Businesses depend on movement.

Customers must be able to reach stores and restaurants. Employees need reliable ways to get to work. Hotels, offices, medical facilities, and entertainment venues all benefit from being connected to the people they serve.

In car-oriented areas, businesses often compete for highway visibility, road access, and parking. In transit-connected areas, the calculation changes.

A train station, subway stop, or busy bus route can increase the number of people who pass through an area without requiring every visitor to arrive by car.

The important question is not simply:

Is public transportation nearby?

It is:

Does the transit system bring the right people to the location frequently, reliably, and conveniently?

Transit expands the customer base

A business normally depends on customers who can reach it within a reasonable amount of time.

Public transportation can expand that customer base by connecting the business to neighborhoods, employment centers, universities, tourist attractions, and other parts of a city.

The Federal Transit Administration defines transit-oriented development as compact, mixed-use development near public transportation, where people can easily reach jobs, shops, restaurants, housing, and services. The agency also identifies economic returns for nearby businesses and landowners as a possible benefit of transit investment.

This can be especially valuable for businesses that depend on frequent pedestrian visits, including:

• Coffee shops

• Restaurants

• Convenience stores

• Grocery stores

• Pharmacies

• Gyms

• Entertainment venues

• Personal services

A station does not only serve people who live nearby. It may bring customers from across the wider transit network.

That can make a small location beside a station more commercially valuable than a larger property that is difficult to reach.

Foot traffic can replace some parking demand

Many suburban businesses need large parking lots because nearly every customer arrives by car.

Businesses near strong public transportation may be able to serve more customers with less parking, particularly when the surrounding area is walkable and contains several connected uses.

Land that would otherwise be used for parking can instead support:

• Additional stores

• Apartments

• Offices

• Restaurants

• Hotels

• Public spaces

Federal Transit Administration guidance describes successful transit-oriented areas as walkable, mixed-use communities that commonly include housing, employment, shops, restaurants, and entertainment within approximately half a mile of a station.

However, transit access does not eliminate the need for parking everywhere.

A grocery store selling large quantities of goods may still need convenient vehicle access. Restaurants may need delivery areas. Hotels require space for taxis and ride-share vehicles. Businesses must consider how customers, employees, suppliers, and emergency vehicles will all reach the property.

The right transportation mix depends on the business model.

Stations can create natural commercial centers

Transit stations concentrate movement.

People may pass through them while traveling to work, school, appointments, shopping, or entertainment. This creates opportunities for businesses that serve customers during different parts of their journey.

For example:

• Coffee shops benefit from morning commuters.

• Restaurants may capture lunch and evening traffic.

• Convenience stores serve quick purchases throughout the day.

• Gyms can attract customers before and after work.

• Hotels benefit from connections to airports and downtown districts.

When housing, offices, retail, and public spaces are developed around a station, the area can remain active beyond commuting hours.

The Federal Transit Administration states that convenient transit access can foster mixed-use development, increase pedestrian activity, and improve an area’s economic-development potential.

The station may begin as a place people move through. With the right surrounding development, it can become a place where people also stop, shop, eat, work, and live.

Subscribe now

Reliability matters more than simply having a station

A transit stop is not automatically valuable to a business.

The service must be useful.

Businesses and developers should consider:

• How frequently trains or buses arrive

• Hours of operation

• Connections to major destinations

• Service reliability

• Passenger volume

• Station cleanliness and safety

• Pedestrian access

• Whether routes operate on weekends and evenings

A station served once every hour creates a different opportunity from one served every few minutes.

A business serving office workers may value strong weekday commuter service. A restaurant or entertainment district may also require evening and weekend service.

The U.S. Department of Transportation notes that reliable and efficient transportation systems support business productivity and improve access to employment and economic opportunities.

A transit line shown on a map may look attractive, but the actual schedule and passenger experience determine how useful it is.

The walk from the station matters

A business can be close to transit and still feel disconnected from it.

Customers may avoid the route if it includes:

• Dangerous road crossings

• Poor sidewalks

• Weak lighting

• Confusing directions

• Empty or inactive streets

• Long waits at traffic signals

• Barriers for people with disabilities

The National Academies’ guidance on station access emphasizes the need to integrate pedestrian, bicycle, bus, automobile, and accessibility features around public-transportation stations.

A store 500 feet from a station may perform poorly if a highway separates it from passengers. Another store located farther away may benefit more because it sits directly along the route people naturally walk.

The practical walking path matters more than the straight-line distance shown on a map.

Transit can influence property values and rents

Strong transportation access can make nearby land more attractive to residents, businesses, and developers.

A review of international research on railway stations found that proximity to transit was frequently associated with property-value premiums, although the effect varied considerably according to the transit mode, property type, market, and exact distance from the station.

Higher property values can benefit landowners and encourage new investment.

They can also create challenges for businesses.

As an area becomes more desirable:

• Commercial rents may increase.

• Small businesses may struggle to renew leases.

• Property taxes may rise.

• New development may target higher-income customers.

• Long-standing residents and businesses may face displacement pressure.

The Federal Transit Administration recognizes that transit projects can cause both direct and indirect displacement of businesses and individuals and may disrupt existing commercial activity.

Transit can create economic value, but that value is not automatically shared equally.

Cities may need affordable commercial spaces, small-business assistance, long-term leases, or anti-displacement programs to help existing businesses remain in the area.

Not every business benefits equally

Public transportation is especially useful for businesses that serve many people within relatively small spaces.

Examples include:

• Offices

• Retail stores

• Restaurants

• Universities

• Hospitals

• Hotels

• Entertainment venues

• High-density housing

Other businesses may depend more heavily on highway access, loading space, or large parking areas.

A warehouse needs workers, but it also requires trucks and freight access. A furniture store may sell products that customers cannot easily carry onto a train. A drive-through restaurant is designed mainly for vehicles.

A successful location strategy must therefore consider both passenger transportation and business operations.

Being close to a station is not automatically an advantage if the property cannot support deliveries, employee schedules, customer purchases, or the physical layout the business requires.

Transit alone does not create a successful district

Cities sometimes expect a new station to automatically attract stores, offices, and housing.

That does not always happen.

The Federal Transit Administration notes that some zoning and development regulations prevent the density and mixed uses needed for transit-oriented development. It also warns that stations are sometimes placed in areas with little existing commercial activity.

A successful station area usually also needs:

• Supportive zoning

• Enough housing and employment

• Safe streets

• Attractive public spaces

• Available development sites

• Reliable infrastructure

• Market demand

• Coordination between transit agencies, cities, and developers

Transit provides accessibility, but businesses still need customers with a reason to visit.

A station surrounded by empty lots, highways, and unsafe pedestrian routes may remain isolated even when thousands of passengers pass through it.

Transit can change the type of businesses an area supports

As transportation access improves, the surrounding business mix may change.

An area that previously served mostly drivers may begin attracting:

• Smaller storefronts

• Restaurants with limited parking

• Apartments above retail

• Offices with fewer parking spaces

• Hotels serving transit-connected travelers

• Services aimed at commuters and residents

Over time, the neighborhood may become denser and more walkable.

This can create a cycle:

Better transit supports development.
Development brings more residents, workers, and customers.
More activity supports additional businesses and transit ridership.

The Federal Transit Administration’s current planning program encourages communities to connect land-use planning with transportation investments, improve pedestrian and bicycle access, involve private developers, and enable mixed-use development near stations.

The strongest results occur when transportation and development are planned together rather than treated as separate projects.

The transit-location equation

A simple way to understand the effect of public transportation is:

Transit-location value = passenger access + foot traffic + connectivity + development potential − weak service − poor station access − higher costs

Passenger access expands the number of customers and employees who can reach the area.

Foot traffic creates opportunities for nearby businesses.

Connectivity links the location to jobs, housing, services, and entertainment.

Development potential allows the area to add new businesses and uses.

Poor service, unsafe walking routes, rising rents, and weak surrounding demand reduce the benefit.

Public transportation does not make every location successful.

But when reliable transit is combined with walkability, supportive development, and real customer demand, it can change both where businesses choose to operate and what an entire neighborhood can become.

