You can’t always explain how you know. But you just know. Something in the rhythm is too perfect. The sentences are too smooth. There’s no roughness, no pause, no moment where the writer changed direction mid-thought because that’s what humans do when they’re actually thinking. It reads like it was assembled, not written.

And once you feel it, you can’t unfeel it. Everything that account posts from that point forward gets filtered through a new question: is this them, or is this their AI?

That question is changing the way people engage with content online. And most creators have no idea it’s happening.

The data is starting to catch up with what audiences have been feeling for a while now. A 2026 consumer study found that 83% of consumers say they avoid content they suspect was generated by AI. Human-written content gets over five times more organic engagement than AI-generated content. And 55% of social media users say they’re more likely to trust content they believe was created by a real person.

Those aren’t small numbers. Those are the majority of your audience telling you that they care about who is behind the words. Not just what the words say, but whether someone actually sat down and thought them.

And this isn’t about quality. Some AI-generated content is well-written. That’s not the point. The point is that audiences aren’t just reading for information anymore. They’re reading for signal. For proof that someone real is on the other end. And when that proof is missing, something in the relationship shifts.

In this digital age you can’t really blame creators for reaching for these tools.

If we go back to my previous article about content burnout: full-time creators work an average of 36.5 hours a week and only 46% of that time is spent creating. The rest is admin, distribution, resizing, repurposing, responding. Over half of creators say having to generate new ideas and post across multiple platforms all the time is a top cause of burnout.

So when a tool shows up that can write your Tuesday caption in 30 seconds, of course you use it. When you’re staring at a blank screen at 10pm because you still haven’t posted today and your brain has nothing left, of course you paste a prompt and let the machine fill the gap. That’s not laziness. That’s survival.

The problem isn’t that creators are using AI. The problem is what happens to their voice when they do it without noticing how much they’re giving away.

It starts small. You use AI to draft a caption once and then edit it a bit to make it sound like you and then you say “I’ll try it once, it’s fine”. But after seeing how easy it was you start editing less, because the output is close enough and you’re tired and who’s going to notice the difference? Then you stop editing. Then you stop writing first drafts altogether. And somewhere in that process, your voice, the actual way you think and phrase things, all got a little too smooth. A little too generic. A little less yours.

This is what brand strategists are calling voice erosion. And it doesn’t look like a crisis. It looks like efficiency. You’re posting more, spending less time on it, staying consistent. All the metrics are doing what they’re supposed to do. But your audience isn’t unfollowing. They’re doing something harder to measure. They’re feeling less. Scrolling past instead of stopping. Reading without reacting. Your name shows up in their feed and nothing happens inside them anymore.

Because what made them follow you in the first place wasn’t your content strategy. It was your voice and your unique thoughts. The way you put things out there that sounded like a real person thinking out loud. And the moment that disappears, even if the content itself stays polished and on-schedule, the connection is gone too.

This isn’t an anti-AI essay. AI is a tool, and just like any other tool, it depends on where you point it.

There’s a difference between using AI behind the scenes, for brainstorming, for structure, for research, for turning a mess of ideas into something you can work with, and using AI as your front-facing voice. The first is a creative shortcut. The second is a trust risk.

The line is simpler than people make it: did you think the thought, or did the machine think it for you?

If you used AI to help you organise an idea you’ve been chewing on for a week, that’s still your thinking. If you typed “write me a caption about authenticity” and posted what came back with a few edits, that’s not your voice. That’s a costume. And your audience can feel the difference, even when they can’t really put their finger on it.

The same principle that applies to content burnout applies here: you don’t have to produce more. You have to mean what you produce. One real thought, written in your actual voice, distributed across platforms in different formats throughout the week, will always outperform five polished captions that could have come from anyone.

The reason we notice when something wasn’t written by a person is because we’re wired for it. Humans have always looked for signals of who is real, who is present, who actually means what they’re saying. We read tone, rhythm, hesitation, specificity. We notice when someone changes direction mid-sentence because a new thought struck them. We notice when a story has the kind of odd, specific detail that no algorithm would think to include.

That instinct isn’t going away. If anything, it’s getting sharper. The more AI-generated content floods the feed, the more valuable the human stuff becomes. Not because it’s better written. Because it’s felt.

And the creators who understand that, the ones who protect their voice even when it’s slower and harder and less efficient, are the ones people will still trust a year from now. Not because they refused to use AI. But because they refused to let it replace the thing that made people care in the first place.

Your audience didn’t follow you for content. They followed you for you.

Don’t make them guess whether you’re still in there.

— Juliette

Thanks for reading That Social Chat.

Share this post with someone who needs to read it.

Share

Want more of That Social Chat? Stick around & Subscribe.

Subscribe now

It’s what haven’t I posted yet?

It’s a subtle shift. The kind you don’t notice until you’re already on the other side of it. One day you’re writing because something struck you on your morning walk, and the next you’re staring at a blank Canva template on a Tuesday night wondering what your “content pillar” is and whether you’ve hit your weekly quota. Somewhere between those two versions of you, the one who created because you had something to say and the one who creates because the algorithm punishes silence, something changed.

The way most burnout does.

Content burnout doesn’t get talked about the way it should. It gets framed as a time management problem, like the fix is a better batching system or a fancier scheduling tool. But that’s not what this is.

This is about the moment creating stopped feeling like expression and fun, and started feeling more like an obligation.

And it’s not a niche experience. It’s the most universal pain point across the entire creator space right now:

• The solo creator trying to build something real between a full-time job and a life.

• The former corporate girl who left the 9-to-5 to build her own brand, only to realize she traded one performance review for a thousand tiny ones, every single day, from an audience that may or may not even see what she posts.

• The person who just wants to write but is drowning in Canva templates and posting schedules and engagement strategies that have nothing to do with why they started.

Over half of creators say that having to come up with new ideas and post to new platforms all the time is a top cause of burnout. Over half. That means the person sitting next to you in the coffee shop, the one who looks like she has it together with her aesthetic grid and her perfect reels, there’s a better than even chance she’s exhausted too. She’s just performing the opposite.

Everybody thinks it’s fun and easy to be a creator. But the actual creating part is the smallest part of the job.

Full-time creators work an average of 36.5 hours a week. That sounds manageable. Almost normal. But only 46% of that time is spent creating. The rest? Admin. Distribution. Scheduling. Responding. Resizing. Repurposing. The invisible labour of keeping the machine fed.

So you’re not a writer, or a thinker, or whatever you set out to be. You’re a content manager. For a brand that also happens to be... you.

And the weight of that is different. Because when you’re managing someone else’s brand, you clock out. But when the brand is your voice, your ideas, and your face: where do you draw the line between promoting your work and performing your life?

Which raises a question worth sitting with. What if a huge part of the exhaustion isn’t about how much you’re creating, but how many times you’re creating from scratch?

Because that’s what most people do. Monday is a brand new Instagram post. Tuesday is a brand new TikTok. Wednesday is a newsletter, Thursday is a reel, and by Friday your brain is empty and you’re Googling “content ideas for [your niche]” with the enthusiasm of someone filling out a tax return.

But the creators who seem to sustain this without burning to the ground? They’re not producing more. They’re producing content once and distributing it in a smart way.

One strong idea, a real thought, an observation, or a question that won’t leave you alone, can become a week’s worth of content without ever feeling repetitive. The full thought becomes a newsletter or a long-form post. A single line from it becomes an Instagram caption. The core question becomes a story poll. A paragraph gets pulled out and turned into a carousel or a reel script. Same thinking, just wearing different outfits for different rooms.

That’s not lazy. That’s sustainable. And more important, it keeps the idea at the centre instead of the schedule.

But even with better systems, there’s a deeper layer to this burnout that no productivity hack can fix.

Three struggles come up over and over when creators are honest about what’s hard: consistency, monetization, and imposter syndrome. They feed each other in the worst way.

You can’t monetize if you’re not consistent. You can’t stay consistent if you’re burned out. And you can’t push through the burnout if a small voice in the back of your head keeps whispering who are you to charge people money for this?

So many creators struggle with selling. Not because they don’t have something valuable, but because putting a price tag on your own thoughts feels exposed. And the comparing doesn’t help. You see someone in your niche with more followers, more content, more confidence, and you convince yourself they know something you don’t. That maybe you should wait. Get a little better at creating. Polish your captions a little more.

But ready never comes when the goal is someone else’s highlight reel.

What helps, and this comes up again and again from creators who’ve made it through the other side, is getting honest about what you need to show up for. Not every platform. Not every format. Not every trend.

Pick the one platform where your audience lives and your voice works. Go deep there. Let the other platforms get the leftovers: a cross-post, a repurposed clip, a screenshot of your best line. You don’t have to build five houses. You have to build one and leave the porch light on.

There’s also this unspoken agreement worth questioning: that silence equals disappearing. That if you don’t post for a week, you’re losing ground. That the algorithm is this ruthless landlord and your content is rent, and if you miss a payment, you’re out.

There’s a little bit of truth in that. Reach does drop. Engagement does cool. The platforms are designed to reward consistency, not quality.

But something interesting happens when you stop treating every post like it has to be a standalone event and start treating your content like a conversation that continues across days. A question on Monday that you revisit on Wednesday. A thought in your stories that becomes a full piece on Friday. The pressure drops, because you’re not starting over every single day. You’re just continuing.

And your audience follows that thread. People don’t need you to be new every day. They need you to be there. Thinking out loud. Working through something real. That’s what they came for.

And that's when it starts to feel like fun again.

Nobody burns out from creating. People burn out from performing.

From the constant pressure to be original on command, to produce on schedule, to turn every thought into a “piece of content” before they’ve even finished thinking it. The exhaustion isn’t about the work. It’s about the distance between why you started and what it’s become.

So if this is where you are right now: tired, stuck, staring at a blinking cursor wondering why the thing you chose feels like the thing you escaped, maybe the fix isn’t a new system.

Maybe it’s a smaller stage. One platform. One idea at a time. One week where you give yourself permission to say less, but mean it more.

The content machine will keep running whether you feed it or not. The question is whether you’re still in there, underneath the templates and the hashtags and the posting schedules, or whether you left and forgot to notice.

— Juliette

Thanks for reading That Social Chat.

Share this post with someone who needs to read it.

Share

Want more of That Social Chat? Stick around & Subscribe.

Subscribe now

Your personal brand isn’t your Instagram bio or your LinkedIn headline. Your personal brand is basically what people say about you when you’re not in the room.

It’s what your old coworker says when your name comes up at a dinner party. It’s how your best friend would describe you to someone who’s never met you. It’s what a former client tells their business partner before recommending you, or not recommending you.

It’s the version of you that lives in other people’s heads. Not the real you, just the parts people have decided to remember about you. And that version of you doesn’t need your permission to exist. It’s already out there, being passed around in conversations you’ll never be part of.

People spend so much time thinking about branding for their business. Positioning. Differentiation. What they stand for, what they say no to. All of them are deliberate decisions. Choices made with a strategy in mind.

But your personal brand? You probably never really thought about it, let alone wrote down what it should say. Yet there have been situations where your personal brand already showed up. Think about a job interview, a first date, or meeting new people. It’s the first impression they get of you.

