This maxim can be understood on two closely related levels: first as a statement about fighting attitude and distance, and second as a description of how the trained bridge responds to contact.

In the first instance, we can picture the Mantis boxer standing in the characteristic beggar-hands position, but any Bai Jong Sau is appropriate. The hands are already extended, the elbows are organised, and the bridges are connected through the back into the unified structure of the body. He is not standing there passively, waiting to discover what the opponent intends to do. His attention is much more direct:

When can I hit you?

The attitude is like that of a sniper waiting for the target to enter the crosshairs. The sniper does not wave the rifle around chasing every possible movement. The weapon is prepared, the line is established, and the shot is taken when the target enters it. In the same way, the Mantis boxer does not needlessly chase an opponent who remains outside the effective range. He waits for the moment when the opponent’s movement brings them into the prepared striking line.

你不來 — If you do not come: if you do not enter the trap, there is nothing yet to release.

我不發 — I do not issue: I do not waste the strike, disclose my intention or release power into empty space.

This requires confidence. An inexperienced practitioner may feel compelled to react to every feint, reach after the opponent or continually change position because they do not trust their hands to deal with what is coming. The trained Mantis boxer develops a different attitude through Chy Sau, Doi Jong and related paired drills. These practices teach that the bridges can cover, intercept and strike as part of the same action. The practitioner therefore does not have to wait, observe the attack, identify it and then select an answer. The trained response is already present within the established frame.

The hands become like a prepared trap. The opponent’s entry supplies the movement that springs it.

The opponent’s force triggers the issue

The second meaning becomes apparent once contact reaches the bridge. Here, “coming” does not refer only to the opponent entering physical range. It also means that the opponent’s force has arrived upon the body.

The bridge is not held as a rigid barrier. It remains sensitive, connected and ready. When incoming pressure touches it, that pressure becomes the signal for the whole body to unify. The bridge receives the information, but the response does not belong to the arm alone. The torso, spine, ribs, abdomen and legs contract together, producing the sudden unified action recognised as shock power.

This is not a force built sequentially from the foot, through the leg and waist, and finally into the hand. There should be no perceptible series of separate bodily actions. The incoming pressure causes the already organised body to respond as one unit. Contact effectively closes the circuit.

The opponent therefore provides both the occasion and the trigger:

Their movement brings them into striking range.

Their contact activates the sensitivity of the bridge.

Their pressure causes the trained body to unify.

The resulting shock is issued back through the point of contact.

The meaning of 發 — faat is consequently deeper than simply “throwing a strike.” It is the issuing of the body’s trained power. Until the correct opportunity or stimulus arrives, that power remains contained within the prepared frame. When the opponent comes, it is released immediately.

Thus, 你不來，我不發 expresses neither hesitation nor passivity. It describes poised readiness: the body is organised, the bridges are alive, and the mind is fixed upon the opportunity to strike. The Mantis boxer does not wait to find out what the opponent wishes to do. He waits for the opponent to enter the trap, and the moment they touch it, the trap closes.

Chinese martial arts often preserve essential teachings in short verses. These are not decorative poetry or complete technical manuals. They are compact devices, principles condensed into language that can be remembered, repeated, and tested through physical practice.

The following verse is preserved in some branches of Southern Praying Mantis (南螳螂)

吊勁如索，開合自然

擒拿各種，把捉技能

沉肩墜肘，收頷沉頭

肋骨開合，如門之樞

蛙仔式，立腳有力

螳螂拳練到有得着，方知始於修行

A functional English translation:

Hanging power is like a rope; opening and closing occur naturally.

Develop the various skills of seizing, grasping, catching and controlling.

Sink the shoulders, drop the elbows, draw in the chin and settle the head.

The ribs open and close like a door turning upon its hinge.

Establish the frog-like posture, with strength through the legs.

Only after gaining something through Mantis Boxing do you realise that genuine cultivation has just begun.

This is a body-method verse. It does not describe six unrelated qualities. Each line addresses one aspect of a single physical organisation: a body that is suspended yet settled, contained yet mobile, and able to open, close and contract as one unit.

The first line establishes the governing principle.

The lines that follow show how this principle is expressed through the hands, upper frame, ribs and legs. The final line reminds us that developing this body is not mastery. It provides the instrument through which genuine Southern Mantis training can begin.

吊勁如索，開合自然 - Hanging Power Is Like a Rope; Opening and Closing Occur Naturally

吊勁—hanging power—describes how the arms are suspended from and connected to the body.

Imagine extending both arms forward and hanging a bucket from each hand. If the arms are held primarily by the local muscles of the shoulders, the shoulders quickly tighten and tire. The arms remain structurally separate from the torso, and the weight concentrates in a small area. With correctly developed hanging power, the load is not carried by the shoulders alone. The arms hang from the large muscles of the back, while the back connects through the torso, spine, pelvis and legs into the ground. The fascial network of the whole body participates in receiving and distributing the weight. The arms are neither held up through isolated muscular effort nor allowed to hang limply. They are suspended from the organised body.

This is why sinking the shoulders and dropping the elbows matter. When the shoulders lift or brace locally, the arms become isolated from the back. When unnecessary tension releases and the elbows settle, the weight of the arms, and any pressure entering through them, can be accepted by the larger structure of the torso.

Hanging power allows the arms to extend without becoming disconnected. They remain heavy, supported and available while still responding freely to changes in pressure.

Releasing Downwards and Opening Upwards

This connection develops through the release of residual tension throughout the fascial structure.

As unnecessary holding releases, the body settles downwards into the ground. Weight passes through the legs and feet rather than becoming trapped in the shoulders, chest, waist or hips. This creates the sinking aspect of the body.

At the same time, the release of habitual tension allows the structure to open upwards from the ground. The crown presses upwards while the feet press downwards. The practitioner experiences opposing but complementary directions: the body settles into the ground while simultaneously lengthening towards the sky.

This should not be created by artificially stretching the spine or pulling the head upwards. It emerges as areas of unnecessary contraction release and the body’s structural relationships become better organised.

The crown may be compared to the central upright beam of a traditional building. The beam rises vertically and supports the roof truss above it. In the same way, the rising crown establishes the upper direction of the body and helps organise the shoulders and torso beneath it. The central beam must remain upright. If it leans, buckles or collapses, the structure built around it becomes compromised. Similarly, the crown rises and the chin settles while the central axis remains vertical.

The body is held between two connected directions: the feet and legs press and release downwards into the ground, and the crown presses upwards and supports the upper structure. These are not two separate actions. They are the two ends of one organised relationship. The downward release permits the upward opening, and the upward opening prevents the downward release from becoming collapse.

This dynamic is fundamental to any traditional Chinese martial art that claims to employ genuinely organised whole-body mechanics. Without it, “sinking” can become little more than squatting, while “rising” can become local muscular lifting. Together they establish a body that is grounded without being compressed and upright without being rigid.

The Rope Snapping Taut

The image of the rope introduces a second and deeper layer of meaning. Imagine holding a slack rope between both hands and then pulling the hands sharply apart. For an instant there is little resistance. As the slack disappears, tension passes through the entire length of the rope and it suddenly snaps taut. The rope does not tighten one section at a time. Its complete length becomes tensioned as one event.

This provides a useful metaphor for 驚彈 (Geng Tan)—shock power. The body is not held in a permanently rigid or fully tensioned state. It remains released, connected and available. When power is required, the connected tissues suddenly become taut, producing a brief whole-body reaction. The body then releases from that activation and returns to its prepared condition.

Hanging power does not mean that the body remains continuously braced. Constant tension would remove the very quality that makes the shock possible. A rope that is already stretched to its limit cannot snap taut again. There must be sufficient release for a sudden transition to occur. The trained body therefore moves between two conditions: a released but organised state in which the fascial connections remain continuous, and a brief unified state in which those connections become suddenly taut.

This rapid transition is central to Geng Tan. The power does not need to travel through the body as a long sequence. The body has already been connected through hanging power. When the change occurs, the whole structure participates in the shock.

Traditional teachers sometimes used stark images to convey intensity. One such image compares the body to a figure dropping at the end of a noose. When the support is removed, the body falls freely until the slack disappears from the rope. At that moment the rope snaps taut and the falling body is checked violently. The initial shock produces a brief whole-body recoil in which the tendons and connective structures brace against the sudden force.

It is the instant of becoming taut, not the hanging itself, that provides the relevant metaphor. The structure begins in a relatively released condition; the force arrives suddenly; tension is distributed through the connected body; the whole frame reacts at once; and the initial shock produces a rebound. This is closely related to the action sought in Geng Tan. The Mantis body is trained so that it can pass from organised release into sudden unified tension and recoil without needing a large preparatory movement.

Opening and Closing Occur Naturally

The second half of the line follows directly from the first: 開合自然—opening and closing occur naturally.

Natural opening and closing become possible because the body is already suspended and connected.

If the shoulders hold the arms locally, every opening and closing action must be manufactured through the muscles of the arms and chest. The movement may resemble the external shape of the method, but it does not pass freely through the whole body.

When the arms hang from the back and the back is connected through the torso and legs into the ground, opening and closing can occur throughout the complete structure. The limbs express changes that are taking place everywhere at once.

“Natural” does not mean untrained or casual. It means that, through training, the relationships have become so deeply established that they no longer have to be assembled consciously each time. The practitioner does not activate the ribs, then move the elbows, then adjust the spine and finally engage the legs. The body opens as one action and closes as one action.

Hanging power provides the continuity that makes this possible. The first line therefore contains the foundation of the entire verse. It explains how the arms are connected to the body, how the body is organised between the ground and the crown, how released fascia permits simultaneous sinking and rising, and how the connected structure can suddenly snap taut to produce Geng Tan.

