Updated: 3 August 2015

By DailyMail.com Reporter

Daily Mail, London, UK

Quote from the article:

“This is the moment a plane enthusiast captured a UFO overtaking a flight during take-off from New York JFK airport.

The footage, from July 7, appears to show the object flying past the Virgin Atlantic plane at high speed. The peculiar object has led to speculation that it may be an extraterrestrial craft.”

My comment:

In my opinion, the unknown object is no bird (see Grok conversation).

https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-3183762/amp/Plane-passenger-captures-moment-UFO-overtakes-Virgin-Atlantic-plane-New-York-JFK-Airport.html

“UFO Caught On Video Overtaking Virgin Atlantic Plane Leaving JFK Airport NY ORIGINAL SOURCE 2015 HD”

Published: 7 July 2015

Source: looknowtv (YouTube channel)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-2bZHOtKZgk

AI image analysis by HiveModeration.com:

“This input is not likely to contain Al-generated or deepfake content”

Hive is a U.S. Department of War partner.

Grok (xAI) conversation:

Analyze this video: Does Grok find that the unknown object has anything that looks like bird wings?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-2bZHOtKZgk

The video is a 2015 plane-spotting clip of a Virgin Atlantic jet taking off from JFK. A small, distant object appears behind/near the tail, then moves past it while appearing to expand, contract, or change aspect. youtube.com

That shape-shifting is the main visual feature people comment on. Descriptions call it cylindrical, rotating, or smeared by camera focus/tracking rather than showing paired, flapping appendages. An expert who reviewed it noted the motion could resemble a receding bird if wings were flapping and the object was turning away, but also stated it does not look like a bird. express.co.uk

No frames or analyses describe visible bird-like wings (feathered outlines, independent flapping, or a clear body-plus-wings silhouette). More common mundane explanations in the comments and coverage are a distant faster aircraft, a spinning object, an insect close to the lens, or focus artifacts.

So no — the unknown object does not show anything that looks like bird wings. The changing outline is better explained by rotation, perspective, or video limitations than by avian anatomy.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

https://x.com/i/grok/share/2d29945636674b2aaea528dbabe4468d

Google AI conversation:

Source: UFOB | Your UAP Library (YouTube channel)

Text by UFOB:

“On the 7th of January 1979, a military crew flying a Nord 262 saw an object changing colours, come out of the sky. It illuminated their dashboard for several seconds. It was reported to be seen from the ground and from other aircraft as well.

A radar operator describes detecting a UFO accelerating very fast to +/- 4000 km/hr.”

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cdMqsuiwCeE

Text by the U.S. Department of War:

‘The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of ten seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2022. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D18, described the UAP as “flying west to east.”

Video Description: The video depicts an area of contrast moving from the bottom left to the top right of the sensor field-of-view. At approximately six seconds, the area of contrast leaves the sensor field-of-view near the top right corner of the frame.

This video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.

Redactions have been made to protect the identity of eyewitnesses, the location of government facilities, or potentially sensitive information about military sites not related to UAP. No redactions have been made to any files released under President Trump’s directive concerning information about the nature or existence of any encounter reported as a UAP or related phenomena.

DATE TAKEN

[2022-12-01]

RELEASE

[5/8/26 - RELEASE 01]

CATEGORY

[B-ROLL]

LENGTH

[00:00:10]

LOCATION

[IQ]’

https://www.war.gov/UFO/release/01/?type=.vid#DOW-UAP-PR023-Unresolved-UAP-Report-Iraq-December-2022

Text by the U.S. Department of War:

“This file contains memorandums and correspondence related to flying disc/saucer sightings and that those are a matter of concern for the Air Materiel Command.

ASSET FILE NAME

[18_100754_ GENERAL 1946-7_VOL_2]

RELEASE

[5/8/26 - RELEASE 01]

AGENCY

[DEPARTMENT OF WAR]

INCIDENT DATE

[12/30/47]

INCIDENT LOCATION

[N/A]

DOCUMENT TYPE

[.PDF]

VIRIN

[260508-D-D0360-1001]”

https://www.war.gov/UFO/release/01/?type=.pdf#18_100754_-General-1946-7_Vol_2

The UFO shut down two street lights. When the unknown object had moved away, the street lights turned back on, according to the witness.

The UFO photos come from the website, ufoinfo.com (now defunct) (http://www.ufoinfo.com/sightings/usa/080619.shtml).

AI photo analysis by HiveModeration.com:

“This input is not likely to contain Al-generated or deepfake content”

Hive is a U.S. Department of War partner.

