Canada and the United States spent years building a trade agreement. Negotiators, lawyers, two ratifications, a rulebook thick enough to settle almost any argument the two countries could have with each other. Last month, that rulebook was walked around in a single afternoon using a law written when Herbert Hoover was president.

That is the story. Not the fifty percent number everyone is posting about this week. The number will move again. The method will not.

And if you are reading this from Lagos or Dhaka or Manila or Warsaw, thinking this is a neighborly squabble on the other side of the world, stay with me for the next few minutes. The mechanism that just got tested on Canada does not have a border built into it.

The Door Nobody Had Ever Opened

Start with what most coverage skipped.

In February, the Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not give a president the authority to impose tariffs, and those tariffs came off. A check worked. The system did the thing the civics textbook says it does.

Then on July 20, the administration signed three proclamations under Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930, the law most people know as Smoot-Hawley, if they know it at all, from a bored teacher in a 1986 movie. The proclamations covered Canadian vehicles, alcohol and dairy, and later widened to 554 tariff lines. Cement. Paper. Textiles. Hockey sticks.

Section 338 had been sitting there for ninety-six years. Referenced occasionally in the thirties and forties, then nothing. No record exists of it ever being used to impose a tariff. It lets a president decide, as a finding of fact, that another country is discriminating against American commerce, and then add up to fifty percent in duties on that country’s goods.

One office. One determination. No vote.

The Part That Should Worry Everyone Outside Canada

Here is what makes this different from every other tariff headline of the past two years.

Most of the previous tariffs on Canada carved out goods that met the trade agreement’s rules of origin, which is why a large share of Canadian exports kept crossing duty free. The Section 338 tariffs do not. They apply to goods that comply with the agreement. It is the first time an American administration has stated plainly that a signed North American trade deal does not shield you.

Sit with what that means for a second, because it is the whole article.

A trade agreement is not a wall. It is a promise, written down, that both sides agreed to treat as binding. Its entire strength comes from the fact that everybody behaves as though it is binding. The moment one party finds a statute that lets it act as if the promise is not there, the promise becomes what it always physically was. Paper.

Carney’s office called it the latest in a series of unilateral American actions taken in direct violation of the agreement. Trade lawyers on both sides are still arguing about whether Section 338 can survive a court challenge, and a version of that fight is probably coming. But the tariffs are already collected. Litigation runs on a schedule of years. Shipping containers do not.

Now think about every other country that signed something with Washington. Japan. South Korea. The European Union. Vietnam. Mexico. Bangladesh, whose garment sector lives entirely on predictable access to American shelves. Every trade ministry on earth spent last month reading the same three proclamations and drawing the same conclusion: the paper we relied on is thinner than we priced it.

Exporters do not respond to that by writing angry op-eds. They respond by adding a risk premium. That premium goes into the cost of the goods, and the cost of the goods goes into a shelf, and the shelf is the one you stand in front of.

That is how a legal argument in Washington ends up in your grocery bill in Dhaka.

Then It Escalated, Twice, In Four Days

Talks collapsed on a Friday night. Carney said American negotiators asked too much and offered too little, suspended negotiations and recalled his team. The fifty percent duty took effect once a short pause expired.

On Monday, Trump posted that on January 1, 2027, tariffs on all Canadian cars, trucks, auto parts and steel rise to fifty percent. Auto duties currently sit at twenty-five. Steel is already at fifty. Canada is the third largest source of American imports, more than three hundred and eighty billion dollars of goods last year.

On Tuesday, Canada answered with retaliatory tariffs of up to fifty percent on hundreds of American products, effective September 8. Steel and aluminum goods. Furniture. Clothing. Dairy, appliances, agricultural equipment, pulp and paper, electronics. Ontario’s premier threatened to cut off American access to electricity and critical minerals.

Automotive supply chains were built on the assumption that the border was basically an inconvenience. Parts cross it several times in different forms before they end up installed in a finished car, which means a single component can get taxed on multiple passes. And the plants at the center of this are not the ones you would guess. Toyota and Honda together accounted for 76.5 percent of Canada’s vehicle production last year, more than Ford, GM and Stellantis combined.

Nobody in that supply chain voted on any of this. Not the line worker in Oshawa. Not the machinist in Michigan whose plant depends on parts from Ontario. Not the family in Alberta whose used sedan just got more expensive because everyone priced out of new cars came shopping in their segment.

The Same Tool, Pointed Somewhere Else

On the same Monday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced a campaign to sever every economic lifeline sustaining Iran. Aviation, digital assets, gold, technology and shipping, plus sixty named individuals and vessels. He would not say which of Iran’s trading partners would face penalties, or when.

Different target, same instrument. Economic force applied from a desk, under authorities that predate almost everyone reading this, reaching countries that were never consulted.

You can already measure where it lands. American gasoline is averaging $4.09 a gallon, up from $2.98 on February 28. Energy prices are 14.7 percent higher than a year ago. Roughly eight million barrels a day are still missing from world supply.

And the Strait of Hormuz does not only move oil. It moves liquefied natural gas, and it moves the feedstocks for fertilizer and plastics. Fertilizer sets the cost of a harvest. Which is why a farmer in Bihar or Kano who has never followed a Treasury press conference in his life is about to pay for one.

Share

What You Can Actually Do About It

You cannot fix the mechanism. You can absolutely stop being the softest place it lands. Every item below is something a person can do this month.

Find out whether you are on a list. The proclamations name covered goods by tariff line, and Canada’s countermeasures list is published by its Department of Finance. If you run a business, freelance for an exporter, or work at a plant that ships across the border, look up your product’s HS code against those annexes. Do not wait for your employer to tell you. Companies announce layoffs after they have run the numbers, and you want to have run yours first.

Move purchases to the right side of the dates. September 8 for Canada’s retaliation list, January 1 for the auto and steel escalation. If you were already going to need a vehicle, a major appliance, a laptop or anything steel-heavy within the next eighteen months, buying ahead of a known date is real money, in the range of thousands rather than hundreds. If you were not going to need one, do not let a headline talk you into debt at a panic price. The trap in every trade war is people buying things they never needed at prices set by fear.

Repair before you replace. Parts get expensive on the same schedule as products. Tires, brakes, a compressor, a water heater element. Getting the work done in the next few months costs less than getting it done in the spring, and a repaired thing does not come with a loan attached.

If your income is in a currency that is not the dollar, stop adding dollar debt. Energy shocks and a strong dollar arrive together, and the people crushed in that squeeze are always the ones who borrowed in one currency and earn in another. Renegotiate what you can now, while you still have leverage.

Sell services, not just goods. Tariffs apply to things that cross a border in a container. They do not apply to design, writing, code, bookkeeping, translation, tutoring, support. If you have a marketable skill and an internet connection, that channel is still open, and it is the one part of the global economy nobody has found a 1930 statute for yet.

Use the programs that already exist. In the United States, LIHEAP helps households cover heating and cooling bills, and SNAP eligibility changes when income drops, not a year later. In the United States and in Canada, dialing 2-1-1 connects you to a live human who knows the local assistance map better than any search engine. Ottawa has said it is providing support to workers and businesses hit by the tariffs, so if you are in an affected sector, get your paperwork ready before the queue forms. Ask your utility about a levelized or budget billing plan, which smooths a winter spike across twelve months instead of dropping it on you in January.

Then tell one other person. Preferably someone older, or someone on a fixed income, or someone who does not read trade news. The gap between people who saw this coming and people who got surprised by it is mostly a gap in who had a friend that mentioned it.

Refer a friend

The Part Worth Holding On To

I do not think the useful response to any of this is fear. Fear makes people buy badly, sell at the bottom and vote for whoever shouts the most convincing thing.

The useful response is clarity about what was never as solid as we assumed. A trade agreement holds because the parties choose to honor it. A currency holds because people believe in it. A supply chain holds because everyone involved keeps showing up. All of it is a set of agreements between human beings, and human beings can revise agreements, which cuts in both directions. The same flexibility that let a ninety-six-year-old clause be pulled off the shelf is the flexibility that lets a country rebuild what it depends on, closer to home, on terms it controls.

You are not powerless in that. You are early.

Most people will meet the January date the way they met every other date on this calendar, by reading about it after it happened, in a piece explaining why their car costs six thousand more. You have four months and a list. Use them.

Subscribe now

Sources

1. CBS News, “Trump announces 50% tariffs on Canadian auto and steel imports starting in 2027” : https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-canadian-automotive-steel-tariffs/

2. NBC News, “Trump hits back at Carney, threatens to hike auto, truck, metals tariffs to 50%” : https://www.nbcnews.com/business/economy/trump-canada-tariffs-autos-metals-rcna594108

3. ABC News, “Canada announces retaliatory tariffs up to 50% against US” : https://abcnews.com/Business/trump-hell-impose-new-tariffs-canada-january-escalating/story?id=135901297

4. CNBC, “Trump says U.S. will hike Canada auto tariffs to 50% as trade war escalates” : https://www.cnbc.com/2026/08/24/trump-canada-auto-tariffs-trade-war.html

5. Global Trade Alert, “Section 338: The Return of the Authority” : https://globaltradealert.org/blog/s338-the-return-of-the-authority

6. Global News, “What are Section 338 tariffs and how are they able to bypass CUSMA?” : https://globalnews.ca/news/11974226/donald-trump-tariffs-section-338-cusma-explained/

7. Morrison Foerster, “Revival of a Dormant Tariff Authority: Section 338” : https://www.mofo.com/resources/insights/260729-revival-of-a-dormant-tariff-authority-section-338

8. Brownstein, “President Trump Imposes Tariffs on Canada Under Section 338” : https://www.bhfs.com/insight/president-trump-imposes-tariffs-on-canada-under-section-338/

9. Congressional Research Service, “U.S.-Japan Trade Agreements and Tariff Negotiations” : https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF11120

10. Al Jazeera, “US launches ‘Operation Economic Outcast’ to cut Iran’s economic lifeline” : https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/24/trump-administration-announces-global-economic-war-on-iran

11. Al Jazeera, “How US sanctions on Iran ripple through global markets and consumers” : https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/8/24/how-us-sanctions-on-iran-ripple-through-global-markets-and-consumers

12. The Washington Post, “Bessent unveils sweeping new Iran sanctions but delays toughest blow” : https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2026/08/24/bessent-unveil-economic-d-day-sanctions-against-iran/

13. CNBC, “Oil prices are little changed after Iran’s president indicates Tehran wants war to end soon” : https://www.cnbc.com/2026/08/21/oil-prices-us-iran.html

14. CNN, live coverage, August 23, 2026 : https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/23/world/live-news/iran-war-trump

15. Congressional Research Service, “The Strait of Hormuz: Security Developments and Impacts on Oil, Gas, and Other Commodities” : https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45281

16. Fortune, “Trump just invoked a 1930 tariff law no president has ever used” : https://fortune.com/2026/08/02/trump-canada-tariffs-legal-basis-1930-law-smoot-hawley/

17. CNN Business, “Trump is threatening new Canadian auto tariffs. That will hurt US automakers and workers” : https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/24/business/trump-canada-auto-tariff-us-industry

Leave a comment

There is no final edition, no farewell column, no gathering at the courthouse steps. The paper just thins. The city hall beat gets folded into a regional desk two hours away. The police blotter disappears. Then one Thursday what lands on the porch is four pages of wire copy with a local weather box glued on top, and it looks close enough to a newspaper that most people never register the difference.

In Virginia, five counties crossed that line quietly. Caroline, Cumberland, Buckingham, Charles City and Prince George now have no dedicated news source. Six independent Virginia papers closed or merged since July 2024, including the Independent-Messenger in Emporia and the News Progress in South Hill. In 2023, seven Virginia counties were news deserts. By last year it was sixteen. Nobody voted for that. It arrived the way a roof fails, slowly and then all at once.

Nationally the count is worse. Between 2005 and 2025 the number of American newspapers fell from 7,325 to 4,490. Daily circulation, which sat between fifty and sixty million at the turn of the century, is now just over fifteen million. Two papers a week are still closing. Two hundred and thirteen counties have no local news source at all, another 1,524 have exactly one left, and roughly fifty million Americans live inside that gap.

Here is the part almost nobody tells you, and the part that lands on your kitchen table.

The Bill Is Already Being Charged to You

In June, Rebuild Local News published an economic analysis by researcher Matthew Baker and University of Illinois Chicago finance professor Dermot Murphy. It put a national number on what happens after the reporters leave: local governments in news deserts pay roughly $1.1 billion in additional borrowing costs every single year.

The mechanism is not complicated. Your county borrows money to build schools, repave roads, replace water lines, expand the hospital. It borrows in the municipal bond market, and the people lending that money price risk for a living. When the last reporter stops attending commission meetings, lenders assume the odds of waste and self-dealing just went up, because history says they did. So they charge more interest. The county pays it. The county pays it out of your property tax bill.

Murphy and his colleagues Pengjie Gao and Chang Lee established the causation in a 2020 study in the Journal of Financial Economics. After a newspaper closes, municipal borrowing costs rise by five to eleven basis points, which works out to about $650,000 in extra interest on a single bond issue. Not correlation. Causation. The effect shows up in the county that lost its paper and not in the neighboring county that kept one.

Scale that out and it stops being abstract. Ohio has 21 news desert counties holding $1.3 billion in bond debt, and the missing coverage makes servicing that debt $12 million more expensive a year. Minnesota’s figure is around $13 million. When the Rocky Mountain News shut down in 2009, the median yield spread on newly issued local municipal bonds in the area jumped 37 basis points.

The waste follows the same pattern. When nobody is watching, county government payrolls grow as a share of local wages. Costly financing arrangements become more common. One study found that after papers close, corporate regulatory infractions in the area rise about one percent and environmental violations jump more than fifteen percent.

None of that is a moral argument about journalism. It is an invoice. If you own a home in one of those counties, part of your tax bill is the price of an empty chair.

How the Chair Got Emptied

This is the story a documentary called Stripped for Parts told before most of the data caught up to it.

The film follows what happened in Denver in 2018, when the Denver Post’s opinion editor Chuck Plunkett published an editorial attacking the paper’s own owners, the New York hedge fund Alden Global Capital, and called them vulture capitalists in print. It follows reporter Julie Reynolds, who spent years digging into where the money actually went, and who wrote more than a hundred articles on it, first for the NewsGuild union and later for national outlets. Her reporting triggered newsroom rebellions at Alden papers across the country.

The business model she uncovered was not mysterious once you saw it. Buy distressed newspapers cheaply. Cut staff hard and fast. Sell the building and the printing plant. Run one story across a dozen papers under a shared services desk. Keep the masthead, because the masthead still sells subscriptions to people who assume somebody is still in the newsroom. Researchers have a name for what is left behind. They call them ghost newspapers, and they are counted as surviving outlets in most statistics even though the local reporting inside them is gone.

Alden now owns the Chicago Tribune and more than 160 other papers, which makes it the second largest local news publisher in the country. In February it took out a full-page ad in its own Tribune announcing it would pay thirty percent above anyone else for the employee-owned Daily Herald in the Chicago suburbs. That same month, the union at the New York Daily News said a fresh round of Alden layoffs would cost it 28 percent of its members.

For a long time there was a floor under all of this. If the paper died, public radio was often still there. Not anymore. Congress rescinded $1.1 billion in already approved funding, and on January 5 the Corporation for Public Broadcasting’s board voted to dissolve the organization entirely after nearly sixty years. One analysis of station finances estimates roughly fifteen percent of local stations could close within three years. In nine counties, public radio is the only local news source there is.

And in July, filings with the FCC showed that Alden’s president, Heath Freeman, is positioned to take a 32 percent voting interest in Cumulus Media as the radio broadcaster comes out of bankruptcy, through a shell company called Next Gen Radio Enterprises LLC. Same fund. Same playbook. New medium, and it happens to be the medium people still use in the car and during a storm.

So the replacement is not coming. That is the thing to understand before you look at your ballot.

What That Does to Your Vote in November

On November 3, tens of millions of Americans will vote on things that touch their lives far more directly than any race that gets national coverage. School levies. Hospital districts. County commissions. Sheriffs. Water and sewer bonds. Property tax measures. Judges nobody can name.

And in a growing share of the country, not one independent reporter has looked into any of it.

Medill surveyed people living in news desert counties earlier this year. Just over half now get their news from nonjournalistic sources, meaning social media groups, influencers, or friends and family. About four in ten check a Facebook or Nextdoor style group daily. Most of them do not feel deprived, which is the quietest and most dangerous finding in the whole report. They also trust the news media far less than people who still have a local outlet, 46 percent against 59 percent.

The Brennan Center laid out in June what this does to an election specifically. Voting procedures differ enormously by state and county, and without local reporting, ordinary administrative hiccups get stripped of context and turned into evidence of fraud. Candidates for local office go entirely uncovered, so voters have nothing to judge them on except party. Research from MIT Sloan found that where local news declines, straight-ticket voting rises, which is what happens when people are handed a ballot full of names they have no information about.

Into that vacuum has come something newer. Political operations are now paying content creators to promote candidates and positions, with almost no disclosure requirements attached. In a Chicago-area survey, a third of respondents said they get daily local news from creators on social platforms, against 18 percent who still turn to a local newspaper. Some of that content is honest. Some of it is bought, and you have no reliable way to tell which is which.

Think about what that means in practice for a retiree on a fixed income. A bond measure lands on your ballot. It will raise your property taxes for the next twenty years. No reporter has read the offering documents, asked who holds the construction contract, or checked whether the last bond delivered what it promised. The only voices explaining it are the campaign that wants it passed and a Facebook group where the loudest poster may or may not be paid. You are not being lazy or careless when you struggle to decide. The information was removed from your community, and nobody asked your permission.

What You Can Actually Do Before November 3

The reporting is gone. The public record is not. Almost everything a local journalist would have checked for you is still sitting in a filing cabinet or a county website, waiting for someone to ask. That someone can be you, and it takes about two hours total.

Find out where you actually stand. Medill’s State of Local News project maps every county in the country. Look up yours. If it shows one surviving outlet, open that outlet’s website and check whether the last three local stories carried a staff byline or a wire credit. That five-minute test tells you whether you have a newsroom or a masthead.

Build your own ballot instead of meeting it cold. Go to vote411.org/ballot, run by the League of Women Voters Education Fund, and enter your address. Personalized sample ballots go live roughly three weeks before Election Day, with candidate answers in their own words and plain-language explanations of ballot measures. Print it. Fill it in at the kitchen table, not in the booth.

Get the agenda before the vote, not after. Every county commission, school board and hospital district in America posts meeting agendas and packets in advance, and nearly all of them will email them to you free if you ask the clerk to add you to the list. Call your county clerk’s office this week and ask. The packet is where the contracts and the dollar figures live, and it is written for the officials, not for the public, which is exactly why it is worth reading.

Verify election procedures with the office that runs them. For anything about registration deadlines, mail ballot rules, ID requirements or polling locations, go to your county election official or your Secretary of State’s site directly. Not a group post, not a screenshot, not a video. If something strange happens at a polling place near you, that office is also the fastest way to find out what actually occurred before it becomes a rumor with a life of its own.

Read the measure itself. Every bond, levy and ballot question has official text and a fiscal note attached to it, usually on the county elections page. Look for the total cost including interest, the term in years, and what happens if revenue falls short. Then ask one question out loud at a public meeting: who receives this money. Public bodies are required to answer public questions on the record, and an unanswered question in the minutes is itself a finding.

Pay one newsroom, even a little. When the Denver Post was gutted, some of the journalists who walked out started The Colorado Sun, which still publishes without a paywall and takes donations as small as five dollars. Others built the Baltimore Banner and San Jose Spotlight. More than three hundred local news startups have launched in the past five years, four out of five of them digital-only. One of them may already be covering your county, and finding it takes one search.

Then do the thing that scales. Stripped for Parts is streaming on PBS Passport through 2028 and available to rent or buy, and the filmmakers will help any group, library, church, union local or senior center host a screening. In their own post-screening survey, eighty percent of attendees said the film changed how they saw local news. Fifty people in a room who suddenly understand why their taxes went up is a political fact that no hedge fund can lay off.

Share

The Chair Is Only Empty If Nobody Sits In It

It would be easy to read all of this as a story about decline, and to close the tab feeling smaller than when you opened it. Do not do that. It is not what the evidence says.

The evidence says a handful of laid-off reporters in Denver built a statewide newsroom out of nothing and it is still standing eight years later. It says three hundred new outlets have opened since 2021 while the giants were shrinking. It says a union at one paper can still cost a hedge fund a headline, and that a fourth-generation newspaper family in Dallas turned down more money last year rather than sell to Alden. It says the missing watchdog has a measurable price, which means restoring the watchdog has a measurable return.

And it says something about you specifically. Every dollar of that $1.1 billion gets charged because a chair at a meeting sits empty. Nobody checked your credentials at the door. Nobody ever will. The agenda is public, the packet is public, the vote is public, and the only thing standing between your county government and an unwatched room is whether one resident decides to show up and read.

This November you are going to vote on your own taxes, your own schools, your own water, your own sheriff. Vote knowing what you are voting on. That is not a small act of citizenship. In a county with no reporters left, it is the whole job, and it is yours now.

Subscribe now

Sources

1. Axios Richmond, “Virginia news deserts more than double as local papers close,” April 6, 2026. https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2026/04/06/virginia-news-deserts-rise-local-newspaper-closures

2. Brennan Center for Justice, “News Deserts Leave Voters Vulnerable to Election Misinformation,” June 17, 2026. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/news-deserts-leave-voters-vulnerable-election-misinformation

3. Medill State of Local News Report 2025, via PRSA. https://www.prsa.org/article/as-newspapers-close--news-deserts-expand--report-finds-nov-dec25

4. Rebuild Local News, “Local News Shortage Leads to $1.1 Billion in Extra Borrowing Costs,” June 10, 2026. https://www.rebuildlocalnews.org/local-news-shortage-leads-to-1-1-billion-in-extra-borrowing-costs-for-local-governments-and-taxpayers/

5. Ohio Capital Journal, “The loss of local news isn’t just making voters less informed, it’s making taxpayers poorer,” June 24, 2026. https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/2026/06/24/the-loss-of-local-news-isnt-just-making-voters-less-informed-its-making-taxpayers-poorer-study-says/

6. Gao, Lee and Murphy, “Financing dies in darkness? The impact of newspaper closures on public finance,” Journal of Financial Economics. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304405X19301606

7. Columbia Journalism Review, “When local papers close, costs rise for local governments.” https://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/public-finance-local-news.php

8. Stripped for Parts: American Journalism on the Brink, dir. Rick Goldsmith. https://strippedforpartsfilm.com/

9. Northwestern Local News Initiative, “Alden Global Capital makes push to buy Daily Herald in Chicago suburbs,” February 9, 2026. https://localnewsinitiative.northwestern.edu/posts/2026/02/09/daily-herald-alden-capital-shaw-media/

10. The NewsGuild, “Daily News Union pushes back as Alden Global Capital begins mass layoffs,” February 2026. https://newsguild.org/daily-news-union-pushes-back-as-alden-global-capital-begins-mass-layoffs/

11. Congressional Research Service, “Public Broadcasting: Background Information and Issues for Congress.” https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48545

12. Nieman Reports, “With Cuts to Federal Funding, How Will Public Media in the U.S. Survive?” https://niemanreports.org/local-trusted-defunded-public-media-federal-funding-npr-cpb/

13. The Desk, “Filings: Alden Global exec likely to emerge as major Cumulus Media stakeholder,” July 29, 2026. https://thedesk.net/2026/07/alden-global-minority-owner-cumulus-media/

14. Poynter, “When local news disappears, people turn to social media feeds, influencers and gossip,” February 2026. https://www.poynter.org/business-work/2026/where-do-people-in-news-deserts-get-information/

15. Medill State of Local News Project map. https://localnewsinitiative.northwestern.edu/projects/state-of-local-news/

16. VOTE411, League of Women Voters Education Fund. https://www.vote411.org/ballot

17. The Colorado Sun, “Stripped for Parts film tells The Colorado Sun’s story. Here’s how you can help,” January 20, 2026. https://coloradosun.com/2026/01/20/stripped-for-parts-documentary-colorado-sun-support/

18. Nieman Lab, “Alden Global Capital fails in its attempt to get its tentacles on The Dallas Morning News,” July 28, 2025. https://www.niemanlab.org/2025/07/alden-global-capital-fails-in-its-attempt-to-get-its-tentacles-on-the-dallas-morning-news/

Leave a comment

In about eight weeks, the Social Security Administration will announce a number, and roughly seventy five million Americans will find out what next year looks like.

The best current estimate is 3.6 percent.