Most of us only ever think about our personal brand when we’re getting ready to be seen. We don’t think about the version of us that’s already out there, created from small moments we don’t even remember.

How people perceive you and how you actually are can be completely different. And that’s why it is so important to know and shape your personal brand.

Where your business brand ends and your personal brand begins

If you’re building something under your own name, a coaching practice, a newsletter, a small agency, this gets complicated fast, because your business brand and your personal brand aren’t actually the same thing, even though they’re both about you.

Your business brand is the positioning, the differentiation, all the deliberate decisions we talked about in Part 1. It’s what you’ve chosen to stand for, professionally, on purpose. Your personal brand is bigger than that. It’s what people think of you as a person, not just as a business, and it includes things your business brand was never designed to cover. How you handled a disagreement with a friend. What you posted three years before you ever had a business. The version of you your old coworkers remember, who has nothing to do with your current positioning at all.

For a lot of people building something on the side, especially if you left a corporate job to do this, these two things get tangled together fast, because you’re not a company with a logo standing between you and your audience. You are the business. Which means your personal brand isn’t separate from your business brand anymore. It’s the foundation it’s sitting on.

This is exactly why it’s not enough to just nail your positioning and call it done. You can have a razor-sharp business positioning, the clearest “I help X do Y” statement in your niche, and still lose people’s trust because of something that has nothing to do with your business at all. A comment that felt off. An inconsistency between how you talk on Substack and how you talk in the comments. A story someone tells about you that predates your business entirely, and colors how people read everything you’ve built since.

You can’t fully separate the two, and trying to keep them in different boxes usually backfires. People aren’t going to keep those parts of you separate the way you do. They’re going to fold everything they know into one impression, professional and personal, old and new, and decide from there whether they trust you.

So build your business positioning deliberately, the way we talked about in Part 1. But don’t assume that’s the whole job. The personal brand underneath it, the one that was never designed on purpose, is still doing just as much of the work.

If you don’t create your personal brand, someone else does it for you.

Think about the last time you heard someone describe a person you didn’t know:

Read more

So I added the line. And then another. And then a whole paragraph that was essentially a disclaimer for my own thoughts. By the time I hit publish, the thing that had started as a genuine observation had become an over-explained version of itself.

Sound familiar?

I think most of us do this, without really thinking about it. We write something real and then immediately bury it under three layers of context and clarification. We say the thing, and then we explain the thing, and then we explain what we didn’t mean by the thing, just in case. We over-explain ourselves into oblivion. And we do it because we’re terrified of being misunderstood.

Which is ironic, really. Because the over-explaining is usually what makes us harder to understand.

There’s always been a gap between how we think we come across online and how people actually see us. In your head, you know what you mean. You can hear your own tone. You know the facial expression that would go with a sentence if you were saying it out loud. The little laugh, the raised eyebrow, the softness in your voice that tells the other person “I’m being honest, not harsh”. But online, none of that comes across. The words arrive stripped of everything that made them feel like you. And so the reader fills in the blanks with whatever they bring to the table: their mood, their history, their last bad interaction with someone who used a similar phrase.

You meant it warmly. They read it cold. You were being playful. They thought you were being passive aggressive. You shared something vulnerable and real. They scrolled past it in two seconds because the opening line didn’t grab them fast enough.

And once you’ve experienced that, the sting of being misread, of someone taking your words and hearing something you never intended? You start compensating. You start padding. You start adding softeners and disclaimers and little escape routes into every sentence, just in case.

“I don’t mean this in a bad way, but…”

“Just my opinion, obviously…”

“I could be wrong, and I know everyone’s experience is different, but…”

We apologise in advance for having a perspective. And we think we’re being considerate. We think we’re being thoughtful. We think we’re making sure nobody gets hurt. But what we’re actually doing is stripping the honesty out of our own voice before anyone even has a chance to hear it.

This post is for subscribers only. Subscribe now to unlock this post.

Subscribe now

Not exaggerating. Four hours, four browser tabs, a Pinterest board with ninety-something saved images, and a group chat message to my best friend that just said “rose or blush??” with zero context, because at that point I’d forgotten she wasn’t inside my head with me.

I know, theoretically, that a hex code is not a strategy. And yet there I was, at 11pm, genuinely convinced that the future of my business hinged on whether I went with #C4A79A or something four shades warmer.

I didn’t figure out my brand that night. I figured out a color.

Those are not the same thing and I think almost everyone forgets that. Including me, apparently.

So let’s talk about branding. What it actually is, what it isn’t, and why so many of us, smart, capable, otherwise-reasonable people, keep mistaking the packaging for the product.

What branding actually is

Here’s my working definition, the one I’ve landed on after doing this professionally for years and unlearning half of what I was taught: branding is the set of decisions that shape how people perceive and remember your business.

Not the logo. Not the font. Not whether the Instagram grid is aesthetically cohesive enough to survive a screenshot. Those are outputs of branding, the visible residue of decisions you made, or didn’t make, about who you are and what you stand for.

Branding is the decision-making layer underneath all of that. It’s what you choose to be known for, what you choose to say no to, what you choose to sound like when you’re explaining something complicated, what you choose to prioritize when two good options are in tension with each other.

Most people build their brand backwards. They start with the aesthetic, the colors, the fonts, the vibe, and hope a consistent identity will somehow come out of it. It doesn’t work that way. You can have the most gorgeous, expensively-designed visual identity in your niche and still have absolutely no brand, because nobody can tell you what you stand for.

That’s why your competitor with the ugly Canva graphics and the brand colors that don’t quite match might have a stronger brand than you, because they’ve made clearer decisions about what they stand for and you haven’t.

Branding isn’t decoration. It’s decision-making, made visible. You need to be clear on your why, how and what.

Positioning, and why almost nobody actually has one

If branding is the decision-making layer, positioning is the first and most important decision inside it: the specific space you occupy in someone else’s mind, relative to every other option they have.

Positioning is not a summary of your résumé. It’s not your services list or the seventeen things you’re capable of doing if someone asks nicely. Positioning is the one thing that comes to mind when someone thinks of you, before they think of anyone else who does something similar.

Here’s where I need to get specific, because “positioning” is one of those words that gets thrown around so much that it’s lost all meaning. So let’s separate what actually counts as positioning and what people mistake it for.

What is NOT a positioning:

• “I help entrepreneurs grow their business.” (This describes an entire industry. It describes me, and also several thousand other people, none of whom you could pick out of a lineup.)

• “I create content that connects with people.” (Sure. So does everyone who has ever posted anything that got more than twelve likes.)

• A vibe. “I’m the fun, relatable one.” Relatable to whom, saying what, that nobody else in your space is saying?

• A values list with no edges. “Authenticity, quality, connection.” Every brand statement ever written contains at least two of these three words, which tells you they’ve stopped functioning as differentiation and started functioning as wallpaper.

What IS a positioning:

The easiest way to build a positioning, if you’re starting from scratch, is to use one of these formulas:

Read more

And there it was. The moment. The shift. The point where something in her life changed and her audience quietly decided they weren’t coming with her. Not dramatically, not all at once — just quietly, one by one, the way people do when they’ve decided a show has lost its appeal and they’d rather stop watching than sit through the disappointment.

So there it was. She lost followers. She lost engagement. She lost something that some people apparently preferred. And I couldn’t help but wonder, what were they actually following in the first place? Because if people leave the moment something changes, does that mean we’re never really allowed to grow?

We don’t talk about this enough — the quiet social contract of online interaction. The unspoken rules we all follow without ever agreeing to them. Like: a like means I see you. A comment means I care. A share means I think you matter enough to put on my own page. And silence? Silence means something too. We just pretend it doesn’t.

There’s a whole language being spoken in the space between posting and responding. When someone consistently watches your stories but never reacts, that’s a choice. When someone who used to comment on everything suddenly goes quiet, that’s a choice too. We call it ghosting when it happens in our DMs, but we don’t have a word for it when it happens in the comments section — and maybe we should, because it feels just as loaded.

The thing is, we’re all doing it. We’re all out here making little decisions about whose content we engage with and whose we scroll past, and most of the time we don’t even think of it as a decision. It just feels like scrolling. But on the other end of that scroll is a person who notices. A person who checks. A person who wonders.

And here’s where it gets interesting. Because there are so many reasons we go quiet on someone’s content, and most of them have nothing to do with the person themselves.

Sometimes we ghost someone’s content because life got busy and the algorithm stopped showing us their posts and we just... drifted. No drama, no decision, just the quiet erosion of digital proximity. Sometimes it’s because their content changed — and not necessarily for the worse, just in a direction that no longer feels relevant to us. They pivoted from travel to motherhood, from dating stories to business advice, from fun to serious, and somewhere in that pivot we stopped seeing ourselves in their feed.

Sometimes, honestly, it’s because their life started looking a little too good and we’re not in the headspace to be a generous audience right now. We’d never admit that out loud. But we’ve all been there — muting someone not because we dislike them but because we can’t afford to compare right now. That’s not malicious. That’s just human.

And then there’s the other kind. The ones who leave because you changed in a way they didn’t sign up for. Not because your content got worse, not because you lost your spark — but because the character they were following evolved into someone more complex, more real, more fully themselves. And that, for some audiences, is unforgivable.

Want more of That Social Chat? Stick around & Subscribe.

Subscribe now

This is the part that sits with me. Because what does it say about the way we consume each other online — that authenticity can actually cost you an audience? That growing publicly, changing visibly, becoming more of yourself in real time, can read as a betrayal to the people watching?

We say we want realness. We say we’re tired of the highlight reel, the perfectly curated grid, the captions that sound like they were written by a wellness brand. We say we want to see the mess, the complexity, the full picture. And then someone shows us their full picture and we quietly unfollow because it wasn’t the picture we had in mind.

There’s a word for that and it’s not pretty. It’s called wanting authenticity on your own terms. Realness, but make it palatable. Growth, but make it aesthetic. Change, but only if it still fits the vibe I come here for.

And I get it — I do. We follow people for a reason. We build a relationship with a version of someone and when that version shifts, it can feel disorienting. Like a favorite coffee shop that changed its menu. You’re allowed to be disappointed. You’re allowed to stop going. But you should probably also acknowledge that the coffee shop doesn’t owe you sameness forever just because you liked it once.

Because here’s the thing nobody says out loud: the people who leave when you grow were never really following you. They were following a filtered, frozen, convenient version of you. The “you” that fit neatly into their feed, that didn’t challenge them, that stayed exactly where they put you. And the moment you outgrew that frame — the moment you got the boyfriend, the baby, the business, the bad day, the opinion, the evolution — you stopped being useful to them in the way you once were.

And that stings. Of course it stings. Because we’re not supposed to think of ourselves as useful. We’re supposed to think of ourselves as connected. But a lot of what passes for connection online is actually just consumption. And consumers leave when the product changes.

The real question isn’t why they left. The real question is what we do with the ones who stayed.

Because someone did stay. Maybe fewer than before, maybe quieter than you’d like — but they’re there. And they’re not there for the character or the aesthetic or the version of you that photographs well in golden hour. They’re there for you — the one who changes, who grows, who posts something real and doesn’t always know how it’s going to land.