Google AI conversation:

https://share.google/aimode/kD0H1Hx8G8y8ny0mu

Published: 5 February 2024

Source: HistoriaTVE (YouTube channel)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XQenQgYzIAA

Grok (xAI) conversation:

Is it possible for Grok to present the Spanish closed caption text from this video, from the start to finish? Please present the text in English.

‘Yes. The video is the 17 September 1978 TVE program Más Allá (“Beyond”), episode 1 on UFOs in Spain, presented by Fernando Jiménez del Oso, with testimony from fighter pilots at Morón Air Base. YouTube auto-captions exist and are in Spanish; below is an English rendering of that spoken text, cleaned into readable paragraphs from the available caption/transcript track (opening through the main pilot interviews). Auto-captions are imperfect, so wording is slightly smoothed for sense while staying faithful to what is said.

This is one of the products of our technology. In a way, it would be like the symbol of the current era. The airplane puts man on that first step towards the stars. You know: the Age of Aquarius. Man entering space.

It is certain that the Earth, from 6,000 or 9,000 meters up, offers a strange, unusual appearance. But at that height the sky is also wide open—a horizon without limits in which anything can be seen. If UFOs really exist, from an airplane, through the eyes of a pilot, is how they should appear most frequently, how they should be seen most often. It is the ideal scenario, so to speak.

One can argue about the testimony of a fisherman, because there may be doubt as to whether what he has seen is really a UFO or an airplane, a prototype, or perhaps a weather balloon. But what is certain is that the technical level of a pilot leaves no room for doubt. If pilots say they have seen UFOs, it means that UFOs exist.

I’m not sure, but this is probably the first time you have had the opportunity to see and hear fighter pilots talking about the subject, talking about UFOs, telling what they have seen. I would tell the skeptics to pay attention to what these men say.

They are from some squadrons.

On July 28, 1976, at 3 p.m., on a completely clear day, I was a fire-control officer at the Bardenas firing range. I was with my wife, and since women are not authorized to approach the fire-control tower—the Americans were firing; the American planes were doing target practice—I took her about 200 meters from the tower so she could see the aircraft traffic from there.

While we were sitting in the car looking in the direction of the American aircraft traffic, I saw an object that was hovering at about 10,000 feet. I estimate it had an apparent diameter of about 40 cm, completely round, a color between silvery-white and transparent. It had two little legs, which I later realized were pointing in the direction the object was moving.

I saw it, and in a split second a series of things went through my mind. I even squinted, wondering if it was a speck of dust. In that split second I became convinced that what I was seeing was real. Then I got out of the car, without saying a word, and started staring at the object, saying, “What is that? What is it?”

My wife, who still didn’t know what it was, thought something was wrong with the planes, that there was traffic, that one of them was having some kind of problem. She got out of the car on her side, stood next to me, looked in the direction I was looking, and said, “What is that?”

Then the object, which I had been looking at for about eight seconds—the time it took me to see it, react, get out, and say all this—moved from the north, where I had been seeing it, at a completely inconceivable speed. Later I calculated the approximate distance it had traveled. It was traveling at 6 or 7,000 knots and disappeared over the horizon at a 90-degree angle, heading east, completely without any acceleration, without making any noise, without any flashing lights, nothing.

The sphere, which I was clearly seeing, moved and disappeared over the horizon in about 10 seconds. I had a camera loaded with color film, and just as the object disappeared, and we were both watching it—“You see it, you see it, huh?”—I reacted. I went to get the camera. When I picked it up, of course, the object was already gone.

Then I decided not to tell my wife what I was thinking, and I asked her, “What did you see?” And she replied, “Well, I saw a round thing, about a certain size. It was silver in color, and it was there, and it moved and disappeared over the horizon.”

Then I reacted again and said, “Tell me again, where was it?” She said, “There, indeed.” “Where was it? What color? What size was it? Where did it disappear from? Over there.” That’s when I said, “Well, that was a UFO, because what I had seen… logically, I’m used to seeing objects in the sky from the years [of flying], and that thing was neither an airplane, nor was the speed normal, nor the shape, nor the size—anything. It was a sphere that was about 8,000 feet high. It had an apparent diameter of about 40 cm with two little legs in the direction of travel, and it moved at a totally dizzying speed from north to east.”

The real size I then calculate from the distance I think it was: it would have been about 50 or 60 feet in diameter—that is, the diameter as if it were an airplane. In meters, well, about 15 or 20 meters in diameter.

How many hours of flight have you had, Fernando?

