They were ordinary places in Kyiv. Places to fill the car, pick up groceries and get on with the day. Of course, what matters most are the people around them – neighbours, workers and families. Some have been killed or injured. Many more have had their sleep broken by explosions and their sense of safety taken from them, while the whole local community is forced to absorb yet another attack

“Every package for our air defense truly protects lives – people’s lives.”

— Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine, 4 August 2026

Nearly four and a half years into the full-scale invasion, one of Europe’s largest cities still does not have the air defence needed to protect civilian life from repeated russian bombardment. No air-defence network can stop every missile or drone. That is not the standard. The failure is that Europe has had years to expand production and secure sufficient supplies, yet Ukraine is still forced to ration protection while russia increases the scale and sophistication of its attacks.

Europe’s most important line of defence does not begin at the Polish border. It runs through the skies above Kyiv, the fields outside Kharkiv and the workshops where Ukrainian engineers are building interceptor drones faster than committees in Brussels can approve another procurement plan.

This is no longer a distant war Europe has chosen to support. Europe’s own security now depends on Ukraine winning it.

That does not require russia to descend into uncontrolled chaos. It requires something more precise: the decisive failure of russia’s imperial war project. Ukraine must remain sovereign, democratic and anchored in Europe – not pushed back into moscow’s sphere through exhaustion, coercion or a settlement that simply gives russia time to reload.

Share

Europe still behaves as though time is on its side

Europe has done a great deal for Ukraine. It has committed billions, welcomed millions of Ukrainians and supplied weapons that have saved lives. That matters, and Ukrainians know it.

But effort is not the same as adequacy.

We are now in the fifth year of the full-scale invasion and more than twelve years into russia’s war against Ukraine. European leaders themselves describe the threat as existential, while still calling for air defence, drones, missiles and ammunition to be delivered more quickly.

Those statements expose the central contradiction. If the threat is existential, the response cannot remain incremental.

“Too many don’t feel the urgency. Too many believe that time is on our side. It is not. The time for action is now.”

— Mark Rutte, NATO Secretary General, 11 December 2025

The problem is not that Europeans value peaceful lives, warm cafés or comfortable weekends. Those are quiet achievements of a free society. The problem is the assumption that comfort is the natural state of history and war a temporary disruption to be managed through annual budgets and delayed orders.

The Kremlin has organised itself around the opposite belief. russia has placed its economy, industry, propaganda and people on a prolonged war footing. It expects democratic societies to tire before authoritarian ones run out of metal or lives to spend.

Every month of hesitation is therefore a wager that Ukraine can keep paying for Europe’s learning curve.

russia is not fighting alone

There is another comforting idea Europe must abandon: that russia is an isolated power slowly exhausting itself.

China remains russia’s indispensable strategic backer. NATO has called Beijing a “decisive enabler” of the war, pointing to support for russia’s defence-industrial base and the flow of dual-use components, machinery and raw materials. North Korea has supplied ammunition, missiles and troops. Iran has provided military support and helped russia develop the drone warfare used against Ukrainian homes and energy infrastructure. Belarus continues to enable the aggression.

This is already a contest between political systems.

“Russia is working with China, with Iran, and North Korea. And these countries fuel Moscow’s war against Ukraine.”

— Mark Rutte, NATO Secretary General, 13 January 2026

Ukraine is supported by democracies with vastly greater combined resources, but inconsistent urgency. russia is supported by an authoritarian network willing to exchange technology, weapons and manpower in pursuit of a common interest: weakening the democratic world and showing that borders can still be changed by force.

moscow, Beijing, Pyongyang and Tehran take this struggle seriously. Europe cannot afford to take it less seriously than they do.

A russian victory would not bring peace

If russia wins, the security crisis does not disappear. It moves west and becomes more dangerous.

Ukraine now has one of the world’s most innovative defence ecosystems. Companies, engineers and military units have compressed years of development into months, especially in drones, electronic warfare, battlefield software and rapidly adapted weapons. Ukraine estimates that its annual defence-production potential exceeds USD35 billion and that it could produce more than eight million drones a year if the capacity were fully financed.

russia could not simply take this entire ecosystem intact. Ukrainian engineers would flee, resist or destroy sensitive assets rather than willingly serve an occupier. Factories would be moved or lost. Resistance would continue.

Yet it would be reckless to assume moscow would gain nothing. russia would try to seize industrial sites, designs, supply chains and specialist knowledge. It would control more territory from which to threaten NATO, gain access to additional resources and attempt to exploit a large population with unmatched experience of modern high-intensity war.

We already know how that exploitation works. The United Nations has documented forced conscription, pressure to accept russian citizenship, the removal of Ukrainian education and compulsory military-patriotic indoctrination in occupied territory. russia has unlawfully drafted residents of Crimea and other occupied regions into its armed forces.

A conquered Ukraine would never become russia’s willing partner. Ukrainians have proved that beyond doubt. An occupying regime would nevertheless try to turn Ukrainian land, factories and people into instruments of its next war – just as it has already done in the territories under its control.

Imagine Europe five years after such an outcome. It would not face the weakened russia many expected in 2022. It could face an emboldened war state positioned farther west, enriched by whatever it managed to seize and still backed by China, North Korea and Iran. Millions of Ukrainians trapped under occupation would be subjected to repression, forced mobilisation and years of propaganda portraying Europe as the betrayer that abandoned them.

That is the future being risked when military support is calibrated to prevent Ukrainian defeat rather than secure Ukrainian victory.

Ukraine could help Europe compete again

There is another part of this story that receives far too little attention. Europe is not only defending Ukrainian territory or containing a military threat. It is deciding whether one of the continent’s most capable technology societies will remain in the democratic world.

Ukraine’s technology market reached an estimated USD7.85 billion in 2025. The sector employed around 305,000 professionals across more than 2,200 active companies and generated over 40 per cent of the country’s service exports. It has kept operating through blackouts, displacement and missile attacks. Ukraine’s digital state has continued to develop during the war, while its defence companies have built a remarkably fast loop between the engineer, the factory and the soldier using the product.

This talent did not appear in February 2022. Ukraine has been producing globally significant technologists for decades.

Max Levchin was born in Kyiv before moving to the United States. He became one of PayPal’s original co-founders and later founded Affirm. GitLab, now one of the world’s best-known software-development platforms, began in Kharkiv with Ukrainian programmer Dmytro Zaporozhets. Grammarly – one of the world’s most prominent AI writing companies – was founded by Ukrainians Max Lytvyn, Alex Shevchenko and Dmytro Lider.

These are individual stories, not a statistical argument. But they reveal something Europe should pay attention to. The constraint has never been Ukrainian talent. Too often, the capital, networks and appetite needed to scale that talent globally were found across the Atlantic.

Europe talks constantly about falling behind the United States and China in artificial intelligence, software, defence technology and industrial innovation. Ukraine cannot close that gap on its own. It can, however, become part of the answer.

Europe is good at research, regulation and high-quality manufacturing. It is often slower at deployment, iteration and scaling. Ukraine has been forced to become exceptionally good at those things. Its engineers work close to the problem, test quickly and improve products against real-world conditions. The same culture that has transformed drone warfare can strengthen cyber security, robotics, autonomous systems, artificial intelligence, energy resilience and digital government.

This is not an argument for romanticising wartime innovation. Ukrainians would prefer to build technology without air-raid sirens. It is an argument for seeing the country clearly: not as a permanent recipient of European help, but as a future contributor to European strength and competitiveness.

A serious partnership would combine Ukrainian speed and engineering depth with European capital, research institutions, advanced manufacturing and market access. Joint ventures, direct procurement, shared research programmes and growth financing could help Europe retain more of its own technology talent and compete in industries it cannot afford to surrender.

“Ukraine is now number one in the world [in drone and counter-drone technology] … we really can learn from Ukraine on this.”

— Mark Rutte, NATO Secretary General, 18 June 2026

Lose Ukraine to russia and Europe risks allowing part of that human and industrial capacity to be destroyed, displaced or exploited by its adversary. Secure a free Ukraine inside the Western democratic sphere and Europe gains a battle-tested technology partner with the ambition to build.

That choice should matter in Paris, Berlin and Brussels just as much as it does in Kyiv.

America can no longer be Europe’s excuse

Europe should welcome every serious contribution from the United States. It cannot continue building its survival strategy around the assumption that Washington will always provide the missing interceptor, the decisive political push or the security guarantee Europe postponed creating for itself.

American politics is volatile and the White House is increasingly unreliable. Commitments can be delayed, diluted or turned into bargaining chips. Europe does not control the people or interests around an American president. It does control its own budgets, factories, orders and political priorities.

Strategic adulthood begins when American disorder no longer serves as an explanation for European inaction.

Europe must decide what victory means

“As long as it takes” was never a strategy. It described duration when Europe needed to define an outcome.