Those are your people. And you probably can’t see them clearly yet because you’re too busy counting the ones who left.

But let’s be honest about the other side of this too. Because we have all ghosted people’s content at some point. And the reasons are so mundane, so deeply unglamorous, that we’d never say them to someone’s face.

There’s the person who posts ten stories a day. Ten. Who has the emotional bandwidth for that? I certainly don’t. By story four I’ve already checked out and by story seven I’ve muted you, and I’m sorry but also — why? What are we doing here? There’s a difference between sharing your life and broadcasting it, and somewhere around story five that line gets crossed.

Then there’s the person who used to feel real and then one day just... didn’t anymore. The captions got a little too polished, the photos a little too staged, the whole feed started feeling like a character someone was playing rather than a person actually living. And you can’t always explain it — it’s just a feeling, a slight uncanny valley of inauthenticity that makes you quietly tap that mute button and move on.

And then there’s the person who only posts once a year. Which, fine, same honestly — but it means I’ve completely lost the thread of who they are now, and when they do post it feels like running into an acquaintance at the supermarket. Perfectly pleasant, slightly awkward, gone before it becomes anything real.

None of these are crimes. None of them make us bad people. They make us human people — with limited attention, specific tastes, and a feed that moves faster than any real relationship ever could.

Share this post with someone who needs to read it.

Share

So where does that leave us? Somewhere complicated, I think. Somewhere between wanting to be seen and accepting that not everyone who watches is actually looking. Between craving engagement and recognizing that silence isn’t always personal. Between feeling hurt when people leave and quietly muting someone ourselves because their stories just never seem to end.

The truth is, online interaction has always been a social contract we never signed. Nobody handed us a rulebook that said a like means I support you, or that unfollowing means I’m done with you as a person, or that muting someone’s stories is a quiet act of self-preservation and not a referendum on their worth. We made all of that up. We layered all of that meaning onto a set of buttons that were designed to keep us scrolling, not to reflect the full complexity of human connection.

But we feel it anyway. Because we’re human. And humans have always looked for signals — who shows up, who stays, who notices when something changes. We’ve just moved that ancient instinct online and given it a dashboard.

Maybe the most liberating thing you can do is decide to stop reading the silence as a verdict. The people who left when you changed were never going to be there for the whole story anyway. And the whole story — the messy, evolving, hard to categorise, doesn’t fit the grid version of your life — is the only one worth telling.

Post it anyway.

Grow anyway.

Change anyway.

And let the analytics be damned.

— Juliette

Thanks for reading That Social Chat!

Share this post with someone who needs to read it.

Share

Want more of That Social Chat? Stick around & Subscribe.

Subscribe now

My products are now available at StanStore.

Check it out!

I saw newsletters with thousands of subscribers, strong voices, and clear topics. People who look like they’ve been doing this for a long time. And I couldn’t help but ask myself: “Did I miss the moment? Am I too late? Does it even make sense to start so late in the game? I’m never going to catch up to these people”.

But the more I looked into it, the more I realized that feeling doesn’t really say anything about the opportunity itself. It just says something about where you’re standing. Everything feels crowded when you’re new to it.

You’re stepping into something that’s already in motion, so of course it feels like you’re behind. But if you zoom out for a second, Substack is still relatively small compared to other platforms. And maybe more importantly, it works differently than platforms like Instagram or TikTok. It’s not just about visibility or reach, but about building something more direct. Something that’s actually yours.

And thinking from that perspective, it changes the question. The question isn’t if you’re too late to start on substack, but it’s about what you actually want to build here. Because that’s the part you have control over.

Maybe you already have a clear idea of what you want to write about. That’s great and you can get started. And if you don’t have a clear idea yet, that’s completely fine too. It just means you get to figure it out as you go. Most people think they need a fully defined niche before they begin. But in reality, clarity often comes from doing, not from overthinking it beforehand.

Ask yourself what you’re good at, what do you find interesting, what gives you energy, what do people come to you for, and so on. That’s usually enough to start with. And from there, it evolves. Because Substack isn’t just about writing one perfect piece. It’s about showing up over time, letting your ideas develop, and allowing your voice to become clearer the more you use it.

At the same time, there’s also a more practical side to this. This isn’t just a creative outlet. It can become something that supports you financially. Not immediately and not without consistency, but in a way that’s much more direct than most platforms.

You don’t need millions of followers for that. A relatively small group of people who genuinely value what you write can already make a difference. But that only happens if you give it time to build. And that’s exactly where most people stop. Not because they’re not good enough, but because they start questioning it too early. They look at numbers that are still small, compare themselves to people who have been doing it longer, and decide it’s not working. While in reality, they just didn’t give it enough time yet.

So maybe the focus shouldn’t be on getting everything right from the start. Maybe it’s about allowing yourself to begin without having all the answers yet. To write before you feel completely ready. To share before everything is perfectly defined. To trust that clarity will come through consistency. Because it usually does. The most important thing is that you keep showing up, you’re consistent in how often you post, and eventually it will start growing.

So if you’re thinking about starting or if you already started but feel unsure, you’re not behind. You’re just at the beginning and that’s exactly where this is supposed to start!

— Juliette

Thanks for reading That Social Chat

Share this post with someone who needs to read it.

Share

Want more of That Social Chat? Stick around & Subscribe.

Subscribe now

Check out my digital products.

Digital Products

I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately — sitting across from someone, having a perfectly fine conversation about weekend plans and whether that new restaurant is worth the wait, and walking away feeling like I didn’t really meet them at all. Like we talked for an hour and said absolutely nothing.

Have you ever left a conversation feeling lonelier than before it started?

That’s the part nobody prepares you for. It’s not that we’re not trying. It’s that filling the air and actually connecting are two completely different things. One keeps people comfortable. The other keeps people close.

How to Create Deeper Connections

Stuck at the surface

Most of us defaulted to surface-level conversation a long time ago and stayed there. Not because we don’t want to go deeper. Because nobody handed us a script for what comes after “so, what do you do?”

And so we cycle through the same five questions. We say “we should do this more often” and mean it, and then somehow never do. We leave conversations with people we genuinely like feeling like we only touched the edges of them.

The people you feel closest to in your life? I’d bet they’re the ones who asked you something nobody else thought to ask. A question that made you pause. That made you think. That made you feel like they actually wanted to know the answer.

That’s not luck. That’s a willingness to go somewhere most people don’t.

If you recognize yourself in this — always hovering at the surface, wishing someone would ask something real — I made something for you. The Connection Deck are 50 questions across five categories: Everyday, Understanding, Connection, Reflection, and Modern Life. The cards help you move beyond small talk and into meaningful conversations. Not icebreakers. Not party games. Questions that actually move the needle. Perfect for date nights, dinners, road trips, or just you and a journal on a quiet evening.

👉 Get The Connection Deck

The understanding gap

But here’s the other thing I’ve been sitting with and this one’s harder to name.

Sometimes you say the exact right words, and they still don’t land. The other person heard you, and still missed what you meant. You walk away feeling misunderstood in a way you can’t quite explain, because technically you said it. It just didn’t translate.

We talk past each other more than we realise. Not because we’re bad communicators. Because understanding was never just about the words. It’s about the gap between what we say and what actually lands. And most of us were never taught how to close it.

So instead, we stay vague. We hint. We say “it’s fine” when it isn’t, and we let silence fill in the blanks. And silence, it turns out, is never neutral. It just hands the story to whoever gets there first.

The Art of Understanding is a digital guide about exactly that gap. About the quiet moments where understanding usually breaks — a text that goes unanswered a little too long, a hurt you decide not to mention, a boundary you hinted at instead of stating — and what it costs when you let them slide instead of naming them.

It’s not about finding better words. It’s about choosing accuracy over self-protection, before silence gets the chance to write an ending you never agreed to.

👉 Get The Art of Understanding

I wonder if the reason we avoid both of these things — deeper questions and clearer naming — is the same one underneath. That being known requires a kind of courage nobody taught us to practice.

But the alternative of staying at the surface, staying vague, and letting it pass, has a cost too. It’s just quieter. Slower. Easier to miss until it isn’t.

So maybe the question isn’t whether you’re ready to go deeper.

Maybe it’s:

What are you waiting for? 🍷

Both items are now available at Gumroad.

Check it out

Share this post with someone who needs to read it.

Share

Want more of That Social Chat? Stick around & Subscribe.

Subscribe now

Most of them I never came back to.

And here’s the thing — I’m someone who did the thing. I left a corporate career, I started a Substack, I show up every week and put words into the world. I am, by most definitions, someone who acts on her ideas. And still. Two hundred and forty seven notes. An overwhelming, slightly embarrassing archive of every version of me that had a thought, got excited, opened the app, and then... moved on.

So if I’m hoarding my own ideas, I have to wonder, what are the rest of us doing?

Some of the notes still make me feel something. A little flutter, a oh right, I forgot about that one. Most of them don’t anymore. They’ve gone flat, like a drink left out overnight. And that’s the part that got me. Not the clutter, not the chaos of it all — but the ones that had quietly expired while I was busy saving the next thing. Ideas I was genuinely excited about, now just sitting there like leftovers nobody wanted to claim.

There’s a specific kind of guilt in that scroll. Not the dramatic kind. Not the I have wasted my potential and squandered my gifts kind. The quiet kind. The oh kind. The kind that creeps up on you on a Tuesday afternoon when you were just looking for a phone number and somehow ended up in a full existential reckoning with your own ambition.

Classic.

We talk a lot about not acting on our ideas out of fear, or perfectionism, or not knowing where to start. And sure, all of that is real. I’ve been there and done that. But I think there’s something else going on too — something sneakier, something we don’t talk about as much because it’s harder to pin down. We’ve started to confuse saving with doing. The note exists, therefore the idea is handled. The voice memo is recorded, therefore the thought is safe. We’ve outsourced the idea to the app, and in doing so, quietly absolved ourselves of the responsibility to actually do anything with it.

And then we move on. We collect. The drafts pile up. And somewhere in that pile is a version of you that had something to say and just... waited too long.

I think part of it is that ideas feel safest when they’re still only yours. Unshared, unfinished, unjudged. In the notes app, the branding concept is still brilliant. The Substack series still has legs. The business idea still has potential. Nobody has poked holes in it yet, including you. There’s something almost comforting about that. The thing you’re about to do. The idea you’re sitting with. It sounds intentional. It sounds like patience. But a lot of the time, if we’re honest, it’s just fear wearing a very convincing disguise.

Because here’s what nobody tells you about waiting for the right moment: the right moment has an opinion about you too. It needs you to still be the person who had the idea. And sometimes, by the time you circle back, you’re not. You’ve moved on, the world has moved on, and the idea that felt urgent and alive just... isn’t anymore. It’s not that it was a bad idea. It’s that it belonged to a specific version of you, at a specific moment in your life, and that window closed quietly while you were busy saving something else.

I think about how many ideas I had in my last year of corporate life: things I wanted to build, things I wanted to say, a whole vision for what I might do if I ever got brave enough to leave. Some of those made it into That Social Chat. A lot of them are still sitting in a notes app, timestamped from three years ago, waiting for a version of me that no longer quite exists.