The Senior Citizens League published that projection on August 12. If it holds, it will be the largest cost of living adjustment in four years. For the average retired worker, the monthly check rises from about $2,084 to about $2,159.

Seventy five dollars.

That number is going to get smaller twice before it reaches your account, and only one of those two has ever been explained to you.

Why the Raise Got Bigger

Start with the part almost every headline gets backwards.

A bigger COLA is not good news. It cannot be. The COLA rises because prices rose, and that is the entire mechanism. When they tell you seniors are getting their biggest raise in four years, what they are telling you is that this was the most expensive year in four.

The raise is a receipt.

You already know what made this year expensive, because you have been living inside it since February. The war closed the Strait of Hormuz. A fifth of the world’s traded oil stopped moving. Crude went from around sixty dollars a barrel to above a hundred and fifteen. Gasoline followed. Everything that arrives on a truck followed the gasoline.

The inflation figure that feeds your COLA swung like a loose gate all year. It opened 2026 at 2.2 percent. By May it had climbed to 4.4. By June it fell back to 3.5. In July it settled at 3.4 percent.

As of the first week of August, oil was still running about 24 percent above where it stood a year ago.

Here is how directly that reaches your kitchen. Kiplinger’s staff economist David Payne told readers that his 2027 estimate depends on crude. About 3.5 percent if oil stays elevated. About 3.3 percent if it drops in the next thirty days.

Your Social Security raise is now partly set by a waterway between Iran and Oman.

Nobody asked you about the war. Nobody asked you about the blockade. But the tankers that stopped moving in March are an input in the arithmetic that decides your grocery budget for 2027, and not one of the men who made those decisions will ever feel the output.

The First Subtraction

Medicare Part B premiums are projected to reach about $209.50 a month in 2027, an increase of roughly 3.5 percent. The final figure comes from CMS in the fall.

That money comes out before your check reaches you. You never see it go, so you never quite feel it leave. And if your income puts you above the IRMAA thresholds, the surcharge takes more still.

I want to be fair here, because you should not trust a writer who shows you only the bad half.

Next year’s Part B increase is genuinely mild by recent standards. The 2026 jump was close to 10 percent. After that, 3.5 percent is a relief, and the people who negotiated it down deserve the credit.

So this is not the scandal. The Part B deduction is a known cost, published every year, argued over in the open.

The scandal is upstream, in how your raise was calculated before anybody subtracted anything.

The Cart

Your COLA comes from an index called the CPI-W.

The Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers.

Urban wage earner. Clerical worker. That is a person who commutes. A person with a paycheck, a car, and a lunch to buy five days a week. It is a fine description of an American.

It is not a description of you.

The CPI-W does more than track prices. It weights them. It decides how much each category counts, based on what a household in that group actually spends. Gasoline for a daily commute carries real weight. Out of pocket healthcare, the kind that lands on a seventy four year old with three prescriptions and a knee that needs looking at, carries much less.

So in a year when medical costs run hot and commuting costs run cool, the index reports that inflation was modest. Your raise is set accordingly. Your actual year was expensive in precisely the categories the formula was built to underweight.

And now the part worth sitting up for.

A better index exists. The government already builds it.

It is called the CPI-E, the Consumer Price Index for the Elderly. The Bureau of Labor Statistics has been calculating it since the 1980s. It uses the same prices and the same formulas as the CPI-W. The single difference is the weighting, drawn from how households with someone aged 62 or older spend their money. Healthcare counts for more. Housing counts for more.

And historically the CPI-E runs higher than the CPI-W, because healthcare has climbed faster than nearly anything else in American life.

The number that describes your life is sitting in a federal database right now. It is calculated. It is published. It is simply not the one they use.

The Senior Citizens League ran the arithmetic on what that costs a person. Someone who retired in 1999 would have collected roughly five thousand dollars more across twenty five years under the CPI-E. Someone who retired in 2014, more than eight thousand.

Now let me be careful about what I am claiming, because you are sharp enough to catch the difference.

Nobody sat in a room and decided to shortchange you. There is no villain in this section, and I am not going to invent one for you.

The COLA formula was written into law in 1972, in a country that ran on factories and paychecks, for a program that was still young. It has been running ever since on a population that changed completely underneath it.

That is the whole problem. The machine is not cruel. The machine is incapable of noticing that the person it measures stopped being an urban wage earner about forty years ago.

A villain you could vote out. A formula nobody has revisited in fifty four years is a harder thing, and it does not care who you voted for.

What Half a Century of the Wrong Cart Adds Up To

Small errors, compounded annually, stop being small.

The Senior Citizens League publishes a study each year called Loss of Buying Power. The 2026 edition found that compared to 2016, Social Security benefits are now worth about 86.3 cents on the dollar.

To recover what has been lost, they calculate that payments would need to rise 15.7 percent, or about $295.85 a month for the average beneficiary.

Set the two numbers beside each other.

The hole is $295.85.

The raise is $75.

The largest cost of living adjustment in four years covers roughly a quarter of the ground given up in the last ten.

This is not a small group absorbing a small inconvenience. Nearly three quarters of American seniors rely on Social Security for more than half their income. About 44 percent rely on it for all of it. Roughly one in ten, some 5.6 million people, live on less than a thousand dollars a month.

For those 5.6 million, the gap between the CPI-W and the CPI-E is not an economics debate. It decides whether the pharmacy trip happens this month or next.

Refer a friend

What You Can Actually Do Before December 7

You cannot change the formula this autumn.

But a window opens in October, it stays open for fifty four days, and there is real money inside it that most eligible people never claim. Everything below is free to pursue.

Re-shop your Part D drug plan. October 15 to December 7.

Drug plans rewrite their formularies every single year. The plan that covered your prescription cheaply in 2026 can drop it, or move it to a costlier tier, in 2027, and the letter telling you so is written to be skimmed. Staying put by default is the most expensive habit in American retirement. Use the Plan Finder at medicare.gov, or call 1-800-MEDICARE and have someone run your actual medication list against every plan in your county.

Get free counseling from SHIP.

Every state runs a State Health Insurance Assistance Program. One on one help, no charge, and critically these are not brokers, so nobody earns a commission from what they recommend to you. Find your state office at shiphelp.org.

Apply for Extra Help if your income is modest.

The Part D Low Income Subsidy cuts premiums, deductibles, and copays, and it is worth thousands of dollars a year. Apply through ssa.gov. Huge numbers of eligible people never apply because they assumed they earned too much. Let the form decide that instead of your guess.

Ask your state about Medicare Savings Programs.

QMB, SLMB, and QI are state run programs that can pay your Part B premium outright. That is the entire $209.50 staying in your check every month instead of leaving it. It is one of the most underclaimed benefits in the country. Call your state Medicaid office and ask for them by name.

Appeal your IRMAA surcharge with Form SSA-44.

Social Security sets your surcharge using your income from two years ago. If your income has since fallen because of retirement, the death of a spouse, or work stoppage, they will keep charging the old rate until you tell them otherwise. The form takes about twenty minutes, and nobody is going to prompt you to file it.

Apply for LIHEAP the first week of October.

Heating assistance opens October 1 in most states, and the money runs out well before the eligible households do. The National Energy Assistance Referral hotline is 1-866-674-6327. If you are already holding a shutoff notice, ask specifically about the crisis grant, which comes from a separate pot.

Run BenefitsCheckUp.org.

Fifteen minutes, free, from the National Council on Aging. It screens you against every assistance program you might qualify for, and it routinely turns up things people had no idea existed.

And one call worth making.

The Social Security 2100 Act was reintroduced this summer. Among other provisions it would switch the COLA calculation from the CPI-W to the CPI-E, and lift the minimum benefit to 125 percent of the federal poverty line. It is unlikely to pass this Congress. Ask anyway, because the bills that get asked about for years are the ones that eventually move. The Capitol switchboard is 202-224-3121. Ask one question and write down the answer: does this office support switching the COLA to the CPI-E, yes or no.

Give a gift subscription

The Part Worth Keeping

You have spent decades being told the annual raise is your protection.

It was never protection. It is a partial refund on a loss you already absorbed, calculated against a shopping cart that belongs to a commuter who does not live in your house.

That is worth being angry about. It is also worth being precise about, because precision is the difference between anger that wears you out and anger that goes somewhere.

Here is what you have now that most people in your position do not. You know the index has a name. You know a better one already sits finished in a government office. You know the exact fifty four day window where unclaimed money is waiting, and you know the seven doors inside it.

Most of your neighbors will read the October headline, feel briefly relieved about seventy five dollars, and claim none of it.

You do not have to be one of them. Not this year.

One note on the numbers. The 3.6 percent figure is a projection, updated monthly as new inflation data arrives. September’s CPI release lands before the official announcement, so the final number will move. The gap between the CPI-W and the CPI-E will not.

Subscribe now

Sources

1. The Senior Citizens League, “COLA Projection Falls to 3.6% With 2 Months Remaining to 2027 Announcement,” August 12, 2026. https://seniorsleague.org/cola-projection-falls-to-3-6-with-2-months-remaining-to-2027-announcement/

2. The Senior Citizens League, COLA Watch. https://seniorsleague.org/cola-watch/

3. Yahoo Finance, “Seniors could see a bigger raise in 2027, according to new Social Security COLA estimate,” August 2026. https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/article/seniors-could-see-a-bigger-raise-in-2027-according-to-new-social-security-cola-estimate-142217210.html

4. Kiplinger, “Social Security COLA 2027.” https://www.kiplinger.com/retirement/social-security/social-security-cola-2027

5. The Motley Fool, “Here’s How the 2027 Social Security COLA Is Projected to Stack Up to the 2026 COLA,” August 16, 2026. https://www.fool.com/retirement/2026/08/16/heres-how-the-2027-social-security-cola-is-project/

6. News4JAX, “Social Security 2027 COLA projected at 3.8% by Senior Citizens League,” August 3, 2026. https://www.news4jax.com/news/local/2026/08/03/social-security-2027-cola-projected-at-38-by-senior-citizens-league/

7. Congressional Research Service, “A Hypothetical Social Security Cost-of-Living Adjustment Based on the Research Consumer Price Index for the Elderly.” https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12675

8. National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, “The CPI-E: A Better Option for Calculating Social Security COLAs.” https://www.ncpssm.org/documents/social-security-policy-papers/the-cpi-e-a-better-option-for-calculating-social-security-colas/

9. Fox Business, “Should the Social Security COLA be measured with a senior-focused inflation metric?” https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/should-social-security-cola-measured-senior-focused-inflation-metric

10. Social Security Administration, Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) Information. https://www.ssa.gov/news/en/cola/index.html

11. Medicare Plan Finder and Open Enrollment. https://www.medicare.gov

12. SHIP National Network. https://www.shiphelp.org

13. National Council on Aging, BenefitsCheckUp. https://www.benefitscheckup.org

Leave a comment

There is a drawer in your house.

Maybe it is a nightstand. Maybe it is the kitchen counter, next to the coffee maker, where you can see it and remember. Inside is a plastic organizer with seven compartments and small raised letters on the lids. Beside it, something with a battery. A meter. A pump. A monitor that beeps when it should.

You built that drawer over years. Every item in it was a decision, or a diagnosis, or a bad afternoon in a doctor’s office that you have since stopped talking about.

Two of those things do not come from here.

One of them depends on an island roughly the size of Maryland, a hundred miles off the Chinese coast. The other depends on the country that has spent the last decade rehearsing how to strangle it.

Nobody has ever told you this. Not your doctor, who does not know. Not your pharmacist, who is not asked. Not the news, which has covered the Taiwan question as a story about warships and aircraft carriers and men in suits, and never once as a story about your drawer.

So let me tell you.

The Move Nobody Calls A War

Start with what would actually happen, because it is not the thing you have been shown on television.

An invasion is loud. Landing craft, missiles, a date that goes in the history books. It is also expensive, uncertain, and would almost certainly bring the American navy into the fight.

A blockade is quiet.

Ships get stopped for inspection. Inspections take a long time. Insurance rates climb until no shipping company will sail. There is no invasion date, no declaration, no single moment anyone can point to and call the beginning. Just a slow tightening, deniable at every step, and by the time the world agrees on what it is watching, it has already been going on for months.

China has practiced this in the open. Taiwan practices against it. Their annual Han Kuang exercises now include training to break a naval blockade of the island’s supply routes, which tells you something plain. Both militaries think this is the likely shape of it.

And a blockade would work, because of a number almost nobody outside Taipei has heard.

February Already Ran The Test

On the twenty-eighth of February this year, the Strait of Hormuz closed.

Not partially. Not for a week. Iran shut the waterway after American and Israeli strikes, and it has stayed effectively shut ever since. Hundreds of ships sat trapped. Traffic collapsed to a handful of vessels a day against a normal count near seventy.

That was five thousand miles from Taipei. It was also a live experiment nobody designed.

Taiwan imports 97 percent of its energy. Roughly a third of its natural gas comes through that exact strait. When the water closed, the island got to find out how much cushion it actually had.

Eleven days.

That is the legally mandated reserve of liquefied natural gas. Eleven days, for the fuel that generates more than forty percent of the island’s electricity. The coal pile buys perhaps six weeks after that. Then the lights that run the most advanced factories on earth start going out.

The strait reopened briefly in June and shut again. Taiwan scrambled, found alternative cargoes, and got through it. Everybody exhaled.

Almost no American outlet connected those two facts. The strait and the island. The rehearsal and the thing being rehearsed.

Beijing connected them. You can be certain of that.

The First Thing To Go

Taiwan makes the chips.

Not some of them. More than sixty percent of the world’s advanced semiconductors come off that island, and for the most sophisticated ones the share climbs higher still.

Here is the part that will make you angry, and you should let it.

About half of all medical devices contain semiconductors. Pacemakers. Insulin pumps. Glucose monitors. Ventilators. The defibrillator on the wall at your church.

And medical devices account for roughly one percent of the semiconductor market.

One percent.

So when supply tightens, and the chip factories decide who eats first, the medical device industry is standing at the back of a very long line. Behind the automakers. Behind the phone companies. Behind the data centers now consuming chips at a rate nobody projected five years ago.

Your pacemaker loses that fight. It is not close.

We already watched a smaller version of this. During the last chip shortage, device manufacturers halted production lines and hospitals started rationing equipment. And the workaround everyone assumes exists, swapping in a different chip, does not really exist. Change a component in a regulated medical device and you can trigger a fresh approval process. Months. Sometimes longer.

That was a shortage caused by a pandemic and a few factory fires.

Now imagine the island itself is dark.

That is the first thing to go.

The Second Thing

You may be thinking you are safe on the pills. Pills are chemistry, not electronics. Nothing in your amoxicillin needs a microchip.

I thought that too, before I looked.

Generic drugs account for about 91 percent of every prescription filled in America. Your prescriptions. Almost certainly all of them.

The United States manufactures 12 percent of its own active pharmaceutical ingredients.

Twelve.

Of the hundred generic drugs Americans take most, 83 percent contain no American-made active ingredient at all. More than forty percent of generic drugs have a single manufacturer on the entire planet. If that one plant floods, or burns, or gets caught on the wrong side of a trade war, there is no second source. There is nothing.

Most of what is left runs through India, which sounds reassuring until you learn that India imports around eighty percent of its active ingredients from China.

And then the number that stopped me cold. A standards body called the United States Pharmacopeia found that China is the only supplier on earth of at least one key starting material for six hundred and seventy-nine different pharmaceutical ingredients.

Six hundred and seventy-nine.

Now hold both hands open. In one, an island that makes the chip in your device and has eleven days of fuel. In the other, a country that makes the molecule in your pill and is currently practicing how to squeeze that island.

A blockade does not create either of those problems.

It collects on both. The same week.

Refer a friend

They Said It Out Loud

Here is the part I keep coming back to.

Those pharmaceutical numbers are not secret. They were not leaked. They were delivered as sworn testimony this past March, in a hearing room in Washington, to the Senate Special Committee on Aging.

The committee whose entire reason for existing is you.

Somebody stood up in that room and said that eighty-three percent of the top generics older Americans depend on contain no American-made ingredient. That more than forty percent have one factory. That six hundred and seventy-nine ingredients trace back to a single country.

And then everyone went home.

No emergency broadcast. No letter from your insurer. No pharmacist calling to say, we should talk about your metformin. It went into the record, and the record went onto a shelf, and you spent that week worrying about your knee.

That is not a conspiracy. It is worse than a conspiracy, in a way. It is nobody’s job.

Give a gift subscription

How This Actually Happened

I want to be careful here, because it would be easy and dishonest to hand you a villain.

There isn’t one.

No party voted for this. No president signed it. It accumulated across roughly thirty years, one procurement decision at a time, each of them defensible on its own morning. A cheaper supplier. A leaner inventory. A plant that closed because the numbers said close it.

Efficiency, everyone called it. Both parties said the word. Both meant it.

The trouble with efficiency is that it eats slack, and slack is the only thing that saves you when something goes wrong five thousand miles away. We spent thirty years converting our margin for error into savings, and we handed the savings to shareholders, and now the margin is gone and the bill is sitting in a drawer in your house.

You did not vote for that. You were never asked.

Get 30% off a group subscription

What You Can Do This Month

None of this is worth reading if it leaves you sitting there afraid. So here is the part that matters, and every item is a question you can ask before the end of the month. Free. No appointment required for most of them.

Ask your pharmacist to check whether any of your regular medications are currently on the FDA’s drug shortage list. It is a public database. She can look while you wait. Almost no patient ever asks, which is exactly why you should.

Ask her which of your prescriptions have only one manufacturer. That is the real fragility marker, and it is not the same as the drug being rare. Some of the most common medicines in America come from a single plant.

Ask your prescriber to name a therapeutic alternative for each of your critical medications now, while there is time to check whether your plan covers it. Finding out at an empty counter is the worst possible moment to start that conversation.

Ask whether a ninety-day fill is appropriate and permitted for your specific medications. This is a question for your prescriber, not a decision to make alone, and it does not apply to everything. But where it is allowed, it turns a two-week scare into a non-event.

If cost is the thing standing between you and a longer fill, ask about Extra Help through Social Security, and ask your pharmacist about the manufacturer’s patient assistance program for your specific drug. Most people who qualify for these never apply, because nobody tells them they exist.

If you have an implanted or battery-powered device, find out the manufacturer, the model, and the replacement window. Then put the appointment on the calendar instead of pushing it another year. A battery you replace on schedule is a battery you never have to source during a crisis.

And write one page. Drug name, dose, manufacturer, pharmacy. Keep a copy in the drawer and one in your wallet. If a substitution ever has to happen fast, that page turns a week of phone calls into a ten-minute conversation.

Seven questions. That is the whole list.

Share

You Are Not Powerless Here

I am not going to tell you a blockade is coming. Nobody knows that, and anyone who says otherwise is selling something.

What I will tell you is that the vulnerability is not pending. It is already built. It was built while you were raising children and paying a mortgage and trusting that somebody whose job it was had this handled.

That trust was reasonable. It was also misplaced, and finding that out at seventy is a particular kind of insult.

But look at what you actually have.

You have a pharmacist who can answer six of those seven questions in a single visit. You have a prescriber who will take the call. You have a month, and possibly years, and a list on a piece of paper that costs nothing.

The people who built this system are not going to fix it in time. That is simply true. What they cannot do is stop you from knowing which of your medicines has one factory, and having a backup named before you need it.

Go open the drawer.

Then go ask.

Subscribe now

Sources

1. Congressional Research Service, The Strait of Hormuz: Security Developments and Impacts on Oil, Gas, and Other Commodities — https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45281

2. Atlantic Council, The Iran war tests Taiwan’s energy resilience, March 2026 — https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/energysource/the-iran-war-tests-taiwans-energy-resilience/

3. Testimony before the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging, March 2026 — https://www.aging.senate.gov/download/testimony_chang-031126pdf?download=1

4. The changing landscape of semiconductor manufacturing: why the health sector should care, National Library of Medicine — https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10292744/

5. Taiwan Climate Action Network, Navigating Geopolitical Turbulence with Taiwan’s Energy Transition Policy — https://tcan2050.org.tw/en/navigating-geopolitical-turbulence-with-taiwans-energy-transition-policy/

6. Australian Strategic Policy Institute, Taiwan worsens its vulnerability to a Chinese energy blockade — https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/taiwan-lacks-clarity-on-energy-security/

7. Bloomberg Economics, Xi, Biden and the $10 Trillion Cost of War Over Taiwan — https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2024-01-09/if-china-invades-taiwan-it-would-cost-world-economy-10-trillion

8. The Unseen Ripple: How Semiconductor Shortages Sent Shockwaves Beyond Automotive — https://markets.financialcontent.com/wral/article/tokenring-2025-11-3-the-unseen-ripple-how-semiconductor-shortages-sent-shockwaves-beyond-automotive

9. Taiwan Ministry of National Defense, Han Kuang exercise anti-blockade training — https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1761638/taiwan-preparing-for-chinese-blockade-in-annual-war-drills/amp

Leave a comment

A War Is a Subscription, and You Are Quietly Paying It

The most useful thing I learned this year did not come from a policy paper. It came from noticing that wars do not happen. They get delivered.

Fuel arrives. A licence gets signed. A shipment of coltan crosses a border. A clip goes viral and a young man decides which side he hates. None of that is a one time event. All of it has to happen again tomorrow, and again the day after, or the whole thing stops. A war is a subscription. Somebody has to keep paying it, and the bill runs through ordinary hands in ordinary countries. Including yours.

That was the idea behind the second session of the World Peace Coalition Peace Talks, which we finished this week. I had a prepared speech. The connection ate it about ninety seconds in, which was probably a mercy, because what came out instead was the thing I actually wanted to say: I am not interested in another room where thoughtful people agree that war is bad.

Three Ways A War Ends

Wars end three ways.

The first is victory, where one side takes what it wanted. That one is rare and it is never in your hands.

The second is exhaustion, where both sides run out of young men. That one is slow, and by the time it arrives there is very little left worth winning.

The third is cost. Continuing becomes more expensive than stopping. Financing dries up, licences get harder, insurers ask uncomfortable questions, a supplier decides the reputational damage is not worth the contract. This is the door most wars actually walk through, and it is the only one built out of thousands of small decisions made by people who never touch a weapon.

That third door is the one you have your hand on.

The Number That Moved

Here is why I no longer accept the sentence “nothing you do matters.”

In July 2025, twenty seven United States senators voted to block a weapons transfer. In April 2026, on a pair of joint resolutions of disapproval, the number was thirty six on one and forty on the other. Both failed. Both lost. And both lost by less than the time before.

Nobody sent a butterfly to the Senate floor. What happened in between was letters, constituent meetings, arrests outside two senators’ offices, local pension committees suddenly having to publish what they hold. Boring, unglamorous, repetitive pressure that moved a number thirteen votes in nine months on an issue that was supposed to be untouchable.

I am not telling you that vote count is a victory. It is not. It is evidence, which is more useful. Evidence that the machinery is not sealed, that it registers contact, and that the people who tell you it does not register contact are usually the ones counting it.

Where Your Money Sleeps

Most people reading this have never bought a weapon. Most people reading this own several.

If you have a pension, an index fund, a workplace retirement plan, or a bank that lends, you almost certainly hold arms manufacturers and energy firms tied to a live war. That is not an accusation. It is the default setting of passive investing, and it was chosen for you.

Some institutions have started to notice. Norway’s sovereign fund adopted an ethical criterion on arms sales to warring states. In Britain, local council pension funds are being forced to publish their defence exposure line by line, because residents asked in writing and would not stop asking.

Meanwhile the global total keeps climbing. SIPRI put world military spending at $2,887 billion in 2025, the eleventh straight year of growth. Per person on this planet, that is about $352. A year. Every year. From a species that cannot reliably fund a mediator.

The Part Nobody Puts In The Brochure

Don, who joined us on the call, did not let any of this go unchallenged, and I am grateful for it. His position was blunt: the system runs on money, money buys outcomes, and a letter from you is a rounding error.

He is not wrong about the asymmetry. So let me be honest about the limits of what I am handing you.

If you sell a share, somebody buys it. Pension consultants say this constantly and they are correct that divestment alone does not bankrupt a manufacturer. One letter to one representative does not stop one transfer. Delaying your phone upgrade by six months does not close a mine. If anyone sells you a version of this where the butterfly flaps and the war ends, they are selling comfort.

What actually moves is slower and duller. Institutions count contacts. Compliance departments log questions. Committees that have to answer the same query for the third quarter running start changing policy just to make the query stop. Reputational cost is real cost, and it is the one cost ordinary people can raise without permission, without money, and without a passport.

Thirteen votes in nine months. That is the honest scale of it. And thirteen votes is not nothing when you look at what a vote is attached to.