That outcome should be a sovereign and democratic Ukraine capable of deterring another russian attack; a russian war machine denied the rewards of aggression; and a European defence industry able to protect the continent without waiting to be rescued from across the Atlantic.

Getting there requires more than another summit declaration. Europe needs faster air-defence production, multi-year orders, deeper investment in Ukrainian manufacturers and tougher enforcement against the supply chains sustaining russia’s military industry. Political decisions must begin moving at the speed of the threat.

From Kyiv, the cost of delay is not abstract. It is visible in the damaged petrol station and supermarket down the road. It is heard during another night of explosions. It is measured in the ordinary routines that become targets while allies debate whether the next delivery might be considered too escalatory.

But I also see the other Ukraine: engineers returning to their laptops after an air raid, businesses reopening, factories adapting and people refusing to surrender their future. There is a word Ukrainians understand deeply – svoboda, freedom. It is not an ornament here. It is something people organise their lives, companies and country to defend.

Europe is not being asked to rescue a distant nation from history. Ukraine is holding back the force that brought imperial war back to the continent, while developing many of the technologies Europe will need to defend itself and compete in the future.

The window for half-measures is closing.

Ukraine’s victory is a Ukrainian national imperative. It is also becoming the condition on which a free, secure and technologically relevant Europe depends.

Subscribe now

Wienerberger – bricks, roofs, pipes.
Nexans – cables, grids, electricity.

But before any of that can happen – before materials move, before machines arrive, before cities rise again – something else must come first.

Plans.

Designs.

Decisions.

Ukraine’s reconstruction does not begin with construction. It begins with engineering.

And that is where Sweco sits.

Share

The hidden first step of a $500+ billion rebuild

Ukraine’s recovery is often framed in physical terms: destroyed homes, damaged bridges, shattered energy systems.

But the reality is more layered.

Every kilometre of rail, every substation, every apartment block must first pass through a chain of approvals:
feasibility studies, environmental assessments, technical designs, procurement frameworks.

Only then can capital be deployed.

This is not optional. It is required.

Because Ukraine is not just rebuilding – it is reforming its entire infrastructure to meet EU standards.

That means:

• Environmental compliance

• Transparent procurement

• Long-term resilience design

• Integration with European systems

In practice, this creates a powerful dynamic:

The first money in does not go to construction companies.
It goes to engineering and consulting firms.

A $30 billion market – before construction even starts

When you strip down the numbers, something becomes clear.

Out of the roughly $500–600 billion total reconstruction need, an estimated ~$30 billion sits in architecture, engineering, and consulting services alone.

And crucially:

• ~70% of these revenues are recognised before construction begins

• Projects cannot proceed without them

• Donor funding is often contingent on them

This makes engineering firms the gatekeepers of the rebuild.

They define what gets built, how it gets built, and who supplies it.

Sweco’s quiet advantage: already on the ground

Many companies are waiting for peace.

Sweco is not.

While contractors and materials suppliers remain partially sidelined, Sweco has been executing funded projects in Ukraine since 2023.

Not headline-grabbing megaprojects.

But something more important:

• Housing, schools, and hospitals in western regions

• Drinking water systems for cities like Kremenchuk

• Wastewater and environmental infrastructure

• Institutional capacity building with EU alignment

These are early-phase projects – small in size, but critical in nature.

They build relationships.

They build trust.

And in a donor-driven ecosystem, trust compounds.

“No waiting required”

Sweco’s business model gives it a structural edge.

Unlike materials companies:

• No factories need to be built

• No heavy logistics required

• No exposure to on-the-ground asset risk

Instead, it relies on human capital – engineers, planners, specialists.

That means:

• Work can begin during conflict

• Projects can be executed remotely or in safer regions

• Revenue can flow before physical reconstruction starts

In a war environment, that flexibility is not just useful.

It is decisive.

Why donors care who draws the plans

Ukraine’s reconstruction will be funded largely by institutions:

• The EU

• The World Bank

• The EBRD

• Nordic development banks

These organisations do not just fund projects.

They enforce standards.

Strict ones.

That creates a filter.

And this is where Sweco stands out.

As a listed Swedish company with deep ESG credentials, it fits neatly into the requirements of donor-funded procurement:

• Transparency

• Compliance

• Auditability

• EU alignment

In other words:

Sweco is not just technically capable – it is institutionally compatible.

That matters more than most investors realise.

A Nordic network, a European footprint

Geography also plays a role.

Sweco operates across 15 European markets with ~23,000 specialists.

It combines:

• A strong Nordic presence (key funding channels)

• Central European proximity (Poland as a gateway)

• Local Ukrainian partnerships built over decades

This creates a hybrid model:

European standards + local execution.

Not easy to replicate.

From early contracts to long-term optionality

Today, Ukraine is still a small line item in Sweco’s revenue mix.

But what matters is not where it stands today – it is how quickly it can scale once reconstruction accelerates.

The rebuild will not happen all at once. It will unfold in phases, with activity ramping as funding is deployed and projects move from planning into execution.

If Ukraine follows a typical post-conflict pattern, the most intensive phase is likely to sit within the first decade after a ceasefire – when capital flows, projects are prioritised, and execution capacity is stretched.

At that point, annual construction activity could reach $50–70 billion.

For engineering firms, that translates into a recurring fee pool of roughly $3–5 billion per year.

At today’s exchange rates, that is equivalent to:

SEK 30–50 billion annually – roughly the size of Sweco’s entire current group revenue.

Put differently:

Even modest market share becomes meaningful very quickly.

• ~5% share → SEK 1.5–2.5 billion annual revenue

• ~10% share → SEK 3–5 billion

• ~15% share → approaching the scale of Sweden, Sweco’s largest national market

This is where the optionality lies.

And because Sweco is a pure consulting business:

• No heavy capital investment required

• No inventory or commodity exposure

• High incremental margins

Which means that if – or when – Ukraine scales,

a significant portion of that revenue has the potential to translate directly into profit.

The competitive reality

This is not a quiet field.

Global giants are circling:

• US-led advisory firms with government backing

• Large-scale consultancies with deep balance sheets

• Players investing heavily in AI-driven engineering

Sweco does not dominate at the top-down level.

But it does not need to.

Its strength is bottom-up:

• Municipal projects

• Water, waste, and environmental systems

• EU-funded, compliance-heavy work

This is where execution matters more than scale.

The constraint no one talks about: talent

There is one bottleneck that could define the entire sector.

Engineers.

Across Europe, there is a growing shortage of qualified specialists.

And in this industry:

People are the product.

Sweco’s response is telling:

• Continuous acquisitions of smaller consultancies

• Rapid integration of specialised teams

• Expansion of technical capabilities

It is not just buying revenue.

It is buying talent.

Because when reconstruction accelerates, capacity will be the limiting factor.

Risks and realities

This is not a straight line.

Key risks remain:

• Escalation of the conflict disrupting current projects

• Delays in large-scale funding deployment

• Competition from global advisory firms

• Macro softness in European construction markets

And perhaps most importantly:

Ukraine optionality may take time to materialise at scale.

But the direction is clear.

The investor takeaway

If Wienerberger is brick by brick,
and Nexans is kilovolt by kilovolt,

Sweco is plan by plan.

It sits at the very start of the value chain.

Before materials.
Before construction.
Before everything.

That positioning matters.

Because in a reconstruction defined by:

• EU standards

• Donor funding

• Long-term modernisation

The companies that design the system often shape the entire outcome.

Sweco is already there.

Not waiting.

Working.

Quietly building the foundation beneath Ukraine’s future.

Subscribe now

Disclaimer: This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Always conduct your own research or consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions. The author may hold positions in the mentioned securities.

Ukraine can rebuild homes, hospitals, factories, and data centres only if electricity flows reliably. Not intermittently. Not locally. But across a resilient, European-grade system. Ukraine is not just restoring what was lost – it is rewiring its future.

Share

Power under attack – and power underpins everything

The brutal reality of the conflict is that Ukraine’s energy infrastructure has been repeatedly and intensively targeted by Russian missile and drone strikes, particularly during winter months. Recent large-scale assaults on power facilities, high-voltage substations and generation assets have left millions without electricity, heat or water amid sub-zero temperatures, with capital regions like Kyiv experiencing outages affecting tens of thousands of homes.

These strikes are part of a broader campaign through the war to weaken civilian resilience by degrading electricity networks, gas infrastructure and thermal power plants, and have damaged key civilian energy assets across multiple regions.

This backdrop of persistent physical risk and humanitarian strain makes the task of rebuilding both urgent and structurally different from a typical post-conflict programme – and it highlights why resilient design and high-standard engineering are not luxuries but necessities.

A rebuild that is becoming real, not theoretical

Ukraine’s recovery is often discussed in abstract, trillion-dollar terms. What matters for investors, however, is how that capital is allocated. World Bank–led assessments point to $500 billion+ in total recovery needs, with $50–70 billion concentrated in energy infrastructure.