Discussion on the full verse is available to our paid subscribers below…

Read more

Iron Body, Iron Shirt and Golden Bell training are often presented as methods of external hardening: repeated impact is used to desensitise an area, strengthen local tissues or demonstrate the ability to withstand punishment. External conditioning of this kind exists and can be effective. However, it does not explain the central idea of Iron Body as it was understood by practitioners of the older generation.

Read more

Doi Jong is a general category of paired training. The familiar Southern Mantis exercise in which two practitioners meet using both arms is more precisely called 雙樁 — Soeng Jong, the double-arm drill. Over time, many schools have simply called this fundamental exercise “Doi Jong,” causing the broader category to become confused with one of its component drills.

Read more

Abstract

Southern Chinese martial arts are frequently explained through a kinetic-chain model in which force originates at the ground and travels sequentially through the feet, legs, waist, spine, shoulders, and arms. While useful for certain systems, this model does not adequately describe the Southern Mantis method transmitted by Wong Keung from Ip Shui and Chu Kwong Wah.

Read more

Here is the full list of the boxing maxims I have received over the years.

Read more

Among the kuen kuit preserved within our Southern Praying Mantis are two remarkably similar statements:

手從心口發 / Sau cung sam hau faat — The hand issues from the chest. and, 手從心發 / Sau cung sam faat — The hand issues from the heart.

At first sight these might appear to be two versions of essentially the same maxim, with the second simply shortening the fir…

Read more

There is a point in long practice when you stop having to remember certain things.

At the beginning, almost everything requires conscious attention. You learn where to place the foot, how to hold the hand, when to breathe, and what comes next. You receive an instruction, attempt to reproduce it, lose some part of it, are corrected, and you try again.

For a long time, practice can feel like an accumulation of things you are attempting not to forget.

Then, gradually, some of those instructions disappear.

You haven’t forgotten them, you just no longer need to remember them.

Something that once existed as an external instruction has become part of the way you move, respond and perceive. You can now recognise that something is wrong before you can explain why, and you can make an adjustment without consciously issuing the instruction that originally taught you to make it.

But perhaps the more interesting transformation happens beyond the practice itself.

After enough years, some of what you have learned begins to appear elsewhere.

You recognise the same patterns in work, relationships, teaching, creative difficulty, ageing, and uncertainty. The circumstances are different, but something underneath them is familiar.

The practice has been teaching you more than the practice.

Learning consequence

One of the things sustained physical practice gives us is repeated contact with consequence.

You can believe you are balanced, but the movement tells you otherwise, or you can believe you are relaxed while holding unnecessary tension.

You can insist that you understand an instruction, then discover under pressure that you cannot yet do it.

So much of ordinary life allows us to remain inside our explanations of ourselves.

Practice is less accommodating.

Something happens when intention repeatedly meets results, and over time, you become more interested in the gap between what you meant to do and what actually happened.

That habit of attention can follow you elsewhere.

You notice that good intentions do not guarantee good effects. That wanting to be patient is different from behaving patiently when frustrated, or that believing yourself to be open to correction is different from what happens inside you when someone actually corrects you.

The practice has not supplied a philosophy of life.

It has simply made a particular discrepancy very familiar: the distance between what we think we are doing and what we are actually doing.

Once you have learned to look for that distance in one place, it becomes harder not to see it in others.

Learning not to rush

Many things in practice cannot be hurried without changing what is being learned.

You can practise more frequently, pay closer attention, or even find better instruction. All of these may help.

But some understanding still requires accumulation.

The nervous system needs experience, perception develops through comparison, judgement through encounters with variation, and the body needs time to understand what the mind may have grasped almost immediately.

This can be frustrating, particularly when we are accustomed to acquiring information quickly.

You understand the explanation. Why can’t you do it?

Understanding the explanation was only the beginning.

Long practice makes this distinction difficult to ignore. It teaches us, repeatedly, that recognising an idea and being formed by it are not the same thing.

There are things in life we cannot think our way into more quickly. Trust. Judgement. Taste. Patience. The ability to teach. Knowing when to intervene and when to leave something alone.

Information may assist all of these. But none can be downloaded whole.

Some things become available only after we have lived through enough examples.

Learning to be corrected

Correction is another ordinary feature of serious practice.

At first, we often experience it personally.

We have tried hard, thought we were improving, and then someone points out that the shoulder is still rising, the timing is still late, or the structure is still collapsing in the same place.

It can feel like being told we have failed.

Eventually, if we stay with the practice, our relationship with correction may change.

The correction just becomes useful information.

This does not mean ego disappears. Nor does a long-term practitioner become immune to embarrassment or defensiveness. But repeated correction gives us opportunities to recognise those responses.

We begin to notice how quickly the mind protects its existing picture of itself.

We may explain, justify or focus on what we did correctly, but ultimately we still have to try again.

Over the years, this can create a particular familiarity with being wrong, not because we come to enjoy it or adopt a false humility, but because we become less threatened by the experience of having our understanding corrected.

We come to understand that being wrong is not only survivable but often necessary, and that is no small lesson to carry into the rest of life.

Learning the difference between force and effectiveness

Beginners often add effort when something is not working.

We push harder, tighten more, move faster, or try to make the technique happen.

Sometimes more effort is required, but often, it is not.

With experience, you begin to discover that difficulty is not always solved by increasing force. The problem may be timing, position, attention or understanding.

This becomes something the body knows before it becomes an idea, and then, perhaps, you begin noticing how often the same instinct appears elsewhere.

When a conversation is not going well, we tend to explain more; when a piece of work is stuck, we add more; when someone does not understand us, we become more emphatic; and when a plan begins to fail, we often commit to it even harder.

Long practice can make us suspicious of unnecessary effort.

Not of effort itself, as serious practice requires plenty of it. But of the assumption that more force is always the answer.

Sometimes the harder lesson is to discover what is actually preventing the thing from working.

Learning to remain when progress becomes invisible

Early progress is often easy to recognise: the beginner learns something they could not do the week before, new material arrives frequently and improvement is clearly visible, but as practice deepens, the changes become smaller and harder to see.

Months may pass around a problem that refuses to resolve and progress becomes difficult to measure, and sometimes you appear to become worse because your perception has improved faster than your ability.

This is one of the stranger experiences of long practice.

You can feel less competent precisely because you have become capable of seeing more.

At the beginning, you did not know enough to recognise the problem. Now you can see it everywhere.

If you stay, your relationship with progress has to change.

You become less dependent on constant evidence that you are improving. You learn that some periods of practice are primarily periods of accumulation. Nothing dramatic seems to be happening, yet distinctions are being refined, errors are becoming visible and judgement is quietly forming.

Life too contains many periods like this.

Parenting. Teaching. Writing. Building a body of work. Learning how to live with another person. Recovering from mistakes. Becoming someone others can depend upon.

The important changes are not always accompanied by the feeling of progress.

Practice gives us somewhere relatively contained in which to learn that.

The craft begins to reveal the practitioner

Perhaps this is where long practice becomes most interesting.

We begin by studying the craft, but eventually, the craft begins showing us ourselves.

Impatience appears in the way we practise. So does vanity.

Practice reveals our desire to be seen as competent, our tendency to avoid what exposes our weaknesses, our attraction to complexity when the fundamentals become familiar, how we respond to those who learn faster than we do, and whether we are willing to return to something we thought we had already understood.

These qualities were not created by the practice. The practice simply gives them somewhere to appear repeatedly, and repetition makes patterns difficult to dismiss as accidents.

You realise that the way you respond when a technique refuses to work may resemble the way you respond when other parts of life refuse to cooperate.

We begin to recognise the desire to force or abandon what is not working, to search for something new instead of staying with the difficulty, our irritation with correction, and the temptation to blame the conditions rather than examine what we are doing.

Once recognised, these patterns become available for examination.

Not because the practice has given you an answer, but because it has given you a mirror with consequences.

What becomes innate

Innate may not be quite the right word for something acquired through years of practice. But it describes something important about how the change eventually feels.

You no longer have to translate everything into principles.

You have encountered certain patterns so many times that you recognise their shape, and you know that forcing something can make it less responsive.

You also know that understanding often arrives after a period in which nothing seems to be happening, and that correction can feel like regression when your perception becomes more exacting.

You know that what appears simple may contain years of refinement, and that the visible result rarely reveals the work that formed it.

These are no longer merely ideas you agree with.

You have met them physically, repeatedly, and under changing conditions.

Ideas are relatively easy to admire. It is much harder to remain with them when they become inconvenient.

It is practice that tests them.

A way of recognising

Perhaps this is what a long practice eventually gives us.

Not necessarily answers about life, and certainly not wisdom by default.

It is something quieter: a growing capacity to recognise.

Through practice, we become familiar with the patterns of impatience and unnecessary force, the temptation to appear competent rather than expose what we do not know, the confusion that often precedes understanding, and the years of effort that can lie behind something that eventually looks effortless.

The situations change, but their underlying shapes become familiar.

This may be why lessons from a serious practice can become difficult to confine to the studio, workshop, training hall or page. Years of repetition have trained more than a particular skill. They have trained attention.

We begin by learning where to put the foot, how to hold the tool, how to hear the phrase or make the movement, believing we are simply practising the thing in front of us. But through years of repetition and correction, success and failure, we are also developing a way of meeting what we do not yet understand, and eventually that way of meeting things comes with us.

The practice has entered the practitioner, and the practitioner returns to life able to see something they could not see before.

Two-man combat technique drills and bridge work are not merely technical exercises for blocking, striking, trapping, or controlling an opponent’s arms. They are progressive methods of training the body to function as one interconnected unit under pressure. They draw out the qualities developed during solo Sarm Bo Jin training and develop their function against an opponent.