Refer a friend

Six Things You Can Do Today

I made a one page sheet during the call. It is free, it is not branded, and there is no signup wall. Print it, copy it, translate it, hand it to a friend. I do not need credit and I do not want your email for it.

Find out where your money sleeps. Search your fund’s holdings page today. Then send one written line to your bank or pension provider asking for a war exposure screen. Written, not a phone call, because written gets logged.

Send one specific ask, not a plea. “Stop the war” gets filed. A named transfer gets answered. Ask your representative, in writing, how they will vote on the next arms transfer or export licence, and ask for a written position you can quote. Keep the reply. That reply is the entire point.

Delay one upgrade, ask one question. Tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold from contested mines pay armed groups directly. In eastern Congo, UN estimates put M23’s take from taxing coltan transport at around $800,000 a month. In March 2026 a shaft collapsed at the Rubaya mine and killed more than two hundred people, including children. Keep the laptop another six months. Email the brand and ask which smelters they audit.

Fund the people who de-escalate. Relief treats the wound. Mediators, ceasefire monitors and local documentation groups work on the cause, and they are chronically starved. The UN’s own Peacebuilding Fund is running roughly $500 million short of its target. Give once to a local mediation or civilian protection group, however small, and set it to repeat.

Verify before you amplify. During this year’s fighting with Iran, fabricated clips of strikes on Tel Aviv and captured soldiers racked up tens of millions of views before anyone checked them. Fake atrocity footage recruits fighters on every side. Reverse image search it and check the date before you share. If it fails, do not post it, and do not quote it to argue with it. Silence starves it faster than a correction does.

Give one displaced person a real hour. Displacement is what turns one war into a generation of wars. Spend an hour on a refugee’s CV, an online language session, a hosting signup, or buy something from a business run by someone who fled. One hour, one person, any country.

Download the PDF and feel free to share it with the people you care about.

Butterfly Sheet Slow A War

28.8KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Give a gift subscription

The Hour That Matters Most

Richard joined us from Canada. Retired English teacher. He spent the call mostly listening, and then near the end he offered to send me an audiobook of John Irving’s A Prayer for Owen Meany, because I had mentioned that my eyes are not what they were and reading has become work.

That small thing sat with me longer than any of the policy talk, because it is the whole argument in miniature. A man I had never met noticed a specific difficulty and offered a specific fix. Not a statement. Not solidarity. An audiobook.

Brandon brought his National Unity and Prosperity Accord, a framework for handling national debt through land leasing instead of sale and shielding jobs from AI displacement. AC, fighting a bad connection the entire time, made the case for decentralising finance so that people control their own pensions rather than discovering once a year what was bought with them. There is a letter going to the Pope and other religious leaders, written collectively, inviting them to a negotiating table. That is the work in progress.

We also opened Shantirboi.com during the session. Free ebooks and audiobooks, personal library and bookmarking coming next, text to speech and translation after that. Eventually a social feed built around books and ideas, so people have somewhere to go that is not designed to farm their children’s attention. I built it because I wanted Richard’s audiobook to have a home that was not owned by someone I would rather not fund.

Episode three is where this gets interesting, because I am going to ask everyone who took an action to report back. Not opinions. Replies. The actual letter your representative sent, the actual answer your pension provider gave, the actual name of the smelter your phone brand refused to disclose. We will read them out. Institutions behave differently when their answers get published, and that is a lever nobody in this coalition needs money to pull.

You are not powerless in this. You are upstream of it. That is a different thing, and it is better.

Subscribe now

Beyond the Words: Three Ways to Engage

A structural framework for peace shouldn’t just live in a long-form essay. To bring these ideas to every audience—from policy wonks to the next generation of leaders—we have translated the Universal Peace Framework into distinct formats you can read, see, and actively play.

📖 Read: The Open Letters & The Equation

Dive deep into the structural architecture of peace. Trace the core principles in The Peace Equation, explore the mechanism of change in the Open Letter to Readers, and track our public challenges to sitting politicians in this ongoing open letter series.

🎨 See: The Cartoons

Complex geopolitics doesn’t have to be dense. Our editorial cartoons strip away the bureaucratic doublespeak, exposing the underlying political economy of war through sharp, accessible visual satire that is built to be shared.

🎮 Play: The Swipe Governance Game

Step into the shoes of a decision-maker. The Swipe Governance Game is an interactive simulation that forces you to balance the immense pressures of diplomacy, constituency demands, and structural conditions. Test whether you can maintain the peace pillars under pressure, or if the system will collapse into conflict.

The Goal: Don’t just let these ideas sit on a screen. Read the framework, share the visuals, test your instincts in the game, and help us force a serious public conversation.

Universal Peace Framework

An Open Letter To Sensible World Leaders

The Peace Equation

Could You Last 30 Days as President?

An Open Letter To Readers

An Open Letter To Religious Leaders

Geopolitical Sci-fi Cartoon

National Unity and Prosperity Accord (NUPA) – United States Core

NUPA is a private-sector architectural operating system designed to discharge the U.S. national debt at zero taxpayer cost by licensing underutilized federal land (only 10% of Bureau of Land Management land). It utilizes a 40/40/20 revenue waterfall to settle historical property debts for 1865 descendants and restore Tribal economic sovereignty. The framework employs “Fixed Cost Arbitrage” to make human labor mathematically more profitable than AI, creating a “Human Sanctuary” against automation displacement. The federal government gets to tax the activity of the hubs, making SSI and Medicare solvent while separating the donor class from government influence, and the ground rent goes to pay off historical liabilities.

Link: https://github.com/bedardbrandon928/National-Unity-and-Prosperity-Accord-NUPA

NUPA-NG: Nigerian Adaptive Framework

This adaptation is engineered to bypass “federal leakage” and discharge Nigeria’s national debt through the voluntary licensing of idle state-managed land. It replaces the core model with a 50/30/20 Sovereign Adaptive Waterfall, giving state governors a 50% royalty to align their self-interest with hub stability. The framework serves as an “Anti-Japa” shield, reversing talent exodus by making local human labor the global gold standard for profitability. The federal government gets to tax the activity of the hubs while the ground rents pay for modernized infrastructure.

Link: https://github.com/bedardbrandon928/National-Unity-and-Prosperity-Accord-NUPA/tree/NUPA-NG

(These repositories are still under construction, I still have to change the name for them)

NUPA-LR: Liberian Adaptive Framework

NUPA-LR utilizes the Liberian Land Rights Act of 2018 as “licensing hardware” to transition customary land into self-funding industrial hubs. It implements an 80/20 Sovereign Adaptive Waterfall where 80% of ground rent flows directly to local Community Land Trusts to eliminate bureaucratic leakage. The system protects the Liberian workforce through a 95% human-labor mandate, targeting industries such as renewable energy and agri-tech. The federal government in Monrovia gets to tax the activity of the hubs.

Link: https://github.com/bedardbrandon928/National-Unity-and-Prosperity-Act-NUPA/tree/NUPA-LR

NUPA-IR: Iranian Adaptive Framework

Designed for post-sanctions Iran, this framework bypasses global banking restrictions through closed-loop, asset-backed transaction perimeters. It features “Tactical Indigestibility” protocols, ensuring infrastructure such as data centers self-terminate if a perimeter breach is detected, rendering them worthless to an invader. The model generates a “Septuple Stream” of state revenue while maintaining a 95% human workforce ratio to shield Iranian citizens from AI displacement.

Link: https://github.com/bedardbrandon928/National-Unity-and-Prosperity-Act-NUPA/tree/NUPA-IR

NUPA-BD: Bangladesh Adaptive Framework

NUPA-BD is a private-sector contractual framework designed to boost Bangladesh’s economy through industrial hubs and a similar “40/40/20” revenue-sharing model to the US, although with different recipients 40% to the central government, 40% to to local communities for local infrastructure (i.e. roads, schools, hospitals, etc.) and 20% ring fenced for the internal infrastructure of the hubs. It operates at zero federal expense by using private corporate deposits to fund infrastructure and site preparation. The system incentivizes high employment by offering 70% land discounts to companies that maintain a 95% human workforce ratio.

Link: https://github.com/bedardbrandon928/National-Unity-and-Prosperity-Act-NUPA/tree/NUPA-BD

Sources

1. Congress.gov, Actions on S.J.Res.138, 119th Congress, motion to discharge rejected 36 to 63, 15 April 2026. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/138/all-actions

2. Sen. Ed Markey, Statement on Joint Resolutions of Disapproval, 15 April 2026. https://www.markey.senate.gov/news/press-releases/sen-markey-statement-on-joint-resolutions-of-disapproval

3. SIPRI, Trends in World Military Expenditure, 2025, April 2026. https://www.sipri.org/publications/2026/sipri-fact-sheets/trends-world-military-expenditure-2025

4. Urgewald, Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global adopts ethical criterion on arms sales. https://www.urgewald.org/en/medien/norwegian-government-pension-fund-introduces-ethical-investment-criterion-weapons-companies

5. The Bristol Cable, How local pension funds invest millions in defence, 22 May 2026. https://thebristolcable.org/2026/05/how-local-pension-funds-invest-millions-in-defence/

6. PRIF Blog, Minerals at the Negotiating Table: Resource Politics and Peace in Eastern DRC, 15 July 2026. https://blog.prif.org/en/2026/07/15/minerals-at-the-negotiating-table-resource-politics-and-peace-in-eastern-drc

7. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Sanctions on Rwandan gold refinery and conflict minerals network, 25 June 2026. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0543

8. UN Geneva, Peacebuilding Fund hits $1 billion milestone amid funding gap, 26 November 2025. https://www.ungeneva.org/en/news-media/news/2025/11/113386/peacebuilding-fund-hits-1-billion-milestone-amid-funding-gap

9. CNN, Fake, AI-generated images and videos of the Iran war are spreading on social media, 11 March 2026. https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/11/politics/fake-ai-images-videos-iran-war

10. Al Jazeera, How conflict minerals fuel war in eastern DR Congo amid US sanctions, 6 July 2026. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/7/6/us-sanctions-target-rwandan-firms-linked-to-conflict-minerals-funding-m23

Leave a comment

Get more from St badhon in the Substack app

Available for iOS and Android

Get the app

You worked. You saved. You earned a warm, paid-for winter in your own home. So why does the arithmetic suddenly feel like it is slipping out from under you? One forecaster saw it coming, owned the calls he got wrong, and left the rest of us a map out.

You know the feeling before you can put a word to it. It is November, and you are standing in front of the thermostat again, running the quiet math you seem to run every year now. A degree lower saves a little. A heavier sweater saves a little more. Nobody sat you down and taught you this arithmetic. You picked it up somewhere across the last few winters, the way a body learns to favor a sore knee without being told.

And all the while the television keeps telling you to relax. Gasoline is easing. The summer scare is fading. The government’s own energy analysts expect pump prices to keep sliding into the fall, and the big banks have oil drifting into the seventies by the new year. The worst, everyone agrees, is behind us.

Then there is the line they bury three paragraphs down, the one that made me want to write to you. America’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve, the national emergency tank kept full for exactly the hard winter you are bracing against, just fell below 300 million barrels. Its lowest level since 1983. The country’s shock absorber is thinner than it has been in more than forty years, and it drained away while you were being reassured there was nothing to fear.

I am reading that number too. I am not going to stand here and tell you it is fine.

The Man Who Saw It Coming

His name is Peter Zeihan, and he is not a mystic or a doomsayer chasing clicks. He is a former intelligence analyst who has spent a career reading maps and birth rates, and he has been making one deeply unpopular argument, in book after book, since 2014. It is an argument that should have been comforting and turned out to be a warning.

The comfortable, affordable, endlessly connected world you built your later years around was never the natural order of things. It was built. On purpose. After the Second World War, America made the planet a promise no empire had ever made: put your goods on the ocean and my navy will carry them safely to shore, for anyone, friend and rival alike. Distance stopped being expensive. A coat stitched on the far side of the earth could arrive at your door for pocket change, because one country had decided to guard the whole sea so you would never have to think about it.

Zeihan’s claim, unglamorous and now more than a decade old, is that America is quietly walking away from that promise. And when the guardian goes home, distance turns costly again. Everything that traveled a long way to reach you starts to cost what it always truly cost. He warned again this summer that the price shock you just survived is not fading out. It is winding up.

Here is why I trust him more than the cheerful voices, and why you can too. Zeihan shows you his failures. He has been predicting China’s collapse since 2010, and China is still on its feet, and he knows it. In 2023 he did the thing almost no forecaster ever dares: he published a scorecard on his own predictions and admitted, in print, where he got it wrong, from overrating Russia’s army to misjudging a stretch of Canadian oil country. A man willing to grade his own misses in public has earned the right to be heard on the calls he keeps getting right. The pundits who only ever remember their wins have not.

The Cushion Was Never the Tank

This is where nearly all the coverage goes wrong. You hear the reserve is running low and you picture a fuel tank, and a tank can always be topped back up. But that stockpile was never really the cushion under your life. It was only the sliver of it you could see and count.

The true cushion was the promise. Eighty years of an arrangement where the sea lanes stayed open and the tankers kept moving, quietly, reliably, whether or not you ever gave a single thought to any of it. That promise is the reason a person who did everything right, who worked and saved and paid off the house, could assume that heat in January and food in February would cost about what they cost the year before. That assumption was the floor under your independence. The reserve touching a forty-year low is not the sickness. It is the first symptom that finally shows on the outside. The cushion beneath your winter was woven out of a guarantee, and quietly, thread by thread, the guarantee is being pulled loose.

And I want to be careful and fair here, because you deserve that. This is not the fault of one party or one man in one office. The retreat has been steady and bipartisan for fifteen years, carried on by administrations that agreed on almost nothing else. Both sides looked at the enormous cost of guarding the world’s shipping and decided, each in their own words, that Americans were done footing the bill. This is not about who you voted for. It is structural, and it is bigger than any election.

Four Winters

So where does it lead? Zeihan refuses to hand you a single prediction. Instead he lays out the whole terrain, the way an honest map shows every road and not only the one you were praying for. Look hard at the next few years and four winters are possible. You are already living inside the first.

The first winter is the All-Clear. The shaky deal near the Strait of Hormuz holds together just well enough, prices ease toward those pleasant year-end forecasts, and the headlines take their bow. This is the winter being sold to you right now, gift-wrapped. What the wrapping hides is that the reserve keeps quietly draining beneath the calm, and the tankers near the Gulf keep getting hit, so the relief is real and paper-thin in the very same breath. Every peaceful month simply sets the next blow on a thinner cushion.

The second winter is the Chokehold. One more strike near that narrow water, one round of talks that collapses, and the strait that carries a fifth of the world’s oil clamps shut. Crude leaps past its spring highs, gas clears five dollars a gallon, and the bill lands in January with the furnace roaring and the reserve too hollow to soften it. This is the winter that comes for you all at once, in the coldest month, when you can least afford the surprise.

The third winter is the Long Tightening, and it is the one almost nobody on television will ever name, because it never gives them a single dramatic day to point a camera at. No crash. No spike. Just the price of everything made or grown far from you creeping up and staying up, a little more each year, as the guarantee keeps unraveling across the decade. Your dollar quietly buys less of the fruit that crossed an ocean and less of the medicine mixed overseas. Not a heart attack. A slow bleed you feel in every receipt. The cheap world does not come marching back. It just slips out the side door while your eyes are on something else.

The fourth winter is the one the panic never mentions, and it is the whole reason I wanted you to meet this man. Call it the Fortress. The very same forces tearing at the wider world leave your own country steadier than almost anywhere on the planet. America sits on its own energy and grows far more food than it can eat. Two oceans have kept every serious war a long, safe distance from your porch. In Zeihan’s map, when the tide of globalization finally goes out, the United States is the boat left riding high. That will not spare you every higher price. But it means the ground beneath your feet is firmer than the frightened headlines will ever let on.

What This Is Really About

Those four winters share something the forecasts keep stepping around. Not one of them is really about oil. They are about you. About whether the deal you spent a lifetime keeping still holds up its end.

The fear was never truly a number on a gas pump. It is older and closer to the bone than that. It is the promise you were handed as a younger person and chose to believe: that if you worked hard and kept your word, you would earn the right to be warm and independent and unafraid in your own home when the work was finally done. That is what the cold is testing. And the dread underneath it is not really the chill in the hallway. It is the phone call you never want to make, to a son or a daughter, to admit the winter got out ahead of you.

You should not have to make that call. Understanding what is actually happening is the first thing that keeps it out of your future.

Because here is the part they will not sell you, and it is the part that hands you back the wheel. You do not need to guess which winter arrives. You only need to stop planning for the cheerful average and start planning for the swing. Budget your heating season around a hard year instead of a promised soft one, so a Chokehold winter becomes an annoyance instead of an emergency. Keep your eye on two plain gauges that will tell you more than any panel of experts in suits: whether that reserve keeps falling, and whether the strait stays open. And hold tight to the fourth winter, because it is real and it is yours. Of all the places to be standing when this tide goes out, you are standing in the one built to ride it through.

I did not write this to frighten you. I wrote it because you deserve the map while there is still time to read it, so you walk into the cold with your eyes open and your footing sure, warmer and calmer than every neighbor who only ever heard the All-Clear.

Winter is coming regardless. Whether it catches you off guard is still, even now, up to you.

Subscribe now

Sources

1. U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve below 300 million barrels, its lowest since 1983; attacks on Gulf refining and tanker traffic near the Strait of Hormuz. Trading Economics, Crude Oil, August 2026. https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/crude-oil

2. Retail gasoline expected to ease through the third quarter; production and price outlook. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Short-Term Energy Outlook, July 2026. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/steo/

3. Brent crude forecast drifting toward the high seventies by year end. J.P. Morgan Global Research, Oil Price Forecast, 2026. https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/global-research/commodities/oil-prices

4. Peter Zeihan’s summer 2026 warning of a deepening oil crunch and constrained Gulf supply. Financial Sense, July 3, 2026. https://www.financialsense.com/podcast/21710/peter-zeihan-warns-oil-crunch-coming-summer

5. Zeihan biography, books from 2014 onward, his 2023 self-assessment of past predictions, and the long-running China-collapse call dated to 2010. Wikipedia, Peter Zeihan. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Zeihan

6. Brent price level, its year-over-year rise, and the June 2026 US-Iran deal context around the Strait of Hormuz. Trading Economics, Brent Crude Oil, August 2026. https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/brent-crude-oil

Leave a comment

A journalist in India opened a fresh Instagram account. No history. No searches for anything dark. She followed a few women who posted about food, weather, and daily life. Then she just scrolled.

Within a week, the app made its move. It served her ads for child sexual abuse material. The ads linked out to Telegram. There, the BBC found, the material was on sale for about a dollar.

Then came the part that should end careers. The BBC reported one of these ads through Instagram’s own tool. A day later, the review team replied. The ad “does not go against our community standards.” The machine surfaced it. A person looked at it and let it stay.

This is from a BBC Eye investigation released in July 2026. It is called “The Careless Machine.” Nobody went looking for the worst thing online. An ordinary account, used in an ordinary way, was walked straight to it.

Meta Ran This Test In 2019

Here is the part most headlines skipped. Meta already knew.

In 2019, a Facebook researcher built a fake user. Her name was Carol Smith. On paper she was a conservative mother from North Carolina. She liked Fox News and Donald Trump. She had never shown any interest in conspiracy theories.

The researcher did one thing. She let Facebook’s own engine decide what Carol should see.

It took two days. The feed started pushing Carol toward QAnon. Within a week it was full of groups and pages that broke Facebook’s own rules. The internal report had a name that reads like a confession. “Carol’s Journey to QAnon.”

So the BBC did not uncover a secret. They repeated Meta’s own test. Then they published the answer Meta had locked in a drawer.

This Is Not About Left Or Right

You might want to make this a story about the other political side. Meta’s own notes will stop you.

The researchers did not only build a conservative. They also built a liberal, Karen Jones. The same engine fed her a steady diet of her own outrage. They built a third account for India, their biggest market. Three blank people. Three different holes, dug in three directions.

That is the whole point. The algorithm has no politics. It has an appetite. It learns what holds you, then gives you more of it. Nothing holds a person like fear, anger, and the sense that someone is coming for the kids. So the engine drifts toward the most extreme version of whatever you already are. Left. Right. Hindu. Muslim. American. Burmese. It does not care which door you go through. It only cares that you keep walking.

We Have Seen Where This Ends

We already know the endpoint. It has happened.

Between 2016 and 2017, the same kind of engine ran in Myanmar. In much of that country, Facebook was the internet. The feed filled with posts that stripped the Rohingya of their humanity. Amnesty International found that Meta’s algorithms amplified the hate and helped drive the violence that followed.

Villages burned. Women were raped. More than seven hundred thousand people ran for their lives. Many of them walked to camps in Bangladesh. That is a few hours from where I sit.

I do not raise Myanmar to shock you. I raise it because it is the same sentence, finished. A disturbing ad is the early sign. An emptied province is the disease at full strength. Same machine. Same appetite. Nobody willing to switch it off.

The Machine Is Not Broken

None of this is a glitch. This is the product doing its job.

A company that sells your attention wants one thing. It wants to hold you longer than anyone else can. The fastest way to hold a person is to scare them or enrage them. Extreme content is simply the best fuel. So an engine built for engagement becomes an engine built for extremes. No villain. No one typing evil commands. Just the design.

That is why “the algorithm made a mistake” is the wrong way to put it. The machine was not broken. It was working. Carol Smith was not a bug report. She was a preview. The company watched the preview, understood it, and kept the engine running. The engine is the business.

So the test never really ended. It only left the lab. Every day you open the app, it builds a fresh Carol Smith. This time she is you.

Refer a friend

Three Ways To Respond

I am not going to tell you what to do. You get to choose. As far as I can see, there are three honest paths.

Stay. Keep using it the way you do now. There is no shame in that. Billions of us are here. Just go in with open eyes. Know what it is doing while you scroll.

Use it on purpose. Stay, but change the terms. Follow only what feeds you. Post only what helps someone. Treat your attention as yours, and spend it by choice. On paper, this is the smartest option. You keep the reach and drop the harm.

Walk out. Delete all of it. Every Meta product, gone.

I picked the third one.

I know the second one sounds wiser. Keep the tool, use it well. But I do not fully trust myself inside that machine, and I am not sure most of us should. The pull is real. Even when you use it with care, it keeps tugging. I watch it every day. People’s thoughts are being shaped by the feed. They repeat what it hands them. They stop thinking their own thoughts.

So I scheduled the deletion. Not as a protest anyone will notice. Not because one person leaving hurts a company worth trillions. I left because I finally saw what I was giving away. Not my data. My attention. The one thing I cannot make more of. They were spending it for me, steering me toward the person I was about to become.

I would rather choose that myself.

If you take one small thing from this, take this. Watch what the feed gives you for one week. Ask who it is trying to turn you into. That question is free, and it belongs to you.

Share

What I Am Building Instead

I am not only walking out. I am trying to build the opposite.

It is a book app. The working name is “Shantir Boi.” The name may still change. The idea will not.

We want one place to read and to listen. A better home than Kindle and Audible, both under one roof. Built on a simple rule. People matter more than profit.

We are early. A few books are in there now. We are still building the audiobooks, the text to speech, author’s corner, and a few features I am excited about. The one I care about most is a small social network inside the app. Not built around outrage. Built around good books.

You can take a quick look here:

Shantir Boi

You’re Invited: The Next Peace Talks

The app is one answer to all of this. A live room is the other.

We are holding the next session of World Peace Coalition: Peace Talks, and you are invited.

This is not a lecture. It is a working conversation. Everything above is about attention being pulled out of you. This is the opposite. A room where people think together, out loud, in real time. So come and be in it. I will also give the first public look at the book app during the session.

Register here: us06web.zoom.us/meeting/register. It takes about ten seconds, and your personal join link arrives by email.

You can also join our Signal group: World Peace Coalition on Signal.

Please check your own time zone carefully. For most of North America and Europe, this falls on Friday, August 14, not the 15th.

• Dhaka, Bangladesh: Saturday, August 15, 12:00 AM to 2:00 AM

• New York and Toronto (Eastern): Friday, August 14, 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM

• Chicago (Central): Friday, August 14, 1:00 PM to 3:00 PM

• Denver (Mountain): Friday, August 14, 12:00 PM to 2:00 PM

• Los Angeles and Vancouver (Pacific): Friday, August 14, 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM

• Halifax (Atlantic Canada): Friday, August 14, 3:00 PM to 5:00 PM

• London: Friday, August 14, 7:00 PM to 9:00 PM

• Paris, Berlin, Madrid: Friday, August 14, 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM

• Athens, Helsinki: Friday, August 14, 9:00 PM to 11:00 PM

• Perth: Saturday, August 15, 2:00 AM to 4:00 AM

• Adelaide: Saturday, August 15, 3:30 AM to 5:30 AM

• Sydney, Melbourne: Saturday, August 15, 4:00 AM to 6:00 AM

We will try to stream live on Substack, Facebook, and YouTube. Live streams have a way of not cooperating, so if it fails, the recording goes up as soon as it is ready.