This is not about restoring what was destroyed. It is about replacing outdated Soviet-era networks with one that is decentralised, renewable-ready, digitally managed, and synchronised with Europe.

Crucially, donor-funded reconstruction now comes with strings attached:

• EU-aligned technical standards,

• fire-safety and efficiency requirements,

• procurement rules that favour compliant, bankable suppliers.

That regulatory shift is quietly decisive – and it plays directly to Nexans’ strengths.

“We are not trained to manage companies at wartime” – but Nexans did

What sets Nexans apart is not only what it sells, but where it stood when the war began.

Unlike many multinationals that exited Ukraine in early 2022, Nexans maintained operations throughout the conflict, with three plants in western Ukraine employing around 2,800 people. Management has repeatedly highlighted that decision as both operationally difficult and strategically defining.

In CEO Christopher Guérin’s words:

“We, managers, are trained to manage companies but not companies at wartime. And I’m very much impressed by the resilience of the Ukrainian people in such crisis.”

He later noted that around 85 % of Nexans’ Ukrainian workforce are women, who “decided to come and work every day since the very beginning of the war”.

This matters more than it may appear. In a reconstruction phase that will be shaped by trust, continuity and institutional memory, Nexans is not arriving as a newcomer.

From survival to strategy – the electrification megatrend

Nexans’ positioning today is the result of a deliberate transformation. Over the past four years, the group has reshaped itself into a pure-play electrification company, exiting non-core activities and focusing on generation, transmission, distribution and end-use.

Management has been explicit about the scale of the opportunity ahead. Guérin described the coming cycle as:

“The third period of massive electrification infrastructure investment”, following the booms of 1890–1910 and 1950–1970.

Ukraine’s reconstruction does not sit outside this trend – it sits right in the middle of it.

Where Nexans fits Ukraine’s rebuild – in practice

1) High-voltage transmission – the hardware of integration

Ukraine’s synchronisation with ENTSO-E in 2022 was historic, but symbolic. The real work lies in reinforcing and expanding cross-border interconnectors to Poland, Romania and Slovakia.

Nexans is one of a small group of European suppliers capable of delivering high-voltage AC and HVDC systems at scale, with a backlog that demonstrates trust from transmission system operators.

As Ukraine pushes westwards electrically, this capability becomes strategic rather than cyclical.

2) Renewables – rebuilding greener by necessity

Ukraine plans to add around 10 GW of new renewable capacity, even as the war continues. Projects such as DTEK’s Tyligulska wind expansion to 500 MW are backed by international financing. Nexans’ global framework agreements with wind OEMs, including Vestas, mean it is often embedded in these projects through turbine and balance-of-plant cabling, rather than competing tender by tender.

3) Distribution and buildings – regulation as a moat

Housing and public buildings represent the largest volume of reconstruction spend. But this is where EU fire-safety and efficiency standards matter most.

Ukraine is harmonising its building norms with EU CPR rules, pushing demand towards low-smoke, fire-resistant cables – an area where Nexans has invested heavily and local competitors often struggle to comply at scale.

In a donor-driven rebuild, compliance is not a cost – it is a competitive barrier.

Nexans – why it stands out in Ukraine’s rebuild

• Scale with relevance: €7.1bn in revenues1 and a global footprint, but critically with deep exposure to European grid and electrification projects rather than commodity wiring.

• Financial resilience: A near net-cash balance sheet2 provides the capacity to take on long-cycle, donor-funded infrastructure projects without balance-sheet strain.

• Credibility on the ground: One of the very few major European industrial suppliers that remained operational in Ukraine throughout the war, preserving workforce, know-how, and institutional trust.

• Capabilities that matter: An €8.1bn high-voltage transmission backlog3 and a portfolio of CPR-certified, fire-safe cables aligned with EU reconstruction standards.

• Strategic focus: A pure-play electrification model spanning HVDC interconnectors, grid distribution, and building systems – precisely the layers Ukraine must rebuild simultaneously.

The investor takeaway

Nexans is not a pure Ukraine bet – and that is part of its appeal.

• Downside is cushioned by a broader European electrification cycle,

• Upside comes from optionality tied to donor-funded reconstruction,

• Strategic fit is unusually tight: grids, renewables, safety, EU alignment.

Electricity is non-negotiable. Before walls rise, power must flow.

If Wienerberger is brick by brick, Nexans is kilovolt by kilovolt.

Subscribe now

Disclaimer: This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Always conduct your own research or consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions. The author may hold positions in the mentioned securities.

Today we turn to one of the companies that could be a direct beneficiary of this thesis: Wienerberger AG, the Austrian building materials group with a €4 billion revenue base and a dense industrial network across Central and Eastern Europe.

Share

The Scale of the Rebuild

Ukraine’s reconstruction needs are staggering. The latest World Bank estimate puts total recovery costs at more than $500 billion. To put that in perspective, that is almost three times Ukraine’s GDP.

Housing alone has suffered losses of $175 billion, with over 2.5 million households affected. Roughly one in eight homes in the country has been damaged or destroyed. Beyond housing, there are urgent needs in transport, water, and energy infrastructure – all of which require modern materials and systems at scale.

But unlike past European conflicts, this rebuild will not be about putting roofs back up as quickly and cheaply as possible. Ukraine’s reconstruction is explicitly tied to its EU accession process. That means all new housing and infrastructure must meet EU construction product standards and the NZEB (Nearly Zero Energy Building) mandate, which sets strict energy efficiency benchmarks.

For example, Ukrainian housing will now need to meet a maximum thermal conductivity of 0.5 W/m²K. For context, many pre-war Ukrainian buildings scored more than double that, closer to 1.25 W/m²K. This regulatory shift means the cheapest local materials are no longer sufficient – and creates a moat for companies that can deliver EU-certified, high-performance solutions.

Why Wienerberger Fits the Bill

Wienerberger is not a household name, but investors should know it. Founded in Vienna in 1819, it has grown into the world’s largest brick producer and one of Europe’s leaders in roof tiles and piping systems.

Three advantages stand out in the Ukrainian context:

1. Geographic Proximity and Capacity

Wienerberger operates over 200 plants across 28 countries, including a dense cluster in Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, and Romania – all bordering Ukraine. In 2024, these sites were running at just 57% capacity, leaving plenty of headroom to scale output for Ukraine without major new investment.

As CEO Heimo Scheuch put it: “We have a dense network close to the Ukrainian border from Romania, over Hungary, Slovakia and into the Polish market.”

That geographic footprint matters. Logistics costs for construction materials are notoriously high. A Polish brick is far easier and cheaper to deliver to Lviv than one shipped from Germany, let alone China.

2. Product-Market Fit

Wienerberger’s portfolio is tailored to exactly what Ukraine needs:

• Porotherm clay blocks for walls, which achieve U-values of 0.17–0.18 W/m²K, exceeding Ukraine’s new efficiency requirements by about 65%.

• Tondach and Terreal roof tiles, including solar-integrated versions, providing modern, decentralised energy solutions.

• Pipelife piping systems, covering water, drainage, and even hydrogen-ready energy infrastructure.

This is not just about selling bricks. It is about delivering system solutions for the entire building envelope and infrastructure, reducing risks for governments and international donors funding the projects.

3. Ethical and Donor Alignment

When Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022, Wienerberger wasted no time exiting the Russian market – a clean break that cost less than 1% of revenues but earned it reputational clarity.

In a donor-driven environment – with funding flowing from the EU, the World Bank, and the EBRD – this matters. Institutions are unlikely to channel billions into projects where the supply chain has lingering ties to the aggressor state. Wienerberger’s “clean sheet” status makes it a natural partner for major contracts.

Learning from the Balkans

Wienerberger’s CEO does not shy away from historical parallels. In a recent call, he recalled the aftermath of the Balkan wars in the 1990s:

“When this war stopped, about six months later, there was a huge demand in products and a huge demand reaching to full capacity utilisation in the whole region. And prices went up too, because of the full utilisation.”

The difference, he stressed, is scale. Bosnia and Croatia needed reconstruction in the single-digit billions. Ukraine’s needs run into the hundreds of billions.

For investors, the precedent is clear: post-conflict reconstruction can trigger sudden, massive spikes in demand and pricing power. Ukraine is positioned to replicate that dynamic, only on a far larger canvas.

Counter-Cyclical Growth Opportunity

Another reason Wienerberger stands out is timing. While Western Europe’s residential construction sector has slumped – with new builds down more than 25% in Germany and Austria – Wienerberger has idle capacity and a pressing need for new growth drivers.

Ukraine offers exactly that: a donor-funded, multi-decade market that could soak up spare production. And because management has taken a conservative approach – “We have not built any potential Ukraine peace deal into our assumptions” – any contribution from Ukraine represents pure upside to current consensus estimates.

In 2024, Wienerberger delivered €760 million in EBITDA on revenues of €4.2 billion. Even a modest reconstruction-driven uplift could move the needle, especially if capacity utilisation rises from 57% closer to 80–90%.

