re actually looking for. You can still manage. You can still cope. You can still perform. But something essential remains untouched.

This piece is about that edge.

If you’ve done the work, therapy, insight, self-awareness, discipline, and you still find yourself reacting in ways that don’t quite make sense, you’re not failing. You’re standing at the threshold of the Last 5%.

Most people who arrive here are not beginners. They are thoughtful, conscientious, and often admired for their emotional intelligence. They understand their history. They can name their patterns. They can trace cause and effect with precision. And yet there is still something that does not move. A reaction that feels disproportionate. A behavior that keeps resurfacing. A moment where the nervous system takes over, and none of the insight seems to matter.

That stuck edge is the Last 5%.

The reflex at this stage is almost always to refine the same approach. Better tools. Better regulation. Better strategies. More discipline. More self-awareness. That reflex makes sense. It worked for a long time. It is also the trap. The skills that carried you through the first 95 percent quietly lose their leverage here.

Management deserves respect. It builds careers, relationships, and stability. For many people, it wasn’t optional. It was survival. Shame, accountability, structure, and self-flagellation are powerful motivators. They get results. They shape identities. They help people succeed. But management has a ceiling. From the nervous system's perspective, even the most thoughtful management still registers as pressure. Even when it’s kind. Even when it’s insightful. The unspoken message remains the same, something in me needs to stop.

And the nervous system responds.

This is the Chinese finger trap of healing. The harder you pull, the tighter it gets. Everything in a high achiever wants to pull harder, apply more effort, and do it better this time. That instinct is precisely what keeps the Last 5% in place.

You don’t need theory to see this. You can hear it in everyday language. When I ask clients how they feel about an unwanted pattern, procrastination, drinking, anger, shutting down, people-pleasing, or staying silent, the responses are strikingly similar. “I’m just so tired of this.” “ I know better!” “I’m at a loss. What do you want me to do?” “I’m over it.” The tone is rarely cruel. More often, it’s exhausted, resigned, pragmatic.

Pause for a moment and really listen to the relationship embedded in those words.

There is no curiosity.
No interest.
No sense that this part might be trying to help.

That stance may feel neutral or justified, but to the nervous system, it lands as rejection. That is management.

Meeting sounds different. Not dramatically different, but relationally different. It sounds like, “Of course you showed up.” “Right on time.” “I see you.” And then something even more important, “We’re okay. We’re more than okay.” “We’ve got this. I’ve got you.” When people first hear this, they often recoil. It feels counterintuitive, even irresponsible. Why would I validate something I want to change?

Because validation is not endorsement. It is recognition.

This is where misattunement becomes central. Almost every pattern that still carries emotional charge traces back to a moment, or a series of moments, when something essential didn’t happen. We weren’t seen, heard, understood, or met. That rupture may have been subtle or profound, brief or chronic, but it landed. And it didn’t land as a story. It landed in the body.

From that moment forward, parts of us organized around protection. They took on roles. They learned how to manage connection, safety, belonging, approval, or control. Not because something was wrong with us, but because something was required of us.

These parts aren’t outdated bugs in the system. They are loyal protectors, still operating from the context in which they were formed.

This becomes clear when you look at what actually triggers us today. Strip away the content of most reactions, and what remains is familiar. Not being seen. Not being heard. Being misunderstood. Being dismissed. The reaction feels outsized because it isn’t just about now. It’s about then. The nervous system is responding as if the original misattunement is happening again.

Meeting a part means seeing it in that context. Getting it. Understanding its logic. Appreciating the job it took on at the time. Not from today’s adult vantage point, but from the reality of the moment in which it was created. When a part finally feels understood in this way, something profound happens. It no longer has to work so hard to be heard.

This is where the work moves from the head into the body. You identify the emotion or reaction, then slow down enough to notice sensation. Tightness in the chest or throat. Heat in the face. Collapse in the gut. Agitation in the limbs. Numbness. There is no right way to do this. The noticing itself is the practice. That sensation isn’t random. It’s the nervous system responding as if the past is still present.

That sensation is the doorway.

Once that doorway opens, different questions become possible. Not rhetorical questions. Real ones.

Most people don’t understand these questions at first. I didn’t. That confusion is the signal that you’re stepping out of the old paradigm.

This non-pathologizing orientation, central to Internal Family Systems, developed by Dick Schwartz, and to Compassionate Inquiry, articulated by Gabor Maté, isn’t philosophical. It’s practical.