The machine will still be there when you get back. The last seven years settled one question. We now know what it does to a blank account left alone with it. Meta answered that in 2019. The BBC confirmed it in 2026. Now you know it too.

Subscribe now

Sources

1. BBC World Service, The Careless Machine: Exposing Instagram’s Darkest Secret, Divya Arya, July 3, 2026.

2. Democracy Now!, Exposing Instagram’s Darkest Secret: BBC’s Divya Arya on Ads for Child Sex Abuse Material in India, July 10, 2026.

3. The News Minute, Meta pushes child sexual abuse material on Instagram, finds BBC investigation, July 2026.

4. Newslaundry, Meta pushes child sexual abuse material on Instagram, finds BBC investigation, July 4, 2026.

5. NBC News, What Facebook knew about how it radicalized users (the “Carol’s Journey to QAnon” report), October 2021.

6. CBS News, Facebook researchers saw how its algorithms led to misinformation (the Carol Smith, Karen Jones, and India test accounts), 2021.

7. Amnesty International, Myanmar: Facebook’s systems promoted violence against the Rohingya; Meta owes reparations, 2022.

8. TIME, Myanmar’s Military Used Facebook to Incite Genocide Against the Rohingya, 2022.

Leave a comment

Open your phone and count the promises. AI will hand you a side income. AI will pick your stocks, write your emails, run your little business while you sleep. Every third ad is a door with money behind it, and the door has your name painted on it.

Almost nobody says the next part out loud. In a boom this size there are always two halves, and the people who get rich in the first half are hardly ever the people who were promised they would.

A scholar in London worked this out a long time ago. She’s eighty-six now. She’s watching the whole thing happen again, and she is not impressed.

The Woman Who Called It

Carlota Perez was born in Caracas in 1939, weeks after the Second World War began. She spent a career studying something most economists find dull: what happens to a society when a giant new technology shows up and money goes a little insane around it.

In 2002 she published her now-famous book. The timing is the part worth sitting with. It landed in the dead of the dotcom winter, when the internet had just cratered and every serious person was calling the web a toy that had fooled a generation of fools.

Perez said they had it backwards. The internet wasn’t finished. It was halfway through a pattern she could sketch on a napkin, and the crash everyone was mourning was only the middle of that pattern. She went further and named what was still coming: a second, larger financial break before the technology could ever pay off for ordinary people.

Six years later, 2008 arrived on schedule.

The Two Halves Of Every Boom

Let me hand you her map, because once you’ve seen it you can’t un-see it, and it explains your own bank statement better than anything on cable news.

Every big technology, going back to steam and railways, runs the same course over roughly fifty years, and it’s now run five times. The first half she calls installation. A dazzling new tool appears and money floods in to build it out. Not patient money. Fast money, the kind that wants to double in eighteen months. Fortunes get made on paper, prices float free of anything real, and a few people standing near the tap get spectacularly rich while everyone else is told their turn is coming.

Then the tap breaks. The bubble pops. That’s her turning point, and it’s supposed to hurt.

The second half she calls deployment, and this is the good part. The golden age, when the technology stops being a casino chip and turns into plumbing. It gets cheap and boring and everywhere. Wages climb. The gains finally spread past the handful who owned the casino. The paved highways, the electric grid, the sturdy middle-class life your parents managed to build, all of that was deployment, the second half of an older boom paying the many at last instead of the few.

So who actually gets paid? In the first half, the money men. Every time. The speculators and the already-rich, close enough to the tap to fill their buckets before the pipe bursts. In the second half, if we’re lucky and careful, everyone else.

That “if” is the entire story, because the second half is not guaranteed to come.

The Golden Age That Never Came

This is the part that should make you angry, in a way you can use.

After 2008 you were promised a recovery. You remember the speeches. Green shoots, back on track, morning in America again. Now look at what the fifteen years since actually did to a household like yours.

If you were retired or nearly there, your bank paid you close to nothing for the better part of a decade. Meanwhile the price of everything you might have bought with those savings, a home, a share of stock, went vertical, because the cheap money never came to you. It went to the people who already held the assets. They got another boom. You got a statement that said 0.4 percent and a grocery bill that didn’t care.

None of that was your bad luck or your bad planning. It was a turning point that failed to turn, and you were standing right under it when it stalled. Perez says this plainly. The stretch we’re living through has been, by her reckoning, the longest turning point in the whole history she studies, because after the 2008 crash we had one job, pull the fast money back and steer it toward building real things, and we flinched. The frenzy never fully ended. The golden age never fully started. A generation of savers got left in the gap between the two halves and paid the bill for standing there.

Golden ages, she keeps having to remind people, don’t happen automatically. Somebody has to make them happen.

It’s Happening Again

Now the same film is running, and the marquee says AI.

Read the numbers with her map in your hand. Hundreds of billions pouring into data centers. A short list of companies each worth more than entire nations. Every startup with a slide deck calling itself “AI-native,” the exact way they all called themselves “dot-com” in 1999. And the promise, always the promise, that intelligence itself is about to be free and you, yes you, will get rich if you’re just holding the right chip stock.

Plenty of people are going to lose their shirts, and even the men running the boom now admit it in interviews. Perez, at eighty-six and still writing her next book, puts it without any drama: she has never watched a golden age arrive without a crash clearing the ground first. The crash isn’t the real danger. What worries her is the thing she’s seen before, a country that walks right up to its turning point and then, out of confusion or capture, doesn’t turn.

Refer a friend

This Is Not Left Versus Right

It would be easy to fold this into the usual fight between teams, and easy is exactly the trap.

The failed turn after 2008 unfolded under one party, and then the other. Both had their hands on the wheel. Both left the fast money in charge of the road. The question Perez asks has nothing to do with which side you cheer for. It’s blunter than that. Does the new technology end up owned by the people who build with it, or by the people who only bet on it? You can’t stitch that onto a hat. It’s a decision a society makes on purpose, at one specific moment, and we are standing inside that moment right now.

From here it can go three ways.

The frenzy might just leak out slowly, the money men keep their winnings, and we get another lost decade of you earning nothing while assets you’ll never own drift higher and higher. That’s the first door, and you have already lived behind it once.

Or the crash comes hard and we handle it about as badly as a society can, and instead of a golden age we get the bigger upheaval Perez warns about, the anger and breakage that follow once people understand the recovery was never coming for them.

Or we turn. The bubble pops, and this time the rules shove the technology out of the casino and into the plumbing, and the second half finally pays the many. That door is still open. Barely, but open.

Get 30% off a group subscription

You’ve Already Seen This Movie

Which brings me to you, and why you matter here more than you’d guess.

You have lived through an entire surge. You were born into the deployment of the last one, the factories and highways and the solid middle-class bargain. You watched the digital installation stack up through the eighties and nineties. You felt both crashes land in your own accounts. You waited out a recovery that reached nearly everyone but you. You are one of the very few people still around who has felt both halves of the cycle in your own life, and that memory isn’t nostalgia. It’s a working instrument.

The young people being told AI will make them rich have never once seen the first half end. You have. You know the shape of that promise, and you know exactly who tends to be holding the bucket when the pipe finally goes.

So do a few small, unglamorous things with that knowledge. Be slow with your own savings while everyone around you is being fast, because the first half rewards the people near the tap and you are not near the tap. Tell your grandchildren the quiet part, the part about who got paid last time and who got a statement that said 0.4 percent. And keep half an eye, locally and loudly, on the boring fights over rules and money, because the boring fights are precisely where the turn is won or lost.

The golden age was never a forecast you sit and wait for. It’s closer to an assignment, and it tends to land on the shoulders of the people who still remember the last time it didn’t show up on its own. You remember. That’s the whole reason this letter is addressed to you.

A Note On Why I Write These

Every article here stays free, and it always will. What I’m building alongside the writing is a set of tools meant to put ordinary people inside exactly those boring, decisive fights over the rules, the place where a turning point is actually forced. Paid subscribers aren’t buying words locked behind a wall. They’re funding that build, and they get an early hand in shaping it. If this piece told you something true about who gets paid, then that build is the part I’m trying to make real for people like you.

Subscribe now

You’re Invited to the Next Peace Talks

We are holding the next session of World Peace Coalition: Peace Talks, and you are invited.

This is not a lecture. It is a working conversation, and the whole point of everything above is that the room is the instrument. So come and be in it.

Register here: https://us06web.zoom.us/meeting/register/HorBuR3RQRChmJQj7ycm2A

Registration takes about ten seconds, and your personal join link arrives by email.

You can also join our signal chat group from here:

World Peace Coalition - Signal

Please check your own time zone carefully. For most of North America and Europe, this falls on Friday 14 August, not the 15th.

• Dhaka, Bangladesh: Saturday 15 August, 12:00 AM to 2:00 AM

• New York / Toronto (Eastern): Friday 14 August, 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM

• Chicago (Central): Friday 14 August, 1:00 PM to 3:00 PM

• Denver (Mountain): Friday 14 August, 12:00 PM to 2:00 PM

• Los Angeles / Vancouver (Pacific): Friday 14 August, 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM

• Halifax (Atlantic Canada): Friday 14 August, 3:00 PM to 5:00 PM

• London: Friday 14 August, 7:00 PM to 9:00 PM

• Paris / Berlin / Madrid: Friday 14 August, 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM

• Athens / Helsinki: Friday 14 August, 9:00 PM to 11:00 PM

• Perth: Saturday 15 August, 2:00 AM to 4:00 AM

• Adelaide: Saturday 15 August, 3:30 AM to 5:30 AM

• Sydney / Melbourne: Saturday 15 August, 4:00 AM to 6:00 AM

Sources

1. Carlota Perez biography, born 20 September 1939 in Caracas, British-Venezuelan scholar: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlota_Perez

2. Carlota Perez, Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages (2002): https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/60509.Technological_Revolutions_and_Financial_Capital

3. On the 2002 timing, the dotcom winter, and the installation/turning point/deployment pattern: https://stratechery.com/2021/the-death-and-birth-of-technological-revolutions/

4. The five great surges and where the AI boom sits in the cycle: https://peofdev.wordpress.com/2025/11/12/carlota-perez-and-the-ai-boom-where-are-we-in-the-cycle/

5. Perez in 2025 on AI, the coming crash, and no golden age without one: https://www.irishtimes.com/business/2025/08/23/brace-for-a-crash-before-the-golden-age-of-ai/

6. Perez on this being the longest turning point in her history, tied to the failure to rein in finance after 2008: https://www.antoinebuteau.com/lessons-from-carlota-perez/

7. On golden ages requiring direction rather than arriving automatically: https://www.ritamcgrath.com/the-turning-point-2025/

Leave a comment

Ray Dalio is seventy-six years old. He has more money than he could spend in three lifetimes. And for the last five years he has been writing something that reads less like a market outlook and more like a will. He isn’t trying to sell you a fund. He’s trying to tell his country something before he goes.

The Man in the Chair

He founded Bridgewater Associates in 1975 out of a New York apartment and built it into the largest hedge fund on the planet. In 2025 he walked all the way out. No more managing anyone else’s money. Just a family office and a keyboard.

He writes constantly. Books, essays, long threads on X that read like personal letters. If you scroll his feed for an hour, you get the feeling of a man who has given up on being polite.

In 2021 he published Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order. Hundreds of pages on why nations succeed and fail. In June 2025 he followed it with How Countries Go Broke: The Big Cycle. The title is not a hypothetical.

The Trade That Made Him

In 2007, when Wall Street was still on cocaine, Dalio was writing memos inside Bridgewater warning the whole thing was about to come apart. He was fifty-eight years old. He had been running the machine for over thirty years by then, and he had noticed the wheels rattling.

He warned the Treasury. He warned the Federal Reserve. Some of them listened. Most of them did not.

In 2008 Bridgewater made money while the rest of Wall Street was on fire. His fund posted positive returns while banks were being taken out on stretchers. Then he did it again from 2010 through 2012, during the European sovereign debt crisis, when Greece and Italy and Spain looked like they might drag the whole euro system down.

Twice in five years he watched the smartest financial minds on the planet miss what he had already circled on his desk.

That is the guy in the chair.

The Framework He Will Not Stop Talking About

He calls it the Big Debt Cycle.

Every economy, he says, runs on credit. Credit expands. People borrow. Growth accelerates. Confidence rises. Everybody feels rich. That part can last for decades. Then, slowly, the debts get too big to service. Interest costs eat the budget. The central bank has to print money to keep the wheels turning. The printed money debases the currency. Assets climb one last time in a melt-up that looks like the boom is back. Then confidence cracks, and everything reprices at once.

He puts the whole cycle at roughly eighty years. Long enough that most people have never lived through one from start to finish. Which is exactly why almost nobody sees the ending until after it lands.

In the new book he walks through forty-eight case studies of countries running this exact script over five hundred years. The Dutch Republic. Britain. Weimar Germany. Ming China. Every one of them thought their reserve status was permanent. None of them were right.

The US, he argues, is somewhere late in the cycle. Not tomorrow. Not next week. But late.

Refer a friend

Where He Says We Are

The receipts he is holding up right now are ugly.

Federal debt sits north of $36 trillion. Interest payments on that debt now outstrip the entire defense budget. In late 2025 the Federal Reserve announced it would stop letting its balance sheet run down, keeping it near six and a half trillion dollars. Officials called it a technical maneuver. Dalio called it a “stimulus into a bubble.”

In an October 2025 interview he said the country was facing “very, very dark times.” He used the phrase death spiral. Not in a book. On camera.

He doesn’t sound like a man promoting a fund. More like someone running out of a burning building, yelling back to check who’s still inside.

Give a gift subscription

What This Reads Like in a Retirement Account

I am not going to insult you by pretending this is about someone else’s savings.

If the framework is right, the currency your retirement is priced in is heading for a slow debasement. Not a crash. A haircut, one year at a time, for a decade or two. Late-stage debt cycles don’t wipe out fixed incomes in a headline. They wear them down in quiet.

Bonds are a promise to pay you dollars. If those dollars buy less each year, the promise thins. Cash in the bank does the same job in reverse. Even the house you own is priced in the same currency, and Dalio’s own model says that in the melt-up phase, assets can climb for years before the confidence cracks and the shape resets.

I am not telling you what to buy. Nobody honest can tell you that. But the man who called 2008 six months before it hit is telling anyone who will listen that the ground under a comfortable American retirement is shifting under the carpet. If you want a second opinion, look at his own life. He fully exited Bridgewater in 2025. He is not standing on the trade floor anymore. He is standing in the doorway with a letter in his hand.

The Line Only You Can Write

Here is the part of Dalio’s project almost nobody reads him for.

He is a billionaire. He could be on his boat. He could be building another fund. He could be doing nothing at all. Instead he spends his seventies at a keyboard, and every essay he writes is addressed to a country he thinks is walking off a cliff.

Look at what he is actually doing.

He is not running for anything. He is not building a machine that outlives him. He is writing down what he knows for the people coming after him. That is the one thing you can do at seventy-six that a thirty-year-old cannot do for himself. You can hand down what you have already learned the hard way.

That is your assignment too.

You lived through the tail end of a solvent country. You remember when Social Security was talked about like a promise. When interest on a savings account meant something. Back when a country like this could still build a factory in eighteen months if it wanted to. Your grandchildren will not know any of that unless somebody sits down and tells them. Not the numbers. The feel. What it was like to live under a currency that behaved.

You don’t need a book deal. You need a notebook and one person willing to sit across from you.

Dalio is doing his version of this in public because he can. You get to do yours in private because you can. Neither one stops the ending. Both are what turn the ending into something the next generation can survive.

Get 30% off a group subscription

The Letter Stays Open

One thing before we close.

Dalio’s diagnosis does not sort by party. The debt on the ledger was added under Reagan and Bush and Clinton and Bush and Obama and Trump and Biden. Every president since 1980 grew the pile. Both parties voted for it every single time. The math never cared about the flags.

Which means the yelling on television, the one that eats every dinner conversation, is the exact distraction the model warns about. Late-cycle politics gets angrier because the numbers stop working, not the other way round. The louder the argument, the closer the arithmetic.

Turn off the argument for a minute.

Look at the number on the debt clock.

Then sit down with whoever in your family is going to inherit the country, and start writing the letter only you can write.

The billionaire in Greenwich has spent five years writing his. He doesn’t need your money. He wrote you one anyway. The one he can’t write is the letter addressed to the person you love.

That one is on you.

Subscribe now

You’re Invited to the Next Peace Talks

We are holding the next session of World Peace Coalition: Peace Talks, and you are invited.

This is not a lecture. It is a working conversation, and the whole point of everything above is that the room is the instrument. So come and be in it.

Register here: https://us06web.zoom.us/meeting/register/HorBuR3RQRChmJQj7ycm2A

Or

RSVP on Zoom

Registration takes about ten seconds, and your personal join link arrives by email.

Please check your own time zone carefully. For most of North America and Europe, this falls on Friday 14 August, not the 15th.

• Dhaka, Bangladesh: Saturday 15 August, 12:00 AM to 2:00 AM

• New York / Toronto (Eastern): Friday 14 August, 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM

• Chicago (Central): Friday 14 August, 1:00 PM to 3:00 PM

• Denver (Mountain): Friday 14 August, 12:00 PM to 2:00 PM

• Los Angeles / Vancouver (Pacific): Friday 14 August, 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM

• Halifax (Atlantic Canada): Friday 14 August, 3:00 PM to 5:00 PM

• London: Friday 14 August, 7:00 PM to 9:00 PM

• Paris / Berlin / Madrid: Friday 14 August, 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM

• Athens / Helsinki: Friday 14 August, 9:00 PM to 11:00 PM

• Perth: Saturday 15 August, 2:00 AM to 4:00 AM

• Adelaide: Saturday 15 August, 3:30 AM to 5:30 AM

• Sydney / Melbourne: Saturday 15 August, 4:00 AM to 6:00 AM

Sources

1. Ray Dalio, Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order (2021): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Changing_World_Order

2. Ray Dalio, How Countries Go Broke: The Big Cycle (June 2025): https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/How-Countries-Go-Broke/Ray-Dalio/9781501124068

3. Dalio October 2025 warning of “very, very dark times” and the Fed’s “stimulus into a bubble,” US debt above $36 trillion: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ray-dalio-warns-next-big-011449318.html

4. Explainer on the Big Debt Cycle framework and its roughly 80-year arc: https://www.mauldineconomics.com/frontlinethoughts/big-debt-cycles

5. Dalio background, Bridgewater founding, 2007 pre-crisis warnings, 2025 exit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Dalio

Leave a comment

His last case took fifteen years to close. He’d called the Soviet Union terminal in 1976. Nobody believed him. Then the flag came down over Moscow one December afternoon in 1991, and half the world’s political scientists needed a new career. He was twenty-five when he made the call. He’s seventy-five now. And he just opened a new file. Your country’s name is on the cover.

The Number That Killed the USSR

His name is Emmanuel Todd.

In 1976 he wasn’t a household name. He was a graduate student. A skinny French kid in Paris with a pile of Soviet statistics on his desk.

He noticed something.

Infant mortality in the USSR was rising. That was not supposed to happen. Countries on the way up bury fewer babies each year. Poor countries. Rich countries. Doesn’t matter which. The line goes down. It’s one of the most reliable arrows in social science.

Except in the Soviet Union. Between 1970 and 1974, the arrow started going the other way.

And then, quietly, Moscow stopped publishing the data.

Todd sat with that for a while. An empire that decides to hide a health statistic isn’t a healthy empire. He kept digging. Suicides rising. Alcohol deaths rising. Wheat that a self-sufficient superpower should have been growing was coming in on ships from Kansas. The men in the Politburo were still on television talking about the world revolution. The numbers were telling a different story.

So he wrote a book. Called it La Chute Finale. The Final Fall.

He said that in ten or twenty or thirty years, an astonished world would watch the Soviet Union dissolve.

Everyone laughed.

Fifteen years later, they stopped.

Why He Trusts the Small Numbers

Todd is a strange kind of forecaster. He doesn’t listen to what a country says about itself. He listens to what it can’t help revealing.

A minister can lie. A newspaper can spin. The raw statistic, before the press office gets to it, has no interest in your feelings. That is the whole method. Watch the ordinary numbers a state can’t fake without stopping publication entirely. How many babies live. How many men kill themselves. How much bread the country has to import. How many hours the students actually study. If those are drifting the wrong way while the speeches get louder, the country is done. It just doesn’t know it yet.

What’s On His Desk Now

He’s seventy-five. The office is still in Paris. His new book came out early in 2024. In French it’s called La Défaite de l’Occident. The Defeat of the West.

Same method. Different country in the crosshairs.

Here is what he has circled in the American file.

The factories don’t work the way they used to. When the war in Ukraine started, the United States couldn’t produce artillery shells fast enough to keep one medium-sized ally supplied. The will was there. The industrial base wasn’t. The world’s largest economy, and the assembly line couldn’t handle a war it wasn’t even fighting.

The schools have been drifting since about 1965, in Todd’s read. Study hours have collapsed. Students used to put in around 48 hours a week. Now it’s closer to 27. Engineering graduates are down. STEM enrollment sags. Fewer people know how to build the things a country needs to be a country.

Then there’s the number. His number. The one that broke the USSR.

American infant mortality started rising again in 2023.

Russia’s is 4.4 per thousand. The United States is 5.4.

Read that twice.

He tracks other things. The dissolution of what he calls “zombie Protestantism,” the moral scaffolding that outlived American church attendance by a few decades and then quietly emptied out. An elite class that governs without conviction, unmoored from the community it’s supposed to serve. The nihilism Todd argues sits under the loudest culture wars, because nihilism is what you get when nobody can answer what any of it is for.

You can argue with him. Plenty do. Le Monde called him a prophet with his eyes closed. A Jacobin critic said his account was too reductive to be useful. Fair points, honestly.

But here is the thing about the guy in the office.

He read one small rising number in 1976 and saw the end of an empire. Fine, dismiss the messenger. The numbers he found don’t care whose side you’re on.

What This Reads Like in a Retirement Account

I won’t insult you by pretending this is about someone else.

If Todd is even half right, the pillars under a comfortable American retirement start feeling shaky. Not next week. Not next year. Over the arc he’s drawing.

The dollar has been the world’s reserve currency because the world has trusted the country behind it. Todd’s case is that the country behind it has been quietly emptying out for four decades and the world is starting to notice. A dollar can lose its buying power without any single dramatic event. Slow inflation is a haircut, one year at a time. Fixed incomes are the first thing it clips.

Savings are a promise denominated in a currency. A currency is a promise denominated in a country. A country is a promise denominated in the people who transmit its habits, its skills, its work.

If those are drifting down, the promise thins.

I’m not telling you to sell your bonds. I don’t know your bonds. Anyone who claims certainty about the next ten years is not a friend. But if a French demographer with a fifty-year track record is holding a red pen over the American file, the honest response is to ask what you would do differently if it turned out he was right.

Not what to buy.

What to hand down.

Refer a friend

The Line He Wrote That Nobody Reads

There’s a sentence in The Defeat of the West that most reviewers walk right past.

The West is running low, Todd writes, on the moral and social capital it inherited from its religious base. Not the ceremonies. The transmission. The habit of one generation handing forward what it learned to the next. That, Todd argues, is the real depletion crisis of our century. Not oil. The unbroken chain from parent to child to grandchild that turns a country full of individuals into a civilization that can actually build something.

Read that slowly.

Almost every article about American decline is written to the young. Go fix it, they’re told. Go rebuild. And they should. But Todd’s whole model says the young can’t fix a transmission break by themselves. A transmission break is by definition something the older link has to close.

That is you.

You are one of the last living Americans who saw what a country with intact transmission looked like. You know what a small factory town felt like before it hollowed out. You remember when a public school ran three shop classes and everyone left able to fix something. You know without having to explain it what a neighbor was for.

That memory isn’t nostalgia. In Todd’s model it is cargo. A civilization that loses that cargo doesn’t come back. A civilization that hands it down does.

You don’t need to run for office. You don’t need a platform. You need to sit down with one person young enough to be your grandchild and hand something over on purpose. A skill. A story. A standard. A book you loved. Whatever piece of the country you carry that would otherwise die with you.

That is the assignment.

The detective on the other side of the ocean thinks the transmission line is already broken. He might be wrong about that. He was right about the last empire, though, and by the time anyone was ready to admit it, it was too late to matter.

Give a gift subscription

The File Stays Open

One thing before we close.

