The inability to receive can look like virtue. It can appear as discipline, independence, generosity, even commitment to one’s own growth. For years, I mistook it for all four.

Guruji remarked to me one day when I was struggling: “You are dedicated, you are always doing, but you cannot receive.” I had no idea what he meant. I assumed my problem was insufficient effort. He had identified the opposite one. I believed I wasn’t enough, that I was lazy, that I always needed to work harder, but I worked so hard I lost the capacity to let anything enter.

This has taken years of work to undo.

Receiving is not passivity, nor is it simply accepting what is offered. It is a capacity: the ability to allow an experience, a teaching, another person or the consequences of one’s own efforts to reach us and remain long enough to have an effect. Like any capacity, it can go undeveloped.

A shout out to for her essay I Can Bring the Casserole. I Can’t Accept One. and the discussion we had that reminded me of the Guruji’s teaching (and my spectacular failings) on how we receive.

The body showed me what the mind could not

I could understand, intellectually, that I did not need to work so hard. Understanding it made very little difference, but my limiting self beliefs had become a habit of action.

Most of you know I'm an Ashtanga practitioner. Yin gave me a way to work through the habit. In a held posture, I began to notice how quickly I wanted to introduce effort. I wanted to adjust, deepen or correct the shape, because leaving it alone might constitute failure. The instruction was more difficult: remain, observe and allow the sensation to be what it was without immediately trying to improve it.

Meditation exposed the same tendency. A thought, feeling or discomfort would arise and I would immediately begin working on it. The practice was to notice that impulse before acting on it.

The change came slowly, through repetition. I began to recognise the moment when observation turned into interference and, occasionally, leave it alone. Over time, the pattern became visible beyond practice: in conversations, frustrations and the ordinary resistance of daily life. Before I could learn to receive help, love or the results of my own work, I first had to learn how often I interrupted experience before it had the chance to reach me.

Growth needs somewhere to go

Guruji’s second teaching explained the first. He asked how I expected to grow when I left no space for growth. I had spent years working on myself without pausing to let any of that work register. If an outcome was not perfect, I treated it as evidence I had not done enough, rather than as something to simply receive.

Unlearning that took longer than I expected, because it meant trusting that effort I could not fully see or measure still counted. I had to accept that doing my best and receiving whatever came back were two separate acts, and that the second one mattered as much as the first.

Contact is not the same as receiving

Amma describes receptivity as the ability to admit and retain what is received, not simply to have a door open for a moment.

I had been exposed to good teaching, care and rest for years without any of it changing me, because exposure and reception are not the same event.

You can receive praise and reject it within a breath. You can receive rest and remain tense throughout it. I had done both on repeat without noticing the gap between contact and something actually landing. Guruji’s teaching gave me the problem. Amma’s gave me the mechanism.

Giving can be another way of staying in control

Ram Dass questioned the assumption that giving is always the stronger position. When someone identifies too fully as the giver, the other person can be pushed into a dependent role, and the relationship stops being mutual. I recognised this in myself. Much of what I called generosity was also a familiar position: useful, capable, never on the receiving end of anyone’s care.

This is where Liz Bucar’s essay comes in. Cooking for someone else asks nothing of you. Accepting food from someone else asks you to let them matter to you. Refusing help can look like independence. It can also be a way of avoiding the exposure that comes with needing anyone.

You cannot force an open heart

Ram Dass’s other teaching on this is that the first honest step is not pretending to be open. It is admitting you feel closed. That reframed something Guruji had never framed as a personal failing. He had not accused me of selfishness. He had named a limitation I could not yet see myself.

Ram Dass describes turning an inner receptor toward the humanity in another person, listening without preparing a reply, letting someone’s presence reach you before you decide what it means. I could not force this. What changed things was the same thing that changed my practice: noticing the effort I was making to stay guarded, and choosing not to make it.

Receiving has a rhythm

Amma also describes a rhythm between receiving, assimilating and spending. My old pattern was constant expenditure. I worked, gave, produced, then wondered why nothing seemed to change. What was missing was the middle step. Nothing I received, whether a lesson, a rest or a kindness, had time to be absorbed before I moved on to the next thing I thought I owed the world.

I now try to pause after finishing something rather than move straight to what comes next. To let praise sit for a moment before deflecting it. To let rest be rest rather than a gap to fill. That pause is where reception actually happens.

The opposite of receiving was resistance

When Guruji first told me I could not receive, I thought he meant I needed to accept things from other people more gracefully. It took years to understand the problem was larger than manners. I could not receive rest because I associated it with laziness. I could not receive help because I associated needing anyone with judgement. I could not receive the results of my own effort because I was already reaching for the next task before the last one had finished teaching me anything.

The opposite of receiving was not giving. It was resistance. Learning to receive did not give me anything new to do. It asked me to stop filling every available space, so that something could arrive, stay long enough to matter, and change me.

Want to Go Beyond Western Yoga? Join TYJ Community!

At The Yoga Journalist, we provide structured, ongoing study for teachers and practitioners who want depth, clarity, and accountability beyond certification.

Here is what we offer:

📰 Free – Read the stories, follow the conversation

Stay informed with independent coverage of the yoga world: contemporary stories, cultural commentary, and industry analysis that reveal what’s really happening beyond the mat.

Includes:

• ✅ Access to free articles featuring contemporary stories, commentary, and industry analysis

• ✅ Archive of public essays

🪷 Perfect for readers, practitioners, and professionals who want to stay grounded in reality and informed about the evolution of yoga today.

🔥 Paid – join the study community

US$15/month

Go beyond commentary and unlock the full depth of yoga knowledge. Paid subscribers enter an ongoing study space with direct access to philosophical inquiry.

Includes:

• ✅ Full archive including educational content

• ✅ Members-only discussion and community access

• ✅ Monthly Online Satsang (live Q&A exploring philosophy and practice)

🧘‍♀️ For students, teachers, and sincere practitioners ready to study in depth.

🕉️ Mentorship – deep study (limited to 5 spots)

The Yoga Journalist Mentorship is designed for teachers, practitioners and yoga content creators who want more than another certification.

It is a one-to-one mentorship designed to help practitioners and teachers integrate yoga more deeply into their practice, teaching and professional lives.

If you’re ready to deepen your practice, refine your teaching and find your voice, book in for a free 20 minute call.

Krishna calls devotion the royal secret. Chapter 9 of the Bhagavad Gita builds its teaching around one claim: sincere love, offered without calculation, reaches further than ritual ever can. Arjuna is told that whatever he does, however small, can become an offering. Vedic ritual earns heaven. Love reaches Krishna.

Krishna holds every form of divine power

The Hindu pantheon's Gods and Goddesses represent different types of energies. Krishna occupies a different position in this chapter. Easwaran describes him as the beginning and the end, the one true friend, the only refuge (9:18). The plural forms of worship still reach him, whether or not the worshipper knows it.

It is true that Krishna has taken on a human form. But those who only see Krishna’s form are limiting their view, producing limited devotion. This builds on from Bhagavad Gita Chapter 7: The Yoga of Wisdom and Realisation.

Read more

Tradition sounds like dogma. And traditional yoga is dogmatic, but about one thing: change. Yoga is the science of self-realisation, meant to be tested, observed, and advanced, like every other science. I found that out the hard way. I’m ADD and allergic to being told what to do, but yoga gave me a discipline for freedom. The question is whether the change is in service of self-realisation, or of ego.

Over the past month, conversations with Sanskrit scholars, leaders in modern yoga, and teachers questioning tradition against a growing body of scientific data have returned to the same question: what is traditional yoga, and what is its role?

Yoga is a science with rules

Like any science, yoga begins with observation. What matters is what happens when a practice is repeated, tested against experience, and refined over time. A practitioner observes what a particular practice produces: a steadier breath, a thought that stops repeating, or a moment of direct awareness.

The hypothesis is that repeating the practice will reproduce the state again. The test is years of that repetition, applied to the self first, often alongside study drawn from other disciplines, anatomy, physiology, philosophy, whatever sharpens the observation.

The revision comes from what decades of that self-study show, not from what a single sitting suggested. One experience proves very little. What matters is whether it can be reproduced through practice, whether it holds up over time, and whether other practitioners working by the same method encounter something comparable. Svadhyaya, self-study sustained over decades, is the mechanism, and posture, breath, mindful living, and meditation are each expected to run through it.

The evolution of practice: real innovation vs. modern wellness trends

Modern yoga contains examples of both processes. It has practitioners who did what Iyengar did: decades of self-practice, sharpened by study borrowed from other fields, tested against direct experience before ever being taught to someone else. An Ashtanga teacher who held the same sequence for twenty years before leading a class of their own. A meditation teacher a decade into daily sitting before accepting a first student. In each case, the teaching came after years of practice had given the teacher something to teach.

It also has goat yoga, beer yoga, rage yoga, and a growing category of fitness classes built to spike mood and energy inside an hour. These forms were not developed through the kind of sustained practice and testing against self-realisation that traditional yoga requires. They came from what photographs well, what fills a Tuesday evening, what gives a body a dopamine spike to carry into the rest of the day. Wanting that is a different aim, not a failure of character, but it was never tested against the aim that defines yoga’s science.

Iyengar’s method was new compared with Patanjali’s, just as any genuine development in yoga will be new when it first appears. The question is what stands behind it: years of self-study for realisation, or an audience?