Well, I have 2,600 flight hours in jets, I think—no, in jets I have about 2,400.

And flying, have you seen anything strange during the flight?

I haven’t [in general]. Flying: one day we took off from here, two planes, to do a mission, low, high, low. Then, shortly after takeoff, we had been flying for 4 or 5 minutes, I spotted an extremely powerful light approximately over Granada. Then I told the formation leader, and he was very surprised. What do we do? We can’t say the light’s height, size, or anything else. All we can say is that it was extremely [bright] to be a reflection or something similar, given that we were estimating the light’s location at about 120 or 130 miles away. Any reflection at that distance is usually very faint and doesn’t have that kind of power.

So we saw the light stationary and decided to approach it. We set a course in that direction, and at the same time we climbed and continued to see the light from different angles and altitudes. At first we saw it from about 3,000 feet above the ground, and then we continued to see it at 20,000 feet.

We thought—and discussed it again in flight—that it could be a reflection of snow or something from the Sierra Nevada mountains, but it was precisely in the northernmost area, and because of the sun’s position it was completely impossible for it to be a reflection of snow.

So we continued approaching the light, now at about 19–20,000 feet. The light, at certain times, although it was very powerful, didn’t maintain a constant amount of light, but rather gave off slight reflections, some more intense than others.

Then, at a certain moment, we had advanced about 50 miles towards the light. The one leading the formation, I don’t know, due to some strange situation or an overly intense reflection, at a certain moment made a sudden turn of the aircraft to the side because he got scared, thinking it was coming towards us. I didn’t see it that way; I kept seeing it, and indeed some much more powerful flashes, but I didn’t see it that way; I stayed in that same position.

Then, since the leader had separated quite a bit, I rejoined him, and we decided to continue a little further towards this light, but we saw that it was no longer maintaining its relative distance from us. That is to say, although we had already advanced 60 or 70 miles, the distance wasn’t decreasing; that is, it continued to look exactly the same size and with the same intensity.

So, seeing that we weren’t making any progress, and the fuel was starting to get low, we turned back towards base.

That’s a case of what you think could be among the objects or lights you can see… even though it wasn’t nighttime; it was daytime. It was 9:30.

We thought about it in flight, we discussed it in flight, we discussed it again on the ground. We thought it could be… well, I don’t know, some mountain refuge with a metal roof that gave off a reflection. The thing is, we’re used to seeing reflections. I’ve flown a lot over the Murcia–Almería area and so on, so there are very intense reflections on the ground from plastic and other things. But they disappear at 10, 12, 15, 20 miles; those reflections disappear, they just fade away.

This was quite far away. I mean, we advanced, as I said, approximately 50 or 60 miles, and we couldn’t see the end of it. So we thought that it could be part of the snow accumulated on the mountain, but I also think that at that distance—taking off from here, from Morón, after 3 minutes, seeing it with that intensity, and then not only that, but when changing altitude the reflections usually disappear, or when changing position—and then what surprised us most of all was the intensity, and as I said, different intensities at different times, but always excessive for all those reflections I’ve seen up to now.

I wanted to ask two questions to clarify these first two testimonies. One, Fernando, I know it’s practically impossible, but I’d like to ask you what the possibility is today that that sphere you saw was a weather balloon.

A weather balloon? No, no possibility at all. First, because I’ve already seen several weather balloons. And what’s more, I have an anecdote: all the pilots from Morón were in Zaragoza doing an alert exercise, and while we were on the runway we saw a metallic balloon suspended in the sky at about 20,000 feet, and everyone was looking at it. Even the next day it was in the Zaragoza newspaper saying that some people had seen a strange object, and it was clearly a weather balloon.

But apart from that, the object I saw—for about six or seven seconds I saw it at apparent rest. Although it could have been moving, it then disappeared at a dizzying speed to the east, in a completely unpredictable direction, and it had absolutely no possibility of being a balloon. It was impossible. It was a sphere moving at an unpredictable speed, since weather balloons are carried by wind speeds, and that wind speed is practically impossible. Without a doubt, I calculated it to be 6,000 or 7,000 knots.

Then the other question would be for Juan José. I don’t think the problem has been clear, at least not for me. You told me, or you said here, that you saw it at a certain height above you in the first moments. So what height could it have been at those first moments?

I calculate it could have been 8,000 or 10,000 feet. Given the distance, it’s very difficult to calculate the distance we think it could have been. It’s difficult to calculate the height it could have had. That makes us think, more than a reflection, that the device had its own light. Yes—what we can call a device, we can call it whatever it was—it could have been round and with its own light.