That’s not nothing. That’s a little heartbreaking, actually.

So what do you do with 191 notes? Do you delete everything and start fresh? Do you set aside a whole weekend to go through them like some kind of creative archaeologist? Do you just... keep adding to the pile and hope for the best?

You don’t have to act on all of them. I want to be clear about that, because the point of this isn’t to make you feel like you need to launch something by Friday. Some ideas are meant to be fleeting, because they were never going to become anything, and that’s fine. Not every thought deserves a destiny. But some of them were going somewhere. Some of them are still waiting for you to show up and say, okay, let’s go.

A simple question I’ve started asking myself when I open a note: does this still feel like me? Not does it still feel relevant, not does it still feel marketable, not does it still make sense in the current landscape, but just, does it still feel like something I would care about? If yes — even a little, even just a flicker — it goes on a short list. Not a to-do list, not a project plan, nothing that’s going to stress me out before I’ve even started. Just a short list of things that still have a pulse. And then I pick one. Just one. And I do something small with it this week. Not the whole thing. Just the first move.

Because the cost of waiting isn’t just a missed opportunity. It’s the slow erosion of trust in yourself. Every idea you save and never touch is a quiet message to your own brain: we don’t actually follow through here. And that builds up over time. It starts to feel like evidence. Evidence that you’re someone who has lots of ideas and does nothing with them. And once you start believing that story, it becomes very hard to start anything at all.

Your notes app is not a graveyard. But it can become one if you’re not careful.

Because the ideas in there? They came from somewhere real. A walk, a conversation, a moment in the middle of a workday where something clicked and you cared enough to stop everything and write it down. That version of you was onto something. She was paying attention. She just needed you to come back for her and maybe you kept meaning to, and maybe life got in the way, and maybe the app just kept filling up and it felt easier to add than to revisit.

And I get it, coming back is the hard part. Because opening the app with intention means having to make a decision. To sit with what’s still alive and what isn’t. To admit that some things have passed, to grieve them a little — yes, grieve, because small losses are still losses — and to choose what still deserves your energy. That’s not nothing. It’s actually one of the more honest things you can do as someone who creates, or wants to, or is still figuring out what that even means for them.

But here’s what I’ve found on the other side of that scroll: relief. Not because everything was salvageable — it wasn’t. But because I stopped carrying the weight of all that potential energy with nowhere to go. A cluttered notes app is heavy in a way you don’t notice until you start to clear it. All those unfinished things, quietly accumulating. It’s a lot to carry around.

You don’t have to publish, pitch, or launch anything today. But open the app. Scroll through it with fresh eyes. Find the one that still feels like something — the one that makes you feel a little nervous, or a little excited, or both at the same time in that very specific way that usually means you’re onto something. And do the smallest possible thing with it. A voice note to a friend, a rough outline, a single sentence written down somewhere new. Just move it. Give it air.

Because the idea that’s been sitting there the longest? It’s not waiting for the right moment anymore.

It’s waiting for you.

Stop saving. Start sending.

— Juliette

Thanks for reading That Social Chat

Share this post with someone who needs to read it.

Share

Want more of That Social Chat? Stick around & Subscribe.

Subscribe now

My products are now available at StanStore.

Check it out!

I’ve been sitting with that sentence for a while now, because something about it feels deeply wrong and at the same time, completely normal nowadays. And that’s the part that scares me.

We’re not in a fight. We’re not drifting. By every modern measure, we are in touch. There are memes. There are voice notes. There are the occasional “we should really plan something soon” messages that we both know will dissolve into the week like they always do. We are, technically, present in each other’s lives. And yet, it’s been eight months.

I started thinking about this properly a few weeks ago, when I was curled up on my couch rewatching old episodes of Sex and the City. And then Gilmore Girls. And then, inevitably, Friends. You know that feeling you get watching those shows? That warm, slightly aching feeling like you’re homesick for a place you’ve never actually lived? I couldn’t shake it. And I kept asking myself: why does their life back then look so much fuller than now?

Then it hit me. They show up. All the time, for everything, without announcing it first. Carrie doesn’t text Miranda to say she’s thinking of stopping by, she just stops by. The whole gang doesn’t schedule a “catch-up call”, they’re at Central Perk, they’re already there. Lorelai and Rory don’t send each other links, they talk, fast and loud, over coffee, in person.

Nobody’s performing. Nobody’s documenting. They’re just, living.

There’s something almost cruel about watching it now, because you recognize what’s missing before you can even name it. It’s not the fashion or the drama or the impossibly large apartments. It’s the texture of their days. The dropping by. The sitting together doing nothing in particular. The way they seem to occupy the same physical space over and over again, like it’s the most natural thing in the world. And I don’t think I’m alone in feeling that quiet ache. Because on the surface, our lives are fuller than ever. There are more people, more platforms, more ways to reach each other at any hour of the day. But somehow the days themselves feel emptier. Like we’ve been handed every possible tool for connection and still can’t shake the feeling that we’re doing it wrong.

And maybe the reason I can’t shake that feeling is because I know what the other side looks like. That’s the thing about millennials — they’ve actually lived through the shift and still remember both sides.

I remember calling a friend’s house and getting her mom on the phone. The little spike of nerves asking if she was home, if she could come out. I remember making plans at school on Friday for Saturday shopping: deciding which bus to take, where exactly to meet, and what time, because once we walked out those school gates, there was no way to reach each other. Our phones could call, text, and play Snake. Texting cost money, so you used words carefully. You said what you needed to say in abbreviations and nothing extra.

And I remember the slow creep of change. The first social platforms. The first time everyone got smartphones. The moment you could reach anyone, anywhere, any time and somehow that felt like the beginning of something wonderful.

It wasn’t. Or at least, not entirely.

Because what we gained in access, we quietly lost in presence. The plans stopped being made at school because you could always sort it out later. The visits stopped being spontaneous because now you could just send a message instead. The stories stopped being saved for the weekend because why wait when you could post it right now, caption and all, before you’d even fully experienced the thing you were posting about.

That’s the part that gets me most. The posting instead of living.

We go somewhere beautiful and the first instinct isn’t to breathe it in, but it’s to capture it. To share it. To search for the best lighting and angle, and think of a caption to go with it. Instead of just being there and enjoying what’s in front of us, we’re so busy documenting the experience before it’s even over. And I understand why, I do — there’s something that feels like connection in that. Someone likes it. Someone comments. Someone says omg where is this?? And for a second it feels like being seen.

But it’s not the same as sitting across from someone and watching their face when you tell them about it. It’s not the same as your friend squeezing your arm and saying I can’t believe you actually went. The like is frictionless. The reaction is instant and gone. Real connection has weight to it, because it takes up space, it takes time, it requires you to actually be somewhere with someone.

We’ve replaced that with volume. More channels, more updates, more ways to reach people and somehow that resulted in more loneliness.

I think what those old TV shows were actually showing us, was what it looked like when communication and connection were still the same thing. When you couldn’t text someone you loved, you went and found them. When you couldn’t share something that happened, you saved the story for when you met up with your friends and then told them in person.

Now we have everything and we’re spread so thin across it that nothing lands anywhere.

And yet, I don’t think we’re doomed.

I think we’ve just gotten lazy with the tools. We use WhatsApp to maintain the illusion of closeness instead of using it to actually close the distance. We send the meme instead of making the plan. We check in from a distance when what we actually want is to be in the same room.

The apps aren’t the problem. The intention is.

Because what if we just used the tools for what they’re actually good at? Make the plan on WhatsApp. Coordinate the logistics. Figure out which bus to take — just like we used to do at school on a Friday, except now we have the luxury of doing it from our couch. And then put the phone down. Let the rest happen in person. Save something to say when you’re actually sitting across from each other.

Real connection doesn’t need to be replaced. It needs to be protected. Carved out, intentionally, in a world that will fill every quiet moment with a notification if you let it.

I’m going to text my friend today. Not to chat, not to send something funny, but to make actual plans. A date, a time, a place.

Eight months is long enough.

— Juliette

Thanks for reading That Social Chat.

If something in this post resonated with you, feel free to share it with someone who needs to read it. And if you want to stick around, subscribe — it’s free.

If you wish to support me, you can always do so with a cup of coffee.

Buy me a coffee

Subscribe now

Share

Not enough about algorithms. Not enough about trends. Not enough about the right time to post or the right hashtag or the right filter that would make strangers on the internet stop scrolling and actually stay. I spent a lot of time convinced that if I just knew more, it would click. That I was one tutorial, one masterclass, one very well-organized Notion dashboard away from finally figuring it out.

So I tried everything. I showed up on Instagram. I posted on LinkedIn. I made TikToks. I pinned things to Pinterest. I sent newsletters. I did all of it — not well, not consistently, not with any real strategy — but I did it. And I was exhausted. The kind of exhausted that has nothing to do with how many hours you worked and everything to do with feeling like you’re running in five directions and going nowhere.

The worst part? My content was getting worse, not better. When you’re spread that thin, you stop thinking about what you’re actually saying. You’re just filling slots. Performing presence instead of creating anything that matters.

Then one afternoon I sat down with a blank page — genuinely blank, no template, no strategy doc — and I asked myself something so simple it almost felt embarrassing: what am I actually trying to say, and where am I saying it?

That’s the whole thing. That’s it. Everything else: the posting schedules, the content pillars, the hook formulas, it’s all just scaffolding around that one honest question.

So this is what I’ve worked out. Not a guru’s playbook. Not a system designed for someone with a team and a content calendar that runs itself. This is for the person who’s been showing up on five platforms, half-present on all of them — and wondering why it still isn’t working.

First: pick your platform. Seriously, just one.

Let me say the thing nobody wants to say: you cannot, and should not, be everywhere.

Every platform has its own algorithm, its own unspoken rules, its own specific flavour of audience. Trying to do all of them at once isn’t ambitious — it’s the fastest route to burnout and bland content. I know because I’ve been there. Spread across five platforms, half-present on all of them, meaningfully connecting on none.

So. Where do you actually belong?

Instagram is for lifestyle and aesthetics. If how things look is part of your message — fashion, food, travel, wellness, personal brand — this is your platform. High engagement when content is beautiful, relatable, or both. The visual matters here as much as the words.

LinkedIn is for professional insight and thought leadership. Text-heavy posts perform surprisingly well there. If you’re a consultant, a B2B marketer, a coach, or someone whose expertise lives in the professional world, LinkedIn is where people will actually want to hire or follow you.

TikTok is raw, real, and built for reach. The discoverability is unmatched — you don’t need followers to go viral. If you can talk to camera and you’re not afraid of imperfection (and honestly, imperfection performs better there), this is where you can grow the fastest. Entertainment, education, humour, DIY — it thrives on personality.

YouTube is the long game. Search-driven, evergreen, deeply loyal once you build an audience. Videos keep working for you long after you publish them. If you want to go deep — tutorials, vlogs, in-depth reviews — YouTube rewards the investment.

Pinterest isn’t a social network. It’s a search engine, and it plays a very long game. Pins drive traffic for months, sometimes years. If you have a blog, a shop, or evergreen content you want to keep working for you in the background, Pinterest is your quiet, steady engine.