Risks and Realities

No investment is risk-free. Ukraine’s reconstruction will face governance challenges – corruption, procurement irregularities, and judicial weaknesses are all well-documented. Security risks, from unexploded ordnance to resumed hostilities, add another layer.

But Wienerberger’s strategy mitigates some of these risks:

• By supplying from neighbouring CEE plants, it avoids overexposing staff or assets inside Ukraine during the early, volatile phases.

• As a publicly traded EU company, it is structurally aligned with donor governance requirements – unlike many local suppliers.

• By leveraging donor-backed insurance and guarantees (such as the World Bank’s MIGA programme), it can further reduce payment and political risks.

The Investor Takeaway

Wienerberger is not a pure-play on Ukraine. It remains a diversified European building materials group with exposure to housing, renovation, and infrastructure markets across the continent. But that is precisely what makes it attractive:

• Downside is cushioned by a broad revenue base.

• Upside is amplified by the optionality of a reconstruction boom that is not priced into guidance.

• Strategic readiness – geographic, operational, ethical – positions it ahead of peers when donor funds start flowing in scale.

For investors seeking exposure to Ukraine’s post-war recovery, Wienerberger offers a rare combination: immediacy, compliance, and leverage to scale.

Looking Ahead: A Series of Spotlights

This is the first in a new series of company spotlights we will publish on Ukraine Rising. In earlier posts, we have explored the big-picture opportunities in housing, energy, minerals, and defence tech. Now we will turn to individual stocks that provide real exposure – from construction to infrastructure to clean energy.

Wienerberger, with its Central European supply chain advantage, is our natural starting point. But it will not be the last. Stay tuned for more.

Subscribe now

Bottom line: Ukraine’s reconstruction is not just a humanitarian mission – it is an investment cycle. And Wienerberger is already standing at the border, ready to supply.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Always conduct your own research or consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions. The author may hold positions in the mentioned securities.

Spider’s Web

This morning’s news made global headlines: Ukraine’s Security Service launched a covert, year-and-a-half-planned drone assault on major Russian airbases from the Arctic to Siberia.

Over 40 bombers and command aircraft were reportedly damaged or destroyed. Some drones were smuggled across borders and activated near the targets. The operation, named Spider’s Web, may have cost Russia billions – and showcased Ukraine’s unmatched capabilities in battlefield innovation.

This wasn’t just a military success. It was a display of tech capacity under fire. And it’s turning Ukraine’s defence sector into something more than wartime improvisation – an emerging frontier for strategic investment.

Share

From Necessity to Export Potential

Ukraine didn’t set out to become a defence tech hub. War forced its hand. But what emerged is remarkable:

• 200,000 FPV drones produced monthly – many built with domestic components

• A thriving drone startup cluster, backed by the Brave1 innovation platform

• Successful long-range and naval drone strikes shifting the balance in the Black Sea

• Unmanned ground vehicles now entering operational testing

• Western interest surging, from NATO planners to Silicon Valley engineers

Unlike traditional defence suppliers bound by slow procurement cycles, Ukraine is running real-time feedback loops – iterate, deploy, adapt – in weeks, not years. The result? Battle-tested R&D at scale.

Reforming While Scaling

The transformation isn’t just technical. Ukraine’s largest arms conglomerate (UkrOboronProm), now operating as a joint-stock company, is adopting OECD governance standards. It’s not just optics – it’s part of a genuine shift to bring more structure and credibility to the industry.

International players are noticing:

• Rheinmetall, KNDS, and others are already partnering or setting up shop

• The Zbroyari programme raised over $1.5 billion from Western donors

• Ukraine’s shift toward NATO-standardisation is accelerating

For investors, this means two things:

1. Commercialisation potential – with defence innovation spinning off into dual-use AI, robotics, and cyber applications

2. A credible pathway to transparency and institutional maturity – something few post-Soviet defence sectors can claim

   ---

The Tech–Defence Feedback Loop

Ukraine’s drone edge doesn’t exist in isolation. It’s tightly linked to the country’s broader digital strength – the same ecosystem that kept the government running on Diia, protected national infrastructure with hardened cybersecurity, and grew IT exports under fire.

Many of the tools powering Ukraine’s drone capabilities – from AI-assisted targeting to cloud-based command-and-control – were built by the same developers delivering fintech and SaaS products to international clients. This overlap creates a unique national advantage: a tech workforce that’s not just globally competitive, but war-tested and cross-functional.

Post-war, this tech–defence crossover could spin off new dual-use companies in AI, edge computing, and automation – all attractive to both civilian and military sectors.

Why It Matters Now

Ukraine’s drone capabilities aren’t slowing down. If anything, today’s strike shows the ceiling is still rising.

But the window for early positioning is narrow. The sector is moving from survival mode to scale-up mode. And the first international players to back this ecosystem – via partnerships, venture funding, or co-development – may be rewarded both financially and geopolitically.

This isn’t about weapons. It’s about infrastructure, talent, and agility – all forged under conditions most R&D labs couldn’t replicate.

More Than a Strike: A Glimpse of Ukraine’s Future

The Spider’s Web operation wasn’t just a show of strength. It was a signal.

A signal that Ukraine isn’t just defending itself – it’s defining itself. In the face of extraordinary pressure, the country has built a fast, decentralised innovation engine that fuses tech, defence, and sheer determination.

This is also about what happens when a society is forced to rethink how it builds, protects, and adapts – with limited time, limited resources, and everything on the line.

Ukraine’s drone revolution reflects something deeper: a culture of urgent problem-solving, horizontal collaboration, and relentless iteration.

And in the years ahead, that same ingenuity may shape not only how Ukraine fights –but how it rebuilds, reforms, and reconnects with the world.

Subscribe now

That’s the story of Ukraine’s housing sector today – a sector reshaped by full-scale war, yet showing signs of surprising resilience and even opportunity.

A Market Pulled in Two Directions

While headlines rightly focus on destruction – over two million homes damaged or destroyed, according to the Kyiv School of Economics – the market itself tells a more complex story.

Share

In the west, safe-haven cities like Lviv, Uzhhorod, and Ivano-Frankivsk have seen property prices and rents surge, driven by millions of internally displaced people (IDPs) fleeing conflict zones. In Lviv alone, the average monthly rent for a small apartment more than doubled – from 7,000 UAH to 16,000 UAH – in less than a year. Prices in these regions continue to trend upwards, supported by businesses relocating westward and new demand for housing that feels – if not safe – then safer.

In the east and south, it’s another story.
Cities like Kharkiv and Odesa saw the market collapse almost overnight. Apartments that sold for $30,000 before the war were going for as little as $10,000 at the low point. And yet – here’s the twist – demand in Kharkiv has recently jumped 79% year-on-year, with prices climbing 8–10% between March 2024 and April 2025. Why? A mix of returning locals, speculative buyers betting on recovery, and resilient local businesses refusing to give up.

Kyiv, meanwhile, sits somewhere in between. Despite being a constant target, the capital’s housing market never fully collapsed. Prices dipped in dollar terms, but domestic demand – supported by government-backed mortgage schemes like eOselia – kept the wheels turning. Recent data shows a 1.6% quarter-on-quarter price increase in Q1 2025, signalling stabilisation, if not yet a full comeback.

A Game of Risk and Resilience

Investors looking at Ukraine’s real estate sector today face a deeply fragmented landscape. Some markets feel overheated, driven by short-term displacement. Others seem bombed-out – literally – but could offer long-term upside if reconstruction and security improve.

The biggest variable? Security.
Without it, eastern and southern markets remain speculative at best. With it, they could represent some of the largest revaluation opportunities in Europe.

And then there’s the EU factor.
If Ukraine progresses on its EU membership path, expect rising demand from foreign investors, regulatory alignment with European standards, and access to billions in EU reconstruction funds. Historical examples – from the Baltics to Bulgaria – suggest this could unlock double-digit annual price growth. But only in regions ready to absorb investment and meet EU building codes.

Where This Leaves Investors

The road ahead is uneven – but that’s precisely why timing and selectivity matter.

• Short term – Watch for correction risks in overheated western cities.

• Medium term – Follow reconstruction flows – materials, labour, infrastructure – into early-stage comeback zones like Kharkiv or Dnipro.

• Long term – Position for EU-driven growth, especially in markets with room to modernise and comply with energy efficiency standards.

Ukraine’s housing market isn’t a quick bet. But as history shows – whether it’s Berlin after the war or Riga after EU accession – crisis and opportunity often share the same address.

In future posts, I’ll go deeper into how to invest – looking at market access, legal considerations, and practical pathways for both foreign and local investors to participate in Ukraine’s real estate rebuild.

Subscribe now

The numbers are staggering. Over $524 billion in reconstruction needs. More than 2.5 million homes damaged or destroyed. An economy set back decades by invasion. But Ukraine isn’t rebuilding what was lost. It’s reimagining what comes next.