Indeed. Luis, what was this?

It was after returning from Christmas vacation in the Canary Islands. Upon arriving in Madrid the next day, my wife and the children went down to Laura for lunch. It was December 29th, around 2:00 p.m. Shortly before lunch we went down with the children to a small park near the town of General Mola in Puerto Rico. While we were playing with the children—it was winter, a very clear day—we were alone in the park with four or five children, one of our sister’s children and our own. We were there playing with them, and suddenly, well, I don’t know why, we were looking at the sky, and suddenly, vertically, I discovered an object about 20 to 30 cm in diameter, metallic in color, that didn’t emit any light. It was metallic in color and at a height like this, completely vertical, an indefinite height. That is to say, it could have been at 10,000 feet or at 30,000 feet—about 20 cm, then 20 cm apparent, of course.

Then we moved. I told Carmen. Then she was looking, but indeed it looks perfectly motionless, totally motionless; that is, the situation was vertical. We were observing it for more than a minute. Then we changed position and the object was in the same position, without moving. We were there for about 30 minutes, and with the mess with the kids, the food, we had to come back to Morón by car and all that. I didn’t have a camera on hand to take pictures, and so we left it. We were talking about it. But we left it.

What shape did it have?

It was a circular shape, metallic in color and totally motionless, around 10,000–15,000 feet. The height could be indefinite; it’s completely vertical. There wouldn’t be that possibility that Julio suggested before, that it was a weather balloon, for example, no, because it didn’t have any apparent or relative mobility. Besides, we stayed fixed in one position to see if it had any movement with respect to the rooftops of the houses, and it was completely motionless. I mean it was completely motionless for the four minutes we were watching it, at least it was motionless, and then we left. We left, but the object was still there; I mean it stayed still even when we left.

There was a rumor here in Morón that said that for a month and a half some objects, strange lights, had been seen at night. That same day, while doing the night patrol, I got into one of the vehicles that they have, the ones with radios to be located all night and at a distance. The two soldiers who were with me told me that maybe it was likely because of the time that we saw the UFO, which by the way usually passed between 11:30 and 1:00, that the times more or less it passed by here, the regular times, you know, so it seemed like it was an express, apparently, that it always passed at the same times.

So we walked practically the entire base. We arrived at a parking lot near where the squadrons are located. There we had a couple of cigarettes, we turned off the car, we turned everything off. Relating a series of previous events, it seems that the day before there had been two UFOs, two lights that had each come from opposite sides of the base. They had, let’s say, met up about 10 miles from here, from the base, and then left together, I was told.

So that night we were waiting. We were there smoking some cigarettes, as I said, and at 12:55 a light appeared. They told me, “There it is, there it is.” We started to look at it. It turns out that, assuming this was the runway, the alignment of the runway, the light appeared at an angle of about 35 degrees above the runway in the direction of sight and at a height of about 35 degrees above the horizon. It was moving very slowly, at a speed of about a small plane, we could say. I placed the light approximately around 7 km, about 4 miles.

The trajectory wasn’t rectilinear. That is, it didn’t describe a straight trajectory like any airplane would, but rather a more or less oscillating trajectory. What we saw wasn’t an object; it was a very bright light. Bright and very strong. To compare it to, well, it would be like a car headlight at about 800 meters, a long beam from a car at about 800 meters—that is, a light that is practically unmistakable.

What color was it?

The light was white, white, white. Well, white or colorless. Well, it wasn’t always white for a while, and then, I’ll comment later, after taking a turn. Well, I’ll continue as it was: that is, a white light was seen.

The conditions at that moment in the field were: calm wind, a completely starry sky, and there was a moon. Commercial jets could be seen passing high above, passing over 30,000 feet, and their position lights and flares were visible. So, very good visibility.

This light that was coming, I mean, very slowly, with an oscillating trajectory, remained practically very slowly parallel to the runway, a position very parallel to the runway. Finally, when it disappeared, after having traveled more than 110 degrees of the horizon, as I say, at that altitude, always constant, it began to descend, it went down, it made a turn of about 360 degrees, a complete turn, exactly. When it started to turn, the white light began to diminish, and then instead of the white light, we saw two opaque red lights, a good color, of a relatively large size, presumably, because we saw two bright, opaque red lights. It did a 360-degree turn and disappeared in the direction of Seville.