An outline of the progressive stages a student should pass through when developing two-man drills can be stated as:

Lose your own strength → become free of the opponent’s strength → borrow the opponent’s strength → finally add your own strength to theirs.

This progression maps clearly onto the development of hand skill and assists in the functional development and understanding of the five stages of power refinement in Southern Mantis:

* 粗勁 Cho Geng — build the foundation
* 暗勁 Um Geng — hide the preparation
* 驚彈 Geng Tan — contract the whole body in an instant
* 彈上彈 Tarn Sern Tarn — rebound without resetting
* 反彈驚彈 Farn Tarn Geng Tan — receive, return, and shock without interruption

Read more

形勢要守 / Ying Sai Yiu Sau - Form and Disposition Must Be Guarded

Literal breakdown:

形 / ying - form, shape, bodily configuration, or outward structure

勢 / sai - disposition, configuration, position, momentum, tendency, strategic advantage

要 / yiu - must; it is necessary to

守 / sau - guard, preserve, hold, maintain, defend

I interpret this maxim 形勢要守 as “Form and disposition must be guarded.” At its most immediate level it concerns the body: maintain correct organisation and preserve the advantageous condition that arises from it. Yet the saying contains progressive layers of meaning. What begins as postural advice deepens into a principle for meeting pressure, uncertainty and change, first in combat, then in ordinary life.

These levels may be stated simply as: the beginner must maintain correct Form and position.

In a combative sense, preserve organisation and do not surrender the advantageous potential of the situation. On an internal sense, do not allow external circumstances to make you abandon the principles that should organise you. And finally from a philosophical view, remain faithful to the Form while adapting continuously to the changing world.

Let’s walk through this progression.

形 / Ying of the visible body is only the manifestation

形 / Ying - Form is first encountered as something visible. The teacher says: keep the head here, sink the shoulders, gather the elbows, settle the waist, organise the stance, guard the centre. The student naturally believes the lesson is about making the body conform to a particular shape.

This is unavoidable in the beginning. The external shape, however, is only the entrance.

The deeper lesson is that the physical body is being organised according to an underlying Form. The teacher’s posture is not correct merely because the teacher stands that way; it is correct because it expresses relationships appropriate to the human body, gravity, force, balance and the martial task at hand.

The practitioner does not invent the ideal organisation of his body and mind. He attempts to apprehend it and increasingly express it. In the traditional Chinese understanding, the ultimate principle is not created by the teacher either. Correct organisation ultimately reflects 道 / Dao, the underlying order of nature.

The teacher recognises and transmits. The student progressively discovers. Neither invents the underlying principles.

The student therefore begins by copying a visible shape, but through practice gradually recognises the Form that gives rise to the shape, and eventually the principle behind the Form.

The progression is clear:

Copy the shape. Understand the Form. Apprehend the principle. Allow the principle to organise the action.

That movement already carries the training beyond mere technique.

意 / Yi - gives Form to the body

This understanding places 意 / Yi - intent in its proper position. Intent is not simply the thought, “I am going to punch.” It is the organising activity of mind.

However, 意 / Yi does not create the Form. Rather, it apprehends, holds and directs the body towards the Form that is being sought. An idea of correct organisation precedes the completed physical expression, and intent progressively brings the body into conformity with it.

The head, spine, ribs, pelvis, elbows, hands and legs do not ideally operate as independent pieces later assembled into a movement. There is first one intention. The body responds to that intention as one organised event.

This is why internal martial training progressively moves away from micromanaging individual parts. Initially the instruction is: “Put the elbow here.” Later it becomes: “Maintain the centre.”

Later still, one intention may organise the entire body.

The Form becomes embodied through intent.

Thus 守形 / Sau Ying — guarding the Form has an internal dimension from the beginning. It is not merely guarding the geometry of the body. It is guarding the clarity of intention that allows the body to remain faithful to the correct organisation.

The novice initially believes that 守 / Sau means preserving a shape. However, with experience, he understands that what must be preserved are the concepts and principles that give a give shape or posture its function, not the superficial external appearance. Over time, the practitioner moves only under the influence of expressing the principle.

The objective of guarding progressively moves from the visible to the invisible: from posture, to organisation, to intention, to principle.

勢 — what arises from correct Form

Our Form interacts with circumstances. 勢 / Sai can describe disposition, tendency, momentum, strategic potential or the developing configuration of a situation.

My body has a particular organisation and the opponent has another. Between us there is distance, direction, pressure, momentum, balance, intent, fear, opportunity and obstruction. All of this produces 勢 / Sai. It is not something belonging exclusively to either person. It arises from the relationship between both people and the circumstances continuously developing between them.

We might say: 形 / Ying is the organisation the practitioner embodies; 勢 / Sai is the potential that emerges when that organisation meets the world, the opponents bridge.

Correct Form creates possibilities, poor Form removes them.

If the body is correctly organised and the opponent presses, his pressure may become something usable. If the organisation of our body and coherent understanding of the principles and concepts collapses, the same pressure becomes a threat. The external event has not necessarily changed. The relationship to it has and this is one of the great lessons of martial arts.

守 - what are we really guarding?

This brings us to perhaps the deepest character in the saying: 守 / Sau - to guard, preserve, maintain or remain faithful.

At first the student guards posture. Then centre. Then balance. Then the advantageous relationship with the opponent. Eventually the question becomes: What within ourselves causes us to abandon the Form? This is where our training turns inward.

The opponent pushes and fear arises; the body stiffens and Form disappears. The opponent suddenly retreats and greed appears; the student chases and Form disappears. The desire to strike harder produces over-extension. Anger raises the breathing, tightens the shoulders and narrows perception. Concern with winning leads to forcing what is not present. In each case the external opponent has exposed an internal one.

A technique teaches what to do to another person. An art eventually teaches what happens inside oneself while attempting to do it.

These two dimensions are not sequential replacements. They coexist. Many practitioners may remain primarily concerned with technique for a long time, while the deeper questions gradually become available through training, where the opponent becomes a mirror

Serious partner training is essential because they can place our internal organisation under uncertainty in a way that our solo practice cannot.

It is easy to remain relaxed when nothing is happening. It is easy to maintain structure when no one disturbs it. It is easy to believe one is centred when no threat is present. But pressure reveals the truth. Our training partner, our opponent therefore functions as a mirror. He shows where tension arises, where fear, impatience or greed appears, where disconnection occurs, and where principle is abandoned in pursuit of an immediate result.

But the partner is more than a diagnostic mirror. His pressure does not merely reveal our faults; it provides the environment in which correct organisation can become embodied. We learn stability because something attempts to disturb us. We learn to receive because something is sent. We learn not to chase and ask for power incorrectly because pressure is suddenly removed.

We learn to preserve organisation because another body continually alters the circumstances in which that organisation must survive.

From this perspective, our training partner, the opponent, is not merely something to defeat. He is both the circumstance through which the quality of 守 is tested and the training instrument through which it is progressively developed.

形勢要守 in Southern Mantis

This reading fits Southern Praying Mantis particularly well because its preferred training environment places the practitioner directly into pressure. Bridge contact supplies immediate information. He will push, pulls, change angle, jams my bridge, or suddenly remove pressure. Throughout all of this, the requirements of my body must be retained. A sudden release of pressure, for example, invites the student to over-extend and chase. A sharp change of angle tempts the structure to collapse in the attempt to follow.

The lesson here is not merely: “Can I stop his technique?” It is: “Can I remain myself while he is trying to change me?” This is a more profound question.

The Six Requirements, the Three Prohibitions, guarding the centre, receiving and issuing, all can be understood as methods of preserving Form under changing conditions.

The encounter continually creates 勢 / Sai. The practitioner’s responsibility is to recognise and use that changing situation without abandoning 守 / Sau.

It is important to not conflate guarding to clinging. To guard the Form does not mean refusing to change. The opposite is true. If the situation alters and the last shape we made is rigidly preserved, the Form itself has already been abandoned. Our outward configuration must continually adapt.

This produces an apparent paradox that is central to the maxim: To preserve the Form, the shape must be allowed to change. The bridge changes. Our stance changes. Pressure and angles change. The distance changes. Yet something essential continues. We preserve principles, not geometry. Here martial practice approaches the broader Daoist understanding of responding naturally to circumstances without losing the underlying principle.

A novice preserves position. The deeper practitioner preserves principle.

This is why an advanced practitioner may outwardly depart from the appearance of the beginner’s posture while remaining completely faithful to the Form behind it. The beginner guards the template because the template is still his principal access to the method. The more experienced practitioner seeks to remain faithful to the principle.

Ultimately physical combat is simply an unusually intense laboratory. Most people meet the same problem daily. Circumstances apply pressure: an insult, a setback, sudden success, fatigue, fear, threat, ambition or uncertainty. Each creates a 勢 / Sai, a developing momentum that attempts to pull us away from our own organisation.

The same question continuously arises: Can I respond to changing circumstances without abandoning the principles by which I intend to live?

Now 形勢要守 / Form and Disposition Must Be Guarded has left the boxing hall.

The person who remains calm only while nothing challenges him has not truly developed calmness. The person who is principled only when there is no cost has not tested his principles.

The martial student who possesses beautiful structure until someone hits him has not yet embodied the Form. Pressure reveals what has genuinely become part of us.

Martial Arts rather than martial techniques

Martial technique asks: How do I strike? How do I throw? How do I defend? How do I overcome this opponent?

Martial Art eventually asks: What happens to my mind when pressure arrives? Can intention remain clear? Can the body remain organised? Can I change without becoming scattered? Can I act decisively without becoming reckless? Can I receive force without immediately fighting against it? Can I issue power without emptying myself? Can I preserve the centre when circumstances invite me to abandon it?