And this is where serious capital should start paying attention.

Share

Beyond Humanitarianism: The Investment Case

Let’s be clear: Ukraine will need aid. Grants. Loans. Blended finance. But that’s not the whole story.

Historical precedents – West Germany after WWII, Japan in the 1950s, South Korea under Park Chung Hee – show us that countries can emerge from devastation stronger than before. Each of these success stories attracted foreign capital not out of sympathy, but because they offered outsized returns. Ukraine is setting the stage for a similar leap.

The Ukrainian government’s National Recovery Plan prioritises energy, agriculture, infrastructure, IT, and manufacturing. These are not handout zones. They are growth engines.

• Ukraine is already a global breadbasket with untapped potential in agrifood processing and agri-tech.

• Its IT sector kept operating throughout the war – now it is poised to digitise everything from government to logistics.

• Rebuilding the energy grid means deploying renewables, green hydrogen, and advanced storage tech at scale.

• The push for EU integration brings regulatory alignment, funding channels, and single market access.

For investors with vision, this is not a frontier market. It is the ground floor of a multi-decade transformation.

Why Now? Because Timing Is the Edge

Early entrants to Germany, Japan, and Korea were rewarded. Not because the timing was obvious – but because they understood the flywheel effect of capital, confidence, and policy alignment.

Ukraine is beginning to build that same momentum:

• The EU’s Ukraine Facility is offering €50 billion in support tied to reform benchmarks.

• International financial institutions (IFIs) are co-financing infrastructure and energy projects.

• Anti-corruption institutions are gaining teeth, with NABU and SAPO bringing real indictments.

And despite the war, Ukraine has already resumed modest GDP growth. The private sector is adapting. Industrial zones are being established away from front lines. Banks are stabilising. Logistics corridors towards Europe are expanding.

Where to Look: Strategic Sectors with Tailwinds

A few areas stand out:

• Renewables & Grid Tech: Rebuilding from scratch allows Ukraine to leapfrog into smart grids and decentralised energy.

• Agri-processing & Biofuels: Move up the value chain, closer to EU demand.

• Digital Infrastructure: Ukraine’s tech ecosystem can anchor digital public goods, fintech, and cyber security services.

• Logistics & Rail: Western Ukraine is a land bridge between the EU and the Black Sea.

• Critical Minerals: Ukraine has rare earths, lithium, and titanium. The EU wants secure supply chains.

The Risks Are Real. So Are the Tools to Manage Them.

Yes, Ukraine carries risks – security, governance, demographics. But these risks are known and increasingly manageable.

Investors already have tools at their disposal: political risk insurance from MIGA and DFC, blended finance to cushion early-stage capital, and strong local partnerships. EU accession is driving regulatory alignment, giving long-term investors a clear de-risking trajectory.

Smart capital will not wait for perfect conditions. It will shape them.

This Is Not a Moment. It’s a Movement.

Ukraine is not a post-conflict charity case. It is a strategic state, a potential EU member, and a market with deep human capital and natural resources. Its people have demonstrated resilience that defies imagination. They are not asking to be saved. They are inviting the world to invest.

This is a call for capital that wants both impact and return. Not in five years. Over twenty.

Because rebuilding a nation is not an exit play. It is legacy capital. And Ukraine is ready for it.

Subscribe for more insights on Ukraine’s investment landscape and the long-term rebuild.

Subscribe now

Below is a curated guide to the best Substacks on Ukraine – organised by focus area – whether you’re interested in military strategy, human stories, cultural insight, or historical context.

Share

🔥 War & Military Analysis

These newsletters break down strategy, tactics, and battlefield developments – often with expert precision.

🟢 –
A retired Australian Major General’s strategic updates on Ukraine and global security.
→ Weekly "Big Five" analyses with sharp insights on military leadership, technology, and war planning.

🟢 –
A professor of strategic studies bringing an academic lens to war developments.
→ Analyses the war through strategic theory, often linking historical precedents to present-day decisions.

🟢 –
Professional-grade military intel from a defence consultant focused on Russia and Belarus.
→ Regular assessments of troop movements, weapon systems, and force readiness.

🟢 – Tatarigami
OSINT-based reporting using satellite imagery, geolocation, and digital sleuthing.
→ Offers near-real-time insights backed by publicly available evidence.

🟢 – Tom Cooper
Air power specialist known for deep dives and no-filter commentary.
→ Detailed, opinionated military reporting with a distinctive voice and high granularity.

🟢 – Anonymous PhD Researcher
Veteran consultant and current PhD student specialising in tech and warfare.
→ Covers AI, drone warfare, computer vision, and OSINT with both academic rigour and practical insight..

🟢 –
Experienced journalist providing frequent updates on the Russian invasion.
→ Daily summaries and field-level insights from a seasoned reporter. Direct, informative, and highly consistent.

🟢 –
Research and translation project focused on the origins of the war in Donbas (2014–2015).
→ Brings historical clarity to the early years of the invasion, with primary sources and contextual commentary. A must-read for historians and researchers.

🟢
Former U.S. Air Force missile officer and one of YouTube’s most recognisable pro-Ukraine commentators.
→ Accessible, direct analysis of the war, NATO, and geopolitics, combining military experience with a strong commitment to countering propaganda and defending democracy.

🟢
Military analyst exploring how AI, drones, and precision warfare are reshaping conflict.
→ Looks beyond today’s battlefield to explain what Ukraine is teaching the world about the future of warfare, technology, and asymmetric conflict.

🟢 –
War correspondent and private military contractor covering conflicts, security, and geopolitical power struggles.
→ Direct, strongly opinionated reporting on Ukraine, Russia, NATO, hybrid warfare, and political influence, written through a security-focused lens.

🟢 – Anonymous Belarusian drone operator
Firsthand writing from a Belarusian fighting alongside Ukraine against Russian occupation.
→ A rare participant’s view of drone warfare, comradeship, fear, and the human realities behind modern combat – with a distinctly anti-imperial Belarusian perspective.

🟢 – &
Specialist research publication on modern warfare, information operations, European defence, and strategic technology.
→ Uses Ukraine as a central case study to examine drones, AI, cyber and electronic warfare, air defence, military industry, and the systems shaping contemporary conflict.

🟢 –
Security-focused analysis of Russia, Ukraine, and the wider Black Sea and Eurasian region.
→ Tracks battlefield adaptation, arms support, Kremlin politics, Crimea, Russia’s war economy, and the strategic conditions needed for a durable peace.

🟢 –
U.S. military veteran, former AWACS technician, security analyst, journalist, and lawyer writing on defence and geopolitics.
→ Explains drones, AI, air defence, missiles, and NATO strategy, with Ukraine as a central case study in how modern warfare is evolving.

🧍‍♀️ Human Stories & On-the-Ground Reporting

These writers bring you face to face with daily life, resilience, and the personal costs of war.

💛 – , ,
An NPR war correspondent’s “open notebook” from Kyiv.
→ Human-first journalism: from giving birth in a war zone to refugee dilemmas and Easter celebrations in bunkers.

💛 –
First-person reflections on living, loving, and holding onto hope in a country at war.
→ “Living for today, dreaming of tomorrow, fighting for a future.” This Substack captures daily life’s emotional texture – grief, resilience, and the beauty that endures even amid destruction.

💛 –
Personal reflections from Eastern Europe, with a focus on Ukraine and Belarus.
→ A newsletter about living in difficult times – and writing to bridge hearts. Zorka’s stories illuminate resilience, belonging, and what it means to be human amid conflict and upheaval.

💛 –
British editor turned aid worker, reporting from Ukraine’s frontlines – especially the east.
→ Vivid, deeply personal accounts of delivering aid, dodging missiles, and supporting communities. Bowles connects readers directly to Ukraine’s human reality and helps channel support where it's needed most.

💛 –
Reflections, poetry, and personal narratives based on the author’s time in Ukraine.
→ Offers a reflective, literary lens on Ukraine's experience of the war.

💛 –
A writer, dancer, and translator documenting life in Ukraine with literary grace and urgency.
→ Blends war diary, cultural witness, and memoir. Chronicles everyday survival, the power of art, and the resistance of Ukrainian spirit.

💛 –
An unfiltered civilian diary from Kyiv, written by a queer Ukrainian living through the war.
→ Honest reflections on air raids, blackouts, politics, and the routines people build around constant uncertainty

💛 –
Ukraine-based journalist combining frontline reporting with analysis of how the war is reshaping Ukrainian society.
→ Vivid accounts of soldiers, civilians, medics, and volunteers alongside reflections on trauma, resilience, military change, and Ukraine’s emerging “iron generation”.

💛 –
Ukraine-based journalist and photographer reporting from the country since before the full-scale invasion.
→ Combines frontline observation, human stories, politics, military reform, and sharp analysis of propaganda and information warfare.

