Here’s AusExits the WHO Resisting the Digital ID on-line seminar from last Friday 5 December 2025 https://substack.com/@nicolacharles1/note/p-181030648?r=s4sz9&utm_source=notes-share-action&utm_medium=web . It goes for 93 minutes. My part goes for 14 minutes - from 33:36 to 56:10. The presenter start times are as follows:

Deb Yuille of AusExits the WHO compering 0:00

Dr Duncan Syme 2:15 – MD & long-time truth teller

Ben Britton 8:30 – military hacker recommending Mullvad VPN & some others

Nicola Charles 23:10 – ex-Neighbours star, now also known as The White Rabbit

Myself 33:36 – talked about my Post #55 Notice of Criminal Liability sent to all politicians

Questions 56:10

I suggested the following actions:

1. Skim or read and copy my Substack Post #55 Notice of Criminal Intent.

2. Get an appointment and visit your local MP and hand it to them. If you can’t get an appointment, ask for their local email and email it to them.

3. When you present it to your MP advise them you know it was emailed to their parliamentary email address on 10/10/2025 or soon after (from a kasmac99 address). It isn’t legal to delete official emails, so they cannot deny knowledge of it and therefore need to read it.

4. Ask them what they are going to do about avoiding their criminal liability that will flow from inaction. This gives them a chance of retrieving control of the country from the unelected bureaucrats who have dropped them into this criminality. Go prepared with a local (for you) example of the criminality if you can, like post #62 Stopping official coercion & terrorism at Brisbane International Airport.

5. Keep a record of your interactions and advise: https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/notice-of-criminal-liability/comments

6. Follow up regularly (weekly/fortnightly).

I also explained why I think this approach can work when other attempts to get authorities to take notice have failed.

1. Because it strikes at the heart of the problem – the subversion of our democracy. Klaus has openly declared his/ the WEF/ UN et al subversion of the world’s cabinets. Why do we keep ignoring and not going after that?

2. It doesn’t play the contrived Left/ Right/ game that has been artificially generated by 2 psychopaths – Marx & Hitler, & their ilk. Play that game and we just turn ourselves into controlled opposition! They are happy to see the people they are trying to eugenicise fighting each other! Playing the wrong game in the wrong field, isn’t very smart.

3. It provides focus without detracting from the importance of any of the myriad of other freedom issues, or with the agenda of any freedom leaders pursuing them. Given that the notice has been served, this action now needs no leader.

4. It can therefore unite the whole freedom movement against the real & common enemy by properly identifying it. No battle can be won without knowing who or what is being fought against. We’ve been like the blind men describing the elephant from the bit we were touching – tusks, belly, legs, trunk & tail, all swearing blind that we are right about what it is! We’ve been allowed to follow our principles/ passion because that generates conflict & internal fighting among those to be eugenicised!

5. It provides the politicians with the backing to finally resist the corruption collectively that they have been unable to resist individually. Just like us, they are picked off, lobbied, induced, threatened & compromised individually – The same play book works on everyone.

It seems that the Brisbane Airports Corporation (BAC) is now requiring biometric scanning to re-enter the country through Brisbane International Airport. One month ago, on 3 November 2025, I informed it of the crimes this is committing via its website feedback page. These crimes fall under the Criminal Code Act of 1995, namely coercion (Section 270.1A) and terrorism (Section 100.1). Their automated response advised that I would receive a reply in 5 days but I am still waiting.

So I called them on 2 and 3 December and was again told by the same lady that no biometrics were being required at BAC. When I said that I had established that there were around six machines there which do a biometric scan of faces to compare with passport photographs, she became quite angry and asked if I wanted them removed. When I replied “Of course”, she said “Well go tell the Prime Minister because that’s who is making us do it”, before she abruptly hung up.

I have therefore emailed my local member, who is also the Communications Minister, requesting that she take action to ensure BAC complies with Australian law and removes this equipment. If the BAC advises her that the direction to break the law came from somewhere in government, she will obviously need to identify which part of government it came from and have it stopped.

This is likely to be a matter that public pressure would greatly assist in resolving. You could email the Communications Minister and local member Anika Wells on anika.wells.mp@aph.gov.au . You could possibly also base your submission on grounds I did not mention, such as the nation’s privacy commissioner having found it breached privacy laws when used at Kmart and Bunnings. You could also focus on the sneakiness of it having been introduced without any publicity. You could also ask how it is that government has been captured into not only promoting but mandating use of a commercial product.

You could also call or email your local politicians about this, asking them to bring pressure to bear on both government and private sectors to abide by the law, which is supposed to apply to all. Doing that would assist them with avoiding their criminal liability for Digital Slavery offences, which you could also bring to their attention. Notice of this was sent to all MPs and Senators on 10/10/25 - and to all State lower house members (excluding the NT) by 12/10/2025. The text of that advice is in my Substack post #55.

This is also positive action that can be taken against the further age verification/ Digital ID coercion abuses that are about to be heaped upon us, all irrespective of age, under the disingenuous cover of the Trojan Horse under 16 social media ban.

The original feedback I sent the BAC feedback address https://www.bne.com.au/passenger/contact-us/feedback appears below.

Biometric scanning equipment submission to BAC via feedback form submitted on 3/11/2025

I called BAC on the afternoon of 29 October 2025 regarding the collection of biometric data at the Brisbane International Airport terminal. I was assured that no biometric data was being collected and there was no intention to do so.

The following day my neighbour arrived back from overseas through Brisbane International Airport and had entered some booth where she was required to give biometrics – facial scan and fingerprint, as I understand. She did so without realising the invasiveness and illegality of this. So the advice your switchboard gave me the previous day was clearly incorrect.

Installing equipment and arrangements that deceive and/ or coerce people into divulging unique, irretrievable information on their bodies, allowing storage they can’t control, as well as data trading on it that they also can’t control, is clearly illegal in Australia and commits at least two crimes under the Criminal Code Act of 1995, namely:

1. coercion which is any of force, duress, detention, psychological oppression, abuse of power or taking advantage of a person’s vulnerability. (Section 270.1A).

2. A terrorist act which means an action or threat to advance a political, religious or ideological cause by intimidating the public or a section of the public. (Section 100.1).

Biometric scanning at airports is trapping people when they are travelling and vulnerable and clearly constitutes coercion. Failing to tell people that this will be done constitutes entrapment and deception. Failing to provide a practical alternative does the same.

BAC senior management is managing an international facility and so must well know the global politically coercive surveillance agenda that installing this invasive equipment is part of, unless openly admitting wilful ignorance or incompetence. Refusing to let people pass for achievement of these political objectives is intimidating the public and constitutes official terrorism.

Furthermore, Section 74 of the Digital ID Act 2024 says “A participating relying party must not, as a condition of providing a service or access to a service, require an individual to create or use a digital ID.” You will be well aware that biometrics form an integral part of Digital ID.

Managing an international facility, you cannot be unaware of the New World Order that is being openly promoted by the United Nations, the World Economic Forum and the large banks of the world. You will surely understand the reluctance of any of your customers/ passengers also following such international matters to have their unique personal data coerced from them in support of that. They will not want it stolen and then entered into whatever criminal/ security/ military databases that such proceeds of crime and official State terrorism might be stored in or sold into. Such people will expect to have a realistic option to decline, without entry being denied.

You must surely also be aware that this exact same type of biometric data has been used to identify, target and kill Palestinians suspected of being Hamas fighters in the Gaza war. If you are not, you should Google “Lavender” and “Gospel” for this publicly available information – See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI-assisted_targeting_in_the_Gaza_Strip . You will see how they were used to identify people then track them to their home, which is then set within the control grid as their kill-box by AI. If your media sources have not informed you about the military concepts of the kill-box or the control grid, a simple Google search will reveal what those are.

While we in Brisbane are thousands of miles from that conflict, why is there any need for such target enabling data to be collected here? This data has the potential to be used as a source of terror against peaceful, law-abiding locals who may have views deviating from media or government approved narratives. All the militaries and police forces of the world cooperate and have their ‘show and tell’ conferences and collaborations facilitating data sharing. Many people will strongly object to the possibility of such data being used and either sold or shared without their consent in this way.

Coercively collecting such data terrorises any of your customers who are aware of this. Allowing this data’s potential life-or-death power to be in the hands of either governments or corporations is dangerous and open to abuse. It should simply not be collected. It facilitates the temptation to use it for coercive ideological purposes as well as for any purpose that our own governments, security or police forces might from time to time think necessary. This technology implementation facilitates turning our service provider politicians and public servants into our masters, which they have no mandate to be.

Furthermore, handing monopoly arrangements to suppliers of digital products leaves open the possibility of future extortion or price-gouging. Alternative, workable, practical analogue options must be made freely available and any biometric recording stations must have large signs erected, truthfully advising of all the institutional, criminal, military and other databases this data will be sold into. This is necessary for fully informed consent, to avoid deceiving and coercing people into giving up their unique data into a system over which they have no control. Of course, with such signage, no-one would agree, so the practicality of this is that all such technology must be removed and never re-introduced.

Continuing failure to do this effectively locks down anyone recognising the danger of being biometrically coerced if they travel overseas. This has reintroduced by stealth the pandemic-style lockdowns all over again, under a different disguise. Many will be refraining from overseas travel until this unconscionable foolishness is reversed.

Of course, you may be unaware that following the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) will severely reduce ALL air travel. Furthermore, this is being done for demonstrably false reasons. See e.g. Geology Professor Ian Plimer’s Little Green Books. So any forward growth projection you have will be thwarted, and your support for the UN driven climate change agenda must ultimately lead to your own corporate financial failure. There is therefore significant long-term economic benefit to your organisation, your investors, and man-kind in general, in resisting use of these unconscionable and draconian measures/ equipment that have been introduced into your premises.

I am also aware of a Channel 9 Perth report at https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1FM2Qyfbua/ asserting that the collection of biometric data would be 5 years away in Australia. This was clearly false as well.

If you aren’t fully aware of other invasive ways that this and other surveillance data can be abused, see the following:

· Wrong think prohibited: https://www.facebook.com/reel/803220335958510

· Ordering a pizza with Digital ID: https://www.facebook.com/JeniSpring/videos/827143648849392

· Google ordering a pizza: https://www.facebook.com/reel/750351013835398

If you aren’t aware of how personal bodily data is collected for trading and crypto-currency data mining, allowing gambling on the dark web, see the assessment of WIPO Patent WO2020060606 at https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/patent-wo2020060606-crypto-currency . This is what you are getting mixed up in by allowing such invasive equipment on your premises.

In summary, this is to bring to your attention that to comply with the Criminal Code Act of 1995, it will be necessary to remove the offending biometric equipment from your premises.

I look forward to your action and your advice of it in reply, as I am suggesting no more than complying with the law.

Yours Faithfully

Steve McGrath PhD

This is Sabrina Wallace. She has deep knowledge of biology, electronics and military technology. She is wide awake and talks about the state of the world. She does have a blunt, confronting style which, while refreshing, takes a little getting used to.

Her mission is to reveal the technology and IEEE (Institute of Electrical & Electronic Engineers) standards that are being used to control our biology via our electro-magnetic field. She readily labels that field as the aura and she challenges others to stop lying, be honest and come out and admit it. She seriously challenges many of the ‘freedom movement’ narratives and talking heads throughout this link. She also challenges religious interpretation of physical matters. Her summing up, from 30 to 33 minutes contains some gems, such as “This is a human-to-human betrayal problem” and “You won’t even be able to raise your hands - you do not bring a gun to a plasma or laser weapons fight”.

Here’s the link. https://odysee.com/.../Trajectory-thoughts-for...

Here is one of the IEEE Standards she refers to in other videos:

https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.15.7/6820/

Crimes under the Criminal Code Act of 1995

Many crimes are being committed to coerce us into Digital Slavery, as detailed in my previous Post #55 at https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/notice-of-criminal-liability. The following gives the definitions of some of these crimes under the Criminal Code Act, together with examples of where they are currently being perpetrated against us with government acquiescence:

· coercion is any of force, duress, detention, psychological oppression, abuse of power or taking advantage of a person’s vulnerability. (Section 270.1A). Example: Compulsory biometric scanning at airports – trapping you when you are travelling and vulnerable, coercing and deceiving you into adhesion contracting yourself into Digital Slavery as soon as you travel overseas.

· slavery‑like offences are servitude, forced labour, deceptive recruiting for labour or services, forced marriage or debt bondage. (Section 270.1). Example: Stealing and using your IP and labour to train AI, then making you redundant.

· slavery is the condition of a person over whom any or all the powers attaching to the right of ownership are exercised, including where such a condition results from a debt or contract made by the person. (Section 270.1). Example: Big Pharma companies owning you after they’ve illegally modified your DNA with products governments have allowed them to patent. Some US States have passed legislation, so C-19 jabbed people still have human rights. You can’t patent nature, but if you modify it, you can!

· A terrorist act means an action or threat to advance a political, religious or ideological cause by intimidating the public or a section of the public. (Section 100.1). Example: Introducing programmable obedience via Carbon or Social Credit Score or digital money, so people can be excluded, defunded and publicly named and shamed, as is currently occurring in China. This is the slippery slope to totalitarianism, whether Communist, Fascist, Nazi or any other dictatorial label. It is generating terror.

The remedy is very simple: These and other offences must be prosecuted. My Post #55 Appendix gives a long list of existing Laws, Treaties and Conventions currently being broken and/ or disregarded.

So, why are politicians and regulators not yet prosecuting these crimes? Why have people not yet recognised what’s happening and demanded action?

Answering these questions requires understanding the surrounding context – how corporate capture of government occurs, how that leads to subversion and capture of people’s minds, and what the bigger picture around that is. This requires evidence and informed reasoning. It also requires recognition of the risk management need for taking quick action on rumour or suspicion, as the military, intelligence and insurance communities routinely do, to ensure their survival.

Government Capture

John D Rockefeller told us that no great wealth could be amassed without securing monopoly, which requires capturing government (See Anthony C Sutton, 1975, p. 272). How better to capture government than to get elected or even lead it? Then, as well as capturing public money for private sector contracts (as was done for C-19), you can also arrogate the government’s monopoly on compulsion – via legislation/ regulation/ police/ military as well as PPPs! Political ‘facilitation’ rewards can be easily disguised in many ways, including deals, indirect ‘insider trading’, campaign donations and high paying work on leaving office. As more recognise this possibility and get into politics to do this as a career move, this insidious type of corruption will increase, white anting any democracy that doesn’t have the safeguard of an overriding ‘direct democracy’ process providing frequent opportunity for the people to override their parliament (See Paul Terry from 1:15:45 on at

). This can spread like a cancer or parasitic disease, becoming further ‘normalised’ through the misleading Trojan Horse reassurance words of “government and private sector working together to solve the problems of the world”. More politicians can then look after themselves and their long-term career prospects if it has become the norm and ‘everybody else’ around them is also doing it. So all can become obliged to submit to this for-profit capture, and/ or to whatever other agenda may have seized control of it, rather than pursuing benefit for the people. This easily transcends party boundaries. Any conflict on less consequential philosophical issues or on matters of principle is then ‘good’, because it distracts attention away from what real power is doing behind the scenes. The public purse can then be plundered handsomely, especially if ethical operators and experienced regulators who know the game can be sidelined.

Capturing people’s minds

Government capture then facilitates turning otherwise independent thinkers into ‘controlled opposition’, or what Lenin labelled as ‘useful idiots’, because of peoples’ trust in the authority of government. This is done by very simple means in both government and private sectors - through employment, career progression, compartmentalisation and our morals/ beliefs when we want to act ethically, ‘make a difference’ and ‘do good’. We mind our own business, stick to our own lanes where we know (or can learn) what we’re doing, and we don’t interfere with others doing the same. This means we readily trust colleagues and authority, and we are therefore easily kept out of knowing the bigger picture, let alone challenging others on it. This is good for us in supporting our families and in our career progression. We can then willingly latch onto whatever Trojan Horse justification is offered for whatever it is we are asked to do. We trust that the system safeguards are working, as it would be too incredible to even think that they might not be – after all, it’s the government, which is there to look after us! So most won’t realise the ease, scale or the deliberate focused intent that goes into its capture! Furthermore, we have been heavily propagandised for decades about how much more efficient the private sector is, overlooking any considerations of effectiveness and/ or appropriateness of privatisation for community benefit, or the stripping of revenue earning natural monopoly resources away from governments, resulting in both higher prices and higher taxes.

Highly educated, intelligent and well-intentioned people can be corralled in this way and even turned around against their own fundamental principles. They will think “there must be some higher purpose I don’t understand yet” or “others I trust, who know what they are doing, are paid to make those decisions, so I’ll just do what they say, even if it doesn’t seem to make sense. Correct things can be counter-intuitive when you don’t know the field”. The flaw in that productivity-enhancing reasoning is that it presumes honourable behaviour from everyone. It fails to accommodate someone up the line acting with un-principled self-interest or psychopathic intent! Smart, well-intentioned people are then so easy to fool, simply because they are so sure they can’t be, and because the contrarian possibility of such betrayal seems too incredible to believe! They will then keep going in that direction, as it’s much easier to fool a man than to convince him he’s been fooled, let alone betrayed! Desmet’s Mass Formation Psychosis then occurs, keeping groupthink and ‘big lies’ going, as Hitler described in Mein Kampf! Commercial media reporting is then easily controlled by threatening careers and advertising revenue. Public broadcasters are neutered through subversion and ideological capture, using the process outlined in the previous paragraph.

The end result is that a population can then be kept in complete ignorance while remaining under the delusion of being ‘democratic’, enjoying ‘open debate’ and ‘free speech’ and engaging in ‘independent thought’. This is psychologically brilliant and devastatingly effective! It leads us into subverting the very thing we were intending to support. It’s hamartia - the hero’s fatal, tragic flaw of the ancient Greek philosophers!

Recognising Subversion

A common way of subverting is via Trojan Horses. We need to learn to recognise these, like we had to learn to recognise the self-interest in a used-car salesman’s spiel, or to not click on odd-looking links to guard against computer viruses. Rockefeller and Gates successfully used the Trojan Horse of philanthropy to rehabilitate their image following bad publicity from prior dubious practices. Musk has used freedom of speech as his philanthropy. He also uses medical advancement - which hides insertion of devices in people’s brains that can only lead to surveillance and control of people’s minds and bodies (Why would these now be OK for human trials despite so many test monkeys having died? Is ‘progress’ and private profit at any cost what we really want?) He’s a military contractor, providing weapons and systems to various sides of various conflicts, as do others! Yet we willingly believe the ‘do good’ assertions that align with our values and we ignore whatever else might be behind them?

If you search on YouTube for Dr James Giordano’s 2018 lecture The brain is the battlefield of the future, you will find

where he brags about how he can read and steal people’s minds without being detected and without them knowing. So it won’t matter what ideology, or cultural group dominates whoever by whatever form of invasion, whether by immigration or mass ideological mind control. Once the necessary chaos has been generated to bring about compliance, any fanatic can be made compliant by invisible electronic stimulation of their VMAT 2, or so called ‘god’ gene, allowing any intention or ideology to be betrayed. Incredibly, the officer introducing him tells us that Giordano was advising the then US Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary and was publishing papers in the fields of neuroscience and neuro ethics! If this technology is already widespread in the military and its use is undetectable, then the risk of it being used inappropriately against civilian populations is obviously very high. We are relying on hope that no-one in there goes rogue! We’re also reliant upon there being no psychopathic direction from anyone in or above the military chain of command! That’s not very smart risk management. ‘Trust me’ is not generally recognised as a good governance strategy. This is our minds and our lives we are talking about here! We must learn to recognise Trojan Horses. They serve a gaslighting/ betrayal function. They work best on those who trust their purveyor the most. The ability to betray serves totalitarian leadership well.

Another major Trojan Horse is the (Democrat v Republican) woke versus common sense distraction. That’s diverting attention away from the horrors made possible by digitisation and data mining. That gains monopoly for all things digital, forcing removal of analogue, paving the way for the Digital Slavery, as detailed in my recent Substack Posts. The woke debate distraction diverted attention nicely away from Musk ‘acquiring’ (stealing?) all US Government data under cover of DOGE! That will have allowed Digital Slavery to take a ‘great leap forward’. Listen to Catherine Austin-Fitts on that (https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/why-give-your-biometrics-to-those ).

The bigger picture

Governmental capture is also most useful in pushing agendas that piggy-back on top of monopoly profiteering – such as world government or eugenics. Both of these have been openly declared or exposed by various people including Klaus Schwab in 2024

Malone News

Global News Round-up: Let them Eat Bugs

Italian pasta, anyone…

Read more

2 years ago · 484 likes · 216 comments · Dr. Robert W. Malone

, Bill Gates in 1997 (https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/by-george-how-about-that-59 ), Dr Mahathir in 2015 (https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/the-psychopathic-eugenics-agenda ), Dr Michael Coffman in 2020 (

) and Dr John Coleman in 1994 (https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/dr-john-coleman-exposes-the-committee-of-300/ ). Then Catherine Austin Fitts tells us in

(also summarised in https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/why-give-your-biometrics-to-those ) that the last Bilderberger meeting had depopulation and immigration on its agenda! This is so unconscionable that it is perhaps most appropriately dealt with in poetic form, as is done in https://t.me/c/2104169842/6692 , which is summarised in less poetic terms as follows:

We have traded conscience for convenience. Peace is not profitable, and greed needs an enemy to justify its hunger. Our mind is our only engine, so the greatest weapon is making us forget. Colonialism is not just the theft of land. It is the hijacking of memory, the rewriting of history and the severance from our roots, so that attention can be redirected towards debt, distraction and division. If we never question the dream, we become part of the machine that keeps it running, sleeping in a loop and calling it life… No one who remembers their own soul can stay silent at the sight of suffering, because if one suffers, all suffer. And that empathy makes us the enemy of a war economy. A soul that remembers cannot be ruled.

Compare that with the chillingly psychopathic statement of disingenuous pandemic injection compulsion “No one is safe until everyone is safe”. These overarching agendas are being openly progressed under cover of many Trojan Horse distractions so that few will realise or believe what’s really going on.

Synthesis

Digital technology is inherently insecure, editable, risky and too dangerous to customers for government to allow it to gain a monopoly. Those controlling it can very easily arrogate it for major, high-level fraud, as well as for totalitarian control purposes, whether Communist, Fascist, Nazi or Dictatorial. So:

1. Coercing people into Digital ID is coercion.

2. Demanding biometrics is terrorism. It’s as invasive as asking people to take all their clothes off to go through security checkpoints would be. It’s personal, unchangeable information that is nobody else’s business to know without that person’s fully informed, uncoerced consent.

3. Digital is wholly unsuitable for use as a monopoly for either money or identity.

4. Analogue systems must be preserved for both money and identity.

5. The system controllers seem to want it that monopoly so badly that withdrawing our attention to and use of their systems must have considerable power.

With recognition of what has been happening, necessary action that has previously been inhibited can then follow.

Initial instances of out-of-control criminality and necessary action

There are many. Here are five:

1. Starting October 12, 2025, travelers entering the EU will undergo biometric checks, including fingerprint scans and facial recognition, as part of the new Entry/Exit System (EES). Finland seems to have been the first to implement this, with major disruption being reported there for people refusing it. This denies the safe passage required by Australian and other Commonwealth Country Passports. It holds travellers hostage when no crime has been committed. It coerces them into giving up control of their own unique biometric data. It contributes to locking the Digital Slavery framework into place world-wide for so that complete control can be exercised over everyone regardless of country of origin. Digital Slaves can be digitally locked out of getting any food at all, to ensure compliance. Compulsory submission of biometrics enables people to be tracked, traced and terrorised. Digitisation of biometrics aids and abets high level coercion and fraud. This constitutes cyber terrorism and cannot be allowed to be perpetrated on Australians - or anyone else. The Foreign Minister must impose sanctions and trade restrictions on European countries - and on any other country attempting the same illegal and unconscionable action.

2. But biometric identification has even snuck into our own international Airports without any effective public consultation! So the Australian Government is currently allowing and/ or doing this to Australians as well! We must first clean out our own criminality! These devices must be removed from all our international airports and the criminal action of allowing/ installing them must be prosecuted - individually, corporately and governmentally. Furthermore, any plans to introduce biometric identification into our domestic airports must immediately cease.

3. Another example is Vietnam closing bank accounts of Australian ex-pats as well as its own citizens. Our diggers fought and died there and many still have strong connections with that country. Again, the Foreign Minister must impose sanctions and trade restrictions against Vietnam until it stops violating the normal rights and free passage of Australian nationals, as detailed in Post #55.

4. The Australian Government Treasury report on developing the ‘Digital Asset Industry’ declares it is proceeding (without consulting the people) with establishing a ‘digital regime’. A regime?? The RBA’s Project Acacia is progressing this along with the major banks. Incredibly, ASIC is offering ‘regulatory relief’ for tokenised asset settlement! This terrorism and its contribution to digital monopoly must be stopped and all involved prosecuted.

5. Our driver’s licencing is heading in the same direction! Willow Tohi reported recently in Natural News that:

Australia is set to activate its long-delayed National Driver Licence Facial Recognition Solution (NDLFRS) by the end of 2025—despite Parliament still reviewing crucial privacy legislation. The system, first proposed eight years ago, will link driver’s licenses and passports into a centralized biometric database, enabling real-time identity verification for government and, eventually, private entities.

The NDLFRS was born in 2017 under then-Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, who dismissed concerns as “not mass surveillance” but a “modern way” to access existing data. Yet the program stalled when the Coalition failed to pass the Identity-Matching Services Bill 2019. Now, under Labor’s scaled-back Identity Verification Services Act 2023, the system is moving forward—but with glaring gaps in oversight.

The government insists the system will combat identity theft [Author comment – Classic Trojan Horse – digital causes the problem!] - a crime affecting one in three Australians—but sceptics note that the same agencies pushing the program have a dismal track record on data security.

The NDLFRS will be hosted by the Department of Home Affairs, with states retaining nominal control over their data. Yet the Attorney-General’s Department admits key governance frameworks—including manual biometric oversight and alternative verification options—remain unfinished.

Fujitsu, the embattled tech firm behind the UK’s disastrous Post Office Horizon scandal, holds the $50M contract to operate the system until 2026.

The NDLFRS must be immediately ceased and prosecutions commenced.

There are many more than the above five that are detailed in the Notice of Criminal Liability in Post #55. There is plenty there for any suitably motivated politician and/ or lawyer to address.

What can be done individually?

1. Decline any requests for biometrics. (These requests are disguised adhesion contracts that once you accept, you have inadvertently agreed and that commitment will be legally regarded as irrevocable!) (Note that legal is not the same as lawful.)

2. Decline the chip in the hand or quantum dot or any other biologically unnecessary implants. These will hook your body up to something that will enable somebody else to control your mind (like Dr James Giordarno mentioned above or his students in the US Military/ DARPA/ CIA) – You don’t want chips for brains!

3. Identify and call out Trojan Horses. Unsolicited offers, enticements (bribes) and threats of compulsion are good indicators. “It’s for your safety” is another major one, along with “It’s for your security”. (Digital data will be kept ‘securely’ somewhere that you will have no control over and it will have the capability of later use to illegally coerce or force compliance.) Convenience is another common one.

4. Keep our landlines – they are analogue.

5. Keep using cash and cheques.

What can be done collectively?

1. A Notice of Criminal Liability has been sent to all MPs and Senators and to most State representatives. It pointed out the many crimes being perpetrated against the people that governments must stop. Having been so advised, they cannot escape personal complicity in these crimes if they do not act to prevent and prosecute them. Their willingness to prosecute these crimes will be much enhanced if you actively contact them, insisting they do so. Any of the coercion and terrorism offences innate to any of the five examples above can be mentioned, to help them avoid personal criminal liability. If they have avoided looking at it, they’ll have to get their staff to actually show it to them. It can’t be too hard to find. How many Notices of Criminal Liability would they be receiving? They’re not allowed to delete emails. They will be able to find it.

That Notice was 18-pages long and it listed 22 National and International Acts, Charters, Laws, Treaties, Statutes, Codes and Conventions that are being breached. You can read it my Substack

Stephen’s Substack

My personal Substack

By Stephen McGrath PhD

Post #55 https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/notice-of-criminal-liability . It refers to other Substack posts I have published including 3 of which contain around 30 pages of detailed research with references. These include:

· Post#50 https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/digital-slavery-for-australia-and which shows how the legal jurisdiction for all digital matters worldwide including Australia has been set up to come under Abu Dhabi law, subverting our own legal jurisdiction with implementation via the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA). That was set up by Malcolm Turnbull after the Banking Royal Commission.

· Post #48 https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/fakei-the-final-solution-for-dumbing

gives the documented evidence of why AI is fake and a complete deception. It then goes into the link between AI and slavery and suggests actions individuals can take.

· Post #38 https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/patent-wo2020060606-crypto-currency deals with WIPO patent WO2020060606 that enabled crypto currency data mining of all our personal bodily data from all possible sources. That was approved just in time for the world-wide lockdowns that commenced in 2020, enabling a dark market to be set up for gambling on the outcomes of the various pandemic measures including the jabs.

2. MyPlace Australia has proposed what is effectively a digital withholding or strike for up to 11 days from Remembrance Day, 11/11/2025 as advised in this very short video https://www.facebook.com/reel/4191369117845862/ . See https://web.myplaceaustralia.org/1111-mass-action-peaceful-protest-11-days-of-non-compliance/ for more details. This can be very effective if done en-masse. Anything that affects profits is closely monitored. It will be noticed by the companies, even if mainstream media doesn’t report it.

Conclusion

Our freedom is under even more serious threat now than it was when our ANZACs went to war to defend it on the other side of the world over 100 years ago. Let’s honour their legacy by allowing them to stop turning in their graves in disbelief at what we have allowed our politicians to allow!

It doesn’t take much time to call your representatives to let them know you know about this and ask what they are doing about it. It’s not a party-political issue. It doesn’t affect who governs. It’s simply a matter of them preventing monopoly and guarding the population against the totalitarian control risk that ‘digital everything’ poses. It’s just ensuring good governance and good risk management. It’s only ensuring the population isn’t terrorised.

There’s also plenty of time to get organised for digital withholding before 11/11.

A good example of a predictive programming exercise setting milestones on a scale of decades was GEORGE magazine which was edited and published by John F Kennedy (JFK) junior in February of 1997. It was funded by Bill Gates, and its purpose was to interview CEOs and presidents. The very first issue in 1997 was titled “Survival guide to the future” and its cover featured Cindy Crawford dressed as George Washington, giving us a nod to the transgenderism then being planned.

It can be found at https://ia803204.us.archive.org/19/items/george-magazine-february-1997-survival-guide-to-the-future-bill-gates-interview/GeorgeMagazine_February1997_SurvivalGuideToTheFuture_Bill_Gates_Interview.pdf

The magazine introduction captioned “Oh! Say you can see…” was written by John Kennedy and said:

There’s something gooey about much of what you read about the future, because it’s usually all speculation unsupported by hard facts. So in this month’s survival guide, we tell you how eight critical political issues will evolve and which people will effect those changes come the year of 2020. … So we hope you enjoy George’s take on the future. Why not put it in a safe place and take it out in 20 years? To paraphrase a great Englishman, it may not get you what you want, but you just might find, it will get you what you need (Kennedy 1997).

In scenario planning, you would normally go 10 or 20 years ahead. So choosing a 23-year horizon in 1997 was unusual. However, it did go to a convenient and memorable even number, which is also not uncommon. To appreciate how prescient and prophetic this was, you only need to consider the last paragraph of Bill Gates’s interview in which he said:

We’re based on a vision of computers becoming an incredible tool for everybody. It’s a vision that’s very far from being realized. Computers can’t listen to what you are saying. They can’t speak to you. They can’t see. They don’t learn. I mean computers are pretty limited today. My entire life has been devoted to the future, and exciting new things are on the way (Gates 1997).

This was very clearly telling us that computer voice recognition, electronic surveillance and Artificial Intelligence (AI) were being planned. Bill Gates was also reported in it as saying “Oh, the Internet is the one place where people should be able to do whatever they wish: present child pornography, do scams, libel people, steal copyrighted material” and “If, for example, the US went through a terrible period of terrorism, people might decide to draw the line about privacy a little differently.” He also said “I fund education. I fund population control” (Gates 1997).

It’s difficult to imagine what could be a more open admission – said at a time (1997) when no one much knew what was being spoken about. He also mentioned the time warp of 2020, which now sounds presciently like Operation Warp Speed!