Sources and methodology

This article focuses primarily on public transportation and transit-oriented development in the United States. It draws on information from:

• Federal Transit Administration — Transit-Oriented Development

• Federal Transit Administration — Benefits of Transit-Supportive Development

• Federal Transit Administration — Land Use Policy

• Federal Transit Administration — Social and Economic Impacts

• U.S. Department of Transportation — Economic Strength and Transportation Access

• National Academies — Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations

• Urban Institute — research on transit-oriented development and displacement

The effects of public transportation vary according to service quality, station design, zoning, local demand, pedestrian access, business type, and surrounding development.

This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute business, real-estate, investment, legal, or financial advice.

Two shopping centers can operate only a few miles apart and produce completely different results.

One remains busy throughout the week, attracts new tenants, and gives customers several reasons to visit. The other struggles with empty storefronts, declining traffic, and businesses that rarely remain open for long.

The difference is not always the age or size of the property.

A successful shopping center connects the right businesses with the right customers in a location that is easy to reach and pleasant to use.

The central question is:

Does the shopping center give enough people a strong and repeated reason to visit?

Location determines the available customer base

A shopping center needs to be close enough to the households, workers, students, and visitors it is designed to serve.

Owners and retailers examine factors such as:

• Population size and growth

• Household income

• Age and family structure

• Nearby employment

• Traffic patterns

• Competing centers

• Residential development

• Customer spending habits

A luxury center may require a large high-income customer base. A neighborhood center anchored by a grocery store may depend more on nearby households and frequent practical visits.

Distance also matters. Research on shopping-center visits suggests that customers generally choose among a limited group of centers based partly on proximity and socioeconomic fit.
Read the research on shopping-center attraction and customer movement.

A center does not need to serve everyone. It needs to understand exactly who its customers are and provide the stores and services they regularly use.

Accessibility can be as important as visibility

A shopping center beside a major road may receive strong exposure, but customers must also be able to enter and leave conveniently.

Important access factors include:

• Clear entrances

• Traffic-light access

• Safe turning movements

• Public transportation

• Pedestrian connections

• Parking availability

• Ride-share areas

• Bicycle access

• Connections to nearby neighborhoods

A center may be physically close to customers but function poorly if it is separated from them by a highway, confusing road design, or unsafe pedestrian routes.

Parking also needs to match the property’s use.

A grocery center requires convenient spaces near the stores because customers may be carrying bags. A dining and entertainment district may need parking for longer visits and stronger evening demand.

The goal is to reduce friction between deciding to visit and actually reaching the stores.

The tenant mix creates the destination

A shopping center is not simply a group of available retail spaces.

Its businesses must work together.

The International Council of Shopping Centers explains that a center’s performance depends partly on its tenant mix—the combination of businesses selected to attract shoppers and maintain steady foot traffic.
Read ICSC’s overview of retail leasing and tenant mix.

A balanced center may include:

• Grocery and essential retail

• Restaurants and cafés

• Fitness and wellness

• Personal services

• Entertainment

• Clothing and specialty shops

• Medical services

• Banks or professional services

These businesses can generate visits at different times.

A coffee shop may attract morning traffic. A grocery store creates repeated weekly visits. Restaurants and entertainment support evenings and weekends. A gym can bring customers early in the morning and after work.

The correct mix depends on the surrounding community. Filling every unit is not enough if the tenants do not match local demand or give customers reasons to visit frequently.

Anchor tenants create traffic

Traditionally, large department stores served as shopping-center anchors. Their size, reputation, and customer traffic supported smaller businesses nearby.

Today, anchors can take many forms:

• Grocery stores

• Discount retailers

• Fitness centers

• Cinemas

• Entertainment concepts

• Large restaurants

• Medical facilities

• Home-improvement stores

ICSC notes that shopping centers have increasingly used nontraditional anchors such as grocery stores and gyms to meet changing community needs.
See ICSC’s discussion of modern shopping-center anchors.

A strong anchor gives customers a main reason to visit. Smaller stores then benefit from the traffic it generates.

However, depending too heavily on one anchor creates risk. If that tenant closes, the center may lose traffic while being left with a large space that is difficult to refill.

Successful properties usually create several sources of demand rather than relying on one store to support the entire center.

Convenience and experience serve different purposes

Online shopping has made it easier to purchase many products without visiting a physical store.

Shopping centers therefore need to offer something the internet cannot provide as easily.

Some centers succeed through convenience:

• Groceries

• Pharmacy services

• Medical appointments

• Fitness

• Banking

• Restaurants

• Personal services

Others succeed through experience:

• Dining

• Entertainment

• Events

• Attractive public spaces

• Social activity

• Unique stores

• Family activities

The strongest approach depends on the location.

A neighborhood center may perform well by making everyday errands easier. A regional shopping destination may need restaurants, entertainment, and public spaces that encourage longer visits.

Research examining the social role of retail centers found that store variety can increase customers’ motivation to spend leisure time at a center rather than visit only for one purchase.
Read the study on retail centers and recreational activity.

A center does not need to become an amusement park. It does need to provide a reason for customers to leave home.

Grocery stores and restaurants create frequent visits

Current U.S. retail leasing activity shows that not every type of retailer is expanding equally.

According to JLL’s first-quarter 2026 U.S. retail report, restaurants, discount retailers, and grocery operators were leading expansion, while apparel and electronics retailers were reducing space. U.S. retail vacancy remained low at approximately 4.4%.
View JLL’s Q1 2026 U.S. retail market report.

These expanding categories often provide repeat demand.

People may visit a grocery store weekly, a restaurant several times per month, or a fitness center several times per week. That repeated traffic can be more valuable than a store that customers visit only occasionally.

ICSC leasing professionals also report that grocery anchors can produce steady traffic that benefits nearby smaller tenants.
Read ICSC’s grocery-anchored shopping-center discussion.

The best tenant is not always the most famous brand. It may be the business that creates the most reliable reason to return.

Maintenance affects how customers judge the center

Customers evaluate the entire property, not only the individual stores.

They notice:

• Cleanliness

• Lighting

• Landscaping

• Parking conditions

• Restrooms

• Security

• Empty storefronts

• Signs

• Sidewalks

• Building appearance

Poor maintenance can make a center feel unsafe or unsuccessful, even when several good businesses remain open.

Vacant stores can create a negative cycle. Lower traffic makes the property less attractive to new tenants, while additional vacancies give customers fewer reasons to visit.

Strong management works to stop this cycle by maintaining the property, communicating with tenants, holding events, marketing the center, and replacing unsuccessful businesses with concepts better suited to the market.

Too much retail space can weaken a center

A shopping center can struggle when its market contains more retail space than customers can support.

This may happen when:

• Population growth slows

• Competing centers open

• Major employers leave

• Customer preferences change

• Stores reduce their physical footprints

• The center was built too large

• The surrounding area loses income or residents

A successful property must continue earning enough sales to support tenants’ rent and operating costs.

Current U.S. retail fundamentals are relatively strong partly because very little new retail space has been built. CBRE reported that the national retail availability rate was approximately 4.9% during the first quarter of 2026, while limited construction continued to support rent growth.
View CBRE’s Q1 2026 U.S. retail figures.

Limited supply can help existing centers, but it does not save poorly located or outdated properties. Retailers remain selective and increasingly favor centers where customer demand has already been demonstrated.

Successful centers adapt

A shopping center designed for customers 30 years ago may no longer match how people live today.

Successful properties may adapt by adding:

• Housing

• Offices

• Hotels

• Restaurants

• Parks

• Medical services

• Entertainment

• Improved outdoor spaces

• Better pedestrian connections

The Urban Land Institute has highlighted a growing trend of transforming aging malls into mixed-use town centers with housing, public spaces, and walkable streets.
Read ULI’s analysis of mall-to-town-center redevelopment.

This approach can introduce residents and workers who create daily activity, rather than depending entirely on shoppers arriving by car.

However, redevelopment must respond to real demand. Adding apartments or entertainment does not automatically fix a weak location. The new uses still need customers, financing, infrastructure, and appropriate design.

Adaptation works when it solves a market problem—not when it only changes the appearance of the property.

The shopping-center equation

A simplified way to understand shopping-center performance is:

Shopping-center value = customer demand + accessibility + tenant mix + repeat visits + adaptability − competition − operating friction

Customer demand determines how much spending exists in the market.

Accessibility determines whether customers can reach the center conveniently.

The tenant mix gives them reasons to visit.

Repeat-use businesses create stable traffic.

Management and adaptability keep the property relevant.

Competition, vacancies, poor maintenance, and excessive costs reduce its strength.