💛 –
Former British soldier, Ukrainian Marine and Mariupol defender bringing firsthand experience to his reporting.
→ Combines frontline analysis, interviews and deeply personal accounts of combat, captivity and survival, with a particular focus on POWs, war crimes and the human cost of Russia’s invasion.

💛 – (Caolan Robertson)
Kyiv-based Irish journalist and documentary filmmaker reporting from Ukraine’s front lines.
→ Combines daily reporting, interviews, investigations, and video with a strong focus on Russian propaganda, European complicity, and the political and economic systems surrounding the war.

💛
Kyiv-based journalist, mother and disinformation researcher documenting ordinary life under war.
→ Blends personal stories with reporting on healthcare, family life, culture, blackouts, air raids, and misinformation – showing how Ukrainians preserve normality and resilience between attacks.

💛 –
American journalist delivering daily reporting and analysis from inside Ukraine.
→ Combines frontline developments and civilian stories with sharp coverage of drones, AI, electronic warfare, Russian energy infrastructure, and the innovation reshaping Ukraine’s defence.

🥖 Culture, Arts & Everyday Resilience

These writers spotlight the everyday acts of survival, care, and tradition that keep Ukrainian life going through war.

🍞 –
A journalist and baker documenting food and resistance.
→ The power of bread: baking traditions, mobile ovens, and the grassroots effort to feed a nation under siege. All paid proceeds go to humanitarian baking.

🌻 Yours Ukrainian –
Kyiv-based journalist and Lawfare Fellow covering life beyond the headlines.
→ Insightful takes on culture, politics, and the emotional texture of modern Ukraine.

🎨 –
Cartoonist and English teacher sharing humorous reflections on life in Ukraine.
→ Features original cartoons and expat anecdotes about language, culture, and classroom quirks – lighthearted and full of charm.

🖋️ –
A young Ukrainian writer turning survival into storytelling.
→ Deeply personal narratives from a refugee-turned-nomad who has lived through both invasions. Through essays, reflections, and dialogue, Anastasia breaks the inherited silence of past generations to reclaim Ukrainian voice and agency – one story at a time.

🎭 –
A creative response to war through poetry, drawings, and personal reflection.
→ Turns grief, resistance, and hope into art, offering an emotional counterpoint to military reporting.

🌸 –
A writer exploring Ukraine through scent, memory, travel, and culture.
→ Beautifully written essays showing how beauty, ritual, and fragrance become acts of resilience in wartime.

🌻
Kharkiv-rooted writer and cultural anthropologist exploring Ukraine through identity, place, and everyday life.
→ Blends personal reflection with culturally informed observation, offering a thoughtful window into Kharkiv, Ukrainian society, and life shaped by war and displacement.

🇺🇦 Ukrainian Voices on Culture, Identity & Resistance

These Substacks go beyond the battlefield, highlighting Ukraine's vibrant intellectual and cultural life.

🌻 –
A literary scholar reflecting on resistance, identity, and survival.
→ Essays on Ukrainian writers, cultural memory, and stories from occupied villages.

🌻 –
Award-winning writer sharing exile reflections and personal essays.
→ From parenting as a refugee to mourning the life left behind, Babkina captures displacement with literary depth.

🌻 –
Journalist applying a post-colonial lens to Russia’s imperial legacy.
→ Dissects the ideological roots of Russian aggression through history, identity politics, and cultural erasure.

🏛️ Politics, History & Long-Term Context

Beyond headlines and hot takes – these Substacks unpack the deeper story of Ukraine and the systems around it.

🧠 –
Yale historian connecting past tyranny to today’s struggle for freedom.
→ A must-read on how history informs the present, particularly the Russia-Ukraine conflict’s ideological stakes.

📝 – Michael Andersen & Brian Bonner
Two veteran journalists telling the truth about Ukraine – bluntly, historically, and without spin.
→ With over 50 years of combined experience, this Substack dives into Ukraine’s past and present with sharp analysis, media critique, and a loyal, pro-Ukrainian lens. Grumpy? Maybe. But essential.

📚 –
Ukrainian-Canadian writer examining Ukraine’s struggle for sovereignty through history, politics, culture, and strategy.
→ Connects today’s war to russification, Soviet repression, imperialism, and the longer Ukrainian struggle for national survival and independence.

⛪
Ukrainian journalist exploring Russia’s religious and imperial ideology – and Ukraine’s resistance to it.
→ Essays on the Russian Orthodox Church, the “Russian World”, historical memory, faith, and Ukraine’s struggle to break free from Moscow’s cultural and spiritual dominance.

📄 –
Independent journalist examining Ukraine through politics, race, democracy, and foreign policy.
→ Combines reporting from Ukraine with analysis of authoritarianism, media framing, social justice, and how race shapes the way the war is understood in the United States and beyond.

📄 –
Strongly pro-Ukrainian geopolitical analysis focused on Russia, Western strategy, and the conditions for lasting peace.
→ Argues that Russian aggression must be defeated rather than accommodated, combining history, information warfare, and strategic analysis to explain why Ukraine’s sovereignty is inseparable from European security.

📄 –
Political strategist and adviser with extensive experience in the former Soviet sphere, including Ukraine and Russia.
→ Combines military strategy, Russian elite politics, and Western security, with particular focus on Ukraine’s drone campaign, deep strikes, and the growing economic and political pressure on Putin’s system.

💰 Economics, Recovery & Investment

Ukraine isn’t only defending its borders – it’s laying the groundwork for reconstruction and growth. This is where the future is being written.

📊 –
An economist examining Ukraine, Russia, and geopolitics through incentives rather than ideology.
→ Explains war, sanctions, and political strategy using economic thinking, making complex decisions easier to understand.

💼 – (launched April 2025)
A new Substack dedicated to investing in Ukraine’s future.
→ Focused on post-war reconstruction, infrastructure, and economic opportunity.
→ Targeted at investors, business leaders, and global partners looking to be part of Ukraine’s comeback.

Why it matters: As Ukraine opens to international capital and local innovation, Ukraine Rising aims to be a practical guide for those ready to build – not just follow.

Subscribe now

Final Thoughts

Substack has become more than a publishing platform – it’s a vital frontline in the information war. These writers help us move past headlines and into understanding. Whether you're tracking drone warfare or Ukrainian poetry, there’s a newsletter here to deepen your view.

📬 Have a favourite Substack on Ukraine I missed? Drop it in the comments.

Behind every new road, pipeline, and apartment block are the machines that clear, drill, crush, and carry. And behind those machines are the engineers planning, designing, and managing thousands of concurrent projects across a damaged, decentralising landscape.

This post is about the companies that may not be in the news photos — but will be in the contracts.

Share

The Heavy Machinery Behind the Recovery

Before you can build, you have to break. Demolish ruins. Clear land. Extract materials. Transport equipment.

Ukraine’s massive physical reconstruction effort will generate long-term demand for heavy-duty construction and demolition machinery: excavators, loaders, breakers, mobile crushers, crushing/screening equipment, and trucks. For this, Europe has three quiet champions:

Metso Oyj (METSO.HE)
A global leader in aggregates processing and crushing equipment. Metso’s machines are used to create the gravel and sand that form the literal foundation of rebuilding. They’ve already been gaining exposure in Eastern Europe, and their modular, mobile products are ideal for regions with damaged infrastructure.

Epiroc AB (EPI-A.ST)
Best known for mining and infrastructure equipment, Epiroc also offers demolition tools, rock drilling rigs, and underground machinery. Their service model is robust, and their Eastern Europe footprint gives them proximity advantage.

Sandvik AB (SAND.ST)
Another Swedish powerhouse, Sandvik supplies rock processing systems, metal cutting tools, and mining equipment. Their technology is used from urban demolition sites to quarry operations. The Ukraine rebuild theme may not move their top line directly, but their global strength makes them a solid, lower-volatility exposure to the theme.

These firms won’t be pure plays on Ukraine. But if you want to get exposure to the nuts and bolts of physical reconstruction — especially in its early stages — this is where to look.

The Engineers Who Will Design the New Ukraine

Big machines need big plans. Rebuilding Ukraine is not just about labour and steel — it’s about design, oversight, and compliance.

Thousands of projects, many funded by EU or international institutions, will require high standards, tight execution, and transparency. That means engineering consultancies will be in high demand.

Sweco AB (SWEC-B.ST)
Headquartered in Sweden but active across Eastern Europe, Sweco specialises in architecture, engineering, urban planning, and environmental consulting. Their strength lies in IFI-funded projects, infrastructure design, and city masterplans. They’re already well-integrated in European public sector contracts and bring ESG credentials to match.

Sweco offers a lower-capital, services-based exposure to the Ukraine rebuild theme. Its risk profile is lower than materials or machinery suppliers, but its influence will be wide. Especially in the early planning phases.

Less Obvious, Still Essential

Investors often focus on what they can see: concrete, cranes, cables. But the less visible layers of Ukraine’s reconstruction may hold some of the most compelling risk-adjusted opportunities.