A physical opponent makes these questions impossible to answer merely intellectually. Our answer must be embodied.

This may be one of the deepest meanings available in 形勢要守.

At the beginner’s level: Maintain correct Form and position.

At the combative level: Preserve organisation and do not surrender the advantageous potential of the situation.

At the internal level: Do not allow external circumstances to make you abandon the principle that should organise you.

At the philosophical level: Remain faithful to the Form while adapting continuously to the changing world.

The purpose of Form is not ultimately to produce a beautiful posture. It is to train recognition and embodiment of an underlying order while everything around us changes.

The study of martial arts can begin with learning where to put the hands and eventually become an enquiry into how a human being should meet pressure, uncertainty and conflict.

The opponent initially appears to stand in front of us. With sufficient training we discover how much of the real combat was taking place within us all along.

Leave a comment

拳打千遍，其理自現 / Kuen Da Chin Pin, Kei Leih Jih Yihn - Practise the Fist a Thousand Times, and Its Principle Will Reveal Itself

A common rendering of this traditional martial maxim is: “Practise the fist a thousand times, and its principle will naturally reveal itself.”

On the surface, this appears to be another expression of the familiar idea that practice makes perfect. Repeat something often enough and eventually you will become good at it. But this interpretation misses much of what the saying has to offer.

The maxim is not simply about repetition. It is about the relationship between correct practice, experience and understanding.

A Thousand Correct Repetitions

The first point must be made very clearly: what is practised a thousand times must be fundamentally correct. Repetition itself has no intelligence. If we practise an incorrect movement once, we have made a mistake. If we practise that same mistake a thousand times, we have trained it. The nervous system does not distinguish between a useful habit and an undesirable one simply because we call what we are doing “practice.” It becomes better at reproducing what we repeatedly ask it to do.

Therefore 拳打千遍 / Practise the Fist a Thousand Times, and Its Principle Will Reveal Itself, should never be interpreted as an instruction for mindless repetition. Correct traditional training contains a continuous process of practice, observation, correction and refinement. The teacher establishes the method, the student attempts to reproduce it, faults are identified and corrected, and the student returns to practice with a slightly clearer understanding. This process repeats itself again and again.

The thousand repetitions are therefore not necessarily a thousand identical repetitions. Ideally, repetition number one hundred is more refined than repetition number ten, and repetition number one thousand contains qualities that the student was incapable of expressing at the beginning. The outward movement may appear much the same, but what is happening within it has progressively changed.

The Principle Was There From the Beginning

The most interesting part of the saying is perhaps not 千遍 / a thousand repetitions, but 其理自現 / “its principle naturally reveals itself.” The important word here is 理 / léih: principle, underlying logic, inherent order or reason. The saying does not suggest that the thousand repetitions somehow create the principle.

The principle is there from the beginning. Indeed, the teacher may have explained it clearly during the student’s first lesson. Keep this relationship between the joints. Maintain this direction. Do not collapse here. Release this unnecessary tension. Receive the pressure in this manner. Do not sacrifice this position in order to create more apparent power. The student hears these instructions and may intellectually understand every word. But intellectual comprehension is not yet physical understanding.

This is one of the difficulties inherent in teaching sophisticated physical skills. The teacher can provide the answer long before the student’s body possesses sufficient experience to understand why that answer is correct.

Information Is Not Yet Knowledge

When first learning a martial art, much of what we possess is borrowed knowledge. We know something because our teacher has told us. This is necessary. Without guidance we would spend enormous amounts of time rediscovering things that generations before us have already investigated. A traditional martial art is, in this sense, accumulated information handed from one generation to another. But the purpose of training is not simply to memorise that information.

We have to make it our own. Suppose the teacher explains a particular structural principle. Initially the student tries to reproduce the position because the teacher has said that it is correct. After some time training, the student begins to notice what happens when the position is lost. After further practice, the same principle appears while striking. Later it appears while receiving pressure, etc The student has not necessarily been given a new principle on each occasion. Rather, the same principle has been encountered repeatedly under different conditions.

Gradually its significance becomes clearer.

Looking at the Same Thing From a Thousand Angles

This is why “a thousand repetitions” should perhaps be understood as more than simply counting movements. During prolonged correct training, we effectively examine the same subject from hundreds of different perspectives. We feel what happens when we perform it correctly and when we get it slightly wrong.

We experience the correction. and encounter resistance. We discover when we are asking for power, where unnecessary effort appears. We find circumstances in which our understanding works and circumstances in which it fails and we watch other students struggle with the same problem.

Maybe we eventually, begin trying to teach it to others and discover that having to explain a principle exposes aspects of our own understanding that remain incomplete.

Each of these experiences is another way of looking at the same thing. Eventually we reach a point where the conclusion seems unavoidable, and this produces one of the most interesting experiences in long-term martial arts training. “I Have Discovered Something” After studying something for a sufficiently long period, an understanding can arise that feels entirely personal.

Suddenly we recognise a relationship that we had not previously seen.

We think: “Ah. Now I understand what is happening” and it can feel as though we have discovered something, and in an important sense, we have.

Nobody can give another person physical experience. The teacher can guide us towards it, correct our errors and save us from unnecessary detours, but eventually we must make the journey ourselves. We approach the subject from so many directions that our conclusions no longer feel like something we have been told. It feels like our own knowledge.

Then comes the amusing, and sometimes humbling, part. We realise that what we have apparently discovered is precisely what the teacher told us at the beginning. The words have not changed. We have changed.

其理自現 / The Principle Reveals Itself. This gives 自現 / jih yihn — “naturally appears” or “reveals itself” particular significance. The teacher does not necessarily need to continually provide more and more information. Sometimes what the student needs is not another explanation. They need more correct experience.

The answer has already been given. What is missing is the accumulated physical understanding necessary to recognise the depth of that answer.

Correct repetition gradually supplies this. What was initially an instruction becomes a sensation.

The sensation becomes recognisable. What is recognisable can be reproduced. What can be reproduced can be tested. What survives testing begins to become understanding.

Eventually the practitioner no longer needs to remember the teacher’s instruction in order to perform the principle. The principle has become embodied within the way they move. This is very different from simply becoming skilled at copying a movement.

The Role of the Teacher

There is another important lesson contained within the maxim. If correct repetition is essential, then the teacher’s role during the early stages of training becomes enormously important. The teacher is not merely providing techniques. They are attempting to ensure that the student spends their thousands of repetitions travelling in the correct direction. A small error left uncorrected can eventually become a large obstacle precisely because repetition is so powerful. Traditional training therefore often appears repetitive from the outside. The student returns repeatedly to foundational exercises, in our case Warm Bo Jin, Chy Sau Dot Jong, methods that we have already “learned.”

But learning the sequence is not the same as exhausting what the sequence has to teach. The beginner performs the exercise to learn the exercise. The intermediate student uses the exercise to investigate the body. The experienced practitioner may use exactly the same exercise to examine increasingly subtle relationships of structure, timing, pressure, intention and power.

The exercise has not necessarily changed, but the practitioner has developed the ability to see more within it.

Returning to the Beginning

This also explains a phenomenon familiar to anyone who has trained seriously for many years: advanced practice often brings us back to the beginning.

We return constantly to Sarm Bo Jin and the first principles our teacher gave us. Yet, over time, we no longer look at it with the eyes of a beginner. Something that once seemed simple now contains layers of information that we were incapable of recognising when it was first taught.

This is one of the great values of prolonged correct training. It changes our relationship with apparently simple material. We stop constantly searching for something new and begin discovering more within what we already possess.

The old saying therefore contains considerably more than an encouragement to work hard.

拳打千遍，其理自現 / Practise the Fist a Thousand Times, and Its Principle Will Reveal Itself,

describes the transformation of instruction into personal knowledge. The principle is present from the first repetition. The teacher may even give us the answer at the beginning. But through correct practice, correction, testing, failure, refinement and countless repetitions, we gradually acquire the experience necessary to understand why that answer is correct.

Eventually, with some luck, the teacher’s knowledge becomes our knowledge. What we were once told becomes something we have personally discovered. And what appeared to be hidden was, in fact, standing in front of us from the very beginning.

The thousand repetitions do not create the principle.

They allow us to finally see it.

Leave a comment

The internet has made us unusually interested in exceptional outcomes.

The viral post, the breakthrough article, the person who suddenly seems to be everywhere, the single opportunity that changes everything.

I understand the attraction. I’ve watched things we’ve created reach far more people than we expected, and it is exciting when it happens. But the more time I spend making things, teaching, training and watching other people learn, the less convinced I am that these moments tell us very much about how anything worthwhile is actually built.

Most of it happens on fairly ordinary days.

I’ve spent most of my life in dance, where you become accustomed to doing things repeatedly. You don’t expect every class to contain a revelation. Sometimes you leave feeling as though you’ve made enormous progress; sometimes you spend an hour working on something you’ve been doing for twenty years and wonder why it still needs attention.

Martial arts has been much the same.

There are things I understand now that I could have been told years ago, and probably was. I simply wasn’t capable of understanding them in the same way then because I didn’t have the experience to attach them to.

I think that’s one of the things we misunderstand about repetition. We tend to imagine that if we’ve already been shown something, understood the explanation and can reproduce it reasonably well, we’ve learned it.

But knowing something and having lived with it for long enough to recognise it in different circumstances are very different things.

What consistency actually gives us

We’re told constantly now that consistency is important. Particularly online.

Show up. Keep going. Don’t quit.

There is obviously some truth in that, but I’ve never particularly liked the suggestion that persistence on its own is enough. I’ve taught too long to believe that.