Substack is for writers and thinkers who want an owned audience. Monetisation is built in. Best when paired with one other platform to drive readers in. It’s not the place to build an audience from scratch — it’s the place to deepen one.

Here’s the rule I actually follow now: start with one primary platform and one secondary. Your primary is where you create. Your secondary is where you distribute or repurpose. Write on Substack, then share excerpts on Instagram. Build TikToks, then pin thumbnails to Pinterest. Pick what fits your content — not what’s trending.

Your week at a glance

Once you know where you’re showing up, the next question is how often. And I want you to hear this clearly: pick your level, not where you aspire to be, but where you actually are right now. Consistency at a lower level beats sporadic bursts at a higher one. Every. Single. Time.

If you’re a beginner — two to three posts per week, one platform

Monday: one feed post. Plan your week (fifteen minutes, no more).
Wednesday: a Story, a Reel, or a Short.
Friday: one feed post. That’s it.

The days in between? Engage. Reply to comments. Leave genuine responses on five accounts in your niche. The algorithm rewards engagement as much as it rewards creation, and most people skip this entirely.

Your only goal at this stage is to show up consistently. Not to go viral. Not to crack the code. Just — show up. Done is better than perfect, and it will be for a long time.

If you’re at an intermediate level — four to five touchpoints per week, two platforms

Now it’s about repurposing smartly. One idea should feed multiple posts. Your Substack essay becomes a LinkedIn reflection. Your Reel concept becomes a Story poll. Stop creating from scratch every single time — that way lies exhaustion.

Monday: primary platform feed post, secondary platform post or share. Wednesday: carousel, Reel, or YouTube Short. Draft your Substack.
Friday: publish long-form, promote across Stories.
Spend at least twenty minutes engaging on two of the days in between.

The weekend is for batching — one to two hours of planning and prep so the next week doesn’t start from zero.

If you’re advanced — daily presence, three to four platforms

You’re operating a content ecosystem, not just posting. Systems are everything at this level. Batch-film short videos in one session. Write your Substack and break it into three LinkedIn posts. Use Pinterest or YouTube as traffic machines running quietly in the background.

Monday through Friday: primary feed post, secondary platform post, short video, community content, Substack note, cross-promotion.
The weekend: batch-film or write for next week. Review your analytics — actually review them, not just check the vanity metrics.

Three or four platforms done well is always better than six platforms done poorly. It seems obvious when you say it out loud. But most of us try to do six anyway.

Choosing your content pillars

Content pillars are the three to five topics your account consistently talks about. They’re the promise you make to your audience. Without them, your content feels random. With them, you become recognisable, and recognition is what builds trust.

The framework is simpler than you think. You need a couple of things to find out your content pillars:

What do you know well? Your expertise, your lived experience, your professional background. This is your credibility pillar — the reason someone should listen to you on this topic at all.

What are your hobbies or interests? Start by listing your hobbies, interests, and passions. Select a few that genuinely excite you and align with your expertise. Your enthusiasm will come through in your content and engagement.

What are you good at? What do you friends, family, or colleagues always ask you to help them with?

What makes you you? Your perspective, your values, your story. This is what makes people follow you over someone else who covers the same niche. It’s the irreplaceable part — the part no one can copy.

Who is your audience and what do they struggle with? What’s the problem you can solve. The question they Googled at midnight. The thing they're embarrassed to ask out loud because surely everyone else has it figured out. (They don't.)

The sweet spot is three pillars that genuinely overlap. Your audience follows you for all three, not just one.

Some examples:
If you’re a wellness coach on Instagram, that might look like: habit stacking and sleep science (your expertise), burnout and “why am I always tired” content (their pain), and your own wellness fails and honest day-in-the-life Stories (what makes you human).

If you’re a career coach on LinkedIn, it might be: interview strategy and salary negotiation (your expertise), the dread of feeling stuck in a job that pays well but means nothing (their pain), and the career pivot you made that everyone told you was a mistake (your story).

If you’re a food creator on TikTok, it might be: quick weeknight cooking and flavor-building techniques (your expertise), the 6pm “what do I even make” panic (their pain), and growing up between two cultures and the recipes that came with it (your story).

Hooks that actually stop the scroll

The hook is the first line of your post. The first second of your video. The subject line of your email. If it doesn’t land, nothing else matters — because no one gets to the rest.

Here are eight hook formats that work across every platform.

The uncomfortable truth. “Nobody talks about how lonely building an audience actually is.” This works because it says what people already feel but haven’t seen articulated out loud. When someone reads it and thinks oh, thank god it’s not just me — you have them.

The specific number. “I posted every day for 90 days. Here’s the one thing that actually moved the needle.” Specificity signals credibility. “A few months” is forgettable. “90 days” is not. Vagueness sounds like you’re guessing. Precision sounds like you’ve done the work.

The hard question. “What if your content isn’t the problem? What if your strategy is?” This flips the assumption. It makes the reader feel seen and slightly challenged at the same time. A good hard question is one they’ve already been quietly asking themselves.

The scene opener. “I was sitting in a client meeting when I realised I hadn’t posted in three weeks.” Drop the reader into a moment. Storytelling works because it feels real, not polished — and real is what people are desperately hungry for in a feed full of produced content.

The counterintuitive take. “Posting less is how I grew faster.” Short, confident, demands an explanation. Breaks a commonly held belief. Make sure you can actually back it up — the hook buys you attention, the content has to earn it.

The direct address. “If you’re still trying to post every single day, this is for you.” Makes the reader feel like it was written specifically for them. Because, if it’s done right, it was.

The bold claim. “Most content advice is written for people who already have an audience.” Take a stance. Bland content is the result of trying to please everyone. The posts that get shared are the ones that are actually aboutsomething.

The relatable fail. “I spent four hours writing a post that got six likes. Here’s what I changed.” Vulnerability plus lesson equals the most shareable format on almost every platform. People share things that make them feel less alone — and less bad about their own failures.

The part where I tell you this isn’t actually about content

All of this — the platforms, the schedules, the pillars, the hooks — it’s a container. It’s useful. It works. But the thing that actually makes content connect has nothing to do with any of it.

The thing that makes content connect is a person. With a point of view. Who shows up consistently and says something honest.

The best hook in the world can’t carry an empty post. The most perfectly timed Instagram Reel means nothing if it’s not actually saying anything. The platform strategy is the vehicle — but you are the reason anyone gets in.

So plan the content. Yes. Build the pillars. Post the Reel. Use the hook formats. But underneath all of that — underneath the scheduling and the batching and the repurposing — stay close to what you actually think. What you’ve actually learned. What you’ve actually been through.

That’s the part no algorithm can replicate.

And that’s the only thing worth putting out there anyway.

If you want to go deeper on any of this — your platform, your pillars, your content strategy — you know where to find me. I'm always up for talking it through!

Thanks for reading That Social Chat.

If something in this post resonated with you, feel free to share it with someone who needs to read it. And if you want to stick around, subscribe — it’s free.

If you wish to support me, you can always do so with a cup of coffee.

Buy me a coffee

Subscribe now

Share

Which platforms to prioritise. What content pillars to build. How often to show up, and what to say when they got there. I wrote strategies, built editorial calendars, sat in boardrooms explaining why consistency matters and why winging it is the enemy of growth.

I was good at it too.

And then I left corporate, started my own thing, and completely fell apart.

Not dramatically. Not in a way anyone noticed. But there I was — the woman who had built content strategies for actual brands — staring at my own blank screen, posting something on a Tuesday because I felt guilty for going quiet, then disappearing for ten days because I didn’t know what to say next.

The irony was not lost on me.

Here’s the thing nobody tells you about content planning: knowing the theory and applying it to yourself are two completely different skills. When you’re working for a brand, the brief is clear. The audience is defined. The product exists. You’re just building the bridge.

When it’s your own name on the door, everything gets murky. You second-guess the platform. You wonder if the thing you want to say is too niche, or not niche enough. You post something heartfelt and it gets six likes, then you post something random and it takes off, and suddenly you have no idea what you’re even doing or why.

That’s not a content problem. That’s a planning problem.

And it’s one I see everywhere.

I see it in the person who’s on every platform at once, burned out and getting nowhere. I see it in the person who posts three times a day for a week and then vanishes for a month. I see it in the person who has genuinely interesting things to say, but no structure to say them in, so it all comes out as noise.

The fix is not complicated. But it does require you to sit down and actually think about it before you start posting.

• Which platform actually suits what you make? Not which platform is trending. Which one fits your content, your niche, and the way you naturally communicate? Because Instagram and LinkedIn and TikTok and Substack and Youtube are not interchangeable. They have different audiences, different rhythms, different unspoken rules — and showing up in the wrong place is like bringing a wedding speech to a comedy night. Technically words, but wildly off.

• What are the three things you want to be known for? Not fifteen. Three. Your content pillars are the promise you make to your audience every time you post. Without them, you’re just talking. With them, you become recognisable — and recognisable is what builds trust, and trust is what builds everything else.

• And how much can you actually commit to? Not how much you aspire to post. How much you can genuinely, sustainably show up for. Because two posts a week, every week, will always outperform five posts a week for one month and then silence.

I had to learn all of this for myself, which felt ridiculous given that I’d been teaching versions of it for nearly a decade. But there’s something about it being yours — your name, your words, your little corner of the internet — that makes it feel much harder than it is.

It doesn’t have to be hard though.

It just has to be mapped out.

If you’re new to this, or if you’ve been posting for a while and it still feels chaotic — take the time to plan before you post. Pick your platform. Define your pillars. Set a realistic schedule and stick to it. The content itself will get easier once the structure is in place, I promise.

And if you want a shortcut, in my next post I put together a full guide that walks you through all of it. Platforms, pillars, weekly schedules for beginners through to advanced creators, and the hooks that actually make people stop scrolling. It’s everything you need to start planning and organizing your content.

Start planning your content step by step

Go plan something. Then go post it.

— Juliette

Thanks for reading That Social Chat.

If something in this post resonated with you, feel free to share it with someone who needs to read it. And if you want to stick around, subscribe — it’s free.

If you wish to support me, you can always do so with a cup of coffee.

Buy me a coffee

Subscribe now

Share

Why is that? Why, in a world drowning in content, do we still so often feel like nobody is actually saying anything?

Because it’s not a quality problem, not really. There is genuinely brilliant writing out there, stunning photography, videos that are technically flawless. But brilliant and connecting are two completely different things. You can produce something perfect and still have it feel like a billboard — impressive, maybe, but not something you’d stop and have a conversation with.

The difference, I think, comes down to something deceptively simple. Some people are broadcasting. And some people are actually connecting.

And I know which one I was doing for the first month of running That Social Chat.

I’d been writing. Genuinely writing — showing up every week, putting words into the world, pouring thought and care into every piece. And I assumed, the way you do when you’ve grown up on Instagram and TikTok, that the platform would do the rest. That there was an algorithm somewhere, humming quietly in the background, ready to show my work to the people it was meant for. Post good content, algorithm rewards you, people find you. That’s how it works, right?

Not on Substack.

Substack isn’t a content platform. It’s a community. And communities don’t work like algorithms — they work like rooms full of people. If you walk into a room, sit in the corner, and wait for everyone to come to you, you will sit there alone for a very long time. But if you walk in, pull up a chair next to someone, and actually engage with what they’re saying — suddenly people know you’re there. Suddenly you exist in the room.