Companies like Metso, Epiroc, Sandvik, and Sweco may not shout from the rooftops — but they’re the ones that make the rooftops possible.

As always, the key is selectivity, diversification, and patience. Ukraine’s revival will be a long, difficult journey. But for those who know where to look, the real winners may already be quietly at work beneath the surface.

Subscribe now

A Resource-Rich Battlefield

Ukraine holds significant deposits of lithium, titanium, graphite, rare earth elements (REEs), and uranium — all materials deemed vital for the 21st-century economy. These are the building blocks of batteries, jet engines, semiconductors, and clean energy. China dominates most of these supply chains. Ukraine, if developed, could offer the West a rare chance to diversify.

The numbers are staggering. Ukraine may hold:

• Europe’s largest titanium reserves

• The continent’s biggest lithium deposits

• Up to 20% of global graphite reserves

• One of the few large-scale untapped REE basins in Europe

But this mineral wealth is not easily accessible. Many of the most promising deposits lie near or inside Russian-occupied territory. Others remain unproven, relying on Soviet-era data. Developing them will take years, if not decades, of patient capital.

The Deal That Changed the Game

Signed in April 2025, the US–Ukraine agreement grants American companies preferential access to Ukraine’s mineral resources in exchange for setting up a jointly managed investment fund for reconstruction. The symbolism is potent: the future of Ukraine’s economy is now tied, in part, to its geology.

The agreement keeps subsoil ownership in Ukrainian hands, but the US will gain a strategic foothold in the country’s extractive sector. For Ukraine, it secures a long-term anchor investor. For Washington, it offers an alternative to Chinese mineral dominance. For investors, it creates a pipeline of possible plays across exploration, processing, infrastructure, and offtake.

Just as importantly, the deal sets a precedent: strategic resources as collateral for long-term geopolitical alignment. This isn’t just about mining rights — it’s about influence, embedded capital, and shaping the postwar economic architecture.

Beyond the Headlines: What Investors Should Watch

1. Geology vs. Geography: The best deposits are often in conflict zones. Until the war ends, access is uncertain.

2. Data Integrity: Much of Ukraine’s mineral data is outdated. Independent verification will be crucial.

3. Infrastructure Gaps: Mining is energy- and transport-intensive. Ukraine’s grid and logistics need massive investment.

4. Processing Bottlenecks: Extracting ore is just the beginning. Ukraine lacks refining capacity, especially for REEs.

5. Regulatory Alignment: Ukraine must balance US priorities with EU standards. Investors will need to navigate both.

6. Fund Mechanics: Details on the jointly managed US–Ukraine investment fund — including governance, disbursement conditions, and project selection — will be key to unlocking co-investment or securing support.

7. Strategic Fit: Projects that clearly align with Western strategic goals — such as diversifying from Chinese supply chains — are more likely to receive diplomatic backing and financial risk-sharing through agencies like DFC or EXIM.

A Long-Term Play in a Volatile Environment

Ukraine’s mineral future isn’t for momentum chasers. It’s for long-horizon capital looking to align with state-backed industrial policy and geopolitical tailwinds. The fundamentals are compelling — vast reserves, Western demand, and Washington’s backing — but none of it works without peace, reform, and infrastructure.

For allocators seeking asymmetric return profiles with strategic upside, this is a frontier position with a policy anchor. The risk is high, but so is the relevance.

The fields of Ukraine once fed Europe. With time and capital, its subsoil could fuel its next leap forward.

Subscribe now

The reconstruction effort, backed by international donors and aligned with Ukraine’s ambition to integrate into the European Union, aims to create a modern, decentralised, renewable-heavy energy system. For European companies leading the energy transition, Ukraine represents a once-in-a-generation opportunity.

Share

A Grid Broken — And a Grid Reinvented

The February 2024 joint assessment pegged Ukraine’s energy sector reconstruction needs at over $11 billion. But beyond immediate repairs, Ukraine’s government and European partners are pushing for a greener reboot: smart grids, decentralised generation, renewable integration, and energy efficiency upgrades.

In effect, Ukraine has the chance to leapfrog legacy systems — moving straight to the energy model Europe itself is striving for.

This means demand not only for traditional power equipment but also for wind turbines, solar farms, battery storage, smart grid technologies, and small modular reactors (SMRs).

The Companies Poised to Power the Future

Siemens Energy AG (ENR.DE)

Few companies are better positioned for Ukraine’s dual task of restoration and modernisation.

Siemens Energy’s portfolio spans gas turbines (crucial for quick grid restoration), high-voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission systems, grid stabilisation technologies, and renewables integration services. Their experience with complex, large-scale energy projects makes them a likely partner for Ukraine’s recovery.

While recent financial challenges (especially related to Siemens Gamesa) warrant monitoring, their core energy business remains central to Europe's energy resilience strategy — and Ukraine's needs.

Nexans S.A. (NEX.PA)

Without cables, there is no energy transition.

Nexans is a global leader in manufacturing power and data cables for energy transmission, distribution, building, and industrial applications. Its existing plant in Poland and historical supply links to Ukraine position it well to support the massive grid restoration and modernisation effort.

As Ukraine upgrades its grid for decentralised energy sources, the demand for high-quality, efficient cabling solutions will be enormous — from connecting solar farms to rebuilding urban distribution networks.

The Broader Renewable Opportunity

Ukraine’s rebuild isn’t just about Siemens Energy and Nexans.

Wind turbine manufacturers, solar panel providers, battery storage firms, and smart metering companies could all find fertile ground as Ukraine reinvents its energy system. EU climate goals, cross-border energy security, and Ukraine’s future EU integration ambitions will ensure that sustainability remains a core design principle.

Europe’s renewable energy leaders stand to gain not just from Ukraine’s reconstruction but from embedding their technology and standards into a major emerging market at the heart of the continent.

Risks and Realities

• Security Risk: Energy infrastructure remains a target as long as conflict persists.

• Funding Risk: Successful modernisation depends on consistent, large-scale funding from donors and IFIs.

• Execution Risk: Complex grid integration, corruption concerns, and skilled labour shortages could delay projects.

Only financially strong, regionally connected, and politically savvy firms will navigate these challenges successfully.

Lighting the Way

Ukraine’s energy reconstruction isn’t just about restoring power — it’s about reshaping the entire energy map of Eastern Europe.

For investors willing to see through today’s risks to tomorrow’s opportunity, European energy and renewables companies could find themselves at the forefront of a generational transformation — one that powers not just Ukraine, but a more resilient, greener Europe.

Subscribe now

In future posts, we'll explore the heavy machinery and engineering services shaping Ukraine's revival. Stay tuned.

Housing and infrastructure need to be restored on a scale Europe hasn’t witnessed in eighty years. Millions of homes, roads, schools, and public buildings must rise from the rubble. The effort won’t just replace what was lost — it will build a stronger, greener Ukraine, aligned with European standards and dreams of a free, modern future.

In this reconstruction, four European construction material giants are poised to play a defining role. Each brings not just scale and product, but crucially, experience and local roots in Eastern Europe — a vital advantage in a rebuilding zone where logistics, speed, and local knowledge could mean everything.

1. Wienerberger AG (WIE.VI)

If rebuilding homes and cities brick by brick is the task, Wienerberger stands ready.

The Austrian firm is Europe’s leading supplier of bricks, clay roof tiles, and pipe systems — exactly the core materials Ukraine’s devastated housing sector will require. Importantly, Wienerberger already has a deep manufacturing footprint across Central and Eastern Europe, positioning it to supply Ukraine efficiently.

Their products align with the "build back better" principle: modern, energy-efficient materials suited for a future EU member state. With strong financials and explicit strategic interest in contributing to Ukraine’s rebuild, Wienerberger could see meaningful, long-term demand tailwinds.

2. Heidelberg Materials AG (HEI.DE)

Concrete is the skeleton of modern cities. And Heidelberg Materials, one of the world’s largest cement and aggregates producers, knows concrete better than anyone.

While it doesn’t currently operate plants inside Ukraine, Heidelberg’s strong presence in neighbouring countries like Poland, Romania, and Hungary gives it a logistical advantage. Trucks, rail, and supply lines already crisscross the region — a critical edge when rebuilding a country the size of Ukraine.

Heidelberg also leans into sustainability, expanding its low-carbon concrete product lines. For Ukraine, which must meet EU standards over time, this future-proof focus is a powerful differentiator.

3. CRH plc (NYSE: CRH)

Among all contenders, CRH carries a rare trump card: direct local production.

The Irish building materials giant owns a cement plant in western Ukraine, acquired back in 1999. This presence inside the country itself could offer unmatched speed and flexibility when rebuilding begins at scale.

Beyond Ukraine, CRH has extensive operations throughout Eastern Europe, adding depth to its logistical capabilities. Financially, CRH is a global heavyweight, capable of absorbing the risks and delays inherent in post-war reconstruction.