I want to be clear about something here, because this isn’t theoretical for me. After many years of therapy, insight, and self-work, learning how to meet rather than manage myself has been the single most foundational shift of my adult life. Three and a half years of consistent work with an IFS therapist moved mountains that decades of understanding could not. Not because I wasn’t trying hard enough before, but because I was still relating to myself from inside the very paradigm that kept these parts in place. This orientation is the foundation of my work because I know what it’s like to live from relentless self-management, and I know what becomes possible when that relationship finally changes. Without this shift, everything else becomes a workaround.

This is also where many therapeutic and coaching approaches quietly stall. Much of the field is organized around symptom relief. Help me calm down. Help me get through this phase. Help me function better while this thing is still here. The market rewards that. It’s understandable. But depth work asks for something far less comfortable. It asks for the courage to sit with the part of you that your entire personality was built to protect you from feeling. The thing that feels so intolerable that everything else organized around keeping it out of awareness. It's the that I finally met that has quietly been running the show.

Reaching that depth isn’t about willpower. It requires safety, skill, and a willingness to stay present when every instinct wants to pull away. Working with a skilled practitioner can make a profound difference here, not because you’re broken, but because this terrain is difficult to navigate alone. Without that depth, most people end up circling the same patterns with better tools and clearer language, but never quite reaching the root.

Without this relational shift, everything else becomes symptom management. Helpful. Sometimes necessary. Often relieving. But incomplete. With this shift, something different happens. When a part finally feels seen, not corrected, not managed, not tolerated, but genuinely understood, the burden begins to lift. Not because you forced it to change, but because it no longer has to protect you alone.

This is also why this work matters beyond the individual. When people can’t meet themselves internally, they look for the world to do it for them. Much of what we’re witnessing collectively isn’t just disagreement or polarization, but nervous systems under strain, reacting from places of unresolved misattunement.

If you find yourself obsessively scrolling, checking out, numbing, dissociating, or feeling disconnected from your center, this isn’t a personal failure. It isn’t proof that something is wrong with you. It’s information. What’s being reflected isn’t only the external world, but an internal world that’s waiting to be met.

This isn’t a requirement. Managing may still work, and sometimes it’s exactly what’s needed. But the invitation is different. To ask, gently and honestly, what is my system asking me to pay attention to that I’ve repeatedly dismissed? What part of me is still waiting to be seen?

When that place is finally met, how we show up to deal with our current realities shifts in a profound way. Not because the world suddenly becomes easy, but because we’re no longer fighting ourselves while living in it.

I see you. I feel you. I get it. I’ve been there.

Thank you for walking this part of the journey with me. If this opened a pause, stirred something, or named an experience you’ve struggled to articulate, I’d genuinely love to hear where it landed for you.

From the heart,

Shasheen

📷 Taken by Author. Four Seasons Bali at Jimbaran Bay 05/28/25

Thank you for taking the time to read this. Attention is one of the most valuable things we have, and I don’t take it lightly. These conversations matter because they name something many of us feel but rarely say aloud. If this resonated, I’d love to hear from you. Your comments help shape a space where we can be honest without performing, and even a like ❤️ or brief response helps this find others who may need it. And if someone in your life might recognize themselves in these words, I hope you’ll share it with them. None of us are doing this alone.

Share

Leave a comment

Subscribe now

I found myself in a familiar place this week. Not overtly dysregulated, not falling apart, but noticeably braced, a low-grade tension humming underneath everything. Upright. Functional. Alert. Part of it was the news cycle. Part of it was the algorithm. Every click seemed to tighten the funnel. Whatever stirred me, whatever activated me even slightly, the stream responded by amplifying it back at me, louder, faster, sharper. The curation felt intentional and, frankly, effective, as if the system had learned exactly how to keep my nervous system engaged.

Last week I wrote about regulation as resistance, about the ways many of us are trying to stay steady inside a world that feels relentlessly activating, and I could feel that reflex in myself almost immediately. I began regulating. Breathing a little more deliberately. Limiting exposure. Grounding. Reminding myself to stay resourced. All reasonable. All familiar. And also, if I am honest, a bit performative, as if I were saying to myself, okay, let’s handle this well, as if regulation itself had quietly become something to get right.

Most of this was happening above the neck, thought regulating thought, strategy managing sensation. The body stayed quiet, but it did not soften. My chest remained tight. My breath stayed high. The alertness never quite stood down. That was the moment that caught my attention, because even as I was doing all the right things, I could feel the pressure underneath. The sense that if I were doing this correctly, I would not feel this affected. That a well regulated nervous system should be able to metabolize the moment without strain. That steadiness was the measure of success.