Shopping centers do not fail simply because people shop online.

They fail when they stop matching the needs of their market.

The strongest centers understand who their customers are, make visits convenient, provide a useful mix of businesses, and continue changing as the surrounding community changes.

Sources and methodology

This article focuses primarily on U.S. shopping centers and draws on retail-market and urban-development research from:

• JLL — Q1 2026 U.S. Retail Market Dynamics

• CBRE — Q1 2026 U.S. Retail Figures

• CBRE — U.S. Real Estate Market Outlook 2026: Retail

• ICSC — A New Approach to Leasing Retail Space

• ICSC — Shopping Centers and Modern Anchor Tenants

• Urban Land Institute — Reinventing U.S. Malls as Mixed-Use Town Centers

Shopping-center performance varies according to local demand, demographics, competition, tenant quality, lease terms, property management, accessibility, and wider economic conditions.

This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute business, real-estate, investment, legal, or financial advice.

A stadium can bring tens of thousands of people into one area within a few hours.

Before a game, fans may eat at nearby restaurants, stay in local hotels, use public transportation, and purchase merchandise. After the event, the streets may quickly become quiet again.

This creates an important question:

Can a stadium create lasting economic activity, or does it only produce short bursts of activity on event days?

The answer depends less on the building itself and more on how the stadium connects with the surrounding area.

A stadium surrounded by parking lots and highways may function as an isolated destination. A stadium integrated with restaurants, housing, hotels, transit, and public spaces may become part of a larger district that operates throughout the year.

Stadiums create concentrated visitor traffic

The most immediate effect of a stadium is the large number of people it attracts during games, concerts, and other events.

Nearby businesses may benefit from customers purchasing:

• Food and drinks

• Hotel rooms

• Parking

• Transportation

• Merchandise

• Entertainment

However, this demand can be irregular.

A football stadium may host only a limited number of home games each year. Even arenas with basketball, hockey, concerts, and other events do not necessarily generate activity every day.

A study of arena-anchored urban developments found that modern projects increasingly combine venues with restaurants, entertainment, hotels, housing, offices, and public spaces. The broader development helps turn occasional event traffic into a more continuous visitor economy.

The stadium may attract people to the area, but the surrounding district needs to give them reasons to arrive earlier, stay longer, and return when no event is taking place.

Design determines whether nearby businesses benefit

Two stadiums can attract similar crowds but have very different effects on nearby neighborhoods.

An isolated stadium may be surrounded by:

• Large parking lots

• Highways

• Fences

• Few sidewalks

• Limited restaurants or retail

• Long distances between buildings

Fans may drive directly to the game, enter the stadium, and leave immediately afterward. Most of their spending may remain inside the venue.

An integrated stadium district may offer:

• Restaurants and cafés

• Hotels

• Apartments

• Shops

• Public plazas

• Entertainment venues

• Walkable streets

• Public transportation

In that environment, visitors are more likely to spend money outside the stadium.

The difference is not simply how many fans attend. It is whether the neighborhood can capture part of their time and spending.

Transportation shapes the district

Stadiums create unusual transportation demand.

Thousands of people may arrive and leave within a short period, placing pressure on roads, parking, trains, buses, and pedestrian routes.

A successful stadium location needs a clear plan for:

• Public transportation

• Vehicle access

• Ride-share pickup

• Parking

• Pedestrian safety

• Emergency access

• Traffic leaving after events

  Thanks for reading The Location Equation's Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Large parking areas can make events easier to attend, but they can also weaken the surrounding neighborhood. Parking lots occupy valuable land and create long distances between the stadium and nearby businesses.

Public transportation can reduce parking requirements and allow more land to be used for housing, restaurants, hotels, and public spaces. It can also make the venue more accessible to visitors who do not own cars.

However, transit capacity must be strong enough to handle the sharp increase in demand before and after events.

The stadium’s location is therefore connected to a wider transportation system, not just the property on which it sits.

Mixed-use districts can create year-round activity

Many newer stadium projects are planned as parts of larger mixed-use developments.

Instead of building only a venue, developers may include:

• Apartments

• Offices

• Hotels

• Restaurants

• Retail

• Entertainment

• Parks and plazas

This approach attempts to make the area active even when the team is not playing.

Residents create daily demand for stores and services. Offices bring weekday activity. Hotels support visitors and events. Restaurants and entertainment attract customers throughout the week.

Research on arena-anchored districts suggests that the strongest projects treat the venue as one part of a broader development rather than expecting the stadium to transform the area by itself.
Read the study on arena-anchored urban developments.

A stadium can serve as the district’s anchor, but the surrounding uses create the neighborhood.

Property values may change

A new stadium can influence nearby land and property values.

Improved transportation, new restaurants, public investment, and greater visibility may make surrounding sites more attractive to developers and businesses.

A 2026 study published in the Journal of Regional Science found that land values increased by approximately 4.5% following stadium openings in the markets studied, with much of the effect connected to proximity to the venue.
View the study overview.

However, the effect is not always positive.

Nearby properties may also experience:

• Noise

• Event-day congestion

• Parking pressure

• Crowds

• Higher rents

• Increased property taxes

• Displacement risk

Earlier research examining housing around FedEx Field found that nearby homes initially sold at a discount compared with properties farther away, although that difference became smaller after the stadium was completed.
Read the housing-value study summary.

The effect therefore depends on the stadium, neighborhood, transportation system, surrounding investment, and type of property being studied.

New investment can create displacement

Rising property values may benefit landowners, but they can also create challenges for existing residents and small businesses.

As an area becomes more desirable:

• Rents may increase

• Property taxes may rise

• Older businesses may lose their leases

• Lower-income residents may face displacement

• New development may target wealthier customers

A stadium project can therefore improve the physical environment while making it harder for some existing community members to remain.

Cities can respond through affordable-housing requirements, support for local businesses, community-benefit agreements, workforce commitments, and protections for existing residents.

The question should not only be whether the area becomes more valuable.

It should also be:

Who receives that value, and who bears the costs?

Citywide economic benefits are often overstated

Stadium proposals are frequently promoted as tools for creating jobs, increasing tax revenue, and growing the local economy.

Economic research is much more cautious.

Brookings has summarized decades of studies finding little evidence that professional sports stadiums consistently create significant citywide income growth or employment. One reason is that much of the spending at games may replace spending that would have occurred elsewhere in the same region.
Read the Brookings analysis.

For example, a resident who spends $150 at a game may reduce spending at another restaurant, cinema, or entertainment business.

This is known as the substitution effect.

The stadium may shift economic activity toward one district without creating an equal amount of entirely new activity for the city.

Visitors coming from outside the region are more likely to add new spending, particularly if they stay overnight. Local spectators are more likely to redirect spending that would have happened somewhere else.

This does not mean a stadium has no value. It means its neighborhood effects should not automatically be confused with broad economic growth.

Public funding changes the calculation

Stadiums often receive government support through:

• Direct construction funding

• Tax exemptions

• Publicly financed infrastructure

• Land contributions

• Tax-increment financing

• Tax-exempt bonds

Supporters may argue that the stadium creates jobs, attracts visitors, improves infrastructure, and supports redevelopment.

Critics argue that public money could instead fund transportation, housing, schools, parks, or other projects with wider community benefits.

Brookings researchers have repeatedly found that stadium subsidies are difficult to justify using broad economic-development claims alone.
Read the Brookings overview of stadium economics.

The relevant question is not only whether the stadium generates activity.

It is whether the public benefits are large enough to justify the public cost.

The stadium-district equation

A simplified way to understand a stadium’s effect is:

District value = event traffic + mixed-use development + accessibility + public spaces − isolation − congestion − public and community costs

Event traffic introduces people to the area.

Mixed-use development keeps the district active beyond game days.

Transportation determines how easily visitors can arrive and how much land must be devoted to parking.

Public spaces and nearby businesses encourage people to remain in the neighborhood.

Isolation, congestion, public costs, and displacement can reduce the overall benefit.

A stadium can help change an area, but it cannot create a successful neighborhood by itself.

The strongest stadium districts are not designed only around watching a game.

They are designed as places where people can live, work, eat, visit, and spend time throughout the year.

Sources and methodology

This article draws primarily on urban-development and stadium-economics research from:

• Brookings Institution — Sports, Jobs and Taxes: Are New Stadiums Worth the Cost?