The CEO has explicitly stated CRH’s readiness to support Ukraine’s comeback — and with a full range of building products from cement to concrete to construction accessories, CRH stands exceptionally well-positioned.

4. Saint-Gobain S.A. (SGO.PA)

If there’s one company perfectly aligned with Ukraine’s "build back greener" ambitions, it’s Saint-Gobain.

The French multinational offers a broad portfolio of sustainable building solutions: high-performance insulation, energy-efficient glass, lightweight construction systems, and more. Ukraine’s energy security will depend not just on new power plants but on dramatically lowering energy consumption — especially in homes and public buildings.

Saint-Gobain's global experience, strong Eastern European footprint, and focus on sustainable building materials make it a prime candidate for projects aiming to create a more resilient, energy-efficient Ukraine.

Building a Stronger Future

Ukraine’s reconstruction will be messy, risky, and slow at times. But make no mistake: it will happen. Cities like Kharkiv, Kherson, Sumy and Odesa will be rebuilt — brick by brick, beam by beam.

For investors willing to take the long view, these four construction stocks offer real exposure to one of the most powerful rebuilding stories of this century.

Not every company will navigate the risks successfully. Not every project will move quickly. But those who help lay Ukraine’s new foundations could also lay the foundations of strong, resilient investment returns for years to come.

Subscribe now

In upcoming posts, we'll dive deeper into the infrastructure, energy, and engineering sectors critical to Ukraine’s revival. Stay tuned.

Ukraine’s reconstruction won’t just be a humanitarian imperative — it will be one of the greatest investment projects Europe has seen since the Marshall Plan. The World Bank, the European Commission, and the Ukrainian government estimate near-term recovery costs at $486 billion (€453 billion). The European Investment Bank suggests the final bill could approach €1 trillion.

For European companies with the right expertise, regional presence, and resilience, this effort could unlock decades of demand. For investors willing to navigate the risks, it offers something even rarer: the chance to stand at the roots of renewal — vidnovlennya (відновлення) — and invest both in returns and in resilience.

The Scale of the Opportunity

The numbers are staggering. Ukraine’s physical devastation — from homes and schools to energy grids and bridges — is among the largest seen in Europe since 1945. Housing alone accounts for an estimated $17 billion in damage; energy needs top $11 billion; transport infrastructure damages near $37 billion.

But this is more than just rebuilding what was lost. Ukraine aims to "build back better," aligning itself with EU standards for energy efficiency, sustainability, and digital modernisation. This means higher-quality materials, greener infrastructure, and smarter grids — and it means serious business for Europe's industrial champions.

The timeline stretches decades. Essential infrastructure repairs will happen first. Then, as peace stabilises, deeper investments in modernised housing, decentralised energy, and industrial renewal will roll forward. Investors must think in horizons of 5, 10, even 20 years.

Where the Money Will Flow

Ukraine’s reconstruction needs touch nearly every core industrial sector:

• Construction & Building Materials: cement, aggregates, bricks, insulation, sustainable roofing systems.

• Infrastructure (Transport, Utilities): roads, bridges, rail, water, sanitation.

• Energy (Traditional & Renewable): grid repair, renewable energy expansion, decentralised systems.

• Heavy Machinery: demolition, site preparation, materials processing.

• Engineering & Project Management Services: planning, oversight, compliance, execution.

Each sector demands scale, technology, and an ability to operate in challenging environments — an advantage European multinationals hold.

The Key Players: Europe’s Industrial Vanguard

Several European stocks are particularly well-positioned for Ukraine’s rebuild:

• CRH plc (Ireland): owns a cement plant in Ukraine itself, with deep Eastern European operations.

• Heidelberg Materials (Germany): massive Eastern European footprint, sustainability-focused concrete products.

• Wienerberger (Austria): bricks, tiles, pipes — essential materials, with heavy regional manufacturing.

• Nexans (France): power and data cable giant, supplying critical infrastructure from its Polish plant.

• Siemens Energy (Germany): turbines, grids, and smart energy systems for a decentralised rebuild.

• Sweco (Sweden): project management and engineering services for complex, multi-sector developments.

• Vinci (France): large infrastructure contractor, with global experience in challenging environments.

• Metso, Epiroc, Sandvik (Nordics): heavy machinery leaders needed for the physical work of rebuilding.

Each brings a different lever — from cement to cables to cranes — but all share capabilities crucial to Ukraine’s new foundations.

Share

The Risks: Investing with Eyes Wide Open

No serious investor can ignore the risks.

First, the geopolitical. A true reconstruction boom depends on the end of major hostilities and a stable, secure environment. Continued fighting, a frozen conflict, or renewed instability could delay or derail projects for years.

Second, execution risks loom large: corruption, bureaucracy, bottlenecks in logistics and labour. Even assuming peace, operating effectively in a post-war environment is enormously complex.

Third, financing. Ukraine will rely heavily on donor countries, international financial institutions, and potentially frozen Russian assets. Delays in disbursement or donor fatigue could create funding gaps.

Investors must think long-term, diversify exposure, and favour companies with strong balance sheets, robust compliance systems, and established Eastern European operations.

A Time for Long-Term Thinkers

For investors willing to plant seeds today, the potential harvest is rich.

Ukraine’s future lies not in returning to what was, but in building anew — greener, more efficient, more integrated with Europe. Companies that supply the bricks, the wires, the grids, and the blueprints will not only drive Ukraine’s comeback — they will be partners in reshaping Europe’s eastern frontier.

The road will be long. It will not be linear. But in Ukraine’s fields and broken streets, a new Europe will rise. Some companies will be the architects of that future. Some investors will be there from the first stone laid.

In future posts, we'll explore the strongest sectors, the best-positioned stocks, and how to balance opportunity with risk. Ukraine’s rebuild is coming — and it will reshape the map of European investment for a generation.

Subscribe now

Here’s how the landscape looks for those ready to explore it.

The Harsh Reality: Direct Investment is Virtually Impossible

Ukraine’s stock exchanges — the PFTS and the Ukrainian Exchange (UX) — are technically alive but largely frozen for equities under martial law. Trading volumes are near zero. Direct access requires a local broker, a Ukrainian tax ID, and the ability to navigate an ocean of capital controls. Even then, you might struggle to sell your shares or repatriate profits.

In short: Direct investments into Kyiv-listed equities are, for now, a dream. Not a plan.

The Practical Route: Think Indirect

Thankfully, there is a real alternative. One main path stands out:

• Depositary Receipts: Some Ukrainian-linked companies are listed on major international exchanges through Global Depositary Receipts (GDRs) or shares.

• Ferrexpo (FXPO.L) — a major iron ore producer, listed on the London Stock Exchange.

• MHP SE (MHPC.L) — Ukraine’s leading poultry and grains group, also on the LSE.

• Astarta (AST.WA) and IMC (IMC.WA) — agriculture groups listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange.

We will revisit each of these companies in future posts for a deeper dive into their prospects, challenges, and strategic positioning.

Subscribe now

Note: No significant ETFs focus directly on Ukrainian stocks. Broader Emerging Market ETFs offer negligible exposure (<0.2%).

Where the Opportunities (and Risks) Are Concentrated

Ukraine's internationally listed companies are mostly in agriculture and natural resources — the roots of the economy. Sectors like IT, infrastructure, and critical minerals, which will be vital for rebuilding, are still largely absent from public markets.

Investing today, you’re betting on:

• The strength of Ukrainian agribusiness.

• The ability of miners like Ferrexpo to weather and thrive after war.

But you’re also carrying profound risks: war disruption, currency volatility, political shifts, and illiquidity.

This is not “safe” investing. This is a bet on Vidnovlennya — Ukraine’s renewal.

The Takeaway: Courage, Patience, and Pragmatism

Ukraine's future will not be built overnight, but it will be built — by its people, and by those willing to invest alongside them. Fields will be replanted. Cities will rise. Companies that survive the war may thrive in the peace that follows.

If you believe in Ukraine's vidrodzhennya (rebirth), you can start building your exposure today. Just do so wisely, through the channels that are open, with clear eyes and a full heart.

Subscribe now

As always, this is not financial advice. Consult legal and tax professionals before investing.

Ukraine’s rebuilding is already in motion — even before the war fully ends. Across public markets, real estate, infrastructure, and private ventures, a new economy is taking shape. For those willing to move early, do the work, and manage risk, the potential for outsized returns is real.

Subscribe now

This publication is your edge:

• Actionable ideas to build early exposure across sectors and asset classes

• Clear, focused analysis of opportunities and the risks you must navigate

• Updates on key developments shaping Ukraine’s investment landscape

I won't just tell stories. I’ll highlight concrete ways to track, evaluate, and act.

🌻 In every frontier, fortune favours those who dare to build before the crowd arrives.

If you're serious about positioning for the next wave of growth, you're exactly where you need to be.