Sitting with it over the weekend, something clarified, not as a personal failure, but as a context problem. I began to see how easily regulation slides into management, how quickly self-care becomes self-monitoring, how often the tools meant to support us are recruited into the same old project of fixing, optimizing, and outperforming our own humanity. What began to clarify for me was that what we are often managing is not dysfunction, but what remains after everything else has worked.

This is not just a personal pattern. It is a cultural one. We live inside a system that rewards composure, productivity, and self-control far more than presence or contact, a system that trusts cognition, rewards polish, and quietly asks us to stay intact at all costs. What I am pointing to here is not a mistake you or I have made. It is a paradigm, a way of understanding ourselves that has shaped therapy, coaching, productivity culture, and even spirituality. A paradigm built on self-management, on correcting, regulating, optimizing, and improving ourselves in order to function, belong, and stay upright. For most of our lives, this paradigm works, and for many of us, self-management was not optional; it was the bridge that made adulthood, stability, and safety possible.

For most of my adult life, I approached personal growth from a single, largely unquestioned assumption: that something in me was broken and that with enough insight, effort, discipline, or healing, I could finally fix it. I did not question this assumption because it felt like common sense. If I was anxious, reactive, ashamed, stuck, or repeating patterns I had already worked through, then clearly something was still wrong. The fact that I was uncomfortable felt like evidence.

So I did what many thoughtful, capable, conscientious people do. I read the books. I went to therapy. I meditated. I journaled. I held myself accountable. I leaned into discipline. I built structure. I optimized. I learned the language of trauma, attachment, nervous systems, parts, patterns, and regulation. I became very good at understanding myself.

And yet, despite all of that growth, there was always something left over. A stubborn remainder. A familiar emotional charge. A sense of this again. That last bit became the most frustrating of all, because by that point, I believed it should not still be there.

This is what I now call the Last 5 percent. Not a lack of effort. Not resistance. Not self-sabotage. But the place where the paradigm itself breaks down. Self-management did not arise from misunderstanding ourselves. It arose because we lived inside families, schools, workplaces, and systems where being managed was safer than being met. Where competence was rewarded more than vulnerability. Where staying composed protected belonging.

Over time, shame learns to clean itself up. It becomes accountability. Accountability becomes discipline. Discipline becomes structure. Structure becomes optimization. Optimization becomes regulation. Eventually, all of it masquerades as self-mastery. By the time we arrive there, the original wound is invisible. The body is organized. The system looks like success. The problem is not that self-management is wrong; it is that it is being asked to do something it was never designed to do.

The reason you are here, reading this, is not because self-management failed you. It is because it finally reached its limit. What remains at that limit is not a skill deficit, not a motivation problem, not a lack of insight. It is what the body has been holding. Not ideas or beliefs, but patterns of tension, readiness, bracing, the learned impulse to stay alert, capable, and contained even when nothing obvious is happening. You do not need special practices or body awareness skills to recognize this. Most of us already feel it as tightness, vigilance, or a sense of never quite standing down.

It is entirely possible to understand your history, name your patterns, track your nervous system, and still be relating to yourself from a place of supervision rather than presence. In fact, that stance is often praised as an expression of emotional intelligence. But understanding is not the same as staying with sensation, and regulation is not the same as capacity. Regulation can create control. Capacity creates room. Control often bypasses what the body is carrying. Capacity includes it. In this paradigm, composure is mistaken for health. Calm is mistaken for resolution. Regulation is mistaken for intimacy with self. What looks like mastery is often just a refined ability to stay upright while remaining guarded.

This is not a personal failing. It is an intelligent adaptation. It made sense. It worked. And it was reinforced everywhere, relationally, professionally, culturally. What we were managing was proximity. Proximity to grief, to need, to longing, to shame, to the parts of us that once threatened belonging.

This is why the Last 5 percent does not respond to discipline, insight, or better regulation. Those strategies were never designed to reach it. When they are applied to that last remaining piece, they often reinforce the very rule that created it: stay together, do not soften, do not need, do not let this be felt. From the body’s perspective, being eliminated feels identical to being abandoned. So it stays, not because it is stubborn, not because it is unconscious, but because it is loyal.

The Last 5 percent is not the part of you that failed to evolve. It is the part of you that refused to disappear. This is the paradox many high-functioning, deeply self-aware people encounter. The very approach that helped them build a life is the one that keeps this final layer intact.