For a whole month I had zero subscribers. Zero followers. I was throwing my writing into an empty void and wondering why nothing came back. Thankfully helped me out by explaining how Substack actually works. So, this week, I started showing up in other people’s notes and posts. I started reading, responding, engaging — actually participating in the conversation instead of just adding to the noise. And within days I had seven subscribers and five followers.

Seven and five. I know that doesn’t sound like much. But when you’ve been sitting at zero for a month, it feels like everything. Because it proved something I think we all know but rarely apply: connection is not a broadcast. It never was.

The problem is that we’ve been taught to think about content as output. You make a thing, you put the thing out, you measure how many people saw the thing. Reach, impressions, views. The whole vocabulary of social media is the vocabulary of broadcasting — of sending a signal out into the world and hoping it travels far enough to find someone.

But that’s not how real connection works. Real connection is a two-way street. It requires you to not just speak, but to listen. To not just post, but to notice. To not just show up with something to say, but to show up for what other people are saying too.

Think about the people in your life you feel most connected to. Are they the ones who talk the most? Or are they the ones who actually hear you? The ones who remember what you said last time, who ask the follow up question, who make you feel like your words landed somewhere real? Online connection works exactly the same way — we’ve just somehow convinced ourselves that it doesn’t. That online, output is enough. That visibility is the same as intimacy.

It isn’t. Not even close. And deep down, I think we all know the difference. We just keep hoping that posting more will somehow close the gap.

Broadcasting has a very specific feeling when you encounter it. You know it immediately, even if you’ve never had a word for it before. It’s the caption that sounds like it was written for a press release. The post that’s technically vulnerable but somehow leaves you feeling nothing. The account that pumps out content on a schedule so precise it feels automated — and maybe it is. The reply to a comment that’s so generic it could have been copy-pasted from a template. “Love this! Thanks for sharing!” Sure. Next.

It’s not that these people are bad at what they do. Often they’re very good at it. They understand hooks and headlines and the mechanics of getting seen. But there’s a difference between being seen and being felt. And broadcasting, no matter how polished, how consistent, how perfectly optimised — is rarely felt.

Because what’s missing is the most human thing of all: the sense that there is actually someone on the other side. Someone who wrote this specific thing for this specific moment, who means it, who would say it the same way to your face over coffee. Broadcasting removes the person from the content. And without the person, all you have is noise — well-produced, aesthetically pleasing, completely forgettable noise.

Ask yourself honestly: when was the last time a perfectly polished post made you feel genuinely seen?

So why do we do it? Why do so many of us default to broadcasting when deep down we know it doesn’t actually work?

I think part of it is fear. Real conversation requires vulnerability. It requires you to say something and mean it, to put an actual opinion into the world, to be someone specific rather than something generic. And being specific is scary, because specific can be wrong. Specific can be disagreed with. Specific can be ignored in a way that feels very personal. Broadcasting is safer — you’re not really saying anything, so nobody can really push back on anything.

Part of it is also the metrics. We’ve been so trained to chase reach and impressions and follower counts that we’ve started optimising for visibility instead of connection. And visibility rewards volume. Post more, be seen more. So we post more. We fill the feed. We hit publish before we’ve even asked ourselves whether we actually have something to say — because the algorithm doesn’t care whether you mean it, only whether you showed up.

And part of it, honestly, is that nobody ever taught us that online interaction could work differently. We grew up watching brands broadcast. We watched influencers broadcast. We learned the language of content before we ever learned the language of community. So we do what we were shown — we talk at people and then wonder why nobody talks back.

So what does real connection look like online? Honestly, it looks a lot like what it looks like offline.

It looks like writing something and meaning it — not because it performs well, not because it fits the content calendar, but because you genuinely had something to say and you meant every word of it. It looks like replying to comments like they’re messages from real people, because they are. It looks like showing up in someone else’s corner of the internet and leaving something thoughtful behind — a real response, a genuine reaction, a question that shows you actually read what they wrote.

It looks like being interested, not just interesting.

That last one is the one we always forget. We spend so much energy trying to be interesting — trying to craft the perfect hook, the most relatable opening line, the caption that stops the scroll. And none of that is wrong, exactly. But if that’s all you’re doing, you’re still just broadcasting. You’re still just a billboard, waiting to be noticed.

The accounts and writers that have stayed with me — the ones I actually look forward to hearing from — are never the most polished. They’re the most present. They make me feel like they’re in conversation with the world, not performing for it. They ask questions and actually want the answers. They engage with the responses they get in a way that makes you think, oh, they actually read that. They actually care.

That’s not a content strategy. That’s just being a good conversationalist. And it turns out, online or off, it’s the rarest thing in the room.

Here’s the thing nobody tells you when you start creating online: the goal was never to be seen by the most people. The goal was to be felt by the right ones.

And you can’t manufacture that. You can’t schedule it, optimise it, or outsource it to an AI that writes your captions while you sleep. Real connection — the kind that turns a reader into a subscriber, a follower into a fan, a stranger into someone who genuinely looks forward to hearing from you — that only comes from actually showing up. Not just with content, but with yourself.

So if your feed feels hollow right now, if you’ve been posting into a void and wondering why nothing comes back — I’d gently ask: are you broadcasting, or are you actually trying to connect? Are you showing up with something to say, or are you showing up for the conversation?

Because the void isn’t empty. It’s full of people, waiting to feel something. Waiting for someone to pull up a chair and actually mean it.

Stop broadcasting. Start connecting.

— Juliette

Thanks for reading That Social Chat.

If something in this post resonated with you, feel free to share it with someone who needs to read it. And if you want to stick around, subscribe — it’s free.

If you wish to support me, you can always do so with a cup of coffee.

Buy me a coffee

Subscribe now

Share

It’s a question that sounds almost ungrateful when you say it out loud. We’re taught to cherish our close relationships, to invest in them, to keep them. And yet, most of us have felt it at some point — that specific sting of sharing good news with someone you love and getting back something that lands a little flat. Not cruel. Not unkind. Just... small. And you’re left wondering if you imagined it.

You didn’t.

Here’s something I’ve been turning over in my mind: your friends know you. And that’s a beautiful thing — until it isn’t. Because knowing someone also means you’ve built a picture of them. You’ve put them in a frame. You know the version of them that existed at 22, or when you first met, or through a particular chapter of their life. And when they start to grow outside of that frame, because they do something unexpected and it doesn’t quite match the image you’ve been carrying, it can feel disorienting.

Think about it this way. A friend who always swore she never wanted kids announces she’s pregnant — and she’s glowing, she’s certain, she’s never been happier. But the people around her are confused. It doesn’t fit the version of her they knew. So instead of just being happy, they start asking questions. Was it planned? Are you sure? Not to be mean, but because it causes a certain discomfort, having their picture disturbed. Or take someone who leaves a stable career to start a company, chasing something they’ve quietly dreamed about for years. To their friends, it comes out of nowhere. It doesn’t match the box they were put in. And so instead of that’s incredible, what they get is are you sure that’s a good idea?

Meanwhile, a stranger on the internet — someone who has no frame, no prior version of you to protect — just sees what’s in front of them. The news. The joy. And they meet it exactly where it is.

That’s why your friends will passionately support an influencer they’ve never met, hyping up every post, every launch, every announcement — but when you start posting online, suddenly there are whispers. Who does she think she is? It’s not always jealousy. Sometimes it’s just that a stranger fits neatly into the box of “person I admire from a distance,” while you — the real, evolving, complicated you — keep refusing to stay in yours.

So is it envy? Is it jealousy? Sometimes, honestly, yes. There are friendships where the dynamic has always been slightly uneven — where one person has unconsciously needed to feel a little further ahead, a little more settled, a little more certain. And when you close the gap, or leap past it entirely, something in them short-circuits. It’s uncomfortable to sit with, but it’s real.

But not always. And I think it’s worth making that distinction, because chalking up every flat response to jealousy lets us off the hook from a more nuanced truth: sometimes people just need time to adjust. The frame doesn’t update overnight.

I had a friend react to my news once with something that stopped me cold. “I can’t picture you like that,” he said. And I felt it — that little gut-drop of why not? But then I watched him catch himself almost immediately. “No — I didn’t mean it like that. I just have to get used to it. To the new version of you.” And something about that — the stumble and then the honesty — actually meant more to me than a polished reaction would have. He was showing me his frame, and then choosing to widen it, in real time.

That’s what a real friend does. They might not always get it right in the first moment. But they come back. They ask the question they forgot to ask. They send the message the next day. They adjust.

The ones to pay attention to are the ones who don’t. The ones who never circle back. Who heard your news, gave you the minimum, and moved on as if it was just another Tuesday. No follow-up the next day, no quiet check-in a week later. Nothing. That silence says something — not always something cruel, but something true. And you’re allowed to hear it.

Here’s the thing nobody really talks about: other people’s happiness does not take away from your own. Someone else’s good news, their promotion, their relationship, their baby, their leap of faith — none of it shrinks what’s available for you. Joy is not a finite resource. Neither is success, or love, or possibility. And if you find yourself unable to be genuinely happy for someone without measuring it against your own life, that’s worth sitting with — quietly, honestly, without judgment. Because that reflex, if left unchecked, will quietly hollow out every relationship you have.

And if you’re on the other side of it — if you’re the one whose news keeps landing in a room that’s just a little too quiet — I want to say this gently but clearly: notice it. You don’t have to make it a crisis. You don’t have to burn anything down. But pay attention to who shows up when things are good, not just when things are hard. Anyone can sit with you in the darkness. It takes a particular kind of love to be genuinely, unselfishly lit up by your light.

Give grace. Give people room to catch up with the version of you that’s still unfolding. But give the same energy you get. Because if you keep throwing confetti for everyone else and they can’t find a single piece for you — that’s information. And you’re allowed to use it.

The stranger who sent me that sweet message probably doesn’t think about it. To them, it was just the obvious response to good news — of course you celebrate, of course you ask how someone’s feeling, of course you show up. And maybe that’s the whole point. Sometimes the people with no history with us, no frame, no version of us to protect, can see us the most clearly.

Not because they know us better. But because they’re meeting us exactly as we are, right now, in this moment.

And sometimes that’s all we’re really asking for.

— Juliette

Thanks for reading That Social Chat.

If something in this post resonated with you, feel free to share it with someone who needs to read it. And if you want to stick around, subscribe — it’s free.

If you wish to support me, you can always do so with a cup of coffee.

Buy me a coffee

Subscribe now

Share

Most of us have heard the sentence “communication is key” so many times, it’s lost all meaning.

We nod along. We agree. We move on. And then we go home and send a passive aggressive text to someone we love, or say “I’m fine” when we’re clearly not, or spend three days replaying a conversation in our heads trying to figure out where it all went wrong.

Because knowing that communication matters and actually knowing how to communicate are two completely different things. And somehow, nobody ever taught us the second part.

I studied communication. Not marketing, not PR — actual communication. The study of how human beings share meaning with each other. Why we sometimes connect instantly and effortlessly, and why we sometimes stand right next to each other and still feel completely alone. I spent years learning the theory of it. And still, even I get it wrong sometimes.