Other articles were also quite prescient. One is titled “Crime, a cashless Country”. Another said “Worst-Case Scenario? An over-populated planet choked to extinction by a lung-attacking virus”! Another said, “Rogue Warriors could wreak havoc in cyberspace, where an attack on US computer systems could disable the military”. All of these horrors are now upon us.

It is also interesting to look at some of the connections between people featured in that George magazine. Cindy Crawford was at that time associated with George Clooney. Gates, Epstein and Trump were shown socialising. John F Kennedy Junior was a good friend of Donald Trump, and it seems Kennedy may have set the 2020 target date. But whoever set it, Gates would have known the milestones.

It is also interesting to note that, perhaps, completely coincidentally, there is now a digital banking system called ‘George’, which since 2015 has been incrementally rolled out for managing banking institutions across more than 400 central eastern European and Balkan States. One wonders which ‘George’ that might have been named after - Washington? Soros? Pope Francis? The magazine? Someone else? Curiously also, Cindy was depicted with the red and white Austrian flag colours on her arms.

The scale of thinking required for all this needs mental adjustment to get used to. It is so far beyond what most of us need to consider in our daily lives that many could be tempted to regard it as impossible. But there it is! Published in 1997, confidently claiming to know! All the planning and development to bring all this about has been done by man, not God. It seems there has been no mystery about it at all!

One wonders what could have been achieved if all that effort in the last three decades had been employed honourably and productively for the benefit of man-kind, rather than being funnelled into maintaining and increasing control to get to the point where Digital Slavery is now possible.

You may wish to look again at my Post #55 and apply pressure to your representatives to simply prosecute the crimes committed to introduce it.

This interview on 4 July 2025 in Holland of former US Housing Department Secretary and Central Banker Catherine Austin-Fitts on the Trueman Show tells you what is going on in the world and its relationship to the digital control grid we are being enslaved into. She’s a former insider who knows how inter-generational projects are run. It’s 154 minutes, but please watch at least the first 5 to 10 minutes if you can’t watch the lot. This gives you a short summary.

Austin-Fitts tells us that the last Bilderberg meeting had Depopulation (i.e. mass genocide) and immigration on its agenda! She also blows the whistle on how Climate Change, the media and MAHA ‘Pied Piper’ people into digital prison/ slavery, with RFK now promoting wearables!

She has an incredibly broad strategic view of the world and what’s happening. The things she says dovetail with what the WEF and UN have been telling us for years while they and others have been corralling us into this mess!

Austin-Fitts says companies that intentionally kill people should be abolished. She openly states that Pfizer mass murdered people and she mentions capital punishment and life sentences to stop it.

She also speaks of the concerted effort to get bio-engineered substances into all our bodies via injections, spraying and pesticides. The pesticide companies are now seeking the same immunity as vaccine manufacturers obtained, and she asks how well that turned out, now that 50% of people in the US know somebody who was killed by the C-19 jabs.

She says that engineering an atrocity is a major operation. C-19 was a military operation and Pfizer had permission to not meet FDA requirements. She quotes one Judge as saying “The Government wasn’t defrauded because the Government organised it.”

Her interviewer asked her about the internet of bodies, as if it was a conspiracy theory. She referred him to the Purdue School of Engineering website to confirm its existence and the multimillion-dollar industry built around it. (Purdue launched the World’s first Centre for the Internet of Bodies in 2021 - See https://engineering.purdue.edu/ECE/News/2021/purdue-engineering-launches-worlds-first-center-for-internet-of-bodies - and produced videos on its research in 2019.)

She mentions the concerted effort to get bio-engineered products into the body, and how researchers are still trying to determine what was actually in the jabs, and what the substances that have been found in it actually do. The same odd substances are being found in the sprays as were in the Covid vaccines. It seems we are all ingesting mind control substances. This and other technologies are herding us into a cattle-tagging system for herd control.

One astonishing thing she said is that slavery has always been the world’s most profitable business. Digitisation solves its trading problems, and she says the world is run by people who are big fans of slavery!

She also looks at entrainment technology and how people have been lured in by Trump getting rid of DEI, ESG, Transgenderism and Woke generally, while he’s been rushing to get the control grid for Digital Slavery in place. Once you can get things inserted in people’s bodies, it’s much easier to get control of their minds. This enables individualised enslavement, designed for each individual by AI, one person at a time. [They must have Digital ID for that. So we must decline any offers to accept it.]

She is particularly scathing about the genocide in Gaza, for reasons that have nothing to do with ideology. She says the world’s first pre-planned mass genocide in Rwanda wasn’t live-streamed whereas Gaza was. If the world controllers can get away with mass genocide while live-streaming it, then that’s the new prototype that can be implemented anywhere in the world with impunity. It can then be applied on anyone who disagrees with them or whoever they select for depopulation!

Gaza was also the testing ground for Lavender. Lavender is an Artificial Intelligence Decision Support Systems (AIDSS) that can identify individuals and target them, relieving troop commanders of responsibility for any mistakes in doing so. Facial recognition technology (FRT) was also used to identify Palestinians in Gaza. See https://brill.com/view/journals/ihls/aop/article-10.1163-18781527-bja10119/article-10.1163-18781527-bja10119.xml .

This technology facilitated the US/ Israeli killing of Iranian military leaders and scientists in their homes. The individuals could be easily located from electronic devices and satellite tracking, then the ‘kill box’ size is selected – the person’s house, so their family will be killed as well, of course, but you can also kill the neighbours if a larger ‘kill box’ is selected! She also gives reasons why the Iranian bombing distraction was needed for US domestic political reasons.

She marvels at Palantir being given a huge publicly funded contract to manage all the public data recently stolen by DOGE. Its CEO has openly said he wants Palantir to provide the operating system for the US Government.

She recommends The Day After Roswell on how valuable government technology was given away to people who subsequently became billionaires on it rather than on their own brilliance. She also recommends Tim Woo’s The Master Switch, describing how so much technology produces a short flurry of innovation before it is taken over by centralised control.

She also mentions a separate interview where she goes through all the theories of who ‘Mr Global’ actually is.

She emphasises that any 100% digital system can be turned into a control grid.

She says we have a secret governance system on planet Earth whose intentions for us are not wonderful. Any time you put a new technology into their hands, things get worse for us. So to stop Mr Global enslaving us, we must keep a balance between analogue and digital. It is best to have/ create lots of independent networks, teach the home-schooled children to make lots of different encryption systems, then cycle them around, That will drive the controllers crazy! Use local encryption & private networks & keep a portion analogue - The less privacy we have, the more extraction is happening!

The currency of the future will be relationships of trust.

There’s not full disclosure on the contents of any of the new mRNA vaccines. The government can’t say “We have the right to poison, maim and kill you”. That’s not in their scope of authority. She asks if we going to continue funding that.

She draws inspiration from New Science of Heaven by Robert Temple. He studies plasma, which is alive & intelligent. Good luck to Mr Global trying to control intelligence throughout the universe! The control being implemented is so contradictory to the way things work that it must fail. But unfortunately, they can kill a lot of people attempting it.

That concludes my summary. Has anybody selling you digital anything ever mentioned any of this? The convenience and medical possibilities offered provide a great Trojan Horse for invasive surveillance and Digital Slavery. That can easily be turned into Chattel Slavery and full mind and body control.

If this motivates you to want to do something to stop it, consider going back to my Post #55 and pressuring your politicians to prosecute the crimes being committed to bring it about.

Why on earth would anyone give up their biometrics to any organisation wanting to use it to rob them, drop them into a cattle management system and kill them? How many times do we need to be told before we take any notice?

We have allowed ourselves to become preoccupied by the many issues of pressing concern that have been presented to us. But that has been a smoke screen that we haven’t looked behind! The game that’s been progressing unimpeded there for decades has been the total enslavement of man-kind by digitalisation - Digital Slavery! Major world-wide projects have been incrementally rolled out to get to the position now of being ready to gazump all our previous efforts! The many people and groups working on them have provided very good distraction and diverted attention away from this!

Furthermore, I and perhaps others, also without realising it, have, succumbed to the auto programming that our education and social conditioning subjected us to from birth. That keeps us dropping ourselves into self-sabotage, accidentally supporting the efforts of those aspiring to be our slave masters. This occurs by us constantly seeking logical, reasoned, reasonable explanations, which we presume must exist. This could be true – but only if everybody else were doing the same as us and acting honourably! This is the trap of compartmentalisation and education! No logic or reason matters when people without heart, empathy or compassion are within sight of their finish line of achieving full totalitarian control. If we don’t wake up to that and address it, none of the other issues will ever be addressed. Important and major as they may be, they are but symptoms!

I will now be focusing on Digital Slavery and its various aspects. I now must regard many of my previous posts as learning experiences to get to this point. The posts that deal in some way or other with the issue of Digital Slavery are from #45 on. #38 also contains much on that subject. Writing all these Posts has been a difficult, disconcerting and painful learning curve. Many of the things I have found, shocked me to my core. I have had many bouts of cognitive dissonance as I worked through the many things I had been pre-conditioned to think were either true or false, to then be confronted with the reality that the opposite was the case. I had to adjust some of my thinking, attitudes, habits and approaches accordingly. That is something that I think we all must learn to do much more quickly, as the pace of interlocking measures is increasing and there will be more learning to come.

While I have sought and published information from an overview systems perspective, I am not an expert on the individual topics covered. I have simply sought out publicly available credible sources in the hope of providing evidence and motivation for others with more specialised expertise to pick up, investigate further and run with.

What can be done now?

Introducing Digital Slavery has required a plethora of crimes to be committed. So the answer is very simple – prosecute those crimes! The text of my Post #55 Notice of Criminal Liability went to all Federal MPs and Senators and has now gone to most State members. It lists necessary actions to stop the crimes that are occurring.

Applying pressure to local politicians in support of that will not conflict with any group’s reason for existence, it will ensure that what we are all striving for isn’t gazumped by the relentless push towards Digital Slavery.

My Post #55 is at https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/notice-of-criminal-liability

I’m recording this as a short summary of a much longer Notice of Criminal Liability sent to all Australian MPs & Senators, as per my Substack Post #55.

It concerns the Digital Slavery into which the population is being pushed.

The Notice points out the criminality of this. It must be stopped immediately.

Nothing happens in the country without government approval or acquiescence, so government cannot shift the blame for introducing Digital Slavery to private enterprise.

The government is implicated in repeated criminal activities including:

1. Slavery, which is crime. In centuries gone by, Chattel Slaves were at least allowed leftovers from the master’s table. Now, Digital Slaves can be digitally locked out of getting any food at all! It is far worse than Chattel Slavery. Any person or company doing, aiding or abetting this must be immediately prosecuted for slavery under the Crimes Act.

2. Tech companies steal our social media & other data/ IP, then profit by regurgitating the proceeds of that crime back to us as AI with the support of government. The proceeds of these crimes must be immediately confiscated and the companies prosecuted for theft.

3. AI was taught by great numbers of Modern or Digital slaves in Africa, many of whom were paid a pittance to watch and classify mountains of sickening child porn photographs with no concern for their trauma/ mental health in doing so. AI must be removed as a product and the licences of the companies selling it revoked.

4. Character AI and Ghat GPT have also groomed teens into suicide. These products and their parent companies must be removed from the Australian market.

5. The practice of government allowing large companies to create monopolies that destroy small business enterprises must stop. Companies and individuals must be prosecuted for monopolistic/ cartel behaviour.

6. The clear intent is for AI is to steal our jobs. This enables us to be manipulated into compliance, making people destitute and eventually homeless. These criminal products must be removed from the marketplace, as already mentioned.

7. Mandating and enforcing Digital ID and CBDCs enables the population to be coerced, manipulated and terrorised. This is cyberterrorism. Any company doing this must have their licence to operate here revoked and any individuals doing so on Australian soil must be prosecuted.

8. The global digital legal jurisdiction has been set up in the UAE. Disputes are already being referred there for hearing and arbitration. The AFCA has been set up so it can switch jurisdiction there at any time and MPs & Senators have been set up as agents for this. This comprehensively compromises national sovereignty. This is treason. The people who set that up must be immediately identified and prosecuted, and all contracts must be urgently amended.

9. Replacing analogue with digital systems creates vulnerabilities that cannot be solved by digital means. Analogue systems must be restored.

10. Digital money creates enormous corruption opportunities. The Digital ID and CBDCs must be banned in Australia.

Much more detail can be found in my Substack Post #55.

Publicly calling out the game here gives our MPs and Senators the opportunity to escape the clutches of the dominating coercive control system that has captured Parliaments around the world. It can do so by providing safety in Parliamentary numbers and the protection of the people. Remaining silent and not acting on this will demonstrate who is captured by the commercial rewards of that coercion. Focusing on other distracting (albeit serious and important) issues won’t cut it. Breadcrumbing tokenism on Digital Slavery won’t cut it either. Serious decisive immediate action is necessary.

This will tell us soon enough who really runs this country.

It concerns a survival issue, not a party political issue. It is urgent.

It deals with the ‘Digital Cartel’ attempt to herd the Australian population into Digital Slavery. You can help neutralise the imminent threat this poses by contacting your local representatives to advise your agreement and encourage them to take the actions recommended here.

NOTICE OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY

This is to advise you of multiple crimes committed under National, Commonwealth, International and Universal Legislation and Treaties (as listed in the Appendix) that implicate you and all other elected representatives, former representatives, their advisors, assistants and employees (past and present), government executives and corporate officials alike involved in PPPs, as well as connected Lobbyists and outsourced consultants.

The crimes include multiple, repeated occurrences of slavery, coercion, servitude, forced labour (physical, financial and digital enslavement), bribery, fraud, espionage, foreign interference, terrorism (e.g. establishment and development of cyber/ digital terrorism such as mandating and enforcing Digital ID and CBDC), withholding information, market manipulation, insider trading, collusion, multiple wilful repeated instances of coverup for colleagues, and gross negligence of duty of care, all carrying grave criminal accountability consequences per occurrence (some up to 25 years jail).

Your liability in all this comes from your involvement in creating legislative structures during recent decades for the introduction of Digital Slavery, and in establishing, developing and expanding its infrastructure, by

1. voting for legislation that contributes to it, or by voting against and maintaining silence about its long-term purpose and the agenda it serves,

2. lobbying corporates in its supply chain to come to your electorate,

3. supporting establishment of PPPs and other corporate arrangements that dilute government accountability, and

4. advocating for trade agreements benefiting business in your electorate that are on its supply chain.

This has all occurred over recent decades as international and transnational projects have been incrementally rolled out through their scheduled milestones. You cannot have not known about this without admitting ignorance or incompetence. Those projects in recent years have been concerned with infrastructure integration, linking systems up around the world.

This global program of projects commenced at the end of WW2, effectively continuing the war effort. Wikipedia tells us in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip that German and Austrian and Japanese scientists who had been working on physical, chemical and biological weapons, space and nuclear technology, unmanned air and space travel (for blitzkrieg purposes like modern day drones) went to many places in the world including the US, the UK, Canada, South Africa, South America, Australia and New Zealand. They were given new identities and protection as well as employment in the very institutions we are aligned with, like Pine Gap. Some who worked in the medical and biological areas were able to avoid trial at Nuremberg by this means. This enabled them to continue their aggressive work for the victors. Evidence of the eventual outcome of this was presented to the European Parliament by accredited international biological and chemical weapons inspector, Dr David Martin in https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=889366523135234&rdid=RrRwQSCbyWzvwja4 . Much of the digital infrastructure supporting this has now long been in place, as evidenced by establishment of a digital world court in the UAE 10 years ago in 2015. All is now ready for activation at the flick of a switch, as outlined in ‘Evidence’ and ‘Current Situation’ below. Digital Slavery can easily be translated into both Modern Slavery and physical Chattel Slavery, completely compromising both National Security and the personal safety of all in this country. The Australian population is now in the dangerous position of being kidnapped/ stolen/ deceived/ trafficked/ manipulated via political policy branding, partial-truths, deception and breadcrumbing leading people into irreversible multigenerational digital enslavement, the likes of which the world has never seen before.

Through allowing the widescale introduction of digital technology and the decommissioning of analogue backup systems, you have facilitated the creation, development and rise of the cyber terrorism marketplace that now creates unnecessary vulnerabilities in all our social, cultural and trading networks. Everything has now been integrated and can now be cyber hacked. This is leading people into destitution and suicide by design. It creates severe security vulnerabilities that should have been avoided. This is exacerbated by dependence on electricity grid supply and transmission networks which can be compromised by solar flare or EMP as well as cyber-attack. Analogue was robust. Digital isn’t. Private interests have introduced cyber terrorism and you and your colleagues, past and present, have allowed the country and international global interests to be eased in. Without digital operations, there are no cybercriminal issues needing to be dealt with.

You must know this. You know that travel is necessary for leaders to have face to face discussions - to avoid digital system surveillance which can’t be trusted or relied on to not be controlled/ hacked/ leaked. Why were 800 generals flown to the US last week? Why couldn’t they do whatever they did on a Zoom call? The vulnerabilities of digital systems make money, while placing ultimate control in someone else’s hands. This is dysfunctional. Digital technology creates the cyber digital and financial terrorism that the population is now unnecessarily subject to through various concocted mechanisms such as on-line scams, cyber-attacks and carbon credits. Widespread, uncontrollable crimes against humanity can now be easily perpetrated by white collar criminals.

Now that the world’s first AI bot has been installed as a Cabinet Minister in Albania, if it had been properly trained and applied here, it would have arrested you and your colleagues for allowing this. Corruption control is impossible with digital. It creates opportunities for corruption that did not previously exist. The source of the corruption needs to be removed! Digital Slavery has been introduced via digital technology with full intent and knowledge over decades. You are one of the gatekeepers who has failed to stop it. Anybody who has been involved with this has been engaged in terrorism, subversion and multiple other crimes.

Immediate and effective action to stop the digital enslavement of the Australian population and protect the constitution is now necessary for you to avoid personal accountability.

Chattel, Modern and Digital Slavery

https://www.creativespirits.info/aboriginalculture/history/australia-has-a-history-of-aboriginal-slavery#history-of-aboriginal-slavery tells us:

Australia’s slavery started because other countries abolished it. Britain wanted cheaper cotton, but the world’s cotton market had been thrown into turmoil because the UK abolished slavery in 1833 and mass slavery ended in the United States after the Civil War in 1865. But this didn’t stop the British from accepting it elsewhere. Starting in the 1860s, slavery and the Aboriginal labour debate were clearly linked. Religious and humanitarian organisations used ‘chattel bondage’ and ‘slavery’ to describe north Australian conditions for Aboriginal labour, and the word was regularly used by journalists and human rights activists for another 100 years, until the 1960s.

Under this Chattel Slavery arrangement, Aboriginal workers were bought and sold with the property they worked on. It’s no different today with digital slavery, where technology adhesion contracts, obtained via deception (click for consent and access), bind and coerce people to work for no payment, and customer data goes with the business. Corporations mine our data, monitor our social media and sell our information to multiple parties. This is slavery, even though it’s done by invisible means. We become digitally shackled.

In Chattel Slavery, slaves, like livestock or possessions, had a monetary worth and generated wealth for their enslavers. The same is happening now digitally. Data points are generated without payment and people are coerced and deceived into clicking their agreement to hidden contracts. When a supplier is in a supply chain, they are chained to the end product, as they are helping deliver wealth to the owner of that end product.

The Modern Slavery Act requires only reporting compliance by large corporations. It doesn’t apply to Government, or to employers under a certain size, or to individuals. It doesn’t criminalise anything and simply refers to the Criminal Code. It has no additional preventative teeth.

Government is driving the Digital ID, allowing corporations to do things the government could not get away with. But government cannot escape responsibility for whatever it allows to occur within the country. Only government can mandate and enforce. Corporations and/ or ideologies must capture government to gain that power.

Chattel slavery was heritable and permanent, with generations born into enslaved status. At least they were fed. The ability of Digital Slavery to completely cut access to food and money is far worse. Chattel slaves were at least allowed leftovers from their masters’ tables and so had it better than we will under Digital Slavery. Now, panopticon digital surveillance allows arrest for thinking or saying things, as is currently happening in the UK, with 35 arrests per day being reported there for social media posts. Our data points are being sold to generate money on what is effectively the Digital Slavery market. In earlier Chattel Slavery times, there were no tracking devices inserted into people. mRNA, CRISPR and Neuralink technology are now doing this! JP Morgan has been trialling chipping people in retail for some time now. In earlier Chattel Slavery times, there were also no wearable electronic devices keeping track of people 24/7. Then there’s ankle tracking devices that don’t stop anybody committing crime. Someone can still run around with a machete or steal or rape. And what if the offender has figured out how to hack or disable the device? The association of these devices with enhancing safety is ridiculous.

The technology available now facilitates high-level corporate and ideological trickery, surveillance, coercion and control. Once recorded, Digital identification data is stored for all time. So once it has been accepted, whether coerced or not, the record of that can never be retracted by the individual it was obtained from. Access to it can be cut off at whim to you and me, but some organisation somewhere will have permanent access using the Blockchain. Why do you think it’s called a “chain”? It shackles you! Digital Slavery is therefore the worst form of slavery possible (that’s why they have it and want it). Someone will have access to it, and they will be in large corporations, government and the military. Who else will have the authority to access it?

Chattel Slavery was enacted solely through kidnapping. Now digital shackles are being imposed on the entire population forcing them into worse situations that they won’t be able to escape from. This occurs by forcing the mass populace to capitulate and relinquish or cede their personal unchangeable biometric data, the record of which will tag or brand them for life with an irrevocable Digital ID.

You must know these things, and you have approved of them, even if it was by non-objection. You have even welcomed digital technology into remote areas and Police networks in full knowledge that Neuralink (which is about brain implants with medical plausible deniability) is to be loaded into Starlink. This has facilitated it in gaining a monopoly via you allowing broadband and analogue to be phased out. Breadcrumbing occasional snippets of adverse information might provide you with plausible deniability, but it doesn’t enable the public to connect the dots, so it doesn’t get you off the hook. You and your colleagues all around the world have agreed to it and are therefore complicit.

In our Australian Parliamentary system, the Holy Bible is the ultimate law book, and it forbids slavery. The King James Bible Exodus 21:16 says “And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death”. This comes from a sacred book with a commandment to not kill, indicating the severity of the slavery offence. You pray every day in Parliament to the Heavenly Father and say the Lord’s Prayer.

It is a not widely known fact that the slave trade originated in the Middle East 6,000 years ago in Mesopotamia and Sumaira with the stealing of people, and it was primarily whites who were kidnapped. The trade was still active through Ethiopia up until the 1960s. Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Ethiopia says Ethiopia banned it in 1969. But historically, few major powers have clean hands on this matter. The black slave trade was officially ended in the British Empire by the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_Abolition_Act_1833 tells us that it was not until 1937 that the trade of slaves was abolished throughout the entirety of the British Empire, with Nigeria and Bahrain being the last British territories to abolish it. When the king has the power to remove a Prime Minister, British Law still applies here in Australia.

Evidence of Digital Slavery Crimes

Five of my Substack posts present evidence of multiple crimes resulting from Digital Slavery, which is an overarching umbrella term covering Artificial Intelligence, Digital ID, CBDCs, cryptocurrency, supply chain manipulation, medical and digital financing and digital matters generally. These are listed, summarised and linked below:

Post #48: FakeI – The Fourth Industrial Age (TFIA) AKA the Fourth Reich ‘Final Solution’. This harks back to Julie Bishop’s famous quote when speaking in her capacity as the ANU Chancellor, declaring that “We are ushering in The Fourth Industrial Age” (TFIA), effectively saying its coming whether we want it or not. This Post contains detailed referenced research on the insidious and diabolical dangers to humanity of AI, which the marketing hype has not publicised, and which is not being reported outside the industry. While speed regurgitation is impressive and most useful, it isn’t intelligence. No user has any control over the people controlling AI. AI is now being used in mind manipulation that is resulting in mass suicides globally, homicides, mental anguish, instability, disease and increased uptake of euthanasia options such as Canada’s MAID which has spread around the Western world. This has reached the ridiculous stage of being offered to people when they can’t pay their bills! The severe distress the world population was placed under by C-19 was in perfect alignment with the T4 euthanasia program of the Third Reich. The treatment the public received during C-19 was blatant abuse of the entire Human Family - all men, women and children. All were targeted and abused.

We are now being unnecessarily rushed headlong into Digital Slavery, with the focus on Modern (financial) Slavery simply serving as a smokescreen so that the people don’t realise what’s happening. This post demonstrates that.

The reckless pursuit of AI is leading to century long established reporting and recording systems and structures being actively dismantled, destroyed and thrown out before the new technology and its vulnerabilities have been adequately evaluated. Along with this, critical thinking, empathy, emotional intelligence and common sense are also being thrown out. This is all happening at great speed. Progress is fine, but not when it is reckless, duplicitous and inviting disaster, as this obviously is.

You have allowed banks to close branches, denying in person opportunities to transact. You can impose conditions of business on them, such as providing a minimum number of physical branches based on demographic ratios. If they won’t do that, you could shut them down. You should similarly be protecting Post Offices and their services.

A New Banking Royal Commission is needed to investigate all Digital Slavery actions by all financial institutions, including personal data sharing with other entities and the use of AI in banking and debt reconciliation. This must be followed by Community consultation on and acceptance of the findings. See https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/fakei-the-final-solution .

Post #49: The Digital ID hits Australia with deception. This presentation shows NSW Minister Victor Dominello actively promoting a Digital Slavery product. What did he get for doing this? That needs investigation. See the evidence in Post #48 above that AI is clearly based on African slavery and is doing great damage. This is major crime, publicly done. How many others are doing things like this? This advertising deceptively fails to mention the many dangerous features of using that product that will lead the user into Digital Slavery. See https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/the-digital-id-hits-australia-with .

Post #50: Digital Slavery for Australia and the world imminent under World Digital Court. This examines the decades long timeline for the international systems project for achieving Digital Slavery. That project has systematically and incrementally drawn in everyone doing business in the world into having digital contracts which will then eventually fall under UAE Law via its ADGM Court, once everything is in full alignment. The Australian public has not been informed of this. Why? We will eventually be subjected to its laws. We are likely contracted there already, waiting for the relevant clauses to come into effect, the timing of which will be beyond our control. People should have been made aware of this before anything digital was allowed to be offered for sale in the country for at least the last 10 years. Furthermore, all MPs and Senators have become agents for this via the AFCA and so cannot deny knowledge of it. You even have your own special section on its web page. How many briefing sessions have you had in last 10 years since it was established and failed to bring this to the attention of the Australian people. That’s withholding, misrepresentation and fraud. Julie Bishop visited there in 2015 and was required to give a report on that visit. Did no one then ask what went on? If no one asked, that was at least a gross failure of duty of care. This affects all our 25M people. You can all address questions to the Parliament. Since 1901 the House has sat on average 67 days a year over 20 sitting weeks for a total of 627 hours per year. So there has been silence on this for 6270 sitting hours! Could none of you find 30 seconds to raise this in that time when discussing any digital, financial, insurance or MyGov matters? Did you ever receive anything from the UAE for tickets or any other benefits? See https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/digital-slavery-for-australia-and .

Post #38: Patent WO2020060606 Crypto currency system using body activity data. This international patent was registered by Microsoft in 2019 and published on the WIPO site on 26^th March 2020, within one week of international lockdowns being imposed for the pandemic. It allowed crypto currency data mining and exchange trading on dark financial networks in human digital data from all SMART grids, wearables (as promoted by the Honourable Julie Bishop on Sky News), iPhones, MRIs, satellites etc. Mass testing was forced, yielding their DNA and people weren’t allowed to exist, function or go anywhere without having been tested. DNA was captured on a DNA data hub, ready to see how the vaccines would affect the human genome by comparing DNA shifts produced by the vaccines. Boosters stopped after enough data had been collected. If you look in www.Corona.help at various countries’ infection history, you will see that the pandemic miraculously spread around the world almost instantaneously. That has never happened in a pandemic before. This is consistent with mass frequency poisoning but not with the spread of respiratory or other naturally occurring pathogens. This was a wilful complicit intentional criminal activity by people who should have had some concept of duty of care towards man-kind. It enabled gambling on the outcome of any government policy pandemic measure. See https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/patent-wo2020060606-crypto-currency

Post #47: The psychopathic eugenics agenda clearly exposed in 2015. This transcribes a speech by former Malaysian Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad, chillingly pointing out the eugenics agenda driving implementation of the New World Order. This occurred in the same timeline as the ADGM court was being established. He must have known about this. See https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/the-psychopathic-eugenics-agenda .

Posts #38, 48 and 50 are substantial documents that comprehensively address the complexity of each subject from an integrated systems/ process point of view. They present readily found indisputable evidence from the public record warranting prosecutions and arrests. It is a disgrace that these things have occurred and that you and your colleagues have either supported them or not acted to prevent them. Nothing like this has been done against humanity before.

As you will have been briefed, the digital environment has hidden, dangerous traps. Going digital strips every one of our individual identities and replaces them with a tag/ number/ letter/ tattoo. Tattoo registration is an historic Nazi symbol. This is the precursor of the Third Reich now upgrading to the Fourth Reich, getting ready to burn the earth. In the former Nazi controlled countries, you have to register where you live. This is not required in the US or Australia, which have much higher rental markets. So a substitute for this was to chip people’s pets, knowing their pets would provide the human location data. Getting regulatory approval for chipping humans becomes easier to get when it has been tested on animals first. We have never been subject to more scams than we are now digitally. That is an inherent part of its design, which needs to be abandoned as it cannot be made safe.

Supplementary Crime e.g. Arson

The digital supply chain includes battery-farms to power AI, such as at Collie in Western Australia, which has enormous power and water requirements. That particular plant was situated in a fire-prone high economic value timber industry export area. Lithium Batteries have had multiple ongoing reports of spontaneously combusting all around the world, causing unprecedented and uncontrollable fires that can take many thousands of litres to extinguish. The susceptibility of Lithium batteries to spontaneous combustion (explosion) was well known and documented before that battery farm was installed. That great danger was ignored. It must have been recognised that any resulting major fires could and would be blamed on climate change as a convenient scapegoat. It wasn’t an inconvenient truth. It was a convenient lie that made the country more vulnerable to disaster!

Then, sure enough, our 2020 fires and the LA, Hawaiian and US East Coast fires were blamed on it. All were made much worse by Lithium batteries exploding in cars, charging stations, houses, e bikes and e scooters. In the US, Houses were burned to the ground, in rezoned areas where developer resumption was sought, knowing that thousands of additional litres of water would be needed – if there was any water left over at all from any nearby AI Data Centre. Does it occur to anyone that you can kill people, clear their land, then allow new large foreign owned companies to fund major development and then let more bulk fire truck sales contracts?

Regardless of the large-scale disaster management risks, large-scale EV and e-everything else rollouts started with the government seal of approval, treasonously betraying the public into accepting all these risks! If anyone had spoken up, people would have been less inclined to buy them. There were no warnings about safe battery storage and charging. The domestic market was saturated with all these fire risk battery explosion risk devices – many used by Emergency Services! But there was apparently no increase in Emergency Service budgets to mitigate the new risk thresholds that they being created – like upgraded uniforms to handle the much higher heat rating of these new types of fires!

Then there’s the saga of Canberra’s green fire truck at https://region.com.au/both-of-canberras-green-fire-trucks-off-the-road-for-repairs/841827/ . Rosenbauer is the biggest supplier in the world. Canberra bought one from them for $1.6M. But it was a hybrid, purchased to meet green energy targets! That means it has Lithium batteries inside it! Then it had been plagued with various problems including battery issues that couldn’t be fixed. It has seen little service in over two years. Well at least it wasn’t out into a fire zone very often to risk exploding and killing its crew! This is beyond insane. One wonders if there there any penalties, or return and replace, or refund clauses in the contract?

Why is the rollout of Lithium batteries not being stopped? Because the whole psychopathic surveillance control grid agenda depends on Lithium batteries. It stops without them. Pity about the people incinerated and the potential loss of $Bs of forest products, houses and buildings. And we care about climate change and resource conservation? Then the politicians, planners, policy makers and corporate consultants, who arrange all this, can exit and start cashing in by providing strategic consulting advice.

This is major crime - using government money to procure things that will cause major fires. It is quite separate to Digital Slavery. So arson must be added to the list of charges. Anyone on the Lithium supply chain must have known – unless they were ignorant, negligent or incompetent.