Todd’s diagnosis doesn’t sort by party. The deindustrialization he tracks ran through Reagan and Clinton and Bush and Obama and Trump and Biden. The education slide crossed every administration. The zero-religion state didn’t come from a party platform. This is a calendar, not a candidate. Which means the argument on television, the one that eats your dinner table, is a distraction from the number on the page.

Turn off the argument for a minute.

Look at the number.

Then look at whoever is nine years old in your family, and ask what you want them to carry.

The detective in Paris keeps the file open. He said the same thing about Moscow in 1976, and the world spent fifteen years insisting he was wrong, and then one December afternoon they didn’t.

Subscribe now

Sources

1. Emmanuel Todd, La Chute Finale (1976), his 1976 prediction of the Soviet collapse: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmanuel_Todd

2. Emmanuel Todd, La Défaite de l’Occident (2024), summary and reception: https://www.thearticle.com/defeat-of-the-west-emmanuel-todd-and-the-russo-ukrainian-war

3. Todd interview on his methodology, Soviet indicators, and the current US-Russia infant mortality comparison: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/emmanuel-todd-russias-role/

4. Todd interview on Protestantism, industrial decline, and nihilism in the West: https://en.interaffairs.ru/article/emmanuel-todd-i-clearly-document-the-dynamics-of-the-decline-of-protestant-passionarity-in-the-wes/

5. American Affairs Journal review of The Defeat of the West, education decline data: https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2024/11/how-the-west-was-lost/

6. Background on Todd’s method and the 1976 prediction: https://www.reaction.life/p/russias-dire-demographic-situation

Leave a comment

You have felt it for a while now. The sense that the machinery you were raised to trust has started to grind against itself. The bank that was supposed to be boring, the court that was supposed to be above it all, the news that was supposed to agree on at least the weather. You watched the country you grew up in start behaving like a different country, and you were told, depending on the channel, that it was one side’s fault or the other’s. Neither answer ever quite fit, because the thing you were watching was bigger than a party. It felt seasonal. It felt like weather.

Twenty-nine years ago, two men gave that weather a name and a date.

The Man Who Dated The Winter

In 1997, a historian named Neil Howe and his co-author William Strauss published a book called The Fourth Turning. Their argument was simple enough to explain at a kitchen table and strange enough that most people filed it under curiosity. History, they said, does not move in a straight line. It moves in a circle roughly the length of one long human life, about eighty to ninety years, the span the Romans called a saeculum. Inside that circle are four seasons. A spring of rebuilding after a crisis. A summer of spiritual and cultural upheaval. An autumn of fraying institutions and rising individualism. And then a winter. A Crisis with a capital C, when the old order breaks down and a new one is forged under pressure.

They opened the book on a chapter called Winter Comes Again, and then they did the thing that makes a forecaster either a prophet or a fool. They put a date on it. Writing in the middle of the comfortable, distracted 1990s, they said that sometime before the year 2025 the country would pass through a great gate in its history, on the scale of the Revolution, the Civil War, and the joined ordeal of the Depression and the Second World War. They warned that the risk of catastrophe would be high. And they said the winter’s trigger would arrive around the first decade of the new century.

The trigger arrived, more or less on schedule, with the financial collapse of 2008. Then a second, harder shock landed in 2020. In 2023, Howe followed up with a sequel arguing that the Crisis which began in 2008 will not resolve until the early 2030s. Which means the coldest, most decisive stretch of the winter is not behind you. It is the ground you are standing on right now.

What The Calendar Already Called

Here is the part that should give you pause, and it has nothing to do with mysticism.

Ask yourself how much of what you were told in 1997 has quietly come true. Not the drama, the numbers. By the end of 2025, the share of Americans who trust the government in Washington to do the right thing most of the time had fallen to seventeen percent. In 1958, when pollsters first asked, it was seventy-three percent. Gallup, measuring confidence across the fourteen pillars of American life, from Congress to the banks to the press, found the average sitting near a record low, with barely a quarter of the country expressing real confidence in any of them.

Now notice what that decline is not. It is not a story about one man, or one party, or one election you can point to and blame. Trust cratered under presidents of both parties. It fell during booms and busts alike. The rot is in the load-bearing walls, not the wallpaper. This is the single most important thing to understand about a winter, and it is the thing the shouting on television is built to hide from you. The Crisis is a calendar, not a villain. Both tribes are reading lines from a script that was written before either of them chose a costume. When you stop hunting for who did this and start asking what season it is, the noise resolves into a pattern you can actually plan around.

What Winters Do To Money

Every previous American winter did something specific to the thing you spent a lifetime accumulating. It repriced it.

In the Revolutionary Crisis, the paper currency people had saved in became a national punchline, worthless almost overnight. In the Civil War, whole fortunes on one side of the country simply evaporated, and inflation ate at the rest. In the last winter, the Depression wiped out savings first, and then the war years rearranged what was left through inflation, rationing, and bonds. Notice the mechanism, because it repeats. Winters rarely knock on the front door and announce themselves to your bank account. They come in quietly, as inflation, as a currency that buys a little less each year, as a slow tax on exactly the people who did the responsible thing and saved.

For you, this is not abstract. A fixed income is a promise denominated in dollars, and a winter is the season that renegotiates what a dollar means. The nest egg you meant to pass down, the house, the account with the grandchildren’s names penciled in the margin, all of it sits inside the season, not safely outside it. I am not going to tell you what to buy, because I am not your advisor, and anyone who claims certainty about the next five years is selling something. But I will hand you the frame the model offers, because it is a frame almost no one your age is being given.

The Part The Prophets Skip

Every article written about the Fourth Turning is addressed to the young.

Go build, they tell the Millennials, you are the heroes of this story. And in Howe’s model they are right about that much. The generation now in its thirties and forties is cast as the doers, the builders, the ones who pour the concrete of whatever comes next. So the writers all turn to face the young, and they leave the most important chair in the room empty.

That chair is yours.

Look at where the model actually places you. In a Crisis, the theory says, the Prophet generation enters elderhood. The Prophets are the values generation, the ones born after the last winter into a confident country, who spent their whole lives arguing about what things mean. If you are a senior American reading this, that is almost certainly your generation, and the role the winter assigns you is not spectator. It is author. The young do the building, but the old decide what is worth building. The Heroes supply the hands. The elders supply the vision, the moral terms, the answer to the only question that finally matters in a Crisis, which is what all the sacrifice is for.

That is why I am writing this to you and not to your grandchildren. They are getting plenty of instruction. You are being told to get out of the way. The model says the opposite. It says the ending of this winter is being drafted right now, in the words the oldest Americans choose to hand down, and that a country resolves its Crisis on the vision its elders manage to articulate before the season turns.

I will be honest about the danger in that, because the model is. The Prophet in old age is not automatically wise. It can be rigid. It can be certain in the worst way, willing to burn the house down to win an argument about what the house is for. The elders who authored the last winter’s ending could have pushed it toward triumph or toward ruin, and which one they chose was not fated. It was a choice. The pen is real, and so is the risk of what you write with it.

Refer a friend

Three Doors

A winter always ends. That is the one promise the model makes and history keeps. What it refuses to promise is how.

Stand at the gate and you will see three doors, and every one of them has been walked through before. Behind the first is Renewal, the outcome Americans like to assume is guaranteed because it is the one that happened last time. The Depression and the war ended in a rebuilt, confident country and the longest boom in its history. Behind the second door is Diminishment, a Crisis survived but not won, a country that comes out the far side smaller, poorer, quieter, its best possibilities spent. And behind the third is Collapse, the door Strauss and Howe refused to pretend was locked, the one where the nation cracks along its seams or hardens into something it would not have recognized in the spring.

The model does not tell you which door opens. It tells you the door is chosen, not assigned, and that it is chosen in the years you are living through, by people including you. That is not a horoscope. That is a responsibility.

Get 30% off forever

The Horoscope Objection

You are a careful reader, so you have already raised the obvious objection, and I am not going to dodge it.

Plenty of serious people call this whole framework a kind of astrology for nations. They point out that if you draw the cycles loosely enough, almost any event can be shoehorned to fit, that the theory is nearly impossible to prove wrong, and that a pattern which explains everything explains nothing. Those critics are not fools, and the honest answer is that they are partly right. You should not treat generational theory as a law of physics, and anyone who quotes it like scripture has stopped thinking.

But here is what the objection cannot wave away. In 1997, when the country was fat and calm and sure the good times were permanent, two men said a great national Crisis would arrive before 2025, triggered in the first years of the century. Then 2008 happened on cue, and 2020 after it. You do not have to believe the mysticism to respect the timing. Treat the Fourth Turning not as a prophecy that relieves you of judgment but as a map that sharpens it. A map can be roughly drawn and still show you which way the river runs. This one has been pointing at winter for twenty-nine years, and the river went where it said.

Share

What An Elder Does In A Winter

So what do you actually do, standing at the gate with a pen in your hand.

You do the small, unglamorous things that only an elder can do, and you do them on purpose. You tell the young what a functioning country actually felt like, in specifics, so that renewal stays imaginable to people who have never once seen it. A generation cannot rebuild something it cannot picture, and you are one of the last living blueprints. You hand down a vision that is larger than a grievance, because a winter authored out of resentment opens the wrong door. You steward what you have deliberately rather than fearfully, and you make the plan for your legacy a decision instead of a default. You mentor one person, by name, all the way. You show up for the civic work, the boring local kind, and you insist on judging it by whether it works and not by which tribe it flatters, because that structural habit of mind is the exact medicine a Crisis needs and the first thing it destroys. And you refuse the rigidity the model warns you about, the temptation to spend your last authority winning an old fight instead of ending a new crisis.

None of that requires you to be powerful. It requires you to be present, and clear, and unwilling to hand the pen to the loudest person in the room.

The winter came in on schedule, the way the man said it would in 1997. The gate is here. And the oldest, strangest, most overlooked line in his entire theory turns out to be the one that matters most to you. The ending of a winter is written by the people old enough to remember a country that worked. That is not your grandchildren. That is you. Pick up the pen.

Subscribe now

Sources

1. Neil Howe and William Strauss, The Fourth Turning: An American Prophecy (1997): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fourth_Turning

2. Neil Howe, The Fourth Turning Is Here (2023): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fourth_Turning_Is_Here

3. Strauss and Howe generational theory, archetypes and the turnings: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strauss%E2%80%93Howe_generational_theory

4. City Journal, review of The Fourth Turning Is Here (the 2008 trigger arriving on schedule, resolution in the 2030s): https://www.city-journal.org/article/review-of-the-fourth-turning-is-here-by-neil-howe

5. Pew Research Center, Public Trust in Government, 1958 to 2025: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/12/04/public-trust-in-government-1958-2025/

6. Gallup, Confidence in U.S. Institutions Remains Near All-Time Low: https://news.gallup.com/poll/712436/confidence-institutions-remains-near-time-low.aspx

Leave a comment

Picture the smallest version of the moment first, because that is how it will arrive. You are standing at a checkout you have used for years, or looking at a payment on your phone, and the answer is no. Not insufficient funds, because the money is there. Just no. A rule on a server somewhere has decided that your dollars are not available to you today, and there is no teller to argue with, no manager who can override it, and no judge who was asked first.

Three weeks ago, you were told this could never happen to you.

On the night of July 10, a bill most people will never read became law without a signature, and buried inside it was a four-year ban on a government digital dollar. The Federal Reserve is now blocked from issuing one through the end of 2030. The headline wrote itself. Privacy had won. The surveillance currency was dead. For once, Washington had locked a dangerous door.

It was a real lock, on a real door. It was also the wrong door.

St’s Substack is free, and it will stay free. If this piece changes how you see the money in your pocket, the most useful thing you can do is share it.

Share

The Door You Were Told to Cheer

Let me give the good news its due, because it is real. For years, Americans across every political line feared the same thing: a central bank digital dollar, a version of money the government could watch, program, and switch off. The fear was bipartisan, and so was the answer. The Senate approved the ban by about 85 to 5, the House passed it in a landslide, and a measure that began its life as a housing bill turned into the first federal wall against a digital dollar. Whatever you think of the people who built it, that wall is standing.

But here is what the celebration missed. Locking the front door did not remove the machine everyone was afraid of. It only decided who gets to run it.

The Man Who Described the Back Door Years Ago

To see it, you need a guide who was studying the back of the house while everyone else watched the front. His name is Brett Scott, and his credibility starts with the fact that he once worked inside the system he now maps. He was a derivatives broker who walked away and became an economic anthropologist, a man who studies money the way a biologist studies a living organism.

In 2022, well before any of this reached the headlines, Scott published a book called Cloudmoney. Its argument sounded eccentric at the time and reads like a weather report now. He said a quiet war on cash was underway, waged not by a single villain but by an alliance of big banks and big technology companies, and that its purpose was to replace the physical money in your hand with private digital money he called cloudmoney: dollars that live only on a company’s servers, under a company’s rules, generating a company’s data.

The part worth holding onto is his map of money itself. Scott points out that we already carry three kinds of dollars stacked on top of one another. There is government cash, the paper in your wallet. There is bank money, the number in your checking account. And there is corporate money, the balance inside a payment app. They look identical when you spend them. They are not identical at all, because each one answers to a different master, and only the first one, cash, is fully yours.

Scott’s warning was plain. As cash fades, the corporate layer swallows the rest, and money stops being something you hold and becomes something you are granted. He was not selling doom. He asked people to check the structure, not to trust his word. The structure has now done exactly what he said it would.

The Machine Is Already Running

Here is where the story stops being a book review, because the machine Scott described is not coming. It is on, and it is holding your dollars.

When Washington banned the government digital dollar, it left the private version untouched. It could hardly have done otherwise, because the private version was already winning. Two companies now sit on top of the digital dollar. Tether’s token is worth around 185 billion dollars and Circle’s is worth roughly 73 billion, part of a private stablecoin market that has swelled past 300 billion dollars and now carries a growing share of the world’s digital money.

And these companies can do the one thing that frightened everyone about a government currency. They can freeze your money. This is not a fear or a forecast. It is a published, repeated fact. Tether alone has frozen more than 4 billion dollars across thousands of wallets, and in April it froze 344 million dollars in a single action, working hand in hand with the United States Treasury.

Honesty is the whole reason you read me, so let me be fair to the other side of this. The overwhelming majority of those freezes have hit genuinely ugly things: sanctioned regimes, human trafficking rings, the scam operations that have drained the savings of people who look a great deal like my readers. If the switch only ever stopped criminals, this article would not exist.

But a switch does not know why it was installed. In March, in a civil lawsuit, a private law firm secured a court order that forced the freezing of sixteen business wallets at once, and the accounts caught in the net were not traffickers or terrorists. They were ordinary operating businesses: exchanges, brokers, payment processors. As one attorney watching the case put it, the value of a digital dollar is only as reliable as the most aggressive lawyer who wants it frozen. The power built to catch monsters had reached an ordinary door.

If you want to know what the people who build this technology understand it to be, you do not have to guess. In 2020, at a panel hosted by the International Monetary Fund, the head of the Bank for International Settlements, the institution that serves as the central bank for central banks, was asked how digital money would differ from cash. His answer has been replayed ever since because it was so unusually blunt. With cash, he said, nobody knows who is spending a given bill. With the new money, the issuer would have absolute control over the rules that govern how every dollar can be used, and, he added, the technology to enforce that control.

He was describing a government currency. But read the sentence again, because the ban did not repeal it. It only changed the name of the issuer. The absolute control he promised did not vanish on July 10. It moved into private hands, and those hands have already shown they will use it.

Before You Sort This Into a Team

I know the instinct, because I feel it too. A story like this wants to be pinned on one side. Resist it, because the evidence will not cooperate.

The ban itself was bipartisan, praised and cursed by people in both parties. The freezing power crosses every border and every ideology. In 2022, Canada froze the bank accounts of citizens protesting their own government. This year, Brazil moved to bar stablecoins from cross-border payments. The United States turns the same tools against its enemies abroad under presidents of both parties. And the private companies now holding the switch answer to shareholders, not voters, which means they answer to no election at all.

If your explanation of this fits on a bumper sticker with the other party’s name on it, the record says your explanation is too small. This is not a story about a party. It is a story about a capability, the power to make money that can be told what it may and may not do, and about a very old question: who should be allowed to hold that power over you.

Three Doors

Strip away the noise and the future of the money in your pocket comes down to three paths.

The first is the freeze-out. Cash quietly disappears from daily life, not by law but through a thousand small refusals: the shop that stopped taking it, the fee that punishes it, the app that made it inconvenient. When the paper is gone, every dollar you have needs someone’s permission to move, and you will not always be the one granting it.

The second is the capture. The rails consolidate into a few private hands, the switch grows more powerful and more automatic, and the distance between you and your own savings becomes a customer-service line and a terms-of-service page you never read. The country keeps its flag and its anthem. Your money quietly stops being yours.

The third is the exit, and it is the reason I wrote this. It is not utopian, and it is not new. It is a world in which money stays plural, where cash survives beside the apps, where no single company owns the only road between you and the things you need. And unlike the other two doors, you do not have to imagine this one. You have already lived inside it.

Refer a friend

The Exit You Already Remember

If you are old enough to remember a Friday paycheck cashed at the bank and carried home in an envelope, you remember the third door from the inside. The money in that envelope did not ask permission. It carried no terms of service. No server had to say yes before you handed a few bills to a neighbor, a grandchild, a church, or a stranger. It could not be switched off from a distance, because there was no distance. It was simply, completely, yours.

That was not a fantasy. It was a Tuesday. And the reason it matters now is that the exit requires inventing nothing. It requires refusing to let a working thing die. The most radical financial act available to an ordinary American in 2026 is also the most old-fashioned one: to keep cash alive, to keep your money spread across more than one kind of rail, and to refuse to run your whole financial life at the mercy of a single company’s switch.

The Part That Belongs to You

None of this asks you to change your politics, and none of it requires you to understand a blockchain. It asks for something smaller and much harder to take from you.

This week, use cash on purpose at least once, at a local business, for something ordinary. Cash acceptance is a right that erodes the moment people stop exercising it, and every paper transaction is a vote to keep the third door open. Keep some cash at home, enough to carry you a few weeks, not hidden in fear but simply held out of the system’s reach. Take ten quiet minutes to notice which of your dollars sit where: what is paper, what is in a bank, and what lives inside an app that can freeze it while you sleep. And do not let convenience walk you into a single rail for everything, because the day you depend entirely on one company’s yes is the day you have handed it your no.

The people who built this machine are counting on one thing above all, that the back door stays open because nobody is looking at it. That is the only real power you just lost, and it is the easiest one to take back. The front door is locked and the celebration was premature, but the house is still yours if you decide to guard the whole of it.

You are looking at the back door now. That was the hardest part, and you have already done it.

If this gave you a clearer view of the money in your life, subscribe so the next piece finds you, and pass it to one person who still keeps cash in a drawer. Everything here stays free.

Subscribe now

Sources

1. CoinDesk, “US Government Digital Dollar Set to Be Banned Tonight Under Housing Law’s CBDC Limit,” July 10, 2026. https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2026/07/10/u-s-government-digital-dollar-set-to-be-banned-tonight-under-housing-law-s-cbdc-limit

2. Crypto-Economy, “The US CBDC Ban 2026 Is Not a Crypto Victory, It Is a Structural Realignment,” June 24, 2026 (Senate 85 to 5 vote). https://crypto-economy.com/the-us-cbdc-ban-2026-is-not-a-crypto-victory-it-is-a-structural-realignment/

3. Brett Scott, Cloudmoney: Cash, Cards, Crypto, and the War for Our Wallets (Penguin, 2022). https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/439997/cloudmoney-by-scott-brett/9781529111484

4. New Books Network, interview and summary of Cloudmoney, including Brett Scott’s background as a former broker. https://newbooksnetwork.com/cloudmoney

5. Next Big Idea Club, “Cloudmoney: Five Key Insights” (the three coexisting forms of money). https://nextbigideaclub.com/magazine/cloudmoney-cash-cards-crypto-war-wallets-bookbite/35625/

6. TechTimes, “Digital Dollar Banned Until 2031 With Stablecoin Rulemaking One Week Away,” July 11, 2026 (Tether about 185 billion, Circle about 73 billion). https://www.techtimes.com/articles/320179/20260711/digital-dollar-banned-until-2031-stablecoin-rulemaking-one-week-away.htm

7. Tether, “Tether Supports Freeze of More Than 344 Million in USDT in Coordination with OFAC and U.S. Law Enforcement,” April 23, 2026 (more than 4.4 billion frozen overall). https://tether.io/news/tether-supports-freeze-of-more-than-344-million-in-usdt-in-coordination-with-ofac-and-u-s-law-enforcement/

8. CoinDesk, “Tether Freezes 344 Million in USDT on Tron Tied to Illicit Activity,” April 23, 2026. https://www.coindesk.com/business/2026/04/23/tether-freezes-usd344-million-in-usdt-on-tron-tied-to-illicit-activity

9. Sammis Law Firm, analysis of the March 23, 2026 court-ordered freeze of sixteen USDC business wallets (SDNY case 26-cv-2327). https://criminaldefenseattorneytampa.com/asset-seizure-asset-forfeiture/cryptocurrency/circle/

10. Agustín Carstens, remarks at the IMF seminar “Cross-Border Payments: A Vision for the Future,” October 19, 2020, as reported. https://hackernoon.com/bis-proposes-unified-ledger-for-cbdcs-tokenized-deposits-and-payments

11. Forbes, “The Sovereign Dilemma: Who Should Control Digital Money?” May 6, 2026 (Canada 2022 account freezes; Brazil stablecoin restriction). https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonegilsson/2026/05/06/the-sovereign-dilemma-who-should-control-digital-money/

12. Bank for International Settlements, Annual Economic Report 2026, Chapter III, “Anchoring Trust in Money” (stablecoin market scale and risks). https://www.bis.org/publ/arpdf/ar2026e3.htm

Leave a comment

Somewhere in the coming months, another ceasefire will be signed over Myanmar. There will be a photograph, a handshake, a short statement thanking the mediators, and a date on which the fighting is supposed to stop. And if you have followed this war at all, you already feel the small, tired certainty settle in your chest: it will not hold. It rarely does.

We have been taught to read that certainty as proof that the war is hopeless. I want to offer you a different reading. The certainty is not proof that peace is impossible in Myanmar. It is proof that the particular deals being signed were never built to last. Those are very different problems, and only one of them is fatal.

You have also absorbed something quieter and more corrosive: that peace is the private property of the powerful. That it belongs to presidents and generals and envoys with motorcades, and that when they fail, the rest of us are meant to grieve, share something online, and move on. Hold that belief in your hand for a moment. This article is going to take it apart, because there was a war that looked every bit as hopeless as Myanmar, and it was ended by people who had no army, no state, and no seat at any powerful table.

The Soup Kitchen That Ended a War

For sixteen years, Mozambique tore itself apart. By the time it stopped, roughly a million people were dead and several million more had fled their homes, and every serious observer assumed the outside sponsors would keep the two sides armed forever. Then, on the fourth of October 1992, the government and the rebels signed a general peace agreement in a quiet building in Rome, and the war simply ended. It has, for the most part, stayed ended for more than three decades.

The mediators were not a superpower. They were the Community of Sant’Egidio, a Catholic lay community best known, at the time, for running soup kitchens and sitting with the poor. They had no leverage in any conventional sense. What they had instead turned out to be worth more.

It is worth being precise about why they succeeded, because that precision is the whole point. First, they had spent years inside Mozambique doing humble, practical work, so both sides already trusted them before the word negotiation was ever spoken. Trust was the asset, and it had been earned slowly. Second, the war had two main parties, not a thousand, so the whole conflict could fit inside a single room. Third, the moment was ripe: the Cold War was ending and the foreign patrons who had funded the fighting were walking away, so both sides finally accepted that neither could win outright. And fourth, the community never pretended to be a superpower. It held the trusted room while governments, the United Nations, and neighbouring states supplied the guarantees. A powerless convener, backed by powerful guarantors. That combination is what ended the war.

What Myanmar Would Have to Build

Now hold Myanmar against that list, not to prove it is impossible, but to see the actual work.

The trust condition is buildable, and it happens to be the one ordinary people can build. You earn a place in the room the way Sant’Egidio did, by showing up usefully and consistently over years, until you carry a standing that no one handed you. That is not a consolation prize for people without power. It is literally how the Mozambique peace began, in a soup kitchen.

The second condition is the hard one, and there is no point softening it. Myanmar is, by most counts, the most fragmented conflict on earth, with more than a thousand armed groups in the field. You cannot mediate that in one room, and anyone promising to convene all parties by next month is selling something. The realistic move is smaller and more honest: help the resistance cohere first, because a fractured resistance has nothing coherent to offer and no one who can sign for it. Getting the opposition and the ethnic movements to stand behind one credible federal offer is slow, unglamorous work, and it needs no one’s permission to begin.