Patanjali, Iyengar and the rules of innovation

Patanjali’s contribution was to give yoga a system: an account of what the mind does, why it suffers, and how sustained practice can lead to direct experience of the self. Iyengar’s alignment work and Sivananda’s synthesis of the four paths developed very different methods within that broader framework, shaped by what each found through years of practice. Each was testing, on himself first, whether Patanjali’s claim held up outside the conditions it was first observed in, centuries earlier. What made their innovations significant was not simply that they worked. Each came from years of practice in which the teacher had tested the principles on himself before making them into instruction for others.

The cost of true lineage: two pivotal decisions

My own Guruji trained inside the gurukula system from the age of five. Two decisions from that life show what that rule can demand in daily life.

One decision came at the end of his formal training, when his own teacher gave him a single instruction: practise, and do what your heart says. It asked him to trust discernment already built over years, not instinct arriving from nowhere.

This was put to the test once his own practice had matured. He left the community that had raised him, along with the financial security and standing that came with staying, to teach Westerners who needed instruction he had spent decades acquiring. See the full story and teaching in The Wellness Lie: Why ‘Follow Your Heart’ Goes Beyond Comfort.

The non-negotiable: how traditional yoga validates change

Traditional yoga is dogmatic about where change comes from. It has to come from sustained self-study, tested against direct experience, and it can be sharpened by knowledge from outside the tradition. The standard remains the same: does the practice serve self-realisation, or does it merely produce attention?

That is why traditional yoga can produce something genuinely new without ceasing to be traditional. The form can change. The teacher can borrow from anatomy or medicine. A practice can look nothing like the one that came before it. What cannot change is the test it has to pass: sustained practice, direct experience, and the pursuit of self-realisation.

Want to Go Beyond Western Yoga? Join TYJ Community!

At The Yoga Journalist, we provide structured, ongoing study for teachers and practitioners who want depth, clarity, and accountability beyond certification.

Here is what we offer:

📰 Free – Read the stories, follow the conversation

Stay informed with independent coverage of the yoga world: contemporary stories, cultural commentary, and industry analysis that reveal what’s really happening beyond the mat.

Includes:

• ✅ Access to free articles featuring contemporary stories, commentary, and industry analysis

• ✅ Archive of public essays

🪷 Perfect for readers, practitioners, and professionals who want to stay grounded in reality and informed about the evolution of yoga today.

🔥 Paid – join the study community

US$15/month

Go beyond commentary and unlock the full depth of yoga knowledge. Paid subscribers enter an ongoing study space with direct access to philosophical inquiry.

Includes:

• ✅ Full archive including educational content

• ✅ Members-only discussion and community access

• ✅ Monthly Online Satsang (live Q&A exploring philosophy and practice)

🧘‍♀️ For students, teachers, and sincere practitioners ready to study in depth.

🕉️ Mentorship – deep study (limited to 5 spots)

The Yoga Journalist Mentorship is designed for teachers, practitioners and yoga content creators who want more than another certification.

It is a one-to-one mentorship designed to help practitioners and teachers integrate yoga more deeply into their practice, teaching and professional lives.

If you’re ready to deepen your practice, refine your teaching and find your voice, book in for a free 20 minute call.

A lifetime of yoga practice is the training of attention: where the mind goes under pressure and what it reaches for in stillness. Most practitioners assume this training has a limit, that death is the one moment for which no rehearsal is possible. Krishna tells Arjuna that the content of the mind at the hour of death is a consequence of what the mind has practised across a lifetime, and that habitual attention is what death asks a person to draw on.

What the Bhagavad Gita says about the mind at death

Krishna tells Arjuna that whatever a person’s mind returns to across a lifetime, its deepest motivations and desires, surfaces as the final thought at death. Easwaran describes a continuity between one life and the next, in which the accumulated weight of desire and motivation travels with the soul into what comes after. For years the mind has habitually focused on certain things, and those habits determine what the mind reaches for when dying begins.

Krishna counsels Arjuna to build a habit of remembering Krishna continually, so the mind has somewhere steady to land. A mind that has built the habit of steady remembrance thinks of nothing else when the moment comes.

The discipline Krishna asks for is daily and repeatable, not a single act of will summoned at the last hour. What the mind returns to on an ordinary Tuesday afternoon carries more weight at the moment of death than anything a person might resolve to feel once dying has begun.

Read more

I am, by nature, a social person. Yet I live a solitary existence: I’m a single writer and yoga teacher. It's my dharma.

For years I assumed people meant connection, and solitude meant its absence. But I have not felt lonely since I started practising Raj Yoga (known as Ashtanga Yoga and Eight Limbs of Yoga). Not less lonely. Not lonely on the difficult days. Not lonely, full stop, despite socialising far less than I used to.

If loneliness has nothing to do with how many people are in the room, something else is causing it. Yoga is the science of self-realisation. It gives you the tools to build the best version of yourself so you can serve others. The eight-limbed path guides you to build a relationship with yourself, so you stop looking outward for gratification. That relationship, not any change in how many people were around me, is what ended the loneliness.

The loneliness I felt with a full social life

Before serious practice, my calendar was full. Dinners most nights, a phone that stayed lit into the evening. By any outside measure I was well connected. Underneath all of it, though, there was a low, steady loneliness I could not explain.

At the time I assumed the fix was more of the same: another dinner, another group, another distraction to close the gap. The gap reopened the moment I was alone again, which told me whatever was missing would not be solved by another person walking through the door.

Sadhguru argues loneliness is something a person does to themselves far more often than something done to them, withdrawing inward even while surrounded by others. “You have chosen to become an island unto yourself.” Years later, reading that line, I saw what had been happening in that busy, crowded period. The withdrawal was internal.

Solitude vs loneliness: why living alone stopped feeling lonely

Today my life is the opposite of life in my twenties. I’m single and live alone. Most days pass in long stretches of quiet: writing and walking the dog. Teaching at home is my only outlet. If the old assumption that people prevent loneliness and their absence causes it, this should be the loneliest stretch of my life thus far. It is instead the opposite.

Ramana Maharshi taught that solitude is a condition of the mind, not a location. A person can stand in the middle of a full, crowded life and remain in solitude, provided they are not tangled up in it, while another can sit alone in a forest and never find solitude, because the mind stays as busy as it was in the crowd. “Solitude is in the mind of man.”

The busy years held no solitude, despite what the calendar suggested. The quiet years are defined by it.

The loneliness epidemic, and what I was really chasing

The World Health Organization’s Commission on Social Connection reported in 2025 that one in six people worldwide experienced loneliness between 2014 and 2023. The former United States Surgeon General went further in 2023, naming an epidemic of loneliness and isolation and comparing its health risk to smoking fifteen cigarettes a day, making the case that connection is a health requirement.

So why did my loneliness disappear when my social contact shrank?

What I was chasing was validation. That I was worth choosing, delivered through a full calendar and constant company. Krishnamurti drew a hard line between loneliness and what he called aloneness: “Solitude is one thing and being alone is another.” His argument is that most relationships and most constant activity exist to escape a person’s own emptiness, and they collapse the moment the escape stops working, because the emptiness was never addressed, only avoided.

The objection is to using another person to escape yourself, not to connection itself. I love being with people. What changed is that I no longer need them to finish a sentence about myself I could not otherwise complete.

Why validation stopped feeling necessary

Traditional yoga, working from the inside out, taught me that I didn’t need a partner, an audience, or anyone’s approval to feel complete on a given day. Validation used to function as evidence. Now it does not register as information worth having.

Vivekananda treated looking outward for approval as a position of weakness, one serious practice is meant to correct, and treated independence as a return to something already whole rather than an achievement built on top of the self. Reading him confirmed a shift that had already taken place in me, without my noticing when.

Yoga works by building a relationship with yourself, so you stop looking outward for gratification. It isn't the physical practice that does this. The limbs most people practise, asana and pranayama, train the body. The ones that build a relationship with yourself sit either side of that: the yamas and niyamas first, then pratyahara, dharana, and dhyana, self-discipline before withdrawal, withdrawal before concentration, concentration before stillness. This is the same concept I wrote about in Why Traditional Yoga Doesn’t Try to Cure Boredom. Here it is applied to loneliness instead of boredom.

None of this was ever about arriving at independence for its own sake. The turning inward was preparation, not the destination. The point was always to turn back outward again, useful instead of needy. Vivekananda made the same claim about self-reliance and service in the same breath: “They alone live, who live for others.”

describes it as “Seva is a spiritual practice that serves God through serving others.”

My teaching and my writing are the practical shape this takes for me now. Both require the solitude, and both exist to be handed to someone else once they are finished.

What I offer people now is not need dressed up as love. It is what is left once the need is gone.

Want to Go Beyond Western Yoga? Join TYJ Community!

At The Yoga Journalist, we provide structured, ongoing study for teachers and practitioners who want depth, clarity, and accountability beyond certification.

Here is what we offer:

📰 Free – Read the stories, follow the conversation

Stay informed with independent coverage of the yoga world: contemporary stories, cultural commentary, and industry analysis that reveal what’s really happening beyond the mat.

Includes:

• ✅ Access to free articles featuring contemporary stories, commentary, and industry analysis

• ✅ Archive of public essays

🪷 Perfect for readers, practitioners, and professionals who want to stay grounded in reality and informed about the evolution of yoga today.