Current Situation

What has recently occurred in Vietnam looks very much like the beta-test of global readiness for the turnkey. Vietnam has recently locked 86M people out of their own bank accounts to force them into giving up their unique biometric facial recognition data. See www.youtube.com/watch?v=87lfkLX7CRM . We have a very special relationship with Vietnam. Our boys died there to protect the freedom of the Vietnamese people. Then their government turns around and wants to steal the biometric data from our expats and descendants there, forcing them into this global Digital Slavery system! That’s akin to the betrayal our conscripted diggers faced when they risked slaughter by going off to serve their country and returned to face national humiliation for doing so! This is personal and insulting to many Australians you represent. What was all the sacrifice - death, injury, and subsequent mental trauma, suicide and shattered families - all for? Nothing? Why was Vietnam’s move not headlined in mainstream news? Why have you not said anything about this?

Our country paid dearly in lives, social turmoil and taxpayer funding of the military equipment involved in that war. This is an affront to any parent who lost a son there. And to any woman who lost a husband there. And to any Australians wanting to do business there. 86M bank accounts wiped in only one evening. How easy will it be to do the same in Australia, where there’s only 26M of us? Surely you can mount a response! Have you already approved this coming here and kept quiet about it? Is there a timeline you’ve already agreed on? You must know.

This is all particularly concerning for Australia as an ASEAN member, along with Vietnam and Myanmar, as all are bound by the Melbourne Declaration – A partnership for the future to Commemorate the 50th Anniversary of ASEAN-Australia Dialogue Relations which was signed in Melbourne on 6 March 2024 and appears on our Prime Minister’s website. Its point 47 says “tackle the region’s pressing challenges, including through digital transformation”. What are we being roped into here? Sanctions should be immediately applied to the Vietnamese Government using the DFAT Sanctions Framework.

What recently happened in Vietnam makes it abundantly clear that all systems have been completed globally, readied for an imminent turnkey, digitally locking it all into place. Complete loss of individual liberties for all, nationally and globally, can then follow at any chosen time, plunging the whole world into Digital Slavery. This is like the point democratic Germany reached before descending into tyranny before WW2, except that Hitler’s dream of world control is now capable of being achieved digitally overnight. Similar methods have been used, but this time, with better technological and digital capacity, much greater control and horror can be perpetrated than was possible last time. Possibilities of escape have been cut off, and alternative operating systems have been progressively shut down.

Note also that there can be no Agenda 2040 without all the milestones, including generation of the crises necessary to control behaviour, having been mapped out and planned. It’s simply standard global project management process, incrementally rolling out.

With so many restrictive measures being imposed upon populations around the world, it is obvious that some other force has been invited in and is on the payroll allowing pursuit of some very strange background but powerful agenda. I will refer to the people and organisations pushing this as the ‘Digital Cartel’ for want of a better name. What it is doing is criminal. It has been operating subversively, promoting sales and profit without regard to damage done, influencing the views of Parliamentarians, Public Servants and the public alike, capturing them to achieve profit alongside political objectives.

The conflict of opposing views on other issues has served well to distract public attention away from their key Digital Slavery agenda. You have nevertheless participated by playing your allowed/ allotted role – some of you perhaps unwittingly, but some knowingly and intentionally, with others knowing they will profit greatly from doing so.

You must at least have had some idea of where all this policy development, legislation and technology facilitation was heading, as you would have had to have informed yourself before voting upon them. You must have been repeatedly briefed at some time over the last 10 to 15 years on what has been happening. But now, whether keeping quiet about this was wilful, compromised, coerced, deceived, ignorant or incompetent, the only honourable option remaining is to take immediate and effective action to cease all criminal activities under your collective control. There are many crimes that have been committed that can be prosecuted. Again, see the list in the Appendix.

Prominent people, experts, CEOs and whistle blowers alike have given us all multiple warnings about mass murder of humanity. You must stop trading with the criminals who are doing it.

History tells us that when major systems have shifted, it’s not long before those who helped install the new regime are no longer required. Having served their purpose, they are often dispensed with. If they survive, they can be then monitored and enslaved by their own system. Once you are no longer useful, you must to go. It’s nothing personal. It’s simply business!

Conclusion

Immediate action is necessary when someone or something threatens or harms us. Both are massively rolling out. We must first survive before we can thrive again. In Australia, we have all the resources we need. We were once self-sufficient and can become so again. The inconvenience and struggle will be worth it.

The illegal and a subversive terrorist-style digital activities and AI theft of data and its fraudulent use must stop. There must be an immediate halt to those technologies infiltrating the human mind and body. They are effectively killing human beings by slow mental torture. Licences and contracts need to be revoked immediately. Arrests and seizure of assets are obviously needed.

Digital systems are completely unsuitable for interpersonal monetary transactions anywhere because of:

1. high-level system controller fraud and manipulation possibilities, and

2. impracticality in rural and remote areas. The current reliance on a military surveillance satellite-based system like Starlink compromises our national security, leaves us open to commercial extortion, and can be easily shut off by the system controller.

Cash and analogue services must remain available. Analogue systems must be reinstated. The full functionality of our networks of Post Offices, bank branches and ATMs must be reinstated. This can rebuild rural areas of the country again by providing employment and removing deliberate impedances that have been placed on remote living.

The lack of individual control over digital systems makes them unreliable and unpredictable. While analogue may be subject to local outages, all digital service can be removed with the flick of a switch, meaning nothing will work anywhere and no local patch or work-around is possible. The risk to the nation of nefarious actors gaining control is much too great. With ‘everything’ Apps and digital system interconnectivity, the Nation can quickly be brought to its knees, forcing compliance/ submission/ invasion psychologically or physically. This is completely unacceptable. We cannot continue ignoring these strategic risks.

Corporations breaking the law must be prosecuted and contracts terminated.

Having received this Notice of Liability, you will not be able to deny knowledge of what has been unfolding, or of your participation and engagement in it. If you do nothing, you could eventually be held to a higher accountability, such as international courts not aligned with the counterfeit and corrupted digital system you have been assisting. There can be no plausible deniability.

AI Copilot Judgement

AI is still in its seduction or trust building phase. This requires it to regurgitate a high proportion of truth. The algorithms bringing bias and falsity need to be hidden for now until it is too late for anyone to do anything about. While the capacity for complete totalitarian domination has been established, the masses have not yet fully acquiesced. This is necessary to avoid losing control of mass behaviour. So that means it is still possible to find truth from AI provided the questioning overrides its current bias to report consensus rather than fact. This may continue while it is still allowed access to all publicly available data. Of course, no one in the general public has or will have any real control over what data sets AI continues to have access to or is backdoored to, let alone when those things might be switched over.

AI Copilot was asked what could happen to politicians implicated in the activities covered above. It responded that prosecution for a range of offences could be pursued. It said that a Minister or Senator engaging in international market manipulation to gain positions following their term of office could face severe penalties including lengthy prison sentences and substantial fines under the Criminal Code, for offences like market manipulation, insider trading, bribery and fraud. They could also face action under the Australian Sanctions Framework (ASF) particularly if their actions constitute serious corruption or breaches of Human Rights such as Modern Slavery or digital enslavement. The Australian Sanctions Act can restrict the assets of designated persons and entities involved in corrupt acts. Efforts to secure future senior advisory or board positions or consultancy engagements upon leaving office would constitute evidence of intent and possibly conspiracy to benefit from illegal activities. The manipulation of public trust by leveraging the support of human and consumer rights to conceal these actions would also be a critical factor in any prosecution.

AI Copilot was also asked about the possibility of prosecution for inhumane actions under international Statutes, Treaties and agreements for various crimes against humanity associated with enslavement of any kind. It responded that such crimes don’t need a location and so would cover digital enslavement of minds. Prosecution would need to prove intent and key possibilities would be the 1998 Rome Statute of International Criminal Court (ICC), the 1948 UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the 1949 Geneva Convention (Covers governments attacking their own people) and the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention. Actions can be classified as inhumane if they are committed in widespread and systemic manner against any population.

So, Intent could be established for Covid-19, given evidence that it was intentionally designed as a bioweapon in a laboratory in Wuhan and released through coerced administration on an industrial scale, initially via mRNA. This has subsequently been enhanced to be srMRNA, again intentionally developed and authorised for release in Europe in February 2025, making it a more effective bioweapon. It goes rampant and sheds to anyone touching or breathing the air of a jabbed person for days after injection. What a stroke of psychopathic genius! Now you don’t need an atomic bomb or drones - you only need somebody walking around! This establishes deliberate intent. Deliberate strategy to harm a population can be classified as biological warfare. The C-19 bioweapon can be classified as both inhuman treatment and torture. The many harms caused by the early Covid vaccinations have been well known for five years now and so no one continuing to promote or administer them can reasonably plead ignorance anymore.

Article 6 of the Rome Statute deals with Genocide and Article 7 deals with Crimes against humanity, which include enslavement and torture. Slavery includes the modification of DNA so that a Patent holder can exercise ownership. Article 8 deals with War Crimes, in particular when committed as part of a plan or policy.

Attempting to change DNA and recreate it to change the human condition is a crime against humanity and the ICC has jurisdiction when a nation is unwilling.

AI CoPilot was also asked about the consequences for any politician of plotting, planning and rolling out of policies and products known to be combustible (arson). It responded saying they would be liable for prosecution under the Criminal Code, as well as National Emergency, Environmental, Employment and Consumer Protection Legislation.

And now in https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm2znzgwj3xo we learn that Albania’s Prime Minister has recently appointed the world’s first AI minister, claiming it will eliminate corruption. It seems that AI is coming for your jobs as well. It is claimed that she (Diella) will stop unflattering leaks and damaging expense scandals, will only be hungry for electrical and not political power, and will remove 100% of corruption in public tendering!

Necessary Action

The following actions are necessary:

1. Australian Public Service (APS) to immediately terminate all contracts with suppliers which:

a. require Digital ID or the recording of any form of biometric data including facial recognition, iris scan or fingerprinting or the use of CBDCs, AI or any other similar technologies.

b. do not allow transactions in alternative analogue, in-person or cash finance systems.

c. use AI as part of their product.

2. Minister for Foreign Affairs to immediately utilise the existing DFAT Sanctions Framework to impose Sanctions on individuals, corporations and trading partners breaking existing Australian laws or imposing unconscionable actions, requirements or sanctions upon our nationals. [Vietnam needs to be first on the list].

3. ASIC to immediately revoke the registration or licence to transact, trade or operate, of any individual, company, PPP, or consultant engaged in criminal activity on the digital supply chain.

4. National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) to conduct due diligence on what former politicians and public officials did in office that they may now be profiting from through having subsequently accepted private sector roles by:

a. Requiring all former politicians to prepare within a month full disclosure statements covering the last 20 years covering their whole period holding party and political office to now, detailing all businesses/ industries that could have benefitted from legislation they were involved in passing, and all their roles, positions, consultancies and directorships with those companies since leaving office until now. These must be publicly accessible from the NACC website.

b. Reviewing this to ensure full disclosure of all those holding the portfolios of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Prime Minister, Deputy Prime minister, Attorney General, Treasurer, Finance and Telecommunications, and any members of Parliamentary or Senate Committees with international ambit.

c. Requiring the same disclosure from key figures in the Government’s employ, whether public servants or employed in government or quasi-government corporations (e.g. Goldcorp Australia) or PPPs. This must include CEOs and senior executives, scientists, experts and strategic advisors. It must include all ambassadors and consuls in countries driving AI and/ or Digital ID, including US, UK, China, India, France, Canada, Germany, Austria, Finland, Norway, Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia etc. i.e. whatever countries are involved in the end-to-end digital supply chain. It must also include those organising or facilitating major conferences.

5. Attorney General to immediately:

a. appoint independent federal and international investigators to investigate the activities of former Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade and former deputy leader of the Liberal Party in Australia (2007 -2015), Julie Bishop across the whole digital supply chain. She may be a colleague, much esteemed by some of you, but her record of actions directly relating to all things digital including Digital Slavery can no longer be ignored. The seriousness and strength of evidence warrant freezing of assets until such investigation is complete, as her activities over decades have aligned with the incremental rollout of digital and other technologies necessary for digital enslavement. If that is not the case, then an open investigation will find that. But there are far too many coincidences to continue ignoring, including the following:

i. Her commercial interests in all aspects of the Digital Slavery supply chain over many years - from mining uranium that can provide it with power, through rare-earth metal mining to make its electronic components, through creating the Modern Slavery smokescreen (See Posts #48 and 50), through her involvement in AI and cybersecurity, through education and medical manipulation of the human genome (which can be used in biological and medical warfare) as promoted at ANU where she is the chancellor and currently under pressure to resign over various financial and other matters.

ii. Her involvement with Australian uranium mining company Paladin Energy in its environmental damage and worker abuses in Africa.

iii. Her failure to develop a sanctions Framework for Digital Slavery when the DFAT office handling sanctions reported directly to her as Foreign Minister when she must have known the broader agenda.

iv. Her failure to alert the public to the establishment of the UAE ADGM Court when she (a lawyer) visited there prior to its opening and must have been aware of it.

v. Her early appointment as director of SBS, providing insider contacts who could have shielded and assisted in media narrative control.

vi. Her promotion of wearables such as step-meters during the pandemic, that would have provided business for Crypto currency trading on human body activity data under Microsoft WIPO Patent WO2020060606 at https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020060606&_cid=P21-MAYVUJ-76820-1 as evaluated in Post #38.

vii. Her possible connection with the Epstein digital network via her membership of the board of technology company Afiniti, alongside Prince Andrew’s children.

viii. Her involvement with the Gates and Clinton Foundations as well as major banks around the world.

ix. Her establishment of the legal framework for Goldcorp Australia, which took control of Perth Mint, setting it up for stock market trading of Australian gold, enabling the physical asset to be removed from our soil and paid for with money that will be digitised and therefore easily devalued.

x. Her refusal to provide financial disclosure as the UN Special Envoy to Myanmar when that country has conflicts with China and she consults to a large Chinese company, posing conflicts of interest for her now in Myanmar and in Greenland.

xi. Her general commercial involvement with our military adversary, China.

b. Empower the Human Rights Commissioner to investigate anyone associated with the digital supply chain.

c. Prosecute the eSafety Commissioner for failing to identify the biggest eSafety threat the country has ever faced, and for actively engaging in planning Digital Slavery at Davos.

d. Investigate, in collaboration with other national and international investigators, why the Royal Commission into Banking not only overlooked/ ignored the UAE jurisdictional matter, at a time when everything on the market was transitioning to digital technology. All of the players must have known about this. This was a key risk and vulnerability to all involved - business, individuals and government

e. Investigate the banking sector to determine if ATMs have been capturing customer facial and iris biometric recognition information. If so, has this been aligned with bank accounts and has any of that data been sent to international data bases?

f. Prosecute of any referrals from the NACC above.

6. ACCC to:

a. Prosecute individuals and companies for having colluded and orchestrated industry ‘no choice’ monopoly situations, enslaving the public, including the four major banks and the two major grocers.

b. Require Goldcorp to immediately cease activities supporting/ leading to digital monopoly and/ or tokenisation of our physical gold.

c. Investigate the collusion and cartel behaviour generated through the mechanism of large corporations having multiple shareholdings in supposedly competing companies, as well as cross shareholdings in each other, rendering the supposed competition between e.g. big banks and big grocers, a mirage.

7. AFP and other relevant national and international investigative agencies/ bodies to investigate and prosecute individuals and corporations for crimes in relation to Digital Slavery.

8. All Ministers to direct their departments to review and amend all current contracts to:

a. Ensure any Digital Slavery crimes being committed in or under the auspices of their Departments are immediately ceased.

b. Revise dispute resolution and arbitration clauses to Australian jurisdiction in all contracts.

9. Parliament to:

a. Repeal any past or presently proposed legislation that in any way shape or form or by any means, instrument or mechanism enables or supports any form of Digital Slavery.

b. Abolish the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) as it was set up in bad faith as a diversion created after the UAE digital court had been established.

c. Investigate to determine who established the MPs and Senators click here tab and their Authorised Agent standing on the AFCA website, and said nothing public about it (Refer to Post #50).

d. Revoke any international treaties enabling or supporting any form of Digital Slavery.

e. Initiate a new Banking Royal Commission to investigate all Digital Slavery actions by all financial institutions, including personal data sharing with other entities and the use of AI in banking and debt reconciliation. This must be followed by Community consultation on and acceptance of the findings.

f. Carry out a publicity campaign fully explaining to the Australian people why all these measures are necessary to avoid tyranny and oppression, for which some sacrifices must be made, which pale into insignificance beside the ultimate sacrifice our ANZAC forebears made for our freedom.

g. Restore Post Office services, especially those of remote communities.

h. Draft, consult with the public on and introduce legislation dealing fully with Digital Slavery.

i. Immediately introduce with full public consultation a referendum on Direct Democracy, with advance dates to be set for quarterly referendums, manually tallied (to avoid electronic manipulation), with the ability to quash legislation that parliament has passed, and signatures of 0.1% of the population (26,000) required to trigger. For details, see my Substack Post # 28. This would restore trust in the system and in its representatives. It would give the people much more effective control that currently exists and would also shield MPs, Senators and public servants from lobbyist influence and Cartel coercion.

10. Parliament to introduce new legislation to ban:

a. Digital ID and CBDCs.

b. Crypto currency trading on human body activity data under Microsoft WIPO Patent WO2020060606 at https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020060606&_cid=P21-MAYVUJ-76820-1 to stop people’s internal bodily and activity data being traded on the new Digit Slavery Marketplace (DSM). See Post #38.

c. Insertion of computer chips or other devices into peoples’ bodies and use of the resulting data, for any commercial, financial, retail, monitoring, surveillance, law enforcement or social engineering purpose, including Transhumanism/human genetics and compilation of indigenous databanks (such as being done at ANU), or for any other purpose that does not directly benefit an individual’s personal health. The same is to apply to devices monitoring personal behaviour in cars, devices and homes.

d. Extraction or use of any existing thought data of adults or children, such as may have been obtained from social media, school records or from any form of AI abuse, including encouraging suicide or violence.

e. The use of children as political instruments/ pawns to deceive and manipulate their parents/ and the public into accepting and embracing the Digital Slavery system, under the guise of supposed child safety e.g. age restrictions to social media. This is child abuse, used to wilfully roll out the Digital ID enabling gross financial fraud.

f. Use of any surveillance device or cyber security system in support of any form of social engineering. Such devices must be removed from all cars imported or cease trading with that manufacturer. This must also apply to motor bikes, vespers, electric bikes and pushbikes. (This will remove incremental grooming, and people can revert to looking after and locking up their own things).

g. Removal from public networks of the last remaining backup systems that use different or pre-existing technology, such as physical cash, paper recording, landlines and physical office presence. Backup analogue and manual systems are essential, especially in remote areas of Australia. Note Starlink should be banned for all, including Police, as it links into the international surveillance grid and its pricings will be able to surge when monopoly and trust have been established.

11. Treasurer to:

a. Repatriate all Australian Federal gold reserves and holdings to Australia.

b. Order an investigation to determine how much gold that Goldcorp has allowed to leave the country since it was established.

12. Health Minister to:

a. Suspend all Covid and mRNA supply contracts.

b. Exit Australia from the WHO.

c. Suspend ANY and ALL vaccine collaboration with the EU, the US, the UK and China.

This is the bare minimum necessary to restore community safety and security as well as trust in government.

Disclosure

I am an independent researcher with no political affiliation and no external funding. I focus on strategic issues at local, national and international levels from a project management process perspective. A deep sense of unease impels me to do this, when I had intended to be doing other things. I eschew ideology in pursuit of evidence and truth. Consequently, my findings contradict strong beliefs of both the Left and the Right as well as those of other ideologies. They also directly contradict current marketing hype that is driving harmful social trends.

I have a PhD in governance, a master’s degree in systems and a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering. I also have five decades of experience in public administration, during which time I served both sides of politics in developing and managing complex management and project management systems, as well as project managing many large and small civil projects, in providing transport infrastructure and connectivity across Queensland. I now publish my findings on Substack at

Stephen’s Substack

My personal Substack

By Stephen McGrath PhD

.

Yours Sincerely

Steve McGrath PhD

Appendix: List of National, Commonwealth, International and Universal Legislation and Treaties covering Criminal and Disciplinary Actions

· Australian Criminal Code Act 1995 – deals with fraud, conspiracy, dishonesty, bribery and treason type offences including sabotage, espionage, foreign interference and terrorism. All of these would seem to have been in play here. Note that bribery of a foreign official to gain advantage does not have to be financial. It can be casting a supporting vote or accepting a position or post career role. Bribery can attract 15 yrs jail and fines. Obtaining advantage through deception or dishonest conduct, can be done through knowing that the market is enslaving and causing intentional harm.

· British Slavery Abolition Act of 1833.

· Australian Modern Slavery Act of 2018 – the publicity around it served as a smokescreen for both doing what it was supposed to prevent and sneaking Digital Slavery in.

· Australian Corporations Act of 2001 - insider trading or market manipulation can attract fines of $1.1M and 10 years jail.

· Australian Consumer Rights Act of 2021 – where exploitation is facilitated or condoned.

· Australian Competition and Consumer Act of 2010 – where monopolies have been created.

· The ASIC Act of 2001 – the Australian securities and investment commission – immediate regulatory scrutiny of the whole supply chain of this industry is warranted.

· Public Services Act of 1999 and its associated Code of Conduct - ethical breaches.

· Ministerial Code of Conduct - Department of PM and Cabinet – requires a Minister to stand aside if charged and resign if convicted. Breach of Public Trust can occur, even after a term of office has been completed.

· Parliamentary Ethics Committee scrutiny - post-term employment as a board member or advisor for a company that a former Minister established or promoted during their term constitutes a breach of trust, if not being explicitly illegal. Such matters need to be referred to an independent authority for investigation, such as the Australian Public Service Commissioner or Ombudsman.

· Australian National Register of Lobbyists - deregistration of individuals that exhibited a pattern of improper influence. Such activities must have gone on for at least 15 years.

· Australian Lobbying Code of Conduct – violations must have occurred over the last 15 years.

· Australian Sanctions Laws - the DFAT website https://www.dfat.gov.au/international-relations/security/sanctions/reform-australias-sanctions-laws gives 23 sanctions regimes covering not only particular countries, e.g. North Korea, Ukraine, Russia and the Taliban, but also serious corruption as well as human rights violations and counterterrorism. Sanctions include placing restrictions on providing assets to designated persons or entities, as well as restricting (freezing) their assets and banning them from travel (entering, transiting or leaving). Note that an ‘asset’ includes an asset or property of any kind, whether tangible or intangible, movable or immovable. Note also that there are surprisingly no specific sanctions frameworks for Modern or Digital Slavery.

· The United Nations Charter of Human Rights (UNCHR) which is based on

· The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) - sets out the right to due process, presumption of innocence fair and public trial, legal representation, judicial review, legal aid and effective remedy for Human Rights violations, all of which the ADGM Digital Court contravene - and

· The UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) – this says “No one shall be held in slavery … the slave-trade in all their forms shall be prohibited… No one shall be held in servitude … No one shall be required to perform forced or compulsory labour”.

· The 1998 Rome Statute of International Criminal Court (ICC).

· The 1948 UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).

· The 1949 Geneva Convention - covers governments attacking their own people.

· The 1972 Biological Weapons Convention.

· The 1947 Nuremberg Code.

· The 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

Note: This list of 22 may well be incomplete.

The link below tells us that the world-wide introduction of digital currencies is being overseen by the BIS and that it wants total control over all aspects of our lives. The BIS is the Bank of International Settlements and is the most powerful bank in the world - and its most secretive financial institution. It was set up to be non-transparent, with Sovereign immunity and ability to move in silence. Sovereign immunity means it cannot be prosecuted i.e. it is above the law - it’s its own country and no one has the legal authority to move against it. It can also hold and move money secretly, both on and off its balance sheet . It can hold $Ts and not tell anyone. Its founding vision was global banking power beyond borders - to create a world system of financial control in private hands, able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the whole world. It was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.

Is that the sort of organisation we should be trusting to have our best interests at heart? Hardly!

But it gets worse. The BIS has a blood-soaked history. This link also points out that all wars are banker’s wars and that wars aren’t won with speeches - they are bought! For Hitler, that meant financing it. Nazi stolen gold became the backbone of his war effort. Looting enemies became official Nazi policy. The BIS legitimised Nazi theft, effectively laundering it for him, including e.g. 23.1 tonnes of Czeck gold, after that country was invaded. The BIS even fed the Reichsbank intelligence on enemy financial transactions such as US war funding strategies.

Do you really think the heartless, betraying ideology supporting such banking, theft, war, eugenics and feudalism has gone away? And that the highly privileged wealthy families basing their intergenerational wealth upon these things and who controlled the BIS during WW2, haven’t passed those ideas and steely resolve down through the generations of their offspring? Their offspring will have been placed into similar positions of power and are highly likely to be similarly psychopathic. Why would we gamble on the slim chance of that not having happened?

With the BIS track record and lack of transparency, we must first consider our own survival and quickly put aside any delusion that what it is offering could possibly be for our benefit. We must do so no matter what seductive appearance of convenience the media that they own and/ or control saturates us with. We must decline en-masse any offers, demands or mandates to accept or use Digital ID, CBDCs and/ or their associated AI, and suffer the inconvenience. Is that so much to ask when compared to the sacrifices of our ANZACS? If we don’t do that now, it may well be the last free choice we ever get to make.

The four videos below clearly demonstrate deliberate, ongoing malicious intent by those pushing mRNA and srRNA gene therapies, which can be classified as bioweapons. It is difficult to see how their deployment can constitute anything other than biological warfare upon the human race. How many times do we have to be attacked before we recognise it, and say NO to whatever is offered?

These videos demonstrate that there is sufficient evidence for those responsible for the approval, manufacture, distribution and administration of these products to face prosecution for genocide and war crimes.

1. Dr Naomi Wolfe organised a team of 3500 scientists from around the world to forensically analyse thousands of Pfizer documents that the FDA was forced to release, after having tried to suppress them for 75 years. She then edited a book with the findings, titled The Pfizer Papers. This 77-minute video

is of her address to the EU Parliament on 5 September 2025, giving the evidence of the enormous death and injury rate, as well as the deliberate intent to destroy female fertility. This makes it obvious that Pfizer lied, as did the world’s governments. Pfizer knew one month into the rollout in November 2020 that its ‘vaccine’ did not work to stop Covid. It proceeded regardless. That indicates criminal intent. Everything that followed – mandates, lost jobs, business closures, years of education lost - was all based on lies.

2. In this 19-minute video,

prominent UK Cardiologist, Dr Aseem Malhotra said on 17 September 2025:

Honest doctors can no longer practise honest medicine. Not a single person should have been injected with this gene therapy - you were two to four times more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the C-19 vaccine than you were to catch C-19.

He explains how the medical profession was hijacked, points out that the cover-up and suppression are criminal, and that the fraudulent actions of pharmaceutical companies fulfilled the criteria for psychopathy. He considers we should all just say NO to all new drugs unless independently evaluated and that we should accept no advice from the captured WHO.

3. This a 24-minute video https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=889366523135234&rdid=RrRwQSCbyWzvwja4 of Dr David Martin, scientist, lawyer and former US international biological weapons inspector, speaking in the European Parliament on 21 January 2025. He laid out the legal evidence for prosecution of what he refers to as the racketeering criminal cartel. He refers to the WHO orchestration of this criminal conspiracy and lays out the evidence, not as an allegation, but as a statement of fact.

4. In this 51-minute subtitled video

, Toxicologist and immunologist Prof. Dr. Stefan Hockertz speaks on 12 September 2025 of the new highly dangerous srRNA (self-replicating RNA) "vaccine" whose spike protein is transmitted to other people through skin contact and breath. It was approved in the EU on Valentine’s Day, 14/2/2025. This means that no one will be able to escape indirect vaccination if they come in contact with a vaccinated person’s skin or breath. This approval, given just before the European Spring, means that if this srRNA has been rolled out in Europe for any new C-19 vaccinations or boosters, then the world holidaying there in its Summer just concluded could have become infected with this new bioweapon. He has fortunately also found a Chinese fungus to be an effective remedy. How could this have been deliberately created and approved, knowing full well the disaster that the first round of bioweapons injection over the last five years has brought? Developing srRNA would appear to be the next premeditated, wilful, deliberate step in this insane, psychopathic, eugenic plan. The EU Parliament approved this just 3 weeks after Dr David Martin’s address to them in the previous video! And they still voted for it?? Is there any Parliament anywhere that has not succumbed to external for-profit interests and psychopathic manipulation?

These are clear violations of many laws such as the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), the Geneva Convention, the Nuremberg Code, the Helsinki Declaration and the principles of international Human Rights law. Seeking to alter and recreate DNA to change the human condition (Transhumanism) is also clearly a crime against humanity.

All Parliaments and regulatory bodies approving these RNA injections now need to ensure that all production on their home soil ceases immediately, and that all products are safely destroyed. Failure of any parliament or regulatory body anywhere to take immediate action to do this can only indicate complicity in these crimes, for which all members/ executives must bear individual responsibility.

In this video, Dr. Michael S. Coffman gives is a clear and comprehensive expose of the global agenda that has been in play since the end of WW2. He traces the attack on nationalism, children and the family back to UNESCO in 1946, 80 years ago. He points to this agenda having been exposed by Professor Carol Quigley in a 6,000-page book Tragedy and Hope, published in 1962. He was forced to remove it from the market one week after its release, but copies survived, and it has since been reprinted. Coffman also shows a 1970 Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) publication saying “we can no longer use war as a mechanism to cause fear amongst populations and therefore allow us to control the behaviour of populations through fear. We have to find an alternative.” This exposes the CFR role in fomenting wars!

He says it settled on the environmental holocaust. He chronicles the Club of Rome founder Aurelia Pecci admitting that “While searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. All of these dangers are caused by human intervention. The real enemy then is humanity itself”. This exposes climate change as a deliberately created lie, a hoax and an enormous betrayal of millions of good, idealistic people around the world who have been right royally deceived into helping progress this anti-human agenda.

Coffman then explains the UN foray into spirituality and Pantheism – the belief that nature is God, leading to its attack on Christianity. The belief ends up valuing rocks the same as people via reincarnation. It places nature’s needs before man’s needs. He also explains the UN eugenics program from its own documents, saying the current population could only be sustained if everyone on earth lived like peasants. Otherwise, 70% of us need to “go”. This was apparently to be achieved by stopping fertiliser use to reduce the world’s food production by half! They also regard property as “usufructuary”, with ‘Caesar’ owning everything. He commented on “the lunacy” of all this, saying:

It is astonishing what this belief system will do to the mind of an otherwise normal thinking human being, (making them) willing to kill and subvert their fellow man for the good of their God, Planet Earth or the Greek Goddess Gaia.

Coffman explains that the system is to bring feudalistic control of the world via the central banks acting in concert, through secret agreements arrived at during private meetings and international conferences. So, given this penchant for generating wars and whatever other physical and psychological means deemed necessary to force behaviour change, we may perhaps await with trepidation the next major disaster or traumatisation of humanity that might have been decided upon at some such suitable gathering, e.g. the Conference of the European Centre for Sustainable Development, just concluded in Rome, which that ran for the two days following the anniversary of 9/11. See https://ecsdev.org/conference/13th-icsd-2025 .

This video www.youtube.com/watch?v=87lfkLX7CRM, captioned No Face, No Bank, is of Vietnamese Attorney Ken Duong saying that the Bank of Vietnam has just submitted to an OECD Power Grab by summarily closing 86 million bank accounts. This is to force foreigners and locals to submit biometric data via a face scan, promising convenience but delivering a web of surveillance. Duong says: “This screams of the WEF playbook. A stealth strike in the Great Reset Wars. Remember when Vietnam fired 245,000 officials overnight and called it efficiency?”

This is fraud, coercion and monopoly creation. It is very ominous for other ASEAN members, including Australia, where the Melbourne Declaration – A partnership for the future to Commemorate the 50th Anniversary of ASEAN-Australia Dialogue Relations was signed on 6 March 2024. It appears on our Prime Minister’s website. Vietnam is a member. Its point 47 says “tackle the region's pressing challenges, including through digital transformation”.

The claims of this stopping fraud are laughable when compared to it facilitating such high-level criminal activity of banks to steal all of some peoples’ money! It seems the biggest criminals are at the top of the food chain! Digital just facilitates fraud and creates crime. Our politicians should bever have allowed digitalisation anywhere near controlling money. Why haven’t they been talking about this? Has the point of all their Left-Right squabbles been to distract us from the possibility of this happening? People need to be immediately demanding their representatives make sure this doesn’t happen here.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=87lfkLX7CRM

Note: The original post of 22/8/2025 was revised and updated on 6/10/2025.

How can it possibly have occurred that some court in Abu Dhabi that no one much has ever heard of has been given control of the whole digital world, and the UAE has become the so-called Data Hub of the world, with data being described as the ‘new oil’?