There was a change in altitude; that is, when it started to turn, it went down, and then when it returned after completing the full turn, it headed towards Seville, rising again until we saw it again. That’s what we saw; the three of us saw it. The two soldiers who were with me, plus four other soldiers on guard, told me about it. They told me they had seen the light, the UFO. Anyway, there was great excitement because it was very well-known here; I always heard some kind of comment.

There was no wind, calm, and the sky was starry. That’s precisely because I don’t know of any object that makes noise at that distance, whether it’s a helicopter or a jet. Initially, we thought it could be an airplane that was holding on approach to San Pablo. But I don’t know of any aircraft that has a landing light that, instead of moving horizontally, moves laterally, especially as it travels across the horizon. A helicopter… I rule out that hypothesis because a helicopter makes a lot of noise, especially at night. You have to realize that at night there is a special sensitivity to noises because daytime noises decrease a lot, so any noise is much louder; it’s not very distinguishable. Anyway, I don’t know of anything that could be known to fly—because that’s what it was flying—that made that [lack of] noise, and so I don’t know.

Juan José, I think you had something interesting to add to your story regarding the size of the object.

Well, yes, of the object. I would like to reaffirm that, given the distance at which we were seeing this luminous object and given its approximate size, it could be like an apple or something like that, since we calculated that it could be closest, first 120 to 130 miles, then when we advanced 50 to 60 miles we saw that we were still more or less… Could I continue that distance? Well, I think the object must have been immense. It must have had a huge diameter and a very large surface area, disproportionate to be a normal reflection of any object on Earth. Compared to a commercial airplane, for example, you can calculate that distance. Normally, when a commercial airplane flies at 30,000 or 35,000 feet, we see it as, I don’t know, extremely small, about the size of a fingernail. That is to say, we can calculate what it could be. So if it was 100 or 120 miles away, it could be, I don’t know, 100 times larger than a commercial airplane or something like that in size.

Commander Valero, I think, wanted to make a clarification.

I don’t mean to overvalue my opinion, nor that my testimony has a higher value than others, based on my experience and because of the years I’ve spent seeing objects in the air and flying, at the same time accompanied by a person who was the complete opposite, who had no flying experience and wasn’t used to it, and because of the time I was able to see the object, the moment, the situation, the time of day—it was absolutely an unknown object, unknown in the sense that it has no explanation for the objects that fly and that are within the domain of any of us who are in this profession. That is to say, it falls entirely within the designation that can be given to it: UFO or whatever.

Besides, you didn’t believe in any of these things at all.

That is to say, I have been skeptical about this and even I still am. I still am skeptical and I don’t believe perhaps in anything other than what I see, but it just so happens that what happened cannot be said without me being the one to say it. What happens is that I was the one who saw it and I am the one who is saying it. What I saw has absolutely no explanation, not even with respect to the objects that are around every day, and besides, there is absolutely no possibility of confusion, not even the slightest possibility of mistaking it for a balloon or anything else. I was watching it for about 10 seconds in an apparent rest and for about 7 or 8 seconds in a terrifying movement, and there is no possibility of confusion due to the time of day, the state of the sky, or anything else.

Those red lights you saw when it turned, when it changed position, could resemble a propulsion system, could resemble, to use a comparative term, the nozzles of an airplane, specifically one of the airplanes here, an F-5 or a Phantom.

They could indeed be red lights, red lights that seemed to have a considerable diameter, considerable in relation to the object. That is, it looked very far away, but two red lights could be seen at the end behind it. Yes, I could see them, but the only thing that happens is that, by emphasizing the lack of sound, and specifically the lack of wind that could have prevented hearing, I really want to emphasize the lack of… I mean, it’s not a linear movement, it’s not a straight line. What that object was moving was a kind of vibration along that straight line, something similar. Anyone who has ever played with one of those little planes that you control from the ground knows that it’s very difficult to keep it in a straight line. Instead, it keeps going up and down, up and down. But any mechanical object, remote-controlled, self-piloted, or even an autopilot, never follows a straight line. Instead, it follows the same straight line in direction, distance, and altitude.

[Music]

Ah.

[Music]​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​’

https://x.com/i/grok/share/fc61eb7c05b14e029279437bca77ee0c

Wikipedia article: “Morón Air Base”:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morón_Air_Base

Morón Air Base, Morón de la Frontera, Spain.

By Shane Galvin

New York Post, New York City, New York

Quote from the article:

‘The Department of War is investigating the claim that the Air Force is holding back two cellphone videos supposedly showing a 100-foot triangle UFO over a Colorado military base.