🔥 Paid – join the study community

US$15/month

Go beyond commentary and unlock the full depth of yoga knowledge. Paid subscribers enter an ongoing study space with direct access to philosophical inquiry.

Includes:

• ✅ Full archive including educational content

• ✅ Members-only discussion and community access

• ✅ Monthly Online Satsang (live Q&A exploring philosophy and practice)

🧘‍♀️ For students, teachers, and sincere practitioners ready to study in depth.

🕉️ Mentorship – deep study (limited to 5 spots)

The Yoga Journalist Mentorship is designed for teachers, practitioners and yoga content creators who want more than another certification.

It is a one-to-one mentorship designed to help practitioners and teachers integrate yoga more deeply into their practice, teaching and professional lives.

If you’re ready to deepen your practice, refine your teaching and find your voice, book in for a free 20 minute call.

Distinguishing jnana from vijnana: wisdom versus realisation

Both terms share the root jna, to know, the origin of the Greek gnosis. Jnana is spiritual wisdom, not scholarship or accumulated study, and is the antonym of ajnana, ignorance. Vijnana asks the practitioner for wisdom that is practised and carried into daily conduct.

Ramakrishna said one who has merely heard of fire has ajnana, one who has seen fire has jnana, but one who has built a fire and cooked on it has vijnana.

Read more

I have not felt the sting of boredom since I started deep practice. Not because life became more eventful, but because I stopped treating boredom as a problem to solve outward. When the feeling starts to rise now, I look inward, at what I have stopped tending to, rather than outward, at what I might add.

On my first trip to Rishikesh, I was attending up to four satsangs a day (I feel like an idiot admitting this publicly, but it’s true). Practicing up to two hours of meditation morning and evening. Daily asana. Seva in between. Between sessions I moved from ashram to ashram, listening to every teacher I could find. Devotion, I told myself.

This is not devotion. It is restlessness wearing a spiritual excuse. Restlessness because I did not trust.

Then I got bored. Bored, in the middle of a schedule with no unfilled hour in it.

I assumed the boredom meant I needed a new teacher, a sharper technique, a different ashram, a new location, something I hadn’t tried yet. A long-term visitor, someone who had watched several monsoons of newcomers arrive in exactly this state, told me: that’s a sign you need to sit.

Was the boredom telling me I needed more yoga, or was it telling me something else? I followed his advice, and sat.

The modern myth: boredom as a ‘problem’ to be solved

Modern culture treats boredom as a problem with an obvious fix: do something new, consume more, change the practice. A bored student switches studios. A bored meditator switches apps. The assumption is that boredom points outward, towards a deficiency in the activity itself.

Traditional yoga tends to respond differently. Rather than adjusting external circumstances, it asks the practitioner to examine the condition of the mind that is producing the boredom in the first place.

Ram Dass taught the moment discomfort arises, most people reach for another experience to relieve it, moving from one thing to the next in what he called a plane of rushes, endlessly collecting. He argued that this collecting habit is really an avoidance of a much simpler, harder truth: that in the present moment, nothing may be happening at all, and that this is survivable.

This is the opposite of the instinct most of us bring to boredom, which is to treat it as evidence that we have chosen the wrong practice rather than as the practice itself beginning to work.

When restlessness disguises itself as devotion

Eventually I stopped moving between teachers. I stayed with one guru, attended his teachings, and let them settle rather than immediately reaching for the next one. Nothing about my external circumstances improved. If anything, the days grew quieter and less eventful. But the way I experienced them changed.

Looking back, I wasn’t bored in Rishikesh. I was trying to escape the practice that was already in front of me, using motion as a substitute for depth. Four satsangs a day is not devotion when none of them has time to change you. It is avoidance, arranged to look like effort.

Boredom, since then, has become a signal rather than a verdict. It rarely means I need more stimulation. Far more often it means I have stopped tending to something that already has my attention available, if I would only give it: the practice itself, gratitude for a teacher already given, or simply sitting long enough for a teaching to sink in.

What traditional teachers say about boredom

Ram Dass located this teaching in his own body, not as theory. During two months Vipassana meditation in Burma, he filled the first day with routines: meditating, arranging his sleeping bag, studying a spider at the window. Then the months ahead became visible, and the boredom set in. Rather than fighting it, he turned towards it. “Boredom became my object of meditation,” he said. Instead of accepting the thought “I’m bored” at face value, he began asking what boredom actually was, what it felt like, examining the sensation rather than the label. The restlessness it produced started to loosen.

made a version of this same argument in a recent Substack Note. “Boredom is beautiful,” she wrote, pointing to how quickly most of us reach for a phone the moment a quiet moment opens up, filling every gap with scrolling, notifications, and noise. Her point was that boredom is not empty at all. It is the space in which insight, creativity, and clarity actually have room to arise, and the habit of immediately “fixing” it closes that space before anything can form.

Both point towards the same conclusion from different angles: the discomfort that shows up as boredom is not a fault in the student or the teaching. It is what happens when the habit of constant activity meets a practice built for stillness.

The psychology of attention: what boredom is signaling

Psychological research by Eastwood and colleagues, in The Unengaged Mind: Defining Boredom in Terms of Attention (2012), found that boredom is closely tied to attention rather than to a simple absence of activity. A person surrounded by things to do can still be bored if their attention cannot engage with any of them.

Danckert and Eastwood, in Out of My Skull: The Psychology of Boredom (2020), describe boredom as functioning as a signal rather than a problem in itself, one that indicates a mismatch between what a person is doing and what would actually hold their attention.

The parallel with traditional practice is direct. Where modern psychology treats boredom as information about attention, traditional yoga treats internal discomfort more broadly as something to investigate before it is eliminated. Neither position asks the practitioner to override boredom with more stimulation. Both ask what it is pointing towards.

As explored previously on TYJ’s Stop Fresh Yoga Sequencing: The Evidence for Repetition, repetition only becomes transformative when we remain with it long enough for discomfort to reveal something deeper

From ‘fixing’ to investigating: a new approach to practice

If I see boredom starting to creep into my life, it is not an inconvenience. It usually tells me I have mistaken movement for progress, or forgotten to be grateful for what I have. It is a sign to go inward.

The lesson from Rishikesh was never that I needed another teacher. It was that I had finally become still enough to hear the one I already had.

Want to Go Beyond Western Yoga? Join TYJ Community!

At The Yoga Journalist, we provide structured, ongoing study for teachers and practitioners who want depth, clarity, and accountability beyond certification.

Here is what we offer:

📰 Free – Read the stories, follow the conversation

Stay informed with independent coverage of the yoga world: contemporary stories, cultural commentary, and industry analysis that reveal what’s really happening beyond the mat.

Includes:

• ✅ Access to free articles featuring contemporary stories, commentary, and industry analysis

• ✅ Archive of public essays

🪷 Perfect for readers, practitioners, and professionals who want to stay grounded in reality and informed about the evolution of yoga today.

🔥 Paid – join the study community

US$15/month

Go beyond commentary and unlock the full depth of yoga knowledge. Paid subscribers enter an ongoing study space with direct access to philosophical inquiry.

Includes:

• ✅ Full archive including educational content

• ✅ Members-only discussion and community access

• ✅ Monthly Online Satsang (live Q&A exploring philosophy and practice)

🧘‍♀️ For students, teachers, and sincere practitioners ready to study in depth.

🕉️ Mentorship – deep study (limited to 5 spots)

The Yoga Journalist Mentorship is designed for teachers, practitioners and yoga content creators who want more than another certification.

It is a one-to-one mentorship designed to help practitioners and teachers integrate yoga more deeply into their practice, teaching and professional lives.

If you’re ready to deepen your practice, refine your teaching and find your voice, book in for a free 20 minute call.

Chapter six of the Bhagavad Gita marks the point where Krishna moves Arjuna from karma yoga, the active life of service, toward the interior practice of meditation. The chapter also strips the word yogi of centuries of confusion, returning it to a definition rooted in work performed without attachment t…

Read more

One of the most common concerns raised by yoga teachers is the pressure to create a fresh sequence every week. Teacher trainings encourage originality, and students often arrive expecting each class to deliver something new.

Yet every major tradition from the Hatha Yoga Pradipika to the traditional Rāja Yoga schools and later lineages including Ashtanga, Iyengar and Sivananda, repetition rather than continual variation was the dominant method of instruction.

Why does tradition contradict Western teachings on sequencing, and what does contemporary science say? The good news is teachers can stop stressing, and students and can deepen their experience by following the simple evidence.

Why the Hatha Yoga Pradipika teaches only 15 asanas

Modern yoga often equates progress with expanding a student’s repertoire of postures.

The Hatha Yoga Pradipika takes the opposite approach. While acknowledging an array of asanas, it distills the practice into 15 foundational asanas before moving to pranayama, mudra, bandha and samadhi.

The architecture of the Hatha Yoga Pradipika is itself an argument. It introduces a limited repertoire of asanas, then immediately moves beyond them. The text presents that once the body is sufficiently prepared, the practitioner should deepen attention rather than expand physical vocabulary.

The objective the Hatha Yoga Pradipika sets out is mastery of the instrument, not expansion of its parts.

Why most traditional yoga lineages repeat the same sequence

The argument for repetition does not belong to one school. Ashtanga Yoga comprises six series, each taught in a fixed order. A student does not advance to the next asana or series until the current one is mastered, which means the same sequence may be practised for years before any new material is introduced.

