Thank you for the incredible response these past two weeks. I genuinely didn’t expect this many of you to show up, and it’s pushed me to want to write more, and go deeper.

Here’s what I’m starting: alongside my regular free posts, I’ll occasionally be writing more deeper, richer and more researched pieces, the kind I’d only feel ready to share with readers who really want to be here. These will be available for a small fee (₹499) rather than posted publicly. This is just a small initiative to create a closer circle of people who are genuinely interested, and I promise to work hard for them! (Since stripe doesn’t operate for new Indian users anymore, I am not able to setup the paid subscription model directly on the app.

Here’s how it’ll work:

My regular posts stay free, as always. For the deeper pieces, just reply to this email or DM me on substack and I’ll send over payment details and get the working sorted. No fixed schedule yet, I want these to be genuinely worth it when they come, not just regular content dumped behind a fee.

If this sounds like something you’d want, keep an eye out, the first one’s coming soon. And if it’s not for you, that’s completely fine too. The free posts aren’t changing.

Thanks again for being here this early.

~Wandering thoughts by Srishty. 🩷

Somewhere along the way, overthinking got rebranded as diligence. We call it “being thorough.” We call it “just wanting to be prepared.” We call it anything except what it actually is: fear, wearing the costume of thought.

I used to believe that if I just turned a decision over enough times, examined it from every angle, ran every possible outcome, imagined every version of how people might react, I would eventually arrive at certainty. A clean, safe, unimpeachable answer. What I’ve learned instead, after years of doing exactly this, is that overthinking doesn’t produce clarity. It produces more overthinking. It is a loop that mistakes motion for progress.

The psychologist calls this rumination, and the research on it is almost insulting in how consistent it is: the more you dwell on a problem without acting, the worse you tend to feel, and the less accurate your conclusions become, not more. Susan Nolen-Hoeksema, who spent decades studying this pattern, found that rumination doesn’t sharpen problem-solving. It corrodes it. The mind convinces itself it’s being responsible, careful, wise. It is actually just spinning its wheels in the mud of its own anxiety, digging the rut deeper with every pass.

Subscribe

Here is the part that took me the longest to accept: overthinking isn’t a thinking problem. It’s an intolerance-of-uncertainty problem wearing a thinking costume. You are not actually trying to solve the question in front of you. You are trying to purchase, in advance, a guarantee that you will not feel regret, embarrassment, or loss no matter what you choose. And no amount of internal deliberation can sell you that guarantee, because it doesn’t exist. Life does not offer refunds on decisions. It never has. The overthinking is just you negotiating with a policy that was never on the table.

The Stoics had a blunter way of putting this. Epictetus divided the world into two piles: things within your control, and things not within your control and insisted that peace of mind comes only from correctly sorting which is which. Overthinking is what happens when you quietly move something from the second pile into the first. You cannot control how the message lands, whether the interview goes well, what your friend actually meant by that comment. You can only control what you say, how you prepare, how you respond. Everything else you’re “thinking through” is actually just rehearsal for a play whose other actors haven’t agreed to their lines.

What strikes me now is how much overthinking pretends to be about the external decision, when it is almost always about an internal identity question hiding underneath it. Should I send this text is rarely just about the text. It’s what does it mean about me if this goes badly. Should I take this opportunity is rarely just logistics. It’s am I the kind of person who deserves this, and what happens to my sense of self if I fail publicly. The decision is the visible iceberg. Underneath it is usually some older, unresolved question about worth that has nothing to do with the choice in front of you and everything to do with a much earlier version of you who didn’t feel safe being wrong.

I don’t think the answer is to stop thinking, or to fake some breezy, thoughtless confidence that isn’t real. I think the answer is smaller and less satisfying than that: notice the moment thinking stops serving the decision and starts serving the fear. There is a specific, recognizable shift, a point where you’ve already gathered enough information to act, and everything past that point is just the mind pacing in a locked room, looking for an exit that was never going to appear through analysis. That shift is worth learning to feel in your body, because it’s the only reliable signal that it’s time to stop deliberating and start living with the answer.

The people I know who move through the world with the most ease are not the ones who think less than I do. They’re the ones who’ve made peace with the fact that no amount of thinking will remove the risk from being alive. They think, and then they let the thought go, the way you’d release a held breath, not because they’re certain, but because they’ve decided uncertainty is a livable condition rather than an emergency to be solved.