Someone can attend class every week and avoid the correction they most need to make. A martial artist can train for decades without questioning habits that have become comfortable. A writer can publish every day and become extremely efficient at saying very little.

Time doesn’t automatically deepen anything.

What matters is what you’re doing while the time passes.

The useful kind of consistency keeps bringing you back into contact with the thing you’re trying to understand. You try something, see what happens, make an adjustment and try again. Sometimes the adjustment is tiny. Sometimes you realise you’ve been approaching the whole thing incorrectly.

After enough of this, you begin to notice things you couldn’t notice at the beginning.

I see this constantly with dancers. A beginner needs quite obvious corrections because they are still trying to organise the larger pieces. Years later, the corrections can become so small that someone watching from outside might wonder whether anything has changed at all. But the dancer can feel the difference.

Their judgement has developed alongside their ability, and I think judgement may be one of the most valuable things practice gives us.

You begin to know what matters and what can be left alone. You recognise when something needs more work and when you’re simply interfering with it. You become better at distinguishing between something that is genuinely difficult and something you’ve made unnecessarily complicated.

Perhaps most importantly, your questions change.

That interests me much more now than accumulating answers.

A year of doing the work

Michael and I spent much of the last year helping with the European Chow Gar Association’s online presence. Between us, we researched, wrote articles and posted every day, and over that period the page grew to more than 11,000 followers.

I’m proud of that, but I’m reluctant to turn it into a story about growing a Facebook page because that isn’t really what I’ve taken from the experience.

What stays with me is how much we learned simply because we were doing the work every day.

We couldn’t have known at the beginning what we knew a year later.

We learned which subjects opened up interesting conversations and which didn’t. We learned that something we assumed would interest people sometimes passed almost unnoticed, while a subject we hadn’t thought particularly significant could prompt an enormous response.

We became better at judging what needed a full article and what could be said simply. We learned more about writing, presentation and communicating specialist material to people with very different levels of experience.

Inevitably, we got things wrong.

That’s important too.

There is a kind of knowledge that only becomes available after you’ve made enough decisions to discover the consequences of them. You can’t read your way into all of it. At some point you have to make something, put it into the world and find out.

We are bringing all of that experience with us now as we build The Long Practice.

Not because we have found a formula that worked once and intend to repeat it. In fact, I think that would miss the lesson entirely.

We are different because of having done it.

The temptation to skip the ordinary part

Perhaps this is why I find our fascination with breakthroughs increasingly strange.

They make good stories because they give us a moment we can point to. Before this happened, things were one way. Afterwards, they were another.

Real development is usually much messier.

A dancer finally performs something they have struggled with for months and it looks as though something has suddenly clicked. Perhaps it has. But that moment contains all the failed attempts that came before it.

A martial principle suddenly makes sense after years of practice. The words may be exactly the same words the practitioner heard as a beginner. What changed was the person hearing them.

Something you create suddenly finds an audience. From the outside, the growth can look remarkably quick. From the inside, you remember all the work nobody saw.

I don’t think the exceptional moment is false. I think we misunderstand where it comes from.

We notice the moment because that’s when the change becomes visible.

The change itself may have been happening quietly for a very long time.

Long doesn’t necessarily mean deep

There is another side to this that matters to me, particularly when we’re talking about something called The Long Practice.

I don’t want “long” to become romanticised.

Doing something for a long time is not inherently admirable. Nor does longevity make someone correct.

I’ve met people in both dance and martial arts who have accumulated an enormous amount of experience, and I’ve also seen how easily experience can harden into habit. We can become so accustomed to our way of doing something that we stop examining it.

So when I talk about long practice, I don’t mean waiting patiently for the years themselves to bestow wisdom upon us.

I mean staying in a relationship with the work for long enough that it continues to challenge what we think we know.

That requires attention. It requires correction. Sometimes it requires another person telling us something we’d rather not hear.

And it requires enough humility to admit that twenty years spent doing something does not make the twenty-first year unnecessary.

In some ways, it makes it more interesting.

Beginning again

The Long Practice is still very young.

After helping to build an audience elsewhere, it would be easy to become preoccupied with how quickly we can do it again.

But I don’t really want to build the same thing again.

I want to know what this becomes.

I wonder what Michael’s writing will look like after he has written a hundred essays. Not because the hundredth will necessarily be better than the tenth, but because writing forces you to examine what you think you know. Trying to explain an embodied idea precisely enough for another person to understand it has a way of exposing the gaps in your own understanding.

I’m curious about what questions that process will produce.

I’m curious about what I’ll discover too, as things I’ve learned through a lifetime in dance begin to sit alongside three decades of teaching, art, law study, martial arts training, creativity and everything else I’ve picked up and changed my mind about along the way.

There will be articles hardly anyone reads. There will probably be ideas we return to later and realise we didn’t quite understand yet. There will be things that work unexpectedly well and others we’re convinced will work that don’t.

I know that now.

A year of making something every day taught me not to be quite so frightened of the ordinary days.

They are where you find out what the work actually is.

Perhaps that’s the part we lose when we’re constantly looking towards exceptional outcomes. We’re so busy watching for the moment when something becomes visibly successful that we overlook what is happening while it isn’t.

The practice is changing.

Our judgement is changing.

We are changing.

Often none of it is particularly obvious while it’s happening.

Then one day we look back and realise we’re no longer standing where we began.

The result may eventually become visible. The formation has usually been happening quietly for much longer.

人過我橋三分險 / Yan Gwo Ngo Kiu, Saam Fan Him - Once the opponent crosses my bridge, danger has entered.

Literal Breakdown

人 — person; the opponent

過 — to pass, cross, or go beyond

我 — me; my

橋 — bridge

三分 — three parts; three degrees; to a significant measure

險 — danger; peril

Very literally: “A person crosses my bridge — three parts danger.”

A smoother martial rendering is: “Once the opponent crosses my bridge, danger has entered.”

三分 does not literally mean “three forms of danger.” 分 indicates a portion, degree or measure, so 三分 is best understood as “three parts” or “three degrees.” Within the martial interpretation of the saying, these three degrees map naturally onto the principal divisions of the arm bridge: wrist, elbow and shoulder.

An opponent who reaches or controls the wrist has begun to penetrate the bridge. Progress to the elbow deepens the entry. Movement toward the shoulder brings the opponent to the threshold of the body itself.

Wrist - elbow - shoulder - body.

The further the opponent advances across the bridge, the less distance, time and defensive structure remain between him and the centre.

Martial Meaning

In Southern Chinese martial language, 橋 (kiu) is not merely an anatomical term for the forearm. The arm becomes a living bridge, a physical and tactical boundary between the body and whatever approaches it. Once the opponent crosses, penetrates or bypasses that bridge, the external distance collapses.

At longer range, distance itself provides time. The eyes can observe, footwork can adjust position, and there is greater opportunity to evade or intercept. As the opponent enters bridge range those margins shrink. Once the bridge is crossed, visual information becomes secondary and tactile information becomes primary. The practitioner must now read position, pressure, intention and structural change directly through contact.

This is the preferred working range of many Southern Chinese systems, including Tong Long Kuen and Wing Chun Kuen; similar principles appear in Taijiquan and other Chinese martial traditions. The bridge is crossed deliberately when attacking; allowing one’s own bridge to be crossed without control places the body in progressive danger.

Three Degrees of Danger

The wrist forms the outer portion of the bridge, the elbow a deeper structural point, and the shoulder the final major articulation before the torso. Control of the wrist grants limited access. Control or passage of the elbow grants considerably more. Progress beyond the elbow toward the shoulder places the body itself in immediate vulnerability.

The saying therefore describes a progressive loss of defensive space. The deeper the penetration, the greater the danger.

Who Is Actually in Danger?

Like many classical martial sayings, 人過我橋三分險 carries a useful ambiguity. It can be read as danger to oneself because the bridge has been penetrated. It can equally be read as danger to the opponent, who by crossing the bridge has entered the range in which one is trained to control and strike.

This dual meaning is especially significant in Southern Praying Mantis. The bridge is simultaneously a defensive boundary and a means of drawing the opponent into the system’s preferred fighting distance. If the opponent crosses on his own terms, one is in danger. If the contact has been deliberately accepted, intercepted, captured or controlled, the opponent may have entered precisely the range where the art is most effective. The bridge is both shield and gateway.

The Bridge in Southern Praying Mantis

In Tong Long Kuen, particularly the Hakka branches (Chow Gar, Chu Gar, Kwongsai Jook Lum, Iron Ox and related lines), the bridge is the primary interface through which information is gathered, position is controlled and short-range power is delivered. The forearm functions as a living connection, both sensor and weapon.

Once contact is established, pressure reveals direction, changes in tension reveal intention, and the relative positions of elbow and shoulder expose structural weakness. Movement through the bridge indicates whether the opponent is advancing, withdrawing, collapsing, resisting or changing direction. Contact is never maintained merely for sensitivity; it must produce advantage. The practitioner sticks when appropriate, but also presses, jams, cuts, redirects, traps, occupies and strikes. The bridge listens while simultaneously protecting the centre, disrupting the opponent’s structure and creating the pathway for power.

In Southern Mantis the bridge is not passive contact. It is an active working relationship between two structures.

Contact and Control

At close range, controlled bridge contact reduces uncertainty. Rather than relying solely on visual identification of every small movement, the practitioner feels changes directly through the opponent’s limbs and body. From contact one learns to sense pressure, direction, structural weakness, shifts in balance, attempts to disengage, and opportunities to strike.

The arms form the initial connection between the two bodies. Through that connection the practitioner controls the space that separates him from the opponent. Once the bridge is established, the objective is not merely to remain attached but to improve one’s own position while degrading the opponent’s. The bridge must therefore perform several tasks at once: protect, sense, control, disrupt and attack.