The Sivananda tradition centres practice around 12 foundational postures, returned to in every class.

Iyengar Yoga uses a defined set of asanas, but its distinctiveness lies in returning to the same posture multiple times within a single session, each repetition used to refine a different layer of physical and internal alignment.

These lineages disagree on much, but their structural decision to restrict variation and build depth through return is consistent across all of them. When independent traditions arrive at the same teaching method through different routes, that convergence deserves examination as a deliberate teaching principle rather than historical accident.

Traditional yoga sequencing was not a product of limited anatomical knowledge. It was a choice made by teachers who understood what skill acquisition in this discipline actually requires. The question a contemporary teacher might usefully sit with is why the industry departed from that model, and on whose authority.

Why repeating the same posture improves alignment

Repetition is frequently misread as mechanical practice, a criticism that Iyengar addressed throughout his teaching career. Returning to the same posture session after session allows a practitioner to refine skeletal organisation, muscular action, breathing and attention in accumulating layers.

Each return to a familiar posture exposes something previously unnoticed, not because the posture has changed but because the practitioner’s capacity for observation has developed. Constantly changing sequences interrupts this process before it can compound.

The student who encounters a posture once a month builds no sustained relationship with it; the student who returns to it every session for a year builds something closer to mastery. A 2022 systematic review published in PLOS ONE confirmed that motor learning develops through repeated task practice, producing more efficient movement patterns and stronger long-term skill retention than variable practice in early and intermediate learners. The mechanism traditional yoga teachers have taught over millennia is repeatedly confirmed by science.

Why repeated asana works like japa meditation

The standard mala contains 108 identical beads, and its structural value lies in removing novelty. Each repetition of mantra stabilises attention rather than generating a new experience; the sameness is the point, not a deficiency to be overcome.

Repeated asana follows the same principle. As external novelty decreases, internal observation becomes available in a way it cannot be when the practitioner is occupied with learning unfamiliar movement.

A 2022 EEG study by Zhang, Peng and Chen, published in Frontiers in Psychology, measured neural activity during Om chanting, and found that it shifted attentional resources away from external stimuli and inward. The study recorded reduced P1 and late positive potential amplitudes during chanting, indicating decreased external vigilance, alongside deactivation of the amygdala and increased prefrontal cortex activity associated with inward attentional regulation. The mechanism japa produces in the brain is what fresh sequencing forecloses in asana: the shift from acquiring external information to observing internal experience with sustained, refined attention.

What contemporary research says about fresh sequencing

Contemporary movement science has spent decades investigating how humans acquire movement skills. Contemporary movement science has spent decades investigating how humans acquire movement skills. Its conclusions resemble the teaching methods preserved in traditional yoga far more than modern sequencing practices.

The PLOS ONE systematic review on motor learning establishes that repeated practice of the same task strengthens movement patterns and supports long-term skill acquisition more effectively than variable practice.

A narrative review examining the known effects of yoga on the brain, in relation to motor performance, body awareness and attentional regulation, found that repeated yoga practice improves all three. This is what traditional fixed-sequence systems were designed to produce, and it is worth noting that the tradition arrived at this understanding without the benefit of neuroimaging.

The burden of constant sequencing, which many teachers now experience as a professional obligation, does not appear to benefit students at the level the research examines. It produces variety, which is a different thing from progress.

Why yoga teachers can stop worrying about sequencing

The historical evidence, confirmed by contemporary movement science, suggests that the pressure to produce a fresh sequence every week is a modern expectation with no scientific benefits.

From the Hatha Yoga Pradipika to the lineages that followed it, traditional systems consistently restricted physical variation and encouraged progressively deeper observation of familiar practice. As examined in the TYJ analysis of abhyasa and how traditional yoga defines progress, the tradition has always understood sustained practice as the vehicle. The question is no longer how to create a different sequence next week. It becomes: how much deeper could a student’s practice grow if their teacher committed to the same sequence long enough for genuine refinement to occur?

Want to Go Beyond Western Yoga? Join TYJ Community!

At The Yoga Journalist, we provide structured, ongoing study for teachers and practitioners who want depth, clarity, and accountability beyond certification.

Here is what we offer:

📰 Free – Read the stories, follow the conversation

Stay informed with independent coverage of the yoga world: contemporary stories, cultural commentary, and industry analysis that reveal what’s really happening beyond the mat.

Includes:

• ✅ Access to free articles featuring contemporary stories, commentary, and industry analysis

• ✅ Archive of public essays

🪷 Perfect for readers, practitioners, and professionals who want to stay grounded in reality and informed about the evolution of yoga today.

🔥 Paid – join the study community

US$15/month

Go beyond commentary and unlock the full depth of yoga knowledge. Paid subscribers enter an ongoing study space with direct access to philosophical inquiry.

Includes:

• ✅ Full archive including educational content

• ✅ Members-only discussion and community access

• ✅ Monthly Online Satsang (live Q&A exploring philosophy and practice)

🧘‍♀️ For students, teachers, and sincere practitioners ready to study in depth.

🕉️ Mentorship – deep study (limited to 5 spots)

The Yoga Journalist Mentorship is designed for teachers, practitioners and yoga content creators who want more than another certification.

It is a one-to-one mentorship designed to help practitioners and teachers integrate yoga more deeply into their practice, teaching and professional lives.

If you’re ready to deepen your practice, refine your teaching and find your voice, book in for a free 20 minute call.

The fifth chapter of the Bhagavad Gita asks: is it better to renounce the world, or to remain in it and act without attachment?

Eknath Easwaran interprets Krishna’s answer as Sannyasa, the formal path of renunciation, is a legitimate road to Self-realisation, but karma yoga, the path of selfless service, is…

Read more

Last year, a yoga teacher with more than 1,000 hours of training contacted me with a familiar dilemma. She was considering another certification.

The problem was not a lack of qualifications.

It was that she didn’t embody yoga.

Across the industry, teachers are accumulating more information than ever before while searching for deeper guidance, supervision and accountability. The future of yoga education may not be another training. It may be mentorship.

The Problem: The industrialisation of yoga

The structural weaknesses of modern yoga education have already been examined extensively in The Yoga Journalist’s Industry Analysis archive. Teacher trainings have become increasingly standardised, commercialised and detached from traditional models of transmission. So what next?

The Global Wellness Institute’s 2026 Science of Yoga Initiative identified a growing body of research examining yoga’s role in nervous-system regulation, behavioural health, emotional resilience and preventative healthcare. The report described a shift away from understanding yoga primarily as a fitness activity towards understanding it as a sophisticated system of self-regulation and therapeutic support. (Global Wellness Institute Science of Yoga Trends 2026.)

As interest in deeper forms of yoga continues to grow, the dominant educational model has not kept pace. While research increasingly focuses on complexity, individualisation and therapeutic application, many teacher trainings remain organised around standardised curricula designed for scale.

The result is a growing mismatch between what teachers are expected to understand and how they are trained to learn.

Why ‘crash courses’ are not the answer

The industry’s preferred response to educational shortcomings has been continuing education. Why? Because it’s a cash cow.

Teachers who feel uncertain are encouraged to complete a 300-hour programme. If uncertainty remains, the solution becomes a specialist training, another certification or a further qualification.

A 2025 study of pre-service teacher education found that structured mentorship improved professional confidence, reflective practice and practical competence more effectively than coursework alone. (Exploring Pre-Service Teacher Professional Learning on Their Preparedness for Teaching Practicum (ResearchGate, 2024/2025)

Yoga teaching is not primarily an informational activity, it is guidance to holistic health: mental, physical, and spiritual.

Teachers rarely struggle because they have forgotten anatomy. They struggle because real students rarely behave like case studies. Professional judgement develops through observation, feedback and experience.

Additional certifications often provide more information without addressing the underlying problem.

The result can leave teachers highly credentialed but professionally unmoored.

The solution: mentorship as the new standard

Mentorship is often described as supplementary education.

A more accurate description would be development for teachers and practitioners.

Medicine does not assume that a graduate becomes competent immediately upon qualification. Newly qualified doctors work under supervision before practising independently. Teacher education programmes pair graduates with experienced mentors, while psychotherapists undertake ongoing supervision throughout their careers.

These professions recognise a simple reality: information alone does not create competence.

Yoga is increasingly encountering the same challenge. In India, teaching yoga is closer to practising medicine than leading a fitness class because the teacher is working with the whole person. As the Global Wellness Institute’s 2026 report demonstrates, yoga is increasingly being applied to mental health, behavioural change, chronic disease management and nervous-system regulation. These developments require teachers capable of responding to complexity rather than simply delivering information.

Mentorship provides a structure for integrating yoga into lived experience rather than simply accumulating knowledge about it. Through enquiry, reflection and personal practice, practitioners and teachers are challenged to align what they teach with how they live. The relationship creates space to examine blind spots, question assumptions and develop greater self-awareness in ways that no standardised curriculum can provide.

There is also an ethical dimension. Mentorship encourages accountability not only in teaching but in living. It asks whether actions, choices and relationships reflect the principles a practitioner claims to embody.

The Hatha Yoga Pradipika assumes progress occurs through qualified instruction. Modern mentorship may simply be a contemporary expression of that older principle.

From performing to practising

The future of yoga education may not be determined by how many new certifications the industry can create.

It may be determined by whether the profession rediscovers the importance of transmission.