What is being asked now is not more effort, but a shift from a management-based relationship with ourselves to a contact-based one. From control to presence. From self-mastery to self-relationship. This does not mean abandoning structure, discipline, or regulation. It means changing how they are used. Structure can support presence or protect us from sensation. Regulation can increase capacity or keep the body braced. The difference is orientation, not technique.

At some point, the work stops being about understanding and starts being about staying present with what the body has been protecting all along. The question is no longer how do I get rid of this. The question becomes what is here, and what happened that made this necessary. Discomfort, in this light, is not evidence of failure. It is information. It is sensation. It is life moving through a system that learned how to survive.

Growth is not measured by the absence of unwanted feelings. It is measured by the quality of our relationship to what we can stay with. This is a radical reorientation for people who have spent their lives getting better at getting better. It asks us to stop trying to optimize our way out of being human and to let go of the fantasy that one day we will be so healed, so regulated, so enlightened that nothing will reach us. That fantasy is not only impossible. It is exhausting.

The invitation is simpler and far more demanding. To stop organizing our lives around avoidance. To notice what happens below the neck. To soften the breath when the impulse is to tighten. To meet what has been held rather than manage it. The Last 5 percent does not show up because something has gone wrong. It shows up because the old paradigm has taken you as far as it can. What remains is not a problem to solve. It is the place where a different relationship with yourself becomes unavoidable.

If any of this resonates, you’re not behind, and you’re not broken. You’re right on time. And I’m walking this with you.

From the heart,

Shasheen

📷 By Author taken at 5th Ave and 78th, NYC 01/17/26

Thank you for taking the time to read this. Attention is one of the most valuable things we have, and I don’t take it lightly. These conversations matter because they name something many of us feel but rarely say aloud. If this resonated, I’d love to hear from you. Your comments help shape a space where we can be honest without performing, and even a like ❤️ or brief response helps this find others who may need it. And if someone in your life might recognize themselves in these words, I hope you’ll share it with them. None of us are doing this alone.

Leave a comment

Share

Subscribe now

I’ve been quiet.

Not because I don’t care. Not because I’m disengaged. And not because I’m confused about what I believe. I’ve been quiet because something in me has been trying to stay oriented while the ground keeps shifting beneath our feet, and because there are moments when speaking too quickly feels like another kind of dishonesty.

I’ve been watching not just the news, but also the effect it’s having on people’s bodies, conversations, and their capacity to stay human with one another.

What finally pushed this out of me wasn’t one headline. It was the accumulation. The sense of whiplash that never lets your system land.

In recent weeks, we’ve been asked to absorb an impossible range of realities. The killing of Renée Good and Alex Pretti in Minnesota, both captured on camera, followed almost immediately by official narratives that contradicted what people could see with their own eyes. Public violence reframed before grief or clarity could even form. Assertions that a foreign president could simply be seized and detained, as if international law were optional. Casual talk about taking Greenland, spoken aloud without embarrassment. Threats of war drift through the background like ambient noise. And threaded through it all, the resurfacing of the Epstein files, framed as transparency, declared complete, accompanied by calm statements insisting there is nothing more to see here.

These events are not identical in scale or cause. What unites them is the psychological mechanism they rely on.

We are not just being overwhelmed. We are being told, repeatedly and confidently, not to trust our own perception.

This is the definition of gaslighting.

There is no sequence the nervous system can follow. Before the body can register one shock, another arrives. Before outrage can settle into understanding, it is displaced. Before grief can be metabolized, it is overridden. The news cycle doesn’t move forward; it compresses. And the effect is not information. It is disorientation.

This isn’t a partisan argument or a claim of moral purity. History is full of moments where fear, power, and certainty combined to justify harm. What feels different now is the scale, the speed, and how openly the public is being instructed to doubt what it can see.

What has become truly destabilizing is not just the volume of events, but what we have learned to tolerate. January 6th was watched, documented, minimized, reframed, and quietly absorbed. Attempts to overturn a democratic process are recoded as patriotism. Violence is morally inverted in real time. Loyalty is elevated above law. Identity above evidence. Fear above fact. Compassion and kindness are dismissed as weakness. Science, logic, and intellectual honesty are treated as inconveniences. Shared reality itself becomes optional.

We are being trained to live inside contradiction without resolution. To absorb shock without integration. To accept erosion as normal. And the cost of that normalization doesn’t just live in our politics or our headlines. It lives in our bodies. In the constant hum of vigilance. In the exhaustion we can’t quite explain. In the sense that something essential has slipped out from under us while we were busy trying to keep up.