Making and Crossing the Bridge

A principle expressed in various forms across Southern Chinese martial arts states:

If there is no bridge, make a bridge.

If a bridge exists, go on top of or along the bridge.

If the opponent goes on top, go underneath while controlling his power.

Contact creates opportunity. The practitioner does not simply collide with the opponent’s arms; he establishes a relationship with them, extracts information from that relationship, and improves his position. The bridge may be created by intercepting an incoming strike, by striking into the opponent’s guard, through trapping or pressing, or by the opponent’s own attempt to attack. However it arises, the moment contact is established the tactical situation changes.

Danger Has Entered

This returns us to the meaning of the saying. The bridge marks the transition between relative distance and immediate engagement. As the opponent progresses from wrist to elbow to shoulder, the protective margin contracts, reaction time shortens, and errors become increasingly costly.

Yet the danger works in both directions. The opponent who crosses the bridge threatens the centre, yet, at the same time he has entered the range where structure can be felt, limbs controlled, and short power issued. The saying therefore carries both a warning and an instruction: do not allow the opponent to cross the bridge without consequence, and once the bridge is crossed, hesitation is no longer appropriate.

At that distance the bridge must sense, control and attack as one continuous action.

人過我橋三分險 reminds us that once the opponent has entered the bridge, the fight has changed. Space has disappeared, time has shortened, and danger, for one person or the other, has already entered.

Leave a comment

The Five Stages of Power Transformation in Southern Praying Mantis describe the progressive reorganisation of the body:

粗勁 Cho Geng — foundational strength

暗勁 Um Geng — concealed power

驚彈 Geng Tan — reflexive whole-body shock

彈上彈 Tarn Sern Tarn — continuous rebound

反彈驚彈 Farn Tarn Geng Tan — receiving, returning and shocking without interruption

These are not five unrelated kinds of force. Each stage contains the previous stage but reorganises and expands it. Cho Geng supplies the physical substance. Um Geng contains and conceals that substance. Geng Tan organises the body with a reflex-like whole-body quality. Tarn Sern Tarn allows the contraction to release, rebound and renew itself without a complete reset. Farn Tarn Geng Tan integrates receiving, returning, rebounding and shocking into one continuous exchange…

If you would like to read the full article please consider becoming a member of our subscription Substack where we will explores how these stages develop through structure, musculofascial organisation, the Six Requirements, the Three Prohibitions and Sarm Bo Jin, Chy Kiu and Doi Jong.

Power does not become less physical as skill advances. It becomes more completely organised.

At this stage I am deliberately not trying to teach him the more specialised bodywork of Mantis. That will come later, when his body, coordination and understanding are ready for it. For now, the priority is much more practical: learning to protect himself, hit effectively, recognise pressure, control distance, deal with incoming force and become comfortable working with another person.

To do this I have been putting together a series of simple two-man exercises designed to develop what I sometimes describe as “intelligence in the hands.”

By this I mean that the hands should gradually learn to recognise what is happening through touch and movement without everything having to be consciously calculated. They learn when a line is open or closed, when pressure should be resisted, redirected or allowed to pass, when to strike, when to cover, and how one action naturally creates the opportunity for another.

The drills are not taken exclusively from Southern Praying Mantis. They draw upon principles and training methods that I have encountered over many years through Wing Chun, Xingyi Quan, Taijiquan, Southern Mantis and, where useful, aspects of Arnis and Escrima.

I am less concerned with preserving the external appearance of any particular system than with identifying simple training methods that develop useful fighting attributes.

Each drill therefore has to justify itself.

It should develop something transferable: timing, distance, balance, structure, accuracy, tactile awareness, defensive responsibility, composure under pressure or the ability to hit while simultaneously dealing with the opponent's attack.

Most importantly, the exercises must lead toward increasingly free and functional application rather than becoming an end in themselves.

There is also a longer-term purpose.

Although the immediate objective is practical boxing ability, I want the habits being developed now to remain compatible with the Southern Mantis body method that will eventually sit underneath them. Rather than teaching one method now and having to dismantle it later, the intention is to establish useful fighting skills first while quietly preparing the ground for more sophisticated training in the future.

So these drills are not intended to represent a new martial art or another collection of techniques.

They are simply a bridge: a way of giving a young practitioner useful skills now, developing intelligent reactions through two-man practice, and creating a foundation upon which deeper Mantis training can later be built.

氣力要留 / Hei Lik Yiu Lau
Always Keep Something in Reserve

Literal Translation
氣 — breath, vitality, functional energy
力 — physical strength or force
要 — must; it is necessary to
留 — retain, preserve, keep back, leave in reserve

A smooth martial rendering:
Always keep something in reserve.

Or, expressed more fully:
Do not expend all of the body’s breath, strength and organised potential in a single action.

This maxim warns against throwing everything outward whenever power is issued. The practitioner should never become emptied, overextended or structurally spent through their own action. Even during an explosive release of Geng Tan, the body must retain its organisation, internal pressure and elastic potential to issue again.

Here, 留 / lau does not mean holding back timidly or deliberately weakening the strike. The action itself should still be decisive and complete. What is retained is not a percentage of effort withheld from the technique, but the integrity of the body that allows power to continue beyond it.

After striking, the practitioner must still be able to issue again immediately, change direction, receive the opponent’s counterforce, preserve the square body, maintain the bridge and centre, and recover the breath without distress.

The first action should therefore contain the seed of the next.

Power is released, but the body is not abandoned. The limbs do not extend until the joints lock. The breath is not expelled until the torso collapses. The frame is not distorted by excessive commitment, and the mind is not so attached to one attack that it becomes unable to recognise and respond to change.

This requirement connects directly with:
還手要連 / Waan Sau Yiu Lin
When countering, the hands must be continuous.

Continuity is only possible when 氣力要留 has been observed. A practitioner who spends everything in the first action has nothing immediately available for the second. One who retains breath, structural integrity and elastic potential can strike, change, receive and strike again without interruption.

This continuity should not be understood merely as throwing a rapid succession of hand techniques. The hands can remain continuous only when the breath, frame, bridge, intention and whole-body organisation also remain continuous. Each action must arise from an organised body and leave that body capable of producing the next action.

The deeper meaning of 氣力要留 is therefore not that the practitioner should be cautious or indecisive. It is that power must never be issued in a way that destroys the conditions from which further power can arise.

Expressed more fully:
Issue power decisively, but never spend the body completely. Preserve sufficient breath, structural integrity and organised potential to receive, change or issue again without interruption.

A serious student can learn enough in a few months to perform basic movements and begin applying them under resistance. It usually takes several years to understand the principles, methods and tactics that form a complete system. Refining those skills, adapting them to changing age and experience, and discovering their subtler possibilities can occupy the rest of a lifetime.

The difficulty arises when these stages are deliberately confused. Lifelong refinement is not the same as lifelong dependence on a teacher. An art may take a lifetime to perfect; it should not take a lifetime before the student has been given enough to understand what they are doing and to continue developing intelligently.

What “Learning” Actually Means

Before discussing timescales we must define the levels of learning being discussed.

Familiarity. The student recognises the basic postures, movements, exercises and terminology.

Functionality. The student can apply fundamental actions against an increasingly unpredictable partner. They maintain reasonable structure, move without losing balance, issue force, protect themselves and make decisions under pressure.

Systemic understanding. The student sees how the methods relate to one another. The art is no longer a collection of unrelated techniques. They understand its body method, tactical priorities, preferred distances, training progression and characteristic ways of solving problems.

Independent development. The student has received enough correct information to practise without continually drifting from the art’s essential direction. They can identify many of their own errors, organise training, analyse new situations and generate solutions from the system’s principles.

Refinement. Timing becomes more exact, unnecessary effort disappears, perception sharpens and subtler actions become possible. This stage has no fixed endpoint. The practitioner continues to change, and the art must be continually reinterpreted through those changes.

It is reasonable to say that refinement may last a lifetime. It is not reasonable to use that fact as an excuse for failing to produce functionality or independent understanding within a sensible period.

What Determines the Speed of Progress

No single timetable fits every student. Physical coordination, previous experience, age, health, temperament, intelligence, powers of observation and willingness to practise all matter.

Training frequency is decisive. One class a week cannot be compared with three or four supervised sessions plus independent practice. Five years of occasional attendance may contain fewer real training hours than one year of concentrated work.

Prior experience shortens the process. A competent boxer already understands distance, balance, pressure, timing and the psychology of working with another person. A judoka or wrestler entering a different grappling method already possesses qualities a complete beginner must develop from scratch.

Natural ability influences rate of progress. It does not remove the teacher’s responsibility to present the material clearly, systematically and honestly.

The second major variable is the teacher.

A talented, dedicated student can make little progress if the teacher withholds information. One instructor may possess a complete method yet reveal it so slowly that the student never sees how the parts fit together. Another may teach many movements while concealing the governing principles. A third may simply lack the ability to explain what they know.

Open teaching does not mean overwhelming a beginner with advanced detail on day one. Proper teaching requires sequence. Some material cannot be understood until the body is prepared and the foundations are stable. There is, however, a clear difference between progressive instruction and deliberate withholding. Progressive instruction gives the student what they are ready to absorb while showing where the training is heading. Deliberate withholding keeps the student permanently dependent.

Realistic Stages of Development

No timetable is exact, yet a competent school should show observable progress.

In the first few months a serious student should begin learning the basic body organisation, footwork, attacks, defences and partner exercises. They will not be an accomplished fighter, but visible changes should already appear.