The distinction matters because information and competence are not the same thing. A teacher can accumulate hundreds of hours of training while remaining uncertain in practice. Professional judgement develops through observation, reflection, accountability and guidance.

Yoga’s traditional lineages understood this. Increasingly, educational research does as well.

For teachers deciding where to invest their time, energy and resources, the choice is becoming clearer. One path emphasises accumulation. The other emphasises enquiry.

How TYJ is being part of the solution

The Yoga Journalist Mentorship is designed for teachers, practitioners and yoga content creators who want more than another certification.

It is a one-to-one mentorship designed to help practitioners and teachers integrate yoga more deeply into their practice, teaching and professional lives.

If you’re ready to deepen your practice, refine your teaching and find your voice, book in for a free 20 minute call.

Eknath Easwaran’s commentary on Chapter 4 of the Bhagavad Gita states the goal of traditional yoga philosophy is liberation from the cycle of birth and death. Karma yoga produces psychological steadiness as a byproduct of correct practice, not as its aim. The fire of spiritual awareness described in this chapter bu…

Read more

To the untrained eye, on the first read, it would have been impressive. The structure was coherent, the tone authoritative, the Sanskrit terms deployed with apparent confidence. To the trained eye, it was an abomination.

Yajna, the Gita's concept of selfless service for the greater good, had been recast as Christian self-sacrifice.

The three gunas (rajas, tamas, and sattva), the three elements of energy present within all matter, from thought to living beings to planets, had been reframed as personality types that override individual will, a concept belonging to Western psychology rather than to Samkhya philosophy.

The AI had not so much translated the tradition as quietly replaced it with something more familiar to a Western audience, and done so with complete conviction. This, it turns out, is not the machine's fault. AI does not generate misinformation about traditional yoga so much as it collects and reproduces the misinformation already saturating the internet, and returns it at speed, in good prose, with no indication that anything has gone wrong.

The internet knows more about yoga than ever. Why is so much of it wrong?

There has never been more yoga content in circulation. Sanskrit terms appear across health publications, corporate wellness programmes, and lifestyle platforms. The Yoga Sutras are cited in psychology journals. The Gita is quoted on LinkedIn. Volume has not produced accuracy. It has produced scale without scrutiny.

The patterns are consistent enough to constitute a method. Sanskrit terms are translated once, inaccurately, and the inaccurate translation circulates across subsequent articles, training manuals, and social media posts until repetition confers the appearance of authority. Dharma becomes “your life’s purpose.” Vairagya becomes “letting go.” Ahimsa migrates into dietary marketing. Each reduction moves a precise philosophical concept toward the concerns of a Western consumer and away from the tradition in which it carries specific, technical meaning. The driving logic is not scholarship. Teachings are shaped to sell: to feel affirming, accessible, and immediately applicable. What the tradition demands, sustained practice, the dismantling of the ego’s preferences, and years of study under qualified guidance, does not convert well. The internet rewards visibility and engagement. Traditional yoga rewards transformation. Those are different objectives, and they produce fundamentally different content.

How AI exposed the weaknesses in modern yoga education

AI language models do not independently study yoga. They identify patterns in published material and reproduce those patterns with syntactic confidence. When inaccurate material dominates what is available, inaccurate material enters the output. This raises a question more significant than anything the technology itself presents: why has so much distorted content been produced, published, and treated as authoritative in the first place?

The answer sits in the structure of modern yoga education. In brief: the 200-hour teacher training standard produces graduates authorised to instruct, publish, and train others within a contact time that compresses complex philosophical systems into weekend summaries. Those graduates write articles and build followings. Their content enters the available published record. AI trains on that record. The distortions compound at scale, each generation of content reproducing the errors of the last with increasing polish and decreasing connection to any primary source.

Traditional yoga was never designed to be learned through textbooks or slogans

The knowledge problem AI has exposed is not a problem of insufficient information. A practitioner can memorise precise definitions of dharma, vairagya, samadhi, and atman and remain entirely unequipped to understand or transmit them. Traditional yoga drew a firm distinction between intellectual knowledge and the experiential understanding that arises through sustained practice under direct guidance. These are not two points on the same continuum. They are categorically different kinds of knowing.

The guru-disciple relationship existed as the structural answer to that distinction, a system developed not as authority for its own sake but to prevent exactly the kind of context collapse that now characterises mainstream yoga content. The Bhagavad Gita encodes this in Chapter 4, verse 34: seek out a teacher of wisdom, learn through discipleship, inquiry, and service. The text itself specifies the transmission method. No algorithm performs that function. An AI model cannot assess whether the person asking it to define samadhi has the experiential ground for the definition to mean anything, and returns instead the most statistically common answer from the available published record.

When yoga becomes content, misinformation becomes inevitable

The content economy operates on requirements structurally incompatible with how traditional yoga knowledge was designed to be experienced. Platforms reward frequency of publication. Search engines favour content that answers questions directly, briefly, and with apparent certainty. Advertising models incentivise reach over rigour. In traditional yoga the teachings cannot be understood until the practitioner embodies them. That process is measured in years, sometimes decades. The practitioner needs to be anointed by their teacher to progress. It produces nothing publishable in the interim.

The result is a systematic compression of complex teachings into formats the platforms can use: quotes extracted from context, reels built on single concepts, teacher-training summaries that reduce a philosophical system to a checklist, search-engine articles written to rank rather than to instruct. Accuracy becomes secondary to engagement at every stage of that production process. AI is the most recent and most efficient participant in it. The model does not introduce a new kind of error. It takes the errors already present in the available record and reproduces them faster, in greater volume, at a level of surface polish that makes them harder to identify without prior knowledge of the tradition.

AI did not create the problem

The inaccurate AI output was not the story. It was evidence. A tradition built on direct experience, long-term practice, and teacher-student transmission has been converted, at scale, into an information product. That conversion began long before large language models existed, in the certification programmes, the training manuals, and the content platforms that together produced the published record AI now reflects back. The technology has made the consequences of that conversion specific and visible in a way that decades of human-led content production did not.

The future of accurate yoga education will not be resolved at the level of the algorithm. A more sophisticated model trained on the same distorted record will return the same distorted results with greater fluency. What is required is a willingness, among practitioners, teachers, and schools, to reconnect with the transmission conditions that historically maintained the integrity of these teachings: primary sources studied under qualified guidance, practice sustained over time, and the recognition that understanding cannot be abbreviated without being lost. The machine reflects what it has been taught. The more pressing question is whether modern yoga still remembers how it learns.

Want to Go Beyond Western Yoga? Join TYJ Community!

At The Yoga Journalist, we provide structured, ongoing study for teachers and practitioners who want depth, clarity, and accountability beyond certification.

Here is what we offer:

📰 Free – Read the stories, follow the conversation

Stay informed with independent coverage of the yoga world: contemporary stories, cultural commentary, and industry analysis that reveal what’s really happening beyond the mat.

Includes:

• ✅ Access to free articles featuring contemporary stories, commentary, and industry analysis

• ✅ Archive of public essays

🪷 Perfect for readers, practitioners, and professionals who want to stay grounded in reality and informed about the evolution of yoga today.

🔥 Paid – join the study community

US$15/month

Go beyond commentary and unlock the full depth of yoga knowledge. Paid subscribers enter an ongoing study space with direct access to philosophical inquiry.

Includes:

• ✅ Full archive including educational content

• ✅ Members-only discussion and community access

• ✅ Monthly Online Satsang (live Q&A exploring philosophy and practice)

🧘‍♀️ For students, teachers, and sincere practitioners ready to study in depth.

💎 Founding Member – sustain the mission

US $220/year

Founding Members directly support the independence of The Yoga Journalist and receive additional access and acknowledgment.

Includes:

• ✅ All Paid-tier benefits

• ✅ One personal email answered per month

• ✅ Quarterly Curated Compendium / Ebook

• ✅ Public dedication and recognition

🌟 For readers who want to nurture meaningful, independent writing and be part of the publication’s legacy.

🕉️ Mentorship – deep study (limited to 5 spots)

US$350/month/AUD$350

An intimate tier for serious students, teachers, and editors seeking direct guidance and structured depth.

Includes:

• ✅ All benefits from Paid and Founding tiers

• ✅ One private 1:1 monthly video call

• ✅ One in-depth weekly email exchange

🪷 For those ready to integrate yoga’s timeless teachings with clarity, accountability, and personal depth.

This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Karma yoga, the path of selfless action set out in Bhagavad Gita Chapter 3, is not a doctrine of renunciation. It is a binding obligation. Before engaging with its central teaching, one distinction requires establishing: yajna, means selfless service performed for the welfare of the universe or the…

Read more

What does ‘follow your heart’ actually mean? Guruji's version produced ostracisation from his own tradition, a deliberate sacrifice of income, a novel excavating the most painful episodes of a life, and a professional position that costs money every year to hold. But it is the only route to truth, and the only path out of long-term suffering.

The Bhagavad Gita 2.47, in Eknath Easwaran's translation, makes the stakes explicit: "You have the right to work, but never to the fruit of work. You should never engage in action for the sake of reward, nor should you long for inaction. Perform work in this world, Arjuna, as a man established within himself, without selfish attachments, and alike in success and defeat."