• Brookings Institution — Public Spending on Private Sports Stadiums

• Sustainability — Arena-Anchored Urban Development Projects and the Visitor Economy

• Journal of Regional Science — Sports Stadiums and Land Values

• Land Economics — How a New Sports Stadium Affects Housing Values

The effects of stadium development vary according to venue type, location, transportation, surrounding land uses, public financing, event schedules, and local market conditions.

This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute business, real-estate, investment, legal, or financial advice.

Warehouses are commonly found on the edges of major cities, near highways, airports, ports, and large industrial districts.

Cheap land is one reason for this pattern, but it is not the only one.

A warehouse connects suppliers, manufacturers, retailers, and customers. Its location affects how quickly goods move, how much transportation costs, whether workers can reach the facility, and whether customers receive orders on time.

The real question is not:

Where can the company find enough land?

It is:

Which location allows the company to reach its customers at the lowest total cost?

Warehouses follow transportation networks

Warehouses regularly receive and send large quantities of goods, making transportation access one of the most important location factors.

Many facilities are built near:

• Interstate highways

• Major truck routes

• Seaports

• Cargo airports

• Rail terminals

• Border crossings

• Intermodal freight hubs

According to the Federal Highway Administration, freight connectors are roads that link major ports, airports, and rail terminals to the national highway system. These connections are important for the timely and reliable movement of goods.

A warehouse near several transportation options gives a company greater flexibility. Imported goods might arrive through a port, travel by rail to an inland terminal, and then move by truck to the warehouse.

A building may have low rent, but those savings can disappear if trucks must travel long distances or regularly experience congestion.

Companies want inventory near customers

E-commerce has increased the importance of delivery speed.

Customers increasingly expect products to arrive within one or two days, and companies often need inventory close enough to meet those expectations.

The U.S. Census Bureau reported that e-commerce represented 16.8% of total U.S. retail sales during the first quarter of 2026. Online sales were also 9.7% higher than during the same period in 2025.

As online shopping grows, companies may use several types of logistics facilities:

• Large regional warehouses that hold broad inventories

• Distribution centers that divide products between markets

• Smaller facilities near cities that store popular products

• Delivery stations that organize the final trip to customers

Not every warehouse needs to be beside a city center. Its ideal location depends on the role it performs within the wider supply chain.

A regional warehouse may prioritize highway and rail access, while a final-delivery facility may need to be much closer to the customers it serves.

Transportation costs can matter more than rent

Warehouse buildings require large amounts of land, encouraging companies to consider locations with cheaper property.

However, real estate represents only one part of total supply-chain costs.

A remote warehouse can create additional expenses through:

• Longer truck journeys

• Greater fuel use

• Driver time

• Highway tolls

• Delivery delays

• Difficulty providing fast service

Research from Prologis estimates that transportation represents approximately 50% of supply-chain costs, while logistics real estate represents about 5%.

This helps explain why companies may pay more for a well-located warehouse. Higher rent can be justified if the location reduces transportation distance and improves delivery performance.

The cheapest building is not always the lowest-cost option.

Workers must be able to reach the facility

Warehouses need people to receive products, manage inventory, operate equipment, prepare orders, load vehicles, and maintain automated systems.

Large fulfillment centers may require hundreds of employees, particularly during holidays and other busy periods.

Companies therefore examine:

• The size of the local workforce

• Wage levels

• Nearby housing

• Road and public-transportation access

• Competition from other employers

• Availability of logistics and technical skills

A site can have excellent highway access but still struggle if too few workers live nearby.

Warehouse clusters can help by creating a workforce with relevant experience. However, they can also create competition between employers and increase wage pressure.

The location must work for customers, trucks, and employees.

Major cities create connected markets

Large metropolitan areas offer several advantages for logistics companies:

• Large populations

• Strong consumer demand

• Retailers and businesses

• Transportation infrastructure

• Workers

• Suppliers

• Delivery networks

A warehouse near a major city may serve the city itself as well as several surrounding communities.

Some cities become logistics hubs because they sit at the intersection of highways, airports, rail lines, or ports. Once a logistics cluster develops, it can attract trucking companies, packaging suppliers, maintenance services, and additional warehouses.

This makes the area increasingly useful to logistics businesses.

However, successful clusters can eventually experience higher land costs, congestion, and competition for workers.

The property must work for trucks

A large building alone does not make a good warehouse.

The site must allow vehicles and products to move efficiently. Important physical features include:

• Loading docks

• Large truck courts

• Trailer parking

• Safe road entrances

• Employee parking

• High ceilings

• Strong floors

• Fire-protection systems

• Reliable electricity

• Space for future expansion

A warehouse can sit beside a highway and still be unsuitable if trucks cannot enter, turn, load, and leave efficiently.

Newer buildings may also offer higher ceilings, more loading docks, better energy systems, and layouts designed for automation.

Demand for quality logistics space remains significant. According to CBRE’s first-quarter 2026 industrial report, U.S. industrial leasing reached 249.8 million square feet during the quarter, an increase of 14% from the previous year. The national industrial vacancy rate was 6.7%.

However, demand is not equal across every building. A modern warehouse in a strong location can be much more useful than an outdated facility with weak transportation access.

Zoning controls where warehouses can operate

Warehouses produce truck traffic, noise, lighting, and activity throughout the day. Cities therefore generally limit them to industrial and logistics zones.

Local governments may regulate:

• Building size and height

• Truck routes

• Operating hours

• Noise

• Parking

• Road access

• Stormwater management

• Distance from residential neighborhoods

Communities may welcome the jobs and tax revenue created by warehouse development while opposing additional truck traffic near homes.

A property may have excellent access and affordable land but still be impossible to develop if local zoning does not permit warehouse use.

Electricity is becoming more important

Modern warehouses are increasingly technology-intensive.

Facilities may use:

• Automated sorting equipment

• Robotics

• Refrigeration

• Computerized inventory systems

• Battery-charging stations

• Electric delivery vehicles

These systems can require significant electrical capacity.

Power availability is especially important for cold-storage warehouses, highly automated fulfillment centers, and facilities supporting electric-truck fleets.

A property can have strong highway access and enough land but still be unsuitable if the local electrical grid cannot support the planned operation.

Location decisions are therefore beginning to consider not only roads and labor, but also access to reliable power.

The warehouse-location equation

A simplified way to understand warehouse site selection is:

Warehouse value = transportation access + customer proximity + labor availability + building capability − land costs and operating friction

Transportation connects the facility to suppliers and customers.

Customer proximity supports faster delivery.

Labor keeps the building operating.

The property’s design and utilities determine what the facility can handle.

Land costs, congestion, zoning, and infrastructure limitations reduce the opportunity.

Warehouses are not built near certain cities simply because empty land is available.

They are built where goods, customers, workers, transportation, and infrastructure can connect efficiently.

A warehouse may look like a large box beside a highway, but its location is part of a much larger system designed to move products from where they are made to where they are needed.

Sources and methodology

This article focuses primarily on warehouse and logistics locations in the United States. It draws on public information from:

• Federal Highway Administration — Freight Connectors

• U.S. Census Bureau — Quarterly Retail E-Commerce Sales

• CBRE — Q1 2026 U.S. Industrial and Logistics Figures

• Prologis — Technology and Supply-Chain Location Decisions

Warehouse-location decisions vary according to the company, products, transportation methods, customer base, labor market, building requirements, and local regulations.

This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute business, real-estate, investment, legal, or financial advice.

Hotels are often described as location-dependent businesses.

That makes sense. A hotel cannot deliver its rooms to customers, and guests usually choose a destination or area before selecting a particular property.

But saying that a hotel needs a “good location” does not explain much.

A downtown business hotel, an airport hotel, a roadside motel, and a beach resort can all succeed in completely different places. The right location depends on who the guests are, why they are traveling, how they will reach the property, and what they expect to find nearby.

The real question is not:

Is this a good location?

It is:

Is this the right location for this type of hotel and its target guests?

The location must match the guest

Different hotel types depend on different sources of demand.

STR, the hospitality data company owned by CoStar, classifies hotel locations into categories such as urban, suburban, airport, interstate, resort, and small metro or town.

Each category serves a different travel pattern:

• Urban hotels may depend on offices, entertainment, tourism, conventions, and major events.

• Airport hotels serve passengers, airline crews, delayed travelers, and nearby businesses.