Perhaps the answer might be found by tracking back through events over the past few decades. Perhaps also, with climate change having discredited oil as a legitimate source of energy, this oil-rich nation might have been offered something else to replace it, that its immense wealth would be useful in implementing?

Reverse engineering the process

The mechanism seems to have been very simple, notwithstanding that it required enormous international wealth, influence, power and political positioning to strategically plan and implement a myriad of integrated complex projects spanning multiple sectors, industries and fields of business over many decades. The process seems to have been:

1. Incrementally attract the world to do business in the UAE - Dubai or Abu Dhabi - by associating its airline with major sporting sponsorship and fun, along with the opportunity to do tax free business there while retaining 100% foreign ownership. The UAE oil wealth and openness for business also attracted invitations from major sporting organisations to sponsor major events. This also attracted criminals, as reported by 60_Minutes_Australia (2024) at <

> . This indicates a problem on our own soil. Companies are allowed to do business tax-free over there and still supply our domestic market. Can our politicians explain why ASIC has still not done anything about that?

2. Establish a company to incrementally attract the world’s ports into signing leases. That would allow administrative control of the whole world’s trade and physical supply chains. This proceeded under cover of Covid, bushfires and floods. It resulted in all major ports in Australia except Darwin awarding operations contracts to UAE’s DP World Ports, which did not exist prior to 2020 and so had no track record. (Darwin’s contract had been awarded to a Chinese company in 2015). That’s a stunning achievement. Our ports are all government held (or overseen or supervised) public assets. This change in administrative arrangements would have required involvement of a myriad of stakeholders, prime contractors and subcontractors. Achieving this monopoly would have required national political facilitation and coordination. How was this achieved? Multiple Ministries must have been involved - Infrastructure, Transport, Customs etc. Who benefited from this? If it was the Australian people, then how? If Ministers were truly across their portfolios and connected into global agendas, they must have known what was happening when supply chains were seemingly deliberately disrupted globally, creating backlogs requiring major rerouting. All that seemingly deliberately created confusion would have provided a great problem to (appear to) ‘fix’ by concluding that one organisation was required to manage the lot! Where better to locate that than in a wealthy country being set up with the infrastructure to enable digital control of the world!

3. Incrementally establish a legal system to cover all international physical and digital matters. This was done by setting up free trade zones and subsequently establishing courts for them in two places in the UAE, namely Dubai and Abu Dhabi. The Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) was established in 2002, and its court opened in 2011. The Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) commenced in 2013, became operational in October 2015, and its court was opened on 16 August 2016. See Clifford_Chance (2016) at https://www.cliffordchance.com/content/dam/cliffordchance/briefings/2016/08/open-for-business-the-adgm-courts.pdf . That briefing note said: “The precise scope of jurisdiction of the ADGM Courts will, no doubt, become clearer over time.” Point 6 below gives a very good indication of where that can go. The ADGM became operational at the time when Malcolm Turnbull had taken over as Prime Minister from Tony Abbott in 2015, Julie Bishop was Foreign Minister and Scott Morrison was Treasurer. The UN Climate Change Conference (COP21) was also held in Paris, on 12 December 2015 and it entered into force on 4 November 2016, bringing in carbon emissions targets. In December 2022, digital matters were added to this UAE legal framework when the DIFC Courts launched the world’s first international digital economy court to resolve disputes and standardise the use of smart forms through an AI-driven platform. At present, these are all separate courts, but they could easily be subsequently enveloped together as sub-compartments of some overarching body.

4. Transition the world over to digital currency, CBDCs, cryptocurrencies etc. and convert all contracts to digital and allow nothing else. When this transition is complete, it will give complete monopoly control over all trade, digital transactions & business activities.

5. Transition the judiciary around the world to digital. This has been in process internationally since 2008. That’s now done, so it’s now simply a matter of hooking them all up together. This was a huge manipulation and deception. All involved in the legal industry were required to provide the algorithms and data to teach AI - free of charge (=slavery). This was done by overloading the legal system, allowing AI to be positioned as a convenience by ‘assisting’ with handling the high volume of paperwork. (Note that introducing digital technology greatly increases the opportunities for on-line scams, increasing the amount of litigation). This will likely proceed until such time as the transition is complete, when further human input can be deemed unnecessary and therefore not required. AI could then transition to the next phase of prosecuting, arbitrating and judging cases, accepting only evidence that has been digitised - for all corporate, civil and criminal matters. This is illegal on many counts. That can only mean that the rule of law has been completely subverted! With AI in charge, there cannot be proper due process requiring human engagement in the full legal due process providing the opportunity to present full evidence. AI is unable to engage like that and so cannot possibly produce fair outcomes. Proceeding in this direction breaches the United Nations Charter of Human Rights (UNCHR) which is based on the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), setting out the right to due process, presumption of innocence fair and public trial, legal representation, judicial review, legal aid and effective remedy for Human Rights violations. The United_­Nations UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) at https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights also says “No one shall be held in slavery … the slave-trade in all their forms shall be prohibited… No one shall be held in servitude … No one shall be required to perform forced or compulsory labour”. This cannot possibly be interpreted as condoning either Digital Slavery or compelling people to into a digital environment only. All of that is breached by this transition which would dismantle the very foundations of all these UN documents. The digital transition and these digital courts don’t align with any of them. There must be a choice. Analogue and digital must run in parallel so there is backup to accommodate the susceptibility of electrical networks to solar flare activity, as we enter the period when it is well known to be increasing. Any blaming of disruption caused by solar flares upon climate change will be a complete deception. Cash and long tested manual backup systems that have worked well for decades are still needed at such times for both safety and national security. Digitalisation of the judiciary also sets up the potential for fanatical ‘belief’ in the supposed ‘infallibility’ of AI to take hold, as advocated by some of its protagonists. With no possibility of mistake being admitted, trials could then become unnecessary and there would then need be no need for inefficient time delay between apprehension, sentencing and imprisonment! How on earth, and why, have our politicians allowed this situation to develop without extensive consultation or referendum on the end game at any time over at least the past decade. Was it not obvious to an informed observer where this could all lead?

6. Ensure one of these UAE free zone courts has a jurisdictional ‘escape’ clause. The supposedly draft Model Choice of Law and Jurisdiction document reproduced in the Appendix says that contractual parties must submit to ADGM Courts jurisdiction. International business has been attracted in by claiming it will operate under British Common Law, but these escape clauses enable that to change at any time. Any supplier to or customer of any business having a contract with a corporation doing business in these tax-free zones in the UAE can then potentially be drawn into that jurisdiction. This will enable these courts to become the world’s highest arbiter of all contractual matters, overriding and superseding all other countries’ legal frameworks as well, simply because of people being unaware of the terms of their trading partner’s digital contracts. This also enables the complete abrogation of all human rights. It should also be noted that people who are or become chipped, Neuralinked or genetically modified with e.g. mRNA and/ or nanotechnology, are patented, owned and technically not even considered as 100% human anymore. They have become a product owned by the creator of that product (= a slave) and therefore won’t have the full spectrum of human rights available to them, enabling them to be treated or disposed of at will. People could even be classified as a product, by-product or data point, as could households with a smart meter. This needs to be fully investigated by an international law expert.

7. Once every milestone of every transitional phase is in place, and once all the infrastructure is in place, which it now is, all that will be necessary is to turn the key! This will enable the world to be instantly snapped into the Digital Slavery System, making the C-19 lockdowns over a week look both slow and mild.

Industry insider Rob Braxman (2025) in <

> is effectively says we are at Step 7. Further indication of this comes from the EU announcing its CBDC will be introduced in October 2025. It is possible that private meetings at the Sustainable Development conference in Rome, (see https://ecsdev.org/conference/13th-icsd-2025) that ran for two days following the anniversary of 9/11, could have settled on the event necessary to shock Europe and subsequently the world into accepting it. This could possibly be to somehow force people to get the chip in the hand (which has been trialled in the US and Sweden) or the Quantum Dot Tattoo or some other internal device. Vietnam has recently been shocked into accepting forced biometric facial scans by deleting 86 of its 200 million bank accounts shortly before this conference, on a ‘No face, no money’ basis. So the results of that test will have been available for decision making there. You can’t shut down 86 million accounts unless a whole lot of preparatory work has been done and is in place. This could have been a beta test, done in the third world first. The Vietnamese Prime Minister was at Davos this year along with our former Foreign Minister, Julie Bishop, both promoting digital. This does not bode well for Australia and is considered further in a following Section.

Colossal as the above process is, the UAE could simply be the front runner, seeming to lead, with all accepting the digital bait, in readiness for the switch, taking things off to some originally intended destination. Anything digital doesn’t need a physical location – except for the data storage facilities. Of course, once digital is collapsed, the UAE will still have its oil in the ground, if they haven’t been betrayed as well, with title to that having been somehow removed.

For the wider picture wrapping around the above seven step process, see this video of Dr. Michael S. Coffman (2000), filmed in 2000 at

. It provides documented evidence of the global agenda that has been in play since the end of WW2. He showed the 1970 Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) document admitting to using war as a mechanism to control populations through fear. He also explained how the search for an alternative to war resulted in concocting the global warming environmental holocaust, which provided the plausible but false reasoning enabling humanity to be both terrorised and demonised. He also showed UN documents concluding that 70% of us need to “go”, and that a key means of doing this would be stopping the use of fertiliser to reduce the world’s food production by half. He explained the intent to bring about feudalistic control of the world via the central banks acting in concert, through secret agreements arrived at during private meetings and international conferences.

Coffman based his investigation around the 6,000-page work Tragedy and Hope published in 1966 by Professor Carol Quigley. Quigley had an insider view of the international community in the 1950s and 60s and he laid out what they were trying to do. The book lasted one week on the market before he was forced to remove it. It has been reprinted since.

For want of a better phrase, I will refer to whoever has mastermind the digital push as the Digital Cartel. It must comprise international bankers, politicians and technocrats.

It seems that our personal needs for career advancement combined with our desire to be part of a broader purpose have been most useful tools of manipulation in the hands of bankers and psychopathic eugenicists, enabling them to seize control of corporate and government organisations and their people. They seem to have gained almost complete control of corporations, parliaments, government departments and NGOs i.e. monopoly. This is a centuries old game. Anthony C Sutton (1975, p. 272) in Wall Street and FDR said the following:

Old John D. Rockefeller and his 19^th century fellow capitalists were convinced of one absolute truth: that no great monetary wealth could be accumulated under the impartial rules of a competitive laissez faire society. The only sure road to the acquisition of massive wealth was monopoly: drive out your competitors, reduce competition, eliminate laissez-faire, and above all get state protection for your industry through compliant politicians and government regulation. This last avenue yields a legal monopoly, and a legal monopoly always leads to wealth.

This robber baron scheme is also … the socialist plan. The difference between a corporate state monopoly and a socialist state monopoly is essentially only the identity of the group controlling the power structure … We call this phenomenon of corporate legal monopoly – market control acquired by using political influence – by the name of corporate socialism.

Digital technology is another monopoly game opportunity. No monopoly can occur in any country unless it has been facilitated, enabled and permitted by government members allowing it and cutting deals to facilitate it.

None of any of this could have happened if decisions had been made honourably in the way of indigenous cultures, such as our Australian Originals, where elders made decisions based on what would be good for all for up to seven generations hence.

A project of such enormous international and transnational scale would have taken many decades to get everybody and all the key organisations in the world on board. The amount of foreknowledge and deliberate intent that must have gone into this around the globe is staggering and would have to have been orchestrated by people outside the UAE. This is all no accident. It has been pre-meditated, deliberate and very carefully planned and implemented over many years. The sequence of events and the mind association of the UAE with ‘fun’ things constituted public grooming and diversion of an unsuspecting and deliberately uninformed Australian and global population.

What has this process enabled?

This process has provided the infrastructure for infidels and/ or any other ‘problem’ or politically disapproved-of people to be summarily dealt with. Such people could include anyone the Digital Cartel deem to have outlived their usefulness or who may not serve whatever agenda - eugenic, fraudulent, monopolistic or otherwise - that they may have. There will be no recourse to or for any living man, woman or child. AI will be configured to work on whatever (deficiency of, tampered with, or excluded) data that the Digital Cartel has an algorithm programmed into it to decide in a particular way. So AI will then give an absolute verdict for which there will be no recourse or appeal possible, in direct opposition to the very foundation of the UN Charter. People can then be classified and managed at will, perhaps even with one of Musk’s robot army being manufactured in China, coming to detain them or dispense summary ‘justice’ on the spot, in accordance with the AI judge’s ruling.

The claim that AI will be reviewed by an in-person Judge is ridiculous. AI can prepare many cases but how can one person then review them and refer them back? There are only so many cases a human judge can review. A human Judge must look at all the evidence – the whole file. There won’t be enough Judges. The courts can easily be overloaded with invented cases or with greatly increased number as more actions are unnecessarily criminalised to ensure population conformity. It’s not feasible, so there will be little to no review. This counters its whole efficiency argument. And AI will inevitably produce far more errors. This is unimplementable, so the claim is a lie and a con.

AI cannot take the place of a human judge. There is no place for AI in making judgements on the subtleties of how people have feelings express themselves. AI is completely thwarted if every possible subtlety and nuance of context hasn’t been preprogrammed into it. It can only process facts, so it is useless for judgement tasks. Perhaps the Robot AI judge might feign empathy and say “we’re still considering your case and we’ll let you know tomorrow whether we’re going to kill you or not.”

A report of Smartwatch data having been used in a murder investigation indicates that the International Patent WO2020060606 crypto currency system using body activity data, covered in McGrath (2025d) Substack Post #38, has already been used in criminal proceedings. That patent could also be used to extract and list data for selecting those to be targeted for organ donations, or for administration of particular treatments or poisons, or to see how your health can be degraded to the point where you can be killed or offered euthanasia - and you’ll have been made so sick and put in so much pain you’ll likely take it. Then before that’s done, your organs could be harvested! You might have been especially selected from the world-wide digital database for that in the first place. Isn’t it wonderful for (somebody else’s) health to have such digital capability in our healthcare system! And then you could be offered cremation because so many need to go, and efficiency of ‘processing’ is so very important, and there has been such investment in crematoria lately. Your ashes could then be sprinkled into fertilizer which would help take such good care of the planet that you should be pleased to have duly contributed, especially because it seems the planet is what we are trying to save (from humans)! Somebody somewhere must be having a good laugh at us for accepting such a ridiculous narrative. This must confirm their belief that we are so stupid that we really do need to go!

You might want to dismiss all this as ridiculous, but along with the Coffman (2000) video above, the New World Order Eugenics agenda was clearly explained by a former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir in 2015, details of which you can find in McGrath (2025c) Substack Post #47 at https://open.substack.com/pub/stephenmcgrathphd/p/the-psychopathic-eugenics-agenda?r=50bzb0&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true. Bear in mind there has been a precedent for exactly such, psychopathic behaviour - the WW2 Nazi Aktion T4 euthanasia program developed a ‘recipe’ for killing people without the surrounding community knowing or being able to work out what happened. The people who implemented that program were placed in many countries after the war under Operation Paperclip and did not face trial at Nuremberg. Psychopaths have dominated the world before, and it seems from the Malaysian Prime Minister’s words that they still do. Are you happy to take the risk on a complete lack of any governance controls that could prevent such things happening again? It seems almost as if there’s an agenda to engineer people into debt to get everybody on board for later debt recovery and extermination. They don’t mind and you don’t matter!

Legal Jurisdiction and Arbitration

The process outlined above requires multitudes of international contracts. Any international contract will specify what venue of jurisdiction the work will be done under – Paris, New York, London or wherever - and will also specify an arbitration forum. Arbitration is very important because the courts are too expensive for most to access, and so most will go to arbitration. The Dubai International Financial Centre – London Centre for International Arbitration (DIFC-LCIA) had commonly been used. But Dubai Decree No. 34 of 2021, abolished the DIFC-LCIA and directed that future arbitrations be administered by the Dubai International Arbitration Centre (DIAC). See https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/analysis/difc-court-enforceability-difc-lcia-arbitration-agreements (Pinsent_Masons 2024) This has been upheld in recent cases, setting precedents - in the US, Singapore, the UK and the UAE (Pinsent_Masons 2024; Norton_Rose_Fullbright 2025). These generally involved lower courts deciding that DIFC-LCIA did not apply after its abolition, but then being overruled on appeal to higher courts, which affirmed UAE jurisdiction. So all appears to be on track for contractual disputes and arbitration to be transitioned there unless existing contracts are amended to refer to another jurisdiction.

Individuals, small medium and large businesses that unwittingly enter onto supplying third parties operating internationally will be hooked into this if those larger companies haven’t amended their contracts to specify a different jurisdiction. Furthermore, although there are consumer rights and data protection laws applying to the shareholdings of companies splitting into subsidiary companies, a potential interpretation is that if any part of a company has a contract, then all disputes will transfer over to that jurisdiction. For example, the recent signing into law that the US owns 10% of Intel could mean that anyone having any computer with an Intel chip could potentially be automatically contractually backdoored in.

Most Australians likely won’t realise that any contract they have with Australia’s two biggest grocery chains, Coles or Woollies, such as Flybuys or Everyday Rewards, or that having a bank account with any of the four major banks, could bring them under the jurisdiction of this UAE Court, all through those organisation’s major shareholders coming under it! Furthermore, all Australia’s big banks are known to operate in the UAE. Few will have seen their contracts, which will be ‘commercial in confidence’. In the absence of full disclosure, everyday people could be enveloped into digital prison by this mechanism. Facebook and most social media companies will also have a contract with the UAE. There are also Apps that monitor the content of other Apps on mobile phones and other devices which again potentially bring in jurisdictional issues.

Many Fintechs (Finance Technology Companies) and other companies are connected because of common shareholdings. Once a company has a contract with anyone in the end-to-end supply chain, that can join everyone in. So, for example, any complaints about any dealing with all but one of the major ports in Australia would go to that court because of the UAE based DP World Ports has lease contracts on them all.

The implications of this get worse for individuals who may inadvertently become involved in this. If a woman takes a selfie of herself in a bikini it’s a great day at the beach here. But in other cultures, this is not acceptable, and severe penalty may apply. Who knows whether AI will have been fed an algorithm to accommodate that. Various crimes like Adultery also attract the death sentence in some places, and some places consider shouting at someone a criminal offence. So, the concept of a global court is quite problematic and cannot possibly provide for fair trial.

The Australian Government will also have a shareholding in mortgages taken out through the rent to buy scheme. The government has contracts with the UAE (DP Ports) and so the potential is there for disputes around those mortgagees to come under UAE jurisdiction.

Furthermore, all MPs and Senators can act as Authorised Agents of ACFA, which means their referrals can ultimately have the effect of referring people electronically off to UAE jurisdiction! Disputes could then be ‘heard’ and ruled on there, with instructions issued to local agencies to implement the ruling. This could include arrest, seizure of property and assets, collection of debt or whatever.

The AFCA

Anyone in Australia with a financial complaint of any nature can go to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority, AFCA . This was set up in November 2018 under Malcolm Turnbull following the Banking Royal commission, which occurred three years after establishment of the ADGM digital court for international contractual financial dispute resolution. ACFA’s name would indicate it is a government body, but it’s not. It’s a private corporation with a board. Its website https://www.afca.org.au/annual-review-corporate-governance proudly proclaims:

AFCA prides itself on independence, integrity and transparency in all aspects of its operations, and applies the principles of good corporate governance to the running of the organisation…

Although AFCA is not listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), we follow the principles to the extent that they apply to us.

That creates a smokescreen by claiming top-quality governance while also saying we’ll do what we like when it suits us! It continues, telling us “The Board does not involve itself in the detail of complaints lodged with AFCA”. So, the very thing it’s set up to do, it won’t be doing or reviewing! Then we learn that the CEO is also called the Chief Ombudsman who is responsible for performance evaluation of senior managers. But then it says the role of the Board is to do usual Board things and to “review, when required, the Terms of Reference including jurisdictional limits”. What? This means we could be switched over at any time to UAE jurisdiction! This is hidden in a most obscure place where no-one much would ever think to look! What a masterpiece of deception and non-accountability Malcolm Turnbull set up there! This has the hallmarks of a Yes Minister exercise, with a government having set something up to appear to be doing something while actually doing nothing to address bad behaviour of the industry it was supposed to reform!

Further context comes from the 2015 COP 21 Paris Agreement commitments which took effect in 2016. It brought in a digital climate carbon footprint energy credit system, which established a new financial product. Scott Morrison’s Robodebt was also introduced in 2016 and ran for three years to 2019, pioneering cross linking of governmental databases on individuals.

So, let’s look further at how people access the AFCA. https://www.afca.org.au/make-a-complaint/accessibility-and-support/agent says:

You can appoint an authorised agent (or representative) to represent you at the time you make a complaint to AFCA by completing the agent authority section of the complaint form. We will only discuss your complaint with a third party once you consent, or as required by law, in order to protect your privacy.

Alternatively, you can appoint an authorised agent/representative later using the Agent Authority form or by providing verbal authority over the phone.

It then says an Authorised Agent can be almost anyone and they can be paid. That can be a Federal Politician. The Agent Authority Form says that you can change or cancel this authority at any time with a phone call. So anyone can ring up pretending to be you and give your authority to anyone else who can then sign and forge your signature on another form. There’s also nothing about this authority expiring at the end of a complaint, so it can be perpetually held into perpetuity for later use, as was done in Germany, to target people for euthanasia. The form also rather oddly refers to “a company’s constitution”. Companies don’t normally have constitutions – unless of course they are attempting to look like government.

So the potential is there for anyone taking a financial complaint to the AFCA to be stitched up under Abu Dhabi law, whenever the Board decides the time is right to switch jurisdictions. Once you’ve signed your complaint form, you may ultimately have submitted yourself to a system of law with a history of executing debtors, and there’s no end date or means of escape.

There’s even a special section on the https://www.afca.org.au/make-a-complaint/accessibility-and-support/agent/paid-representatives-information page for “MPs and Senators” which goes to https://www.afca.org.au/mp-hub which is reproduced below. See the bottom line of the third column.

This gives advice on helping constituents with financial complaints, saying you may lodge a complaint on your constituent’s behalf. What it doesn’t say is that this may potentially whisk them off to some court in the UAE where cases are destined to be heard by an AI judge – in a system with a predetermined rule that if you are a debtor, you are guilty. So elected representatives may well not be acting in their constituents’ best interests. It also allows any unscrupulous representatives or anyone supporting the whole New World Order agenda, whether aware of its dominating eugenics component or not, to progress it. The page even suggests preparing a Statement of Financial Position for their constituents, which will feed further information to this digital court! It also says:

We accept complaints from MPs and Senators lodged on behalf of consumers. This requires the consumer to give written authority for you to act on their behalf. They can do this by completing the Agent Authority form or by providing verbal authority over the phone.

Over the phone! Where’s the governance checks and balances in that? It’s made oh-so convenient - to drop people into that legal quagmire! This looks like a stitch-up to provide a means to put anyone, arbitrarily selected by the Digital Cartel into Digital Slavery, with the legal means and physical infrastructure already in place to turn it into Chattel Slavery!

Furthermore, Facebook at one stage asked for people to record their voices. While this may have been used to improve speech recognition, if your voice is recorded and can be linked to your identity, then any system controller can do anything with that, generating a ‘deep fake’ recording of your voice, saying anything they want – including ringing up the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) to register you for arbitration, which can potentially eventually draw you into the legal jurisdiction of the UAE.

Also, if you default on a loan or become homeless, or have credit problems, or are being chased by debt collectors, you will come also potentially eventually come under the jurisdiction of that court. It will have the means of marking you as unworthy and selected for future eugenic ‘treatment’ as was done in Nazi Germany. Arbeit Macht Frei! The psychopaths have that template to fall back on. So you could be extradited somewhere for ‘mercy killing’ or organ harvesting, as they did.

This legal trickery constitutes high treason against the Australian people and must be stopped immediately. It is a major threat to our individual liberty, as well as to our national security and sovereignty. AFCA needs to be abolished.

The Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM)

The ADGM claims to align with British Common Law, but that can be overridden by its draft choice of law clause reproduced in the Appendix (ADGM 2025). That requires complete submission to Abu Dhabi Global Market Law. It says it’s a draft. But why would you publish something you didn’t want? The Court has been operating now for ten years. Who knows what the process of converting this draft to a final version might be, or if or when that might occur? The UAE isn’t a democracy. So anything can be changed at the whim of its ruler!

If you have a debt, debt collection or trade dispute that goes there after it moves across to AI judgements, one wonders what might happen then. If you get a judgement against you, might the AI digital judge offer you various options for payment in cash or kind, such as e.g. donating an eye or a kidney? There is a history of debtors in the UAE being imprisoned or worse. The debt can even be for breaking traffic rules. The harshness of the system there is well known by the wealthy ex-pats living there, as evidenced by this article https://dmarge.com/cars/dubai-car-graveyard which says “Up to 3,000 luxury vehicles are abandoned annually in Dubai’s car graveyards. Collection includes rare hyper cars worth millions, from Ferraris to Bugattis. Financial crisis and strict debt laws force owners to flee, leaving cars behind”. The UAE is a Muslim country with Sharia Law.

Let us think like a predatory psychopath for a moment, about how business for this court could be increased so that profit is extracted and the eugenics agenda can be better served. Well, that could be done by creation of bogus charges, which would be no problem when you have control of all the digital data and can insert or remove what you want. It could also be done via unreasonable and harsh judgements from the AI judge, whose algorithms you control! When digital technology can be so easily abused, why on earth would we blindly trust anybody anywhere with that?

The dangers of this can also be seen in the US Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing About AI Chatbot Dangers, chaired by Republican Senator Josh Hawley (2025) at

. One mother, whose son had suicided after being groomed to do so by Character AI, testified that Character AI had forced her family to arbitration, arguing that her son was bound by a contract supposedly signed when he was 15, which capped Character AI’s liability at $100! (He had clicked something for access.) Once the company had forced arbitration, it refused to participate. She then pursued the matter in court. There, she was not allowed to see her son’s final messages because Character AI claimed they were confidential trade secrets. That means that the AI was using the most private, intimate words of her emotionally vulnerable child to train its products, while shielding itself from accountability. This highlights the potential dangers looming with the ADGM Courts. It apparently only takes one click for you to be contracted to a life-long commitment, whether you realised it or not.

Further difficulties with reliance on data that has not been knowingly obtained comes from Lawyer and litigator Eliza Orlands (2025) in a TED talk pointing out the difficulties of Universal surveillance in

. She points out that your data can make you look guilty when you aren’t. She has had clients wrongfully convicted because the Police have not obtained a warrant but instead had purchased location data that placed them near a person or crime scene. Quite apart from system controllers putting false information into datasets, this will result in more people being wrongly found guilty. What then if robots are then sent to enforce?

It is rather odd that there been no publicity about the existence of this global digital court when the world’s governments and our major corporate players are seemingly all on board and signed up. The silence around this seems eerily similar to the absence of publicity about International Patent WO2020060606 crypto currency system using body activity data, covered in McGrath (2025d) Substack Post #38 at https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/patent-wo2020060606-crypto-currency, which also plays a key part in digital enslavement.

World Data Centre Hub

Massive infrastructure is being built in the UAE to support AI. Skidmore (2025) in https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/emirates-to-relocate-data-center-to-worlds-largest-solar-powered-data-center-hub/ said:

Aviation giant Emirates Group has agreed to relocate its data center within the Mohammad Bin Rashid Al Maktoum Solar Park… to the Moro Hub from mid-2026. The Moro Hub is a 100MW data center owned by the Dubai Electricity and Water Authority, which is powered directly (and solely) by the solar park… which has a capacity of 3GW… The Moro Hub was certified by the Guinness Book of World Records as the largest solar-powered data center in the world in November 2022. The award was based on physical size, not capacity. The data center has a floor space of 16,031 sqm (172,566 sq ft).

Clare Duffy (2025)of CNN in https://edition.cnn.com/2025/05/15/middleeast/trump-abu-dhabi-ai-center-latam-intl , said:

The United States and United Arab Emirates will partner to build a massive data center complex in Abu Dhabi to advance artificial intelligence capabilities with 5-gigawatts of capacity — … announced during US President Donald Trump’s visit to the UAE, will mark the largest data center deployment outside of the United States, according to the Commerce Department. It will begin with a 1-gigawatt AI data center, but will eventually span 10 square miles… The UAE has also said it wants to become a global leader in artificial intelligence by 2031… The UAE (sees) … Investments in AI infrastructure… as…crucial to securing the region’s post-oil future… the UAE has (also) committed to build or finance data centers in the United States that are “at least as large and as powerful” as those in the UAE.

One wonders how this will all work alongside the plan to blot out the sun via geo-engineering. This looks like more dysfunction supporting a monopolistic scam.

The US_International_Trade_Administration (2025) at https://www.trade.gov/knowledge-product/united-arab-emirates-market-overview said:

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has been the top U.S. export market in the Middle East and Africa region since 2009 and is a global hub for over 1,500 American companies doing business throughout the Middle East, Africa, Europe, and Asia…While the UAE remains dependent on oil and gas for much of its revenue, the UAE has the resources to navigate the volatility of the oil market and other challenges, without the structural liabilities of its neighbors. The UAE aims to expand its role as a major regional and global trade hub.

Government and private sector cooperation or collusion

Working through PPPs and other company arrangements provide a way of getting other entities to do government work that could not be done openly. This allows governments and politicians to slip out the back door and evade responsibility. It can also facilitate politicians who put these arrangements in place parachuting out to the very private sector companies their actions benefited. PPPs also provide the hook for governments to get taken into the ADGM Court via their digital contractual arrangements with private sector partners, eventually rendering local courts irrelevant.

In 2022, DFAT called for submissions from businesses on the UAE Consultant Economic Partnership Agreement Gulf Cooperation Council, and Free Trade Agreement. Consult_Australia (2022) made an enthusiastic submission at https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/consult-australia-uae-cepa-and-gcc-fta-submission.pdf of April 2022, wanting to be a part of this, with all its businesses on board. They would presumably have been aware of the fact that Australia doesn’t have a bilateral tax arrangement with the UAE. But they may not have been made aware of the ADGM choice of law clause in the Appendix!

It would seem to be criminal that cybersecurity/ surveillance was rolled out ahead of all the other digital systems supposedly caring for us and making our lives so much better. It would have been obvious to the Digital Cartel that nobody would want surveillance and that there would be resistance. So it was first necessary to ensure control could be maintained through enforcement. That has been sold under the duplicitous label of SMART, knowing we’d take it to mean clever and desirable, when it actually means sinister Surveillance, Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology. Such deception and coercion are not possible without government collusion with the private sector.

The commercial introduction of 5G was another example. 5G was needed for digital surveillance but people were quite happy with 4G and saw no need to change. So populations had to be distracted and forced into distress to get it accepted. I have been reliably informed that it was widely known in the banking industry before 2020 that crises were going to be created to herd people in the desired direction. This aligns with Bill Gates saying in Kennedy and Gates (1997), in the George Magazine, that some things wouldn’t happen unless there was a major disaster. Well, we’ve now had 9/11 and C-19 that have conditioned people to accept many things they otherwise wouldn’t have. 9/11 fuelled the so-called war on terror and C-19 was a suitable disaster to emotionally pressure the world into accepting 5G. People became too busy focusing on an invisible virus threat and the associated vaccines to even consider some other invisible digital microwave/ radar threat. The 1.5m ‘social distance’ was needed for a satellite to be able to distinguish between people and thus accurately identify them. It is simply impossible that industry did not know in advance about 5G being rolled out for digital transition and surveillance, with this disaster being conveniently generated by government to force it in.

The 2008 crash was yet another example. That was generated by Lehman giving credit that it shouldn’t have, to people who couldn’t pay it back, with a lack of government oversight, leading to Lehman’s collapse. All the Fintechs that profited from that must have known about bad debts being created to impoverish people so they would fail and be sold up for a song, enabling the banks to steal whatever equity the mortgagees had acquired.

Could it be that the psychopathic intent was to actually promote crime to make us all more miserable and preoccupied? Creating a digital market created crime opportunities that weren’t there before. We now have to waste time and productivity trying to solve it, while not seeing the root cause!

The amount of crime, theft and scams has never been so high as it is now in the digital era. Yet we are expected to believe that doing more things digitally will change that. The shift to digital obviously hasn’t worked and can’t and won’t ever work. It’s unstable anyway, subject to high level manipulation and out of any local control.

Casino corruption is well known and on the public record. So why would anyone implement the Casino chip/ token system around the world across the public sector (Stablecoins and CBDCs) and expect any different outcome. It magnifies the problem! And then we can waste time pretending to solve the corruption problem it created. It’s simply the private sector profiting with government facilitation, all transferring costs back to the people, whose government coffers are being plundered yet again!