The third condition is the reverse of Mozambique, and it is the uncomfortable truth of this war. In Mozambique the sponsors left. In Myanmar, the most important neighbour has moved in. China has brokered ceasefires of its own along the border, protects its investments, and keeps a hand on every side at once. There will be no settlement that Beijing is standing outside of. Any workable peace has to bring China inside the structure rather than shout at it from the lawn. Meanwhile the regional body that was supposed to handle all of this, along with its much-discussed five-point plan, has spent years producing communiqués and very little peace.

The Machine We Can Actually Touch

So what can a person do, sitting far from any of this, holding nothing but attention and a little time? More than you have been led to believe.

Start with visibility, because this war runs partly on the world’s willingness to look away. A military government counts on the news cycle moving on. A writer, a reader, a person who simply refuses to let the subject go quiet, is a small counterweight to that, and counterweights add up.

Then follow the physical things that keep the killing possible. The most direct line between a distant decision and a dead child in a Myanmar village runs through jet fuel. The military’s one decisive advantage is the air, and its aircraft do not fly without imported aviation fuel. Human rights investigators have found that 2025 was the worst year yet for aerial attacks on civilians, and that the fuel keeps arriving through a shifting fleet of ghost ships. Campaigns already exist to press the suppliers, insurers, shippers, and governments to choke that supply, and they are precisely the kind of pressure an ordinary citizen can amplify, name by name, company by company.

Then there is the law, and here is the detail I most want you to carry out of this piece. When Myanmar’s military was accused of genocide against the Rohingya, the country that brought it before the world court was not a great power. It was the Gambia, one of the smallest and poorest states in Africa, acting on behalf of a people with no army of their own. Bangladesh, which actually shelters most of the Rohingya refugees, did not file that case. The Gambia did, and the case has since reshaped how the world litigates atrocity. That is the whole thesis of this article, standing in a courtroom. You do not need to be powerful to move a war. You need to be willing to act where the powerful will not.

None of these things ends a war on its own. What they do is bend the cost curve and shape the ground on which the ripe moment eventually arrives. Soup kitchens were ordinary action too. It compounds.

Why “Unity” Keeps Detonating

There is one more thing to understand, and it explains why Myanmar’s peace deals keep failing at a level far below any single broken ceasefire.

Since independence in 1948, the dominant idea of the Myanmar nation has been assimilation: one central, Burman, Buddhist core deciding what the country is, and calling everyone’s sameness unity. But sameness does not unify a diverse country. It detonates it. Every ethnic nationalism you can name there, Kachin, Karen, Shan, Rakhine, Chin, grew as a reaction to being told to dissolve into someone else’s nation. The 1947 Panglong promise of genuine autonomy was made and then broken, and that broken promise is the original wound. The military-drafted constitution of 2008 then wrote central domination into the country’s very foundation.

You cannot repair this by nationalising harder. Forcing more unity onto Myanmar pours fuel on the exact fire you are trying to put out. The way through is to invert the model entirely: unity as federation rather than unity as sameness, a national identity co-authored by its parts, where the autonomy of each people is written down and guaranteed rather than granted at the centre’s mercy and revoked at its convenience.

This is where one simple structural test cuts through everything. Any mechanism that depends on the consent of the very actor it is meant to constrain is not a mechanism. It is theatre. A ceasefire the military is trusted to police itself fails that test, which is why those ceasefires break. And a nation defined entirely by the group it is supposed to hold in check fails the same test, which is why forced unity keeps detonating. Unity that is not co-written by the ethnic states is simply domination wearing a flag.

The resistance’s own Federal Democracy Charter, drafted in 2021, is the first serious attempt to write that co-authored nation down. It is imperfect and unfinished. And there is a clean way to judge whether it is a genuinely pluralist vision or just a new majority in waiting: watch whether it fully includes the Rohingya, the group Myanmar has worked hardest to erase. That inclusion, or its absence, is the proof.

Refer a friend

You Are Not a Spectator

So here is where this leaves you.

The belief that ordinary people cannot build peace is not a finding. It is a permission slip, and we keep signing it and handing it to the same people who are currently failing. A lay community with no power ended a sixteen-year war because it refused to sign that slip. It decided that peace was its business too.

Myanmar’s war is harder than Mozambique’s in real and specific ways, and I have tried not to pretend otherwise. But harder is not the same as hopeless, and the whole distance between those two words is the space where citizens work. You will not sign a treaty. You can keep a war visible, follow the fuel and the money, back the small actors turning law into leverage, and insist that unity in Myanmar has to mean federation and not erasure. That is not nothing. Gathered across enough people, it is the very environment that peace grows in.

You were never meant to be a spectator to this. Almost no one is, once they decide not to be.

Share

Join the Next Peace Talks

We are holding the next session of World Peace Coalition: Peace Talks, and you are invited.

This is not a lecture. It is a working conversation, and the whole point of everything above is that the room is the instrument. So come and be in it.

Register here: https://us06web.zoom.us/meeting/register/HorBuR3RQRChmJQj7ycm2A

Or

RSVP on Zoom

Registration takes about ten seconds, and your personal join link arrives by email.

Please check your own time zone carefully. For most of North America and Europe, this falls on Friday 14 August, not the 15th.

• Dhaka, Bangladesh: Saturday 15 August, 12:00 AM to 2:00 AM

• New York / Toronto (Eastern): Friday 14 August, 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM

• Chicago (Central): Friday 14 August, 1:00 PM to 3:00 PM

• Denver (Mountain): Friday 14 August, 12:00 PM to 2:00 PM

• Los Angeles / Vancouver (Pacific): Friday 14 August, 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM

• Halifax (Atlantic Canada): Friday 14 August, 3:00 PM to 5:00 PM

• London: Friday 14 August, 7:00 PM to 9:00 PM

• Paris / Berlin / Madrid: Friday 14 August, 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM

• Athens / Helsinki: Friday 14 August, 9:00 PM to 11:00 PM

• Perth: Saturday 15 August, 2:00 AM to 4:00 AM

• Adelaide: Saturday 15 August, 3:30 AM to 5:30 AM

• Sydney / Melbourne: Saturday 15 August, 4:00 AM to 6:00 AM

We will try to stream live on Substack, Facebook and YouTube. Live streaming has a way of not cooperating, so if it fails, the recording will be posted here as soon as it is ready.

Subscribe now

Sources

1. Rome General Peace Accords, overview. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rome_General_Peace_Accords

2. Conciliation Resources, Accord: the Mozambique peace process. https://www.c-r.org/accord/mozambique/preface-accord-mozambique

3. Community of Sant’Egidio, the relevance of Mozambique’s peace agreement. https://www.santegidio.org/pageID/30384/langID/en/The-relevance-of-Mozambique-s-peace-agreement.html

4. Amnesty International, jet fuel and air strikes in Myanmar (January 2026). https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2026/01/myanmar-jet-fuel-used-in-deadly-air-strikes-flowing-in-on-ghost-ships-with-suspected-links-to-iran/

5. Justice For Myanmar, call for coordinated sanctions on the aviation fuel supply chain. https://www.justiceformyanmar.org/press-releases/justice-for-myanmar-calls-for-new-and-coordinated-sanctions-on-juntas-aviation-fuel-supply-chain

6. UN Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar, ICJ: The Gambia v. Myanmar. https://iimm.un.org/en/icj-gambia-v-myanmar

7. East Asia Forum, how the ICJ Rohingya case reshaped human rights litigation. https://eastasiaforum.org/2026/03/17/the-icj-rohingya-case-reshapes-human-rights-litigation/

8. South China Morning Post, China’s Kunming-brokered ceasefire. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3296285/china-has-brokered-another-ceasefire-myanmar-civil-war-will-it-hold

9. The Manila Times, ASEAN’s stalled five-point plan. https://www.manilatimes.net/2026/07/21/news/myanmars-future-mideast-fighting-hang-over-asean-talks/2388057

10. Foreign Policy, federalism, Panglong, and the 2008 constitution. https://foreignpolicy.com/2024/10/29/myanmar-military-resistance-ethnic-minorities-rights-federalism/

11. Federal Democracy Charter (2021), primary text, Myanmar Law Library. https://myanmar-law-library.org/law-library/laws-and-regulations/constitutions/federal-democracy-charter-2021.html

12. Conflict tracker on Myanmar’s fragmentation and territorial control. https://world-on-fire.com/conflicts/myanmar.html

Leave a comment

In October 1992, two men sat down in an old monastery in Rome and ended a war.

One of them ran the government of Mozambique. The other ran the army that had been trying to overthrow it for sixteen years. The fighting had killed about a million people. Four million more had fled their homes.

That afternoon, they signed their names, and it stopped.

Now here is the part that should interest you.

The people who brought them to that table were not diplomats. They had no government behind them. No army. No seat at the United Nations. No legal authority of any kind.

The Community of Sant’Egidio was a small Catholic group started by a few students in Rome in 1968. They were known for running soup kitchens and teaching poor children to read.

When the two Mozambican sides could not agree on which government they trusted to mediate, they asked Sant’Egidio to do it instead.

Why This Usually Gets Explained Wrong

People tell this story as a miracle. Ordinary people, impossible outcome, the power of faith.

It is a warm story. It is also useless, because it teaches you nothing you can copy.

Here is the version you can use.

Sant’Egidio worked because nobody could stop them.

They had no mandate, so no one could take their mandate away. They needed no permission, so no one could refuse permission. Their only tools were a quiet room and twenty years of friendships in Mozambique. You cannot veto a room. You cannot veto a friendship.

That is not a spiritual fact. It is a design fact.

And once you see it, you cannot stop seeing it.

Whenever anyone proposes a peace mechanism, a treaty, an oversight body, a review process, ask one question: who has to say yes for this to bite? If the answer is the party being constrained, it is decoration. If the answer is a court, or a neutral third party, or nobody at all, it might be real.

I call this the veto test.

It takes four seconds. It will change what you believe about things you were told are working.

Start With America

There is a law in the United States that most Americans have never heard of.

When the US government wants to sell major weapons to another country, it must tell Congress first. Congress then gets a window of time in which it can block the sale.

This is real. It is written into the Arms Export Control Act. It exists so that elected representatives have a say in where American weapons go.

Congress has tried to use it. The Congressional Research Service has counted 127 attempts, filed by members of both parties, against presidents of both parties, over fifty years.

None of them has ever stopped a sale. Not one.

Before you decide that means Congress never really tried, look at 2019.

That year both chambers voted to block weapons going to Saudi Arabia. The House passed it by more than forty votes. The Senate passed it too.

Then the president vetoed it, and the Senate could not find the two thirds needed to overrule him.

The machine worked perfectly. Right up to the moment it reached the desk of the man it was built to restrain.

How The Tool Broke

Here is where it gets strange, and where the blame does not sit where you expect.

The original law, written in the 1970s, worked differently. Back then, both chambers of Congress could stop a weapons sale by themselves. The president did not sign anything. Congress simply said no, and the sale stopped.

Then, in 1983, the Supreme Court decided a case called INS v. Chadha.

That case was about an immigration deportation. It had nothing to do with weapons at all.

The Court ruled that Congress cannot overrule the executive branch without passing a full law, which means it has to go to the president for signature.

Suddenly dozens of oversight laws across the United States were unconstitutional. Congress had to rewrite them.

So in February 1986, it rewrote this one. From that day, blocking a weapons sale required a full law. Which requires the signature of the same president who approved the sale. Or two thirds of both chambers to overrule him.

Nobody planned this. There was no villain and no conspiracy.

A court ruled on an unrelated immigration case, and a working check on American weapons quietly turned into one that has failed every single time since.

The people being restrained were handed the power to say no.

That is the whole explanation.

If you are American, this is your stake in it. You were told your representatives have a check on where your country’s weapons go. That is true on paper. What you were not told is that the check was rebuilt in 1986 in a way that makes it nearly impossible to use.

Now Look At The Netherlands

Same problem. Different design. Different result.

In the Netherlands, ordinary citizens’ organisations went after weapons exports too. But they did not ask parliament to vote.

They went to court.

They asked judges a simple question: did the government follow its own legal obligations before approving these exports?

The Appeals Court spelled out those obligations in detail for the first time in Dutch law. The Supreme Court later ordered the minister to reassess the export licence.

The government did not get to grade its own homework. Someone else did.

I will not oversell this. Later rulings went the government’s way. Courts often refuse to overrule elected officials on foreign policy. These campaigners have lost as often as they have won.

But notice the difference.

The Dutch route does not require the weapons exporter to agree that it should stop exporting weapons.

That one structural detail is why it produces results at all, while the American route produces 127 resolutions and nothing else.

Same goal. Same treaties. Different architecture. Opposite outcome.

Refer a friend

Now The Biggest One

Run the test on the world’s highest criminal court.

The International Criminal Court can charge a sitting head of state. It has done so.

What it cannot do is arrest one.

The Court has no police and no prison. It depends on its 123 member countries to make the arrests for it.

Apply the veto test and you can predict the result without reading a single case file.

An arrest warrant against a powerful leader can only be carried out by a country willing to carry it out. Mongolia was reported for non-compliance after Vladimir Putin visited and left freely. Hungary was reported after Benjamin Netanyahu did the same, and then left the Court altogether this June.

The only punishment available is a report to a committee, which has no penalty it can impose.

And yet.

Rodrigo Duterte, former president of the Philippines, is sitting in a cell in The Hague right now. The judges confirmed all the charges against him in April. His trial opens on 30 November this year.

So why did that one work?

Not because the law forced anyone’s hand. It worked because the government of the Philippines changed, and the new one decided it was willing.

The veto was not defeated. It was simply withdrawn.

That is not an argument against the Court. It tells us exactly where the repair goes. Not more charges, which the Court files easily. What is missing is national laws that let a country’s own police act on a warrant without a fresh political decision every time, and automatic consequences for countries that refuse.

Both are boring. Both remove a veto. Those are the same sentence.

Give a gift subscription

The Part That Should Give You Hope

Here is what I did not understand when I started looking into this.

The veto test cuts both ways.

Yes, every mechanism that needs powerful people to agree will keep failing. That is the bad news, and it explains most of what you see in the world.

But the reverse is also true, and it is much bigger news.

Anything that does not need their permission cannot be taken away by them either.

Nobody granted Sant’Egidio anything. So nobody could revoke it. No government could shut them down, because there was nothing to shut down. They were just people, in a room, who had spent twenty years earning the trust of both sides.

That is the one category of power that has actually ended a war from below. And it is the one category that no leader, no army and no treaty can withdraw from you.

Your attention is yours. Nobody approves it.

Your questions are yours. Nobody licenses them.

Your willingness to sit in a room with someone you disagree with is yours. No parliament votes on it. No president signs it. No court can rule it unconstitutional.

You have been told for years that ordinary people cannot do anything about war.

The people who ended the war in Mozambique ran soup kitchens.

They had no mandate. That was not their weakness. That was their entire advantage.

Get 30% off a group subscription

Come Sit In The Room

We are holding the next session of World Peace Coalition: Peace Talks, and you are invited.

This is not a lecture. It is a working conversation, and the whole point of everything above is that the room is the instrument. So come and be in it.

Register here: https://us06web.zoom.us/meeting/register/HorBuR3RQRChmJQj7ycm2A

Or

RSVP on Zoom

Registration takes about ten seconds, and your personal join link arrives by email.

Please check your own time zone carefully. For most of North America and Europe, this falls on Friday 14 August, not the 15th.

• Dhaka, Bangladesh: Saturday 15 August, 12:00 AM to 2:00 AM

• New York / Toronto (Eastern): Friday 14 August, 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM

• Chicago (Central): Friday 14 August, 1:00 PM to 3:00 PM

• Denver (Mountain): Friday 14 August, 12:00 PM to 2:00 PM

• Los Angeles / Vancouver (Pacific): Friday 14 August, 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM

• Halifax (Atlantic Canada): Friday 14 August, 3:00 PM to 5:00 PM

• London: Friday 14 August, 7:00 PM to 9:00 PM

• Paris / Berlin / Madrid: Friday 14 August, 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM

• Athens / Helsinki: Friday 14 August, 9:00 PM to 11:00 PM

• Perth: Saturday 15 August, 2:00 AM to 4:00 AM

• Adelaide: Saturday 15 August, 3:30 AM to 5:30 AM

• Sydney / Melbourne: Saturday 15 August, 4:00 AM to 6:00 AM

We will try to stream live on Substack, Facebook and YouTube. Live streaming has a way of not cooperating, so if it fails, the recording will be posted here as soon as it is ready.

, , , , , , and , this is your invitation too. And if you have been reading these pieces quietly for months without ever saying anything, you are exactly the person I am hoping shows up.

You do not need anyone’s permission to join. That is rather the point.

Subscribe now

Sources

1. Community of Sant’Egidio, “Dossier: Mozambique and the Community of Sant’Egidio.” https://www.santegidio.org/pageID/34180/langID/en/Dossier-Mozambique-and-the-Community-of-Sant-Egidio.html

2. Conciliation Resources, “Preface: Accord Mozambique.” https://www.c-r.org/accord/mozambique/preface-accord-mozambique

3. Congressional Research Service, “Arms Sales: Congressional Review Process,” RL31675. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/RL31675

4. Congressional Research Service, “Fact Sheet: Joint Resolutions of Disapproval Under the Arms Export Control Act,” R47094. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47094

5. Congressional Research Service, “Statutory Mechanisms for Agency Oversight After INS v. Chadha,” R48965. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48965

6. Larry A. Mortsolf, “Revisiting the Legislative Veto Issue: A Recent Amendment to the Arms Export Control Act.” https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA496538.pdf

7. CIVICUS, interview with PAX on the Dutch arms export ruling. https://civicus.org/index.php/media-resources/news/interviews/6871-netherlands-no-government-should-allow-transfers-of-weapons-to-a-state-committing-war-crimes

8. Arms Trade Litigation Monitor. https://armstradelitigationmonitor.org/

9. Oxford Human Rights Hub, “Balancing Acts: The Intricacies of Enforcing ICC Arrest Warrants Against Heads of State.” https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/balancing-acts-the-intricacies-of-enforcing-icc-arrest-warrants-against-heads-of-state/

10. International Bar Association, “Pursuing the Arrest and Surrender of Suspects at Large.” https://www.ibanet.org/document?id=IBA-Pursuing-Arrest-Surrender-ICC-Report

11. Lawyers for Palestinian Human Rights, legal briefing on enforcement of ICC arrest warrants. https://lphr.org.uk/latest-news/lphr-legal-briefing-on-enforcement-of-icc-arrest-warrants/

12. Edmarverson A. dos Santos, “Closing the ICC Arrest Gap: A Graduated Cooperation Mechanism for States Parties.” https://www.diplomacyandlaw.com/post/closing-the-icc-arrest-gap

13. International Criminal Court, “ICC Pre-Trial Chamber I confirms all charges against Rodrigo Roa Duterte.” https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/icc-pre-trial-chamber-i-confirms-all-charges-against-rodrigo-roa-duterte-and-commits-him-trial

14. International Criminal Court, “Duterte case: Trial to open on 30 November 2026.” https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/duterte-case-trial-open-30-november-2026

Leave a comment

The livestream failed. Substack kept cutting the broadcast. And when the room finally settled, nine people were in it. One of our members, Bob, said the quiet part out loud near the end: he was a little shocked more people had not logged in, “but I guess we gotta start somewhere, so there you are.”

He is right. And I am going to show you what “somewhere” looked like, because what happened in that small room over two hours convinced me of something no turnout number could shake: the room was small, and the people in it were anything but.

The Room

Around the table, digitally speaking, sat a retired certified financial planner with 45 years of community volunteering behind him. An applied anthropologist and hypnotherapist who, in an earlier chapter, built and ran a company of 125 interpreters and translators serving hospitals, courts, and farms. A chartered financial analyst. A grandmother and elder carrying an 880-year-old peace model. A retired businessman. A sharp-eyed techno skeptic. A self-taught systems architect from Arizona. And me.

No senators. No institutions. No funding. Which, if you read my piece on the researcher who studied every uprising since 1900, you already know is how every entry in her database begins.

“Peace Is Not Enough”

Jackie went first, and gave the session its thesis before we ever reached the frameworks. Long before she was our anthropologist, she built and ran that interpreting company, until, in her words, she watched decades of civil rights progress unravel around the very services her industry existed to provide. What she carried out of that experience was a Buckminster Fuller conviction, and she said it better than any mission statement I could write:

“We want to help make the world work for 100% of humanity in the shortest possible time... Peace is not enough. Peace is the prerequisite for the world working.”

Hold onto that sentence. Everything else that happened in the room was people working out, in good faith, how to build the thing that comes after the prerequisite.

The Architect

Then Brandon spoke, and I want to introduce him properly, because he is one of the most remarkable people this coalition has drawn.

Brandon is a self-taught systems designer from Arizona, and in the span of just eight months he has done something most think tanks with nine-figure budgets never manage: he conceived, drafted, and published a complete economic framework, legal architecture and contracts included, and put every page of it in public on GitHub where anyone can pressure-test it. He calls it NUPA, and he is refreshingly blunt about what it is not:

“Don’t let the name fool you, it’s not a proposal for legislation... It’s an economic operating system.”

The design, in kitchen-table terms: instead of selling off millions of federal acres for a one-time cash injection, lease them. Route the ground rent through sovereign tribal nations as the landlords of the future. Grant steep lease discounts only to corporations that contractually maintain a 95 percent human workforce, aimed at solar, wind, data centers, and logistics hubs. Hard-code the revenue split: 40 percent to the host tribal nations, 40 percent to a historical-debt dividend that funds reparations without touching a single taxpayer dollar, 20 percent reinvested into self-sustaining infrastructure. By his modeling, up to $5 trillion into the economy over a decade, without raising anyone’s taxes. He has already built country-specific adaptations, and analysts abroad are studying deployment roadmaps, with Nigeria the furthest along. He is also, I should add, further ahead than most of Washington on the problem underneath it all: the government’s own projections about AI displacing a massive share of jobs by 2030, which is a threat to the entire tax base that almost nobody is designing for. Brandon is.

And when the conversation turned to what my Peace Equation actually needs to leave the realm of ideals, Brandon supplied the missing organ in one chat message:

From the chat, Brandon: That’s what NUPA is for, it’s to fund the Peace Framework. If it’s not implemented, the Peace Framework will remain an idealistic theory.

He is right, and it is the most clear-eyed sentence anyone has said about my own work. Every peace plan in history has died of the same disease: no funding mechanism. Brandon walked into our first meeting carrying a candidate cure.

The Moment I Will Remember

Naturally, a room like ours tested the framework, which is precisely what a working group is for. Jackie, our anthropologist, raised the question her discipline exists to raise: the Indigenous nations at the heart of the model must be genuine co-authors of it, not recipients of it. Grandmother Sharon added that no pillar, however brilliant, can be forced; it has to be agreed to. Brandon met every challenge head-on, without a flinch, and pointed to the work already underway: he has partnered with a former independent presidential candidate specifically to bring the framework to the stakeholders whose voices decide it, and his tribal partnership documents are deliberately non-binding invitations, not prescriptions. Watching a builder defend his load-bearing walls while staying genuinely open about everything else was a masterclass in how this coalition should argue.

And then something happened that I have never once seen inside an institution: a stranger’s suggestion improved the framework in real time, in the chat, in under an hour.

From the chat: Xóchitl: @Brandon Bedard, have you thought about calling your framework “Accord” rather than “Act”? Brandon: I do regret calling it an act, since it’s not top-down legislation... you’re right, it would make it less confusing. Xóchitl: It might be better to change the name now while it’s still early than wait. Brandon: I’ll get started on it today, because you’re right... Thank you for this!

No committee. No six-month review. A chartered financial analyst in one state and a systems architect in another, upgrading a trillion-dollar blueprint through mutual respect, live. Understand what that exchange actually reveals: it takes real strength to build something for eight months and still hear a better idea within sixty minutes. Institutions cannot do this. Egos cannot do this. Brandon did it without blinking, and if this coalition ever amounts to what I believe it can, that little exchange will be remembered as the first proof it worked. Brandon, since I know you will read this: that seat is yours for as long as you want it, and we know exactly how fortunate we are that you chose this table to build at.

Refer a friend

The 880-Year-Old Precedent

Grandmother Sharon then placed something on the table that reframed the entire evening. Around the year 1142, in what is now the northeastern United States and southeastern Canada, five nations locked in generational retaliatory war did what the modern world keeps insisting is impossible: they agreed on shared values first, care of the Earth among them, and built their confederation on top of that agreement. It became the Haudenosaunee, the Iroquois Confederacy, and it still exists.

