President Trump has repeatedly threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act in response to protests against federal immigration enforcement, including after ICE operations in Minnesota in January 2026 and earlier unrest in California and other cities, but no formal invocation has occurred. Defense and Homeland Security officials recommended against it for border matters, citing sufficient existing authority and low crossing volumes, while legal experts note that statutory conditions—such as impracticable enforcement of federal law amid rebellion—have not been clearly met in recent episodes. Potential court challenges and congressional pushback remain key constraints. Trader pricing reflects these barriers and the absence of qualifying large-scale violence, with midterms approaching as a possible catalyst for renewed consideration.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日$1,127,406 Vol.
9月30日
2%
12月31日
17%
$1,127,406 Vol.
9月30日
2%
12月31日
17%
For the purposes of this market, "invoke" means that the President formally announces the use of the Insurrection Act as legal authority for deploying active-duty U.S. military forces or federalizing the National Guard in response to civil disorder, insurrection, or rebellion.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
マーケット開始日: Jul 31, 2026, 5:45 PM ET
リゾルバー
0x65070BE91...For the purposes of this market, "invoke" means that the President formally announces the use of the Insurrection Act as legal authority for deploying active-duty U.S. military forces or federalizing the National Guard in response to civil disorder, insurrection, or rebellion.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
リゾルバー
0x65070BE91...President Trump has repeatedly threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act in response to protests against federal immigration enforcement, including after ICE operations in Minnesota in January 2026 and earlier unrest in California and other cities, but no formal invocation has occurred. Defense and Homeland Security officials recommended against it for border matters, citing sufficient existing authority and low crossing volumes, while legal experts note that statutory conditions—such as impracticable enforcement of federal law amid rebellion—have not been clearly met in recent episodes. Potential court challenges and congressional pushback remain key constraints. Trader pricing reflects these barriers and the absence of qualifying large-scale violence, with midterms approaching as a possible catalyst for renewed consideration.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日



外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問