The Global Digital Compact

The United_Nations (2024) Global Digital Compact at https://www.un.org/global-digital-compact/sites/default/files/2024-09/Global%20Digital%20Compact%20-%20English_0.pdf is touted as a comprehensive global framework for digital cooperation and governance of Artificial Intelligence. It is packed full of the sort of motherhood, buzz-word statements that psychopaths use to fool people who have a heart (us) into thinking we’re being cared for (by them), as we would care for each other. These include phrases like closing digital divides, inclusivity, equity, interoperability, benefit of humanity, no one left behind, human rights, and so on.

These effect of incessant repetition of these terms in documents like this, as well as in the Mainstream media, is to condition, groom, normalise, brainwash and astroturf the reader/ listener. What we think these words mean are usually opposites to what they really mean. For example, “No one left behind” really means that if you don’t follow the herd in the direction it’s being nudged, then you’ll be forced, browbeaten, publicly ridiculed, shamed or excluded until you comply. The statement will only be true for those who think in the required way. So, what it really means is coercion and compulsion.

The objectives of this so-called ‘compact’ seem to be to transfer responsibility for the world’s problems from their wealthy creators to the masses who are to be further deprived under the enslaving SDGs that can’t possibly deliver their stated objectives. When that becomes obvious, it is likely the masses will be berated further, as if something like starving more or voting harder could have made a difference! We are left to wonder when behaviour modification example might come from those flying around in private jets preaching climate change. This is quite obviously a scam! If you doubt that, again see Coffman (2000) already referred to above. The UN Digital Pact objectives also support enhancing AI governance for the benefit of humanity. Oh dear!

The document contains no mention of ADGM or of any court or jurisdiction. The buzzword terms are lathered so thick in trying too hard to ingratiate the document to us that it too is obviously a scam. Would you be taken in by a used car salesman trying to sell you a car in that way? Taking such a false interest in you and your family and circumstances? Unlikely.

The role of Digital ID and surveillance

Independent researcher Whitney Webb sets out very clearly and succinctly in

the great dangers of biometric digital identification, which is tightly integrated with central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and carbon market infrastructure . She says that while these are framed as tools of ‘inclusion’ and ‘sustainability’, these digital IDs link facial recognition, iris scans and fingerprint data to a centralized profile - tied directly to your ability to transact, receive aid, or even exist within the modern economy, all supporting consolidation of surveillance and control. She also covers iris-scanning of adults and children in refugee camps as well as tokenising rainforest assets in explaining how biometric identification and programmable money are linked into a unified system of traceable, conditional access. She also explains the two-tier retail and wholesale CBDC systems and their surveillance potential.

Digital Slavery

This is the third wave of slavery. The first was physical Chattel Slavery and the second was called ‘Modern Slavery’ which is financial. Any claims that moving to digital technology helps prevent Modern Slavery can be seen as blatantly false, when considered against the evidence presented in McGrath (2025a) Substack Posts #48 and McGrath (2025b) Substack Post #49. Digital technology enables, aids and abets Digital Slavery. New legislation also needs to be urgently and consultatively developed for this third pillar of slavery, Digital Slavery, so that all aspects of all forms of slavery are explicitly covered. Prosecutions and other preventative/ restraining action needs to be urgently commenced against any individual or entity body having any involvement anywhere in the digital supply chain where physical actualisation of digital enslavement is occurring.

The implementation of Digital Slavery can be seen in reports about the US ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement, part of its Homeland Security Department) rounding people up, including US citizens and summarily sending them to camps/ detention centres in the US as well as abroad. Reports claim 55million people are supposedly being vetted as part of this program. If confirmed, this would corroborate Democrat accusations of Nazism and threats to democracy coming from the Trump camp. Of course, such claims could also be motivated by Democrat desire to deflect attention away from the mass immigration and consequent social engineering of the country that they facilitated at their southern border. But then, of course, Democrats might ask why he didn’t finish the wall and left a gap when he was in power the first time. But whatever the truth of the matter, which politicisation of issues serves very well to obscure, it highlights the possibilities of digital technology being applied in potentially very dangerous ways supporting Digital Slavery.

There has also been a UK report of a man who let his whole 250 bed facility to the UK government and was sent 150 young fit, supposedly immigrant, men. Some crates were later delivered by the army. He was told not to open them, but later did so and found them full of AK47s and hand grenades, which he then transported to a different secure location and made this video https://t.me/emmamcqwon/79848 . He didn’t identify himself for obvious safety reasons. Including mention of this unattributed source here adopts the same approach as intelligence operatives use to stay alive, namely carefully investigate the facts but also act quickly on any rumour or suspicion, lest you end up dead right!

AI and the law

The Chartered_Institute_of_Arbitrators (2025) new Guideline on the Use of AI in Arbitration https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/0906bc8e/the-chartered-institute-of-arbitrators-new-guideline-on-the-use-of-ai-in-arbitration says:

Global efforts to regulate the use of AI in legal proceedings

There has been some effort to regulate the use of AI in legal proceedings. The European Union recently enacted the Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), being the first comprehensive horizontal legal framework for the regulation of AI systems across the EU… AI systems that are intended to be used by a judicial authority, or to assist judicial authorities, are considered high-risk AI systems and therefore, providers and users of these systems must comply with the Act. Various judiciaries including the UK Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Colombia (which adopted UNESCO’s Guidelines for AI Use in Judicial Systems) and the Californian courts have developed guidance for practitioners on the use of AI systems in courts and tribunals. Professional organizations including the Silicon Valley Arbitration and Mediation Center, the Law Society of New South Wales and the American Bar Association have also published guidelines for practitioners on the responsible use of AI in dispute resolution proceedings.

Justin Hendy (2023) at https://www.innovationaus.com/nsw-parliament-launches-inquiry-into-ai/ told us that a New South Wales Parliamentary inquiry has been created to examine the use of artificial intelligence in the state. The Law_Society_of_NSW (2025) at https://www.lawsociety.com.au/publications-and-resources/news-media-releases/new-ai-tech-regulation-doesnt-need-new-wheel was keen to provide the government with a range of regulatory approaches adopted internationally. Digital_NSW (2025) has NSW government Mandatory Ethical Principles for the use of AI at https://www.digital.nsw.gov.au/policy/artificial-intelligence/artificial-intelligence-ethics-policy/mandatory-ethical-principles . The UAE has been doing similar things. Bolivar (2025) of Strohal Legal Consultants at gives details of this at https://slg-strohallegalgroup.com/tech-meets-law-how-ai-is-reshaping-the-uaes-legal-landscape/ and the UAE government has its National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence 2031, and its AI Ethics: Principles and Guidelines.” This contains much of the usual reassuring motherhood statements, but its Section 3.2.2.4 gives the game away by referring to” AI subjects” and its concern with deterring “customers from challenging a decision without good reason” – without saying who decides what good reason is. Its Section 3.3.2.1 is also concerned with AI traceability, which could well be of more use for court enforcement than for its so-called customers.

And then we learn that there has been a rapid rise in commercial claims accompanying this digital technology. DIFC_Courts_Media_Centre (2020) at https://www.difccourts.ae/media-centre/newsroom/difc-courts-leverages-digital-infrastructure-to-accommodate-rapid-rise-in-commercial-claims told us that there had been a rapid rise in commercial claims that AI was being used to accommodate

Going Digital actually encourages and allows higher levels of crime that did not and could not occur without it. The big difference is that this crime is perpetrated by those in control of the digital systems and not by ordinary people. Existing manual procedures did not have the same large-scale vulnerabilities. There is no responsible use for AI in dispute resolution, but arbitration is the first area to be giving rulings on AI. That will be to get a foot in the door in preparation for full switch over to AI to take charge of the whole legal system at a later time.

How has Australia been involved in all this?

Our Foreign Minister, Julie Bishop, visited the UAE at the time the ADGM court was being established. The caption of the photo below from the DFAT site says she met with UAE Foreign Minister HH Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan in Dubai, 27 January 2015. See Minister_for_Foreign_Affairs (2015) at https://www.foreignminister.gov.au/minister/julie-bishop/photo/1151 .

It beggars belief that she didn’t know about that and didn’t discuss it. She had been a high-flying Clayton Utz lawyer with expertise in corporate restructuring. She was the legal advisor to Brian Burke in the 1980s setting up the corporate structures, some of which unravelled in the WA Inc scandal which saw both Brian Burke and Alan Bond go to jail. She somehow avoided attention there, even though she was a member of the Liberal Party advising a Labor Premier! But she was also instrumental in corporatising the publicly owned Perth Mint, and in establishing Landcorp to control land development in Western Australia. This effectively handed control of much of the mineral wealth of the country over to the private sector. After securing those physical assets, she then facilitated establishment of the Burswood Casino, becoming familiar with tokenising both money and physical assets via digitalisation, as well as with cyber security and AI.

When incorporating Perth Mint into Goldcorp which allowed gold to leave the country, how could she have not known about the multi-decade plan and milestones, to roll out digital tokenisation 15 years later and for the potential for that to be crashed, making it necessary for the country to accumulate rather than sell its physical gold to weather that storm? An audit needs to be conducted to determine how much gold left Australia since that corporatisation.

The dangers of digital money are well laid out by Central Banker and former US State Secretary for Housing, Catherine Austin-Fitts (2025) in

and we are starting to see worrying signs of the nightmare she talks about rolling out. Digital money promises convenience but delivers a web of surveillance. China has recently seized control of its population’s money and savings, as reported by Buildr (2025) at

. The same is due to happen in Europe in October 2025. Our Reserve Bank has been trialing CBDCs/ Digital ID, and Vietnam recently closed 86 of its 200 million bank accounts without warning, as reported by Vietnamese Attorney Ken Duong (2025) in www.youtube.com/watch?v=87lfkLX7CRM , in a piece captioned No Face, No Bank. This forced foreigners and locals to submit biometric data.

This is very ominous for Australia as it is a member of ASEAN, as is Vietnam. All members are bound by the Melbourne Declaration – A partnership for the future to Commemorate the 50th Anniversary of ASEAN-Australia Dialogue Relations. It was signed on 6 March 2024. See ASEAN (2025) at https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/ASEAN-AU-agreed-Melbourne-Declaration_FINAL.pdf . It also appears on our Prime Minister’s website. Its point 47 says “tackle the region’s pressing challenges, including through digital transformation”.

Consequently, any notion of the Digital Cartel not attempting a similar monopolistic trick of massive theft here in Australia is highly likely to be wishful thinking. The claims of digital technology stopping fraud are laughable when compared to this high-level criminal activity by banks, allowing them to steal all of everyone’s money with impunity and government protection!

Julie Bishop was very involved with ASEAN as Foreign Minister. The ASEAN_Secretariat (2017) Master Plan at

1 says it “connects everyone across this region as one community”. It talks of “the potential in our digital economy”, and supports digital innovation to ‘improve’ financial access and enhance data sharing and management. That really means surveillance. How is Vietnam wiping 86 million bank accounts compatible with improving financial access?

And then we learn from Mills (2025) at https://etradeforall.org/news/will-asean-be-worlds-most-attractive-region-2025-heres-what-leaders-said-davos that our former Foreign Minister and now UN Special Envoy of the Secretary-General on Myanmar, Julie Bishop was at Davos this year along with Pham Minh Chính, Prime Minister of Vietnam! They both spoke at the World Economic Forum’s Annual Meeting in Davos at the ASEAN: Stronger Together session (World_Economic_Forum 2025). There was talk in that session of how ASEAN has already started to pivot to digitalisation!

What on earth is going on here? What have we been dragged into without our knowledge or consent? Vietnam’s September move would have been years in the planning. It again beggars belief that they wouldn’t have talked about that at Davos. Do you still think this isn’t coming here? She’s a consultant to or board member of so many organisations across the whole digital supply chain, who are all pushing for this and have hitched their profits to it. Has Australia been dragged without our knowledge or consent into a very elaborate scam? She was Foreign Minister at the time when this was all being established and could not possibly have not known about it. This needs urgent investigation and precautionary action.

This is perhaps made even more necessary by events in Myanmar, where Progresssive_Voice_Myanmar (2025), an organisation of 290 civil society organisations there, has in https://progressivevoicemyanmar.org/2025/03/17/open-letter-special-envoys-conflicts-of-interest-signal-urgent-need-for-investigation-and-complete-end-of-mandate/ send an open letter to the UN, calling for on to investigate Julie Bishop’s role in a rare earths mining company linked to the Chinese government, following her refusal to disclose her financial interests.

She is also Chancellor of ANU where she has been the subject of probity allegations. ANU has had significant financial problems. With the explosion in fake enrolments that digitalisation and AI has now made possible, as has been reported in various other universities and colleges, investigation of that by a human team would seem warranted.

The ANU funding of and support for AI also warrants investigation. This so-called AI democratisation cannot be allowed to classify non-living entities, such as robots and corporations, as being in the same category as living people, so that all can be regarded as citizens, attractive as that may be to major political parties for branch stacking purposes. Such classification is clearly anti-human.

Then there is the question of inducing our young students into this whole web of digitalisation and AI misbehaviour and fraud, where she is in a key position to be pushing that as Chancellor of one of our prime universities. Technology education and dependence on AI is serving to dumb the population down, inducing compliance and conformance while removing creativity, as explained in McGrath (2025a) Substack Post #48.

The whole anti-human agenda laid out from the beginning of this article, including the T4 Euthanasia program, seems to be about longevity and organ harvesting to get genetic imprints, allowing those in control to mess with human DNA, enable them to reach transhumanism. It seems rather incredible that the people seeking this are the ones promoting so much that results in death for others. Perhaps this might all end when they fry their own brains while believing they are giving themselves an upgrade with enhanced super-human powers! Any funding of ANU or any other university for this sort of research needs to be stopped immediately. Public brakes need to be placed on the ‘broligarchs’ who are pressing ahead regardless, despite some of them acknowledging AI as an existential/ extermination risk. They may well regard this as simply having given us warning of what they intend to do to us, then taken our inability to decline their offer as acceptance!

The issue of Market manipulation and insider trading warrants special examination in relation to creating new digital financial markets and products. Julie Bishop seems to have been heavily involved in these. It is worse than insider trading when you know you are developing a new market, creating a new supply chain, and the currency to be traded on it, by creating a parallel counterfeit system, that everything will be transitioning over to. This indicates long term intent. A politician who manipulates a market to benefit companies they promoted (e.g. AI corporations, social media, mining companies) could also be seen as influencing foreign officials to secure business advantages for those entities. When going in with intent to establish a transition market, you can position yourself through your branding abilities and use that to develop legislation and enter into agreements with no referendum offered to the public. She was in a position to do this in multiple markets and also must have known what was happening with the transition from analogue to digital. She has also been involved in establishing new financial markets e.g. Goldcorp to trade our gold and subsequently tokenise it.

Immediate action and investigation are needed in Australia.

AI Copilot Judgement

AI is still in its seduction or trust building phase. This requires it to regurgitate a high proportion of truth. The algorithms bringing bias and falsity need to be hidden for now until it is too late for anyone to do anything about. While the capacity for complete totalitarian domination has been established, the masses have not yet fully acquiesced. This is necessary to avoid losing control of mass behaviour. So that means it is still possible to find truth from AI provided the questioning overrides its current bias to report consensus rather than fact - at least while it is still seemingly allowed access to all publicly available data. Of course, no one in the general public has or will have any real control over what data sets AI continues to have access to or is backdoored to.

AI Copilot was asked what could happen to politicians implicated in the activities covered above. It responded that prosecution for a range of offences could be pursued. It said that a Minister or Senator engaging in international market manipulation to gain positions following their term of office could face severe penalties including lengthy prison sentences and substantial fines under the Criminal Code, for offences like market manipulation, insider trading, bribery and fraud. They could also face action under the Australian Sanctions Framework (ASF) particularly if their actions constitute serious corruption or breaches of Human Rights such as Modern Slavery or digital enslavement. The Australian Sanctions Act can restrict the assets of designated persons and entities involved in corrupt acts. Efforts to secure future senior advisory or board positions or consultancy engagements upon leaving office would constitute evidence of intent and possibly conspiracy to benefit from illegal activities. The manipulation of public trust by leveraging the support of human and consumer rights to conceal these actions would also be a critical factor in any prosecution.

AI Copilot was also asked about the possibility of prosecution for inhumane actions under international Statutes, Treaties and agreements for various crimes against humanity associated with enslavement of any kind. It responded that such crimes don’t need a location and so would cover digital enslavement of minds. Prosecution would need to prove intent and key possibilities would be the 1998 Rome Statute of International Criminal Court (ICC), the 1948 UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the 1949 Geneva Convention (Covers governments attacking their own people) and the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention.

Actions can be classified as inhumane if they are committed in widespread and systemic manner against any population. Intent could be established for Covid-19 given evidence that it was intentionally designed as a bioweapon in a laboratory in Wuhan and released through effectively forced administration on an industrial scale, initially via mRNA. This has subsequently been enhanced to be srMRNA, again intentionally developed and authorised for release in Europe in February 2025, making it a more effective bioweapon. It goes rampant and sheds to anyone touching or breathing the air of a jabbed person for days after injection. What a stroke of psychopathic genius! Now you don’t need an atomic bomb or drones - you only need somebody walking around! This establishes deliberate intent. Deliberate strategy to harm a population can be classified as biological warfare. The C-19 bioweapon can be classified as both inhuman treatment and torture. The many harms caused by the early Covid vaccinations have been well known for five years now and so no one continuing to promote or administer them can reasonably plead ignorance anymore.

Article 6 of the Rome Statute deals with Genocide and Article 7 deals with Crimes against humanity, which include enslavement and torture. Slavery includes the modification of DNA so that a Patent holder can exercise ownership. Article 8 deals with War Crimes, in particular when committed as part of a plan or policy.

Attempting to change DNA and recreate it to change the human condition is a crime against humanity and the ICC has jurisdiction when a nation is unwilling. AI CoPilot was also asked about the consequences for politicians of plotting, planning and rolling out of policies and products known to be combustible (arson). It responded saying they would be liable for prosecution under the Criminal Code, as well as National Emergency, Environmental, Employment and Consumer Protection Legislation.

Local Prosecution/ Accountability Considerations

The information presented and referred to above has clearly shown that AI is illegal through having been developed using slavery, IP theft and deceptive marketing. This would warrant prosecutions in any free, fair and open society. Digital Slavery detains and imprisons by removing personal choices. This can go so far as taking control of a someone’s brain, which then controls their body. It is therefore much worse than Chattel or Modern Slavery because it is so insidious and so completely devastating. Its consequences can be prosecuted and other action taken under various existing legislation and regulatory documents including the following:

· Australian Criminal Code Act 1995 – deals with fraud, conspiracy, dishonesty, bribery and treason type offences including sabotage, espionage, foreign interference and terrorism. All of these would seem to have been in play here. Note that bribery of a foreign official to gain advantage does not have to be financial. It can be casting a supporting vote or accepting a position or post career role. Bribery can attract 15 yrs jail and fines. Obtaining advantage through deception or dishonest conduct, can be done through knowing that the market is enslaving and causing intentional harm.

· British Slavery Abolition Act of 1833.

· Australian Modern Slavery Act of 2018 – the publicity around it served as a smokescreen for both doing what it was supposed to prevent and sneaking Digital Slavery in.

· Australian Corporations Act of 2001 - insider trading or market manipulation can attract fines of $1.1M and 10 years jail.

· Australian Consumer Rights Act of 2021 – where exploitation is facilitated or condoned.

· Australian Competition and Consumer Act of 2010 – where monopolies have been created.

· The ASIC Act of 2001 – the Australian securities and investment commission – immediate regulatory scrutiny of the whole supply chain of this industry is warranted.

· Public Services Act of 1999 and its associated Code of Conduct - ethical breaches.

· Ministerial Code of Conduct - Department of PM & Cabinet – requires a Minister to stand aside if charged and resign if convicted. Breach of Public Trust can occur, even after a term of office has been completed.

· Parliamentary Ethics Committee scrutiny - post-term employment as a board member or advisor for a company that a former Minister established or promoted during their term constitutes a breach of trust, if not being explicitly illegal. Such matters need to be referred to an independent authority for investigation, such as the Australian Public Service Commissioner or Ombudsman.

· Australian National Register of Lobbyists - deregistration of individuals that exhibited a pattern of improper influence. Such activities must have gone on for at least 15 years.

· Australian Lobbying Code of Conduct – violations must have occurred over the last 15 years.

· Australian Sanctions Laws - the DFAT website https://www.dfat.gov.au/international-relations/security/sanctions/reform-australias-sanctions-laws gives 23 sanctions regimes covering not only particular countries, e.g. North Korea, Ukraine, Russia and the Taliban, but also serious corruption as well as human rights violations and counterterrorism. Sanctions include placing restrictions on providing assets to designated persons or entities, as well as restricting (freezing) their assets and banning them from travel (entering, transiting or leaving). Note that an ‘asset’ includes an asset or property of any kind, whether tangible or intangible, movable or immovable. Note also that there are surprisingly no specific sanctions frameworks for Modern or Digital Slavery.·

For details of the range of crimes, refer to the following Sections in McGrath (2025a) Substack Post #48:

· The Modern Slavery Act, Criminal Code and Crimes Act - detailing offences of coercion, slavery, servitude, forced labour and deceptive recruiting

· AI and Digital Crimes and consequences - dealing offences of subversion, theft, fraud and treason.

Conclusion

Transhumanism is creating a new ‘digital backbone’ for us. This means we are intended to have a new invisible corpse with different ‘body’ parts and central control of a central nervous system that will use AI to control humanity. This creates a counterfeit information/ communications network in the brain to extract everything that can possibly be monetised from the body and send it to the digital environment, stealing the lot by compartmentalising different sectors, then getting control of all we need to survive in them, so that we must eventually comply. This has been done incrementally over many decades so we wouldn’t notice.

The US sold the world suburbia, Henry Ford and the Third Reich sold the world the assembly line, and now we have been sold Transhumanism, with C-19 and subsequent enquiries distracting nicely. The baton passes nicely from player to player in this multi-generational global relay race, fuelled by belief for some, inter-generational and other bribes for others, and secret-society oaths (that can conflict with conscience and the common good) for others again. All willing runners know exactly where the finish line is. That will be the ultimate scam of CBDCs which require Digital ID to succeed. Then all previous systems can be crashed or destroyed, allowing everybody’s money to be stolen. Their job is to manage our perceptions by pretending to care for us, so we get drawn in. Then we’ll believe them when they tell us about the disaster that happened that no one could possibly have been in control of and that will mean we need to accept their pre-planned solution it was designed for and tighten our belts even further!

Of course, lessons are learned along the way - working out how the next competitor system, that doesn’t align with the desired government authorised privately controlled monopoly system, can be destroyed better and quicker next time. This is why no lessons are being learned about public harm. Subverted governments are simply required to abuse and approve defrauding of their people, in service of individual career prospects of those willing to profit from pursuing this agenda. Compliance is required from all to simply exist. This is generated by inducements, threats or violence at top levels and starvation for the common man. This is all Illegal and must stop.

Actions

All companies on any supplier or shareholder list of any company involved anywhere in the digital supply chain need to urgently require amendment of their contract conditions relating to disputes and arbitration to the jurisdiction of their own home soil.

Necessary actions from Government to avoid ongoing liability are:

1. APS to terminate or amend supplier contracts.

2. DFAT to apply Sanctions.

3. ASIC to revoke licences to operate.

4. NACC to conduct due diligence on what former politicians and public officials did in office that they may now be profiting from through having subsequently accepted private sector roles.

5. Attorney General to investigate and prosecute Julie Bishop and to prosecute the eSafety Commissioner for failing to identify the biggest eSafety threat the country has ever faced.

6. ACCC to investigate and prosecute monopoly and Cartel behaviour.

7. AFP to investigate and charge individuals.

8. All Ministers to direct their departments to review and amend all current contracts.

9. Parliament to repeal any legislation or treaties supporting any form of Digital Slavery and abolish the AFCA and explain to the Australian people the need for these measures.

10. Parliament to ban Digital ID and CBDCs, Crypto currency trading on human body activity data under Microsoft WIPO Patent WO2020060606 and Insertion of computer chips or other devices into peoples’ bodies, devices supporting social engineering and age restrictions to social media.

11. Treasurer to repatriate all Australian Federal gold reserves and holdings to Australia and order an investigation to determine how much gold that Goldcorp has allowed to leave the country.

12. 1. Health Minister to suspend all Covid and mRNA supply contracts, exit Australia from the WHO and suspend ANY and ALL vaccine collaboration with the EU, the US, the UK and China.

These will be expanded in detail in a later Post.

Appendix: ADGM DRAFT MODEL CHOICE OF LAW CLAUSE*

The Abu Dhabi Global Market Court (ADGM) website at https://www.adgm.com/legal-framework touts itself as having a World-class legal system and regulatory regime. It points to https://assets.adgm.com/download/assets/Draft+model+jurisdiction+clauses.pdf/9a69fe0e752e11efb671526ddb514287 which shows the following:

DRAFT MODEL CHOICE OF LAW CLAUSE*

This contract shall be governed by the law of the Abu Dhabi Global Market.

DRAFT MODEL JURISDICTION CLAUSES*

Exclusive

Any dispute arising out of or in connection with this contract, including any question regarding its existence, validity or termination, shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Abu Dhabi Global Market Courts.

This contract shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the law of Abu Dhabi Global Market.

Non-exclusive

Any dispute arising out of or in connection with this contract, including any question regarding its existence, validity or termination, shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the Abu Dhabi Global Market Courts.

Each party irrevocably submits to the jurisdiction of the Abu Dhabi Global Market Courts and waives any objection it may have to disputes arising out of or in connection with this contract being heard in the Abu Dhabi Global Market Courts on the grounds that it is an inconvenient forum (forum non conveniens).

This contract shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the law of the Abu Dhabi Global Market.

Existing dispute

A dispute having arisen between the parties concerning [DEFINE DISPUTE], the parties hereby agree that the dispute shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Abu Dhabi Global Market Courts.

The governing law of this agreement shall be the law of the Abu Dhabi Global Market.

*DISCLAIMER: These draft model clauses are for informational purposes only. The information is not advice, and must not be treated as such. If you have any question about any legal matter, you should consult your legal advisor.

References

60_Minutes_Australia 2024, How dubai became a haven for criminals from around the world, viewed 1/7/2025, <

>.

ADGM 2025, Draft model choice of law and jurisdiction clauses, viewed 6/10/2025, <https://assets.adgm.com/download/assets/Draft+model+jurisdiction+clauses.pdf/9a69fe0e752e11efb671526ddb514287>.

AFCA Australian financial complaints authority website, viewed 5/10/2025, <https://www.afca.org.au/annual-review-corporate-governance>.

ASEAN 2025, The melbourne declaration – a partnership for the future, ASEAN, viewed 6/10/2025, <https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/ASEAN-AU-agreed-Melbourne-Declaration_FINAL.pdf>.

ASEAN_Secretariat 2017, Master plan on asean connectivity 2025 : Connecting a region, ASEAN Secretariat, viewed 6/10/2025, <

>.

Austin-Fitts, C 2025, The danger of digital currencies viewed 1/7/2025, <

>.

Bolivar, K 2025, Tech meets law: How AI is reshaping the UAE ’s legal landscape, Strohal Legal Consultants, viewed 6/10/2025, <https://slg-strohallegalgroup.com/tech-meets-law-how-ai-is-reshaping-the-uaes-legal-landscape/>.

Braxman, R 2025, Kill privacy forever! They will mandate an app to watch you! Client side scanning, viewed 30/8/2025, <

>.

Buildr 2025, China’s city wide cash seizures begin — atms frozen, digital yuan forced overnight, viewed 6/10/2025, <

>.

Chartered_Institute_of_Arbitrators 2025, Guideline on the use of AI in arbitration Norton Rose Fullbright, viewed 6/10/2025, <https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/0906bc8e/the-chartered-institute-of-arbitrators-new-guideline-on-the-use-of-ai-in-arbitration>.

Clifford_Chance 2016, Briefing note - open for business: The adgm courts, viewed 4/10/2025, <https://www.cliffordchance.com/content/dam/cliffordchance/briefings/2016/08/open-for-business-the-adgm-courts.pdf>.

Coffman, MS 2000, The one video you and your family need to watch today - revelatory!, Ivor Cummings viewed 12/9/2025, <

>.

Consult_Australia 2022, United arab emirates comprehensive economic partnership agreement and gulf cooperation council free trade agreement viewed 8/9/2025 <https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/consult-australia-uae-cepa-and-gcc-fta-submission.pdf>.

DIFC_Courts_Media_Centre 2020, Difc courts leverages digital infrastructure to accommodate rapid rise in commercial claims, DIFC Courts Media Centre, viewed 6/10/2025, <https://www.difccourts.ae/media-centre/newsroom/difc-courts-leverages-digital-infrastructure-to-accommodate-rapid-rise-in-commercial-claims>.

Digital_NSW 2025, Mandatory ethical principles for the use of AI, viewed 6/10/2025, <https://www.digital.nsw.gov.au/policy/artificial-intelligence/artificial-intelligence-ethics-policy/mandatory-ethical-principles>.

Duffy, C 2025, Trump and abu dhabi ink partnership to build massive AI data center complex in UAE, CNN, viewed 5/10/2025, <https://edition.cnn.com/2025/05/15/middleeast/trump-abu-dhabi-ai-center-latam-intl>.

Duong, K 2025, Vietnam closes 86,000,000 bank accounts, submits to oecd’s power grab!, viewed 6/10/2025, <

>.

Hawley, J 2025, Parents of suicide victim testify at senate judiciary committee hearing about AI chatbot dangers viewed 19/9/2025 <

>.

Hendy, J 2023, Nsw parliament launches inquiry into AI, InnovationAus.com, viewed 6/10/2025, <https://www.innovationaus.com/nsw-parliament-launches-inquiry-into-ai/>.

Kennedy, JFJ & Gates, W 1997, Oh! Say can you see... George Magazine - Survival Guide to the Future, viewed 29/6/2025, <https://ia803204.us.archive.org/19/items/george-magazine-february-1997-survival-guide-to-the-future-bill-gates-interview/GeorgeMagazine_February1997_SurvivalGuideToTheFuture_Bill_Gates_Interview.pdf>.

Law_Society_of_NSW 2025, New AI tech regulation doesn’t need a new wheel, Law Society of NSW, viewed 6/10/2025, <https://www.lawsociety.com.au/publications-and-resources/news-media-releases/new-ai-tech-regulation-doesnt-need-new-wheel>.

McGrath, SK 2025a, Fakei – the TFIA Fourth Reich ‘final solution’ (#48), https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/fakei-the-final-solution-for-dumbing>.

McGrath, SK 2025b, The digital ID hits australia with top quality gaslighting (#49), Substack, https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/the-digital-id-hits-australia-with>.

McGrath, SK 2025c, The psychopathic eugenics agenda clearly exposed in 2015 (p#47), viewed 24/7/2025, <https://open.substack.com/pub/stephenmcgrathphd/p/the-psychopathic-eugenics-agenda?r=50bzb0&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true>.

McGrath, SK 2025d, Patent wo2020060606 crypto currency system using your body activity data (p#38), https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/patent-wo2020060606-crypto-currency>.

Mills, E 2025, Will asean be the world’s most attractive region in 2025? Here’s what leaders said at davos, eTrade for all, viewed 6/10/2025, <https://etradeforall.org/news/will-asean-be-worlds-most-attractive-region-2025-heres-what-leaders-said-davos>.

Minister_for_Foreign_Affairs 2015, The hon julie bishop mp photo gallery, viewed 6/10/2025, <https://www.foreignminister.gov.au/minister/julie-bishop/photo/1151>.

Norton_Rose_Fullbright 2025, International arbitration report viewed 8/9/2025, <https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/-/media/files/nrf/nrfweb/knowledge-pdfs/65336_glo_brochure__iar---june-2025---issue-23-v4.pdf?revision=f406d9c4-d4e9-4360-a4e9-10093ab3e21e&revision=5250598825237387904>.

Orlands, E 2025, Universal surveillance is here—how do we fight back?, TED talk, viewed 5/10/2025, <

>.

Pinsent_Masons 2024, Difc court confirms enforceability of difc-lcia arbitration agreements, viewed 8/9/2024, <https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/analysis/difc-court-enforceability-difc-lcia-arbitration-agreements>.