• Interstate hotels depend heavily on drivers passing through the area.

• Resorts rely mainly on leisure and destination travel.

• Suburban hotels may serve business parks, hospitals, universities, weddings, and visiting families.

A location that works perfectly for one hotel may be unsuitable for another.

An airport hotel does not necessarily need a lively downtown environment. It needs quick airport access, reliable transportation, and services that match travelers’ schedules.

A luxury hotel, however, may need prestigious surroundings, restaurants, shopping, cultural attractions, and a neighborhood that supports high room rates.

The guest comes first. The location should be selected around that guest’s reason for traveling.

Demand generators fill hotel rooms

Hotels need nearby places and activities that consistently bring people into the market. These are known as demand generators.

Common hotel demand generators include:

• Corporate offices

• Convention centers

• Airports

• Hospitals

• Universities

• Stadiums

• Tourist attractions

• Government facilities

• Industrial parks

• Wedding and event venues

• Shopping and entertainment districts

HVS, a hospitality consulting firm, identifies proximity to demand generators and nearby amenities as major factors in hotel success. It also warns that a hotel can become vulnerable when it depends too heavily on one source of demand.
Read HVS’s hotel success factors.

For example, a hotel beside one large corporate headquarters may perform well while that company is growing. If the company relocates, reduces travel, or allows more remote work, the hotel may lose a major part of its customer base.

A stronger location may serve several sources of demand:

• Business travelers during the week

• Tourists on weekends

• Wedding guests during event periods

• University visitors during graduations

• Sports fans during major games

A varied demand base helps reduce the hotel’s dependence on one customer group.

Accessibility is more than distance

A hotel may appear close to an airport, downtown district, or attraction on a map but still be inconvenient in practice.

Guests care about the actual journey.

Important accessibility questions include:

• How long does the trip take during traffic?

• Is the hotel easy to find?

• Is the entrance visible and safe?

• Is public transportation nearby?

• Does the property provide parking?

• Can taxis and ride-share vehicles enter easily?

• Can tour buses and delivery vehicles reach the property?

• Is the surrounding area comfortable to walk through?

A hotel located five miles from an airport may be more convenient than one located two miles away if the closer property requires a confusing route or frequently experiences traffic delays.

Accessibility also affects employees. Hotels require housekeeping, front-desk, maintenance, foodservice, and management workers. A location that is difficult or expensive for staff to reach can create hiring and retention problems.

The property must be accessible to both guests and the people needed to operate it.

Nearby amenities improve the guest experience

A hotel room is only one part of a trip.

Guests may also need:

• Restaurants

• Coffee shops

• Grocery or convenience stores

• Entertainment

• Shopping

• Parks

• Pharmacies

• Public transportation

• Safe pedestrian routes

The importance of these amenities depends on the hotel.

A full-service resort may provide restaurants, recreation, shopping, and entertainment within the property. A limited-service hotel with few on-site facilities depends more heavily on the surrounding neighborhood.

Nearby amenities can also help a hotel compete. Two properties may offer similar rooms, but guests may prefer the one that allows them to walk to dinner, attend a meeting, or reach an attraction without arranging another trip.

A hotel’s effective product therefore extends beyond its property boundaries.

The neighborhood becomes part of the stay.

Competition can confirm demand

Hotels often appear in clusters near airports, convention centers, downtown districts, and tourist attractions.

Like restaurant clustering, this can be both positive and negative.

Existing hotels may confirm that the area generates lodging demand. A cluster can also make the area familiar to event organizers, business travelers, travel agents, and tourists.

However, every additional hotel adds rooms to the market.

Developers must examine:

• Existing room supply

• Planned hotel developments

• Competitors’ room rates

• Occupancy levels

• Hotel quality and brand

• Guest reviews

• Meeting and event space

• Whether demand is growing quickly enough to support more rooms

Hotel performance is commonly measured using Revenue per Available Room, or RevPAR, which combines occupancy and average room rates. A hotel can improve RevPAR by filling more rooms, charging higher rates, or achieving a balance between the two.
Read STR’s explanation of RevPAR.

Location types do not always perform equally. CBRE’s first-quarter 2026 U.S. hotel data showed that occupancy recovery continued to differ between urban, airport, suburban, interstate, and resort hotels. Interstate locations had recovered more strongly relative to 2019 occupancy than the other location categories.
View CBRE’s Q1 2026 hotel figures.

This is why the developer cannot assume that a strong national hotel market guarantees success at one specific site.

Hotel demand is local.

The site must physically support the hotel

A promising neighborhood does not automatically mean that every property within it is suitable.

The site must support:

• The planned number of rooms

• Parking or valet operations

• Guest drop-off areas

• Deliveries and waste collection

• Emergency access

• Meeting or event facilities

• Restaurants and kitchens

• Outdoor amenities

• Employee and service areas

• Future renovations or expansion

Developers must also consider zoning, building height, traffic requirements, environmental conditions, utility capacity, construction costs, and approval timelines.

A compact urban location may justify a taller, more expensive hotel because of strong room rates and limited land. A roadside hotel may require a larger surface parking area but use a simpler building design.

The physical plan must fit both the land and the expected economics.

A prestigious address can still become a poor investment if the property is too difficult or expensive to develop.

Guests must feel comfortable in the area

Hotels operate throughout the day and night.

Guests may arrive late, leave early, walk with luggage, or visit an unfamiliar city. Their perception of the surrounding area can influence booking decisions and reviews.

The hotel should consider:

• Street lighting

• Sidewalk quality

• Cleanliness

• Noise

• Traffic

• Nearby land uses

• Late-night activity

• The distance between parking and the entrance

• Whether guests feel comfortable walking nearby

Perception matters even when official crime statistics do not tell the entire story. An area that feels confusing, isolated, or poorly maintained can discourage guests from booking or returning.

The neighborhood must support the promise made by the hotel brand.

A good location must work throughout the week

Some hotel locations are extremely busy at certain times and quiet at others.

A hotel in a corporate district may perform well from Monday through Thursday but struggle on weekends. A resort may experience strong weekends and holiday periods but weaker weekday demand. A stadium hotel may benefit from major events but remain quiet when nothing is scheduled.

The strongest locations often combine several types of demand.

For example:

• Corporate demand during weekdays

• Leisure demand during weekends

• Conventions during slower seasons

• Weddings and social events throughout the year

This is sometimes described as having a strong business mix.

The goal is not simply to fill rooms during the busiest nights. It is to reduce the number of weak periods across the entire year.

The future of the area matters

A hotel is a long-term real-estate investment.

The location should be evaluated based on what the area may become—not only what it is today.

Potential changes include:

• New transit lines

• Airport expansion

• New offices or hospitals

• Convention-center investment

• University growth

• Stadium construction

• Neighborhood redevelopment

• Road changes

• New competing hotels

• Changes in tourism or business travel

Infrastructure can create new hotel demand by improving access and attracting employment or visitors. CBRE has recently highlighted how airports, roads, and rail investment can support long-term hotel demand by changing how easily people reach a market.
See CBRE’s analysis of infrastructure-supported hotel growth.

But future projects should be treated carefully. A proposed convention center, office tower, or attraction may be delayed, reduced, or never completed.

A hotel should not depend entirely on development that exists only in a presentation.

The hotel-location equation

A simplified way to think about hotel site selection is:

Hotel location value = demand generators + accessibility + guest fit + nearby amenities + future growth − competition − development and operating friction

Demand generators create reasons for people to visit.

Accessibility determines how easily they can reach the property.

Guest fit determines whether the location matches the hotel’s concept.

Amenities improve the overall stay.

Competition, construction costs, regulation, and weak periods reduce the opportunity.

The best hotel location is not automatically the busiest, most central, or most expensive address.

It is the location that consistently connects the right guests with the right hotel at a cost the property can support.

Subscribe now

Sources and methodology

This article draws primarily on hospitality research and industry information from:

• STR and CoStar — Hotel Location Types and Industry Glossary

• STR and CoStar — Understanding Revenue per Available Room

• HVS — Top Hotel Success Factors

• CBRE — Q1 2026 U.S. Hotel Performance

• CBRE — Infrastructure and Hotel Demand Growth

• American Hotel & Lodging Association — 2026 Hotel Industry Conditions

Hotel performance varies according to market conditions, hotel type, brand, management, competition, development costs, and local travel demand.