The heart points toward dharma, right action, and leaves you to pay for it. This article extends the account first published in How I Met My Guru: From Fashion’s Front Row to the Banks Of The Ganges, and examines five instances in which following that instruction produced a specific, measurable cost, and why absorbing that cost is the only path out of suffering the tradition identifies. It is anchored in Chapter 2 of the Bhagavad Gita.

The teacher who left everything

Guruji's own teacher gave him one instruction when his education ended: teach, and follow your heart. It was up to Guruji how he practiced this.

Guruji's heart said leave the monastic system and spread the authentic tradition to a wider audience. The weight of that decision is only legible when you understand what he was leaving. He had won the national gold medal for asana. He led spiritual services at ashrams throughout Rishikesh and was sought out for counsel by those inside the tradition that had formed him. This was his friends and family he had grown up with from the age of five. None of that standing transferred.

Teaching lay people, most of them Western, most of them arriving with fundamental misconceptions about yoga, placed him outside every circle in which his knowledge was recognised. In the monastic system he had the security of a home and community. Teaching independently, he has neither. He survives on donations.

This is the first fact about Guruji's teaching that the wellness version of it obscures: the man who told me to follow my heart had done exactly that, at precise and continuing cost, before I ever sat across from him.

Bhagavad Gita 2.33 says: abandoning one's duty out of fear of social consequence is the greater failure.

Guruji did not weigh the consequences. He acted.

The yoga I chose not to chase

I arrived in Rishikesh with a plan: a short stay, then Pune and Mysore, the two cities whose institutions confer the credentials Western yoga culture accepts as legitimate. The teachers I had trained with across the globe were descendants from those lineages, and the checklist my Sydney teachers gave me before I left was drawn from the same logic.

Guruji appeared nowhere on it. He was in his mid-twenties, newly finished with his own education, operating without institutional affiliation the Western yoga world would recognise. My heart said stay. I stayed six months and never made it to Pune or Mysore.

Guruji’s lineage is not as recognised as Ashtanga or Iyengar, but both Patthabi Jois and BKS Iyengar are from Guruji’s lineage. Try explaining that to Western yoga certification bodies. Most have never heard of gurukula, let alone traced lineages back to it.

This is not complaint. It is data. Bhagavad Gita 2.41 describes the resolute intellect as single-pointed, against the irresolute mind that branches in pursuit of external sanction. The checklist I carried to Rishikesh was a document of branches. The single point clarified itself the morning I met Guruji and has not shifted since.

Why external authority is a trap

The moment that gave this article its title repeated throughout my time in Rishikesh and has not stopped since.

Practice would reach a wall, and I would go to Guruji asking what the scriptures said. His answer was consistent: "The scriptures say follow your heart. Practice, and see what your heart says."

What I was asking for, each time, was external authority that would spare me developing my own discernment. Guruji refused to supply it, because supplying it would have deepened the habit I needed to break.

The restless mind, as Bhagavad Gita 6.35 describes, is brought under control through practice and dispassion, not through accumulating correct references. The texts describe the territory. They do not cross it on your behalf. This is the distinction lost when the teaching is extracted from its context: ‘follow your heart’ does not mean act on instinct. It means acting from Atman, the soul that connects us to all that is.

Atman is the self that exists beneath conditioning, ego, and the constant demand for reassurance. Reaching that self requires work until the noise subsides enough for something more reliable to be heard. That process cannot be shortcut by finding the right verse, and Guruji knew better than to pretend otherwise.

Writing towards the truth

The novel I am writing existed inside me before my spiritual practice began. It is not a book the practice produced; it is a book the practice made it possible to write. The story is about truth and ego, and writing it requires returning to the most painful moments of my life, sitting inside them long enough to render them accurately, and trusting that the compulsion to tell this particular story is instruction rather than indulgence.

My professional life as a copywriter provided technical capability. A near-death experience removed the argument for further delay. What neither provided was the belief that I was the right person to write it. That belief has not arrived, and waiting for it is the error Bhagavad Gita 2.14 describes as: the fluctuations of confidence and doubt must be endured, not resolved before one acts. The heart's instruction and belief in one's own suitability are not the same thing.

The book is being written not because I feel qualified but because the instruction has been consistent long enough that refusing it is no longer a serious position.

The financial cost of integrity

The consequences of teaching traditional yoga rather than its commercially dominant Western form are not philosophical. They are financial.

Students arrive expecting yoga to produce comfort. Traditional yoga, as Guruji taught it, asks them to observe themselves honestly, which is a harder proposition to sell and a less forgiving market to occupy. The gap between what students expect and what authentic practice requires is where income is lost.

My article Yoga Has a Content Problem: Here is Why You Won't See My Asana Practice Online, discusses an unpopular position in an industry that rewards visibility and ease carries an ongoing cost.

This is Guruji's choice reproduced in a different context: the same structural decision, the same results. He left mastery and standing to follow his heart into uncertain ground.

Bhagavad Gita 2.38 instructs Arjuna to treat gain and loss, victory and defeat, as equivalent, and then act. The instruction does not make the loss smaller. It removes the loss as a reason to stop.

Why real yoga isn't about feeling

The wellness industry's version of ‘follow your heart’ is permission to honour feeling. Guruji's version is the opposite. Every instance in this article involved acting against feeling: against the comfort of recognised credentials, against the relief of external authority, against the instinct not to return to painful material, against the economic logic of teaching what sells.

The Bhagavad Gita's second chapter is not a text about honouring Arjuna's emotional state. It is a systematic argument for why that state is the least reliable guide available to him. Krishna does not validate Arjuna's grief, confusion, or moral paralysis. He dismantles them and replaces them with one instruction: act from the self that is established, not from the self that is afraid.

The hardship is not incidental to the path. It is the mechanism by which the conditioned self is worn away until what remains is the self that was never in conflict to begin with. That is the tradition's account of freedom from suffering: not the absence of difficulty, but the dissolution of the self that suffers. The teaching is four words. The work it demands is a life.

🧘‍♀️ Like this story? It’s just the surface.

Join The Yoga Journalist as a Paid Subscriber for full access to educational essays, lecture archives, community and author access, and the Monthly Online Satsang — where real yoga is studied, not sold.

Can’t subscribe? Help The Yoga Journalist by spreading the word!

If you enjoyed the post or publication, please share.

Share

Share The Yoga Journalist

Krishna, who has remained silent through the entirety of Chapter 1, now speaks. Arjuna stops arguing and begins asking. His questions are the questions that carry the entire Gita forward.

Does he have a soul?

Does it survive death?

Is there a reality deeper than the one the senses report, and if so, wh…

Read more

‘Nervous system regulation’ has become the dominant phrase of modern yoga culture. It appears in retreat advertising, studio mission statements, somatic certifications, podcast interviews, and social media captions with striking consistency. Contemporary yoga increasingly presents itself not as a spiritual discipline, but as a technology for autonomic stability.

The shift is historically significant because yoga has always possessed its own psychological framework. Patanjali did not describe yoga as stress reduction. The Yoga Sutras define practice as the restraint of mental fluctuations (1.2) and locate suffering within attachment, conditioning, and misidentification rather than dysregulation of the nervous system. Yet modern yoga discourse increasingly bypasses this philosophical architecture in favour of clinical terminology drawn from neuroscience and trauma therapy.

This is not simply a change in vocabulary. It reflects a transformation in how yoga legitimises itself within Western culture.

Why neuroscience became commercially useful

The language of nervous system regulation solved several problems for the modern yoga industry simultaneously.

First, it gave yoga scientific credibility without requiring scientific precision. Terms such as “vagus nerve activation”, “polyvagal safety”, and “regulation” carry the authority of medicine while remaining broad enough for flexible marketing. A studio can advertise “nervous system healing” more easily than liberation from avidya.

Second, neuroscience language allowed yoga to detach itself from overt spirituality at a moment when institutional religion was declining across much of the West. Wellness consumers increasingly distrust religious authority structures while remaining highly receptive to therapeutic frameworks. The nervous system became a secular replacement for the soul.

Third, the language aligned yoga with the economics of burnout. Modern wellness culture revolves around overstimulation, anxiety, insomnia, emotional exhaustion, and digital fatigue. Nervous system regulation positions yoga as recovery infrastructure for late capitalist working conditions. The practice becomes compatible with the lifestyles that classical yoga often questioned.

This transition accelerated after the mainstream success of trauma discourse. Bessel van der Kolk’s The Body Keeps the Score reshaped wellness culture by popularising the idea that trauma is stored physiologically within the body. Yoga entered this framework as a therapeutic intervention rather than a metaphysical discipline. Teacher trainings rapidly absorbed the language of grounding, co-regulation, and somatic safety.

The result is that yoga classes now frequently resemble therapeutic environments more than philosophical ones.

The rise of the therapeutic yoga teacher

The modern yoga teacher increasingly operates within a quasi-clinical role. Studio biographies emphasise trauma-informed training, nervous system literacy, somatic facilitation, and emotional safety. Sanskrit study, textual literacy, and philosophical lineage often occupy far less space.

This reflects a deeper institutional change within yoga education itself. Contemporary teacher trainings devote substantial hours to anatomy and therapeutic communication because these skills are commercially transferable. Knowledge of samadhi is difficult to monetise within healthcare partnerships or corporate wellness programmes. Nervous system language is not.

The transformation also changes the social function of yoga classes. Historically, yoga frequently demanded confrontation with attachment, discipline, austerity, silence, or ego destabilisation. Much of modern wellness culture prioritises regulation, comfort, and emotional containment instead.