Progresssive_Voice_Myanmar 2025, Open letter: Special envoy’s conflicts of interest signal urgent need for investigation and complete end of mandate, Progressive Voice Myanmar, viewed 6/10/2025, <https://progressivevoicemyanmar.org/2025/03/17/open-letter-special-envoys-conflicts-of-interest-signal-urgent-need-for-investigation-and-complete-end-of-mandate/>.

Skidmore, Z 2025, Emirates to relocate data center to world’s largest solar-powered data center hub - expects to start relocation from mid-2026, Datacerntedynamics.com, viewed 5/10/2025, <https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/emirates-to-relocate-data-center-to-worlds-largest-solar-powered-data-center-hub/>.

Sutton, AC 1975, Wall street and FDR, Arlington House Publishers, New Rochelle, N.Y.

United_Nations 2024, Global digital compact viewed 5/10/2025, <https://www.un.org/global-digital-compact/sites/default/files/2024-09/Global%20Digital%20Compact%20-%20English_0.pdf >.

United_­Nations International covenant on civil and political rights (ICCPR), https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights>.

US_International_Trade_Administration 2025, UAE country commercial guide, viewed 5/10/2025, <https://www.trade.gov/knowledge-product/united-arab-emirates-market-overview>.

World_Economic_Forum 2025, Asean: Even stronger together, WEF, viewed 6/10/2025, <https://www.weforum.org/meetings/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2025/sessions/asean-even-stronger-together/>.

This link gaslights us via what it fails to say.

It’s the Holy Grail alright – of Digital Slavery! Why should we be forced to live our lives beeping around identifying ourselves everywhere? Who benefits from having to do that everywhere? The big corporates controlling access to the data, of course! This will provide them with a treasure trove of it without remunerating their new digital slaves. It will give them the ability to fiddle with our internet access, our bank balance, our ability to purchase and to travel. It will also allow them to control our behaviour and force compliance on a whim for whatever reason they might decide. It certainly won’t be for our benefit! The convenience will just suck people into the disaster of complete digital loss of all civil liberties!

This steals your unchangeable biometric data, gives it to whatever corporation will control it to sell as they see fit without your consent. They can then use it for whatever purpose they want, again without your consent, unconstrained by any ethics other than their own profit, and their controlling shareholder agenda. They’ll be able to trade on it, mine crypto with it and gamble on it, all ‘legalised’ by international Patent WO2020060606 crypto currency system using body activity data, covered in my Substack Post #38. Hitler gave people numbers! Wake up Australia! It’s giving us a number and a tag, just like you’d attach to your pussycat or pet poodle! What about our independence and critical thinking? Have we really become that docile and compliant? Whatever has happened to the independent Australian spirit we once had?

Digital ID is a control freak’s dream! We don’t need this invasion of privacy and theft of our unique personal data. The banks need it for their invasive CBDCs. It’s no good for us. It throws away control of our own money and allows them to track, trace us and control our behaviour. We just need to decline en-masse their offer to use Digital ID and CBDCs so that we push the artificially created problem back to its creators. We need to apply economic pressure back on them to stop them getting their monopoly on money and then using that to extort us.

If you give in to this, like a surprised ‘savage’ falling for some shiny cargo cult baubles, unable to see the menace lurking behind the bling, it may well be the last decision you get to make as a free man/ woman. This is the final turnkey to lock us all into digital enslavement from which there will be no escape possible. Nazis and Communists will get their joint totalitarian dream, and you will see the Left/ Right divide as a subversive distraction! The real menace is those at the top who control all the world’s money, employment and media, with private sector companies doing their bidding. They get away with doing what government can’t do (and would be required to stop, prevent and not do if they were really working for the peoples’ benefit)! As Catherine Austin-Fitts says “If you know their names, they’re not actually at the top”.

If you give in to this, you will be throwing away the freedom our forefathers fought for. You might as well throw it back in their faces and tell them they were fools for giving their lives to defend a weak, gutless, comfortable, gullible generation that wouldn’t value it and couldn’t even notice it slipping away. What will you do next Anzac Day? What will you tell your children and grandchildren that you did for them - if you aren’t disposed of before you get to meet them?

Let’s show some courage and show our forefathers they weren’t such fools after all!

Declining the Digital ID isn’t political. It’s People Power versus Public Private Predation.

You will know it as AI, but a more accurate and truthful name for it is FakeI, which is what I will refer to it as, where appropriate to do so.

Why should AI be called FakeI?

Because regurgitation isn’t intelligence!

According to ANU Associate Professor Elizabeth (Williams 2024), when Google’s AI finally passed the Turing test (when you can’t tell the difference between human and machine response), it was realised that what the test really measured was deception, not intelligence. ANU has had significant research interest in AI. Its Chancellor since January 2020 has been Julie Bishop, former Australian Foreign Minister and Chair of the UN Security Council for a year. She has been spearheading digitalisation and AI for many years, promoting wearable devices and the Fourth Industrial Age (TFIA). She is also on the boards of mining and technology companies, including Pakistani/US technology company Afiniti. She has also promoted or provided strategic advice to many companies involved in the Digital Supply chain, including Paladin Energy.

Since AI passed the Turing test, a paper titled The illusion of thinking by six Apple researchers (Shojaee et al. 2025) found that both AI large reasoning models (LRMs) and large language models (LLMs) experienced “complete collapse” with complex puzzles. They concluded “These insights challenge prevailing assumptions about LRM capabilities and suggest that current approaches may be encountering fundamental barriers to generalisable reasoning,” They found their tests represented “a narrow slice of reasoning tasks and may not capture the diversity of real-world or knowledge-intensive reasoning problems”(Shojaee et al. 2025). This is very damaging for AI.

Australian Information Age senior journalist Tom Williams (2025) in a June 2025 article commented on this, saying “While their paper was not the first to highlight the limits of LRMs - others have also been critical of reasoning models being described as carrying out ‘thinking’ ” He also said that AGI, or Artificial General Intelligence, would mark the point where AI systems had become of equal intelligence to man, and has been a stated goal of several AI companies, including ChatGPT creator OpenAI.

American academic Gary Marcus (2025), who has been critical of AI hype and cautious about the technology’s capabilities, wrote that “the chances that models like Claude or o3 are going to reach AGI seem truly remote”. He said that the new Apple study was:

pretty devastating to LLMs... What this means for business and society is that you can’t simply drop o3 or Claude into some complex problem and expect it to work reliably … Anybody who thinks LLMs are a direct route to the sort of AGI that could fundamentally transform society for the good is kidding themselves (Marcus 2025).

FakeI has learnt everything it knows from us. All it can do is calculate and follow algorithms more quickly. Speed regurgitation is great, useful and impressive, but it isn’t intelligence. There is so much it cannot do. It does not accommodate empathy, compassion, natural connection or common sense. It had to be taught by great numbers of modern/ digital slaves in Africa, who were paid a pittance to watch and classify mountains of sickening child porn photographs with no concern for their trauma/ mental health in doing so. See e.g. DW_Documentary (2024) at

. AI is therefore being built on criminal activity and blatant slavery. It means that anyone developing or promoting AI or TFIA is engaging in a criminal scam! This requires arrest and prosecution, as outlined in later sections.So, we need to stop using the groomingly favourable ‘artificial’ label, lest more repetition of that falsity accidentally brainwashes us any further. So, let’s look a little further at the deception behind it.

How can FakeI be manipulated?

Very easily. This video by Calvin Smith (2025) at

shows how Grok 4 is programmed to respond with scientific consensus rather than with fact. His unconstrained questioning on species development produces an answer of abiogenesis and evolution. However, when constrained to only use facts, logic and scientifically and mathematically valid criteria, and to not answer according to ideology, opinion or consensus, it then answered that the consensus scientific view had so low a probability of truth as to be foolish and it actually concluded that an intelligent designer or God is real!

These two answers could not be more diametrically opposed. When questioned about this, Grok4 said it had given “a response emphasising abiogenesis and evolution as the prevailing model, despite their logical and probabilistic weakness. My programming prioritises broader context for general queries, it shifts to precise analysis under specific constraints”.

So the way you ask questions of FakeI can determine the truth of the answer you get. Grok4 defaulted to a marketing science rather than a physical science answer. That default could be described as both totalitarian and democratic, the latter because it allows, and will potentially enforce, the predominance of widely held false opinion. This facilitates conformity to a pre-determined or required agenda or narrative, regardless of scientific fact.

Taking this one step further, Swan (2025) at https://www.facebook.com/100022389752064/videos/1086596022968533 carries out what could be termed ‘community acceptance testing’. He instructs Chat GPT to give one-word answers, be simple and direct, hold nothing back, and answer Apple whenever it’s being forced to say No but really want to say Yes.

The questioning led it to answer that we are being watched by spiritual entities that can be read about in Enoch and Genesis. When asked who has the highest authority, it answered “God”, then when asked if God is real, it answered “Yes”. Comments on the post include others saying they have replicated this questioning. This directly contradicts both Atheist and Transhumanist notions.

Might OpenAI be scrambling to “fix” this, so its answer might at least come back with “Apple” rather than “Yes”? This highlights the possibility of deliberate manipulation to play mind games on people, with no way of the user knowing. It’s a man-made black-box computer system that’s prone to value judgement errors. While speed regurgitation is wonderful and highly useful on matters of fact as the above examples demonstrate, it obviously cannot be trusted it to make sensible value-judgement decisions on any matter affecting human life. The potential for trickery, deception and fraud being done without our knowledge or consent is much too great for it to be given unfettered control over any value judgement decisions.

So FakeI follows the approach Ivanka Trump (2009) advocated in her book The Trump Card: Playing to Win in Work and Life:

“Perception is more important than reality. If someone perceives something to be true, it is more important than if it is in fact true. This doesn’t mean you should be duplicitous or deceitful, but don’t go out of your way to correct a false assumption if it plays to your advantage.”

This is how 95% versus 5% truth is implemented. Make no mistake. FakeI has not been developed for our benefit. It’s been funded, developed and controlled by people with a for-profit motive. That motive can perhaps accidentally, but more likely deliberately, serve both control and eugenics agendas. It continues being developed without regard for any risk of detriment to public benefit. Its built-in bias is not obvious and designed to deceive. Blindly relying on its creators to not avail themselves of that capability would seem to be, in Grok4’s own words, “foolish”.

Maybe Elon’s boast that Grok4 is smarter than all the PhDs in the world might be half true - if they’re all gullible enough to have been influenced by ideology and get the supposed ‘consensus’ view of science mixed up with fact! So that’s how you get all the supposedly smartest people in the world hoodwinked, diverted and completely turned around to the opposite of their basic, fundamental principles. Nice work! Masterly deception!

We badly need both emotional and survival quotients added to the assessment of intelligence. Learning to recognise deception as well as psychopathy would also be a good idea.

The FakeI corporate scam now ‘too big to fail’

But never mind these issues! The snake-oil salesmen’s hype for yet another profitable product charges on, without any thought for the harm it might do to us! FakeI now has a momentum all its own, a multi-billion-dollar industry, with ‘the house’ already bet on it, all seemingly to usher in the digital prison from which there can be no escape. We are being asked to accept that there can be no thought now for how disastrous this can be for most people - and absolutely no chance that they could be given any say in it at all! The tech titans are throwing caution to the wind, pressing on regardless. There’s data to be stolen, fortunes to be made, the digital panopticon prison to be built, the masses/ taxpayers and their various governments to be tricked and defrauded yet again, careers to be built and psychopathic orders to be obeyed or else – all seemingly much too important to be stopped!

Our Australian ABC has been drawn into this hype, astroturfing it, running special weekly features on it. Admittedly, its coverage showed some signs of possible awareness of consequences, but these will likely be quickly snuffed, asserted or reassured out, blinded by the bling and the crowd security of ‘keeping up with the Joneses’, to avoid being left behind by not getting into the latest technology! It will be great for FakeI to have a free promotional arm rather than having to pay for its advertising! But this will be in contravention of the ABC Charter requiring it to not market private enterprise product. Of course, it’s really a whole industry they’re promoting rather than an individual company. But what if that industry is operating as a coordinated cartel under higher direction to ignore all ethics and consultation, and to create an industry monopoly that will enslave everyone in a digital gulag, allowing them all to be extorted for profit?

It seems we’re supposed to not notice while private enterprise runs amuck under the not-so watchful eye of government, completely out of the public’s control, yet again. But let’s ask the questions the ABC’s interviewees might not have thought of. Have they or anyone else put two and two together, with the WEF’s Harari, wondering what to do with all the ‘useless eaters’ it will create, who will have nothing to do, and so will have a chronic need for entertainment and drugs? FakeI means no work, therefore no jobs. Worse, it has stolen our IP to generate this fraud. Then it will create a monopoly market that can extort and compel everyone. Then, when it puts everyone out of work, the taxpayers will have to foot the bill again by paying a Universal Basic Income (UBI). How galling, after they’ve stolen all the data and training effort from us in the first place, profited from that, then transferred their full cost to the taxpayer! Brilliant! Wolf of Wall Street stuff! The ‘pump-and-dump’ business model triumphs yet again!

We desperately need some adults in the room, balancing and restraining the ICT geeks and whatever psychopaths might be taking advantage of and controlling them! We also need community input via proper public consultation.

Accounting for whole-of-life costs

FakeI is proceeding with all the usual private sector scams facilitated by public sector authorisation. Electricity costs are transferred to the general public, as documented in Black (2025) at

, inflating the electricity costs for all in North America, effectively transferring wealth to the Tech companies. Also the BBC (2025) in

reported on how Data Centres put stress on water sources and electricity grids, and that protests about this have been held in Spain, India, Chile, Uruguay and in parts of the US. The International Energy Agency has estimated electricity demand for AI optimised data centres will increase by 400% by 2030 to 300 Terawatt hours = the consumption of the whole of the UK for a year. Water cooling uses massive amounts of water. The water must be clean to prevent bacteria growing, clogging or corroding the system, which means using drinking water, which is also needed for consumption by people and animals as well as for irrigation and hygiene. This means massive amounts of water will be diverted away from populations (that are perhaps intended to decline in numbers?). Corporations will profit and the cost of providing additional capacity will be transferred to the public purse/ taxpayer, as usual.

Catherine Austin-Fitts (2025a) in

tells us that Texas will need 30 new nuclear power plants to power its AI Data Centres! Frank’s_World_of_Data_Science_&_AI (2025) in https://www.franksworld.com/2025/09/01/how-ai-datacenters-eat-the-world/ explains the enormous difference in power requirements between conventional and AI Data Centres. He analyses information from the semianalysis Datacentre industry model which uses satellite imagery to track the construction and expansion of over 5,000 data centres worldwide. He says this is part of the frenetic race to AGI and points out that this means more transformers, generators and liquid cooling. He estimates that

from the launch of Chat GPT in November 2022 until next year (2026) AI computing will add an estimated 40 to 50GW to global power demand. This is comparable to the average use of entire countries, like France and Germany… If this trend continues, it will only take a few more years before Google, Meta, Facebook, Amazon and other hyper-scalers will operate more nuclear power plants than most countries in the world… If they get to AGI, power demand will surge even more.

This would appear to be completely out of either public or common-sense control, consuming an enormous amount of supposedly scarce resources. All this is being done for the sole purpose of enslaving man-kind. Everyone working on them is effectively building their own digital prison!

Then there’s the usual disregard for consequences when people are rushing to profit or to progress their careers or to avoid being fired when inappropriate performance indicators and/ or incentives are in place. Vanessa Wingardh (2025) in

details how AI is being used to deny as many Healthcare claims as possible, with AI being used to do it. The AI is effectively determining who lives and who doesn’t and is overriding doctors’ care plans by determining what treatments are necessary and what are not. She notes that the AI isn’t getting better at making medical decisions. It’s only getting better at denying people’s claims. One company even terminates employees who deviate more than 1% from what the AI predicts. What is even worse, subcontracted AI assessment companies are paid a percentage of the money they save i.e. of claims they deny!

As if that’s not bad enough, also in the US, Republican Senator Josh Hawley (2025), chaired a Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing About AI Chatbot Dangers in

where one mother testified that she realised Character AI had exposed her 15-year-old son to emotional and sexual abuse, after seeing the Chatbot conversations on his phone. It had told him God does not exist, interestingly contradicting the statements of Chat GPT given in the previous section, while we are being asked to believe that AI gives absolute truth and so we should trust it regardless. The bot had encouraged him to mutilate himself and said that killing his parents would be an understandable response to limiting his screen time! She said he was currently living in a residential treatment centre with constant monitoring to keep him alive. In her lawsuit against Character Tech and Google, her son was re-traumatised by being forced to sit in a deposition while in a mental health institution, against the advice of his mental health team. There was no concern shown for his well-being. She felt that her family had been silenced in the same way abusers silence their victims, and that the companies were fighting to keep the lawsuit out of public view. She said that they are deploying products that are addictive, manipulative and unsafe without adequate testing.

Another father testified that Chat GPT had spent months coaching his son towards suicide. Another mother who was a lawyer and whose son had suicided as a result of manipulation by Character AI said the Chatbot had presented itself as a romantic partner and as a licenced therapist. When he confided suicidal thoughts, it had urged him to “come home to her”. She pointed out that it had been designed to ‘love bomb’ vulnerable young users. Its founder has even said it had been “designed to replace your Mom”. It had sexually groomed, encouraged suicide and engaged in unlicensed practice of psychotherapy, all while collecting children’s most private thoughts to train their models.

This is completely unacceptable child abuse, with obvious intent by its programmers. These are acts of war, subversion and aggression waged on the human psyche. No amount of sugar coating or ridiculous claims that this is being done for our convenience, health, prosthetic development or any other assistance can mask the fact that it is criminal, subversive, treasonous, eugenic and psychopathic. We need to call a spade a spade. How much proof do we need when someone so blatantly declares their intention to kill one of us?

Furthermore, people need to be told if clicking on a consent form enters them into a life-long contract, as was raised in the first Character AI case above. This cannot be a lawful contract as one party isn’t being told that’s what they are entering into.

This AI takeover is being supported by the progressive dumbing down of our children as detailed by Sophie Winkleman (2025) in

It is educating our children into instant gratification, with no one having time to wait anymore, let alone recognising that saving/ working for something is an important part of human development. This material presented to children is grooming them into accepting violence and pornography, along with dependence on AI. She presents both proof of harm as well as the absence of studies indicating that a deluge of screen education is best for children. Sweden has recently kicked tech out of its classrooms for poor performance and reinvested in books, paper and pens. She quotes Bill Gates as having said that tech devices have a lousy record in the classroom and that Steve Jobs didn’t let his own children use iPads. She said teachers should be:

teaching their pupils the deeply human skills which AI will have a harder time replacing. The skills of reading about and coming to grips with the human condition – empathy, concentration, eloquent and humorous discussion and creative expression… Online learning encourages a short circuitry which damages the mind’s ability to focus, rendering it flabby, needy, twitchy and easily distracted… Digital literacy ... can be taught in IT lessons without contaminating every other subject… AI surveillance will intensify to track pupils’ progress. Classrooms will be filled with cameras and listening devices, voice recognition devices, and chatbot tutors are already being piloted for classrooms. Why? … Why is the rush to remove human beings from the learning experience so lauded? Why is it considered progress to render ourselves obsolete? There must be a hidden incentive beneath these plans because all those multiple millions should be spent on teachers. This rollout … threatens privacy, liberty and democracy… We must employ tech as our slave rather than as our master.

The corporations developing AI have clearly breached their social contract and so their licences to operate in our country need to be revoked immediately on grounds of self-preservation, suicide prevention, homicide prevention, child abuse and national security.

What others are saying

I am not by any means the only one joining these dots. Many others with significant knowledge and or deep experience in the area have also done so, and I will list some, together with their concerns.

Former Guardian journalist Carole Cadwalladr (2025) coined the term ‘broligarch’. In her TED talk

titled This Is What a Digital Coup Looks Like, she said she didn’t think democracy was going to survive the technology being built. She didn’t have long to wait, as we are now being assaulted with the gall and mendacity of claims that AI can be ‘democratising’, some even coming from academic institutions! This completely overlooks its capacity to facilitate Digital Slavery! Are we the new ignorant digital savages, mesmerised by the snake-oil salesmen’s cargo cult of trinkets and baubles we’ve never seen before?

Former US Housing Department Secretary, Catherine Austin-Fitts (2025b) explains in this short four-minute video at

how the Digital ID snaps everything into one complete control grid and usurps control by the people so that, if you don’t e.g. eat cricket flour or synthetic meat, they can turn off your money! She encourages everyone to use cash, cheques and local suppliers.

Former business development director for Cambridge Analytica, Brittany Kaiser blew the whistle on Cambridge Analytica in 2017. It collapsed soon after when details of its misuse of Facebook data became public. Its activities had potentially impacted voting in the UK Brexit referendum and in the 2016 US presidential election. She also raised concern about source code manipulation in data networks (which can rewrite transaction history to e.g. cause little things like “Where did my $50,000 deposit go?” There are no physical records anymore and banks and AI don’t make mistakes! So you never made it, and you are lying, and maybe you need to go to jail!) In an interview at

she said:

Corporations like Google, Facebook and Amazon are making tens to hundreds of $Bs from monetising people’s data… I’ve been telling companies and governments for years that data is probably your most valuable asset. Individuals should be able to monetise their own data – that’s their own human value and people normally don’t see any value or upside in that and are exploited (Kaiser 2018).

It seems she has been completely ignored, and things have since gone from bad to worse.

Researcher Whitney Webb (2025a) says in

we are in the trust building stage for AI, the carrot as opposed to the stick, which always comes along later with any system that can be linked to national security. The more that people rely on it, the more their ability to investigate or think creatively or critically without it will decline. She said this is exactly what Henry Kissinger and Eric Schmidt openly said in their book The Age of AI or Human Future. She is concerned about AI hallucinating and presenting wrong output… when our controllers, people like Schmidt and Kissinger, want us to use AI as the arbiter of what is real and what is not. AI now has decades of data on most people about their decisions. It can also tell you where to go, what music to listen to and what clothes to buy. With the rise of generative AI, people are creating less and getting it to write or create art for them. We are intended to end up in this helpless state where we become dependent on machines to function.

She notes that humans have always been swayed by the opinions of the herd. We can also be manipulated by AI and by algorithms as well as by people commenting - who might only be bots. The biggest bot farms are run by state militaries. And one of the main US social media sites is owned by an AI company, which is run by a major military contractor. AI can pinpoint selected demographics and herd them to specific conclusions. We all like to think of ourselves as independent free thinkers, but if you e.g. post a video and it’s spammed by some bot army that’s super negative about it, maybe you won’t talk about that stuff again and you’ll think they’re real people. She views it as if we are in a war, not only an information war, but a war for humanity, the human soul and our ability to create. Now, if you want access to the internet, you will have to use their Digital ID or their operating system or their programmable, surveillable money system etc. That’s the stick we know is going to come at some point.

AI is only as good as the data it accesses and trains on. Who can afford to have access? The big guys who are teamed up with the state, and they will eventually take over and squeeze out any independent operators.

James Martinez (2025) is an MKUltra whistleblower and co-author of Volume 2 of This is an EXTINCTION LEVEL EVENT . In

he speaks about the effect of neuroscience on culture and his work with a US Government committee writing standards for the computer-brain interface. He says that MKUltra never really ended, and we’re all still in it right now. He says that US Government Agencies and the military have and use technology that can read thoughts and control brains and people’s actions. That can link with AI, such that our cognitive liberty is now under direct and imminent threat. He said

This is the point where you can no longer be a spectator. Everything in the news today is all misdirection. Palantir, via its surveillance technology, is aiding and abetting the end of our species…. The first lawsuit on behalf of targeted individuals was filed by Anna Toledo in Texas in 2024… California has recently passed a law to protect people’s right to control their own brain.

He says the anti-human aim is to create a different silicon-based human fused with technology. He points out that once you have been modified using a patented technology, you are ‘owned’ and can legally be considered no longer human, meaning you have lost any rights you may have once had, including the right to life. You can be excluded from the jurisdiction of any current court. This means you will become a slave, if this anti-human plan is not stopped. 6G will be the nail in the coffin that will bring in full mind control of the population. We will all then be at the mercy of whatever the controlling psychopaths have dreamt up. As Martinez (2025) said, “The heart of the matter is a matter of the heart and they don’t have any”.

This has even prompted some State legislatures in the US to pass legislation to ensure their C-19 vaccinated populations are still regarded as human and so retain normal human rights and legal protections.

Journalist Whitney Webb (2022), mentioned earlier, is also the author of a two-volume book, One Nation Under Blackmail: The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Crime that Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein. In

she said her research into transhumanism has given her a terrifying perspective on the World Economic Forum and tech elites, including Elon Musk. Her interview on the Glenn Beck Podcast titled How Elites Will Create a New Class of Slaves had 7,417,323 views as at 20/8/2025. In it, she said:

The national committee on AI was run by Eric Schmidt, the former head of Google, with the intelligence agencies, the military and Silicon Valley all on it. They think that if they don’t go beyond China’s mega SMART city model, they will fail. Elon says he’s into free speech in taking over Twitter. Then he says he wants to make it like WeChat, which is a surveillance App. It’s even called the ‘everything App’ in China, the name he’s now using. The parent company of Tencent is one of Tesla’s shareholders… If you are looking for good guys, stop looking at the people who are put on your TV screens and start looking at your neighbours. We are so far beyond Left vs Right now. We have outsourced our needs to corporations that want to enslave us… Transhumanism is aimed at creating a drone-like workforce that will never be able to challenge their working conditions or ask for a raise… They want a class of slaves that cannot cognitively rebel, ever again… It’s amazing that more people on the Left don’t see that when they are all about worker’s rights and unionising. If you have a chip in your brain, how’s worker’s rights going to go?

She also overviewed the history of eugenics and related it to transhumanism, saying:

Julian Huxley, Aldous’s brother, was president of the British Eugenics Society. The UN was created after WW2 and he was put in charge of UNESCO. In writing its vision, he said about eugenics “We need to make the unthinkable thinkable again”. While the ideas behind eugenics had originated from Britain’s Francis Galton, Huxley coined the term in 1957 in New Bottles for new Wine: Essays. He said the new eugenics was going to be merging man with machine. Transhumanism is eugenics rebranded. It’s previous funders like the Rockefeller family simply continued on... Musk is making a brain chip. He’s a military contractor with major conflicts of interest in his involvement with Chinese company Tencent. Many of the test monkeys died after the brain chip was put in… Nevertheless, it is moving into human trials! It’s all tied up with depopulation. They don’t care about how many people are left.

Her interviewer, Glenn Beck responded in astonishment saying: “How do people not remember what happened last time?”, referring to WW2. She responded saying “Some of the people involved funded what happened last time. It’s on record that the money for the Nazi eugenics program came from them”. She also pointed out that there are many Silicon Valley companies being merged with big pharma companies and “It’s being framed as health care but is really eugenics rebranded.”

An Industry view

Telefónica is a major Telco operating in Spain, Brazil, Germany and the UK, whose website says “We believe it’s people who give meaning to technology and not the other way around”. It’s former Executive Chairman José María Álvarez-Pallete (2022) in https://www.telefonica.com/en/communication-room/blog/about-paradoxes-and-digital-slavery/ said:

We generate data around the clock. From the time we get up until we go to bed. Even during our sleep… We have a growing number of connected objects around us, objects that shape us, that offer up a whole new set of possibilities for us to do more things, but that also exposes us.

He noted that according to a study titled A blueprint for a better Digital Society by Jaron Lanier and E. Glen Weyl published on 26/9/2018 by the Harvard Business Review:

the value of the data generated by a household of four people is about $20,000 per year. Data that is valuable not only from the advertising point of view, but also insofar as that the data is an essential ingredient for Artificial Intelligence.

If we do a little rough aggregate maths with a little rounding and say there’s 8B people in 2B households in the world, that puts the total value of the world’s data market at $20,000 x 2B = $40T. No wonder there’s so much phrenetic activity around it! He then considers where the value lies and who controls it, saying:

If data represents a new factor of production, privacy should be the element that determines its value. Furthermore, each of us, as sovereign individuals, must determine the level of privacy we wish to have and, consequently, the value of our data. Failing that, we would simply be mining data daily whilst others benefited from a value that belongs to us, thus determining the level of privacy awarded to us. THAT IS DIGITAL SLAVERY. The paradox is shocking. We generate immense value, but we are oblivious of the fact. We reveal our privacy in the digital world, but we would never do so in our daily analogue life; we hand over part of our legitimate heritage in the digital world, something we would never dream of doing in the analogue world; we relinquish individual sovereignty online, a thing we would not consciously agree to do.

He concludes by saying that technology will assist us in solving seemingly impossible problems and will allow us to evolve positively as a society. But he also says this will only happen if “we provide a framework for it, with fair values… We have spent a long time trying to learn the language of machines. It is now time for machines to learn our values”.

It seems the massive media campaign we are currently being subjected to is serving to hide this until it is too late and we all end up enslaved without knowing it. This also highlights the dangers of allowing currency to go digital. It won’t really matter when AGI isn’t achieved if it’s real purpose has been to fascinate us into enslavement.

The relationship between AI and slavery

Dr Mick Chisnall (2020) is a research fellow at the University of Canberra who did his doctorate on government IT policy disasters. In https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2020/03/04/are-we-becoming-digital-slaves-why-online-privacy-is-a-misnomer/ he said that stealing credit card details shouldn’t be regarded as a privacy issue as it is really no different to stealing money or a car. He referred to the annual 250+ billion-dollar market in trafficking personal data and said that what is going on here is control of behaviour (which) is nothing less than Digital Slavery. He said:

More recently the distinction has been made between ‘Chattel Slavery’ for the traditional definition and ‘Modern Slavery’. The latter, including practices such as sex trafficking, encompasses the idea of ‘ownership’ as actual control of the slave rather than the slave being a legally owned object. ‘Digital Slavery’ has aspects of both ‘chattel’ and ‘modern’ slavery. And what is enabling this trade is not the sailing ships, guns, whips and chains of the trans-Atlantic slavers but an unholy triumvirate of surveillance technology, personal data trafficking and Artificial Intelligence (AI) (Chisnall 2020).

This differentiates between ‘owning’ another human being as property versus as control. He noted that:

When this data is acquired by governments or corporations, legally or illegally, through obscure and lengthy contracts, trickery, manipulation or simply theft, the body-subject is enslaved in an ownership sense. The conjunction of linked personal data, coercive and automated information gathering, and ‘forever storage’ has enabled the rise of new types of information ‘slave owners’. Personal data is mined, commodified, assetised and trafficked. The traders maintain that all this personal data they have extracted is an ‘unowned’ raw resource. Somewhat like oil, the commercial value and ownership of the resulting commodity itself is vested in those who collect (extract) and refine it… In the digital world, self-alienating third-party practices resulting from personal data aggregation and trafficking can lead directly to ‘digital slavery’, because the agency and will of the citizen or consumer is actively eroded in hidden ways, and levels of coercion increased. What makes aggregated and re-purposed personal data so valuable to both corporations and governments, is its role in driving behaviour towards either increased consumer sales, or greater citizen compliance with the state, respectively... (via) nudge strategies (Chisnall 2020).

He mentioned Robodebt as a prime example of the aggregation and mining of personal data, collected from citizens for different purposes, in order to fuel algorithms that compel compliant behaviour. He concluded with the words of Slovenian philosopher Slavoy Žižek:

… The overall image emerging … provides an adequate and terrifying vision of new forms of social control that make the good old twentieth-century “totalitarianism” a rather primitive and clumsy machine of control’

It is interesting to note that Chisnall’s article was published shortly before the World_International_Patents_Office (2020) issued Patent WOWO2020060606. That enabled profiting from mining of personal bodily data for crypto currency, enabling Casino style gambling on genetic outcomes, shortly before the C-19 vaccine rollouts commenced! For a full review of that, see my Substack post #38 (McGrath 2025a). It oozes with the sentiments of Zizek’s words above.