Within six to eighteen months of consistent training the student should possess some functional ability in controlled partner work and carefully managed resistance. They should be able to perform a limited number of things reliably rather than many things badly.

After two or three years the fundamentals should be reasonably stable. The student should understand the art’s principal strategy, recognise its major training categories and apply its core actions against progressively less cooperative partners.

After four to six years of serious, regular practice under open instruction, a capable student should ordinarily have been exposed to the core system. They will not perform every part equally well and will still have much to refine, but they should understand the art well enough to take responsibility for their continued development.

These estimates assume consistent training, competent teaching and regular testing against resistance. Complex weapons traditions or methods that demand major physical reorganisation may take longer. Even then, the student should not wait ten or twenty years before seeing practical results.

The simplest answer remains:

Months to begin becoming functional. Several years to receive and understand the core. A lifetime to refine it.

The Boxing Comparison

Western boxing offers a useful reference because its objectives are clear and its methods are tested continuously.

A beginner is not expected to become elite quickly. The coach does, however, expect functional stance, guard, footwork, basic punches, defences and partner work from the outset. These are taught as foundations, not mysteries reserved for later. Regulations require only a medical check and thirty days of safe sparring before a first bout, readiness remains a coaching decision, but the assumption is that meaningful function can appear early.

Feedback is immediate: the student quickly discovers whether their stance collapses, their punches land, or their defence holds under pressure. Depth comes from refining simple actions over years, not from postponing them. A jab can be learned in one lesson, made reliable in months, and refined across a career.

Traditional martial arts should be judged by the same standard. Depth belongs in the improvement of functional material, not in indefinite delay.

What History Actually Shows

The claim that a student must remain under one teacher for several decades before becoming capable of independent development is hard to reconcile with martial-arts history.

Bruce Lee began Wing Chun under Ip Man at about thirteen and left Hong Kong at eighteen. Roughly five years of diligent training gave him a substantial foundation before he moved to the United States and continued developing his own approach. He never claimed to have exhausted the entire system. His example illustrates the difference between completing a curriculum and receiving enough training to support further investigation.

Jigoro Kano began jujutsu study in the late 1870s and founded the Kodokan in 1882 at the age of twenty-two. He had trained intensively in more than one tradition, extracted their principles and began organising what became Kodokan Judo. He continued studying and refining Judo for the rest of his life, yet he did not wait decades before teaching, researching and developing a coherent system.

Accounts commonly state that Cheng Man-ch’ing studied with Yang Chengfu for approximately six years. He then taught, wrote and developed his shortened form. Even the traditional account does not depend on several uninterrupted decades of personal instruction.

These cases do not prove that five or six years automatically produce mastery. They show that serious practitioners have repeatedly received a foundation, left a teacher, and continued developing through practice, research, exchange and experience. Many arts were shaped by people who studied intensively for limited periods and then spent far longer testing and refining what they had learned.

Taijiquan and the Myth of Necessary Decades

Taijiquan is the clearest example of an art around which exaggerated timescales have grown.

It is often claimed that a student must train for ten, twenty or thirty years before the art becomes martially usable. The more refined skills, listening, following, neutralising, borrowing force, controlling balance and issuing power with minimal preparation, do require prolonged practice. That does not mean a student should remain practically helpless for decades.

Yang Luchan took his method to Beijing and taught within Qing court, aristocratic and military circles. Whatever the precise details, Taijiquan was transmitted in environments where martial ability had practical value. A military or protective setting requires people to become more capable within the time available to train them. Exceptional refinement may take decades; the initial method must begin working much sooner.

A Taijiquan student should therefore acquire practical foundations in the early years: organising the body, protecting balance, moving efficiently, striking, uprooting, controlling space and applying the central tactics. Subtler abilities can then grow from that functional base.

When someone claims that practical Taijiquan cannot be demonstrated until decades have passed, yet cannot themselves demonstrate its principles against moderate resistance, the claim of hidden depth should not be accepted automatically. “It takes decades” can become a shield against examination. The longer the promised timescale, the longer the method can avoid being tested.

When Time Becomes a Commercial Strategy

Not every long teacher-student relationship is exploitative. Some continue for decades because they remain valuable and productive.

The idea that decades of compulsory attendance are necessary can, however, serve a commercial purpose. A student who believes the essential teaching will always arrive next year can be retained indefinitely. Material may be divided into excessive grades, forms or secret levels. Principles may be withheld and later presented as advanced discoveries. Students may be told they are “not ready” whenever they ask how movements are applied. Failure is attributed to insufficient years of loyalty rather than examined as a possible failure of method.

Sometimes the teacher is not deliberately deceptive. They may simply transmit the art in the disconnected pieces in which they themselves received it. Length of service then becomes the main measure of authority because clearer measures of competence are lacking.

A credible teacher should be able to explain what development is expected at different stages: after three months, after one year, after three years, and at the point when the overall architecture of the system should be understood. The exact answers will vary, but there should be answers.

“Keep training for another ten years” is not a curriculum.

Learning Is Endless; Transmission Should Not Be

A martial art can remain a lifelong study without taking a lifetime to transmit.

The teacher’s responsibility is to give the student the principles, training methods, technical material and corrective understanding needed to preserve the art’s direction. The student’s responsibility is to practise those things honestly, test them intelligently and gradually make them their own.

At some point the student must stop being merely an imitator. They must become capable of researching their own experience without abandoning the foundations they were given, adapting the art to their body, age and circumstances while remaining faithful to its essential method.

That point should not require several decades of compulsory dependence.

A student may stay with a teacher for life because the relationship continues to enrich practice,

not because the teacher has ensured they cannot function without it.

The art may be inexhaustible. The teaching should not be indefinitely postponed.

Months to begin learning how the art functions. Several years to receive and understand its central method. A lifetime to discover how deeply that method can be developed.

In the practice of many southern Chinese martial systems there is are a common emphasis on Six Requirements that form a concise, interlocking set of conditions that turn ordinary posture into a living, connected frame. They are not six isolated postural cues to be “held.” Together they organise the bones, joints and tendons so that the fascial body can release (鬆, sung) and still transmit force as one integrated unit.

The requirements are traditionally stated as:

身要正 / San yiu zing — The body must be upright and correctly aligned.

腰要沉 / Jiu yiu cam — The waist must sink and settle.

馬要穩 / Maa yiu wan — The stance must be stable.

肘要收 / Zau yiu sau — The elbows must gather inward.

橋要短 / Kiu yiu dyun — The bridges must remain short and compact.

力要整 / Lik yiu zing — Power must be unified, integrated and complete.

These Six Requirements may be understood as the conditions through which sung (as we previously described it) becomes structurally useful. Without them, release degenerates into mere looseness. With them, the body can remain soft yet organised, yielding yet capable of sudden, whole-body expression.

The Internal Logic of the Sequence

The order is deliberate and progressive.

身要正 / San yiu zing — The body must be upright and correctly aligned、腰要沉 / Jiu yiu cam — The waist must sink and settle、馬要穩 / Maa yiu wan — The stance must be stable, organise the central body and its relationship with the ground.

肘要收 / Zau yiu sau — The elbows must gather inward and 橋要短 / Kiu yiu dyun — The bridges must remain short and compact, organise the arms and connect the bridges to the torso.

力要整 / Lik yiu zing — Power must be unified, integrated and complete, describes the unified result produced by the preceding five.

Thus the final requirement is both an instruction and a diagnostic test. If strength remains localised in the shoulder, arm or hand, the body is not yet whole, coordinated and integrated. Somewhere within the frame, one or more of the earlier requirements has been lost.

A concise statement of the whole teaching is:

The first five requirements construct and maintain the frame; the sixth confirms that the frame has become one body.

1. 身要正 — The Body Must Be Upright and Correctly Aligned

“Correct” here does not mean rigid military posture. It means the vertical axis is free of unnecessary lean, twist or collapse. The head sits lightly atop the spine, the sternum is neither thrust forward nor collapsed, the pelvis is neither tucked nor arched into lordosis. When the body is whole, the weight of the upper body can travel cleanly through the spine into the pelvis and onward into the legs. Misalignment immediately creates compensatory tension; the fascia cannot release because it is busy holding the structure upright against its own distortion.

2. 腰要沉 — The Waist Must Sink and Settle

The waist (jiu) is the critical junction between upper and lower body. “Sinking” is not a forced downward push of the hips, nor is it a collapse of the lower back. It is a quiet settling of the dantian region so that the lumbar spine lengthens slightly and the iliac crests drop into the support of the legs. When the waist sinks, the spine is no longer held by muscular bracing; it rests. This settling simultaneously opens the connection between the torso and the legs and prevents the common error of “floating” power that never reaches the ground.

3. 馬要穩 — The Stance Must Be Stable

Stability of the ma (stance) is not achieved by locking the knees or gripping the floor aimlessly with the toes. It arises from the preceding two requirements: an aligned body whose weight has settled through a sunk waist into well-organised legs. The feet feel the ground evenly; the knees remain soft yet directed; the pelvis sits balanced between the two feet. A stable stance is both rooted and mobile—ready to yield or to drive without first having to “set” itself.

4. 肘要收 — The Elbows Must Gather Inward

The elbows are the primary governors of the bridge. “Gathering” does not mean forcing the elbows toward the centre-line by muscular effort alone. It arises from the sinking of the shoulders and the settling of the ribs, which allow the elbows to drop and draw inward naturally. When the shoulders release downward and the ribcage settles, the elbows are carried into a position that feels attached to the centre-line and and will hang slightly forward of the torso, rather than flaring outward through the tensing of the deltoids or trailing behind through collapse at the elbow that is unsupported by the ribs.