That, I suspect, is the actual work. Not thinking better. Trusting sooner.

Nobody claps on the boring days.

There's no applause when you wake up at the same time for the four-hundredth day in a row and do the unglamorous thing again — the studying, the writing, the showing up for a life you haven't fully built yet. No one is watching when you choose the harder, quieter path over the easier, louder one. There's no montage. No swelling music. Just you, a task, and a version of yourself that nobody else will ever meet.

We've been sold a lie about transformation. We think it looks like a single dramatic moment — the breakup that changes everything, the diagnosis that rearranges your priorities, the rock bottom that becomes a launchpad. And sometimes it does look like that. But most of the time, transformation is criminally boring. It's Tuesday. It's the fortieth Tuesday. It's you, doing the thing you said you'd do, on a day when absolutely nothing is telling you that it matters.

The tyranny of the highlight reel

Here's what nobody tells you about becoming someone: the version of you that everyone eventually admires was built entirely out of moments nobody saw. Not the finished thing — the *making* of the thing. The 6 a.m. alarms. The meal you didn't want to cook but did anyway. The page you wrote when you had nothing to say. The rejection you absorbed quietly and then, absurdly, tried again the next morning.

We only ever see people at the destination. We see the acceptance letter, not the two hundred rejected drafts. We see the toned arms, not the eighteen months of unremarkable gym sessions where nothing visibly changed. We see the calm, articulate person on stage, not the version of them that used to rehearse their own name in the mirror because they were that afraid of their own voice.

This creates a strange kind of despair in ordinary people doing ordinary, difficult work: *if nothing is happening, am I failing?*

You're not. You're just in the part of the story that doesn't make it into anyone's highlight reel — because there's nothing to film. Growth, in its actual raw form, is almost embarrassingly undramatic.

Motivation is a liar

Motivation shows up for the beginning. It's loud and generous and convinces you that this time will be different. Then, somewhere around day nine, it leaves — quietly, without warning, the way a guest slips out of a party without saying goodbye.

What's left after motivation leaves is the only thing that was ever going to get you anywhere: discipline. Not the punishing, joyless version of discipline we're taught to fear, but something closer to *loyalty* — loyalty to a person you haven't met yet. The you six months from now, two years from now, is depending entirely on whether the you of today keeps a promise that feels, in this exact moment, completely pointless.

This is the part almost nobody talks about honestly: discipline doesn't feel meaningful while you're doing it. It feels like nothing. It feels like just another Tuesday. The meaning only becomes visible in retrospect, assembled out of hundreds of days that each, individually, looked like failure to produce anything at all.

The identity you're quietly building

Every time you do the hard, boring, unglamorous thing instead of the easy one, you're not just completing a task. You're casting a vote for the kind of person you are. Not the person you post about being. Not the person in your bio. The actual person — the one who exists in the sum of what you do when no one is measuring you.

James Clear's often-repeated idea that "every action is a vote for the type of person you wish to become" gets quoted so often it's lost its teeth. But sit with it properly for a second: it means identity isn't a decision you make once. It's not an announcement. It's a *tally*. And the boring days are where almost all the votes get cast, because the boring days are most of your life. The dramatic ones are rare. The in-between is everything.

So when you skip the workout, that's a vote too. When you don't open the document, that's a vote too. Not a catastrophe — just a small, quiet ballot cast for a slightly different future person than the one you say you're trying to become. Nobody's shaming you for it. That's simply how the mechanism works, whether you like it or not.

What to do with an unremarkable Tuesday

If you're in a season right now that feels like nothing is happening — you're doing the work, showing up, and the results are stubbornly invisible — this is the part where I'd normally tell you to trust the process. But that phrase has been said so many times it's become wallpaper. So instead:

Consider that the invisibility *is* the process. Not a detour from it. Not a waiting room before the real thing starts. This — the unremarkable, unrecorded, unapplauded Tuesday — is the actual site of construction. The person you're becoming isn't waiting for you somewhere down the road. They're being built, molecule by molecule, in exactly this moment, out of exactly this much effort, on exactly this unspectacular day.

You will likely never get to see the moment your effort tips over into visible change. It rarely arrives with a bang. It sneaks up on you — one day you simply notice that the thing that used to be hard isn't hard anymore, and you can't remember the precise Tuesday it stopped being hard. There wasn't one. There were hundreds.

So: no applause today. No one is watching. Do it anyway.

That's not a consolation prize. That's the whole game.