This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute business, investment, legal, or financial advice.

Opening a restaurant next to several competitors may seem like a bad decision.

The new restaurant must compete for customers, employees, parking, delivery orders, and attention. If ten restaurants already operate on the same street, why would an owner want to become number eleven?

The answer is that nearby restaurants do not only divide demand. Together, they can attract more people to an area and turn it into a recognized dining destination.

For restaurant owners, the important question is not simply:

How many competitors are nearby?

It is:

Does the area attract enough customers to support another restaurant—and can the new concept give them a reason to choose it?

Restaurant clusters create destinations

A single restaurant gives customers one option. A street or district containing several restaurants gives them a reason to visit the area even before deciding exactly where to eat.

Groups often disagree about cuisine, price, atmosphere, or service style. A dining district provides alternatives. If one restaurant is full, too expensive, or unsuitable, customers can choose another nearby instead of leaving the area completely.

Economists refer to benefits created when similar businesses locate near one another as agglomeration benefits.

A study of restaurants in Milan examined what happened after the city removed regulations that had required minimum distances between restaurants. After the restrictions were removed, restaurants became more concentrated in certain neighborhoods. Areas that gained restaurants continued attracting more, helping create stronger dining clusters. The researchers also found that restaurants in those clusters became more differentiated by cuisine, quality, and price.
Read the research from the National Bureau of Economic Research.

The finding suggests that restaurants are not always fighting over a fixed number of customers. A group of restaurants can make an area more attractive and increase the total number of people who visit it.

Customers value having options

Restaurant decisions are often made for families, groups of friends, business meetings, dates, or celebrations. Each person may have different preferences.

A district with several restaurants reduces the risk of choosing the wrong area. Customers know they will probably find at least one acceptable option nearby.

Research on how customers choose restaurants also shows that location and convenience can strongly influence restaurant selection, although their importance varies by dining occasion. Someone buying a quick lunch may care more about convenience, while someone planning a celebration may prioritize food quality and atmosphere.

The cluster therefore becomes part of the experience.

Customers are not only choosing one restaurant. They are choosing an area that offers convenience, flexibility, and variety.

Competitors can prove that demand exists

Opening in an undeveloped area may provide lower rent and less competition, but it also creates more uncertainty.

The owner must determine whether customers will:

• Travel to the area

• Notice the restaurant

• Accept its prices

• Visit regularly

• Order delivery or takeout

• Return often enough to support the business

Successful restaurants nearby provide evidence that people already visit the area to eat.

Their presence may signal:

• Strong pedestrian or vehicle traffic

• Suitable customer demographics

• Evening and weekend activity

• Accessible parking or transportation

• Favorable zoning

• Existing demand for food and entertainment

Competition does not guarantee that another restaurant will succeed, but it can confirm that a market already exists.

An isolated restaurant may need to create customer traffic by itself. A restaurant in an established district can benefit from traffic the area already attracts.

Restaurants still need to be different

Clustering works best when the restaurants are not identical.

If several nearby restaurants offer the same menu, prices, atmosphere, and service, they may compete directly for the same customers. This can lead to discounting and weaker sales.

Restaurants can reduce that risk by differentiating themselves through:

• Cuisine

• Price

• Atmosphere

• Service style

• Food quality

• Operating hours

• Speed and convenience

• Delivery and takeout

• Target customer

A café, fast-casual restaurant, bakery, fine-dining restaurant, and dessert shop can operate in the same district without competing for every transaction.

They may even support one another throughout the day. A customer could purchase coffee in the morning, lunch at another restaurant, and dessert after dinner.

Competition creates pressure, but it can also encourage restaurants to develop clearer identities.

Access still matters

A popular dining district will struggle if customers cannot reach it conveniently.

Restaurant clusters generally need some combination of:

• Walkability

• Parking

• Road access

• Public transportation

• Visibility

• Safe sidewalks

• Delivery-driver access

Restaurants also benefit from nearby demand generators such as offices, apartments, hotels, universities, shopping centers, stadiums, and entertainment venues.

These surrounding uses bring people into the area. Restaurants then give those people more reasons to stay.

A cluster may look compact on a map but function poorly if it is divided by dangerous roads, difficult parking, or weak pedestrian connections.

Clustering can become expensive

As a restaurant district becomes more successful, the location may become more expensive.

Landlords may raise rents, suitable properties may become harder to find, and restaurants may compete for the same chefs, managers, servers, and delivery capacity.

These pressures matter because restaurant profit margins can be fragile. The National Restaurant Association reported that 42% of surveyed U.S. operators said their restaurants were not profitable in 2025, while food, labor, utilities, insurance, and card-processing costs continued to create challenges.

A popular location can produce strong traffic and still be a poor investment if rent and operating costs are too high.

Restaurant owners therefore need to compare the extra customers created by the district with the extra cost of operating there.

When a cluster becomes overcrowded

Restaurant clustering has a limit.

An area becomes saturated when the number of restaurants grows faster than customer demand.

Possible warning signs include:

• Frequent closures

• Many similar concepts

• Heavy discounting

• Empty tables during peak periods

• High tenant turnover

• Rising rents without rising traffic

The owner must distinguish between a healthy cluster and an overcrowded market.

Several competitors may show that an area is attractive. Too many similar competitors may show that the available demand is already divided too widely.

The key questions are:

How much additional traffic does the cluster create?

and

How much of that traffic can the new restaurant realistically capture?

The restaurant-clustering equation

A simple way to understand the decision is:

Cluster value = shared traffic + customer choice + district reputation − competition − higher operating costs

Restaurants open next to competitors because the cluster can create a destination, demonstrate existing demand, and give customers more reasons to visit the area.

However, joining a cluster only works when the restaurant has a distinctive concept and the market is strong enough to support it.

Sometimes the greatest risk is opening beside several competitors.

Other times, the greater risk is opening somewhere customers have no reason to visit at all.

Sources and methodology

This article draws primarily on the following research and industry sources:

• National Bureau of Economic Research — The Agglomeration of Urban Amenities: Evidence from Milan Restaurants

• American Economic Association — The Agglomeration of Urban Amenities

• International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health — Customer Restaurant Choice

• National Restaurant Association — 2026 Restaurant Industry Outlook

The effects of restaurant clustering vary according to the market, restaurant type, customer behavior, transportation access, competition, and local real-estate costs.

This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute business, investment, legal, or financial advice.

The gas-station business model appears simple: purchase fuel at a wholesale price, sell it at a higher retail price, and keep the difference.

In reality, a modern gas station may combine several businesses on one property:

• Fuel retail

• A convenience store

• Food and beverages

• Car washes or other services

• EV charging

• Commercial real estate

The pumps generate enormous sales, but they do not necessarily generate the largest share of profit.

Fuel creates revenue—but margins are limited

Fuel is usually the largest source of gas-station revenue.

In 2025, U.S. convenience stores generated approximately $476.3 billion in fuel sales. Fuel represented about 65% of total industry sales, but only 38.8% of gross profit dollars.

This difference matters because the station does not keep most of the money paid at the pump.

The selling price must cover:

• The wholesale cost of fuel

• Taxes

• Transportation and distribution

• Card-processing fees

• Labor

• Equipment maintenance

• Rent and other operating expenses

According to the National Association of Convenience Stores, the average fuel gross margin in 2025 was approximately 39.7 cents per gallon. However, that is the margin before expenses.

After operating costs, the station may retain only a relatively small pre-tax profit from each gallon sold.

This is also why rising gasoline prices do not automatically benefit retailers. When wholesale prices increase, stations must either raise their prices and risk losing customers or delay the increase and accept a smaller margin.

Fuel’s other purpose is attracting customers

Fuel is valuable because it gives drivers a regular reason to visit the property.

Once customers arrive, the station can encourage them to enter the store and purchase:

• Coffee

• Cold drinks

• Snacks

• Prepared food

• Groceries

• Automotive products

The pumps create customer traffic. The store attempts to increase the amount each customer spends.

This is why operators care about store visibility, checkout speed, product placement, cleanliness, lighting, restrooms, and the distance between the pumps and the entrance.

A station with strong fuel sales but weak in-store traffic may be missing a major source of profit.

The convenience store is a major profit center

U.S. convenience stores generated $341.2 billion in foodservice and merchandise sales during 2025.

Different products serve different purposes.