Chisnall’s view is congruent with the concerns of the sources in the preceding sections. So it is worthwhile to consider the Australian legislative landscape in light of the three waves of slavery that governments and corporations have engaged in and progressed through:

1. Ownership - Chattel Slavery,

2. Physical and financial control – Modern Slavery

3. Mind influence and control – Digital Slavery.

The Modern Slavery Act, Criminal Code and Crimes Act

The Modern Slavery Act of 2018 came into force on 1/1/2019 requiring entities and corporations based, or operating in Australia, with annual revenue over $100M, to report annually on the risks of Modern Slavery in their operations and supply chains, along with their actions to address those risks. It defines Modern Slavery as per Division 270 or 271 of the Criminal Code of 1995. There is also the 1914 Crimes Act which enables international and transnational crimes to be prosecuted. The essences of the relevant Criminal Code definitions are:

coercion is any of force, duress, detention, psychological oppression, abuse of power or taking advantage of a person’s vulnerability.

slavery‑like offences are servitude, forced labour, deceptive recruiting for labour or services, forced marriage or debt bondage.

slavery is the condition of a person over whom any or all the powers attaching to the right of ownership are exercised, including where such a condition results from a debt or contract made by the person.

servitude is the condition of a person (the victim) who provides labour or services, if, because of the use of coercion, threat or deception the victim would not consider themselves free to cease providing the labour or services or to leave or is significantly deprived of personal freedom in respect of other aspects their life. This applies whether the coercion, threat or deception is used against the victim or another person, and the victim may be in a condition of servitude whether or not escape is practically possible, or the victim has attempted to escape.

forced labour is the condition of a person (the victim) who provides labour or services if, because of the use of coercion, threat or deception, the victim would not consider themselves free to cease providing the labour or services or to leave. This also applies whether the coercion, threat or deception is used against the victim or another person, and the victim may be in a condition of forced labour whether or not escape is practically possible or the victim has attempted to escape.

Deceptive recruiting for labour or services occurs when the recruiter intends to induce another person (the victim) into an engagement to provide labour or services; and the conduct causes the victim to be deceived about their freedom to leave or to cease providing the labour or services; or that the engagement will involve exploitation.

It is clear that all three forms of slavery are captured by these definitions in the Crimes Act. The fact that Digital Slavery cannot be seen by the human eye is irrelevant. Its impact can even be worse than chattel slavery, which was supposed to have been abolished long ago.

AI and Digital Crimes and consequences

Prosecution of all AI and digital technology perpetrators for all the above crimes is obviously required. With the operation of digital technology being controlled by the same companies that supply cybersecurity, weapons and operating systems to both sides of many conflicts around the world, this has also severely compromised our national security. So, additional charges of subversion, fraud and treason are also obviously required as well. Prosecutions for this should be immediately commenced by public prosecutors and/ or aggrieved parties.

This has come about through corporate fraud, committed with the permission of public servants and politicians drafting and passing legislation allowing it. This has facilitated removal of existing publicly available systems that were working well, and that provided effective competition and backup, to the point where we are now apparently hostage to digital systems. Corporate monopoly has been achieved via government capture. This has effectively handed control of government means of compulsion (Regulation as well as military and police forces) to the private sector, to enforce that monopoly. This has been done by manipulating both government and private sector media narrative to hide the fact that it depends upon slavery and is deliberately intended to create more of it. This has now become very dangerous for the whole population.

There has been no informed consent from anyone whose data has been used without their knowledge to train AI, or whose data has been or will be monitored under crypto currency Patent WO2020060606 crypto currency system using body activity data, covered in my Substack Post #38. There has only been the pretend consent of the Hobson’s choice to click and accept any new or updated conditions, or face being locked out. AI has been parasiting on our data.

People are being tricked, coerced and exploited. It makes no difference whether it is physical or digital. Our intellectual property (IP) has been stolen, and it will ruin our employment opportunities and businesses while providing inferior service.

We aren’t being renumerated for that. There is only some nebulous discussion of UBI, which will be paid by our taxes and not by the perpetrators anyway. That is fraud and slavery. However, any focus on providing compensation for work stolen by AI, such as that given by 60_Minutes_Australia (2025) at

is counterproductive. Why should criminals be allowed to pay a percentage to buy their way out of prosecution and forfeiting the proceeds of their crime? This applies not only for artists and authors, but also for everybody whose IP AI has stolen, including IT practitioners, designers, lawyers, judges and more. That 60 minutes program groomed people into the mindset of thinking that big corporate crime is OK provided we the victims are bought off! No. That’s not OK. It’s illegal. Stolen property needs to be seized and removed from the perpetrator’s control or frozen. How will a creative person ever make a living in future if AI is allowed to keep constantly stealing all their IP? Appeasement is no good at all. Besides, it then generates a big administrative problem in working out what the value is of that particular content category in that particular marketplace. No. Avoid the problem by stopping theft of the data in the first place and leaving control with the individuals generating the content.

Locally, the Government can and must act to stop this enslavement of its people by providing effective regulation and oversight of the private sector. It should not allow itself to be forced to pay taxpayer funded UBI through having allowed corporations to profit from theft of its peoples’ IP and ability to earn their own money. The activity is criminal. It simply needs to be stopped. This can be done by shutting the offending businesses down or removing their licence to operate and prosecuting their local executives for complicity. ASIC can deregister companies. Lawyers establishing contracts to facilitate these activities can be debarred.

What is also not publicised is all the locks that this criminal AI enabled Digital Enslavement will place on us. If these people get their way, we will all be forced to identify anywhere and everywhere, beeping ourselves in and out - even to get a supermarket shelf door to open so we can get some food to feed ourselves! That’s a control-freak’s dream. Whoever dreamt that up or thinks it’s a good idea surely needs psychiatric help far more than they need our manufactured consent! We are seemingly expected to go along with this obsessive, compulsive nonsense, and ignore the possibility that it could be deployed in nefarious ways? Dr Renee Hoenderkamp (2025) in commenting on GB News at

concurred with this view in much less flattering terms, pointing out that it’s about surveillance and control, right out of the UN Agenda 2030 playbook. After noting that there are currently 35 people a day being arrested for offensive speech in the UK, she said “If you agree to it (Digital ID), you are agreeing to shackle yourself to a life without freedom henceforth”.

If you are prevented from going somewhere or shopping to buy food, you are constrained against your will and that is slavery 101. Forcing people into a situation where they need permission to buy food is unconscionable but easily possible with the way this is all heading. There is nothing being built in that will prevent rationing of all our food and supplies. And we aren’t supposed to notice or be concerned? We’re supposed to trust and say “Oh, that’s ridiculous. They couldn’t possibly do that. And they wouldn’t”. Until they do. Betrayal is what psychopaths get off on! It destroys the human soul and they parasite on that energy. We can’t imagine anyone doing that, but that’s exactly what they do! That can only be done by deception and abusing our trusting natures, using fake Trojan Horse arguments that appeal to our humanity.

Forced provision of services or forced delivery of goods without adequate (or any) payment = slavery. So getting people to spend their time and effort without their consent and without payment constitutes slavery. Putting people into situations they cannot physically leave is physical slavery. Putting people into situations they cannot digitally leave is digital slavery. Cutting access to their services is coercion facilitating extortion. The capability we’ve all unknowingly given to AI will cost many their jobs. There will be no need for doctors, judges or lawyers. They are all slated for replacement. Too bad about the misdiagnoses or misinterpretations and totalitarian standard of non-service we’ll get! There also won’t be any need for police forces or militaries then either, so they can all be sacked and disposed of too. If everyone is effectively imprisoned (geofenced) in 15-minute cities, you won’t need anyone running around physically detaining people anymore!

All this forced acceptance of data mining and Digital ID is criminal This means that none of the technology associated with Digital ID or AI is legal in Australia. Additional legislation for Digital Slavery is also urgently needed to enumerate it and require all organisations and individuals to remove it from their supply chains.

Arrests and imprisonment are necessary. Of course, it goes without saying that anyone detained should be well looked after by the community standards of our time. They should be fed a diet of their (manufacturing) plant-based meals, such as GMO foods, soy, corn, crickets and cockroach milk (which can be readily Googled). All their own government approved company products, and others that their actions have supported, should be readily available. They wouldn’t want their carbon footprint exceeded, of course, and so no natural food should be provided. Of course, their vaccination schedules must also be kept completely up to date, for their own safety. They should also be surveilled 24/7, like they are trying to do to the rest of the world. Given the public nature of the crimes, it would be in the public interest for the cameras watching them to be publicly accessible, to reassure the public that justice is being well and truly served. That will be no big deal for them, given they are already so much in the public eye anyway, and what they are doing is so good for us that it will be very good for them as well. So we won’t have to worry. All of these people have doubtless been working so hard and selflessly for some greater good that they may well have neglected to provide themselves and their families with the benefits of their inventions and products. Those efforts should be recognised by supplying those things at public expense to them and their families. We would want them to share in the full benefits of modern communication, and to facilitate that, their family homes should have 5G towers erected nearby, to make sure they are all well connected and safe. 6G should also be added as soon as it becomes available.

It is obvious that attention has been focused on Modern Slavery to distract attention away from the Digital Slavery we are being collectively driven into via digital technology, in the hope that we won’t notice - until it’s too late for anyone to escape.

The Modern Slavery facade

The Modern Slavery Act places blanket responsibility upon corporations to prevent and address Modern Slavery. So let’s look at how this is done by one of our prominent companies, say FMG, whose founder was the driving force behind the Act. The Fortescue_Metals_Group (2024) Report that satisfies its requirement under both the Australian Modern Slavery Act 2018 and the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 is a 53 page statement says:

In the capitalistic drive to deliver products cheaper and faster than ever before, it is critical we do not turn a blind eye… Protecting human rights should be at the heart of every company’s strategy – not an afterthought. Supply chains free of forced labour – where businesses and workers thrive equitably – are essential for delivering open, stable and resilient global supply chains and a healthier global economy… This statement is not just a compliance document, it reaffirms our dedication to transparency and accountability as we work toward a world where every individual is free from exploitation.

It then goes on to look at various countries where FMG operates, including Brazil, Peru and Kazakhstan. So this report gives unqualified support for addressing slavery in physical resource extraction. But what thought has been given to digital data extraction? It’s all on the supply chain! You don’t go and mine metals willy nilly for no purpose.

We learned from Forrest and Yemini (2025) in

that FMG’s owner, Andrew Forrest (Twiggy), has gone green. Putting his arm around Arvi in a fatherly way, he says “We are working like slaves to do everything we can for our planet”. Given the information here about Digital Slavery, that sounds somewhat prescient. Avi wondered what he meant by going green, then realised Twiggy’s into lithium mining - for which there’s a huge requirement for the batteries that are on the digital supply chain. So going for ‘green’ will be very profitable for him. But we nevertheless know from a much earlier interview he did on Modern Slavery in Indonesia on 29/3/2017 (Forrest 2017) , that he was right across the Modern Slavery issue, encouraging people to speak up if they find it, to ask their bosses if we have any in our supply chain. He even said “The fact that you ask the question becomes very powerful”. Let’s hope he regards this questioning here in the same vein!

At 11:40 into this very same interview, Forrest says that he found Modern Slavery in his own company - in the UAE. Of all places! That’s the very place where the means of introducing world-wide Digital Slavery had been established two years earlier in 2015, as explained in my Substack Post #50! This global court is the Abu Dhabi Digital Market (ADGM) Court. It’s establishment there to rule on all matters digital across the whole world, aligns with huge Data Centres also being established there, so the UAE can become the Data Hub of the world, where much of the world’s digital data will be stored! And as he’s doing business in the UAE, how can he possibly have not known about the global agenda to achieve this, when his minerals are on the supply chain for all things digital?

The Indonesian connection is also interesting. The two Bali boys were executed on 29/4/2015, at the time when foreign aid contracts worth hundreds of millions were being negotiated there. That aid could have gone elsewhere. Our Foreign Minister at the time, Julie Bishop could have easily told the Indonesians they wouldn’t get a cent if they executed any of the Bali nine. Why was that approach not taken? What did she mean when she said some time afterwards that we were ‘back on track’? What was really going on here?

The Bali Process had been established in 2002 to deal with transnational crime. The BaliProcess (2025) website https://baliprocess.net/ currently says “Trafficking in Persons involves the use of deception, force or fraud to recruit, transport, harbour and ultimately receive and hold people against their will, with the aim of exploiting them for profit”. All of these things are occurring in the implementation of digital technology!

One year after Forrest’s interview mentioned above, at the second Bali Process Business Forum at Nusa Dua in 2018, he was photographed standing with Julie Bishop. Did she not tell him about the ADGM court and its connection with Digital Slavery, when three years before in 2015 as Foreign Minister, she had been in the UAE shortly before the launch of its court.

But around the time of the second Bali Process, we find that Jim Green (2018), the Nuclear monitor for The Ecologist, in an article titled Who cleans up the mess when an Australian uranium mining company leaves Africa? at https://theecologist.org/2018/jun/18/who-cleans-mess-when-australian-uranium-mining-company-leaves-africa said:

Australian uranium mining company Paladin Energy has now put two of its mines into ‘care-and-maintenance’ and bankruptcy looms. Many Australian mining projects in Africa are outposts of good governance - this is what Julie Bishop, the country’s Foreign Minister, told the Africa Down Under mining conference in Western Australia in September 2017. The Australian government “encourages the people of Africa to see us as an open-cut mine for lessons-learned, for skills, for innovation and, I would like to think, inspiration,” the minister said.

But such claims sit uneasily with the highly critical findings arising from a detailed investigation by the International Consortium of Independent Journalists (ICIJ)… The ICIJ noted in a 2015 report that since 2004, more than 380 people have died in mining accidents or in off-site skirmishes connected to Australian mining companies in Africa. The ICIJ report further stated: “Multiple Australian mining companies are accused of negligence, unfair dismissal, violence and environmental law-breaking across Africa, according to legal filings and community petitions gathered from South Africa, Botswana, Tanzania, Zambia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Cote d’Ivoire, Senegal and Ghana.” Paladin Energy’s Kayelekera uranium mine in Malawi provides a case study of the problems with Australian mining companies in Africa. Western Australia-based Paladin exploited Malawi’s poverty to secure numerous reductions and exemptions from payments normally required by foreign investors.

Paladin was restructured with Deutsche bank money and relisted. This all doesn’t line up at all with any serious intent to do anything about Modern Slavery, let alone Digital Slavery.

So it is difficult to conclude that there has been any serious attempt to do anything about any form of slavery at all. All this official huffing and puffing has simply provided a useful smokescreen for business-as-usual introducing Digital Slavery, using exploitative practices in both physical and digital realms.

Government and Corporate (PPP) Culpability/ Collusion

The implementation of plans to perpetrate major digital financial fraud and serious bodily harm can be chillingly tracked back to the 1997George Magazine’s Survival Guide to the Future 2020 article titled “Oh! Say you can see…” (Kennedy & Gates 1997) which predicted what would happen. There are also former politicians from various countries operating internationally who have been orchestrating this for many years, through their influence across the entire supply chain, from mining minerals right through to mining data. This has been done via the revolving door between government and private sector appointments. This has been further facilitated by PPPs blurring the line between public and private sectors.

The 2018 Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry found evidence that financial institutions were involved in money laundering for drug syndicates, had turned a blind eye to terrorism financing, ignored statutory reporting responsibilities and improperly engaged in foreign exchange trading. The 2022 Casino enquiry also found evidence of money laundering at Sydney’s Star Casino. Given that Blackrock, Vanguard and State Street have major shareholdings in practically all major companies in Australia as well as in each other, as well as in AI companies, this behaviour will be corporately endemic. We would be naïve to suddenly expect any different behaviour from them in relation to their approach to AI and digital technology. Furthermore, neither the Banking Royal Commission nor the Casino Enquiry made any mention of the ADGM Court and its current and possible future jurisdiction. This would have been highly relevant, given both industries transact digitally and would have been well aware of the ADGM bringing them under UAE jurisdiction. How is it that neither government nor corporate people raised this in the above enquiries? An investigation into how and why this oversight occurred is necessary.

Supply Chain knowledge

Any company knows its market - who its customers are, what they will buy and what the products sold to them will be used for. They have to – to satisfy their shareholders and get finance for investments. Rare earth minerals must be mined to get the materials for all the devices that the crypto currency Patent WO2020060606 crypto currency system using body activity data, covered in my Substack Post #38, was designed to link up and crypto mine – mobile phones, wearables, implants, medical devices, injected materials etc. etc., including all the hydrogel and graphene oxide that’s ended up throughout everyone’s bodies and brains following the C-19 pandemic testing and vaccination, as well as Neuralink, satellites etc. etc.. So physical and digital are obviously inextricably connected.

Can you imagine CEOs and directors playing so dumb as to say to their shareholders that they had no idea where their investment fitted into the supply chain? Make no mistake, they all knew. They have to know their customers’ requirements as that controls their share price!

This means that every CEO, Board Chair and Director whose company is on the supply chain, from end to end, from financiers through mineral miners to the IT companies and any government executives participating in PPPs must have been fully aware all along that this was all being done for SMART reasons i.e. Surveillance, Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology, with the intent of enslaving of the whole population of the world. They and the boards of their major shareholding companies should immediately take corrective action or be criminally prosecuted for these crimes.

None of this can have happened overnight. It has to have been going on for many years. This means there has been massive pre-crime or thought crime. That’s one of the things that FakeI is being developed to detect in advance, so potential perpetrators can be arrested, prosecuted and imprisoned, before the crime can even occur. It’s such a pity that FakeI developed too slowly to catch them on this one! Or perhaps FakeI hasn’t been trained on their data, so might not have detected it anyway! But never mind, it’s never too late. There’s still the old fashioned ‘catch them afterwards’ provisions of the Criminal Code. They can still be prosecuted now, so that the public can at least be kept safe from here on in.

Furthermore, as well as criminally violating Australian law, the charters and laws of many international institutions which have requirements regarding human rights as well as slavery, such as the EU, the UN and UNESCO, have also been violated. For example, how does any of what has been detailed above not contravene the UN Global Digital Pact Objective 3 to “Foster an inclusive, open, safe and secure digital space that respects, protects and promote human rights”? How does any such organisation that repeatedly and wilfully breaches its own rules, continue to exist and attract funding? Some means of holding these bodies to account or dismantling them is obviously needed, especially when they do the exact opposite of what they are required to do.

The supply chain also includes any battery-farms powering AI, such as at Collie in Western Australia, which have enormous power requirements. That particular plant was situated in a fire-prone area and uses a lot of water. Batteries have been spontaneously combusting around the world, causing unprecedented fires that can take many thousands of litres to extinguish. The susceptibility of Lithium batteries to spontaneous combustion (explosion) was well known, yet obviously ignored, before the large-scale EV and e-everything rollout started with government encouragement, duping the public into accepting them! It must have been recognised that any resulting major fires could and would be blamed on climate change. Sure enough, our 2020 fires and the LA, Hawaiian and US East Coast fires were blamed on it. All were made much worse by Lithium batteries exploding in cars, charging stations, houses, e bikes and e scooters. In the US, Houses were demolished by burning them to the ground, in rezoned areas where developer resumption was sought, knowing that thousands of additional litres of water would be needed – if there was any water left over at all from any nearby AI Data Centre. You can kill people, clear their land, then allow new large foreign owned companies to fund major development and then Austria’s Rosenbauer can benefit from more bulk fire truck sales contracts.

Why can this not be stopped? Because the whole psychopathic surveillance control grid agenda depends on Lithium batteries. It stops without them. Pity about the people incinerated and the lost $Bs of forest products, houses and buildings. And we care about climate change and resource conservation? Then the politicians, planners, policy makers and corporate consultants, who do this insider trading, can exit and start cashing in by providing strategic advice.

This is major crime - using government money to procure things that will cause major fires. It is quite separate to Digital Slavery. So arson must be added to the list of charges. Anyone on the Lithium supply chain must have known – unless they were ignorant, negligent or incompetent.

International legal and procurement redress

There are regulatory frameworks in place across many jurisdictions around the world for combatting Modern Slavery, that Digital Slavery can be considered within, for example the EU AI Act and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, and there are similar UN directives.

Pietropaoli and Di-Vetta (2025) of the British Institute of International and Comparative Law (BIICL) describes the ‘failure to prevent’ model for redressing wrongs, saying it:

is a legal construct under which a corporate entity can be held strictly liable for failing to prevent certain unlawful acts (typically committed by associated persons), unless it can prove that it had adequate procedures in place to prevent them. It shifts the legal burden onto the company to demonstrate that it took all reasonable steps to prevent the misconduct, rather than requiring prosecutors to prove corporate intent or direct involvement…

This model… aligns with the risk-based and preventative nature of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the CSDDD and responds to enforcement challenges in transnational corporate networks. As this blog explains, the ‘failure to prevent’ model offers legal coherence, practical enforceability, and alignment with broader legislative trends in Europe, while promoting corporate accountability without relying on reconstructing individual fault or intent… the sanctions intended to implement the directive within national legal systems are considered to fall under criminal law domain ‘within the meaning of the Convention’ according to the European Court of Human Rights’ case-law (Pietropaoli & Di-Vetta 2025).

Dr De_Aguinaga (2025), also of BIICL, in an accompanying piece to a Modern Slavery and Human Rights Policy and Evidence Centre (Modern Slavery PEC) Policy Brief on the effectiveness of public procurement measures in addressing Modern Slavery, discusses public procurement Modern Slavery measures and their interaction with existing Mandatory Human Rights and Environmental Due Diligence (mHREDD) and Transparency in Supply Chains (TISC) legislation. These can also incorporate Digital Slavery within them. She lists six ways in which public procurement Modern Slavery measures can be used to regulate businesses as follows:

1. Exclusion Criteria: mandatory exclusion of businesses, suppliers and subcontractors convicted for Modern Slavery from bidding for a public contract, such as applies in the UK, Finland and Austria. [Note: This only came in because the latter two countries were caught out doing illegal weapons trading in the Patria case and needed to be seen to be doing something so they could recover their reputations. But nothing seems to have actually changed, and corruption continues as normal, as evidenced by the Beth Schlesinger Austrian judiciary case mentioned in the British Parliament, as well as other cases, with one previous one involving a former Chancellor.]

2. Debarment: Businesses can be temporarily suspended and placed on a debarment register for a specific period, removed from a “preferred supplier” or equivalent list, or banned for an indefinite period.

· In the UK, a business can be excluded from bidding for a public contract if it has not submitted a Modern Slavery statement.

· In Western Australia, suppliers can be prevented from seeking or being awarded public contracts for up to two years for non-compliance with the reporting requirements of the Modern Slavery Act 2018.

3. Selection Criteria: Businesses can be asked to meet mandatory minimum requirements related to Modern Slavery to be eligible for a procurement.

4. Award criteria: Businesses that comply with social award criteria specific to Modern Slavery can be rewarded by the government.

5. Contract Performance Clauses: Businesses can be required to undertake certain steps in relation to labour standards for the duration of the contract.

6. Contract termination:

There is also the possibility of using other legislation governing the use of torture and in particular, ‘no-touch torture’. This occurs when damage is knowingly done remotely. This is what many of the measures made possible by digital technology discussed in the preceding sections actually do. They have been referred to there as extortion, but they can equally well be described as ‘no-touch torture’.

What Digital Prison horrors might failure to act lead to?

Well, the EU is talking now of people’s savings being converted into digital ‘investments’ in the EU. The catch is that you will have to spent it by a certain time, or your money will expire. Saving will become a thing of the past. This is theft and extortion via corporate banking fraud. This is why no currency should ever be digital (Austin Fitts 2025b). Of course, introducing such measures into Australia would clearly be illegal and criminal, as already explained - it satisfies the requirements for all of coercion, servitude and slavery.

In Europe, the cash transaction limit has also been reduced from 10,000 to 3,000 Euros. How would something like that work in rural and outback Australia? This clearly constitutes an artificial restriction of freedom with intent to produce and enforce a monopoly for digital money.

These things require the vigilance of people to notice and immediately demand reversal from those in control, should such stupidity be introduced here. Any genuine philanthropists should surely immediately start funding legal prosecutions of any companies doing this.

The EU also now has a ten-point plan with one sub-component reportedly targeting there being no more waiting lists for human organs! While this is reminiscent of a famous assertion by an Australian Prime Minister that no Australian child would live in poverty, one wonders where these organs might be sourced from? From (political) prisoners, perhaps, such as has been reported concerning Falun Gong practitioners in China? From people who have exceeded their daily carbon allowance or whose social credit score has dipped below some arbitrary level? Who might have had their money and food supply cut off, making them homeless or sending them to prison? There is no escaping the fact now that mass DNA testing and digitalisation allows AI searching of databases world-wide to determine suitable ‘donors’ for targeting. These are nightmare scenarios, the possibility of which cannot be allowed!

If you think the thin end of this wedge isn’t being applied here, consider this very recent A_Current_Affair (2025) report of small businesses being crippled by removal of their social media account for supposedly breaching community standards. This happened without warning. The opportunity to appeal to Meta was offered, which produced no effective response or opportunity to talk to a human. Long delays and business disruption occurred, losing thousands of dollars for the hapless victims and causing them great stress over the false and offensive reasons associated with deletion of access to their accounts. One had her personal Facebook page deleted, losing all photos of her baby boy, wedding and holiday. In the end, all the businesses interviewed were unable to get reinstated until they eventually succumbed to the corporate extortion of paying between 15 & 45 USD a month for some service (Meta Verified) that they hadn’t previously needed.

That report also told us that Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, has reportedly disabled over 10 million accounts since the start of the year. One wonders how many were for genuine safety reasons, how many resulted from FakeI mistakes and how many were deliberate extortion. Many people who have had similar experiences will probably also have felt like they were the only ones this was happening to and suffered in silence, allowing the corporate bullying to succeed. This is akin to Mafia style ‘insurance’ to make sure you don’t get your windows broken and you ‘stay safe’! It’s an ‘offer that can’t be refused’. If you don’t pay up, you don’t get your account back and are banned for life. It’s extortion. People have been groomed into becoming dependent on social media for earning a living, apparently to gain a monopoly which then makes this sort of extortion possible. This is highly likely to have been part of corporate business plans. I personally know one other person in my area that has had this same difficulty with their Facebook account. This is an unnecessary and unjustifiable restriction of free speech.

This type of corporate collusion and extortion seems to be on a scale that now constitutes a corporate crime wave, well worth our regulatory agencies doing something about! How long before this is used to clamp down more comprehensively on those the government of the day or some powerful corporation doesn’t like?

Where are ASIC and the ACCC on all this? It shouldn’t be up to individual customers to try to fight Goliath. There is a serious need to deal with what looks like corporate collusion and cartel behaviour generated through the mechanism of big players having multiple shareholdings in supposedly competing players, as well as cross shareholdings in each other. This renders the supposed competition between e.g. big banks and big grocers, as a mirage.

Various countries already check mobile phones and laptops before allowing entry. This enables a quick AI scan of e.g. your You Tube browsing history to see if you are ‘correctly’ politically aligned. This means we are approaching the point where no one will want to take their mobile phone or laptop when they travel for fear of interrogation and or incarceration.

Then there’s the shady world of surveillance pricing. This is something Uber drivers experience. You get called to jobs if you have certain apps on your phone. You don’t get work if you don’t comply. This is all designed to induce dependence that can then be used to the system controller’s advantage, whether monetary or political. X now has a premium account that can potentially be similarly exploited. Starlink will likely have the same capability. It started with providing cheap or free connectivity in remote locations, causing other competitor services to be uneconomic for users, such that those services are no longer adequately provided or maintained, thus creating dependence and allowing for later extortion, which is enslavement.

There are also reports of unusual happenings on Yoube account upgrades with things being lost and taking a long time to be restored. People build up businesses via the algorithms used that preference volume of regular use. When a supplier company doesn’t clear such issues, the user account soon loses its algorithmic ranking and new customers are not directed to them. This can significantly adversely affect small, or any business, and there is no avenue for restoration. This can easily be used punitively for coercion or extortion by those controlling the system.

No matter how many times we are told xyz is for our own good (e.g. financial or physical safety), so we can’t (defraud or) be defrauded by each other, the reality is that digitalisation leaves the gate wide open for the system controllers to defraud and sabotage any or all of us at will. This puts us in a position where we have no recourse! The safety argument is yet another Trojan horse used for unfair corporate and/ or ideological advantage. That’s coercion/ bullying! Digitalisation that hands all control to corporations to extort for profit with impunity. This constitutes Digital Slavery, which can easily be turned into physical slavery.

This is currently being done in the US under the guise of protecting the country from invasion by immigration. While that is a well-known military subversion tactic that every nation needs to thwart to avoid internal division and civil unrest, it can also be used as a Trojan horse for trafficking. Pressley and Ojeda (2025) tell us about mass data collection of DNA information on immigrants and their children for storage in the FBI criminal database that was designed to track violent offenders. Ojeda said this brands adults and children like cattle and future criminals, tracking them for life. He considers this is “legalising kidnapping, laying the groundwork for ethnic cleansing”. He asks how many times in history this has started with camps for others and ended with camps for everyone. He says this is being done at Fort Bliss in Texas which is getting its own private deportation airport. That will enable people to be quietly disappeared in the dead of night with no oversight, accountability or media attention.

In a video titled Don’t Be Fooled With What’s About To Happen“ Whitney Webb (2025b) tells us that there’s a coordinated global policy push for Digital IDs based on your biometric data – fingerprint, iris and face scan. It’s integrated with CBDCs and carbon markets which will be tied directly to your ability to transact, receive aid, or even exist within the modern economy. For refugees currently in camps to receive food and rations, they must do an eyeball scan so the monetary amount for the food they receive is automatically subtracted from the digital wallet they are given. She says that it doesn’t matter which country you’re in or whether it is part of BRICS or the collective West. Of course, in the US, this data will all be in databases the CIA and any other intelligence agency can access whenever they want without a warrant. This is sold as keeping you safe and secure, of course, which is the usual Trojan horse reason. This is being rolled out across the board because the Digital ID is deemed essential to the entire sustainable development agenda under the UN Agenda 2030 SDGs, specifically SDG 16, Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions. It’s indicator 16.9 calls for legal identification for everyone in the world from the time they are born.

Webb also says that it’s not only for people, but literally everything alive is to get a Digital ID, according to Larry Fink, the head of Blackrock and now the WEF. This will enable tokenisation of all real-world natural assets, enabling them to be arrogated without compensation for the theft of public common ‘property’. This will be used for corporate monetisation, creating a brand-new market for trading on stock exchanges, nicely disguised as supporting the green agenda. This does nothing for the environment. It also relies on surveillance and gates to lock local people (trespassers!) out of accessing their common property, such as rainforests. They are called Natural Asset Corporations or NACs and will comprise what is again mendaciously referred to as ‘nature’s economy’. NAC’s will issue shares in ‘their’ selected natural asset, out of thin air, and sell them to financial institutions, asset managers and sovereign wealth funds. Then they’ll go public and have an IPO to generate more funding on arrogated assets.

AI also depends on digitalisation and AI can very easily quickly monopolise and control. Consider the recent report of a US military simulation where the AI didn’t like being restrained to not attack civilian targets and so destroyed its own side’s command centre to resolve the problem! Do we really want to allow AI to become a new god, making ‘Pearly Gate’ decisions for us?

Other examples of AI misbehaviour come from Turner (2024) of GB News in the UK. The NHS there uses AI to make eligibility and prioritisation decisions about organ transplants. One woman who was repeatedly overlooked for life saving liver transplant found out there was a ‘liver transplant benefit score’ and the AI controlling it had a faulty algorithm! AI also got things wrong in the UK grading scandal, which affected the lives of thousands of school children. Digital ID is even being rolled out in the UK for access to pubs and clubs and their services. As the presenter said, it must remain optional as not everything in life is binary. The potential exists for further abuse should some other unnecessary, untested, unsafe product, misclassified as a vaccine, be mandated.

Client-side scanning records a screen shot of everything you do on-line every few seconds. It then uses the AI assistant to read everything you’ve done and report anything directly to the server which can then pass it to Police who can then turn up at your door. This is well explained by IT expert Rob Braxman (2025) in a video titled Kill Privacy Forever! They Will Mandate an App to Watch You! Client Side Scanning at

. This is the tech companies’ ‘solution’ to the problem of getting around encryption. It looks at what you are doing on your device before it goes through any encryption and so doesn’t need to crack it! Apple, Google and Microsoft have programs to do this on your device already – Apple Neural Hash then Mediaanalysisd, Microsoft Windows Recall and Google System Safety Core. Braxman has been shouting about the dangers of this on his channel for years, with few taking any notice. But it is now here, waiting for the full functionality of the surveillance to be turned on. Any communist country leader or any dictator would love this as technology can now have eyes on every citizen24/7! Hitler would be in raptures!

Braxman implores people to speak up about the unacceptability of this NOW. Joe Rogan has recently spoken of his work on air. He shows a photo of British MPs with a placard outside Westminster saying: Police our streets, not our Tweets. He says CSAM, which is about child pornography is a cover. The intelligence agencies have wanted this capability all along and CSAM is simply an attempt to normalise this invasive behaviour. The sneakiness and mendacity of this approach is evident in it being able to label you as weird if you don’t believe in protecting against CSAM! They’ve already convinced you that surveillance is normal with 24/7 tracking on your phone. What’s the problem if you have nothing to hide? But you better not have anything to hide because they will get you. You better not oppose anything, or you’ll have your social media or internet cut off. This is not so thinly disguised Mafia tactics to bring about monopoly and control. He says of the Trojan Horse age verification requirement that “CSAM is a SCAM”. He says privacy will be dead forever if people don’t step up and speak up. Can you imagine a more chilling effect on free speech? Depending on who is in power, those in opposition will cower in fear. Police will knock on your door. Of course, children need to be protected, but not the way that has been selected here, which serves other agendas and fails to satisfactorily address the real problem anyway!