“If I get angry at you and I want to punch you in the face, I’m out of Good Mind. And it’s my responsibility to get myself into Good Mind... We can’t force the pillars on anyone. The pillars might be really great, but if there’s not agreement, then there’s force.”

She added a detail the drafters of our own Constitution left out when they borrowed from that confederacy: the women were the guardians of policy. If one person in council was triggered “out of Good Mind,” everything stopped, respectfully, until they returned to it. Compare that to any legislature you have watched this year.

Share St's Substack

The Neuroscience of Why We’re Stuck

Jackie then connected Sharon’s model to the laboratory. All human thinking is values-based; the brain literally categorizes by value, a finding rooted in the work of Nobel laureate Gerald Edelman. And the manipulation economy we live inside exploits one specific physiological switch:

“When you’re in survival mode, you lose access to the front part of your brain... your executive brain function... You go back to the knee-jerk survival strategies you learned in childhood. And I need you to get that part of why we don’t have peace: we are being manipulated and controlled by keeping us in upset, and divided, and at each other’s throats.”

She named the four myths her forthcoming book argues sit underneath it all, and dropped them into the chat where they belong on a poster:

From the chat, Jackie: Four Fundamental Myths that block humanity from thriving: the Myth of Separation, the Myth of Scarcity, the Myth of Not Being Enough, and the Myth of Undeservability.

Her closing instruction was the least abstract thing said all night: get out of the rage bait and practice returning to calm, because calm is not self-care decoration. Calm is the physical precondition for conscious choice, which the whole project depends on. Or as she put it, quoting an Ojibwe teacher of hers: “I’m not interested in your spirituality unless it grows corn.”

Get 30% off a group subscription

The Man With the Postcards

If you want to know what one twenty-ninth of a neighborhood looks like in practice, it looks like Will. A retired financial planner from New York, he described looking out his window at a 91-degree, cloudless day where you could not see the sun for wildfire smoke, and then told us what he does about the state of the world: he mails a postcard to 26 of his neighbors. Not friends. Just neighbors. Ideas, not opinions, each one backed by a source.

“I want to build coalitions of not like-minded people. I want unlike-minded people... You don’t have to agree where I want to be. I don’t have to agree where you want to be. But not talking, neither one of us is getting there. Words matter, deeds matter more.”

Twenty-six postcards. One person in twenty-nine. The math of my last article, walking around in the world with a stamp on it.

Give a gift subscription

What the Chat Knew

Some of the evening’s truest lines never got spoken aloud. Lloyd, listening quietly, dropped one message that carried the stakes of everything we were discussing: his daughter lives in Minneapolis, three blocks from where Renee Good was murdered, and his son works in a Chicago hospital protecting patients and staff. The reason nine strangers spend an evening on peace frameworks is sitting right there, in one father’s sentence.

And two more, which I am framing on my wall:

From the chat, Jackie: Drops of water become a flood. From the chat, Xóchitl: @St badhon we are the seeds.

Share

The Honest Accounting, and the Door

So here is the scoreboard from session one, reported the way I report everything, without cosmetics. The technology failed. Nine people came. No resolution was passed and no funding was raised, and every framework on the table, mine included, left the room stronger for the questioning, which is exactly what pressure-testing is for. My own Peace Equation took its turn under the lights too: the foundations (end occupations, asymmetric fairness, colonial accountability) and the pillars that make war expensive and peace profitable, from citizen-felt financial penalties to demilitarized zones policed by a force whose only mandate is de-escalation. Brandon has already published a piece fusing his framework with mine, The Tensegrity Fusion, because that is apparently the speed this group moves at.

And the century of data I wrote about last week says none of the smallness matters yet. Every movement that ever crossed the threshold began below it, in a room with bad audio and folding chairs, or the digital equivalent we occupied. The unit of the statistic is not the crowd. It is the person who shows up before there is a crowd to hide in.

The next session of Peace Talks will be announced here with enough lead time to prepare, and the invitation stands exactly as before: come as you are, skeptics first in line. Between now and then, steal Will’s move. You do not need a framework or a following. You need one postcard, one neighbor, one unlike-minded conversation. Drops of water become a flood, and as of this week, I can report from direct observation: the first drops are already falling.

Subscribe now

Sources and Links From the Session

1. St badhon, “The Peace Equation: How to End the Wars,” the Universal Peace Framework discussed in this session. https://stbadhon.substack.com/p/the-peace-equation-how-to-end-the

2. Brandon Bedard, National Unity and Prosperity Accord (NUPA), full framework repository. https://github.com/bedardbrandon928/National-Unity-and-Prosperity-Act-NUPA

3. Brandon Bedard, “The Tensegrity Fusion,” combining NUPA with the Peace Equation. https://open.substack.com/pub/brandonbedard/p/the-tensegrity-fusion

4. Brandon Bedard, on Substack. https://substack.com/@brandonbedard

5. Jackie Ambrow, writing at https://jackieambrow.substack.com and Positively-HUB.com; her book with Xóchitl T. Suriano Ambrow, “Mental Freedom, Mental Sovereignty” (Conscious Choice Series, Vol. 1), is forthcoming.

6. Xóchitl T. S. Ambrow, CFA, on Substack. https://substack.com/@infinitelyxochitl

7. Grandmother Sharon Riegie Maynard, on Substack. https://sharonriegie.substack.com/

8. On the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Confederacy and the Great Law of Peace, see the Confederacy’s own account at https://www.haudenosauneeconfederacy.com/

9. Rutger Bregman, “Moral Ambition” (2024), referenced in discussion.

10. R. Buckminster Fuller quotations shared in the session chat, including “How do we make the world work for 100% of humanity in the shortest possible time, through spontaneous cooperation, without ecological offense or the disadvantage of anyone?”

Leave a comment

Of all the questions readers send me, one arrives more than any other, in a hundred different wordings, always with the same tired heartbeat underneath: what can one ordinary person actually do? You watch the wars begin and end on other people’s schedules. You watch institutions bend. You read pieces like mine, including the one about the 10,000-year database that so many of you shared, and you write to me afterward asking, sincerely, what a retired teacher in Ohio or a nurse in Manchester is supposed to do about any of it.

Today I can finally give you the answer I have been assembling for months, and it has a decimal point in it. It comes from a researcher who did not want to find it, which is exactly why you can trust her. And at the end of this article, for the first time, I am not only going to tell you what the data says ordinary people can do. I am going to hand you a door, with a time and a link on it, because today my colleagues and I are opening one.

The Wager

In the mid-2000s, a young American political scientist named Erica Chenoweth believed what most of her field believed and most of history seems to teach: that real power grows out of force, and that regimes fall to whoever can apply the most of it. She studied terrorism and insurgency. She was, by her own account, a committed skeptic of nonviolence, which she regarded as noble and mostly decorative.

Then a colleague, Maria Stephan, who studied civil resistance, challenged her on the one ground a scientist cannot refuse: the evidence. Nobody, it turned out, had ever systematically counted. So the two of them did something nobody had done before. With an international team of scholars, they identified every major attempt of the twentieth century to overthrow a regime or win territorial liberation, violent and nonviolent alike, and built a dataset of 323 campaigns spanning 1900 to 2006. Chenoweth expected the guns to win the ledger. The dataset was, in a real sense, her wager against hope.

She lost the wager, and the loss made history.

The Verdict

When the numbers settled, the nonviolent campaigns had succeeded 53 percent of the time, against 26 percent for the violent ones. Not a rounding error. Double. And the gap was widening with time: in the most recent decade of the dataset, civil resistance campaigns succeeded about 70 percent of the time while violent efforts had collapsed to barely over 10 percent.

The reason turned out to be beautifully unmysterious. Revolutions are won by participation, and participation has a doorway problem. An armed struggle can only recruit those willing and able to fight, which means mostly young men with nothing to lose. A strike, a boycott, a mass refusal, a stay-at-home, these have doorways wide enough for a grandmother, a bus driver, a civil servant, a teenager, a shopkeeper with bad knees. And every regime, however fearsome it looks, stands on human pillars: the police who enforce, the workers who produce, the clerks who administer, the soldiers who aim. When enough ordinary people visibly withdraw their cooperation, those pillars start to wonder which side of history they are standing under, and pillars that wonder eventually walk. The data even carries an epilogue: countries freed by civil resistance were far more likely to become durable democracies, while countries freed by violence tended to reproduce the tyranny they overthrew, under new management.

The Number

Then, digging further into her own data for a 2013 talk, Chenoweth found the detail that made her famous, the one I have been saving for you. Looking at peak participation, she noticed a threshold. In her words: “no government has withstood a challenge of 3.5 percent of their population” mobilized against it at a peak event. The Philippines in 1986, when millions filled the streets and Marcos fled. Estonia and its neighbors, who sang an empire out of their countries. Georgia in 2003. Case after case, when active, sustained participation crossed that line, the regime fell, and many fell to far less.

Sit with how small that number is. Not a majority. Not a movement of half the country. One person in twenty-nine. In the United States, about twelve million people, fewer than watch a routine playoff game. The lesson buried in a century of uprisings is not that ordinary people are powerless. It is that almost none of them have ever been needed, and none of them are ever told so.

The Honest Fine Print

You know this newsletter does not sell magic, so here is the fine print, and notice who wrote most of it: she did.

Chenoweth herself insists the finding is a rule of thumb, not an iron law, observed in campaigns for regime change and self-determination, not automatically transferable to every cause. In a 2020 update, she flagged her own counterexample: Bahrain’s uprising exceeded six percent of the population and was still crushed. Other scholars have criticized the dataset’s boundaries and classifications. And her most sobering recent finding is one every reader of this publication should tattoo somewhere: the effectiveness of civil resistance has been declining in the smartphone era, because social media builds crowds fast and organizations slowly, and crowds without organization are fireworks, bright, loud, and gone. The threshold was never really about bodies in a square for one afternoon. It was about the boring, durable, structured participation underneath: the meetings, the networks, the people who keep showing up in week forty.

Which is to say: the number is real, and the number is not a shortcut. It is a load-bearing wall, and walls are built one unglamorous brick at a time.

The Bridge You Already Crossed

If you read my article about the scientist who fed 10,000 years of history into a database, you will recognize the shape of what I have just shown you. Turchin’s data said societies in crisis have three endings, and that the rare good one, the exit, has always been built by ordinary people who constructed the firebreak before the spark. What his data could not supply was the blueprint. Chenoweth’s data is the blueprint. It tells you the material (mass nonviolent participation), the load rating (3.5 percent, honestly caveated), and the construction method (organization, not outrage). One database diagnosed the disease. The other one, built by a skeptic trying to prove the opposite, documented the cure and its dosage.

Between them, they answer the question in all those emails. What can one ordinary person do? Statistically speaking: be one twenty-ninth of everything.

A small housekeeping note before the last section: everything I publish stays free, because this work is meant to travel. If it has earned anything from you, a paid subscription is what keeps it independent and is the single biggest help you can give it.

The Door

And now the part I have never done in this publication before.

For the past year, some of you know, I have been working with a small group of collaborators, engineers, lawyers, analysts, and researchers across three continents, on a framework for de-escalating wars and the machinery ordinary citizens would need to demand it. We have decided to stop building quietly. We are calling ourselves the World Peace Coalition, and today we are holding the first session of our live discussion series, Peace Talks.

It is not a webinar and nobody will perform at you. It is a working table: the 3.5 percent rule taken literally, starting at the only size anything true ever starts, which is embarrassingly small. Every campaign in Chenoweth’s dataset, every single one, began as a meeting that looked too small to matter. This is ours, and you are invited to it exactly as you are, skeptics especially welcome. Chenoweth walked into this field as a skeptic. Look what she built by demanding evidence.

Peace Talks, session one, today at [12 AM BST, 2PM EST]. Join us here: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/79683245649

Join The Meeting

Bring your doubt, bring your questions, bring your one twenty-ninth. The century of data says the pillars walk when ordinary people move first. Today we find out, in the smallest possible way, whether that includes us.

Subscribe now

Sources

1. Erica Chenoweth and Maria J. Stephan, “Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict,” Columbia University Press, 2011.

2. Commons Library, “Civil Resistance and the 3.5% Rule: An Overview,” 2025. https://commonslibrary.org/chenoweth-3-5percent-rule/

3. Wikipedia, “Erica Chenoweth” (NAVCO findings and success rates). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erica_Chenoweth

4. American Bar Association, “Defeating Tyranny with the 3.5 Percent Rule,” October 2025. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/resources/human-rights/2025-october/defeating-tyranny/

5. Erica Chenoweth, “Questions, Answers, and Some Cautionary Updates Regarding the 3.5% Rule,” Carr Center Discussion Paper, Harvard Kennedy School, 2020. https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/2024-05/Erica%20Chenoweth_2020-005.pdf

6. Wikipedia, “3.5% rule” (formulation and criticisms). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3.5%25_rule

7. Erica Chenoweth, “The Future of Nonviolent Resistance,” Journal of Democracy, July 2020 (listed at ericachenoweth.com/research). https://www.ericachenoweth.com/research

Leave a comment

You have probably noticed that asking “how is American democracy doing?” no longer produces an answer. It produces an argument. Half the country tells you the republic is in freefall, the other half tells you it has never been healthier, and both halves are certain, which is precisely the problem. When your own senses disagree this violently, you are in the situation pilots call flying in fog, and pilots solved that problem a century ago. When you cannot trust your feelings, you trust the instruments.

Here is what most Americans do not know: an instrument panel for democracy exists. It was not built by either American party, it is not housed in Washington, and it has been taking readings on every country on Earth for decades. This year, its needle moved on the United States in a way it has never moved on any established democracy before. And because I refuse to hand you fear without a handle, know this from the start: the same scientists who recorded the fall have also identified, precisely, the point at which it can still be reversed, and it has a date.

The Instrument

In Gothenburg, Sweden, a research institute called V-Dem, short for Varieties of Democracy, maintains the largest global dataset on democracy ever assembled: 202 countries, measured on hundreds of separate indicators, with data reaching back to 1789, built by a network of more than 4,200 scholars and country experts around the world. It does not ask whether a country feels democratic. It measures the components separately, the way a mechanic checks systems one by one: Are elections clean? Can the press speak? Do courts constrain the executive? Can you criticize the government without consequence? Each indicator is scored by multiple independent experts, and the scores are aggregated by methods designed to wash out any single scholar’s bias.

The reason to trust this particular instrument is its track record. V-Dem’s gauges registered the democratic decay of Hungary under Orbán, Turkey under Erdoğan, and Venezuela under Chávez in real time, while pundits were still debating whether anything was wrong. The pattern its data revealed across those cases even has a name now, executive aggrandizement: a democratically elected leader, rather than staging a coup, gradually dismantles the institutions that check his power, weakens the opposition using the state’s own resources, and hollows the democracy from inside while its outer shell remains standing. The same sequence appeared in country after country, measurable on the gauges long before it was undeniable on the streets.

Which brings us to what the gauges say now.

The Reading

In its 2026 Democracy Report, titled Unraveling the Democratic Era, the V-Dem team led by Professor Staffan Lindberg delivered a finding that should have led every newscast in the country and mostly did not. The United States was reclassified from a liberal democracy to an electoral democracy, the first time in more than 50 years it has not held the higher status. In the institute’s own words, American democracy is in a “much faster deterioration process than any other democracy in modern times.” Read that twice. Not faster than most. Faster than any, in the entire modern record of the world’s largest democracy dataset.

Now, a careful reader should ask the careful question: could one instrument be miscalibrated? It could. Which is why you check the panel, not the gauge. Freedom House, an entirely separate organization using entirely separate methods, gave the United States its lowest score since its modern index began in 2002. The Polity project, a third independent dataset used by political scientists for half a century, now classifies the United States as an anocracy, a hybrid system, writing bluntly that the country is “no longer considered a democracy and lies at the cusp of autocracy.” And Bright Line Watch, which surveys hundreds of American political scientists, found expert ratings of U.S. democracy closer to an illiberal democracy than to a full one. Four instruments. Built by different teams, in different countries, on different methods, funded by different sources. All four needles, pointing the same direction.

The global context makes the reading heavier, not lighter. Nearly a quarter of the world’s nations are currently autocratizing, and six of the ten newest cases are in Europe and North America, including Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States. For the first time in a generation, there are more autocracies than democracies on Earth. The single most attacked component everywhere, the canary in every coal mine, is freedom of expression. The second is the rule of law, now deteriorating in 22 countries, the United States among them. What is happening here is not an American storm. It is an American chapter of a global one, which is exactly why a global instrument can see it so clearly.

What the Gauges Are Not Saying

I promised you honesty over drama, so here is the counterweight, stated fairly.

These indices have serious critics, and some of their objections are sound. Expert coding involves judgment, and judgment can drift with the political mood of the academy. The comparative scholars themselves note that the United States, for all its measured decline, has not matched the repression or political violence of the severest cases, and that America retains something Hungary and Turkey never had: enormous wealth, federalism, independent state governments, a dense civil society, and courts that still rule against power with regularity. A downgrade is not a death certificate. The honest statement of the evidence is narrower and, to me, more useful: four independent measurement systems agree that the direction is down and the speed is without precedent among established democracies. Instruments cannot tell you how the flight ends. They tell you the heading and the rate of descent, and they are telling us now, while altitude remains.

And altitude remains. That is the entire point of the next section.

The Reversal Point Has a Date

Buried in the same reports that recorded the fall is the finding that should structure your entire year, and it comes with unusual precision. The researchers note that autocratization remains reversible so long as the decay has not yet consumed the electoral system itself, the machinery by which voters can still change course. Once elections themselves stop functioning as real contests, the exits close. Until then, they are open. Professor Lindberg has said it plainly: the 2026 American midterm elections will be a critical test for the quality of elections and democracy in the United States.

That is not a metaphor. That is a scientist who measures democratic collapse for a living, pointing at a specific date on your calendar, this November 3, and saying: this is where the instrument gets its next reading.

And reversal is not a theory. It is in the same dataset. Eighteen nations, one in ten worldwide, are democratizing right now, among them Brazil and Poland, two countries that were recently on the same downward slope America is on and turned around. In nearly every recovery case, the pattern rhymes: citizens who disagreed about everything else converged on defending one thing, the machinery of elections itself, and the machinery held, and the ordinary contest of politics resumed on the other side. Recoveries do not require a nation to agree. They require it to keep the referee.

Refer a friend

Your Instruments

So what does a reader of this newsletter actually do with a reading like this? Not despair, which is useless, and not doomscrolling, which is worse. Three things, none of which require you to change a single political opinion, because none of this is about which side wins. The dataset does not care who you vote for. It measures whether voting still decides things.

First, secure your own ballot the boring way. Confirm your voter registration this month, not in October, and read your state’s current rules on how you are allowed to vote, because those rules are being actively contested this year and the version in your memory may not be the version in force. Ten minutes, once, now.

Second, consider becoming part of the machinery itself. Elections in America are run by ordinary local people, and every jurisdiction needs poll workers, most are paid, and the training is provided. A democracy’s referee system is not an abstraction. It is your neighbors at folding tables, and there are never enough of them. Signing up takes one search: your county’s name plus “poll worker.” If the gauges are wrong, you will have spent a few days serving your town. If the gauges are right, you will have stood at the exact point the scientists say the reversal happens.

Third, protect the referee in conversation. When you hear anyone, of any party, casually delegitimize the vote-counting itself before a single vote is counted, push back gently, in person, as a neighbor. The comparative data is unambiguous on this: democracies do not usually die when citizens disagree fiercely. They die when citizens stop accepting that the count is real. Every recovery on record began with people refusing that final step.

Subscribe now

The fog is real, and I will not pretend otherwise. But you are not flying blind. The instruments exist, they were built over decades by thousands of scholars with no stake in our tribal wars, and this year they gave the United States the most serious reading in their history, along with the location of the exit. Fifty years of status, lost. One date, circled. The needle will be read again in November, and unlike almost everything else in this story, what it reads then is genuinely, measurably, up to the passengers.

Give a gift subscription

Sources

1. V-Dem Institute, “Democracy Report 2026: Unraveling the Democratic Era?” (Nord, Altman, Fernandes, Good God, Lindberg), University of Gothenburg, March 2026. https://www.v-dem.net/publications/democracy-reports/

2. University of Gothenburg, “Democratic backsliding reaches western democracies, with U.S. decline ‘unprecedented,’” March 2026. https://www.gu.se/en/news/democratic-backsliding-reaches-western-democracies-with-us-decline-unprecedented

3. V-Dem Institute press release, “Democratic Backsliding Reaches Western Democracies,” March 2026. https://www.v-dem.net/news/press-release-democratic-backsliding-reaches-western-democracies-with-us-decline-unprecedented/

4. EurekAlert (AAAS), “Democratic backsliding reaches Western democracies,” March 2026. https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1120076

5. Wikipedia, “Democratic backsliding in the United States” (compiling V-Dem, Freedom House, Polity, Bright Line Watch, and International IDEA assessments). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_backsliding_in_the_United_States

6. Nord et al., “State of the world 2024: 25 years of autocratization,” Democratization (Taylor & Francis), 2025. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13510347.2025.2487825

7. Re:Russia, “Autocracy 2025: Is there an end in sight to the third wave of de-democratisation?” 2026. https://re-russia.net/en/analytics/0410/

8. Factually, “How Bad Is Democratic Backsliding in the U.S. in 2026?” (synthesis of Brennan Center, Carnegie, NPR, and index data), June 2026. https://factually.co/fact-checks/politics/democratic-backsliding-usa-2026-comparative-history-fcf14f

Leave a comment

There is a particular kind of fear that arrives in a heat wave, and if you have lived through enough summers you know it in your body before your mind names it. It is the moment the air conditioner is running full and the house still will not cool, when you catch yourself listening for the compressor, half-wondering what happens if it stops. For 160 million Americans across 30 states, that was the last week of June and the first days of July. And this time, the fear was not paranoia. The people who run the power grid were feeling a version of it too, because they had written down, eight weeks earlier, that this exact squeeze was coming.

This is a story about a warning with a date on it, an emergency that arrived roughly on schedule, and a machine quietly eating the nation’s electricity. It is also, by the end, a story about what you can actually do, because unlike most of what frightens us, this one comes with a short list of levers you personally control.

The Warning Had a Date on It

The organization at the center of this is called PJM Interconnection. Most Americans have never heard of it, yet it runs the largest power grid in the country, coordinating electricity for 67 million people across 13 states and Washington, D.C. It does not own power plants. It is the air traffic control tower of electricity, matching supply to demand every few seconds, and when it speaks in its normal bureaucratic register, people who study the grid listen closely.

This spring, PJM stopped speaking in its normal register. In its capacity planning, the operator laid out a blunt diagnosis: there is a fundamental mismatch between how fast electricity demand is now growing and how quickly new supply can be built. That is not a sentence organizations like PJM write lightly. It is the grid equivalent of a doctor setting down the chart and speaking plainly.

Then the calendar did something almost too neat to believe. In mid-May, weeks after that warning, an early heat wave collided with routine power-plant maintenance, and PJM had to ask federal regulators for emergency authority to keep the lights on. It expected to have less than 5,800 megawatts of reserve cushion at the May peak, a thin margin for a system that size. The warning was not a distant forecast. Within eight weeks it was a live emergency, and then, at the end of June, a bigger one.

The Week the Emergency Came

On June 30, with a brutal heat dome settling over the eastern half of the country, the U.S. Department of Energy declared a formal emergency across PJM’s territory. It was, by one count, the third time in 2026 that federal emergency power had been invoked for this single grid, after a January cold snap and that May squeeze. Zoom out and the pattern is starker still: the Department issued 34 such emergency orders across the nation’s grid operators in 2026 alone, spanning Texas, New England, New York, the Midwest, the Southeast, and Puerto Rico. The tool built for rare crises is becoming a seasonal habit.

The heat itself was genuinely dangerous. The heat index hit 110 degrees in New York City, 112 in Philadelphia, and 113 in Washington, D.C. PJM forecast a record peak demand of 166,304 megawatts, which would break a record that had stood since 2006. To grasp that number, remember that a single megawatt powers roughly 750 homes.

And here is the part that reveals the real story hiding under the weather. The emergency order gave PJM the power, as a last resort before rolling blackouts, to reach into the grid’s biggest customers and order them onto their own backup generators. Specifically, any facility with at least 50 megawatts of demand could be told to switch to onsite backup power within 15 minutes of an emergency signal, freeing capacity for homes and hospitals. Hospitals, 911 centers, water treatment plants, and air traffic control were exempted, protected as critical. The facilities being pushed off the public grid to protect your air conditioning were the data centers.