Days after The Post revealed the alleged coverup the agency said it is “actively investigating” the whereabouts of two videos showing the out-of-this-world aircraft, recorded on successive nights by a service member in 2023, acting Pentagon Press Secretary Joel Valdez said on Wednesday.’

https://nypost.com/2026/08/15/us-news/department-of-war-investigating-triangle-ufo-videos-after-post-report-will-release/

Related article:

https://ufointel.substack.com/p/news-article-exclusive-100-foot-triangular

Richard Dolan Intelligent Disclosure (YouTube channel)

Text by Richard Dolan Intelligent Disclosure:

‘A new tranche of “UFO files” has just been released from Washington, and there’s already a lot of speculation about what it all means. In this video, Richard goes through the material directly—historical documents, space-era transcripts, and recent military ISR cases from the 2020s—to see what’s actually there. Some of it has been public for years. Some of it is potentially interesting. This is a beginning of the process of actually examining the files themselves.

Review the files: https://www.war.gov/UFO/’

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=19mbUxhkz9U

Related article:

https://ufointel.substack.com/p/video-richard-dolan-uap-tranche-5

Text by the U.S. Department of War:

‘This document is an FBI FD-302, a form the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) uses to record interviews. This FD-302 records a March 2024 interview with a former U.S. military pilot, in which the interviewee describes several incidents potentially involving unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) in 2023 and 2024. The interviewee also recalls a 2002 incident potentially involving UAP, while deployed as a military reservist in Afghanistan. An FBI digital rendering based upon the observer’s description accompanies this document, under the title FBI-UAP-D025.

Redactions have been made to protect the identity of eyewitnesses, the location of government facilities, or potentially sensitive information about military sites not related to UAP. No redactions have been made to any files released under President Trump’s directive concerning information about the nature or existence of any encounter reported as a UAP or related phenomena.

ASSET FILE NAME

[FBI-UAP-D024, FD-302, “AIRBORNE LIGHTS AND TRIANGLE,” 2002, 2023-2024]

RELEASE

[8/7/26 - RELEASE 05]

AGENCY

[FBI]

INCIDENT DATE

[2002, 2023-2024]

INCIDENT LOCATION

[NORTHEASTERN U.S.; AFGHANISTAN]

DOCUMENT TYPE

[.PDF]

VIRIN

[260807-O-D0360-1144]’

https://www.war.gov/UFO/release/05/?releaseDate=Release+05&release=05&type=.pdf#FBI-UAP-D024-FD-302-Airborne-Lights-and-Triangle-2002-2023-2024

Related article:

https://ufointel.substack.com/p/us-government-ufo-document-fbi-uap

Text by the U.S. Department of War:

‘This image is an artistic interpretation of a reported incident above Bagram Air Force Base, Afghanistan, potentially involving unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) in June 2002. This image is based upon a first-hand description provided by a former military service member, as described in FBI-UAP-D024. The Federal Bureau of Investigation prepared this digital rendering as a visual aid in 2026 in support of the PURSUE initiative.

ASSET FILE NAME

[FBI-UAP-D025, DIGITAL RENDERING, “AIRBORNE TRIANGLE,” 2002]

RELEASE

[8/7/26 - RELEASE 05]

AGENCY

[FBI]

INCIDENT DATE

[2002]

INCIDENT LOCATION

[AFGHANISTAN]

DOCUMENT TYPE

[.IMG]

VIRIN

[260807-O-D0360-1145]’

https://www.war.gov/ufo/?releaseDate=Release+05&release=05#FBI-UAP-D025-Digital-Rendering-Airborne-Triangle-2002

Related article:

https://ufointel.substack.com/p/us-government-ufo-document-fbi-uap-521

Source: TenaaTV (YouTube channel)

Text by TenaaTV:

“On the morning of February 3, 1979, something extraordinary happened at Soesterberg Air Base in the Netherlands. A massive black triangular UFO silently flew over the military installation, witnessed by at least twelve Dutch soldiers.

This documentary uncovers the chilling details of one of Europe’s most mysterious UFO encounters, combining first-hand testimonies, historical context, and expert analysis. Was this a secret military craft, an extraterrestrial visitor, or something else entirely?

NOTE: All content uploaded to TenaaTV has been legally licensed to us by the producer or distribution company representing content ownership. Rights are licensed either worldwide or for specific territories. If you are a rights owner and believe there is an error with your content, please contact us at hello@tenaa.tv.”

My comment:

The 2023 Dutch documentary film is directed by Bram Roza.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9dqgLsirxz8

Wikipedia article: “Soesterberg Air Base”:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soesterberg_Air_Base

Soesterberg Air Base (25 June 2001), Soesterberg, Netherlands.