I’m not naming these lives to provoke outrage. I’m naming them to illustrate how systems quietly teach us what suffering we are expected to tolerate.

And underneath all of this, beneath the spin and the saturation and the constant re-narration of reality, is something more basic and more disturbing.

Cruelty has become normalized.

Not as an aberration, but as a posture. As something administrable. As something that can be done calmly, justified bureaucratically, and then explained away as necessary. Recently, an image circulated of a five-year-old boy, Liam Ramos, wearing a bright blue bunny hat and carrying a small Spider-Man backpack, being led into federal detention with his father after being taken from their home while seeking asylum. A judge later ordered their release, condemning the detention and naming the trauma inflicted on a child as an abuse of power. What should have landed as an unambiguous moral rupture instead entered the same cycle as everything else. Brief outrage. Competing explanations. Then disappearance into the churn.

This is how cruelty becomes tolerable.

The same cruelty and gaslighting are unmistakable in the handling of the Epstein files.

For years, the existence of a well-documented, international pedophile ring has been treated as a kind of open secret. Court records. Sworn testimony. Civil settlements. Flight logs. Corroborated survivor accounts. This is not speculation or an internet rumor. It is a matter of public record, legal adjudication, and documented evidence of organized sexual abuse enabled by wealth, power, and institutional protection.

Women came forward at enormous personal cost. Many were children when the abuse began. They carried the trauma for decades, often in silence, often dismissed, often discredited. When they finally spoke, they were scrutinized more harshly than the men who harmed them. Their credibility was questioned. Their motives dissected. Their pain turned into spectacle. And then, when attention reached a breaking point, the same familiar maneuver appeared. A flood of documents. Carefully framed releases. Official statements signaling finality. And a calm, authoritative message beneath it all. There is nothing more to see here.

This is gaslighting in its purest form.

Not denial of facts, but distortion of meaning. Not silence, but saturation. Not saying it didn’t happen, but insisting that what clearly happened does not mean what it looks like it means. The public is shown fragments of horror, then told to accept closure without accountability. Survivors are used as evidence that the system worked, even as the system ensures no true reckoning occurs. The message to these women is devastatingly clear. Your suffering is real enough to acknowledge, but not real enough to disrupt power.

This is not transparency. It is containment.

When a society repeatedly drags survivors into the light only to abandon them again, it teaches a brutal lesson. Speak, and you will be exposed. Persist, and you will be exhausted. Tell the truth, and you will be asked to accept that justice is off the table. Over time, this doesn’t just silence victims. It trains the public to doubt its own moral clarity. To look away. To accept that some crimes are simply too inconvenient to fully confront.

Don’t believe your eyes. Don’t trust your outrage. Don’t ask for more.

Social psychology has been warning us about this for decades. In the Stanford Prison Experiment, ordinary people placed into roles of authority rapidly adopted abusive behavior toward those assigned less power, not because they were inherently cruel, but because the structure made cruelty permissible and even expected. In the Milgram experiments, participants were willing to administer what they believed were painful electric shocks to another human being when instructed to do so by an authority figure, despite clear signs of distress. These experiments were never warnings about bad people. They were warnings about systems that reward obedience, dull empathy, and make harm feel ordinary.

What we are witnessing now feels like a societal version of those experiments playing out in real time.

We do not need to psychoanalyze individual leaders to understand what is happening. We can look at outcomes. Children used as leverage. Survivors are exposed without repair. Violence reframed. Accountability dissolved. Suffering is treated as collateral damage in the service of power, control, or ideological loyalty. When cruelty is administered through policy, defended through rhetoric, and repeated often enough, it stops registering as cruelty at all. It becomes background noise.

And none of this is happening in a vacuum.

The cruelty does not spread on its own. It is carried. Amplified. Engineered.

We live inside media and algorithmic systems that are exquisitely tuned to the human nervous system. These systems know exactly what keeps us hooked. They know that outrage travels faster than nuance. That fear binds attention. That humiliation seeks relief. That belonging feels like safety. They know that constant novelty keeps the system aroused and exhausted at the same time. And they know that an exhausted public is easier to steer than a grounded one.

So the zone is flooded on purpose.

Not because no one is in control, but because perpetual activation is profitable. One crisis replaces the last before the body can complete a response. One moral rupture is buried under the next. Context fragments. Memory shortens. Meaning is deferred. Reflection is crowded out. The goal is not understanding. It is momentum.

