I watched her work through it, the single theme, the single pillar, the Red Thread that will now run through Presenza, this newsletter, LinkedIn, Instagram, and every Substack Note for the coming week, and I found myself thinking less about the content itself than about a much older, much blunter question Gurdjieff kept returning to across decades of teaching. Not what should you do. Whether you have decided, clearly enough to matter, what you are actually trying to do at all.

He called this an Aim, and he was almost contemptuous of how casually people used the word for things that were not aims in his sense at all.

Read more

This transition week, from the first client seen again after a month to Sunday’s family lunch, from resetting the alarm to yesterday’s honest reckoning, has left me with something resembling a compass, not a detailed plan but an inner orientation about what actually matters as I face the season beginning.

It is not the same thing I used to look for in previous years around this time, lists of goals to hit, solemn resolutions written on September first exactly like what I wrote yesterday about wanting to avoid. It is something simpler and more reliable, the renewed awareness that the quality with which I move through each single day matters more than any goal written in advance, and that this quality depends almost entirely on how much I choose to stay present, not on how well I plan.

Next week the structured schedule with my wife starts again, the return to the weekly brief we had paused for the summer. I am not approaching it with the same frantic energy with which I have sometimes started other projects, the kind that mistakes enthusiasm for a guarantee of success. I am approaching it with something quieter, the trust that whatever the schedule requires, I will be able to move through it with the same attention I trained over these past weeks, not with a brand new effort invented from scratch.

In the REALIZZARE block of my morning, fully resuming its usual rhythm from today, this compass promises no specific result. It only promises that, whatever result arrives, I will more likely be present while it happens, instead of distracted by calculating how far away the next one is.

Today, before filling your calendar with goals, write one line too about the quality of attention you want to bring into this season, regardless of what the pages will hold.

You do not need to know every step of the path. You only need a clear direction, and enough presence to recognize it, one step at a time.

I am not judging anyone who writes those posts, I did it myself for years. I am noticing, more clearly today than in the past, a precise illusion worth taking apart. The calendar has no transformative power whatsoever. A Monday is not mechanically different from a Sunday in determining our capacity to change. September first contains no special energy that August thirty first did not already have.

What makes certain dates memorable is not an objective property of time, but a decision made by the collective mind to treat them as symbolic thresholds, useful perhaps for organizing the social calendar, but completely irrelevant to the real mechanism of personal change, which never follows the calendar, only the quality of attention we bring, day after day, regardless of what number marks that day.

The real risk in this illusion is not harmless. Postponing real change to next Monday, next month, next New Year is one of the most effective ways to never actually change, because every future postponement promises a commitment the present, conveniently, never has to honor today.

I chose, this September first, not to write any solemn resolution. I chose instead to do, today, the exact same small observation practice I did yesterday, August thirty first, with no special ceremony around it. If anything genuinely changes in me, it will not be because of the date. It will be because of the attention I choose to bring, today as much as yesterday, as it will be tomorrow, September second.

In the EVOLVERE block of my morning, the growth I look for never waits for symbolic dates to begin. It begins, when it begins, on any ordinary day chosen only because it is the one in which I remembered to be present.

Today, if you have postponed something to a more symbolic moment to start, ask yourself if you can simply begin now, on this ordinary, ceremony free day.

No date has ever changed anyone. Only the attention brought inside any date, chosen or random, has that power.

Forty minutes into the standstill, Christian and Alessandro started arguing over a phone charger again, the same argument, almost word for word, that opened the very first article of this series five weeks ago.

Maria Giovanna, driving, said something sharp about the noise. I said something sharper back, not really about the noise at all, about the heat, the traffic, five weeks of shared bathrooms, something that had been quietly accumulating and finally found an excuse to speak.

For about thirty seconds the whole car was raised voices, and then, as quickly as it started, it stopped, everyone slightly embarrassed, the traffic still not moving an inch.

I felt, immediately afterward, a small and very familiar relief. That felt good to get out. And it is exactly that sentence, that felt good to get out, that Gurdjieff considered one of the most convincing and most dangerous lies the machine tells about itself.

Read more

I was writing as though I had completed a journey, as though a month of observation had made me a better, more conscious, almost superior version of who I was at the end of July. The tone was that subtle, dangerous one of spiritual pride, the kind that disguises itself as authentic growth while actually looking for a new reason to feel special.