Text by the U.S. Department of War:

“The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of 51 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2023.

Video description:

00:00-00:04: An area of contrast transits the frame from the bottom right edge to the lower left edge of the sensor field-of-view.

00:05-00:51: The sensor pans to track the area of contrast, keeping it generally within the center of the frame.

This video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.

Redactions have been made to protect the identity of eyewitnesses, the location of government facilities, or potentially sensitive information about military sites not related to UAP. No redactions have been made to any files released under President Trump’s directive concerning information about the nature or existence of any encounter reported as a UAP or related phenomena.

DATE TAKEN

[2023-01-01]

RELEASE

[8/7/26 - RELEASE 05]

CATEGORY

[B-ROLL]

LENGTH

[00:00:51]

LOCATION

[UL]”

https://www.war.gov/UFO/release/05/?releaseDate=Release+05&release=05&type=.vid#DOW-UAP-PR149-Unresolved-UAP-Report-Middle-East-2023

https://x.com/repericburlison/status/2090444341940543511

Text by X.com:

“Congressman Eric Burlison’s office is aiding current and former government employees in obtaining waivers from UAP-related nondisclosure agreements, following guidance from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence on President Trump’s directive. Whistleblowers like Air Force veteran Jeff Nuccetelli, former DIA official Jay Stratton—whose memoir ‘Out of the Shadows’ releases October 13—and others including Matthew Brown and Dylan Borland are appealing directly to the president for immunity to speak publicly. Burlison noted progress with Stratton and hinted at a possible congressional hearing, building on prior testimony like Nuccetelli’s September 2025 House appearance detailing military site incursions.”

https://x.com/i/trending/2090452024710361403

The Good Trouble Show with Matt Ford (YouTube channel), Los Angeles, California

Text by The Good Trouble Show with Matt Ford:

‘The most recent cattle mutilation on their land was found last week.

Ben and Ashlee ranch in Colorado’s San Luis Valley. They keep finding their cattle dead and mutilated on their own ground. This is not a story about something that happened in the 1970s. It is still going on, and this week they go public, live, with photos and video proof.

No narrator. No reenactments. No archival footage. Just the two people it is happening to, taking your questions in real time.

Cattle mutilation has been reported across rural America for more than fifty years and the description barely changes: clean surgical cuts, organs removed, little or no blood, no tracks and no predator sign.

The San Luis Valley is where the modern phenomenon began. In September 1967 a mare named Lady, misreported ever since as “Snippy,” was found mutilated in this same valley, and became the first case in the country tied to UFOs in the national press. Colorado logged as many as 200 reported cases in 1975 alone. That September, Senator Floyd Haskell asked the FBI to open an investigation. The FBI declined for lack of jurisdiction. A federally funded inquiry in 1980 concluded predators. Ranchers kept finding them anyway, and Linda Moulton Howe built a career on the cases that answer never covered.

So we are asking it directly, on air: are UFOs related? What do the people finding these animals believe is happening, and what were they told when they reported it?

Matt Ford hosts live Saturday, August 15 at 1 PM Pacific. Ben and Ashlee take your questions from the chat.’

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2po_qY4Ot88

On Watch with Chris Farrell, Judicial Watch, Washington, D.C.

Judicial Watch (YouTube channel)

Text by On Watch with Chris Farrell:

‘Matthew Brown is a U.S. national security and policy analyst who came forward in 2025 as a whistleblower exposing “Immaculate Constellation,” a special access program tracking unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP/UFOs).’

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DffuAUbNL98

Related article:

https://ufointel.substack.com/p/xcom-trending-topic-whistleblowers

Text by the U.S. Department of War:

“The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of 1 minute and 39 seconds of video footage from an electro-optical and infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2025.

Video description:

00:00-01:39: The sensor pans to track an area of contrast from left to right across the background, keeping it generally centered within the frame. The sensor adjusts collection mode and level of magnification several times.

This video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.

Redactions have been made to protect the identity of eyewitnesses, the location of government facilities, or potentially sensitive information about military sites not related to UAP. No redactions have been made to any files released under President Trump’s directive concerning information about the nature or existence of any encounter reported as a UAP or related phenomena.

