**No US ally is positioned to acquire independent control of nuclear weapons by the end of 2026.** Discussions in South Korea, Japan, Poland, and the Baltics center on strengthened extended deterrence, NATO nuclear sharing arrangements, or civil nuclear cooperation rather than indigenous arsenals. South Korea has advanced talks on nuclear-powered submarines under IAEA safeguards while reaffirming NPT commitments and rejecting independent armament or redeployment of U.S. tactical weapons. Poland has signaled interest in NATO nuclear roles without hosting warheads on its territory. Saudi Arabia’s recent U.S. civil nuclear agreement emphasizes enrichment limits and verification tied to nonproliferation standards. These developments, combined with technical timelines, alliance guardrails, and the absence of breakout programs, underpin traders’ strong consensus against near-term acquisition.
Ringkasan eksperimental yang dihasilkan AI dengan referensi data Polymarket. Ini bukan saran trading dan tidak berperan dalam bagaimana pasar ini diselesaikan. · Diperbarui5% peluang
$212,568 Vol.
$212,568 Vol.
Dec 31, 2026
5% peluang
$212,568 Vol.
$212,568 Vol.
Dec 31, 2026
This market will resolve to "Yes" if credible reports from international nuclear agencies, a claimant government, or a consensus of credible global news sources officially confirm that a US ally which did not possess nuclear weapons as of November 12, 2025, possesses a nuclear weapon by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET.
If a US ally participates in a nuclear sharing agreement that does not include independent control over nuclear weapons, this will not qualify for "Yes" resolution. Only full control over an operational nuclear weapon will count. Any admission from Israel of the possession of a nuclear weapon will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution.
For the purposes of this market, a "US ally" is defined as a country that is a member of NATO or a Major Non-NATO Ally (https://www.state.gov/major-non-nato-ally-status/) as of November 12, 2025. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
**No US ally is positioned to acquire independent control of nuclear weapons by the end of 2026.** Discussions in South Korea, Japan, Poland, and the Baltics center on strengthened extended deterrence, NATO nuclear sharing arrangements, or civil nuclear cooperation rather than indigenous arsenals. South Korea has advanced talks on nuclear-powered submarines under IAEA safeguards while reaffirming NPT commitments and rejecting independent armament or redeployment of U.S. tactical weapons. Poland has signaled interest in NATO nuclear roles without hosting warheads on its territory. Saudi Arabia’s recent U.S. civil nuclear agreement emphasizes enrichment limits and verification tied to nonproliferation standards. These developments, combined with technical timelines, alliance guardrails, and the absence of breakout programs, underpin traders’ strong consensus against near-term acquisition.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if credible reports from international nuclear agencies, a claimant government, or a consensus of credible global news sources officially confirm that a US ally which did not possess nuclear weapons as of November 12, 2025, possesses a nuclear weapon by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET.
If a US ally participates in a nuclear sharing agreement that does not include independent control over nuclear weapons, this will not qualify for "Yes" resolution. Only full control over an operational nuclear weapon will count. Any admission from Israel of the possession of a nuclear weapon will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution.
For the purposes of this market, a "US ally" is defined as a country that is a member of NATO or a Major Non-NATO Ally (https://www.state.gov/major-non-nato-ally-status/) as of November 12, 2025. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
If a US ally participates in a nuclear sharing agreement that does not include independent control over nuclear weapons, this will not qualify for "Yes" resolution. Only full control over an operational nuclear weapon will count. Any admission from Israel of the possession of a nuclear weapon will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution.
For the purposes of this market, a "US ally" is defined as a country that is a member of NATO or a Major Non-NATO Ally (https://www.state.gov/major-non-nato-ally-status/) as of November 12, 2025. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
Pasar Dibuka: Nov 13, 2025, 5:54 PM ET
Volume
$212,568Tanggal Berakhir
Jan 1, 2027Pasar Dibuka
Nov 13, 2025, 5:54 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if credible reports from international nuclear agencies, a claimant government, or a consensus of credible global news sources officially confirm that a US ally which did not possess nuclear weapons as of November 12, 2025, possesses a nuclear weapon by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET.
If a US ally participates in a nuclear sharing agreement that does not include independent control over nuclear weapons, this will not qualify for "Yes" resolution. Only full control over an operational nuclear weapon will count. Any admission from Israel of the possession of a nuclear weapon will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution.
For the purposes of this market, a "US ally" is defined as a country that is a member of NATO or a Major Non-NATO Ally (https://www.state.gov/major-non-nato-ally-status/) as of November 12, 2025. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
**No US ally is positioned to acquire independent control of nuclear weapons by the end of 2026.** Discussions in South Korea, Japan, Poland, and the Baltics center on strengthened extended deterrence, NATO nuclear sharing arrangements, or civil nuclear cooperation rather than indigenous arsenals. South Korea has advanced talks on nuclear-powered submarines under IAEA safeguards while reaffirming NPT commitments and rejecting independent armament or redeployment of U.S. tactical weapons. Poland has signaled interest in NATO nuclear roles without hosting warheads on its territory. Saudi Arabia’s recent U.S. civil nuclear agreement emphasizes enrichment limits and verification tied to nonproliferation standards. These developments, combined with technical timelines, alliance guardrails, and the absence of breakout programs, underpin traders’ strong consensus against near-term acquisition.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if credible reports from international nuclear agencies, a claimant government, or a consensus of credible global news sources officially confirm that a US ally which did not possess nuclear weapons as of November 12, 2025, possesses a nuclear weapon by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET.
If a US ally participates in a nuclear sharing agreement that does not include independent control over nuclear weapons, this will not qualify for "Yes" resolution. Only full control over an operational nuclear weapon will count. Any admission from Israel of the possession of a nuclear weapon will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution.
For the purposes of this market, a "US ally" is defined as a country that is a member of NATO or a Major Non-NATO Ally (https://www.state.gov/major-non-nato-ally-status/) as of November 12, 2025. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
If a US ally participates in a nuclear sharing agreement that does not include independent control over nuclear weapons, this will not qualify for "Yes" resolution. Only full control over an operational nuclear weapon will count. Any admission from Israel of the possession of a nuclear weapon will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution.
For the purposes of this market, a "US ally" is defined as a country that is a member of NATO or a Major Non-NATO Ally (https://www.state.gov/major-non-nato-ally-status/) as of November 12, 2025. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
Volume
$212,568Tanggal Berakhir
Jan 1, 2027Pasar Dibuka
Nov 13, 2025, 5:54 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...**No US ally is positioned to acquire independent control of nuclear weapons by the end of 2026.** Discussions in South Korea, Japan, Poland, and the Baltics center on strengthened extended deterrence, NATO nuclear sharing arrangements, or civil nuclear cooperation rather than indigenous arsenals. South Korea has advanced talks on nuclear-powered submarines under IAEA safeguards while reaffirming NPT commitments and rejecting independent armament or redeployment of U.S. tactical weapons. Poland has signaled interest in NATO nuclear roles without hosting warheads on its territory. Saudi Arabia’s recent U.S. civil nuclear agreement emphasizes enrichment limits and verification tied to nonproliferation standards. These developments, combined with technical timelines, alliance guardrails, and the absence of breakout programs, underpin traders’ strong consensus against near-term acquisition.
Ringkasan eksperimental yang dihasilkan AI dengan referensi data Polymarket. Ini bukan saran trading dan tidak berperan dalam bagaimana pasar ini diselesaikan. · Diperbarui
Hati-hati dengan link eksternal.
Hati-hati dengan link eksternal.
Pertanyaan yang Sering Diajukan