This is how cruelty survives without ever being fully named.

When everything is urgent, nothing is integrated. When everything is shocking, nothing is metabolized. When every story is framed as breaking, the nervous system never gets to stand down. Over time, we begin to confuse saturation with awareness. We tell ourselves we are staying informed when, in reality, we are staying activated.

This is not a failure of intelligence or character. It is what happens when human biology is placed inside systems that were never designed to protect it.

Layer that constant activation on top of normalized cruelty, and something deeper takes hold. Moral injury. Not just burnout. Not just overwhelm. A fracture that occurs when what we are repeatedly asked to tolerate violates something fundamental in us, and there is no clear place to put the protest.

If you’re feeling this as a tight chest, a shallow breath, or a constant sense of vigilance, that’s not metaphor. That’s your nervous system responding to sustained threat. Nothing is wrong with you.

I feel this in myself.

I feel the pull toward numbing out. Toward scrolling without really seeing. Toward outrage that spikes and then collapses into fatigue. Toward the quiet fantasy of disengagement, not because I don’t care, but because caring has started to feel physiologically expensive. If any of that resonates, I want to say this clearly. There is nothing wrong with you.

These are not character flaws. They are stress responses.

When the world becomes unpredictable, the nervous system looks for relief. Sometimes that relief comes through anger. Sometimes through collapse. Sometimes through checking out entirely. None of these responses mean you are apathetic or broken. They mean you are human, trying to survive in conditions that keep changing faster than the body can adapt.

This is where the work shifts.

The work now is not to know more, but to stay human while knowing. To resist the pull toward numbness without becoming consumed by outrage. To remain connected to what is real, embodied, and relational, even as everything around us encourages fragmentation.

Because at the end of the day, after the headlines stop scrolling and the noise quiets, we are left alone with our bodies. With the tight chest. The shallow breath. The jaw that won’t unclench. The sense that there is nowhere for the anger to go and nowhere for the grief to land.

This is what I mean when I talk about the Last Five Percent. Not the part of us that debates or analyzes or optimizes. The part that surfaces under pressure. The part that wants certainty at any cost. The part that hardens. The part that checks out. The part that longs to belong more than it longs to be honest. The part that can be pulled toward cruelty if cruelty promises relief.

If we don’t attend to that layer, we become vulnerable to the very forces we think we’re resisting.

Staying regulated is not disengagement. Staying human is not a weakness. And tending to the nervous system is not a luxury in moments like this. It is a form of resistance.

This is not about pretending things are okay. They’re not. It is about refusing to let saturation steal our capacity to feel, to think, and to stay in relationship with one another. It is about slowing down enough to notice when the system is overwhelmed and choosing care instead of collapse. Connection instead of isolation. Presence instead of constant consumption.

You do not need to have the right take. You do not need to track every detail. You do not need to stay outraged all the time to prove that you care. What matters is that you do not abandon yourself in the process. What matters is that you do not confuse numbness for strength or exhaustion for clarity.

If you’re struggling right now, you’re not failing. You’re responding to something that is genuinely destabilizing.

If you feel angry and don’t know where to put it, you’re not broken. You’re paying attention.

And if you’re tired, deeply tired, that doesn’t mean you’ve given up. It means your system has been under strain for a long time.

I don’t have neat answers. I don’t have a tidy resolution. What I have is a commitment to stay present, even when it’s uncomfortable. To refuse to harden as a form of protection. To keep choosing what is human, embodied, and relational, even when the world seems determined to fracture those things.

For now, that looks like slowing down. Feeling what’s actually here. Trusting your perception. Reaching for connection. Remembering that tending to your inner world is not separate from engaging the outer one. It is the ground that makes engagement possible.

Compassion is not a soft virtue in hard times. It is the refusal to let systems designed to exhaust, divide, and normalize cruelty decide who we become, or what our nervous systems are trained to accept as normal.

Thank you for staying with it, and for continuing to walk this stretch of the road with me.

From the heart,

Shasheeen

📷 by Author. Taken at the Sphere, Las Vegas, Dead & Co. 08/08/2004

Thank you for taking the time to read this. Attention is one of the most valuable things we have, and I don’t take it lightly. These conversations matter because they name something so many of us feel but rarely speak aloud. If this resonated, I’d love to hear from you. Your comments help shape a community where we can be honest without performing. And if someone in your life might recognize themselves in these words, I hope you’ll share it with them. None of us are doing this alone.

Leave a comment

Subscribe now

Share

Related Posts