So let’s talk about what communication actually is, why it breaks down, and what you can do about it — not for your brand, not for your career, but for the relationships that actually matter to you.

What communication actually is

Most people think communication is about talking. It isn’t. Or rather, it’s not only about talking.

Communication is everything you use to share meaning with another person. The words you choose — and the ones you don’t. Your tone of voice. The timing of a message. Whether you put your phone down when someone is speaking to you. Whether you say “I hear you” and actually mean it, or whether you’re already formulating your response before they’ve finished their sentence.

It’s the difference between texting someone “k” and texting “sounds good!” It’s the difference between saying “you never listen” and saying “I feel like I’m not being heard right now.” Same underlying feeling, completely different effect.

Communication isn’t just what you transmit. It’s what the other person receives. And those two things are often not the same thing at all.

Why we talk past each other

Here’s the thing nobody tells you: most miscommunication isn’t about honesty. We’re not usually lying to each other. We’re just assuming the other person is working from the same context we are — and they almost never are.

You send a message and in your head it sounds warm and casual. They read it and it sounds cold and distant. You bring up a topic you’ve been thinking about all week; they’ve had a completely different week and aren’t emotionally ready for that conversation. You think you’ve been clear about something; they heard something entirely different.

This is what communications scholars call the gap between encoding and decoding — the space between what you mean to say and what the other person actually understands. Every single conversation has this gap. The goal isn’t to eliminate it. That’s impossible. The goal is to stay curious about it.

The couples, friends, and colleagues who communicate well aren’t the ones who never miscommunicate. They’re the ones who notice when something got lost in translation and say “wait, can we back up?” instead of letting it calcify into resentment.

The things we communicate without saying a word

I’ve always been more interested in what people don’t say than what they do.

The friend who replies to your good news with “oh wow, congrats” and nothing else. The colleague who suddenly goes very quiet in a meeting. The partner who says they’re fine but hasn’t laughed at anything in three days. The person who asks how you are but is already looking at their phone before you answer.

We communicate constantly — through our body language, our silences, our response times, our energy in a room. And we read these signals constantly too, even when we don’t realise we’re doing it. Your nervous system is running a continuous background assessment of everyone around you. You feel when something is off before you can articulate why.

The problem is we’ve been taught to ignore this. To take things at face value. To not “make assumptions.” But there’s a difference between making assumptions and paying attention. The first leads you astray. The second keeps you connected.

Why consistency matters more than grand gestures

We tend to think of good communication as the big moments. The difficult conversation you finally had. The apology that landed. The time you really opened up about something hard.

And yes, those moments matter. But they’re not actually what builds trust in a relationship. What builds trust is the small, consistent, everyday stuff.

It’s responding to a message when you said you would. It’s remembering that your friend has a stressful week and checking in. It’s showing up with the same energy whether you’re happy or tired or distracted. It’s being the person who doesn’t go quiet for three weeks and then reappear expecting everything to be normal.

Consistency is how people learn they can rely on you. And being reliable — emotionally, not just logistically — is the foundation of every relationship worth having.

This doesn’t mean you have to be available all the time. It means being honest when you’re not. “I’m going through something, can I call you next week?” is good communication. Disappearing without explanation is not.

Actually listening — which is harder than it sounds

We are remarkably bad at listening. Not because we’re selfish, but because we’ve never been taught how.

Most of us listen to respond. We hear the first few sentences someone says, we clock the general topic, and then we start thinking about what we want to say next. We’re physically present in the conversation but mentally we’ve already moved on.

Real listening looks different. It means staying in the discomfort of not knowing where a conversation is going. It means asking a follow-up question instead of redirecting to your own experience. It means sometimes just sitting with what someone said and not immediately trying to fix it or reframe it or make it better.

The most connecting thing you can do for someone isn’t to have the right words. It’s to make them feel genuinely heard. And that’s rare enough that people remember it for years.

So what do you actually do with this?

I’m not going to give you a five-step framework. That’s not really how human connection works.

But I will say this: most communication problems I’ve ever witnessed — including my own — aren’t problems of not caring enough. They’re problems of not saying the thing. The real thing. Not the version that’s been softened and hedged and made palatable, but the actual feeling underneath it.

“I miss you and I don’t know how to say that without feeling needy.”

“I felt left out and I’ve been weird about it ever since.”

“I’m not actually fine. I just don’t know how to explain what’s wrong yet.”

Those sentences are terrifying to say. They’re also the ones that change everything.

Communication isn’t a skill you perfect. It’s a practice you return to. You get it wrong, you notice, you try again. The people who are good at it aren’t people who never fumble — they’re just people who care enough to keep trying.

And that, more than anything, is what “communication is key” actually means.

— Juliette

Thanks for reading That Social Chat.

If something in this post resonated with you, feel free to share it with someone who needs to read it. And if you want to stick around, subscribe — it’s free.

If you wish to support me, you can always do so with a cup of coffee.

Buy me a coffee

Subscribe now

Share

That was it. No dramatic resignation letter. No idea what came next. No safety net. Just eight years of corporate frustration finally boiling over into six words said to an empty bedroom.

Eight years of working harder than most people in the room and watching it go unnoticed. Eight years of explaining basic marketing principles to people who had the title but not the knowledge. Eight years of being told, implicitly or explicitly, that my turn hadn’t come yet — while the people who had “been there longest” held their ground and called it seniority.

So I quit. And then the real chaos began.

I’m writing this for the version of me that existed right after that moment — the one Googling “how to start an online business” at midnight, drowning in advice that all assumed you already knew what you wanted to do and who you wanted to serve. If you’re in that place right now, this article is for you. It’s not a polished roadmap or a framework from someone who figured it all out. It’s just an honest review of what I actually did, what didn’t work, and what I’m still figuring out.

Because here’s the thing nobody tells you: you will never be 100% ready. You just have to start somewhere.

Figure out your passion — but don’t expect it to be obvious

Everyone tells you to “follow your passion” like it’s a thing you can just look up in a drawer somewhere. Mine wasn’t that simple.

I knew I loved marketing and communications. I knew I loved writing, connecting with people, making things feel human rather than corporate. But “I like marketing” is not a business. So my partner and I started talking through what this could actually look like. We landed on going self-employed — companies could hire me for marketing or communications projects. Clean, logical, straightforward.

So I built a website. Designed a logo. Went back and forth on brand colors for what felt like an embarrassingly long time. (Not too corporate. Not too girly. Something that felt like me but also professional. You know how it goes.) I posted on Instagram and TikTok. I had vague ideas about selling online guides or courses.

And then… nothing really happened. Not because the idea was bad, but because I was chasing a version of “success” that didn’t actually excite me. I didn’t want to be a social media advice account. I didn’t want to sell generic guides that told people things they could have Googled. I wanted to do something that felt real. I just didn’t know what that was yet.

And I think that’s the part nobody warns you about. You can know what you’re good at and still not know what you actually want to spend your time doing. Those two things can look identical from the outside and feel completely different from the inside. The trick — if there is one — is giving yourself enough room and enough time to tell them apart. Even when it feels like you should already know.

Find your niche — and accept that it will probably change three times

If you’re waiting to find your niche before you start, you’ll be waiting forever. I know this because I tried.

Here is a slightly embarrassing list of the niches I cycled through in roughly eighteen months:

• Marketing advice for companies

• Online marketing for small businesses and entrepreneurs

• Social media strategy for entrepreneurs

• Helping people build their online businesses

• Back to general marketing advice

• Social media strategies for content creators

• …and now, just writing about life that happens to include the honest story of building a business

Each pivot felt like failure in the moment. Looking back, each one taught me something I needed to know to get to the next version.

I also went through a couple of brand names. I kept changing it every few weeks, because I started having doubts every single time. My first marketing brand was something focused entirely on social media — which felt too limiting. So after a while I started That Social Chat alongside it, with the feeling that it could be broader, more personal, more me. But then I’d panic about monetization and swing back to the more “professional” version. And then we were back at square one again. I did this little dance at least three times.

What finally broke the cycle was Substack. When I found it, something clicked — not because the platform solved my niche problem, but because it gave me a format that matched how I actually think and write. And from that, a clearer sense of what I was building started to emerge.

So my advice isn’t “find your niche.” It’s start somewhere, pay attention to what feels true, and let the niche find you. It will. Just maybe not on the timeline you had in mind.

Build your community — with your real voice, not a fake one

Here’s something I noticed pretty early on: the content I was most proud of was almost never the content that performed best. And the content that performed best was almost never the content I’d worked hardest on.

The posts that got the most response were the honest ones. Not the polished, structured, here-are-your-five-steps ones. The ones where I just… talked. Like a person. About what I’d actually tried and what had actually happened. Those were the ones that got replies that started with “this is exactly how I feel.” And that, I’ve learned, is worth so much more than any like or view ever will be.

There’s a real difference between writing at someone and writing alongside them. One positions you as an expert above the reader. The other positions you as a person next to them, figuring it out together. And people feel that difference, even if they can’t explain why.

A word on AI while we’re here: I use it, and I’m not going to pretend otherwise. But there’s a difference between using AI to help you think more clearly and using it to replace your thinking entirely. I’ve seen the results of both — in my own work and in other people’s. The posts that sound like a prompt response to “give me 30 captions about productivity” are immediately recognizable. They have a particular kind of smoothness that contains no actual person. Don’t do that. Use it as a sounding board, not a ghostwriter.

The readers who actually come back do so because of your voice. Not your topic, not your niche. Just you. So don’t iron it out trying to sound more professional or more like everyone else.

Shape your brand — and know that it’s allowed to evolve

I used to think branding was just about having the right name, logo, tone of voice and color palette. And yes, those things matter a lot. But I’ve come to think your brand is really just the answer to one question: what do people feel when they encounter your work?

That Social Chat didn’t arrive fully formed. It went through versions — different names, different focuses, different visual identities — before it became what it is now: a space for honest, human writing about real life, with marketing woven in as one thread among many, rather than the whole fabric.

For a long time I thought rebranding meant I had failed. That I was going backwards. But looking back, every version of the brand was just me getting clearer — on my values, on what I wanted to say, on who I actually wanted to say it to. The rebrands weren’t chaos. They were part of the process.

A few things I’ve learned about branding the hard way:

• Consistency matters more than perfection. Show up with clarity and people will start to recognize you, even if the visuals aren’t flawless.

• Your story is part of your brand. What made you take this step, why you created your brand, the struggles, the ups and downs — that’s not a liability. It’s what makes you relatable.

• You are allowed to change direction. Rebranding is not starting over. It’s editing.

The most important question in branding isn’t “what do I look like?” It’s “what do I stand for? And does everything I put out actually reflect that?”

Stay connected — with your readers and with yourself

Nobody talks about this part enough: building something online is lonely. Especially in the beginning, when you’re putting things out into what feels like a complete void and wondering if any of it matters.

Sustainability — the kind that actually lasts — isn’t about going viral. It’s about showing up consistently enough that people know you’re not going anywhere. For me, that means writing once a week, as honestly as I can. Actually telling people what’s going on, what I’m thinking about, what I’m still working through. Not performing a version of success I don’t have yet. Just… showing up as me.