The distinction matters because these systems are built upon different assumptions about suffering.

The Bhagavad Gita does not frame distress as a nervous system problem requiring stabilisation. Arjuna’s crisis on the battlefield is existential, ethical, and metaphysical. Krishna does not instruct him to regulate his physiology. He dismantles Arjuna’s attachment to identity, consequence, and death itself.

Modern yoga culture often removes that philosophical intensity. What remains is a therapeutic adaptation of selected techniques.

Why the language spread so quickly online

Social media accelerated the dominance of nervous system discourse because the terminology performs well algorithmically. “Regulation” is emotionally legible, clinically adjacent, and broadly applicable to large audiences. It also functions as identity language.

The phrase allows consumers to reinterpret ordinary emotional experiences through a therapeutic framework:

• fatigue becomes dysregulation

• discomfort becomes nervous system activation

• withdrawal becomes protection

• emotional dependency becomes attachment wounding

This therapeutic reframing has expanded far beyond yoga into dating culture, productivity discourse, parenting, and self-help media. Yoga simply adapted itself to the prevailing language environment.

The trend also reflects a broader aesthetic shift within wellness culture. During the 2010s, yoga branding centred heavily on spirituality, transcendence, and manifestation. The post-pandemic wellness economy shifted towards clinical aesthetics: nervous systems, hormones, trauma, sleep optimisation, cortisol, and biometric tracking.

The body became measurable again.

Mark Singleton’s research on twentieth-century yoga demonstrates that modern yoga repeatedly reshapes itself around dominant cultural authorities. Earlier generations aligned yoga with physical culture and gymnastics. The current phase aligns yoga with neuroscience and therapy.

In both cases, legitimacy comes from proximity to respected institutional systems.

What disappears when yoga becomes regulation

Classical yoga traditions contain detailed physiological and psychological models. Yet those systems existed within larger metaphysical frameworks concerning liberation, renunciation, karma, and consciousness. Nervous system discourse isolates regulation from those wider aims.

This produces a subtle but important inversion. Traditional yoga often viewed discomfort as structurally necessary to practice. The Hatha Yoga Pradipika repeatedly frames discipline through restraint, austerity, and sustained effort. Modern wellness systems frequently interpret discomfort as evidence of dysregulation or unsafety.

Equanimity becomes calmness. Detachment becomes emotional processing. Renunciation becomes self-care.

The philosophical consequences are substantial because the goal of practice changes. Yoga no longer asks whether suffering originates from attachment to identity, consumption, ambition, or sensory dependence. It asks whether the nervous system feels safe.

That framework is highly effective for wellness marketing because it individualises distress. Structural exhaustion becomes a regulation problem solvable through breathwork, restorative classes, or vagal exercises. The surrounding economic and technological conditions remain untouched.

The modern popularity of nervous system regulation therefore reveals something larger than a passing wellness trend. It demonstrates how yoga adapts itself to the psychological language preferred by the culture consuming it.

Patanjali framed yoga as liberation from conditioned mental activity. Contemporary wellness culture increasingly reframes it as management of physiological stress within the conditions that produce that stress. The practice survives, but its philosophical horizon becomes considerably narrower.

Want to Go Beyond Western Yoga? Join TYJ Community!

At The Yoga Journalist, we provide structured, ongoing study for teachers and practitioners who want depth, clarity, and accountability beyond certification.

Here is what we offer:

📰 Free – Read the stories, follow the conversation

Stay informed with independent coverage of the yoga world: contemporary stories, cultural commentary, and industry analysis that reveal what’s really happening beyond the mat.

Includes:

• ✅ Access to free articles featuring contemporary stories, commentary, and industry analysis

• ✅ Archive of public essays

🪷 Perfect for readers, practitioners, and professionals who want to stay grounded in reality and informed about the evolution of yoga today.

🔥 Paid – join the study community

US$15/month

Go beyond commentary and unlock the full depth of yoga knowledge. Paid subscribers enter an ongoing study space with direct access to philosophical inquiry.

Includes:

• ✅ Full archive including educational content

• ✅ Members-only discussion and community access

• ✅ Monthly Online Satsang (live Q&A exploring philosophy and practice)

🧘‍♀️ For students, teachers, and sincere practitioners ready to study in depth.

💎 Founding Member – sustain the mission

US $220/year

Founding Members directly support the independence of The Yoga Journalist and receive additional access and acknowledgment.

Includes:

• ✅ All Paid-tier benefits

• ✅ One personal email answered per month

• ✅ Quarterly Curated Compendium / Ebook

• ✅ Public dedication and recognition

🌟 For readers who want to nurture meaningful, independent writing and be part of the publication’s legacy.

🕉️ Mentorship – deep study (limited to 5 spots)

US$350/month/AUD$350

An intimate tier for serious students, teachers, and editors seeking direct guidance and structured depth.

Includes:

• ✅ All benefits from Paid and Founding tiers

• ✅ One private 1:1 monthly video call

• ✅ One in-depth weekly email exchange

🪷 For those ready to integrate yoga’s timeless teachings with clarity, accountability, and personal depth.

This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Arjuna stands on the battlefield with Krishna, his charioteer and advisor, and refuses to fight when he realises he must kill his own kin to save the kingdom. The scene presents a moral crisis that functions as an inner conflict, with Krishna positioned to guide him through it.

This establishes the foundation for Kr…

Read more

Living the Bhagavad Gita: A Nine-Month Programme in Applied Study

The Bhagavad Gita was delivered on a battlefield to a warrior who could not act. Krishna’s response was not comfort. It was instruction on how to function when every choice feels wrong. The text exists to be applied, tested, and verified through lived experience.

Most Western readers treat it as inspirational literature. Read once. Agreed with. Shelved.

The Yoga Journalist is launching a nine-month programme to study the Bhagavad Gita as it was intended: as a manual for practice.

What you get

Nine months. Eighteen chapters. Applied study.

• One chapter analysis published every fortnight

• Fortnightly group discussion in TYJ’s paid subscriber chat

• Structured observation tasks between articles

• Sequential study using Eknath Easwaran’s translation

Not a book club. Not casual reading.

This is svadhyaya: testing teachings against your actual decisions and behaviour. You report where the Gita works and where it fails in your life. The group verifies collectively. The text remains the authority.

How it works

Each fortnight:

1. Article published: Chapter analysis with context, key teachings, and applied interpretation

2. Observation task: Structured assignment tied to the chapter (e.g., track reactions to success and failure over the fortnight)

3. Group chat discussion: Report findings. Identify contradictions between teaching and behaviour. No feelings. No stories. Data only.

Example:

Verse 2.47 states you should act without attachment to results. You observe that your mood collapses when a project fails. That gap between instruction and behaviour is where practice begins. We discuss your experiences in the group chat and satsang.

Why this is different

Most Gita programmes:

• Cost thousands of pounds

• Deliver academic lectures

• Focus on philosophy, not application

• No group accountability

This programme:

• Costs $15/month (standard TYJ paid subscription)

• Delivers applied study

• Tests teachings in real life

• Group verification in paid subscriber chat

No separate course fee. No premium enrolment. The Gita is the authority. Your subscription pays for structure and accountability.

Who this is for

You should join if:

• You have read the Gita but cannot explain how its teachings function in practice

• You quote verses but have never tested them against your decisions

• You studied yoga through physical practice and want the philosophical foundation

• You want accountability beyond your own interpretation

You should not join if:

• You want inspiration without application

• You prefer casual book club discussion

• You are not willing to observe and report contradictions in your behaviour

The commitment is nine months. The method is disciplined.

What you will gain

After nine months of sequential study:

• Functional understanding of how Gita teachings operate in real decisions

• Method for applying traditional texts beyond this programme

• Verification through observation, not intellectual agreement

• Accountability to authoritative instruction, not personal interpretation

Programme details

Start date: Tuesday 5th May, 2026.
Duration: Nine months (18 chapters)
Cost: $15/month (TYJ paid subscription, includes all articles and chat access)

You’ll need the text: Eknath Easwaran’s translation of the Bhagavad Gita

Enrolment is open now for paid subscribers to The Yoga Journalist.

See our subscription packages below.

Want to Go Beyond Western Yoga? Join TYJ Community!

At The Yoga Journalist, we provide structured, ongoing study for teachers and practitioners who want depth, clarity, and accountability beyond certification.

Here is what we offer:

📰 Free – Read the Stories, Follow the Conversation

Stay informed with independent coverage of the yoga world: contemporary stories, cultural commentary, and industry analysis that reveal what’s really happening beyond the mat.

Includes:

• ✅ Access to free articles featuring contemporary stories, commentary, and industry analysis

• ✅ Archive of public essays

🪷 Perfect for readers, practitioners, and professionals who want to stay grounded in reality and informed about the evolution of yoga today.

🔥 Paid – Join the Study Community

AUD $15/month or $130/year (Approx USD $10.50 / month or USD $94.00 / year)

Go beyond commentary and unlock the full depth of yoga knowledge. Paid subscribers enter an ongoing study space with direct access to philosophical inquiry.

Includes:

• ✅ Full archive including educational content

• ✅ Members-only discussion and community access

• ✅ Monthly Online Satsang (live Q&A exploring philosophy and practice)

🧘‍♀️ For students, teachers, and sincere practitioners ready to study in depth.