Some products, such as beverages and snacks, are purchased frequently. Others may produce stronger margins or encourage customers to purchase several items during the same visit.

The operator must therefore manage the store as a mix of categories rather than focusing only on total revenue.

A dollar spent inside the store may contribute more toward gross profit than a dollar spent on fuel.

Foodservice is increasingly important

Many convenience stores now compete with quick-service restaurants.

They may sell:

• Pizza

• Chicken

• Sandwiches

• Breakfast items

• Bakery products

• Made-to-order meals

• Coffee and fountain drinks

In 2025, foodservice represented 28.5% of in-store sales but 38.9% of in-store gross profit dollars.

Foodservice is important because it can:

1. Produce stronger margins than fuel.

2. Give customers a reason to choose one station over another.

3. Attract visitors who do not need gasoline.

Fuel from two nearby stations may appear nearly identical. Their food, coffee, cleanliness, and customer experience can be very different.

A customer who visits specifically for breakfast or lunch treats the station as a destination, not simply a place to refuel.

Food and beverages reinforce each other

Packaged beverages are another major in-store category.

NACS reported that packaged beverages represented 18.7% of convenience-store in-store sales in 2025. Earlier industry research also found that many customers purchasing packaged drinks bought prepared food during the same visit. (NACS)

Common combinations include:

• Coffee and breakfast

• A sandwich and bottled drink

• Pizza and a soft drink

• Snacks and beverages for a road trip

The store’s layout and promotions are designed to encourage these combinations and increase the average amount spent per visit.

Additional services make the property more productive

Gas stations can also earn revenue from services such as:

• Car washes

• Vacuum stations

• ATMs

• Propane exchanges

• Package lockers

• Quick-service restaurants

• Advertising

• EV charging

These services allow the operator to generate more income from the same land and customer traffic.

A station may operate the service directly or lease part of its property to another business. For example, a restaurant or charging company may pay rent or share revenue with the property owner.

However, the right service depends on the location.

A large suburban property may support a car wash, restaurant, and charging area. A compact urban station may lack the land required for those uses.

EV charging creates a developing opportunity

EV charging can produce direct revenue and encourage customers to spend more time on the property.

A station can purchase and operate chargers itself, or allow a third-party charging company to install and manage them. The third party may then pay rent or share charging revenue with the property owner. (NACS)

Charging may also support in-store sales because EV drivers often remain on the property longer than gasoline customers.

However, charging is not automatically profitable. Operators must consider:

• Installation costs

• Electrical capacity

• Utility pricing

• Customer demand

• Parking requirements

• Maintenance

• Nearby competition

The value may come from a combination of charging income, rent, additional store purchases, and keeping the location relevant as transportation changes.

The property itself may create value

A gas station is both an operating business and a commercial real-estate asset.

The operator may:

• Own the land and business

• Lease the property

• License a fuel brand

• Lease part of the site to another operator

• Own the property and rent it to an independent station operator

Owning a well-located corner can create long-term value if the surrounding area grows.

However, gas-station properties also carry specialized risks. Underground fuel tanks and possible contamination can make redevelopment more difficult and expensive.

The owner is therefore evaluating two connected investments:

1. The income produced by the operating business

2. The long-term value and risk of the land

Operating expenses determine what remains

Gas stations can generate high revenue while earning relatively modest net profit.

Major operating expenses include:

• Fuel and merchandise inventory

• Wages

• Credit- and debit-card fees

• Utilities

• Insurance

• Rent or mortgage payments

• Equipment repairs

• Cleaning and security

• Food waste and inventory losses

• Environmental compliance

In 2025, credit- and debit-card fees across the U.S. convenience-store industry reached a record $21.3 billion.

This makes operational discipline essential.

A station must control labor, reduce waste, prevent theft, maintain equipment, price fuel carefully, and keep popular products in stock.

A busy station can still perform poorly if its expenses are not controlled.

Location connects the entire business model

Every source of revenue depends on location.

A highway station may depend on travelers and high fuel volume. A neighborhood station may rely on repeat customers and convenience purchases. A suburban property may support a large store, car wash, restaurant, and chargers.

Location influences:

• Customer volume

• Customer type

• Fuel demand

• In-store spending

• Land cost

• Competition

• Available space

• Future property value

This is why gas-station profitability cannot be understood by studying the fuel margin alone.

The complete model

A simplified version of the business is:

Fuel creates traffic.

The convenience store increases spending per visit.

Foodservice generates stronger margins and independent demand.

Additional services produce more income from the property.

Efficient operations protect the remaining profit.

Real estate may create long-term value.

Location determines how well everything works together.

Two stations may sell similar fuel at similar prices but produce very different financial results.

One may depend almost entirely on fuel sales. Another may operate as a convenience store, restaurant, car wash, charging destination, and valuable commercial property that also happens to sell gasoline.

The fuel-price sign is the most visible part of the business.

But it is only one part of how the station makes money.

Sources and methodology

This article focuses primarily on U.S. convenience stores that sell motor fuel. It draws on public information from:

• NACS — 2026 U.S. Convenience Store Count

• NACS — U.S. Convenience In-Store Sales Top $340 Billion

• NACS — Key Facts About Fueling

• NACS — Foodservice Growth and Packaged Beverages

• NACS — EV Charging: From Concept to Operations

Financial performance varies by location, ownership structure, store format, competition, and operating costs. Standalone fuel kiosks, truck stops, membership-club stations, and international markets may operate differently.

This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment, legal, environmental, or financial advice.

Leave a comment

Gas stations often appear to occupy obvious locations.

They sit beside busy roads, near highway exits, at major intersections, and close to growing neighborhoods. From the outside, the strategy can seem simple: find a road with many cars and build a station beside it.

But that explanation misses the more interesting question:

Why was the gas station built on that particular corner instead of another property only a few hundred feet away?

A road may carry thousands of vehicles every day, yet a station can still struggle if drivers cannot enter easily, see it early enough, or return to the road without inconvenience. A less visible site may outperform it because it offers better access, serves a more suitable customer base, or costs significantly less to develop.

For gas stations, location is not merely where the business operates.

Location is part of the product, the operating model, and the investment.

Traffic is the starting point—not the answer

One of the first measurements considered when evaluating a potential site is traffic volume.

Transportation agencies commonly use Annual Average Daily Traffic, usually shortened to AADT, to estimate the average number of vehicles passing along a section of road during a typical day.

At first glance, a road carrying 40,000 vehicles per day appears more attractive than one carrying 15,000.

However, more traffic does not automatically produce more customers.

The station operator still needs to understand:

• Who is using the road?

• Where are those drivers going?

• When does traffic peak?

• Which direction is busiest?

• Are the drivers commuters, residents, tourists, or commercial drivers?

• Can those drivers conveniently enter the property?

A busy highway carrying long-distance traffic may support a large travel center. A smaller suburban road may produce fewer vehicles but more repeat customers from nearby homes.

Traffic represents potential demand. The station must still convert that potential into actual visits.

Not all passing traffic is usable traffic

Consider two gas-station sites on the same road.

The first has a wide entrance, access from two streets, clear signage, and a traffic light that gives drivers time to turn.

The second has one narrow entrance, sits behind a raised median, and requires drivers traveling in one direction to continue past the property and make a U-turn.

The two sites may have identical traffic counts, but they do not offer identical access.

The Federal Highway Administration describes access management as the management of driveways, median openings, intersections, and other points where vehicles enter or leave properties. These decisions influence traffic flow, safety, and the ease with which customers can reach a business.

For a gas station, important access questions include:

• Can drivers enter from more than one road?

• Can vehicles make both right and left turns into the site?

• Does a median prevent customers from entering?

• Is the driveway too close to a busy intersection?

• Can larger vehicles move safely around the property?

• Can customers leave without crossing several lanes of traffic?

• Will vehicles waiting at the pumps block entrances or parking spaces?

Fuel is widely available and highly substitutable. Drivers can often continue for another mile and purchase a similar product from another station.

That makes convenience especially important. A small amount of friction may be enough to send a customer somewhere else.

Direction and time of day change a site’s value

Traffic patterns are rarely equal in both directions.

One side of a road may capture commuters driving toward an employment center in the morning. The other side may become more valuable during the evening journey home.

A station near offices may depend on daytime customers. One near a residential area may experience stronger morning, evening, and weekend traffic. A highway site may attract long-distance travelers throughout the day.