DATE TAKEN

[2025-01-01]

RELEASE

[8/7/26 - RELEASE 05]

CATEGORY

[B-ROLL]

LENGTH

[00:01:39]

LOCATION

[UL]”

https://www.war.gov/ufo/?type=.vid#DOW-UAP-PR134-Unresolved-UAP-Report-Middle-East-2025

Lismore Northern Star, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia

Source: Trove, National Library of Australia, Canberra, ACT, Australia

The whole article:

‘“Flying Saucers” reported by a Nowra Fleet Air Arm pilot are being investigated by Naval Headquarters in Melbourne.

The pilot, Lieutenant O’Farrell, saw two objects which he took to be “flying saucers” when flying at night over Goulburn, N.S.W., on a return trip to Nowra.

He told authorities at Nowra, naval air station and base for the Fleet Air Arm, that he saw what appeared to be the lights of two aircraft when flying at about 285 miles an hour.

He said a “saucer” flew on each side of him, circled his plane, and then drew rapidly away.

At his request the Nowra radar crew fixed his position and reported back that the screen showed an echo of another object moving along his Sea Fury.

This is the first known case in which unidentified objects in the sky have been confirmed by radar.

Authorities ascertained there were no other military aircraft in the vicinity at the time.

The Minister for the Navy, Mr. Francis, confirmed tonight that a pilot from Nowra air station had recently observed two lights on his radar “with vague shapes underneath.”

Mr. Francis was commenting on reports today that a pilot from Nowra some months ago had reported seeing two lighted objects flying close to his plane and at a faster speed than his aircraft.

The objects have been described as “Flying Saucers” because their identity is unknown.

Mr. Francis in his statement said, “It is a fact that on a night cross country flight from the R.A.N. station, Nowra, on August 3 (1954), a pilot in his aircraft at 13,000 feet observed two lights on his radar with vague shapes underneath.

“The lights passed ahead of him at a very fast speed. He was at the time flying at 220 knots. The pilot contacted Nowra and advised them.

“It was later ascertained that the only other aircraft in the vicinity was a T.A.A. Convair.”

Mr. Francis added that the pilot, was in the vicinity of Goulburn when he made his observation.

No further report of the pilot’s discovery had been received yet from R.A.A.F. headquarters.

NOT METEORITES

Dr. S. C. B. Gascoigne, of the Commonwealth observatory, Mt. Stromlo, commenting on Mr. Francis’ statement tonight, said it was highly unlikely and almost impossible that the objects could have been meteorites.

This was because the objects as reported were too low in the sky and had apparently persisted for too long.

Unless the objects were much higher than reported or were due to a “meteorological refraction,” which also was unlikely, their identification was baffling.

The report of the pilot “just about ruled out meteorites or hallucinations.”’

https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/96500678

Google AI conversation:

https://share.google/aimode/bxWrJ3Ycbq5Mh6y9V

“I just spent the past week at @EAA AirVenture Oshkosh talking in depth with nearly 160 pilots across commercial, military, business, and general aviation.

All but four shared a UAP encounter or firsthand story.

Whether you believe the explanations are mundane, foreign, or something else entirely, one thing was nearly unanimous: pilots need a protected way to report unusual aerial encounters without fear of career repercussions.

Congress should pass legislation that provides confidential reporting protections. Aviation safety depends on pilots being able to report what they observe.

Thank you to all our volunteers and supporters who made this possible. We’ll be releasing a video of the event on our @SafeAerospace YouTube channel soon.”

https://x.com/uncertainvector/status/2081181687057096745

My comment:

The text has been added to help text search.

Richard Dolan Intelligent Disclosure (YouTube channel)

Text by Richard Dolan Intelligent Disclosure:

‘The fifth White House UAP release contains far more than many people seem to realize.

In this deep dive, I examine some genuinely remarkable contemporary and historical cases: a Special Operations AC-130 encounter with multiple “cold orbs” over the Gulf of Oman; a 1964 Navy pursuit of a delta-shaped object tracked above 3,800 knots; new material surrounding the USS Omaha encounter; extraordinary FBI reports involving enormous triangular objects, close encounters, thermal detections, and a bizarre five-hour event in the western United States; and newly assembled historical records showing how seriously the U.S. military was privately treating the UFO problem as far back as the 1940s and 1950s.

The release remains frustratingly incomplete—critical telemetry, locations, dates, and other details are often missing or redacted. And no, this is not “Disclosure.” But anyone claiming there is nothing important here simply isn’t paying attention.

Taken together, these documents and videos add new evidence to a phenomenon the U.S. government has been encountering, investigating, and struggling to understand for nearly eighty years.

White House UAP Tranche #5: https://www.war.gov/UFO’

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JYkgr0FjIGU