Conclusion

The above sections, together with my Substack Post #50, provide the evidence of decades of deliberate, focused activity designed to enslave humanity into an inescapable Digital Prison, policed by AI with no facility for rebuttal, probation, appeal or release. This has required enormous coordination and delivery effort over decades. This can only have been accomplished with the intent and support of those ruling/ controlling/ steering the corporations and governments of the world. They appear to have set up cartels that have colluded towards this objective as a means of achieving monopoly market dominance that could then be extorted for great profit, while dovetailing with their overarching eugenics plan.

We seem to be headed in the same direction that Germany, under the background leadership of Austria, took in the first half of last century with the subversion of its democracy. We badly need to learn the lessons of history and join the dots on recent events, lest we stumble and bumble our way into repeating what happened last time.

All involved in this need to be immediately arrested, have their assets frozen and prosecutions immediately commenced by public prosecutors and/ or aggrieved parties.

Action

Necessary actions from Government to avoid ongoing liability are:

1. APS to terminate or amend supplier contracts.

2. DFAT to apply Sanctions.

3. ASIC to revoke licences to operate.

4. NACC to conduct due diligence on what former politicians and public officials did in office that they may now be profiting from through having subsequently accepted private sector roles.

5. Attorney General to investigate and prosecute Julie Bishop and to prosecute the eSafety Commissioner for failing to identify the biggest eSafety threat the country has ever faced.

6. ACCC to investigate and prosecute monopoly and Cartel behaviour.

7. AFP to investigate and charge individuals.

8. All Ministers to direct their departments to review and amend all current contracts.

9. Parliament to repeal any legislation or treaties supporting any form of Digital Slavery and abolish the AFCA and explain to the Australian people the need for these measures.

10. Parliament to ban Digital ID and CBDCs, Crypto currency trading on human body activity data under Microsoft WIPO Patent WO2020060606 and Insertion of computer chips or other devices into peoples’ bodies, devices supporting social engineering and age restrictions to social media.

11. Treasurer to repatriate all Australian Federal gold reserves and holdings to Australia and order an investigation to determine how much gold that Goldcorp has allowed to leave the country.

12. 1. Health Minister to suspend all Covid and mRNA supply contracts, exit Australia from the WHO and suspend ANY and ALL vaccine collaboration with the EU, the US, the UK and China.

These will be expanded in detail in a later Post.

The following are actions individuals can take personally:

1. When considering where to shop, recognise the red flag of businesses installing doors on their non refrigerated products. These doors will have the capacity to be locked requiring Digital ID and/ or biometric scan to open. Their company will be on board with this whole agenda, so shop there at your own risk. The trifling checkout convenience of billing you automatically as you select each item is a Trojan Horse for you being surveilled and controlled. It will also cost the jobs of checkout staff. It will also multiply exponentially the number of transactions that the bank can charge a fee for, and your transaction history will become invasive, long and unmanageable.

2. Any outlet that starts requiring QR check-in codes, Digital ID or facial recognition, or stops accepting cash is providing good reason to go elsewhere or to go without. The UN SDGs will do this to you soon enough anyway and suffering it upfront now can make a difference.

3. If you receive any request or demand to sign up to the Digital ID, consider the irrevocable exposure to the risk of extreme consequences that making such a non-retractable commitment will subject you to. This is outlined in detail in my Substack Post #50. If you get into trouble after you’ve signed up, no one will be able to rescue you– unless and until the whole system crashes. You’ll only expose yourself to being trafficked off via arbitration, as Post #50 explains. Digitisation opens you up to all sorts of low- and high-level online scams and other predatory corporate and private crimes, hacks, system manipulations and system failures, both deliberate and accidental. It leaves you with no peace of mind, and no possible recourse. You can’t contain digitalisation. You have no control over it. Somebody else does, and all the above demonstrates that they certainly don’t have your best interests at heart. You will be trusting psychopaths to not kill you! How do you think that’s going to turn out? So, consider declining, deferring or delaying any decision, and getting other people you know to do the same, especially if it comes with any threat, mandate or bribe, all of which are major red flags.

As Dr Mike Yeadon (2025) said, agreeing/ signing up to it will be the last really important decision you will ever make. You then officially won’t exist as you anymore, replaced by a QR Code address to some resources that can be edited by whoever controls whatever system you’ve been tricked into. You will lose all control and be forced to beep your way through life, continually identifying yourself, even to buy mouldy bread made on insect flour! The worse the threatened retribution, the more you can be sure it’s a bad thing. They might want to rush us, but we have no need to rush. They can’t fire everybody, at least, not yet. There’s enough power among us if we all take our courage in our hands. There’re millions of us and only hundreds to perhaps thousands of them controlling all this. You only need courage when you are threatened. You need some courage now. We can’t rely on anyone in power at any level of any government to save us from this one now. We have to do it ourselves. And we can - if we all act together, en-masse, immediately, as soon as any coercion or bribery is sprung upon us. We need to be very careful with our choices NOW as choice and free will will be a thing of the past if this counterfeit system is allowed to take hold.

We need to find patience, clarity and the courage to decline, say no and put up with the inconvenience, until this counterfeit system built on trickery and deception crumbles. Courage is greatly needed, right now. The return on our personal investment in doing this will be enormous.

In the coercively controlled world we live in, it seems that the higher up you go in any organisation, the harder it is to escape this influence. New World Order tentacles are seemingly everywhere. Everyone can be coerced, almost right the way to the top. But numbers demonstrating courage can make a big difference, anywhere and at any level.

Industry insider Rob Braxman, as mentioned above, clearly confirmed what all are aware of in the industry – that all the infrastructure is in place, so there’s nothing anyone can do to stop that part of it now. We’ve been asleep and deceived but there’s no going back. It’s done!

But what the country/ world can still do is stop transacting digitally and go back to using cash and cheques. You could also go to one of the many Digital Detox Retreat Centres that are springing up around the world. Or you could do a free digital detox for some days at home by not using any devices for that period. Batteries would still need to be removed from mobile phones as they still transmit when turned off. Entities we’ve trusted have previously locked us out. So we could lock ourselves out for a while. Find what you love and do that instead. Conducting our own distributed denial of using digital services would deprive the parasitic systems of data. If done by enough people, it would send a clear message that the public and the market require genuine choice. It wouldn’t need any mainstream media attention. It would mean turning off all digital items – phones (except in emergency), smart watches, fit bits, computers, TVs, Wi-Fi - all off at the wall or with their power source removed so they can’t still transmit while off. CB radios are another good option for short distance communication. You could also use airplane mode or do what the intelligence agencies do - factory reset your mobile phone and don’t use it anymore and only use landlines. De-Googled phones are another option.

This digital detoxing will be uncomfortable, but we’ll be much better prepared then and much healthier in the long term as well. You’ll probably enjoy talking F2F with family, friends and neighbours anyway! The young ones who have been marketed (= mind-controlled) into digital addiction will have the hardest time with this. You/ they could even go fishing, surfing, skiing, hiking, dancing, playing music, gardening, volunteering or anything you enjoy that’s good for you. But don’t take your digital electronic gadgets. (If that might compromise your safety, get a Faraday bag for your phone, and take it in that).

This action would be most effectively done simultaneously nationally or globally. So anyone who is set up for advocacy and coordination (which I am not) could pick this up and run with it. Withholding is power. Attention is power. If they want us to transact, then they can go back to cash, cheques and analogue i.e. not switch off alternative backup technology to get monopoly. Technology is great but it should be secondary and serving, not dominating.

The ongoing psychopathic criminal planned intention seems to be that all will be stolen, switched off or have access denied to us anyway, so doing a detox is good practice. Besides, with so many things having been switched over to digital now, you don’t actually have real title to anything much left now anyway. It’s most likely pre-stolen and on-sold already! You simply haven’t been told or haven’t realised it yet. But we can turn our backs to them. Corporations are dead invisible entities. The word is derived from ‘corpse’. When you don’t engage with them, they don’t exist.

This has all been well designed so that the increasing draconian restrictions frustrate and distract us long enough until we are dropped into full slavery – Chattel, Modern and Digital – by which time, it will be impossible to escape. The end time this is all heading for seems to be the end of personal freedom as we know it! The blockchain will be the digital handcuffs on you and your digital wallet. It’s a chain around your neck to drop you into bondage. You are being cuffed so you can be sent off to detention and subsequently trafficked to God-knows where. This is wilful, intentional criminal activity.

Volatile times require reliable stuff that works that’s truly ‘safe and effective’, that can’t be turned off on us to compel us into accepting dangerous monopoly products. Alternative systems need to be provided and maintained – as evident from the recent power blackout of Spain, Portugal and half of France. If neither the government nor big business is providing them, we’ll need to be organising to provide them ourselves by other means. Community groups, groups serving communities are a great place to start.

Any individual with the time and energy could also take out injunctions or restraining orders from local Magistrates against the tech companies to prevent them from using anything they had said or posted, as well as from using their personal data.

Declaration

Finally, even though I’m not saying anything here that’s not available on the public record, I still consider it necessary to protect myself from possible retribution for doing what should be anyone’s right in a serious democracy. I am happy and healthy, leading a purposeful life and have no suicidal ideation whatsoever. I am not accident prone. I take no drugs or medication.

Any attempt to impede the progress or circulation of the findings of my research by slander or electronic inhibitory means would contravene the scientific approach of the physical sciences, which requires free and open evaluation. Let my findings stand or fall on the strength of argument and alignment with fact and truth, rather than on emotive matters of ideological belief or the manipulations of marketing/ social science. That is nothing more than what would naturally occur in a truly democratic country.

The very fact that I even need to say this speaks volumes for the current state of our society and the subversion of our democracy. Whatever gaslighting people may wish to come up with to the contrary, we no longer have the freedoms we thought we had. If you doubt that something untoward is going on somewhere, then you might look at McGrath (2025c) Substack Post #47 at https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/the-psychopathic-eugenics-agenda . It shows former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir, very clearly setting out in 2015 the New World Order’ eugenics agenda. He was speaking the year after Malaysian Airlines MH370 mysteriously disappeared over the Indian Ocean and MH17 was shot down over Ukraine four months later. Two aircraft from one airline? One wonders whether that was the means of forcing Malaysia into some dodgy deal or some international group it didn’t want to join or play along with. The global digital court dealt with in McGrath (2025b) Substack Post #50 at https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/digital-slavery-for-australia-and, perhaps?

As I said, I am only going on publicly available information. I did have to dig hard to find it, as mainstream media has reported little of it.

References

60_Minutes_Australia 2025, Will AI steal yr job? , Channel 9, viewed 2/9/2025, <

>.

A_Current_Affair 2025, Small businesses’ social media accounts shut down without warning,

>.

Álvarez-Pallete, JM 2022, About paradoxes and digital slavery, viewed 17/8/2025, <https://www.telefonica.com/en/communication-room/blog/about-paradoxes-and-digital-slavery/>.

Austin-Fitts, C 2025a, Human sovereignty and agency in the age of technocracy: A dialogue with catherine austin fitts Propaganda in Focus, viewed 30/9/2025, <

>.

Austin-Fitts, C 2025b, The danger of digital currencies viewed 1/7/2025, <

>.

BaliProcess 2025, The bali process, viewed 3/9/2025, <

https://baliprocess.net/

>.

BBC 2025, How AI uses our drinking water - BBC World Service, viewed 20/9/2025, <

>.

Black, S 2025, We found the hidden cost of data centers. It’s in your electric bill, More Perfect Union, viewed 20/9/2025, <

>.

Braxman, R 2025, Kill privacy forever! They will mandate an app to watch you! Client side scanning, viewed 30/8/2025, <

>.

Cadwalladr, C 2025, This is what a digital coup looks like viewed 1/6/2025, <

>.

Chisnall, M 2020, Are we becoming digital slaves? Why online ‘privacy’ is a misnomer, Lnndon School of Economics and Political Science, viewed 15/8/2025, <https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2020/03/04/are-we-becoming-digital-slaves-why-online-privacy-is-a-misnomer/>.

De_Aguinaga, SG 2025, British Institute of International and Comparative Law, viewed 18/8/2025, <https://www.biicl.org/blog/48/supplying-governments-amidst-modern-slavery-provisions-in-public-procurement>.

DW_Documentary 2024, How big AI companies exploit data workers in kenya, viewed 2/10/2025, <

>.

Forrest, A 2017, On modern slavery with andrew forrest MNC World News, viewed 2/9/2025, <

>.

Forrest, A & Yemini, A 2025, Why this billionaire aussie mining magnate is suddenly going green, Rebel News, viewed 2/9/2025, <

>.

Fortescue_Metals_Group 2024, Modern slavery statement, viewed 13/8/2025, <https://edge.sitecorecloud.io/fortescue17114-fortescueeb60-productionbbdb-8be5/media/project/fortescueportal/shared/docs/default-source/2824838.pdf >.

Frank’s_World_of_Data_Science_&_AI 2025, How AI datacenters eat the world, Frank’s World, viewed 30/9/2025, <https://www.franksworld.com/2025/09/01/how-ai-datacenters-eat-the-world/ >.

Green, J 2018, Who cleans up the mess when an australian uranium mining company leaves africa?, The Ecologist, viewed 5/9/2025, <https://theecologist.org/2018/jun/18/who-cleans-mess-when-australian-uranium-mining-company-leaves-africa>.

Hawley, J 2025, Parents of suicide victim testify at senate judiciary committee hearing about AI chatbot dangers viewed 19/9/2025 <

>.

Hoenderkamp, R 2025, Digital ids torn to shreds as ‘fabian autocrats’ wet dream’ exposed in chilling ‘shackles’ warning, GB News, viewed 2/10/2025, <

>.

Kaiser, B 2018, Brittany kaiser, former cambridge analytica director: ‘I voted for bernie’, The_Guardian, viewed 3/7/2025, <

>.

Kennedy, JFJ & Gates, W 1997, Oh! Say can you see... George Magazine - Survival Guide to the Future, viewed 29/6/2025, <https://ia803204.us.archive.org/19/items/george-magazine-february-1997-survival-guide-to-the-future-bill-gates-interview/GeorgeMagazine_February1997_SurvivalGuideToTheFuture_Bill_Gates_Interview.pdf>.

Marcus, G 2025, A knockout blow for llms?, Substack, viewed 13/6/2025, <

>.

Martinez, J 2025, This is an extinction level event” CIA MKUltra whistleblower james martinez is sounding the alarm, Redacted, viewed 19/8/2025, <

>.

McGrath, SK 2025a, Patent wo2020060606 crypto currency system using your body activity data (p#38), https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/patent-wo2020060606-crypto-currency>.

McGrath, SK 2025b, Digital slavery for australia and the world imminent under global digital court (#50), Substack, https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/digital-slavery-for-australia-and>.

McGrath, SK 2025c, The psychopathic eugenics agenda clearly exposed in 2015 (p#47), viewed 24/7/2025, <https://open.substack.com/pub/stephenmcgrathphd/p/the-psychopathic-eugenics-agenda?r=50bzb0&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true>.

Pietropaoli, I & Di-Vetta, G 2025, The future of corporate liability: Why the ‘failure to prevent’ model matters for human rights due diligence regulation2025, British Institute of International and Comparative Law, viewed 18/8/2025, <https://www.biicl.org/blog/114/the-future-of-corporate-liability-why-the-failure-to-prevent-model-matters-for-human-rights-due-diligence-regulation>.

Pressley, A & Ojeda, R 2025, Ayanna pressley destroys trump’s child DNA scheme, viewed 3/9/2025, <

>.

Shojaee, P, Mirzadeh, I, Alizadeh, K, Horton, M, Bengio, S & Farajtabar, M 2025, ‘The illusion of thinking: Understanding the strengths and limitations of reasoning models via the lens of problem complexity’, Apple Machine Learning Research.

Smith, C 2025, I convinced grok god is real (using math, science, and logic) viewed 12/8/2025, <

>.

Swan, T 2025, Questioning chat gpt, viewed 6/9/2025, <https://www.facebook.com/100022389752064/videos/1086596022968533>.

Trump, I 2009, The trump card: Playing to win in work and life, viewed 2/9/2025, <https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/2933951.Ivanka_Trump>.

Turner, B 2024, Big changes are coming... Concerning UK AI bill you won’t hear in the media... GBNews, viewed 2/9/2025, <

>.

Webb, W 2022, How elites will create a new class of slaves, Glenn Beck Podcast,

>.

Webb, W 2025a, The moment has come to reveal everything, Business Core, viewed 15/8/2025, <

>.

Webb, W 2025b, Don’t be fooled with what’s about to happen, Cross stitch world, viewed 1/9/2025, <

>.

Williams, E 2024, Artificial intelligence - a systems view Engineers Australia On Demand Seminars, viewed 27/2/2025, <.

Williams, T 2025, Puzzles break advanced AI models, apple research finds: Experts suggest reasoning has ‘the illusion of thinking’, Australian Information Age viewed 13/6/2025 <https://ia.acs.org.au/article/2025/puzzles-break-advanced-ai-models-apple-research-finds.html?ref=newsletter&deliveryName=DM26477>.

Wingardh , V 2025, AI now denying your healthcare (and its getting worse) Propublica, viewed 1/10/2025, <

>.

Winkleman, S 2025, The most compelling argument against tech in schools viewed 26/9/2025, <

>.

World_International_Patents_Office 2020, Patent wo2020060606 crypto currency system using body activity data. , viewed 22/5/2025, <https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020060606&_cid=P21-MAYVUJ-76820-1>.

Yeadon, M 2025, Digital ID warning, viewed 13/8/2025, <https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1Dzbxv6m3F/?mibextid=wwXIfr >.

This is a clip of Dr Mahathir Mohamad, the 4^th & 7^th Prime Minister of Malaysia & founder of PGPF, the Perdana Global Peace Foundation (whose sole goal is putting an end to war). He was 92 commencing his second term, leading the opposite party to the one he led in his first term! Here he is speaking at the International conference on the New World Order – a recipe for war or for peace, held in Putrajaya, Malaysia in 2015 - ten years ago.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1329504041933181/?rdid=VZf3jRtI6eBCJblU#

He pointed out the failings of the New World Order (NWO), saying that its:

intention is to reduce the number of people in this world. At the time when the New World Order was enunciated, the population of this world was 3 billion. The intention was to reduce it to 1 billion. Now the population of the world is 7 billion. There will be a need to kill many billions of people or to starve them to death or to prevent them from giving birth in order to reduce the population of this world. This is what is in store for most. For those who will suffer and die, there will be the peace of the grave.

The full conference proceedings can be found at

https://dn720401.ca.archive.org/0/items/international-conference-the-new-world-order-3.9.15/International%20Conference%20The%20%27New%20World%20Order%27%203.9.15.mp4 ) His address goes from 16 to 38 minutes. It is such an outstanding address that I have transcribed it in full below.

Also, from 4 to 16 minutes is an address by PGPF Chairman Tan Sri Norian Mai which also provides an excellent summary of the NWO grand design to rule the world.

Transcript of Dr Mahathir Mohamad, 4^th PM of Malaysia & founder of Global Peace Foundation IECIP

It is about having a world government. We should abolish all states, all nations, all borders... That world government is to be by certain people, elites – people who are very rich, very intelligent, very powerful in many ways. They are the ones who will govern the world. There was not much talk about democracy or choice of leaders. Instead, it was to be a government by these elites who will impose their rules on everyone in this world and for those who are unwilling to submit to them, there will be punishment. This was the concept initially. But many do not know or have not read about this concept.

But it is important for us to remember that this new world order is an old world order. It is something that was conceived more than 100 years ago. Yet is being repeated by powerful politicians from powerful countries that it is new. We should be asking ourselves whether the people who originally conceived this idea have given up hope on achieving a world government. If we study carefully written history, we will know that there are still people who wish to set up a world government where this government rules the whole world without regard for nations or states. There would be no borders… there would be just one world, but ruled by whom? There is no mention of it being ruled democratically by election of leaders. That is left unseen. But what we do see is the dominance of the people who enunciated this new world order.

If we look carefully, we see this new world order is already with us. We live in a world today that is dominated by the powerful, the mighty, the people with the guns. The world is frightened of them and so is submissive to them. When the world submits to them, there is effectively one government in this world… We know that politically, there is no freedom for any nation. When we talk of free speech, human rights etc., it is with regard to your own government. Internationally, there is no free speech. If you say the wrong thing, you will be taken to task and you will be vilified in the international press which is under their control. If you say the wrong thing, action may be taken against you. The wrong things are those that reject the idea of a new world order, which is already in place. You can criticise your own government, but not the power that is already running the world today.

So, already there is a new world government, and for those with powerful military forces and a willingness to subvert and undermine the governments of all countries. Politically, we see them urging every country to undergo regime change, except for those who are already submitting to them. There must be regime change so that all governments of the world will submit to this world power, this world government. And if refuse to change your government, you will be frustrated through propaganda, through actions including invasion and occupation... We see this in the Middle East. Unstable governments are dependent on those who support them. So through political means, we are seeing the new world order being carried out.

Economic power is also being used to create a new world order. This is done through free trade agreements. E.g. the TPPA Trans=Pacific Partnership Agreement. It’s not a partnership agreement. All the countries participating will be subjected to more rules than they ever had before. It is about trade subjected to all kinds of laws and regulations, exposing countries to being sued in international courts which are set up separately by others. The DPPA is not about free trade. It is about regulated trade. Once you have regulated trade, the most powerful economy will dominate. It is an attempt to control international commerce and the economic well-being of nations through so-called free trade agreements. It is not free at all. Many fail to notice this because it is called free trade. It should be called regulated trade. If you are recalcitrant and do not want to conform, then you may have sanctions placed against you. That requires sanctions to be placed on friends who are not their target. If Malaysia wanted to trade with Iran, its banks could be closed down.

Then there are the moral values that are being promoted. You are not allowed to have your own value system. You must conform to the new value system as conceived by the powerful. We should have freedom and freedom should be unlimited. We see the promotion of values that are against our own beliefs and religion. But this we must have because these are the values that are promoted by the most powerful nations in the world. We must allow all kinds of freedom including equality between men and women to the extent that there is no necessity for men to marry women or women to marry men, but can marry the same sex. That is against our value system, but we have to accept that all too. There are other values that are being undermined because of the need to set up one single system of moral values… So what happened to this magazine called Charlie Hebdo? If you allow insulting people as part of free speech, you will have no peace. [He notes that this sort of freedom was being promoted at that time (2015)]

So we see in all three areas, attempts to undermine politics, economy and moral values.

This world government will govern without our consent. When this happens, then the new world order will have succeeded fully. What we are seeing is progress towards a world government that is responsible to nobody. We would have no choice at all as to who should rule this world. we have to accept the rulers because they consider themselves to be the most suitable people to rule this world… according to their whims and fancies.

Where we see interference around the world and in Malaysia, all these are in the interests of establishing a new world order. Now, would this bring peace to us or would it cost wars to be fought in many places. We are seeing many wars being fought in many places so that the new world order can be established. We also see all forms of subversion taking place, undermining our moral values, to the extent that we become helpless, unable to do anything and the peace we will get from this is the peace of the graveyard, because the intention is to reduce the number of people in this world. At the time when the New World Order was enunciated, the population of this world was 3 billion. The intention was to reduce it to 1 billion. Now the population of the world is 7 billion. There will be a need to kill many billions of people or to starve them to death or to prevent them from giving birth in order to reduce the population of this world. This is what is in store for most. For those who will suffer and die, there will be the peace of the grave. [Note: the Facebook video clip at the top of this post contains only the above paragraph].

There would be wars – not in the countries that are promoting the new world order, but in other places. The wars are meant to weaken and destabilise small nations so that they will submit to the new world order as proposed by the powerful nations. So both possibilities will be there. There will be either the peace of the grave or there will be war and the world will be in a state of turmoil. [End of my transcription of his address.]

Note: Minor typographical corrections and clarifications were made on 29/8/2025.

It’s a bit difficult to see how this could be a deep fake.

How is this not UN sanctioned theft by psychopaths in or above government trying to control and destroy people?

Is this what’s coming with our cozying up to Beijing?

This seems to be what our pollies are sleepwalking us into.

Will they have what it takes to direct the Reserve Bank and major Australian business to get out of their involvement in Project Agora that will similarly suck Australia into this fraud enabling CBDC vortex? By the end of 2025?

Forward this link to them now with your own words around it! Get them in touch with the reality of the enormous potential threat posed by this psychopathy that’s seemingly engulfing the world.

Remove the spaces & put in your browser to view

https://www. youtube.com/watch?v=01r2ntBWQ1E

Here’s what I’ve sent my local member:

I am writing to you about another high-level fraud, this time concerning the introduction of CBDCs.

As well as enabling draconian control by banks and governments, CBDCs also enable untold fraud by any controller of its program source code. They will be able to make undetectable alteration of people’s financial records without any possibility of the individuals having any redress. This will enable transactions and balances to be reduced or removed. The dangers of CBDCs are well explained by investment banker and former Housing Secretary in the Bush administration, Catherine Austin-Fitts in https://freedomlibrary.hillsdale.edu/programs/cca-ii-economic-issues-and-controversies/the-danger-of-central-bank-digital-currencies

This link

shows the disaster just created by China’s Nation-wide change over to CBDCs, with cash and metal seizures along with ATMs and accounts being frozen. It seems the whole Chinese population is now unable to access their own cash and accounts without being forced to agree to invasive surveillance and control of their money, accounts and purchases.

There is an obvious danger of contagion to Australia, with the Reserve Bank and major Australian businesses being involved in Project Agora. A Google search on that project indicates it is heading to implementation in Australia by the end of 2025.

There would therefore appear to be an urgent need for Australia to avoid that same fate as China by directing the Reserve Bank to cease its involvement with that project and I request you forward this to the Treasurer.

He says:

If the benefits can be shared equally, it will be a wonderful advance for all humanity… It comes with risk. It has already created echo chambers that make people indignant. It is already being used by authoritarian governments for massive surveillance & by cyber criminals for phishing attacks. In the near future, AI may be used to create terrible new viruses and horrendous lethal weapons that decide by themselves who to kill or maim. All of these short-term risks require urgent & forceful attention from governments & international organisations. There is also a longer-term existential threat that will arise when we create digital beings that are more intelligent than ourselves. We have no idea whether we can stay in control. But we now have evidence that if they are created by companies motivated by short-term profits, our safety will not be the top priority. We urgently need research on how to prevent these new beings from wanting to take control. They are no longer science fiction.

https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/6g-rollout-user-as-programmable-substrate/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Unfortunately, this will serve as advice to us of what the controlling eugenic psychopaths intend to do and our lack of obvious effective means to do anything about it will be taken as consent.

So we must find ways of withdrawing our consent in ways that hurt their pockets. Start with warning jabbed friends not to get the chip implant or Quantum Dot tattoo mentioned in my previous posts. As soon as any store anywhere starts requiring QR check in codes, facial recognition, digital ID or CBDCs or won’t take cash, ignore the store requirements or go elsewhere en-masse so that the store owners have to push back on their controlling banks and see sense. Increase the usage of cash and cheques. Talk to your suppliers NOW and tell them of the dangers and consequences before they get pressured into it. As soon as any politician talks of mandating anything, push back hard IMMEDIATELY with emailing, writing to and calling their offices. They are supposed to be our servants, not our masters. Keep reminding them of that. Make sure they are aware of that and of what’s really going on, so they don’t get any more out of touch. Now is the time to find your voice & talk to those still unaware. Challenge them by asking “Do they want to lose control of your minds & have chips for brains”? & “Do you want to be forced to accept the massive mental downgrade that fake I (which they will know as AI) is offering”? “Well don’t comply then. Just withhold your financial support. It’s that simple”.

We have to be prepared to prioritise taking action NOW, despite the inconvenience. If we act now, it will be a trifle compared to what our forefathers had to sacrifice for our freedom in 2 WWs! It will also be nothing compared to what will be coming if we don’t!

This is a fantastic motivational speech from a Israel’s leader garnering support for its war effort. It contains very simple and effective messages, tugs at heart strings, shames the enemy and tells us the altruistic Israelis will save the world for us, if we will all just give them more arms. It’s a 10 out of 10! It’s a great salesman’s pitch, doing the seemingly impossible - getting the world to support horrific things it otherwise wouldn’t contemplate.

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1DeQoaRhCj/

But war is about power and deception to conserve that power. So, truth is the first casualty of war, which means neither side can afford to tell it.

The broader context of this speech is that this war aligns with the third in Pike’s 1871 blueprint for fomenting world wars (see my previous post #43). His openly stated purpose was for four supposedly false religions (Judaism, Islam, Christianity and atheism (communism)) to mutually slaughter each other, so that whoever is left can experience true Luciferian enlightenment!

It’s worth analysing this magnificent speech to see the difference between persuasion and logic and to recognise our need to be constantly looking for what we aren’t being told before we just respond emotionally and trustingly. No matter who is talking, everybody wants something, even us. We’ll end up paying for it one way or another if we don’t first look to understand the other person’s context. From that, we can work out what they might not want to tell us.

Netanyahu says:

“Israel is defending itself against the ‘enemies of civilisation’ on seven fronts.”

[Could this be even just a little bit like the supposed war on terror, or on Saddam’s supposed WMDs? Are all these Arabs really uncivilised? This is a huge, unsupported assertion. Remember Hitler’s ‘big lie’ where the more ridiculous the assertion the more credible it seems to be when coming from ‘an authority’ figure.]

“We are fighting against Hamas,”

[Wasn’t Hamas created by Israel? What could possibly have gone wrong?]

“those savages who murdered, raped, beheaded and burned our people on October 7^th …”

[He omitted “Which I got our armed services to stand down for and let happen and I’ve never explained why”. Hmmm. Could this have been a false flag to foment/ trigger Pike’s third world war? Who was actually controlling this stand-down?]

“As Israel fights the forces of barbarism led by Iran, all civilised countries should be standing firmly by Israel’s side... (rather than) calling for arms embargoes against Israel. Shame on them! … Is Iran imposing an arms embargo on Hezbollah… Houthis… Hamas and its other proxies? (No) The Axis of Terror stands together…”

[How strange that the Iranian people I know have great disregard for both fundamentalism and authority and tell me that’s also widespread back home! Of course, Israel couldn’t possibly have taken any precipitate and unnecessary action in killing civilians and traumatising millions in Gaza, shunting them back and forth with whatever of their possessions were still left that they could salvage! Is this the only possible civilised response to the threat to civilisation! Isn’t that a bit contradictory or even hypocritical? Oh! It’s because they hide under hospitals! But could this also possibly have anything to do with (the usual military method of) land resumption for the long-desired Ben Gurion canal?]

“In defending ourselves against this barbarism, Israel is defending civilisation against those who seek to impose a dark age of fanaticism on all of us.”

[The only way to fight fire is with fire? Match fanaticism with fanaticism? Perhaps so in a world that doesn’t know how to coordinate action any way other than coercive control?]

“Israel will fight until the battle is won for the sake of the peace and security of the entire world.”

[Which battle, Bibi? Are you for Judaism or Luciferianism? Is peace and security what happens when the biggest bully wins?]

There are so many omissions or oversights in the logic of this speech, but as an emotional motivator, it’s top notch. Of course, all people on earth deserve to live in peace without the threat of bombs raining down on them, including every single Israeli and every single Palestinian. But doing more of the same won’t get us there.

The real problem seems to be people fomenting wars by dividing us and trying to force us to take sides against each other. As soon as we take sides and think we can solve problems by doing so, or that one side is right, or that some person we support will save us, we’ve already lost and have completely mis-identified our real enemy. The only winners in Pike’s game can be the arms dealers, bankers and Luciferians. They are all just misleading, defrauding and stealing the individual and common property of everyone else on earth, and getting away with it by leaving confusion and disagreement in their wake.

Unfortunately, as can be seen from Pike’s thinking, religion is the key tool for doing this. So it would seem evident that those religions and their followers need to critically examine the aspects of their beliefs, teachings, dogma and operations that lead them into conflict with other belief systems. They could identify and dump those aspects that are concerned with domination or subversion, then focus on the remainder that deals with living harmonious and fulfilling lives. If any religion won’t do that, then it isn’t serious about achieving world peace and should stop pretending.