In this state the arms remain connected to the torso’s power instead of becoming independent levers. Excessively open elbows lengthen the bridge, dilute structural integrity and invite the opponent into the centre. Excessively collapsed elbows create congestion and loss of range. The correct gathering, produced by sunk shoulders and settled ribs, keeps the bridge short, elastic and continuously linked to the body.

5. 橋要短 — The Bridges Must Remain Short and Compact

“Bridge” (kiu) refers to the forearm structures used in contact. A short bridge is not a cramped or withdrawn arm; it is a bridge that has not been extended beyond the point where structural integrity and connection to the torso are maintained. Long bridges that do not hang from the torso matrix, sacrifice both power and sensitivity; short bridges preserve the elastic integrity of the fascial lines running from hand through forearm, elbow, shoulder and into the torso. The requirement of shortness is therefore inseparable from the requirement that the elbows gather. Again, short does not necessarily mean the arms are held close to the body. It means that the movement to activate them from a static position is small. Southern Mantis specialises in having a long arm bridge that uses very short expressions of power, that can be difficult to deal with in a fight. The hands are all ready very close to the opponent when they attempt to move in.

6. 力要整 — Power Must Be Unified, Integrated and Complete

This is the culmination and the continuous test of the preceding five. Whole body power is not the sum of sequential muscular contractions. It is the simultaneous reorganisation of the entire connected body so that force appears at the point of contact as a single, unbroken event. When the frame is correctly organised and the correct dynamic relaxation is present, pressure received at the bridge is registered by the torso, spine, waist, legs and feet as one event. Likewise, outgoing power is not assembled piece by piece; it is expressed through the whole.

If power feels local, trapped in the shoulder, isolated in the arm, or generated only by the hand, the practitioner knows immediately that one or more of the first five requirements has been compromised.

The Relationship Between the Six Requirements and 鬆 (Sung)

The Six Requirements and sung are mutually dependent.

Without sung, the Six Requirements harden into rigid postures. The body becomes a stiff scaffold rather than a living frame; movement becomes mechanical and the capacity for sudden change is lost.

Without the Six Requirements, sung becomes mere looseness—disconnection without useful structure. The body may feel relaxed, yet force cannot travel cleanly and the structure collapses under pressure.

Correct training therefore unites both: 有形而不僵，有鬆而不散 / Jau jing ji bat goeng, jau sung ji bat saan - Possessing form without rigidity; possessing release without disconnection.

When the Six Requirements are together, movement at the hand can be perceived throughout the entire fascial network. The body behaves as a single elastic continuum rather than a collection of separately controlled parts. This is the practical meaning of “one body” or “whole body”.

Training Implications

In solo forms, the practitioner continually checks whether each of the six conditions is present. In two man Jong practice and application, the same checklist becomes diagnostic: any loss of whole-body connection or any localisation of force immediately points back to a failure in one or more of the requirements.

The Six Requirements are therefore not a static checklist to be achieved once and then forgotten. They are the continuous conditions of correct structure. Maintained correctly they allow the practitioner to remain soft yet organised, rooted yet mobile, and capable of expressing power that is both sudden and complete.

There is a difference between borrowing the appearance of a thing and becoming capable of producing it.

That difference is practice.

It is increasingly easy to reproduce the visible surface of serious work. A certain visual style can be imitated. A familiar tone can be adopted. Ideas about discipline, philosophy, health, artistry and reflection can be arranged into an attractive format and presented as though they belong naturally together.

But presentation is not formation.

The outward form may be copied quickly. The inward substance cannot.

Real craft is not created by identifying what appears to be working for someone else and reproducing its features. It is built through the long accumulation of attention, failure, correction, research, repetition and lived experience. It is shaped in private, often for years, before anyone else recognises its value.

By the time the public sees the work, much of the real work has already happened.

They see the essay, but not the notebooks behind it. They see the movement, but not the endless corrections. They see the clarity, but not the confusion that had to be endured before clarity became possible. They see the aesthetic, but not the life that gave it meaning.

This is why imitation always has limits.

Someone may copy the arrangement of ideas, but they cannot copy the experience that produced them. They may reproduce a language of depth, but language alone does not create depth. They may speak about discipline, tradition or health, but those subjects become meaningful only when they have been tested against time, responsibility and actual practice.

The distinction is not always immediately visible.

Imitation can look convincing at first because surfaces are easy to recognise. Real craft is often quieter. It does not need to declare itself constantly because it is supported by something deeper: judgement.

Judgement is one of the least discussed products of long practice.

It is the ability to know what matters and what does not. What should be included and what should be left out. When to act, when to wait, when to simplify and when greater complexity is necessary. It is the capacity to recognise the difference between an idea that sounds profound and one that has survived contact with reality.

Judgement cannot be downloaded.

It develops through repeated exposure to consequence.

A true practitioner has had to discover where theory breaks down. A true teacher has had to watch different people misunderstand the same instruction in different ways. A true craftsperson has had to refine the work when enthusiasm was gone and recognition was absent.

This is what gives mature work its weight.

It has been corrected by reality.

Craft is not content

One of the dangers of the present moment is that every discipline is increasingly treated as content.

Practices that once demanded apprenticeship, patience and direct experience are flattened into things to be consumed, repackaged and circulated. Their most visible features are separated from the conditions that made them meaningful.

The result may be polished. It may even be popular. But popularity and authority are not the same thing.

Content is produced to maintain attention.

Craft is developed to meet a standard.

The standard may belong to a tradition, a teacher, a discipline, the material itself, or the practitioner’s own conscience. Whatever its source, it demands something more difficult than novelty. It demands accuracy.

This is why a practitioner returns.

They return to the same movement because it is not yet honest. They return to the same sentence because it does not yet say what they mean. They return to the same principle because their current understanding remains incomplete.

The return is not evidence of creative exhaustion.

It is evidence of seriousness.

People who are primarily interested in appearance tend to move on quickly. They need the next idea, the next aesthetic, the next claim. Depth is slower because depth requires remaining with something after the excitement has passed.

The source of the work matters

Original work does not necessarily mean creating something from nothing.

Every serious practitioner inherits.

They inherit methods, questions, language, standards and obligations. Martial artists inherit from teachers and lineages. Dancers inherit a vocabulary of movement. Writers inherit language. Craftspeople inherit tools, materials and forms developed by others.

Originality lies in what happens when those inheritances are genuinely absorbed, tested and made responsible.

A person may spend years studying several traditions and still be engaged in one continuous enquiry. The purpose is not to collect identities, but to discover what each method reveals. Over time, ideas begin to meet one another. Differences become clearer. Shared principles emerge. The practitioner develops a voice because they have earned a point of view.

That voice cannot be reproduced merely by copying its vocabulary.

The words are the final layer.

Beneath them are years of choices.

What was pursued, abandoned, corrected, unresolved and what proved true in practice.

This is the formation behind the form.

Real practice leaves traces

Long practice changes the practitioner.

It changes how they observe, how they listen and how quickly they recognise superficiality in themselves. It makes them less satisfied with easy answers. It often makes them more precise and less theatrical.

The deeper someone goes into a discipline, the more aware they become of what they do not know.

This humility is not weakness. It is evidence that the work has exceeded the ego’s first explanations.

By contrast, imitation often produces premature certainty. The language arrives before the understanding. The identity is claimed before the competence is formed. The person begins by presenting themselves as the finished result.

Real craft rarely develops that way.

It is formed through a long period in which the work is more important than being seen doing the work. There are hours nobody witnesses. There are questions that remain unanswered for years. There are refinements too subtle to impress anyone who has not developed the eyes to see them. Yet these are precisely the things from which lasting work is made.

There is no monopoly on serious ideas

No one owns discipline. No one owns reflection, philosophy, artistry or the pursuit of health. These belong to every person willing to engage with them seriously.

The concern is not that others explore the same territory. Shared enquiry can be valuable. Traditions grow through conversation, comparison and sincere exchange.

The difference lies in whether someone is contributing from genuine experience or merely adopting the signs of seriousness.

Real practitioners do not need to monopolise ideas. They deepen them.

They do not protect themselves by insisting that no one else may speak. They protect the integrity of the work by continuing to practise, research, question and refine.

That is the advantage of the originator.

Not ownership.

Depth.

Someone may copy what the work looked like yesterday. But genuine practice has already moved on, not by abandoning its principles, but by understanding them more completely.

Imitation follows the visible result. Craft continues at the source.

The answer is not to look sideways

When others reproduce aspects of your work, it is tempting to become preoccupied with them. But comparison can become another form of distraction. The proper response is not louder self-assertion. It is better work.

Return to the practice. Clarify the thinking. Strengthen the standard.

Make the distinction between appearance and substance impossible to miss over time.

A copied format may attract attention temporarily. It cannot sustain a body of work without the experience, discipline and judgement required to keep developing it.

Eventually, repetition exposes whether someone has a source or only a template.

Those with a template keep rearranging the same surface.

Those with a source continue to discover.

This is why true practitioners are difficult to outrun.

They are not racing for novelty.

They are rooted in a process that continues to generate understanding.

The long practice

The Long Practice was not created as a format.

It emerged from a life shaped by books, teachers, notes, questions, training, reflection and the repeated effort to understand things properly.

Its combination of martial arts, philosophy, movement, health, craftsmanship and lived experience is not a branding exercise. It reflects the actual breadth of the enquiry.

That distinction is fundamental.

The work is not arranged to create the impression of depth. The form exists because the depth was already there. That is the central difference between real craft and imitation:

One begins with the appearance and tries to work backwards.

The other begins with the work and allows the appearance to emerge.

The first can be assembled quickly.

The second takes a lifetime.

Cantonese: 散 Saan - loose, scattered, disunited or lacking organisation or, to scatter, disperse, dissolve or break apart

Read more