I want to build more of a presence on social media too — more conversation, more two-way exchange. But I’ve learned not to run before I can walk. Right now, my priority is creating a body of work I’m genuinely proud of. The rest can grow from there.

And then there’s the other kind of staying connected — with yourself. Checking in every few months and asking: is this still what I want to be making? Is this still true? Am I showing up as me, or am I showing up as a version of me that I think people want to see? It’s a small question that makes a big difference. Because the moment you start creating for an imaginary audience instead of an honest one, people feel it. Even if they can’t name it.

So where does that leave me?

Still figuring it out, honestly.

I’m still working out if this is the direction I want to go in. Still finding my voice, even after all this time. Still wondering some days if I’m doing the right thing. The doubts don’t disappear once you quit your job or launch your website or hit publish on your first paid article. They just change shape.

But here’s what I keep coming back to: if I had waited until I had it all figured out, I would still be lying in that bed staring at the ceiling. The road only becomes visible once you start walking.

If you’re at the beginning — or in the messy middle, which is honestly where most of us live — I hope this gave you something real. Not a checklist. Not a guarantee. Just the reminder that everybody who’s building something started without knowing how it would go.

Including me.

You don’t have to be ready. You just have to start.

— Juliette

Thanks for reading That Social Chat.

If something in this post resonated with you, feel free to share it with someone who needs to read it. And if you want to stick around, subscribe — it’s free.

If you wish to support me, you can always do so with a cup of coffee.

Buy me a coffee

Subscribe now

Share

But this time something felt different.

She had been talking for almost an hour about things I had absolutely no idea about. A new job I didn’t know she’d started. A relationship that had ended months ago. A move I hadn’t heard anything about. And somewhere between the eggs benedict and the second coffee I found myself thinking — is this a normal friendship? Are we just... updating each other about lives we’re no longer actually part of?

And then the bigger question crept in, the one I couldn’t shake for the rest of the day:
What exactly defines a friendship? And have we been thinking about them all wrong?

There’s this unspoken rule we seem to carry around that a “real” friendship means being completely available to each other, knowing every detail of each other’s lives, being each other’s first call in a crisis and last text before bed. And if a friendship doesn’t tick all of those boxes, we quietly file it away as something lesser. Something that doesn’t really count.

But then I started to wonder, what if that’s not actually how friendships work? What if we’ve been holding them to a standard that was never realistic in the first place?

Not everyone has to be your ride-or-die. And that’s okay

Here’s a thought that genuinely changed how I see things: surface-level friendships are healthy. Not every person in your life needs to know your deepest fears, your childhood wounds, or the thing you said three years ago that you still cringe about at random times.

Some friends are for the gym. Some friends are for partying. Some are just for complaining about work over a glass of wine and then going home feeling slightly better about your life. And all of those friendships have value — real, genuine value — even if they never go deeper than that.

When you stop expecting everyone to be your everything, something shifts. The disappointment fades. The resentment disappears. You stop feeling let down by people who were never equipped to give you what you were looking for in the first place.

The deep, vulnerable, 3 a.m. conversations? Those are for the two or three people who have actually earned that part of you. And that’s not cold, that’s just keeping it real.

Memories versus updates

There’s a difference between friends you make memories with and friends you give life updates to. And I think it’s worth sitting with that distinction for a moment.

You know the kind of friendship I mean. The one where you meet up twice a year, spend an hour catching each other up on what’s happened since you last saw each other, and then go home feeling vaguely... empty? Not because anything went wrong, but because nothing really happened either. You exchanged information. You didn’t actually experience anything together.

Real friendships — the ones that feed you — are built on shared moments. The spontaneous road trip. The dinner that turned into a five hour conversation. The friend who showed up at your door without being asked because they just knew. Those are the memories that compound over time and turn into something solid.

Now, I’m not saying you should audit your friendships and start cutting people off. That’s not what this is. But I do think it’s worth asking yourself occasionally: are we making memories, or are we just updating each other? Because there’s a difference. And knowing the difference helps you understand what you actually have, and what you might be missing.

Friend languages

We talk a lot about love languages — the idea that different people give and receive love in different ways. Some through words of affirmation, some through acts of service, some through quality time. And we’ve largely accepted that understanding someone’s love language makes you better at loving them.

So why don’t we apply the same thinking to friendships?

Because if I look at the friendships in my life honestly, they all operate on completely different frequencies. There’s the friend I drink rosé with on a Tuesday for no reason other than it feels like the right thing to do. There’s the one I call when I need to laugh until my stomach hurts. There’s the one with the impeccable fashion sense who I drag to every shopping trip because her opinion is the only one I trust. There’s the one I gossip with — shamelessly, lovingly, with zero guilt. And then there’s the one I call when everything falls apart, the one who gets the unfiltered version of me, the one who has seen me cry in a car park and still showed up the next day.

All of these friendships are real. All of them matter. But they speak completely different languages.

And maybe, just like with love languages, the key isn’t finding one person who speaks all of them fluently. Maybe it’s about recognising which language each friendship speaks, and appreciating it for exactly that. You get out of that friendship what you both need. Nothing more, nothing less. And that’s not a limitation, that’s actually a kind of freedom.

Everyone’s definition of “close” is different

Here’s the other thing worth remembering: closeness doesn’t look the same to everyone.

For some people, a close friend is someone they see every single week. They go to the same yoga class, they grab coffee after, they text throughout the week. That’s their bestie. That’s their person.

For someone else, a close friend is someone they see three times a year. But when they do, they pick up exactly where they left off, no explanation needed, no catching up required. The distance doesn’t matter because the connection does.

Neither of those is wrong. Neither is more valid than the other. And yet we constantly measure our friendships against some invisible standard, usually someone else’s, and find them lacking.

What if instead we just asked: does this friendship feel good? Does it give me something real? Do I leave this person feeling more like myself, or less?

Because at the end of the day, that’s what actually matters. Not how often you see each other, not how many years you’ve known each other, not whether they’d be in your wedding party. Just: does this friendship add something to your life?

So here’s what I think

Friendships are not one size fits all. They never were. Some are deep and some are light and most of them are somewhere in between — and all of them, if they’re honest and kind and real in their own way, deserve to be there.

Stop waiting for everyone to be your ride-or-die. Stop feeling guilty about the friendships that live happily on the surface. Stop measuring closeness by frequency or availability or how much someone knows about your life.

Instead, figure out what language your friendships speak. Appreciate them for what they are rather than what they’re not. And hold the two or three people who get the whole, unfiltered version of you, a little closer.

Those ones are rare. And they’re worth everything.

— Juliette

Thanks for reading That Social Chat.

If something in this post resonated with you, feel free to share it with someone who needs to read it. And if you want to stick around, subscribe — it’s free.

If you wish to support me, you can always do so with a cup of coffee.

Buy me a coffee

Subscribe now

Share

A year ago, I quit my corporate job. I remember it as if it was yesterday when I put in my notice.

No safety net, no fully formed plan, just a feeling that I was done waiting for the “right moment” that was never going to come on its own. I don’t regret this decision for a single second.

But the year that followed? There are things I would do differently if I could do it all over again.

This isn’t a “look how far I’ve come” post. It’s more of an honest reflection on the mistakes I made, the time I wasted, and the lessons I had to learn the hard way — so maybe you don’t have to.

1. I waited way too long to just start.

This was probably my biggest mistake. And if I’m being fully honest with myself, it still makes me a little mad.

Before I did anything — built a website, picked a name, chose brand colors, defined my audience — I convinced myself I needed to have all the answers first. I needed to feel ready. I needed to be sure.

But here’s the thing nobody tells you clearly enough: you will never be 100% ready for something you’ve never done before. That’s just not how it works. You can’t prepare your way into certainty when the thing itself is completely new to you.

So I waited. And doubted. And switched niches. And changed my brand name. And picked new colors. And then changed them again. Months went by.

Until at some point I just thought — okay, f*ck it. Just do something.

Because you know what? You’re allowed to rebrand when you’re a year in. You’re allowed to change your logo, your name, your colors, your direction. None of it is as permanent as it feels when you’re staring at a blank screen at 11pm trying to make everything perfect before you’ve even begun.

It’s not that deep. Start anyway. The rest figures itself out once you’re actually moving.

2. I let the moment pass. More than once.

Here’s something no one really talks about: content and ideas have a shelf life.

I spent weeks — sometimes months — working on digital products, guides, courses. Putting real time and energy into them. And then, because I kept second-guessing whether they were good enough, I’d sit on them just a little too long. And by the time I finally felt ready to share them, someone else had already posted something similar. The moment had passed. What I made was no longer new or relevant — it was just late.

That stings. Especially when you know the work was good.

The hard truth is that done is almost always better than perfect. An imperfect post that goes out today will always outperform the perfect one you’re still editing next month.

3. I was wildly inconsistent. Yes, me.

Okay, this one is a little embarrassing to admit, because consistency is literally one of the first things I tell anyone who asks me about building a brand or growing online.

“Be consistent. Post with a frequency you can actually maintain. Show up regularly.”

And then I proceeded to do the exact opposite.

One week I was fully in it — creating content, showing up everywhere, really giving it everything I had. And then the next week? Tired. Burnt out. Convinced it wasn’t working and questioning why I was putting in so much effort for what felt like very little in return.

There’s a saying: the best helmsmen stand on shore. And wow, was that painfully accurate.

The thing is, I know better. One bad week doesn’t tell you anything. One quiet month doesn’t mean it’s not working. Building something takes time, and the results rarely show up on your timeline. But knowing that and actually living by it when you’re in the middle of it — that’s a completely different challenge.

I’m still working on this one, if I’m being honest.

4. I was on way too many platforms.

Instagram. TikTok. LinkedIn. Pinterest. Facebook. My own website. Substack. X.

Yeah.

I thought being everywhere meant reaching more people. What it actually meant was spreading myself so thin that nothing got the attention it deserved — including me.

Here’s what I’d tell myself if I could go back: pick two platforms, three at most. Choose the ones where your audience actually is, and where you genuinely don’t hate showing up. Then focus there. Do it well. Do it consistently. And ignore everything else — at least for now.

More platforms doesn’t mean more impact. It usually just means more burnout.

So, what’s the real lesson here?

Looking back, almost every mistake I made came down to the same thing: I was in my own way.

Waiting too long. Overthinking too much. Spreading too thin. Knowing what to do and still not doing it.

Entrepreneurship has a funny way of holding up a mirror. It shows you exactly where you hesitate, where you self-sabotage, and where you have to get out of your own head and just move.

One year in, I’m still figuring it out. But I’m figuring it out while actually doing it — and that, I think, is the whole point.

Year two starts now. And this time, I’ll try to actually take my own advice.

And if you want to watch me either figure it all out or spectacularly fail trying — well, that’s what this Substack is for. Welcome to the ride.

— Juliette

Thanks for reading That Social Chat.

If something in this post resonated with you, feel free to share it with someone who needs to read it. And if you want to stick around, subscribe — it’s free.

If you wish to support me, you can always do so with a cup of coffee.

Buy me a coffee

Subscribe now

Share