This is one of the hardest traps to spot in any work on the self, because it uses the exact language of growth to build a new form of vanity, perhaps subtler than the one it meant to overcome. It does not matter how much I have observed my own automatisms if I then turn that observation into a new pedestal from which to look down on those who have not done the same work. It would be like freeing myself from one buffer only to build a new one, more elegant, made of awareness instead of ignorance.

I deleted the first three lines and started over differently. Not a summary of progress made, but an honest list of the times when, despite an entire month of declared observation, I still fell into the same old automatisms, the laptop reopened two hours after getting home, the irritation over resetting the alarm, the instinctive defense in front of my father in law back in July. The list was longer than I expected.

This does not mean the month was useless. It only means that work on the self never produces a finish line reached, only a slightly faster ability to notice when we have fallen asleep again. There is nothing to display in this, and precisely for that reason it is truer than any triumphant summary.

In the ESSERE block of my morning, the honesty I look for concerns this too, unmasking pride disguised as growth before it becomes a new character to maintain.

Today, if you are taking stock of something, check whether you are looking for the truth or just a new reason to feel superior to who you were before.

Real progress never produces a pedestal. It only produces, sometimes, one extra second before falling asleep again.

This morning, getting ready to go out, I asked myself something I rarely ask before such a well established family ritual. Is the person sitting down at that table today really the same one who stood up last time, at the end of July, or has something, over these weeks, changed enough to make them different, even though the table, the chairs, the plates will remain identical?

It is an uncomfortable question because it has no clean answer, and maybe that is exactly why it is worth asking. A month of self observation, from the choir of inner voices to resetting the alarm yesterday, has left something behind, I wrote as much myself a few days ago talking about invisible luggage. But that something, returning to the exact context where the family script activates most easily, risks dissolving in an instant, simply because the environment itself automatically calls back the usual roles, regardless of how much we have changed in the meantime.

I am not going to lunch today to prove to anyone that I have changed, that would be another performance, maybe the subtlest one of all, the enlightened son coming back different from vacation. I am going with a simpler question in my pocket. Will I manage to notice, even for a few minutes, the difference between the role I will automatically put on sitting down at that table and the one I will consciously choose to inhabit?

The table will be identical. My father’s jokes will probably be the same as always. But I can choose to listen to them today with the attention I trained in Sapri, instead of the usual autopilot, and that alone, without announcing it to anyone, would already change something.

In the GUIDARE block of my morning, leadership starts exactly with this silent choice, carrying into the oldest, most repetitive contexts the quality of presence built elsewhere, with no need to make it visible to others.

Today, if you return to a highly repetitive family context, try bringing a different quality of attention into it, without changing anything about the outer script.

The table never changes. Whoever sits at it, if they choose to truly be there, can change every single time.

“We consider mostly our own feelings.”
(P.D. Ouspensky, The Fourth Way)

Last Monday of August, bags back in the car, this time heading inland, away from the coast. Before I’ve even arrived, the phone starts filling up with messages left unanswered for weeks. A colleague asks if I’ve read his proposal. An acquaintance comments on something I posted before leaving, in a tone I can’t quite decode, maybe critical, maybe just distracted. I spend the next twenty minutes mentally drafting the perfect reply to a comment its author has probably already forgotten writing.

This isn’t thinking about work. It’s something more subtle and far more expensive. I’m spending precious time building, tending, defending an image of myself inside other people’s minds, most of whom aren’t thinking about me for even a tenth of the time I’m spending on them.

Read more

A month ago, my first morning in Sapri, I had noticed how different it felt to wake without that electronic sound, how the body found an older rhythm when left free to do so. This morning, resetting that alarm, I distinctly felt resistance to going back under that command, as if the body itself were protesting the return of a master it had almost forgotten.

This discomfort, looked at closely, contains a subtle error worth correcting before it turns into a whole week of bad mood. The alarm itself is not the problem. The problem is the idea that the alarm automatically represents a loss of freedom, a forced return under a mechanical yoke, while the past month represented real freedom. But the freedom I lived in Sapri did not depend on the absence of an alarm. It depended on the quality of attention I brought to my waking, with or without one.

Confusing the tool with the condition is a mistake we make often. We believe it is the external object, the schedule, the constraint, that determines our inner freedom, when in reality that freedom depends almost entirely on how we move through whatever condition we find ourselves in, constrained or not. A present man can be free even with an alarm. A distracted man can be a prisoner even without one.