The National Association of Convenience Stores reports that U.S. fuel purchases are spread across several periods:

• 25% occur between 6:00 and 10:00 a.m.

• 33% occur between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.

• 32% occur between 3:00 and 7:00 p.m.

• 9% occur during the remaining hours

This shows why a daily traffic total is not enough.

A complete site analysis should consider traffic by hour, direction, trip purpose, and vehicle type. The most valuable side of the road depends on the customers the station is designed to serve.

Visibility gives drivers time to react

A station must be visible early enough for a driver to notice it, evaluate it, and enter safely.

The driver may need to:

1. Recognize the station.

2. Read the fuel-price sign.

3. Decide whether to stop.

4. Move into the correct lane.

5. Slow down.

6. Find the entrance.

A property may technically face a major road but still have weak visibility because of trees, nearby buildings, elevation changes, poor lighting, confusing signage, or an awkward approach angle.

Road speed also matters. A driver traveling at highway speed needs more distance to notice a station and safely change lanes than someone traveling along a slower urban street.

Chevron’s retail site-planning guidance highlights the importance of studying traffic and pedestrian movement, as well as the relationship between surrounding roads, fuel canopies, and store buildings.

Visibility is therefore not simply whether the property can be seen.

It is whether the customer can understand and access the property before passing it.

The surrounding area determines who the customers will be

Gas stations benefit from nearby places that regularly generate vehicle trips.

These can include:

• Residential neighborhoods

• Employment centers

• Shopping districts

• Highway interchanges

• Airports

• Universities

• Hospitals

• Industrial areas

• Tourist destinations

• Truck routes

However, each demand generator creates a different type of customer.

A station near an airport may experience strong fuel demand from rental-car customers but limited convenience-store sales. A neighborhood station may sell less fuel per transaction but benefit from repeat visits and stronger in-store spending.

A truck-oriented site may need diesel lanes, large turning areas, parking, showers, and substantial foodservice. A compact urban station may depend on quick transactions and a smaller store.

This means the operator is not only choosing a road.

The operator is choosing a customer base.

The surrounding population, income, commuting patterns, vehicle ownership, and nearby businesses all influence what type of station the location can support.

Competition can be a threat—and a positive signal

Gas stations frequently appear in clusters.

It may seem irrational for several stations to operate around the same intersection, but competitors can provide useful information.

Their presence may suggest that the area has:

• Strong fuel demand

• Favorable zoning

• Suitable traffic patterns

• Enough land for station development

• An established customer habit of stopping for fuel

Customers may also view the intersection as a known fueling destination where prices and brands can be compared.

However, competition can divide the available demand. A new station may take customers from nearby operators—or from another location owned by the same company.

Fuel-retailing analysts use models to estimate site demand, competitor effects, and potential cannibalization. For example, Kalibrate’s fuel-site analysis evaluates visitor profiles, competitors, projected fuel volume, store sales, and different property configurations.

The correct question is not simply:

Are competitors nearby?

It is:

Is there enough demand for another station, and can this site offer a meaningful advantage?

That advantage might come from:

• Easier access

• Lower prices

• More pumps

• Better food

• Cleaner facilities

• A recognized brand

• A larger convenience store

• A car wash

• Faster service

• Better lighting and security

Competition does not automatically make a site unattractive. It raises the standard that the new station must meet.

The land must support the entire business model

A modern gas station requires much more than a row of pumps.

The property may need space for:

• Underground fuel tanks

• Fuel-delivery vehicles

• Pump islands and canopies

• A convenience store

• Customer parking

• Safe vehicle circulation

• A car wash

• A drive-through restaurant

• Stormwater systems

• Landscaping

• EV chargers

• Future expansion

A property at a major intersection may still be unsuitable if it is too small, oddly shaped, difficult to enter, or unable to support enough pumps and services.

Operators can use site-analysis models to test different configurations before committing capital. They may compare a larger store with a smaller one, add or remove pumps, consider a car wash, or evaluate whether the market can support a restaurant or EV charging.

The best location is therefore not always the one expected to sell the most fuel.

It may be the location that allows the operator to generate the greatest total value from the property.

A prime location can still be too expensive

Highly visible corners are attractive to many businesses.

Gas stations may compete for land with:

• Restaurants

• Pharmacies

• Banks

• Car washes

• Retail centers

• Apartments

• Medical offices

The National Association of Convenience Stores notes that real estate is generally more expensive at convenient, sought-after corners.

This creates a trade-off.

A prime corner may generate more sales but require a much larger investment. A nearby secondary location may generate fewer sales while costing significantly less.

The operator must compare:

• The additional customers gained from the superior site

• The additional cost of acquiring and developing it

• The return that could be earned from alternative sites

• The value of using the property for another purpose

Location quality cannot be separated from price.

An excellent property can still become a poor investment if the operator pays too much for it.

Zoning can eliminate an otherwise attractive location

Gas stations are specialized land uses.

A site may have excellent traffic, strong visibility, and suitable demographics but still fail because local rules do not allow fuel retailing.

Local requirements may govern:

• Permitted land uses

• Distance from homes or schools

• Driveway access

• Signage

• Lighting

• Operating hours

• Landscaping

• Fire safety

• Fuel-canopy design

• Environmental review

• Stormwater management

Obtaining approval can take time and may require changes that reduce the project’s financial attractiveness.

This is why site selection must consider planning and regulation early in the process—not after the land has already been purchased.

Environmental risk follows the property

Gas stations also require underground storage tanks and fuel-delivery systems.

In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency regulates underground storage tanks used to store petroleum and certain hazardous substances. Owners and operators face requirements related to installation, corrosion protection, spill prevention, leak detection, recordkeeping, and financial responsibility.

A petroleum release can affect soil, groundwater, nearby property, and the future redevelopment of the site.

The EPA refers to many contaminated or potentially contaminated former fuel sites as petroleum brownfields. These properties may require assessment or cleanup before they can be reused.

Environmental risk therefore affects more than current operating costs.

It can influence:

• Financing

• Insurance

• Property value

• Future saleability

• Redevelopment potential

• The range of future uses available for the land

A location may produce attractive short-term sales while creating expensive long-term obligations if its infrastructure is not properly managed.

The site must remain useful as transportation changes

The value of a location can change over time.

New roads may redirect traffic. A neighborhood may grow or decline. Competing stations may open. Vehicle technology may change the services customers expect.

EV charging creates a different site-planning challenge from gasoline.

A gasoline customer may remain for only a few minutes, while an EV customer may stay longer. This increases the importance of parking, electrical capacity, food, restrooms, seating, and other services.

A NACS guide to public charging infrastructure notes that operators must consider equipment costs, utility charges, permits, site planning, and operating arrangements before installing chargers.

Not every existing station can adapt easily. Some lack sufficient land, electrical capacity, or customer demand.

The strongest sites may therefore be the ones that can evolve from simple fueling stops into broader roadside retail and service destinations.

The location equation

A simplified way to think about gas-station site selection is:

Site potential = usable traffic × accessibility × customer fit × spending potential − property and operating friction

Traffic creates the opportunity.

Access determines whether the opportunity can be captured.

Visibility helps drivers recognize and act on it.

Customer fit determines what services the station should offer.

Land costs, competition, regulation, and environmental risk reduce the value of the opportunity.

There is no universal traffic count, site size, or intersection type that guarantees success. The correct location depends on the operator’s format, target customer, competition, pricing strategy, and sources of revenue.

The next time you see a gas station beside a major road, the interesting question may not be why it was placed near traffic.

It may be:

What combination of movement, access, land, and customer behavior made that particular type of location worth choosing?

Sources and methodology

This article focuses primarily on the United States and draws on public information from:

• Federal Highway Administration — Traffic Monitoring Guide

• Federal Highway Administration — Access Management

• National Association of Convenience Stores — Key Facts About Fueling

• National Association of Convenience Stores — Why Gas Prices Vary by Station

• Chevron — Retail Site-Plan Fundamentals

• Kalibrate — Fuel-Site Analysis

• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency — Underground Storage Tank Regulations

• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency — Petroleum Brownfields

• National Association of Convenience Stores — Public EV Charging

Industry behavior, regulations, and site-selection practices vary by market. The examples and statistics in this article should not be assumed to apply equally to every country, state, or individual property.

This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment, legal, environmental, or financial advice.