The grid held. No rolling blackouts occurred. But the operating reserve, the buffer between normal and catastrophe, fell by more than half during the crunch, dropping to about 5,091 megawatts from nearly 11,000. The record it dodged this week is one PJM is now forecast to break soon regardless, with or without a heat wave to blame.

The Machine in the Basement of Your Retirement Fund

Why is the country’s largest grid suddenly writing emergency sentences and drafting data centers into backup duty? The answer is a number that should be printed on the front of every utility bill in America.

PJM projects that peak demand will grow by 32 gigawatts between 2024 and 2030. Of that enormous increase, all but 2 gigawatts is driven by data centers. In other words, essentially all of the growth now straining the grid that cools your home is coming from the server farms that power artificial intelligence and cloud computing. The thing making your lights flicker is the same thing Wall Street is celebrating.

That collision is already in your wallet, whether or not you have noticed it. PJM’s capacity market, the mechanism that pays power plants to promise they will be available in future years, recently cleared at a record $333.44 per megawatt-day, up more than elevenfold from just three auctions earlier. The grid’s own independent market monitor attributes 63 percent of that spike to data center demand, a cost of roughly $9.3 billion that lands not on the tech companies but on ordinary ratepayers. During the June emergency, wholesale power in parts of the system topped $2,000 per megawatt-hour, nearly triple the level of a comparable peak the previous summer. You are, in a real and measurable sense, already helping to pay the electricity bill of the AI boom.

And if you hold a standard index fund in your retirement account, as most Americans near retirement do, you own the other end of this too. The handful of companies building these data centers are the same mega-cap technology names that now dominate the S&P 500. So the machine that is straining your grid, raising your power bill, and inflating your retirement statement is, remarkably, a single machine. That is not a reason to panic. It is a reason to understand what you are holding, from both directions.

Why This Is Not Simply Doom

It would be easy to end on dread, but that would be both lazy and false, because the honest picture includes real reasons the lights kept working.

The grid did not fail. It bent. The emergency tools, ugly as they are, functioned exactly as designed: the least essential heavy users were shifted to their own power so that homes and hospitals kept theirs. As Energy Secretary Chris Wright noted in the order, there are tens of gigawatts of backup generation sitting largely untapped, a real cushion that exists precisely for weeks like this one. The story of late June is not that the grid collapsed. It is that it was stretched to a margin thinner than anyone should be comfortable with, and that the thing doing the stretching is growing fast.

There is also a fierce, healthy fight now underway over who should pay. Federal regulators have called a conference to reform PJM’s governance. PJM itself has urged states to write rules that shield ordinary ratepayers from data-center-driven costs. Several governors are pressing the operator directly. The question of whether hyperscale data centers should carry their own reliability costs, rather than socializing them onto your bill, is live and unsettled, which means it is exactly the kind of fight where an informed citizen’s voice still matters.

Refer a friend

What You Can Actually Do

Here is the part most coverage skips. You are not powerless in this story. You have levers, and they run from tonight’s thermostat all the way to your statehouse.

Protect your own household first. During any grid alert, the single most effective move is to lift your thermostat to 78 degrees or higher and shift heavy appliances, dryers, dishwashers, ovens, out of the late-afternoon peak between roughly 2 and 7 p.m. Cooking outdoors and running fans only in occupied rooms genuinely helps, both the grid and your bill. None of this is required of residential customers, but every bit of shaved peak demand widens the very reserve margin that came so close to the edge.

If anyone in your home depends on power, plan now, not during the next alert. If you or a loved one relies on an oxygen concentrator, a CPAP, refrigerated medication, or a stairlift, this is the sentence in this article I most want you to act on. Call your utility this month and ask to be placed on its medical-priority or critical-care registry, which most utilities maintain. Ask what notification you would receive before any emergency reduction, and put a basic backup in place, a battery pack for medical devices, a cooler and plan for medication, a known cooling center you could reach. Preparation is cheap in July and priceless in a blackout.

Then use your citizen’s voice on the real question. The fight over whether data centers pay their own way is being decided right now at the state level, by public utility commissions and legislators, in proceedings that almost nobody from the public attends. A single email to your state representative and your public utility commission, saying plainly that you expect large data centers to bear their own reliability costs rather than shifting them onto residential ratepayers, lands in a nearly empty inbox and therefore carries weight far beyond its length. This is the rare policy fight where the room is quiet enough that ordinary voices echo.

The grid operator did something unusual this year. It told us, in writing and with a date, that demand was about to outrun supply. Then the calendar proved it right, twice, and drafted the AI machines onto backup power to keep the rest of us cool. The warning has been issued and, unlike so many warnings, this one arrives with a set of switches you can actually reach: the one on your wall tonight, the phone call that protects the vulnerable person in your home, and the short message to the officials deciding who pays. The heat will break and return. What you do between now and the next dome of it is, refreshingly, up to you.

Subscribe now

Sources

1. Bloomberg, “US Declares Power Emergency for PJM Grid as Heat Wave Threatens Record Demand,” June 30, 2026. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-30/emergency-ordered-for-largest-us-power-grid-as-record-heat-nears

2. Utility Dive, “PJM gets emergency approval to curtail data centers, large loads during hot weather,” May 19, 2026. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/pjm-doe-emergency-order-curtail-data-centers/820571/

3. Yahoo Finance / OilPrice, “Power Prices Triple on PJM as Heat Wave and Data Centers Collide,” July 2026. https://finance.yahoo.com/energy/articles/power-prices-triple-pjm-heat-140000690.html

4. MLQ News, “PJM Power Grid Activates Federal Emergency as Heat Wave Pushes Demand Near All-Time Record,” July 2026. https://mlq.ai/news/pjm-power-grid-activates-federal-emergency-as-heat-wave-pushes-demand-near-all-time-record/

5. Maryland Matters, “PJM gets green light to push data centers onto back-up power during heat wave,” June 30, 2026. https://marylandmatters.org/2026/06/30/pjm-gets-green-light-to-push-data-centers-onto-back-up-power-during-heat-wave/

6. Electric Choice, “PJM Emergency Order: Heat Wave Threatens Record Demand (2026),” updated July 2, 2026. https://www.electricchoice.com/blog/pjm-emergency-order-heat-wave-2026/

7. PJM Inside Lines, “PJM Hot Weather Operations Update, June 30, 2026.” https://insidelines.pjm.com/pjm-operations-update-june-30-2026/

8. Reuters (via U.S. News), “US Issues Emergency Order for PJM Interconnection as Heatwave Looms,” June 30, 2026. https://www.usnews.com/news/top-news/articles/2026-06-30/us-issues-emergency-order-for-pjm-interconnection-as-heatwave-looms

Leave a comment

Sometime in the winter of 2015, you probably watched a movie about a strange, quiet man with a glass eye who walked barefoot around his office, blasted heavy metal, and read the mortgage documents that nobody on Wall Street had bothered to read. Christian Bale played him. The film won an Oscar. And the reason Hollywood made it at all is that the strange, quiet man turned out to be right about everything while the entire financial world laughed at him.

That man is real. His name is Michael Burry. And eight months ago, he quietly began filming the sequel.

Nobody sent you a call sheet, so consider this article your notice: you have a part in this one. Probably a bigger part than you think.

Act One: The Original

Burry was never supposed to be a Wall Street character at all. He trained as a medical doctor, taught himself investing during hospital night shifts, and built a hedge fund on one unglamorous skill: he actually read the paperwork. In 2005, buried in thousands of pages of mortgage documentation, he found the rot at the center of the American housing boom, and he bet his entire fund against it.

Then came the part the movie captured so painfully. For two long years, he was wrong. Housing kept rising. His investors screamed at him, demanded their money back, called him unstable. Being early, it turns out, looks exactly like being wrong, every single day, until the morning it doesn’t. When the morning came in 2008, his bet made $725 million for his investors and about $100 million for himself, and the laughing stopped permanently.

But remember how the original actually ended, because it matters for the sequel. The banks got rescued. The clever traders got bonuses. The bill went to the extras, the ordinary families in the background of every scene, the pension holders and homeowners who never got a warning because nobody thought they were worth warning. In the original, people like you and me were the extras.

The sequel has recast us. Hold that thought.

Act Two: The Sequel

Last November, Burry did something almost unheard of in his industry. At the top of the greatest bull market in a generation, he shut down his hedge fund, returned his investors’ money, and handed back his registration with financial regulators. No more clients. No more quarterly filings. A man with his track record walking away from the fee machine is itself a signal, but it was where he went next that tells you everything: he became a writer. On Substack, the same platform where you are reading me now. He named his newsletter Cassandra Unchained - , after the prophetess of Greek myth who was cursed to see the future truly and never be believed. It reportedly gained more than 20,000 paying subscribers on its first day.

And then Cassandra showed her hand. In a May disclosure, Burry revealed that as much as 80 percent of his portfolio now sits in put options against Nvidia and Palantir, the two crown jewels of the artificial intelligence boom, with a notional value near $1.1 billion. A put option, stripped of jargon, is a contract that pays off only if a stock falls hard. It is the same instrument, spiritually, as the one from the movie. He has since added fresh bets against Tesla, Caterpillar, Micron, Applied Materials, and the index that holds America’s chipmakers, publishing a chart showing that index is more stretched against its own history than at any time since the dot-com bubble, and calling it “a pure form of overvaluation in an index.”

Two honest cautions before we go further, because you deserve the version of this story without the Hollywood lighting. First, since he closed his fund, Burry’s positions are self-reported on his newsletter rather than verified in regulatory filings, credible given who he is, but no longer independently auditable. Second, that billion-dollar figure is the value of the shares his contracts reference, not the money he has actually wagered, which is a small fraction of it. The headline number is dramatic. The real bet is still enormous, and the conviction behind it, 80 percent of everything he has disclosed, is the loudest part.

What does he see? Not simply “expensive stocks.” His argument is a circle. Four giant companies, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Meta, account for roughly half of Nvidia’s revenue from data centers. Their spending announcements are then read by the market as proof of endless demand, which lifts the chip stocks, which justifies more spending, which is read as more proof. Money moving in a circle, he argues, is being mistaken for money being earned. When two Asian chip giants announced yet another mega-factory, he remarked that it looked to him like the beginning of the end. Bank of America’s own bubble-risk gauge for semiconductors now reads 0.91, near critical levels. Meanwhile the Micron position tells you his style is unchanged: he opened that short on July 1, against a stock that had risen nearly 700 percent in twelve months. He is once again standing directly in front of the parade.

And once again, the crowd is jeering. Nvidia trades near its all-time high with a market value above $5.3 trillion, which means his Nvidia contracts are, as of today, deeply underwater. Five days ago, a mocker on social media crowned him Captain Broken Clock. His reply, in full: “Nice graphic, but nothing on it is true.”

Intermission: The Case Against the Prophet

Every good sequel needs doubt, and here it is, stated as fairly as I can. Burry has been wrong before, and not only in small ways. A bearish call he made in 2023 preceded a rally of roughly 131 percent. The companies he is betting against are not the empty shells of 1999; they are the most profitable enterprises in human history, and their earnings keep beating expectations quarter after quarter. It is entirely possible that artificial intelligence is 1995, not 1999, and that this era’s skeptics will spend a decade explaining themselves. Even his Palantir short, currently his winning position, rests on a personal judgment, his view that its fair value is “single digits to low double digits” against a market price above $130, and personal judgments are exactly what markets exist to disagree about.

Notice, though, what he is not doing. He is not short America. Alongside the famous bets, he has been buying the unglamorous software companies the AI stampede trampled, Adobe, Salesforce, Autodesk, and even holds Microsoft. He is not predicting the end of technology. He is shorting a story, the specific story that says the circle of money can spin forever. In the original movie, he was also down for two agonizing years before the verdict came in. Early and wrong look identical until the day they don’t. Sometimes, of course, wrong is just wrong. You should hold both possibilities at once, because that is precisely what the next section is about.

Act Three: Your Scene

Here is where you walk onto the set, and I need you to see the casting change clearly. In the original, the other side of Burry’s trade was Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank. In the sequel, the other side of his trade is, in meaningful part, the American retirement account. Perhaps yours.

Not because you bought AI stocks. Because you bought the thing you were told was the opposite of a bet: the index fund. The steady, sensible, diversified S&P 500 fund inside your 401(k), your IRA, your target-date fund. Except the index is no longer what it was when that advice was minted. Today the ten largest companies make up about 40.8 percent of it, well above the 26.6 percent peak reached at the height of the dot-com bubble. In plain terms, roughly $40 of every $100 you place in an S&P 500 fund flows into just ten companies, most of them tied to the same single theme Burry is betting against. During this spring’s rally, analysts at Nomura found that ten stocks drove 69 percent of the gains while the other 490 companies came along for the ride. You own 500 names on paper. Your outcome is decided by about ten.

And you have already filmed your first scene, whether you noticed or not. In June alone, the seven biggest technology companies shed $2.2 trillion in value, which means the quarterly statement that arrived at your house this month already contains the tremor. Not the earthquake. The tremor.

So how does the sequel end? Three ways, and unlike the movie, the ending has not been filmed yet.

In the first ending, the prophet is simply wrong. The AI boom earns its way into its prices, the productivity is real, Burry’s contracts expire worthless, and this article becomes a curiosity you half-remember. This is genuinely possible, and anyone who tells you otherwise is selling certainty they do not have.

In the second ending, there is no crash at all, and that is the trap. The dot-com bubble is remembered as an explosion, but for the ordinary investor it was a fog: the Nasdaq needed roughly fifteen years to permanently reclaim its 2000 peak. For a 35-year-old, a lost decade is an inconvenience and even a buying opportunity. For a 70-year-old drawing monthly income from a concentrated fund, selling shares at depressed prices year after year, a lost decade is the crash, played in slow motion, and it is the ending aimed most precisely at readers of this publication. The financial planners call this sequence of returns risk. I call it the quiet ending, because nobody holds a press conference for it.

In the third ending, the break comes hard and fast, the movie ending. Even here, history is less cruel than memory: diversified investors who held through 2008 without selling were made whole within about five years. The permanent damage in both prior bubbles was concentrated among two groups, the leveraged and the panicked, the people who either borrowed against the story or sold everything at the bottom of it.

Which brings us to your line in the script, and it is not what you might fear. I am not a financial advisor, I am not telling you to sell anything, and I remind you that the man at the center of this story has been early before and wrong before. The assignment is smaller and more powerful: know what you own. It takes fifteen minutes. Pull up your retirement fund’s fact sheet, any fund company publishes it, and find the line that says what percentage sits in its top ten holdings. If it is an S&P 500 fund, the answer will be close to 40 percent, and you deserve to know that consciously rather than discover it later. Then count the honest number of years until you will need this money. And if you work with an advisor, ask one precise question, calmly, this month: if the ten biggest stocks in the index fell by half and stayed down for five years, what happens to my income plan? A good advisor will answer with arithmetic. An evasive one has also answered you.

In the original film, the saddest characters were the ones who never got a warning, because nobody thought the extras were worth warning. Whatever else happens in the sequel, that part of the script has now changed for you. Burry made his legend by being the only man in the room who read the paperwork. In this movie, the paperwork is your own quarterly statement, it is sitting on your kitchen table right now, and reading it is the one scene entirely under your control.

Cassandra’s curse was never that she was wrong. It was that no one listened until the horse was inside the walls. Whether or not the prophet is right this time, you get to be the character who listened for fifteen minutes and checked. In both of the last two bubbles, that character did just fine.

Subscribe now

Sources

1. Investing Time Daily, “Michael Burry’s Portfolio: His 2026 AI Bubble Bets,” June 2026. https://investingtimedaily.com/michael-burry-portfolio-2026/

2. TradingKey, “’Big Short’ Burry Doubles Down: Nvidia, Palantir Short Positions Double in Big Bet on AI Bubble Bursting,” May 12, 2026. https://www.tradingkey.com/analysis/stocks/us-stocks/261877483-michael-burry-ai-bubble-short-nvidia-palantir-options-valuation-dotcom-comparison-scion-asset-tradingkey

3. Blockonomi, “Michael Burry’s Nvidia Short Position: Are AI Stocks Headed for a Crash?” July 2026. https://blockonomi.com/michael-burrys-nvidia-nvda-short-position-are-ai-stocks-headed-for-a-crash/

4. Business Insider (via AOL), “’Big Short’ investor Michael Burry reveals fresh bets against Tesla, Nvidia, and Caterpillar,” July 2026. https://www.aol.com/articles/big-short-investor-michael-burry-134257000.html

5. Moneywise (via Yahoo Finance), “’Sometimes, we see bubbles’: Why Michael Burry is betting against AI and doubling down on these stocks instead,” May 6, 2026. https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/sometimes-see-bubbles-why-michael-101000194.html

6. J.P. Morgan Asset Management, “How extreme is market concentration?” May 2026. https://am.jpmorgan.com/us/en/asset-management/liq/insights/market-insights/market-updates/on-the-minds-of-investors/how-extreme-is-market-concentration/

7. RBC Wealth Management, “The ‘Great Narrowing’: S&P 500 Concentration,” January 2026. https://www.rbcwealthmanagement.com/en-us/insights/the-great-narrowing-sp-500-concentration

8. Forbes, “The S&P 500 Concentration Problem: When Index Investing Becomes a Bet on 10 Stocks,” June 22, 2026. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonkirsch/2026/06/22/the-sp-500-concentration-problem-when-index-investing-becomes-a-bet-on-10-stocks/

9. The Madison Partners, “Your S&P 500 Index Fund Isn’t as Diversified as You Think,” July 2026. https://www.themadisonpartners.com/your-sp-500-index-fund-isnt-as-diversified-as-you-think/

Leave a comment

Every war on this planet sends you a bill. You pay it at the gas pump, at the grocery store, in your retirement account, and in the quiet worry you carry about the world your grandchildren are inheriting. Last year, violence cost the global economy $19.1 trillion, roughly $2,400 taken from every human being alive. Poverty runs on the same meter. Almost half of humanity lives on less than $8.30 a day while the world spends trillions managing the problem instead of ending it.

You have been told your whole life that these are matters for presidents, generals, and economists. That the most you can do is watch the news and feel sick. That story is not true. It has never been true. It survives because it is convenient for the people who profit from things staying exactly as they are.

So a few ordinary people decided to stop repeating it.

One of us is a writer and app developer in Bangladesh. The other is a self-taught economic systems designer in Kingman, Arizona, who describes himself as just a guy who got tired of watching a broken system glitch out while the rest of us paid the bill. We have never shared a room. We found each other through our words, the same way you found this article. I published the Peace Equation, a ten-pillar framework for making war expensive and peace cheap. Brandon published NUPA, the National Unity and Prosperity Act, an economic architecture that answers the question every peace plan dies on: where does the money come from. And earlier this month I published the Poverty Equation, a framework for ending poverty that no government can capture and no corruption can break.

Three frameworks. Two ordinary people. Zero permission asked.

Now we are opening the room.

A Podcast With No Name, On Purpose

Brandon and I are launching a live show together. It does not have a name yet, and that is not an oversight. A show about ordinary people taking their power back should not be named by two guys in a private chat. It should be named by the people in the room. So the very first thing we will do together, live, is choose the name. Bring your suggestion. If yours wins, you will have named the thing before it existed. Tell that story at dinner for the rest of your life.

The first episode has one job: to answer, together, the question that sits under everything we have both published. How do we, the ordinary people, actually stop the wars and active conflicts, and eradicate poverty once and for all? Not in theory. Not someday. With the tools, leverage, and numbers we already hold. We will walk through where the Peace Equation and NUPA lock together, where the Poverty Equation fits into your own street, and what a coalition of ordinary citizens can realistically move in the next twelve months. Then we will open the floor. Your questions, your objections, your ideas. Skeptics are not just welcome. Skeptics are the point. A framework that cannot survive your doubts does not deserve your Tuesday afternoon.

When And Where

Mark your calendar. Here is the time wherever you live:

United States and Canada, Eastern (New York, Toronto, Montreal): Wednesday, July 15, 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM

United States and Canada, Central (Chicago, Winnipeg): Wednesday, July 15, 1:00 PM to 3:00 PM

United States and Canada, Pacific (Los Angeles, Vancouver): Wednesday, July 15, 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM

Australia, East (Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane): Thursday, July 16, 4:00 AM to 6:00 AM

Australia, West (Perth): Thursday, July 16, 2:00 AM to 4:00 AM

Bangladesh (Dhaka): Thursday, July 16, 12:00 AM to 2:00 AM

The doors open on Zoom. No registration, no fee, no gatekeeper. Just click and you are in the room:

Join the live call

You do not need credentials to attend. Brandon is not a college graduate. I am not a diplomat. Neither fact stopped us from building frameworks that thousands of people are now reading and sharing. Whatever you think disqualifies you from a conversation about world peace is exactly the kind of thinking this show exists to retire. If you have ever paid a tax, filled a gas tank, or buried someone before their time, you are qualified. You are, in fact, the entire point.

Join the live call here.

The Room Between The Shows

The conversation does not stop when the call ends. We have built a home for it called the World Peace Coalition, where members are already sharing ideas, questions, and next steps between episodes. You can join us on the Signal group or the WhatsApp group, whichever app you prefer. Come introduce yourself. Tell us where you are in the world. The coalition is exactly as strong as the number of ordinary people in it, which means every single person who joins makes it materially stronger. Including you.

One more thing, said plainly. Everything I publish is free and will stay free, because a framework for ordinary people that sits behind a paywall is a contradiction. If you believe in this work and want to put fuel in the tank, a paid subscription is how this operation keeps running without answering to a sponsor, a party, or a donor. It is the difference between a hobby and a movement. But your presence on July 15 is worth more to me than your money. Bring yourself first.

The wars are kept alive by a small number of people who pay none of their cost. The rest of us, billions of us, have simply never been in the same room at the same time. On July 15, for two hours, some of us will be.

Save the date. Set an alarm. Bring a friend who thinks none of this can work. See you there.

A Personal Note To The People Already In The Room

Some of you reading this have already been building this future with us for months, and this show does not happen without you. I want to name you here, not to flatter you, but because the ordinary people watching deserve to see who is actually in the coalition.

, you have been the conscience of every framework I have written this year. Your work on human culture and consciousness is the reason the Peace Equation has a soul instead of just a spreadsheet. Bring the questions no one else is brave enough to ask.

, you see systems the way most people see weather, as if the patterns were obvious. Bring your CFA brain and your systems eye. If Brandon and I miss something on the economics, I am counting on you to catch it live.

, you have carried more of the operational weight of this movement than anyone outside our chats will ever know. You have earned the mic. Come speak as the person who actually turns ideas into working software.

, you have walked the halls of the New York State Assembly and you have sat with tribal leaders. You know what it takes to move a room of skeptics from no to maybe. Bring one story from that life. It will land harder than any statistic we cite.

Greg, if joins us, the conversation lifts to planetary scale in a single sentence. Your framing of Earth as a living system is the piece most peace conversations never get to. Bring it.

, your voice on democratic accountability is the missing link between the Peace Equation and the American living room. You have the ear of the audience that needs this most. Bring one uncomfortable truth from Uncomfortable.

, your ground in property law is exactly the technical spine NUPA needs pressure-tested in public. If asset-backed enforcement is going to survive contact with reality, it will be because someone like you stress-tested it early. Bring the hard questions.

, , you have both been part of this conversation quietly and consistently. This is your invitation to step out of the audience and into the room. Come speak. This coalition is stronger with your voices at the front of it, not the back.

To everyone else in the World Peace Coalition, the Signal group, the WhatsApp group, and the comment threads, this show is yours as much as it is ours. Consider yourself personally invited by name, because you are.

Subscribe now

Sources

1. The Peace Equation: How to End the Wars in Iran, Gaza, and Ukraine. St badhon. https://stbadhon.substack.com/p/the-peace-equation-how-to-end-the

2. The National Unity and Prosperity Act (NUPA). Brandon Bedard. https://substack.com/@brandonbedard/p-201843983

3. How Ordinary People Can End Poverty Once And For All. St badhon, The Social Equation. https://thesocialequation.substack.com/p/how-ordinary-people-can-end-poverty

4. Zoom link for the live call, July 15/16. https://us04web.zoom.us/j/79683245649?pwd=x7sfgaxZ2dSrZfRaDSbmkayYYdE8LR.1

5. World Peace Coalition on Signal. https://signal.group/#CjQKILLGY2rFeMInnxdwtjF3leCNiuridmRQyThbeDsmmTVIEhBYQWQyOuThKy0PPG4-oF53

6. World Peace Coalition on WhatsApp. https://chat.whatsapp.com/IDYzdMGpCgx5Xvp0ogisPt

Leave a comment