This morning I chose to look at that set alarm not as the end of something, but as a test, the same quality of conscious waking I practiced in Sapri, now carried into a more constrained condition. If I manage it, the freedom I found on vacation was never the vacation’s alone. It was mine, and I carry it with me wherever I go, alarm included.

In the ESSERE block of my morning, resuming its usual schedule from Monday, the real training starts exactly here, checking whether the presence found in easy conditions survives in stricter ones too.

Today, look at a tool or constraint you automatically associate with less freedom, and ask yourself whether it is really the problem, or the way you move through it.

It is not the absence of constraints that makes you free. It is the quality of attention you bring inside every constraint, when you actually choose to bring it.

I asked him why he cared so much, given that in two weeks those notebooks would be full of notes scrawled in a hurry anyway. He looked at me as if the question made no sense and said, because right now they’re still perfect.

That sentence stayed with me all evening. A blank notebook contains, in its untouched wholeness, every future possibility simultaneously, before a single line chooses to exclude all the others. The moment the first word is written, the notebook stops being infinite and becomes something specific, with a precise direction, with mistakes already made that no eraser will ever fully remove without leaving a trace.

There is something similar in how we treat beginnings, not only school ones. A newly imagined project, a relationship just started, even a new month, all carry this same quality of pure possibility, not yet contaminated by any concrete choice. This is why beginnings excite us more than their actual unfolding, not because they are better, but because they are still everything at once, before becoming one single thing.

The risk, when that excitement fades after the first few weeks, is not that the notebook has become worse. It is that we forget to treat every following page with the same care reserved for the first, as if only the beginning deserved attention and everything else were just execution to get through.

This morning I looked at my September calendar, still mostly blank, with the same gaze Alessandro gave his notebooks yesterday. Not everything is written yet. And even once I start filling it, every page will deserve the same care as the first.

In the EVOLVERE block of my morning, this awareness helps me stop treating growth as something that only happens at beginnings, and start seeing it as something every single page, even the hundredth, can still hold.

Today, look at something you started long ago and try treating it with the care you would give its first day.

A notebook does not stop being precious after the first page. We are the ones who stop treating it that way.

I want to be honest about the small, specific dread that accompanies this return, because I suspect it is more common than the productivity culture around us admits, and because it points directly at the final teaching I want to leave with you before this month closes.

Some part of me, quietly, has spent the last several days wondering whether everything genuinely useful I noticed this August, the identification at the waterline, my mother’s ledger at the dinner table, Fabio’s buffer on the boat, the committee of unaccountable “I”s, the master in the basement, the instrument that finally stopped flinching, Christian’s question about pretending, whether all of it survives the return to structure, or whether it quietly evaporates the moment the calendar takes the wheel back.

This exact worry, it turns out, is one Gurdjieff addressed directly, and his answer cuts against almost every popular assumption about what a spiritual path is supposed to look like.

Read more

Read more

Watching that sand scattered on the balcony floor, I asked myself a question I…

Read more

There was no real urgency. No client had wr…

Read more

It is the same mechanism I have obser…

Read more

The suitcases were already in the car. Gaia was doing a tour of the house to check she had not left anything behind, with that precision of hers that always knows where things belong. Alessandro had forgotten three markers under the bed and was looking for them with the expression of someone who knows th…

Read more

In July, every object I put into the suitcase carried the excitement of what wa…

Read more

I feel something tighten in my chest, a thin shadow that isn’t quite anxiety yet but resembles it, the same feeling I had as a child on the last Sunday of August, knowing the alarm clock would go off for school the next morning.

For years I handled this feeling in two ways, both wrong. Either I ignored it until the very last moment, enjoying the sea with a kind of forced denial that left the final vacation days poisoned by what I refused to feel, or I anticipated it too soon, mentally starting to “work” by mid August, ruining the rest with September knocking three weeks early. Neither of those is Presence. They’re just two different ways of being at war with time.

Read more

Read more

Read more

Here is what I actually want to draw your attention to, though, because it is not the irritation itself. It is what happened immediately afterward, which is the part almost everyone gets wrong, myself included, for most of my adult life. Within half a second of feeling the irritation, a second reaction arrived on top of it: disappointment in myself for feeling irritated at all, over something as small as spilled shells, at a father who is supposed to know better after two decades of studying exactly this kind of moment.

That second reaction, the disappointment layered on top of the original feeling, is the part Gurdjieff spent enormous effort trying to help students remove, and it is the single most common way that Self Observation, his foundational and supposedly simplest practice, gets quietly ruined before it ever produces anything real.

Read more