💎 Founding Member – Sustain the Mission

AUD $220/year (Approx USD $154.00 / year)

Founding Members directly support the independence of The Yoga Journalist and receive additional access and acknowledgment.

Includes:

• ✅ All Paid-tier benefits

• ✅ One personal email answered per month

• ✅ Quarterly Curated Compendium / Ebook

• ✅ Public dedication and recognition

🌟 For readers who want to nurture meaningful, independent writing and be part of the publication’s legacy.

🕉️ Mentorship – Deep Study (Limited to 5 Spots)

$350/month

An intimate tier for serious students, teachers, and editors seeking direct guidance and structured depth.

Includes:

• ✅ All benefits from Paid and Founding tiers

• ✅ One private 1:1 monthly video call

• ✅ One in-depth weekly email exchange

🪷 For those ready to integrate yoga’s timeless teachings with clarity, accountability, and personal depth.

This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

The problem with consistency in spiritual life

Ram Dass repeatedly warned that the desire to appear consistent is a subtle form of ego maintenance. In his lectures on spiritual maturation, he describes how the personality constructs a coherent identity and then defends it, even when direct experience contradicts it. Truth, in this framework, is not an extension of identity but a force that destabilises it.

This distinction reframes a common assumption in modern discourse. Consistency is often treated as a marker of integrity. Within traditional Indian thought, it can function as its opposite. A fixed position suggests attachment to a mental construct rather than responsiveness to reality as it is encountered.

Mohandas K. Gandhi’s public life offers a precise example. In The Story of My Experiments with Truth, he states plainly that his views changed frequently as his understanding deepened. He writes that he is concerned only with being consistent with truth as it appears in the present moment, not with his past statements. He was famously consistent in his vows (yamas), which provided the container for his intellectual shifts. This is not rhetorical modesty. It is a methodological stance that places truth above personal coherence.

Two levels of truth and the limits of consistency

Classical Buddhist philosophy formalises this tension through the doctrine of two truths. Nāgārjuna, in the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, states that the Buddha’s teaching relies on two levels: conventional truth and ultimate truth. Conventional truth governs language, identity, and social interaction. Ultimate truth refers to the nature of reality beyond conceptual designation.

Consistency operates entirely within the conventional domain. It depends on stable definitions, repeated positions, and recognisable identity. Ultimate truth does not conform to these requirements. It cannot be stabilised through language or held as a fixed position.

This creates a structural conflict. A practitioner who insists on consistency remains bound to conventional truth. A practitioner oriented towards ultimate truth must accept discontinuity in their views, because each formulation is provisional. Ram Dass’ insistence on following truth even when it contradicts previous positions aligns directly with this framework. What appears as inconsistency is the refusal to reify a conceptual position into a permanent identity.

Jain philosophy and the impossibility of a single position

Jain philosophy extends this analysis through the doctrine of anekāntavāda, the principle that reality is many-sided. Umāsvāti’s Tattvārtha Sūtra establishes that any statement about reality captures only one aspect of a complex whole. No single proposition can exhaustively describe what is.

From this perspective, consistency is not a virtue but a limitation. To maintain one fixed position is to privilege one angle of vision while excluding others. A commitment to truth requires the capacity to revise, qualify, and even contradict earlier claims as new aspects become apparent.

This is refined further through syādvāda, the Jain system of conditional predication. Statements are framed as true under specific conditions rather than universally. A proposition may be valid in one context and invalid in another. The practitioner who adjusts their position accordingly is not inconsistent. They are accurate.

Ram Dass’ observation that spiritual growth makes one appear inconsistent to others can be understood through this lens. The appearance of contradiction reflects a shift in perspective, not a failure of integrity. The demand for consistency, by contrast, enforces a static viewpoint that cannot accommodate the complexity of reality.

Rta and satya: when truth disrupts order

The distinction between social order and truth is already present in the Vedic corpus. The Ṛg Veda introduces the concept of ṛta, the underlying order that governs the cosmos. Human conduct aligned with this order is described as satya, truth in action.

At a social level, consistency supports order. Predictable behaviour allows systems to function. However, alignment with ṛta is not reducible to social conformity. When human norms diverge from the deeper order, adherence to truth may require disruption.

This tension clarifies Gandhi’s method of satyagraha. His commitment was not to consistency within political strategy but to truth as he understood it in relation to ṛta. When that understanding changed, his actions changed. The resulting shifts were often criticised as inconsistency. Within the Vedic framework, they represent realignment with a deeper order that is not fixed at the level of human convention.

Ram Dass’ teaching follows the same trajectory. The ego seeks stability because it is invested in maintaining its structure. Truth, understood as alignment with reality, does not guarantee that stability. It may require the abandonment of previously held positions.

Truth as lived alignment, not conceptual stability

The Sikh tradition sharpens this distinction by defining truth as an existential condition rather than a conceptual one. The opening line of the Guru Granth Sahib, the Mul Mantar, identifies the ultimate reality as Sat, truth itself. This is not presented as a proposition to be believed but as a reality to be realised and embodied.

Within this framework, consistency of belief has limited value. A person may hold a stable set of ideas while remaining misaligned with truth in practice. Conversely, a person whose understanding evolves may appear inconsistent while moving closer to alignment.

This distinction addresses a central issue in Ram Dass’ teaching. The personality constructs a narrative of who one is and then attempts to remain faithful to that narrative. Truth does not operate at the level of narrative. It is encountered directly and requires response. Each response may differ from the last because the conditions are not identical.

The insistence on consistency therefore becomes a resistance to this process. It prioritises the preservation of identity over the recognition of reality.

Gandhi and the discipline of changing one’s mind

Gandhi’s writings provide a disciplined articulation of this principle in practice. He explicitly rejects the expectation that his later views must align with his earlier ones. In The Story of My Experiments with Truth, he states that he has no concern for appearing consistent, only for being faithful to truth as he perceives it at any given time.

This position is not casual. It demands continuous self-examination. Each claim must be tested against experience, and when it fails, it must be revised or abandoned. The cost is reputational instability. Public figures are judged on consistency because it signals reliability. Gandhi accepts the loss of that signal in order to maintain alignment with truth.

Ram Dass frames the same process in psychological terms. The ego fears contradiction because it threatens coherence. The spiritual path requires tolerating that threat. As identification with the constructed self weakens, the need to defend past positions diminishes. What remains is responsiveness to what is perceived as true in the present.

Inconsistency as a marker of progress

The alignment between Ram Dass and these Indian traditions is precise. Truth is not a fixed doctrine but a dynamic relationship with reality. Consistency belongs to the maintenance of identity within the conventional domain. When truth is prioritised, that identity becomes unstable.

Buddhist philosophy distinguishes between conventional and ultimate truth, placing consistency within the former. Jain logic demonstrates that any single position is partial and must be revised as perspective shifts. Vedic thought allows for the disruption of social order when it diverges from deeper reality. Sikh teaching defines truth as lived alignment rather than conceptual agreement. Gandhi embodies the practical consequences of these principles in public life.

The conclusion follows directly. A practitioner committed to truth cannot guarantee consistency. Each new perception carries the possibility of contradiction. What appears as instability is often the correction of a prior limitation.

This position challenges a central assumption in modern discourse. Integrity is not measured by the ability to remain the same. It is measured by the willingness to change when confronted with what is true.

Want to Go Beyond Western Yoga? Join TYJ Community!

At The Yoga Journalist, we provide structured, ongoing study for teachers and practitioners who want depth, clarity, and accountability beyond certification.

Here is what we offer:

📰 Free – Read the Stories, Follow the Conversation

Stay informed with independent coverage of the yoga world: contemporary stories, cultural commentary, and industry analysis that reveal what’s really happening beyond the mat.

Includes:

• ✅ Access to free articles featuring contemporary stories, commentary, and industry analysis

• ✅ Archive of public essays

🪷 Perfect for readers, practitioners, and professionals who want to stay grounded in reality and informed about the evolution of yoga today.

🔥 Paid – Join the Study Community

AUD $15/month or $130/year (Approx USD $10.50 / month or USD $94.00 / year)

Go beyond commentary and unlock the full depth of yoga knowledge. Paid subscribers enter an ongoing study space with direct access to philosophical inquiry.

Includes:

• ✅ Full archive including educational content

• ✅ Members-only discussion and community access

• ✅ Monthly Online Satsang (live Q&A exploring philosophy and practice)

🧘‍♀️ For students, teachers, and sincere practitioners ready to study in depth.

💎 Founding Member – Sustain the Mission

AUD $220/year (Approx USD $154.00 / year)

Founding Members directly support the independence of The Yoga Journalist and receive additional access and acknowledgment.

Includes:

• ✅ All Paid-tier benefits

• ✅ One personal email answered per month

• ✅ Quarterly Curated Compendium / Ebook

• ✅ Public dedication and recognition

🌟 For readers who want to nurture meaningful, independent writing and be part of the publication’s legacy.

🕉️ Mentorship – Deep Study (Limited to 5 Spots)

$350/month

An intimate tier for serious students, teachers, and editors seeking direct guidance and structured depth.

Includes:

• ✅ All benefits from Paid and Founding tiers

• ✅ One private 1:1 monthly video call

• ✅ One in-depth weekly email exchange

🪷 For those ready to integrate yoga’s timeless teachings with clarity, accountability, and personal depth.

This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.